{include:Teesworks - keywords - menu}
EN010103-001137-NZT DCO 6.4.46 ES Vol III Appendix 24A Planned Development and Development Allocations.pdf:13: pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments and be constructed at all if market conditions do not
EN010103-002421-NZT DCO 9.42 - Comments on D9 Submissions & Additional Submissions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:51: surface sediments with archaeological potential.
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:25: intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and coarse
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:27:3.2.63 The SAC is a large macro-tidal coastal plain estuary with high suspended sediment
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:39: the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which has a
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:41: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:41: sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that might
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:46: the Proposed Development. This includes potential dredging (removal of sediment)
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:46: shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats, are
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:51: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:61:6.1.23 Appendix F documents an analysis by a coastal process specialist of the sediment
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:61: interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:63: for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on a raft in the
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:65: leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation) reaching
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:66: non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in the
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:67: sediment
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:67: off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:75: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:90: soft sediments in two Sydney estuaries, Australia. Marine and Freshwater
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:97: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:97: sediment process and invasive species spread impacts of the rock armour for the new or existing outfall. Effects of the rock armour are therefore taken
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:133:Sediment Transport within Tees Bay
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:133: Information from the analysis of sediment grab samples22 is provided in Figure 2 which
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:133: shows the predominant sediment type to be Medium Sand within the area of Tees Bay
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:133: Subsequent interpretation of sediment data combined with other datasets was used to
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:133: establish a conceptual sediment transport model2222 for Tees Bay, as shown in Figure 3.
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:133: This illustrates the complex nature of sediment transport processes within the bay with the
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:133: sediment transport is also indicated within the bay, a typical mechanism that has a
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:134: of tidal and wave-induced currents will be required to initiate sediment motion, potentially
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:135: surface profile of the rock armour, the scale of any sediment disturbance around its
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:135: perimeter will be small. The sediment that is disturbed will be non-cohesive sand with a
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:135: provide an indicative Zone Of Influence (ZOI) for sediment disturbed as a result of scouring
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:136: avoid interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:136: sediment transport processes are likely to be affected.
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:137:Figure 5. Location of seabed sediment grab samples (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:138:Figure 6. Tees Bay Conceptual Sediment Transport Model (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:54: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:89: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request at
EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:89: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the sampling plan approved
EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:89:laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform marine licence
EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:102: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request at
EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:102: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the sampling plan approved
EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:102:laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform marine licence
EN010103-001076-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 3 EC1_C.pdf:57: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment 522000
EN010103-001076-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 3 EC1_C.pdf:57: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (E) 522505
EN010103-001076-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 3 EC1_C.pdf:57: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (W) 522505
EN010103-001076-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 3 EC1_C.pdf:57: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SW) 522505
EN010103-001076-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 3 EC1_C.pdf:57: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (S) 522000
EN010103-001076-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 3 EC1_C.pdf:58: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SE) 520500
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:25: largest intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27: sediment loads. It is a dynamic system that feeds accreting and eroding intertidal and
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:40: However, the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:42: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:42: chemical sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:48: of sediment) around the water discharge, which lies in Tees Bay approximately 1
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:48: off-shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats,
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:53: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:64: sediment process implications of the rock armour. Its conclusions are summarised
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:65: affect sediment transport processes. Based on the analysis in Appendix F and the
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:67: Critical Load for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:69: spills, leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation)
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:70: toxic or non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:71: sediment
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:71: run-off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:76: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:91: soft sediments in two Sydney estuaries, Australia. Marine and Freshwater
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97: sediment process and invasive species spread impacts of the rock armour for the new or existing outfall. Effects of the rock armour are therefore taken
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:133:Sediment Transport within Tees Bay
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:133: Information from the analysis of sediment grab samples21 is provided in Figure 2 which
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:133: shows the predominant sediment type to be Medium Sand within the area of Tees Bay
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:133: Subsequent interpretation of sediment data combined with other datasets was used to
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:133: establish a conceptual sediment transport model21 for Tees Bay, as shown in Figure 3. This
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:133: illustrates the complex nature of sediment transport processes within the bay with the
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:133: sediment transport is also indicated within the bay, a typical mechanism that has a
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:134: of tidal and wave-induced currents will be required to initiate sediment motion, potentially
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:135: surface profile of the rock armour, the scale of any sediment disturbance around its
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:135: perimeter will be small. The sediment that is disturbed will be non-cohesive sand with a
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:135: provide an indicative Zone Of Influence (ZOI) for sediment disturbed as a result of scouring
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:136: avoid interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:136: sediment transport processes are likely to be affected.
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:138:Figure 5. Location of seabed sediment grab samples (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:139:Figure 6. Tees Bay Conceptual Sediment Transport Model (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-002461-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 20.pdf:5: to loss of seabed sediment including, but are not limited to, the use of bagged solutions filled
EN010103-002461-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 20.pdf:8: “scour protection” means measures to prevent loss of seabed sediment around foundation
EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:39:sediments can also affect the P retention within the drainage fields and therefore the
EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:39:distance any P plume extends. Calcareous sediments having very high P retention (average
EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:39:97%), with plumes not extending beyond 10m and non-calcareous sediments showing
EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:39:The evidence has shown that it is the aerated drainage field sediments which provides a key
EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:47:in the underlying sediment (all accounting for seasonal variations and fluctuations in growth).
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:94: due to sediment mobilisation during construction; this effect is no greater than
EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:146: water quality (mobilisation of fine sediment) in Tees Bay due to the potential
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:1:Annex D - Sediment Quality ……………………………………………………………………….. 139
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:6: • Annex D Sediment Quality;
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:9: sediment composition and movement, continuity, and structure of the
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:24:sediment plumes need to be taken into account in the Screening stage (see paragraph 9.5.6 and Table 9C-10). At
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:24: sediment plumes, and this is considered in Table 9C-15 (Tees
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:24: Potential impacts from a thermal/sediment plume scoped into
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:24: Section 9.7. We can confirm that thermal and sediment
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:30: Waterbody pollutants and sediments during construction
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:30: Waterbody pollutants and sediments during construction
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:33:Further details regarding hydrodynamics, tides and sediments are provided later in the baseline.
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:33:confluence with the Tees. At low tide, fine sediments are exposed in the channel and are dark in colour suggesting potential presence of pollutants. During especially high tides anecdotal
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:34:sediment and pollution pressures were notable with an oil sheen on the water. There were very few macrophytes and the channel has incised banks, rising steeply 1-2 m abruptly from the
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:35: macrophytes. Sediments are fine with
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:35: beneath the Teesside Works bed was dominated by fine sediment
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:36: is not known, although it is sediment. Submerged macrophytes
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:36: alignment is unclear but is known bed. Fine sediment accumulations
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:37: bed was dominated by fine sediment,
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:37: sediment accumulations were
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:37: 57102 24152 and flows west into dominated by fine sediment. There are
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:37: bed dominated by fine sediment.
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:38: erode, transport and deposit sediment resulting in the formation of
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:39: pollution from contaminated waterbody bed sediments. The reasons for the
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:41:9.4.43 Numerous investigations of sediment quality have recently been undertaken
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:41: dredged material. These give an indication of sediment quality in the Tees
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:41: sediments. In some locations, concentrations of contaminants exceeded
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:50:sediment mobilisation, be impacted by runoff Tees Transitional WFD additional
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:50:and this sediment containing fine sediment waterbody (including downstream
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:50:requirement for a new for mobilised sediments waterbody receptors given scale
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:50:sediments during its water.
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:50:sediment into the water
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:55: of the waterbody, and the flow and quantity of water and sediment. Impacts
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:56:hydromorphology (i.e. and local sediment dynamics during
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:57: temporarily through mobilisation of fine sediments into the water column.
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:57:clarity, temperature, from mobilisation of sediments,
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:58: contaminated sediments has been
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:58: sediments into the water column, which may contain contaminants deposited
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:59:It disturbs sediment with ✓ Potential for sediment at the outfall
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:59: physical disturbance and changes in water quality (e.g. a sediment plume
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:59:Subtidal kelp beds 175.17 Intertidal soft sediment 845.53
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:59: Subtidal soft sediments 1219.64
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:59: 2016), noting that this also includes the footprint of thermal, or sediment or
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:60: Lower Sensitivity Habitat (Intertidal Soft Sediment, Subtidal Soft Sediment
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:60: assessment on account of the potential sediment, chemical or thermal plume
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:60: sediment plume risks has been undertaken,
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:60: sediment plume during construction could
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:61:migration, or spawning sediment that may be contaminated,
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:64: elements the seabed and local sediment dynamics
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:64:Water Quality Physico-chemical and Impacts from mobilisation of sediments, diffuse
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:64:Biology: Habitats Habitats and benthic Potential temporary sediment plume during
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:65: conveyance of fine sediment and chemical spillages to any of these water
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:65: terms of fine sediment impacts or chemical spillages on water quality.
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:65:clarity, temperature, sediments, surface water runoff
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:66:It disturbs sediment ✓ No direct works to the Tees Estuary or
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:66: of sediment anticipated.
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:67: Subtidal kelp beds 4.13 Intertidal soft sediment 400.13
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:67: Subtidal soft sediments 610.31
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:67: immediately adjacent to Lower Sensitivity Habitat (Intertidal Soft Sediment
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:67: and Subtidal Soft Sediment). The nearest Higher Sensitivity Habitat
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:67: noting that this also includes the footprint of thermal or sediment plumes:
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:67: sediment plume being produced by the installation and removal of the coffer
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:68:larger sediment would not cover this size area, given
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:68:the water sediment would not cover this size area, given
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:68:sensitivity and cobbles, intertidal soft sediment, rocky
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:68: sediment. The area affected by increased DIN
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:68: laden with fine sediment would not cover this
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:68:delay or prevent fish disturbance of fine sediment or
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:69: sediment.
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:70:Water Quality Physico-chemical and Potential for conveyance of fine sediment and chemical
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:70:Biology: Fish Fish Fine sediment and chemical spillages could impact fish
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:70:Protected areas N/A Fine sediment and chemical spillages could impact fish
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:71: of soils, sediments, oils, fuels or other construction chemicals, or through
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:71: sediments, ground or groundwater, or through uncontrolled site run off;
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:71: Temporary impacts on sediment dynamics and morphology in the Tees
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:71: • Temporary impacts on sediment dynamics and morphology in Tees Bay
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:71: sediment, which may eventually be transported to watercourses where it can
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:72: also be a direct source of fine sediment mobilisation, and this sediment could
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:72: Background sediment quality data (see Annex D) shows that it is quite likely
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:72: that marginal sediments within the Tees Estuary could contain contaminants
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:72: across the Study Area may also contain contaminated sediments due to the
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:72: found at depth in sediments within Tees Bay.
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:72:9.7.7 Other potential sources of fine sediment during construction works include
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:72:9.7.8 Generally, excessive fine sediment in runoff is chemically inert and affects
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:72: potential for conveyance of fine sediment, debris and any contamination
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:72: or waterbodies directly. Like excessive fine sediment in construction site
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:73: wastewater. Fine sediment may also be disturbed in waterbodies directly or
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:73: past industrial activity, this sediment may not be inert and may potentially
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:75: management of fine sediment in surface water runoff as a result of the
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:75: of fine sediment or other material in, and the pollution by sediment of, any
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:75: control fine sediment laden runoff.
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:75: • To protect waterbodies from fine sediment runoff, topsoil/subsoil will be
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:79: direct impact to the sea bed and associated sediment mobilisation and scour
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:82: Surface Water Quality – Suspended Fine Sediment
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:82: largely avoiding sediment disturbance. The discharge pipeline would then be
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:82: sediment on the seabed of the Tees Coastal water body. Increased
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:82: suspended sediment concentrations would result in a temporary increase in
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:82: the turbidity of the water column and could potentially (subject to sediment
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:82: sediment plume.
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:82:9.7.51 However, it is considered that any sediment plume arising from this
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:82: drainage Infrastructure has the potential to mobilise sediments e.g. soils
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:83: scale and any sediment plume would be very quickly dispersed by the
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:83: element would occur due to suspended fine sediments, nor any non-
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:83:9.7.57 Soft sediment habitats characterise much of the footprint of the marine
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:83: sediment habitats are, according to the Marine Life Information Network’s
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:84: expected. This includes the recolonisation of suitable sediments by sandeels
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:85:9.7.64 Increased suspended sediment concentrations from the construction works
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:85: Document Ref. 6.2)). However, any contaminated sediments which are
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:85: sediment and sediment-bound contaminants), no adverse impact is
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:85: dynamic environments characterised by mobile sediments and variable
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:86: and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments with the aim of
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:87: for the outfall structure itself and potential sediment disturbance beneath the
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:87: significant sediment transport, any disturbance beneath the jack-up-barge
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:87: Surface Water Quality – Suspended Fine Sediment
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:87: conveyance of fine sediment to any of these water bodies through
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:87: sediment impacts on water quality.
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:87:9.7.77 Measures to manage formation of excessive sediment in runoff and to
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:87: due to suspended fine sediments, nor any non-compliance with WFD
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:88: Surface Water Quality – Suspended Fine Sediment
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:88: the potential for conveyance of fine sediment to any of these water bodies
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:88:9.7.83 Measures to manage formation of excessive sediment in runoff and to
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:88: anticipated due to suspended fine sediments, nor any non-compliance with
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:89: in runoff laden with fine sediment or containing pollutants into the water body
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:107: sediments that are easy to erode. Appropriate scour protection would be
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:113:Compounds source body bed sediments bed sediments which may contain
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:117: sediment or chemical spillages) will
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:117:prevents sediment transfer implemented prevent this mitigation measure from
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:117: prevent further sediment entering the
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:118: sediment or chemical spillages) will
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:129:Ensure maintenance prevents sediment transfer Required but not yet implemented
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:133: sediment supply into the estuary from offshore areas.
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:134:B.1.11 Suspended sediment concentrations are generally low in Tees Bay and in
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:134: of fine bed sediments.
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:134: vicinity of the Proposed Development has bed sediments comprising 65-70%
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:134:B.1.15 The sediment regime in the area includes surface seabed sediments,
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:134: suspended sediments and a variety of sources and sinks. Silts and muds are
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:134: readily transported as suspended sediment load and can remain in
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:134: carried as bedload. Suspended sediment concentrations between 1500 and
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:141:Annex D - Sediment Quality
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:141:D.1.1 Numerous investigations of sediment quality have recently been undertaken
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:141: disposal of dredged material. These give an indication of sediment quality in
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:141:Table D1: Assessment of Sediment Samples Against CEFAS Action Levels for
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:141: (Royal Haskoning, 2016a) also included sediment sampling in the main Tees
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:142:D.1.4 Surface sediment samples were collected as well as sediment from a range
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:142: of depths down to 4.87 m below the surface. In summary, the sediments
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:142: notably for chromium, copper and mercury. As such these sediments were
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:142:D.1.5 Two earlier impact assessments of sediment quality were undertaken to
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:142:D.1.6 The QE II berth sediment assessment consisted of two samples immediately
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:142: sediment to a depth of 4 m below ordnance datum. Results indicated that all
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:142:D.1.7 The NGCT sediment samples were collected in 2006 from several locations
EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:142: channel and at depth than in surface sediments. In some locations,
EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:2:(temporary and localised, and related to the mobilisation of fine sediment) during
EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:4:Suspended sediment concentrations
EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:4:In order to assess the suspended sediment concentrations impacts, we require
EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:19:suspended sediments: where dredging and disposal is required, pre-construction
EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:19:sediment contamination testing shall be carried out in consultation with the MMO
EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:20:increased Suspended Sediment Concentrations (SSC), smothering and toxicity
EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:20:from the release of sediment-bound contaminants may occur on benthic ecology
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:12: characterisation of baseline sedimentology was presented to
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:16: Draft DML Condition 10 (Sediment Sampling)
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:20: • The MMO are concerned regarding the potential impacts to local sediment
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:23: was a very large volume of sedimentology data in the River Tees from other projects and
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:23: (discharge) is less well-covered in terms of sediment data but the area is expected to comprise
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:30: Sedimentology (Slide 11, Annex A)
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:30: EW summarised the MMO’s comments on sedimentology [see extract
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:30: limitations to the usage of existing data on sediment and contaminant
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:44: not preluded sediment from disposal at sea. The PAHs).
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:44: sediment sampling will be required. We will engage with the MMO in a
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:60: number of the MMO / Cefas’ comments on sediment.
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:95:Sediment Composition
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:95:The major sediment fractions at each OWF benthic grab station are presented in Figure 2. The particle size analysis
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:95:There was little variation between the OWF stations, all being dominated by a high content of sandy sediments
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:95:(63 µm - 2 mm), with a generally low mud content (sediment <63 µm). Only station 21C had a sediment composition
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:95:containing gravel (sediment ≥2 mm), representing 11.2% of the total sediment fraction. Overall, sand represented the
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:95:highest sediment fraction across all stations (>90%), excluding station 21C (sand = 75.8%). The classification of most
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:95:Figure 2. Major sediment fractions (%) at each OWF grab sampling station considered
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:95: Station Folk and Ward Folk and Ward Mean µm Mean phi Sediment Modified Folk
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:96: Station Folk and Ward Folk and Ward Mean µm Mean phi Sediment Modified Folk
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:97:which is synonymous with sediment that has a high content of sand, with little to no fractions of mud (‘infralittoral fine
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:97:characterised by moderate to high exposure and sediments possessing a low clay/silt content, characteristic of this
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:98:The sediment content of the 2019 Teesside Net Zero subtidal benthic stations in Tees Bay, consisted of predominantly
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:98:shallow inshore area, where the level of exposure is considered to be greater (apparent from the lower sediment content
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:98:of mud), were determined to be the biotope A5.223. The stations located in slightly deeper waters, where the sediment
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:101: Intertidal phase I and phase II sampling; and Subtidal sediment grab
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:130: Subtidal sediment grab sampling
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:141: sediment testing will be carried out in consultation with the MMO.
EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:141: IC added that the works would be through bedrock and not marine sediment
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:27:Shale gas is methane trapped in sedimentary rock formations and is considered one form of
EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:28:the sedimentary formations that are fracked for shale gas are often several kilometers or more below
EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:35: erosion and transportation of sediment.
EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:40: reduce the potential for mobilisation of exposed soil and / or sediment.
EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:40: sediment being entrained by water flow or becoming entrained by the
EN010103-002629-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 5 - Equinor - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:135:Born: 1961 Business, a PhD, Reservoir Characterisation, Geology/Sedimentology from University of Reading as
EN010103-002248-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:84:sediment discharges can be simulated.
EN010103-002189-Marine Management Organistation - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 6.pdf:4:1.1.14 Part 3 10(1) – “The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan
EN010103-002189-Marine Management Organistation - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 6.pdf:4:1.1.16 Part 3 10(2) – The MMO consider the word “sediment” should be inserted
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:11: sediment sampling plan to the the plan must be submitted to the
EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:11: consider the word “sediment”
EN010103-002460-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 19.pdf:50:due to loss of seabed sediment. The range of remedial cable protection parameters and
EN010103-002460-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 19.pdf:54: “scour protection” means measures to prevent loss of seabed sediment around foundation
EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:3: a sediment control plan;
EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:9:5.5.5 Suitable measures will be put in place to prevent sediment being washed into
EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:14:Deposition of fine sediment The contractor will comply with relevant Good Practice Guidance To be confirmed in Final Appointed Contractors
EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:14: Management of Fine Sediment:
EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:14: deposition of fine sediment or other material in any existing
EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:15: to control fine sediment laden runoff;
EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:15: To protect waterbodies from fine sediment runoff, topsoil/subsoil will
EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:23: potential for mobilisation of exposed soil and / or sediment. Although
EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:33:release of sediments to water bodies
EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:34: Pre-construction sediment contamination testing shall be carried out
EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:34: the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments
EN010103-001060-NZT DCO 6.4.25 ES Vol III Appendix 12H Supplementary Habitat Information Report Coatham Sands Part 1.pdf:5: South Gare breakwater has influenced sediment dynamics within the dune
EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:3: • a sediment control plan;
EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:9:5.5.5 Suitable measures will be put in place to prevent sediment being washed into
EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:14:Deposition of fine sediment The contractor will comply with relevant Good Practice Guidance To be confirmed in Final Appointed Contractors
EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:14: Management of Fine Sediment:
EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:14: deposition of fine sediment or other material in any existing
EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:15: to control fine sediment laden runoff;
EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:15: • To protect waterbodies from fine sediment runoff, topsoil/subsoil will
EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:23: potential for mobilisation of exposed soil and / or sediment. Although
EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:34:release of sediments to water bodies
EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:36: shore sediments.
EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: • Pre-construction sediment contamination testing shall be carried out
EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments
EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:41: shore sediments to a depth sufficient to prevent frac out;.
EN010103-001086-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 13 EC2_E.pdf:16: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SE) 521024
EN010103-001086-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 13 EC2_E.pdf:16: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (S) 521537
EN010103-001085-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 12 EC2_D.pdf:71: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (NW) 522400
EN010103-001085-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 12 EC2_D.pdf:71: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (NW) 522320
EN010103-001085-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 12 EC2_D.pdf:112:Most of these Superficial deposits are unconsolidated sediments such as
EN010103-001085-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 12 EC2_D.pdf:113:types based on origin: igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary.
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:2:Annex D - Sediment Quality
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:7: • Annex D Sediment Quality;
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:10: sediment composition and movement, continuity, and structure of the
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:28: Waterbody pollutants and sediments during construction
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:28: Waterbody pollutants and sediments during construction
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:30:Further details regarding hydrodynamics, tides and sediments are provided later in the baseline.
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:30:confluence with the Tees. At low tide, fine sediments are exposed in the channel and are dark in colour suggesting potential presence of pollutants. During especially high tides anecdotal
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:31:sediment and pollution pressures were notable with an oil sheen on the water. There were very few macrophytes and the channel has incised banks, rising steeply 1-2 m abruptly from the
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:32: macrophytes. Sediments are fine with
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:32: beneath the Teesside Works bed was dominated by fine sediment
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:33: is not known, although it is sediment. Submerged macrophytes
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:33: alignment is unclear but is known bed. Fine sediment accumulations
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:34: bed was dominated by fine sediment,
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:34: sediment accumulations were
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:34: 57102 24152 and flows west into dominated by fine sediment. There are
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:34: bed dominated by fine sediment.
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:35: erode, transport and deposit sediment resulting in the formation of
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:36: contaminated waterbody bed sediments.
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:37:9.4.42 Numerous investigations of sediment quality have recently been undertaken
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:37: dredged material. These give an indication of sediment quality in the Tees
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:37: sediments. In some locations, concentrations of contaminants exceeded
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:45:sediment mobilisation, be impacted by runoff Tees Transitional WFD additional
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:45:and this sediment containing fine sediment waterbody (including downstream
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:45:requirement for a new for mobilised sediments waterbody receptors given scale
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:45:sediments during its
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:45:sediment into the water
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:49: of the waterbody, and the flow and quantity of water and sediment. Impacts
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:50:bed morphology and and local sediment dynamics during
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:50: mobilisation of fine sediments into the water column. There is also potential
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:51:temperature, salinity, from mobilisation of sediments,
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:51: temporarily during construction through mobilisation of sediments into the
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:52:It disturbs sediment with ✓ Potential for sediment at the outfall
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:52: disturbance and changes in water quality (e.g. a sediment plume relating to
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:52:Subtidal kelp beds 175.17 Intertidal soft sediment 845.53
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:52: Subtidal soft sediments 1219.64
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:52: noting that this also includes the footprint of thermal or sediment plumes:
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:53: cross Lower Sensitivity Habitat (Intertidal Soft Sediment, Subtidal Soft
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:53: Sediment and Subtidal Rock Reef). The nearest Higher Sensitivity Habitat
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:53: on account of the potential sediment or thermal plume to be produced by the
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:53:larger sediment plume risks has been undertaken,
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:53: there is the potential for a temporary sediment
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:54:spawning (e.g. creating sediment that may be contaminated,
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:55: elements the seabed and local sediment dynamics
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:55: Water Quality Physico-chemical and Impacts from mobilisation of sediments, diffuse
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:55:Biology: Habitats Habitats and benthic Potential temporary sediment plume during
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:56: conveyance of fine sediment and chemical spillages to any of these water
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:57: terms of fine sediment impacts or chemical spillages on water quality.
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:57:temperature, salinity, sediments, surface water runoff
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:58:It disturbs sediment 9.6.52 9.6.53 ✓ No direct works to the Tees Estuary or
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:58:above CEFAS Action disturbance of sediment anticipated.
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:58:Subtidal kelp beds 4.13 Intertidal soft sediment 400.13
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:58: Subtidal soft sediments 610.31
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:58: immediately adjacent to Lower Sensitivity Habitat (Intertidal Soft Sediment
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:58: and Subtidal Soft Sediment). The nearest Higher Sensitivity Habitat
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:58: noting that this also includes the footprint of thermal or sediment plumes:
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:58: sediment plume being produced by the installation and removal of the coffer
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:59: sediment would not cover this size area,
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:59:water body’s area sediment would not cover this size area,
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:59:lower sensitivity sediment would not cover this size area,
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:59:delay or prevent fish entering it fine sediment or chemical
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:59:change in depth or flow) fine sediment.
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:61:Water Quality Physico-chemical and Potential for conveyance of fine sediment and
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:61:Biology: Fish Fish Fine sediment and chemical spillages could impact
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:61:Protected areas N/A Fine sediment and chemical spillages could impact
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:61: of soils, sediments, oils, fuels or other construction chemicals, or through
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:61: sediments, ground or groundwater, or through uncontrolled site run off;
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:61: • Temporary impacts on sediment dynamics and morphology in the Tees
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:61: • Temporary impacts on sediment dynamics and morphology in Tees Bay
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:62: sediment, which may eventually be transported to watercourses where it can
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:62: also be a direct source of fine sediment mobilisation, and this sediment could
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:62: Background sediment quality data (see Annex D) shows that it is quite likely
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:62: that marginal sediments within the Tees Estuary could contain contaminants
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:62: across the Study Area may also contain contaminated sediments due to the
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:62: found at depth in sediments within Tees Bay.
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:62:9.7.7 Other potential sources of fine sediment during construction works include
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:62:9.7.8 Generally, excessive fine sediment in runoff is chemically inert and affects
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:63: potential for conveyance of fine sediment, debris and any contamination
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:63: or waterbodies directly. Like excessive fine sediment in construction site
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:63: wastewater. Fine sediment may also be disturbed in waterbodies directly or
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:63: past industrial activity, this sediment may not be inert and may potentially
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:65: management of fine sediment in surface water runoff as a result of the
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:65: of fine sediment or other material in, and the pollution by sediment of, any
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:66: control fine sediment laden runoff.
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:66: • To protect waterbodies from fine sediment runoff, topsoil/subsoil will be
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:69: direct impact to the sea bed and associated sediment mobilisation and scour
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:71: Surface Water Quality – Suspended Fine Sediment
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:71: technologies and thereby avoiding sediment disturbance. The discharge
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:71: similar) has the potential to temporarily disturb sediment on the seabed of
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:71: the Tees Coastal water body. Increased suspended sediment concentrations
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:71: could potentially (subject to sediment properties and chemical composition)
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:71: cause an oxygen demand within the sediment plume.
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:71:9.7.39 However, it is considered that any sediment plume arising from this
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:71: drainage Infrastructure has the potential to mobilise sediments e.g. soils
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:71: scale and any sediment plume would be very quickly dispersed by the
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:71: element would occur due to suspended fine sediments, nor any non-
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:72:9.7.45 Soft sediment habitats characterise much of the footprint of the marine
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:72: sediment habitats are, according to the Marine Life Information Network’s
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:73: expected. This includes the recolonisation of suitable sediments by sandeels
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:73:9.7.52 Increased suspended sediment concentrations from the construction works
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:73: Document Ref. 6.2)). However, any contaminated sediments which are
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:73: sediment and sediment-bound contaminants), no adverse impact is
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:74: dynamic environments characterised by mobile sediments and variable
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:75: and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments with the aim of
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:75: potential sediment disturbance beneath the jack-up-barge legs. Given the
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:75: dynamic nature of the water body with significant sediment transport, any
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:75: Surface Water Quality – Suspended Fine Sediment
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:76: conveyance of fine sediment to any of these water bodies through
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:76: sediment impacts on water quality.
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:76:9.7.65 Measures to manage formation of excessive sediment in runoff and to
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:76: due to suspended fine sediments, nor any non-compliance with WFD
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:77: Surface Water Quality – Suspended Fine Sediment
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:77: the potential for conveyance of fine sediment to any of these water bodies
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:77:9.7.71 Measures to manage formation of excessive sediment in runoff and to
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:77: anticipated due to suspended fine sediments, nor any non-compliance with
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:77: in runoff laden with fine sediment or containing pollutants into the water body
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:89: sediments that are easy to erode. Appropriate scour protection would be
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:93:Compounds source body bed sediments bed sediments which may contain
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:97: sediment or chemical spillages) will
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:97:prevents sediment transfer implemented prevent this mitigation measure from
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:97: prevent further sediment entering the
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:97: sediment or chemical spillages) will
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:106:Ensure maintenance prevents sediment transfer Required but not yet implemented
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:110: sediment supply into the estuary from offshore areas.
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:111:B.1.11 Suspended sediment concentrations are generally low in Tees Bay and in
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:111: of fine bed sediments.
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:111: vicinity of the Proposed Development has bed sediments comprising 65-70%
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:111:B.1.15 The sediment regime in the area includes surface seabed sediments,
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:111: suspended sediments and a variety of sources and sinks. Silts and muds are
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:111: readily transported as suspended sediment load and can remain in
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:111: carried as bedload. Suspended sediment concentrations between 1500 and
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:118:Annex D - Sediment Quality
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:118:D.1.1 Numerous investigations of sediment quality have recently been undertaken
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:118: disposal of dredged material. These give an indication of sediment quality in
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:118:Table D1: Assessment of Sediment Samples Against CEFAS Action Levels for
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:118: (Royal Haskoning, 2016a) also included sediment sampling in the main Tees
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:119:D.1.4 Surface sediment samples were collected as well as sediment from a range
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:119: of depths down to 4.87 m below the surface. In summary, the sediments
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:119: notably for chromium, copper and mercury. As such these sediments were
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:119:D.1.5 Two earlier impact assessments of sediment quality were undertaken to
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:119:D.1.6 The QE II berth sediment assessment consisted of two samples immediately
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:119: sediment to a depth of 4 m below ordnance datum. Results indicated that all
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:119:D.1.7 The NGCT sediment samples were collected in 2006 from several locations
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:119: channel and at depth than in surface sediments. In some locations,
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:128: to the estuary. They have a strong influence on sediment dynamics and
EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:134: veneer of organic sediment that prevents rooting by plants are possible
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:166: and sediments and the historical industrial input 26.08.20 - review of responses to Stage 2 thermal and chemical plume Report; and
EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:174: pre-construction sediment sampling is included
EN010103-000891-NZT DCO 6.2.5 ES Vol I Chapter 5 Construction Programme and Management.pdf:22:5.3.75 Suitable measures will be put in place to prevent sediment being washed into
EN010103-000891-NZT DCO 6.2.5 ES Vol I Chapter 5 Construction Programme and Management.pdf:23: suitable measures will be put in place to prevent sediment being washed off-site, and the
EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:26: sediments and construction and operation of
EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:27:BIO.1.28 Applicants Paragraphs 14.6.43 to 14.6.46 of ES Chapter 14 APP-096 discuss impacts from sediment
EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:75: effects to surface water quality from mobilisation of contamination in fine sediment during
EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:75: potential impacts of fine sediment to water quality in the Tees Bay arising from the construction
EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19:Resources prevent the deposition of fine sediment or other 16: Construction environmental management plan
EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19: material in, and the pollution by sediment of, any DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement
EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19:ES Chapter 9 - Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water To protect waterbodies from fine sediment runoff, DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement
EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:32: exposed soil and / or sediment. Although not
EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:42:Conservation, ES Appendix 9C: WFD Assessment Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments
EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:42: Ballast Water and Sediments with the aim of (2017)
EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:43:ES Chapter 14 - Marine Ecology and Nature Pre-construction sediment contamination testing shall DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement
EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:60: • a sediment control plan;
EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:61:ES Appendices 5A - Framework CEMP, 9C - WFD Management of Fine Sediment: Measures will be DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement
EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:61:Assessment taken to prevent the deposition of fine sediment or 16: Construction Environmental Management Plan
EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:65: exposed soil and / or sediment. Although not
EN010103-002321-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:95:sediment discharges can be simulated.
EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:53: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:88: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request at
EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:88: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the sampling plan approved
EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:88:laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform marine licence
EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:99: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request at
EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:99: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the sampling plan approved
EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:99:laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform marine licence
EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:64: • sediment run-off to surface waters affecting wetland habitats used by
EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:65: emerge into the subtidal environment dredging/disturbance of sediment
EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:68:Sediment runoff to surface Effects on habitats on which birds Out Controlled through measures within the Chapter 9: Surface Water, Flood Risk
EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:68: sediment plumes creating conditions
EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:86: and diving birds resulting from increases in water turbidity (sediment plumes),
EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:97: sediment concentrations (SSC, i.e. turbidity), including deposition of
EN010103-002368-Natural England - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ3 (if required).pdf:8: sediment.
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:11: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:67: sedimentary changes
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:67: sedimentary conditions
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: the concerns raised by Natural low point of this rapidly eroding coastline. Any sediment transport is incident from the north, where cliff heights are
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: REP4-054, and provide evidence the upper intertidal and could therefore provide a temporary obstruction to longshore sediment transport processes
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: to justify your assertion in [REP1- on the upper foreshore. This sediment could be sourced from active erosion of the cliffs (a natural background process
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: 038] and REP3-046 that the not dependent upon the nature and extent of Hornsea Four ramp construction) or from offshore/nearshore sediment
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: temporary access ramp at the transport downdrift under the prevailing hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (most likely). This could result in the
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: landfall would not impact the cliff build-up of downdrift (moving north to south) sediment against the access ramp in the upper intertidal until the
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: profile. sediment build-up was sufficient to facilitate bypassing the ramp.
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: MC.2.4 The MMO Cumulative modelling of cable The Applicant wishes to clarify that the intended dredged sediment disposal area for Hornsea Four comprises all of the
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: proposed cable crossings in relevant). The undertaker is authorised by those provisions to deposit 7,300,596 m3 of sediment within the array area
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: respect of changes to sediment disposal site, i.e. the area covered by Work No. 1 as shown on the offshore works plan; and 4,491,735 m3 of sediment
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: MC.2.5 The MMO Sediment sampling and analysis
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: analysis of marine sediment to
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: sediment for disposal?
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: sediment samples for
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: MC.2.6 Applicant Dogger Bank Disposal Area Plan The Applicant wishes to clarify that the intended dredged sediment disposal area for Hornsea Four comprises all of the
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: Four Dogger Bank A & B Order relevant). The undertaker is authorised by those provisions to deposit 7,300,596 m3 of sediment within the array area
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: Limits Interaction and Disposal disposal site, i.e. the area covered by Work No. 1 as shown on the offshore works plan; and 4,491,735 m3 of sediment
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: dredged sediment disposal area
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: MC.2.7 Applicant Dredged sediment sampling In reference to OSPAR, the Applicant has assumed the MMO is referring to the OSPAR Guidelines for the Management
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: ongoing monitoring of sediment is secured via a condition in the DMLs (Condition 13(1)(d) of Schedules 11 and 12 (REP4-050)) and will be submitted to,
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:80: results of the sediment sample similar condition having been included in other recent offshore wind farm DCOs.
EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:98: drainage and foul water (Co14) and the supply of sediment and contaminants
EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:24: intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and coarse
EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:26:3.2.63 The SAC is a large macro-tidal coastal plain estuary with high suspended sediment
EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:38: the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which has a
EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:40: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:40: sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that might
EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:45: includes potential dredging (removal of sediment) around the water discharge,
EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:45: shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats are
EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:50: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:61: for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on a raft in the
EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:63: leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation) reaching
EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:64: non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in the
EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:65: sediment
EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:65: off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:69: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:89: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:38: • changes to coastal processes and sedimentation patterns;
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:73:on the coastal and estuarine sediment and flow dynamics, and ultimately how this
EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:75:may have water quality impacts, e.g. from mobilisation of silt and sediments, with
EN010103-001913-NZT DCO 9.18 - Further information to Historic Environment Questions July 2022 (D4).pdf:27: of the sub-surface sediments with archaeological potential.
EN010103-001754-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 6 - June 2022.pdf:13:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
EN010103-001024-NZT DCO 6.4.9 ES Vol III Appendix 9A Flood Risk Assessment Part 1.pdf:79:• Please provide water quality and sediment quality data in an MS Excel format for the monitoring
EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:54: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:91: “sediment sampling plan” means a plan that provides an adequate characterisation of material
EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:96: 11.12.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for
EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:96: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken—
EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:96: (a) in accordance with the sediment sampling plan approved by the MMO pursuant to sub-
EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:96: (b) by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform
EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:96: (3) Details of the sediment sampling and analysis undertaken pursuant to sub-paragraph (2) must
EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:96: (4) No dredging and disposal activities may be undertaken until the details of sediment sampling
EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:103: “sediment sampling plan” means a plan that provides an adequate characterisation of material
EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:109: 11.12.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for
EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:109: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken—
EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:109: (a) in accordance with the sediment sampling plan approved by the MMO pursuant to sub-
EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:109: (b) by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform
EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:109: (3) Details of the sediment sampling and analysis undertaken pursuant to sub-paragraph (2) must
EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:109: (4) No dredging and disposal activities may be undertaken until the details of sediment sampling
EN010103-001088-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 15 EC2_G.pdf:79: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SE) 524931
EN010103-001088-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 15 EC2_G.pdf:79: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (E) 524922
EN010103-001088-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 15 EC2_G.pdf:98:Most of these Superficial deposits are unconsolidated sediments
EN010103-001088-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 15 EC2_G.pdf:99:sedimentary.
EN010103-000825-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2.pdf:199:soil, groundwater, surface water and sediment contamination. The litigation and claims category includes provisions for matters related to, for example,
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:12: characterisation of baseline sedimentology was presented to
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:16: Draft DML Condition 10 (Sediment Sampling)
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: was a very large volume of sedimentology data in the River Tees from other projects and
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: (discharge) is less well-covered in terms of sediment data but the area is expected to comprise
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:29: Sedimentology (Slide 11, Annex A)
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:29: EW summarised the MMO’s comments on sedimentology [see extract
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:29: limitations to the usage of existing data on sediment and contaminant
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:43: not preluded sediment from disposal at sea. The PAHs).
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:43: sediment sampling will be required. We will engage with the MMO in a
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:59: number of the MMO / Cefas’ comments on sediment.
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:94:Sediment Composition
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:94:The major sediment fractions at each OWF benthic grab station are presented in Figure 2. The particle size analysis
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:94:There was little variation between the OWF stations, all being dominated by a high content of sandy sediments
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:94:(63 µm - 2 mm), with a generally low mud content (sediment <63 µm). Only station 21C had a sediment composition
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:94:containing gravel (sediment ≥2 mm), representing 11.2% of the total sediment fraction. Overall, sand represented the
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:94:highest sediment fraction across all stations (>90%), excluding station 21C (sand = 75.8%). The classification of most
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:94:Figure 2. Major sediment fractions (%) at each OWF grab sampling station considered
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:94: Station Folk and Ward Folk and Ward Mean µm Mean phi Sediment Modified Folk
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95: Station Folk and Ward Folk and Ward Mean µm Mean phi Sediment Modified Folk
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:96:which is synonymous with sediment that has a high content of sand, with little to no fractions of mud (‘infralittoral fine
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:96:characterised by moderate to high exposure and sediments possessing a low clay/silt content, characteristic of this
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97:The sediment content of the 2019 Teesside Net Zero subtidal benthic stations in Tees Bay, consisted of predominantly
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97:shallow inshore area, where the level of exposure is considered to be greater (apparent from the lower sediment content
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97:of mud), were determined to be the biotope A5.223. The stations located in slightly deeper waters, where the sediment
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:100: Intertidal phase I and phase II sampling; and Subtidal sediment grab
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:129: Subtidal sediment grab sampling
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:140: sediment testing will be carried out in consultation with the MMO.
EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:140: IC added that the works would be through bedrock and not marine sediment
EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:26: sediments and construction and operation of
EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:2:Annex G: Proportion of sediment-sensitive invertebrates (PSI)
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:12: • Proportion of Sediment-sensitive Invertebrates (PSI) scores – used to
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:12: indicate the level of sedimentation at a site (watercourses only);
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:15: characterised by species tolerant of heavily sedimented conditions it is unlikely
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:21:13.4.46. The PSI score is indicative of ‘heavily sedimented’ conditions, with 61% of the
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:21: species recorded being highly insensitive to fine sediment cover.
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:22:13.4.51. The PSI score is indicative of ‘heavily sedimented’ conditions, with
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:22: approximately 67% of taxa recorded being highly insensitive to fine sediment
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:22:13.4.56. The PSI score is indicative of ‘heavily sedimented’ conditions with
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:22: approximately 62% of taxa recorded being highly insensitive to fine sediment
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:30: (2013). The assessment of fine sediment accumulation in rivers using macro-
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:52:Annex G: Proportion of sediment-sensitive
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:52:The Proportion of Sediment-sensitive Invertebrates (PSI) index (Extence et. Al, 2013)
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:52:by, fine sediments.
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:52:a Fine Sediment Sensitivity Rating (FSSR) raging from A to B, as detailed in the Table
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:52:PSI score corresponds to the percentage of fine sediment-sensitive taxa present in a
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:52:to watercourses with high fine sediment cover.
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:52:Table G1. Fine Sediment Sensitivity Rating (FSSR) groups used to derive PSI
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:53: 81-100 Minimally sedimented / Unsedimented
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:53: 61-80 Slightly sedimented
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:53: 41-60 Moderately sedimented
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:53: 21-40 Sedimented
EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:53: 0-20 Heavily sedimented
EN010103-001089-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 16 EC2_H.pdf:20: Soil Sample Type: Sediment (NE) 527335
EN010103-001089-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 16 EC2_H.pdf:20: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (S) 526500
EN010103-001089-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 16 EC2_H.pdf:20: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (N) 526570
EN010103-001546-Marine Management Organistation - Comments on Relevant Representations (RRs).pdf:4: • Potential impacts to local sediment transport in the context of erosion and scour.
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:25: intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and coarse
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:27:3.2.63 The SAC is a large macro-tidal coastal plain estuary with high suspended sediment
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:39: the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which has a
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:41: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:41: sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that might
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:45: the Proposed Development. This includes potential dredging (removal of sediment)
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:46: shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats, are
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:51: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:61:6.1.23 Appendix F documents an analysis by a coastal process specialist of the sediment
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:61: interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:63: for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on a raft in the
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:65: leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation) reaching
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:66: non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in the
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:67: sediment
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:67: off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:72: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:86: soft sediments in two Sydney estuaries, Australia. Marine and Freshwater
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:93: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:93: sediment process and invasive species spread impacts of the rock armour for the new or existing outfall. Effects of the rock armour are therefore taken
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:128:Sediment Transport within Tees Bay
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:128: Information from the analysis of sediment grab samples21 is provided in Figure 2 which
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:128: shows the predominant sediment type to be Medium Sand within the area of Tees Bay
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:128: Subsequent interpretation of sediment data combined with other datasets was used to
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:128: establish a conceptual sediment transport model21 for Tees Bay, as shown in Figure 3. This
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:128: illustrates the complex nature of sediment transport processes within the bay with the
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:128: sediment transport is also indicated within the bay, a typical mechanism that has a
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:129: of tidal and wave-induced currents will be required to initiate sediment motion, potentially
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:130: surface profile of the rock armour, the scale of any sediment disturbance around its
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:130: perimeter will be small. The sediment that is disturbed will be non-cohesive sand with a
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:130: provide an indicative Zone Of Influence (ZOI) for sediment disturbed as a result of scouring
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:131: avoid interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:131: sediment transport processes are likely to be affected.
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:133:Figure 5. Location of seabed sediment grab samples (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:133:Figure 6. Tees Bay Conceptual Sediment Transport Model (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:26: sediments and construction and operation of
EN010103-001994-NZT DCO 9.26 - Riparian Mammal Report - August 2022(D5).pdf:12: Watercourse could not be entered as either the water or sediment level was too
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:37: • changes to coastal processes and sedimentation patterns;
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:72:on the coastal and estuarine sediment and flow dynamics, and ultimately how this
EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:74:may have water quality impacts, e.g. from mobilisation of silt and sediments, with
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:25: intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and coarse
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:27:3.2.63 The SAC is a large macro-tidal coastal plain estuary with high suspended sediment
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:39: the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which has a
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:41: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:41: sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that might
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:46: the Proposed Development. This includes potential dredging (removal of sediment)
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:46: shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats, are
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:51: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:62:6.1.23 Appendix F documents an analysis by a coastal process specialist of the sediment
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:62: interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:64: for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on a raft in the
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:66: leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation) reaching
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:67: non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in the
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:68: sediment
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:68: off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:76: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:91: soft sediments in two Sydney estuaries, Australia. Marine and Freshwater
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:98: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:98: sediment process and invasive species spread impacts of the rock armour for the new or existing outfall. Effects of the rock armour are therefore taken
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:134:Sediment Transport within Tees Bay
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:134: Information from the analysis of sediment grab samples22 is provided in Figure 2 which
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:134: shows the predominant sediment type to be Medium Sand within the area of Tees Bay
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:134: Subsequent interpretation of sediment data combined with other datasets was used to
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:134: establish a conceptual sediment transport model2221 for Tees Bay, as shown in Figure 3.
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:134: This illustrates the complex nature of sediment transport processes within the bay with the
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:134: sediment transport is also indicated within the bay, a typical mechanism that has a
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:135: of tidal and wave-induced currents will be required to initiate sediment motion, potentially
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:136: surface profile of the rock armour, the scale of any sediment disturbance around its
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:136: perimeter will be small. The sediment that is disturbed will be non-cohesive sand with a
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:136: provide an indicative Zone Of Influence (ZOI) for sediment disturbed as a result of scouring
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:137: avoid interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:137: sediment transport processes are likely to be affected.
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:138:Figure 5. Location of seabed sediment grab samples (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:139:Figure 6. Tees Bay Conceptual Sediment Transport Model (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-001727-DLA Piper UK LLP - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words 1.pdf:22: to loss of seabed sediment including, but are not limited to, the use of bagged solutions filled
EN010103-001727-DLA Piper UK LLP - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words 1.pdf:25: “scour protection” means measures to prevent loss of seabed sediment around foundation
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:15: conductor pipe previously driven by the off-shore rig into the near surface sediments. The presence of the
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:19: sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be set back into the riverbank).
EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:36: pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments
EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:19:Resources prevent the deposition of fine sediment or other 16: Construction environmental management plan
EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:19: material in, and the pollution by sediment of, any DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement
EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:20:ES Chapter 9 - Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water To protect waterbodies from fine sediment runoff, DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement
EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:33: exposed soil and / or sediment. Although not
EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:43:Conservation, ES Appendix 9C: WFD Assessment Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments
EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:43: Ballast Water and Sediments with the aim of (2017)
EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:44:ES Chapter 14 - Marine Ecology and Nature Pre-construction sediment contamination testing shall DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement
EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:60: • a sediment control plan;
EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:62:ES Appendices 5A - Framework CEMP, 9C - WFD Management of Fine Sediment: Measures will be DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement
EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:62:Assessment taken to prevent the deposition of fine sediment or 16: Construction Environmental Management Plan
EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:65: exposed soil and / or sediment. Although not
EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:47: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:81: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request at
EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:81: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the sampling plan approved
EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:81:laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform marine licence
EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:93: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request at
EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:93: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the sampling plan approved
EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:93:laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform marine licence
EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:53: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:86: “sediment sampling plan” means a plan that provides an adequate characterisation of material
EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:91: 12.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for
EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:91: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken—
EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:91: (a) in accordance with the sediment sampling plan approved by the MMO pursuant to sub-
EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:91: (b) by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform
EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:91: (3) Details of the sediment sampling and analysis undertaken pursuant to sub-paragraph (2) must
EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:91: (4) No dredging and disposal activities may be undertaken until the details of sediment sampling
EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97: “sediment sampling plan” means a plan that provides an adequate characterisation of material
EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:103: 12.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for
EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:103: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken—
EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:103: (a) in accordance with the sediment sampling plan approved by the MMO pursuant to sub-
EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:103: (b) by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform
EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:103: (3) Details of the sediment sampling and analysis undertaken pursuant to sub-paragraph (2) must
EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:103: (4) No dredging and disposal activities may be undertaken until the details of sediment sampling
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:27: pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments
EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:39: disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay
EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:3:of marine sediments…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 19
EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:8: a time frame must be included in which sediment sampling should be provided to
EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:8: ‘A sediment sampling plan must be requested from the MMO at least 6 months prior
EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:8: to the commencement of dredging. The sediment sampling and analysis must be
EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:11: sediment transport in the context of erosion and scour. Considering this
EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:13: (e.g., sediment sampling and subsequent sample analysis following the MMO’s
EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:13: shellfish to increased SSC Suspended Sediment Concentrations and deposition
EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:13: reactions and move away from the vicinity of adverse sediment conditions, if
EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:14: adjacent habitat temporarily and recolonising suitable sediments following
EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:15: sediments.
EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:18:Berg, L. (1982). The effect of exposure to short-term pulses of suspended sediment on
EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:18:Berli, B.I. et al. (2014). Acute exposure to a common suspended sediment affects the
EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:18:Salmon & Trout Conservation (2017). The impact of excess fine sediment on
EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:19: disposal of marine sediments
EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:19:Elevated concentrations of suspended sediment can have the following physical effects on
EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:19: of particles, suspended sediment concentration, water velocity and gill dimensions
EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:19: ability of the fish to utilise anaerobic metabolic pathways in high sediment
EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:10: sedimentary bedrocks that are fluvial, lacustrine and marine in origin (British
EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:20: preservation potential of marine sediments to identify areas where there was
EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:24: Sediments and Quaternary. Nottingham: British Geological Survey.
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:53: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:89: “sediment sampling plan” means a plan that provides an adequate characterisation of material
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:94: 12.10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken—
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95: (a) in accordance with the sediment sampling plan approved by the MMO pursuant to sub-
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95: (b) by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95: (3) Details of the sediment sampling and analysis undertaken pursuant to sub-paragraph (2) must
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95: The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the sampling plan approved by
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95:laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform marine licence
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95:No dredging and disposal activities may be undertaken until the details of sediment sampling and
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:102: “sediment sampling plan” means a plan that provides an adequate characterisation of material
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:109: 12.10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:109: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken—
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:109: (a) in accordance with the sediment sampling plan approved by the MMO pursuant to sub-
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:109: (b) by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:109: (3) Details of the sediment sampling and analysis undertaken pursuant to sub-paragraph (2) must
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:109: The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the sampling plan approved by
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:109:laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform marine licence
EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:109:No dredging and disposal activities may be undertaken until the details of sediment sampling and
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:25: intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and coarse
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27:3.2.63 The SAC is a large macro-tidal coastal plain estuary with high suspended sediment
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:39: the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which has a
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:41: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:41: sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that might
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:46: the Proposed Development. This includes potential dredging (removal of sediment)
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:46: shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats, are
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:51: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:61:6.1.23 Appendix F documents an analysis by a coastal process specialist of the sediment
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:61: interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:63: for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on a raft in the
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:65: leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation) reaching
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:66: non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in the
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:67: sediment
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:67: off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:74: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:89: soft sediments in two Sydney estuaries, Australia. Marine and Freshwater
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:96: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:96: sediment process and invasive species spread impacts of the rock armour for the new or existing outfall. Effects of the rock armour are therefore taken
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:132:Sediment Transport within Tees Bay
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:132: Information from the analysis of sediment grab samples22 is provided in Figure 2 which
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:132: shows the predominant sediment type to be Medium Sand within the area of Tees Bay
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:132: Subsequent interpretation of sediment data combined with other datasets was used to
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:132: establish a conceptual sediment transport model2221 for Tees Bay, as shown in Figure 3.
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:132: This illustrates the complex nature of sediment transport processes within the bay with the
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:132: sediment transport is also indicated within the bay, a typical mechanism that has a
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:133: of tidal and wave-induced currents will be required to initiate sediment motion, potentially
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:134: surface profile of the rock armour, the scale of any sediment disturbance around its
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:134: perimeter will be small. The sediment that is disturbed will be non-cohesive sand with a
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:134: provide an indicative Zone Of Influence (ZOI) for sediment disturbed as a result of scouring
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:135: avoid interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:135: sediment transport processes are likely to be affected.
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:136:Figure 5. Location of seabed sediment grab samples (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:137:Figure 6. Tees Bay Conceptual Sediment Transport Model (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-001084-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 11 EC2_C.pdf:75: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (NE) 522891
EN010103-001084-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 11 EC2_C.pdf:75: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (NE) 522589
EN010103-001084-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 11 EC2_C.pdf:75: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (E) 522284
EN010103-001084-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 11 EC2_C.pdf:75: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (S) 522291
EN010103-001084-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 11 EC2_C.pdf:75: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (NW) 522351
EN010103-001084-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 11 EC2_C.pdf:76: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (NE) 522790
EN010103-001084-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 11 EC2_C.pdf:76: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (NE) 522915
EN010103-001084-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 11 EC2_C.pdf:76: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (NE) 523000
EN010103-001084-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 11 EC2_C.pdf:109:Most of these Superficial deposits are unconsolidated sediments such as
EN010103-001084-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 11 EC2_C.pdf:110:types based on origin: igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary.
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:34: temporary impacts on sediment dynamics and morphology in Tees Bay;
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:35: which do not disturb the bed or bank habitats or mobilise sediments.
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:35: sediments and accidental spillages will be prevented or minimised through the
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:39: sediments to water bodies; and
EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:41: suspended sediment concentrations (i.e. turbidity) and deposition;
EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:46: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:90: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan request at least six
EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:90: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the approved sampling plan
EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:90:and must be undertaken by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment
EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:106: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan request at least six
EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:106: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the approved sampling plan
EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:106:and must be undertaken by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment
EN010103-001075-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 2 EC1_B.pdf:109: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SE) 522249
EN010103-001075-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 2 EC1_B.pdf:109: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (S) 522000
EN010103-001075-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 2 EC1_B.pdf:109: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (S) 522000
EN010103-001075-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 2 EC1_B.pdf:109: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (W) 522249
EN010103-001075-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 2 EC1_B.pdf:109: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (S) 522000
EN010103-001075-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 2 EC1_B.pdf:110: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (NW) 522500
EN010103-001075-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 2 EC1_B.pdf:110: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (N) 523000
EN010103-001075-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 2 EC1_B.pdf:110: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (N) 522500
EN010103-001075-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 2 EC1_B.pdf:110: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (NW) 523000
EN010103-001075-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 2 EC1_B.pdf:110: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (NE) 522632
EN010103-001075-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 2 EC1_B.pdf:110: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (E) 522249
EN010103-001075-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 2 EC1_B.pdf:111: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (E) 522000
EN010103-001075-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 2 EC1_B.pdf:111: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (W) 522249
EN010103-001075-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 2 EC1_B.pdf:111: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (S) 522018
EN010103-001075-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 2 EC1_B.pdf:134:Most of these Superficial deposits are unconsolidated sediments
EN010103-001075-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 2 EC1_B.pdf:135:sedimentary.
EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:37: Figure in brackets represents number of tests that underwent sedimentation testing.
EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:86:order of magnitude above the solubility limit indicating the presence of non-aqueous phase liquid or sediment with
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:92: of fine sediment) during the construction phase, if the existing
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:96: success of the marine enhancement measures. Suspended sediment mixed. Impacts from this small amount of dredging are anticipated
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:96: concentrations In order to assess the suspended sediment to be localised and minor and no additional mitigation is proposed
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:97: Suspended sediment concentrations
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:107: and localised, and related to the mobilisation of fine sediment)
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:122: and the dispersion of suspended sediments: where dredging and
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:122: disposal is required, pre-construction sediment contamination
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:122: Sediment Concentrations (SSC), smothering and toxicity from the
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:122: release of sediment-bound contaminants may occur on benthic
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:124: Suspended sediment concentrations Issue: Section 14.6.32 lists the
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:124: sediment concentrations (SSC) and create a sediment plume within
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:124: soft sediments, or will this go into rocky reef, or mussel bed habitat?
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:125: dredgings? What will happen to the bored sediment? What are the
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:126: Issue: Fine sediment could be pollutants and pollutant loads should No dewatering is proposed.
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:239: included in which sediment sampling should be provided to
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:239: ‘A sediment sampling plan must be requested from the
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:239: dredging. The sediment sampling and analysis must be
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:245: the Tees North Wave Buoy, but the MMO were unable to Order – Environmental Statement Section 5 Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:245: form. Environmental Statement: Hydrodynamic and Sedimentation Studies (HR
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:245: 6.1.4 The application appears to overlook the potential of 6.1.4 An assessment of the impact of sediment disturbance on water quality is
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:245: the project to impact local sediment transport in the given in Section 9.6 in relation to construction and also operation. This
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:245: context of erosion and scour. Considering this application is includes consideration to sediment disturbance in relation to the jack-up-
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:246: identified relating to scour or sediment disturbance. If there are other
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:247: (Temporary Threshold Shift) based on the SPLrms metric, seafloor. Environmental factors such as sediment conditions and seasonal
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:250: they will be subject to DML conditions (e.g., sediment option (located approximately 3 km south-east of Tees Mouth) has not yet
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:251: backfill/side cast (as required) are already included within used. Where dredging is required, pre-construction sediment contamination
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:251: of fish and shellfish to increased SSC [Suspended Sediment away from other projects where cumulative effects are expected. The
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:251: Concentrations] and deposition is considered to be low”. sediment within the bay is sand and gravel and will resettle quickly (within
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:252: move away from the vicinity of adverse sediment
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:252: biology supporting conclusions such as “Although sandeel strong site fidelity, spending most of their life buried in sediment, for which
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:252: sediments following completion of the works”. The MMO in the distribution of this species between areas of preferred habitat, which
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:252: limited size of the dredge envelope, short in extent (given that the sediment
EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:255: sediments.
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:12: characterisation of baseline sedimentology was presented to
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:16: Draft DML Condition 10 (Sediment Sampling)
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:21: • The MMO are concerned regarding the potential impacts to local sediment
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:23: was a very large volume of sedimentology data in the River Tees from other projects and
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:23: (discharge) is less well-covered in terms of sediment data but the area is expected to comprise
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:30: Sedimentology (Slide 11, Annex A)
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:30: EW summarised the MMO’s comments on sedimentology [see extract
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:30: limitations to the usage of existing data on sediment and contaminant
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:44: not preluded sediment from disposal at sea. The PAHs).
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:44: sediment sampling will be required. We will engage with the MMO in a
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:60: number of the MMO / Cefas’ comments on sediment.
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:95:Sediment Composition
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:95:The major sediment fractions at each OWF benthic grab station are presented in Figure 2. The particle size analysis
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:95:There was little variation between the OWF stations, all being dominated by a high content of sandy sediments
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:95:(63 µm - 2 mm), with a generally low mud content (sediment <63 µm). Only station 21C had a sediment composition
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:95:containing gravel (sediment ≥2 mm), representing 11.2% of the total sediment fraction. Overall, sand represented the
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:95:highest sediment fraction across all stations (>90%), excluding station 21C (sand = 75.8%). The classification of most
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:95:Figure 2. Major sediment fractions (%) at each OWF grab sampling station considered
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:95: Station Folk and Ward Folk and Ward Mean µm Mean phi Sediment Modified Folk
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:96: Station Folk and Ward Folk and Ward Mean µm Mean phi Sediment Modified Folk
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:97:which is synonymous with sediment that has a high content of sand, with little to no fractions of mud (‘infralittoral fine
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:97:characterised by moderate to high exposure and sediments possessing a low clay/silt content, characteristic of this
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:98:The sediment content of the 2019 Teesside Net Zero subtidal benthic stations in Tees Bay, consisted of predominantly
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:98:shallow inshore area, where the level of exposure is considered to be greater (apparent from the lower sediment content
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:98:of mud), were determined to be the biotope A5.223. The stations located in slightly deeper waters, where the sediment
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:101: Intertidal phase I and phase II sampling; and Subtidal sediment grab
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:130: Subtidal sediment grab sampling
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:141: sediment testing will be carried out in consultation with the MMO.
EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:141: IC added that the works would be through bedrock and not marine sediment
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:25: intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and coarse
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:27:3.2.63 The SAC is a large macro-tidal coastal plain estuary with high suspended sediment
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:39: the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which has a
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:41: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:41: sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that might
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:47: the Proposed Development. This includes potential dredging (removal of sediment)
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:47: shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats, are
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:53: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:63:6.1.23 Appendix F documents an analysis by a coastal process specialist of the sediment
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:64: interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:66: Critical Load for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:68: spills, leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation)
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:69: toxic or non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:70: sediment
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:70: run-off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:90: soft sediments in two Sydney estuaries, Australia. Marine and Freshwater
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:97: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:97: habitat loss, sediment process and invasive species spread impacts of the rock armour for the new or existing outfall, to be effectively neutral on foraging
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:133:Sediment Transport within Tees Bay
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:133: Information from the analysis of sediment grab samples21 is provided in Figure 2 which
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:133: shows the predominant sediment type to be Medium Sand within the area of Tees Bay
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:133: Subsequent interpretation of sediment data combined with other datasets was used to
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:133: establish a conceptual sediment transport model211 for Tees Bay, as shown in Figure 3.
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:133: This illustrates the complex nature of sediment transport processes within the bay with the
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:133: sediment transport is also indicated within the bay, a typical mechanism that has a
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:134: a combination of tidal and wave-induced currents will be required to initiate sediment
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:135: surface profile of the rock armour, the scale of any sediment disturbance around its
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:135: perimeter will be small. The sediment that is disturbed will be non-cohesive sand with a
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:135: used to provide an indicative Zone Of Influence (ZOI) for sediment disturbed as a result of
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:136: avoid interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:136: sediment transport processes are likely to be affected.
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:138:Figure 52. Location of seabed sediment grab samples (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:138:Figure 63. Tees Bay Conceptual Sediment Transport Model (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:112:of 364 installed cages at the end of 2020. This year-on-year reduction 2) remediation of soil and sediments; and
EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:112:access a damaged site to start joint investigation visits with regulators, In 2021, the remediation of the soil and sediments at the Bodo project
EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:49: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:84: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request at
EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:84: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the sampling plan approved
EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:84:laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform marine licence
EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:97: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request at
EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:97: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the sampling plan approved
EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:97:laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform marine licence
EN010103-001023-NZT DCO 6.4.8 ES Vol III Appendix 8C Air Quality - Amine Degradation Assessment.pdf:10: sediments.
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:24: intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and coarse
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:26:3.2.63 The SAC is a large macro-tidal coastal plain estuary with high suspended sediment
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:38: the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which has a
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:40: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:40: sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that might
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:45: includes potential dredging (removal of sediment) around the water discharge,
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:45: shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats are
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:50: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:62: Critical Load for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:64: leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation) reaching
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:65: toxic or non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:66: sediment
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:66: run-off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:70: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:84: soft sediments in two Sydney estuaries, Australia. Marine and Freshwater
EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:90: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:180: “scour protection” means measures to prevent loss of seabed sediment around any structure
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:331: (d) the removal of sediment samples for the purposes of informing environmental monitoring
EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:354: (e) the removal of sediment samples for the purposes of informing environmental monitoring
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:49: from sediment deposition on subtidal habitats and communities. It is stated that area including the area around the potential source of inert water based drilling
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:49: seabed is composed of soft sediment) or will be reflected back from hard
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:50: sediment conditions and seasonal stratification is not considered. The Sound
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:51: temporary and small in extent. The sediment within the bay is sand and gravel
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:52: will be in soft sediment, the sound source levels as a result of this activity are
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:153: in fine sediment during construction are neutral to slight adverse (not significant) conclusion in Chapter 9 of the ES APP-091 that effects to surface water quality
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:153: noting the requirement for further ground investigation and quantitative risk from mobilisation of fine sediment during construction are neutral to slight
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:153: place to manage potential impacts of fine sediment to water quality in the Tees Water Management Plan accompanying the CEMP. The contents of the CEMP
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:153: With regard to potential impacts of fine sediment to water quality in the Tees Bay
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:153: eliminate mobilisation of fine sediment during these works, but any mobilised
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:153: sediment would quickly dissipate in this tidal setting and because the seabed is
EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:153: expected to consist mainly of sand, any sediment will settle readily. All
EN010103-001144-NZT DCO 6.4.33 ES Vol III Appendix 14E Coastal Modelling Report.pdf:16:sediment discharges can be simulated.
EN010103-001083-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 10 EC2_B.pdf:48: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (S) 520022
EN010103-001083-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 10 EC2_B.pdf:48: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (W) 520481
EN010103-001083-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 10 EC2_B.pdf:48: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SE) 520234
EN010103-001074-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 1 EC1_A.pdf:55: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (NE) 523000
EN010103-001074-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 1 EC1_A.pdf:55: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SE) 522000
EN010103-001074-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 1 EC1_A.pdf:55: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (E) 522516
EN010103-001074-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 1 EC1_A.pdf:55: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (E) 522768
EN010103-001074-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 1 EC1_A.pdf:55: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (NE) 523000
EN010103-001074-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 1 EC1_A.pdf:56: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (W) 522516
EN010103-001074-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 1 EC1_A.pdf:56: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (S) 522500
EN010103-001074-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 1 EC1_A.pdf:56: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (W) 522334
EN010103-001074-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 1 EC1_A.pdf:56: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (W) 522734
EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:49: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:85: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request at
EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:85: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the sampling plan approved
EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:85:laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform marine licence
EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:98: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request at
EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:98: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the sampling plan approved
EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:98:laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform marine licence
EN010103-001759-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 1 - June 2022.pdf:5: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 5
EN010103-001759-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 1 - June 2022.pdf:18: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
EN010103-001759-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 1 - June 2022.pdf:28: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
EN010103-001159-NZT DCO 5.7 - Carbon Capture Readiness Assessment.pdf:4:Figure 5.1: Major sedimentary basins on the UK Continental Shelf……………………………….. 24
EN010103-001159-NZT DCO 5.7 - Carbon Capture Readiness Assessment.pdf:28:Figure 5.1: Major sedimentary basins on the UK Continental Shelf11
EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf:388:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf:397:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf:407:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf:416:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf:425:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf:441:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf:517: Nutrient Release and Sediment Oxygen Demand in a Eutrophic Land-Locked
EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf:517: DETSC 2040 Sediment Oxygen Demand contains nutrients to promote bacterial growth. The oxygen level in the supernatant liquid is monitored for up to n/a Not Accredited
EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf:517: Sediment Oxygen Demand and Biochemical Oxygen Demand: Patterns of Oxygen
EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf:522: DETSC 2325 Mercury in Soil Atomic Fluorescence Spectroscopy particulates and diluted to volume. Treatment with tin (II) chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour PSA Method – Millennium Merlin Method for Mercury in Sludge, Soils and Sediments 0.05 mg/kg MCERTS(Soils)
EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf:523: mineral soil material – Method by sieving and sedimentation
EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf:526: Fluorescence Spectroscopy Sediments.
EN010103-001792-NZT DCO 2.1a - Schedule of Changes to the draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:10:Project B, Part 3(10) the sediment sampling and analysis must be carried out at least 6 weeks prior to the
EN010103-001792-NZT DCO 2.1a - Schedule of Changes to the draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:10: the Environment Agency must be consulted on the sediment sampling plan under sub-
EN010103-001792-NZT DCO 2.1a - Schedule of Changes to the draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:10: paragraph (1) and dredging and disposal following the carrying out of the sediment
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:12: characterisation of baseline sedimentology was presented to
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:16: Draft DML Condition 10 (Sediment Sampling)
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:21: • The MMO are concerned regarding the potential impacts to local sediment
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:23: was a very large volume of sedimentology data in the River Tees from other projects and
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:23: (discharge) is less well-covered in terms of sediment data but the area is expected to comprise
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:30: Sedimentology (Slide 11, Annex A)
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:30: EW summarised the MMO’s comments on sedimentology [see extract
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:30: limitations to the usage of existing data on sediment and contaminant
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:44: not preluded sediment from disposal at sea. The PAHs).
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:44: sediment sampling will be required. We will engage with the MMO in a
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:60: number of the MMO / Cefas’ comments on sediment.
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:95:Sediment Composition
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:95:The major sediment fractions at each OWF benthic grab station are presented in Figure 2. The particle size analysis
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:95:There was little variation between the OWF stations, all being dominated by a high content of sandy sediments
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:95:(63 µm - 2 mm), with a generally low mud content (sediment <63 µm). Only station 21C had a sediment composition
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:95:containing gravel (sediment ≥2 mm), representing 11.2% of the total sediment fraction. Overall, sand represented the
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:95:highest sediment fraction across all stations (>90%), excluding station 21C (sand = 75.8%). The classification of most
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:95:Figure 2. Major sediment fractions (%) at each OWF grab sampling station considered
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:95: Station Folk and Ward Folk and Ward Mean µm Mean phi Sediment Modified Folk
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:96: Station Folk and Ward Folk and Ward Mean µm Mean phi Sediment Modified Folk
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:97:which is synonymous with sediment that has a high content of sand, with little to no fractions of mud (‘infralittoral fine
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:97:characterised by moderate to high exposure and sediments possessing a low clay/silt content, characteristic of this
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:98:The sediment content of the 2019 Teesside Net Zero subtidal benthic stations in Tees Bay, consisted of predominantly
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:98:shallow inshore area, where the level of exposure is considered to be greater (apparent from the lower sediment content
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:98:of mud), were determined to be the biotope A5.223. The stations located in slightly deeper waters, where the sediment
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:101: Intertidal phase I and phase II sampling; and Subtidal sediment grab
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:130: Subtidal sediment grab sampling
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:141: sediment testing will be carried out in consultation with the MMO.
EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:141: IC added that the works would be through bedrock and not marine sediment
EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:85: sediments and construction and operation of a
EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:27:BIO.1.28 Applicants Paragraphs 14.6.43 to 14.6.46 of ES Chapter 14 APP-096 discuss impacts from sediment
EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:74: effects to surface water quality from mobilisation of contamination in fine sediment during
EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:74: potential impacts of fine sediment to water quality in the Tees Bay arising from the construction
EN010103-001946-NZT ISH4 S2.pdf:24:There was also a slight adverse effect predicted on tees bay water body from fine sediment during the
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:25: intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and coarse
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:27:3.2.63 The SAC is a large macro-tidal coastal plain estuary with high suspended sediment
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:39: the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which has a
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:41: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:41: sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that might
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:46: the Proposed Development. This includes potential dredging (removal of sediment)
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:46: shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats, are
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:51: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:62:6.1.23 Appendix F documents an analysis by a coastal process specialist of the sediment
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:62: interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:64: for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on a raft in the
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:66: leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation) reaching
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:67: non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in the
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:68: sediment
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:68: off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:76: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:91: soft sediments in two Sydney estuaries, Australia. Marine and Freshwater
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:98: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:98: sediment process and invasive species spread impacts of the rock armour for the new or existing outfall. Effects of the rock armour are therefore taken
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:134:Sediment Transport within Tees Bay
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:134: Information from the analysis of sediment grab samples22 is provided in Figure 2 which
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:134: shows the predominant sediment type to be Medium Sand within the area of Tees Bay
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:134: Subsequent interpretation of sediment data combined with other datasets was used to
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:134: establish a conceptual sediment transport model2221 for Tees Bay, as shown in Figure 3.
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:134: This illustrates the complex nature of sediment transport processes within the bay with the
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:134: sediment transport is also indicated within the bay, a typical mechanism that has a
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:135: of tidal and wave-induced currents will be required to initiate sediment motion, potentially
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:136: surface profile of the rock armour, the scale of any sediment disturbance around its
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:136: perimeter will be small. The sediment that is disturbed will be non-cohesive sand with a
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:136: provide an indicative Zone Of Influence (ZOI) for sediment disturbed as a result of scouring
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:137: avoid interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:137: sediment transport processes are likely to be affected.
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:139:Figure 5. Location of seabed sediment grab samples (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:139:Figure 6. Tees Bay Conceptual Sediment Transport Model (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:18: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:33: subtidal sediments (10 sites each), Particle Size Distribution and Sediment
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:34: that changes to suspended sediment, for example, were to be considered within the
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:34: been undertaken for sediment dispersion at the Teesside A / Teesside C disposal
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:82:Sediment Composition
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:82:The major sediment fractions at each OWF benthic grab station are presented in Figure 2. The particle size analysis
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:82:There was little variation between the OWF stations, all being dominated by a high content of sandy sediments
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:82:(63 µm - 2 mm), with a generally low mud content (sediment <63 µm). Only station 21C had a sediment composition
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:82:containing gravel (sediment ≥2 mm), representing 11.2% of the total sediment fraction. Overall, sand represented the
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:82:highest sediment fraction across all stations (>90%), excluding station 21C (sand = 75.8%). The classification of most
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:82:Figure 2. Major sediment fractions (%) at each OWF grab sampling station considered
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:82: Station Folk and Ward Folk and Ward Mean µm Mean phi Sediment Modified Folk
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:83: Station Folk and Ward Folk and Ward Mean µm Mean phi Sediment Modified Folk
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:84:which is synonymous with sediment that has a high content of sand, with little to no fractions of mud (‘infralittoral fine
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:84:characterised by moderate to high exposure and sediments possessing a low clay/silt content, characteristic of this
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:85:The sediment content of the 2019 Teesside Net Zero subtidal benthic stations in Tees Bay, consisted of predominantly
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:85:shallow inshore area, where the level of exposure is considered to be greater (apparent from the lower sediment content
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:85:of mud), were determined to be the biotope A5.223. The stations located in slightly deeper waters, where the sediment
EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:89:that for littoral sediment), and total nitrogen deposition is forecast to be below the minimum Critical Load at
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:24: intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and coarse
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:26:3.2.63 The SAC is a large macro-tidal coastal plain estuary with high suspended sediment
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:38: the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which has a
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:40: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:40: sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that might
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:45: includes potential dredging (removal of sediment) around the water discharge,
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:45: shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats are
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:50: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:61: for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on a raft in the
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:63: leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation) reaching
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:64: non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in the
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:65: sediment
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:65: off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:69: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:83: soft sediments in two Sydney estuaries, Australia. Marine and Freshwater
EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:89: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-000890-NZT DCO 6.2 ES Vol I Cover and Contents.pdf:12: water, surface water and/or sediments) to human and/or ecological
EN010103-000890-NZT DCO 6.2 ES Vol I Cover and Contents.pdf:13: environmental samples (soil, sediment, water, etc.)
EN010103-000890-NZT DCO 6.2 ES Vol I Cover and Contents.pdf:29:SSC Suspended Sediment Concentrations - the total value of both mineral
EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:3: • a sediment control plan;
EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:9:5.5.5 Suitable measures will be put in place to prevent sediment being washed into
EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:14:Deposition of fine sediment The contractor will comply with relevant Good Practice Guidance To be confirmed in Final Appointed Contractors
EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:14: Management of Fine Sediment:
EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:14: deposition of fine sediment or other material in any existing
EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:15: to control fine sediment laden runoff;
EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:15: • To protect waterbodies from fine sediment runoff, topsoil/subsoil will
EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:23: potential for mobilisation of exposed soil and / or sediment. Although
EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:34:release of sediments to water bodies
EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:35: • Pre-construction sediment contamination testing shall be carried out
EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:35: the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:25: intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and coarse
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:27:3.2.63 The SAC is a large macro-tidal coastal plain estuary with high suspended sediment
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:39: the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which has a
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:41: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:41: sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that might
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:46: the Proposed Development. This includes potential dredging (removal of sediment)
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:46: shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats are
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:51: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:62:6.1.26 Appendix F documents an analysis by a coastal process specialist of the sediment
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:63: interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:65: for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on a raft in the
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:67: leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation) reaching
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:68: non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in the
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:68: sediment
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:69: off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:74: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:88: sediments in two Sydney estuaries, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research, 49:
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:94: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:94: sediment process and invasive species spread impacts of the rock armour for the new or existing outfall. Effects of the rock armour are therefore taken
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:132:Sediment Transport within Tees Bay
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:132: Information from the analysis of sediment grab samples21 is provided in Figure 2 which
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:132: shows the predominant sediment type to be Medium Sand within the area of Tees Bay
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:132: Subsequent interpretation of sediment data combined with other datasets was used to
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:132: establish a conceptual sediment transport model21 for Tees Bay, as shown in Figure 3. This
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:132: illustrates the complex nature of sediment transport processes within the bay with the
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:132: sediment transport is also indicated within the bay, a typical mechanism that has a
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:133: of tidal and wave-induced currents will be required to initiate sediment motion, potentially
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:134: surface profile of the rock armour, the scale of any sediment disturbance around its
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:134: perimeter will be small. The sediment that is disturbed will be non-cohesive sand with a
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:134: provide an indicative Zone Of Influence (ZOI) for sediment disturbed as a result of scouring
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:135: avoid interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:135: sediment transport processes are likely to be affected.
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:137:Figure 5. Location of seabed sediment grab samples (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:137:Figure 6. Tees Bay Conceptual Sediment Transport Model (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:46: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:87: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan request at least six
EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:87: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the approved sampling plan
EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:87:and must be undertaken by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment
EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:101: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan request at least six
EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:101: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the approved sampling plan
EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:101:and must be undertaken by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:24: intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and coarse
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:26:3.2.63 The SAC is a large macro-tidal coastal plain estuary with high suspended sediment
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:38: the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which has a
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:40: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:40: sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that might
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:45: includes potential dredging (removal of sediment) around the water discharge,
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:45: shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats are
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:50: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:61: for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on a raft in the
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:63: leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation) reaching
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:64: non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in the
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:65: sediment
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:65: off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:69: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:83: soft sediments in two Sydney estuaries, Australia. Marine and Freshwater
EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:89: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:24: intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and coarse
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:26:3.2.63 The SAC is a large macro-tidal coastal plain estuary with high suspended sediment
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:39: the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which has a
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:40: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:41: sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that might
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:46: the Proposed Development. This includes potential dredging (removal of sediment)
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:46: shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats are
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:52: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:63: for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on a raft in the
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:65: leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation) reaching
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:66: non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in the
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:67: sediment
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:67: off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:71: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:85: sediments in two Sydney estuaries, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research, 49:
EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:91: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:25: sediments and construction and operation of
EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:3: • a sediment control plan;
EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:9:5.5.5 Suitable measures will be put in place to prevent sediment being washed into
EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:14:Deposition of fine sediment The contractor will comply with relevant Good Practice Guidance To be confirmed in Final Appointed Contractors
EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:14: Management of Fine Sediment:
EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:14: deposition of fine sediment or other material in any existing
EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:15: to control fine sediment laden runoff;
EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:15: • To protect waterbodies from fine sediment runoff, topsoil/subsoil will
EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:23: potential for mobilisation of exposed soil and / or sediment. Although
EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:35:release of sediments to water bodies
EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:37: • Pre-construction sediment contamination testing shall be carried out
EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:37: the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments
EN010103-001779-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix BIO.1.39 Example Marine Pollution Contingency Plan - June 2022.pdf:58: ocean quahog (Arctica islandica), subtidal coarse sediment, subtidal mixed sediments and
EN010103-001779-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix BIO.1.39 Example Marine Pollution Contingency Plan - June 2022.pdf:76: sandwaves were also present across the area. Seabed sediments generally comprise
EN010103-001779-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix BIO.1.39 Example Marine Pollution Contingency Plan - June 2022.pdf:76: offshore circalittoral sand and offshore circalittoral coarse sediment.
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:91: due to sediment mobilisation during construction; this effect is no greater than
EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:142: water quality (mobilisation of fine sediment) in Tees Bay due to the potential
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:25: intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and coarse
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27:3.2.63 The SAC is a large macro-tidal coastal plain estuary with high suspended sediment
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:39: the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which has a
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:41: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:41: sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that might
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:46: the Proposed Development. This includes potential dredging (removal of sediment)
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:46: shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats, are
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:51: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:61:6.1.23 Appendix F documents an analysis by a coastal process specialist of the sediment
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:61: interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:63: for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on a raft in the
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:65: leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation) reaching
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:66: non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in the
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:67: sediment
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:67: off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:74: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:89: soft sediments in two Sydney estuaries, Australia. Marine and Freshwater
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:96: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:96: sediment process and invasive species spread impacts of the rock armour for the new or existing outfall. Effects of the rock armour are therefore taken
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:132:Sediment Transport within Tees Bay
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:132: Information from the analysis of sediment grab samples22 is provided in Figure 2 which
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:132: shows the predominant sediment type to be Medium Sand within the area of Tees Bay
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:132: Subsequent interpretation of sediment data combined with other datasets was used to
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:132: establish a conceptual sediment transport model22 for Tees Bay, as shown in Figure 3. This
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:132: illustrates the complex nature of sediment transport processes within the bay with the
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:132: sediment transport is also indicated within the bay, a typical mechanism that has a
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:133: of tidal and wave-induced currents will be required to initiate sediment motion, potentially
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:134: surface profile of the rock armour, the scale of any sediment disturbance around its
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:134: perimeter will be small. The sediment that is disturbed will be non-cohesive sand with a
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:134: provide an indicative Zone Of Influence (ZOI) for sediment disturbed as a result of scouring
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:135: avoid interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:135: sediment transport processes are likely to be affected.
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:136:Figure 5. Location of seabed sediment grab samples (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:137:Figure 6. Tees Bay Conceptual Sediment Transport Model (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-001090-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 17 EC2_I.pdf:18: Soil Sample Type: Sediment (W) 527255
EN010103-001090-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 17 EC2_I.pdf:18: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SW) 526836
EN010103-001090-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 17 EC2_I.pdf:30:Most of these Superficial deposits are unconsolidated sediments such as
EN010103-001090-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 17 EC2_I.pdf:31:types based on origin: igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary.
EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:27: sediments and construction and operation of
EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:12: characterisation of baseline sedimentology was presented to
EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:17: Draft DML Condition 10 (Sediment Sampling)
EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:2:Appendix C: Sediment Chemical Analysis Results ………………………………………. 14-46
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:2:Figure 14D-2: Major sediment fractions (%) at each sampling station (replicate
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:2:Figure 14D-10: Subtidal benthic EUNIS biotope and sediment classifications
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:3:Figure 14D-15: Major sediment fractions (%) at each OWF grab sampling station
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:3:Table 14D-2: Wentworth scale of particle size for defining sediment type
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:3:Table 14D-3: MMO marine sediment analysis carried out by SOCOTEC UK
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:5: stations, from which triplicate sediment grab samples were collected (Figure
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:10: seabed sediment samples. A 0.1 m2 Day grab was used to collect seabed
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:10: samples, with three replicate samples per station. In total, 69 sediment
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:10: sediment particle size analysis. Additional replicate samples were also
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:10: • 10% of sample removed for subsequent sediment particle size analysis
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:10: • the sediment sample was gently washed through a 1 mm sieve using a
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:10: PSA statistics and sediment classifications were generated from the
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:10: percentages of the sediment determined for each sediment fraction using
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:10:14.2.10 Sediment fractions were defined by size classes based on the Wentworth
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:10: sediment classes (percentage silt, sand and gravel) were also derived in
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:11: sediment based on particle sizes defined by Wentworth) (Folk, 1954).
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:11:Table 14D-2: Wentworth scale of particle size for defining sediment type
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:11:Wentworth Scale of Particle Phi units (φ)1 Sediment Type
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:11: Sediment Chemistry Analysis
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:11:Table 14D-3: MMO marine sediment analysis carried out by SOCOTEC UK Ltd.
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:13: sediment chemical data was log(x) transformed, and all abiotic data was
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:13: undertaken (Phillips et al., 2014). The status of the sediment dwelling
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:14:14.2.23 Environmental, sediment PSA and macrofaunal data obtained during the
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:14: sediment, and the biological community found. Habitats observed were
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:14:2. General Habitats Sublittoral sediment (A5)
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:15:14.3.1 The major sediment fractions at each sampling station are presented in
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:15: 1,2, and 5), most of them being dominated be sandy sediments, with a
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:15: generally low mud (sediment <63 µm) and gravel content (sediment ≥2 mm).
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:15: 5), mud represented the highest sediment fraction (>80%). The classification
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:15:Figure 14D-2: Major sediment fractions (%) at each sampling station (replicate
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:16:Station Folk and Ward Folk and Ward Mean µm Mean phi Sediment Modified Folk
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:17: Sediment Chemistry
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:17:14.3.2 Sediment samples for contaminant analysis were collected at 10 of the 23
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:17: full results of the sediment chemical analysis can be found in Appendix C.
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:17: sediment concentrations have been compared to guidelines published by
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:17:14.3.5 The Canadian sediment quality guidelines consist of Threshold Effects
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:18: assessment tool for identifying sediments in which adverse biological effects
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:26:14.3.27 The non-metric MDS plot for sediment data, presented in Figure 14D-8,
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:26: MDS plot. This gives a description of the sediment characteristics at each
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:26: percentage content of mud, sand, and gravel in the sediment of each
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:26: both the percentage sediment content of mud and water depth provided the
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:26: explanation for dissimilarity was depth and the percentage sediment content
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:27: sediment content of mud has the highest correlation value overall
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:27: abiotic variables as follows: mean particle size, depth, percentage sediment
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:27: methods of the sediment chemical analysis, the test could only be completed
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:27: and the percentage sediment content of mud also provided some
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:27: stations but also had different sediment types and exposure regimes, being
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:27: species), Simpson’s evenness, and environmental data (sediment PSA and
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:28:14.3.34 Across the subtidal benthic sampling stations, and based on the sediment
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:28: the sediment content was high in mud, were classified as ‘sublittoral mud’
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:28: mud’. The sediment content in these areas were high in mud and supported
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:29: sediment that has a high content of sand, with little to no fractions of mud
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:29: associated with sediments which are subject to higher levels of physical
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:30:Figure 14D-10: Subtidal benthic EUNIS biotope and sediment classifications map
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:33: sandy muds but can also found in mixed sediments. The substratum is
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:35: characterised by sediments of varying composition. Exposure is also likely
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:35: and sediments possessing a low clay/silt content. The latter biotope complex
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:35: 6 an increase in mud content within sediments had led to a shift in biotope
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:35: mobility of sediment in this area, as a result of the varying levels of exposure
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:36: communities within the Study Area can be explained in part by the sediment
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:36: classification of the samples, in particular the percentage sediment content
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:36: nature of sediments via the processes of siltation and erosion though biotic
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:36: factors such as inhabiting species which stabilise the sediment are also
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:36: greater proportion of ‘sand’ in this area. The sediment particle distribution
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:36: depths of <2.5 m, had sediment which contained no fractions of mud. In
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:36: can be a source of natural physical disturbance to soft sediment
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:36: sediment characteristics, sediment organic matter content, pore-water
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:36: these lower depth stations, apparent from the sediment classifications in
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:36:14.4.11 Of the physical factors the percentage content of mud within the sediment,
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:36: availability, sedimentation and temperature can be predicted using depth
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:36:14.4.12 Sediment chemistry however, was also found to be an important factor the
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:37:14.4.13 The concentrations of PAHs were compared against the sediment chemical
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:37: trace metals and PAHs adhere to sediment particles and are rapidly
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:37: absorbed into the sediment following run-off into coastal waters (Dean,
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:37: infaunal taxa (Dean, 2008). Therefore, elevated sediment contaminant
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:39: areas, the sediment content, and the putative level of exposure, being
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:41: Analysis of Unconsolidated Sediment by Sieving or Laser Granulometer.
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:41: Canadian sediment quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life. In:
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:41: composition in sedimentary rock nomenclature. The Journal of Geology,
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:42: sediment organic matter in sandy intertidal sediments (NW Atlantic coast,
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:42: concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments. Environmental
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:42: sediment analysis and sample plans. Online. Available at:
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:42: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:43: PD Teesport Ltd. (2015). Sediment Sampling Results 2015.
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:43: Snelgrove, P.V.R. and Butman, C.A. (1994). Animal-sediment relationships
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:43: sediments. The Journal of Geology, 30(5), 377 – 392.
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:44:The method used involved drying all sediments at 80°C for at least 24 hours prior to
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:44:sample was found to be <63 μm. Oven drying sediment causes the aggregation of
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:44:particles in muddy sediments (>5 % mud) and for these reasons, such sediments
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:44:visual assessment of all thawed sediment samples was undertaken prior to drying to
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:44:Frozen sediment samples were first transferred to a drying oven and thawed at 80°C
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:44:for at least six hours prior to visual assessment of sediment type and wet sieving over
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:44:24 hours prior to dry sieving. Once dry, the sediment sample was run through a series
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:44:The fine fraction residue (<1 mm sediments) was transferred to a suitable container
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:44:sediment surface. The fine fraction was analysed by laser diffraction using a wet
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:44:element Beckman Coulter LS 13320. Due to the silty nature of the sediments,
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:45: Station/ Textural Folk and Folk and Ward Mean Mean Major Sediment Modified
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:46: Station/ Textural Folk and Folk and Ward Mean Mean Major Sediment Modified
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:47: Station/ Textural Folk and Folk and Ward Mean Mean Major Sediment Modified
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:49:Appendix C : Sediment Chemical Analysis Results
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:49:Table C-1: Trace and heavy metal sediment concentrations against Cefas (2003) and Canadian guidelines (CCME, 1999)
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:49:Values exceeding sediment concentrations highlighted in corresponding colour
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:50:Table C-2: PAH sediment concentrations against Canadian guidelines (CCME, 1999) and ERLs/ ERMs (Long et al., 1995)
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:51:Values exceeding sediment concentrations highlighted in corresponding colour
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:52:Table C-3: Organotin sediment concentrations against Cefas (2003) standards
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:52:Values exceeding sediment concentrations highlighted in corresponding colour
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:52:Table C-4: PCB sediment concentrations against Cefas (2003) and Canadian guidelines (CCME 1999)
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:52:Values exceeding sediment concentrations highlighted in corresponding colour
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:53:Table C-5: Organochlorine sediment concentrations against Cefas (2003) standards and OSPAR BCs (OSPAR, 1998)
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:53:Values exceeding sediment concentrations highlighted in corresponding colour
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:69: Sediment Composition
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:69: The major sediment fractions at each OWF benthic grab station are presented in
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:69: content of sandy sediments (63 µm - 2 mm), with a generally low mud content
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:69: (sediment <63 µm). Only station 21C had a sediment composition containing gravel
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:69: (sediment ≥2 mm), representing 11.2% of the total sediment fraction. Overall, sand
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:69: represented the highest sediment fraction across all stations (>90%), excluding station
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:69: Figure 14D-15: Major sediment fractions (%) at each OWF grab sampling
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:69:Station Folk and Ward Folk and Ward Mean µm Mean phi Sediment Modified Folk
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:70:Station Folk and Ward Folk and Ward Mean µm Mean phi Sediment Modified Folk
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:72:(A5.233; SS.SSa.IFiSa.NcirBat), which is synonymous with sediment that has a high
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:72:is characterised by moderate to high exposure and sediments possessing a low
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:72:The sediment content of the 2019 Teesside Net Zero subtidal benthic stations in Tees
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:73:the level of exposure is considered to be greater (apparent from the lower sediment
EN010103-001143-NZT DCO 6.4.32 ES Vol III Appendix 14D Subtidal Benthic Ecology.pdf:73:slightly deeper waters, where the sediment content of mud was higher and as such
EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:20: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:20:Resources prevent the deposition of fine sediment or other 16: Construction environmental management plan
EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:20: material in, and the pollution by sediment of, any DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement
EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:20:ES Chapter 9 - Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water To protect waterbodies from fine sediment runoff, DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement
EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:33: exposed soil and / or sediment. Although not
EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:43:Conservation, ES Appendix 9C: WFD Assessment Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments
EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:43: Ballast Water and Sediments with the aim of (2017)
EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:44:ES Chapter 14 - Marine Ecology and Nature Pre-construction sediment contamination testing shall DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement
EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:61: • a sediment control plan;
EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:62:ES Appendices 5A - Framework CEMP, 9C - WFD Management of Fine Sediment: Measures will be DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement
EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:62:Assessment taken to prevent the deposition of fine sediment or 16: Construction Environmental Management Plan
EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:66: exposed soil and / or sediment. Although not
EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:15:ES Chapter 9 - Surface Reasonably practicable measures will be taken to prevent the deposition of fine sediment or DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1):
EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:15:Water, Flood Risk and other material in, and the pollution by sediment of, any existing waterbody, arising from Requirement 16: Construction
EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:16:ES Chapter 9 - Surface To protect waterbodies from fine sediment runoff, topsoil/subsoil will be stored a minimum of 20 DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1):
EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:26: works to reduce the potential for mobilisation of exposed soil and / or sediment. Although not
EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:34:Ecology and Nature of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments with the aim of preventing the spread of marine Invasive and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water
EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:34:Conservation, ES and Non-Native Species (INNS). All project vessels shall adhere to the International Maritime and Sediments (2017)
EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:34:ES Chapter 14 - Marine Pre-construction sediment contamination testing shall be carried out in consultation with the DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1):
EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:47: • a sediment control plan;
EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:48:ES Appendices 5A - Management of Fine Sediment: Measures will be taken to prevent the deposition of fine DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1):
EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:48:Framework CEMP, 9C - sediment or other material in any existing waterbody, arising from construction activities. this Requirement 16: Construction
EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:51: reduce the potential for mobilisation of exposed soil and / or sediment. Although not anticipated
EN010103-001077-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 4 EC1_D.pdf:19: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (NE) 522899
EN010103-001077-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 4 EC1_D.pdf:19: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SE) 522463
EN010103-001077-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 4 EC1_D.pdf:29:Most of these Superficial deposits are unconsolidated sediments such as
EN010103-001077-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 4 EC1_D.pdf:30:types based on origin: igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary.
EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:26: sediments and construction and operation of
EN010103-001087-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 14 EC2_F.pdf:77: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SW) 524952
EN010103-001087-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 14 EC2_F.pdf:77: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (N) 525052
EN010103-001087-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 14 EC2_F.pdf:77: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (S) 523724
EN010103-001087-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 14 EC2_F.pdf:77: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (NW) 525500
EN010103-001087-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 14 EC2_F.pdf:102:Most of these Superficial deposits are unconsolidated sediments such as
EN010103-001087-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 14 EC2_F.pdf:103:types based on origin: igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary.
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:81: due to sediment mobilisation during construction; this effect is no greater than
EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:133: water quality (mobilisation of fine sediment) in Tees Bay due to the potential
EN010103-001280-Rule 6 Letter.pdf:43: dredged sediment and drilling spoil;
EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:46: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:87: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan request at least six
EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:87: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the approved sampling plan
EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:87:and must be undertaken by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment
EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:101: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan request at least six
EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:101: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the approved sampling plan
EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:101:and must be undertaken by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:24: intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and coarse
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:26:3.2.63 The SAC is a large macro-tidal coastal plain estuary with high suspended sediment
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:39: the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which has a
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:40: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:41: sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that might
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:46: the Proposed Development. This includes potential dredging (removal of sediment)
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:46: shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats are
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:52: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:63: for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on a raft in the
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:65: leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation) reaching
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:66: non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in the
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:67: sediment
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:67: off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:71: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:85: sediments in two Sydney estuaries, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research, 49:
EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:91: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-001079-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 6 EC1_F.pdf:104: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (W) 523763
EN010103-001079-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 6 EC1_F.pdf:104: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (N) 524000
EN010103-001079-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 6 EC1_F.pdf:104: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (W) 523759
EN010103-001079-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 6 EC1_F.pdf:104: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SW) 523763
EN010103-001079-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 6 EC1_F.pdf:104: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SW) 523500
EN010103-001079-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 6 EC1_F.pdf:105: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (W) 523500
EN010103-001079-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 6 EC1_F.pdf:105: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (E) 523763
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:17: and water quality (i.e. fine sediments, chemical spills) during construction and
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:29: fine sediments. It is also unlikely that there will be meaningful changes in
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:32: and sediments at a minimum 20 m away from watercourses; and
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:34: construction areas (i.e. fine sediments) and impacts on water quality from
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:35: potential indirect impacts on habitat (i.e. fine sediments) and water quality
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:35: which are adapted to poor water quality and sedimentation and would not be
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:35: sensitive to short term increases in sediment, if this occurred. An incident
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:35: There will be negligible impacts on habitat (i.e. from fine sediments) and
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:36: historically modified, with a substrate largely dominated by fine sediments
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:36: and sedimentation.
EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:36: There will be minor indirect impacts on habitat (i.e. fine sediments) and water
EN010103-001824-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on the Applicants’ dDCO.pdf:15:Clay – Fine-grained sediments less than 0.0039 mm in size. Usually impermeable to fluids in the subsurface and
EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:14: sediment size does not match or there are particular constraints.
EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:3: • a sediment control plan;
EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:9:5.5.5 Suitable measures will be put in place to prevent sediment being washed into
EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:14:Deposition of fine sediment The contractor will comply with relevant Good Practice Guidance To be confirmed in Final Appointed Contractors
EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:14: Management of Fine Sediment:
EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:14: deposition of fine sediment or other material in any existing
EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:15: to control fine sediment laden runoff;
EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:15: • To protect waterbodies from fine sediment runoff, topsoil/subsoil will
EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:23: potential for mobilisation of exposed soil and / or sediment. Although
EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:35:release of sediments to water bodies
EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:37: • Pre-construction sediment contamination testing shall be carried out
EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:37: the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments
EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:52: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:87: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request at
EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:87: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the sampling plan approved
EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:87:laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform marine licence
EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:100: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request at
EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:100: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the sampling plan approved
EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:100:laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform marine licence
EN010103-001081-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 8 EC1_H.pdf:29: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (NE) 524185
EN010103-001081-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 8 EC1_H.pdf:29: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SW) 524000
EN010103-001081-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 8 EC1_H.pdf:29: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (NE) 524543
EN010103-001081-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 8 EC1_H.pdf:29: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (N) 525000
EN010103-001081-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 8 EC1_H.pdf:44:Most of these Superficial deposits are unconsolidated sediments such as
EN010103-001081-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 8 EC1_H.pdf:45:types based on origin: igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary.
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:1:Annex D - Sediment Quality ……………………………………………………………………….. 133
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:6: • Annex D Sediment Quality;
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:9: sediment composition and movement, continuity, and structure of the
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:23:sediment plumes need to be taken into account in the Screening stage (see paragraph 9.5.6 and Table 9C-10). At
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:23: sediment plumes, and this is considered in Table 9C-15 (Tees
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:23: Potential impacts from a thermal/sediment plume scoped into
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:23: Section 9.7. We can confirm that thermal and sediment
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:29: Waterbody pollutants and sediments during construction
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:29: Waterbody pollutants and sediments during construction
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:32:Further details regarding hydrodynamics, tides and sediments are provided later in the baseline.
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:32:confluence with the Tees. At low tide, fine sediments are exposed in the channel and are dark in colour suggesting potential presence of pollutants. During especially high tides anecdotal
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:33:sediment and pollution pressures were notable with an oil sheen on the water. There were very few macrophytes and the channel has incised banks, rising steeply 1-2 m abruptly from the
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:34: macrophytes. Sediments are fine with
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:34: beneath the Teesside Works bed was dominated by fine sediment
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:35: is not known, although it is sediment. Submerged macrophytes
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:35: alignment is unclear but is known bed. Fine sediment accumulations
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:36: bed was dominated by fine sediment,
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:36: sediment accumulations were
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:36: 57102 24152 and flows west into dominated by fine sediment. There are
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:36: bed dominated by fine sediment.
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:37: erode, transport and deposit sediment resulting in the formation of
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:38: attributed to diffuse pollution from contaminated waterbody bed sediments.
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:39:9.4.43 Numerous investigations of sediment quality have recently been undertaken
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:39: dredged material. These give an indication of sediment quality in the Tees
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:40: sediments. In some locations, concentrations of contaminants exceeded
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:48:sediment mobilisation, be impacted by runoff Tees Transitional WFD additional
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:48:and this sediment containing fine sediment waterbody (including downstream
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:49:requirement for a new for mobilised sediments waterbody receptors given scale
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:49:sediments during its
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:49:sediment into the water
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:53: of the waterbody, and the flow and quantity of water and sediment. Impacts
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:54:hydromorphology (i.e. and local sediment dynamics during
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:54: through mobilisation of fine sediments into the water column. There is also
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:55:clarity, temperature, from mobilisation of sediments,
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:55: contaminated sediments has been
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:56: sediments into the water column, which may contain contaminants deposited
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:56:It disturbs sediment with ✓ Potential for sediment at the outfall
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:57: physical disturbance and changes in water quality (e.g. a sediment plume
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:57:Subtidal kelp beds 175.17 Intertidal soft sediment 845.53
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:57: Subtidal soft sediments 1219.64
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:57: 2016), noting that this also includes the footprint of thermal, sediment or
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:57: Lower Sensitivity Habitat (Intertidal Soft Sediment, Subtidal Soft Sediment
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:57: potential sediment, chemical or thermal plume to be produced by the
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:59:migration, or spawning sediment that may be contaminated,
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:62: elements the seabed and local sediment dynamics
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:62:Water Quality Physico-chemical and Impacts from mobilisation of sediments, diffuse
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:62:Biology: Habitats Habitats and benthic Potential temporary sediment plume during
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:63: for conveyance of fine sediment and chemical spillages to any of these water
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:63: terms of fine sediment impacts or chemical spillages on water quality.
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:63:clarity, temperature, sediments, surface water runoff
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:64:It disturbs sediment with ✓ No direct works to the Tees
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:64: sediment anticipated.
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:65: Subtidal kelp beds 4.13 Intertidal soft sediment 400.13
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:65: Subtidal soft sediments 610.31
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:65: noting that this also includes the footprint of thermal or sediment plumes:
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:65:larger sediment would not cover this size area, given
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:65:the water sediment would not cover this size area, given
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:65:sensitivity and cobbles, intertidal soft sediment, rocky
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:66: sediment. The area affected by increased DIN
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:66:delay or prevent fish disturbance of fine sediment or
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:66: sediment.
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:67:Water Quality Physico-chemical and Potential for conveyance of fine sediment and
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:67:Biology: Fish Fish Fine sediment and chemical spillages could impact fish
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:67:Protected areas N/A Fine sediment and chemical spillages could impact fish
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:68: of soils, sediments, oils, fuels or other construction chemicals, or through
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:68: sediments, ground or groundwater, or through uncontrolled site run off;
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:68: • Temporary impacts on sediment dynamics and morphology in Tees Bay
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:69: sediment, which may eventually be transported to watercourses where it can
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:69: also be a direct source of fine sediment mobilisation, and this sediment could
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:69: sediments within Tees Bay.
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:69:9.7.7 Other potential sources of fine sediment during construction works include
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:69:9.7.8 Generally, excessive fine sediment in runoff is chemically inert and affects
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:69: sediment, debris and any contamination during these construction works to
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:69: or waterbodies directly. Like excessive fine sediment in construction site
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:70: wastewater. Fine sediment may also be disturbed in waterbodies directly or
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:70: past industrial activity, this sediment may not be inert and may potentially
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:72: management of fine sediment in surface water runoff as a result of the
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:72: of fine sediment or other material in, and the pollution by sediment of, any
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:72: control fine sediment laden runoff.
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:72: • To protect waterbodies from fine sediment runoff, topsoil/subsoil will be
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:75: direct impact to the sea bed and associated sediment mobilisation and scour
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:79: Surface Water Quality – Suspended Fine Sediment
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:79: technologies and thereby largely avoiding sediment disturbance. The
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:79: sediment on the seabed of the Tees Coastal water body. Increased
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:79: suspended sediment concentrations would result in a temporary increase in
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:79: the turbidity of the water column and could potentially (subject to sediment
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:79: sediment plume.
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:79:9.7.51 However, it is considered that any sediment plume arising from this
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:79: drainage Infrastructure has the potential to mobilise sediments e.g. soils
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:79: scale and any sediment plume would be very quickly dispersed by the
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:79: element would occur due to suspended fine sediments, nor any non-
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:80:9.7.57 Soft sediment habitats characterise much of the footprint of the marine
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:80: sediment habitats are, according to the Marine Life Information Network’s
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:81: expected. This includes the recolonisation of suitable sediments by sandeels
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:81:9.7.64 Increased suspended sediment concentrations from the construction works
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:81: Document Ref. 6.2)). However, any contaminated sediments which are
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:82: dynamic environments characterised by mobile sediments and variable
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:83: and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments with the aim of
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:83: outfall structure itself and potential sediment disturbance beneath the jack-
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:83: sediment transport, any disturbance beneath the jack-up-barge legs would
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:83: Surface Water Quality – Suspended Fine Sediment
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:83: Network. There would be the potential for conveyance of fine sediment to any
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:84: cumulative impact in terms of fine sediment impacts on water quality.
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:84:9.7.77 Measures to manage formation of excessive sediment in runoff and to
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:84: due to suspended fine sediments, nor any non-compliance with WFD
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:84: Surface Water Quality – Suspended Fine Sediment
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:85: the potential for conveyance of fine sediment to any of these water bodies
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:85:9.7.83 Measures to manage formation of excessive sediment in runoff and to
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:85: anticipated due to suspended fine sediments, nor any non-compliance with
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:85: in runoff laden with fine sediment or containing pollutants into the water body
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:102: sediments that are easy to erode. Appropriate scour protection would be
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:107:Compounds source body bed sediments bed sediments which may contain
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:111: sediment or chemical spillages) will
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:112:prevents sediment transfer implemented prevent this mitigation measure from
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:112: prevent further sediment entering the
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:112: sediment or chemical spillages) will
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:123:Ensure maintenance prevents sediment transfer Required but not yet implemented
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:127: sediment supply into the estuary from offshore areas.
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:128:B.1.11 Suspended sediment concentrations are generally low in Tees Bay and in
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:128: of fine bed sediments.
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:128: vicinity of the Proposed Development has bed sediments comprising 65-70%
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:128:B.1.15 The sediment regime in the area includes surface seabed sediments,
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:128: suspended sediments and a variety of sources and sinks. Silts and muds are
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:128: readily transported as suspended sediment load and can remain in
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:128: carried as bedload. Suspended sediment concentrations between 1500 and
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:135:Annex D - Sediment Quality
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:135:D.1.1 Numerous investigations of sediment quality have recently been undertaken
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:135: disposal of dredged material. These give an indication of sediment quality in
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:135:Table D1: Assessment of Sediment Samples Against CEFAS Action Levels for
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:135: (Royal Haskoning, 2016a) also included sediment sampling in the main Tees
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:136:D.1.4 Surface sediment samples were collected as well as sediment from a range
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:136: of depths down to 4.87 m below the surface. In summary, the sediments
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:136: notably for chromium, copper and mercury. As such these sediments were
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:136:D.1.5 Two earlier impact assessments of sediment quality were undertaken to
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:136:D.1.6 The QE II berth sediment assessment consisted of two samples immediately
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:136: sediment to a depth of 4 m below ordnance datum. Results indicated that all
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:136:D.1.7 The NGCT sediment samples were collected in 2006 from several locations
EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:136: channel and at depth than in surface sediments. In some locations,
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:2:Table 14A-1: Classification used for defining sediment type based on the
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:2:Table 14A-2: MMO marine sediment analysis carried out by SOCOTEC UK Ltd. . 14-7
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:8: Springs (MLWS) (Figure 14A-1). At each station, triplicate 0.01 m2 sediment
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:8: laboratory. An additional core sample was also taken and the sediment
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:9: PSD statistics and sediment classifications were generated from the
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:9: percentages of the sediment determined for each sediment fraction using
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:9:14.2.8 Sediment descriptions were defined by their size class based on the
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:9: sediment classes (percentage silt, sand and gravel) were also derived in
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:9:Table 14A-1: Classification used for defining sediment type based on the
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:9:Wentworth Scale Phi units (φ) Sediment Type
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:9: Sediment Chemistry Analysis
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:10:Table 14A-2: MMO marine sediment analysis carried out by SOCOTEC UK Ltd.
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:11: the substratum, either rock or sediment, and the biological community found.
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:11:2. General Habitats Sublittoral sediment (A5)
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:17: composed of medium to fine sand, with low mud content. The sediments are
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:18:14.3.12 This biotope is typically found on the mid to lower shore where sediment
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:19:14.3.15 Sediment types at each sampling station, as described by the Folk (1954)
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:19: sediments and a generally low mud content (sediments < 63 μm). Mud
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:19: gravel (sediments >2000 μm) present and therefore classified as ‘slightly
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:19: ‘fine’ sand (sediments 63 – 2000 μm).
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:19:14.3.16 The sediment types at the additional sampling stations (stations A – F), taken
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:19: Sands, being dominated by sandy sediments and a generally low mud
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:19: content (sediments < 63 μm).
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:20:Station Textural Group Classification Folk and Ward Description Folk and Ward Sorting Mean µm Mean phi Major Sediment Fractions (%) Modified Folk
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:21: Sediment Chemistry
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:21:14.3.17 Sediment samples for contaminant analysis were collected at each of the 10
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:21: sediments taken at each of the 10 sampling stations. In the absence of any
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:21: statutory thresholds, sediment concentrations have been compared to
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:21:14.3.20 The Canadian sediment quality guidelines consist of Threshold Effects
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:21: sampled exceeded either Cefas or Canadian sediment quality guidelines at
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:22: assessment tool for identifying sediments in which adverse biological effects
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:28: Sediment substrata is relatively homogenous and dominated by sand across
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:29: Bran Sands differs slightly from Cotham Sands as the sediment contains
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:29: intertidal sediments. Furthermore, no new species were recorded during the
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:29: results of the sediment samples taken during the intertidal Phase II survey
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:30: (collected in 2019 only) indicated that soft sediment shores within the study
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:30: sediment concentrations do not necessarily imply toxicity to benthic
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:31: effects on hydromorphology and specifically the sediment particle size
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:31: sediment substrata within the study area would likely alter the intertidal
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:31: sediment communities is less conclusive (Mieszkowska et al., 2013b) and
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:33: Analysis of Unconsolidated Sediment by Sieving or Laser Granulometer.
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:33: Canadian sediment quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life. In:
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:33: composition in sedimentary rock nomenclature. The Journal of Geology,
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:33: concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments. Environmental
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:34: Port of London Authority (n.d). Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines for
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:34: https://www.pla.co.uk/Environment/Canadian-Sediment-Quality-Guidelines-
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:34: sediments. The Journal of Geology, 30(5), 377 – 392.
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:35:The method used involved drying all sediments at 80°C for at least 24 hours prior to
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:35:sample was found to be <63 μm. Oven drying sediment causes the aggregation of
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:35:particles in muddy sediments (>5 % mud) and for these reasons, such sediments
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:35:visual assessment of all thawed sediment samples was undertaken prior to drying to
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:35:Frozen sediment samples were first transferred to a drying oven and thawed at 80°C
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:35:for at least six hours prior to visual assessment of sediment type and wet sieving over
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:35:24 hours prior to dry sieving. Once dry, the sediment sample was run through a
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:35:The fine fraction residue (<1 mm sediments) was transferred to a suitable container
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:35:sediment surface. The fine fraction was analysed by laser diffraction using a wet
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:35:element Beckman Coulter LS 13320. Due to the silty nature of the sediments,
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:57: sediment colour at Bran Sands lower shore station.
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:62:Table C-1: Trace and heavy metal sediment concentrations against Cefas (2003) and Canadian guidelines (CCME, 1999)
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:63:Table C-2 PAH sediment concentrations against Canadian guidelines (CCME, 1999) and ERLs/ ERMs (Long et al., 1995)
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:65:Table C-3 Organotin sediment concentrations against Cefas (2003) standards
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:65:Table C-4 PCB sediment concentrations against Cefas (2003) and Canadian guidelines (CCME 1999)
EN010103-001113-NZT DCO 6.4.29 ES Vol III Appendix 14A Intertidal Benthic Ecology Survey Report.pdf:66:Table C-5 Organochlorine sediment concentrations against Cefas (2003) standards and OSPAR BCs (OSPAR, 1998)
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:25: intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and coarse
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:27:3.2.62 The SAC is a large macro-tidal coastal plain estuary with high suspended sediment
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:40: the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which has a
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:42: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:42: sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that might
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:47: the Proposed Development. This includes potential dredging (removal of sediment)
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:47: shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats, are
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:52: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:62:6.1.23 Appendix F documents an analysis by a coastal process specialist of the sediment
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:62: interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:64: for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on a raft in the
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:66: leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation) reaching
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:67: non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in the
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:68: sediment
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:68: off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:73: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:87: soft sediments in two Sydney estuaries, Australia. Marine and Freshwater
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:94: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:94: sediment process and invasive species spread impacts of the rock armour for the new or existing outfall. Effects of the rock armour are therefore taken
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:129:Sediment Transport within Tees Bay
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:129: Information from the analysis of sediment grab samples21 is provided in Figure 2 which
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:129: shows the predominant sediment type to be Medium Sand within the area of Tees Bay
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:129: Subsequent interpretation of sediment data combined with other datasets was used to
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:129: establish a conceptual sediment transport model21 for Tees Bay, as shown in Figure 3. This
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:129: illustrates the complex nature of sediment transport processes within the bay with the
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:129: sediment transport is also indicated within the bay, a typical mechanism that has a
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:130: of tidal and wave-induced currents will be required to initiate sediment motion, potentially
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:131: surface profile of the rock armour, the scale of any sediment disturbance around its
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:131: perimeter will be small. The sediment that is disturbed will be non-cohesive sand with a
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:131: provide an indicative Zone Of Influence (ZOI) for sediment disturbed as a result of scouring
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:132: avoid interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:132: sediment transport processes are likely to be affected.
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:134:Figure 5. Location of seabed sediment grab samples (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:134:Figure 6. Tees Bay Conceptual Sediment Transport Model (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:51: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:87: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request at
EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:87: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the sampling plan approved
EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:87:laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform marine licence
EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:100: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request at
EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:100: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the sampling plan approved
EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:100:laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform marine licence
EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:20: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:53: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:90: “sediment sampling plan” means a plan that provides an adequate characterisation of material
EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:94: 11.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for
EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:94: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken—
EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:94: (a) in accordance with the sediment sampling plan approved by the MMO pursuant to sub-
EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:94: (b) by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform
EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:94: (3) Details of the sediment sampling and analysis undertaken pursuant to sub-paragraph (2) must
EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:94: (4) No dredging and disposal activities may be undertaken until the details of sediment sampling
EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:101: “sediment sampling plan” means a plan that provides an adequate characterisation of material
EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:106: 11.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for
EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:106: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken—
EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:106: (a) in accordance with the sediment sampling plan approved by the MMO pursuant to sub-
EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:106: (b) by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform
EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:106: (3) Details of the sediment sampling and analysis undertaken pursuant to sub-paragraph (2) must
EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:106: (4) No dredging and disposal activities may be undertaken until the details of sediment sampling
EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:25: sediments and construction and operation of
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:9: • determine characteristics of seabed sediments;
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:13:and Sedimentology Directive as ‘sandbanks which are slightly covered by sea water at all times’, such as Dogger Bank SAC and the North Norfolk Sandbanks SAC.
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:13: and inhabit sandy sediments, which are the dominant sediment type for this habitat. Within the SNS MNA, seabed substrates generally consist of
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:13: sandy gravel close to the shore, whereas further Offshore the sediments mainly consist of sand with patches of gravel, sandy mud and sandy gravel.
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:13: Likewise, according to UKOOA (2001), the southern sector tends to have coarser sediments with a relatively low proportion of silt/clay.
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:13: the sediment has a higher proportion of mud. The nearshore seabed is composed of an assortment of mixed sediments, with more muddy and sandy
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:13: gravel and fewer areas of sand. Where gravelly sediments are consolidated and stable, an associated rich fauna more characteristic of rocky areas
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:13: close to shore. Deep circalittoral sand deep circalittoral coarse sediment are predicted as the most widespread habitats, with the former more
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:13:Benthic Ecology As a result of the mosaic of different sediment types within the SNS MNA, a wide variety of habitats are present in this region. In terms of broad
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:13: Callianassa subterranean and the cumacean crustacean Eudorella truncactula. Coarser sediments in less than 30m are typified by two communities,
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:14: Teesside, muddier sediments have been found to prevail, and were characterised by the presence of Nephrops novergicus and a reduced frequency
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:17: changes in Suspended Sediment in the Final CEMP. For Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources specifically, key
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:17: • temporary impacts on morphology of the • all reasonably practicable measures will be taken to prevent the deposition of fine sediment
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:20: species from increased suspended sediment includes:
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:20: • pre-construction sediment contamination testing shall be carried out in consultation with the
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:26: contained with seabed sediments; developed. A preliminary list of likely mitigation to be employed has been developed based on the
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:26: • increases in Suspended Sediment • the Environmental & Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) process will include a formal public
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:31: • Increase in Suspended Sediment Concentrations and associated
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:31: Suspended Sediment Concentrations (i.e. Turbidity) and Deposition
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:35: Suspended Sediment Concentrations (i.e. Turbidity) and Deposition
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:46: sediments to water bodies; and • indirect effects to marine ecology
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:47: increased suspended sediment
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:58: geological store. sediment concentrations (i.e. porpoise (Phocoena phocoena), the
EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:60: seabed sediments; appropriate control and mitigation
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:12: characterisation of baseline sedimentology was presented to
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:16: Draft DML Condition 10 (Sediment Sampling)
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:21: • The MMO are concerned regarding the potential impacts to local sediment
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:23: was a very large volume of sedimentology data in the River Tees from other projects and
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:23: (discharge) is less well-covered in terms of sediment data but the area is expected to comprise
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:30: Sedimentology (Slide 11, Annex A)
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:30: EW summarised the MMO’s comments on sedimentology [see extract
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:30: limitations to the usage of existing data on sediment and contaminant
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:44: not preluded sediment from disposal at sea. The PAHs).
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:44: sediment sampling will be required. We will engage with the MMO in a
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:60: number of the MMO / Cefas’ comments on sediment.
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95:Sediment Composition
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95:The major sediment fractions at each OWF benthic grab station are presented in Figure 2. The particle size analysis
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95:There was little variation between the OWF stations, all being dominated by a high content of sandy sediments
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95:(63 µm - 2 mm), with a generally low mud content (sediment <63 µm). Only station 21C had a sediment composition
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95:containing gravel (sediment ≥2 mm), representing 11.2% of the total sediment fraction. Overall, sand represented the
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95:highest sediment fraction across all stations (>90%), excluding station 21C (sand = 75.8%). The classification of most
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95:Figure 2. Major sediment fractions (%) at each OWF grab sampling station considered
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95: Station Folk and Ward Folk and Ward Mean µm Mean phi Sediment Modified Folk
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:96: Station Folk and Ward Folk and Ward Mean µm Mean phi Sediment Modified Folk
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97:which is synonymous with sediment that has a high content of sand, with little to no fractions of mud (‘infralittoral fine
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97:characterised by moderate to high exposure and sediments possessing a low clay/silt content, characteristic of this
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:98:The sediment content of the 2019 Teesside Net Zero subtidal benthic stations in Tees Bay, consisted of predominantly
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:98:shallow inshore area, where the level of exposure is considered to be greater (apparent from the lower sediment content
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:98:of mud), were determined to be the biotope A5.223. The stations located in slightly deeper waters, where the sediment
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:101: Intertidal phase I and phase II sampling; and Subtidal sediment grab
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:130: Subtidal sediment grab sampling
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:141: sediment testing will be carried out in consultation with the MMO.
EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:141: IC added that the works would be through bedrock and not marine sediment
EN010103-001078-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 5 EC1_E.pdf:34: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SE) 523456
EN010103-001078-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 5 EC1_E.pdf:34: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (E) 523456
EN010103-001078-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 5 EC1_E.pdf:34: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (W) 523456
EN010103-001078-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 5 EC1_E.pdf:34: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (N) 523568
EN010103-001078-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 5 EC1_E.pdf:34: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (W) 523355
EN010103-001078-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 5 EC1_E.pdf:50:Most of these Superficial deposits are unconsolidated sediments such as
EN010103-001078-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 5 EC1_E.pdf:51:types based on origin: igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary.
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:25: intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and coarse
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:27:3.2.63 The SAC is a large macro-tidal coastal plain estuary with high suspended sediment
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:39: the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which has a
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:41: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:41: sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that might
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:47: the Proposed Development. This includes potential dredging (removal of sediment)
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:47: shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats are
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:52: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:63:6.1.26 Appendix F documents an analysis by a coastal process specialist of the sediment
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:64: interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:66: Critical Load for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:68: leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation) reaching
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:69: toxic or non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:70: sediment
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:70: run-off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:90: sediments in two Sydney estuaries, Australia. Marine and Freshwater Research, 49:
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:96: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:96: habitat loss, sediment process and invasive species spread impacts of the rock armour for the new or existing outfall, to be effectively neutral on foraging
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:134:Sediment Transport within Tees Bay
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:134: Information from the analysis of sediment grab samples21 is provided in Figure 2 which
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:134: shows the predominant sediment type to be Medium Sand within the area of Tees Bay
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:134: Subsequent interpretation of sediment data combined with other datasets was used to
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:134: establish a conceptual sediment transport model21 for Tees Bay, as shown in Figure 3. This
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:134: illustrates the complex nature of sediment transport processes within the bay with the
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:134: sediment transport is also indicated within the bay, a typical mechanism that has a
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:135: of tidal and wave-induced currents will be required to initiate sediment motion, potentially
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:136: surface profile of the rock armour, the scale of any sediment disturbance around its
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:136: perimeter will be small. The sediment that is disturbed will be non-cohesive sand with a
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:136: provide an indicative Zone Of Influence (ZOI) for sediment disturbed as a result of scouring
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:137: avoid interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:137: sediment transport processes are likely to be affected.
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:139:Figure 5. Location of seabed sediment grab samples (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:139:Figure 6. Tees Bay Conceptual Sediment Transport Model (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:46: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:81: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan request at least six
EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:81: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the approved sampling plan
EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:81:and must be undertaken by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment
EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:93: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan request at least six
EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:93: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the approved sampling plan
EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:93:and must be undertaken by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment
EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:47: (d) a sediment control plan;
EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:84: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request at
EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:84: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the approved sampling plan
EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:84:undertaken by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform
EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:97: 10.—(1) The relevant undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO request at
EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:97: (2) The sediment sampling and analysis must be undertaken against the approved sampling plan
EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:97:undertaken by a laboratory which has been validated by the MMO for sediment analysis to inform
EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:32: superimposed tills and interbedded water laid sediments could be a result
EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:34: They consist of unconsolidated sediment, mainly mud and / or sand. They
EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:35: sand, silt and clay) sediments”.
EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:270: contaminated sediment. if practical.
EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:270: Pre-works sediment sampling as per Marine
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:1:Table 9-13: Assessment of Sediment Samples Against Cefas Action Levels for
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:17:sediment contamination affecting the so is no longer included in this
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:17:sediments listed over CEFAS level 1.
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:18:continue to impact the River Tees. disturbance of bed sediment in the Nature Conservation (ES
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:19:siltation and sediment movement, (ES Volume I, Document Ref. 6.2)
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:19:sediments (i.e. compacted below the Document Ref. 6.4).
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:19:of the River Tees on sediment Report.
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:19:polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons disposal of sediment is no longer
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:19:sediment from disposal at sea. The
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:19:ethers (PBDEs) or organotin content disposal of sediment is no longer
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:20:required for various dredging disposal of sediment is no longer
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:20:pre-application sediment sampling Development. Engagement with
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:20:MMO could not find a detailed A baseline of sediment quality for Refer to Section
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:20:breakdown of the sediments within the Study Area is included within 9.4Baseline.
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:20:sediment dynamics. Tees Estuary.
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:32: deposit sediment resulting in the formation of geomorphic bedforms that result in
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:34:and is currently occupied by various heavy industries. Further details regarding hydrodynamics, tides and sediments are provided later in the baseline.
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:34:Tees. At low tide, fine sediments are exposed in the channel and are dark in colour suggesting potential presence of pollutants. During especially high tides anecdotal
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:35:was smothered in fine sediment and pollution pressures were notable with an oil sheen on the water. There were very few macrophytes and the channel has incised
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:36: macrophytes. Sediments are fine with
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:36: beneath the Teesside Works bed was dominated by fine sediment
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:37: is not known, although it is fine sediment. Submerged
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:37: course alignment is unclear but bed. Fine sediment accumulations
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:38: bed was dominated by fine sediment,
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:38: Significant sediment accumulations
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:38: 57102 24152 and flows west bed was dominated by fine sediment.
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:38: bed dominated by fine sediment.
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:41: the estuary bed (Royal Haskoning, 2016a). This effect leads to a net sediment
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:42:9.4.27 Suspended sediment concentrations are generally low in Tees Bay and in the
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:42: of fine bed sediments.
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:42: the Proposed Development has bed sediments comprising 65-70% silt, with
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:42:9.4.31 The sediment regime in the area includes surface seabed sediments,
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:42: suspended sediments and a variety of sources and sinks. Silts and muds are
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:42: readily transported as suspended sediment load and can remain in
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:42: carried as bedload. Suspended sediment concentrations between 1500 and
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:44: pollution from contaminated waterbody bed sediments.
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:48: Sediment Quality
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:48:9.4.53 Numerous investigations of sediment quality have recently been undertaken
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:48: of dredged material. These give an indication of sediment quality in the Tees
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:49:Table 9-13: Assessment of Sediment Samples Against Cefas Action Levels for
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:49: Haskoning, 2016a) also included sediment sampling in the main Tees Estuary
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:49:9.4.56 Surface sediment samples were collected as well as sediment from a range
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:49: of depths down to 4.87 m below the surface. In summary, the sediments
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:49: chromium, copper and mercury. As such these sediments were not considered
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:50:9.4.57 Two earlier impact assessments of sediment quality were undertaken to
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:50:9.4.58 The QE II berth sediment assessment consisted of two samples immediately
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:50: sediment to a depth of 4 m below ordnance datum. Results indicated that all
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:50:9.4.59 The NGCT sediment samples were collected in 2006 from several locations
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:50: and at depth than in surface sediments. In some locations, concentrations of
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:64: sediments. It is also important for the dilution and dispersion of treated/untreated
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:64: Proposed Development. It is also possible that fine sediments are contaminated
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:64: and with estimated Q95 >0.001m3/s. It is also possible that fine sediments are
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:64: sediments are contaminated and that these may be leaching into the water
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:65: m3/s. It is also possible that fine sediments are contaminated and that these may
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:65: >0.001 m3/s. It is also possible that fine sediments are contaminated and that
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:65: >0.001 m3/s. It is also possible that fine sediments are contaminated and that
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:67: for full details). Fine sediment may also be disturbed in waterbodies directly or
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:68: industrial activity, this sediment may not be inert and may potentially contain
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:70:9.5.11 Measures to manage fine sediment in surface water runoff as a result of
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:70: of excessive fine sediment in runoff (timing of works, minimising earthworks
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:70: fine sediment (e.g. settlement lagoons, sumps, spraying on to land or even
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:70: direct impact to the sea bed and associated sediment mobilisation and scour
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:71: direct impact to the sea bed and associated sediment mobilisation and scour.
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:78: of soils, sediments, oils, fuels or other construction chemicals, or through
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:78: sediments, ground or groundwater, or through uncontrolled site run off.
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:78: • Temporary impacts on sediment dynamics and morphology in Tees Bay
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:79: sediment mobilisation, and this sediment could contain contaminants given
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:79: Study Area may also contain contaminated sediments due to the past industry
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:79: watercourses. Other potential sources of fine sediment during construction
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:79: Surface Water Quality – Suspended Fine Sediments
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:79: avoiding significant sediment disturbance. The discharge pipeline would then
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:79: similar) has the potential to temporarily disturb sediment on the seabed of the
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:79: Tees Coastal waterbody. Increased suspended sediment concentrations
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:79: could potentially (subject to sediment properties and chemical composition)
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:79: cause an oxygen demand within the sediment plume.
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:80: for longer than coarser substrates (e.g. sand which typifies the sediment found
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:80:9.6.10 In light of this, the release of suspended sediment and subsequent deposition
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:80:9.6.11 Sediment chemistry investigations in Tees Bay show very low levels of
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:80: sediment bound contaminants in this area (Appendix 14A: Intertidal Benthic
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:80: mobilisation of sediments in Tees Bay is not considered to pose a
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:80: contamination risk and any disturbed sediments would disperse and settle out
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:80:9.6.12 It is not considered that any sediment plume arising from MBT construction
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:80:9.6.15 There would be the potential for conveyance of fine sediment to any of these
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:80: there is potential for a cumulative impact in terms of fine sediment impacts on
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:80: receive runoff laden with fine sediment may eventually discharge to Tees Bay
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:81: suspended sediment in runoff would be negligible with the mitigation
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:81:9.6.19 Given the embedded mitigation to deal with fine sediment from runoff and
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:82: the subtidal seabed for the outfall structure itself and potential sediment
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:82: waterbody with significant sediment transport, any disturbance beneath the
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:82: temporarily stored on the floodplain. Sediment, construction materials and
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:90: erosion), or unconsolidated fine sediments that are easy to erode. Appropriate
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:98: dispersion of sediment and WBM. However, provided that standard and good
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:98: regard to mobilisation of sediment, but no other significant effects.
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:99:sediments Bay), Belasis Beck: Very CEMP and WMP
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:107: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies.
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:108: Environmental Statement Section 7 Marine Sediment and Water Quality
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:108: ES%20Section%207%20Marine%20sediment%20and%20water%20quality.
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:108: Environmental Statement Appendix 7.2 Sediment Quality Data Online.
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:108: Environmental Statement Section 5 Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary
EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:108: ES%20Section%205%20Hydrodynamic%20and%20sedimentary%20regim
EN010103-001141-NZT DCO 6.4.30 ES Vol III Appendix 14B Fisheries and Fish Ecology Baseline Part 3.pdf:40:14.6.48 Dover sole is a nocturnal feeder spending the day buried in bottom sediment
EN010103-001141-NZT DCO 6.4.30 ES Vol III Appendix 14B Fisheries and Fish Ecology Baseline Part 3.pdf:41: grounds. Fine sandy sediments allow juveniles to bury themselves and hide
EN010103-001141-NZT DCO 6.4.30 ES Vol III Appendix 14B Fisheries and Fish Ecology Baseline Part 3.pdf:42:14.6.58 Sandeel spend a large proportion of the year buried in the sediment, only
EN010103-001141-NZT DCO 6.4.30 ES Vol III Appendix 14B Fisheries and Fish Ecology Baseline Part 3.pdf:43: juveniles in the winter when they burrow into the sediment (Macer, 1966;
EN010103-001141-NZT DCO 6.4.30 ES Vol III Appendix 14B Fisheries and Fish Ecology Baseline Part 3.pdf:44: cohesive muddy sediments, in which they construct their burrows (Howard,
EN010103-001141-NZT DCO 6.4.30 ES Vol III Appendix 14B Fisheries and Fish Ecology Baseline Part 3.pdf:44: 1989). The type of sediment also dictates the structure of the Nephrops
EN010103-001141-NZT DCO 6.4.30 ES Vol III Appendix 14B Fisheries and Fish Ecology Baseline Part 3.pdf:44: smaller sized individuals, whilst fine sediment is characterised by lower
EN010103-001141-NZT DCO 6.4.30 ES Vol III Appendix 14B Fisheries and Fish Ecology Baseline Part 3.pdf:45: abdomen. At this time, females do not feed and remain in pits in the sediment
EN010103-001141-NZT DCO 6.4.30 ES Vol III Appendix 14B Fisheries and Fish Ecology Baseline Part 3.pdf:53: M.R. (2005). Identifying Sandeel Ammodytes marinus sediment habitat
EN010103-001080-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 7 EC1_G.pdf:132: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SW) 524154
EN010103-001080-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 7 EC1_G.pdf:132: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (S) 524000
EN010103-001080-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 7 EC1_G.pdf:132: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SE) 523500
EN010103-001080-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 7 EC1_G.pdf:132: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (N) 525000
EN010103-001080-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 7 EC1_G.pdf:223:Most of these Superficial deposits are unconsolidated sediments such as
EN010103-001080-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 7 EC1_G.pdf:224:types based on origin: igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary.
EN010103-001602-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 3 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – EQUINOR NEW ENERGY LIMITED.pdf:136:Born: 1961 Business, a PhD, Reservoir Characterisation, Geology/Sedimentology from University of Reading as
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:17: surveys, consisting of sediment grab sampling, also undertaken. The subtidal
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:21: (Document Ref. 2.1). This includes sediment
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:23:will be located on current sedimentary habitat or a
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:26:Sedimentology within the marine environment has been
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:26:sediment contamination affecting the water Chapter (see paragraphs 14.6.32 and 14.6.53).
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:26:leachate samples from marine sediments listed Level 1 with some material between Action Level
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:26: reduces the risk of disturbance of sediment with a
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:28: this included aspects of thermal modelling, sedimentology and potential
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:31:14.4.21 Sediment samples collected from the 10 intertidal stations and 10 of the 23
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:33: intertidal sediments within the Study Area showed no evidence of contaminant
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:33: species. This is also consistent with historical sedimentological data which
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:33: clearly indicates that sediments within the inner reaches of River Tees are
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:33: sedimentological characterisation database surrounding the Site were
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:33: high exposure and sediments possessing a low clay / silt content. The latter
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:34: an increase in mud content within sediments had led to a shift in biotope from
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:34: mobility of sediment in this area, as a result of the varying levels of exposure
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:34:14.4.35 Samples analysed for sediment chemistry found elevated levels of both trace
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:34: estuary. There was little evidence to suggest the presence of wider sediment
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:34: the localised contamination of sediments within the mouth of the Tees Estuary7
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:43: and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments with the aim of
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:44: high levels of fine sediment or contaminants;
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:45: runoff, spillage risk and the dispersion of suspended sediments are outlined
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:45: where dredging and disposal is required, pre-construction sediment
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:49:Sediment Concentrations (i.e. Turbidity) ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:52: substrate, in an otherwise sediment type seabed. Beneficial effects to benthic
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:53: sediment habitats, such as those which characterise much of the footprint of
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:55: This includes the ability of sandeels to recolonise nearby suitable sediments
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:56: Suspended Sediment Concentrations (i.e. Turbidity) and Deposition
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:56: suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) (i.e. turbidity) and create a
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:56: sediment plume (with associated deposition effects) within the marine
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:56: discharge of fine sediment in surface water run-off to the Tees Estuary
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:56: the mobilisation of sediment at the break-out point where the MBT
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:56: levels. The release and re-deposition of sediment-bound contaminants also
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:56: receptors from SSC, deposition and the release of sediment-bound
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:57: DHV UK Ltd., 2015b). Sediments released rapidly settled to the seabed
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:57: (e.g. sand which typifies the sediment found in Tees Bay) because of the
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:57: deposition of WBM greater than 3 mm, where effects to sediment oxygen
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:57:14.6.39 Barite is a naturally occurring material originating in sedimentary rock types,
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:57:14.6.40 In light of this, the release of suspended sediment and subsequent deposition
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:57:14.6.41 Sediment chemistry investigations in Tees Bay show very low levels of
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:57: sediment bound contaminants in this area (Appendix 14D, ES Volume III,
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:57: sediments of the Estuary (e.g. see PD Teesport Ltd, 2015). The concentration
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:57: Document Ref. 6.4). For more information on sediment quality results, see
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:57:where drill cuttings were added to benthic sediment box-core samples.
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:58: Document Ref. 6.2). Thus, the mobilisation of sediments in Tees Bay, is not
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:58: considered to pose a contamination risk and any disturbed sediments would
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:58:14.6.43 Epifaunal abundance within the ZoI for turbidity and sediment deposition
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:58: that exhibit low sensitivity to disturbance and increased suspended sediments
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:58: temporary. As the sediment at the dredge location is predominantly sand and
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:58: Similarly, seabed sediment mobilised as the MBT machine breaks-out in the
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:58: sediment oxygen concentration and the structure of benthic communities have
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:58: pathways on sediment habitats and communities from increased turbidity and
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:59: plume of sediment which could present a barrier to migration.
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:59: mobile sediments and variable turbidity, and so there is considered limited
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:59: sediments following completion of the works. Water currents would also be
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:59: expected to disperse SSC and remove overlying deposited sediments. Thus,
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:59:14.6.51 Sediment dispersion modelling, undertaken for existing consented
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:100: backfilling of the outfall head void as soft sediments would be able to recover
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:104: of habitat that is representative of the Estuary in terms of sediment type and
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:104: completion, likely within 1-2 years (MarLIN, 2021). Soft sediments, such as
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:104: Suspended Sediment Concentrations (i.e. Turbidity) and Deposition
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:104: sediment-bound contaminants) is predicted to occur for all of the assessed
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:104: smothering and toxicity from the release of sediment-bound contaminants may
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:108:14.10.9 Soft sediment habitats are known to be highly resilient to direct physical
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:108: However, the pipeline is to be buried under the sediment, meaning any habitat
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:109: Increased Suspended Sediment Concentrations (i.e.
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:109: potential to increase suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) (i.e. turbidity)
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:109: and create a sediment plume within the marine environment:
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:110: sediments settle out. Both increased turbidity and deposition can cause
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:110: effects to higher trophic levels. The release and re-deposition of sediment-
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:110:14.10.20 In general, the release of suspended sediment and subsequent
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:110:14.10.21 In Tees Bay and the surrounding area, information on sediment
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:110: contaminant sampling is somewhat limited. However, sediment sampling as
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:110: sediment contamination in the wind farm site were below Canadian sediment
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:110: contaminated sediments are disturbed during the construction phase, these
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:110: HDD bores, may result in the mobilisation of sediment which would increase
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:110: SSC and turbidity. Considering that the sediment surrounding the footprint of
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:110: to the area of disturbance. In both HDD drilling scenarios, any sediment
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:111:14.10.26 Sediments will be mobilised during burial (e.g. by jetting or ploughing) of
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:111: which limits the size of the footprint, and the sandy sediments will rapidly settle
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:111: on sediment habitats and communities from increased turbidity and deposition
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:111: impacts to turbidity, a plume of sediment is unlikely to present a barrier to
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:111: deposited sediments. This means that the risk of displacement and
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:113: sediment, the sound source levels as a result of this activity are expected to
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:115: Canadian sediment quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic life. In:
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:119: for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:119: Sediments-(BWM).aspx 10/05/2021.
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:120: concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments. Environmental
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:120: sediment analysis and sample plans. Online. Available at:
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:120: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:121: PD Teesport Ltd. (2015). Sediment Sampling Results 2015.
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:124: Effects of sedimentation from water-based drill cuttings and natural
EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:124: sediment on benthic macrofaunal community structure and ecosystem
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:39: greater potential for dispersion of sediment and Document Ref. 6.2). No
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:39: mobilisation of fine sediments, resulting in a Resources (ES Volume I, Estuary (for water quality
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:39: Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources additional mitigation of fine sediment). All
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:39: sediments or spillages to Tees Estuary,
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:40: waterbody and Kettle Beck watercourse, mobilisation of fine sediments, resulting in a Resources (ES Volume I, Bay (for water quality with
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:40: significant cumulative effects during construction additional mitigation fine sediment). All other
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:41: waterbody), and so there is potential for receptor) due to mobilisation of fine sediments, Resources (ES Volume I, Operation: Neutral -slight
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:44: for dispersion of sediment and water-based mud (WBM). However, provided
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:44: mobilisation of fine sediment. There are no other significant cumulative
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:44: (temporary and localised, and related to the mobilisation of fine sediment)
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:67: sediment concentration (SSC) (i.e. turbidity) (including deposition of
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:68: sediment concentrations (i.e. turbidity)
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:68: sediment concentrations (i.e. turbidity)
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:71: sediment concentrations (i.e. turbidity)
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:73: estuary in terms of sediment type and in faunal communities. Habitat loss
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:73: completion, likely within 1-2 years. Soft sediments, such as those which
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:73: Suspended Sediment Concentrations (i.e. Turbidity) and Deposition
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:73: deposition of sediment-bound contaminants) is predicted to occur for all of
EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:74: with increased SSC, smothering and toxicity from the release of sediment-
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:25: intertidal sediment flats in the country. It comprises extensive fine sand and coarse
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:27:3.2.63 The SAC is a large macro-tidal coastal plain estuary with high suspended sediment
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:39: the habitat associated with this species on APIS is littoral sediment, which has a
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:41: sediments, potentially still affecting the benthic fauna.
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:41: sediment analysis has shown no evidence of high contaminant levels that might
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:46: Development. This includes potential dredging (removal of sediment) around the
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:46: shore. However, soft sediments, which characterise much of the marine habitats, are
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:51: sediment around the outfall pipe). However, this impact pathway will be assessed in
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:61:6.1.23 Appendix F documents an analysis by a coastal process specialist of the sediment
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:61: interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:63: for littoral sediment and the common terns are understood to nest on a raft in the
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:65: leaking machinery, inappropriate storage of materials and sedimentation) reaching
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:66: non-toxic pollutants or sediments) have the potential to lead to changes in the
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:67: sediment
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:67: off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:75: pipeline from below MLWS to and sediment dispersal impacts of pipeline installation and construction/decommissioning on the
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:90: soft sediments in two Sydney estuaries, Australia. Marine and Freshwater
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:97: littoral sediment, which has a relatively high nitrogen tolerance (a minimum critical load of 20 kgN/ha/yr). Total nitrogen deposition at the closest part of the
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:97: sediment process and invasive species spread impacts of the rock armour for the new outfall. Effects of the rock armour are therefore taken forward to
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:133:Sediment Transport within Tees Bay
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:133: Information from the analysis of sediment grab samples22 is provided in Figure 2 which
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:133: shows the predominant sediment type to be Medium Sand within the area of Tees Bay
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:133: Subsequent interpretation of sediment data combined with other datasets was used to
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:133: establish a conceptual sediment transport model22 for Tees Bay, as shown in Figure 3. This
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:133: illustrates the complex nature of sediment transport processes within the bay with the
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:133: sediment transport is also indicated within the bay, a typical mechanism that has a
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:134: of tidal and wave-induced currents will be required to initiate sediment motion, potentially
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:135: surface profile of the rock armour, the scale of any sediment disturbance around its
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:135: perimeter will be small. The sediment that is disturbed will be non-cohesive sand with a
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:135: provide an indicative Zone Of Influence (ZOI) for sediment disturbed as a result of scouring
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:136: avoid interfering with wave propagation that could in turn affect sediment transport
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:136: sediment transport processes are likely to be affected.
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:137:Figure 5. Location of seabed sediment grab samples (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:138:Figure 6. Tees Bay Conceptual Sediment Transport Model (source: ABPmer (2004))
EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18:Resources prevent the deposition of fine sediment or other 16: Construction environmental management plan
EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18: material in, and the pollution by sediment of, any DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement
EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19:ES Chapter 9 - Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water To protect waterbodies from fine sediment runoff, DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement
EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:32: exposed soil and / or sediment. Although not
EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:42:Conservation, ES Appendix 9C: WFD Assessment Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments
EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:42: Ballast Water and Sediments with the aim of (2017)
EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:43:ES Chapter 14 - Marine Ecology and Nature Pre-construction sediment contamination testing shall DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement
EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:59: • a sediment control plan;
EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:60:ES Appendices 5A - Framework CEMP, 9C - WFD Management of Fine Sediment: Measures will be DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement
EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:60:Assessment taken to prevent the deposition of fine sediment or 16: Construction Environmental Management Plan
EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:64: exposed soil and / or sediment. Although not
EN010103-002322-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:85:sediment discharges can be simulated.
EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:48: Adherence to ballast water, sediments and biofouling regulations to
EN010103-001082-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 9 EC2_A.pdf:33: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SE) 519470
EN010103-001082-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 9 EC2_A.pdf:33: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SE) 520091
EN010103-001082-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 9 EC2_A.pdf:33: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SE) 519851
EN010103-001082-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 9 EC2_A.pdf:53:Most of these Superficial deposits are unconsolidated sediments such as
EN010103-001082-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A Annex B Part 9 EC2_A.pdf:54:types based on origin: igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary.
EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:28: the uncontrolled discharge of sediment-rich water.
EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:32: storage of fuels and chemicals and from the off-site migration of sediment-rich
EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:34: off, dispersion of suspended sediments and spillage risk in the
EN010103-001778-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix DLV.1.7 LCA Extracts - June 2022.pdf:23: sediments. Mud characterises the areas offshore around routes.
EN010082-000499-_DOC_40066269(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Clean).pdf:18: management plan, a sediment control plan and monitoring measures.
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:21:compared with a CL (min) of 8 kg N/ha/yr for supralittoral sediment), and
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:27: qualifying interest bird species include supralittoral sediment (acidic and calcareous type), littoral sediment and
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:27: standing open water and canals. The supralittoral and littoral sediment habitat types were assessed during the air
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:29: qualifying interest bird species include supralittoral sediment (acidic and calcareous type), littoral sediment and
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:29: standing open water and canals. The supralittoral and littoral sediment habitat types were assessed during the air
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:37: Teesmouth Supralittoral sediment (acidic
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:37: Supralittoral sediment
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:37: Supralittoral sediment
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:37: Littoral sediment supporting:
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:38: Supralittoral sediment (acidic
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:38: Supralittoral sediment
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:38: Supralittoral sediment
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:39: Littoral sediment supporting:
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:40: Teesmouth and Supralittoral sediment (acidic type) supporting:
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:40: Supralittoral sediment (calcareous type)
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:40: Supralittoral sediment supporting:
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:41: Littoral sediment supporting:
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:41: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type) supporting:
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:41: Supralittoral sediment (calcareous type)
EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:41: Littoral sediment supporting:
EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: 1, and sediment traps, as required. Contractor environment management
EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: Chapter sediment laden runoff. plan (‘CEMP’)
EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: Chapter discharges or sediment laden runoff, and will where plan (‘CEMP’)
EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: will transit through a temporary sedimentation
EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: 44. Volume At the pre-construction stage a separate Sediment Construction Main Works Sediment Control 13.Construction
EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:18: 73. Volume Use of temporary bunds, site drainage and sediment Decommissioning Main Works DCO 25. Decommissioning
EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:19: 75. Volume Use of sediment traps, as required. Decommissioning Main Works DCO 25. Decommissioning
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:175: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000520-8.46 - DOC_140207101(1)_DCO changes summary.pdf:6:Schedule 1 Insertion “a materials management plan; a sediment control plan; and These items have been included following FWQ 1.5.8 to ensure they are secured through
EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:17: sediment laden runoff;
EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:30: works will include monitoring of water discharges or sediment
EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:30: water will transit through a temporary sedimentation tank with
EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:30: and / or sediment laden runoff.
EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:31: sediment load; and
EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:33: At the pre-construction stage a separate Sediment Control Plan (SCP) will be designed and
EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:40: Plan; Sediment throughout of each
EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:40:Construction bunds, temporary site drainage and sediment traps will be installed as required. EPC Contractor
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: DCO. The CEMP is also envisaged to include details of waste management and a sediment
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:25: of till / glacial diamicton (terrigenous sediment that is unsorted / poorly
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: (e.g. from paints), an increase in total suspended solids from sediment
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:47:near surface and sediment traps, as
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:48: and sediment traps, as
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:48:excavation, sediments to materials by water drainage to the
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:48:historic and features by surface and sediment traps, as
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:50: sediment laden runoff
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:50:traffic on-Site, sediment sediments by industry-standard Significant
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:50: local drainage • Use of sediment traps, as
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:50:traffic on-Site, sediment sediments by industry-standard Significant
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:50: land • Use of sediment traps, as
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:51:and use of introducing and sediment traps, as
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:60: solids from sediment mobilisation, geochemistry variations (i.e. pH values
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:63: and fuels spills and sediment traps, as
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:65:on-Site, sediment sediments by using industry- Significant
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:65: Kettle Beck and water bodies • Use of sediment traps,
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:65: drainage and sediment
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:66: drainage and sediment
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:72: include monitoring of water discharges or sediment laden runoff, and will
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:72: system. All discharged water will transit through a sedimentation pond
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:73:6.173 At the pre-construction stage a separate Sediment Control Plan (SCP) will be
EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:75: surface water runoff, sediments and contaminants migration during the
EN010082-000496-_CONSENTORDER_40063542(1)_DEADLINE 2_ DCOv2.pdf:16: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: reduce sediment load;
EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:17: sediment laden runoff;
EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:27: of water discharges or sediment laden runoff, and will where appropriate be treated prior
EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:28: a temporary sedimentation tank with in the drainage system to remove particulates prior
EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:28: sediment laden runoff.
EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:28: settlement tanks/ ponds to reduce sediment load; and
EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:30: At the pre-construction stage a separate Sediment Control Plan (SCP) will be designed and
EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:37: Plan; Sediment throughout of each
EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:37:Construction bunds, temporary site drainage and sediment traps will be installed as required. EPC Contractor
EN010082-000551-8.54 - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (v3).pdf:20: sediment control plan and monitoring measures.
EN010082-000583-8.63 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Tracked - Version 6.pdf:17: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000650-The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Order 2019 (Final) (Validated).pdf:17: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:5: 1, drainage and sediment traps, as required. Contractor environment
EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:7: Chapter sediment laden runoff. management plan
EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:10: Chapter water discharges or sediment laden runoff, and management plan
EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:10: temporary sedimentation tank with in the
EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:14: 44. 5.45 Volume At the pre-construction stage a separate Construction Main Works Sediment Control 13.Construction Tertiary
EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:14: 1, Sediment Control Plan (SCP) will be designed Contractor Plan environment
EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:20: 1, sediment traps, as required. Contractor Decommissioning
EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:21: 75. 5.77 Volume Use of sediment traps, as required. Decommissioning Main Works DCO 24. Tertiary
EN010082-000194-EN010082-6.3.4-ES Annex D1-Phase 1 Final-November 2017.pdf:8: of till / glacial diamicton (terrigenous sediment that is unsorted / poorly
EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:33: Redcar and Management Plan) and SCP (Sediment Control Plan). to the re-use of soils and crushed concrete on site. The SCP relates to the potential for erosion of soils during the construction period
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:83: sediment control plan to control dust during excavation. the assessment as it will be significantly below the crite-
EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:327: waste management and a sediment control plan to control dust during
EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:17: sediment laden runoff;
EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:28: works will include monitoring of water discharges or sediment
EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:28: water will transit through a temporary sedimentation tank with
EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:29: and / or sediment laden runoff.
EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:29: sediment load; and
EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:31: At the pre-construction stage a separate Sediment Control Plan (SCP) will be designed and
EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:39: Plan; Sediment throughout of each
EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:39:Construction bunds, temporary site drainage and sediment traps will be installed as required. EPC Contractor
EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:17: sediment laden runoff;
EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:29: works will include monitoring of water discharges or sediment
EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:29: water will transit through a temporary sedimentation tank with
EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:29: and / or sediment laden runoff.
EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:29: reduce sediment load; and
EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:33: At the pre-construction stage a separate Sediment Control Plan (SCP) will be designed and
EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:41:Construction bunds, temporary site drainage and sediment traps will be installed as required. EPC Contracto
EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:32: supralittoral sediment (acidic and calcareous type), littoral sediment and standing open water and canals (see Tables 1-
EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:32: sediment habitat types were assessed during the air quality assessment and the Applicant considers that these will not
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: thermally altered metamorphosed sediments.
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:Tees & Hartlepool Littoral sediment supporting
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:South Gare & Supralittoral sediment (acidic
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: Littoral sediment supporting
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: Littoral sediment supporting
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:Seaton Dunes & Supralittoral sediment (acidic
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:10:South Gare & Coatham Sands Supralittoral sediment (acidic type) supporting
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:10:Redcar Rocks SSSI Littoral sediment supporting Charadrius
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:10:Seaton Dunes & Common SSSI Supralittoral sediment (acidic type) supporting
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:14: littoral sediment (pioneer, low-mid, mud-upper saltmarshes) supporting Calidris alba sanderling;
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:15: supralittoral sediment (coastal stable dune grasslands and shifting coastal dunes); or
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:15: littoral sediment (pioneer, low-mid, mud-upper saltmarshes) supporting Charadrius hiaticula
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:15: Scoped out of requiring further No CLs were available for the assessment of a number of other supralittoral sediment (dune
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:15: littoral sediment; or
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: significant ecological effects could result on littoral sediment supporting Charadrius hiaticula
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: supralittoral sediment (coastal stable dune grasslands and shifting coastal dunes); and
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: littoral sediment (pioneer, low-mid, mud-upper saltmarshes) supporting Charadrius hiaticula
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: Scoped out of requiring further No CLs were available for the assessment of a number of other supralittoral sediment (dune
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: assessment grasslands and other dune communities) and littoral sediment (saltmarsh) habitat types (see
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: Scoped out of requiring further No CLs were available for the assessment of a number of littoral sediment (saltmarsh and
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: littoral sediment;
EN010082-000202-EN010082-6.3.12-ES Annex G1-Effects of Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:20: compared with a CL (min) of 8 kg N/ha/yr for supralittoral sediment), and
EN010082-000580-8.60 - Tees CCPP - HRA Addendum.pdf:4: -10 kg N/ha/yr for supralittoral sediment / sand dunes), and no likely
EN010082-000580-8.60 - Tees CCPP - HRA Addendum.pdf:4: sediment
EN010082-000580-8.60 - Tees CCPP - HRA Addendum.pdf:5: and littoral sediment), or not defined (standing open water and canals);
EN010082-000580-8.60 - Tees CCPP - HRA Addendum.pdf:5: sediment);
EN010082-000580-8.60 - Tees CCPP - HRA Addendum.pdf:5: sediment 23 8
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:22: Littoral sediment supporting Calidris alba
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:22: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type) supporting
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:22: Seal Sands SSSI Littoral sediment supporting Calidris canutus knot 20 30 0.0203 0.10% 0.068% 13.86 13.9 69% 46% 69% 46% No
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:22: Littoral sediment supporting Charadrius hiaticula
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:22: Seaton Dunes & Supralittoral sediment (acidic type) supporting
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:23: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type)
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:23: Littoral sediment supporting
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:23: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type)
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:29:Cleveland SPA Supralittoral sediment (acidic type) 8 10 0.0392 0.49% 0.39% 18.48 18.5 231% 185% 231% 185% No
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:29: SPA Supralittoral sediment (calcareous type) 10 15 0.0392 0.39% 0.26% 18.48 18.5 185% 123% 185% 123% No
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:29: SPA Supralittoral sediment 15 20 0.0392 0.26% 0.20% 18.48 18.5 123% 93% 123% 92% No
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:29: Little tern - Supralittoral sediment (acidic
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:29: Little tern - Supralittoral sediment (calcareous
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:29: SPA Little tern - Supralittoral sediment 15 20 0.0392 0.26% 0.20% 18.48 18.5 123% 93% 123% 92% No
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:29: SPA Eurasian teal - Littoral sediment 20 30 0.0392 0.20% 0.13% 18.48 18.5 93% 62% 92% 62% No
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:29:pSPA SPA Supralittoral sediment (acidic type) 8 10 0.0407 0.51% 0.41% 18.48 18.5 232% 185% 231% 185% No
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:30: SPA Supralittoral sediment (calcareous type) 10 15 0.0407 0.41% 0.27% 18.48 18.5 185% 123% 185% 123% No
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:30: SPA Supralittoral sediment 15 20 0.0407 0.27% 0.20% 18.48 18.5 123% 93% 123% 92% No
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:30: Little tern - Supralittoral sediment (acidic
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:30: Little tern - Supralittoral sediment (calcareous
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:30: SPA Little tern - Supralittoral sediment 15 20 0.0407 0.27% 0.20% 18.48 18.5 123% 93% 123% 92% No
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:30: SPA Eurasian teal - Littoral sediment 20 30 0.0407 0.20% 0.14% 18.48 18.5 93% 62% 92% 62% No
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:30: SPA sediment 20 30 0.0407 0.20% 0.14% 18.48 18.5 93% 62% 92% 62% No
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:30: SPA sediment (acidic type) 8 10 0.0407 0.51% 0.41% 18.48 18.5 232% 185% 231% 185% No
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:30: SPA sediment (calcareous type) 10 15 0.0407 0.41% 0.27% 18.48 18.5 185% 123% 185% 123% No
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:30: SPA sediment 10 20 0.0407 0.41% 0.20% 18.48 18.5 185% 93% 185% 92% No
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:32:Cleveland - Supralittoral sediment (acidic type)
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:32: - Supralittoral sediment (calcareous type)
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:32: - Supralittoral sediment
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:32: sediment (acidic type)
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:32: sediment (calcareous type)
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:32: sediment
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:32: Eurasian teal - Littoral sediment sensitive
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:33: - Supralittoral sediment (acidic type)
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:33: - Supralittoral sediment (calcareous type)
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:33: - Supralittoral sediment
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:33: sediment (acidic type)
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:33: sediment (calcareous type)
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:33: sediment
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:33: Eurasian teal - Littoral sediment sensitive
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:33: sediment sensitive
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:33:and Supralittoral sediment (acidic type)
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:34:Coast Ramsar Supralittoral sediment (calcareous type)
EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:34: Supralittoral sediment
EN010082-000650-The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Order 2019 (Final) (Validated) (2).pdf:17: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000195-EN010082-6.3.5-ES Annex D2-Envirocheck-Final-November 2017.pdf:57: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (W) 520376
EN010082-000195-EN010082-6.3.5-ES Annex D2-Envirocheck-Final-November 2017.pdf:57: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SW) 520359
EN010082-000195-EN010082-6.3.5-ES Annex D2-Envirocheck-Final-November 2017.pdf:57: Soil Sample Type: Rural Soil and Sediment (SE) 519812
EN010082-000195-EN010082-6.3.5-ES Annex D2-Envirocheck-Final-November 2017.pdf:100:Most of these Superficial deposits are unconsolidated sediments such as
EN010082-000195-EN010082-6.3.5-ES Annex D2-Envirocheck-Final-November 2017.pdf:101:types based on origin: igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary.
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:175: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:14: (Materials Management Plan) and SCP (Sediment Control Plan). additional information has been provided by the applicant with regard to (Application Document Ref: 8.6) submitted at Deadline 2 of the Examination.
EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:18: sediment control plan to control dust during excavation. The Team
EN010082-000524-_DOC_150670236(1)_DEADLINE 4_ DCO (Validated).pdf:16: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:26: Redcar and Cleveland (Sediment Control Plan).
EN010082-000497-_DOC_40064625(1)_DEADLINE 2_ DCO showing changes.pdf:17: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000589-2.1 - Tees CCPP - Draft Development Consent Order – Final (Version 7).pdf:16: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000554-8.51 - Draft DCO - Clean (v5).pdf:16: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000650-The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Order 2019 (Final) (Validated) (3).pdf:17: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000552-8.53 - Explanatory Memorandum - Clean (v3).pdf:19: management plan, a sediment control plan and monitoring measures.
EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:24: metamorphosed sediments.
EN010082-000537-8.47 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Clean (v4).pdf:16: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000595-8.71 - Tees CCPP - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (Version 4).pdf:21: include a materials management plan, a sediment control plan and
EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:17: sediment laden runoff;
EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:30: works will include monitoring of water discharges or sediment
EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:30: water will transit through a temporary sedimentation tank with
EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:30: and / or sediment laden runoff.
EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:31: sediment load; and
EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:33: At the pre-construction stage a separate Sediment Control Plan (SCP) will be designed and
EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:40: Plan; Sediment throughout of each
EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:40:Construction bunds, temporary site drainage and sediment traps will be installed as required. EPC Contractor
EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:8: Management Plan) and SCP (Sediment Control Plan).
EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:33:also envisaged to include details of waste management and a sediment control plan to control dust during excavation. The Team will review the content of the
EN010082-000498-_DOC_40066241(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Tracked).pdf:18: sediment control plan and monitoring measures.
EN010082-000650-The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Order 2019 (Final) (Validated) (1).pdf:17: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000501-8.9 - Tees CCPP - Abbreviation List.pdf:8: SCP Sediment Control Plan
EN010082-000594-8.69 - Draft Development Consent Order - Tracked (Version 7).pdf:17: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000538-8.48 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Tracked (v4).pdf:16: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:20: compared with a CL (min) of 8 kg N/ha/yr for supralittoral sediment), and
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type) supporting sandwich tern Sterna sandvicensis and little tern
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: Supralittoral sediment (calcareous type) supporting sandwich tern and little tern a b a a d a
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: Supralittoral sediment supporting sandwich tern and little tern a b a a d a
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: Littoral sediment supporting common shelduck Tadorna tadorna , Eurasian teal Anas crecca, red knot
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:27: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type) supporting sandwich tern Sterna sandvicensis, little tern Sterna
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:27: Supralittoral sediment (calcareous type) supporting sandwich tern, little tern and common tern a b a a d
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:27: Supralittoral sediment supporting sandwich tern, little tern and common tern a b a a d a
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:27: Littoral sediment supporting common shelduck Tadorna tadorna , Eurasian teal Anas crecca, red knot
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:27: Littoral sediment supporting avocet Recurvirostra avosetta a b a a d a
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:33: Teesmouth Supralittoral sediment (acidic type)
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:33: Supralittoral sediment (calcareous type)
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:33: Supralittoral sediment supporting:
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:33: Littoral sediment supporting:
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:33: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type)
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:34: Supralittoral sediment (calcareous type)
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:34: Supralittoral sediment supporting:
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:34: Littoral sediment supporting:
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:35:Teesmouth and Supralittoral sediment (acidic type) supporting:
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:35: Supralittoral sediment (calcareous type)
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:35: Supralittoral sediment supporting:
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:35: Littoral sediment supporting: Not Sensitive n/a n/a n/a n/a
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:35: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type) supporting:
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:36: Supralittoral sediment (calcareous type)
EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:36: Littoral sediment supporting:
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:55: construction site sediments into watercourses.
EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:125: baseline conditions and construction site sediments into measures. The ReFH2 plot scale
EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:17: sediment laden runoff;
EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:28: works will include monitoring of water discharges or sediment
EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:29: water will transit through a temporary sedimentation tank with
EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:29: and / or sediment laden runoff.
EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:29: sediment load; and
EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:31: At the pre-construction stage a separate Sediment Control Plan (SCP) will be designed and
EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:39: Plan; Sediment throughout of each
EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:39:Construction bunds, temporary site drainage and sediment traps will be installed as required. EPC Contractor
EN010082-000519-8.45 - CONSENTORDER_150335454(1)_DEADLINE 4_ DCOv3.pdf:16: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:17: sediment laden runoff;
EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:28: works will include monitoring of water discharges or sediment
EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:29: water will transit through a temporary sedimentation tank with
EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:29: and / or sediment laden runoff.
EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:29: sediment load; and
EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:31: At the pre-construction stage a separate Sediment Control Plan (SCP) will be designed and
EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:39: Plan; Sediment throughout of each
EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:39:Construction bunds, temporary site drainage and sediment traps will be installed as required. EPC Contractor
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:175: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:53: construction site sediments into watercourses.
EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:123: baseline conditions and construction site sediments into measures. The ReFH2 plot scale
EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:175: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:5: Management Plan) and SCP (Sediment Control Plan).
EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:9: also envisaged to include details of waste management and a sediment control plan to control dust during excavation. The Team will review the content of the
EN010082-000553-8.52 - Draft DCO - Tracked (v5).pdf:16: (d) a sediment control plan; and
EN010082-000582-8.62 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Clean - Version 6.pdf:16: (d) a sediment control plan; and
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:26:Marine sediment and The tidal Tees estuary between Teesmouth and the Tees Barrage and Tees Bay, incorporating the existing dredged material disposal sites.
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:35:6.5.1 The Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA includes both marine (i.e. sediment either continuously or
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:50: the sediment budget (e.g. loss of fluvial sediment to offshore disposal sites due to
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:50: sediment flow to Coatham Sands due to offshore disposal of maintenance dredged
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:51: Effects on food resources due to reduced water and sediment quality following
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:51: sediment
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:61:Harbour 900m Disturbance and sediment quality - construction
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:61: uncontaminated and contaminated sediments during piling or dredging activities. Piling noise
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:64: between sediment plumes created during capital dredging (with potential effects on food
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:64: between sediment plumes created during capital dredging (with potential effects on prey
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:76: Coastal processes Habitat Loss Disturbance Water/sediment Emissions In-combination
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:78: phase noise disturbance, creation of a sediment plume during capital dredging and changes to the
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:78: hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes during operation.
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:78: disturbance, creation of a sediment plume during capital dredging and changes to the hydrodynamic
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:78: and sedimentary regimes during operation.
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:79: sediment plume during construction and changes to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:81: • release of uncontaminated and contaminated sediments during piling / dredging; and,
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:81: • impacts arising from disturbance to un-contaminated sediment as well as contaminated sediment;
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:82: • water / sediment quality issues that may arise during the operational phase due to maintenance
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:83: and subtidal habitats due to changes to the hydrodynamic and sediment transport regime. The two
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:83: extent and magnitude on the hydrodynamic and sediment transport regime. For the purposes of the
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:86: Effect on sedimentary regime (budget) of the Tees estuary
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:86: integrate to result in an effect on the sediment budget of the estuary.
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:86:10.3.19 The largest sediment input to the Tees estuary is from offshore and given that the proposed scheme
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:86: on the supply of material into the Tees estuary from offshore. In addition, no changes to sediment
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:86:10.3.20 Sediment transport modelling has been undertaken to predict the increases in infill in the berth pocket,
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:86: change in the pattern of distribution of sediment deposition in the subtidal zone, with a small increase in
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:86: fine sediment infill in Chart area 9 (approximately 1%) (see Figure 10.4), associated with a small
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:86: decrease in fine sediment infill in Chart area 8 (approximately 2 to 3%).
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:86: redistribution of locations of sediment deposition in response to predicted changes in current speeds as
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:87: a result of the proposed works. It is predicted that this very small change in the overall fine sediment
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:87: no effect on sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees estuary would occur.
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:87: on water and sediment quality. This sub-section focusses on potential effects of the proposed scheme
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:87: on suspended sediment concentration in the water column during capital dredging, sediment deposition
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:87: Suspended sediment concentration in the water column during capital dredging
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:87:10.3.23 Modelling of the dispersion of sediment during capital dredging has been undertaken for a range of
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:87: sediment concentration above background concentrations in the vicinity of the dredger is predicted to
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:87: spatial extent of sediment plume.
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:87: sediment outwith the proposed dredge footprint are only a few tens of mg/l at most, on average. The
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:87: simulations show that an area of elevated suspended sediment concentration, in the range of 10mg/l to
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:87:10.3.27 Sediment quality testing has been undertaken at 8 stations located within the proposed berth pocket
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:87: and section of approach channel that would be dredged. Sediment cores were taken from each station,
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:87: with sub-samples taken at depth intervals throughout each core. The quality of the sediment to be
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:88: Sediment deposition onto the seabed
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:88:10.3.28 The sediment dispersion modelling made predictions of the extent and magnitude of deposition onto
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:88: activity. The plume dispersion modelling predicted no average increase in suspended sediment
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:88: concentration is shown over the intertidal areas, leading to a prediction of negligible sediment being
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:89: Figure 10.6 Predicted mean increase in depth averaged suspended sediment concentrations above
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:89: suspended sediment concentrations within the water column.
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:89:10.3.30 However, the sediment transport modelling has predicted that the effect of the proposed scheme is
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:89: in the overall fine sediment regime in the Tees is not predicted to alter the frequency of, or methodology
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:90: Figure 10.7 Predicted mean increase in depth averaged suspended sediment concentrations above
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:91: Figure 10.8 Predicted mean increase in depth averaged suspended sediment concentrations above
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:92: Figure 10.9 Predicted fine sediment deposition after three tides, TSHD dredging in low river flow, spring
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:99: sedimentary regime during the operational phase (which have the potential to indirectly affect habitats
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:99: Of particular importance in this context is the effect of the scheme on the sedimentary regime of the
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:99: Tees estuary. This is predicted to be negligible, with no effect on the supply of sediment to intertidal
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:100:10.4.8 The suspension and dispersion of sediment during capital dredging would temporarily affect water
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:100: clarity, with a plume of sediment being dispersed along the axis of the navigation channel. The
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:100: modelling work undertaken has predicted that there would be no increase in suspended sediment
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:100: within the designated sites, and sediment deposition onto the seabed would be negligible beyond the
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:100:10.4.9 The sediment plume within the Tees is likely to affect birds that feed on small fish in the water column,
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:100: with some redistribution in feeding activity likely to occur. The sediment plume modelling has predicted
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:100: that suspended sediment concentrations would not be impacted at the estuary mouth and, therefore,
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:100:10.4.10 Given that the initial assessment of the quality of marine sediments that would be dredged has revealed
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:100: suspension and dispersion of sediment during capital dredging. This would reduce the spatial extent of
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:100: the sediment plume as currently predicted by the EIA studies undertaken to date.
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:100: Coast SPA and Ramsar site. This conclusion will be revisited when the full implications of the sediment
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:127: • effect on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime resulting in a potential effect on morphology of
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:127:11.4.16 The potential for an interaction between sediment plumes that are predicted to be generated by capital
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:127: Under such circumstances, the effect would be a greater increase in suspended sediment
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:128:11.4.18 Increased suspended sediment concentrations have the potential to effect fish populations (which
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:128: movement away from the zone of increased suspended sediment concentration. However, the effect of
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:128:11.4.19 The depositon of sediment onto the seabed has the potential to affect benthic invertebrate resource
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:128: potential cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible. The predicted footprints of sediment
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:128: that the only project with any potential to effect intertidal areas due to sediment depositon is the NGCT
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:128: sediment deposition was predicted during capital dredging for the Harbour facility.
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:128: low potential for suspended sediment arising from maintenance dredging to interact with a sediment
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:128: sediment to the estuary, was being undertaken
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:128:11.4.22 Mitigation measures to limit the suspension and subsequent deposition of sediment during capital
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:128: dredged sediment, and this measure would limit sediment release into the water column as far as
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:129:11.4.23 As set out in Section 10.3, the quality of the sediment to be dredged as part of the Harbour facility
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:129: proposal is currently being assessed following the recent completion of a sediment sampling exercise.
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:129: Changes to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime resulting in a potential effect on
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:129: sedimentary regime has been undertaken and reported in Part 5 Cumulative Impact Assessment
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:129: • the Harbour facilities would not change the supply of fine sediment to the Tees;
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:129: • deposition of sediment in the berth pocket of the YPP Harbour facility would be material that would
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:129:11.4.26 In summary, therefore, the effect of the Harbour facility would be to cause a redistribution of sediment
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:129: the proposed scheme has no potential to affect the sediment budget of the estuary and, therefore, there
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:129:11.4.27 The only project predicted to have the potential to affect the estuary sediment budget was the NGCT. It
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:129: Tees and the resultant effect on tidal flows and sediment transport. As a consequence of this effect, it
TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:130: morphology, with the proposed scheme having a negligible effect on deposition of sediment in the berth
TR030002-000468-Section 6 App 6.2 Land Quality Generic Risk Assessment.pdf:36: • 33 No Particle size distributions (both sieve and sedimentation) – Appendix D.2
TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:87: (5) Any contaminated sediment (largely silt) lying deeper than one metre below the surface of
TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:121: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which is
TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:121: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:122:sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the construction of such of the
TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:123: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:123: 20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:123: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making
TR030002-000429-EIA Appendices Index.pdf:1:Appendix 7.1 Benthic and Sediment Sampling Strategy
TR030002-000429-EIA Appendices Index.pdf:1:Appendix 7.2 Sediment Quality Data
TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:5: traffic, marine sediment quality, marine ecology).
TR030002-000748-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 2.pdf:3:The ground to be dredged typically comprises sedimentary silts overlying geological deposits of sands,
TR030002-000748-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 2.pdf:3:grab due to elevated concentrations of contaminants present within the sediment. There are a number of
TR030002-000748-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 2.pdf:38: present within the sediment. There are a number of options for the
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (4).pdf:13:APP-198 Section 5: Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (4).pdf:13:APP-206 Section 7: Marine Sediment and Water Quality
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (4).pdf:13:APP-207 Section 7: Appendix 7.1 Benthic and Sediment Sampling Strategy
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (4).pdf:13:APP-208 Section 7: Appendix 7.2 Sediment Quality Data
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:15:North Tees Reclamation Ponds Site, North 3.4 Km Deposit of sediment for recovery -
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:23: due to the elevated concentrations of contaminants present within the sediment (see below). Table
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:24:5.1.3 A sediment quality survey of the proposed dredging (and quay construction) areas has been
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:25:5.1.5 The sediment quality data generated by the vibrocore survey was assessed to identify whether any
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:25: disposal or reuse options for the sediment on land.
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:25:5.1.6 The hazardous waste assessment was made on each of the 38 sediment samples in accordance with
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:26:5.1.12 If sediment is deposited on land (i.e. above mean high water spring tide level) it may be subject to the
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:26: proposed use. The following measures would be implemented for any waste sediment deposited on
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:27:5.1.15 There are no Quality Protocols specifically for marine sediment. However, it is noted that the Waste &
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:27: sediment in the list of acceptable wastes, as long as it can be demonstrated that the sediment is inert
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:27: and does not include any fines. This Quality Protocol requires that the sediment is subjected to
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:27: recycling. However, it does have several advantages, particularly if the sediment is recovered for use
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:27: emissions compared with transport of virgin material to site; or removal of sediment from site for
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:28:5.1.22 The wet sediment is a waste and would be subject to waste regulatory control if it were removed from
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:28:5.1.23 It is not possible at this stage to ascertain whether the sediment would be directly suitable for any re-
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:28: from storing the sediment whilst wet is contained. Storage would be on an impermeable surface or
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:29: Recovery of the sediment for reuse in construction off-site
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:29: use of the sediment as waste in construction.
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:30: sediment, is included within the scope of the CoP. The CoP is subject to self-regulation, via the use of
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:30: certainty, not a probability. The use of the dredged sediment must form part of the detailed design,
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:30: be used. The movement of the dredged sediment from the dewatering process to final use must be
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:31:5.1.42 The proposed treatment of the hazardous sediment prior to use would be designed to reduce the levels
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:31: sediment mean that it is unsuitable for use.
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:32:5.1.51 The sediment is a hazardous waste, therefore, for disposal, it could only be sent to a hazardous class
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:32: The sediment would not be landfilled if it failed the Hazardous WAC. If this happened, the waste would
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:32: facilities that are likely to be able to receive contaminated silt. There is no scope for the wet sediment
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:33: a waste exemption that allows the use of uncontaminated sediment for construction ‘U1 use of waste in
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:33: the use of up to 5,000 tonnes of uncontaminated sediment for drainage work carried out under the Land
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:34:5.2.13 There are standard permits that allow the use of non-hazardous sediment for construction purposes;
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:34: could also be applied to the use of the uncontaminated sediment.
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:45: Dredged sediment
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:87:Step 1 Yes - the sediment would be Directive waste according to the Waste Framework Directive
TR030002-000460-Section 3 App 3.1 Waste management.pdf:124:Sediment Samples
TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:8:Disposal of contaminated sediments from capital dredging
TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:9:The Environmental Statement refers to the expectation that contaminated sediments
TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:9:Any such contaminated sediment to be deposited on land will require necessary
TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:9:be agreed in advance of any sediment disposal.
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:1:Benthic and Sediment
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:3:Our reference : 9Y0989/Sediment quality and benthic ecology
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:3: strategy for sediment quality and benthic ecology
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:3:This note sets out a revised proposed strategy to sampling for sediment quality and benthic
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:3:In support of the EIA, YPL wishes to proceed with a programme of sediment sampling for
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:4:the proposed works both in terms of the direct and indirect impacts. The sediment quality data
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:4:The purpose of this note is to set out our existing knowledge regarding sediment quality and
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:5:would require removal of approximately 4m of sediment. The existing bed levels within the
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:5:3. Sediment quality data
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:5:3.1 Previous sediment quality surveys
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:6:discharges, this legacy remains in areas of estuarine sediments that remain undisturbed. This is
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:6:less of an issue where sediment is regularly removed, such as within the existing navigation
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:6:There have been a number of sediment quality studies undertaken in the Tees Estuary over the
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:6:years which have generally shown decreasing levels of contaminants within the sediments
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:6:Sediment samples were collected as part of the EIA for the Northern Gateway Container
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:6:The sediment sampling locations for this survey are presented in Figure 3. Overall, the chemical
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:6:Figure 3 Sediment sample locations for the NGCT EIA and QEII Jetty EIA
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:6:A sediment quality survey was carried out in December 2008 to characterise the area that is
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:6:sediment layer went, whichever horizon was reached first. The results from two of the vibrocores
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:7:Bed sampling results in the vicinity of the proposed scheme show bed sediments in the area to
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:7:There is no existing sediment quality data available within the footprint of the proposed berth
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:7:4. Proposed approach to sediment quality survey and assessment
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:7:upon the quantity of sediment to be dredged. Given the amount of material to be dredged, this
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:7:Sediment samples will be analysed by a UKAS accredited laboratory for the following
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:8: Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life (CCME, 2002).
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:8:sedimentary habitats of the Tees Estuary have been reclaimed over this period.
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:8:subject to regular dredging and sediment removal. Analysis of macrobenthic data from the Tees
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:9:fine sediment locations within the estuary (Royal Haskoning, 2009). Results indicated a light to
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:9:to be indirectly affected (e.g. through sediment deposition).
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:10:determine sample volume, visual characteristics of the sediment and the presence of anoxia and
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:10:A sub-sample of the sediment will be retained for Particle Size Analysis (PSA) to enable any
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:10:sediment community associations to be determined. A cut-off 100ml syringe would be used to
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:10:remove sediment from the undisturbed surface of the Day grab sample for PSA analysis. This
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:11:(2001). In addition indicator species for contaminated sediment will be noted.
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:11:Sampling of sediments for PSA is an essential accompaniment to macrofaunal surveys. Small-
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:11:scale heterogeneity at the seabed dictates that a PSA sediment sub-sample should be collected
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:13:Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (2002) Canadian sediment quality guidelines
TR030002-000471-Section 7 App 7.1 Benthic and sediment sampling strategy.pdf:13:OSPAR (2002) JAMP Guidelines for Monitoring Contaminants in Sediments. Joint
TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:15:water and sediment quality; in addition the decommissioning works would take
TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:6:Section 5 – Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:7:Section 7 – Marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:8:14 The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume is selection of the dredge method. Contaminated Deemed Marine Licence (Schedule 5)
TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:8: sediments are to be dredged using an enclosed grab. Dredging of geological deposits may be
TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:8: During backhoe dredging, an experienced operator would be used to minimise losses of sediment into
TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:8: the water column. Other measures to limit the sediment plume generation comprise limiting the swing
TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:8: of the backhoe over water, thereby reducing the time when sediment can leak out of the bucket. The
TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:8: The re-suspension of sediment caused by CSD can be reduced through optimising the cutter speed,
TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:9:18 In order to minimise the spatial extent of the reduction in water quality during sediment placement in Deemed Marine Licence (Schedule 5)
TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:9: box would prevent significant release of suspended sediments during dewatering of placed dredged
TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:56: (a) the undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for approval at least six
TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:56: (b) the sediment sampling and analysis of the sediment must be completed by a laboratory
TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:56: (5) Any contaminated sediment (largely silt) lying deeper than one metre below the surface of the
TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:102: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which is
TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:102: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:104:affected by sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the construction
TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:104: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:104: 19.20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:105: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making good
TR030002-000813-Document 6.11A - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:6: Use of an enclosed grab to dredge the contaminated sediment (thereby minimising resuspension of
TR030002-000813-Document 6.11A - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:6: overflowing and discharge of water containing suspended sediment into the estuary).
TR030002-000800-Document 4.2B - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean).pdf:23: a new paragraph 34 (2) has been added to require a further sediment
TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:17: Section 5 – Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:18: Section 7 – Marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:19:12 The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume is selection of the dredge method. Contaminated sediments are to be dredged using an
TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:19: During backhoe dredging, an experienced operator would be used to minimise losses of sediment into the water column. Other measures to limit
TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:19: the sediment plume generation comprise limiting the swing of the backhoe over water, thereby reducing the time when sediment can leak out of
TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:19: The re-suspension of sediment caused by CSD can be reduced through optimising the cutter speed, swing velocity and suction discharge,
TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:19:16 In order to minimise the spatial extent of the reduction in water quality during sediment placement in Bran Sands lagoon, a silt screen / curtain
TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:19: significant release of suspended sediments during dewatering of placed dredged material.
TR030002-000696-PD Teesport Limited 1.pdf:9: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which is a
TR030002-000696-PD Teesport Limited 1.pdf:9: specified in the notice for the purpose of preventing, mitigating or making good the sedimentation,
TR030002-000696-PD Teesport Limited 1.pdf:11: of such parts of the river within the Order limits as might be affected by sedimentation, scouring, currents
TR030002-000696-PD Teesport Limited 1.pdf:11: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-000696-PD Teesport Limited 1.pdf:11: 20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation, scouring,
TR030002-000696-PD Teesport Limited 1.pdf:11: reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making good the
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:5: Overview of the Sedimentary Sequence……………………………………………………. 9
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:5: UNIT 2 sandy/ silty/ gravelly Clay (possible mid-Holocene sediments) …………… 10
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:5: UNIT 3 gravelly Sand and slightly silty and clayey Sand (marine sediments) ….. 10
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:5: UNIT 4 gravelly sandy Clay (estuarine alluvium/ polluted fluvial sediments) ……. 11
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:5: Summary of sediments from the proposed Material Handling Facility …………….. 11
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:7:The following five sedimentary units were interpreted from the logs:
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:7: • Unit 2 Estuarine alluvium and peat (possible mid-Holocene sediments)
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:7: • Unit 3 Marine sediments/ Estuarine alluvium
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:7: • Unit 4 Estuarine alluvium/ polluted fluvial sediments
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:9: (indicated by surviving peat deposits) to be preserved beneath later sediments.
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:9: transgression). Analysis of sediments, pollen and diatoms indicate woodland/forest,
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:11:4.1 For each log an interpretation of the sedimentary sequence was carried out and a
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:11: unitary system generated in order to group the sediments. Five major units (Units 1
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:11:4.2 The sedimentary sequence observed within the boreholes obtained from proposed
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:11: the boreholes from proposed Harbour Facility. A summary of the sedimentary
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:11: Overview of the Sedimentary Sequence
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:11:4.3 The following table summarises the sedimentary sequence.
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:11: Sedimentary Unit Interpretation
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:11: Unit 4 Estuarine alluvium/ polluted fluvial sediments
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:11: Unit 3 Marine sediments/ Estuarine alluvium
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:11: Holocene sediments)
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:12: UNIT 2 sandy/ silty/ gravelly Clay (possible mid-Holocene sediments)
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:12: the vibrocores due to their limited depth of penetration. This sediment was generally
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:12:4.6 This sediment was identified at a similar depth within several of the online BGS
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:12:4.8 Coal was recorded within this sediment within one of the borehole (BHP3), between
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:12: UNIT 3 gravelly Sand and slightly silty and clayey Sand (marine sediments)
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:13: seabed sediment.
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:13: below the Sand (2.2m thick) (VC06). These sediments are interpreted as estuarine
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:13: sediments within the marine sediment.
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:13: UNIT 4 gravelly sandy Clay (estuarine alluvium/ polluted fluvial sediments)
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:13: interpreted as modern polluted fluvial sediment.
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:13: to 2.2m think within BHP5B. This unit is interpreted as estuarine sediments, and it
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:13: overlays the Clay within BHP3, this is also interpreted as an estuarine sediment,
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:13: Summary of sediments from the proposed Material Handling Facility
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:14:4.18 A clay sediment overlays Unit 1. This sediment frequently contains coal and
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:14: Laminated sand is recorded within the clay sediment within BH507 and BH152
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:14:4.20 The nature of sediments overlying the weathered bedrock (Unit 1) indicates that they
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:14: bedrock has been mapped in the area as sedimentary bedrock, part of the Mercia
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:15: was subject to intertidal deposition. Intertidal sediments are characterised by twice-
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:15: a-day flooding and drainage, with estuarine and/ or marine sediments deposited
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:15:5.6 Unit 3 appears to predominantly represent marine sediments, indicating a period of
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:15: marine transgression. This is followed by estuarine/ fluvial sediments within Unit 4.
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:15: sediments are recorded from within the boreholes, which are located adjacent to the
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:15: and has been interpreted as modern polluted fluvial sediment. This is because this
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:16: sediment sequence within these boreholes does not appear to correspond to those
TR030002-000496-Section 15 App 15.3 Stage 1 geoarchaeological assessment.pdf:16: sediments overlaying the weathered bedrock appear to have been disturbed within
TR030002-000459-ES Section 24 References.pdf:1: Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (2002). Canadian sediment quality guidelines for the
TR030002-000459-ES Section 24 References.pdf:2:CIRIA (2000). Scoping the assessment of sediment plumes from dredging.
TR030002-000459-ES Section 24 References.pdf:4:HR Wallingford (2002). Teesmouth Sediment Study. EX 4514.
TR030002-000459-ES Section 24 References.pdf:4:HR Wallingford (2005). Northern Gateway Container Terminal. Hydrodynamic and sedimentation
TR030002-000459-ES Section 24 References.pdf:4:HR Wallingford (2006). Northern Gateway Container Terminal. Hydrodynamic and sedimentation
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:29: • Hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:29: • Marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:30:Hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes (see Scoping Report
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:31:3.28 The SoS should ensure that effects resulting from sediment
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:31: hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes resulting from the
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:32:Marine sediment and water quality (see Scoping Report
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:32:3.36 The SoS is pleased to note that a site specific sediment quality
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:33: the sedimentary and hydrodynamic assessment.
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:33: and sedimentary assessment data that is due to be gathered by
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:34: birds (see the SoS’ comments on ‘Hydrodynamic and sedimentary
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:35: example, the hydrodynamic and sediment regime and marine and
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:38: hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime. This assessment should
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:71:The results should be provided of sediment quality testing from the berth pocket and dredge
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:82: of the initial sediment analysis and the duration of the consent.
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:83: Hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:83: sediment regime and cause additional sedimentation which could increase dredging
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:83:18. The MMO welcomes the commitment to assess sediment dispersion (or retention)
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:83: of sediment into the Tees estuary, including through the dewatering of Bran Sands
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:83: Marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:83:20. The MMO considers that the potential impacts on marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:83:24. The effects on marine ecological receptors from changes to marine sediment and
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:84:27. The effects on natural fisheries resource from changes to marine sediment and water
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:93: contaminated sediments and benthic communities.
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:93: environment and designated sites (water quality, suspended sediment concentration SSC)
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:93: sediment trap, intercepting fine sediment in particular and reducing the level of deposition at
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:93: hypothesis for decline of SPA birds in the estuary is a shift from fine sediments to course
TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:93: marine ones. The potential impact on sediment flow should therefore be examined in detail.
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:3: release of sediments during piling and capital dredging; and,
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:3: changes to sediment transport pathways / coastal processes.
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:3: impacts arising from disturbance to uncontaminated sediment (as well as contaminated
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:3: sediment);
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:3: water / sediment quality issues that may arise during the operational phase due to maintenance
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:4: Water and sediment quality.
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:4: (comprising effects on tidal propagation, wave climate, current speeds and sediment budget of the
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:4: forms of construction on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime. For the purposes of the HRA, the
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:5: Effect on sedimentary regime (budget) of the Tees estuary
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:5:10.3.11 The results of the modelling of the predicted effect on sediment budget are presented in ES Section
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:5: speeds integrate to result in an effect on the sediment budget of the estuary.
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:5:10.3.12 The largest sediment input to the Tees estuary is from offshore and given that the proposed scheme
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:5: to sediment transport in the predominantly sandy areas around Teesmouth are expected and so no
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:5:10.3.13 Sediment transport modelling has been undertaken to predict the increases in infill in the berth pocket,
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:5: sediment transport into the estuary). The effect of the scheme would be a localised redistribution of
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:5: (existing) sediment deposition in response to predicted changes in current speeds. It is predicted that
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:5: this very small change in the overall fine sediment regime would not alter the present frequency of, or
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:5: methodology used for, maintenance dredging and no effect on sediment supply to intertidal areas
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:7: the shallows would mean that benthic invertebrates would be already present within the sediment (from
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:8: sediment quality below), an assessment of hydraulic functioning of the lagoon has been undertaken
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:12: Water and sediment quality
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:12: on water and sediment quality. This sub-section focusses on the potential effects of the proposed
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:12: scheme on the suspended sediment concentration in the water column during capital dredging,
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:12: sediment deposition and water quality in Bran Sands lagoon. The potential effect of dust generation
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:12: Suspended sediment concentration in the water column during capital dredging
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:12:10.3.36 Modelling of the dispersion of sediment during capital dredging has been undertaken for a range of
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:12:10.3.38 The results show that the mean increase in depth averaged sediment concentration above background
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:12: extent of sediment plume. Predicted mean concentration increases of suspended sediment outside the
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:12: an area of elevated suspended sediment concentration, in the range of 10mg/l to 50mg/l above
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:12:10.3.39 Sediment quality testing has been undertaken within the proposed berth pocket and section of
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:13: are contaminated (ES Section 7.4). Consequently, it is proposed that these sediments would be
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:13: release of contaminated material during the capital dredging. Hence the results of the sediment plume
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:13: during dredging of non-contaminated sediments.
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:13: suspended sediment concentrations within the water column. However, the sediment transport
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:13: sediment regime in the Tees is not predicted to alter the frequency of, or methodology used for,
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:13: Sediment deposition onto the seabed
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:13:10.3.41 The sediment dispersion modelling made predictions of the extent and magnitude of deposition onto
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:13: sediment concentration over the intertidal areas; hence a negligible quantity of sediment would be
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:22: sedimentary regime (which have the potential to indirectly affect habitats within the designated sites)
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:22: Of particular importance in this context is the effect of the scheme on the sedimentary regime of the
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:22: Tees estuary. This is predicted to be negligible, with no effect on the supply of sediment to intertidal
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:23:10.4.9 The suspension and dispersion of sediment during capital dredging would temporarily affect water
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:23: clarity, with a plume of sediment being dispersed along the axis of the navigation channel. The
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:23: modelling work undertaken has predicted that there would be no increase in suspended sediment
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:23: within the designated sites, and sediment deposition onto the seabed would be negligible beyond the
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:23:10.4.10 The sediment plume within the Tees is likely to affect birds that feed on small fish in the water column,
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:23: with some redistribution in feeding activity likely to occur. The sediment plume modelling has predicted
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:23: that suspended sediment concentrations would not be affected at the estuary mouth and, therefore,
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:29: effect on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime resulting in a potential effect on
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:30:11.3.9 The potential for an interaction between sediment plumes that are predicted to be generated by capital
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:30: Under such circumstances, the effect would be a greater increase in suspended sediment
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:31:11.3.11 Increased suspended sediment concentrations have the potential to effect fish populations (which
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:31: movement away from the zone of increased suspended sediment concentration. However, the effect of
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:31: but the short term and localised nature of peaks in suspended sediment arising during dredging would
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:31:11.3.13 The deposition of sediment onto the seabed has the potential to affect the benthic invertebrate resource
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:31: potential cumulative impact is predicted to be negligible. The predicted footprints of sediment
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:31: that the only project with any potential to effect intertidal areas due to sediment deposition is the NGCT
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:31: sediment deposition was predicted during capital dredging for the Harbour facilities and, therefore,
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:31: of sediment onto the seabed is predicted to occur as a result of maintenance dredging. No
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:31: dredging be undertaken elsewhere in the Tees estuary, there is a low potential for suspended sediment
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:31: arising from maintenance dredging to interact with a sediment plume from capital dredging. It should
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:31: capital dredging project, with the associated release of fine sediment to the estuary, was being
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:31:11.3.16 Mitigation measures to limit the suspension and subsequent deposition of sediment during capital
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:32: dredged sediment, and this measure would limit sediment release into the water column as far as
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:32: contaminated sediment during the capital dredging for these projects and, therefore, no potential for an
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:32: in combination effect occur during the dredging of contaminated sediments.
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:32:11.3.17 The effect of sediment suspension on feeding birds (terns) in the nearshore zone associated with the
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:32: due to either suspended sediments or habitat change. Consequently, no significant in combination
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:32: Changes to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime resulting in a potential effect on
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:32: on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime has been undertaken and reported in Part 3 Section 25
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:32: the Harbour facilities would not change the supply of fine sediment to the Tees; and,
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:32: the deposition of sediment in the berth pocket of the Harbour facilities would be material that
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:32:11.3.20 Therefore, the effect of the Harbour facilities would be to cause a redistribution of sediment that
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:32: proposed scheme would not have the potential to affect the sediment budget of the estuary and,
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:32:11.3.21 The only project predicted to have the potential to affect the estuary sediment budget was the NGCT. It
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:32: the Tees and the resultant effect on tidal flows and sediment transport.
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:33: morphology, with the proposed scheme having a negligible effect on the deposition of sediment in the
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:64:The marl is geological (i.e. uncontaminated) material that underlies contaminated sediment. A description of
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:64:the sediment quality at the site of the proposed port terminal and within the footprint of the capital dredging is
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:70:sediments (i.e. concentrations of various contaminants) is routinely tested and the licence is only granted if
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:70:the sediment meets appropriate standards.
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:70:Consequently, it is not expected that there would be a concern with regard sediment quality that would
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:74:increase further as the organic content of the sediment increases (Evans and Lucas, 2000).
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:74:recreated intertidal area at Teesmouth when new silt layers had deposited over compacted sediment created
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:74:Bolam and Whomersley (2003) studied the nature of invertebrate colonisation of fine grained sediments
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:74: 2. Vertical migration up through the placed sediment.
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:74:occur due to the smothering effect and depth of sediment associated with the placement of the dredged
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:74:material. Some lateral migration (mechanism 3) may occur between the sediments of the lagoon and the
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:75:sedimentary habitats in the estuary and lagoon.
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:92: of these sediments should be given thorough consideration (10.3.36)
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:93: truth the suitability of the sediment (particle size and lack of contamination) .(10.3.18)
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:96:sediment quality and particle size i.e. only want ‘uncontaminated fines’ for this project.
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:123: Coastal processes Habitat Loss / change Disturbance Water/sediment quality In-combination
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:123:processes, habitats or water and sediment quality. Given that the decommissioning works would take place in 100 years’ time, in combination effects cannot
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:124: Coastal processes Habitat Loss / change Disturbance Water/sediment quality In-combination
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:124:processes, habitats or water and sediment quality. Given that the decommissioning works would take place in 100 years’ time, in combination effects cannot
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:127: Disruption to the sediment budget (e.g. loss of fluvial sediment to offshore disposal Coastal
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:127: interruption of sediment flow to Coatham Sands due to offshore disposal of
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:127: deposition of sediment disrobed during dredging in intertidal areas. Effect on water sediment
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:133: Coastal processes Habitat Loss / Disturbance Water/sediment In-combination
TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:134: Coastal processes Habitat Loss / Disturbance Water/sediment In-combination
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:29: 1. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime;
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:29: 3. Marine sediment and water quality;
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:46: and sediment transfer modelling should be undertaken to predict and
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:88: the Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime; Hydrology, hydrogeology
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:88: and land quality; Marine sediment and water quality; Marine ecology;
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:89: 1. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime;
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:89: 3. Marine sediment and water quality;
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:89: 2. no change in the supply of fine sediment from offshore is predicted
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:89: and the predicted accumulation of sediment close to the site (i.e. the
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:89: sedimentary regime of the Tees Estuary) would also be unchanged;
TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:90: 4. previous sediment quality surveys in the Tees estuary have identified
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:8: Abstract - Although the Mesozoic sediments of the Cleveland Basin (North Yorkshire) have
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:8: of Mesozoic sediments in the British Isles. The at the end of that year. This has allowed us to trace the
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:8: sediments accumulated in the Cleveland Basin (the main coastal faults for some distance offshore. Survey
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:10: BAJOCIAN Group CaytonBayFm 12 m > NM 85 m sedimentation of the Osgodby Formation was ac-
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:10: sediments supporting Hemingway's (1963) suggestion of Tertiary
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:10: deltaic sediments prograded over the area from the The JEBCO seismic sections show the expected intense
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:10: with these predominantly non-marine sediments are borough Fault Belt at the southern margin of the
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:10: movement continued to affect sedimentation (Farrow, almost no faulting of Permian or younger sediments.
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:11: fault patterns would require three-dimensional ima- influenced Mesozoic sedimentation, and there may be
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:11: gery and the detailed problems presented cannot be sediments preserved within the trough that are absent
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:11: Sediment masses must be assumed to have moved Figure 2 shows a migrated seismic section along a
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:12: for the sediments within it, data from wells nearby the Zechstein in this area, which is near the extreme
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:12: section of which it forms a part, there would be no extent of subsidence affecting the Mesozoic sediments
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:12: basic fault pattern is reasonably discernible along the onshore. The Mesozoic sediments are extensively
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:12: Zechstein level and extensive movements within the the overlying sediments. It is hard to make an
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:12: Mesozoic sediments, and low-strength layers along interpretation which does not involve at least the
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:13: the sedimentary infill is not necessarily typical of the
TR030002-000577-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 2.pdf:14: Ravenscar. In Geology of the Yorkshire Coast (eds J. E. sedimentation in the Flamborough Head region of
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:7: Collection of vibrocores and analysis of samples in order to inform sediment quality issues (see
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:10: sediment plumes created by capital dredging and the offshore disposal of dredged
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:15:Reduce sediment resuspension
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:16:Sediment management
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:20: Increase in sediment supply to surface water bodies associated ground preparation as well as changes in surface water
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:20: Direct disturbance to bed associated with piling works, with the potential for increased sediment supply to downstream
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:21: result of increased fine sediment supply and disturbance of channel bed and banks
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:21: Potential for indirect impacts as a result of increased fine sediment supply and
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:21: Potential for indirect impacts as a result of increased fine sediment supply and
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:21: sediment supply and pollutant presence in surface runoff in association with
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:23: Additional points should be allocated where sediment chemical oxygen demand is an issue, if
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:24:Sediment quality Cefas Action Levels There is the potential for Cefas Action Levels to be exceeded. Yes
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:27:Sediment quality Cefas Action Levels Only sediments acceptable to CEFAS will be disposed of to the site. No
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:29: Potential for indirect impacts associated with poor management of surface water run-off (sediments
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:29: have been identified in the RBMP. However, the low potential for increase in the supply of sediment
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:29: the dynamic sediment and flow regime that characterise the Tees Estuary, it is considered highly
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:30: flows and reduce the potential for surface run off to contain sediments or contaminants.
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:31:Surface water The construction of the small individual The potential increase of sediments to the None. Implementation of mitigation
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:31:construction/d temporarily on sediment loads to the water
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:32: The construction and surface water The release of sediments into the water body Any deterioration in the Implementation of mitigation
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:32:(sediment through the crushed rock will reduce the biological quality Given that potential changes are
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:33:Surface water Changes to in-channel habitats as a result of the Increased fine sedimentation on the channel bed Given that potential changes are unlikely to be of
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:33:management release of sediment and the accidental release of could smother existing substrates, and adversely sufficient significance to cause deterioration, the
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:36: contaminants within sediments to be dredged.
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:37: fish which may experience a temporary deterioration in water quality due to re-suspension of sediment
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:37: during dredging. As discussed with Section 11 of the ES, sediment plumes induced by dredging are
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:37: dredging, resulting in rapid dispersion of suspended sediment. The installation of the new quay will
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:41: There is the possibility that dredging could The soft muddy sediments will be dredged using a Any deterioration in the Since control measures
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:41: levels of nutrients. This could impact on As a result, sediment release into the water the water body has the scheme design thus
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:41: water quality. The remaining material is column will be mitigated as far as practicable. potential to cause a reducing sediment
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:42: There is the possibility that dredging could The soft muddy sediments will be dredged using a The potential for EQS Since control measures
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:42: into the water column thus potentially As a result, sediment release into the water impact on biological scheme design and
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:42: causing Environmental Quality Standard column will be mitigated as far as practicable. communities therefore sediment
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:45:Potential The potential release of suspended solids In general, sediment plumes induced by dredging are Given that the potential changes are unlikely to be
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:45:on biological suspended sediment are only expected on a short
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:45: conditions of high suspended sediment, as
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:46: impact on WFD compliance parameters via release of sediment laden surface water or surface
TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:47: Use of an enclosed grab to reduce sediment release during removal of contaminated sediments.
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (5).pdf:3: through an increase in suspended sediments due to the
TR030002-000860-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.11B - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:7: Use of an enclosed grab to dredge the contaminated sediment (thereby minimising resuspension of
TR030002-000860-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.11B - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:7: overflowing and discharge of water containing suspended sediment into the estuary).
TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:55: (5) Any contaminated sediment (largely silt) lying deeper than one metre below the surface of the
TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:87: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which is
TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:87: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:89:affected by sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the construction
TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:89: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:89: 19.20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:89: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making good
TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:7:Section 5 – Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:8:Section 7 – Marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:9:14 The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume is selection of the dredge method. Contaminated Deemed Marine Licence (Schedule 5)
TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:9: sediments are to be dredged using an enclosed grab. Dredging of geological deposits may be
TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:9: During backhoe dredging, an experienced operator would be used to minimise losses of sediment into
TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:9: the water column. Other measures to limit the sediment plume generation comprise limiting the swing
TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:9: of the backhoe over water, thereby reducing the time when sediment can leak out of the bucket. The
TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:9: The re-suspension of sediment caused by CSD can be reduced through optimising the cutter speed,
TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:10:18 In order to minimise the spatial extent of the reduction in water quality during sediment placement in Deemed Marine Licence (Schedule 5)
TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:10: box would prevent significant release of suspended sediments during dewatering of placed dredged
TR030002-000018-Examination Library.pdf:13:APP-198 Section 5: Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime
TR030002-000018-Examination Library.pdf:13:APP-206 Section 7: Marine Sediment and Water Quality
TR030002-000018-Examination Library.pdf:13:APP-207 Section 7: Appendix 7.1 Benthic and Sediment Sampling Strategy
TR030002-000018-Examination Library.pdf:13:APP-208 Section 7: Appendix 7.2 Sediment Quality Data
TR030002-000472-Section 7 App 7.2 Sediment quality data.pdf:1:Sediment Quality Data
TR030002-000472-Section 7 App 7.2 Sediment quality data.pdf:24:Samples will initially be stored in the Sedimentology Laboratory.
TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:20:Section 7 – Marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:15:18.5.17 The results of the sediment plume dispersion modelling for a backhoe dredger and CSD, presented and
TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:15: is, therefore, predicted that there would be no impact on surface water abstractions due to sediment
TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:15: enclosed grab would be utilised to dredge the contaminated sediment that overlies the geological
TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:15: sediments beneath. The enclosed grab would result in negligible losses of sediment to the water
TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:16:18.5.18 The results of the sediment plume dispersion modelling undertaken for the TSHD show that mean
TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:16: increases in the concentration of total suspended sediment (in the region of 10mg/l to 20mg/l above
TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:16: due to increased suspended sediment would be temporary in nature. Based on the above, the
TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:16: outlined within Section 7.5 (with regard to minimising sediment plume dispersion during dredging)
TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:54: (5) Any contaminated sediment (largely silt) lying deeper than one metre below the surface of the
TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:84: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which is
TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:84: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:85:sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the construction of such of
TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:86: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:86: 20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:86: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making good
TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf:11:sediments is impossible to assess with accuracy. As such, no site-focussed
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (5).pdf:13:APP-198 Section 5: Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (5).pdf:13:APP-206 Section 7: Marine Sediment and Water Quality
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (5).pdf:13:APP-207 Section 7: Appendix 7.1 Benthic and Sediment Sampling Strategy
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (5).pdf:13:APP-208 Section 7: Appendix 7.2 Sediment Quality Data
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:3:collected in relation to other topics (e.g. hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime and marine and coastal ornithology) should
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:3:The potential impacts on marine sediment and water quality must be assessed with relation to sensitive receptors such as Section 11
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:3:The effects on natural fisheries resource from changes to marine sediment and water quality must also be assessed. Section 11
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:5:The increase in suspended sediment should be assessed in terms of the potential barrier to fish migration and behavioural Section 11
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:8:11.3.14 The predicted effects of the proposed scheme on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime and
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:8: potential impacts on marine sediment quality, water quality and marine ecology are relevant to this
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:9: benthic invertebrates found in subtidal and intertidal sediments. Intertidal habitats are a key marine
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:24:11.5.2 As discussed within Section 3, an enclosed grab is proposed for dredging the sediment present above
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:24: dispersion of contaminated sediment within the estuary during dredging. The potential for the release
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:24: of uncontaminated sediment during dredging of the sands and gravels, clay and marl remains. The text
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:24: sediment.
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:24:11.5.4 The re-suspension of sediment as a consequence of the proposed dredging could also potentially affect
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:25: behavioural effects. In general, sediment plumes induced by dredging are considered to pose only a
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:25: contaminated sediments. Backhoe dredging and enclosed grab dredgers are considered likely to
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:25: minimise the resuspension of sediment into the water column (assuming best operational practice is
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:25: anticipated to rapidly dilute and disperse temporarily increased suspended sediment concentrations.
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:25:11.5.12 Limiting re-suspension of sediment during TSHD can be achieved through the following measures:
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:26: significantly lower release rate of sediment to the water column compared with, for example, typical
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:26: CSD or TSHD. The main measure that can be adopted to minimise losses of sediment to the water
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:26: control over the dredging equipment is one of the main factors affecting sediment disturbance during
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:26: backhoe over water, thereby reducing the time when sediment can leak out of the bucket. In addition,
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:26:11.5.14 The re-suspension of sediment caused by CSD can be reduced through optimising the cutter speed,
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:45: benthic invertebrates found in subtidal and intertidal sediments. Environment Agency data on fish
TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:47: over water. Reduction in sediment plume gen
TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:48: (a) the undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for approval at least 6
TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:48: (b) the sediment sampling and analysis of the sediment must be completed by a laboratory
TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:48: (5) Any contaminated sediment (largely silt) lying deeper than 1 metre below the surface of the
TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:89: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which
TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:90: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:91:be affected by sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the
TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:91:Sedimentation, etc: remedial action
TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:91: 20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:92: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document.pdf:3: through an increase in suspended sediments due to the
TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:7:Section 5 – Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:8:Section 7 – Marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:9:12 The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume is selection of the dredge method. Contaminated MMO Licence Sch 4
TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:9: sediments are to be dredged using an enclosed grab. Dredging of geological deposits may be
TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:9: During backhoe dredging, an experienced operator would be used to minimise losses of sediment into
TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:9: the water column. Other measures to limit the sediment plume generation comprise limiting the swing
TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:9: of the backhoe over water, thereby reducing the time when sediment can leak out of the bucket. The
TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:9: The re-suspension of sediment caused by CSD can be reduced through optimising the cutter speed,
TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:10:16 In order to minimise the spatial extent of the reduction in water quality during sediment placement in Requirement 9
TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:10: box would prevent significant release of suspended sediments during dewatering of placed dredged
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:7:3. HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:7:3.1. The assessment of likely effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime was informed by
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:7: modelling of sediment plume released from construction activities;
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:7: sediment transport; and,
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:7: (comprising effects on tidal propagation, wave climate, current speeds and sediment budget of
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:7: There would be a localised redistribution of (existing) sediment deposition in response to
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:7: predicted changes in current speed. This very small change in the overall fine sediment
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:7: and no effect on sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the estuary would occur.
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:7: sedimentary regime is appropriate. There are no areas of disagreement over the findings of
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:10:5. MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:10:5.1. The baseline environment for marine sediment and water quality was informed by the
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:10: Sediment quality data from samples collected as part of the EIAs for the Northern Gateway
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:10: A sediment quality survey undertaken as part of the EIA for the Harbour facilities during
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:10: Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQG) for the Protection of Aquatic Life (Canadian
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:10: and sediment quality during the construction and operational phases of the Harbour facilities.
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:10: re-suspension of sediment during capital dredging and piling;
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:10:5.4. The sediment quality survey confirmed that the sediment overlying virgin geology that would
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:10:5.6. The following controls have been proposed in order to minimise impacts to marine sediment
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:11: limiting re-suspension of sediment during trailing suction hopper dredging can be achieved
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:11: reduction of sediment plumes during backhoe dredging can be achieved by using an
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:11: resuspension of sediment during cutter suction dredging can be reduced through
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:11: sediment during placement of dredged material required to construct the habitat
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:11: enhancement. Only sediment that is deemed acceptable for disposal or an alternative use
TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:11: Bran Sands lagoon (i.e. no sediment precluded from disposal at sea due to elevated
TR030002-000866-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 8.9 - Applicants Responses to Rule 17 Letter and Comments on the RIES.pdf:3:processes, habitats or water and sediment quality.
TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:1: Section 6 (hydrology, hydrogeology and land quality) and Section 7 (marine sediment quality and
TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:1: effects of the proposed scheme on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (reported in Section 5)
TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:6:particular the effects resulting from changes to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime. The
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:5:and sedimentary regime is appropriate. Document 6.5 (Appendices to ES)
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:8:3. HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:8:3.1. The assessment of likely effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime was informed by
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:8: modelling of sediment plume released from construction activities;
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:8: sediment transport; and,
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:8: (comprising effects on tidal propagation, wave climate, current speeds and sediment budget of
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:8: There would be a localised redistribution of (existing) sediment deposition in response to
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:8: predicted changes in current speed. This very small change in the overall fine sediment
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:8: and no effect on sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the estuary would occur.
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:8: sedimentary regime is appropriate. There are no areas of disagreement over the findings of
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:9:4. MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:9:4.1. The baseline environment for marine sediment and water quality was informed by the
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:9: Sediment quality data from samples collected as part of the EIAs for the Northern Gateway
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:9: A sediment quality survey undertaken as part of the EIA for the Harbour facilities during
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:9: Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQG) for the Protection of Aquatic Life (Canadian
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:9: and sediment quality during the construction and operational phases of the Harbour facilities.
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:9: re-suspension of sediment during capital dredging and piling;
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:9:4.4. The sediment quality survey confirmed that the sediment overlying virgin geology that would
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:9:4.6. The following controls have been proposed in order to minimise impacts to marine sediment
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:10: limiting re-suspension of sediment during trailing suction hopper dredging can be achieved
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:10: reduction of sediment plumes during backhoe dredging can be achieved by using an
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:10: resuspension of sediment during cutter suction dredging can be reduced through
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:10: sediment during placement of dredged material required to construct the habitat
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:14: release of sediments during piling and capital dredging; and,
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:14: changes to sediment transport pathways / coastal processes.
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:14: impacts arising from disturbance to uncontaminated sediment (as well as contaminated
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:14: sediment);
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:15: water / sediment quality issues that may arise during the operational phase due to
TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:15: lagoon. Natural England has suggested that this could either smother soft sediments pumped
TR030002-000730-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 5.pdf:4: 2.6 Regulatory Positions for the use of Treated Contaminated Sediment in Construction ………….. 9
TR030002-000730-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 5.pdf:6: Harbour Facilities (see section 1.2 below). The layers of sediment to be dredged include contaminated
TR030002-000730-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 5.pdf:8: Royal HaskoningDHV, ‘York Potash Project - Sediment disposal – Hazardous Waste Assessment‘, 9Y0989-109-
TR030002-000730-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 5.pdf:9: contaminated sediment has been treated to a specification that meets the requirements for this use.
TR030002-000730-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 5.pdf:10: Royal HaskoningDHV, ‘York Potash Project - Sediment disposal – Hazardous Waste Assessment‘, 9Y0989-109-
TR030002-000730-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 5.pdf:11: for the contaminated sediment.
TR030002-000730-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 5.pdf:13:2.6 Regulatory Positions for the use of Treated Contaminated Sediment in Construction
TR030002-000730-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 5.pdf:14:2.6.8 Where the intention is to use the treated sediment at another site, the treatment of hazardous
TR030002-000730-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 5.pdf:15: Sediment Network7 that has a focus on the management of sediment.
TR030002-000730-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 5.pdf:20: dredged sediment:
TR030002-000730-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 5.pdf:20: Royal HaskoningDHV, ‘York Potash Project - Sediment disposal – Hazardous Waste Assessment‘, 9Y0989-109-
TR030002-000730-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 5.pdf:22: preferred, there could be scope to use treated contaminated sediment as backfill material where it has
TR030002-000730-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 5.pdf:23: contaminated sediment suitable for use gave rise to unacceptable emissions, or was technically
TR030002-000730-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 5.pdf:24:4.6.2 The option to provide a dedicated dewatering or treatment facility for the contaminated sediment on-site
TR030002-000730-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 5.pdf:37: Sediment Network28 that has a focus on the management of sediment.
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:14:associated storage and car parking. This sediment in the quay berth.
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:38: less able to withstand further impacts. NE note that further lighting assessments, noise assessments and sediment quality
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:39: reduction through loss of fluvial sediments from dredging) should also be considered in this section (10.4.8). Construction of
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:39: 2.2.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime - NE requires further clarity regarding the infill rate of 100,000m3 per year.
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:39: 2.2.2 Marine sediment and water quality - NE notes that more recent sediment quality samples have been taken for the
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:41: the area over which the potential effects of the proposed scheme on tidal currents and sediment transport may occur. Such
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:41: backhoe dredger. The MMO would expect the full details of the sediment plume modelling to be included in the final ES i.e.
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:41: calibration, validation, increase in suspended sediment data.
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:41: The MMO agrees that increasing the suspended sediment concentrations by 10-50mg/l would be temporary in nature and
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:41: short lived, however the increase in suspended sediment should be assessed in terms of the potential barrier to fish
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:41: 5.5 Sediment and water quality - It is noted that the sediment samples are currently being analysed and a full impact
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:41: the sediment analyses results for contaminants. Dependant on the levels of contamination, mitigation measures may be
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:41: of the risks associated with disturbance to potentially contaminated sediment will be undertaken during the EIA process.
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:42: sedimentation (and therefore increased maintenance dredging) or increased erosion within the final ES. The MMO would
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:42: results of sediment analysis and the length of licence, frequent sample analysis will be required throughout the scheme of
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:43: Dredging: Sediment contamination test results should be made available at the earliest opportunity to allow for consideration
TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:43: protection of migratory fish. Monitoring of sediment levels needs to be agreed to allow for background and threshold levels
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:12: preserved beneath later sediments. The AOC Archaeology desk-based assessment highlighted that,
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:22: proposed Harbour facility identified five broad sedimentary units, as interpreted from the logs:
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:22: x Unit 2 Estuarine alluvium and peat (possible mid-Holocene sediments)
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:22: x Unit 3 Marine sediments / Estuarine alluvium
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:22: x Unit 4 Estuarine alluvium / polluted fluvial sediments
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:25: concentrations of some contaminants in the marine sediments overlying geological material, an
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:25: enclosed grab is proposed to dredge the fine sediments overlying the geological deposits. This would
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:25: reduce opportunities for archaeological material to be identified within these sediments, although
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:25: sediment is ‘younger’ than the material below it.
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:29: (Cotswold Archaeology, 2014a) (Appendix 15.3). One of the sedimentary units identified and
TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:29: sediments) was identified as possibly having the potential to contain in-situ prehistoric
TR030002-000712-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 8.pdf:4: Coastal processes Habitat Loss / Disturbance Water/sediment In-combination
TR030002-000712-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 8.pdf:5:d see Table 8.2 (Water and sediment quality) for evidence supporting conclusions.
TR030002-000712-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 8.pdf:5:an effect on coastal processes, habitats or water and sediment quality. Given that the decommissioning works would take place in 100
TR030002-000712-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 8.pdf:6: Coastal processes Habitat Loss / Disturbance Water/sediment In-combination
TR030002-000712-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 8.pdf:6:d see Table 8.2 (Water and sediment quality) for evidence supporting conclusions.
TR030002-000712-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 8.pdf:7:an effect on coastal processes, habitats or water and sediment quality. Given that the decommissioning works would take place in 100
TR030002-000712-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 8.pdf:10: Cleveland SPA Disruption to the sediment budget (e.g. loss of fluvial sediment to offshore disposal sites due to Coastal processes
TR030002-000712-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 8.pdf:10: and Ramsar site maintenance dredging and potential impacts to bird feeding and interruption of sediment flow to
TR030002-000712-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 8.pdf:11: Effects on food resources due to reduced water quality following dredging and deposition of sediment Water and
TR030002-000712-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 8.pdf:11: disrobed during dredging in intertidal areas. Effect on water quality in Bran Sands lagoon. sediment quality
TR030002-000712-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 8.pdf:18: Coastal processes Habitat Loss / Disturbance Water/sediment In-combination
TR030002-000712-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 8.pdf:19:an effect on coastal processes, habitats or water and sediment quality. Given that the decommissioning works would take place in 100
TR030002-000712-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 8.pdf:20: Coastal processes Habitat Loss / Disturbance Water/sediment In-combination
TR030002-000712-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 8.pdf:21:an effect on coastal processes, habitats or water and sediment quality. Given that the decommissioning works would take place in 100
TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:1:Hydrology, Hydrogeology, Marine Sediment and Water quality, Coastal
TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:19:Hydrology, Hydrogeology, Marine Sediment and Water quality, Coastal
TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:20:Disposal of contaminated sediments from capital dredging
TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:20:sediments that cannot be disposed of at sea would be deposited at appropriate
TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:21:Sediment plume modelling data
TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:21:The marine sediment and water quality assessment uses the sediment plume
TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:21:the validation and calibration of the sediment regime models. The applicant is
TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:21:concerns on the sediment plume modelling simulations and assessment of
TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:22:contaminated sediment above geological deposits (ES paragraphs 7.5.4. and
TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:22:contaminated sediment?
TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:22:The ES does not identify any significant impacts in relation to marine sediment
TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:22:and water quality and does not propose any monitoring of sediment or marine
TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:22:responses on the scope of the sediment quality survey) record the following
TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:48: (a) the undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for approval at least 6
TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:48: (b) the sediment sampling and analysis of the sediment must be completed by a laboratory
TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:48: (5) Any contaminated sediment (largely silt) lying deeper than 1 metre below the surface of the
TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:93: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which
TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:93: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:94:be affected by sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the
TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:95:Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:95: 20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:95: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making
TR030002-000752-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 1.pdf:15:clearance and issues with sedimentation of the channel. In order to model the current situation as closely as possible,
TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:56: (a) the undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for approval at least six
TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:56: (b) the sediment sampling and analysis of the sediment must be completed by a laboratory
TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:56: (5) Any contaminated sediment (largely silt) lying deeper than one metre below the surface of the
TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:99: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which is
TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:99: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:100:sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the construction of such of
TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:101: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:101: 20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:101: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making good
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:51: with port development may affect sediment transport which in turn
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:51: is an assessment of benthic ecology from sediment samples taken, of
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:53: assessment concludes that the changes in sedimentation as a
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:53: the increased concentration of sediment in the river during capital
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:56: the effect of such noise and sedimentation on spawning fish RR-015.
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:62: sediment in the water column which could reduce food availability or,
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:62: being less susceptible because of tidal variations in sediment levels.
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:62: possible which generally minimises dispersal of sediments. The
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:62: underwater noise and sedimentation on spawning fish RR-015. They
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:69: sedimentary regimes.
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:83: landside works would not affect contaminated sediments and dredging
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:84: compliance as a consequence of release of sediment laden
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:92: habitats or water and sediment quality, and that as the
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:93: changes to sediment and water quality; and
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:96: Changes to sediment and water quality
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:96: APP-127 and APP-128 confirms that changes to sediment and water
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:96: include suspended sediment concentration in the water column during
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:96: capital dredging, sediment deposition and water quality in Bran Sands
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:97:6.6.19 To avoid contamination as a result of suspended sediment, the silts
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:193:APP-198 Section 5: Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:193:APP-206 Section 7: Marine Sediment and Water Quality
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:193:APP-207 Section 7: Appendix 7.1 Benthic and Sediment Sampling Strategy
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:193:APP-208 Section 7: Appendix 7.2 Sediment Quality Data
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:266: (a) the undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for approval at least
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:266: (b) the sediment sampling and analysis of the sediment must be completed by a laboratory
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:266: (5) Any contaminated sediment (largely silt) lying deeper than one metre below the surface of
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:311: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:311: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:312:be affected by sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:313: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:313: 20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:313: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making
TR030002-000726-York Potash Limited (Document 6.11).pdf:6: Use of an enclosed grab to dredge the contaminated sediment (thereby minimising resuspension of
TR030002-000726-York Potash Limited (Document 6.11).pdf:7: overflowing and discharge of water containing suspended sediment into the estuary).
TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:57: (a) the undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for approval at least six
TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:57: (b) the sediment sampling and analysis of the sediment must be completed by a laboratory
TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:57: (5) Any contaminated sediment (largely silt) lying deeper than one metre below the surface of the
TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:101: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which is
TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:101: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:102:sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the construction of such of
TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:103: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:103: 20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:103: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making good
TR030002-000714-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:9:1.3 planning sediments from capital dredging contaminants.
TR030002-000714-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:10:contaminated sediments that
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (3).pdf:13:APP-198 Section 5: Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (3).pdf:13:APP-206 Section 7: Marine Sediment and Water Quality
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (3).pdf:13:APP-207 Section 7: Appendix 7.1 Benthic and Sediment Sampling Strategy
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (3).pdf:13:APP-208 Section 7: Appendix 7.2 Sediment Quality Data
TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:57: (a) the undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for approval at least six
TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:57: (b) the sediment sampling and analysis of the sediment must be completed by a laboratory
TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:57: (5) Any contaminated sediment (largely silt) lying deeper than one metre below the surface of the
TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:100: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which is
TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:100: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:101:sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the construction of such of
TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:102: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:102: 20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:102: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making good
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:46: chapters have provided confirmation of Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (Section 5.4 of
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:47: Marine sediment and water quality (Section 7.4 of
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:47: the current sediment quality at the location of the
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:60: Hydrology, Hydrogeology, Marine Sediment and
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:62:HWF 1.3 Applicant Disposal of contaminated sediments from
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:63: be agreed in advance with the relevant management of contaminated dredged sediments and
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:63: expectation that contaminated sediments contaminated sediment, including details of sites that may
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:63: be deposited at appropriate licensed sediments.
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:64: and how would this be secured in the management of the contaminated sediments (hence this
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:65:HWF 1.6 Applicant Sediment plume modelling data
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:65: Marine The marine sediment and water quality Two sediment modelling tools were applied to the project;
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:65: Management assessment uses the sediment plume an estuary-wide sediment regime model using the
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:65: assessment of impacts on marine water sediment plume model SEDPLUME (originated by HR
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:65: Organisation (MMO) in their relevant overall sediment infill rate in the Tees as is described in
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:66: sediment regime models. The applicant is SEDPLUME is used to predict the dispersion of sediment
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:66: concerns on the sediment plume sediment release source term which is included within the
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:66: of sediment release was used in the modelling.
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:67: for Deadline 1. sediments. In addition, the dispersive nature of the
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:67: contaminated sediment above geological Tracker. It is confirmed that paragraph 6 of the DML is the
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:68: sediment?
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:69: England (NE) impacts in relation to marine sediment and
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:69: monitoring of sediment or marine water
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:69: the scope of the sediment quality survey)
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:70: whether it is intended to conduct this in deposition of sediment from capital dredging on Seal
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:70: monitoring as it is not evident from the ES Sands and, therefore whether baseline benthic/sediment
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:70: secured and delivered through the DCO considered unlikely that sediment that is suspended by
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:70: Tees estuary. As evidence for this position, sediment
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:71: predicted negligible sediment deposition at Seal Sands.
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:71: was no significant risk of sediment deposition at Seal
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:71: no sediment deposition was predicted at Seal Sands and,
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:105: (paragraph 11.2.1), include maintenance effect of maintenance dredging on sediment budget of the
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:105: with the capital dredging required for the sediment resuspension during the dredging activity) and
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:105: proposed development. the potential for interaction between sediment suspended
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:105: some of the sediment disturbed during Phase 2 capital
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:105: required for Phase 2 of the development? spatial extent of any sediment plume created by capital
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:129: Management The applicant has provided a WFD The MMO’s request specifically related to the sediment
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:130: of the Tees water body. The proposed inputs of fine sediment into the Tees estuary as any
TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:130: habitat enhancement works are sediment placed as part of the habitat enhancement
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (2).pdf:13:APP-198 Section 5: Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (2).pdf:13:APP-206 Section 7: Marine Sediment and Water Quality
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (2).pdf:13:APP-207 Section 7: Appendix 7.1 Benthic and Sediment Sampling Strategy
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (2).pdf:13:APP-208 Section 7: Appendix 7.2 Sediment Quality Data
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (3).pdf:3: through an increase in suspended sediments due to the
TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:3: were less that those published on the Admiralty Chart due to sedimentation within the approach
TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:6: current channel depths do not match the advertised depths due to sedimentation within the channel).
TR030002-000747-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:3: Organisation contaminated sediment above geological
TR030002-000747-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:4: sediment? Paragraph 7.5.20 of the ES (Doc
TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:7:Further lighting assessment, noise assessment and sediment quality data are awaited with are essential for a Sections 14.5 and 1
TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:58: (a) the undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for approval at least six
TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:58: (b) the sediment sampling and analysis of the sediment must be completed by a laboratory
TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:58: (5) Any contaminated sediment (largely silt) lying deeper than one metre below the surface of the
TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:98: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which is
TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:98: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:99:sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the construction of such of
TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:100: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:100: 20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:100: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making good
TR030002-000672-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 10 to 21.pdf:37: enter the quay area safely. The dredging build-up of river sediment in the quay
TR030002-000672-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 10 to 21.pdf:296: • Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime
TR030002-000672-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 10 to 21.pdf:296: • Marine Sediment and Water Quality
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:6: 5.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes 33
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:6: 5.3 Marine sediment and water quality 45
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:16: over which the potential effects of the proposed scheme on tidal currents and sediment
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:35: to an assessment of sediment quality which would be undertaken as part of the EIA
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:41:5.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:41: This section describes the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of the Tees
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:41: and sedimentary processes will draw on information from publicly-available information
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:42:hydrodynamic and sedimentological regimes in the Tees have been described
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:43:Sediment
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:43:In general, suspended sediment concentrations are low within the estuary and within
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:43:events. In general, the suspended sediment concentrations appear to be dominated by
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:43:downstream. In the vicinity of the proposed scheme, suspended sediment
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:43:40mg/l to 80mg/l. In terms of the tidal sequence, the highest suspended sediment levels
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:44: sediment have been noted around the Shell Jetty, but with little penetration further up
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:44: Bed sampling results in the vicinity of the proposed scheme show bed sediments in the
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:44: forces for sediment transport are the tidal flows, density driven currents, wave induced
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:44: sedimentary regime of the estuary is likely to arise from the capital dredging of the
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:44: of sediment released from the bed and/or overflowing from the dredger. Sediments
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:44: the bed elsewhere. Whilst disturbance of seabed sediments would occur during the
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:44: disposal of dredged material may have an effect on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:44: regime (e.g. effect on tidal currents and sediment transport). However, as both are
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:44: would any significant effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime beyond
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:44: • Changes to the sediment regime in the area as a consequence of any changes
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:44: in the estuarine hydrodynamics, including sedimentation into the dredged berth
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:45: impacts on sediment and water quality, as discussed within Section 5.3.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:45: Sediment dispersion from dredging
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:45: Based on sediment release rates (to be defined when further information is known about
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:45: dredged sediment types and quantities, dredger vessels and production rates), the
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:46: extent of the sediment plume and the high freshwater flow, neap tide conditions will be
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:46: footprints of elevated suspended sediment concentrations and deposition arising from
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:46: An assessment of sediment dispersion (or retention) from the offshore disposal sites will
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:46: be undertaken. The potential for release of sediment into the Tees estuary (e.g. through
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:46: Sedimentation
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:46: sedimentation regime as it would not significantly change the amount of sediment
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:46: imported to the Tees from offshore (the largest sediment input). However, it is proposed
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:46: that a desk-assessment of sedimentation rates at the proposed quay is undertaken.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:51: the waste disposal area, it is considered that there is potential for the sediment within
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:53:5.3 Marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:53: Sediment quality
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:53: and wastewater discharges, this legacy remains in areas of estuarine sediments that
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:53: remain undisturbed. This is less of an issue where sediment is regularly removed, such
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:53: There have been a number of sediment quality studies undertaken in the Tees estuary
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:53: sediments (Tansley, 2003).
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:53: Sediment samples were collected as part of the EIA for the NGCT during 2006 (Royal
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:53: and within the area proposed for the container terminal. The sediment sampling
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:53: A sediment quality survey was carried out in December 2008 to characterise the area
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:53: OD or as deep as the sediment layer went, whichever horizon was reached first. The
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:54:Figure 5.3 Sediment sample locations for the NGCT EIA and QEII Jetty EIA
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:55: There is no existing sediment quality data available for the footprint of the proposed
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:55: that there is potential for water and sediment within the lagoon to be contaminated
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:55: where any disturbed sediment may be deposited.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:55: Reduced water quality associated with sediment disturbance during dredging and piling
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:55: The potential exists for sediment disturbance / re-suspension during dredging of the
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:55: of sediment during such activities has the potential to adversely impact upon water
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:55: and release of contaminants adsorbed to sediment (if present) into the water column.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:56:etc.) which would adversely impact upon water and sediment quality.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:56:dredging will be lower. There would be some short-term build-up of fine sandy sediment
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:56:accumulation of coarser sediments arising from the dredging of stiff clay was also
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:56:Increased suspended sediment concentration due to maintenance dredging
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:56:increase in suspended sediment concentration. It is anticipated that this would be
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:57: Due to the lack of site-specific sediment quality data and the undisturbed nature of the
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:57: seabed at the location of the proposed berth pocket, it is proposed that sediment
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:57: proposed that sediment samples are recovered at depth and at the surface along the
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:57: It is proposed that the sediment samples will be analysed for the following parameters:
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:57: • Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life (CCME,
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:57: The numerical modelling (see Section 5.1) and any existing sediment survey data for the
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:57: The main form of mitigation to limit sediment plume generation due to dredging is
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:57: lower release rate of sediment to the water column compared with, for example, a cutter
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:58: of settlement tanks and appropriate disposal of sediment to a licenced waste
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:58: of the intertidal sedimentary habitats of the Tees estuary have been reclaimed over this
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:58: areas subject to regular dredging and sediment removal. Analysis of macrobenthic data
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:61:suspended sediment during dredging and deposition following dredging
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:61:An increase in the total suspended sediment (TSS) concentration in the water column
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:61:The release of sediment into the water column could potentially affect the dissolved
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:61:biological oxygen demand. Sediment would disperse from the dredge location and
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:62:the seabed at the locations where sediment settles out of suspension. Dredging is also
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:62:likely to release contaminants that may be bound to seabed sediments into the water
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:62:the location of the dredging activity, with the volume of sediment released into the water
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:62:vicinity of the dredging, dispersion and dilution of the sediment plume would occur and
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:62:sediment concentrations. However, this effect will be considered fully within the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:63: would be some short-term build-up of fine sandy sediment and this would be dispersed
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:63: over time. Some longer term accumulation of coarser sediments arising from the
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:63: The results of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary assessment will also inform this
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:63: section of the EIA, particularly the prediction of sediment plume dispersion during capital
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:67: resources for birds, in particular terns, through increased total suspended sediment
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:67: deposition of fine sediment disturbed by dredging.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:67: flow regime. In addition, sediment dispersion modelling will be undertaken to
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:67: demonstrate the fate of sediment released into the water column during the capital
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:68: fine sediment.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:72: which feed on benthic invertebrates found in subtidal and intertidal sediments. The
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:73: and/or for prolonged periods of time, an increase in suspended sediment concentration
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:73: can also release contaminants bound to seabed sediments into the water column,
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:74: sedimentary regime, marine sediment quality, water quality and marine and coastal
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:74: The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume generation due to dredging is the
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:74: rate of sediment to the water column compared with, for example, a cutter suction
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:83: deposits) still remains, preserved beneath later sediments. There is also potential for
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:83: surfaces (often indicted by peat deposits and other organic sediments).
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:83: preserved beneath later sediments.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:89: in effects to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, which consequently could
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:89: effect on hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime (and consequently flood risk) than the
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:92: changes in hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:93: potential impact on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime and results of any
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:100: • Hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:100: • Marine sediment and water quality.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:105:Hydrodynamic • Creation of a sediment plume during dredging and piling works. • Use of TELEMAC-3D flow model to
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:105:sedimentary approach channel. released during capital dredging.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:105:regime • Changes to sediment regime including sedimentation into the • Desk assessment of sedimentation ra
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:105:Marine • Reduced water quality associated with dredging, piling and • Recovery of sediment samples at th
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:105:sediment and
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:105: • Reduced water quality due to offshore disposal of dredged • Sediment quality results would be c
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:106: • Release of sediment into the water column leading to increased also inform this section of the EIA.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:108: • Effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime could information and meets with their tech
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:109: Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (2002). Canadian sediment quality
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:110:HR Wallingford, (2002). Teesmouth Sediment Study. EX 4514.
TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:110:sedimentation studies. Report EX 5250, Release 1.0, January 2006.
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (4).pdf:3: through an increase in suspended sediments due to the
TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:54: (5) Any contaminated sediment (largely silt) lying deeper than one metre below the surface of the
TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:84: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which is
TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:84: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:85:sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the construction of such of
TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:86: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:86: 20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:86: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making good
TR030002-000569-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2a - MDT Planning Statement.pdf:87: sedimentary Fordon Evaporite deposit contains significant proportions of polyhalite. The deposit
TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:18:The marl is geological (i.e. uncontaminated) material that underlies contaminated sediment. A description of
TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:18:the sediment quality at the site of the proposed port terminal and within the footprint of the capital dredging is
TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:23:sediments (i.e. concentrations of various contaminants) is routinely tested and the licence is only granted if
TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:23:the sediment meets appropriate standards.
TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:23:Consequently, it is not expected that there would be a concern with regard sediment quality that would
TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:27:increase further as the organic content of the sediment increases (Evans and Lucas, 2000).
TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:27:recreated intertidal area at Teesmouth when new silt layers had deposited over compacted sediment created
TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:27:Bolam and Whomersley (2003) studied the nature of invertebrate colonisation of fine grained sediments
TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:27: 2. Vertical migration up through the placed sediment.
TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:27:occur due to the smothering effect and depth of sediment associated with the placement of the dredged
TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:27:material. Some lateral migration (mechanism 3) may occur between the sediments of the lagoon and the
TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:28:sedimentary habitats in the estuary and lagoon.
TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:42: of these sediments should be given thorough consideration (10.3.36)
TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:43: truth the suitability of the sediment (particle size and lack of contamination) .(10.3.18)
TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:46:sediment quality and particle size i.e. only want ‘uncontaminated fines’ for this project.
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (1).pdf:13:APP-198 Section 5: Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (1).pdf:13:APP-206 Section 7: Marine Sediment and Water Quality
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (1).pdf:13:APP-207 Section 7: Appendix 7.1 Benthic and Sediment Sampling Strategy
TR030002-000018-Examination Library (1).pdf:13:APP-208 Section 7: Appendix 7.2 Sediment Quality Data
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (2).pdf:3: through an increase in suspended sediments due to the
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:3:The Secretary of State agrees with the intention to use hydrodynamic and sedimentary assessment data that is due to be gathered
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:4:Natural England noted that further lighting assessment, noise and sediment quality assessment are to be undertaken which are es
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:4:The indirect impacts on SPA birds on Bran Sands through loss of sediments from dredging should be considered.
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:5:It will be necessary to assess whether the works will affect any other part of the Tees estuary in terms of sedimentation or increased eros
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:6: tidal currents and sediment transport may occur (Section 1.4).
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:8: made to the results of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime studies (Section 5) and the impact
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:8: assessments for noise and vibration, water and sediment quality (Section 7), marine ecology (Section
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:23:9.5.1 As discussed in Section 5.5, the proposed capital dredging would cause suspension of fine sediment
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:23: into the water column, causing a sediment plume which could potentially affect habitats used by
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:23: through the water column. The proposed use of an enclosed grab for dredging contaminated sediment
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:24: suspended sediment concentration resulting from the use of this dredging plant is presented in Section
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:24:9.5.2 The potential effect of dredging using a CSD and TSHD on suspended sediment concentration in the
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:24: for some species of waterbirds. On the basis of the sediment plume dispersion modelling, no impact is
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:24: suspended sediment likely.
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:24:9.5.3 It is predicted that increased suspended sediment concentrations for the duration of capital dredging
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:24:9.5.4 The mitigation measures that are proposed to limit sediment release during capital dredging (see
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:24: Smothering of intertidal food resource through deposition of fine sediment following dredging
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:24:9.5.5 The results of the sediment deposition modelling predict that no material disturbed during capital
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:34: the sediment (from the point of establishment of the new habitat), and the exchange of water between
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37: Effect on sedimentary regime (budget) of the Tees estuary and consequences for intertidal
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37: speeds integrate to result in an effect on the sediment budget of the estuary (as described in Section
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:9.6.30 The largest sediment input to the Tees estuary is from offshore and given that the proposed scheme
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37: on the supply of material into the Tees estuary from offshore. In addition, no changes to sediment
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:9.6.31 Sediment transport modelling has been undertaken to predict the increases in infill in the berth pocket,
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:38: change in the pattern of distribution of sediment deposition in the subtidal zone, with a small increase in
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:38: fine sediment infill in Chart area 9 (approximately 1%) (see Figure 5-14), associated with a small
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:38: decrease in fine sediment infill in Chart area 8 (approximately 2 to 3%).
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:38: redistribution of locations of sediment deposition in response to predicted changes in current speeds as
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:38: a result of the proposed works. It is predicted that this very small change in the overall fine sediment
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:38: no effect on sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees estuary would occur.
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:41:9.9.8 The hydrodynamic and sediment transport modelling predicts that there would be no impact on
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:42: Reduction of sediment plumes during backhoe dredgin
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:42: Re-suspension of sediment during CSD can be reduce
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:42:sediment following
TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:44:Effect on sedimentary - - No impact None required
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:4: the potential to be indirectly affected (e.g. through sediment deposition). The study area, therefore,
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:5:The Secretary of State welcomes that the assessment will draw on the results of the sedimentary and hydrodynamic assessment.
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:6:The effects on marine ecological receptors from changes to marine sediment and water quality must also be assessed.
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:7:has been provided prior to the availability of sediment analysis results. The MMO notes that a full assessment will be undertaken i
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:11: is considered unlikely that sediment what this assertion is based on. sedim
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:11:Natural England noted that maintenance Point noted. The sediment None No ad
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:11:also be given to the interruption of sediment inform this.
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:17: adjacent areas that potentially would be indirectly affected (e.g. through sediment deposition during
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:17: suitability and photographed to determine sample volume, visual characteristics of the sediment and
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:17: presence of anoxia and epifauna. A sub-sample of the sediment was retained for particle size analysis
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:17: (PSA) to enable any sediment community associations to be determined. The sub-sample for PSA
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:17: analysis was recovered using a small core (a cut-off 100ml syringe) to remove sediment from the
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:17: sediment recovered from each core, standardised the sampled sediment depth profile between
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:17: sampling stations, minimised bias of sampling of certain sediment types and reduced the volume of
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:17: sediment required for PSA analysis.
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:23:8.3.26 The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, marine sediment
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:25: construction of breakwaters and training walls. Over 80% of the intertidal sedimentary habitats of the
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:25: similar in faunal composition to previously surveyed fine sediment locations within the estuary (Royal
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:25: for the NGCT. The survey identified that subtidal sediments comprised high silt/clay content in the
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:26: these areas. Towards the mouth of the estuary, in the sandy sediments, the infauna was dominated by
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:26: numerically dominant. These species are typically associated with estuarine sedimentary habitats.
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:27: enriched sublittoral muddy sediments). Connor et al. (2004) note the presence of this biotope in the
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:27: (Capitella capitata and Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment). This was
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:27: capitata in enriched sublittoral muddy sediments), the occurrence of which in the Tees estuary has
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:30:8.4.22 Intertidal areas (which can be sedimentary, such as sand and mudflat, or rocky habitats) represent
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:48: frontage and would create intertidal sediment feeding areas for waterbirds. .
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:48: Potential impacts to marine ecology from increased total suspended sediment during dredging
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:48: Sediment resuspension
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:48: phase would result in increases in the total suspended sediment (TSS) concentrations of the water
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:48: contaminated sediments into the water column given the proposed use of an enclosed grab for
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:49: the potential impact to marine ecology associated with the resuspension of uncontaminated sediment.
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:49: feeding apparatus (e.g. filter feeding molluscs). In addition, high concentrations of suspended sediment
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:49:8.5.19 In general, sediment plumes induced by dredging are considered to pose only a limited risk to water
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:49: basis during Phase 1 and Phase 2. During dredging, suspended sediment would rapidly disperse away
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:49: illustrated in the sediment dispersion plots included in Section 5.5).
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:49: receptors from increased concentrations of suspended sediment and sediment deposition following
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:49: sediment into the water column as far as possible (assuming best operational practice is implemented
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:49: increased concentrations of suspended sediment within the water column due to dredging using a
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:49:8.5.21 The sediment plume dispersion plots presented in Section 5.5 illustrate that the footprint of effect on
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:49: suspended sediment is greatest for a TSHD during low river flow and spring tide conditions. On
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:50: Sediment deposition
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:50:8.5.23 As discussed above, a proportion of the sediment that is dredged would be disturbed, re-suspended
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:50:8.5.24 The results of the sediment plume modelling undertaken specifically for the proposed scheme are
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:50: tens of centimetres is predicted. The sediment predicted to be deposited within the immediate area of
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:50:8.5.26 No average increase in suspended sediment concentration is shown over the intertidal for any of the
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:50: potential dredging methods, leading to a prediction of negligible sediment being able to deposit on the
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:50: intertidal areas. Based on the sediment plume modelling results, no significant indirect impacts on
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:50: intertidal habitats due to sediment deposition following dredging are anticipated. Subtidal deposition is
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:50:8.5.28 The controls outlined within Section 7.5 with regard to minimising suspended sediment load during
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:59: (Capitella capitata in enriched sublittoral muddy sediments) and SS.SMU.SMuVS.CapTubi (Capitella
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:59: capitata and Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment) from the shallower
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:60: (Capitella capitata in enriched sublittoral muddy sediments) and SS.SMU.SMuVS.CapTubi (Capitella
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:60: capitata and Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment) biotopes. The
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:60: deposition of sediment. A summary of the potential impacts anticipated to arise during the construction
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:61:suspended during Low Low Negligible Reduction of sediment plumes during backhoe dredgin
TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:61: Re-suspension of sediment during CSD can be reduce
TR030002-000474-Section 8 App 8.2 Underwater noise modelling report.pdf:13:has shown that suction noise dominates measured levels where the sediment is made up of
TR030002-000474-Section 8 App 8.2 Underwater noise modelling report.pdf:13:with CSDs, despite the operation of a cutterhead. As the sediment to be dredged in the River
TR030002-000474-Section 8 App 8.2 Underwater noise modelling report.pdf:14:Dredger Specification Date and Sediment Source Transmission Author
TR030002-000474-Section 8 App 8.2 Underwater noise modelling report.pdf:15:Dredger Specification Date and Sediment Source Transmission Author
TR030002-000372-Rule 17 Letter.pdf:4: processes, habitats or water and sediment quality. Requirement 11 of the draft
TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (1).pdf:3: through an increase in suspended sediments due to the
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:8: concentrations of contaminants within the sediment. Capital dredging of the sands and gravels is likely
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:13:2.2 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:13:2.2.1 Hydrodynamic and sediment transport modelling were undertaken for the proposed Harbour facilities.
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:13: the scheme. No change in the supply of fine sediment from offshore is predicted and the predicted
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:13: accumulation of sediment within the berth pocket and the section of the approach channel to be
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:13: only. As a result, no effect on the overall sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary is predicted and no
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:14:2.4 Marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:14:2.4.1 Existing marine water and sediment quality within the study area was investigated. The impact
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:14: concerning EQSs for chemical contaminants and guideline values to determine water and sediment
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:14:2.4.2 Previous sediment quality surveys undertaken in the Tees estuary have identified elevated
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:14: identified metal and PAH concentrations in estuarine sediments which exceed Cefas Action Levels 1
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:15:2.4.3 The assessment identified a number of impacts that could arise with regard to marine and sediment
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:15: suspension of sediment as a result of capital and maintenance dredging and piling, and deterioration of
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:15: and sediment quality are predicted to be of negligible significance.
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:16:2.5.7 The results of sediment plume modelling undertaken for the proposed scheme show that an average
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:16: increase in suspended sediment would not occur over the intertidal for any of the potential dredge
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:16: methods to be used during construction; leading to the prediction that negligible sediment would
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:16: smothering of the intertidal food resource through deposition of sediment following dredging;
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:25: to this disposal included the assessment of fine sediments on a precautionary basis. The disposal of
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:25: ecology and commercial navigation. However, the assessment of the dispersion of fine sediment from
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:29: consideration of potential impacts on the supply of fine sediments and contaminants, direct disturbance
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:32: increased suspended sediment concentration arising from capital dredging for other projects (should
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:32: would be additive, with an overall combined increase in suspended sediment concentration where the
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:32: sediment plume from more than one projects overlap. However, the cumulative impact on fish
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:32: significance, given the very small change in the overall fine sediment regime predicted (i.e.
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:32:3.12.3 The dispersion of suspended sediment and deposition on the seabed during capital dredging has the
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:32:3.12.4 The cumulative impact on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary was
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:32: It was concluded that there would be no cumulative impact on the sediment budget given that the YPP
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:32: would not change the sediment supply to the Tees estuary or result in an overall increase in the
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:33: impact WFD compliance parameters via the release of sediment laden surface water or surface water
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:33: contaminated sediments). Therefore, the residual impact is unlikely to be sufficient to cause
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:35: sedimentary regime (which have the potential to indirectly affect habitats within the designated sites)
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:35: no effect on the supply of sediment to intertidal areas within the Tees estuary or wider coastal
TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:37: No significant impact upon the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary, and
TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:11: marine sediments is considered to be as a result of leaching from these coatings. However, the
TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:11: sediments.
TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:12: of marine sediments and an assessment of the potential impacts associated with disturbance of
TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:12: contaminated sediments.
TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:39: spillages, mobilisation of sediment and contaminants by surface run-off or disturbance of contaminated
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:49:Marine sediment and The tidal Tees estuary between Teesmouth and the Tees Barrage and Tees Bay (an area of approximately 10.5km , incorporating the existing dredged
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:69: Disruption to the sediment budget (e.g. loss of fluvial sediment to offshore disposal Coastal
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:69: interruption of sediment flow to Coatham Sands due to offshore disposal of
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:69: deposition of sediment disrobed during dredging in intertidal areas. Effect on water
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:69: sediment quality
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:70: wave climate and tidal propagation impacting on sediment transport pathways.
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:70: Water and sediment Construction activities have the potential to impact on the SPA and Ramsar qualifying features /
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:70: quality criteria through release of uncontaminated sediments during capital dredging activities.
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:81: sediment and disturbance.
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:81: sediment plumes created during capital dredging
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:81: sediment plumes created during capital dredging
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:86: construction phase noise disturbance, creation of a sediment plume during capital dredging and
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:86: changes to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes during operation.
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:86: disturbance, creation of a sediment plume during capital dredging and changes to the
TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:86: hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes during operation.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:4: 5.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes 33
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:4: 5.3 Marine sediment and water quality 45
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:14: over which the potential effects of the proposed scheme on tidal currents and sediment
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:33: to an assessment of sediment quality which would be undertaken as part of the EIA
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:39:5.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:39: This section describes the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of the Tees
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:39: and sedimentary processes will draw on information from publicly-available information
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:40:hydrodynamic and sedimentological regimes in the Tees have been described
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:41:Sediment
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:41:In general, suspended sediment concentrations are low within the estuary and within
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:41:events. In general, the suspended sediment concentrations appear to be dominated by
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:41:downstream. In the vicinity of the proposed scheme, suspended sediment
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:41:40mg/l to 80mg/l. In terms of the tidal sequence, the highest suspended sediment levels
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:42: sediment have been noted around the Shell Jetty, but with little penetration further up
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:42: Bed sampling results in the vicinity of the proposed scheme show bed sediments in the
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:42: forces for sediment transport are the tidal flows, density driven currents, wave induced
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:42: sedimentary regime of the estuary is likely to arise from the capital dredging of the
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:42: of sediment released from the bed and/or overflowing from the dredger. Sediments
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:42: the bed elsewhere. Whilst disturbance of seabed sediments would occur during the
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:42: disposal of dredged material may have an effect on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:42: regime (e.g. effect on tidal currents and sediment transport). However, as both are
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:42: would any significant effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime beyond
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:42: • Changes to the sediment regime in the area as a consequence of any changes
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:42: in the estuarine hydrodynamics, including sedimentation into the dredged berth
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:43: impacts on sediment and water quality, as discussed within Section 5.3.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:43: Sediment dispersion from dredging
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:43: Based on sediment release rates (to be defined when further information is known about
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:43: dredged sediment types and quantities, dredger vessels and production rates), the
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:44: extent of the sediment plume and the high freshwater flow, neap tide conditions will be
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:44: footprints of elevated suspended sediment concentrations and deposition arising from
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:44: An assessment of sediment dispersion (or retention) from the offshore disposal sites will
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:44: be undertaken. The potential for release of sediment into the Tees estuary (e.g. through
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:44: Sedimentation
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:44: sedimentation regime as it would not significantly change the amount of sediment
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:44: imported to the Tees from offshore (the largest sediment input). However, it is proposed
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:44: that a desk-assessment of sedimentation rates at the proposed quay is undertaken.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:49: the waste disposal area, it is considered that there is potential for the sediment within
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:51:5.3 Marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:51: Sediment quality
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:51: and wastewater discharges, this legacy remains in areas of estuarine sediments that
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:51: remain undisturbed. This is less of an issue where sediment is regularly removed, such
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:51: There have been a number of sediment quality studies undertaken in the Tees estuary
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:51: sediments (Tansley, 2003).
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:51: Sediment samples were collected as part of the EIA for the NGCT during 2006 (Royal
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:51: and within the area proposed for the container terminal. The sediment sampling
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:51: A sediment quality survey was carried out in December 2008 to characterise the area
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:51: OD or as deep as the sediment layer went, whichever horizon was reached first. The
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:52:Figure 5.3 Sediment sample locations for the NGCT EIA and QEII Jetty EIA
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:53: There is no existing sediment quality data available for the footprint of the proposed
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:53: that there is potential for water and sediment within the lagoon to be contaminated
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:53: where any disturbed sediment may be deposited.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:53: Reduced water quality associated with sediment disturbance during dredging and piling
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:53: The potential exists for sediment disturbance / re-suspension during dredging of the
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:53: of sediment during such activities has the potential to adversely impact upon water
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:53: and release of contaminants adsorbed to sediment (if present) into the water column.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:54:etc.) which would adversely impact upon water and sediment quality.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:54:dredging will be lower. There would be some short-term build-up of fine sandy sediment
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:54:accumulation of coarser sediments arising from the dredging of stiff clay was also
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:54:Increased suspended sediment concentration due to maintenance dredging
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:54:increase in suspended sediment concentration. It is anticipated that this would be
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:55: Due to the lack of site-specific sediment quality data and the undisturbed nature of the
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:55: seabed at the location of the proposed berth pocket, it is proposed that sediment
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:55: proposed that sediment samples are recovered at depth and at the surface along the
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:55: It is proposed that the sediment samples will be analysed for the following parameters:
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:55: • Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life (CCME,
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:55: The numerical modelling (see Section 5.1) and any existing sediment survey data for the
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:55: The main form of mitigation to limit sediment plume generation due to dredging is
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:55: lower release rate of sediment to the water column compared with, for example, a cutter
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:56: of settlement tanks and appropriate disposal of sediment to a licenced waste
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:56: of the intertidal sedimentary habitats of the Tees estuary have been reclaimed over this
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:56: areas subject to regular dredging and sediment removal. Analysis of macrobenthic data
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:59:suspended sediment during dredging and deposition following dredging
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:59:An increase in the total suspended sediment (TSS) concentration in the water column
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:59:The release of sediment into the water column could potentially affect the dissolved
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:59:biological oxygen demand. Sediment would disperse from the dredge location and
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:60:the seabed at the locations where sediment settles out of suspension. Dredging is also
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:60:likely to release contaminants that may be bound to seabed sediments into the water
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:60:the location of the dredging activity, with the volume of sediment released into the water
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:60:vicinity of the dredging, dispersion and dilution of the sediment plume would occur and
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:60:sediment concentrations. However, this effect will be considered fully within the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:61: would be some short-term build-up of fine sandy sediment and this would be dispersed
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:61: over time. Some longer term accumulation of coarser sediments arising from the
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:61: The results of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary assessment will also inform this
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:61: section of the EIA, particularly the prediction of sediment plume dispersion during capital
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:65: resources for birds, in particular terns, through increased total suspended sediment
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:65: deposition of fine sediment disturbed by dredging.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:65: flow regime. In addition, sediment dispersion modelling will be undertaken to
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:65: demonstrate the fate of sediment released into the water column during the capital
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:66: fine sediment.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:70: which feed on benthic invertebrates found in subtidal and intertidal sediments. The
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:71: and/or for prolonged periods of time, an increase in suspended sediment concentration
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:71: can also release contaminants bound to seabed sediments into the water column,
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:72: sedimentary regime, marine sediment quality, water quality and marine and coastal
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:72: The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume generation due to dredging is the
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:72: rate of sediment to the water column compared with, for example, a cutter suction
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:81: deposits) still remains, preserved beneath later sediments. There is also potential for
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:81: surfaces (often indicted by peat deposits and other organic sediments).
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:81: preserved beneath later sediments.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:87: in effects to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, which consequently could
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:87: effect on hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime (and consequently flood risk) than the
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:90: changes in hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:91: potential impact on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime and results of any
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:98: • Hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:98: • Marine sediment and water quality.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:103:Hydrodynamic • Creation of a sediment plume during dredging and piling works. • Use of TELEMAC-3D flow model to
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:103:sedimentary approach channel. released during capital dredging.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:103:regime • Changes to sediment regime including sedimentation into the • Desk assessment of sedimentation ra
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:103:Marine • Reduced water quality associated with dredging, piling and • Recovery of sediment samples at th
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:103:sediment and
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:103: • Reduced water quality due to offshore disposal of dredged • Sediment quality results would be c
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:104: • Release of sediment into the water column leading to increased also inform this section of the EIA.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:106: • Effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime could information and meets with their tech
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:107: Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (2002). Canadian sediment quality
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:108:HR Wallingford, (2002). Teesmouth Sediment Study. EX 4514.
TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:108:sedimentation studies. Report EX 5250, Release 1.0, January 2006.
TR030002-000106-141120_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and MMO.pdf:2:The MMO have completed sediment sample analysis which showed areas of
TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:63: and minimise sediment supply. Flows from the filter drains and swales would
TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:63: to flow volumes and velocities and sediment input to the surface drainage
TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:23: habitats or water and sediment quality; in addition
TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:86: see Table 8.2 (Water and sediment quality) for evidence supporting conclusions.
TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:86:an effect on coastal processes, habitats or water and sediment quality. Given that the decommissioning works would take place in
TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:88: see Table 8.2 (Water and sediment quality) for evidence supporting conclusions.
TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:88:an effect on coastal processes, habitats or water and sediment quality. Given that the decommissioning works would take place in
TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:100:an effect on coastal processes, habitats or water and sediment quality. Given that the decommissioning works would take place in
TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:102:an effect on coastal processes, habitats or water and sediment quality. Given that the decommissioning works would take place in
TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:56: (a) the undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for approval at least six
TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:56: (b) the sediment sampling and analysis of the sediment must be completed by a laboratory
TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:56: (5) Any contaminated sediment (largely silt) lying deeper than one metre below the surface of the
TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:101: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which is
TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:101: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:102:sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the construction of such of
TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:103: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:103: 20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:103: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making good
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:27: • Hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:27: • Marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:28:Hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes (see Scoping Report
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:29:3.28 The SoS should ensure that effects resulting from sediment
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:29: hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes resulting from the
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:30:Marine sediment and water quality (see Scoping Report
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:30:3.36 The SoS is pleased to note that a site specific sediment quality
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:31: the sedimentary and hydrodynamic assessment.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:31: and sedimentary assessment data that is due to be gathered by
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:32: birds (see the SoS’ comments on ‘Hydrodynamic and sedimentary
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:33: example, the hydrodynamic and sediment regime and marine and
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:36: hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime. This assessment should
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:69:The results should be provided of sediment quality testing from the berth pocket and dredge
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:80: of the initial sediment analysis and the duration of the consent.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:81: Hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:81: sediment regime and cause additional sedimentation which could increase dredging
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:81:18. The MMO welcomes the commitment to assess sediment dispersion (or retention)
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:81: of sediment into the Tees estuary, including through the dewatering of Bran Sands
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:81: Marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:81:20. The MMO considers that the potential impacts on marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:81:24. The effects on marine ecological receptors from changes to marine sediment and
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:82:27. The effects on natural fisheries resource from changes to marine sediment and water
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:91: contaminated sediments and benthic communities.
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:91: environment and designated sites (water quality, suspended sediment concentration SSC)
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:91: sediment trap, intercepting fine sediment in particular and reducing the level of deposition at
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:91: hypothesis for decline of SPA birds in the estuary is a shift from fine sediments to course
TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:91: marine ones. The potential impact on sediment flow should therefore be examined in detail.
TR030002-000275-P D Teesport Limited.pdf:10: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which
TR030002-000275-P D Teesport Limited.pdf:10: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-000275-P D Teesport Limited.pdf:11: be affected by sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the
TR030002-000275-P D Teesport Limited.pdf:12: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-000275-P D Teesport Limited.pdf:12: 20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-000275-P D Teesport Limited.pdf:12: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:49: 1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime;
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:49: 3 Marine sediment and water quality;
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:63: (b) Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:63: regarding the rates of sediment infill.
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:63:7.17 The EA raised the potential issue of existing sediment contamination
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:63: regard, it emphasised the importance for the sediment contamination
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:63: fish. Further, the need to agree the measures for monitoring sediment
TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:79: hydrodynamics and sedimentation regimes, contamination, highways
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1: release of sediment from the offshore disposal site included consideration of a series of dredging
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1: scenarios used to simulate the release of fine sediment from capital dredging. Three types of sediment
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1: release at the disposal site were assessed; fine sediment (mean grain size less than 63μm), sand sized
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1: sediment, with grain sizes up to 1mm, and material coarser than 1mm. Although the contaminated silts
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1: would not be disposed offshore, the modelling has included assessment of the fine sediments on a
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1: quality (i.e. increase in suspended sediment concentration and dispersion from the disposal site).
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2: Fine sediment
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:22.2.2 The in-situ sediment with the highest proportion of fine sediment used in the dredging plume
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2: calculate the fine sediment content of the 7,850 Tonnes Dry Solids in the hopper of the TSHD taken to
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2: the disposal site. The proportion of fine sediment was calculated as 5% of the load (i.e. 390 TDS).
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2: sediment would be expected to descend rapidly through the water column, entraining water as it
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2: descends. This dynamic plume phase restricts the release of fine sediment into the water column to 5-
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2: 10% losses of fine sediment from the dynamic plume was assumed.
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2: sediment in this material would be expected to be winnowed out and transported away from the
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2: disposal site; however, the rate of sediment losses from the site due to this process would not exceed
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2: the extent of the fine sediment plume expected to arise from disposal operations in the offshore area, a
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:22.2.6 The fine sediment dispersion from disposal operations was modelled by the Lagrangian particle
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2: tracking model, SEDPLUME-RW(3D). A source term of 60kg/s of fine sediment was included in the
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:22.2.7 Figure 22-1 shows the maximum excess (i.e. increased) suspended sediment concentration predicted
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2: additional sediment. This should be recognised when interpreting the potential impact of the sediment
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2: within 1km beyond the boundary of the site. Occurrences of excess sediment concentration in the
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:3: Figure 22-1 Maximum depth-average excess suspended sediment concentration from sediment released
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:3:22.2.9 Figure 22-2 shows the maximum depth of sediment deposition from the fine sediment released during
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:3: sediment at the site. Note that this maximum deposition may indicate either a temporary deposit during
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:3: Sand size sediment
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:4: Figure 22-2 Maximum depth of sediment deposition from sediment released during disposal operations
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:4:22.2.11 Evidence of sediment dispersion rates from the disposal sites (Appendix 22.1) gathered as part of
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:4: MAFF funded research (HR Wallingford, 1998) suggested a rate of sandy sediment dispersion from the
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:4: for either the TSHD or the CSD – equivalent to 5,900m3/tide. Of this sediment, approximately 50%
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:4: of sediment dispersion. Consequently, it would be expected that most of the sandy sized material
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:4: of the disposal site would remove the sediment, although at a lower rate than stated above for calm and
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5: Coarser size sediment
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:22.3.3 The assessment of the dispersion of fine sediment from the Tees Bay C disposal site (Section 22.2)
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5: The peak increase in fine sediment concentration represents a precautionary assessment, and the
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5: with a longer term accumulation of coarser sediments. The sand would, over time, disperse away from
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:6: the deposited sediment. Any impact, however, would be confined to within the boundaries of the
TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:6: colonised with infauna due to the nature of the sediment.
TR030002-000560-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_1 of 2.pdf:4: 2.2 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime………………………………………………………………………… 41
TR030002-000560-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_1 of 2.pdf:4: 2.4 Marine sediment and water quality ………………………………………………………………………………. 42
TR030002-000704-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 6.pdf:8:silt, (‘York Potash Project - Sediment disposal – Hazardous Waste Assessment‘, Royal HaskoningDHV,
TR030002-000704-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 6.pdf:13: unlikely to be contaminated as a consequence of anthropogenic influence. These sediments are not
TR030002-000704-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 6.pdf:13: ‘York Potash Project – Sediment disposal – Hazardous Waste Assessment‘,Royal HaskoningDHV, (2014). 9Y0989-109-
TR030002-000704-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 6.pdf:17: principle, because the treated sediment would be used away from the point of production.
TR030002-000704-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 6.pdf:18: sediment to ensure it would be suitable for use and that the use of such material would be replacing the
TR030002-000704-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 6.pdf:34:Receipt of wet sediment from the barges:
TR030002-000704-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 6.pdf:34:Transport of wet sediment to a suitable facility for dewatering
TR030002-000704-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 6.pdf:34:The transportation will be carried out using high sided 8 wheel tippers that are sealed and contain the sediment
TR030002-000704-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 6.pdf:34:Treatment options for the dewatered sediment to facilitate beneficial recovery (or disposal where justified),
TR030002-000704-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 6.pdf:34:The treatment options we would consider to ensure BAT and to enhance re-use options for the sediments are
TR030002-000704-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 6.pdf:35:All waste sediment once dewatered would be tested using our in-house UKAS accredited laboratory and assessed if
TR030002-000704-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 6.pdf:35:/ dewatering of the sediments. There is an option for Augean to de-water the material and return to site for the
TR030002-000704-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 6.pdf:40:1 Receipt of Wet Sediment From the Barges.
TR030002-000704-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 6.pdf:40:2 Transport of Wet Sediment to a Suitable Facility for Dewatering.
TR030002-000704-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 6.pdf:40: It is assumed that sediments would be received at PD Ports and materials transferred onto dump
TR030002-000704-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 6.pdf:41:5 Treatment options for the dewatered sediment to facilitate beneficial recovery (or disposal where
TR030002-000435-ES Section 1 Introduction.pdf:4: tidal currents and sediment transport may occur. Such effects have the potential to affect other
TR030002-000756-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 3.pdf:16:g Settlement, sedimentation Damage to onshore structures due to ground Soil surveys, geotechnical analysis Dredging
TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:54: (5) Any contaminated sediment (largely silt) lying deeper than one metre below the surface of the
TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:84: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which is
TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:84: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:85:sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the construction of such of
TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:86: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:86: 20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:86: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making good
TR030002-000676-Doc 7.2 - Summary of Proposals Document.pdf:13: enter the quay area safely. The dredging build-up of river sediment in the quay
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:7.1.1 This section of the ES describes the existing environment in relation to marine water and sediment
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1: decommissioning of the conveyor to influence suspended sediment levels in Dabholm Gut). Proposed
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1: potential effects of the proposed scheme on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime and, therefore,
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:7.2.1 The assessment of potential impacts on marine water and sediment quality has been made with
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1: Table 7-1 Summary of NPS for Ports requirements with regard to marine water and sediment quality
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: impact on marine water and sediment quality for this proposed scheme includes:
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:5: marine sediment and water quality.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6: sediment and water quality
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:The Secretary of State was pleased to note that a site specific sediment quality survey will be carried out at the proposed The results
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:The EIA should provide results of sediment quality testing from the berth pocket and dredge channel. Section 7.4
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:The MMO considers that the potential impacts on marine sediment and water quality must be assessed with relation to Section 8 a
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:7:including fish, marine mammals, birds, contaminated sediment and benthic communities.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:7:and suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) and designated sites should be presented in the EIA.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:7:Sediment contamination results should be made available at the earliest opportunity to allow consideration of options for Section 7.4
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:7:the fate of dredged spoil. Monitoring of sediment levels needs to be agreed to allow for background and threshold levels
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:7:Natural England notes that sediment quality data are awaited which are essential for a proper understanding of impacts. Section 7.4
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:7:Natural England notes more recent sediment quality samples have been taken for the No.1 quay project by PD Ports Section 7.4
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:8:7.2.21 In addition to the formal consultation as outlined above, a specification for the sediment quality (and
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:8: and sediment quality survey. In response to these comments, a revised specification was developed
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:8:7.3.1 For marine sediment and water quality, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:8: the hydrodynamic and sediment dispersion modelling and was based on the maximum extent over
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:8: which effects are predicted to occur (e.g. sediment plumes generated during capital dredging and
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:8: effects on tidal currents during operation). The study area for marine sediment and water quality is
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:8:7.3.2 In order to define the sediment quality baseline, a site-specific survey was commissioned and
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:8: undertaken in July 2014. As discussed in Section 7.2, the sediment quality sampling and analysis
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:8:7.3.4 The sediment samples were analysed by Cefas for the following parameters:
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:9: x Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQG) for the Protection of Aquatic Life (Canadian
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:10: Table 7-5 Summary of consultation responses on the scope of the sediment quality survey
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:10:Ensure that the reason for excluding Bran Sands from No sediment deposition is predicted to occur over Natural England
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:10:sediment sampling is explained in the ES. intertidal areas at Bran Sands and, therefore, there rationale for the
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:10: sediment sampling.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:10:Five sample locations, as opposed to 4 should be adopted. from Cefas as to the whether this will alter the Sediment would
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:11:sample. 100ml) syringe will be used to remove sediment
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:11:gravel, sand and silt/clay. sediment quality
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12:7.3.9 Cefas guidance indicates that, in general, concentrations of contaminants within sediment which are
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12: made. Comparison of results from sediment quality analysis with Cefas Action Levels therefore
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12:7.3.10 The CSQG involved the derivation of interim marine sediment quality guidelines (ISQGs), or Threshold
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12: database containing direct measurements of toxicity of contaminated sediments to a range of aquatic
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12: guidelines provide an indication of likely toxicity of sediments to aquatic organisms. However, these
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:13: Existing sediment quality data from the Tees estuary
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:13: scheme have both been used to inform the existing baseline conditions for sediment quality.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:13: Sediment quality
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:13: however, this legacy of contamination remains in estuarine sediments that have not been disturbed or
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:13:7.4.3 Sediment samples were collected as part of the EIA for the NGCT during 2006 (Royal Haskoning,
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:13:7.4.4 An additional sediment quality survey was carried out within the Tees estuary in December 2008, in
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:13: redevelopment project. Two vibrocores (VC004 and VC001B) sampled sediments to a depth of 4m
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:13:7.4.5 The results from the vibrocores identified that all metals analysed within the sediments exceeded Action
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:14:7.4.6 As well as identifying contaminated sediments, the sediment quality survey also indicated a pattern of
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:14: Site-specific sediment survey
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:14:7.4.7 In order to define the baseline for sediment quality at the site of the proposed scheme, a site-specific
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:14: Where recovery of sediment within the vibrocore was low (i.e. due to the vibrocore being unable to
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:14: significantly penetrate into the sediment), samples were recovered at 0.5m intervals. A summary of the
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:14:7.4.11 A comparison of the sediment quality data obtained with the sediment quality guidelines indicates that
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:14: the sediments contain relatively high levels of contaminants. Particularly elevated concentrations of
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:14:7.4.12 Concentrations of metals in the sediments exceed Cefas Action Level 1 at the majority of sampling
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:14: zinc. The survey data also indicates that concentrations of metals in the sediments of the approach
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:7.4.14 The data also indicate that concentrations of contaminants within the surface sediments are lower than
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15: those in the deeper sediments. This reflects the historical industrialised nature of the Tees estuary
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15: previous sediment quality surveys.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15: Table 7-8 Summary of samples collected and ground conditions encountered during the sediment quality
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15: Vibrocore (see location Depth of sub-sample taken from the Composition of sediment
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:16:7.4.15 Based on the results of the historic sediment quality surveys undertaken for the proposed NGCT and
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:16: QEII schemes, in addition to the results of the sediment quality survey and analysis undertaken in 2014
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:16: for the proposed scheme, sediment (as an environmental receptor) is considered to be of low
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:17: * NGCT Sediment Sample Sites
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:17: Environmental Statement: Sediment Sample
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:17:L:\Applications\YPL\MXDs\HarbourFacility_ES\Chapter7\Figure_7_1_SedimentSampleLocations_RH_20150304.mxd
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:20: Re-suspension of sediment during dredging and piling
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:20: sediments and release them into the water column as a plume. This would increase the suspended
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:20: sediment concentrations within the estuary, thus increasing the turbidity of the water column.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:20: Additionally, increases in suspended sediment concentrations could give rise to high oxygen demands,
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21:7.5.4 As discussed in Section 3, an enclosed grab is proposed for dredging of the contaminated sediment
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21: sediment release from this method of dredging.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21:7.5.5 The dredging of the geological deposits underlying the contaminated sediment would be undertaken
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21: using a backhoe, CSD or TSHD (or a combination of all three types of dredging plant). Sediment
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21: on suspended sediment concentrations (with the exception of an enclosed grab due to the negligible
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21: sediment release from this method). The predicted implications on water quality arising from the use of
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21:7.5.6 A backhoe dredger is suitable for dredging cohesive and non-cohesive sediment in confined seabed
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21: would be generated by a CSD or TSHD). Backhoe dredging therefore typically releases less sediment
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21: water as a medium to transport the dredged sediments (CIRIA, 2000).
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21:7.5.7 The sediment plume simulations for the backhoe dredger predict that an area of elevated suspended
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21: sediment in the range of 10mg/l to 50mg/l above background is confined to the immediate vicinity of the
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21: dredger, with no wider effects within the estuary. The predicted sediment plume for the backhoe
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21:7.5.8 CSDs are commonly used where stiffer cohesive sediments and weak rocks need to be dredged. The
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21: head is not enclosed, results is a significantly higher rate of sediment release in comparison with the
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21:7.5.9 The sediment plume simulation undertaken for the CSD (see Figure 7-4) indicates an area of elevated
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21: dredger, at up to 500mg/l of suspended sediment.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21: suspended sediment concentrations above those normally experienced in the estuary, albeit within a
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:Figure 7-3 Simulated average increase in suspended sediment concentration from backhoe dredging in
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:23:Figure 7-4 Simulated average increase in suspended sediment concentration from CSD dredging in spring
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:24:7.5.11 The sediment plume simulations for the TSHD (see Figure 7-5) predict that an area of elevated
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:24: suspended sediment in the range of 10mg/l to 50mg/l above background may be anticipated in the
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:24: predicted in the immediate area of the dredger, at up to 200mg/l of suspended sediment.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:24: Summary of impact to water quality due to sediment disturbance during dredging
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:24: re-suspension of sediment into the water column. The proposed use of an enclosed grab for the
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:24: contaminated sediments above geological deposits would ensure that the generation of a contaminated
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:24: sediment plume is minimised as far as practicable.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:24:7.5.13 The sediment plume modelling simulations (presented and discussed within Section 5) have shown
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:24: Figure 7-5 Simulated average increase in suspended sediment concentrations from TSHD dredging in spring
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25:7.5.14 In general, sediment plumes induced by dredging are considered to pose only a limited risk to water
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: suspended solids are only expected on a short term basis. No increase in suspended sediment is
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: construction of the port terminal, would result in re-suspension of bed sediments. This effect, however,
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25:7.5.16 The sensitivity of the water in terms of the potential for water and sediment quality impacts is assessed
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25:7.5.18 There are a number of controls that would be implemented to ensure that the suspended sediment load
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: is minimised during dredging. The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume is selection of the
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: for the proposed dredge of contaminated sediment, above the use of an enclosed grab. Controls which
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25:7.5.19 Limiting re-suspension of sediment during TSHD can be achieved through the following good practice
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: significantly lower release rate of sediment to the water column compared with, for example, typical
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: CSD or TSHD. The main measure that can be adopted to minimise losses of sediment to the water
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: over the dredging equipment is one of the main factors affecting sediment disturbance during backhoe
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26: water, thereby reducing the time when sediment can leak out of the bucket. In addition, the practice of
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:7.5.21 The re-suspension of sediment caused by CSD can be reduced through optimising the cutter speed,
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26: from such machinery, which has the potential to adversely affect water and sediment quality through
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27: suspended sediment concentrations from runoff.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:7.5.30 As discussed within Section 7.4, the sediments present above geological deposits within the footprint
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27: sediments would not be used as part of the habitat enhancement proposals, and therefore, the potential
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27: reduction in water quality within Bran Sands lagoon would be due to increased suspended sediment
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27: sediment would arise during the construction phase only (i.e. no operational phase impact).
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27: sediment concentration.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27: storage area to the immediate north) flows directly into the lagoon and the lagoon receives sediments in
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27: is of low sensitivity with respect to changes in suspended sediment concentration.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27: suspended sediment are likely to be experienced across the full width of the lagoon. It is considered
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:7.5.34 In order to minimise the spatial extent of the reduction in water quality during sediment placement, a silt
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:28: fine sediment entering the Tees as the material dewaters.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:28: Increased suspended sediment concentration due to maintenance dredging
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:28: the amount of sediment imported to the Tees from offshore (given that the proposed scheme does not
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:28: sediment transport in the predominantly sandy areas around Teesmouth are expected and so no effect
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:28:7.6.5 Sediment transport modelling was undertaken for the operational phase of the proposed scheme, to
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:28: determine any changes to the local sediment regime. The results for the post-development cases show
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:28: a negligible effect on the overall import of fine sediment into the estuary (less than 0.5%). The effect of
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:28: the scheme is to result in a localised redistribution of locations of sediment deposition in response to
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:28: small change in the overall fine sediment regime would not alter the present frequency of, or
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:28:7.6.6 Based on the information presented above and given the low sensitivity of the water and sediment
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:28: to increased suspended sediment concentrations from maintenance dredging.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:30:7.6.18 Given the above and the low sensitivity of the water and sediment quality receptors, the magnitude of
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:30: Increased suspended sediment concentrations during removal of conveyor system
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:30: would be no impact on suspended sediment concentration during decommissioning.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:31: and fuel from such machinery, which has the potential to adversely affect water and sediment quality.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:31:7.8.1 This section has discussed the existing marine water and sediment quality within the study area for the
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:31: and guideline values to determine water and sediment quality.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:31:7.8.2 Previous sediment quality surveys undertaken in the Tees estuary have identified elevated
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:31: concentrations in estuarine sediments which exceed Cefas Action Level 1 and 2 and the TEL and PEL.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:31: sediment quality during the construction, operation and decommissioning of the Harbour facilities.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:31: These impacts include re-suspension of suspended sediment as a result of capital and maintenance
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:31: on marine water and sediment quality are predicted to be of negligible significance at worst.
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:31:7.8.4 Uncertainty in the assessment of impacts on marine sediment and water quality is considered to be low
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:31: site-specific sediment quality surveys and on-going water quality sampling and analysis throughout the
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:31:7.8.5 A summary of the impacts predicted with regard to marine sediment and water quality is presented in
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:32: Table 7-12 Summary of impacts with regard to marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:32:Re-suspension of sediment during Low Low Negligible None required. However controls would be imple
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:32: Reduction of sediment plumes during backhoe dr
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:32: Re-suspension of sediment during CSD can be r
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:32:Increased suspended sediment Low Low Negligible None required
TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:33:Increased suspended sediment No impact None required
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:54: The geology of North Yorkshire is dominated by a succession of sedimentary, largely
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:54: The resulting sedimentary succession is comprised predominantly of a sequence of relatively
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:74: The sedimentary succession itself is shown in Figure 3-1 and is relatively simple from a
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:78: surrounding sedimentary rocks and thus may act as vertical conduit for water.
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:78: on the sedimentary succession.
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:80: by four major Permian evaporite cycles (Z1-Z4) and a Mesozoic sedimentary sequence
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:80: combination of the complex sedimentary environment and later deformation, local-scale
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:93: component of this complexity is sedimentary in nature and related to the seam splitting up in
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:93: sedimentary rocks. If this fracturing continues to depth, then the Cleveland Dyke may act as a
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:168:2 SEDIMENTATION AND STRATIGRAPHY OF GERMAN ZECHSTEIN, AFTER RICHTER-
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:173: 2.2 The Zechstein evaporites were deposited mainly in four sedimentary cycles, referred
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:173: deposition are punctuated by thin beds of predominantly detrital sediments such as the
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:174: sedimentation and are reflected as 'Highs' or 'Ridges' over which there is localized
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:174: 3.4 Sedimentation during the first two Zechstein cycles was strongly influenced by
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:175: 3.6 More than 1 km of Zechstein sediments accumulated in the centre of the Southern
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:175: North Sea Basin. The sediments, being mostly evaporites, have been severely
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:179: thinning of the deposit and the occurrence of sedimentary structures indicative of
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:182: and magnesium were added to the sediments below, and these displaced calcium
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:184: minerals and fine clastic sediment (red clay). Unit D is only recognizable where
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:189: and have been mapped displacing Jurassic sediments (Figure 16). There is, however,
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:192: average for low conductivity sedimentary rocks of 26°C/km (Downing & Gray,
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:209: Contr. Sedimentology, 9, 115-129.
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:211: in Sedimentology 50. Elsevier. 556 pp.
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:212: Sedimentology. 9, 7-34.
TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:213: 77 Warren, J.K., 2006. Evaporites: Sediments, Resources and Hydrocarbons. Publ.
TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:6:on sediment modelling. That document highlighted that no
TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:6:sediment (or very little) was expected to go into Seaton Channel.
TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:23:Any such contaminated sediment to be deposited on land will Please see Applicant’s response to Q1 HWF 1.3.
TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:23:agreed in advance of any sediment disposal.
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:3:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:5:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:5:Northern Gateway Container Terminal - Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:5:and sedimentological effects of the construction on the Tees Estuary and Tees Bay as part of the
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:5:The sediment plumes resultant from the operation of cutter suction and trailer suction hopper
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:5:fine sediment concentrations increases were predicted to be less than 5mg/l furhter than 2km
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:6:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:6:Seaton Channel would result in deposition of approximately a third of the extra sediment
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:7:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:7:4. Sediment transport……………………………………………………………………………………………. 21
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:7: 4.1 Introduction and sediment sources ………………………………………………………….. 21
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:7: 4.3.4 Sensitivity to sediment resuspension……………………………………………. 29
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:8:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:8:5. Sediment dispersion …………………………………………………………………………………………. 33
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:8: 6.3 Sedimentation ………………………………………………………………………………………. 43
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:9:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:10:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:10:Figure 4.5 Net tidal sediment transport for existing condition under representative wave
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:10:Figure 4.7 Net tidal sediment transport for existing condition under an extreme wave condition
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:10:Figure 4.9 Net tidal sediment transport for proposed scheme under representative wave
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:10:Figure 4.11 Net tidal sediment transport for proposed scheme under an extreme wave condition
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:11:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:11:Figure 5.12 Conceptual sediment transport diagram at disposal sites
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:12:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:13:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:13: input to address the hydrodynamic and sedimentological effects of the construction on
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:13: The key effects related to the sedimentary regime of the estuary system arising during
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:13: the construction phase are the suspension of sediment into the water column during the
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:13: regime can also result in changes to sediment transport processes which in turn can
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:13: depositional areas for sediment; hence the need for maintenance dredging of such
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:13: are deepened or realigned through capital dredging, the flow and sediment regimes can
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:14:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:14: before and after the development. Section 4 covers the studies related to sediment
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:14: (mud) sediment. Section 5 describes the studies of the dispersion of sediment plume
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:14: dredged arisings. This chapter also describes the studies of the dispersion of sediment
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:15:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:16:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:17:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:18:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:19:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:20:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:21:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:22:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:23:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:24:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:24: to provide input for subsequent sediment transport studies (see Chapter 4).
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:25: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:26:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:27: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:28:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:29:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:30:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:31: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:32:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:33:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:33:4. Sediment transport
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:33:4.1 INTRODUCTION AND SEDIMENT SOURCES
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:33: quay and deepened approach channel are the changes to sediment transport and
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:33: The present situation in the Tees for sediment transport have been summarised well in
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:33: data from these reports provided the baseline understanding of the sediment transport
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:33: sediment transport are the tidal flows, density driven currents, wave induced currents,
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:33: of fluvial sediment into the estuary. ABPmer (2005) reported that considerable siltation
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:33: has occurred upstream of the barrage with the implication that fluvial sediment input to
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:34:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:34: source of sediment in to the system. This material comes in on the flood tide,
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:35:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:35: Sediment transport simulations were performed with the HR Wallingford model,
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:35: SANDFLOW. SANDFLOW is a dynamic non-cohesive sediment (sand) transport
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:35: model that simulates the advection and dispersion of suspended sediment due to the
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:35: effects of both currents and waves. The sediment transport algorithm is based on a
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:35: SANDFLOW was used to simulate the sediment transport patterns throughout the Tees
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:35: typical (representative) waves and for storm waves. The resulting sediment transport
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:35: patterns include only the potential for sediment transport, since the information on the
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:35: actual availability of sediment is not incorporated.
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:35: The sediment grain size varies over the study area and although SANDFLOW is capable
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:35: of simulating transport of mixed sediment grain sizes, the processes associated with the
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:35: transport of mixed sediments is not well understood. Therefore, for the purposes of this
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:35: Output from SANDFLOW comprises the net residual potential sediment transport rate
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:35: Due to the non-linear nature of sediment transport (which means that increases in
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:35: currents give rise to disproportionately higher sediment transport rates) the sediment
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:35: the vector is proportional to the magnitude of the sediment flux for each colour band,
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:35: on the basis of being representative of the total effects of wave stirring on the sediment
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:36:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:36: sediment transport model where, at runtime, the appropriate wave stirring field is
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:36: The results from the sediment transport model (from four wave conditions and tide
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:36: infrequent (but not the most extreme) storms on the sediment transport regime, which
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:36: may be important in some areas where sediment transport is only significant during
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:36: 4.3, the sediment model SANDFLOW was run only for the middle storm wave
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:37:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:37: Figure 4.5 shows the distribution of the sediment flux throughout the area of interest for
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:37: Figure 4.7 shows the distribution of the sediment flux throughout the area of interest for
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:37: SANDFLOW was re-run to simulate the sediment transport patterns following the
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:37: Figure 4.9 shows the distribution of the sediment flux throughout the area of interest
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:37: existing sediment flux (Figure 4.5) it is difficult to ascertain any differences between
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:38:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:38: Figure 4.11 shows the sediment flux distribution throughout the area of interest for this
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:39:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:39: would not have a significant effect on the potential sediment transport in the estuary.
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:40:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:40: sediment dynamics near intertidal areas.
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:40: As described in the Section 4.1 the bulk of fine sediment is thought to enter the system
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:40: within the estuary fine sediment would be pushed further landward by the gravitational
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:40: HR Wallingford (1989b) attempted a correlation between suspended sediment
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:40: The chosen model for the study of fine sediment transport was SUBIEF3D which is a
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:40: hydrodynamics generated by TELEMAC3D to transport fine sediment with allowance
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:40: The model was amended to represent the settling of sediment according to the algorithm
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:41:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:41: As the main import of sediment occurred during storm events near bed stresses in Tees
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:41: The volumes of sediment imported for the conditions simulated are shown below. The
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:41: Fluvial sediments 80,000 m3/year
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:41:4.3.4 Sensitivity to sediment resuspension
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:42:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:42: allowing finer dredged sediments to pass back into the estuary and removing only the
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:42: Fluvial sediments 80,000 m3/year
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:43:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:43: 4.19. As mentioned above neither of the simulations include the effects of sediment
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:44:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:45:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:45:5. Sediment dispersion
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:45: This section describes an assessment of the dispersion of sediment associated with the
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:45: on discharge of sediment from Dabholm Gut.
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:45: The sources of sediment considered are:
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:45: dispersion, deposition and resuspension of the fine sediment within the Tees Estuary
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:45: simulates the increase of suspended sediment concentrations over the back ground
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:45: caused by sediment plumes.
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:46:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:46: generate a sediment source that remains available for resuspension by smaller waves for
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:46: Using SEDPLUME-RW(3D) to disperse sediment from dredging operations there are a
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:46: rate of sediment introduced to the water column. PD Teesport commissioned Dredging
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:46: various parameters which would act as input to the sediment plume study as well as
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:47:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:47: The trailer dredger sucks up a mixture of sediment and water from the sea bed and
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:47: discharged overboard and contains a proportion of the finer sediment fractions. This
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:47: sediment concentrations. DRL used their hopper models to predict the nature of the
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:47: Sediment parameters
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:48:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:48: predicted to increase suspended sediment concentrations by 500mg/l in the immediate
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:48: the barge loading site would not receive as much sediment as those along the channel.
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:48: reclamation. Increases in suspended sediment concentrations above those occurring
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:48: approach channel on suspended sediment concentrations over Seal Sands and in the
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:49:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:50:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:50: investigate the dispersal of sediment in the disposal site.
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:50: Figure 5.12 shows a conceptual sediment transport diagram over the maintenance
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:50: The analysis concludes that the site is generally dispersive. The fine sandy sediment is
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:51:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:51: The analysis described above was carried out assuming a sediment size of 0.1mm.
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:51: Sensitivity to the sediment size was investigated calculating the rate of dispersal for a
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:51: 0.2mm sediment size. The calculated transport rate for the 0.2mm sediment size is
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:51: also be doubled with the coarser sediment size.
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:51: sediment in the area would be expected during the dredging and disposal operations.
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:51: Dabholm Gut (Figure 5.13). In reality, sediment may be released for just part of each
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:52:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:52: The sediment parameters were defined in the dispersion model as follows:-
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:53:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:54:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:55:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:55: deepening of the Seaton Channel on the hydrodynamics and sediment transport regime
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:55:6.3 SEDIMENTATION
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:56:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:56: per year. Application of the 3D flow and fine sediment transport model suggested a rate
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:56: west. No increased import of sediment is predicted as the 3D nature of the currents is
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:56: conditions the increase in sedimentation in Seaton Channel accounts for only a third of
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:56: the predicted increase in sediment supply to the Seaton Channel / Seal Sands area.
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:56: supply of fine sediment entering Seaton Channel resulting from the proposed Northern
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:57:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:58:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:59:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:59: and density driven flow, waves and sediment transport. Where available these have
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:59: Container Terminal in terms of changes to the hydrodynamic and sediment transport
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:59: The sediment plumes resultant from the operation of cutter suction and trailer suction
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:59: The suspended fine sediment concentrations increases were predicted to be less than
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:60:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:60: The general increase in sediment import in the area of the Seaton Channel turning circle
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:60: extra sediment imported due to the Approach Channel deepening.
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:60: would not significantly change the hydrodynamic or sedimentological regimes or
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:61:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:61: use in numerical models of long term sediment transport predictions. In Hydraulic and
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:61: in hydrodynamics and sediment transport, TERRC facility. Report 2004-1387.
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:62:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:62: HR Wallingford (1998a) Measurement of sediment properties of dredged material from
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:62: HR Wallingford (2002). Teesmouth Sediment Study. EX 4514.
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:62: modelling of cohesive sediment transport processes in estuarine environments. Final
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:62: new algorithms to parameterise the mass settling flux for Estuarine sediments. HR
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:62: Winterwerp, J.C. (2003) On the Deposition flux of cohesive sediment. Proceedings of
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:62: 7th International Conference on Nearshore and Estuarine Cohesive Sediment Transport
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:63:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:64:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:65:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:66:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:68:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:72: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:73: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:74: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:75: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:76: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:77: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:78: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:79: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:80: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:81: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:82: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:83: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:84: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:85: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:86: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:87: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:88: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:89: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:90: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:91: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:92: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:93: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:94: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:95: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:96: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:97: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:98: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:99: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:100: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:101: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:102: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:103: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:104: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:105: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:114: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:115: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:116: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:117: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:118: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:119: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:120: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:121: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:122: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:123: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:124: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:125: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:126: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:127: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:128: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:129: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:130: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:131: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:132: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:133: Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:136:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:137:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:138:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:139:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:141:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:142:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:143:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:144:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:145:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:145:Figure 4.5 Net tidal sediment transport for existing condition under representative
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:146:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:147:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:147:Figure 4.7 Net tidal sediment transport for existing condition under an extreme wave
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:148:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:149:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:149:Figure 4.9 Net tidal sediment transport for proposed scheme under representative wave
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:150:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:151:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:151:Figure 4.11 Net tidal sediment transport for proposed scheme under an extreme wave
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:152:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:153:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:154:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:155:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:156:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:157:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:158:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:159:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:160:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:161:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:162:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:173:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:173:Figure 5.12 Conceptual sediment transport diagram at disposal sites
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:174:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:202:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:203:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:204:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:205:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:209:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000466-Section 5 App 5.2 Model calibration and validation.pdf:210:Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies
TR030002-000437-ES Section 3 Project description_1 of 2.pdf:34: due to the elevated concentrations of contaminants present within the sediment (see Section 7.4).
TR030002-000437-ES Section 3 Project description_1 of 2.pdf:34: made predictions of sediment suspension and dispersion using each dredge method, with the impact
TR030002-000437-ES Section 3 Project description_1 of 2.pdf:34: the worst case predictions (in terms of predicted increases is suspended sediment concentrations and
TR030002-000437-ES Section 3 Project description_1 of 2.pdf:34: the spatial extent of the sediment plume).
TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:20:Section 7 – Marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:14: coastal processes, habitats or water and sediment quality, and that as the
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:24:Changes to sediment and water quality
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:24: 128] confirms that changes to sediment and water quality during the
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:24: and prey availability. Potential impacts include suspended sediment
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:24: concentration in the water column during capital dredging, sediment
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:24: effects on the integrity of the site as a result of changes to sediment and
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:24:4.33 To avoid contamination as a result of suspended sediment, the silts would
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:30: Coastal processes Habitat loss/change Disturbance Water/sediment In-combination
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:31: propagation, wave climate, current speeds and sediment budget of the estuarine system) are assessed and reported in
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:31: and sedimentary regime as a result of the capital dredging, it has been concluded that these are unlikely to result in
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:31: potential for an effect from the Harbour Facility alone on coastal processes, habitats or water and sediment quality. The
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:37:f. Changes to sediment and water quality
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:37: Paragraph 10.3.35 of the applicant’s HRA Report APP-127 and APP-128 confirms that changes to sediment and
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:37: Potential impacts include suspended sediment concentration in the water column during capital dredging, sediment
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:37: result of changes to sediment and water quality (paragraph 10.4.9-10.4.13, HRA Report APP-127 and APP-128).
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:37: To avoid contamination as a result of suspended sediment, the silts would be dredged using an enclosed grab
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:39: Coastal processes Habitat loss/change Disturbance Water/sediment In-combination
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:41: • Environmental Statement Section 5: Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary
TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:41: • Environmental Statement Section 7: Marine Sediment and Water Quality
TR030002-000762-Tata Steel UK Limited and others.pdf:9:Disposal of contaminated sediments from capital dredging
TR030002-000494-Section 15 App 15.1 Archaeology desk based appraisal.pdf:16:4.2.4 Other desk-based assessments, as well as assessments of borehole samples from sediments within
TR030002-000494-Section 15 App 15.1 Archaeology desk based appraisal.pdf:29: sediments.
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:3:Disposal of contaminated sediments from capital dredging
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:12:3. HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:12:3.1. The assessment of likely effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime was informed by
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:12: modelling of sediment plume released from construction activities;
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:12: sediment transport; and,
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:12: (comprising effects on tidal propagation, wave climate, current speeds and sediment budget of
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:12: There would be a localised redistribution of (existing) sediment deposition in response to
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:12: predicted changes in current speed. This very small change in the overall fine sediment
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:12: and no effect on sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the estuary would occur.
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:12: sedimentary regime is appropriate. There are no areas of disagreement over the findings of
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:15:5. MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:15:5.1. The baseline environment for marine sediment and water quality was informed by the
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:15: Sediment quality data from samples collected as part of the EIAs for the Northern Gateway
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:15: A sediment quality survey undertaken as part of the EIA for the Harbour facilities during
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:15: Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQG) for the Protection of Aquatic Life (Canadian
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:15: and sediment quality during the construction and operational phases of the Harbour facilities.
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:15: re-suspension of sediment during capital dredging and piling;
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:15:5.4. The sediment quality survey confirmed that the sediment overlying virgin geology that would
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:15:5.6. The following controls have been proposed in order to minimise impacts to marine sediment
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:16: limiting re-suspension of sediment during trailing suction hopper dredging can be achieved
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:16: reduction of sediment plumes during backhoe dredging can be achieved by using an
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:16: resuspension of sediment during cutter suction dredging can be reduced through
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:16: sediment during placement of dredged material required to construct the habitat
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:16: enhancement. Only sediment that is deemed acceptable for disposal or an alternative use
TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:16: Bran Sands lagoon (i.e. no sediment precluded from disposal at sea due to elevated
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:4:5 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME ………………………………………….. 139
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:5:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY …………………………………………………. 227
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:13:Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:13: regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:13: hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:13:Figure 5-1 Numerical modelling domain for the hydrodynamic and sedimentary
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:13:Figure 5-2 Simulated sediment release from CSD dredging in spring tide, low river
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:13: flow conditions a) average increase in suspended sediment
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:13:Figure 5-3 Simulated sediment release from TSHD dredging in spring tide, low river
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:13: flow conditions a) average increase in suspended sediment
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:13:Figure 5-4 Simulated sediment release from backhoe dredging in spring tide, low
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:13: river flow conditions a) average increase in suspended sediment
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:14:Figure 5-5 Simulated sediment release from CSD dredging in neap tide, high river
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:14: flow conditions a) average increase in suspended sediment
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:14:Figure 5-6 Simulated sediment release from TSHD dredging in neap tide, high river
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:14: flow conditions a) average increase in suspended sediment
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:14:Figure 5-7 Simulated sediment release from backhoe dredging in neap tide, high
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:14: river flow conditions a) average increase in suspended sediment
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:15:Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:15: and sediment quality
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:15: Section 42 of the Planning Act 2008 with regard to marine sediment and
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:15:Table 7-5 Summary of consultation responses on the scope of the sediment
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:15: during the sediment quality survey
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:15:Table 7-12 Summary of impacts with regard to marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:16:Appendix 7.1 Sediment quality sampling and analysis strategy
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:16:Appendix 7.2 Cefas sediment quality data
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:16:Figure 7-1 Sediment sample locations for the NGCT EIA and QEII Jetty EIA
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:16:Figure 7-3 Simulated average increase in suspended sediment concentration from
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:16:Figure 7-4 Simulated average increase in suspended sediment concentration from
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:16:Figure 7-5 Simulated average increase in suspended sediment concentrations from
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:31:Figure 22-1 Maximum depth-average excess suspended sediment concentration
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:31: from sediment released during disposal operations
TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:31:Figure 22-2 Maximum depth of sediment deposition from sediment released during
TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:55: (a) the undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for approval at least six
TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:55: (b) the sediment sampling and analysis of the sediment must be completed by a laboratory
TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:55: (5) Any contaminated sediment (largely silt) lying deeper than one metre below the surface of the
TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:92: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which is
TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:92: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:93:sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the construction of such of
TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:94: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:94: 20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:94: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making good
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:7:25 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIMES ……………………………………….. 236
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:7:26 MARINE WATER AND SEDIMENT QUALITY ………………………………………………… 254
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:10:Table 25.1 Summary of potential cumulative effects on the Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:10: sediment plume dispersion and deposition onto the seabed during capital dredging
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:10:Table 25.3 Summary of results of the predictive modelling of suspended sediment concentration
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:11:Table 26.1 Summary of potential cumulative effects on Marine Water and Sediment Quality for the
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:11:Figure 25.1 Numerical modelling domain for the hydrodynamic and sedimentary studies
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:20: Marine sediment and The tidal Tees estuary between Teesmouth and the Tees Barrage and Tees Bay,
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:29: marine sediment and water quality, waterbirds, commercial navigation and hydrodynamic and
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:29: sedimentary processes) are not included in the project wide assessment (Part 2) but are considered in
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:54: that there are no means by which the project could affect the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:168: sediment and contaminants MHF Mill Race
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:168: Increased supply of fine sediment and contaminants during construction
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:168: surface. These activities have the potential to increase sediment supply to the surface watercourses in
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:169: mitigation measures have been identified, including sediment management, measures to manage
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:169:10.3.5 An increase in fine sediment supply could result in localised increases in turbidity and increased
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:169: sediment deposition in downstream channels, adversely impacting the geomorphology of the water
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:169: bodies Furthermore, increased sediment supply potentially could affect existing aquatic habitats and
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:169: strategies, which would reduce sediment supply and minimise the possibility of water quality impacts
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:184: Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:184: Marine water and sediment quality.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:218: sediment and contaminants Harbour facilities Airvolution Energy wind Mill Race
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:219: Increased supply of fine sediment and contaminants during construction
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:219: have the potential to increase sediment supply to the surface watercourses in the vicinity of the Harbour
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:219: from Dogger Bank Teesside offshore wind farm also have the potential to increase sediment supply
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:219:20.3.5 An increase in fine sediment supply could result in localised increases in turbidity and increased
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:219: sediment deposition in the channels downstream, adversely impacting upon the geomorphology of the
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:219: water body. Furthermore, increased sediment supply could potentially smother existing bed habitats
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:219: to decrease runoff and prevent the supply of sediment and other contaminants to the surface drainage
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:219: system. These measures would reduce sediment supply and minimise the possibility of water quality
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:220: release of fine sediments and contaminants into the river (as appropriate). The impact from these
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:250:25 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIMES
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:250:25.1.1 The ZOI for the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (and all marine elements) is presented in
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:250: Figure 25-1 Numerical modelling domain for the hydrodynamic and sedimentary studies
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:250:25.1.2 Table 25-1 identifies potential cumulative effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes from
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:251:25.2.1 Potential cumulative effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes of the Tees estuary have
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:251: Table 25-1 Summary of potential cumulative effects on the Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime for the
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:251: suspended sediment
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:251: effect) Marine water and sediment quality.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:251: parameters rather than for the hydrodynamic and sedimentary
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:251: sediment budget
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:251: operational phases on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes. The modelling tools were first
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:251: included tidal flow modelling, wave modelling, sediment transport, bed change modelling and modelling
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:251: of sediment plume released from construction activities.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:252: sedimentary regimes are assessed in terms of the significance of the potential cumulative impact of
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:252: and sediment quality and waterbird populations). The assessment of cumulative impacts on these
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:252: sedimentary regime.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:252:25.3.1 The study area for the assessment of hydrodynamic and sedimentary effects encompasses the tidal
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:252:25.3.2 Suspended sediment concentrations are typically low within the estuary and Tees Bay. The highest
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:252: storm events. In general, the suspended sediment concentrations appear to be dominated by
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:252:25.3.3 In the middle to lower reaches of the estuary, suspended sediment concentrations are, for the most
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:252: highest suspended sediment levels occur close to high water.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:252: the flood tide, particularly during times when sediment concentrations in Tees Bay are raised by the
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:252: Dispersion of suspended sediment and deposition on the seabed during capital dredging
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:252: which would create a plume of sediment in the water column which would disperse according to
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:252: prevailing currents and subsequently deposits on the seabed. Sediment depositing on the seabed in
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:253:25.4.2 The extent of sediment plume created by capital dredging is heavily dependent on the dredging plant
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:253: different sediment types as part of the same project. Consequently, for the purposes of this CIA, the
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:253: maximum potential spatial extent of sediment plume generation and deposition footprint has been
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:253: presents a summary of the results of the predictive modelling of suspended sediment concentration and
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:253: Table 25-2 Summary of conditions used in the predictive modelling of the maximum extent of sediment
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:253:25.4.4 In all cases, the maximum increase in suspended sediment concentration in the water column is
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:253: suspended sediment is predicted at the location of the proposed terminal. This is due to the fact that
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:253: the modelling incorporated run-off of water with a high suspended sediment load, representing the de-
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:253:25.4.5 For each project, significant deposition of sediment onto the seabed is predicted to occur only in close
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:254:Table 26-3 Summary of results of the predictive modelling of suspended sediment concentration and
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:254:Predicted increase in suspended sediment concentration (upper) and deposition onto the seabed (lower)
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:255:Predicted increase in suspended sediment concentration (upper) and deposition onto the seabed (lower)
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:256:Predicted increase in suspended sediment concentration (upper) and deposition onto the seabed (lower)
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:257: effect of increases in suspended sediments during maintenance dredging on food resources of SPA
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:257: remobilisation and redistribution of sediments (which may be contaminated); and,
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:257: measures (where appropriate) are presented in Section 26 (marine water and sediment quality),
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:263: Changes to estuarine sediment budget
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:263: potentially result in an effect on the sediment budget of the estuary and, consequently, the morphology
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:263:25.4.23 The largest sediment input to the Tees estuary is from offshore and given that the proposed Harbour
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:264: offshore. In addition, no changes to sediment transport in the predominantly sandy areas around
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:264:25.4.24 For the Harbour facilities, sediment transport modelling has been undertaken to predict the increases in
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:264: modelling predicted a change in the pattern of distribution of sediment deposition in the subtidal zone,
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:264: with a small increase in fine sediment infill in Chart area 9 (approximately 1%) (see Figure 25-8),
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:264: associated with a small decrease in fine sediment infill in Chart area 8 (approximately 2 to 3%).
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:264: affect sediment supply into the Tees estuary, the predicted effect would result in a localised
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:264: redistribution of the locations of sediment deposition in response to predicted changes in current
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:264: sediment regime would not alter the present frequency of, or methodology used for, maintenance
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:264: dredging, and no effect on sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees estuary would occur.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:264:25.4.26 The effect of the QEII Berth Development on tidal flows, waves and fluvial or offshore sediment supply
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:265: bed sediment types may be expected; however, any increase in the deposition of fine sediments would
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:265: also be subject to disturbance from the vessels using the berth, reducing any build-up of sediment in
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:265: fine sediment (as described in the previous paragraph)
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:268:26 MARINE WATER AND SEDIMENT QUALITY
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:268:26.1.1 Table 26-1 identifies the potential cumulative effects on marine water and sediment quality from the
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:268: Table 26-1 Summary of potential cumulative effects on Marine Water and Sediment Quality for the Harbour
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:268: suspended sediment QEII Berth
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:268:26.2.1 The assessment of potential cumulative impact on marine water and sediment quality was based upon
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:268: the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary studies that are discussed in Section 25.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:268:26.2.2 With regard to sediment quality, this section describes the potential for disturbance and dispersion of
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:268: non-contaminated and potentially contaminated sediments during capital dredging and the
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:268: these sediments are assessed within Section 27 Marine Ecology given that this is the receptor that
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:268:26.3.1 The study area, at is widest extent, is as described for the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime. The
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:268: of the estuary (as discussed within the impact assessment below) where suspended sediment
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:268: the tidal sequence, the highest suspended sediment levels occur close to high water. This baseline
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:269:26.3.2 The sediment quality survey undertaken for the NGCT did not detect the presence of contaminants that
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:269: contaminants were found to be present in the unconsolidated sediments overlying the geological
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:269: Potential for cumulative increase in suspended sediment concentration during capital and
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:269: maintenance dredging (including potentially contaminated marine sediment)
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:269:26.4.1 Given that the generation of a sediment plume is a construction phase effect (i.e. would occur during
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:269: represent sediment plume dispersion under specific tidal conditions (to enable a realistic worse case to
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:269: programmes of capital dredging would coincide to result in a scenario where sediment plumes combine
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:269:26.4.2 Analysis of the results presented in Table 25-3 indicates that the sediment plumes arising from
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:269: impact would be a greater increase in suspended sediment concentration than predicted for the
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:269: Harbour facilities alone but within the same plume spatial extent (i.e. the spatial extent of the sediment
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:269: projects). It should be noted that the sediment plume predicted due to the NGCT encompasses, and
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:269:26.4.3 With regard to the potential for dredging contaminated sediment, the marine licence for the capital
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:269: of contaminants within the dredged sediment, and this measure would limit sediment release into the
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:269: suction dredger or backhoe dredger (the implications of both types of dredger on suspended sediment
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:270:26.4.5 The quality of the sediment overlying the geological material to be dredged as part of the Harbour
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:270:26.4.6 It is concluded that the predicted suspended sediment concentration generated by capital dredging for
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:270: significance. Mitigation incorporated into each project to avoid dispersion of contaminated sediments
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:270: undertaken elsewhere in the Tees estuary, there is a low potential for suspended sediment arising from
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:270: maintenance dredging to interact with a sediment plume from capital dredging.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:270:26.4.8 Mitigation to limit the dispersion of dredged sediment for the QEII Berth Development project (i.e. the
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:270:26.4.10 In terms of dispersion of suspended sediment during dredging, the EIA studies for the Harbour facilities
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:270: above, it is however proposed that contaminated sediment would be dredged using an enclosed grab.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:271:26.4.13 The hydrodynamic and sediment transport studies undertaken for the Harbour facilities included making
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:271: there would be a very small change in the overall fine sediment regime which would not alter the
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:272: to deposition of sediment that sediment predicted from the construction of Harbour
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:272: to creation of a sediment
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:272: dredging. by changes in the hydrodynamic and sedimentary
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:272: sedimentary regime (i.e. extent of sediment deposition during capital dredging and the nature of indirect
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:272: populations is also informed by the sediment plume dispersion studies undertaken for the Harbour
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:272: of non-contaminated and potentially contaminated sediments during capital dredging.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:272:27.3.1 The study area, at is widest extent, is as described for the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime. The
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:273: deposition of sediment onto the seabed is predicted to occur as a result of capital dredging. Much of
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:273: benthic invertebrates found in subtidal and intertidal sediments. The lower Tees estuary supports many
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:273: Smothering of benthic invertebrate communities due to deposition of sediment that is dispersed
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:273:27.4.1 It is evident from the predictions of sediment deposition onto the seabed presented in Table 25-3 that
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:274:27.4.5 The predicted footprints of sediment deposition for the NGCT and the Harbour facilities are similar,
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:274: deposition of sediment arising from the Harbour facilities capital dredging. As a result, the direct effect
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:274:27.4.7 The mitigation described in Section 26 with regard to limiting suspended sediment increase and
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:274: dispersion during capital dredging is also relevant here (i.e. sediment suspension and dispersion is
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:274: Effect on fish populations due to creation of a sediment plume during capital dredging
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:274:27.4.8 As discussed in Section 27, there is the potential for the sediment plumes to coincide resulting in an
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:274: additive effect on suspended sediment concentration within the zone of interaction. Suspended
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:274: sediment increases are expected to result in a behavioural effect on fish, with movement away from the
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:274: zone of increased suspended sediment concentration. However, the effect of a combined plume (in the
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:275:27.4.10 The mitigation described in Section 27 with regard to limiting suspended sediment increase and
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:275: sediment to the Tees due to the proposed scheme. The predicted deposition of sediment in the berth
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:275: facilities would, therefore, be to cause a redistribution of sediment that requires maintenance dredging.
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:275: potential to affect the sediment budget of the estuary and, therefore, there would be no impact
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:275:27.4.12 The NGCT was predicted to have an effect on sediment supply into the estuary (summarised in
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:275: morphology, with the proposed scheme having a negligible effect on deposition of sediment in the berth
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:278: increased suspended sediment
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:278: sedimentary regime (i.e. extent of sediment deposition during capital dredging and the nature of indirect
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:279: Potential effect on waterbird feeding resource due to increased suspended sediment during
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:279: due to creation of a sediment plume during capital dredging) given that waterbirds potentially affected
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:279: occur, with movement away from the zone of increased suspended sediment concentration. However,
TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:279:28.4.2 The mitigation described in Section 27 with regard to limiting suspended sediment increase and
TR030002-000495-Section 15 App 15.2 Northern Gateway Archaeological Appraisal.pdf:17: impact upon buried sediments within the Tees Channel which have the potential
TR030002-000495-Section 15 App 15.2 Northern Gateway Archaeological Appraisal.pdf:18: sediments it is recommended that borehole data from the channel is examined to
TR030002-000495-Section 15 App 15.2 Northern Gateway Archaeological Appraisal.pdf:18: suitable sediments, further sampling and environmental assessment of these
TR030002-000495-Section 15 App 15.2 Northern Gateway Archaeological Appraisal.pdf:18: sediments would be required. The specific sampling strategy would be discussed
TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:1: the behaviour of designated interest features (e.g. sediment transport and water levels). Hence this
TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:1: Section 5 – Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:1: Consideration of the influence of a project on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime takes account of the
TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:1: interactions between potential alterations to waves, tides, currents, water levels and sediment movement in order to
TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:1: regime of the estuary (e.g. sediment accretion / erosion) were then assessed in terms of the significance of the
TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:2:Section 7 - Marine sediment and water quality (Tees estuary)
TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:2:sediment would also avoid the potential for affects associated with the contaminated sediment for affect the water
TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:3: sediment re-suspension from
TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:30: evaporites were deposited primarily in four sedimentary cycles within the UK,
TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:30: insoluble material. Only the sedimentary Cycle Z2 (the Fordon Evaporite
TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:80: sedimentary rocks and if this fracturing continues to a depth, then the
TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:124: superficial deposits of sand and gravel and glacial till sediment. NLP is
TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:19:The marl is geological (i.e. uncontaminated) material that underlies contaminated sediment. A description of
TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:19:the sediment quality at the site of the proposed port terminal and within the footprint of the capital dredging is
TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:24:sediments (i.e. concentrations of various contaminants) is routinely tested and the licence is only granted if
TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:24:the sediment meets appropriate standards.
TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:24:Consequently, it is not expected that there would be a concern with regard sediment quality that would
TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:28:increase further as the organic content of the sediment increases (Evans and Lucas, 2000).
TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:28:recreated intertidal area at Teesmouth when new silt layers had deposited over compacted sediment created
TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:28:Bolam and Whomersley (2003) studied the nature of invertebrate colonisation of fine grained sediments
TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:28: 2. Vertical migration up through the placed sediment.
TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:28:occur due to the smothering effect and depth of sediment associated with the placement of the dredged
TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:28:material. Some lateral migration (mechanism 3) may occur between the sediments of the lagoon and the
TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:29:sedimentary habitats in the estuary and lagoon.
TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:43: of these sediments should be given thorough consideration (10.3.36)
TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:44: truth the suitability of the sediment (particle size and lack of contamination) .(10.3.18)
TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:47:sediment quality and particle size i.e. only want ‘uncontaminated fines’ for this project.
TR030002-000834-Document 4.2B - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked).pdf:24: a new paragraph 34 (2) has been added to require a further sediment
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:5 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:5.1.1 This section of the ES describes the existing environment for the hydrodynamic and sedimentary
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:5.2.1 The assessment of potential effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes has been made
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1: requirements relevant to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes / coastal processes, as presented
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1: the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes is presented in Table 5-2.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:2:Where relevant, applicants should undertake coastal geomorphological and sediment transfer modelling to predict and understand im
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:2: regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3:Effects resulting from sediment dispersion relating to quay construction are to be assessed as
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3:The ES should provide an assessment of the impact on hydrodynamics and sedimentary
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3:act as a sediment trap, intercepting fine sediment and reducing the level of deposition at the
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3:for decline of SPA birds in the estuary is a shift from fine sediments to coarse marine ones. The
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3:potential impact on sediment flows should be examined in detail.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3:assessed during the EIA. The EIA must also assess the potential to alter the sediment regime
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3:and cause additional sedimentation which could increase dredging operations at other locations
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3:The MMO welcomes the commitment to assess sediment dispersion (or retention) from the
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3:offshore disposal sites and to assess and quantify the potential for release of sediment into the Noted
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:4:The MMO would expect full details of sediment plume modelling to be included in the ES i.e.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:4:calibration, validation, increase in suspended sediment data.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:4:sediment in chart area 9
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:5:terms of sedimentation or increased erosion (outside of Chart area 9).
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:6:5.3.1 The study area for the assessment of hydrodynamic and sedimentary effects of the proposed scheme
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:6: Figure 5-1 Numerical modelling domain for the hydrodynamic and sedimentary studies
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:6:5.3.2 The assessment of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary effects of the proposed scheme is based on
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:6: modelling, sediment transport, bed change modelling and modelling of sediment plume released from
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:7:5.3.4 New data on bed sediment types anticipated to be dredged for the proposed scheme has been used in
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:7: defining the detail of the dredging activity and to inform the modelling of the release of sediment during
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:7: the estuary (e.g. sediment accretion / erosion) were assessed in terms of the significance of the
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:8: near-bed upstream (flooding) flows are observed. These effects are important in supplying sediment to
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:8: the estuary from offshore (the main sediment supply).
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:9: Sediment
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:9:5.4.14 In general, suspended sediment concentrations are low within the estuary and within Tees Bay. The
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:9: values are also attributed to either high rainfall or storm events. In general, the suspended sediment
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:9:5.4.15 In the vicinity of the proposed scheme, suspended sediment concentrations are, for the most part, less
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:9: suspended sediment levels occur close to high water. After storm periods, higher concentrations of
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:9: suspended sediment have been noted around the Shell Jetty, but with little penetration further up the
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:9:5.4.16 Historic bed sampling results in the vicinity of the proposed scheme show bed sediments in the area to
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10:5.4.18 Within the system, the driving forces for sediment transport are the tidal flows, density driven currents,
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10: suggests that out of the 1.35 million m3 of sediment that is dredged annually, 250,000m3 is mud. Of the
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10: Sediment release during dredging
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10:5.5.1 As described in Section 3, an enclosed grab is proposed to dredge the contaminated sediments
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10:5.5.2 The main issues which have the potential to arise with regard to sedimentation during the construction
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10: x Increased turbidity due to release of sediments into the water column during the dredge.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10: x The effects of fine sediment run-off from the fill material used in the quay construction (this is
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10:5.5.3 A larger rate of sediment release would be anticipated from the TSHD or the CSD in comparison with
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10: would be virtually no sediment release from the enclosed grab method, as this is a specialist technique
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10: that is specifically used to limit the release of sediment into the water column during dredging as much
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10: as possible (e.g. when sediments to be dredged are known to be contaminated).
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:11:5.5.4 Sediment plume modelling tests have been carried out for the proposed scheme to predict the effects
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:11: to the fact that there is negligible sediment release from an enclosed grab). The modelling used two
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:11: flow, spring tide flow simulation was used to demonstrate the maximum extent of the sediment plume
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:11: 5-2 to 5-7. The modelling includes sediment release at the dredger drag head and overflow from the
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:11: hopper. Overflow typically provides the largest sediment release rate from a barge loaded from a CSD.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:11: tide conditions. The findings of the sediment plume modelling are discussed in greater detail below.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:11:5.5.7 The simulations for the CSD predict that mean elevated suspended sediment concentration increases
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:11: predicted, while tens of centimetres of sediment deposition is predicted in the vicinity of the barge itself.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:11: Elsewhere within the estuary (up to 1.5km either side of the dredge location), fine sediment deposition
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:11:5.5.8 The simulation results for the backhoe dredger predict that an area of elevated suspended sediment
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:11: dredger, with no wider effects within the estuary. Sediment deposition of a maximum of a few
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:11:5.5.9 The simulations for the TSHD show that an area of elevated suspended sediment concentration, in the
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:11: up to 200mg/l of suspended sediment. Fine sediment deposition is predicted to be a maximum of a few
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:11:5.5.10 During simulations for all dredge methods, no average increase in suspended sediment concentration
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:11: is shown over the intertidal areas, leading to a prediction of negligible sediment being able to deposit on
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:12: Sediment release during disposal
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:12: Figure 5-2 Simulated sediment release from CSD dredging in spring tide, low river flow conditions
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:12: a) average increase in suspended sediment concentration b) deposition after 3 tides of dredging
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:13:Figure 5-3 Simulated sediment release from TSHD dredging in spring tide, low river flow conditions
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:13:a) average increase in suspended sediment concentration b) deposition after 3 tides of dredging
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:14:Figure 5-4 Simulated sediment release from backhoe dredging in spring tide, low river flow conditions
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:14:a) average increase in suspended sediment concentration b) deposition after 3 tides of dredging
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:15:Figure 5-5 Simulated sediment release from CSD dredging in neap tide, high river flow conditions
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:15:a) average increase in suspended sediment concentration b) deposition after 3 tides of dredging
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:16:Figure 5-6 Simulated sediment release from TSHD dredging in neap tide, high river flow conditions
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:16:a) average increase in suspended sediment concentration b) deposition after 3 tides of dredging
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:18:Figure 5-7 Simulated sediment release from backhoe dredging in neap tide, high river flow conditions
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:18:a) average increase in suspended sediment concentration b) deposition after 3 tides of dredging
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:23: Changes to the local sediment regime including sedimentation in the dredged areas
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:23: sediment imported to the Tees from offshore (identified to be the largest sediment input). Furthermore,
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:23: no changes to sediment transport in the predominantly sandy areas around Teesmouth are expected
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:23: and so no effect on sand transport is anticipated. However, cohesive sediment transport modelling was
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:23:5.6.20 The baseline situation for sediment transport in the Tees as a whole is an average total infill rate of
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:23: significant source of this fine material is marine sources. Fine sediment moved into suspension during
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:23: Tees (Chart areas 1 to 9), total fine sediment infill has been in the range 100,000 to 600,000m 3 per
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:32: the import of fine sediment and the potential infill rate in the proposed dredged areas associated with
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:32:5.6.23 The model simulated an existing (i.e. baseline) overall import of fine sediment of 430,000m 3 into Chart
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:32: the model predicted an existing 88,000m3 per year of fine sediment infill, which is very close to the
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:32: sediment into the estuary (less than 0.5%). This is to be expected because the width and depth of the
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:32: for changes to the amount of sediment imported though this route is also unchanged.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:32: sediment infill in Chart area 9 (approximately 1%). These changes are extremely small and are well
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:32: sediment supply into the berth pocket. It is for this reason that the solid quay structure (which removes
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:33:5.6.27 Overall, therefore, the effect of the proposed scheme is to result in a localised redistribution of sediment
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:33: change in the overall fine sediment regime would not require any alteration in the present frequency of,
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:33: or methodology used for, maintenance dredging and no effect on sediment supply to intertidal areas
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:33:5.7.1 The hydrodynamic and sediment transport modelling undertaken predicts that the effects of the
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:33: scheme. No change in the supply of fine sediment from offshore is predicted and the predicted
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:33: accumulation of sediment within the berth pocket and the section of the approach channel to be
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:33: result, no effect on the overall sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary is predicted.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:33:5.7.2 A summary of the predicted effects of the proposed scheme on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:33: Table 5-5 Summary of predicted effects of the proposed scheme on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:33: Sediment release Summary of effect
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:33: Enclosed grab x There would be virtually no sediment release from the enclosed grab
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:33: CSD x Mean elevated suspended sediment concentration increases above
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:33: Backhoe dredger x An area of elevated suspended sediment concentrations in the range of
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:33: TSHD x An area of elevated suspended sediment concentration, in the range of
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:33: suspended sediment.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:34:Sediment deposition Summary of effect
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:34:operations. Negligible sediment is predicted to deposit on the intertidal areas.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:34: of sediment deposition is predicted in the vicinity of the barge itself.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:34: location), fine sediment deposition over the simulation period is
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:34:Backhoe x Sediment deposition of a maximum of a few millimetres is predicted up
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:34:TSHD x Fine sediment deposition is predicted to be a maximum of a few
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:35:Change to local x No potential for effect on the amount of sediment imported to the Tees
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:35:sediment regime in from offshore.
TR030002-000440-ES Section 5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:35: sediment deposition due to change in current speed.
TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:56: (a) the undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for approval at least
TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:56: (b) the sediment sampling and analysis of the sediment must be completed by a laboratory
TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:56: (5) Any contaminated sediment (largely silt) lying deeper than one metre below the surface of
TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:98: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which
TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:98: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:99:be affected by sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the
TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:100: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:100: 20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:100: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making
TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:62: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which
TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:62: notice for the purpose of preventing, mitigating or making good the sedimentation,
TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:64: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:64: 19.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:64: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making
TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:32:To: The Applicant sediment modelling. That document highlighted that no sediment (or
TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:32:sediment and water quality and does not propose any monitoring of initial concern was based on the original much larger dredge
TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:32:sediment or marine water quality (Doc 6.4). However, Table 7.5 (approach channel and berth pocket) which was subsequently
TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:32:(Summary of consultation responses on the scope of the sediment reduced in the submitted application. Based on the Northern Gateway
TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:56: (a) the undertaker must submit a sediment sampling plan to the MMO for approval at least six
TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:56: (b) the sediment sampling and analysis of the sediment must be completed by a laboratory
TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:56: (5) Any contaminated sediment (largely silt) lying deeper than one metre below the surface of the
TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:99: (b) during construction gives rise to sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action which is
TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:99: sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action so far as required for safe navigation or
TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:100:sedimentation, scouring, currents or wave action that might result from the construction of such of
TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:101: Sedimentation, etc.: remedial action
TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:101: 20.—(1) This paragraph applies if any part of the river becomes subject to sedimentation,
TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:101: may reasonably be put in dredging the river to remove the sedimentation or in making good
TR030002-000417-Doc 1.5 s55 Checklist.pdf:16: Section 5 – Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
TR030002-000417-Doc 1.5 s55 Checklist.pdf:16: Section 7 – Marine sediment and water quality
TR030002-000417-Doc 1.5 s55 Checklist.pdf:18: Appendix 7.1 – Benthic and sediment sampling strategy
TR030002-000417-Doc 1.5 s55 Checklist.pdf:18: Appendix 7.2 –Sediment quality data
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:5: A sediment sampling regime would only be necessary if a marine licence was also being applied
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:6: approach is the most appropriate means of assessing the potential effects of the proposed scheme on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:6: Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime This will comprise a review of the 2006 ES findings and providing an evidence base as to why the potential effects on the hydrodynamic and
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:6: sedimentary regime remain valid. A review of the findings of other environmental assessments (e.g. the York Potash Harbour Facilities ES, QEII ES
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:6: and Tees Dock No.1 Quay ES) will also be undertaken to inform the desk based assessment. No further modelling hydrodynamic or sedimentary
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:6: The 2006 ES was informed by historic sediment quality surveys in the Tees estuary, as well as a site-specific sediment quality survey. Since 2006,
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:6: several sediment quality surveys have been undertaken at various locations within the Tees estuary, the most recent being in 2014 to inform the EIA
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:6: for the York Potash Harbour Facilities. We propose to review all relevant sediment quality data since 2006 to further inform our understanding of the
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:6: Marine sediment quality
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:6: sediment quality within the Tees estuary and to determine whether there would be an issue regarding the offshore disposal of dredged material. The
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:6: MMO confirmed during April 2017 that there is no requirement to take additional sediment quality samples if PDT is proposing to apply for an HRO
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:6: extension only. We therefore do not propose to take any additional sediment quality samples to inform the assessment.
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:6: The findings from the desk based review of existing sediment quality data and the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime will be used to determine
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:6: whether the findings from the 2006 ES remain valid (particularly with regard to the potential for remobilisation of contaminated sediment during
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:6: materially affect the conclusions of the 2006 and its supplement. The findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime review and sediment and
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:6: marine licence as well), there would be no requirement for additional sediment quality sampling. We consider that the same principle would apply with
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:7: and sedimentary regime assessment and sediment and water quality assessment will then be used to determine whether the assessment presented in
I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:7: findings of the sediment quality assessment, water quality assessment and marine ecology assessment to determine whether the impacts (and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:3: 1.6.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, marine ecology,
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:3: recreational navigation and water and sediment quality 26
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:5:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME 159
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:5: 6.2.3 Sediment 163
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:6: 6.4.4 Non-cohesive sediment studies 196
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:6: 6.4.5 Cohesive sediment studies 197
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:6:7 MARINE SEDIMENT QUALITY 208
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:6: 7.1.1 Overview of sediment quality based on existing sources 208
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:6: 7.2.1 Impact of dispersion and redistribution of sediments on the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:6: contaminated sediment during capital dredging 227
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:6: biologically contaminated sediment during capital dredging 228
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:6: 7.3.1 Potential change in sediment quality 229
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:6: 7.3.2 Potential effects on the sediment quality of the receptor sites due
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:7: 9.2.1 Increase in suspended sediment concentrations and increased
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:7: 9.3.1 Periodic increases in suspended sediment concentrations and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:7: remobilisation of potentially contaminated sediment caused by
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:7: 10.1.5 Description of sediment types 283
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:7: 10.2.2 Potential smothering effect caused by sedimentation of material
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:7: 10.2.3 Deposition of fine sediment within areas of saltmarsh 295
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:8: 10.2.4 Potential smothering effect caused by sedimentation of material
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:8: from an increase in suspended sediment concentrations and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:8: 10.2.6 Remobilisation of potentially contaminated sediments and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:8: 10.3.3 Potential effect of increased supply of fine sediment to Seal
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:8: 11.2.4 Effect of sediment deposition on intertidal food resources due to
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:8: 11.2.5 Effect of increased suspended sediments on the food resource for
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:8: 11.3.2 Potential effect of increased supply of fine sediment to Seal
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:9: increases in suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) due to
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:14:1.9 The domain for the hydraulic and sedimentary modelling 27
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:15:7.1 National Marine Monitoring Programme sediment sampling sites (EA) 210
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:15:7.2 Sediment sample locations 212
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:15:7.3 Results of sediment analysis for selected parameters 220
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:16: samples of different sediment composition (purple = sediment group A,
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:16: yellow = sediment group B)
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:16: with a descriptor of the general sediment type superimposed on each
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:16:25.5 Conceptual sediment transport diagram at disposal sites 457
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:18:7.1 National Marine Monitoring Programme sediment chemistry data 209
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:18:7.2 Data from particle size analysis of sediments from the receptor sites 213
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:18:7.3 Data from particle size analysis of sediments within the main channel 213
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:18:7.4 Interim marine sediment quality guidelines (ISQGs)/threshold effect 216
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:18:7.5 Summary of sediment quality data for marine sediments within the 218
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:18:7.6 Summary of sediment quality data for marine sediments within the 219
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:19:9.8 Sediment levels (Csed) derived from equilibrium partitioning 268
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:19:9.9 Comparison of sediment standard to mean sediment concentrations in 269
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:21:25.2 Results of sampling of sediment in areas where maintenance dredging 449
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:23:ISQG Interim sediment quality guideline
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:24:SSC Suspended sediment concentration
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:26:Epifauna Species living on the surface of the sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:26: predominantly comprising sediment habitats.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:27:Infauna Species living within sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:34: • Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (Section 6);
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:34: • Marine sediment quality (Section 7);
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:35: • Appendix 3 Sediment quality data.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:35: • Accompanying Document 1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary studies.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:45: established through the hydraulic and sedimentary studies undertaken as part of
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:51: • Suggests inclusion of brominated flame retardants in sediment analysis.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:51:English Nature Mike Quigley • Include effects of dredging on hydrodynamics, sediment transport, river profiles, intertidal areas and tidal profiles. 3, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14,
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:52: • Recommends looking at dissolved oxygen issues caused by re suspension of sediments during the dredging.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:52: • Highlighted that the sediment disposal to land may require a waste management licence.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:52: • Requirement for a settlement facility for dewatering of dredged sediment process.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:52: • Recommended inclusion of nonylphenols in contaminant list for sediments.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:54:Club • Possible adverse effect of development on sedimentary regime on birds.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:55:1.6.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, marine ecology, fisheries, marine and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:55: commercial and recreational navigation and water and sediment quality
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:55: to the hydraulic and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary and coastal area.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:55: the boundary for the hydraulic and sediment transport model (model domain) and is
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:56: Figure 1.9 The domain for the hydraulic and sedimentary modelling
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:60: undertaking modelling of the dispersion of the sediment plume. The potential effects
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:60: • Water and sediment quality; and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:103: dispersion of sediment plumes during dredging). Further details on the parameters
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:103: used in the sediment plume simulations are provided in Section 6.3.1.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:114: sedimentary studies that have been undertaken as part of the EIA (see Section 6). It
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:122: water quality of the Tees Estuary in terms of increases in suspended sediments and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:122: any associated contaminants which may exist within the sediments. They may also
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:129: • Marine Sediment Quality
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:129: 4. In order to assess the likely impact of the development on marine sediment quality
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:129: sediment characteristics. Eight samples were collected within the footprint of the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:129: potentially to be at risk from remobilised and potentially contaminated sediments. The
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:130: sediments and their deposition at the receptor sites. However once the terminal
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:131: over spring tides. The assessment indicated that although sediment will be released
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:132: of animals living within the sediment and species living on the surface of the sea bed.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:137: • Remobilisation, dispersion and redistribution of potentially contaminated sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:137: • Release of potentially contaminated sediment during quay construction;
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:137: • Potential remobilisation of sediment by localised erosion resulting from changes in
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:137: river channel, seabed sediments will become re-suspended and dispersed
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:138: sediment disperses and subsequently settles. As a result of the heavy industrial
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:138: nature of the Tees estuary, the assessment indicated that where sediment has
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:138: contaminated sediment during construction there would be a benefit of minor
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:141: sedimentary regime;
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:185: are associated with the increase in suspended sediment concentrations in the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:188:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:188: hydrodynamic and sediment regime of the Tees estuary arising from the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:188: wave climate, flow regime, sediment transport pathways, etc) and it is not
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:190: Details of the pre-barrage hydrodynamic and sedimentological regimes in the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:192:6.2.3 Sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:192: 1. In general, suspended sediment concentrations are low within the estuary and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:192: high rainfall or storm events. In general, the suspended sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:192: of the proposed development (i.e. in the Tees Dock area) suspended sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:192: from 40-80mg/l. In terms of the tidal sequence, the highest suspended sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:192: suspended sediment have been noted around the Shell Jetty, but with little
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:193: system the driving forces for sediment transport are the tidal flows, density
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:193: of fluvial sediment into the estuary. ABPmer (2005) reported that considerable
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:193: sediment input to the estuary has reduced. However, even the pre-barrage
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:193: from Tees Bay, is the predominant source of sediment in to the system. This
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:195: the studies on the dispersion of the sediment plume arising during dredging, as
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:195: d) Losses of suspended sediment are inevitable at the dredging face or draghead,
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:195: less instantaneous release of solids. Therefore, sediment plume studies were
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:195: mixture of sediment and water from the sea bed and discharging this mixture
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:195: into a hopper on the dredger. The proportion of sediment loaded into the hopper
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:195: finer sediment fractions. This overspilled sediment will either fall to the bed or
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:196: remain in suspension, forming a sediment plume. The plume from the overspill
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:196: discharge is an order of magnitude greater than sediment resuspension from the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:196: dredger draghead and so it is the only sediment source considered for sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:196: to the TSHD the proportion of sediment loaded into the barge can be increased
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:196: plumes of suspended fine sediment. Importantly the TSHD will result in a
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:196: source of fine sediment released along the path of the dredging activity (i.e. in
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:196: simulate the dispersion, deposition and resuspension of the released sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:196: 8. Parameters for the sediment plume simulations for the CSD were established
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:197: 9. Parameters for the sediment plume simulations for the TSHD were established,
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:197: because the sediment enters the water firstly in a dynamic plume phase (i.e. not
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:197: sediment mixes with the water it behaves as a passive plume that is transported
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:199: CSD in terms of predicted peak concentration of suspended sediments and peak
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:202: is predicted to increase suspended sediment concentrations by 500mg/l in the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:202: much sediment as those along the channel.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:202: of the run-off from the reclamation. Increases in suspended sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:202: suspended sediment concentrations over Seal Sands and in the Seaton
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:203: suspended sediment concentrations and deposition at Bran Sands and North
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:208: gravitationally driven currents with knock on effects for sediment transport and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:208: report of the hydrodynamic and sedimentological studies to support the EIA (HR
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:225:6.4.4 Non-cohesive sediment studies
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:225: SANDFLOW. SANDFLOW is a dynamic non-cohesive sediment (sand)
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:225: sediment due to the effects of both currents and waves. The sediment transport
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:225: 2. SANDFLOW was used to simulate the sediment transport patterns throughout
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:226: which serve to drive sand into the outer channel. Sandy sedimentation rates in
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:226: contributed to by sedimentary events, involving the slippage of sediment that
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:226:6.4.5 Cohesive sediment studies
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:226: potentially, as a consequence, the sediment dynamics of intertidal areas.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:226: 3. As described in Section 6.2, the bulk of fine sediment enters the system during
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:226: the main source is offshore). Once within the estuary, fine sediment is pushed
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:226: 4. The chosen model for the study of fine sediment transport was SUBIEF3D which
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:226: uses the hydrodynamics generated by TELEMAC3D to transport fine sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:228: 1. The preceding sections present the findings of the flow, wave and sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:228: • Increased import of fine sediments resuspended in Tees Bay;
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:230: counter this effect reducing the sediment supply from North Gare Sands into the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:230: 17. Analysis of bed sediment shown in HR Wallingford (2002) suggests that in
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:230: Seaton Channel the bed sediment tends to be finer (>70% particles < 63um)
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:230: whereas on Seal Sands bed sediments over most of the area comprise
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:230: sediment of less than 50%, fines, particularly towards the east. Of this amount
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:230: silt. The material showed a pattern with the sandiest sediment occurring at
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:231: higher elevations and muddier sediment in gullies and deeper pockets on the top
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:231: contrary to HR Wallingford (2002) which reported that sediment on Seal Sands
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:231: sediment supply and changes to the processes occurring on Seal Sands.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:231: 20. Changes to sediment supply:
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:231: • Increased sedimentation in the turning area probably due to a combination of the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:231: build up on North Gare Sands and more favourable conditions for sedimentation
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:232: • Increased import (aproximately10%) of fine sediments to Seaton Channel with a
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:232: proportionate increase in fine sediment supply to Seal Sands.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237:7 MARINE SEDIMENT QUALITY
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237: 1. The capital dredging will resuspend seabed sediments and enable sediment to
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237: microbiological characteristics of the areas to which the sediment disperses and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237: subsequently settles. The main routes whereby sediment is released into the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237: water column during the dredging activity are through sediment disturbance at
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237: the dredge head and the overflow of water (containing suspended sediments)
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237: from the dredger. The dispersion and settlement of fine sediment during capital
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237: sediments both within the area to be dredged and areas in the lower Tees
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237: estuary to which sediments have the potential to disperse and settle (termed
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237:7.1.1 Overview of sediment quality based on existing sources
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237: estuarine sediments have acted as a sink for these contaminants.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237: contamination entering the estuary; however where estuarine sediments have
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237: where sediments have been removed through capital and maintenance dredging
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237: programmes, the risk of contaminated sediment remaining is decreased,
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237: although this clearly depends on the depth to which sediments have been
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237: 2. There have been a number of sediment quality studies undertaken in the Tees
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237: estuary and sediment quality data are available for the area in the vicinity of the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:237: sediments in the Tees estuary has shown that various parts of the estuary have,
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:238: Agency collects sediment quality data annually at various sites within the Tees
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:238:Table 7.1 National Marine Monitoring Programme sediment chemistry data
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:239: Programme Sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:240: 7. In summary, this data shows that all areas have some level of sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:240: dredged. This is probably related to the continual removal of sediments via
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:240: chemical and microbiological conditions for sediments within the footprint of the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:240: subject to deposition of sediment that will be disturbed during the capital
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:240: sediment samples were determined through analysis, as detailed below.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:240: sediment quality survey has been divided into three groups; ‘main channel’,
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:240: This is based on the expected sediment quality of the various sites; for example,
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:240: expectation that the presence of fine sediment, which has not been dredged
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:241:Key: Sediment Sample Locations Figure 7.2
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:242: sediment-associated contaminants (CIRIA, 2000).
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:242: of sediment-bound contaminants were determined, and are listed as follows:
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:242: • Basic sediment types (i.e. silt, sand or gravel); and,
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:242: 3. For physical characteristics, there are no sediment quality standards. The
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:242:Table 7.2 Data from particle size analysis of sediments from the receptor
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:242:Table 7.3 Data from particle size analysis of sediments within the main
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:243: 5. Sediments in the receptor sites in the intertidal areas close to the estuary mouth
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:243: TS11), however, comprise of more silty sediments (>60%) with varying amounts
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:243: 6. Sediments in the area to be reclaimed (TS10, TS13 and TS14; shown in italics
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:243: 7. Sediments in the main channel are quite variable in nature; however, most
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:243: 1. Contaminants within the sediments to be dredged can, depending on the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:243: physical characteristics of the sediments (see Section 7.1.3), be mobilised and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:243: 2. Sediment analysis for the above parameters was undertaken at each of the 13
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:243: 3. The principle approach to assessing sediment quality impacts is to compare
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:243: survey results against assessment criteria established as sediment quality
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:244: (EQSs) for in situ sediment quality. The only guidance for sediment quality is
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:244: the Canadian interim sediment quality guidelines (ISQG) have been used.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:244: sediments with these guideline values will, therefore, provide a basic indication
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:244: present within the Tees estuary sediments are at risk from sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:244: 8. Table 7.4 lists the existing sediment quality guidelines for some of the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:244: sediment quality guidelines exist).
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:245:Table 7.4 Interim marine sediment quality guidelines (ISQGs)/threshold effect
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:246:Summary of sediment quality data
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:246: summarise the sediment quality from the survey.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:247:Table 7.5 Summary of sediment quality data for marine sediments within the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:248:Table 7.6 Summary of sediment quality data for marine sediments within the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:251: concentrations in the sediments of the Tees estuary are discussed and where a
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:251: standard exists, compared to the Canadian sediment guidelines.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:251: bioaccumulate within the food chain. Concentrations of PCBs in the sediments
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:252: for estimating the petroleum contamination of the sediments.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:252: results are greater than 100mg/kg therefore levels of TPHs in the sediments are
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:252: the Canadian sediment quality guidelines; however a PEL is not defined. It can
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:252: sediments. Samples for PBDEs taken from the Tees estuary are therefore
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:252: predominantly low and are in the range <0.1µg/kg and 9µg/kg of sediment for
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:253: sediments were analysed for bacterial content. The following parameters were
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:253: 2. Results for the majority of sediment sampling sites were reported below the limit
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:253: of detection (i.e. less than 10 bacteria per gram of sediment). Sites TS05 and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:253: Bacterial contamination of the estuarine sediments is, therefore, considered to
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:253:7.2.1 Impact of dispersion and redistribution of sediments on the physical composition
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:253: 1. Changes to sediment quality could occur when sediment is released into the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:253: composition of the seabed sediments at locations in which it is predicted to
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:253: settle. Changes to sediment chemistry as a consequence of this predicted effect
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:253: 2. In summary, the sediments at the ‘receptor’ sites predominantly comprise of
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:253: sediment survey (see Section 7.1.2) indicates that Seal Sands comprises
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:253: approximately 20% of fine sediments, the remainder being sand. Other historic
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:253: data shows, however, that sediment composition over Seal Sands is variable
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:253: 3. Coarser sediments predominate in the more exposed areas such as close to the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:253: receptor sites there is also a small percentage of silt present in the sediments.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:254: 4. The dispersion and deposition of sediment caused by the capital dredging is
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:256: and depositing sediment would be re-dredged. In addition, these areas are not
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:256: 8. For the intertidal areas, the magnitude of sediment deposition over the course of
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:256: material that settles will be reworked into the substratum (i.e. the sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:256: expected to encourage the accumulation of fine sediment through physical
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:256: trapping of fine sediment and would exacerbate the tendency of the substratum
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:256: entirely different type of sediment into a receptor area.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:256: 11. Given the above, the physical impact of sediment deposited as a result of capital
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:256: sediment during capital dredging
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:256: 7.1.4. A comparison of the survey data with the sediment quality guidelines
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:256: indicates that the sediments in the main channel and in the area which will be
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:257: the reclamation area) and, therefore, the sediments in this area would be
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:257: 3. A comparison of survey data from the receptor sites with the sediment quality
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:257: guidelines indicates that the sediments at these sites contain detectable levels of
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:257: those measured in the channel area. Sediments released during dredging from
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:257: the main channel could therefore, potentially impact on the sediment quality of
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:257: significant changes in sediment quality at the receptor sites will occur as a
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:257: levels are likely to be low due to the fact that the sediments in this area are
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:257: 5. The impact of the capital dredging on sediment chemistry of the receptor sites at
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:257: contaminated sediment during capital dredging
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:257: total coliforms and faecal enterococci. Contamination of the sediments by
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:257: occur over the time period between sediment being transported and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:258:7.3.1 Potential change in sediment quality
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:258:7.3.2 Potential effects on the sediment quality of the receptor sites due to
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:258: concluded that there would be no impact on sediment quality as a consequence
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:267: sediment samples, taken from over water boreholes adjacent to the north north
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:282: 1. The capital dredging will result in the suspension of sediment into the water
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:282: silt upstream of the barrage also resulted in the coarsening of sediments
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:293:9.2.1 Increase in suspended sediment concentrations and increased turbidity during
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:293: 1. Changes to water quality will occur when sediment is released into the water
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:293: column by dredging; sediment will be dispersed by tidal currents and potentially
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:294: 3. The effect of capital dredging on suspended sediment concentration has been
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:294: sediment concentrations of up to 500mg/l are predicted in the immediate vicinity
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:294: of the dredger; however, effects on suspended sediment concentrations are very
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:294: sediment plume spreads further afield (along the tidal axis) compared to
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:294: dredging in the Tees Dock turning circle. Suspended sediment concentrations
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:294: reclamation show that peak increases in suspended sediment concentrations of
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:294: suspended sediment concentration arising during the dredging in the lower
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:294: channel and the effect of run-off from the reclamation of suspended sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:296: sediment concentrations (i.e. less than 20mg/l above background).
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:296: suspended sediment concentrations reduce to less than 50mg/l above
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:296: 1. The resuspension of sediments as described in Section 9.2.1 also has the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:296: sediments within the proposed reclamation area will be covered by the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:296: EQSs, the sediment-water partitioning approach has been used. This assumes
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:297: that the critical factor in sediment toxicity is the concentration of the contaminant
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:297: in the interstitial water. The sediment standard is taken as the concentration in
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:297: the sediment, in equilibrium with the interstitial water that does not give rise to a
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:297: case the standards set by the Dangerous Substances Directive. The sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:297: relationship between contaminant concentration in the sediment and the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:297: surrounding water and are referred to as Koc The sediment level is then
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:297: organic carbon of the sediment sample. Csed values are then compared to
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:297: measured sediment concentrations and if Csed are exceeded, there is the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:297: sediment concentration likely to cause a breach in the EQS. Values are then
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:297: compared to actual mean sediment concentrations in Table 9.8.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:297:Table 9.8 Sediment levels (Csed) derived from equilibrium partitioning
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:298:Table 9.9 Comparison of sediment standard to mean sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:298: contaminants in the sediments within the dredging areas are below the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:298: significance criteria. This means that the interstitial water of the sediment mostly
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:298: the significance criteria. This means that the interstitial water of the sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:298: 6. Dredging would release sediment into the overlying water column. The
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:298: sediment and the contaminants in the interstitial water would undergo significant
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:298: the sediment survey however, did not record TBT or DBT levels above the limit
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:298: of detection. Re-suspension of contaminated sediment with high concentrations
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:298: sediments. Deca BDE has not been reported in water samples which is
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:298: the case for PAH contaminants as PAHs have a high affinity for sediments and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:299: 1. The resuspension of sediment as a consequence of the proposed capital
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:299: 2. In general, sediment plumes induced by dredging are considered to pose only a
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:299: 1. The proposed capital dredging has the potential to disturb sediment and release
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:299: sediment-bound bacteria into the water column. Bacteria could therefore be
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:299: 2. The majority of samples collected during the sediment quality survey registered
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:300: disturbance of the sediments during dredging.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:301:9.3.1 Periodic increases in suspended sediment concentrations and increased
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:301: potentially contaminated sediment caused by changes in tidal flows or wave
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:301: in effects on the hydraulic and sedimentary regime of the estuary system. For
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:302: should they affect sedimentary areas that have elevated levels of contamination,
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:302: sediments and, therefore, the potential for the scheme to result in mobilisation of
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:302: potential to result in a trend of increased mobilisation of sediment.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:302: sediments of the seabed at this location in terms of mobilisation of sediment, is
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:302: mobilisation of sediment from intertidal areas is considered to be low and as
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:302: contaminated sediments.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:307: sedimentary habitats of the Tees Estuary have been reclaimed (Environment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:308: as Seaton-on-Tees channel, the sediments comprised a high mud fraction and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:308: 5. At the mouth of the Tees estuary, the sediments are less muddy and were
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:308: sediment and variable salinity and are indicators of a nutrient rich environment,
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:312: particle size data in order to describe the spatial distribution of sediment types
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:312:10.1.5 Description of sediment types
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:312: 1. In order to describe the distribution in sediment type in the survey area, cluster
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:312: showing the percentage similarity in particle size composition of the sediment at
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:312: 2. Figure 10.2 demonstrates that the bed sediments within the survey area can be
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:312: sediments in group B contain relatively high percentages of sand with varying
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:312: degrees of silt and clay. Sediments in group A however, contain greater than
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:312: dominate the sediments in group A.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:313:samples of different sediment composition (purple = sediment group A, yellow =
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:313:sediment group B).
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:313: 3. The geographical distribution of the two sediment groups is shown on Figure
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:313: 10.3. It can be seen that generally, the more sandy sediments dominate the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:313: mouth of the estuary. Areas also containing sandy sediments are located in the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:313: region directly opposite the proposed quay wall area. Finer sediments are
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:313: consistent with the requirement for maintenance dredging of fine sediments in
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:314: Sediment Group A Container Terminal
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:314: Sediment Group B Environmental Statement
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:318: data with a descriptor of the general sediment type superimposed
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:318: sediment composition at each station have been superimposed on the sample.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:318: The full results of the sediment analysis of the samples are presented in
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:318: the sandy sediments towards the mouth of the Tees estuary, suggesting that
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:318: sediment composition has a strong influence on the nature of the biological
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:318: 9. Groups A and B generally tend to be present in sediments where a high
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:318: dominate Group A. These species are characteristic of fine sediments, usually
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:320: (termed opportunistic species) to colonise the disturbed sediment and the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:323:10.2.2 Potential smothering effect caused by sedimentation of material resuspended by
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:323: maximum depth of sediment deposition over the course of dredging sand will be
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:323: up to 1mm. As described in Section 7, this sediment will be subject to a number
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324: net effect of the dredging and dispersive processes acting on the sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324: following deposition, could be the deposition of up to 1mm of fine sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324: 3. Sediment deposition has the potential to affect benthic organisms of the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324: characterise fine sediment habitats within estuarine areas. As such, they are
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324: tolerant of fluctuating environmental conditions, such as periodic sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324: concluded therefore, that the rates of sediment deposition, and the overall
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324: degree of sedimentation, that is predicted in this instance would be tolerated by
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324: structure is predicted to arise as a result of the deposition of fine sediments at
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324: sediments at Bran Sands or North Gare Sands.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324:10.2.3 Deposition of fine sediment within areas of saltmarsh
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324: within this area, resulting in localised peak deposition of up to 1mm of sediment.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:325:10.2.4 Potential smothering effect caused by sedimentation of material resuspended by
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:325: 1. Capital dredging is predicted to result in the deposition of fine sediment within
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:325: These species are typically found in fine estuarine sediment. As such, they are
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:325: tolerant to some degree, to elevations in near-bed suspended sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:325: concentrations and periodic sediment deposition. In view of the temporary
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:325: increase in suspended sediment concentrations and turbidity
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:325: 1. The amount of suspended sediment in the water column can influence the depth
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:325: levels and/or for prolonged periods of time, an increase in suspended sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:325: suspended sediment concentrations that are predicted beyond the immediate
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:325: sediment concentrations) and the fact that the dredging is a temporary activity
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326: which would not have a prolonged effect on suspended sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326: 3. Particularly large increases in suspended sediment concentrations are predicted
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326: suspended sediment concentrations in these areas does not represent an
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326: suspended sediment concentrations is considered to be of negligible
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326:10.2.6 Remobilisation of potentially contaminated sediments and subsequent effects on
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326: deposition of the sediments to be dredged. In summary, a comparison of the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326: survey data collected as part of this EIA with the Canadian Sediment Quality
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326: Guidelines indicates that the sediments in the main channel and in the area
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326: above the probable effect level (PEL). Sediment contamination therefore varies
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326: the reclamation, sediments within this area will not be resuspended in the water
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326: Canadian sediment quality guideline. Several exceedances of the PEL are,
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326: Sediment remobilised and deposited as a consequence of dredging in these
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326: Section 7. In summary, a comparison of the survey data with the sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:327: sediments is also addressed and discussed in Sections 7.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:327: be influenced by sediment deposition arising during dredging.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:327: for parameters surveyed it is unlikely that significant changes in the sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:329:10.3.3 Potential effect of increased supply of fine sediment to Seal Sands on benthic
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:329: sediment to areas which are currently muddy is not considered to be an issue
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:329: on Seal Sands on particle size distribution of the sediments and consequently on
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:329: 4. Tansley (2003) concludes that sediment type and sediment changes that have
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:329: Enteromorpha mats. It may be that the sediment type on Seal Sands may have
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:330: which are currently comprised of sandy sediments as the hydraulic regime of
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:330: likely to act as a sediment trap.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:330: change in nature of the sediments that are exposed at the surface of the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:331: similar sediment type to that which is currently present. As such, over time the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:351:11.2.4 Effect of sediment deposition on intertidal food resources due to capital dredging
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:351: 1. The deposition of fine sediment within intertidal areas due to capital dredging
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:351:11.2.5 Effect of increased suspended sediments on the food resource for terns
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:351: predicted to cause an increase in the peak suspended sediment concentrations
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:351: the estuary) although there is some lateral dispersion of sediments either side of
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:351: the dredger. In Tees Bay, increases in suspended sediment concentrations
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:352: relatively minor (less than 25 mg/l). Deposition of sediment is largely limited to
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:352: fish away from the areas of increased suspended sediment concentrations.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:354: d) Increased import of fine sediments resuspended in Tees Bay;
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:354: areas of Seal Sands that are currently comprised of muddy sediments, with
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:354: effect on intertidal morphology is the increase in supply of fine sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:355:11.3.2 Potential effect of increased supply of fine sediment to Seal Sands on feeding
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:355: 1. The potential impact of the increased supply of fine sediments to Seal Sands on
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:356: through increasing the suspended sediment concentration of the water column
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:356: 2. The hydraulic and sediment transport studies conclude that there would be an
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:369: suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) due to dredging and dewatering of
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:369: 1. The construction phase will result in increases in the suspended sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:370: significant elevations in suspended sediment concentrations are predicted to
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:370: suspended sediment concentrations throughout the course of the capital
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:370: sediment concentrations is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:370: arise as a result of the resuspension of contaminated sediments during capital
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:371: for such chemical effects to arise is informed by the findings of the sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:371: discussed in Section 9.2, the resuspension of sediments in the water column is
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:371: sediment concentrations, that dissolved oxygen levels are unlikely to be
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:371: of the quality of the sediments to be dredged.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:372: which protrude above the sediment surface. Therefore, impacts on this
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:373: the deposition of fine sediment that is suspended and dispersed during capital
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:379: isostatic uplift, coastal erosion, and fluvial erosion, in addition to sedimentation in
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:385: impact upon buried sediments within the Tees Channel, which have the potential
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:385: 4. To mitigate against the destruction of such sediments it is recommended that
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:386: suitable sediments, further sampling and environmental assessment of these
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:386: sediments would be required. The specific sampling strategy would be
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:436: adverse effect on human health. Dust deposition by sedimentation under the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:451: sediment transport studies undertaken as part of the EIA (Section 6 and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:461: 1. The hydraulic and sedimentary studies indicate that there is no requirement to
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:461: changes to the flow regime and sediment transport pathways. The potential
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:478:Table 25.2 Results of sampling of sediment in areas where maintenance
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:478: sediment source that remains available for resuspension by smaller waves for 3-
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:484: in order to investigate the dispersal of sediment in the disposal site.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:485: 4. Figure 25.5 shows a conceptual sediment transport diagram over the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:485: dispersive. The fine sandy sediment is transported both in the ebb and the flood
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:486:Figure 25.5 Conceptual sediment transport diagram at disposal sites
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:487: 8. The analysis described above was carried out assuming a sediment size of
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:487: 0.1mm. Sensitivity to the sediment size was investigated calculating the rate of
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:487: dispersal for a 0.2mm sediment size. The calculated transport rate for the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:487: 0.2mm sediment size is halved when comparing it to the 0.1mm. Consequently,
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:487: the timescale of dispersal will also be doubled with the coarser sediment size.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:487: sandy sediment in the area would be expected during the dredging and disposal
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:487: of fine sandy sediment and this will be dispersed over time. Some longer term
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:487: accumulation of coarser sediments arising from the dredging of stiff clay will
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:488: 1. On the basis of the assessment of the dispersion of fine sediment from either
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:488: sediment concentrations outside of the boundary of the disposal site.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:488: at the disposal site, with a longer term accumulation of coarser sediments. The
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:490: PD Teesport to verify the conclusions of the hydraulic and sedimentary studies
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:490: with respect to rates of infill of sediment entering the estuary from Tees Bay.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:492:HYDRODYNAMICS AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:492:Increased suspended sediment Peak increases in suspended sediment concentrations of None required It is not appropriate to assess
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:493:Effect on sediment transport The main predicted effect of the proposed capital dredging is None required See above
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:493: to increase the import of sediment from Tees Bay into the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:494:MARINE SEDIMENT QUALITY
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:494:redistribution of sediment on the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:494:contaminated sediments during
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:494:sediments during capital
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:494:Potential change in sediment Minor beneficial None required Minor beneficial
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:494:sediment quality of the receptor
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:496:sediment caused by changes in
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:497:caused by sedimentation of
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:497:sediment within areas of
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:497:caused by sedimentation of No impact in the long term
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:497:contaminated sediments and
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:498:fine sediment to Seal Sands on
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:499:Potential effect of sediment No impact None required No impact
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:499:supply of fine sediment to Seal
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:501:sediment concentrations due to winter months to avoid
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:510:offshore disposal site term, sandy sediment will disperse away from the site.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:515:Nationally important waterbirds Yes (e.g. hydraulic and sedimentary)
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:515: sediment deposition during dredging)
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:515: (e.g. hydraulic and sedimentary)
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:515: sediment deposition during dredging)
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:518: significantly from an established sediment concentrations at the mouth
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:520: plants) should not deviate sediment is predicted at this location.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:526: sediment concentrations with the result that Seal Sands may experience a
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:526: higher sedimentation rate. It is also noted that the sediment fractions may also
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:526: Container Terminal on the hydrodynamics and sediment transport regime during
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:533: Application of the 3D flow and fine sediment transport model as part of the
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:534: the channel and decreasing towards the west. No increased import of sediment
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:534: in sedimentation in Seaton Channel accounts for only a third of the predicted
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:534: increase in sediment supply to the Seaton Channel / Seal Sands area that is
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:534: the increase of supply of fine sediment entering Seaton Channel resulting from
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:536: predicted effects on the hydraulic and sediment regime of the Tees estuary.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:536: relevance here as this unit comprises the intertidal sediments of the Seal Sands.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:538:CCME (2001a). Canadian sediment quality guidelines for the protection of aquatic
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:538:life:summary tables. Updated in: Canadian sediment quality guidelines, 1999, CCME,
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:538:CIRIA (2000) Scoping the assessment of sediment plumes from dredging. CIRIA
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:539:changes in hydrodynamics and sediment transport, TERRC facility. Report 2004-1387.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:540:HR Wallingford (2002). Teesmouth Sediment Study. EX 4514.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:540:sedimentation studies. EX 5250.
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:540:modelling of cohesive sediment transport processes in estuarine environments. Final
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:540:NRA (1995) Screening survey for PCBs in Tees estuary sediments. Regional Marine
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:542:University of Durham (undated). An investigation of the sediment budget, the fate of
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:542:contaminants and dating sediment contamination in the Teesmouth and Cleveland
NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:545: Sediment quality data
I&BPB6776L001F01.pdf:2: A sediment sampling regime would only be necessary if a marine licence was also being applied
20171212 EIA Scoping Response Teesport Extension Final.pdf:5: review of “Marine and Sediment Quality” and “Water Quality” sections of the
20171212 EIA Scoping Response Teesport Extension Final.pdf:5: potential impact of release of sediment contaminants and localised increases in
20171212 EIA Scoping Response Teesport Extension Final.pdf:5: suspended sediments from the dredging activities.
20171212 MMO Letter with additional comments Teesport Scoping.pdf:2: disturbance of sediments and potential release of contaminants
20171212 MMO Letter with additional comments Teesport Scoping.pdf:3:sediment quality samples and analysis of the dredge material may be required to
20171212 MMO Letter with additional comments Teesport Scoping.pdf:3: licencing process. A regime of sediment sampling will be
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:You should provide analysis of the sediment to enable a determination to be made about whether the material is
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:The sediment to be disposed has been analysed by MMO accredited laboratories. The
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:MAR000356_2', it was not possible to analyse one of the sediment samples within the
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:laboratory given the granular / stony nature of the sediment. The attached emails
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:21:You should provide analysis of the sediment to enable a determination to be made about whether the material is
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:27:You should provide analysis of the sediment to enable a determination to be made about whether the material is
MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:28:undertakes sediment sampling and analysis in accordance with the requirements of its
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:3:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME 49
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:3:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY 68
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:7:Appendix 9 Historic sediment quality data
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:13:purposes of the assessment of potential environmental effects (i.e. studies on the dispersion of sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:20:Settling basins will allow suspended sediment to settle out from the mudstone reclamation slurry. Overflow
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:20:water from the reclamation will then pass through silt traps to limit the amount of suspended sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:20: of suspended sediment into the river.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:21:disposal of dredged sediment in Bran Sands lagoon is therefore excluded from the proposed scheme
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:32:and sedimentary studies that have been undertaken as part of the 2006 EIA (see Section 6). It is proposed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:38:suitable locations for the re-use of dredged sediment; three were located adjacent to the South Gare
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:56:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:56:The predicted effects of the proposed scheme on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime have been
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:56:and sedimentary regime.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:56:The hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime chapter from the 2006 ES is contained in Appendix 6 for
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:56:hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary and Tees Bay. The 2006 ES defined the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:56: • Sediment (covering each of fluvial, industrial and marine sources)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:57: and, therefore, the construction effects on the sediment regime were assessed through
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:57: of effects on both the sediment transport regime and morphological changes.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:57: approach was sufficient and that no additional hydrodynamic and sediment transport modelling
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:57: included tidal flow modelling, wave modelling, sediment transport, bed change modelling and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:57: modelling of sediment plume released from construction activities.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:57:there have been no changes to baseline understanding regarding the hydrodynamic and sedimentary
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:57: • Sediment regime (including background levels of suspended sediment and sources of suspended
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:57: sediment).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:57:sediment deposition with limited natural re-suspension, an average of approximately 1 million m 3 of material
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:58:sedimentary regime within the Tees estuary is likely to materially change from the present-day conditions.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:58:To assess the effects of the proposed scheme, a 3D sediment transport model was used to simulate
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:58:dispersion, deposition and resuspension of released sediment in the Tees estuary. A 3D flow model was
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:58:information to drive the sediment transport model. To model sand transport, HR Wallingford used
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:58:SANDFLOW, an in-house model which predicts movement of non-cohesive sediment.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:58:construction phase effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime. Given that there are no significant
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:58:assessment of construction phase effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime remains valid.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:59:6.3.1 Increase in suspended sediment concentrations and deposition resulting
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:59:required) will generate a plume of sediment in the water column. The simulated dredge locations and the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:59:The modelling predicts that the largest rise in peak suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) above
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:59:Peak deposition of sediment on the seabed is predicted to follow a similar pattern, with deposition predicted
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:67:Seaton Channel turning circle (as the Seaton Channel is the main route of sediment transport to Seal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:67:The dredger and sediment parameters used for the simulation were:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:67:Sediment parameters:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:68:At the sensitive receivers (shown on Figure 6.1), whilst the presence of the sediment released by the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:72:sedimentary regime. This incorporated results from bespoke assessments and numerical modelling of the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:72: • Effects of the development on non-cohesive sediments - informed by sand transport modelling by
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:72: HR Wallingford Ltd. using the SANDFLOW sediment transport model to simulate the advection and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:72: • Effects of the development on cohesive sediments - informed by mud transport modelling by HR
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:72: results from the modelling of changes in tides, waves, non-cohesive sediment transport and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:72: cohesive sediment transport. Consideration was given to effects on subtidal and intertidal areas,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:72:operational phase effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime remains valid. The potential
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:74:6.4.5 Potential effects on intertidal areas due to change in sedimentary regime
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:75:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:75: • Reductions in water quality associated with the dispersion and redistribution of sediments during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:75: • Reductions in water quality and effects on sediment quality at receptor sites due to maintenance
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:75:The assessment of potential impacts on marine sediment and water quality has been made with reference
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:75:Table 7.1 Summary of NPS requirements with regard to marine sediment and water quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:76:Sediment sampling and analysis consultation
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:76:Targeted consultation was undertaken with the MMO to confirm the sediment sampling and laboratory
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:76:analysis requirements. This was undertaken through the submission of a sediment sampling plan request
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:76:Table 7.2 Summary of comments in the MMO’s Scoping Opinion with regard to marine sediment and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:76: with regard to sediment quality within the SEIR. Cefas stated that: “the HRO does An update to the assessment presented in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:76: contaminated sediment. This should be considered in the SEIR (as an update to additional sediment quality survey.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:76:Environment Agency stated that should sediment be found to be contaminated, alternatives to offshore
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:76:disposal would be required. A summary of the sediment quality data is presented in Section 7.3, and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:76:For marine sediment and water quality, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:76:hydrodynamic and sediment dispersion modelling and is based on the maximum extent over which effects
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:76:are predicted to occur (e.g. sediment plumes generated during capital dredging and effects on tidal currents
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:76:The description of the existing environment with regard to sediment quality has been informed through a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:76:combination of desk-based review and a targeted sediment quality sampling survey. As noted above, the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:77: 2019 sediment sampling
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:77: ( 2018 sediment sampling
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:77: G6 Sediment sampling locations
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:78:samples recovered from Tees GasPort in October 2018), to provide sufficient evidence of sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:78:The methodology used to assess the significance of the potential environmental impacts on marine sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:78:The assessment of potential impacts associated with disturbance of sediment during the construction phase
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:78: • Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQG) for the Protection of Aquatic Life (Canadian Council
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:78:Cefas guidance indicates that, in general, concentrations of contaminants within sediment which are below
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:78:and 2 requires further consideration before a decision can be made. Comparison of results from sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:79:The CSQG involved the derivation of interim marine sediment quality guidelines (ISQGs), or Threshold
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:79:contaminated sediments to a range of aquatic organisms exposed in laboratory tests and under field
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:79:conditions (CCME, 2002). As a result, these guidelines provide an indication of likely toxicity of sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:80:The results of the sediment quality surveys outlined in the previous section, and information pertaining to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:80:7.4.1 Sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:80:Results of the 2019 site specific sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:80:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in July 2019 in accordance with the requirements set out in the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:80:Table 7.5 Summary of sediment quality data from the site-specific sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:83:sediment samples recovered in 2006, with BDE209 concentrations ranging from <0.5µg/kg to 340µg/kg.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:83:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in support of the marine licence application for the Tees GasPort
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:84:Table 7.6 Summary of sediment quality data from the Tees GasPort scheme
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:85:Comparison of the sediment quality data with the CSQG has identified elevated concentrations of metals
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:86:Summary of previous sediment quality surveys in the Tees
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:86:The findings of sediment quality surveys undertaken in support of previously consented schemes in the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:86:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:86:within Tees Dock. Though showing signs of minor contamination, it was determined that the ‘soft’ sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:86:The 2006 sediment quality survey undertaken to inform the 2008 HRO application involved the recovery of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:86:The 2006 ES presented data regarding the physical characteristics of sediment within the footprint of the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:86:The data from 2006 shows that sediments in the receptor sites in the intertidal areas close to the estuary
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:86:sediments (>60%) with varying amounts of clay and gravel. The percentage of organic matter varies
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:86:there is no reason to suggest that the nature of the sediments in the various locations has materially
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:88:Table 7.7 Data from particle size analysis of sediments from the five receptors sites surveyed during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:88:Table 7.8 Data from particle size analysis of sediments from within the main channel and the reclamation
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:90:In the absence of the proposed scheme, there is no reason to believe that sediment and water quality within
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:90:sediment sampling being undertaken from the surface in accordance with the conditions on the maintenance
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:90:7.5.1 Remobilisation, dispersion and redistribution of sediment during capital
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:90:Remobilisation and dispersion of sediment during capital dredging
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:91:suspension of sediments and release them into the water column as a plume. This would increase the TSS
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:91:The analysis of sediment quality samples recovered from within the proposed dredge footprint has shown
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:91:sediments and therefore remain bound. As a result, most PAHs will be strongly sorbed by particulate matter
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:91:concentrations of PDBEs are lower than those found in upstream sediments (which Cefas has confirmed is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:91:to the potential resuspension of sediments from a turbidity perspective only (on the basis that the sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:91:SSC are predicted to occur within the immediate vicinity of the dredger, but the sediment plume spreads
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:91:sediment concentrations 500m from the dredger are not, however, predicted to exceed levels experienced
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:92:Redistribution of sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:92:Changes to sediment quality could occur when sediment is released into the water column by dredging,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:92:therefore change the physical composition of the seabed sediments at locations in which it is predicted to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:92:In summary, sediment quality sampling has confirmed that sediments at the ‘receptor’ sites (shown on
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:92:comprises approximately 20% of fine sediments, the remainder being sand (Royal Haskoning, 2006). Other
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:92:historic data shows, however, that sediment composition over Seal Sands is variable (University of Durham,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:92:Coarser sediments predominate in the more exposed areas such as close to the estuary mouth at North
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:92:present in the sediments (Royal Haskoning, 2006).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:92:The dispersion and deposition of sediment caused by the capital dredging is described in Section 6.3. Two
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:93:be significantly disturbed) and depositing sediment would be re-dredged.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:93:For the intertidal areas, the magnitude of sediment deposition over the course of the dredging operations is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:93:substratum (i.e. the sediment would be expected to become muddier). The presence of an extensive
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:93:accumulation of fine sediment through physical trapping of fine sediment and would exacerbate the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:93:entirely different type of sediment into a receptor area.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:93:Given the above, the physical impact of sediment deposited as a result of capital dredging on receptor areas
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:93:The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume is selection of the dredging method. As noted above,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:95:Limiting re-suspension of sediment during TSHD can be achieved through the following good practice
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:95:The re-suspension of sediment caused by CSD can be reduced through optimising the cutter speed, swing
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:95: contaminated sediment during capital dredging
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:95:of the sediments by bacteria is considered to be low. A review of readily available internet resources
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:95:in a material change to the concentrations of total coliforms and faecal enterococci in sediment recorded
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:95:points. There is also the potential for bacterial die-off to occur over the time period between sediment being
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:95:7.5.3 Effect of mobilising sediments on oxygen concentrations in the water
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:95:The resuspension of sediment as a consequence of the proposed capital dredging could potentially affect
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:96:7.6.1 Potential change in sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:96:7.6.3 Potential effects on the sediment quality of the receptor sites due to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:97:As such, it is concluded that there would be no impact on sediment quality as a consequence of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:97: potentially contaminated sediment caused by changes in hydrodynamics
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:97:sedimentary regime of the estuary system. For example, changes to tidal current speeds and directions
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:97:they affect sedimentary areas that have elevated levels of contamination and result in mobilisation of such
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:97:increases in current speed are predicted are not expected to experience erosion of sediments and,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:97:result in a trend of increased mobilisation of sediment.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:97:for additional effects on the sediments of the seabed at this location in terms of mobilisation of sediment, is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:97:Overall, the potential for the proposed scheme to result in changes to the mobilisation of sediment from
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:97:of potentially contaminated sediments.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:104: • Impacts on marine ecology from increases suspended sediment during capital dredging and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:104: • Impacts on the benthic community structure associated with increased supply of sediments to Seal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:105:ecology (and sediment quality) sampling specification to Natural England for review and comment under a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:107:hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling undertaken. This section excludes consideration of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:107: adjacent areas that potentially would be indirectly affected (e.g. through sediment deposition during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:107:sediment and presence of anoxia and epifauna. A sub-sample of the sediment was retained for PSA to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:107:enable any sediment community associations to be determined. The sub-sample for PSA analysis was
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:107:recovered using a small core to remove sediment from the undisturbed surface of the sample. This PSA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:107:sub-sampling technique standardised the amount of sediment recovered from each core, standardised the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:107:sampled sediment depth profile between sampling stations, minimised bias of sampling of certain sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:107:types and reduced the volume of sediment required for PSA analysis.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:109: • Core sampling where soft sediment was present using a 0.01 m 2 corer. Samples were collected to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:109:sediment surface features (e.g. Polydora sp. mats), sediment type and characteristics, topography and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:110:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, marine sediment quality,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:111: High energy, A5: Sublittoral sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:111: Low energy, A5: Sublittoral sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:111: Moderate energy, A5: Sublittoral sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:112:present in sediments from the survey area are rare and therefore, in this respect, the species present were
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:112:SS.SMu.ISaMU.Cap (Capitella capitata in enriched sublittoral muddy sediments) and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:112:sediment), where C. capitata dominated and was accompanied by large numbers of Ophryotrocha sp.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:112:These species are characteristic of fine sediments, usually with some level of organic pollution and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:114: and are sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the Markey Wighton Axis.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:114: complex of peats, estuarine and marine sediments deposited during the Holocene, which overlie the glacial
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:114: sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea level changes.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:115:Sediment type
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:115:Sediment types, as classified using the Folk triangle (Folk, 1954) for each of the sample stations across the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:115:2019 survey area are provided in Figure 9.4. A variety of sediment types were present across the survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:115:Sediment biotopes
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:115:salinity infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations were unable to be classified further than the EUNIS
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:116:Figure 9.4 Comparison of Folk (Folk, 1954) sediment types as determined from PSD analysis of samples acquired during the 2019 survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:117:Figure 9.5 Distribution of biotopes determined from PSD and macrobenthic analysis of samples recovered during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:120:sediments and in estuarine environments (Wolff 1968, Hughes 1998). The beds can play an important role
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:120:Intertidal areas (which can be sedimentary, such as sand and mudflat, or rocky habitats) represent important
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:121: A2 – Littoral sediment A2:12 Estuarine coarse sediment shores
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:121:Occasional areas of impoverished coarse sediment was also found along the low-mid shore (Ocean
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:121:wave action. In some areas, coarse sediment beaches occurred on the lower to mid shore (A2.12 –
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:121:Estuarine coarse sediment shores) and occasionally formed a mosaic with A1.33 - Red algal turf in lower
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:124:depths, which would continue to influence the benthic communities present within the sediments.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:125:as being highly intolerant to substratum loss. A. islandica is found buried in sandy and muddy sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:128: sediment during dredging
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:128:Sediment resuspension
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:128:result in increases in the TSS concentrations of the water column. Based on the findings of sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:128:contaminated sediment being released into the water column. The assessment below therefore focusses
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:128:on the potential impact to marine ecology associated with the resuspension of non-contaminated sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:128:(i.e. sediment which does not contain elevations beyond Action Level 2).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:128:filter feeding molluscs). In addition, high concentrations of suspended sediment may impact on fish through
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:128:In general, sediment plumes induced by dredging are considered to pose only a limited risk to water quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:128:background) are predicted in the immediate vicinity of the dredger. Sediment plume modelling predicts that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:128:in suspended sediment. This information is presented below.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:be of low sensitivity to increases in suspended sediment.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:The dominant sediment biotope present within the dredge footprint is EUNIS biotope A5.323, Nephtys
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:resistance and resilience to changes in suspended sediment, and low sensitivity (to changes in suspended
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:sediment).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:Given the temporary and localised nature of the predicted increase in suspended sediment, in addition to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:the low sensitivity of the key species present in the estuary to increased suspended sediment, an impact of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:Smothering caused by sedimentation of material resuspended by capital dredging within intertidal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:the deposition of sediments at Bran Sands or North Gare Sands.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:to occur on Seal Sands. The predicted total maximum depth of sediment deposition over the course of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:dredging sand will be up to 1mm. As described in Section 6, this sediment will be subject to a number of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:predicted that the net effect of the dredging and dispersive processes acting on the sediment following
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:deposition, could be the deposition of up to 1mm of fine sediment overall.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:Sediment deposition has the potential to affect benthic organisms of the intertidal areas of Seal Sands
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:summary, the species present are typical species that characterise fine sediment habitats within estuarine
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:areas. As such, they are tolerant of fluctuating environmental conditions, such as periodic sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:the rates of sediment deposition, and the overall degree of sedimentation, that is predicted in this instance
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:130:as a result of the deposition of fine sediments at Seal Sands.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:130:Deposition of fine sediment within areas of saltmarsh
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:130:localised peak deposition of up to 1mm of sediment.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:130:Smothering caused by sedimentation of material resuspended by capital dredging within subtidal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:130:Capital dredging is predicted to result in the deposition of fine sediment within the subtidal zone. Much of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:130:stations. These species are typically found in fine estuarine sediment. As such, they are tolerant to some
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:130:degree, to elevations in near-bed SSC and periodic sediment deposition. In view of the temporary nature
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:135:9.6.3 Potential effect of increased supply of fine sediment to Seal Sands on
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:135:sediment to areas which are currently muddy is not considered to be an issue which would result in an
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:135:distribution of the sediments and consequently on benthic community structure. A number of studies have
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:136:Tansley (2003) concludes that sediment type and sediment changes that have taken place on Seal Sands
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:136:are influencing factors in determining the location of Enteromorpha mats. It may be that the sediment type
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:136:encourage accumulation of fine material in areas which are currently comprised of sandy sediments as the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:136:are likely to be confined to those areas colonised by Enteromorpha which is likely to act as a sediment trap.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:137:with those which are currently present is largely dependent on the change in nature of the sediments that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:137:expected to result in the exposure of a similar sediment type to that which is currently present. As such,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:140: • Effects of sediment deposition on intertidal food resources due to capital dredging.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:140: • Potential effect of increased supply of fine sediment to Seal Sands on feeding resource for
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:141:hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime may occur.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:144: • Hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime (Section 6).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:144: • Marine sediment and water quality (Section 7).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:156:of sediment into the water column, causing a sediment plume that could potentially affect habitats used by
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:156:indirectly due to altered hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime) as well as reduced ability of birds to identify
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:156:Sediment quality data from within the footprint of the proposed dredge has confirmed that there are no
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:156:prey due to the resuspension of sediment which contains concentrations of contaminants in excess of Action
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:156:estuary. The modelled sediment dispersion plume from the proposed NGCT dredge does not interact with
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:156:impacts to little tern foraging ability as a result of increased suspended sediments during the construction
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:158:and re-suspension of sediment (Cook and Burton, 2010). Common tern have been reported to have a high
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:158:line of the trailing suction dredger track. The hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling results illustrate that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:158:granular material and clay and up to 33 weeks for mudstone) and the predicted extent of the sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:159:To reduce the impact associated with the predicted increase in suspended sediments, the use of a TSHD
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:159:and tending to be more confined to the shallower waters. Mitigation of the suspended sediment generated
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:160:11.5.5 Effects of sediment deposition on intertidal food resources due to capital
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:160:The deposition of fine sediment within intertidal areas due to capital dredging has the potential to affect
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:164: • increased import of fine sediments resuspended in Tees Bay;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:164:of Seal Sands that are currently comprised of muddy sediments, with coarser areas unlikely to experience
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:164:for a potential effect on intertidal morphology is the increase in supply of fine sediment described above.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:165:11.6.2 Potential effect of increased supply of fine sediment to Seal Sands on
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:165:The potential impact of the increased supply of fine sediments to Seal Sands on the benthic community
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:165:eastern side of the estuary for the duration of the capital dredge, to reduce the potential for sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:165:phase impacts associated with sediment transport to Seal Sands manifesting during the operation phase
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:166:The hydraulic and sediment transport studies conclude that there would be an increased maintenance
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:167:area of intertidal habitat and create an area of sedimentary habitat that is expected to provide a more
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:168: • Impacts caused by increased suspended sediment during capital dredging and dewatering during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:169:sediment dispersion modelling and is based on the maximum extent over which effects are predicted to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:169:occur (e.g. sediment plumes generated during capital dredging and effects on tidal currents during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:170:The predicted effects of the proposed scheme on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime and potential
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:170:impacts on marine sediment quality, water quality and marine ecology are relevant to this section of the EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:170:invertebrates found in subtidal and intertidal sediments. Intertidal habitats are a key marine habitat and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:183: Isles. Distributions for different Catch rates below 100m are sediment which allow them to bury themselves and three months, ranging from December have revealed several sub- the lugworm and siphons of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:183: differences, with plaice <25cm sediment remains during the lifespan, although location. summer feeding and split up invertebrates such as sessile
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:183: virtually restricted to south and older fish may be found on even coarser sediments. again for the next spawning polychaetes, bivalves and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:183: at Teesside. 10 to 100 per hour Regularly caught throughout most from 1m to 1,105m, but catch Most often found on coarser sediments such as invertebrates (including small
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:184: containing fine sediment are avoided being absent to occur throughout much of the adult
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:184: sediments. tide) to about 250m depth. they may spend all day in the polychaetes and fish (including
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:184: show clear preference for specific sediments. importance of a spawning area off the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:184: Most abundant in the 0 to 5m bury themselves deep into sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:187: sediment concentrations due to dredging and dewatering of the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:187:variation, in the immediate vicinity of the dredger (see Section 6). Sediment plume modelling has however
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:188:the TSS concentrations of the water column. Sediment quality data from within the footprint of the proposed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:188:contaminated sediment. The assessment has been grouped into impacts on eggs and larvae, juveniles and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:188:to the findings of the sediment plume modelling reporting in Section 6 (which illustrate that the sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:189:The re-suspension of sediment as a consequence of the proposed dredging could also potentially affect
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:189:findings of a sediment quality survey presented in Section 7, this is considered unlikely.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:189:In general, sediment plumes induced by dredging are considered to pose only a limited risk to water quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:189:It has also been reported that dredging activities often generate no more increased suspended sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:189:floods and large tides can increase suspended sediments over much larger areas, for longer periods that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:189:fish (Forewind, 2014). For lethal effects to occur, concentrations of suspended sediment have to be on the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:189:high sensitivity of resident and migratory fish in the Tees to increases in suspended sediment, an overall
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:190:the Tees to increased suspended sediment. Based on the information available on MarLIN for the dominant
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:190:‘tolerant’ and ‘not sensitive’ to increases in suspended sediment.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:190:The controls outlined in Section 7 with regard to minimising suspended sediment load during dredging are
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:193:as polychaete worms and the siphons of molluscs which protrude above the sediment surface. Therefore,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:196:match the advertised depths due to sedimentation within the channel).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:203:previously undisturbed buried sediments within the Tees estuary (comprising peat and alluvial deposits),
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:207:Sediment samples from the Tees have confirmed percentage organic matter values of between 1.2% and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:213:wave and sediment modelling studies undertaken to assess the effects of the proposed scheme on the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:213:hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime. Given the findings of those assessments, it has been deemed that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:223:wall is exposed on spring tides and comprises sediments accumulating over rip-rap of road planings (similar
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:226:Sediment plume modelling predicts that SSC would not increase above background concentrations by more
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:226:quality in the vicinity of the abstraction point due to increased suspended sediment would be temporary in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:226:The controls outlined in Section 7 (with regard to minimising sediment plume dispersion during dredging)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:227:The hydraulic and sedimentary studies indicate that there is no requirement to change the current
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:227:and sediment transport pathways. The potential effects of the proposed scheme on these aspects are
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:243: • Beneficial use of sediment as part of habitat enhancement works (discussed further below).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:243:suitable locations for the re-use of dredged sediment; three were located adjacent to the South Gare
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:244:use of dredged sediment to create / enhance existing roost sites does represent a possible option. The
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:244:Although there are no immediately identifiable schemes which could utilise the dredged sediment that would
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:247:Hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling has been undertaken to understand the predicted dispersion of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:250:short-term build-up of fine sandy sediment at the disposal site, however, this would be dispersed over time.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:250:The PSD results show that the sediments within and adjacent to Tees Bay C comprise gravelly muddy sand,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:253:Based on the predicted dispersion of fine sediment from Tees Bay C described above, it is concluded that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:253:longer-term accumulation of coarser sediments. It is predicted that the sand would, over time, disperse
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:255: Mixed sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:256: sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:256:of the disposal site. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling has predicted some short-term build-up of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:256:fine sandy sediment at the disposal site, however, this would be dispersed over time. No peak deposition
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:256:sensitive to smothering or increases in suspended sediment.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:259:disturbance and increased suspended sediments on migratory fish).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:259: influencing the same area as affected by the sediment plume); and,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:261: • the hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:261: • sediment and water quality;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:263: which is located at the mouth of Victoria Harbour. The underwater effect on sediment transport or morphology between the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:264: hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of the estuary
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:266:27.5.2 Hydrodynamics and sedimentary regimes
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:266: • dispersion of suspended sediment during capital dredging and deposition;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:266: • changes to the sediment budget.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:266:for cumulative impacts on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:266:Dispersion of suspended sediment and deposition on the seabed during capital dredging
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:266:sediment which will disperse throughout the estuary according to the prevailing currents, prior to settling on
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:267:The extent of the sediment plume created by capital dredging is heavily dependent on the dredging plant
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:267:sediment types as part of the same project. Consequently, for the purposes of this CIA, the maximum
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:267:potential spatial extent of sediment plume generation and deposition footprint has been identified from the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:267:sediment in the water column was predicted to be in close proximity to the dredger, with plume dispersion
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:267:resulting in a significantly reduced concentration of suspended sediment beyond the source of the plume.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:267:Significant deposition of sediment was also only predicted in close proximity to the dredging (and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:267:sediment and sediment deposition plots for each of the schemes referred to above are presented in Figures
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:267:Figure 27.1 Predicted increase in suspended sediment concentration (left) and deposition on the seabed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:268:Figure 27.3 Predicted increase in suspended sediment concentration (left) and deposition on the seabed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:269:At the sensitive receivers, whilst the presence of the sediment released by the maintenance dredging is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:269:The predicted footprints of sediment deposition for the NGCT and the York Potash Harbour facilities are
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:269:to sediment deposition is the NGCT project (alone); deposition due to the NGCT project is predicted to be
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:269:of very low magnitude. No intertidal sediment deposition is predicted during capital dredging for the York
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:269:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:269:sediment, and this measure would limit sediment release into the water column as far as practicable. The
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:269:sediment and water quality, marine ecology, ornithology, fish and fisheries) is discussed below.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:270:Changes to estuarine sediment budget
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:270:as a result of this scheme. In addition, no changes to sediment transport in the predominantly sandy areas
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:270:The York Potash Harbour Facilities are predicted to result in a localised redistribution of sediment deposition
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:270:change in the overall fine sediment regime will not alter the present frequency of, or methodology used for,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:270:maintenance dredging, and no effect on sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees estuary will
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:271:cumulative impacts to arise to the estuarine sediment budget as a result of the projects screened into the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:271:27.5.3 Marine water and sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:271:Potential for cumulative increase in suspended sediment during capital and maintenance dredging
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:271:A cumulative effect on water quality as a result of dredging induced sediment plume generation will only
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:271:In addition, the predictions made for each project (shown in Figures 27.2 to 27.4) represent sediment plume
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:271:coincide to result in a scenario where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:271:The sediment plume predicted due to the NGCT encompasses, and extends beyond, the area of the plume
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:271:sediment, this is only applicable to the York Potash Harbour Facilities. Mobilisation of contaminated
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:271:sediment has not been identified as a risk for the NGCT scheme (Section 7). The sediment overlying the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:271:peak suspended sediment above those normally experienced in the estuary (this effect would be additive).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:271:contaminants known to be present in sediments from the York Potash Harbour Facilities dredge footprint
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:271:In terms of uncontaminated sediment dispersion, a significant cumulative impact is not anticipated due to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:273:Smothering of benthic invertebrate communities due to deposition of sediment dispersed during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:273:The predicted footprints of sediment deposition for the NGCT and the York Potash Harbour Facilities are
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:273:deposition is likely to be temporary due to the unconsolidated nature of the sediment, and the cumulative
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:273:The proposed NGCT is predicted to have an effect on sediment supply into the estuary, with a predicted
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:273:of fine sediment to the Tees due to the York Potash Harbour Facilities. The scheme has no potential to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:273:affect the sediment budget of the estuary and, therefore, there will be no impact on morphology of intertidal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:274:Potential effect on waterbird feeding resource due to increased suspended sediment during capital
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:274:due to a sediment plume during capital dredging), given that the waterbirds potentially affected would be
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:275:Effects on fish populations due to a sediment plume during capital dredging
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:275:There is potential for the sediment plumes predicted to be generated by the dredging required for NGCT,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:277: • Effects on biological habitats from capital dredging (removal of habitat / sedimentation).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:277: • Effects on fish due to the creation of a sediment plume from dredging.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:277: • Effects on water quality due to the creation of a sediment plume from dredging.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:277:of disturbance to fish due to creation of a sediment plume was a particular concern and therefore several
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:279:sections are as follows: Section 7 (marine sediment and water quality); Section 9 (marine ecology); Section
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:287: sedimentary regime of the estuary system), the area would be
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:293:tidal propagation, wave climate, current speeds and sediment budget of the estuarine system) has been
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:298:Reductions in water quality due to resuspension of sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:298:indirectly impact on foraging behaviour for birds. As reported in Section 7, the sediment to be dredged does
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:298:interest features of the pSPA and Ramsar site is therefore via an increase in suspended sediment within
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:298:Figures 6.2 to 6.4 indicate that the magnitude of the effect (i.e. increased suspended sediment) is likely to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:298:for granular material and clays) and the predicted extent of the sediment plume, it is expected that there
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:298:To reduce the impact associated with the predicted increase in suspended sediments, the use of a TSHD
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:299:the shallower waters. Mitigation of the suspended sediment generated by reducing the size of the dredger,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:300: • Effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime during operation.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:302:An interaction between the sediment plumes predicted to be generated by capital dredging associated with
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:302:from the area of increased suspended sediment. It should be noted, however, that the effect of the combined
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:302:habitats (i.e. deposition of sediment). As reported in Section 27, the predicted deposition footprints of the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:302:more extensive in terms of its spatial magnitude. No intertidal sediment deposition was predicted as a result
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:303:As outlined in Section 27, the impacts associated with the re-mobilisation of contaminated sediment are
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:303:only applicable to the York Potash Harbour Facilities. Mobilisation of contaminated sediment has not been
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:303:Potash Harbour Facilities (i.e. use of an enclosed grab for dredge contaminated sediments) would remove
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:303:the potential for the re-suspension of contaminated sediment and subsequent deposition over other areas
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:303:The effect of sediment suspension on feeding birds (terns) in the nearshore zone associated with the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:303:species was predicted due to either suspended sediments or habitat change. As outlined in Section 12, the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:303:sediment or habitat change) and the conclusion of the NGCT assessment (i.e. negligible effect on feeding
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:303:sediment from Hartlepool channel is not considered sufficient to result in a lethal effect on fish, with any
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:304:29.6.5 Changes to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:304:through the mouth of the Tees and the resultant effect on tidal flows and sediment transport.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:305:the supply of fine sediment to the Tees, and the sediment predicted to deposit in its berth pocket would be
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:305:effect on the sediment budget of the estuary to arise and, therefore, there would be no impact on morphology
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:305:Sedimentary and hydrodynamic modelling undertaken for the consented Hartlepool approach channel
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:305:proposed scheme is predicted to be low. The magnitude of effect on the baseline sediment transport regime
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:305:in the vicinity of the approach channel. There is no predicted effect on the baseline sediment transport
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:306:Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 2002. Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQG)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:317:sampling of bed sediment types, erosion/deposition measurements and silt flux
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:317:sedimentological effects of NGCT on the SPA/SSSI inter-tidal habitats of Seal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:318:sediment monitoring during dredging/construction has been submitted to and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:318:areas or have an unacceptable impact on wildlife, water quality or the sedimentary regime.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:322: 5.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:323: 5.2 Marine sediment and water quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:323: • Sediment sampling will be undertaken (RHDHV
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:323: quality (informed by sediment quality data.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:324: sediment quality data.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:324: following receipt of sediment quality data and any
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:324: changes to the marine ecology, sediment and water
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:328: disturbance of sediments and potential release of contaminants
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:329:sediment quality samples and analysis of the dredge material may be required to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:329: licencing process. A regime of sediment sampling will be
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:333: around the beneficial use of dredged sediment as it is not always
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:334: Sediment quality:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:334: SR and MS outlined that additional sediment quality sampling is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:334: anticipated. EH stated that should sediment be found to be
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:334: Action: review sediment quality data against the Cefas Action RHDHV
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:335: sediment quality survey.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:335: Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:338:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:338: hydrodynamic and sediment regime of the Tees estuary arising from the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:338: wave climate, flow regime, sediment transport pathways, etc) and it is not
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:340: Details of the pre-barrage hydrodynamic and sedimentological regimes in the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:342:6.2.3 Sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:342: 1. In general, suspended sediment concentrations are low within the estuary and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:342: high rainfall or storm events. In general, the suspended sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:342: of the proposed development (i.e. in the Tees Dock area) suspended sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:342: from 40-80mg/l. In terms of the tidal sequence, the highest suspended sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:342: suspended sediment have been noted around the Shell Jetty, but with little
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:343: system the driving forces for sediment transport are the tidal flows, density
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:343: of fluvial sediment into the estuary. ABPmer (2005) reported that considerable
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:343: sediment input to the estuary has reduced. However, even the pre-barrage
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:343: from Tees Bay, is the predominant source of sediment in to the system. This
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:345: the studies on the dispersion of the sediment plume arising during dredging, as
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:345: d) Losses of suspended sediment are inevitable at the dredging face or draghead,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:345: less instantaneous release of solids. Therefore, sediment plume studies were
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:345: mixture of sediment and water from the sea bed and discharging this mixture
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:345: into a hopper on the dredger. The proportion of sediment loaded into the hopper
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:345: finer sediment fractions. This overspilled sediment will either fall to the bed or
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:346: remain in suspension, forming a sediment plume. The plume from the overspill
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:346: discharge is an order of magnitude greater than sediment resuspension from the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:346: dredger draghead and so it is the only sediment source considered for sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:346: to the TSHD the proportion of sediment loaded into the barge can be increased
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:346: plumes of suspended fine sediment. Importantly the TSHD will result in a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:346: source of fine sediment released along the path of the dredging activity (i.e. in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:346: simulate the dispersion, deposition and resuspension of the released sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:346: 8. Parameters for the sediment plume simulations for the CSD were established
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:347: 9. Parameters for the sediment plume simulations for the TSHD were established,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:347: because the sediment enters the water firstly in a dynamic plume phase (i.e. not
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:347: sediment mixes with the water it behaves as a passive plume that is transported
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:349: CSD in terms of predicted peak concentration of suspended sediments and peak
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:352: is predicted to increase suspended sediment concentrations by 500mg/l in the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:352: much sediment as those along the channel.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:352: of the run-off from the reclamation. Increases in suspended sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:352: suspended sediment concentrations over Seal Sands and in the Seaton
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:353: suspended sediment concentrations and deposition at Bran Sands and North
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:358: gravitationally driven currents with knock on effects for sediment transport and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:358: report of the hydrodynamic and sedimentological studies to support the EIA (HR
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:375:6.4.4 Non-cohesive sediment studies
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:375: SANDFLOW. SANDFLOW is a dynamic non-cohesive sediment (sand)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:375: sediment due to the effects of both currents and waves. The sediment transport
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:375: 2. SANDFLOW was used to simulate the sediment transport patterns throughout
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:376: which serve to drive sand into the outer channel. Sandy sedimentation rates in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:376: contributed to by sedimentary events, involving the slippage of sediment that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:376:6.4.5 Cohesive sediment studies
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:376: potentially, as a consequence, the sediment dynamics of intertidal areas.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:376: 3. As described in Section 6.2, the bulk of fine sediment enters the system during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:376: the main source is offshore). Once within the estuary, fine sediment is pushed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:376: 4. The chosen model for the study of fine sediment transport was SUBIEF3D which
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:376: uses the hydrodynamics generated by TELEMAC3D to transport fine sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:378: 1. The preceding sections present the findings of the flow, wave and sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:378: • Increased import of fine sediments resuspended in Tees Bay;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:380: counter this effect reducing the sediment supply from North Gare Sands into the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:380: 17. Analysis of bed sediment shown in HR Wallingford (2002) suggests that in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:380: Seaton Channel the bed sediment tends to be finer (>70% particles < 63um)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:380: whereas on Seal Sands bed sediments over most of the area comprise
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:380: sediment of less than 50%, fines, particularly towards the east. Of this amount
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:380: silt. The material showed a pattern with the sandiest sediment occurring at
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:381: higher elevations and muddier sediment in gullies and deeper pockets on the top
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:381: contrary to HR Wallingford (2002) which reported that sediment on Seal Sands
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:381: sediment supply and changes to the processes occurring on Seal Sands.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:381: 20. Changes to sediment supply:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:381: • Increased sedimentation in the turning area probably due to a combination of the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:381: build up on North Gare Sands and more favourable conditions for sedimentation
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:382: • Increased import (aproximately10%) of fine sediments to Seaton Channel with a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:382: proportionate increase in fine sediment supply to Seal Sands.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:387:Benthic ecology and sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:388:Subject: Northern Gateway Container Terminal - sediment and marine ecology sampling
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:388:our proposed approach for both benthic ecological sampling and marine sediment quality sampling that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:388:to collect and analyse sediment samples from the dredge area every three years. As well as confirming
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:388:both elements into account when determining the number and location of sediment samples required.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:388:This document has been issued to both the MMO and Natural England with regard to sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:391:commitment); this has been established and verified through the hydraulic and sedimentary studies that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:392: 4. Previous benthic ecology and sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:392:The survey identified that subtidal sediments comprised high silt/clay content in the main approach
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:392:the estuary, in the sandy sediments, the infauna was dominated by the polychaetes Chaetozone christiei
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:395:sediment composition, indicating that the biological community present in each group was influenced by
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:395:sediments (i.e. towards the mouth of the Tees estuary). Group A and Group B were generally present in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:395:sediments with a high percentage of fine material (i.e. to the east of Seaton Channel and in the main
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:395:channel areas), with Group A found in sandy silty sediments and Group B in silty sediments. The 2006
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:395:(muddy), or (3) mixed sediments. The two QEII Berth sample stations comprised of fine sediment and fell
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:395:into the 2nd group of silty or muddy sediments, indicating that the data conformed to the structure of a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:395:typical fine sediment community, containing an unremarkable silty sediment infaunal assemblage typical
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:395:of these sediment types.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:395:conditions and are very similar in faunal composition to previously surveyed fine sediment locations
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:396:muddy sediments) and SS.SMU.SMuVS.CapTubi (Capitella capitata and Tubificoides spp. in reduced
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:396:salinity infralittoral muddy sediment), where C. capitata dominated and was accompanied by large
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:396:numbers of Ophryotrocha sp. These species are characteristic of fine sediments, usually with some level
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:396: 4.2. Sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:396:2006 NGCT sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:396:Sediment samples were collected as part of the EIA for the NGCT during 2006 (Royal Haskoning, 2006)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:396:to deposition of sediment that will be disturbed during the capital dredging (giving a total of 13 sampling
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:397:Figure 4 2006 NGCT sediment sample locations
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:398: ! Sediment Sample Locations in Trafigura dredge footprint
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:399:2008 QEII Berth sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:399:An additional sediment quality survey was carried out within the Tees estuary in December 2008, in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:399:vibrocores (VC004 and VC001B) sampled sediments to a depth of 4m below Ordnance Datum (OD), or
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:399:The results from the vibrocores identified that all metals analysed within the sediments exceeded Action
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:400:As well as identifying contaminated sediments, the sediment quality survey also indicated a pattern of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:400:a sealed barge to minimise re-suspension of sediment into the water column. No such requirements
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:400:2014 York Potash Harbour Facilities sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:400:A site-specific sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:400:taken from the adjacent approach channel that will be deepened as part of the NGCT project. Sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:402: 5. Proposed approach to benthic ecology and sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:402:suitability and photographed to determine sample volume, visual characteristics of the sediment and the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:402:A sub-sample of the sediment will be retained for Particle Size Analysis (PSA) to enable any sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:402:community associations to be determined. A cut-off 100ml syringe would be used to remove sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:403:indicator species for contaminated sediment will be noted.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:403:Sampling of sediments for PSA is an essential accompaniment to macrofaunal surveys. Small-scale
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:403:heterogeneity at the seabed dictates that a PSA sediment sub-sample should be collected from the same
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:403: 5.2. Sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:403:sediment sampling:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:404:licencing process. A regime of sediment sampling will be required to support a marine licence application
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:404:sediment quality sampling, it is proposed that additional sediment quality samples are recovered
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:404:sediments within the dredge footprint were suitable for offshore disposal. Sampling in 2008 for the QEII
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:404:dredge footprint in the main channel)) confirmed contaminants within the unconsolidated sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:404:minimise the resuspension of sediment into the water column.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:404:The 2014 sampling undertaken for the York Potash Harbour facilities confirmed that the sediments within
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:404:Based on the above, in addition to the fact that the vast majority of sediments to be dredged comprise
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:404:considered that there is sufficient sediment quality data from previous studies within the Tees estuary
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:404:(specifically the 2008 and 2014 surveys), which confirm that the sediments to be dredged at depth
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:404:including precluding disposal at sea and a means of minimising sediment loss to the water column
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:404:2014), the number of samples required is determined on the quantity of sediment to be dredged. The
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:405:sediment samples (this is a guide only) collected at evenly distributed locations across the dredge
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:405:Sediment samples will be analysed by a laboratory validated by the MMO. The laboratory data will be
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:405: • Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life (CCME, 2002).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:406:MMO sediment quality sampling plan
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:410: for other activities which are likely to lead to the mobilisation of sediments. Based on
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:410:dredging does not exceed 1 metre below the sediment surface)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:411:Surface samples should be taken from the upper layer of in-situ sediment using a non-
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:411: measure. Where sediment data are lacking or not appropriate for their intended use,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:412: licensing-sediment-analysis-and-sample-plans
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:412:This list indicates the laboratories which have been validated to undertake sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:412:Irrespective of which validated laboratory is used to undertake sediment analysis, results
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:412: sediment-analysis-and-sample-plans).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:412: quantity and quality of sediments, there may be a need for surface sediments to be re-
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:416:Figure 4. DCO/2014/00002 York Potash - Sediment Composition Analysis for Trace
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:416:Figure 5. DCO/2014/00002 York Potash - Sediment Composition Analysis for
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:417: is sufficient evidence on sediment quality to undertake an assessment of potential impacts on the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:417: areas or of areas where other activities are likely to lead to the mobilisation of sediments. To enable
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:417: applicable, we require sediment samples to be provided for analysis.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:417:3. PD Teesport are seeking a joint sediment sampling plan to inform a marine licence application for
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:418: agree with the applicant’s stipulation that subsurface sediment samples are neither necessary nor
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:418:activities/contaminants/pbde-sediment/
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:420:Historic sediment quality data
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:421:Summary of historic sediment quality surveys in the Tees estuary
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:421:2006 NGCT sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:421:Sediment samples were collected as part of the EIA for the NGCT during 2006 (Royal Haskoning,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:421:potentially be subject to deposition of sediment that will be disturbed during the capital dredging
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:422:Table 1 Summary of sediment quality data for metals and organotins from samples recovered during 2006
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:424:2008 QEII Berth sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:424:A sediment quality survey was carried out in the Tees estuary in December 2008 to characterise the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:424:sediments to a depth of 4m below Ordnance Datum (OD), or as deep as the corer reached.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:424:The results from the vibrocores identified that all metals analysed within the sediments exceeded AL1.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:424:As well as identifying contaminated sediments, the sediment quality survey also indicated a pattern of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:424:loading into a sealed barge to minimise re-suspension of sediment into the water column. No such
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:424:2012 sediment sampling from Tees Dock No.1 Quay
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:424:Technical Note (Royal Haskoning, 2011) which presented the available sediment quality data from
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:424:Tees Dock, and provided justification for taking no further sediment quality samples prior to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:424:In 2011, the most recent sediment quality data from the Tees Dock were requested from Cefas. The
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:424:PDT (and therefore the data was specifically in relation to sediment samples recovered from the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:424:minor contamination, it was determined that the ‘soft’ sediments within ‘Tees Dock Water Area’
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:424:licensed sites in Tees Bay. It was also concluded that the sediment chemistry of the unconsolidated
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:424:sediments present, and which required removal as part of the proposed scheme, would be expected
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:424:to contain similar levels of contamination to those sediments sampled in support of existing
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:425:2014 York Potash Harbour Facilities sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:425:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:425:results are therefore directly applicable to the NGCT scheme). Sediment samples were therefore
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:432: Estuarine coarse sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:432: A2 – Littoral Sediment shores
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:434:A typical photograph of the habitat classified as A2 (littoral sediment) is shown below (Plate 2.4).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:434:The littoral sediment habitat is considered to be naturally occurring as the sediment has accumulated in this
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:434:Areas that are classified as a mixture of littoral rock and sediment are, however, considered man-made as
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:434:Given the above, a distinction has been made between littoral rock and littoral sediments in terms of habitat
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:435: Plate 2.4 Typical habitat classified as A2.12 (Estuarine coarse sediment shores)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:435: High 6 A2.12 (Estuarine coarse sediment shores) 0.05
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:435:habitats of relevance to this assessment are A1 (littoral rock) and A2 (intertidal sediments) (see Table 2.1).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:436:of survey), for the intertidal sediment habitat, it is judged that the habitat condition should be classified as
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:436:impede the natural movement of sediments, poor transition of habitats and the fact that the ecological status
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:436: (intertidal sediments)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:437:soft sediment, intertidal habitat.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:437:and there are no areas of sedimentary habitat present in this area. The current habitat is, therefore,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:437:The intention of the proposed intervention is to create intertidal sedimentary habitat (mudflat) using
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:439: High 6 Intertidal sediments (A2) 0.54
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:439:The proposed habitat improvement (creation of intertidal sediment) is considered to have good potential to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:439:‘moderate’. While the intertidal sediment would be expected to support the development of a benthic
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:439:of sediments, poor transition of habitats and the fact that the ecological status of the overlying water body
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:439:On this basis, a condition score of 2 is assigned to the habitat condition of the intertidal sediment (post-
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:440:could be taken to create/restore intertidal habitat rich in soft sediments. A specific action related to this
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:440:pressure is to develop a 'beneficial use' of maintenance dredgings programme to retain fine sediments within
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:442:improvement of littoral sediment (i.e. the relevant habitat in this case).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:442:Table 3.5 Time to target condition for littoral sediment (summarised from Natural England, 2019)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:442:Littoral sediment 1 5 10
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:442:restore or create habitat. A distinction is made between ‘re-creation’ and ‘restoration’; for littoral sediment,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:442: ‘Moderate’ is one of the categories for littoral sediment defined in the condition tables included in Appendix A of Natural England
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:443: sediments 0.54 6 2 (Moderate) 1.5 1.5 1 0.837 1 12.2
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:449:Development proposal and location: Northern Gateway Container Terminal (NGCT) – Sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:449: ‘Note / Memo: Northern Gateway Container Terminal – sediment and marine ecology
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:449:Natural England (NE) welcomes the methodology for surveying benthic ecology and sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:450:Sediment quality sampling
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:450: sediment quality samples are required to advise the EIA, however NE defers to the Marine
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:450: sediment quality samples required to meet OSPAR Regulations.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:452: Sediment & Marine Ecology Report 2019
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:453:Report Title: Northern Gateway Container Terminal Development Sediment & Marine Ecology Report 2019
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:453:Recommended Ocean Ecology Limited (2019). Northern Gateway Container Terminal Development Sediment &
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:455: 3.1. Sediments………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 24
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:455: 3.1.1. Sediment Type……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 24
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:455: 3.1.2. Sediment Composition …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 24
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:455: 3.1.3. Sediment Groups ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 24
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:456: 4.2. Sediments………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 44
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:457:Figure 1. Actual grab and trawl positions sampled during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019. ……………. 13
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:457:Figure 2. Locations of intertidal quadrats taken during the intertidal NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019. ……. 14
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:457:Figure 3. Comparison of Folk (Folk 1954) sediment types as determined from PSD analysis of samples acquired during the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:457:samples collected during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019. …………………………………………………………. 27
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:457:Figure 5. Non-metric MDS ordination plot of sediment groups conducted on station averaged Euclidean distance
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:457:Figure 6. Distribution of sediment groups conducted on station averaged Euclidean distance resemblance PSD data. …….. 29
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:457:Table 1. Number of subtidal sample stations for the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019. …………………………. 12
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:457:Table 3. Classification used for defining sediment type based on the Wentworth Classification System (Wentworth 1922) .. 21
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:457:Table 5. Summary of macrobenthic abundance and diversity of sediments sampled during the year 2 in-dredge monitoring
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:459:conduct a subtidal and intertidal sediment and marine ecology survey for the proposed Northern Gateway
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:459:sediment composition to support the environmental assessment for the NGCT marine licence application.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:459:Generally, the sediment types present in the Tees Estuary have remained stable when compared to previous
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:459:surveys. The inner Estuary was characterised by muddy sediments while offshore and outer areas saw an
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:459:The macrobenthic assemblages associated with sediments within the Tees Estuary and in outer areas were
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:459:impoverished coarse sediment was also found along the low-mid shore.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:460:surveys to assess the benthic ecology and marine sediment quality in support of the environmental assessment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:460:for maintenance dredging within the Tees Estuary, sediment samples were collected and analysed from two
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:460: establish a baseline for marine sediments and associated benthic communities;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:461:The 2006 survey identified that subtidal sediments comprised high silt/clay content in the main approach
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:461:sediment and comprised of a similar faunal assemblage to that found in the main channel in 2006. Overall, the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:461:sediments) and SS.SMU.SMuVS.CapTubi (Capitella capitata and Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:461:muddy sediment), where C. capitata dominated and was accompanied by large numbers of Ophryotrocha sp. In
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:462:Table 1. Number of subtidal sample stations for the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:463:Figure 1. Actual grab and trawl positions sampled during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:464:Figure 2. Locations of intertidal quadrats taken during the intertidal NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019 overlain on the UAV imagery derived orthomosaic.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:465:Plate 1. Dedicated survey vessel, Seren Las, for the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:468:encountered. Other information recorded included general site conditions, sediment surface features, sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:468:Where areas of soft sediment were present, a 0.01 m2 corer was used to collect a sample for subsequent
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:469:survey area and the Riverside Ro-Ro ferry terminal. Bottom left: Soft sediment 0.01 m2 core sampling. Bottom right: Hard
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:470:PSD analysis of separate sediment samples was undertaken by in-house laboratory technicians at OEL’s
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:470:Frozen sediment samples were first transferred to a drying oven and thawed at 80°C for at least six hours. A
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:470:each sieve size. PSD statistics and sediment classifications were then generated from the absolute percentages
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:470:of the sediment retained on each sieve using Gradistat v8.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:470:When the % contribution of fines (<0.063) was >5 %, the <1 mm fraction of sediment was re-analysed using
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:470:laser diffraction. The fine fraction residue (<1 mm sediments) was transferred to a suitable container and allowed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:470:to settle for 24 hours before excess water was syphoned from above the sediment surface. The fine fraction was
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:470:sediments, ultrasound was used to agitate particles and prevent aggregation of fines.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:470:the whole sample. Once the data was merged, PSD statistics and sediment classifications were generated from
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:470:the percentages of the sediment determined for each sediment fraction using the Gradistat v8 software.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:470:Sediment descriptions were defined by their size class based on the Wentworth classification system (Wentworth
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:470:1922) (Table 3). Statistics such as mean and median grain size, sorting coefficient, skewness and bulk sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:471:Table 3. Classification used for defining sediment type based on the Wentworth Classification System (Wentworth 1922)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:471: Wentworth Scale (mm) Phi units (φ) Sediment Types
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:471:sediment and fixative. The low-density fauna were then separated by elutriation with fresh water, poured over a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:471:0.5 mm mesh sieve, transferred into a Nalgene, and preserved in 70 % IDA. The remaining sediment from each
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:474:3.1. Sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:474:In total, 44 sediment samples were analysed for full particle size classification. Sediment type is mapped in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:474:3.1.1. Sediment Type
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:474:Sediment types, as classified using the Folk triangle (Folk 1954), for each of the stations sampled across the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:474:survey area in 2019 are presented in Figure 3. A variety of sediment types were present across the survey area
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:474:abundant sediment types present. Mud was present within the Tees at the inshore locations, around the QEII
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:474:3.1.2. Sediment Composition
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:474:and Tees Bay C areas. The single intertidal core was characterised by very coarse sediment.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:474:3.1.3. Sediment Groups
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:474:stations according to their sediment characteristics using the SIMPROF routine. The SIMPROF test resulted in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:474:twelve sediment groups (and many outliers) which highlighted the fine-scale differences in the sediment types
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:474:distance of 6 was used to categorise the stations into four separate sediment groups across the area with two
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:474:3.1.4. Sediment Biotopes
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:474:‘Abra alba and Nucula nitidosa in circalittoral muddy sand or slightly mixed sediment’. Mixed sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:474:dominated disposal site C that was classified as EUNIS biotope A5.44 ‘Circalittoral mixed sediments’ as the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:475:Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations were unable to be classified
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:475:Plate 3. Grab samples collected during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019. Top left: mud (M,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:475:representative of sediment group A). Top right: sandy mud (sM, representative of sediment group B). Bottom left: muddy
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:475:sand (mS, representative of sediment group C). Bottom Right: muddy sandy gravel (msG, representative of sediment group
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:476:Figure 3. Comparison of Folk (Folk 1954) sediment types as determined from PSD analysis of samples acquired during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:477:Figure 4. Mean (±SE) percentage contribution of mud, sand, and gravel of samples collected during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:478:Figure 5. Non-metric MDS ordination plot of sediment groups conducted on station averaged Euclidean distance resemblance PSD data.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:479:Figure 6. Distribution of sediment groups conducted on station averaged Euclidean distance resemblance PSD data.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:480:Figure 7. Distribution of biotopes determined from PSD and macrobenthic analysis of samples acquired during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:481:The macrobenthic assemblages of sediments constituted 292 taxa recorded with a mean (± SE) of 38.78 ± 2.57
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:481:Table 5. Summary of macrobenthic abundance and diversity of sediments sampled during the NGCT sediment and marine
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:486: sampled during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019. © Ocean Ecology Ltd.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:487:fauna sampled during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:488:Figure 13. Percentage contributions of the top 10 epibenthic taxa to total abundance (A) and occurrence (B) from epifaunal trawls collected during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:492:some areas, coarse sediment beaches occurred on the lower to mid shore (A2.12 – Estuarine coarse sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:492:Table 6. Key biotopes recorded in the Phase I intertidal survey during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:492: A2 - Littoral Sediment A2.12 Estuarine coarse sediment shores
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:495:(PDT) to conduct a subtidal and intertidal sediment and marine ecology survey for the proposed Northern
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:495:analysis were to establish a baseline for the marine sediments present and the associated macrobenthic and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:495:4.2. Sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:495:Muddy sediments dominated the inner areas of the Tees Estuary. This was also observed in previous studies
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:495:where sandy mud and slightly gravelly sandy mud dominated the sediment groups present (Fugro 2014). This
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:495:implies that the sediments are relatively stable within the inner areas of the estuary which is indicative of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:495:This is likely linked to increased hydrodynamic energy and results in sediment types that are expected to occur in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:496:with grain size (Witbaard et al. 2019). High levels of fine or suspended sediments may impact A. islandica growth
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:496:has also increased. Brittlestars can occur in very dense beds on sediments and in estuarine environments (Wolff
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:496:mid shore and red algal turf along the lower shore. Occasional areas of impoverished coarse sediment was also
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:497:Davies CAL, Tomlinson K, Stephenson T (1991) Heavy metals in river tees estuary sediments. Environ Technol
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:497:Folk R. (1954) The distribution between grain size and mineral composition in sedimentary rock nomenclature. J
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:497:Gray JS, Elliott M (2009) Ecology of Marine Sediments: from Science to Management, 2nd Editio. Oxford: Oxford
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:497:James CJ, Gibson R (1980) The distribution of the polychaete Capitella capitata (Fabricius) in dock sediments.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:498:Wentworth C. (1922) A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J Geol 30:377–392
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:500:The 2006 survey confirmed that none of the species present in sediments from the survey area are
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:500:The three groups correlated to sediment composition, indicating that the biological community
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:500:samples were generally located in sandy sediments (i.e. towards the mouth of the Tees estuary).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:500:Group A and group B were generally present in sediments with a high percentage of fine material
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:500:sediments and group B in silty sediments. Both groups (A and B) contained predominantly
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:500:species are characteristic of fine sediments, usually with some level of organic pollution and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:501:sandy, (2) silty (muddy), or (3) mixed sediments. The two QEII Berth samples were comprised of fine
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:501:sediment and fell into the 2nd group of silty or muddy sediments, indicating that the data
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:501:conformed to the structure of a typical fine sediment community, containing an unremarkable silty
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:501:sediment infaunal assemblage typical of these sediment types.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:501:similar in faunal composition to previously surveyed fine sediment within the estuary during the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:501:enriched sublittoral muddy sediments) and SS.SMU.SMuVS.CapTubi (Capitella capitata and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:501:Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment), where C. capitata dominated and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:501:sediments, usually with some level of organic pollution and associated depleted oxygen levels.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:514:has shown that suction noise dominates measured levels where the sediment is made up of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:514:with CSDs, despite the operation of a cutterhead. As the sediment to be dredged in the River
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:515:Dredger Specification Date and Sediment Source Transmission Author
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:516:Dredger Specification Date and Sediment Source Transmission Author
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:591:Table 2: Summary of Sedimentary Units Identified in Vibrocores and Boreholes for the York
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:592:broad sedimentary sequence was identified with a sediment unit of peat and estuarine alluvium identified
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:596:undisturbed buried sediments within the Tees Channel, which have the potential to preserve important
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:598:The logs revealed five broad sedimentary units. These are summarised in Table 2.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:598:Table 2: Summary of Sedimentary Units Identified in Vibrocores and Boreholes for the York Potash Harbour Facilities Assessment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:598: Sedimentary Unit Description Interpretation General Depth
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:598: fluvial sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:598: Gravelly Sand and slightly silty Marine sediments/ Estuarine Up to 12m thick in boreholes,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:598: sediments)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:603: sedimentary sequence within the area of study and identify the archaeological potential of identified
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:603: sediment units; and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:603: If sedimentary units with archaeological potential are identified during Stage 2 then PD Teesport
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:603: Each selected core sample would be cleaned and recorded, noting sediment colour, type and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:619: Leave marine growth, rust, sediment or concretion intact; and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:620: Marine growth, rust, sediment or concretion should be left intact;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:629:and sedimentary studies undertaken as part of the EIA (see Section 6 of the EIA Report). As a result,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:632: elevated levels of sediment contamination.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:634: • Biological habitats: Capital dredging (removal of habitat/sedimentation).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:634: • Fish: Capital dredging (sediment plume).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:634: • Water quality: Capital dredging (sediment plume).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:634:To assess the effects of the proposed scheme on estuary morphology, a 3D sediment transport model has
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:634:been used to simulate dispersion, deposition and suspension of released sediment in the Tees estuary. A
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:634:current and tidal flow information to drive the sediment transport model. To model sand transport, HR
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:635:116.5ha) comprises soft subtidal sediments that exist within the current navigation channel and are,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:635:currently outside of the existing channel comprises 3.5ha and this also consists of subtidal soft sediments.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:636:subtidal sediments are typical of sublittoral microbenthic communities (Ocean Ecology, 2019). As has
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:636:The deposition of fine sediment resuspended by the dredging process is not anticipated to impact on the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:636:localised peak deposition of up to 1mm of sediment. Peak deposition of this order of magnitude is not
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:636:The construction phase will result in increases in the suspended sediment concentration of the water
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:636:of sediment plumes during dredging was modelled. The largest rise in peak suspended sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:637:sediment is anticipated to fall out of suspension within the immediate vicinity of the dredger, particularly in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:637:to increases in suspended sediment concentrations, the effects are short term and will only occur during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:637:The proposed capital dredging has the potential to disturb sediment and release sediment-bound bacteria
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:637:Tees Bay and potentially impact on compliance with the Bathing Waters Directive. However, sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:637:data collected during 2006 did not indicate significant levels of bacteria within the sediments (no further
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:637:analysis into the bacterial concentrations in sediments was undertaken during 2019 as this was not
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:642: Lower sensitivity habitats present Cobbles, Gravel and Shingle (0.77ha); Intertidal soft sediments (400.13ha); rocky shore (26.93ha); subtidal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:642: rocky reef (4.13ha); subtidal soft sediments (610.31ha).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:643: Lower sensitivity habitats present Cobbles, gravel and shingle (3.36ha), Intertidal soft sediment (845.53ha), Rocky shore (184.33ha), Subtidal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:643: rocky reef (7170.93ha), Subtidal soft sediments (1219.64ha)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:651: sediment disturbance or building
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:651: It disturbs sediment with ✓ Sediment sampling indicates that the sediments to be dredged do not contain levels of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:652: Biology: fish Yes The dredging could potentially impact on migratory fish due to the sediment plume being
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:653: Biology: fish Yes The dredging could potentially impact on migratory fish due to the sediment plume being
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:657: the sediments exhibit elevated levels of contamination.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:658: Could affect water clarity, temperature, During the reclamation process, settling basins will allow suspended sediment to settle out this water body
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:658: patterns continuously for longer than a spring pass through silt traps to limit the amount of suspended sediment discharged to the river.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:659: sediment disturbance or building
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:659: It disturbs sediment with contaminants ✓ Reclamation will be undertaken using dredged material predominantly made up of granular These activities
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:659: effectively cap the contaminated sediment material located within the reclamation area.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:667: example through sediment disturbance or
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:667: It disturbs sediment with contaminants above ✓ N/A
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:11:The technical note addendum concludes that sediment sampling data undertaken at
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:12:create large sediment plumes, which could potentially impact the protected wreck
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:13:Sediment samples from the Tees have confirmed percentage organic matter values
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:13:sedimentary regime in respect to most recent climate change allowances. After
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:14:quality, an inadequate assessment of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime in
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:15: monitoring and suspended sediment monitoring.
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:16:Sediment and Water Quality) and Section 26 (Offshore Disposal of Dredged
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:16:sediment but concluded no significant adverse impacts. Results of sediment
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:16:sediment analysis conducted in accordance with Cefas advice under pre-application
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:16:not uncommon for the Tees due to its industrial past. Given that sediment was
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:17:Cefas noted that due to the large volumes of sediment to be disposed of at the Tees
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:18: • Hydrodynamics and sedimentary regimes
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:18: • Marine water and sediment quality
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:19: • Hydrodynamics and sedimentary regimes – Section 5.13
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:19: • Marine water and sediment quality – Section 5.6
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:19:sedimentary regime was required as the physical processes affected by climate
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:21:currently present is largely dependent on the change in nature of the sediments that
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:21:capital dredging is expected to result in the exposure of a similar sediment type to
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:22:regarding the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime in the estuary since the
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:22:suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) would have any significant impact on
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:22: • Impacts caused by increased suspended sediment during capital dredging
20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:25:sediment would be negligible. The applicant also noted that the effect of the dredging
20220208 Northern Gateway MLA202000079 Notice to Natural England.pdf:2:The technical note addendum concludes that sediment sampling data undertaken at the
I&BPB8270MM001F0.1.pdf:2: 5.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
I&BPB8270MM001F0.1.pdf:3: 5.2 Marine sediment and water quality
I&BPB8270MM001F0.1.pdf:3: • Sediment sampling will be undertaken (RHDHV
I&BPB8270MM001F0.1.pdf:3: quality (informed by sediment quality data.
I&BPB8270MM001F0.1.pdf:4: sediment quality data.
I&BPB8270MM001F0.1.pdf:4: following receipt of sediment quality data and any
I&BPB8270MM001F0.1.pdf:4: changes to the marine ecology, sediment and water
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:3:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME 49
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:3:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY 68
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:7:Appendix 9 Historic sediment quality data
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:13:purposes of the assessment of potential environmental effects (i.e. studies on the dispersion of sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:20:Settling basins will allow suspended sediment to settle out from the mudstone reclamation slurry. Overflow
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:20:water from the reclamation will then pass through silt traps to limit the amount of suspended sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:20: of suspended sediment into the river.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:21:disposal of dredged sediment in Bran Sands lagoon is therefore excluded from the proposed scheme
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:32:and sedimentary studies that have been undertaken as part of the 2006 EIA (see Section 6). It is proposed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:38:suitable locations for the re-use of dredged sediment; three were located adjacent to the South Gare
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:56:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:56:The predicted effects of the proposed scheme on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime have been
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:56:and sedimentary regime.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:56:The hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime chapter from the 2006 ES is contained in Appendix 6 for
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:56:hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary and Tees Bay. The 2006 ES defined the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:56: • Sediment (covering each of fluvial, industrial and marine sources)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:57: and, therefore, the construction effects on the sediment regime were assessed through
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:57: of effects on both the sediment transport regime and morphological changes.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:57: approach was sufficient and that no additional hydrodynamic and sediment transport modelling
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:57: included tidal flow modelling, wave modelling, sediment transport, bed change modelling and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:57: modelling of sediment plume released from construction activities.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:57:there have been no changes to baseline understanding regarding the hydrodynamic and sedimentary
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:57: • Sediment regime (including background levels of suspended sediment and sources of suspended
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:57: sediment).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:57:sediment deposition with limited natural re-suspension, an average of approximately 1 million m 3 of material
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:58:sedimentary regime within the Tees estuary is likely to materially change from the present-day conditions.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:58:To assess the effects of the proposed scheme, a 3D sediment transport model was used to simulate
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:58:dispersion, deposition and resuspension of released sediment in the Tees estuary. A 3D flow model was
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:58:information to drive the sediment transport model. To model sand transport, HR Wallingford used
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:58:SANDFLOW, an in-house model which predicts movement of non-cohesive sediment.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:58:construction phase effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime. Given that there are no significant
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:58:assessment of construction phase effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime remains valid.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:59:6.3.1 Increase in suspended sediment concentrations and deposition resulting
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:59:required) will generate a plume of sediment in the water column. The simulated dredge locations and the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:59:The modelling predicts that the largest rise in peak suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) above
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:59:Peak deposition of sediment on the seabed is predicted to follow a similar pattern, with deposition predicted
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:67:Seaton Channel turning circle (as the Seaton Channel is the main route of sediment transport to Seal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:67:The dredger and sediment parameters used for the simulation were:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:67:Sediment parameters:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:68:At the sensitive receivers (shown on Figure 6.1), whilst the presence of the sediment released by the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:72:sedimentary regime. This incorporated results from bespoke assessments and numerical modelling of the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:72: • Effects of the development on non-cohesive sediments - informed by sand transport modelling by
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:72: HR Wallingford Ltd. using the SANDFLOW sediment transport model to simulate the advection and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:72: • Effects of the development on cohesive sediments - informed by mud transport modelling by HR
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:72: results from the modelling of changes in tides, waves, non-cohesive sediment transport and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:72: cohesive sediment transport. Consideration was given to effects on subtidal and intertidal areas,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:72:operational phase effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime remains valid. The potential
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:74:6.4.5 Potential effects on intertidal areas due to change in sedimentary regime
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:75:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:75: • Reductions in water quality associated with the dispersion and redistribution of sediments during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:75: • Reductions in water quality and effects on sediment quality at receptor sites due to maintenance
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:75:The assessment of potential impacts on marine sediment and water quality has been made with reference
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:75:Table 7.1 Summary of NPS requirements with regard to marine sediment and water quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:76:Sediment sampling and analysis consultation
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:76:Targeted consultation was undertaken with the MMO to confirm the sediment sampling and laboratory
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:76:analysis requirements. This was undertaken through the submission of a sediment sampling plan request
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:76:Table 7.2 Summary of comments in the MMO’s Scoping Opinion with regard to marine sediment and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:76: with regard to sediment quality within the SEIR. Cefas stated that: “the HRO does An update to the assessment presented in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:76: contaminated sediment. This should be considered in the SEIR (as an update to additional sediment quality survey.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:76:Environment Agency stated that should sediment be found to be contaminated, alternatives to offshore
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:76:disposal would be required. A summary of the sediment quality data is presented in Section 7.3, and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:76:For marine sediment and water quality, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:76:hydrodynamic and sediment dispersion modelling and is based on the maximum extent over which effects
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:76:are predicted to occur (e.g. sediment plumes generated during capital dredging and effects on tidal currents
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:76:The description of the existing environment with regard to sediment quality has been informed through a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:76:combination of desk-based review and a targeted sediment quality sampling survey. As noted above, the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:77: 2019 sediment sampling
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:77: ( 2018 sediment sampling
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:77: G6 Sediment sampling locations
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:78:samples recovered from Tees GasPort in October 2018), to provide sufficient evidence of sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:78:The methodology used to assess the significance of the potential environmental impacts on marine sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:78:The assessment of potential impacts associated with disturbance of sediment during the construction phase
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:78: • Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQG) for the Protection of Aquatic Life (Canadian Council
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:78:Cefas guidance indicates that, in general, concentrations of contaminants within sediment which are below
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:78:and 2 requires further consideration before a decision can be made. Comparison of results from sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:79:The CSQG involved the derivation of interim marine sediment quality guidelines (ISQGs), or Threshold
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:79:contaminated sediments to a range of aquatic organisms exposed in laboratory tests and under field
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:79:conditions (CCME, 2002). As a result, these guidelines provide an indication of likely toxicity of sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:80:The results of the sediment quality surveys outlined in the previous section, and information pertaining to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:80:7.4.1 Sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:80:Results of the 2019 site specific sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:80:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in July 2019 in accordance with the requirements set out in the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:80:Table 7.5 Summary of sediment quality data from the site-specific sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:83:sediment samples recovered in 2006, with BDE209 concentrations ranging from <0.5µg/kg to 340µg/kg.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:83:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in support of the marine licence application for the Tees GasPort
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:84:Table 7.6 Summary of sediment quality data from the Tees GasPort scheme
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:85:Comparison of the sediment quality data with the CSQG has identified elevated concentrations of metals
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:86:Summary of previous sediment quality surveys in the Tees
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:86:The findings of sediment quality surveys undertaken in support of previously consented schemes in the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:86:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:86:within Tees Dock. Though showing signs of minor contamination, it was determined that the ‘soft’ sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:86:The 2006 sediment quality survey undertaken to inform the 2008 HRO application involved the recovery of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:86:The 2006 ES presented data regarding the physical characteristics of sediment within the footprint of the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:86:The data from 2006 shows that sediments in the receptor sites in the intertidal areas close to the estuary
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:86:sediments (>60%) with varying amounts of clay and gravel. The percentage of organic matter varies
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:86:there is no reason to suggest that the nature of the sediments in the various locations has materially
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:88:Table 7.7 Data from particle size analysis of sediments from the five receptors sites surveyed during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:88:Table 7.8 Data from particle size analysis of sediments from within the main channel and the reclamation
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:90:In the absence of the proposed scheme, there is no reason to believe that sediment and water quality within
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:90:sediment sampling being undertaken from the surface in accordance with the conditions on the maintenance
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:90:7.5.1 Remobilisation, dispersion and redistribution of sediment during capital
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:90:Remobilisation and dispersion of sediment during capital dredging
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:91:suspension of sediments and release them into the water column as a plume. This would increase the TSS
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:91:The analysis of sediment quality samples recovered from within the proposed dredge footprint has shown
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:91:sediments and therefore remain bound. As a result, most PAHs will be strongly sorbed by particulate matter
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:91:concentrations of PDBEs are lower than those found in upstream sediments (which Cefas has confirmed is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:91:to the potential resuspension of sediments from a turbidity perspective only (on the basis that the sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:91:SSC are predicted to occur within the immediate vicinity of the dredger, but the sediment plume spreads
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:91:sediment concentrations 500m from the dredger are not, however, predicted to exceed levels experienced
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:92:Redistribution of sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:92:Changes to sediment quality could occur when sediment is released into the water column by dredging,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:92:therefore change the physical composition of the seabed sediments at locations in which it is predicted to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:92:In summary, sediment quality sampling has confirmed that sediments at the ‘receptor’ sites (shown on
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:92:comprises approximately 20% of fine sediments, the remainder being sand (Royal Haskoning, 2006). Other
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:92:historic data shows, however, that sediment composition over Seal Sands is variable (University of Durham,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:92:Coarser sediments predominate in the more exposed areas such as close to the estuary mouth at North
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:92:present in the sediments (Royal Haskoning, 2006).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:92:The dispersion and deposition of sediment caused by the capital dredging is described in Section 6.3. Two
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:93:be significantly disturbed) and depositing sediment would be re-dredged.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:93:For the intertidal areas, the magnitude of sediment deposition over the course of the dredging operations is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:93:substratum (i.e. the sediment would be expected to become muddier). The presence of an extensive
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:93:accumulation of fine sediment through physical trapping of fine sediment and would exacerbate the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:93:entirely different type of sediment into a receptor area.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:93:Given the above, the physical impact of sediment deposited as a result of capital dredging on receptor areas
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:93:The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume is selection of the dredging method. As noted above,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:95:Limiting re-suspension of sediment during TSHD can be achieved through the following good practice
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:95:The re-suspension of sediment caused by CSD can be reduced through optimising the cutter speed, swing
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:95: contaminated sediment during capital dredging
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:95:of the sediments by bacteria is considered to be low. A review of readily available internet resources
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:95:in a material change to the concentrations of total coliforms and faecal enterococci in sediment recorded
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:95:points. There is also the potential for bacterial die-off to occur over the time period between sediment being
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:95:7.5.3 Effect of mobilising sediments on oxygen concentrations in the water
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:95:The resuspension of sediment as a consequence of the proposed capital dredging could potentially affect
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:96:7.6.1 Potential change in sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:96:7.6.3 Potential effects on the sediment quality of the receptor sites due to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:97:As such, it is concluded that there would be no impact on sediment quality as a consequence of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:97: potentially contaminated sediment caused by changes in hydrodynamics
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:97:sedimentary regime of the estuary system. For example, changes to tidal current speeds and directions
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:97:they affect sedimentary areas that have elevated levels of contamination and result in mobilisation of such
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:97:increases in current speed are predicted are not expected to experience erosion of sediments and,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:97:result in a trend of increased mobilisation of sediment.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:97:for additional effects on the sediments of the seabed at this location in terms of mobilisation of sediment, is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:97:Overall, the potential for the proposed scheme to result in changes to the mobilisation of sediment from
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:97:of potentially contaminated sediments.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:104: • Impacts on marine ecology from increases suspended sediment during capital dredging and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:104: • Impacts on the benthic community structure associated with increased supply of sediments to Seal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:105:ecology (and sediment quality) sampling specification to Natural England for review and comment under a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:107:hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling undertaken. This section excludes consideration of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:107: adjacent areas that potentially would be indirectly affected (e.g. through sediment deposition during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:107:sediment and presence of anoxia and epifauna. A sub-sample of the sediment was retained for PSA to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:107:enable any sediment community associations to be determined. The sub-sample for PSA analysis was
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:107:recovered using a small core to remove sediment from the undisturbed surface of the sample. This PSA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:107:sub-sampling technique standardised the amount of sediment recovered from each core, standardised the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:107:sampled sediment depth profile between sampling stations, minimised bias of sampling of certain sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:107:types and reduced the volume of sediment required for PSA analysis.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:109: • Core sampling where soft sediment was present using a 0.01 m 2 corer. Samples were collected to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:109:sediment surface features (e.g. Polydora sp. mats), sediment type and characteristics, topography and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:110:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, marine sediment quality,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:111: High energy, A5: Sublittoral sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:111: Low energy, A5: Sublittoral sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:111: Moderate energy, A5: Sublittoral sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:112:present in sediments from the survey area are rare and therefore, in this respect, the species present were
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:112:SS.SMu.ISaMU.Cap (Capitella capitata in enriched sublittoral muddy sediments) and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:112:sediment), where C. capitata dominated and was accompanied by large numbers of Ophryotrocha sp.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:112:These species are characteristic of fine sediments, usually with some level of organic pollution and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:114: and are sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the Markey Wighton Axis.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:114: complex of peats, estuarine and marine sediments deposited during the Holocene, which overlie the glacial
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:114: sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea level changes.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:115:Sediment type
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:115:Sediment types, as classified using the Folk triangle (Folk, 1954) for each of the sample stations across the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:115:2019 survey area are provided in Figure 9.4. A variety of sediment types were present across the survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:115:Sediment biotopes
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:115:salinity infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations were unable to be classified further than the EUNIS
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:116:Figure 9.4 Comparison of Folk (Folk, 1954) sediment types as determined from PSD analysis of samples acquired during the 2019 survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:117:Figure 9.5 Distribution of biotopes determined from PSD and macrobenthic analysis of samples recovered during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:120:sediments and in estuarine environments (Wolff 1968, Hughes 1998). The beds can play an important role
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:120:Intertidal areas (which can be sedimentary, such as sand and mudflat, or rocky habitats) represent important
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:121: A2 – Littoral sediment A2:12 Estuarine coarse sediment shores
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:121:Occasional areas of impoverished coarse sediment was also found along the low-mid shore (Ocean
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:121:wave action. In some areas, coarse sediment beaches occurred on the lower to mid shore (A2.12 –
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:121:Estuarine coarse sediment shores) and occasionally formed a mosaic with A1.33 - Red algal turf in lower
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:124:depths, which would continue to influence the benthic communities present within the sediments.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:125:as being highly intolerant to substratum loss. A. islandica is found buried in sandy and muddy sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:128: sediment during dredging
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:128:Sediment resuspension
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:128:result in increases in the TSS concentrations of the water column. Based on the findings of sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:128:contaminated sediment being released into the water column. The assessment below therefore focusses
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:128:on the potential impact to marine ecology associated with the resuspension of non-contaminated sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:128:(i.e. sediment which does not contain elevations beyond Action Level 2).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:128:filter feeding molluscs). In addition, high concentrations of suspended sediment may impact on fish through
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:128:In general, sediment plumes induced by dredging are considered to pose only a limited risk to water quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:128:background) are predicted in the immediate vicinity of the dredger. Sediment plume modelling predicts that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:128:in suspended sediment. This information is presented below.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:be of low sensitivity to increases in suspended sediment.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:The dominant sediment biotope present within the dredge footprint is EUNIS biotope A5.323, Nephtys
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:resistance and resilience to changes in suspended sediment, and low sensitivity (to changes in suspended
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:sediment).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:Given the temporary and localised nature of the predicted increase in suspended sediment, in addition to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:the low sensitivity of the key species present in the estuary to increased suspended sediment, an impact of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:Smothering caused by sedimentation of material resuspended by capital dredging within intertidal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:the deposition of sediments at Bran Sands or North Gare Sands.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:to occur on Seal Sands. The predicted total maximum depth of sediment deposition over the course of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:dredging sand will be up to 1mm. As described in Section 6, this sediment will be subject to a number of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:predicted that the net effect of the dredging and dispersive processes acting on the sediment following
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:deposition, could be the deposition of up to 1mm of fine sediment overall.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:Sediment deposition has the potential to affect benthic organisms of the intertidal areas of Seal Sands
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:summary, the species present are typical species that characterise fine sediment habitats within estuarine
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:areas. As such, they are tolerant of fluctuating environmental conditions, such as periodic sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:the rates of sediment deposition, and the overall degree of sedimentation, that is predicted in this instance
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:130:as a result of the deposition of fine sediments at Seal Sands.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:130:Deposition of fine sediment within areas of saltmarsh
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:130:localised peak deposition of up to 1mm of sediment.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:130:Smothering caused by sedimentation of material resuspended by capital dredging within subtidal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:130:Capital dredging is predicted to result in the deposition of fine sediment within the subtidal zone. Much of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:130:stations. These species are typically found in fine estuarine sediment. As such, they are tolerant to some
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:130:degree, to elevations in near-bed SSC and periodic sediment deposition. In view of the temporary nature
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:135:9.6.3 Potential effect of increased supply of fine sediment to Seal Sands on
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:135:sediment to areas which are currently muddy is not considered to be an issue which would result in an
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:135:distribution of the sediments and consequently on benthic community structure. A number of studies have
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:136:Tansley (2003) concludes that sediment type and sediment changes that have taken place on Seal Sands
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:136:are influencing factors in determining the location of Enteromorpha mats. It may be that the sediment type
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:136:encourage accumulation of fine material in areas which are currently comprised of sandy sediments as the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:136:are likely to be confined to those areas colonised by Enteromorpha which is likely to act as a sediment trap.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:137:with those which are currently present is largely dependent on the change in nature of the sediments that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:137:expected to result in the exposure of a similar sediment type to that which is currently present. As such,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:140: • Effects of sediment deposition on intertidal food resources due to capital dredging.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:140: • Potential effect of increased supply of fine sediment to Seal Sands on feeding resource for
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:141:hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime may occur.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:144: • Hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime (Section 6).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:144: • Marine sediment and water quality (Section 7).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:156:of sediment into the water column, causing a sediment plume that could potentially affect habitats used by
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:156:indirectly due to altered hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime) as well as reduced ability of birds to identify
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:156:Sediment quality data from within the footprint of the proposed dredge has confirmed that there are no
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:156:prey due to the resuspension of sediment which contains concentrations of contaminants in excess of Action
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:156:estuary. The modelled sediment dispersion plume from the proposed NGCT dredge does not interact with
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:156:impacts to little tern foraging ability as a result of increased suspended sediments during the construction
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:158:and re-suspension of sediment (Cook and Burton, 2010). Common tern have been reported to have a high
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:158:line of the trailing suction dredger track. The hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling results illustrate that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:158:granular material and clay and up to 33 weeks for mudstone) and the predicted extent of the sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:159:To reduce the impact associated with the predicted increase in suspended sediments, the use of a TSHD
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:159:and tending to be more confined to the shallower waters. Mitigation of the suspended sediment generated
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:160:11.5.5 Effects of sediment deposition on intertidal food resources due to capital
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:160:The deposition of fine sediment within intertidal areas due to capital dredging has the potential to affect
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:164: • increased import of fine sediments resuspended in Tees Bay;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:164:of Seal Sands that are currently comprised of muddy sediments, with coarser areas unlikely to experience
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:164:for a potential effect on intertidal morphology is the increase in supply of fine sediment described above.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:165:11.6.2 Potential effect of increased supply of fine sediment to Seal Sands on
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:165:The potential impact of the increased supply of fine sediments to Seal Sands on the benthic community
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:165:eastern side of the estuary for the duration of the capital dredge, to reduce the potential for sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:165:phase impacts associated with sediment transport to Seal Sands manifesting during the operation phase
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:166:The hydraulic and sediment transport studies conclude that there would be an increased maintenance
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:167:area of intertidal habitat and create an area of sedimentary habitat that is expected to provide a more
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:168: • Impacts caused by increased suspended sediment during capital dredging and dewatering during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:169:sediment dispersion modelling and is based on the maximum extent over which effects are predicted to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:169:occur (e.g. sediment plumes generated during capital dredging and effects on tidal currents during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:170:The predicted effects of the proposed scheme on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime and potential
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:170:impacts on marine sediment quality, water quality and marine ecology are relevant to this section of the EIA
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:170:invertebrates found in subtidal and intertidal sediments. Intertidal habitats are a key marine habitat and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:183: Isles. Distributions for different Catch rates below 100m are sediment which allow them to bury themselves and three months, ranging from December have revealed several sub- the lugworm and siphons of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:183: differences, with plaice <25cm sediment remains during the lifespan, although location. summer feeding and split up invertebrates such as sessile
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:183: virtually restricted to south and older fish may be found on even coarser sediments. again for the next spawning polychaetes, bivalves and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:183: at Teesside. 10 to 100 per hour Regularly caught throughout most from 1m to 1,105m, but catch Most often found on coarser sediments such as invertebrates (including small
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:184: containing fine sediment are avoided being absent to occur throughout much of the adult
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:184: sediments. tide) to about 250m depth. they may spend all day in the polychaetes and fish (including
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:184: show clear preference for specific sediments. importance of a spawning area off the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:184: Most abundant in the 0 to 5m bury themselves deep into sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:187: sediment concentrations due to dredging and dewatering of the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:187:variation, in the immediate vicinity of the dredger (see Section 6). Sediment plume modelling has however
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:188:the TSS concentrations of the water column. Sediment quality data from within the footprint of the proposed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:188:contaminated sediment. The assessment has been grouped into impacts on eggs and larvae, juveniles and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:188:to the findings of the sediment plume modelling reporting in Section 6 (which illustrate that the sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:189:The re-suspension of sediment as a consequence of the proposed dredging could also potentially affect
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:189:findings of a sediment quality survey presented in Section 7, this is considered unlikely.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:189:In general, sediment plumes induced by dredging are considered to pose only a limited risk to water quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:189:It has also been reported that dredging activities often generate no more increased suspended sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:189:floods and large tides can increase suspended sediments over much larger areas, for longer periods that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:189:fish (Forewind, 2014). For lethal effects to occur, concentrations of suspended sediment have to be on the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:189:high sensitivity of resident and migratory fish in the Tees to increases in suspended sediment, an overall
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:190:the Tees to increased suspended sediment. Based on the information available on MarLIN for the dominant
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:190:‘tolerant’ and ‘not sensitive’ to increases in suspended sediment.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:190:The controls outlined in Section 7 with regard to minimising suspended sediment load during dredging are
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:193:as polychaete worms and the siphons of molluscs which protrude above the sediment surface. Therefore,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:196:match the advertised depths due to sedimentation within the channel).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:203:previously undisturbed buried sediments within the Tees estuary (comprising peat and alluvial deposits),
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:207:Sediment samples from the Tees have confirmed percentage organic matter values of between 1.2% and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:213:wave and sediment modelling studies undertaken to assess the effects of the proposed scheme on the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:213:hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime. Given the findings of those assessments, it has been deemed that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:223:wall is exposed on spring tides and comprises sediments accumulating over rip-rap of road planings (similar
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:226:Sediment plume modelling predicts that SSC would not increase above background concentrations by more
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:226:quality in the vicinity of the abstraction point due to increased suspended sediment would be temporary in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:226:The controls outlined in Section 7 (with regard to minimising sediment plume dispersion during dredging)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:227:The hydraulic and sedimentary studies indicate that there is no requirement to change the current
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:227:and sediment transport pathways. The potential effects of the proposed scheme on these aspects are
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:243: • Beneficial use of sediment as part of habitat enhancement works (discussed further below).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:243:suitable locations for the re-use of dredged sediment; three were located adjacent to the South Gare
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:244:use of dredged sediment to create / enhance existing roost sites does represent a possible option. The
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:244:Although there are no immediately identifiable schemes which could utilise the dredged sediment that would
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:247:Hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling has been undertaken to understand the predicted dispersion of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:250:short-term build-up of fine sandy sediment at the disposal site, however, this would be dispersed over time.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:250:The PSD results show that the sediments within and adjacent to Tees Bay C comprise gravelly muddy sand,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:253:Based on the predicted dispersion of fine sediment from Tees Bay C described above, it is concluded that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:253:longer-term accumulation of coarser sediments. It is predicted that the sand would, over time, disperse
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:255: Mixed sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:256: sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:256:of the disposal site. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling has predicted some short-term build-up of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:256:fine sandy sediment at the disposal site, however, this would be dispersed over time. No peak deposition
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:256:sensitive to smothering or increases in suspended sediment.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:259:disturbance and increased suspended sediments on migratory fish).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:259: influencing the same area as affected by the sediment plume); and,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:261: • the hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:261: • sediment and water quality;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:263: which is located at the mouth of Victoria Harbour. The underwater effect on sediment transport or morphology between the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:264: hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of the estuary
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:266:27.5.2 Hydrodynamics and sedimentary regimes
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:266: • dispersion of suspended sediment during capital dredging and deposition;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:266: • changes to the sediment budget.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:266:for cumulative impacts on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:266:Dispersion of suspended sediment and deposition on the seabed during capital dredging
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:266:sediment which will disperse throughout the estuary according to the prevailing currents, prior to settling on
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:267:The extent of the sediment plume created by capital dredging is heavily dependent on the dredging plant
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:267:sediment types as part of the same project. Consequently, for the purposes of this CIA, the maximum
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:267:potential spatial extent of sediment plume generation and deposition footprint has been identified from the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:267:sediment in the water column was predicted to be in close proximity to the dredger, with plume dispersion
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:267:resulting in a significantly reduced concentration of suspended sediment beyond the source of the plume.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:267:Significant deposition of sediment was also only predicted in close proximity to the dredging (and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:267:sediment and sediment deposition plots for each of the schemes referred to above are presented in Figures
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:267:Figure 27.1 Predicted increase in suspended sediment concentration (left) and deposition on the seabed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:268:Figure 27.3 Predicted increase in suspended sediment concentration (left) and deposition on the seabed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:269:At the sensitive receivers, whilst the presence of the sediment released by the maintenance dredging is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:269:The predicted footprints of sediment deposition for the NGCT and the York Potash Harbour facilities are
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:269:to sediment deposition is the NGCT project (alone); deposition due to the NGCT project is predicted to be
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:269:of very low magnitude. No intertidal sediment deposition is predicted during capital dredging for the York
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:269:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:269:sediment, and this measure would limit sediment release into the water column as far as practicable. The
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:269:sediment and water quality, marine ecology, ornithology, fish and fisheries) is discussed below.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:270:Changes to estuarine sediment budget
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:270:as a result of this scheme. In addition, no changes to sediment transport in the predominantly sandy areas
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:270:The York Potash Harbour Facilities are predicted to result in a localised redistribution of sediment deposition
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:270:change in the overall fine sediment regime will not alter the present frequency of, or methodology used for,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:270:maintenance dredging, and no effect on sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees estuary will
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:271:cumulative impacts to arise to the estuarine sediment budget as a result of the projects screened into the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:271:27.5.3 Marine water and sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:271:Potential for cumulative increase in suspended sediment during capital and maintenance dredging
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:271:A cumulative effect on water quality as a result of dredging induced sediment plume generation will only
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:271:In addition, the predictions made for each project (shown in Figures 27.2 to 27.4) represent sediment plume
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:271:coincide to result in a scenario where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:271:The sediment plume predicted due to the NGCT encompasses, and extends beyond, the area of the plume
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:271:sediment, this is only applicable to the York Potash Harbour Facilities. Mobilisation of contaminated
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:271:sediment has not been identified as a risk for the NGCT scheme (Section 7). The sediment overlying the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:271:peak suspended sediment above those normally experienced in the estuary (this effect would be additive).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:271:contaminants known to be present in sediments from the York Potash Harbour Facilities dredge footprint
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:271:In terms of uncontaminated sediment dispersion, a significant cumulative impact is not anticipated due to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:273:Smothering of benthic invertebrate communities due to deposition of sediment dispersed during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:273:The predicted footprints of sediment deposition for the NGCT and the York Potash Harbour Facilities are
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:273:deposition is likely to be temporary due to the unconsolidated nature of the sediment, and the cumulative
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:273:The proposed NGCT is predicted to have an effect on sediment supply into the estuary, with a predicted
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:273:of fine sediment to the Tees due to the York Potash Harbour Facilities. The scheme has no potential to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:273:affect the sediment budget of the estuary and, therefore, there will be no impact on morphology of intertidal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:274:Potential effect on waterbird feeding resource due to increased suspended sediment during capital
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:274:due to a sediment plume during capital dredging), given that the waterbirds potentially affected would be
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:275:Effects on fish populations due to a sediment plume during capital dredging
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:275:There is potential for the sediment plumes predicted to be generated by the dredging required for NGCT,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:277: • Effects on biological habitats from capital dredging (removal of habitat / sedimentation).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:277: • Effects on fish due to the creation of a sediment plume from dredging.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:277: • Effects on water quality due to the creation of a sediment plume from dredging.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:277:of disturbance to fish due to creation of a sediment plume was a particular concern and therefore several
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:279:sections are as follows: Section 7 (marine sediment and water quality); Section 9 (marine ecology); Section
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:287: sedimentary regime of the estuary system), the area would be
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:293:tidal propagation, wave climate, current speeds and sediment budget of the estuarine system) has been
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:298:Reductions in water quality due to resuspension of sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:298:indirectly impact on foraging behaviour for birds. As reported in Section 7, the sediment to be dredged does
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:298:interest features of the pSPA and Ramsar site is therefore via an increase in suspended sediment within
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:298:Figures 6.2 to 6.4 indicate that the magnitude of the effect (i.e. increased suspended sediment) is likely to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:298:for granular material and clays) and the predicted extent of the sediment plume, it is expected that there
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:298:To reduce the impact associated with the predicted increase in suspended sediments, the use of a TSHD
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:299:the shallower waters. Mitigation of the suspended sediment generated by reducing the size of the dredger,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:300: • Effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime during operation.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:302:An interaction between the sediment plumes predicted to be generated by capital dredging associated with
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:302:from the area of increased suspended sediment. It should be noted, however, that the effect of the combined
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:302:habitats (i.e. deposition of sediment). As reported in Section 27, the predicted deposition footprints of the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:302:more extensive in terms of its spatial magnitude. No intertidal sediment deposition was predicted as a result
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:303:As outlined in Section 27, the impacts associated with the re-mobilisation of contaminated sediment are
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:303:only applicable to the York Potash Harbour Facilities. Mobilisation of contaminated sediment has not been
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:303:Potash Harbour Facilities (i.e. use of an enclosed grab for dredge contaminated sediments) would remove
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:303:the potential for the re-suspension of contaminated sediment and subsequent deposition over other areas
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:303:The effect of sediment suspension on feeding birds (terns) in the nearshore zone associated with the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:303:species was predicted due to either suspended sediments or habitat change. As outlined in Section 12, the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:303:sediment or habitat change) and the conclusion of the NGCT assessment (i.e. negligible effect on feeding
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:303:sediment from Hartlepool channel is not considered sufficient to result in a lethal effect on fish, with any
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:304:29.6.5 Changes to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:304:through the mouth of the Tees and the resultant effect on tidal flows and sediment transport.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:305:the supply of fine sediment to the Tees, and the sediment predicted to deposit in its berth pocket would be
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:305:effect on the sediment budget of the estuary to arise and, therefore, there would be no impact on morphology
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:305:Sedimentary and hydrodynamic modelling undertaken for the consented Hartlepool approach channel
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:305:proposed scheme is predicted to be low. The magnitude of effect on the baseline sediment transport regime
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:305:in the vicinity of the approach channel. There is no predicted effect on the baseline sediment transport
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:306:Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, 2002. Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQG)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:317:sampling of bed sediment types, erosion/deposition measurements and silt flux
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:317:sedimentological effects of NGCT on the SPA/SSSI inter-tidal habitats of Seal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:318:sediment monitoring during dredging/construction has been submitted to and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:318:areas or have an unacceptable impact on wildlife, water quality or the sedimentary regime.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:322: 5.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:323: 5.2 Marine sediment and water quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:323: • Sediment sampling will be undertaken (RHDHV
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:323: quality (informed by sediment quality data.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:324: sediment quality data.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:324: following receipt of sediment quality data and any
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:324: changes to the marine ecology, sediment and water
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:328: disturbance of sediments and potential release of contaminants
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:329:sediment quality samples and analysis of the dredge material may be required to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:329: licencing process. A regime of sediment sampling will be
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:333: around the beneficial use of dredged sediment as it is not always
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:334: Sediment quality:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:334: SR and MS outlined that additional sediment quality sampling is
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:334: anticipated. EH stated that should sediment be found to be
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:334: Action: review sediment quality data against the Cefas Action RHDHV
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:335: sediment quality survey.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:335: Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:338:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:338: hydrodynamic and sediment regime of the Tees estuary arising from the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:338: wave climate, flow regime, sediment transport pathways, etc) and it is not
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:340: Details of the pre-barrage hydrodynamic and sedimentological regimes in the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:342:6.2.3 Sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:342: 1. In general, suspended sediment concentrations are low within the estuary and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:342: high rainfall or storm events. In general, the suspended sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:342: of the proposed development (i.e. in the Tees Dock area) suspended sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:342: from 40-80mg/l. In terms of the tidal sequence, the highest suspended sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:342: suspended sediment have been noted around the Shell Jetty, but with little
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:343: system the driving forces for sediment transport are the tidal flows, density
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:343: of fluvial sediment into the estuary. ABPmer (2005) reported that considerable
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:343: sediment input to the estuary has reduced. However, even the pre-barrage
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:343: from Tees Bay, is the predominant source of sediment in to the system. This
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:345: the studies on the dispersion of the sediment plume arising during dredging, as
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:345: d) Losses of suspended sediment are inevitable at the dredging face or draghead,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:345: less instantaneous release of solids. Therefore, sediment plume studies were
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:345: mixture of sediment and water from the sea bed and discharging this mixture
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:345: into a hopper on the dredger. The proportion of sediment loaded into the hopper
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:345: finer sediment fractions. This overspilled sediment will either fall to the bed or
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:346: remain in suspension, forming a sediment plume. The plume from the overspill
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:346: discharge is an order of magnitude greater than sediment resuspension from the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:346: dredger draghead and so it is the only sediment source considered for sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:346: to the TSHD the proportion of sediment loaded into the barge can be increased
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:346: plumes of suspended fine sediment. Importantly the TSHD will result in a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:346: source of fine sediment released along the path of the dredging activity (i.e. in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:346: simulate the dispersion, deposition and resuspension of the released sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:346: 8. Parameters for the sediment plume simulations for the CSD were established
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:347: 9. Parameters for the sediment plume simulations for the TSHD were established,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:347: because the sediment enters the water firstly in a dynamic plume phase (i.e. not
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:347: sediment mixes with the water it behaves as a passive plume that is transported
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:349: CSD in terms of predicted peak concentration of suspended sediments and peak
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:352: is predicted to increase suspended sediment concentrations by 500mg/l in the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:352: much sediment as those along the channel.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:352: of the run-off from the reclamation. Increases in suspended sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:352: suspended sediment concentrations over Seal Sands and in the Seaton
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:353: suspended sediment concentrations and deposition at Bran Sands and North
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:358: gravitationally driven currents with knock on effects for sediment transport and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:358: report of the hydrodynamic and sedimentological studies to support the EIA (HR
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:375:6.4.4 Non-cohesive sediment studies
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:375: SANDFLOW. SANDFLOW is a dynamic non-cohesive sediment (sand)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:375: sediment due to the effects of both currents and waves. The sediment transport
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:375: 2. SANDFLOW was used to simulate the sediment transport patterns throughout
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:376: which serve to drive sand into the outer channel. Sandy sedimentation rates in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:376: contributed to by sedimentary events, involving the slippage of sediment that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:376:6.4.5 Cohesive sediment studies
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:376: potentially, as a consequence, the sediment dynamics of intertidal areas.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:376: 3. As described in Section 6.2, the bulk of fine sediment enters the system during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:376: the main source is offshore). Once within the estuary, fine sediment is pushed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:376: 4. The chosen model for the study of fine sediment transport was SUBIEF3D which
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:376: uses the hydrodynamics generated by TELEMAC3D to transport fine sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:378: 1. The preceding sections present the findings of the flow, wave and sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:378: • Increased import of fine sediments resuspended in Tees Bay;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:380: counter this effect reducing the sediment supply from North Gare Sands into the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:380: 17. Analysis of bed sediment shown in HR Wallingford (2002) suggests that in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:380: Seaton Channel the bed sediment tends to be finer (>70% particles < 63um)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:380: whereas on Seal Sands bed sediments over most of the area comprise
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:380: sediment of less than 50%, fines, particularly towards the east. Of this amount
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:380: silt. The material showed a pattern with the sandiest sediment occurring at
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:381: higher elevations and muddier sediment in gullies and deeper pockets on the top
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:381: contrary to HR Wallingford (2002) which reported that sediment on Seal Sands
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:381: sediment supply and changes to the processes occurring on Seal Sands.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:381: 20. Changes to sediment supply:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:381: • Increased sedimentation in the turning area probably due to a combination of the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:381: build up on North Gare Sands and more favourable conditions for sedimentation
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:382: • Increased import (aproximately10%) of fine sediments to Seaton Channel with a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:382: proportionate increase in fine sediment supply to Seal Sands.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:387:Benthic ecology and sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:388:Subject: Northern Gateway Container Terminal - sediment and marine ecology sampling
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:388:our proposed approach for both benthic ecological sampling and marine sediment quality sampling that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:388:to collect and analyse sediment samples from the dredge area every three years. As well as confirming
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:388:both elements into account when determining the number and location of sediment samples required.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:388:This document has been issued to both the MMO and Natural England with regard to sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:391:commitment); this has been established and verified through the hydraulic and sedimentary studies that
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:392: 4. Previous benthic ecology and sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:392:The survey identified that subtidal sediments comprised high silt/clay content in the main approach
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:392:the estuary, in the sandy sediments, the infauna was dominated by the polychaetes Chaetozone christiei
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:395:sediment composition, indicating that the biological community present in each group was influenced by
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:395:sediments (i.e. towards the mouth of the Tees estuary). Group A and Group B were generally present in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:395:sediments with a high percentage of fine material (i.e. to the east of Seaton Channel and in the main
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:395:channel areas), with Group A found in sandy silty sediments and Group B in silty sediments. The 2006
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:395:(muddy), or (3) mixed sediments. The two QEII Berth sample stations comprised of fine sediment and fell
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:395:into the 2nd group of silty or muddy sediments, indicating that the data conformed to the structure of a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:395:typical fine sediment community, containing an unremarkable silty sediment infaunal assemblage typical
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:395:of these sediment types.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:395:conditions and are very similar in faunal composition to previously surveyed fine sediment locations
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:396:muddy sediments) and SS.SMU.SMuVS.CapTubi (Capitella capitata and Tubificoides spp. in reduced
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:396:salinity infralittoral muddy sediment), where C. capitata dominated and was accompanied by large
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:396:numbers of Ophryotrocha sp. These species are characteristic of fine sediments, usually with some level
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:396: 4.2. Sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:396:2006 NGCT sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:396:Sediment samples were collected as part of the EIA for the NGCT during 2006 (Royal Haskoning, 2006)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:396:to deposition of sediment that will be disturbed during the capital dredging (giving a total of 13 sampling
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:397:Figure 4 2006 NGCT sediment sample locations
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:398: ! Sediment Sample Locations in Trafigura dredge footprint
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:399:2008 QEII Berth sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:399:An additional sediment quality survey was carried out within the Tees estuary in December 2008, in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:399:vibrocores (VC004 and VC001B) sampled sediments to a depth of 4m below Ordnance Datum (OD), or
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:399:The results from the vibrocores identified that all metals analysed within the sediments exceeded Action
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:400:As well as identifying contaminated sediments, the sediment quality survey also indicated a pattern of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:400:a sealed barge to minimise re-suspension of sediment into the water column. No such requirements
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:400:2014 York Potash Harbour Facilities sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:400:A site-specific sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:400:taken from the adjacent approach channel that will be deepened as part of the NGCT project. Sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:402: 5. Proposed approach to benthic ecology and sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:402:suitability and photographed to determine sample volume, visual characteristics of the sediment and the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:402:A sub-sample of the sediment will be retained for Particle Size Analysis (PSA) to enable any sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:402:community associations to be determined. A cut-off 100ml syringe would be used to remove sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:403:indicator species for contaminated sediment will be noted.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:403:Sampling of sediments for PSA is an essential accompaniment to macrofaunal surveys. Small-scale
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:403:heterogeneity at the seabed dictates that a PSA sediment sub-sample should be collected from the same
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:403: 5.2. Sediment quality
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:403:sediment sampling:
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:404:licencing process. A regime of sediment sampling will be required to support a marine licence application
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:404:sediment quality sampling, it is proposed that additional sediment quality samples are recovered
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:404:sediments within the dredge footprint were suitable for offshore disposal. Sampling in 2008 for the QEII
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:404:dredge footprint in the main channel)) confirmed contaminants within the unconsolidated sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:404:minimise the resuspension of sediment into the water column.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:404:The 2014 sampling undertaken for the York Potash Harbour facilities confirmed that the sediments within
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:404:Based on the above, in addition to the fact that the vast majority of sediments to be dredged comprise
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:404:considered that there is sufficient sediment quality data from previous studies within the Tees estuary
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:404:(specifically the 2008 and 2014 surveys), which confirm that the sediments to be dredged at depth
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:404:including precluding disposal at sea and a means of minimising sediment loss to the water column
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:404:2014), the number of samples required is determined on the quantity of sediment to be dredged. The
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:405:sediment samples (this is a guide only) collected at evenly distributed locations across the dredge
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:405:Sediment samples will be analysed by a laboratory validated by the MMO. The laboratory data will be
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:405: • Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life (CCME, 2002).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:406:MMO sediment quality sampling plan
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:410: for other activities which are likely to lead to the mobilisation of sediments. Based on
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:410:dredging does not exceed 1 metre below the sediment surface)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:411:Surface samples should be taken from the upper layer of in-situ sediment using a non-
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:411: measure. Where sediment data are lacking or not appropriate for their intended use,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:412: licensing-sediment-analysis-and-sample-plans
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:412:This list indicates the laboratories which have been validated to undertake sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:412:Irrespective of which validated laboratory is used to undertake sediment analysis, results
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:412: sediment-analysis-and-sample-plans).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:412: quantity and quality of sediments, there may be a need for surface sediments to be re-
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:416:Figure 4. DCO/2014/00002 York Potash - Sediment Composition Analysis for Trace
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:416:Figure 5. DCO/2014/00002 York Potash - Sediment Composition Analysis for
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:417: is sufficient evidence on sediment quality to undertake an assessment of potential impacts on the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:417: areas or of areas where other activities are likely to lead to the mobilisation of sediments. To enable
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:417: applicable, we require sediment samples to be provided for analysis.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:417:3. PD Teesport are seeking a joint sediment sampling plan to inform a marine licence application for
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:418: agree with the applicant’s stipulation that subsurface sediment samples are neither necessary nor
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:418:activities/contaminants/pbde-sediment/
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:420:Historic sediment quality data
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:421:Summary of historic sediment quality surveys in the Tees estuary
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:421:2006 NGCT sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:421:Sediment samples were collected as part of the EIA for the NGCT during 2006 (Royal Haskoning,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:421:potentially be subject to deposition of sediment that will be disturbed during the capital dredging
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:422:Table 1 Summary of sediment quality data for metals and organotins from samples recovered during 2006
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:424:2008 QEII Berth sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:424:A sediment quality survey was carried out in the Tees estuary in December 2008 to characterise the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:424:sediments to a depth of 4m below Ordnance Datum (OD), or as deep as the corer reached.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:424:The results from the vibrocores identified that all metals analysed within the sediments exceeded AL1.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:424:As well as identifying contaminated sediments, the sediment quality survey also indicated a pattern of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:424:loading into a sealed barge to minimise re-suspension of sediment into the water column. No such
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:424:2012 sediment sampling from Tees Dock No.1 Quay
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:424:Technical Note (Royal Haskoning, 2011) which presented the available sediment quality data from
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:424:Tees Dock, and provided justification for taking no further sediment quality samples prior to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:424:In 2011, the most recent sediment quality data from the Tees Dock were requested from Cefas. The
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:424:PDT (and therefore the data was specifically in relation to sediment samples recovered from the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:424:minor contamination, it was determined that the ‘soft’ sediments within ‘Tees Dock Water Area’
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:424:licensed sites in Tees Bay. It was also concluded that the sediment chemistry of the unconsolidated
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:424:sediments present, and which required removal as part of the proposed scheme, would be expected
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:424:to contain similar levels of contamination to those sediments sampled in support of existing
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:425:2014 York Potash Harbour Facilities sediment quality survey
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:425:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:425:results are therefore directly applicable to the NGCT scheme). Sediment samples were therefore
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:432: Estuarine coarse sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:432: A2 – Littoral Sediment shores
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:434:A typical photograph of the habitat classified as A2 (littoral sediment) is shown below (Plate 2.4).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:434:The littoral sediment habitat is considered to be naturally occurring as the sediment has accumulated in this
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:434:Areas that are classified as a mixture of littoral rock and sediment are, however, considered man-made as
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:434:Given the above, a distinction has been made between littoral rock and littoral sediments in terms of habitat
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:435: Plate 2.4 Typical habitat classified as A2.12 (Estuarine coarse sediment shores)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:435: High 6 A2.12 (Estuarine coarse sediment shores) 0.05
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:435:habitats of relevance to this assessment are A1 (littoral rock) and A2 (intertidal sediments) (see Table 2.1).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:436:of survey), for the intertidal sediment habitat, it is judged that the habitat condition should be classified as
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:436:impede the natural movement of sediments, poor transition of habitats and the fact that the ecological status
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:436: (intertidal sediments)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:437:soft sediment, intertidal habitat.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:437:and there are no areas of sedimentary habitat present in this area. The current habitat is, therefore,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:437:The intention of the proposed intervention is to create intertidal sedimentary habitat (mudflat) using
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:439: High 6 Intertidal sediments (A2) 0.54
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:439:The proposed habitat improvement (creation of intertidal sediment) is considered to have good potential to
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:439:‘moderate’. While the intertidal sediment would be expected to support the development of a benthic
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:439:of sediments, poor transition of habitats and the fact that the ecological status of the overlying water body
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:439:On this basis, a condition score of 2 is assigned to the habitat condition of the intertidal sediment (post-
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:440:could be taken to create/restore intertidal habitat rich in soft sediments. A specific action related to this
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:440:pressure is to develop a 'beneficial use' of maintenance dredgings programme to retain fine sediments within
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:442:improvement of littoral sediment (i.e. the relevant habitat in this case).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:442:Table 3.5 Time to target condition for littoral sediment (summarised from Natural England, 2019)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:442:Littoral sediment 1 5 10
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:442:restore or create habitat. A distinction is made between ‘re-creation’ and ‘restoration’; for littoral sediment,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:442: ‘Moderate’ is one of the categories for littoral sediment defined in the condition tables included in Appendix A of Natural England
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:443: sediments 0.54 6 2 (Moderate) 1.5 1.5 1 0.837 1 12.2
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:449:Development proposal and location: Northern Gateway Container Terminal (NGCT) – Sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:449: ‘Note / Memo: Northern Gateway Container Terminal – sediment and marine ecology
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:449:Natural England (NE) welcomes the methodology for surveying benthic ecology and sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:450:Sediment quality sampling
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:450: sediment quality samples are required to advise the EIA, however NE defers to the Marine
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:450: sediment quality samples required to meet OSPAR Regulations.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:452: Sediment & Marine Ecology Report 2019
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:453:Report Title: Northern Gateway Container Terminal Development Sediment & Marine Ecology Report 2019
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:453:Recommended Ocean Ecology Limited (2019). Northern Gateway Container Terminal Development Sediment &
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:455: 3.1. Sediments………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 24
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:455: 3.1.1. Sediment Type……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 24
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:455: 3.1.2. Sediment Composition …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 24
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:455: 3.1.3. Sediment Groups ………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 24
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:456: 4.2. Sediments………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 44
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:457:Figure 1. Actual grab and trawl positions sampled during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019. ……………. 13
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:457:Figure 2. Locations of intertidal quadrats taken during the intertidal NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019. ……. 14
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:457:Figure 3. Comparison of Folk (Folk 1954) sediment types as determined from PSD analysis of samples acquired during the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:457:samples collected during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019. …………………………………………………………. 27
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:457:Figure 5. Non-metric MDS ordination plot of sediment groups conducted on station averaged Euclidean distance
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:457:Figure 6. Distribution of sediment groups conducted on station averaged Euclidean distance resemblance PSD data. …….. 29
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:457:Table 1. Number of subtidal sample stations for the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019. …………………………. 12
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:457:Table 3. Classification used for defining sediment type based on the Wentworth Classification System (Wentworth 1922) .. 21
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:457:Table 5. Summary of macrobenthic abundance and diversity of sediments sampled during the year 2 in-dredge monitoring
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:459:conduct a subtidal and intertidal sediment and marine ecology survey for the proposed Northern Gateway
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:459:sediment composition to support the environmental assessment for the NGCT marine licence application.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:459:Generally, the sediment types present in the Tees Estuary have remained stable when compared to previous
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:459:surveys. The inner Estuary was characterised by muddy sediments while offshore and outer areas saw an
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:459:The macrobenthic assemblages associated with sediments within the Tees Estuary and in outer areas were
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:459:impoverished coarse sediment was also found along the low-mid shore.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:460:surveys to assess the benthic ecology and marine sediment quality in support of the environmental assessment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:460:for maintenance dredging within the Tees Estuary, sediment samples were collected and analysed from two
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:460: establish a baseline for marine sediments and associated benthic communities;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:461:The 2006 survey identified that subtidal sediments comprised high silt/clay content in the main approach
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:461:sediment and comprised of a similar faunal assemblage to that found in the main channel in 2006. Overall, the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:461:sediments) and SS.SMU.SMuVS.CapTubi (Capitella capitata and Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:461:muddy sediment), where C. capitata dominated and was accompanied by large numbers of Ophryotrocha sp. In
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:462:Table 1. Number of subtidal sample stations for the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:463:Figure 1. Actual grab and trawl positions sampled during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:464:Figure 2. Locations of intertidal quadrats taken during the intertidal NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019 overlain on the UAV imagery derived orthomosaic.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:465:Plate 1. Dedicated survey vessel, Seren Las, for the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:468:encountered. Other information recorded included general site conditions, sediment surface features, sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:468:Where areas of soft sediment were present, a 0.01 m2 corer was used to collect a sample for subsequent
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:469:survey area and the Riverside Ro-Ro ferry terminal. Bottom left: Soft sediment 0.01 m2 core sampling. Bottom right: Hard
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:470:PSD analysis of separate sediment samples was undertaken by in-house laboratory technicians at OEL’s
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:470:Frozen sediment samples were first transferred to a drying oven and thawed at 80°C for at least six hours. A
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:470:each sieve size. PSD statistics and sediment classifications were then generated from the absolute percentages
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:470:of the sediment retained on each sieve using Gradistat v8.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:470:When the % contribution of fines (<0.063) was >5 %, the <1 mm fraction of sediment was re-analysed using
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:470:laser diffraction. The fine fraction residue (<1 mm sediments) was transferred to a suitable container and allowed
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:470:to settle for 24 hours before excess water was syphoned from above the sediment surface. The fine fraction was
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:470:sediments, ultrasound was used to agitate particles and prevent aggregation of fines.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:470:the whole sample. Once the data was merged, PSD statistics and sediment classifications were generated from
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:470:the percentages of the sediment determined for each sediment fraction using the Gradistat v8 software.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:470:Sediment descriptions were defined by their size class based on the Wentworth classification system (Wentworth
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:470:1922) (Table 3). Statistics such as mean and median grain size, sorting coefficient, skewness and bulk sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:471:Table 3. Classification used for defining sediment type based on the Wentworth Classification System (Wentworth 1922)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:471: Wentworth Scale (mm) Phi units (φ) Sediment Types
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:471:sediment and fixative. The low-density fauna were then separated by elutriation with fresh water, poured over a
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:471:0.5 mm mesh sieve, transferred into a Nalgene, and preserved in 70 % IDA. The remaining sediment from each
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:474:3.1. Sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:474:In total, 44 sediment samples were analysed for full particle size classification. Sediment type is mapped in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:474:3.1.1. Sediment Type
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:474:Sediment types, as classified using the Folk triangle (Folk 1954), for each of the stations sampled across the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:474:survey area in 2019 are presented in Figure 3. A variety of sediment types were present across the survey area
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:474:abundant sediment types present. Mud was present within the Tees at the inshore locations, around the QEII
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:474:3.1.2. Sediment Composition
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:474:and Tees Bay C areas. The single intertidal core was characterised by very coarse sediment.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:474:3.1.3. Sediment Groups
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:474:stations according to their sediment characteristics using the SIMPROF routine. The SIMPROF test resulted in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:474:twelve sediment groups (and many outliers) which highlighted the fine-scale differences in the sediment types
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:474:distance of 6 was used to categorise the stations into four separate sediment groups across the area with two
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:474:3.1.4. Sediment Biotopes
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:474:‘Abra alba and Nucula nitidosa in circalittoral muddy sand or slightly mixed sediment’. Mixed sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:474:dominated disposal site C that was classified as EUNIS biotope A5.44 ‘Circalittoral mixed sediments’ as the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:475:Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations were unable to be classified
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:475:Plate 3. Grab samples collected during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019. Top left: mud (M,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:475:representative of sediment group A). Top right: sandy mud (sM, representative of sediment group B). Bottom left: muddy
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:475:sand (mS, representative of sediment group C). Bottom Right: muddy sandy gravel (msG, representative of sediment group
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:476:Figure 3. Comparison of Folk (Folk 1954) sediment types as determined from PSD analysis of samples acquired during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:477:Figure 4. Mean (±SE) percentage contribution of mud, sand, and gravel of samples collected during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:478:Figure 5. Non-metric MDS ordination plot of sediment groups conducted on station averaged Euclidean distance resemblance PSD data.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:479:Figure 6. Distribution of sediment groups conducted on station averaged Euclidean distance resemblance PSD data.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:480:Figure 7. Distribution of biotopes determined from PSD and macrobenthic analysis of samples acquired during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:481:The macrobenthic assemblages of sediments constituted 292 taxa recorded with a mean (± SE) of 38.78 ± 2.57
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:481:Table 5. Summary of macrobenthic abundance and diversity of sediments sampled during the NGCT sediment and marine
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:486: sampled during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019. © Ocean Ecology Ltd.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:487:fauna sampled during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:488:Figure 13. Percentage contributions of the top 10 epibenthic taxa to total abundance (A) and occurrence (B) from epifaunal trawls collected during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:492:some areas, coarse sediment beaches occurred on the lower to mid shore (A2.12 – Estuarine coarse sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:492:Table 6. Key biotopes recorded in the Phase I intertidal survey during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey 2019.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:492: A2 - Littoral Sediment A2.12 Estuarine coarse sediment shores
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:495:(PDT) to conduct a subtidal and intertidal sediment and marine ecology survey for the proposed Northern
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:495:analysis were to establish a baseline for the marine sediments present and the associated macrobenthic and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:495:4.2. Sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:495:Muddy sediments dominated the inner areas of the Tees Estuary. This was also observed in previous studies
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:495:where sandy mud and slightly gravelly sandy mud dominated the sediment groups present (Fugro 2014). This
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:495:implies that the sediments are relatively stable within the inner areas of the estuary which is indicative of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:495:This is likely linked to increased hydrodynamic energy and results in sediment types that are expected to occur in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:496:with grain size (Witbaard et al. 2019). High levels of fine or suspended sediments may impact A. islandica growth
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:496:has also increased. Brittlestars can occur in very dense beds on sediments and in estuarine environments (Wolff
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:496:mid shore and red algal turf along the lower shore. Occasional areas of impoverished coarse sediment was also
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:497:Davies CAL, Tomlinson K, Stephenson T (1991) Heavy metals in river tees estuary sediments. Environ Technol
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:497:Folk R. (1954) The distribution between grain size and mineral composition in sedimentary rock nomenclature. J
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:497:Gray JS, Elliott M (2009) Ecology of Marine Sediments: from Science to Management, 2nd Editio. Oxford: Oxford
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:497:James CJ, Gibson R (1980) The distribution of the polychaete Capitella capitata (Fabricius) in dock sediments.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:498:Wentworth C. (1922) A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J Geol 30:377–392
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:500:The 2006 survey confirmed that none of the species present in sediments from the survey area are
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:500:The three groups correlated to sediment composition, indicating that the biological community
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:500:samples were generally located in sandy sediments (i.e. towards the mouth of the Tees estuary).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:500:Group A and group B were generally present in sediments with a high percentage of fine material
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:500:sediments and group B in silty sediments. Both groups (A and B) contained predominantly
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:500:species are characteristic of fine sediments, usually with some level of organic pollution and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:501:sandy, (2) silty (muddy), or (3) mixed sediments. The two QEII Berth samples were comprised of fine
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:501:sediment and fell into the 2nd group of silty or muddy sediments, indicating that the data
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:501:conformed to the structure of a typical fine sediment community, containing an unremarkable silty
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:501:sediment infaunal assemblage typical of these sediment types.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:501:similar in faunal composition to previously surveyed fine sediment within the estuary during the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:501:enriched sublittoral muddy sediments) and SS.SMU.SMuVS.CapTubi (Capitella capitata and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:501:Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment), where C. capitata dominated and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:501:sediments, usually with some level of organic pollution and associated depleted oxygen levels.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:514:has shown that suction noise dominates measured levels where the sediment is made up of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:514:with CSDs, despite the operation of a cutterhead. As the sediment to be dredged in the River
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:515:Dredger Specification Date and Sediment Source Transmission Author
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:516:Dredger Specification Date and Sediment Source Transmission Author
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:591:Table 2: Summary of Sedimentary Units Identified in Vibrocores and Boreholes for the York
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:592:broad sedimentary sequence was identified with a sediment unit of peat and estuarine alluvium identified
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:596:undisturbed buried sediments within the Tees Channel, which have the potential to preserve important
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:598:The logs revealed five broad sedimentary units. These are summarised in Table 2.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:598:Table 2: Summary of Sedimentary Units Identified in Vibrocores and Boreholes for the York Potash Harbour Facilities Assessment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:598: Sedimentary Unit Description Interpretation General Depth
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:598: fluvial sediments
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:598: Gravelly Sand and slightly silty Marine sediments/ Estuarine Up to 12m thick in boreholes,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:598: sediments)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:603: sedimentary sequence within the area of study and identify the archaeological potential of identified
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:603: sediment units; and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:603: If sedimentary units with archaeological potential are identified during Stage 2 then PD Teesport
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:603: Each selected core sample would be cleaned and recorded, noting sediment colour, type and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:619: Leave marine growth, rust, sediment or concretion intact; and
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:620: Marine growth, rust, sediment or concretion should be left intact;
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:629:and sedimentary studies undertaken as part of the EIA (see Section 6 of the EIA Report). As a result,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:632: elevated levels of sediment contamination.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:634: • Biological habitats: Capital dredging (removal of habitat/sedimentation).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:634: • Fish: Capital dredging (sediment plume).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:634: • Water quality: Capital dredging (sediment plume).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:634:To assess the effects of the proposed scheme on estuary morphology, a 3D sediment transport model has
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:634:been used to simulate dispersion, deposition and suspension of released sediment in the Tees estuary. A
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:634:current and tidal flow information to drive the sediment transport model. To model sand transport, HR
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:635:116.5ha) comprises soft subtidal sediments that exist within the current navigation channel and are,
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:635:currently outside of the existing channel comprises 3.5ha and this also consists of subtidal soft sediments.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:636:subtidal sediments are typical of sublittoral microbenthic communities (Ocean Ecology, 2019). As has
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:636:The deposition of fine sediment resuspended by the dredging process is not anticipated to impact on the
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:636:localised peak deposition of up to 1mm of sediment. Peak deposition of this order of magnitude is not
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:636:The construction phase will result in increases in the suspended sediment concentration of the water
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:636:of sediment plumes during dredging was modelled. The largest rise in peak suspended sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:637:sediment is anticipated to fall out of suspension within the immediate vicinity of the dredger, particularly in
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:637:to increases in suspended sediment concentrations, the effects are short term and will only occur during
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:637:The proposed capital dredging has the potential to disturb sediment and release sediment-bound bacteria
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:637:Tees Bay and potentially impact on compliance with the Bathing Waters Directive. However, sediment
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:637:data collected during 2006 did not indicate significant levels of bacteria within the sediments (no further
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:637:analysis into the bacterial concentrations in sediments was undertaken during 2019 as this was not
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:642: Lower sensitivity habitats present Cobbles, Gravel and Shingle (0.77ha); Intertidal soft sediments (400.13ha); rocky shore (26.93ha); subtidal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:642: rocky reef (4.13ha); subtidal soft sediments (610.31ha).
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:643: Lower sensitivity habitats present Cobbles, gravel and shingle (3.36ha), Intertidal soft sediment (845.53ha), Rocky shore (184.33ha), Subtidal
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:643: rocky reef (7170.93ha), Subtidal soft sediments (1219.64ha)
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:651: sediment disturbance or building
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:651: It disturbs sediment with ✓ Sediment sampling indicates that the sediments to be dredged do not contain levels of
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:652: Biology: fish Yes The dredging could potentially impact on migratory fish due to the sediment plume being
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:653: Biology: fish Yes The dredging could potentially impact on migratory fish due to the sediment plume being
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:657: the sediments exhibit elevated levels of contamination.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:658: Could affect water clarity, temperature, During the reclamation process, settling basins will allow suspended sediment to settle out this water body
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:658: patterns continuously for longer than a spring pass through silt traps to limit the amount of suspended sediment discharged to the river.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:659: sediment disturbance or building
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:659: It disturbs sediment with contaminants ✓ Reclamation will be undertaken using dredged material predominantly made up of granular These activities
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:659: effectively cap the contaminated sediment material located within the reclamation area.
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:667: example through sediment disturbance or
IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:667: It disturbs sediment with contaminants above ✓ N/A
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:3:8.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime 6
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:3:8.2 Marine sediment and water quality 7
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:9: • Site surveys, including a benthic ecological survey and sediment quality survey.
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:9: • Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:9: • Marine sediment and water quality.
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:10:8.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:10:To assess the effects of the proposed scheme, a 3D sediment transport model was used to simulate
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:10:dispersion, deposition and resuspension of released sediment in the Tees estuary during the construction
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:10:current and tidal flow information to drive the sediment transport model. To model sand transport, HR
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:10:Wallingford used SANDFLOW, an in-house model which predicts movement of non-cohesive sediment.
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:10:The largest rise in peak suspended sediment concentrations above background concentrations is predicted
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:10:the predicted increases in concentrations of suspended sediment above background are significantly less.
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:10:Peak deposition of sediment follows a similar pattern, resulting in much of the deposited sediment being re-
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:11:8.2 Marine sediment and water quality
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:11:Based on the findings of a sediment quality survey and the sediment plume modelling results, no significant
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:11:construction works would result in the generation of a sediment plume which would reduce water quality on
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:11:a temporary basis due to increased suspended sediment concentrations.
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:11:suspension of sediments as a result of dredging or runoff from the reclamation. In addition, the following
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:12: • Effects of sediment deposition on intertidal food resources due to capital dredging.
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:12:area of intertidal habitat and create an area of sedimentary habitat that is expected to provide a more
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:13:invertebrates found in subtidal and intertidal sediments. Intertidal habitats are a key marine habitat and
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:13:and migratory fish due to the resuspension of sediments. The adoption of the mitigation measures outlined
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:13:in Section 8.2 will control the spatial extent of the sediment plume, resulting in a residual impact of minor
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:16:Infrastructure as a result of the proposed construction works. Sediment plume modelling predicts that there
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:16:Section 8.2 (with regard to minimising sediment plume dispersion during dredging) would be implemented
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:17:Hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling predicts that in the context of the existing disposal of
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:17:There will be some short-term build-up of fine sandy sediment at the disposal site; however, this would be
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:17:suspended sediment than predicted for the NGCT alone, but with the same predicted spatial extent of the
PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:18:WFD compliance. However, the risk of disturbance to fish due to creation of a sediment plume was a
Licence Document (Marine).pdf:16:5.2.7 If dredging activities have not been completed within 3 years of the date of the last sampling (August 2019), a sediment
Licence Document (Marine).pdf:16: The sediment sampling and analysis must be completed by a laboratory validated by the MMO at least 6 weeks prior
Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:4:Table 2: Summary of Sedimentary Units Identified in Vibrocores and Boreholes for the York
Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:5:broad sedimentary sequence was identified with a sediment unit of peat and estuarine alluvium identified
Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:9:undisturbed buried sediments within the Tees Channel, which have the potential to preserve important
Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:11:The logs revealed five broad sedimentary units. These are summarised in Table 2.
Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:11:Table 2: Summary of Sedimentary Units Identified in Vibrocores and Boreholes for the York Potash Harbour Facilities Assessment
Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:11: Sedimentary Unit Description Interpretation General Depth
Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:11: fluvial sediments
Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:11: Gravelly Sand and slightly silty Marine sediments/ Estuarine Up to 12m thick in boreholes,
Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:11: sediments)
Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:16: sedimentary sequence within the area of study and identify the archaeological potential of identified
Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:16: sediment units; and
Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:16: If sedimentary units with archaeological potential are identified during Stage 2 then PD Teesport
Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:16: Each selected core sample would be cleaned and recorded, noting sediment colour, type and
Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:32: Leave marine growth, rust, sediment or concretion intact; and
Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:33: Marine growth, rust, sediment or concretion should be left intact;
Returns.pdf:3: sampling (August 2019), a sediment sampling plan request must be submitted to the
Returns.pdf:3: MMO at least 6 months prior to this date (August 2022).The sediment sampling and
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:11:The technical note addendum concludes that sediment sampling data undertaken at
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:12:create large sediment plumes, which could potentially impact the protected wreck
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:13:Sediment samples from the Tees have confirmed percentage organic matter values
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:13:sedimentary regime in respect to most recent climate change allowances. After
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:14:quality, an inadequate assessment of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime in
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:15: monitoring and suspended sediment monitoring.
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:16:Sediment and Water Quality) and Section 26 (Offshore Disposal of Dredged
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:16:sediment but concluded no significant adverse impacts. Results of sediment
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:16:sediment analysis conducted in accordance with Cefas advice under pre-application
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:16:not uncommon for the Tees due to its industrial past. Given that sediment was
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:17:Cefas noted that due to the large volumes of sediment to be disposed of at the Tees
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:18: • Hydrodynamics and sedimentary regimes
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:18: • Marine water and sediment quality
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:19: • Hydrodynamics and sedimentary regimes – Section 5.13
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:19: • Marine water and sediment quality – Section 5.6
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:19:sedimentary regime was required as the physical processes affected by climate
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:21:currently present is largely dependent on the change in nature of the sediments that
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:21:capital dredging is expected to result in the exposure of a similar sediment type to
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:22:regarding the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime in the estuary since the
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:22:suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) would have any significant impact on
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:22: • Impacts caused by increased suspended sediment during capital dredging
Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:25:sediment would be negligible. The applicant also noted that the effect of the dredging
MLA_2021_00215-Licence Document (Marine)-20.pdf:9: unconsolidated sediment which will then be disposed of
MLA_2021_00215-Licence Document (Marine)-16.pdf:10: unconsolidated sediment which will then be disposed of
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:3:Pre-application consultation was undertaken with the MMO on the sediment sampling
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:3:was had regarding the sediment analysis results and elevated levels of PAHs and heavy
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:14:sediment which will be disposed of at a licenced onshore disposal site. The hard
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:unconsolidated sediment as it contains elevated levels of contaminants. Please refer to
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:Dredging of the unconsolidated sediment will be completed in 1 to 3 weeks. Dredging
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:of the consolidated sediment will take up to 5 weeks. Both timescales are dependent
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:16:You should provide analysis of the sediment to enable a determination to be made about whether the material is
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:16:Unconsolidated sediment was sampled and tested for contaminants. Elevated levels of
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:16:Unconsolidated sediment will be disposed of at a suitably licenced onshore disposal
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:16:Consolidated sediment (clay and Mercia mudstone) will be disposed of at a licenced
MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:19:You should provide analysis of the sediment to enable a determination to be made about whether the material is
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:3:4.1 Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime 24
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:3:4.2 Water and Sediment Quality 25
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:5:Figure 7 Sediment sample stations 26
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:15:layer of silts on top of consolidated clay and Mercia mudstone. Sediment sampling has been undertaken
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:15:within the dredge footprint which indicates that the superficial sediments are not suitable for disposal
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:15:or another dredging technique with a closed bucket, will be used to minimise any potential sediment plume.
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:15:This material will be disposed at a suitably licenced site on land. Dredging of this sediment is anticipated to
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:15:Once the superficial soft sediment has been removed the underlying layers of consolidated clay and Mercia
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:22:phase. The capital dredge will involve the removal of unconsolidated sediments which are not suitable for
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:23:3.3.2 Sediment Sampling Plan and Analysis Requirements
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:23:Pre-application consultation was undertaken with the MMO on the sediment sampling and chemical analysis
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:24:A detailed description of the sediment sampling and analysis results is provided in Section 4.2. Samples
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:24:heavy metals were present in the sediment and as such the material was not suitable for offshore disposal.
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:24:Consequently, undergoing PBDE analysis on the sediment was precluded (correspondence with MMO is
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:25: • Water and sediment quality • Traffic and transport
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:25:4.1 Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:26:impact upon the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of Tees Dock or wider Tees Estuary
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:26:4.2 Water and Sediment Quality
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:26:In order to inform potential impacts to water quality during the dredging activities, sediment sampling and
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:26:sediments at approximately 2m depth. Therefore, all cores were sub-sampled at the surface (0m), mid-
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:26:An assessment of potential impacts associated with disturbance of sediment during the construction phase
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:28:Cefas guidance indicates that, in general, concentrations of contaminants within sediment which are below
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:28:sediments under consideration persistently exceed ALs, additional assessment is required. This might be
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:28:the application of additional sediment quality guidelines or undertaking more detailed water quality
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:28:modelling. In the absence of any other UK sediment guidelines Cefas ALs are considered an acceptable
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:28:The PSA results for the sediment samples indicate that the sediment within the dredge zones is mixed silt
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:29:the sediments generally marginally exceeded AL1 however some results show heavy metal concentrations
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:33:The heavy metal and PAH analysis results indicate that the unconsolidated sediment within the dredge
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:33:unconsolidated sediment within the dredge footprint has been estimated using the sediment depth (2m) and
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:33:Sediment re-suspension caused by grab-dredging can be reduced in the following ways:
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:33: • Limiting the swinging of the grab over open water, thereby reducing the time when sediment can
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:33:removal of the soft sediment is undertaken using an environmental grab (e.g. clamshell bucket or similar)
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:33:release of the sediment/water mixture when lifted through and above the water. Material would then be
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:33:The literature indicates that the suspended sediment plume induced by a clamshell bucket under estuarine
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:33:gravitational settling predominates, and a final mixing zone in which plume sediments continue to settle
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:33:sediment to be resuspended however, due to the consolidated nature of these geological features this will
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:33:Therefore, given the small overall volume of contaminated sediment to be removed, the volume of sediment
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:34:construction of the bankseat, which could cause some temporary disturbance of localised sediments.
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:34:However, the potential volume of sediment that will be disturbed is considered to be minimal in the context
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:35:claim’, construction of breakwaters and training walls. Over 80% of the intertidal sedimentary habitats of
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:35:reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment (EUNIS habitat code A5.325). This habitat is characterised by
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:35:a relatively low species richness and is found in the muddier sediments, usually with a high organic content,
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:35:‘Capitella capitata and Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment’.
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:35:dredging required to maintain the advertised dredge depth. Where sediment resettles, recruitment of the
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:36:As discussed in Section 4.2 the unconsolidated sediment within the dredge areas is not suitable for offshore
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:36:sediment during dredging activities. As discussed in Section 4.2.3, the approximate volume of
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:36:contaminated sediment within the dredge footprint is estimated to be 3,000m3, a small proportion of the total
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:36:similar), and given the small overall volume of contaminated sediment to be removed, the volume of
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:36:sediment that would be resuspended by the dredging activities would be small in scale. The literature also
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:40:As discussed in Section 4.2, unconsolidated sediments within the proposed dredge areas is not considered
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:40:minimise the volume of this sediment which could be suspended into the water column and redistributed.
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:40:The volume of contaminated sediment within the dredge footprint is approximately 3,000m3, a small
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:40:and given the small overall volume of contaminated sediment to be removed, the volume of sediment that
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:40:sediments is anticipated.
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:42:Sediment samples taken from within the capital dredge footprint for physico-chemical analysis indicate that
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:42:the unconsolidated sediment is not suitable for offshore disposal. This sediment will therefore be
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:43:undertaken by road. The unconsolidated capital dredge sediment is not suitable for offshore disposal and
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:43:archaeology present within the dredge or pontoon footprint. The soft sediment is underlain by hard Mercia
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:48:Bohlen, W. F. (1978). Factors governing the distribution of dredge-resuspended sediments. Proceedings of
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:48:CIRIA (2000) Scoping the assessment of sediment plumes from dredging. CIRIA Publication C547. London,
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:49:sediment. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:60:However, the risks will be reduced by sediment sampling and analysis for
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:67: availability • Common resuspended. Potential impacts due to suspended sediment are
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:67: tern therefore also small-scale, short-term and temporary with sediment
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:72: • Intertidal soft sediment – 4km2
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:72: • Subtidal soft sediment – 6.1km2
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:72: • Reduce sediment resuspension;
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:72: • Sediment management;
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:74: modified for the same limited resuspension of sediment, and once completed the maintenance dredge requirement will slightly maintenance
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:74: chemicals. The activity may disturb any chemicals. Sediment
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:74: Environmental Quality chemicals. However, sediment may
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:74: sediment during installation however which will accumulate
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:74: disturb sediment with disturbed will not be at levels of dredged from within Tees
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:74: Physico-chemistry water clarity, environment will take place over a sediments will take place over 1 to 3 the new berth will take
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:75: than a spring neap tidal initial percussive piling for 5 minutes place over 4 to 5 weeks, depending concentration of sediment
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:75: resuspension of sediment the deposits which are considered to be suspended during regular
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:75: water will be unaffected. significant sediment plumes due to its
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:75: The activity is located within the subtidal soft sediment habitat. The
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:76: subtidal soft sediment lower
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:76: area of the subtidal soft sediment
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:76: Biology - Fish Will the activity be in an The unconsolidated sediment No
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:76: of percussive piling per pile), sediment to be removed, the volume
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:76: intermittent (up to three piles per of sediment that would be
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:76: or spawning? concentration of sediment
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:78: • Chemistry – the activity will disturb sediment with contamination exceeding AL1.
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:78: • Reduce sediment resuspension;
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:78: • Sediment management;
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:78:The proposed scheme would cause the resuspension of sediment through the capital dredging activity
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:78:however this is anticipated to be minor as the volume of sediment is 3,000m3, small very small proportion
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:78:of the main capital dredge of 15,300m3. Dredging of this soft sediment will be completed in one to three
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:78:to the contamination present in this sediment it is proposed that a clamshell or similar dredge is used to
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:78:reduce the volume of sediment that will be suspended and it is therefore predicted that SSCs will be
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:79:Chemistry – Sediment Contamination
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:79:As discussed in Section 4.2, sediment samples taken from within the dredge footprints were found to
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:79:soft unconsolidated sediment and the material will therefore be disposed of at a suitably licenced onshore
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:79:been designed to minimise the resuspension of sediment during the dredging activity, specifically when the
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:79:indicates that the suspended sediment plume induced by a clamshell bucket under estuarine conditions is
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:79:settling predominates, and a final mixing zone in which plume sediments continue to settle governed
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:79:Therefore, given the small overall volume of contaminated sediment to be removed, the volume of sediment
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:83: of sediments. Based on the information submitted (as described above), the
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:84: materials rather than pointing to one specific sediment type.
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:84: 2.8. Surface samples should be taken from the upper layer of in-situ sediment using a
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:85: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:85: This list indicates the laboratories which have been validated to undertake sediment
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:85: 4.2. Irrespective of which validated laboratory is used to undertake sediment analysis,
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:85: (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:86: potential for changes in the quantity and quality of sediments, there may be a need
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:86: for surface sediments to be re-sampled and analysed if the project has not
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:89:sediment samples to be tested for PBDEs.
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-ZZ-NT-Z-3500-Tees Dock Ro Ro 2 - Combi Wall Update-18.pdf:3:Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime – The presence of the combi wall is not anticipated to cause a
MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-ZZ-NT-Z-3500-Tees Dock Ro Ro 2 - Combi Wall Update-18.pdf:3:Water and sediment quality – No change to the dredging methodology is proposed, therefore no change
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:3:4.1 Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime 24
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:3:4.2 Water and Sediment Quality 25
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:5:Figure 7 Sediment sample stations 26
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:15:layer of silts on top of consolidated clay and Mercia mudstone. Sediment sampling has been undertaken
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:15:within the dredge footprint which indicates that the superficial sediments are not suitable for disposal
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:15:or another dredging technique with a closed bucket, will be used to minimise any potential sediment plume.
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:15:This material will be disposed at a suitably licenced site on land. Dredging of this sediment is anticipated to
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:15:Once the superficial soft sediment has been removed the underlying layers of consolidated clay and Mercia
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:22:phase. The capital dredge will involve the removal of unconsolidated sediments which are not suitable for
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:23:3.3.2 Sediment Sampling Plan and Analysis Requirements
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:23:Pre-application consultation was undertaken with the MMO on the sediment sampling and chemical analysis
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:24:A detailed description of the sediment sampling and analysis results is provided in Section 4.2. Samples
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:24:heavy metals were present in the sediment and as such the material was not suitable for offshore disposal.
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:24:Consequently, undergoing PBDE analysis on the sediment was precluded (correspondence with MMO is
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:25: • Water and sediment quality • Traffic and transport
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:25:4.1 Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:26:impact upon the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of Tees Dock or wider Tees Estuary
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:26:4.2 Water and Sediment Quality
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:26:In order to inform potential impacts to water quality during the dredging activities, sediment sampling and
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:26:sediments at approximately 2m depth. Therefore, all cores were sub-sampled at the surface (0m), mid-
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:26:An assessment of potential impacts associated with disturbance of sediment during the construction phase
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:28:Cefas guidance indicates that, in general, concentrations of contaminants within sediment which are below
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:28:sediments under consideration persistently exceed ALs, additional assessment is required. This might be
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:28:the application of additional sediment quality guidelines or undertaking more detailed water quality
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:28:modelling. In the absence of any other UK sediment guidelines Cefas ALs are considered an acceptable
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:28:The PSA results for the sediment samples indicate that the sediment within the dredge zones is mixed silt
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:29:the sediments generally marginally exceeded AL1 however some results show heavy metal concentrations
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:33:The heavy metal and PAH analysis results indicate that the unconsolidated sediment within the dredge
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:33:unconsolidated sediment within the dredge footprint has been estimated using the sediment depth (2m) and
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:33:Sediment re-suspension caused by grab-dredging can be reduced in the following ways:
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:33: • Limiting the swinging of the grab over open water, thereby reducing the time when sediment can
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:33:removal of the soft sediment is undertaken using an environmental grab (e.g. clamshell bucket or similar)
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:33:release of the sediment/water mixture when lifted through and above the water. Material would then be
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:33:The literature indicates that the suspended sediment plume induced by a clamshell bucket under estuarine
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:33:gravitational settling predominates, and a final mixing zone in which plume sediments continue to settle
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:33:sediment to be resuspended however, due to the consolidated nature of these geological features this will
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:33:Therefore, given the small overall volume of contaminated sediment to be removed, the volume of sediment
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:34:construction of the bankseat, which could cause some temporary disturbance of localised sediments.
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:34:However, the potential volume of sediment that will be disturbed is considered to be minimal in the context
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:35:claim’, construction of breakwaters and training walls. Over 80% of the intertidal sedimentary habitats of
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:35:reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment (EUNIS habitat code A5.325). This habitat is characterised by
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:35:a relatively low species richness and is found in the muddier sediments, usually with a high organic content,
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:35:‘Capitella capitata and Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment’.
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:35:dredging required to maintain the advertised dredge depth. Where sediment resettles, recruitment of the
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:36:As discussed in Section 4.2 the unconsolidated sediment within the dredge areas is not suitable for offshore
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:36:sediment during dredging activities. As discussed in Section 4.2.3, the approximate volume of
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:36:contaminated sediment within the dredge footprint is estimated to be 3,000m3, a small proportion of the total
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:36:similar), and given the small overall volume of contaminated sediment to be removed, the volume of
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:36:sediment that would be resuspended by the dredging activities would be small in scale. The literature also
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:40:As discussed in Section 4.2, unconsolidated sediments within the proposed dredge areas is not considered
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:40:minimise the volume of this sediment which could be suspended into the water column and redistributed.
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:40:The volume of contaminated sediment within the dredge footprint is approximately 3,000m3, a small
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:40:and given the small overall volume of contaminated sediment to be removed, the volume of sediment that
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:40:sediments is anticipated.
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:42:Sediment samples taken from within the capital dredge footprint for physico-chemical analysis indicate that
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:42:the unconsolidated sediment is not suitable for offshore disposal. This sediment will therefore be
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:43:undertaken by road. The unconsolidated capital dredge sediment is not suitable for offshore disposal and
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:43:archaeology present within the dredge or pontoon footprint. The soft sediment is underlain by hard Mercia
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:48:Bohlen, W. F. (1978). Factors governing the distribution of dredge-resuspended sediments. Proceedings of
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:48:CIRIA (2000) Scoping the assessment of sediment plumes from dredging. CIRIA Publication C547. London,
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:49:sediment. In Tyler-Walters H. and Hiscock K. (eds) Marine Life Information Network: Biology and Sensitivity
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:60:However, the risks will be reduced by sediment sampling and analysis for
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:67: availability • Common resuspended. Potential impacts due to suspended sediment are
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:67: tern therefore also small-scale, short-term and temporary with sediment
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:72: • Intertidal soft sediment – 4km2
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:72: • Subtidal soft sediment – 6.1km2
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:72: • Reduce sediment resuspension;
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:72: • Sediment management;
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:74: modified for the same limited resuspension of sediment, and once completed the maintenance dredge requirement will slightly maintenance
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:74: chemicals. The activity may disturb any chemicals. Sediment
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:74: Environmental Quality chemicals. However, sediment may
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:74: sediment during installation however which will accumulate
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:74: disturb sediment with disturbed will not be at levels of dredged from within Tees
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:74: Physico-chemistry water clarity, environment will take place over a sediments will take place over 1 to 3 the new berth will take
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:75: than a spring neap tidal initial percussive piling for 5 minutes place over 4 to 5 weeks, depending concentration of sediment
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:75: resuspension of sediment the deposits which are considered to be suspended during regular
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:75: water will be unaffected. significant sediment plumes due to its
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:75: The activity is located within the subtidal soft sediment habitat. The
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:76: subtidal soft sediment lower
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:76: area of the subtidal soft sediment
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:76: Biology - Fish Will the activity be in an The unconsolidated sediment No
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:76: of percussive piling per pile), sediment to be removed, the volume
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:76: intermittent (up to three piles per of sediment that would be
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:76: or spawning? concentration of sediment
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:78: • Chemistry – the activity will disturb sediment with contamination exceeding AL1.
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:78: • Reduce sediment resuspension;
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:78: • Sediment management;
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:78:The proposed scheme would cause the resuspension of sediment through the capital dredging activity
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:78:however this is anticipated to be minor as the volume of sediment is 3,000m3, small very small proportion
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:78:of the main capital dredge of 15,300m3. Dredging of this soft sediment will be completed in one to three
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:78:to the contamination present in this sediment it is proposed that a clamshell or similar dredge is used to
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:78:reduce the volume of sediment that will be suspended and it is therefore predicted that SSCs will be
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:79:Chemistry – Sediment Contamination
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:79:As discussed in Section 4.2, sediment samples taken from within the dredge footprints were found to
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:79:soft unconsolidated sediment and the material will therefore be disposed of at a suitably licenced onshore
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:79:been designed to minimise the resuspension of sediment during the dredging activity, specifically when the
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:79:indicates that the suspended sediment plume induced by a clamshell bucket under estuarine conditions is
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:79:settling predominates, and a final mixing zone in which plume sediments continue to settle governed
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:79:Therefore, given the small overall volume of contaminated sediment to be removed, the volume of sediment
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:83: of sediments. Based on the information submitted (as described above), the
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:84: materials rather than pointing to one specific sediment type.
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:84: 2.8. Surface samples should be taken from the upper layer of in-situ sediment using a
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:85: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:85: This list indicates the laboratories which have been validated to undertake sediment
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:85: 4.2. Irrespective of which validated laboratory is used to undertake sediment analysis,
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:85: (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:86: potential for changes in the quantity and quality of sediments, there may be a need
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:86: for surface sediments to be re-sampled and analysed if the project has not
MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:89:sediment samples to be tested for PBDEs.
MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:12:You should provide analysis of the sediment to enable a determination to be made about whether the material is
MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:16:You should provide analysis of the sediment to enable a determination to be made about whether the material is
MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:You should provide analysis of the sediment to enable a determination to be made about whether the material is
MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:You should provide analysis of the sediment to enable a determination to be made about whether the material is
MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:28:You should provide analysis of the sediment to enable a determination to be made about whether the material is
502 - Waste FD MASTER.pdf:6: • Shore protection - wrong sediment type;
502 - Waste FD MASTER.pdf:6: • Beach nourishment - wrong sediment type;
502 - Waste FD MASTER.pdf:6: • Displacement infill - wrong sediment; and
501 - Water FD MASTER.pdf:6: Estuarine Ecology and the resuspension of contaminated sediments. These impacts
501 - Water FD MASTER.pdf:7: sediments and an increase in water turbidity. This is associated with the dredging
501 - Water FD MASTER.pdf:7: sediments had a relatively low solubility they were expected to quickly resettle and
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:1: SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; TERRC FACILITY
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:2:and sediment transport due to dredging required in the development of the TERRC facility in the Tees Estuary.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:2:indicate minor changes in sediment transport and sedimentation rates. Some increase in sedimentation may be
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:2:the lower parts of the channel. Suspended sediment concentrations, sediment dispersion and sedimentation
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:2:sedimentation. The model results indicate that the suspended sediment concentrations can exceed 1000 mg/l
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:2:away from the dredge. Some of the released sediments for both the backhoe and the hopper dredge are
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:2:amounts of sediment onto Seal Sands.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:2:Impact on marine life has been evaluated due to changes in hydrodynamics and sedimentation regime as a
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:2:areas and at Seals Sand has been mapped and compared with international sediment quality standards. Levels
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:2:contamination have been compared with international sediment quality standards.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:2:sediment transport; TERRC facility Sediment transport
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:3:4.1 Modelling the hydrodynamic regime and sediment transport 10
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:3:4.1.1.2 Sediment transport modelling software – SED2D 11
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:3:4.1.3 Sediment transport, model setup, calibration and verification 18
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:3:4.1.3.1 Non-cohesive sediments (sand) 18
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:3:4.1.3.2 Cohesive sediments (silt/clay) 20
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:3:4.1.4 Sediment transport due to dredging 21
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:3:5 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODELLING ………………26
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:3:5.1 Hydrodynamics and sediment regime in the Tees Estuary 26
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:3:5.1.2 Prevailing sediment regime 26
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:3:5.1.2.1 Suspended sediment 27
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:3:5.2.2 General impacts on sediment concentrations 41
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:3:5.2.2.1 Selected sediment concentrations, sand 41
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:3:5.2.2.2 Selected sediment concentrations, silt/clay 43
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:3:5.3 Conclusions – hydrodynamics and sediment transport modelling 45
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:4:10.1 Sediment transportation 73
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:4:10.3.1 Impact of changes in hydrodynamics and sediment transportation 75
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:4:Appendix A Metal concentrations in sediments
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:4:Appendix B PCB concentrations in sediments
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:4:Appendix C TBT concentrations in sediments
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:4:Appendix D PAH concentrations in sediments
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:4:Appendix E Hydrodynamic and sediment transportation modelling. Detailed impact on
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:5:hydrodynamics and sediment transport due to dredging required in the development of the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:5:The modelled results indicate minor changes in sediment transport and sedimentation rates.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:5:Some increase in sedimentation may be expected due to lower velocities and bottom shear stress
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:5:Suspended sediment concentrations, sediment dispersion and sedimentation from the suggested
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:5:dredging operations will be much larger compared to tidal driven transport and sedimentation.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:5:The model results indicate that the suspended sediment concentrations can exceed 1000 mg/l for
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:5:quickly away from the dredge. Some of the released sediments for both the backhoe and the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:5:12 weeks, as planned, can therefore introduce considerably amounts of sediment onto Seal
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:5:The levels of contamination have been compared with international sediment quality standards.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:6:assess the impact on hydrodynamics and sediment transport due to dredging required in the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:6:components. The first relates to the impact on circulation and sedimentation due to changing the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:6:column suspended sediment concentrations due to the dredging activity, which is done in co
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:6:hydrodynamic and sediment regimes, and thereby on marine life in the Tees estuary. In order to
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:6:distribution, sediment concentrations and sediment erosion and deposition rates are not
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:6:emphasized, as the Tees estuary sediment transportation processes are influenced by events like
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:6:The theoretical basis for the hydrodynamic and sediment transportation models and the cohesive
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:6:sediments in particular, are known to be simplifications of natural processes. This imposes some
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:6:and deposition of cohesive sediments like clay and silt are unstable, as are the natural processes
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:6:proposed developments rather than the absolute values of sediment erosion and accretion.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:11:Table 3-1 Calculated volumes of dredged sediments.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:12:The hydrodynamic and sediment transport model are assumed to be driven by tidal processes.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:12:when absolute values of sedimentation are considered, other factors like floods, storms and
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:12:dredging will have a great impact on the sediment transport and distribution. It is unrealistic to
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:12:sedimentation. This is justified by the hydrodynamic modelling results, which indicate minor
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:12:changes to the hydrodynamic regime and sediment transport in the area for the different
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:12:modelled scenarios. However, some more sedimentation might be expected due to lower
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:13:differences of siltation rates are estimated from the sediment transportation model. The following
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:14:sediment transportation regime, with subsequent impact on marine life, stemming from the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:14:In order to capture these general impacts, the basic hydrodynamic and sediment processes are
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:14:hydrodynamic and sediment processes. The sediment transportation in particular is influenced by
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:14:wave action and storm events. It is found that predicted sediment concentrations and
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:14:4.1 Modelling the hydrodynamic regime and sediment transport
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:15:4.1.1.2 Sediment transport modelling software – SED2D
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:15:The SED2D is a generalized finite element computer model for vertically averaged sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:15:transport in open channels flow /11/. It is the sediment transport companion for the RMA2
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:15:the sediment is mobilized when energy forces exceed critical shear stress, and sediment is
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:15:When modelling erosion and deposition of non-cohesive sediments (sand) the model assumes a
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:15:For modelling of cohesive sediments (silt, clay), up to ten layers can be defined and clay layers
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:15:SSFATE is a versatile suspended sediment computer modelling system based on the concept of
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:15:Lagrangian sediment particles. SSFATE contains many features. For example, ambient currents,
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:15:series plots of suspended sediment concentrations, and the spatial distribution of sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:16:specification of the sediment source strength and vertical distribution.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:16:conditions will affect results, especially regarding sediment concentration and deposition.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:21:the estuary. The subsequent sedimentation rates from this representative 14-day period can be
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:21:extrapolated to calculate annual sedimentation rates.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:22:4.1.3 Sediment transport, model setup, calibration and verification
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:22:The SED2D sediment transport model is based on the hydrodynamic input computed by RMA2.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:22:(silt/clay) setup. In both cases (sand and clay/silt) calculated values of sediment concentration
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:22:the area, and data and description on the grain size distribution of the sediment. A number of
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:22:modelling non-cohesive sediments. A number of models based upon various theoretical
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:22:4.1.3.1 Non-cohesive sediments (sand)
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:22:density and settling velocity. A grain size of 0.2 mm was used for the non-cohesive sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:22:fractions present in most of the Tees Estuary, coarser sediments are probably not widely present.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:23:The fact that the model is run with only one effective grain size for non-cohesive sediments is
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:23:transportation of such sediments is limited, when excluding waves, storms and vessel traffic.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:23:where it is found that re-suspension of sediments “does not take place in the Tees to any great
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:23:made that the uppermost 0-50 mm of the sediment in Seaton Channel consists of 92 % silt/clay
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:23:0.5 mg/l (average) in Seaton Channel. If one assumes that the suspended sediment grain size
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:23:distribution “mirrors” the sediment distribution, and based on a median suspended sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:23:distribution in the sediment which is quite close to the fraction in the sediment.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:23:sediment concentrations and transportation as seen in /2/ and /3/ was reached.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:23:steep gradients in sediment concentrations in the numerical model. The value chosen for the sand
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:23:Concentrations at the seawards boundary are artificially high to make sure enough sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:24:Table 4-5 SED2D Input parameters for non-cohesive sediments (sand)
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:24:4.1.3.2 Cohesive sediments (silt/clay)
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:24:Dependent on the shear stress exercised by currents on the sea bed, sediments deposit, erode or
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:24:sediment roughness defined as Manning’s n.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:24: Sediments erode in layers
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:24: Sediments are eroded from bed
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:24: Sediments in water column are kept
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:24: Sediments in water column settle
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:24:Figure 4-6 Cohesive sediment erosion/deposition dependent on shear stress
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:25:4.1.4 Sediment transport due to dredging
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:25:To determine suspended sediment plumes resulting from the dredging activities, a numerical
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:26:sediment released by the dredging activity is simulated using particles, which are transported on
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:27:The next step in the application of SSFATE was the representation of the sediment sources
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:27:Specification of the sediment source strength is an important part in the application of SSFATE.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:27:Based on sediment samples provided by DNV, it was assumed that 92% of the dredged material
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:27:about 20% of the sediments in the Tees Estuary is clay, Therefore, the final grain size
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:27:3% of the sediment dredged by the hopper dredge would be released into the water column over
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:28:Allen Teeter of CHT led to assuming that the bulk density of the sediments being dredged with a
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:28:represent the new bathymetry (depth change) and the hydrodynamics and sediment transport
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:29: - Modelling erosion (resuspension), particle transport and sedimentation;
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:29: - A qualitative description on possible impact on ecological habitats due to sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:29: erosion, sediment transport and sedimentation. This part will focus on the most relevant
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:29: (erosion, particle transport and sedimentation) will give a picture of the dispersion and
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:29: sedimentation of contaminants in the estuary and channels. We have not included in this
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:29: - The current sedimentation regime may affect the vessel movements in the estuary with
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:29: - The modelling shall also consider the suspended sediment concentrations in light of the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:29:Impact on marine life has been evaluated due to changes in hydrodynamics and sedimentation
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:29:international sediment quality standards. Levels have been mapped for several metals (Ar, Cd,
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:30:compared with international sediment quality standards.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:30:5 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODELLING
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:30:5.1 Hydrodynamics and sediment regime in the Tees Estuary
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:30:comes to sediment transportation, especially as the bulk of the sediments are found to originate
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:30:In general, alluvial estuaries which are “in regime” i.e. the sediment budget is balanced and they
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:30:estuary are in general well below this figure, creating deposition of sediments. These low
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:30:Sediments will deposit in the channels until the velocities increase enough to achieve a balanced
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:30:sediment budget. As the velocities are low, sediments are less likely to be carried upstream to the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:30:5.1.2 Prevailing sediment regime
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:30:The main bulk of sediments originate from the seaward boundary /2/. Maintenance dredging of
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:30:the Tees Estuary currently yields some 700,000 tonnes per year. The sediments are found to be
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:30:silt/clay, but are in general sandy rather than muddy. The sediments at the seawards end of
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:30:transported further into the estuary. Most of the sediment is transported by rising tides at times of
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:Previous studies /2/ shows that most sediment are carried into the estuary from the Tees bay
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:from North Gare Sands on rising tides during storm events. 80 % of the sediment moves into the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:Within the last 10 years a decrease in the rate of sediment deposition has been noticed for the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:patterns influencing the suspension of sediments in the Tees bay, from decreased maintenance
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:dredging resulting in less suspended sediment, or from a combination of these possibilities.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:5.1.2.1 Suspended sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:Suspended sediment is of high importance in the Tees estuary as little re-suspension of settled
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:sediments occurs /2/. Carriage in suspension is thus the main pathway where sediments may
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:spread to new locations, controlling erosion and sedimentation zones in the area and transport
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:adsorbed/entrained pollutants. Data on suspended sediment cover 26 sampling points as shown
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:in Figure 5-1. Median suspended sediment concentrations in the period 2003-2004 are shown in
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:Figure 5-2 and Figure 5-3. The data show rather large variations in the suspended sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:traffic will have a great influence on the suspended sediment concentration due to erosion by
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:impact. Such events may be the most controlling factors regarding the sediment regime (erosion,
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:Another important source of sediment re-distribution is the continuous dredging operations
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:which have increased the concentrations of suspended sediments, affecting the sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:distribution in the estuary /2/. Both development and maintenance dredging create sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:fractions of sediments up- and downstream at great lengths from the dredging area.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:31:sediment varied from 4.5 mg/l at sampling point 1029 to 57 mg/l at sampling point 1347. There
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:32:Figure 5-1 Sampling locations for suspended sediment. Data from EA
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:33:dredging, as the near bed velocities are generally too low to erode deposited sediment. This
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:33:means that deposited sediment will tend to stay where it falls out of suspension unless the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:33:sediment is disturbed some other way (dredging, shipping). Suspended sediments concentrations
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:33:University of Durham /1/ is focused on the erosion and sedimentation regime on Seal Sands, and
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:33:lists some controlling factors regarding suspended sediment and sediment transport. See also
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:33: - Less fluvial sourced sediment is reaching the intertidal zone because settling
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:33: behind the Barrage and conversely estuarine and marine sediment is unable to
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:33: Median suspended sediment (mg/l)
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:33:Figure 5-2 Suspended sediment concentrations mg/l (medians)
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:34: Median suspended sediment (mg/l)
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:34:Figure 5-3 Suspended sediment sampling (medians)
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:35:Wallingford /2/. At the furthest point upriver the sediment is mainly sand. In midst estuary it is a
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:35:high proportion of silt, whilst in the entrance channel the sediment is again mainly sand. The
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:36:sediment regime as follows:
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:38:Adjustments may be considered especially with regards to roughness of the sediment type which
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:38:for the sediment type at the planned dredging depth so the calculations have been based on data
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:38:covering 0-5 cm of the sediment.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:41:As explained in Section 4.1.3.2 above, sediments will erode from or deposit to the bed dependent
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:43:constricted areas of Tees channel. Erosion of fine sediments may be the case here.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:43:small, indicating no great change in sediment regime. However, some local changes occur. The
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:45:5.2.2 General impacts on sediment concentrations
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:45:The general impact of the proposed developments of the TERRC site on sediment concentrations
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:45:The main sediment source is the sea, both for cohesive sediments and for non-cohesive
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:45:sediments, as can be seen in Figure 5-16, Figure 5-17, Figure 5-20 and Figure 5-21. A generally
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:45:5.2.2.1 Selected sediment concentrations, sand
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:45:The suspended sediment concentration of sand (at T=210) along Seaton Channel, through Tees
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:45:Figure 5-16 Sediment concentration (mg/l) profile, sand, from upstream Seaton Channel to
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:46:Figure 5-17 Corresponding plot of sediment concentrations (mg/l) for sand, scenario 8, T =
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:47:5.2.2.2 Selected sediment concentrations, silt/clay
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:47:The suspended sediment concentration of silt/clay (at T=210 hrs) along Seaton Channel, through
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:47:Figure 5-20 Sediment concentration (mg/l) profile, clay, from upstream Seaton Channel to
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:48:Figure 5-21 Corresponding plot of sediment concentrations for clay, scenario 8, T = 199
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:49:Detailed impacts on hydrodynamics, sediment concentrations, and deposition rates / erosion
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:49:5.3 Conclusions – hydrodynamics and sediment transport modelling
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:50: Processes sediment load
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:50: Impacts – sediment Clay erosion Sand carried
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:50: Impacts – sediment Clay Sand
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:50:Figure 5-24 Dynamics of hydrodynamic and sediment transportation model
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:50:constant river flow, applying a constant sediment concentration. Other processes contributing to
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:50:water flow and sediment suspension such as storms, waves, traffic and dredging will produce a
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:51:carriage of sand upstream is small. This is also reflected in the true sediment found further up
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:51:suspends sediments that are transported to other areas. Throughout the scenarios the shear stress
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:51:decreases, also decreasing the concentration of clay sediments in the water column. Less clay is
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:53:reasons for the decline in numbers of feeding birds at Seal Sands. Changes in sedimentation
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:53:detrimental effects on feeding capacity, with the numbers of sediment feeders such as Shelduck
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:53:being gradually deepened. A computer model showed that the river contributed little sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:53:relative to contributions from the Tees bay. Most of the sediments are of marine origin, coming
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:53:Most sediment originates from North Gare Sands on rising tides during storm events. 80 % of the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:53:sediment moves into the estuary during 7 months from October to April, with 60 % of transport
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:53:expected long term sediment deposition decrease of 10 %. The Barrage was not expected to have
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:53:Sedimentation rates are reported to have decreased in the last 10 years, with a shift towards less
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:54:breakwater. Sediment deposits at the edge of the Seaton turning area are reported to collapse into
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:54:may be alleviated by deepening Seaton Channel to create a sediment trap.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:54:wave erosion. Algal mats established and have spread lately, further stabilising the sediments.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:54: Channel, creating a sediment trap.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:55:A study of the sediment dynamics in the lower Tees was commissioned by the Environment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:55:for trade effluent and sewage discharges into the estuary. Sediment dynamics between June 2003
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:55:Based upon repeat sampling of the upper 2 cm of intertidal sediments on 70 sites on Seal Sands
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:55:evidently been accreting sediments since the 1970’s. Predictions from HR Wallingford from
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:55:1966 regarding sedimentation rates and characteristics have come true. Since 1992 sampling
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:55:shows a trend towards finer sediments, possibly from dredging operations. This is somewhat in
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:55:could cause sediment fractions to become finer).
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:55:Six sediment cores were analysed to reconstruct the sediment history of Seal Sands. Sedimentary
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:55:cores showed net accretion since the beginning of the 20th century. Some showed sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:55:and firmer. The high abundance of epiphytic diatoms in sediments predating 1950 showed that
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:55:today. Fine grain sediments buried beneath the surface on Seal Sands contain significant
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:56:The Environment Agency /7/ supplied further base data regarding bathymetry, currents, sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:56:distribution and quality, suspended sediment, temperature, salinity, tidal elevation and water
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:57:SSFATE provides several type of output. These include animations of suspended sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:57:concentrations and particle movements for each individual sediment fraction as well as for all
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:57:picture of the suspended sediment plume showing the maximum concentrations computed
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:57:anywhere in the water column during the simulation for all sediment fractions taken together. As
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:57:Figure 7-1 shows the maximum sediment concentrations in the plume resulting from dredging at
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:57:in this area, the plume is of limited extent. It can be seen that maximum total suspended sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:57:the dredge. Figure 7-2 shows the bottom deposition of the released sediments as a mass per unit
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:58:Figure 7-1 Maximum total suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l) for backhoe at
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:59:Figure 7-3 Maximum total suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l) for backhoe at
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:59:deposition. For dredging during a spring tide, Figure 7-7 displays the suspended sediment plume
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:60:Figure 7-5 Backhoe dredging, Location #2, neap tide, max sediment concentrations mg/l.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:60:Figure 7-6 Backhoe dredging, Location #2, neap tide, sediment deposition g/m2 after 2 days
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:60:Figure 7-7 Backhoe dredging, Location #2, spring tide, max sediment concentrations mg/l.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:61:Figure 7-8 Backhoe dredging, Location #2, spring tide, sediment deposition g/m2 after 2
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:61:Figure 7-9 Backhoe dredging, Area 2, neap tide, max sediment concentrations mg/l
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:62:Figure 7-10 Backhoe dredging, Area 2, neap tide, sediment deposition g/m2 after 2 days of
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:62:Figure 7-11 Backhoe dredging, Area 2, spring tide, max sediment concentrations mg/l.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:63:Figure 7-12 Backhoe dredging, Area 2, spring tide, sediment deposition g/m2 after 2 days
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:63:Figure 7-13 Backhoe dredging, Area 3, neap tide, max sediment concentrations mg/l.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:64:Figure 7-14 Backhoe dredging, Area 3, neap tide, sediment deposition g/m2 after 2 days of
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:64:Figure 7-15 Backhoe dredging, Area 3, spring tide, max sediment concentrations mg/l.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:65:Figure 7-16 Backhoe dredging, Area 3, spring tide, sediment deposition g/m2 after 2 days
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:65:Figure 7-17 and Figure 7-19 show the maximum concentration of suspended sediment plumes
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:65:dredging line. The spring tide suspended sediment plume extents all the way to the boundary of
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:65:Figure 7-17 Hopper dredging, neap tide, max sediment concentrations mg/l
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:66:Figure 7-18 Hopper dredging, neap tide, sediment deposition g/m2 after 2 days of dredging.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:66:Figure 7-19 Hopper dredging, spring tide, max sediment concentrations mg/l
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:67:Figure 7-20 Hopper dredging, spring tide, sediment deposition g/m2 after 2 days of
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:67:interaction doesn’t significantly increase the maximum concentrations of the suspended sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:69:close contact with the sediment, in and on which many pollutants accumulate (heavy metals,
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:70:nematode species have dominated the communities present in the Seaton Channel sediments.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:71:the sediments and increase in coverage of green algae, especially Enteromorpha over parts of
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:72:ISQG Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines according to the Canadian
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:72:compared with international sediment quality standards. Levels have been mapped for several
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:72:The sediment quality standards that have been used for metals, PCBs, PAHs and TBT are
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:73:(NC) for metals in sediments (/20/). Values are given in mg/kg in standard sediments (10%
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:73:(NC) for PCBs in sediments (/23/).
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:74:Table 8-4 Probable Effect Level (PEL) and Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines ( ISQG)
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:74:for PAHs in sediments according to the Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (/21/).
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:74:given in µg/kg dry weight (sediments with 1% organic carbon).
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:75:The sedimentation rate in Seaton Channel, the holding basin and the dry dock may rise when the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:75:any erosion. It is also possible that finer sediments settle upstream, and Seaton Channel may act
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:77:10.1 Sediment transportation
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:77:The hydrodynamic and sediment transportation processes predicted by the computer model has
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:77: Processes sediment load
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:77: Erosion Sedimentation
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:77: Impacts – sediment Clay erosion Sand carried
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:77: Impacts – sediment Clay Sand Higher deposition rates
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:77:The hydrodynamic and sediment transportation processes predicted by the computer model has
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:78:erosion, and increase the potential for sedimentation. Although little or no clay sediments are
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:78:sedimentation will change. Even if no sediment is present in the water column, the potential for
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:78:deposition increases with decreasing shear stress. This increase in sedimentation potential is not
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:78:sediment available in the water column for deposition.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:78:See Figure 10-1 when considering other natural sediment sources and processes in the estuary,
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:78:the sedimentation pattern may change. Suspended sediment is in reality not only introduced by
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:78:sedimentation patterns, traffic and dredging. Dredging operations, as modelled in Section 7
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:78:above, produce far higher concentrations of suspended sediment that, dependent on the tidal
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:78:“continuous operation” /2/, so higher concentrations of suspended sediment may be expected
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:78:As the sedimentation potential increases, the suspended sediments not considered in the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:78:higher sedimentation rate.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:78:The sediment “fractions” may also change from sand to finer sand, silt and clay. The boundary
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:78:Greatham Creek form a semi-closed hydrodynamics and sediment “sub-cell” within the Tees
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:78:enclose the bay and all water and sediment interchange has to come through a relatively narrow
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:78:channel. Seaton Channel and Seal Sands receive sediments largely from North Gare Sands and
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:78:It is seen that the hydrodynamic characteristics and corresponding sediment transportation
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:79:It is believed that for the assumptions made concerning the sediment source strengths and grain
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:79:size fractions SSFATE computations realistically represent suspended sediment plumes that will
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:79:total suspended sediment concentrations can exceed 1000 mg/l for the backhoe dredge, but are
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:79:The size of the sediment plumes are significantly larger when dredging during a spring tide
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:79:suspended sediment plumes when the backhoe is operating in Area #1. However, some
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:79:Some of the released sediments for both the backhoe and the hopper dredge are transported into
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:79:the shallow areas south of the Seaton Channel. There is very limited intrusion of sediments into
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:79:tide, suspended sediments can be transported out to the sea as a result of the hopper dredge
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:79:10.3.1 Impact of changes in hydrodynamics and sediment transportation
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:79:sedimentation increases in this area. Outward the bounds of Seaton Channel the hydrodynamics
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:79:and sediment transportation regime are not significantly changed.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:79:This means a total reduction in average sediment concentration and annual deposition rates, but
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:79:also a proportionate increase in the percent of sand and larger fractions in the total sediment load.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:79:and dredging contribute to the sediment load in the water column and thereby the annual
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:79:deposition rates of both clay and sand. Looking at the contribution to the sediment load in the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:79:the sediment loads generated from the natural processes that were modelled. As the heavier
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80:contributing to the increased sediment loads over the largest areas. Dredging is taking place
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80:very difficult to conclude on the effects of changes in sediment load and deposition rates due to
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80:the modelled changes in hydrodynamics. But in general changes in sediment concentrations and
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80:deposition rates may have positive effects by slowing down the accretion of sediments on Seal
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80:Based on the reduced potential for erosion and an increased potential for sedimentation,
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80:especially in the outer parts of Seaton Channel, it is possible that the sediment trapping
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80:sediment trapping efficiency in this area will increase for the larger fractions as sand due to the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80:sedimentation regime at Seal Sands, as bird feeding conditions on Seal Sands have been
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80:Maximum concentration of sediments in the water column within the bounds of Seaton Channel
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80:predicted by the modelling of the hydrodynamics was 22 mg/l. The average sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80:within the bounds of Seaton Channel. The dredging operations are modelled to yield sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80:sedimentation regime and the sediment load in the water column within the bounds of Seaton
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80:but mainly on the north side of the channel. Areas affected by sediment concentrations above 50
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80:of Seal Sands and parts of Tees river. In large areas of Seaton Channel the sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80:concentrations up to 100 mg/l in the water column, but in general the sediment concentrations
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80:simultaneously, there will be little interaction of the suspended sediment plumes when the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:80:interaction doesn’t significantly increase the maximum concentrations of the suspended sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:81:concentrations of sediments in the water column during the dredging operations may cause
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:81:Common Seal and Grey Seal are not believed to be directly affected by the increase in sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:81:area. The area affected by the increased sediment concentrations is in general limited to Seaton
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:81:indirectly affected by the increased sediment concentrations. Effects of noise and visual
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:81:Dredging area 4 and 5 with the hopper dredge will lead to a significant increase in sediment load
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:81:are settling out quickly, the sediments load affecting Seal sands will mainly be finer sediments as
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:81:4200 g/m2. Only the lighter fractions of the sediments are anticipated to deposit on Seal Sands.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:81:sediments on Seal sands, possibly from dredging operations. Dredging operations in general
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:81:the fauna in areas of high sedimentation due to the dredging operations are disturbed,
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:81:rates are high, the fauna will most probably be buried by the depositing sediments. Further away
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:81:all dredging areas (bulk samples), generally from the surface down to 1 m sediment depth. Five
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:81:meters down in the sediments the level of contamination is below the risk limit for effects on the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:82:sediments. Further down (0.5 m and 1 m) the level only exceeded the risk limit by a factor of
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:82:generally high in Seaton Channel and Seal Sands sediments. The dredging operations will
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:82:contribute to the spreading of PAH contaminated sediments that have concentrations that exceed
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:82:the ecosystem risk limit. Data on sediment concentration of organics are however sparse, and
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:82:nothing is known about the concentration of organics in the areas the sediment will be
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:83:/1/ Donoghue, Zong, Dunford, Watt: “An investigation of the sediment budget, the fate of
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:83: contaminants, and dating sediment contamination in the Teesmouth and Cleveland
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:83:/2/ Burt et al: “Teesmouth Sediment Study”. Report EX 4514, HR Wallingford 2002.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:83:/7/ Diana Orr, Clare Buckler, Environment Agency: Assorted bathymetry, sediment,
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:83: of sediment resuspension characteristics of selected dredges,” Technical Report HL-89-
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:84:/23/ Breedveld, G.D. and Bakke, T. 2004. Risk assessment of contaminated sediments. The
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:84: sediments. Geochemica et Cosmochimica Acta 57; 3041-3061.
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:85: METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN SEDIMENTS
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:86:Concentrations of arsenic (mg/kg dry weight) in sediments on Seal Sand and in Seaton
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:87:Concentrations of Zink (mg/kg dry weight) in sediments on Seal Sand and in Seaton
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:88:Concentrations of Cadmium (mg/kg dry weight) in sediments on Seal Sand and in Seaton
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:89:Concentrations of Copper (mg/kg dry weight) in sediments on Seal Sand and in Seaton
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:90:Concentrations of Iron (mg/kg dry weight) in sediments on Seal Sand and in Seaton
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:91:Concentrations of Mercury (mg/kg dry weight) in sediments on Seal Sand and in Seaton
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:92:Concentrations of Nickel (mg/kg dry weight) in sediments on Seal Sand and in Seaton
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:93:Concentrations of Lead (mg/kg dry weight) in sediments on Seal Sand and in Seaton
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:94: PCB CONCENTRATIONS IN SEDIMENTS
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:95: Location and sediment depth
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:95:Concentration of CB#105 (µg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:95: Location and sediment depth
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:95:Concentration of CB#118 (µg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:96: Location and sediment depth
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:96:Concentration of CB#153 (µg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:96: Location and sediment depth
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:96:Concentration of CB#156 (µg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:97: Location and sediment depth
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:97:in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality thresholds for the mixture of planar congeners
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:98: TBT CONCENTRATIONS IN SEDIMENTS
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:99:Concentration of TBT (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:99: Location in dredging area 4; Seaton Channel. Sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:100: PAH CONCENTRATIONS IN SEDIMENTS
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:101:Concentration of Acenaphene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:101:quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) and Probable
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:101:Concentration of Acenaphthylene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:101:quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) and Probable
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:102:Concentration of Anthracene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:102:quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) and Probable
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:102:Sediment quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) and
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:103:Concentration of Benzo(a)pyrene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:103:quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) and Probable
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:103:Concentration of Chrysene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:103:thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) according to the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:104:Sediment quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG)
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:104:Concentration of Fluoranthene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:104:quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) according to
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:105:Concentration of Fluorene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:105:thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) according to the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:105:Concentration of Naphthalene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:105:quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) according to
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:106:Concentration of Phenanthrene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:106:quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) according to
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:106:Concentration of Pyrene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:106:thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) according to the
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:107: HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORTATION MODELLING
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:109:As erosion of cohesive sediments occurs at this point, silt/clay deposits will not be sustained Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:109: and this type of sediment will not exist here. The negative deposition rate therefore shows the Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:110:As erosion of cohesive sediments occurs at this point, silt/clay deposits will not be sustained
Appendix 16.1a - DNV Report Rev1 2004.pdf:110: and this type of sediment will not exist here. The negative deposition rate therefore shows the
Appendix 16.1d 2006-0416 V01 - Scenario 11 hydrodynamics.pdf:4:In 2004, DNV carried out a predictive study of the effects on hydrodynamics and sediment
Appendix 16.1d 2006-0416 V01 - Scenario 11 hydrodynamics.pdf:4:owned by Able UK. The study included numerical modelling of hydrodynamics and sediment
Appendix 16.1d 2006-0416 V01 - Scenario 11 hydrodynamics.pdf:14: sediment transport; TERRC facility. DNV Report 2004-1387
Appendix 16.1d 2006-0416 V01 - Scenario 11 hydrodynamics.pdf:14:/3/ Further modelling of hydrodynamics and sediment transport from developments at the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:39: Such materials include Bilge water; Ballast water; Ballast sediments; Invasive
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:41: ballast sediment and on the hull (especially significant if vessels are in a poor
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:41: wave climate, sediment transport potential, patterns of sediment erosion and
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:42: sediment from in front of adjacent Quays 10 and 11 and the effects of any
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:42:f) Re-suspension of contaminated sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:43:a) Dredging. The disposal of potentially contaminated dredged sediments
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:43: increased disturbance to seals and birds, and contaminated sediment re-
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:43: in the sediment within and outside the dock area. This must include
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:43: sediment sampling examines deep, underlying sediment (deep coring
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:43: they play a role in burying contaminated sediment and reducing its
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:43:b) Impacts on sediments within dock. This should be examined both within
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:44: potentially contaminated sediments will need to be addressed. (Ai-vi) (Bi-v)
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:44:c) Leachate from contaminated sediments – The potential for any sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:82: C. SEDIMENT REMOVAL
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:83: Removal of Sediments from 4 weeks 50.5 50.5 49.5
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:115: Hydrodynamics and Sediment Transport; TERRC Facility
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:116: SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; TERRC FACILITY
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:117:and sediment transport due to dredging required in the development of the TERRC facility in the Tees Estuary.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:117:indicate minor changes in sediment transport and sedimentation rates. Some increase in sedimentation may be
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:117:the lower parts of the channel. Suspended sediment concentrations, sediment dispersion and sedimentation
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:117:sedimentation. The model results indicate that the suspended sediment concentrations can exceed 1000 mg/l
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:117:away from the dredge. Some of the released sediments for both the backhoe and the hopper dredge are
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:117:amounts of sediment onto Seal Sands.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:117:Impact on marine life has been evaluated due to changes in hydrodynamics and sedimentation regime as a
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:117:areas and at Seals Sand has been mapped and compared with international sediment quality standards. Levels
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:117:contamination have been compared with international sediment quality standards.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:117:sediment transport; TERRC facility Sediment transport
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:118:4.1 Modelling the hydrodynamic regime and sediment transport 10
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:118:4.1.1.2 Sediment transport modelling software – SED2D 11
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:118:4.1.3 Sediment transport, model setup, calibration and verification 18
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:118:4.1.3.1 Non-cohesive sediments (sand) 18
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:118:4.1.3.2 Cohesive sediments (silt/clay) 20
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:118:4.1.4 Sediment transport due to dredging 21
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:118:5 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODELLING ………………26
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:118:5.1 Hydrodynamics and sediment regime in the Tees Estuary 26
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:118:5.1.2 Prevailing sediment regime 26
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:118:5.1.2.1 Suspended sediment 27
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:118:5.2.2 General impacts on sediment concentrations 41
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:118:5.2.2.1 Selected sediment concentrations, sand 41
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:118:5.2.2.2 Selected sediment concentrations, silt/clay 43
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:118:5.3 Conclusions – hydrodynamics and sediment transport modelling 45
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:119:10.1 Sediment transportation 73
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:119:10.3.1 Impact of changes in hydrodynamics and sediment transportation 75
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:119:Appendix A Metal concentrations in sediments
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:119:Appendix B PCB concentrations in sediments
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:119:Appendix C TBT concentrations in sediments
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:119:Appendix D PAH concentrations in sediments
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:119:Appendix E Hydrodynamic and sediment transportation modelling. Detailed impact on
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:120:hydrodynamics and sediment transport due to dredging required in the development of the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:120:The modelled results indicate minor changes in sediment transport and sedimentation rates.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:120:Some increase in sedimentation may be expected due to lower velocities and bottom shear stress
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:120:Suspended sediment concentrations, sediment dispersion and sedimentation from the suggested
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:120:dredging operations will be much larger compared to tidal driven transport and sedimentation.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:120:The model results indicate that the suspended sediment concentrations can exceed 1000 mg/l for
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:120:quickly away from the dredge. Some of the released sediments for both the backhoe and the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:120:12 weeks, as planned, can therefore introduce considerably amounts of sediment onto Seal
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:120:The levels of contamination have been compared with international sediment quality standards.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:121:assess the impact on hydrodynamics and sediment transport due to dredging required in the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:121:components. The first relates to the impact on circulation and sedimentation due to changing the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:121:column suspended sediment concentrations due to the dredging activity, which is done in co
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:121:hydrodynamic and sediment regimes, and thereby on marine life in the Tees estuary. In order to
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:121:distribution, sediment concentrations and sediment erosion and deposition rates are not
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:121:emphasized, as the Tees estuary sediment transportation processes are influenced by events like
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:121:The theoretical basis for the hydrodynamic and sediment transportation models and the cohesive
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:121:sediments in particular, are known to be simplifications of natural processes. This imposes some
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:121:and deposition of cohesive sediments like clay and silt are unstable, as are the natural processes
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:121:proposed developments rather than the absolute values of sediment erosion and accretion.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:126:Table 3-1 Calculated volumes of dredged sediments.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:127:The hydrodynamic and sediment transport model are assumed to be driven by tidal processes.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:127:when absolute values of sedimentation are considered, other factors like floods, storms and
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:127:dredging will have a great impact on the sediment transport and distribution. It is unrealistic to
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:127:sedimentation. This is justified by the hydrodynamic modelling results, which indicate minor
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:127:changes to the hydrodynamic regime and sediment transport in the area for the different
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:127:modelled scenarios. However, some more sedimentation might be expected due to lower
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:128:differences of siltation rates are estimated from the sediment transportation model. The following
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:129:sediment transportation regime, with subsequent impact on marine life, stemming from the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:129:In order to capture these general impacts, the basic hydrodynamic and sediment processes are
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:129:hydrodynamic and sediment processes. The sediment transportation in particular is influenced by
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:129:wave action and storm events. It is found that predicted sediment concentrations and
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:129:4.1 Modelling the hydrodynamic regime and sediment transport
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:130:4.1.1.2 Sediment transport modelling software – SED2D
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:130:The SED2D is a generalized finite element computer model for vertically averaged sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:130:transport in open channels flow /11/. It is the sediment transport companion for the RMA2
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:130:the sediment is mobilized when energy forces exceed critical shear stress, and sediment is
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:130:When modelling erosion and deposition of non-cohesive sediments (sand) the model assumes a
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:130:For modelling of cohesive sediments (silt, clay), up to ten layers can be defined and clay layers
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:130:SSFATE is a versatile suspended sediment computer modelling system based on the concept of
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:130:Lagrangian sediment particles. SSFATE contains many features. For example, ambient currents,
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:130:series plots of suspended sediment concentrations, and the spatial distribution of sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:131:specification of the sediment source strength and vertical distribution.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:131:conditions will affect results, especially regarding sediment concentration and deposition.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:136:the estuary. The subsequent sedimentation rates from this representative 14-day period can be
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:136:extrapolated to calculate annual sedimentation rates.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:137:4.1.3 Sediment transport, model setup, calibration and verification
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:137:The SED2D sediment transport model is based on the hydrodynamic input computed by RMA2.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:137:(silt/clay) setup. In both cases (sand and clay/silt) calculated values of sediment concentration
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:137:the area, and data and description on the grain size distribution of the sediment. A number of
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:137:modelling non-cohesive sediments. A number of models based upon various theoretical
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:137:4.1.3.1 Non-cohesive sediments (sand)
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:137:density and settling velocity. A grain size of 0.2 mm was used for the non-cohesive sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:137:fractions present in most of the Tees Estuary, coarser sediments are probably not widely present.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:138:The fact that the model is run with only one effective grain size for non-cohesive sediments is
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:138:transportation of such sediments is limited, when excluding waves, storms and vessel traffic.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:138:where it is found that re-suspension of sediments “does not take place in the Tees to any great
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:138:made that the uppermost 0-50 mm of the sediment in Seaton Channel consists of 92 % silt/clay
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:138:0.5 mg/l (average) in Seaton Channel. If one assumes that the suspended sediment grain size
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:138:distribution “mirrors” the sediment distribution, and based on a median suspended sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:138:distribution in the sediment which is quite close to the fraction in the sediment.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:138:sediment concentrations and transportation as seen in /2/ and /3/ was reached.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:138:steep gradients in sediment concentrations in the numerical model. The value chosen for the sand
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:138:Concentrations at the seawards boundary are artificially high to make sure enough sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:139:Table 4-5 SED2D Input parameters for non-cohesive sediments (sand)
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:139:4.1.3.2 Cohesive sediments (silt/clay)
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:139:Dependent on the shear stress exercised by currents on the sea bed, sediments deposit, erode or
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:139:sediment roughness defined as Manning’s n.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:139: Sediments erode in layers
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:139: Sediments are eroded from bed
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:139: Sediments in water column are kept
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:139: Sediments in water column settle
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:139:Figure 4-6 Cohesive sediment erosion/deposition dependent on shear stress
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:140:4.1.4 Sediment transport due to dredging
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:140:To determine suspended sediment plumes resulting from the dredging activities, a numerical
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:141:sediment released by the dredging activity is simulated using particles, which are transported on
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:142:The next step in the application of SSFATE was the representation of the sediment sources
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:142:Specification of the sediment source strength is an important part in the application of SSFATE.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:142:Based on sediment samples provided by DNV, it was assumed that 92% of the dredged material
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:142:about 20% of the sediments in the Tees Estuary is clay, Therefore, the final grain size
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:142:3% of the sediment dredged by the hopper dredge would be released into the water column over
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:143:Allen Teeter of CHT led to assuming that the bulk density of the sediments being dredged with a
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:143:represent the new bathymetry (depth change) and the hydrodynamics and sediment transport
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:144: - Modelling erosion (resuspension), particle transport and sedimentation;
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:144: - A qualitative description on possible impact on ecological habitats due to sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:144: erosion, sediment transport and sedimentation. This part will focus on the most relevant
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:144: (erosion, particle transport and sedimentation) will give a picture of the dispersion and
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:144: sedimentation of contaminants in the estuary and channels. We have not included in this
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:144: - The current sedimentation regime may affect the vessel movements in the estuary with
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:144: - The modelling shall also consider the suspended sediment concentrations in light of the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:144:Impact on marine life has been evaluated due to changes in hydrodynamics and sedimentation
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:144:international sediment quality standards. Levels have been mapped for several metals (Ar, Cd,
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:145:compared with international sediment quality standards.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:145:5 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORT MODELLING
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:145:5.1 Hydrodynamics and sediment regime in the Tees Estuary
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:145:comes to sediment transportation, especially as the bulk of the sediments are found to originate
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:145:In general, alluvial estuaries which are “in regime” i.e. the sediment budget is balanced and they
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:145:estuary are in general well below this figure, creating deposition of sediments. These low
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:145:Sediments will deposit in the channels until the velocities increase enough to achieve a balanced
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:145:sediment budget. As the velocities are low, sediments are less likely to be carried upstream to the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:145:5.1.2 Prevailing sediment regime
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:145:The main bulk of sediments originate from the seaward boundary /2/. Maintenance dredging of
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:145:the Tees Estuary currently yields some 700,000 tonnes per year. The sediments are found to be
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:145:silt/clay, but are in general sandy rather than muddy. The sediments at the seawards end of
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:145:transported further into the estuary. Most of the sediment is transported by rising tides at times of
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:Previous studies /2/ shows that most sediment are carried into the estuary from the Tees bay
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:from North Gare Sands on rising tides during storm events. 80 % of the sediment moves into the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:Within the last 10 years a decrease in the rate of sediment deposition has been noticed for the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:patterns influencing the suspension of sediments in the Tees bay, from decreased maintenance
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:dredging resulting in less suspended sediment, or from a combination of these possibilities.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:5.1.2.1 Suspended sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:Suspended sediment is of high importance in the Tees estuary as little re-suspension of settled
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:sediments occurs /2/. Carriage in suspension is thus the main pathway where sediments may
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:spread to new locations, controlling erosion and sedimentation zones in the area and transport
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:adsorbed/entrained pollutants. Data on suspended sediment cover 26 sampling points as shown
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:in Figure 5-1. Median suspended sediment concentrations in the period 2003-2004 are shown in
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:Figure 5-2 and Figure 5-3. The data show rather large variations in the suspended sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:traffic will have a great influence on the suspended sediment concentration due to erosion by
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:impact. Such events may be the most controlling factors regarding the sediment regime (erosion,
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:Another important source of sediment re-distribution is the continuous dredging operations
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:which have increased the concentrations of suspended sediments, affecting the sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:distribution in the estuary /2/. Both development and maintenance dredging create sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:fractions of sediments up- and downstream at great lengths from the dredging area.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:146:sediment varied from 4.5 mg/l at sampling point 1029 to 57 mg/l at sampling point 1347. There
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:147:Figure 5-1 Sampling locations for suspended sediment. Data from EA
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:148:dredging, as the near bed velocities are generally too low to erode deposited sediment. This
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:148:means that deposited sediment will tend to stay where it falls out of suspension unless the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:148:sediment is disturbed some other way (dredging, shipping). Suspended sediments concentrations
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:148:University of Durham /1/ is focused on the erosion and sedimentation regime on Seal Sands, and
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:148:lists some controlling factors regarding suspended sediment and sediment transport. See also
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:148: - Less fluvial sourced sediment is reaching the intertidal zone because settling
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:148: behind the Barrage and conversely estuarine and marine sediment is unable to
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:148: Median suspended sediment (mg/l)
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:148:Figure 5-2 Suspended sediment concentrations mg/l (medians)
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:149: Median suspended sediment (mg/l)
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:149:Figure 5-3 Suspended sediment sampling (medians)
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:150:Wallingford /2/. At the furthest point upriver the sediment is mainly sand. In midst estuary it is a
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:150:high proportion of silt, whilst in the entrance channel the sediment is again mainly sand. The
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:151:sediment regime as follows:
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:153:Adjustments may be considered especially with regards to roughness of the sediment type which
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:153:for the sediment type at the planned dredging depth so the calculations have been based on data
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:153:covering 0-5 cm of the sediment.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:156:As explained in Section 4.1.3.2 above, sediments will erode from or deposit to the bed dependent
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:158:constricted areas of Tees channel. Erosion of fine sediments may be the case here.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:158:small, indicating no great change in sediment regime. However, some local changes occur. The
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:160:5.2.2 General impacts on sediment concentrations
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:160:The general impact of the proposed developments of the TERRC site on sediment concentrations
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:160:The main sediment source is the sea, both for cohesive sediments and for non-cohesive
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:160:sediments, as can be seen in Figure 5-16, Figure 5-17, Figure 5-20 and Figure 5-21. A generally
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:160:5.2.2.1 Selected sediment concentrations, sand
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:160:The suspended sediment concentration of sand (at T=210) along Seaton Channel, through Tees
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:160:Figure 5-16 Sediment concentration (mg/l) profile, sand, from upstream Seaton Channel to
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:161:Figure 5-17 Corresponding plot of sediment concentrations (mg/l) for sand, scenario 8, T =
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:162:5.2.2.2 Selected sediment concentrations, silt/clay
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:162:The suspended sediment concentration of silt/clay (at T=210 hrs) along Seaton Channel, through
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:162:Figure 5-20 Sediment concentration (mg/l) profile, clay, from upstream Seaton Channel to
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:163:Figure 5-21 Corresponding plot of sediment concentrations for clay, scenario 8, T = 199
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:164:Detailed impacts on hydrodynamics, sediment concentrations, and deposition rates / erosion
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:164:5.3 Conclusions – hydrodynamics and sediment transport modelling
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:165: Processes sediment load
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:165: Impacts – sediment Clay erosion Sand carried
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:165: Impacts – sediment Clay Sand
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:165:Figure 5-24 Dynamics of hydrodynamic and sediment transportation model
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:165:constant river flow, applying a constant sediment concentration. Other processes contributing to
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:165:water flow and sediment suspension such as storms, waves, traffic and dredging will produce a
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:166:carriage of sand upstream is small. This is also reflected in the true sediment found further up
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:166:suspends sediments that are transported to other areas. Throughout the scenarios the shear stress
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:166:decreases, also decreasing the concentration of clay sediments in the water column. Less clay is
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:168:reasons for the decline in numbers of feeding birds at Seal Sands. Changes in sedimentation
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:168:detrimental effects on feeding capacity, with the numbers of sediment feeders such as Shelduck
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:168:being gradually deepened. A computer model showed that the river contributed little sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:168:relative to contributions from the Tees bay. Most of the sediments are of marine origin, coming
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:168:Most sediment originates from North Gare Sands on rising tides during storm events. 80 % of the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:168:sediment moves into the estuary during 7 months from October to April, with 60 % of transport
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:168:expected long term sediment deposition decrease of 10 %. The Barrage was not expected to have
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:168:Sedimentation rates are reported to have decreased in the last 10 years, with a shift towards less
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:169:breakwater. Sediment deposits at the edge of the Seaton turning area are reported to collapse into
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:169:may be alleviated by deepening Seaton Channel to create a sediment trap.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:169:wave erosion. Algal mats established and have spread lately, further stabilising the sediments.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:169: Channel, creating a sediment trap.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:170:A study of the sediment dynamics in the lower Tees was commissioned by the Environment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:170:for trade effluent and sewage discharges into the estuary. Sediment dynamics between June 2003
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:170:Based upon repeat sampling of the upper 2 cm of intertidal sediments on 70 sites on Seal Sands
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:170:evidently been accreting sediments since the 1970’s. Predictions from HR Wallingford from
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:170:1966 regarding sedimentation rates and characteristics have come true. Since 1992 sampling
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:170:shows a trend towards finer sediments, possibly from dredging operations. This is somewhat in
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:170:could cause sediment fractions to become finer).
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:170:Six sediment cores were analysed to reconstruct the sediment history of Seal Sands. Sedimentary
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:170:cores showed net accretion since the beginning of the 20th century. Some showed sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:170:and firmer. The high abundance of epiphytic diatoms in sediments predating 1950 showed that
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:170:today. Fine grain sediments buried beneath the surface on Seal Sands contain significant
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:171:The Environment Agency /7/ supplied further base data regarding bathymetry, currents, sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:171:distribution and quality, suspended sediment, temperature, salinity, tidal elevation and water
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:172:SSFATE provides several type of output. These include animations of suspended sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:172:concentrations and particle movements for each individual sediment fraction as well as for all
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:172:picture of the suspended sediment plume showing the maximum concentrations computed
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:172:anywhere in the water column during the simulation for all sediment fractions taken together. As
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:172:Figure 7-1 shows the maximum sediment concentrations in the plume resulting from dredging at
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:172:in this area, the plume is of limited extent. It can be seen that maximum total suspended sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:172:the dredge. Figure 7-2 shows the bottom deposition of the released sediments as a mass per unit
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:173:Figure 7-1 Maximum total suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l) for backhoe at
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:174:Figure 7-3 Maximum total suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l) for backhoe at
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:174:deposition. For dredging during a spring tide, Figure 7-7 displays the suspended sediment plume
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:175:Figure 7-5 Backhoe dredging, Location #2, neap tide, max sediment concentrations mg/l.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:175:Figure 7-6 Backhoe dredging, Location #2, neap tide, sediment deposition g/m2 after 2 days
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:175:Figure 7-7 Backhoe dredging, Location #2, spring tide, max sediment concentrations mg/l.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:176:Figure 7-8 Backhoe dredging, Location #2, spring tide, sediment deposition g/m2 after 2
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:176:Figure 7-9 Backhoe dredging, Area 2, neap tide, max sediment concentrations mg/l
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:177:Figure 7-10 Backhoe dredging, Area 2, neap tide, sediment deposition g/m2 after 2 days of
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:177:Figure 7-11 Backhoe dredging, Area 2, spring tide, max sediment concentrations mg/l.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:178:Figure 7-12 Backhoe dredging, Area 2, spring tide, sediment deposition g/m2 after 2 days
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:178:Figure 7-13 Backhoe dredging, Area 3, neap tide, max sediment concentrations mg/l.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:179:Figure 7-14 Backhoe dredging, Area 3, neap tide, sediment deposition g/m2 after 2 days of
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:179:Figure 7-15 Backhoe dredging, Area 3, spring tide, max sediment concentrations mg/l.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:180:Figure 7-16 Backhoe dredging, Area 3, spring tide, sediment deposition g/m2 after 2 days
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:180:Figure 7-17 and Figure 7-19 show the maximum concentration of suspended sediment plumes
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:180:dredging line. The spring tide suspended sediment plume extents all the way to the boundary of
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:180:Figure 7-17 Hopper dredging, neap tide, max sediment concentrations mg/l
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:181:Figure 7-18 Hopper dredging, neap tide, sediment deposition g/m2 after 2 days of dredging.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:181:Figure 7-19 Hopper dredging, spring tide, max sediment concentrations mg/l
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:182:Figure 7-20 Hopper dredging, spring tide, sediment deposition g/m2 after 2 days of
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:182:interaction doesn’t significantly increase the maximum concentrations of the suspended sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:184:close contact with the sediment, in and on which many pollutants accumulate (heavy metals,
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:185:nematode species have dominated the communities present in the Seaton Channel sediments.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:186:the sediments and increase in coverage of green algae, especially Enteromorpha over parts of
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:187:ISQG Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines according to the Canadian
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:187:compared with international sediment quality standards. Levels have been mapped for several
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:187:The sediment quality standards that have been used for metals, PCBs, PAHs and TBT are
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:188:(NC) for metals in sediments (/20/). Values are given in mg/kg in standard sediments (10%
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:188:(NC) for PCBs in sediments (/23/).
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:189:Table 8-4 Probable Effect Level (PEL) and Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines ( ISQG)
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:189:for PAHs in sediments according to the Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines (/21/).
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:189:given in µg/kg dry weight (sediments with 1% organic carbon).
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:190:The sedimentation rate in Seaton Channel, the holding basin and the dry dock may rise when the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:190:any erosion. It is also possible that finer sediments settle upstream, and Seaton Channel may act
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:192:10.1 Sediment transportation
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:192:The hydrodynamic and sediment transportation processes predicted by the computer model has
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:192: Processes sediment load
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:192: Erosion Sedimentation
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:192: Impacts – sediment Clay erosion Sand carried
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:192: Impacts – sediment Clay Sand Higher deposition rates
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:192:The hydrodynamic and sediment transportation processes predicted by the computer model has
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:193:erosion, and increase the potential for sedimentation. Although little or no clay sediments are
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:193:sedimentation will change. Even if no sediment is present in the water column, the potential for
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:193:deposition increases with decreasing shear stress. This increase in sedimentation potential is not
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:193:sediment available in the water column for deposition.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:193:See Figure 10-1 when considering other natural sediment sources and processes in the estuary,
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:193:the sedimentation pattern may change. Suspended sediment is in reality not only introduced by
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:193:sedimentation patterns, traffic and dredging. Dredging operations, as modelled in Section 7
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:193:above, produce far higher concentrations of suspended sediment that, dependent on the tidal
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:193:“continuous operation” /2/, so higher concentrations of suspended sediment may be expected
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:193:As the sedimentation potential increases, the suspended sediments not considered in the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:193:higher sedimentation rate.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:193:The sediment “fractions” may also change from sand to finer sand, silt and clay. The boundary
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:193:Greatham Creek form a semi-closed hydrodynamics and sediment “sub-cell” within the Tees
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:193:enclose the bay and all water and sediment interchange has to come through a relatively narrow
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:193:channel. Seaton Channel and Seal Sands receive sediments largely from North Gare Sands and
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:193:It is seen that the hydrodynamic characteristics and corresponding sediment transportation
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:194:It is believed that for the assumptions made concerning the sediment source strengths and grain
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:194:size fractions SSFATE computations realistically represent suspended sediment plumes that will
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:194:total suspended sediment concentrations can exceed 1000 mg/l for the backhoe dredge, but are
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:194:The size of the sediment plumes are significantly larger when dredging during a spring tide
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:194:suspended sediment plumes when the backhoe is operating in Area #1. However, some
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:194:Some of the released sediments for both the backhoe and the hopper dredge are transported into
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:194:the shallow areas south of the Seaton Channel. There is very limited intrusion of sediments into
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:194:tide, suspended sediments can be transported out to the sea as a result of the hopper dredge
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:194:10.3.1 Impact of changes in hydrodynamics and sediment transportation
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:194:sedimentation increases in this area. Outward the bounds of Seaton Channel the hydrodynamics
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:194:and sediment transportation regime are not significantly changed.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:194:This means a total reduction in average sediment concentration and annual deposition rates, but
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:194:also a proportionate increase in the percent of sand and larger fractions in the total sediment load.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:194:and dredging contribute to the sediment load in the water column and thereby the annual
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:194:deposition rates of both clay and sand. Looking at the contribution to the sediment load in the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:194:the sediment loads generated from the natural processes that were modelled. As the heavier
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195:contributing to the increased sediment loads over the largest areas. Dredging is taking place
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195:very difficult to conclude on the effects of changes in sediment load and deposition rates due to
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195:the modelled changes in hydrodynamics. But in general changes in sediment concentrations and
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195:deposition rates may have positive effects by slowing down the accretion of sediments on Seal
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195:Based on the reduced potential for erosion and an increased potential for sedimentation,
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195:especially in the outer parts of Seaton Channel, it is possible that the sediment trapping
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195:sediment trapping efficiency in this area will increase for the larger fractions as sand due to the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195:sedimentation regime at Seal Sands, as bird feeding conditions on Seal Sands have been
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195:Maximum concentration of sediments in the water column within the bounds of Seaton Channel
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195:predicted by the modelling of the hydrodynamics was 22 mg/l. The average sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195:within the bounds of Seaton Channel. The dredging operations are modelled to yield sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195:sedimentation regime and the sediment load in the water column within the bounds of Seaton
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195:but mainly on the north side of the channel. Areas affected by sediment concentrations above 50
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195:of Seal Sands and parts of Tees river. In large areas of Seaton Channel the sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195:concentrations up to 100 mg/l in the water column, but in general the sediment concentrations
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195:simultaneously, there will be little interaction of the suspended sediment plumes when the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:195:interaction doesn’t significantly increase the maximum concentrations of the suspended sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:196:concentrations of sediments in the water column during the dredging operations may cause
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:196:Common Seal and Grey Seal are not believed to be directly affected by the increase in sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:196:area. The area affected by the increased sediment concentrations is in general limited to Seaton
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:196:indirectly affected by the increased sediment concentrations. Effects of noise and visual
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:196:Dredging area 4 and 5 with the hopper dredge will lead to a significant increase in sediment load
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:196:are settling out quickly, the sediments load affecting Seal sands will mainly be finer sediments as
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:196:4200 g/m2. Only the lighter fractions of the sediments are anticipated to deposit on Seal Sands.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:196:sediments on Seal sands, possibly from dredging operations. Dredging operations in general
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:196:the fauna in areas of high sedimentation due to the dredging operations are disturbed,
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:196:rates are high, the fauna will most probably be buried by the depositing sediments. Further away
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:196:all dredging areas (bulk samples), generally from the surface down to 1 m sediment depth. Five
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:196:meters down in the sediments the level of contamination is below the risk limit for effects on the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:197:sediments. Further down (0.5 m and 1 m) the level only exceeded the risk limit by a factor of
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:197:generally high in Seaton Channel and Seal Sands sediments. The dredging operations will
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:197:contribute to the spreading of PAH contaminated sediments that have concentrations that exceed
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:197:the ecosystem risk limit. Data on sediment concentration of organics are however sparse, and
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:197:nothing is known about the concentration of organics in the areas the sediment will be
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:198:/1/ Donoghue, Zong, Dunford, Watt: “An investigation of the sediment budget, the fate of
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:198: contaminants, and dating sediment contamination in the Teesmouth and Cleveland
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:198:/2/ Burt et al: “Teesmouth Sediment Study”. Report EX 4514, HR Wallingford 2002.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:198:/7/ Diana Orr, Clare Buckler, Environment Agency: Assorted bathymetry, sediment,
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:198: of sediment resuspension characteristics of selected dredges,” Technical Report HL-89-
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:199:/23/ Breedveld, G.D. and Bakke, T. 2004. Risk assessment of contaminated sediments. The
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:199: sediments. Geochemica et Cosmochimica Acta 57; 3041-3061.
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:200: METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN SEDIMENTS
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:201:Concentrations of arsenic (mg/kg dry weight) in sediments on Seal Sand and in Seaton
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:202:Concentrations of Zink (mg/kg dry weight) in sediments on Seal Sand and in Seaton
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:203:Concentrations of Cadmium (mg/kg dry weight) in sediments on Seal Sand and in Seaton
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:204:Concentrations of Copper (mg/kg dry weight) in sediments on Seal Sand and in Seaton
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:205:Concentrations of Iron (mg/kg dry weight) in sediments on Seal Sand and in Seaton
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:206:Concentrations of Mercury (mg/kg dry weight) in sediments on Seal Sand and in Seaton
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:207:Concentrations of Nickel (mg/kg dry weight) in sediments on Seal Sand and in Seaton
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:208:Concentrations of Lead (mg/kg dry weight) in sediments on Seal Sand and in Seaton
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:209: PCB CONCENTRATIONS IN SEDIMENTS
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:210: Location and sediment depth
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:210:Concentration of CB#105 (µg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:210: Location and sediment depth
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:210:Concentration of CB#118 (µg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:211: Location and sediment depth
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:211:Concentration of CB#153 (µg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:211: Location and sediment depth
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:211:Concentration of CB#156 (µg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:212: Location and sediment depth
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:212:in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality thresholds for the mixture of planar congeners
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:213: TBT CONCENTRATIONS IN SEDIMENTS
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:214:Concentration of TBT (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:214: Location in dredging area 4; Seaton Channel. Sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:215: PAH CONCENTRATIONS IN SEDIMENTS
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:216:Concentration of Acenaphene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:216:quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) and Probable
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:216:Concentration of Acenaphthylene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:216:quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) and Probable
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:217:Concentration of Anthracene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:217:quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) and Probable
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:217:Sediment quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) and
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:218:Concentration of Benzo(a)pyrene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:218:quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) and Probable
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:218:Concentration of Chrysene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:218:thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) according to the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:219:Sediment quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG)
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:219:Concentration of Fluoranthene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:219:quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) according to
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:220:Concentration of Fluorene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:220:thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) according to the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:220:Concentration of Naphthalene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:220:quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) according to
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:221:Concentration of Phenanthrene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:221:quality thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) according to
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:221:Concentration of Pyrene (mg/kg dry weight) in dredging areas 1 to 4. Sediment quality
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:221:thresholds are given as Interim Sediment Quality Guidelines (ISQG) according to the
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:222: HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENT TRANSPORTATION MODELLING
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:224:As erosion of cohesive sediments occurs at this point, silt/clay deposits will not be sustained 3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:224: and this type of sediment will not exist here. The negative deposition rate therefore shows the 3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:225:As erosion of cohesive sediments occurs at this point, silt/clay deposits will not be sustained
3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:225: and this type of sediment will not exist here. The negative deposition rate therefore shows the
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:2:and long term impacts on hydrodynamic and sediment transport processes in the Tees esturary
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:2: hydrodynamics, sediment Market Sector
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:3:2 SEDIMENT COMPUTER MODELLING AND INTERPRETATION ………………… 2
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:3:2.1 Inherent sediment modelling uncertainties 2
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:3:2.2 Indicies for understanding the sediment processes 2
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:3:3.2 Water column sediment concentrations, general effects 7
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:3:3.3 Water column sediment concentrations, dredging 7
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:3:6 SEDIMENT CHARACTERISTICS ……………………………………………………………….. 13
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:3:9 SUSPENDED SEDIMENT AND DISSOLVED OXYGEN………………………………. 16
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:4:and sediment transport processes, and subsequent effects on spreading of pollutants and impact
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:4:“Environmental assessment of dredging operations, changes in hydrodynamics and sediment
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:4:2 SEDIMENT COMPUTER MODELLING AND INTERPRETATION
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:4:Prediction of changes in hydrodynamic and sediment transport processes are complex and
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:4:2.1 Inherent sediment modelling uncertainties
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:4:It is an appreciated fact in the sediment modelling community that the nature of sediment
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:4:transport modelling makes it difficult to accurately predict specific sediment accretion rates by
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:4:the use of computer models. The modelling of cohesive sediments is in particular regarded as
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:4:unpredictable. The uncertainty stems from the underlying principles and sediment transportation
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:4:states: “Understanding of sediment transport leads to better predictions of morphology changes
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:4:parameter to understand the change in erosion and sedimentation for the natural and man-made
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:4:2.2 Indicies for understanding the sediment processes
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:5:The understanding of the sediment processes in the Teesmouth estuary in general and on Seal
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:5:An apparent discrepancy has been pointed out between the reported decrease in sediment
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:5:“Seaton Channel, and to a lesser extent Seal Sands, may experience a higher sedimentation rate”.
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:6:entire model. Thus the modelled sedimentation rate is lower for clay in general when the channel
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:6:sediments. At the same time the deepening of Seaton Channel will trap the sand, which comes
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:6:from outside the Tees estuary, before it reaches Seal Sands. The sediments that do reach Seal
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:6:decrease in sand deposition and the increase in clay deposition will result in a finer sediment
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:6:The sedimentation rate in Seaton Channel is expected to increase for both sand and clay. The
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:6:sedimentation rate for Seal Sands is expected to increase for clay only. The sand is expected to
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:6:“Seaton Channel, and to a lesser extent Seal Sands, may experience a higher sedimentation rate”
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:7:to render the basic understanding of the changes in hydrodynamic and sediment transport
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:7:the numerical model does not predict specific sediment accretion rates, but it gives indicies as to
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:7:the changes in sedimentation processes. When the modelling results are collated with other
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:7:model. Since the sediment transport model is also based on that hydrodynamic model and
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:8:study, we are confident that the conclusions based on the hydrodynamic and sediment
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:8:and tidal processes to ensure full understanding of the underlying hydrodynamic and sediment
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:9:used for indicating the relative changes in sediment transport processes, and that indications
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:9:to provide input to understanding the changes for the sediment regime in the estuary. The net
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:9:3.2 Water column sediment concentrations, general effects
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:9:coarse fractions of sediments, thereby also decreasing the amount of sand reaching the cooling
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:9:3.3 Water column sediment concentrations, dredging
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:9:increased sediment concentrations in the water column. Fine sediment fractions are found to be
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:10:more mobile than coarse sediments, which are deposited nearer the dredging site. Please refer to
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:10:Data from the Environmental Agency /4/ and Astra Zeneca /5/ show that sediment
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:10:in excess of 300 mg/l. The background sediment concentration is therefore estimated as in the
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:10:Report 2004-1387 fig 7-11) may increase the sediment concentrations at the power station intake
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:10:water column sediment concentrations.
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:10:The dredging operations are therefore expected to increase local sediment concentrations
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:10:British Energy should be invited to comment on what concentrations of suspended sediments are
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:10:unacceptable for the safe operation of the nuclear plant. Sediment concentration monitoring may
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:10:settling of fine fractions, but whether it has any impact by eroding sediments is doubtful. For
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:10:cohesive sediments there is a “window” between the critical shear stress for deposition and for
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:11:show the suspended sediment concentration and deposition for the modelled scenarios i.e. when
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:11:The hopper dredge will generate by far the largest suspended sediment concentration and
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:11:the max suspended sediment concentration and deposition when using a hopper dredge after two
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:11:The suspended sediment concentration and the deposition rate are for all sediment fractions
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:11:Figure 4-1 – Hopper dredging, spring tide, max sediment concentrations mg/l
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:12:Figure 4-2 – Hopper dredging, spring tide, sediment deposition g/m2 after 2 days of
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:12:sediment is the fine fraction (clay and fine silt). Taking into account that the fine fraction will be
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:12:less for animals living in the sediment (digging animals). In longer terms any animals not
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:12:capable of dealing with this sediment load will probably come back as new larvae settles and the
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:12:data available of the organic content in the sediment to be dredged this is an open question. An
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:13:be spread to Seal Sand by the fine fraction of the suspended sediment, but as nothing is known
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:13:there will be an increase in the sediment concentration on Seal Sand. An important fact is that
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:15:6 SEDIMENT CHARACTERISTICS
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:15:Recoverability is dependant upon several factors one of which is sediment type. Given the
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:16:change, affecting the recoverability. Due to lack of data the nature of the sediment at the new
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:16:further studies must include deep core sediment sampling. See also replies to RPS queries below.
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:16:2001, although the exact sediment yield from Seaton Channel is unknown. According to PD
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:16:shows the spreading and accretion of sediments when conducting dredging operations at various
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:16:The suspended sediment levels are presented in the DNV Report 2004-1387 figs 7-1, 7-3, 7-5, 7-
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:16:maximum sediment concentrations throughout Seaton Channel, Seal Sands and the Tees Estuary.
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:16:suspended sediment concentration is presented and discussed in Chapter 5.1.2.1.
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:16:show the sediment deposition in Seaton Channel, Seal Sands and the Tees estuary. The
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:18:9 SUSPENDED SEDIMENT AND DISSOLVED OXYGEN
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:18:The presence of suspended sediments in the water column has little effect on the dissolved
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:18:The BOD of the dispersing sediment is dependent on the organic and nutrient content. No data
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:18:on the organic content of the sediments in Seaton Channel or the TERRC dock exist. As most of
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:18:the sediment is of marine origin /3/, the organic content and subsequently the BOD is low. The
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:18:COD of the sediments is also believed to be low for this reason.
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:18:organic content in sediments from Seal Sands are low at depths below 0.5 m. In upper levels the
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:18:Enteromorpha sp. The cores have been dated, showing that sedimentation on the inner reaches of
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:19:DNV proposes that the current sediment monitoring regime in Seaton Channel and in the dry
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:19:dock is extended to include evaluations of organic content of the sediments. It may also be
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:19:4: What effects have you observed on wildlife from the dredging activities? Does the sediment
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:20:coarse sediments, thereby reducing the current trend of sand accretion on Seal Sands. This view
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:20: operations, changes in hydrodynamics and sediment transport; TERRC facility”. DNV
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:20:/2/ Donoghue, Zong, Dunford, Watt: “An investigation of the sediment budget, the fate of
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:20: contaminants, and dating sediment contamination in the Teesmouth and Cleveland
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:20:/3/ Burt et al: “Teesmouth Sediment Study”. Report EX 4514, HR Wallingford 2002.
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:20:/4/ Environment Agency; Assorted bathymetry, sediment, pollution and other data. Diana
Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:21:/16/ http://www.hrwallingford.co.uk/research/sediments.html
502 - Waste FD MASTER(2).pdf:6: • Shore protection - wrong sediment type;
502 - Waste FD MASTER(2).pdf:6: • Beach nourishment - wrong sediment type;
502 - Waste FD MASTER(2).pdf:6: • Displacement infill - wrong sediment; and
Licence Document (Marine).pdf:14:5.2.11 A relevant sediment sampling plan request must be submitted at least 6 months prior to the end of years 3 and 6 from
Licence Document (Marine).pdf:14: The relevant sediment sampling and analysis must be completed by a laboratory validated by the MMO at least 6 weeks
Decision Letter (Marine).pdf:2:You should ensure that methods are employed to minimise re-suspension of sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1141-MLA.2020.00506.2 SBQ MLV2 FIR 19 Response.pdf:2: is likely to compare with the suspended sediment concentrations and plumes modelled within the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1141-MLA.2020.00506.2 SBQ MLV2 FIR 19 Response.pdf:2: proposed to minimise the resuspension of contaminated sediments.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1141-MLA.2020.00506.2 SBQ MLV2 FIR 19 Response.pdf:2: as shielding or enclosing of the cutter head to contain disturbed sediment) will be used.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1141-MLA.2020.00506.2 SBQ MLV2 FIR 19 Response.pdf:3:3.3 Suspended sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1141-MLA.2020.00506.2 SBQ MLV2 FIR 19 Response.pdf:3:sediment concentrations anticipated as a result of MLV2 in comparison with that previously modelled
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1141-MLA.2020.00506.2 SBQ MLV2 FIR 19 Response.pdf:3:The scheduling of the activities helps to mitigate the risk of resuspension of the contaminated sediments.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1141-MLA.2020.00506.2 SBQ MLV2 FIR 19 Response.pdf:4:The additional sediment plume modelling which was included and accepted as part of Marine Licence
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1141-MLA.2020.00506.2 SBQ MLV2 FIR 19 Response.pdf:5:As noted in the Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling Technical Note submitted to support
MLA_2020_00506-20220512_MLA_2020_00506_1_variation_HRA_FINAL.pdf:2: • Capital dredging of approximately 1,800,000m3 of marine sediments with offshore disposal into the Tees Bay C disposal
MLA_2020_00506-20220512_MLA_2020_00506_1_variation_HRA_FINAL.pdf:6: suspended sediments during dredging represents a very localised,
MLA_2020_00506-20220512_MLA_2020_00506_1_variation_HRA_FINAL.pdf:7: sediments
MLA_2020_00506-20220512_MLA_2020_00506_1_variation_HRA_FINAL.pdf:7: another sediment
MLA_2020_00506-20220512_MLA_2020_00506_1_variation_HRA_FINAL.pdf:8: including sediment
MLA_2020_00506-20220512_MLA_2020_00506_1_variation_HRA_FINAL.pdf:9: This scheme comprises capital dredging up to 4.8 million m3 of sediment from the
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:4: impacts (e.g., increased suspended sediment concentrations, poor
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:6: process and sediment plan monitoring to comment on the appropriateness of DO
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:6: dredge footprint have been proposed based on the results of the sediment plume responses to the Environment Agency’s comments.
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:6: influence of the sediment plume).
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:6: the zone of influence of the sediment plume).
MLA_2020_00506-20221017_MLA_2020_00506_variation 2_HRA_FINAL.pdf:2: • Capital dredging of approximately 1,800,000m3 of marine sediments with offshore disposal into the Tees Bay C disposal
MLA_2020_00506-20221017_MLA_2020_00506_variation 2_HRA_FINAL.pdf:6: suspended sediments during dredging represents a very localised,
MLA_2020_00506-20221017_MLA_2020_00506_variation 2_HRA_FINAL.pdf:7: sediments OSPAR/MHWS line and the new quay wall.
MLA_2020_00506-20221017_MLA_2020_00506_variation 2_HRA_FINAL.pdf:7: another sediment
MLA_2020_00506-20221017_MLA_2020_00506_variation 2_HRA_FINAL.pdf:8: including sediment
MLA_2020_00506-20221017_MLA_2020_00506_variation 2_HRA_FINAL.pdf:9: This scheme comprises capital dredging up to 4.8 million m3 of sediment from the
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:2: suspended sediment brought in from the sea. Short term peaks in suspended sediment (during
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:2: sediment to pass but which has been shown to have trapped SSC upstream and to have
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:2: detrimentally affected fine-grained sediment transport onto the intertidal marshes and mudflats
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:3: are presented principally as changes in suspended sediment concentration (SSC), the principal
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:4: disposal. Again, concern is largely focused on the water quality issue of the sediment plume,
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:4:26. Disposal assessments do not present the maximum bed thickness change due to the sediment
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:5: on flow and sedimentation, but it is not clear that these have been modelled together, or simply
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:7: the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime will be constant throughout such changes.”
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:7:47. In Section 7.4.1 Sediment Quality, (p144) the application states that concentrations of PDBE209
20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:7:50. However, I do recognise that the volume of sediment to be extracted is (in total) very large for
20210729 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank - Further Proposed Sampling to delineate an exclusion zone+SJB.pdf:1: there is sufficient evidence on sediment quality to undertake an assessment of potential
20210729 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank - Further Proposed Sampling to delineate an exclusion zone+SJB.pdf:1: mobilisation of sediments. To enable us to provide that advice, and to fulfil the UK’s obligations
20210729 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank - Further Proposed Sampling to delineate an exclusion zone+SJB.pdf:1: Marine and Coastal Access Act where applicable, we require sediment samples to be provided
20210729 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank - Further Proposed Sampling to delineate an exclusion zone+SJB.pdf:2: mobilisation of sediments.
20210729 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank - Further Proposed Sampling to delineate an exclusion zone+SJB.pdf:2: particularly with regard to the Tees, it is unlikely that the samples will show the sediment to be
20210729 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank - Further Proposed Sampling to delineate an exclusion zone+SJB.pdf:3: the upper layer of in-situ sediment using a non-metallic / stainless steel scoop. To maintain
20210729 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank - Further Proposed Sampling to delineate an exclusion zone+SJB.pdf:3: for-sediment-sampling).
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:4: impacts (e.g., increased suspended sediment concentrations, poor
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:6: process and sediment plan monitoring to comment on the appropriateness of DO
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:6: dredge footprint have been proposed based on the results of the sediment plume responses to the Environment Agency’s comments.
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:6: influence of the sediment plume).
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:6: the zone of influence of the sediment plume).
354204 MLA_2020_00506 - South Bank Wharf dredge Middlesbrough 5.07.2021 (1).pdf:2:recharge the sediment behind it, in terms of noise and levels of activity on the river (please note this is
354204 MLA_2020_00506 - South Bank Wharf dredge Middlesbrough 5.07.2021 (1).pdf:4:2. Sediment and Water Quality
354204 MLA_2020_00506 - South Bank Wharf dredge Middlesbrough 5.07.2021 (1).pdf:4: specific sediment quality survey.
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:2: with specialisms in coastal process and sediment plan monitoring to comment on the
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:3: specialisms in coastal process and sediment plan monitoring to comment on the
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:4: with specialisms in water quality and sediment plan monitoring to comment on the
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:6:move away from the vicinity of adverse sediment conditions, if refuge conditions are present (Sigler
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:6:sediment on swimming ability of juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta) and rainbow trout
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:6:fish to utilise anaerobic metabolic pathways in high sediment environments. The authors concluded
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:6:to environmentally relevant, suspended sediment-generated turbidities.
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:6:Elevated concentrations of suspended sediment can have the following physical effects on all life
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:6: suspended sediment concentration, water velocity and gill dimensions (Appleby and
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:7:Settlement of sediment around areas of dredging and disposal can have the following impacts:
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:7: i. Smothering of benthic foraging grounds by settlement of sediment.
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:7: ii. Smothering of benthic eggs and larvae by settlement of sediment.
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:7: iii. Reduced oxygen levels in water due to release of sediments containing high organic
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:7: iv. Exposure to contaminants contained within dredged sediment.
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:7: v. Re-suspension of sediments causes nutrient enrichment promoting the formation of algal
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:7: vi. Resuspension of sediments resulting from dredging can smother organisms and hinder
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:7:Berg, L. (1982). The effect of exposure to short-term pulses of suspended sediment on the behaviour of
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:7:Berli, B.I. et al. (2014). Acute exposure to a common suspended sediment affects the swimming performance
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:7:Henley, W.E., Patterson, M.A., Neves, R.J., and Dennis L. (2000). Effects of Sedimentation and Turbidity
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:7:Gilmour, J. (1999). Experimental investigation into the effects of suspended sediment on fertilisation, larval
20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:7:Salmon & Trout Conservation (2017). The impact of excess fine sediment on invertebrates and fish in
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:2: • Capital dredging of approximately 1,800,000m3 of marine sediments with offshore disposal into the Tees Bay C disposal
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:6: • Intertidal mixed sediments footprint is within close proximity to the North Tees mudflat, which
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:8: pSPA: suspended sediments during dredging represents a very localised,
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:8: • Common Tern (B) temporary and short-term disturbance, with any suspended sediment
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:8: • Intertidal mixed sediments
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:9: sediments (water clarity). However, any changes will be localised
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:9: sediment transport patterns. The magnitude of changes in water
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:9: • Pied avocet (B) baseline sediment transport patterns, except for the principal effect
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:9: • Gadwall the baseline sediment transport process or morphological function
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:10: • Intertidal mixed sediments • Water column
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:10: not sufficient to cause far-field effects on the baseline sediment
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:10: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:11: area will be habituated to fluctuating sediment levels. The
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:12: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:12: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:12: sediment transport patterns, except for the principal effect of a likely
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:13: baseline sediment transport process or morphological function of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:13:another sediment type) • Salicornia and other annuals colonising there are the following features:
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:13: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:13: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:14: temporary loss of marine sediment. The construction activities
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:14: • Intertidal mixed sediments
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:15: • Intertidal mixed sediments a land barrier there should be no pathway for potential impacts to
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:15: sufficient to cause far-field effects on the baseline sediment
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:15: • Intertidal mixed sediments
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:18:sediment transport • Little Tern (B)
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:18: • Pied avocet (B) suspended sediments during dredging represents a very localised,
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:18: • Common Tern (B) sediment likely to rapidly settle back on the bed following
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:18: • Intertidal mixed sediments
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:19: baseline sediment transport patterns, except for the principal effect
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:19: the baseline sediment transport process or morphological function
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:20: Changes in suspended sediment (water clarity) submitted with this application. Licence application
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:20: as the dredged sediment will be reused as part of this works. The relevant compatible pressures have been
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:21:to above water noise, barrier to species movement, visual disturbance water flow (tidal current) changes, including sediment transport considerations and
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:21:changes in suspended sediments (water clarity).
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:22: sediment (water the placement of site won will be reduce displacement pathways to such
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:22: Common redshank, Breeding impact of sedimentation with the
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:22: including sediment Subtidal coarse sediment
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:24: Changes in suspended sediment (water clarity) submitted with this application. Licence application
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:24: as the dredged sediment will be reused as part of this works. Applicant has stated that excavation of the
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:24: impact of sedimentation with the aim of reduction
354204 MLA_2020_00506 - South Bank Wharf dredge Middlesbrough 5.07.2021.pdf:2:recharge the sediment behind it, in terms of noise and levels of activity on the river (please note this is
354204 MLA_2020_00506 - South Bank Wharf dredge Middlesbrough 5.07.2021.pdf:4:2. Sediment and Water Quality
354204 MLA_2020_00506 - South Bank Wharf dredge Middlesbrough 5.07.2021.pdf:4: specific sediment quality survey.
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:1: Benthic (including marine invasive non-native species) and sediment contaminant survey data
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:3:Chapter 7: Marine Sediment and Water Quality
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:3: of sediment contaminants are less clear, particularly in regards to heavy metals
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:3: Please re-consult Natural England when the results of the contaminant sediment
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:3:Sediment rather than PDBEs.
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:4: To restrict suspended sediment plumes to one side of the estuary at a time, and
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:6: To restrict suspended sediment plumes to one side of the estuary at a time, in
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:7: Water flow (tidal current changes) including sediment transport.
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:9: suspended sediment
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:9: including sediment Please provide clarity as to the meaning of the underlined phase above.
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 Updated Scheme of Monitoring - May 2022.pdf:1:dredging associated with the South Bank Quay project that sediment suspended within the dredging
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 Updated Scheme of Monitoring - May 2022.pdf:1:coarser-grained sediment fractions), or at a point in time within a few minutes to a few hours after this if it
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 Updated Scheme of Monitoring - May 2022.pdf:2:is carried in suspension by the prevailing currents (for finer-grained sediment fractions). Near surface
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 Updated Scheme of Monitoring - May 2022.pdf:4:sufficient given that the modelling indicates the majority of the sediment will fall to the riverbed, either soon
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 P03 South Bank Phase 1 Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:2: footprint and outside of the predicted zone of influence of the sediment plume).
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 P03 South Bank Phase 1 Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:2: the sediment plume).
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 P03 South Bank Phase 1 Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:2:maximum enhanced areas of suspended sediment concentrations from the dredge) were selected based
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 P03 South Bank Phase 1 Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:2:on the results of the sediment plume modelling that was undertaken as part of the Environmental Impact
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 P03 South Bank Phase 1 Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:3:The EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020) predicted that sediment suspended within the dredging
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 P03 South Bank Phase 1 Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:3:operation (for coarser-grained sediment fractions), or at a point in time within a few minutes to a few hours
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 P03 South Bank Phase 1 Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:3:after this if it is carried in suspension by the prevailing currents (for finer-grained sediment fractions) (Royal
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 P03 South Bank Phase 1 Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:3:Figure 1 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from dredging activities during
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 P03 South Bank Phase 1 Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:4:Figure 2 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-surface layer) arising from dredging activities
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:2: • Capital dredging of approximately 1,800,000m3 of marine sediments with offshore disposal into the Tees Bay C disposal
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:6: including sediment
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:7: • Intertidal mixed sediments footprint is within close proximity to the North Tees mudflat,
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:8: • Common Tern (B) suspended sediments during dredging represents a very localised,
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:8: temporary and short-term disturbance, with any suspended sediment
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:9: • Intertidal mixed sediments
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:9: sediments (water clarity). However, any changes will be localised
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:9: sediment transport patterns. The magnitude of changes in water
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:9: baseline sediment transport patterns, except for the principal effect
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:10: • Herring gull the baseline sediment transport process or morphological function
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:10: • Intertidal mixed sediments • Water column
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:10: not sufficient to cause far-field effects on the baseline sediment
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:10: • Intertidal mixed sediments
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:11: area will be habituated to fluctuating sediment levels. The
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:12: • Intertidal mixed sediments a land barrier and the distance of the feature from the activities
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:12: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:12: sediment transport patterns, except for the principal effect of a likely
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:13: baseline sediment transport process or morphological function of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:13:another sediment • Salicornia and other annuals colonising mud there are the following features:
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:13: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:13: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:14: temporary loss of marine sediment. The construction activities
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:14: • Intertidal mixed sediments
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:15: • Intertidal mixed sediments a land barrier there should be no pathway for potential impacts to
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:15: far-field effects on the baseline sediment transport process,
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:15: • Intertidal mixed sediments No Likely Significant Effect concluded.
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:18:including sediment • Little Tern (B)
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:18: • Common Tern (B) suspended sediments during dredging represents a very localised,
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:18: sediment likely to rapidly settle back on the bed following
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:18: • Intertidal mixed sediments
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:18: baseline sediment transport patterns, except for the principal effect
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:19: the baseline sediment transport process or morphological function
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:20: Changes in suspended sediment (water clarity) submitted with this application. Licence application
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:20: dredged sediment will be reused as part of this project. works. The relevant compatible pressures are not
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:21:Terminal m3 of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of the approach scheme, in-combination effects to the interest features of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:22: from suspended sediment.
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:23:to above water noise, barrier to species movement, visual disturbance water flow (tidal current) changes, including sediment transport considerations and
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:23:changes in suspended sediments (water clarity).
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:26:sediment (water will cause plumes of sediment to measures for the proposed scheme in the
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:26: characterised by a short-lived one time, sediment plumes occupy only
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:26: sediment concentrations by the barriers to species movement.
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:26:including sediment • Gadwall order of a few hundred mg/l at the
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:26: • Black-headed gull ensure sediment plumes are only
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:26: Subtidal coarse sediment plume effects will be observed
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:27: Changes in suspended sediment (water clarity) submitted with this application. Licence application
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:27: as the dredged sediment will be reused as part of this works.
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:28:(NGCT) million m3 of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of scheme, in-combination effects to the interest features of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:28: million m3 of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:29: from suspended sediment.
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:30: • Dredging along the axis of the River Tees will be undertaken to ensure sediment plumes are only occurring in half of the river during capital dredging
20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:1: birds, fish, mammals) or other physical (e.g., morphology, bathymetry) or chemical (sediment
20210406 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Phase 1 Request to review interim analysis results SEAL Advice FINAL.pdf:1:SEDIMENT QUALITY DATA TO SUPPORT A MARINE LICENCE FOR THE TEES SOUTH BANK
20210406 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Phase 1 Request to review interim analysis results SEAL Advice FINAL.pdf:1: in my capacity as scientific and technical advisor dredge and disposal (including sediment
20210406 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Phase 1 Request to review interim analysis results SEAL Advice FINAL.pdf:1: proposing to undertake a sediment quality and benthic ecology survey in the Tees estuary. The
20210406 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Phase 1 Request to review interim analysis results SEAL Advice FINAL.pdf:3: range low (ERL), the indication is that the sediment in the sample can be considered low risk. If
EA_MLA2020005061_VAR_OFFICIAL200722.pdf:1: identified through sediment sampling, then this will not be needed.
EA_MLA2020005061_VAR_OFFICIAL200722.pdf:2:contaminants bound up in sediments into the water column, impacts on migratory
EA MLA_2020_00506 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:1: Site specific sediment surveys and assessments
EA MLA_2020_00506 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:1:i) Site specific sediment surveys and assessments
EA MLA_2020_00506 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:specific sediment surveys. The EIA notes in paragraph 7.4.3 that a site-specific sediment
EA MLA_2020_00506 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:Requirement: Submit additional suite of site-specific sediment quality surveys
EA MLA_2020_00506 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:3:In respect to the impacts of sediment deposition resulting from the Stages 1 to 4 of the
MLA-2020-00506.pdf:1: These fishing operations are unlikely to be affected by the activities, EIA shows sediment
MLA-2020-00506.pdf:1: this is unlikely to be impacted by the works as the sediment plume is unlikely to travel that
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:8:transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger to the offshore disposal site.
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:3: i. Changes in marine water quality (i.e. increased suspended sediment) due to dredging
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5:20. For the proposed development, an additional 1.8 million (M) m3 of marine sediment is predicted to
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: be dredged from the Tees, resulting in sediment plumes. The effects of the plumes have been
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: modelled using a sediment dispersion model run for the entire four-month dredging period covering
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: on the sediment plume model presented, the applicant concluded that peak concentrations from
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: low SSC from 0 to 8.5 mg/l. Modelling of the sediment plume during capital dredging indicates that
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: activities be undertaken simultaneously, the sediment plumes, could result in additive effect which
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: impact as far as possible. However, it is stated that ‘the additive effect of the sediment plumes from
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:6: a time in order to reduce the extent and impact of the sediment plume. However, in my opinion,
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:6: season (e.g. salmon), as a result of increased suspended sediment concentrations, poor water
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:6:25. I recommend that the applicant presents a revised sediment dispersion model that includes the
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:7: suspended sediment concentrations and the extent of the plume across the river channel will be
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:7: avoidance reactions and move away from the vicinity of adverse sediment conditions, if refuge
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:7: conditions are present (Sigler et al., 1984; Bash et al., 2001). The effects of suspended sediment
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:7: metabolic pathways in high sediment environments. The authors concluded that the ability of
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:7: relevant, suspended sediment-generated turbidities.
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:11:54. The benthic surveys and sediment sampling used to inform the assessment on marine ecology
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:12:Berg, L. (1982). The effect of exposure to short-term pulses of suspended sediment on the behaviour
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:12:Berli, B.I. et al. (2014). Acute exposure to a common suspended sediment affects the swimming
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:12:Henley, W.E., Patterson, M.A., Neves, R.J., and Dennis L. (2000). Effects of Sedimentation and
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:12:Gilmour, J. (1999). Experimental investigation into the effects of suspended sediment on fertilisation,
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:13:Salmon & Trout Conservation (2017). The impact of excess fine sediment on invertebrates and fish
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:14: pocket to a depth of 15.6m bCD (below Chart Datum). The total volume for marine sediments
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:14:marine sediments
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:14:Elevated concentrations of suspended sediment can have the following physical effects on all life stage
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:14: suspended sediment concentration, water velocity and gill dimensions (Appleby and Scarratt,
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:15:Settlement of sediment around areas of dredging and disposal can have the following impacts:
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:15: i. Smothering of benthic foraging grounds by settlement of sediment.
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:15: ii. Smothering of benthic eggs and larvae by settlement of sediment.
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:15: iii. Reduced oxygen levels in water due to release of sediments containing high organic matter.
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:15: iv. Exposure to contaminants contained within dredged sediment.
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:15: v. Re-suspension of sediments causes nutrient enrichment promoting the formation of algal
20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:15: vi. Resuspension of sediments resulting from dredging can smother organisms and hinder
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:2: To restrict suspended sediment
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:2:area of the estuary impacted by any sediment plumes resulting from dredging activities therefore this
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:2:dredging associated with the South Bank project that sediment suspended within the dredging plumes will
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:3:grained sediment fractions), or at a point in time within a few minutes to a few hours after this if it is carried
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:3:in suspension by the prevailing currents (for finer-grained sediment fractions) (Royal HaskoningDHV,
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:3:Linked to the relatively limited extent of the sediment plume, the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020)
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:3:alongside the fact that a significant component of the dredged material is geological sediment which is
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:4:summarise, it is predicted that whilst the sediment plumes could combine to cover a larger area of the
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:4:estuary, additive effects in terms of increasing sediment peaks were not predicted. This is because the
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:4:Figure 2-2 Time series plots showing short term nature of sediment peaks (green is Smith’s Dock Water Quality monitoring point,
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:5:the tidal sequence, the highest suspended sediment levels occur close to high water. After storm periods,
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:5:higher concentrations of suspended sediment have been noted around the Shell Jetty, but with little
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:6:sensitive to dredging related sediment plumes.
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:6:being The Effects of Turbidity and Suspended Sediments on ESA-Listed Species from Projects Occurring
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:6:in the analysis of projects that generate suspended sediments. Concentrations in the literature are not,
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:6: move away from the sediment generating activity. If
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:8:given that modelling indicates that the majority of the sediment will fall to the riverbed, either soon after
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:10: 4. NOAA Fisheries (2018) The effects of turbidity and suspended sediments on ESA-Listed
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:11: 8. Wilber DH, Clarke, DG. 2001. Biological effects of suspended sediments: a review of suspended
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:11: sediment impacts on fish and shellfish with relation to dredging activities in estuaries. North
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:1: 5.2. The effects of turbidity and suspended sediments on ESA-Listed Species from Projects
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:2: bioacoustics, and sediment specialists advice comments for Tees South Bank Quay project 1.
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:2: (e.g., increased suspended sediment concentrations, poor water quality and underwater
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:3: oxygen, turbidity and suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) levels falls outside my
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:3: with specialisms in coastal processes and sediment transport, to comment on the
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:3: proposed based on the results of the sediment plume modelling that was undertaken as part of
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:5: effects occurred in adult fish during 24 hours of exposure to suspended sediment up to 1,000
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:6: experiencing from changes in turbidity and TSS, making them less tolerant of sediment
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:6: variable sediment concentration levels, exposure durations and an ability for fish to
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:6: been acknowledged that suspended sediment will fall to the riverbed within the dredged areas
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:7: with the monitoring programme (as per comments 18-23), the large volumes of sediments to be
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:7: possible, sediment-generating activities and TSS exposure in areas and times when Atlantic
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:9:Reason: To restrict suspended sediment plumes to one side of the estuary at a time, in order to
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:10:move away from the vicinity of adverse sediment conditions, if refuge conditions are present (Sigler
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:10:sediment on swimming ability of juvenile brown trout (Salmo trutta) and rainbow trout
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:10:fish to utilise anaerobic metabolic pathways in high sediment environments. The authors concluded
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:10:to environmentally relevant, suspended sediment-generated turbidities.
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:10:Elevated concentrations of suspended sediment can have the following physical effects on all life
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:10: suspended sediment concentration, water velocity and gill dimensions (Appleby and
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:11:Settlement of sediment around areas of dredging and disposal can have the following impacts:
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:11: i. Smothering of benthic foraging grounds by settlement of sediment.
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:11: ii. Smothering of benthic eggs and larvae by settlement of sediment.
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:11: iii. Reduced oxygen levels in water due to release of sediments containing high organic
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:11: iv. Exposure to contaminants contained within dredged sediment.
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:11: v. Re-suspension of sediments causes nutrient enrichment promoting the formation of algal
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:11: vi. Resuspension of sediments resulting from dredging can smother organisms and hinder
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:11:Berg, L. (1982). The effect of exposure to short-term pulses of suspended sediment on the behaviour of
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:11:Berli, B.I. et al. (2014). Acute exposure to a common suspended sediment affects the swimming performance
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:11:Henley, W.E., Patterson, M.A., Neves, R.J., and Dennis L. (2000). Effects of Sedimentation and Turbidity
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:11:Gilmour, J. (1999). Experimental investigation into the effects of suspended sediment on fertilisation, larval
20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:11:Salmon & Trout Conservation (2017). The impact of excess fine sediment on invertebrates and fish in
MLA_2020_00506_1 South Bank Wharf Variation Response FINAL 392938.pdf:3:related to contaminated sediments. We acknowledge that Cefas will likely be consulted on any
MLA_2020_00506_1 South Bank Wharf Variation Response FINAL 392938.pdf:3:sediment sampling plan required, however we would like to take the opportunity to advise that you
MLA_2020_00506_1 South Bank Wharf Variation Response FINAL 392938.pdf:3:ensure that adequate testing for contaminants and pollutants within sediments is carried out down to
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:1: Benthic (including marine invasive non-native species) and sediment contaminant survey data
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:3:Chapter 7: Marine Sediment and Water Quality
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:3: of sediment contaminants are less clear, particularly in regards to heavy metals
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:3: Please re-consult Natural England when the results of the contaminant sediment
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:3:Sediment rather than PDBEs.
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:4: To restrict suspended sediment plumes to one side of the estuary at a time, and
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:6: To restrict suspended sediment plumes to one side of the estuary at a time, in
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:7: Water flow (tidal current changes) including sediment transport.
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:9: suspended sediment
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:9: including sediment Please provide clarity as to the meaning of the underlined phase above.
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:1: disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be set back
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:2:9. The report provided gives a clear overview of sediment quality in the Tees river, and potential
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:3:13. The report uses a range of data from marine licensing sediment sampling and targeted
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:3: sediment survey work conducted in the Tees within the last 10 years, to give a broad overview
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:3: of the quality and chemical composition of sediment within the River. These data include
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:3:16. Conclusions about sediment quality largely rely on the assessment of previous licensing
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:3: sediment management options alternative to disposal to adhere to the waste hierarchy
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:4: cumulative impact to ecological receptors from the disposal of dredged sediment offshore.
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:4: sediment. For cumulative operations of this scale, some modelling to determine the likely
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:5: receive disposed sediment of Tees Bay C (TY150) cannot be answered in this consultation,
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:5: and would likely require sediment and plume dispersal modelling as part of a cumulative
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:5:31. The sediment data presented for this application have been reported in the MMO Results
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:6: (TY150) to receive the volumes of sediment proposed by both the NGCT and South Bank
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:2: • Capital dredging of approximately 1,800,000m3 of marine sediments with offshore disposal into the Tees Bay C disposal
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:6:including sediment
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:7: • Intertidal mixed sediments footprint is within close proximity to the North Tees mudflat,
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:8: • Common Tern (B) suspended sediments during dredging represents a very localised,
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:8: temporary and short-term disturbance, with any suspended sediment
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:9: • Intertidal mixed sediments • Water column
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:9: sediments (water clarity). However, any changes will be localised
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:9: sediment transport patterns. The magnitude of changes in water
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:9: baseline sediment transport patterns, except for the principal effect
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:10: • Sanderling the baseline sediment transport process or morphological function
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:10: • Intertidal mixed sediments • Water column
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:10: not sufficient to cause far-field effects on the baseline sediment
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:10: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:11: area will be habituated to fluctuating sediment levels. The
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:11: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:12: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:12: sediment transport patterns, except for the principal effect of a likely
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:12: baseline sediment transport process or morphological function of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:13:another sediment • Salicornia and other annuals colonising mud there are the following features:
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:13: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:13: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:13: temporary loss of marine sediment. The construction activities
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:14: • Intertidal mixed sediments
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:15: • Intertidal mixed sediments a land barrier there should be no pathway for potential impacts to
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:15: far-field effects on the baseline sediment transport process,
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:15: • Intertidal mixed sediments No Likely Significant Effect concluded.
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:17:including sediment • Little Tern (B)
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:18: • Common Tern (B) suspended sediments during dredging represents a very localised,
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:18: sediment likely to rapidly settle back on the bed following
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:18: • Intertidal mixed sediments
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:18: baseline sediment transport patterns, except for the principal effect
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:19: the baseline sediment transport process or morphological function
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:19: Changes in suspended sediment (water clarity) submitted with this application. Licence application
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:20: dredged sediment will be reused as part of this project. considered further here.
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:21:Terminal m3 of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of the approach scheme, in-combination effects to the interest features of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:22:to above water noise, barrier to species movement, visual disturbance water flow (tidal current) changes, including sediment transport considerations and
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:22:changes in suspended sediments (water clarity).
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:25:sediment (water will cause plumes of sediment to measures for the proposed scheme in the
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:25: characterised by a short-lived one time, sediment plumes occupy only
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:25: sediment concentrations by the barriers to species movement.
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:25:including sediment • Gadwall order of a few hundred mg/l at the
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:25: • Black-headed gull ensure sediment plumes are only
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:25: Subtidal coarse sediment plume effects will be observed
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:26: Changes in suspended sediment (water clarity) submitted with this application. Licence application
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:26: as the dredged sediment will be reused as part of this works.
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:28:(NGCT) million m3 of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of scheme, in-combination effects to the interest features of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:28: million m3 of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of
MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:29: • Dredging along the axis of the River Tees will be undertaken to ensure sediment plumes are only occurring in half of the river during capital dredging
20210615 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA _ SEAL Advice Followup+SJB.pdf:1: in my capacity as scientific and technical advisor for sediment quality in relation to, and
20210615 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA _ SEAL Advice Followup+SJB.pdf:2: but ultimately deferred comment until sediment sampling data would be presented. The
20210615 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA _ SEAL Advice Followup+SJB.pdf:2: applicant presented interim sediment sampling data for comment by Cefas (Jemma Lonsdale,
20210615 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA _ SEAL Advice Followup+SJB.pdf:2: sedimentary rocks (Merriman et al. 2003). Compositions of such mudstone may be
20210615 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA _ SEAL Advice Followup+SJB.pdf:2: considered exempt from sediment analysis as per the OSPAR guidelines 5.2a and 5.2b 1 –
20210615 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA _ SEAL Advice Followup+SJB.pdf:7: fine grained sedimentary rocks: clay, mudstone, shale and slate. British Geological Survey
20220608 MLA2020005061 L20121003331 Cefas advice Final.pdf:1: in my capacity as scientific and technical advisor for sediment quality in relation to, and
20220608 MLA2020005061 L20121003331 Cefas advice Final.pdf:3: Sediment Plume Modelling_Final.pdf and ‘pdf sections 2.1 and 2.2.’ which were listed on MCMS
20220608 MLA2020005061 L20121003331 Cefas advice Final.pdf:3: with a knowledge of coastal process review the hydrodynamic and sediment plume modelling
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:3:3.6 Capital dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils / landside materials within
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:4:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME 43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:4:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY 134
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:8:5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:8:6 Sediment sampling plan
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:9:effects on tidal currents and sediment transport may occur (i.e. the potential zone of influence). The
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:9: The study area for marine topics comprises the hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling domain,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:15:berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:22:3.6 Capital dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils /
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:22:estuarine (marine) sediments and excavation of soils / landside materials within the riverbank to create the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:22:A summary of the proposed design levels and dredge volumes for marine sediments is detailed in Section
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:22:3.6.1 Volume of marine sediments to be dredged
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:22:The total dredge volume for marine sediments is predicted to be approximately 1,800,000m3. As detailed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:22:marine sediment is anticipated to comprise Tidal Flat Deposits and Glacial Till. It is proposed that all areas
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:24:Table 3.2 Proposed volumes of marine sediments to be dredged (excluding over-dredge volumes)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:24:transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger to the offshore disposal site. It is assumed that
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:24:In addition to the removal of marine sediments, the proposed scheme will require the excavation of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:24:avoid the risk of a jack-up barge ‘punching’ into the underlying sediments when berthed at the quay during
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:25:sediments from the river channel would be deposited offshore within the Tees Bay C disposal site. As noted
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:33:suitable locations for the re-use of dredged sediment; three were located adjacent to the South Gare
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:51:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:51:This section presents the baseline conditions with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:51:While the proposed scheme has the potential to alter hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes, the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:51:The assessment of potential effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime has been made with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:51:that are relevant to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes, as presented within the NPS for Ports, are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:51:Where relevant, applicants should undertake coastal geomorphological and sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:51:shorelines where the proposal could inhibit sediment flow or have an impact on coastal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:52:Table 6.2 MPS requirements relevant to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:52:activity or development will have on coastal processes, including sediment movement.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:52:hydrodynamics and the sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:52:Table 6.3 North East Marine Plan policies relevant to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:52:A summary of consultation responses relevant to the assessment of hydrodynamics and sedimentary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:53: aspects of relevance to hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes, namely: on the tidal prism of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:53: as stop start thresholds for parameters such as suspended sediment and 13 and Section 7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:53:For hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes, the study area needs to cover all areas of river, adjacent
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:54:Figure 6.1 Study area for assessing potential effects on hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:54:There has been much previous work to characterise the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:54:Table 6.5 Review of existing information on the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:54:2002 Teesmouth Sediment Study. HR Wallingford, 1989
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:54: Further information relating to sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:55: Anglo American Harbour Facilities – modelling, sediment transport, bed change
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:55: Environmental Statement. modelling and modelling of sediment plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:57:sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary, carried out over many decades. This work is summarised below
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:57:Table 6.6 Review of existing information on the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:57:2002 Teesmouth Sediment Study. HR Wallingford, 1989
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:57: Further information relating to sediment contamination and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:57: Anglo American Harbour Facilities – Royal HaskoningDHV, modelling, wave modelling, sediment transport, bed change
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:57: Environmental Statement. 2014 modelling and modelling of sediment plume released from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:60: • Sediment plume modelling: The updated and verified 3D Tees Estuary Tidal Model was used to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:60: predict movement of suspended sediment from the proposed dredging and disposal activities by
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:60: coupling with a sediment plume model built in MIKE21-MT software. The sediment plume model
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:60:synthesised and used in combination with knowledge of other factors, such geological constraints, sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:60:the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime through an Expert Geomorphological Assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:62:of reaches require maintenance dredging to remove both sands and silts. The volume of sediments dredged
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:62:cumulatively (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2013). A notable proportion of this sediment is marine sand that is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:62:channel deepened to its present depth. The role of the River Tees in supplying fine sediment to the coastal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:62:to allow bypassing of sediment, but observed accumulations upstream, and a 24% reduction in the dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:62:requirement of the harbour, indicates that much of the river sediment is trapped by the structure (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:63:sediments) which is offset by maintenance dredging and disposal at offshore licenced disposal site Tees
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:66:Tees Bay and the Tees estuary attract sediment because the tidal current flows are generally quite low
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:66:the transport of sediment within Tees Bay, with an overall tendency for southerly directed transport because
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:66:sediment from the seabed enabling more to become transported by the tidal currents during these storms.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:66:subtleties locally influence sediment transport in these locations.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:71:bed upstream (flooding) flows are observed. These effects are important in supplying sediment to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:71:estuary from offshore (the main sediment supply).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:80:It is recognised that the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, as characterised within this
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:80:relative effect of the proposed scheme upon the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime will be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:80:the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime in a relative manner, using the baseline understanding
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:81:6.4.4 Sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:81:Suspended sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:81:In general, suspended sediment concentrations (SSCs) are low within the estuary and within Tees Bay.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:81:the highest suspended sediment levels occur close to high water. After storm periods, higher concentrations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:81:of suspended sediment have been noted around the Shell Jetty, but with little penetration further up the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:81: Suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:84:Sediment sources and transport
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:84:Historic bed sampling results in the vicinity of the proposed scheme show bed sediments in the area to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:84:Within the system the driving forces for sediment transport are the tidal flows, density driven currents, wave
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:85: with the implication that fluvial sediment input to the estuary has reduced (ABPmer, 2005).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:85: sediment into the estuary system. This material comes in on the flood tide, particularly during times
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:86:has also been utilised to move recently deposited accumulations of sediment to adjacent scour spots within
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:86:the river, thus maintaining sediment within the estuarine system and reducing the overall volumes of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:89:A review of the dredged sediment quality data is presented in Section 7.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:90:sedimentary regime arising from the demolition works is very low.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:90:6.5.2 Capital dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:91:Each year, between 25 – 30 million tonnes (wet weight) of dredged marine sediments from ports, harbours
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:91:offshore site will both result in sediment plumes. These effects have been investigated using numerical
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:91:modelling of the sediment dispersion associated with the dredging and disposal activities, as well as the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:91:changes in bed thickness when the suspended sediment falls from the plume to become deposited on the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:91:A MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model has been coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic model (MIKE3-HD)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:91:disturbance effects have been included. The dredging methods, schedule and sediment release settings
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:91:sediment releases have been made near continuously throughout the dredging operations (except for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:91:Results from the sediment dispersion modelling are discussed in turn for the dredging and disposal activities.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:91:Note that all the modelling plots in the following sections show the elevations in SSC or sediment deposition
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:108:The sediment plumes that arise from the four stages of the dredging could potentially affect areas of riverbed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:108:or seabed that are remote from the point of sediment release in terms of either increases in SSC or increases
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:108:in sediment deposition. This could affect water quality (in terms of increased turbidity) or aquatic ecology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:110:Sediment suspended within the dredging plumes will fall to the riverbed, either soon after disturbance or
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:110:spillage occurring during the dredging operation (for coarser-grained sediment fractions), or at a point in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:110:finer-grained sediment fractions). Figure 6.50 shows the maximum changes in riverbed thickness caused
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:110:by this deposition. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the dredged areas (from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:110:zone of influence from the sediment plumes.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:111:Figure 6.50 Maximum riverbed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:111:Within this maximum zone of influence from sediment plumes and bed deposition, the following receptors
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:111:could potentially be adversely affected by increases in SSC or increases in sediment deposition (or both
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:112:during Stage 4. Similarly it is only point 3 where any appreciable sediment deposition occurs, and this is at
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:112:and at Mudflat 3 it increases by a peak of 8mg/l (Figure 6.54). Sediment deposition on the mudflats is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:112:6.56). Sediment deposition at these locations is predicted to be immeasurable (Figure 6.57).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:112:background levels of concentrations (Figure 6.58). Sediment deposition at Location 6 (Middlesbrough
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:113:Overall changes of these magnitudes in SSC and sediment deposition are unlikely to cause significant
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:113:Figure 6.51 Location of points used for of timeseries analysis of changes in SSC and sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:114:Figure 6.53 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the water quality monitoring points
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:115:Figure 6.55 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the mudflat monitoring points
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:116:Figure 6.57 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the navigation (north bank) monitoring
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:117:Figure 6.59 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the navigation (south bank) monitoring
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:118:is licensed for the disposal of dredged sediment and is routinely monitored as part of a national programme.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:118:Therefore, plumes arising from disposal activities and subsequent sediment deposition is unlikely to be of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:118:activity commences and starts to form its own sediment plume (Plot H), the initial plume has moved
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:126:sediment plume associated with one release event (this example being from Stage 1). It can be seen that
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:126:much of the sediment falls to the bed within close proximity of the point of release, forming a small deposit
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:128:Figure 6.65 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from one disposal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:129:Figure6.66 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from one disposal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:129:Whilst turbidity and sediment deposition effects within the disposal site are to be expected (and indeed are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:130:changes in SSC and sediment deposition
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:131:The river dredging and offshore disposal activities will both cause plumes of sediment to form close to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:131:and all sediment particles suspended in the water column will eventually settle to the river or seabed,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:131:During dredging, there will be a release of sediment particles from the deliberate physical disturbance to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:131:point of sediment release, the enhanced SSC values are considerably lower because the coarser material
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:132:and the Oil Terminal. Other than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition on the riverbed will be of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:132:very minor magnitudes, in areas covering the same spatial extent as the sediment plumes. Where this
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:132:Overall, the changes in SSC and sediment deposition arising from the river dredging and offshore disposal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:132:sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:140: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is positive as it will help
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:141:6.6.4 Maintenance dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:141:maintenance dredging is likely to be due to the low levels of suspended sediment measured in this reach of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:142:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:142:This section presents the baseline conditions with regard to sediment and water quality of the Tees estuary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:142:and sedimentary regime (see Section 6) as well as recent survey data collected to inform other project EIAs
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:142:The assessment of potential impacts on marine sediment and water quality has been made with reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:142:Table 7.1 Summary of NPS requirements with regard to marine sediment and water quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:143:Table 7.2 Summary of scoping consultation responses with regard to marine sediment and water
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:143: sediment and dissolved oxygen.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:143: proposed dredge on water and sediment quality are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:143: the findings of hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:143: sediment and create smothering effects / turbidity / sediment plumes.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:143: based on the anticipated sediment types to be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:144: dispose of capital dredged sediment. Impacts
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:144: As part of the application, the applicant will need to provide sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:144:For marine sediment and water quality, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:144:hydrodynamic and sediment dispersion modelling and is based on the maximum extent over which effects
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:144:are predicted to occur (e.g. sediment plumes generated during capital dredging and effects on tidal currents
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:144:The description of the existing environment with regard to sediment quality has been informed through desk-
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:144:based review of existing sediment quality data. The most recent publicly available sediment quality data to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:144:7.3.2.1 Sediment data
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:144:The assessment of potential impacts associated with disturbance of sediment during the construction phase
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:144: • Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQG) for the Protection of Aquatic Life (Canadian Council
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:145:can be quantified. Therefore, for EIA, in the same way, if contaminant levels in the sediments under
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:145:application of additional sediment quality guidelines (as outlined below) or undertaking more detailed water
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:145:The CSQG involved the derivation of interim marine sediment quality guidelines (ISQGs), or Threshold
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:145:contaminated sediments to a range of aquatic organisms exposed in laboratory tests and under field
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:145:conditions (CCME, 2002). As a result, these guidelines provide an indication of likely toxicity of sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:146:If additional assessment is indicated to be required as a result of recording elevated sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:146:above the lower Cefas Action Level 1, the undertaking of simple calculations using estimates of sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:146:losses from dredging equipment and concentrations of contaminants within the sediments to be dredged
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:147:The methodology used to assess the significance of the potential environmental impacts on marine sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:147:7.4.1 Sediment quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:147:Results of the sediment quality data from the NGCT marine licence application
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:147:PDT carried out a sediment quality survey in July 2019 to inform the marine licence application for the NGCT
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:147:the two schemes, specifically at the Tees Dock turning circle. Results from the NGCT sediment quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:147:survey are detailed below. The NGCT sediment quality sampling positions in relation to the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:148: ( 2019 sediment sampling locations for NGCT
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:148: A3 G1 NGCT Sediment sampling locations (2019)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:149:Table 7.6 Summary of sediment quality data from the NGCT sediment quality survey (2019)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:152:sediment samples recovered in 2006, with BDE209 concentrations ranging from <0.5µg/kg to 340µg/kg.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:152:that found in 2006. The MMO has recently confirmed that the sediment to be dredged from the NGCT
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:153:Summary of previous sediment quality surveys in the Tees
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:153:The findings of sediment quality surveys undertaken in support of previously consented schemes in the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:153:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:153:within Tees Dock. Though showing signs of minor contamination, it was determined that the ‘soft’ sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:153:The 2006 sediment quality survey undertaken to inform the 2008 HRO application involved the recovery of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:156:In general, suspended sediment concentrations are low within the estuary and within Tees Bay. The highest
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:156:within the estuary) and analysed in the laboratory for suspended sediment concentrations. The results
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:156:this period, concentrations of suspended sediment were very low. It should be noted however, that the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:156:Table 7.8 Suspended sediment concentrations recorded at Transect T8 in July 2020
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:156: Suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:156:A site-specific sediment quality survey is proposed to be undertaken during 2020 to provide a detailed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:156:understanding of sediment quality within the proposed scheme footprint and validate the information set out
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:156:of sediment samples from 25 stations from the surface and at depth, with sampling positions equally spread
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:156:In the absence of the proposed scheme, there is no reason to believe that sediment and water quality within
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:156:sediment sampling being undertaken from the surface in accordance with the conditions on the maintenance
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:157:7.5.1 Dispersion and redistribution of sediment during capital dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:157:Capital dredging would result in the creation of sediment plumes. To consider the potential extent and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:157:Modelling was undertaken using a MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:158:Figure 7. 3 Plume of suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities during Stage 2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:160:Figure 7. 5 Plume of suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities during Stage
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:161:Figure 7.6 Plume of enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:162:Figure 7.7 Timeseries of changes in suspended sediment concentrations at water quality monitoring
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:162:sediment plume is not predicted to reach The Gares water quality monitoring point, no effects on the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:162:Additionally, a significant component of the dredged material is likely to be geological sediment, which is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:163:The concentrations of PAHs and metals within the sediments in the Tees estuary could potentially affect
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:163:An assessment to look at the potential for sediments exceeding Action Level 1 to cause EQS failures has
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:163:estimates of sediment losses from dredging equipment and concentrations of contaminants within the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:163:sediments to be dredged to provide an indication of the amount of contamination that could be released into
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:163:sediments and no account is made of any settlement of sediment that may occur immediately following
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:163:from these calculations that a risk is presented by the concentrations of zinc in the sediment and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:163:sediment as a result of the proposed scheme) although the maximum allowable concentration was not
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:164:sediment per day and maximum concentrations both in the water and in the sediment)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:164: in sediments in sediments concentration with baseline
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:164: Sediment data taken from NGCT 2019 (see Table 7.5)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:164: Calculated loss of sediment derived using indicative values for the mass of sediment resuspended per m 3 of dredged material in CIRIA guidance (John et al., 1999) in kg/m3. Worst case S-Factor for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:165:sediment per day and maximum concentrations in the water and in the sediment)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:165: sediments sediments concentration with baseline
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:166:of zinc and benzo(b)fluoranthene (both sediment and water quality values) at low water volumes within the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:166:estuary. If the calculations at mean low water are re-run using average concentrations (sediment and water
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:166: • The calculations assume that all sediment remains in suspension. In reality, it is likely that some
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:166: likely that some contamination will remain bound to sediment particles.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:166: • The maximum concentration within the sediments used for each parameter does not occur across
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:166: • The maximum values for water quality concentrations are not reflective of sediment conditions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:166: releases less sediment into the water column.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:166:Additionally, information from sediment plume modelling (see Section 7.5.1) indicates that only the Smiths
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:166:7.5.4 Release of sediment during riverbank excavation to create the berth
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:167:As these works progress, there is the potential for sediment to be suspended when working in and around
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:168:7.6.1 Dispersion and redistribution of sediment during maintenance dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:191: • Impacts on marine ecology from increased suspended sediment during capital dredging and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:194:hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling undertaken. This section excludes consideration of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:195:Cross reference to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (Section 6) and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:195:the marine sediment and water quality assessment (Section 7) has been made when assessing potential
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:195:quay wall to create the berth pocket will remove both intertidal sediments and landside materials / soils.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:197: sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the Markey
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:197: sediments deposited during the Holocene, which overlie the glacial deposits from the last
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:197: and subsidence to south makes these sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:198:present in sediments from the survey area are rare and therefore, in this respect, the species present were
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:198:SS.SMu.ISaMU.Cap (Capitella capitata in enriched sublittoral muddy sediments) and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:198:sediment), where C. capitata dominated and was accompanied by large numbers of Ophryotrocha sp.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:198:These species are characteristic of fine sediments, usually with some level of organic pollution and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:199: would be indirectly affected (e.g. through sediment deposition during capital dredging).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:199:Sediment type
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:199:Sediment types, as classified using the Folk triangle (Folk, 1954) for each of the sample stations across the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:199:2019 survey area are provided in Figure 9.3. A variety of sediment types were present across the survey
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:199:Sediment biotopes
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:199:‘Capitella capitata and Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:201:Figure9.3 Comparison of Folk (Folk, 1954) sediment types as determined from PSD analysis of samples acquired during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey, 2019
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:202:Figure 9.4 Distribution of biotopes determined from PSD and macrobenthic analysis of samples recovered during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey, 2019
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:204:sediments and in estuarine environments (Wolff 1968, Hughes 1998). The beds can play an important role
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:204:walkovers have confirmed that the intertidal comprises intertidal mud and gravelly sediment with rocks and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:206: A2 – Littoral sediment A2.12 Estuarine coarse sediment shores
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:206:Occasional areas of impoverished coarse sediment was also found along the low-mid shore (Ocean
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:206:depths, which would continue to influence the benthic communities present within the subtidal sediments.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:208: A. islandica is found buried in sandy and muddy sediments from the low intertidal zone down to 400m
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:209:that impede the natural movement of sediments and poor transition of habitats). Although there are areas
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:210:9.5.2 Effects of increased suspended sediment concentrations during dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:210:will disturb sediment, which will result in localised and short-term increases in suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:210:Based on sediment quality sampling that was undertaken within the Tees estuary in July 2019 (as reported
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:210:in Section 7), it is not expected that any contaminated sediment would be released into the water column
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:210:ecology as a result of increased concentrations of suspended sediment within the water column (i.e.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:210:resuspended sediment which does not contain elevations beyond Action Level 2). The dredged sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:210:filter feeding molluscs). In addition, high concentrations of suspended sediment may impact on fish through
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:210:In general, sediment plumes induced by dredging are considered to pose only a limited risk to water quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:210:dredging periods. The sediment plume generated by dredging would likely be dispersed by tidal currents
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:210:upon disturbance of the sediment.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:211:during spring tides (Section 7.4.2). These are considerably lower than suspended sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:211:immediate vicinity of the dredger. Sediment plume modelling predicts different plume extents and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:211:suspended sediment concentrations depending on the stage of dredging (as described in Section 6). In all
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:211:cases, the sediment plume is predicted to be very narrow within the river, with the phase of dredging with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:211:The sediment plume modelling reported within Section 6 also extracted time series plots of changes in SSC
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:211:importance (where information is available) to increases in suspended sediment. This information is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:211:S. spinulosa relies on suspended particles for its tube growth. Increased suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:211:to increases in suspended sediment concentrations, according to this sensitivity review.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:211:A. islandica typically occurs in silty sediments, in sheltered to wave exposed conditions, where the surface
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:211:sediment likely gets resuspended regularly, and where accretion rates and moderate to high. A. islandica
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:211:can burrow in the sediment it lives in for several days, thereby it is able to avoid sudden changes in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:211:the proposed dredge is considered to be of low sensitivity to increases in suspended sediment.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:The dominant sediment biotope present within the dredge footprint is EUNIS biotope A5.323, Nephtys
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:resistance and resilience to changes in suspended sediment and was reported to be not sensitive (to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:changes in suspended sediment) (De-Bastos, 2016). As such, for the purposes of this assessment, the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:Given the temporary and localised nature of the predicted increase in suspended sediment, in addition to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:the low/very low sensitivity of the key species present in the estuary to increased suspended sediment, an
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:is 32.5ha. This is expected to cause a very limited extent of suspended sediment concentrations, and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:Some of the sediment that is suspended as a result of the dredging activities will be deposited to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:sediment fractions), or at a point in time within a few minutes to a few hours after this if it is carried in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:suspension by the prevailing currents (for finer-grained sediment fractions) (Section 6). The modelling
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:carried out on this, as reported in Section 6, indicates that much of the resuspended sediment is deposited
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:from the sediment plumes.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:(deposition) from the sediment plume model were extracted at a series of points within the affected river
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:reaches (relating to locations of mudflats, as shown on Figure 6.53). Sediment deposition at all of these
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:et al., 2004). This movement of water allows for any deposited sediment to be moved around and away
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:relatively quickly. However, some sediment may still be present long enough to damage the fronds of F.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:213:sediments at Seal Sands, Bran Sands or North Gare Sands, due to the limited footprint of dredging activities,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:213:up to a deposit of 5 cm because they are able to burrow and reposition within the new sediment (Whomersley
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:213:sediment. This information is presented below.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:213:MarLIN reports that even though smothering by fine sediments may temporarily limit the feeding, growth
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:213:sediments for up to several weeks, and that recovery would be almost immediate. As such, S. spinulosa is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:213:of sediments, with no effect on its growth or population structure being evident as a result of smothering
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:213:(Powilliet et al., 2006; 2009). As such, it is considered that a deposit of up to 30cm of fine sediments is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:213:A sudden smothering of 5cm of sediment would temporarily suspend the feeding and respiration of A. alba
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:213:species that characterise fine sediment habitats within estuarine areas (mainly polychaete and oligochaete
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:213:of fluctuating environmental conditions, such as periodic sediment disturbance due to storms and are not
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:213:concluded therefore, that the rates of sediment deposition, and the overall degree of sedimentation, that is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:214:component of the benthic community. Considering this, the predicted rates of sediment deposition, and the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:214:as a result of the deposition of fine sediments, with no impact in the longer term.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:215:may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment (Section 6.6.2). In areas adjacent to the north bank
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:215:The predicted changes to the rate of sedimentation within the navigation channel as a consequence of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:217:mammals from the offshore disposal of dredged sediments are assessed in Section 26.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:223:known prey for harbour porpoise, exhibit a strong association with particular surface sediments.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:235:widely, dependent on the dredger type, operational stage, or environmental conditions (e.g. sediment type,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:sediment within the water column. However, marine mammals often inhabit turbid environments.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments during dredging or other activities will
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:disturbance and temporary loss of seabed habitat; increased suspended sediment concentrations and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:sediment re-deposition; smothering and underwater noise.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:256: hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume effects would not extend to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:257: hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume effects would not extend to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:270: • hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (Section 6);
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:270: • marine sediment and water quality (Section 7);
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:279:Cross reference has been made, where relevant, to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:296:In summary, the largest sediment plumes are likely to arise during Stage 2 of the dredging (i.e. BHD and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:296:(it is not a sediment plume, rather a combined zone of influence). The sediment dispersion modelling of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:296:of this assessment, the sediment plume may be regarded as representing a temporary loss of foraging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:297:terns do not forage to any significant extent within the predicted range of the sediment plume. Likewise, the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:297:tern species as a result of increased suspended sediments during the construction phase.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:297:and re-suspension of sediment (Cook and Burton, 2010). However, common terns typically only dive to 1m
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:297:England, 2018a), and the area likely to be affected by the sediment plume at any one time represents around
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:298:12.5.3 Effects of sediment deposition on intertidal food resources
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:298:The deposition of fine sediment within intertidal areas due to capital dredging has the potential to affect
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:298:dredging, is presented in Section 6.5.2. Fine sediment will be deposited within minutes or hours if carried
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:306:invertebrate prey to birds feeding on the mudflats . The predicted minor accretion of sediment at North Tees
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:307:sediments are assessed in Sections 26. Potential cumulative impacts are addressed in Section 27.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:309: thresholds for parameters such as suspended sediment and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:309:informed by the hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling undertaken, as well as the understanding
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:310:Cross reference to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (Section 6), the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:312:inhabiting soft sediment environments.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:318:During capital dredging, approximately 1.8Mm3 of sediment (including approximately 1.27Mm3 of soft
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:318:details of the increase in SSC, including the visual output of sediment plume modelling for the capital
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:318:dredging, is provided in Section 6. The peak suspended sediment concentration within the Tees during the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:319:As detailed in the water quality assessment in Section 7, sediment quality testing from 2019 indicates that
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:319:it is very unlikely that disturbance of sediment during the dredging would result in exceedances of EQSs,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:319:sediment plume creating a ‘barrier’ effect could cause a significant disruption to the annual migration pattern,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:319:during a period of very hot and dry weather. Modelling of the sediment plume during capital dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:319:of suspended sediments are predicted to decrease significantly with increased distance from the dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:320:period. However, while unlikely, it has to be taken into account that sediment plumes encompassing the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:328:capital dredging activity will consequently result in an increase in sediment deposition, which has the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:328:fish/shellfish. The extent of sediment deposition above baseline levels is detailed in Section 6. The
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:328:maximum sediment deposition, illustrated in Figure 6.50, shows that much of the sediment falls to bed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:328:sediment deposition, it again can be assumed that feeding fish would be accustomed to similar conditions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:329:dominated by fucoid algae). The intertidal area comprises mud and gravelly sediment with some rocks.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:333:not match the advertised depths due to sedimentation within the channel).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:337: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is positive as it will help
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:343: sedimentary regime (see Section 6) the study area comprises all areas of river, adjacent coastline
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:346:heritage assets which may arise as a result of changes to hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:347:by-product of changes to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes resulting from a project) may also depend
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:352:Archaeology, 2014) suggested the presence of five sedimentary units:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:352: • Unit 2 Estuarine alluvium and peat (possible mid-Holocene sediments);
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:352: • Unit 3 Marine sediments/ Estuarine alluvium;
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:352: • Unit 4 Estuarine alluvium/ polluted fluvial sediments; and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:352:remains, preserved beneath later sediments. Given this potential, geoarchaeological assessment of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:359:directly and indirectly change the hydrodynamic and sedimentary process regimes, both locally and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:359:than those protected by sediment cover. Conversely, if increased sedimentation results in an exposed site
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:359:Potential effects upon the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime are assessed in Section 6. With regard
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:359:to effects during construction it is concluded that, other than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:360:hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary. Consequently, there is no pathway for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:360:additional, indirect impacts to heritage assets associated with changes in sediment deposition, over and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:360: • Reductions in baseline current speeds may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:421: • Effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:424:well as hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling reported in Section 6.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:425:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (as set out in Section 6)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:467:This would include dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils / landside material within the river
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:467:The total dredged volume for marine sediments is predicted to be approximately 1,800,000m3. Dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:467:the transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger to the offshore disposal site.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:478:The proposed scheme is predicted to generate up to approximately 1,800,000m3 of dredged sediment from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:478:been undertaken on a worst-case basis whereby all dredged sediment from the Tees estuary would be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:478:As the offshore disposal commences, a plume of sediment would be generated with the greatest
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:478:concentrations predicted at the end of the discharge period. The sediment plume is predicted to increase
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:478:commences and starts to form its own sediment plume, the initial plume has moved sufficiently far from its
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:478:deposition of sediment. As shown on Figure 6.66, deposited sediment from one disposal event is predicted
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:479:Based on the modelled effects of the sediment plume at the Tees Bay C disposal site described above, it is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:479:The PSD results show that the sediments within and adjacent to Tees Bay C comprise gravelly muddy sand,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:482: sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:482:of the disposal site. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling has predicted some short-term build-up of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:482:sediment at the disposal site, however, this would be dispersed over time.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:482:sensitive to smothering or increases in suspended sediment.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:485:for the assessment of potential impacts associated with offshore disposal of dredged sediments (see
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:485:disposal of dredged sediments are likely to be less than those generated during dredging activities. The
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:485:display a fleeing response, as a result of underwater noise during offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:485:offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:485: sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:485:result of underwater noise associated with offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:485: sediments based on density of 0.014/km2 for reference population anticipated to be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486:disposal of dredged sediments would be limited to the immediate vicinity of the vessels while they are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486:dredged sediments on harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486:sediments on marine mammals
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: sediments Negligible / Negligible
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: sediments (5% of (0.00003% of the NE England MU) based (permanent effect with less than 0.001% of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during offshore disposal of dredged sediments has been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487:disturbance due to the disposal of dredged sediment into the disposal site to seals at Seal Sands, including
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:dredged sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:The offshore disposal of dredged material would temporarily increase the suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:Changes to marine mammals prey resource during offshore disposal of dredged sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:temporary loss of seabed habitat, increased suspended sediment concentrations and sediment re-
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:490:disturbance and increased suspended sediments on migratory fish).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:490: influencing the same area as affected by the sediment plume); and,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:492: of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of the approach channel, Approximately
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:493: effect on sediment transport or morphology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:494: the Tees navigation channel, the turning circle and Tees Dock to a hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:500:27.5.2 Hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:500: • dispersion of suspended sediment during capital dredging and deposition at the offshore disposal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:500: • changes to the sediment budget.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:500:(increased suspended sediment concentrations) are relevant to the CIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:500:Dispersion of suspended sediment and deposition on the seabed during capital dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:500:sediment which will disperse throughout the estuary according to the prevailing currents, prior to settling on
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:500:The extent of the sediment plume created by capital dredging is heavily dependent on the dredging plant
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:501:be used for dredging different sediment types as part of the same project. As noted in Section 6.5.2, it is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:501:important to note that figures showing the “maximum extent of sediment plume dispersion and deposition”
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:501:Consequently, for the purposes of this CIA, the maximum zones of influence of sediment plume dispersion
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:501:27.3 presents a summary of the results of the predictive modelling of suspended sediment concentration
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:501:of sediment plume dispersion and deposition onto the river and/or seabed during capital dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:501:sediment in the water column was predicted to be in close proximity to the dredger, with plume dispersion
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:501:resulting in a significantly reduced concentration of suspended sediment beyond the source of the plume.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:501:For the NGCT studies, significant deposition of sediment was also only predicted in close proximity to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:502:(right) as a result of the proposed scheme [Note: plots show sediment plume impacts arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:503: • effect of increases in suspended sediments during maintenance dredging on food resources of SPA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:503: • remobilisation and redistribution of sediments (which may be contaminated); and,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:503:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:503:sediment, and this measure would limit sediment release into the water column as far as practicable. The
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:503:sediment and water quality, marine ecology, ornithology, fish and fisheries) is discussed below.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:505:Changes to estuarine sediment budget
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:505:deposition of sediment which would be positive in areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, as it
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:505:offshore as a result. In addition, no changes to sediment transport in the predominantly sandy areas around
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:505:The Anglo American Harbour Facilities are predicted to result in a localised redistribution of sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:505:very small change in the overall fine sediment regime will not alter the present frequency of, or methodology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:505:used for, maintenance dredging, and no effect on sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:506:cumulative impacts to arise to the estuarine sediment budget as a result of the projects screened into the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:506:27.5.3 Marine sediment and water quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:506:In relation to marine sediment and water quality, the proposed scheme has the potential to result in the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:506: • dispersion of suspended sediment during marine works, dredging and disposal; and,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:506: • changes to water quality associated with the release of sediment contamination.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:506:addition, the predictions made for each project represent sediment plume dispersion under specific tidal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:506:where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each project)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:506:In relation to sediment contamination, data collected to inform the EIAs indicates that concentrations are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:506:additional mitigation measures are identified to reduce any resulting sediment plume as far as possible and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:507:Smothering of benthic invertebrate communities due to deposition of sediment dispersed during
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:507:Sediment deposition resulting from the dredging for the proposed scheme will largely be within the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:507:less than 5cm, within the same area of river that is affected by the zone of influence from the sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:507:(deposition) from the sediment plume model were extracted at a series of points within the affected river
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:507:reaches (relating to locations of mudflats, as shown on Figure 6.51). Sediment deposition at all of these
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:507:The predicted footprints of sediment deposition for the NGCT and the Anglo American Harbour Facilities
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:507:This deposition is likely to be temporary due to the unconsolidated nature of the sediment, and the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:508:The proposed scheme is not predicted to have an effect on sediment supply into the estuary. The very
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:508:minor changes in the hydrodynamic regime, specifically currents, may lead to a slight increase in sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:508:The studies for the NGCT scheme concluded that there would not be a change in the supply of fine sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:508:sediment budget of the estuary and, therefore, was assessed that there would be no impact on morphology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:513:(i.e. dredging along the axis of the river rather than across it to ensure that, at any one time, sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:513:HaskoningDHV, 2015)). However, the additive effect of the sediment plumes from separate dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:514:sediment plumes may deter such species from migrating to and from spawning sites.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:514:the respective sediment plumes could result in an additive effect, as demonstrated in Figures 27.1 to 27.3.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:514:of the sediment plumes from separate dredging campaigns cannot be completely avoided if the campaigns
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:517:hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime (Section 27.5.2) concludes that no significant cumulative impacts
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:526: Intertidal soft sediments (400.13ha); Intertidal soft sediment (845.53ha),
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:526: reef (4.13ha); subtidal soft sediments reef (7170.93ha), Subtidal soft
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:526: (610.31ha). sediments (1219.64ha)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:526: 24.Reduce sediment resuspension
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:526: 26.Sediment management
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:528: sediments with INNS are already present
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:528: measures identified for the Tees estuary. habitats located within sediment plumes created
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:531: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is deemed to be a positive
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:532:Capital dredging within the river would result in sediment plumes. To consider the potential extent and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:532:Modelling was undertaken using a MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:534:Figure 28.4 Timeseries of changes in suspended sediment concentrations at water quality monitoring
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:534:The resuspension of sediment could also potentially affect dissolved oxygen levels in the water. This is due
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:534:represent a more conservative scenario, as sediment plume modelling outlined above indicates relatively
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:534:dissolved oxygen problem or where sediments have a high chemical oxygen demand and that in practice,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:534:high for dissolved oxygen and it is not anticipated that the sediments will have a high chemical oxygen
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:535:In terms of contaminants, the concentrations of PAHs and metals within the sediments in the Tees estuary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:535:and the lower CSQG. An assessment to look at the potential for the release of sediments exceeding Cefas
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:535:Action Level 1 to cause EQS failures was therefore undertaken to inform the marine sediment and water
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:535:maximum concentrations for baseline water quality and sediments in the estuary indicate that there is a risk
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:535:undertaken for high tide volumes in the estuary (for maximum sediment and water quality baseline
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:535:For high water with maximum water and sediment concentrations and use of average concentrations for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:535:both water and sediment quality, the estimated concentrations reduce below EQS. This indicates that the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:535: • The calculations assume that all sediment remains in suspension. In reality, it is likely that some
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:535: likely that some contamination will remain bound to sediment particles.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:535: • The maximum concentration within the sediments used for each parameter does not occur across
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:535: • The maximum values for water quality concentrations are not reflective of sediment conditions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:535: releases less sediment into the water column.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:535:Additionally, sediment plume results for Smiths Dock monitoring point (point 3) indicated only temporary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:535:therefore the majority of the dredge would impact on the lower sensitivity habitat ‘subtidal soft sediment’ of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:535:berth pocket would remove 25,000m2 of intertidal sediments, of which there are 4,001,300m2 within the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:536:Subtidal sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:536:Results in 2019 indicate a variety of sediment types are present across the survey area and most samples
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:536:infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations were unable to be classified further than the EUNIS level 4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:536:assemblage may take place before the original topography is restored, if the exposed, underlying sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:536:composition and numbers following dredging, it is predicted that the sediment communities would recover
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:536:Intertidal sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:536:walkovers confirm that the intertidal area to be lost comprises intertidal mud and gravelly sediment with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:537:Sediment settlement
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:537:Sediment suspended within the dredging plumes will fall to the riverbed, either soon after disturbance or
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:537:spillage occurring during the dredging operation (for coarser-grained sediment fractions), or at a point in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:537:finer-grained sediment fractions. Figure 28.5 shows the maximum changes in riverbed thickness caused
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:537:by deposition. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the dredged areas (from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:538:zone of influence from the sediment plumes. As a result, a deterioration in ecological class status is not
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:538:Figure 28.5 Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:538:An increase in suspended sediment in the water column may lead to physiological effects in finfish, including
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:538:in sediment concentrations due to the natural fluctuations associated with tidal activity, discharge from the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:538:(including most adult finfish) are generally able to detect early onset of increased sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:539:peak migratory season, when a sediment plume creating a ‘barrier’ effect could cause a significant disruption
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:539: Reduce sediment resuspension disposal activities currently ongoing. Disposal would be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:539: Sediment management
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:541: Reduce sediment resuspension
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:541: Sediment management measures
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:542: Reduce sediment resuspension
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:542: Sediment management
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:543:wall would remove a small area of intertidal soft sediment, the measures outlined in Section 28.8 would
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:544: • Cumulative effects of sediment plumes and associated effects on water quality and fish
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:545:Section 27 considers the potential cumulative effects of the proposed schemes on sediment plumes and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:545:marine water quality. To summarise, whilst the sediment plumes could combine to cover a larger area of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:545:the estuary, additive effects in terms of increasing sediment peaks are not predicted. This is because the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:545:contaminated material has been identified in the Anglo American Harbour Facilities sediments (i.e. above
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:545:proposed project both include mitigation measures to dredge in long strips to reduce the effects of sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:545:Any project that requires dredging would disturb the marine communities within the sediments to be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:545:In terms of wider effects, significant deposition of sediment again is generally only predicted in close
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:547: Sediment transport Hydrodynamic modelling showed that the proposed scheme would give rise to only a small magnitude reduction in baseline flows varying during different phases of the tidal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:547: sediment at the North Tees mudflat which could be seen to be a positive effect in areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay. In the main channel, deposition will
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:547: Modelling for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities concluded that the only effects were likely to be localised redistribution of sediment deposition in response to predicted
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:547: sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees estuary.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:549:Whilst concentrations of contaminants in the sediments indicated a risk to water quality EQS’, assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:549:suspended sediment thus reducing the risk of significant water quality effects. Mitigation measures to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:550:would be sediment plumes associated with dredging simultaneously. However, on further consideration,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:559:proposed scheme nor the modelled extent of the maximum-expected sediment plume from the capital
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:559:Following modelling of noise levels and sediment dispersion, it has been concluded that the overall zone of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:559:influence of the proposed scheme will be determined by the sediment plume during dredging activities.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:562: of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of the approach channel, Approximately proposed scheme, in-combination effects to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:572:on tidal propagation, wave climate, current speeds and sediment budget of the estuarine system) has been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:572:and so will cause no effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:572:The capital dredging of the river will cause plumes of sediment to form. The plume effects arising from the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:572:river dredging are characterised by a short-lived localised increase in suspended sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:572:of sediment from the plumes on the river or seabed will be very small.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:573:The reductions in baseline current speeds may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment. In areas
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:573:Section 28), there is approximately 400ha of “intertidal sediment” habitat within the estuary. The area of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:575:requires use of TSHD and BHD on soft sediment in the channel and berth pocket) will result in plumes of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:575:The sediment dispersion modelling of Stage 2 dredging indicates that, at any given time, significant SSC
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:575:Full details of the sediment dispersion modelling are presented in Section 6.5.2.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:575:England, 2018a). The area affected by the sediment plume generated from proposed dredging, though
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:580:In terms of intra-project effects on foraging common terns, the zone of influence from the sediment plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:581: • effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:582:findings of invertebrate sampling undertaken on sediment samples from The Slems). The HRA undertaken
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:582:proposed scheme in combination with the NGCT scheme represents less than 1% of “intertidal sediment”
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:583:Effects on fish may be compounded by the combined sediment plumes of other projects or plans that may
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:584:An interaction between the sediment plumes would only occur in the unlikely event that the capital dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:584:sediment from Hartlepool channel is not considered sufficient to result in a lethal effect on fish, with any
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:584:sediment plumes occupy only half of the river cross section) has also been proposed for the NGCT project.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:585:29.6.4 In-combination effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:585:wide change in hydrodynamics. There is no predicted effect on the baseline sediment transport regime and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:585:of the Tees and the resultant effect on tidal flows and sediment transport.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:585:change the supply of fine sediment to the Tees, and the sediment predicted to deposit in its berth pocket
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:585:potential for an effect on the sediment budget of the estuary to arise and, therefore, there would be no
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:585:Sedimentary and hydrodynamic modelling undertaken for the consented Hartlepool approach channel
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:585:proposed scheme is predicted to be low. The magnitude of effect on the baseline sediment transport regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:585:sediment transport regime and seabed or shore morphology across the wider study area as a result of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:586:The zone of influence from predicted sediment plumes (including the combined plumes from the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:593:HR Wallingford (2002). Teesmouth Sediment Study. EX 4514.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:593:HR Wallingford (2006). Northern Gateway Container Terminal. Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:593:sediment plumes arising from dredging. Construction Industry Research and Information Association
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:597:Robertson, M.J., Scruton, R.S. and Clarke, K. (2006). Effect of sediment on freshwater fish and fish
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:598:Royal HaskoningDHV (2013). Cell 1 Sediment Transport Study. Phase 1: Scoping Report. Scarborough
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:2:Disposal assessments do not present the maximum bed thickness change due to the sediment disposal,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:2:prior to the modelling, we envisaged that the disposed sediment would mostly remain within, or very close
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:2:that the most important potential coastal process impact would be changes in suspended sediment plumes,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:2:suspended sediment plumes; that being each disposal within the licensed disposal site being released at
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:2:bed thickness caused by deposition of material from the sediment plume associated with one single release
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:3:site used for of timeseries analysis of changes in SSC and sediment deposition (reproduced from ES
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:4:Additional figure Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the offshore disposal site
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:4:different points will be used for subsequent deposits and therefore the maximum SSC and sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:4:Corresponding with these patterns, sediment deposition under this worst case is greatest just beyond the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:5: This reach already experiences deposition of sediments sufficient to necessitate maintenance
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:5: (curtailing sediment supply elsewhere), and we believe that because the anticipated increase in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:6:These results have been compared against the critical velocities for sediment motion.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:7: • In the baseline, the maximum peak currents of 0.20m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:7: • With the scheme, the maximum peak currents of 0.15m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:9: • In the baseline, the maximum peak currents of 0.21m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:9: • With the scheme, the maximum peak currents of 0.19m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:11: • In the baseline, the maximum peak currents of 0.36m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:11: • With the scheme, the maximum peak currents of 0.35m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:13: • Given this, there will not be an increased risk of erosion of existing sediments; rather there may
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:15:screened into the assessment. The individual plots from sediment dispersion modelling undertaken for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:15:each project are presented and discussed. It is not practicable to undertake a combined sediment plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:15:addition, the predictions made for each project represent sediment plume dispersion under specific tidal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:16:scenario where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:16:We would also like to reiterate that the sediment plumes shown in Section 6 of the EIA Report are maximum
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:16:suspended sediment from any stage of the dredging). It is important to note that this type of figure does
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:16:Cefas recommend that you present a revised sediment dispersion model that includes the dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:19:Conclusions about sediment quality largely rely on the assessment of previous licensing sample data as
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:20:The site specific sediment quality survey results have been provided to the MMO (with the exception of
MLA_2020_00506-Returns-56.pdf:6: of contaminated sediment outside of the area bounded
MLA_2020_00506-Returns-56.pdf:6: by Schedule 8. Any movement of contaminated sediment
MLA_2020_00506-Final BH01-BH15 Logs-60.pdf:17: sediment deforma on. Gypsum veins (1-2cm thickness) are locally present. Fractures are very
MLA_2020_00506-Final BH01-BH15 Logs-60.pdf:18: sediment deforma on. Gypsum veins (1-2cm thickness) are locally present. Fractures are very
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:2:Disposal assessments do not present the maximum bed thickness change due to the sediment disposal,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:2:prior to the modelling, we envisaged that the disposed sediment would mostly remain within, or very close
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:2:that the most important potential coastal process impact would be changes in suspended sediment plumes,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:2:suspended sediment plumes; that being each disposal within the licensed disposal site being released at
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:2:bed thickness caused by deposition of material from the sediment plume associated with one single release
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:3:site used for of timeseries analysis of changes in SSC and sediment deposition (reproduced from ES
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:4:Additional figure Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the offshore disposal site
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:4:different points will be used for subsequent deposits and therefore the maximum SSC and sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:4:Corresponding with these patterns, sediment deposition under this worst case is greatest just beyond the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:5: This reach already experiences deposition of sediments sufficient to necessitate maintenance
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:5: (curtailing sediment supply elsewhere), and we believe that because the anticipated increase in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:6:These results have been compared against the critical velocities for sediment motion.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:7: • In the baseline, the maximum peak currents of 0.20m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:7: • With the scheme, the maximum peak currents of 0.15m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:9: • In the baseline, the maximum peak currents of 0.21m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:9: • With the scheme, the maximum peak currents of 0.19m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:11: • In the baseline, the maximum peak currents of 0.36m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:11: • With the scheme, the maximum peak currents of 0.35m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:13: • Given this, there will not be an increased risk of erosion of existing sediments; rather there may
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:15:screened into the assessment. The individual plots from sediment dispersion modelling undertaken for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:15:each project are presented and discussed. It is not practicable to undertake a combined sediment plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:15:addition, the predictions made for each project represent sediment plume dispersion under specific tidal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:16:scenario where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:16:We would also like to reiterate that the sediment plumes shown in Section 6 of the EIA Report are maximum
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:16:suspended sediment from any stage of the dredging). It is important to note that this type of figure does
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:16:Cefas recommend that you present a revised sediment dispersion model that includes the dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:19:Conclusions about sediment quality largely rely on the assessment of previous licensing sample data as
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:20:The site specific sediment quality survey results have been provided to the MMO (with the exception of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:2:the method of removal of sediment that has changed). Therefore, no change in the final operational
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:6: method of the removal of sediment under MLV2) and therefore no change in the final operational
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:6:sediment concentrations during previous consultations, and I noted in my previous advice that “it would
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:6:additional dredged material is likely to compare with the suspended sediment concentrations and plumes
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:6:(provided during consultation for MLV1 in relation to the Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:7:assessment. I recognise that the Applicant has provided the Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:7:comparison of the suspended sediment concentrations and plumes modelled within the original EIA, with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:7:Please provide a side-by-side comparison of the suspended sediment concentrations and plumes
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:7:sediment applied for within MLV2. Therefore, given that the material type and dredge methodology has
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:7:already been modelled, the sediment plume should not be any more extensive than that already
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:8: and sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:8:Request 19 Response section 3.6, states that “as noted in the Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:9:Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling Technical Note provided as Appendix D in document 5 in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:9:The hydrodynamic and sediment plume modelling report took into account (i.e., pre-empted) the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:9:Therefore, the 9-weeks specified within the hydrodynamic and sediment modelling report reflects the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:10:1.34million m3 of dredged sediment cumulatively in any given month with Northern Gateway Container
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-EN-SB-ME-EV-1144-MLA.2022.00506.2 South Bank Quay FIR 20 Response.pdf:11:Report and the updated hydrodynamic and sediment plume modelling report submitted in support of
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 Updated Scheme of Monitoring - May 2022.pdf:1:dredging associated with the South Bank Quay project that sediment suspended within the dredging
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 Updated Scheme of Monitoring - May 2022.pdf:1:coarser-grained sediment fractions), or at a point in time within a few minutes to a few hours after this if it
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 Updated Scheme of Monitoring - May 2022.pdf:2:is carried in suspension by the prevailing currents (for finer-grained sediment fractions). Near surface
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1124 Updated Scheme of Monitoring - May 2022.pdf:4:sufficient given that the modelling indicates the majority of the sediment will fall to the riverbed, either soon
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:1:Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:3:3 Sediment Regime 5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:3:3.2 Sediment Data 5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:3:3.4.3 Sediment Release Assumptions 10
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:3:3.4.4 Sediment Property Representation 10
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:3:Table 3-4: Sediment settling velocity and critical bed shear stress 10
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:Figure 3-3 Sediment release schedule for dredger 9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:Figure 3-4 Sediment release schedule at offshore disposal site 9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:Figure 3-5 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:Figure 3-6 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-surface layer)arising
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:Figure 3-7 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:Figure 3-8 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-surface layer) arising
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:Figure 3-9 Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:Figure 3-10 Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:Figure 3-11 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:from disposal activities under the previously assessed project with all sediment release at the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:Figure 3-12 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:from disposal activities under the proposed project variation to Phase 1 with all sediment release
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:Figure 3-13 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:from disposal activities under the proposed project variation to Phase 1 with sediment release at
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:Figure 3-14 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from disposal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:activities under the previously assessed project with all sediment release at the centre of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:Figure 3-15 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from disposal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:activities under the proposed project variation to Phase 1 with all sediment release at the centre
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:Figure 3-16 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from disposal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:4:activities under the proposed project variation to Phase 1 with sediment release at random points
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:5:The numerical modelling study was reported in Chapter 6: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Processes
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:5:of the EIA Report and the accompanying Appendix 5: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:5: movement of suspended sediment from the proposed dredging and disposal activities by coupling with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:5: a sediment plume model built in MIKE3-MT software. The sediment plume model was run for the entire
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:5:consideration of hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes. The wider study area: (i) extends
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:6: potential spill rate of sediment from the dredging process;
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:7:The effects of these changes in approach to Phase 1 upon the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime have
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:7:been re-assessed using a combination of expert geomorphological assessment (EGA) and sediment plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:8: of sediment. In the main channel the deposition will require periodic dredging to maintain the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:8:Full details were provided within Chapter 6: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Processes of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:8:Report and the accompanying Appendix 5: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Plume Modelling of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:9:3 Sediment Regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:9:This section of the report describes the updated sediment dispersion modelling exercise for Phase 1 of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:9:South Bank Wharf development project that was undertaken to investigate the suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:9:as well as the deepening of parts of the Tees Dock turning area. The sediment transport model was built in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:9:3.2 Sediment Data
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:9:Based on the ground investigation data, for the sediment dispersion modelling, the following particle size
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:9:Sediment Category Sediment Size (mm) Soft material Hard material
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:9:The sediment dispersion model built in MIKE3-MT is coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic model built in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:10:The sediment dispersion model has been run for a three-month period to cover the full duration of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:10:The sediment dispersion model has been setup with four layers in order to differentiate between suspended
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:10:sediment concentrations (SSC) throughout the water column, e.g. near the sea bed and near the water
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:10:In order to simulate the sediment dispersion close to natural conditions, wave disturbance effect has been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:10:The dredging method, dredging schedule and details of the sediment release settings for the sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:11:The sediment will be dredged using a Cutter Suction Dredger (CSD).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:12:maintenance. Figure 3-3 shows the sediment release schedules for the dredger at the South Bank Quay
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:12:sediment release schedules for the transport barge at the offshore disposal site.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:13: Figure 3-3 Sediment release schedule for dredger
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:13: Figure 3-4 Sediment release schedule at offshore disposal site
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:14:3.4.3 Sediment Release Assumptions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:14:The following assumptions have been made for the simulation of sediment plumes arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:14:areas along multiple lines which means the sediment release will be more dispersed and thus the sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:14:3.4.4 Sediment Property Representation
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:14:The five sediment fractions, critical bed shear stresses and fall velocities used in the sediment dispersion
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:14:model to represent bed sediments are shown in Table 3-4. The critical bed shear stress and fall velocities
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:14:Table 3-4: Sediment settling velocity and critical bed shear stress
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:14: Sediment Grading Sediment Settling Critical Shear
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:14:This section describes the CSD dredge and disposal cycle for the two different soil types. The sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:14:release rate, sediment loss rate and discharge sediment rate are the same for each of the dredge areas,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:14:site. The dredger disperses sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 1.11 kg/s. The
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:14:sediment loss rate (the so-called ‘S-factor’) is taken as 6 kg/m3 for the CSD which follows the CIRIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:15:site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 2038.333 kg/s. The barge will then take 80
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:15:disperses sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 2.5 kg/s. The sediment loss rate
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:15:site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 11,891.67 kg/s. The barge will then take 80
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:15:Results from the updated sediment dispersion modelling for proposed variations to the Phase 1 project are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:15:following sections show the elevations in SSC or sediment deposition due to these activities above baseline
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:15:For SSC and sediment deposition, maximum ‘zone of influence’ plots are presented in following sections.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:17: Figure 3-5 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from dredging activities under the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:18:Figure 3-6 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-surface layer)arising from dredging activities under the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:19:Figure 3-7 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from dredging activities under the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:20: Figure 3-8 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-surface layer) arising from dredging activities under the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:21:bed thickness caused by the deposition of sediment from the plumes created by river dredging. It can be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:21:seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the dredged areas (from where it will be re-dredged
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:21:sediment plumes.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:21: Figure 3-9 Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging activities under the previously
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:22:to within the footprint of the dredged areas, from where the re-deposited sediment will be dredged and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:22: Figure 3-10 Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging activities under the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:22:licensed for the disposal of dredged sediment and is routinely monitored as part of a national programme.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:22:Therefore, plumes arising from disposal activities and subsequent sediment deposition is unlikely to be of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:23: Figure 3-11 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from disposal activities under the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:23:previously assessed project with all sediment release at the centre of the disposal site Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:24: Figure 3-12 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from disposal activities under the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:24: proposed project variation to Phase 1 with all sediment release at the centre of the disposal site updated modelling
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:25: Figure 3-13 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from disposal activities under the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:25: proposed project variation to Phase 1 with sediment release at random points within the disposal site updated modelling
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:26:shows the maximum changes in sea bed thickness caused by deposition of material from the sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:26:much of the sediment falls to the bed within the disposal area, forming a mound on the sea bed. Deposition
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:26:the sediment plume. In reality, disposals will be at different points within the licensed area, and so such a
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:26: Figure 3-14 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from disposal activities under the previously
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:26: assessed project with all sediment release at the centre of the disposal site Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:27: Figure 3-15 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from disposal activities under the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:27: project variation to Phase 1 with all sediment release at the centre of the disposal site updated modelling
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:28: Figure 3-16 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from disposal activities under the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:28: project variation to Phase 1 with sediment release at random points within the disposal site updated modelling
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:29:cause plumes of sediment to form close to the release points of material into the water column. These
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:29:plumes will disperse under wave and current action and all sediment particles suspended in the water
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:29:Full details were provided within Chapter 6: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Processes of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001 Technical Note - Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling_Final-49.pdf:29:Report and the accompanying Appendix 5: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Plume Modelling of the
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:1: shallower layers of sediment. The OSPAR exemption for glacial deposits / geological material is based on the assumption that such types of
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:1: sediment will not have been exposed to pollutants due to their transport pre-dating industrial activity. It could be the case that the PAH levels
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:2: water quality and sediment plumes) is sufficient to cover this activity. It is also noted that the approach taken has been previously agreed as
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:3:I recognise that the Tees Bay C disposal site (TY150) was licenced some time ago and that disposal of marine sediments has been
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:3:sediment quality (SEAL) highlights that the current volume of material consented to be disposed of at the Tees Bay C site is very high
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:3:I appreciate that the Applicant has provided brief reassessments of marine water and sediment quality (document 6, 2.1) and hydrodynamic
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:3:and sedimentary processes (document 6, 2.2), with regards to whether the changes proposed in the variation will cause conditions outside of
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:3:topic areas, I note that the Applicant considers that only potential increases in suspended sediment and effects upon water quality are likely
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:The reason for this is that increases in suspended sediment concentration in the water column and plumes of suspended sediment created
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:is likely that greater concentrations of non-consolidated finer sediments, such as clay, will remain suspended in the water column for longer
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:than coarser sediments, such as sand, which will settle gradually following the cessation of the activity. Fine sediments such as clay are of
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:greatest concern in relation to fish receptors as there is potential for such sediments to clog gills, which can potentially inhibit respiration and
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:visible aggregation of sediment in the epithelium of their gill filaments and lamellae (Goldes et al., 1988). It should also be noted that the
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:physical characteristics of the sediment (source material, size and angularity of particles) and the immediacy of the response (responses in
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:fisheries advisors raised concerns in relation to impacts on fish from increased suspended sediment concentrations repeatedly during
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:discussion of how the additional dredged material is likely to compare with the suspended sediment concentrations and plumes modelled
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:removal of sediments, using both land-based excavators and cutter suction dredging, in close proximity to the contaminated material
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:boundary has the potential to cause the resuspension of contaminated sediments. In particular, where consolidated clay is removed, organic
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:matter and contaminants imbued within the clay soils may be released into the water column. Fine sediment particles (<63 µm) are
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:understood to be the sediments of greatest concern with regard to contaminants, showing a high affinity to combine with soluble metals, and
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:the resuspension of contaminated sediments.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:5:hopper dredging). By comparison, the rotational cutting of sediment by cutter suction dredging may have greater potential to release
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:5:suspended sediment into the water column, thus it may be likely that greater concentrations of suspended sediments are observed as a
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:5:result of this method. Suspended sediment is of concern in relation to fish receptors for the reasons outlined in comment 20 above, and in
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:5:However, elevated suspended sediment concentrations also have the potential to deplete levels of dissolved oxygen (DO) in the water
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:5:enclosing of the cutter head to contain disturbed sediment) has been proposed.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:5:2 requests an increase to the disposal volume, this total volume is less than what was modelled as part of the Hydrodynamic and Sediment
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:6:comments2. In previous fisheries advice1, advisors highlighted that the sediment plume arising from the proposed dredging regime had the
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:7: suspended sediment concentrations and plumes modelled within the original EIA. The MMO do not require additional modelling at this
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:7: in proximity to the contaminated material boundary is proposed to minimise the resuspension of contaminated sediments.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:7: head to contain disturbed sediment) will be used.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:8: Increased suspended sediment concentration (SSC) can affect an organism’s filter-feeding mechanisms and its ability to respire and excrete.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:9: Comment 8 above, it states “In light of the review of the marine water and sediment quality assessment and hydrodynamic and sedimentary
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:9:Berg, L. (1982). The effect of exposure to short-term pulses of suspended sediment on the behaviour of juvenile salmonids. In: Hartman, G.F.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:9:Gilmour, J. (1999). Experimental investigation into the effects of suspended sediment on fertilisation, larval survival and settlement in a
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:9:Henley, W.E., Patterson, M.A., Neves, R.J., and Dennis L. (2000). Effects of Sedimentation and Turbidity on Lotic Food Webs: A Concise
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:10:John, S.A., Challinor, S.L., Simpson, M., Burt, T.N. and Spearman, J. (2000). Scoping the assessment of sediment plumes arising from
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:10:Kemp, P., Sear, D., Collins, A., Naden, P. and Jones, I., (2011). The impacts of fine sediment on riverine fish. Hydrological processes, 25(11),
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:11:Annex 2 Potential impacts to marine and migratory fish from dredging and disposal of marine sediments
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:11:again upon their return to the sea after spawning. Elevated concentrations of suspended sediment resulting from dredging and disposal of
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:11:marine sediments can have the following physical effects on all life stage of fish, particularly salmonids:
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:11: depends on size and shape of particles, suspended sediment concentration, water velocity and gill dimensions (Appleby and Scarratt,
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:11:Settlement of sediment around areas of dredging and disposal can have the following impacts:
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:11: I. Smothering of benthic foraging grounds by settlement of sediment.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:11: II. Smothering of benthic eggs and larvae by settlement of sediment.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:11: III. Reduced oxygen levels in water due to release of sediments containing high organic matter.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:11: IV. Exposure to contaminants contained within dredged sediment.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:12:V. Re-suspension of sediments causes nutrient enrichment promoting the formation of algal blooms, causing a reduction in water quality
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:12:VI. Resuspension of sediments resulting from dredging can smother organisms and hinder growth, feeding and survival rates (Gilmour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:3:2 SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY 2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:3:2.1.1 Site-specific sediment quality survey 2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:3:2.1.2.1 Sediment results 2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:3:3.2.2 Effects of increased suspended sediment concentrations during dredging on marine species and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:5:The marine sediment and water quality assessment, marine ecology assessment and fisheries assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:5:application could be submitted to the MMO. Site-specific sediment quality, benthic ecology (including
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:6:2 SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:6:2.1.1 Site-specific sediment quality survey
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:6:A site-specific sediment quality survey was undertaken between 30th November and the 7th December 2020.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:6:As directed by the MMO in its sampling plan (reference SAM/2020/00026), sediment samples were
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:6:The results of the site-specific sediment quality data, water quality data and the updated water quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:6:2.1.2.1 Sediment results
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:6:The full set of sediment quality data is presented in Appendix 1. Table 2.1 provides a summary of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:6:sediment quality data for the samples requested by the MMO; Table 2.2 provides a summary of the results
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:7: Sediment Sampling Locations and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:8:Table 2.1 Summary of site-specific sediment quality data used in water quality assessment (collected
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:9:Table 2.2 Summary of site-specific sediment data used in water quality assessment for additional
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:11:the case following an interim review of the sediment quality data in April 2021.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:11:the re-suspension of sediment as the material is removed. An enclosed grab results in virtually no release
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:11:of sediment as the material is dredged. The results from this borehole (BH34) have therefore been excluded
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:12:Sediment from BH34 contained elevated concentrations of ICES7 (sum of seven congeners) and ICES25
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:12:There are no Action Levels for PBDEs and therefore an assessment against sediment quality guidelines is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:13:sediment losses from dredging equipment and concentrations of contaminants within the sediments to be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:13:simple quantitative assessment of potential sediment disturbance on water quality in the context of EQS
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:14:The tool characterises multiple transfers of chemicals from sediment to water which cumulatively determine
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:14: • estimation of chemical load associated with disturbed sediment partitioning (once sediments are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:14: those sediment particles that are disturbed into the water column.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:14:With respect to metals, the risks to water quality relating to sediment disturbance activities primarily derive
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:15:sediment concentration of 40mg/l is used in the tool (see Figure 2.3).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:16:Figure 2.3 Time series of changes in suspended sediment concentrations at water quality monitoring
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:16:sediment concentrations are at 40mg/l, there is the risk of an EQS failure, however, compliance would be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:16:achieved when suspended sediment concentrations reduce to 31mg/l (see maximum acceptable sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:16:uplift column in Appendix 2). It can be seen in Figure 2.2 that the suspended sediment plume is predicted
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:16:to be relatively localised to the dredging activity and suspended sediment concentrations reduce to typically
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:17:However, sediment plume modelling does not predict long term and large scale extents of elevated
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:17:lower levels of contaminants, therefore the risk to EQS is only during dredging of the finer sediments in the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:17:of contaminants in sediment at that location. As reported earlier, and enclosed grab results in virtually no
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:17:release of sediment as the material is dredged. No further mitigation measures are required. The residual
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:18:the footprint of the proposed scheme included rocky and sedimentary habitats (elaborated on in Section
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:18:3.1.5), whereas the North Tees Mudflat and subtidal sections featured sedimentary habitats.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:21:infralittoral muddy sediment’. Although these biotopes are different to those recorded in the 2020 site-
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:22:pebble and cobble sized sediments in an admixture of mud, sand and gravel. Much of this material is likely
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:24:and sediment) biotopes. The main species and algal cover reported in the EIA Report for the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:24:and capital dredging, effects from increased suspended sediment concentrations, and effects from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:25: increased suspended sediment “Effects of smothering following
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:25: physical removal of Changes in suspended sediment Smothering
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:26: increased suspended sediment “Effects of smothering following
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:26: physical removal of Changes in suspended sediment Smothering
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:27:3.2.2 Effects of increased suspended sediment concentrations during dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:27:suspended sediment during dredging is expected to be in the form of a narrow plume within the river, which
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:27:suspended sediment concentrations to a level that will change the WFD scale for one year (the benchmark
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:27:Although the intertidal fucoid biotopes are of medium sensitivity to changes to suspended sediments, the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:receptors from increased suspended sediments remains at negligible significance.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:when smothered depends on several factors. If the silt content of the smothering sediment is high and water
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:content low, then it is unlikely that the species will be able to migrate to the surface of the sediment if buried
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:deeper than 5cm (Jackson, 2000). If, however, the smothering sediment is looser with more water content,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:C. volutator can be heavily affected by smothering, where sedimentation rates of 2 to 2.5cm/month in an
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:However, this experiment was carried out in a setting of sedimentation induced by the blockage or significant
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:reduction in water flow, rather than deposition of sediments within the water column in an unobstructed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:ability to photosynthesise if sediment settles on the fronds. For the barnacle (Semibalanus balanoides)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:28:biotope, barnacles are filter feeders, so any settlement on sediment will reduce their ability to feed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:34: detailed in the EIA Report following review of the site-specific sediment quality data. As such, the conclusion
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:45: • Sediment data quality to inform the water quality assessment (Section 2).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:45:The site-specific sediment quality data is presented in Section 2 (and Appendix 1) of this report alongside
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:45:Agency. Given that Section 2 of this report considers the sediment quality data in the context of WFD EQSs,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:45:parameters, the short term nature of the sediment plume and limited spatial extent would limit any EQS
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:45:sediment concentrations that were likely to exceed EQS. As a consequence, a non-temporary deterioration
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:45:deterioration in species composition and numbers following dredging, it is predicted that the sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:48:Environment Agency (2019) Evidence. SeDiChem Technical Report SC180002: Impact of sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:50:Sediment quality data
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:51: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 8.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 8.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 7.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 8.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 7.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 8.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 8.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 4.83
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 9.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.28 2.98
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 7.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 8.7 0.00 0.00 8.72 0.00 5.68
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 8.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 8.6 0.00 0.00 9.07 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 7.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 8.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 8.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 8.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.87 0.43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:52:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 9.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.59 3.09
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 2.32 2.56 2.63 2.04 1.63 1.52
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 1.44 2.38 1.82 1.79 1.54 1.69
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 1.25 2.24 2.11 2.59 2.01 1.93
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 4.53 1.52 0.98 1.28 1.19 1.26
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 2.57 0.85 0.69 1.53 1.56 1.86
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:53:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 1.30 2.07 2.83 2.62 2.49 2.27
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 2.64 6.51
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 0.90 3.47 1.07 2.99 17.78 21.83
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 1.26 1.65 9.37 20.86 19.31 12.54
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 1.52 3.54 3.57 6.92 8.70 7.19
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 2.05
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.86 2.38
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 1.01 0.09 3.12 3.46 3.72 6.04
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 2.10 1.02 5.97 28.48 35.18 13.11
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.98
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.95
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.19
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 1.44 0.10 2.60 3.27 1.72 4.67
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:54:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 1.78 0.94 3.80 3.84 2.25 6.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 4.06 0.93 1.47 7.47 8.89 10.22
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 5.13 2.30 0.21 3.21 6.70 7.72
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 4.17 1.54 0.89 7.13 9.42 10.75
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 3.19 3.81 0.62 3.23 7.87 9.56
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 9.83 2.23 0.42 0.91 2.36 3.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 6.00 1.92 0.94 6.83 8.57 9.78
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 3.29 0.91 0.30 5.08 8.15 9.35
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 5.80 1.88 0.61 1.01 0.58 0.91
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 7.80 4.11 2.10 3.71 3.21 3.56
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 5.46 1.46 0.64 6.23 8.05 9.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 3.36 2.70 0.48 1.38 3.65 5.09
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 4.46 2.89 0.23 3.83 7.96 9.44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 5.91 4.62 1.37 2.96 3.97 4.38
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 4.14 1.05 0.43 0.72 0.49 0.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 2.85 1.82 0.65 6.00 9.20 10.99
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 4.46 1.93 0.44 5.16 8.09 9.15
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 3.83 1.22 1.06 6.70 8.41 9.96
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 4.71 1.04 0.44 5.48 7.97 9.26
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 6.19 3.93 0.57 3.92 5.10 6.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:55:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 4.79 3.78 1.84 1.98 3.71 4.26
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 10.40 10.01 10.00 9.41 7.49 5.08
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 7.84 8.28 8.99 8.94 7.61 5.62
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 10.39 10.23 10.16 9.19 7.16 4.91
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 9.12 10.41 9.76 8.80 7.57 5.93
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 2.96 3.80 4.12 4.12 3.68 2.81
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 9.37 9.78 9.66 8.77 7.04 5.04
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 9.65 9.84 10.66 10.43 8.56 6.02
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 0.55 0.85 0.71 0.63 0.62 0.45
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 3.21 3.41 3.34 3.06 2.53 1.86
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 9.44 9.38 9.78 9.28 7.46 5.20
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 5.37 6.48 6.60 6.04 4.94 3.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 9.03 10.04 10.44 9.79 8.10 5.96
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 4.18 5.00 4.70 4.21 3.60 2.79
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 0.50 0.62 0.65 0.64 0.58 0.42
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 9.73 10.23 9.78 8.76 7.14 5.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 9.11 9.34 10.04 9.76 8.09 5.81
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 9.78 9.70 9.97 9.46 7.63 5.34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 9.49 9.57 10.10 9.74 7.96 5.61
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 6.02 6.87 7.01 6.35 5.14 3.78
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:56:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 4.19 4.98 4.57 4.06 3.49 2.74
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 3.09 2.08 1.70 1.54 1.42
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 3.91 3.01 2.53 2.17 1.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 3.12 2.17 1.73 1.50 1.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 4.31 3.31 2.72 2.30 2.01
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 2.12 1.90 1.72 1.46 1.23
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 3.36 2.41 1.94 1.68 1.50
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 3.92 2.84 2.32 2.00 1.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 0.34 0.40 0.39 0.29 0.18
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 1.47 1.45 1.45 1.31 1.12
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 3.42 2.52 2.07 1.78 1.58
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 2.83 2.66 2.60 2.40 2.14
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 4.05 2.92 2.30 1.93 1.67
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 2.23 2.10 2.02 1.84 1.67
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 0.33 0.35 0.36 0.29 0.20
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 3.70 2.77 2.26 1.94 1.70
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 3.93 2.94 2.37 2.00 1.77
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 3.48 2.51 2.05 1.79 1.61
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 3.69 2.70 2.24 1.96 1.77
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 2.70 2.17 1.87 1.62 1.41
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:57:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 2.19 2.01 1.85 1.62 1.43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 1.25 1.03 0.76 0.54 0.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 1.59 1.26 0.87 0.58 0.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 1.15 0.94 0.69 0.49 0.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 1.73 1.39 0.98 0.65 0.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 1.05 0.84 0.60 0.40 0.23
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 1.33 1.11 0.84 0.61 0.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 1.52 1.22 0.85 0.57 0.32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 0.11 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 0.93 0.74 0.54 0.39 0.23
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 1.39 1.14 0.83 0.57 0.34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 1.86 1.54 1.16 0.84 0.52
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 1.44 1.16 0.84 0.58 0.34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 1.52 1.31 1.00 0.72 0.44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 0.12 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.01
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 1.48 1.21 0.88 0.62 0.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 1.56 1.25 0.84 0.52 0.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 1.41 1.16 0.85 0.60 0.36
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 1.57 1.30 0.95 0.67 0.40
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 1.22 1.02 0.78 0.58 0.36
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:58:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 1.27 1.09 0.83 0.61 0.38
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.13 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.14 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 0.08 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.15 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 0.02 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 0.09 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.13 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 0.20 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.13 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 0.17 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.15 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.10 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.14 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.15 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 0.15 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:59:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 0.15 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 23.0 0.72 57.5 63.8 0.58 32.7 142 238
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 13.8 0.37 45.8 40.9 0.37 41.9 74.7 131
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 25.2 0.43 52.6 51.6 0.47 33.4 129 185
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 23.4 2.31 165 180 1.58 32.0 177 381
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 9.4 0.20 15.8 23.1 0.17 13.8 42.2 63.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 23.0 0.51 52.4 55.3 0.51 29.5 153 208
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 25.1 0.91 74.8 93.7 0.92 33.2 168 281
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 4.2 0.21 9.5 13.7 0.04 11.4 13.1 47.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 5.1 0.19 15.1 15.5 0.02 20.0 10.3 53.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 23.9 0.67 59.2 67.7 0.60 31.2 150 244
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 7.4 0.30 27.5 35.9 0.09 28.3 19.6 68.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 21.0 0.98 78.7 100 0.88 30.6 177 312
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 5.6 0.21 20.3 18.8 0.02 24.1 14.5 59.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 3.2 0.13 9.0 10.6 <0.01 10.0 8.2 46.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 23.5 0.79 74.0 79.7 0.76 34.1 162 264
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 23.6 0.81 73.3 78.4 0.91 30.8 171 282
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 23.0 0.79 65.0 68.7 0.67 31.0 160 262
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 23.9 0.85 71.1 77.8 0.77 33.5 184 292
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 11.0 0.26 32.8 36.3 0.20 25.4 65.1 110
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:60:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 7.3 0.18 24.3 24.4 <0.01 29.0 15.1 63.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:61: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:61:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.014 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:61:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 0.013 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:61:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.024 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:61:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.038 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:61:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:61:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.014 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:61:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.036 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:61:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:61:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:61:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.019 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:62: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:62:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment <0.005 0.020
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:62:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.048 0.030
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:62:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 0.008 0.011
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:62:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 0.006 0.017
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:62:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.031 0.030
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:62:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.065 0.043
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:62:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.027 0.016
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:62:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.036 0.025
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:62:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 0.009 0.015
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:62:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment <0.005 0.020
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:63: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:63:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 274 227 373 823 835 800
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:63:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 230 161 306 583 633 623
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:63:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 219 194 320 806 798 798
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:63:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 796 806 882 1630 1440 1420
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:63:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 117 83.8 326 676 653 558
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:63:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 331 219 350 767 805 818
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:63:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 554 353 524 1000 1060 1110
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:63:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 6.34 14.1 7.96 16.1 17.4 21.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:63:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 6.42 2.51 6.93 19.8 23.2 35.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:63:VC-07 MMO1 000-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 499 300 396 759 808 818
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:64: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:64:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 655 780 381 3480 1630 2760
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:64:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 489 601 243 2740 1310 2150
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:64:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 666 782 365 3670 1720 2840
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:64:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 1150 1420 528 7780 3300 6050
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:64:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 476 514 242 1150 908 938
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:64:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 669 778 332 3270 1540 2630
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:64:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 803 979 512 3830 1880 2960
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:64:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 31.4 33.6 5.64 97.1 91.0 85.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:64:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 45.8 56.6 4.69 191 171 156
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:64:VC-07 MMO1 000-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 649 769 452 3400 1540 2600
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:65: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:65:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 2250 753 132 1350 429 559
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:65:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 1750 563 103 948 351 413
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:65:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 2280 865 133 1330 388 541
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:65:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 4530 1320 247 2190 1220 964
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:65:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 807 674 100 1170 205 371
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:65:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 2210 738 141 1280 453 569
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:65:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 2520 989 178 1610 692 729
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:65:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 85.1 28.6 4.51 21.6 15.2 9.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:65:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 151 42.5 10.4 32.5 21.5 11.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:65:VC-07 MMO1 000-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 2200 731 138 1340 569 525
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:66: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:66:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 1220 240 1440 1450 214
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:66:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 1040 182 1210 1230 174
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:66:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 1260 223 1510 1300 182
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:66:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 3010 420 2980 2680 124
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:66:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 514 180 1020 1470 118
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:66:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 1160 234 1430 1400 217
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:66:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 1500 338 1780 1880 106
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:66:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 22.4 3.93 64.1 33.0 33.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:66:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 56.7 8.48 137 41.9 30.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:66:VC-07 MMO1 000-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 1250 236 1470 1490 48.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:67: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:67:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 54.6 10.4 17.9 33.3 41.9 58.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:67:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 748 578 834 1320 1450 1330
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:67:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 11.4 5.75 11.1 34.4 43.0 55.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:67:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 2.12 2.24 1.87 4.46 5.32 6.14
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:67:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 399 320 489 1030 1080 1070
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:67:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 765 348 667 1390 1480 1340
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:67:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 406 292 402 881 975 965
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:67:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 389 281 471 1000 1030 1140
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:67:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 67.6 193 77.3 123 131 139
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:67:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 10.0 4.06 6.89 24.5 35.7 59.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:68: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:68:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 66.0 80.5 14.6 229 129 157
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:68:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 1040 1260 622 4700 2090 3550
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:68:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 84.1 91.5 12.1 288 208 204
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:68:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 9.51 11.1 1.93 36.3 32.9 32.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:68:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 830 971 472 3490 1690 2700
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:68:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 1110 1360 611 4130 2090 3300
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:68:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 759 896 482 3080 1490 2430
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:68:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 792 950 423 3430 1640 2650
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:68:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 114 135 58.3 607 330 441
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:68:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 81.7 101 10.1 257 153 152
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:69: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:69:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 111 56.7 10.7 56.3 48.0 25.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:69:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 2570 1300 227 2060 905 963
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:69:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 181 65.2 12.0 59.6 34.4 22.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:69:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 32.9 8.97 1.41 6.65 5.12 2.69
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:69:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 2380 984 174 1760 541 740
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:69:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 2710.0 1320 240 2290 842 1020
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:69:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 2080 851 162 1460 510 681
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:69:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 2140.0 979 172 1690 528 716
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:69:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 336 138 23.0 205 126 86.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:69:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 101.0 65.1 11.8 41.9 34.1 20.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:70: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:70:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 63.4 10.5 134 76.6 10.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:70:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 2060 454 2230 2730 498
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:70:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 77.8 13.7 170 70.3 21.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:70:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 8.15 1.23 26.1 10.3 50.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:70:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 1340 292 1660 1970 312
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:70:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 1880 531 2190 2690 224
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:70:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 1190 284 1400 1650 237
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:70:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 1320 293 1630 1920 150
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:70:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 236 38.1 288 245 127
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:70:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 66.7 7.78 150 50.5 15.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:71: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:71:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.00116 0.00041 0.00117 0.00081 0.00010 0.00094 0.00009 0.00094
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:71:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 0.00100 0.00034 0.00087 0.00089 0.00015 0.00058 0.00016 0.00088
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:71:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.00102 0.00035 0.00099 0.00106 0.00011 0.00102 0.00019 0.00074
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:71:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.00286 0.00085 0.00264 0.00242 0.00030 0.00252 0.00039 0.00214
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:71:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 0.00052 0.00012 0.00049 0.00030 <0.00008 0.00045 0.00011 0.00049
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:71:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.00112 0.00041 0.00113 0.00116 0.00022 0.00129 0.00021 0.00102
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:71:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.00189 0.00056 0.00114 0.00155 0.00013 0.00174 0.00018 0.00172
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:71:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:71:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:71:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.00125 0.00051 0.00126 0.00110 0.00031 0.00106 0.00016 0.00100
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:72: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:72:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.00021 0.00165 0.00011 0.00021 0.00022 0.00078 0.00078
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:72:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 0.00016 0.00107 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00011 0.00057 0.00059
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:72:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.00017 0.00127 0.00008 <0.00008 0.00017 0.00041 0.00039
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:72:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.00058 0.00393 0.00025 0.00039 0.00055 0.00184 0.00191
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:72:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 0.00014 0.00081 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00031 0.00017
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:72:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.00032 0.00181 0.00010 0.00014 0.00025 0.00105 0.00080
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:72:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.00038 0.00208 0.00012 0.00021 0.00034 0.00113 0.00109
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:72:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00015 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:72:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00038 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:72:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.00030 0.00169 0.00012 0.00017 0.00028 0.00075 0.00068
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:73: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:73:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.00020 0.00056 0.00021 0.00076 0.00199 0.00060 0.00013
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:73:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment <0.00008 0.00029 <0.00008 0.00045 0.00123 0.00052 0.00015
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:73:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.00013 0.00037 0.00014 0.00050 0.00128 0.00045 0.00013
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:73:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.00051 0.00129 0.00076 0.00196 0.00475 0.00149 0.00044
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:73:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00017 0.00044 0.00015 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:73:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.00011 0.00049 0.00021 0.00077 0.00196 0.00060 0.00021
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:73:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.00032 0.00063 0.00030 0.00089 0.00227 0.00066 0.00029
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:73:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00010 0.00017 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:73:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00016 0.00045 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:73:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.00014 0.00057 0.00019 0.00063 0.00176 0.00056 0.00022
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:74: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:74:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.00084 0.00142 0.00111
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:74:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 0.00056 0.00108 0.00064
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:74:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.00051 0.00087 0.00073
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:74:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.00203 0.00326 0.00239
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:74:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 0.00025 0.00041 0.00024
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:74:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.00076 0.00150 0.00090
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:74:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.00103 0.00186 0.00131
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:74:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 0.00011 0.00013 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:74:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 0.00015 0.00035 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:74:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.00068 0.00126 0.00072
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:75: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:75:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 0.00021 <0.00008 0.00018 0.00012 <0.00008 0.00015 <0.00008 0.00015
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:75:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.00170 0.00062 0.00135 0.00112 0.00019 0.00141 0.00018 0.00122
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:75:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 0.00010 <0.00008 0.00006 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00004 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:75:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:75:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.00199 0.00063 0.00156 0.00158 0.00035 0.00266 0.00031 0.00154
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:75:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.00181 0.00064 0.00174 0.00144 0.00027 0.00181 0.00027 0.00106
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:75:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.00132 0.00050 0.00106 0.00114 0.00026 0.00147 0.00014 0.00104
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:75:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.00166 0.00060 0.00160 0.00167 0.00027 0.00160 0.00029 0.00134
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:75:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 0.00045 0.00011 0.00040 0.00036 <0.00008 0.00039 0.00009 0.00027
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:75:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:76: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:76:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment <0.00008 0.00026 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00058 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:76:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.00040 0.00241 0.00017 0.00023 0.00034 0.00101 0.00107
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:76:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00064 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:76:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:76:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.00042 0.00279 0.00018 0.00034 0.00046 0.00067 0.00176
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:76:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.00055 0.00247 0.00012 0.00020 0.00057 0.00097 0.00138
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:76:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.00038 0.00214 0.00015 0.00021 0.00026 0.00059 0.00088
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:76:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.00043 0.00244 0.00009 0.00037 0.00036 0.00073 0.00097
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:76:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00047 0.00022
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:76:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00033 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:77: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:77:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00029 0.00074 0.00023 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:77:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.00028 0.00088 0.00028 0.00090 0.00237 0.00087 0.00024
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:77:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00024 0.00070 0.00019 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:77:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00010 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:77:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.00037 0.00118 0.00044 0.00070 0.00177 0.00056 0.00021
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:77:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.00036 0.00088 0.00042 0.00102 0.00249 0.00089 0.00028
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:77:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.00025 0.00060 0.00023 0.00068 0.00170 0.00054 0.00019
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:77:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.00021 0.00072 0.00026 0.00077 0.00202 0.00072 0.00025
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:77:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment <0.00008 0.00019 <0.00008 0.00027 0.00075 0.00029 0.00009
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:77:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00015 0.00033 0.00012 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:78: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:78:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 0.00027 0.00056 0.00016
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:78:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.00113 0.00181 0.00134
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:78:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 0.00023 0.00048 0.00012
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:78:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:78:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.00083 0.00128 0.00098
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:78:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.00118 0.00194 0.00147
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:78:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.00078 0.00126 0.00105
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:78:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.00092 0.00168 0.00111
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:78:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 0.00032 0.00060 0.00037
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:78:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 0.00011 0.00027 0.00009
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.00071 0.00060 0.00346 0.00058 0.00021 0.00405 0.00046
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 0.00132 0.001040 0.00525 0.000969 0.000345 0.00565 0.00064
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.00049 0.00040 0.00264 0.000367 0.000153 0.00296 0.00040
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.001440 0.00195 0.00622 0.001770 0.000428 0.00702 0.00079
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.00075 0.00059 0.00352 0.00054 0.00022 0.00379 0.00047
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.00140 0.00113 0.00585 0.00109 0.00041 0.00629 0.00079
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.00074 0.00057 0.00340 0.000532 0.000214 0.00392 0.00051
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 0.000046 0.00002 0.00019 0.000050 <0.00002 0.00018 0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.00326 0.00263 0.01110 0.00269 0.000650 0.01100 0.00130
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment <0.00002 0.00003 0.00005 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.00006 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.00087 0.00069 0.00364 0.000713 0.000221 0.00411 0.00047
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.001870 0.00149 0.00816 0.001880 0.000601 0.00919 0.00099
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.00075 0.00058 0.00321 0.00058 0.000187 0.00333 0.00044
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.00088 0.00067 0.00422 0.00075 0.00027 0.00517 0.00067
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 0.00007 0.00008 0.00033 0.00009 0.00002 0.00032 0.00004
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:79:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 0.00002 0.00003 0.00006 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.00006 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment <0.00002 0.00074 0.00042 0.00055 0.139
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment <0.00002 0.00103 0.000492 0.000899 0.090
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment <0.00002 0.00053 0.000355 0.000436 0.109
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.00005 0.00131 0.000567 0.000682 0.054
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment <0.00002 0.00075 0.00041 0.00080 0.127
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment <0.00002 0.00124 0.00058 0.00082 0.164
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.003
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment <0.00002 0.00072 0.000415 0.000591 0.159
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment <0.00002 0.00004 <0.00002 0.000030 0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.00004 0.00216 0.00112 0.002350 0.230
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment <0.00002 0.00004 <0.00002 0.00002 0.002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.00002 0.00069 0.000378 0.000571 0.202
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.00006 0.00163 0.000670 0.002110 0.220
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.00002 0.00058 0.00035 0.000563 0.250
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment <0.00002 0.00089 0.00046 0.00070 0.243
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment <0.00002 0.00007 0.00003 0.00007 0.033
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:80:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000039 0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:81: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:82: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:82:Particle Size Analysis Wet Sediment Wet and dry sieving followed by laser diffraction analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:82:Organotins Wet Sediment Solvent extraction and derivatisation followed by GC-MS analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:82:Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) Wet Sediment Solvent extraction and clean up followed by GC-MS analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:82:Total Hydrocarbon Content (THC) Wet Sediment Ultra-violet fluorescence spectroscopy
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:83: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 7.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 8.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 8.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.52
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 7.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 8.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 8.9 0.00 5.26 0.00 2.10 4.90
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 8.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 11.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 9.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 7.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 8.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.49
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.09 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 8.0 0.00 4.55 0.00 0.00 3.25
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.30 1.51
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.61
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 8.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.01 6.52
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 8.8 0.00 11.60 0.00 0.00 6.74
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 7.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 8.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.70
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 7.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 8.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.79
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 8.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 8.5 0.00 12.19 1.50 1.01 5.08
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.62
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 8.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.70
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 8.8 0.00 0.00 7.77 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:84:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 8.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 2.37 3.77 4.74 5.61 6.30 7.12
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 6.05 5.02 5.54 6.43 6.06 6.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 5.66 4.68 5.43 6.27 6.00 5.96
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 0.00 1.92 1.05 1.48 0.86 0.83
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 0.00 1.93 0.72 0.63 0.88 0.75
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 0.00 1.71 1.60 1.45 1.73 1.58
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 1.13 0.99 1.97 2.38 1.79 1.64
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 0.69 1.02 1.36 0.97 0.99 0.94
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 2.88 2.80 3.19 3.12 3.11 3.18
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 5.82 5.28 4.96 3.75 3.28 3.18
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 1.16 2.16 2.95 3.25 3.96 4.89
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 2.94 1.65 1.84 2.11 1.69 1.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 4.60 3.12 2.75 2.48 2.04 1.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 3.25 4.93 5.45 5.00 4.62 4.01
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 2.62 3.58 5.02 6.13 7.45 7.17
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 0.00 0.32 0.70 2.29 4.65 7.71
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 4.46 5.13 4.06 3.53 3.25 3.64
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 4.97 6.64 5.72 5.98 5.37 4.67
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.33 1.24 0.99 1.07 1.37 1.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 1.82 1.63 1.92 2.76 2.28 2.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:85:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 2.56 2.08 1.88 1.70 1.71 1.50
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 1.74
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 3.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 6.66 12.79 11.31 7.89 5.36 2.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 4.97 4.72 7.60 4.07 2.80 2.61
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 4.61 5.56 6.67 2.77 2.44 1.49
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 3.80
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 1.37 0.00 0.00 0.78 3.95 4.32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 4.54
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 0.87 0.20 2.74 2.08 4.55 2.63
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 2.63 0.00 0.00 0.32 1.55 1.60
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 2.23 0.00 0.00 0.91 3.38 1.94
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 3.99 14.34 12.91 5.88 3.00 2.17
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 1.24 0.00 0.00 0.55 2.33 3.64
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 1.01 0.02 1.19 1.06 1.14 2.27
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71 4.70
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 2.85 0.77 3.64 3.75 2.28 2.59
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 2.17
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 5.56 6.79 6.16 5.55 3.21 2.26
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 7.51 6.64 5.09 4.56 6.05 6.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 2.87 4.79 4.09 4.50 6.56 6.25
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 3.25 4.92 7.66 5.45 2.32 2.63
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 1.73 0.01 0.75 1.03 2.12 2.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 1.94 0.07 2.70 3.41 0.68 3.13
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:86:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 1.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 5.44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 6.48 2.33 1.67 8.05 9.06 10.11
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 5.38 2.17 0.19 3.08 7.05 8.73
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 2.81 0.85 0.72 1.80 1.67 1.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 3.43 0.65 1.43 7.27 8.56 10.40
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 3.91 0.70 0.45 5.89 8.48 10.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 2.21 1.48 0.41 1.19 1.69 2.03
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 1.97 0.92 0.23 1.62 1.78 2.18
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 3.55 3.52 1.84 3.22 5.45 7.08
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 4.35 1.36 0.67 6.49 8.61 10.36
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 3.27 2.31 0.45 4.47 7.67 10.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.70 5.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 5.50 4.38 1.20 3.83 5.35 6.14
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 3.86 3.69 1.36 1.90 4.68 6.22
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 7.07 5.45 3.67 7.20 6.17 6.44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 2.70 2.41 0.87 1.67 3.92 5.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 2.47 2.19 0.36 0.93 2.75 4.25
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 2.27 0.71 0.22 1.92 2.51 3.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 3.96 3.22 0.61 2.37 3.74 5.26
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 2.10 0.48 0.11 2.04 4.03 5.47
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 6.28 1.45 0.77 6.22 7.76 9.38
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 2.47 1.09 0.18 1.90 3.22 4.43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 5.51 2.40 0.81 6.21 7.99 9.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 2.35 1.03 0.12 0.32 1.40 2.48
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 7.49 2.39 1.72 3.33 2.81 3.55
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 4.53 1.02 0.55 1.70 1.66 2.12
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 2.19 0.85 0.08 1.13 1.83 2.48
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 6.14 2.77 1.49 5.74 6.11 7.71
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 5.14 2.81 0.50 3.36 3.73 5.23
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:87:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 5.65 4.15 2.91 3.24 4.94 6.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 9.28 9.49 9.28 8.30 6.52 4.55
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 8.46 9.13 9.22 8.73 7.44 5.70
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 1.62 1.56 1.47 1.32 1.07 0.80
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 10.00 9.45 9.69 9.40 7.71 5.40
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 9.53 9.41 10.10 9.70 7.94 5.69
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 2.04 2.36 2.12 1.82 1.53 1.23
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 2.33 2.15 2.21 2.23 1.92 1.44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 6.25 7.42 7.66 7.28 6.25 4.82
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 9.43 9.32 9.75 9.15 7.40 5.31
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 8.90 10.03 10.54 9.75 7.99 5.86
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 5.76 8.60 8.50 8.64 8.56 7.09
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 5.89 6.88 6.36 5.78 5.13 4.15
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 6.16 7.89 7.52 6.59 5.42 4.19
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 4.78 5.46 4.92 4.15 3.49 2.75
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 5.59 7.16 6.63 5.83 4.93 3.78
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 4.20 4.95 5.39 5.28 4.55 3.47
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 3.63 3.71 3.72 3.37 2.60 1.78
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 5.18 6.13 6.14 5.54 4.49 3.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 5.76 6.44 6.14 5.30 4.19 3.08
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 8.46 9.02 9.24 8.55 6.99 5.11
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 4.75 5.75 5.82 5.10 3.90 2.68
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 8.92 9.80 10.06 9.13 7.25 5.13
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 2.70 3.62 3.58 3.21 2.72 2.11
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 3.34 3.17 3.40 3.53 3.10 2.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 2.06 2.08 2.22 2.15 1.75 1.23
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 3.03 3.27 3.42 3.31 2.73 1.92
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 7.07 7.06 7.99 7.97 6.55 4.56
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 5.13 5.47 5.84 5.57 4.54 3.24
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:88:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 5.71 6.97 6.64 5.91 5.01 3.99
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 2.94 2.06 1.65 1.44 1.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 4.27 3.54 3.04 2.55 2.15
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 0.61 0.55 0.51 0.43 0.35
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 3.42 2.40 2.00 1.81 1.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 3.86 2.87 2.35 1.99 1.73
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 1.00 0.91 0.83 0.70 0.56
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 1.12 1.05 1.00 0.85 0.68
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 3.80 3.46 3.25 2.97 2.73
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 3.57 2.61 2.14 1.90 1.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 4.04 3.01 2.42 2.04 1.81
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 5.75 5.44 5.16 4.82 4.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 3.31 3.00 2.77 2.50 2.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 3.35 3.08 2.90 2.59 2.27
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 2.20 2.04 1.96 1.78 1.59
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 2.93 2.70 2.54 2.22 1.85
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 2.64 2.31 2.10 1.85 1.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 1.32 1.24 1.20 1.04 0.84
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 2.54 2.37 2.30 2.12 1.91
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 2.29 1.96 1.76 1.55 1.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 3.47 2.50 1.97 1.66 1.48
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 1.92 1.74 1.72 1.62 1.47
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 3.38 2.41 1.92 1.63 1.43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 1.63 1.42 1.26 1.08 0.93
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 1.55 1.20 1.05 0.92 0.79
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 0.83 0.64 0.56 0.49 0.42
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 1.41 1.32 1.33 1.24 1.11
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 2.96 2.17 1.76 1.44 1.19
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 2.51 2.44 2.39 2.16 1.90
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:89:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 3.25 2.97 2.75 2.43 2.13
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 1.11 0.92 0.68 0.49 0.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 1.79 1.41 0.98 0.65 0.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 0.27 0.20 0.14 0.10 0.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 1.46 1.20 0.89 0.64 0.39
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 1.48 1.19 0.83 0.56 0.32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 0.45 0.35 0.26 0.19 0.12
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 0.52 0.39 0.27 0.19 0.11
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 2.50 2.16 1.66 1.21 0.74
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 1.61 1.36 1.00 0.70 0.42
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 1.59 1.29 0.89 0.59 0.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 4.64 3.95 2.66 1.60 0.78
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 2.07 1.78 1.36 0.98 0.60
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 1.95 1.62 1.23 0.91 0.57
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 1.41 1.19 0.91 0.67 0.41
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 1.50 1.15 0.80 0.54 0.31
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 1.48 1.27 0.98 0.72 0.45
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 0.65 0.49 0.34 0.24 0.14
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 1.69 1.43 1.10 0.82 0.51
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 1.21 1.03 0.81 0.61 0.38
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 1.31 1.09 0.81 0.58 0.35
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 1.29 1.08 0.83 0.62 0.39
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 1.23 1.00 0.73 0.51 0.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 0.81 0.68 0.52 0.39 0.24
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 0.67 0.54 0.39 0.28 0.17
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 0.34 0.27 0.20 0.14 0.09
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 0.96 0.79 0.59 0.44 0.27
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.97 0.75 0.53 0.36 0.21
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 1.66 1.40 1.07 0.79 0.49
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:90:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 1.86 1.56 1.20 0.88 0.55
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.14 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 0.02 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 0.15 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 0.05 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 0.04 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 0.29 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.16 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 0.25 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 0.23 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 0.23 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 0.16 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 0.18 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 0.06 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 0.20 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 0.15 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.14 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 0.16 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 0.10 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 0.06 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 0.04 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 0.10 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.08 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 0.19 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:91:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 0.22 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 25.0 0.63 50.0 62.5 0.45 30.7 143 222
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 23.6 0.81 76.5 99.9 0.63 31.2 129 204
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 4.9 0.08 35.5 13.9 0.07 41.9 13.1 60.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 27.1 0.36 50.6 51.7 0.45 33.2 124 184
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 26.6 0.84 71.4 89.8 0.94 26.9 141 236
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 8.3 0.24 31.2 18.9 0.08 39.1 21.8 77.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 4.8 0.20 22.7 17.1 <0.01 29.1 8.7 52.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 5.7 0.24 25.2 21.4 <0.01 33.9 14.1 51.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 26.7 0.42 46.2 46.1 0.38 30.8 153 192
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 26.2 1.00 77.9 113 0.86 33.4 169 311
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 8.3 0.32 35.0 30.2 0.02 47.3 29.2 81.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 6.9 0.23 29.4 23.5 <0.01 40.8 21.9 64.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 5.8 0.20 23.5 27.6 <0.01 28.4 11.2 52.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 5.7 0.24 22.6 24.1 <0.01 27.3 14.0 57.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 8.6 0.70 72.4 174 0.61 29.3 45.4 147
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 4.6 0.11 25.2 20.6 <0.01 32.8 6.7 60.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 3.9 0.10 18.8 9.3 0.02 21.5 8.9 39.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 5.9 0.15 20.3 24.3 <0.01 24.5 10.9 49.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 5.4 0.12 20.6 22.0 <0.01 23.1 4.7 38.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 21.3 1.31 113 120 1.06 30.6 200 340
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 4.2 0.10 21.6 107 <0.01 26.6 8.5 47.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 22.3 0.87 72.3 78.5 0.84 31.2 171 274
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 5.0 0.10 21.4 13.9 <0.01 24.2 7.7 44.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 2.2 0.09 16.9 9.4 <0.01 18.9 3.7 28.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 5.5 0.12 20.4 71.8 <0.01 22.9 6.3 40.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 7.7 0.07 26.6 11.6 <0.01 29.8 9.3 45.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 20.1 1.05 91.4 98.1 1.02 29.0 175 304
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 6.2 0.22 21.3 33.2 <0.01 25.7 13.9 53.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:92:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 6.2 0.30 23.2 34.9 <0.01 28.7 14.6 59.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:93: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:93:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.023 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:93:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.052 0.013
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:93:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 0.006 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:93:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 0.014 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:93:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.009 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:93:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 0.008 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:93:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:93:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment <0.005 0.007
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:93:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.017 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:93:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.027 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:94: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:94:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:94:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:94:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 0.006 0.006
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:94:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 0.006 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:94:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 0.021 0.013
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:94:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 0.006 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:94:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 0.008 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:94:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 0.006 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:94:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 0.006 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:94:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.039 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:95: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:95:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 0.007 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:95:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.021 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:95:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 0.008 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:95:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:95:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 0.006 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:95:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 0.006 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:95:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.041 0.037
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:95:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 0.006 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:95:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 0.009 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:96: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:96:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 217 155 293 665 680 685
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:96:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 1060 1240 1170 1380 1090 996
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:96:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 3.28 7.46 3.97 4.87 4.62 3.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:96:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 213 175 288 635 648 615
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:96:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 320 196 330 629 623 650
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:96:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 9.40 3.90 14.9 16.7 19.3 20.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:96:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 1.25 <1 1.61 2.39 2.60 6.47
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:96:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 11.9 2.45 11.9 34.1 43.1 47.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:96:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 218 189 264 562 557 540
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:96:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 608 491 674 1180 1130 1220
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:97: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:97:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 588 673 326 3300 1570 2610
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:97:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 801 1090 568 12000 4940 8610
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:97:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 3.86 4.79 2.40 47.0 22.7 35.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:97:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 552 627 307 2980 1460 2300
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:97:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 449 566 271 2680 1270 2050
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:97:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 19.8 22.4 8.85 103 52.2 76.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:97:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 4.01 5.98 1.43 19.1 10.2 13.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:97:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 82.6 64.2 12.2 146 184 146
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:97:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 509 576 251 3340 1550 2640
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:97:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 952 1130 418 6580 2790 4780
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:98: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:98:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 2290 713 121 1160 358 478
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:98:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 6150 1510 118 2840 1730 544
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:98:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 26.5 5.53 <1 9.64 8.14 2.20
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:98:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 2090 706 112 1140 344 435
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:98:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 1690 709 97.7 1250 468 400
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:98:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 55.2 22.1 3.66 34.4 16.3 12.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:98:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 9.6 4.68 <1 4.73 2.69 1.64
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:98:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 180 49.4 6.67 52.1 27.1 26.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:98:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 2320 639 102 995 349 389
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:98:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 3840 1160 192 1730 862 751
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:99: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:99:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 1140 184 1340 1170 85.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:99:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 4820 271 4570 2830 89.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:99:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 13.90 1.13 20.8 14.8 5.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:99:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 1020 177 1380 1150 219
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:99:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 1020 196 1290 1270 290
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:99:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 46.5 4.91 53.3 62.2 38.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:99:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 7.40 <1 10.0 6.94 3.87
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:99:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 24.9 14.1 138 67.2 8.47
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:99:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 1130 146 1310 999 231
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:99:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 2710 391 2490 2010 71.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:100: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:100:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 43.1 12.4 32.4 135 211 287
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:100:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 40.9 11.6 30.1 131 195 266
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:100:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 3.96 1.75 3.36 13.7 18.3 36.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:100:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 8.89 2.88 9.15 35.4 42.3 57.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:100:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 646 474 547 615 647 590
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:100:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 3.82
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:100:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 56.2 65.1 78.6 143 165 163
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:100:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 4.12 1.83 3.30 13.1 18.9 37.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:100:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment <1 1.38 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:100:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 1300 1930 2020 4490 4530 4190
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:101: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:101:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 450 514 47.8 2100 1050 1110
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:101:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 437 487 47.7 2010 1040 1050
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:101:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 46.6 55.6 6.65 112 85.6 74.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:101:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 88.6 96.4 11.3 246 241 213
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:101:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 435 564 263 2470 1080 1770
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:101:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 1.89 3.56 <1 4.54 3.81 3.48
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:101:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 121 145 69.7 428 199 310
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:101:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 46.4 60.2 6.10 157 102 89.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:101:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment <1 1 <1 5.42 3.72 5.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:101:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 2840 3680 1800 9790 4610 6910
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:102: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:102:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 684 342 62.5 200 323 123
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:102:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 675 334 49.4 187 305 112
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:102:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 52.7 34.7 7.03 22.7 20.7 13.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:102:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 202 70.1 12.4 53.5 30.0 25.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:102:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 1430 621 95.5 1070 837 404
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:102:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 2.57 2.90 <1 1.42 1.12 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:102:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 244 143 26.3 207 75.1 112
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:102:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 56.4 43.9 5.85 23.5 21.5 12.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:102:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 3.80 <1 <1 1.22 1.28 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:102:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 6120 3790 638 8190 1830 2870
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:103: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:103:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 665 29.6 995 285 21.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:103:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 771 27.5 940 279 9.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:103:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 25.5 3.98 82.6 28.4 98.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:103:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 52.8 15.0 195 63.9 49.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:103:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 1070 195 1240 1470 36.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:103:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 1.70 <1 2.89 2.04 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:103:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 181 47.3 207 268 42.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:103:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 45.7 3.48 94.9 30.2 5.94
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:103:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 3.13 <1 3.21 1.61 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:103:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 3850 1270 5550 9040 1280
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:104: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:104:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 14.9 14.2 15.9 26.5 22.9 42.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:104:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 503 281 644 1110 1250 1270
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:104:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 1.96 2.36 1.21 1.45 1.34 1.70
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:104:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 3.19 3.15 1.03 1.30 1.04 2.50
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:104:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment <1 3.53 <1 1.03 1.02 1.34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:104:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment <1 1.88 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:104:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 427 415 424 684 817 739
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:104:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 9.46 6.07 7.03 20.3 24.3 46.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:104:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 5.67 3.16 4.98 17.6 23.0 51.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:105: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:105:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 27.7 46.2 10.9 404 109 271
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:105:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 895 1070 503 3630 1920 2940
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:105:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment <1 1.78 <1 6.79 4.09 8.59
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:105:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 1.41 2.36 1.01 11.0 4.78 10.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:105:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 1.01 1.69 <1 8.50 3.68 6.78
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:105:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment <1 <1 <1 3.69 2.19 3.73
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:105:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 535 628 425 1550 695 1100
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:105:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 47.7 69.1 10.4 200 124 128
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:105:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 53.5 77.0 8.28 208 134 122
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:106: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:106:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 208 57.5 5.16 39.7 21.4 15.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:106:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 2510 1150 191 1980 611 829
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:106:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 4.56 1.87 <1 2.21 2.59 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:106:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 8.27 3.21 <1 2.87 2.71 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:106:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 5.49 1.69 <1 2.92 1.37 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:106:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 2.88 1.19 <1 <1 1.06 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:106:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 778 664 123 1250 447 516
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:106:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 89.9 53.2 6.42 37.3 28.4 13.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:106:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 82.8 52.8 6.29 33.4 25.9 12.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:107: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:107:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 184 7.00 90.4 52.3 16.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:107:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 1410 358 2100 2200 408
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:107:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 3.23 <1 4.38 3.27 2.21
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:107:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 5.43 <1 6.53 3.73 1.14
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:107:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 3.25 <1 3.84 2.64 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:107:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 1.31 <1 2.12 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:107:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 767 230 1030 1550 372
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:107:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 61.4 6.81 114 42.0 6.09
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:107:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 62.1 5.80 123 37.0 11.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:108: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:108:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.00093 0.00038 0.00091 0.00081 0.00012 0.00095 <0.00008 0.00078
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:108:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.00203 0.00071 0.00200 0.00163 0.00030 0.00179 0.00015 0.00177
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:108:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:108:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 0.00081 0.00024 0.00086 0.00079 0.00016 0.00078 <0.00008 0.00064
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:108:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.00208 0.00060 0.00172 0.00159 0.00022 0.00154 0.00015 0.00138
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:108:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 0.00020 <0.00008 0.00019 0.00017 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00009
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:108:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:108:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:108:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.00067 0.00030 0.00082 0.00069 <0.00008 0.00054 0.00012 0.00064
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:108:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.00502 0.00067 0.00312 0.00234 0.00052 0.00436 0.00099 0.00376
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:109: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:109:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.00020 0.00135 <0.00008 0.00018 0.00026 0.00040 0.00066
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:109:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.00038 0.00300 0.00018 0.00027 0.00048 0.00095 0.00122
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:109:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:109:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 0.00019 0.00123 <0.00008 0.00023 0.00015 0.00034 0.00041
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:109:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.00042 0.00252 0.00016 0.00021 0.00033 0.00104 0.00095
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:109:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment <0.00008 0.00021 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00019 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:109:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00016 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:109:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00039 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:109:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.00017 0.00128 0.00011 0.00015 0.00020 0.00035 0.00051
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:109:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.00156 0.00670 0.00023 0.00055 0.00083 0.00078 0.00174
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:110: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:110:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.00014 0.00046 0.00014 0.00050 0.00143 0.00037 0.00012
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:110:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.00027 0.00095 0.00039 0.00113 0.00282 0.00095 0.00029
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:110:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00017 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:110:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment <0.00008 0.00024 0.00015 0.00043 0.00108 0.00032 0.00012
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:110:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.00017 0.00072 0.00026 0.00098 0.00264 0.00086 0.00035
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:110:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00011 0.00028 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:110:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00025 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:110:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00014 0.00044 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:110:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.00018 0.00029 0.00020 0.00037 0.00103 0.00037 0.00013
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:110:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.00045 0.00124 0.00030 0.00089 0.00226 0.00071 0.00026
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:111: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:111:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.00052 0.00091 0.00070
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:111:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.00129 0.00200 0.00153
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:111:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment <0.00008 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:111:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 0.00044 0.00079 0.00056
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:111:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.00131 0.00199 0.00136
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:111:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 0.00016 0.00031 0.00009
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:111:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 0.00010 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:111:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 0.00012 0.00028 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:111:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.00043 0.00075 0.00057
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:111:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.00119 0.00248 0.00134
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:112: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:112:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 0.00020 <0.00008 0.00011 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:112:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:112:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:112:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:112:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 0.00122 0.00029 0.00107 0.00086 0.00015 0.00087 <0.00008 0.00083
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:112:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:112:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:112:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:112:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 0.00013 0.00009 0.00018 0.00012 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:112:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.00179 0.00054 0.00198 0.00161 0.00032 0.00195 0.00035 0.00162
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:113: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:113:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00080 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:113:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00026 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:113:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00028 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:113:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00034 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:113:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 0.00021 0.00147 <0.00008 0.00011 0.00017 0.00073 0.00051
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:113:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00014 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:113:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00014 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:113:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00016 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:113:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment <0.00008 0.00009 0.00009 0.00012 <0.00008 0.00027 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:113:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.00052 0.00283 0.00019 0.00025 0.00059 0.00084 0.00149
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:114: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:114:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00039 0.00100 0.00044 0.00010
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:114:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00011 0.00036 0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:114:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00009 0.00027 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:114:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00012 0.00037 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:114:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 0.00009 0.00034 0.00012 0.00069 0.00174 0.00068 0.00022
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:114:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00012 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:114:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00009 0.00023 0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:114:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00022 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:114:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00011 0.00028 0.00014 0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:114:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.00032 0.00090 0.00044 0.00100 0.00230 0.00084 0.00028
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:115: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:115:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 0.00035 0.00067 0.00026
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:115:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 0.00017 0.00022 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:115:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment <0.00008 0.00020 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:115:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 0.00011 0.00024 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:115:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 0.00094 0.00141 0.00090
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:115:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:115:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment <0.00008 0.00014 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:115:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment <0.00008 0.00013 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:115:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 0.00018 0.00029 0.00016
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:115:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.00112 0.00167 0.00130
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:116: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:116:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 0.00009 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:116:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.00152 0.00054 0.00146 0.00121 0.00027 0.00122 0.00014 0.00127
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:116:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:116:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:116:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:116:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:116:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.00195 0.00050 0.00152 0.00190 0.00026 0.00154 0.00023 0.00180
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:116:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:116:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:117: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:117:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00031 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:117:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.00029 0.00229 0.00011 0.00022 0.00034 0.00054 0.00092
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:117:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00002 <0.00008 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:117:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:117:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:117:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00025 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:117:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.00042 0.00305 0.00012 0.00020 0.00050 0.00063 0.00126
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:117:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00024 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:117:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00022 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:118: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:118:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00013 0.00032 0.00012 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:118:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.00020 0.00051 0.00030 0.00069 0.00165 0.00054 0.00021
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:118:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00010 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:118:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00009 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:118:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00010 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:118:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00009 0.00023 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:118:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.00035 0.00095 0.00046 0.00084 0.00188 0.00067 0.00025
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:118:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00023 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:118:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00009 0.00030 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:119: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:119:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 0.00014 0.00025 0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:119:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.00085 0.00132 0.00107
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:119:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:119:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment <0.00008 0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:119:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment <0.00008 0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:119:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 0.00010 0.00018 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:119:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.00111 0.00172 0.00146
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:119:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 0.00008 0.00018 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:119:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 0.00008 0.00019 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.00053 0.00048 0.00295 0.00047 0.00018 0.00324 0.00046
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.00063 0.001210 0.00463 0.001140 0.000291 0.00478 0.00067
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 0.000457 0.00034 0.00282 0.000355 0.000164 0.00313 0.00049
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.00134 0.00135 0.00671 0.00153 0.000450 0.00739 0.00089
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.00035 0.00030 0.00214 0.000327 0.000119 0.00243 0.00036
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.003330 0.00320 0.01520 0.003430 0.000951 0.01570 0.00199
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 0.000677 0.00083 0.00247 0.000928 0.000175 0.00290 0.00036
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 0.00023 0.00019 0.00096 0.00019 <0.00002 0.00116 0.00015
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.004380 0.00366 0.01250 0.003650 0.000810 0.01200 0.00164
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.00138 0.001090 0.00568 0.001180 0.000361 0.00558 0.00070
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.00270 0.00181 0.00837 0.00182 0.00050 0.00798 0.00095
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:120:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment <0.00002 0.00058 0.00040 0.00057 0.209
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment <0.00002 0.00080 0.000398 0.000425 0.033
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment <0.00002 0.00053 0.000422 0.000459 0.123
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment <0.00002 0.00127 0.00060 0.001080 0.107
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment <0.00002 0.00041 0.000310 0.000356 0.126
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment <0.00002 0.00283 0.001510 0.002140 0.157
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 0.00004 0.00060 0.000246 0.000324 0.012
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment <0.00002 0.00023 0.00013 0.00025 0.009
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.00012 0.00335 0.001920 0.004800 0.147
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment <0.00002 0.00101 0.000489 0.000789 0.253
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.00002 0.00146 0.00080 0.00173 0.234
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.00004 0.004
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:121:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:122: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:123: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:123:Particle Size Analysis Wet Sediment Wet and dry sieving followed by laser diffraction analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:123:Organotins Wet Sediment Solvent extraction and derivatisation followed by GC-MS analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:123:Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) Wet Sediment Solvent extraction and clean up followed by GC-MS analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:123:Total Hydrocarbon Content (THC) Wet Sediment Ultra-violet fluorescence spectroscopy
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:124: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:125: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:125:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 8.5 13.63 9.42 2.80 0.78 7.72
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:125:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 8.6 0.00 0.00 15.95 6.96 10.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:125:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 8.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:125:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 8.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:125:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:125:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:125:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 8.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:125:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:125:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 7.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.11 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:125:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.27 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:125:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 8.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.41 1.25
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:125:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 8.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.74
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:126: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:126:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 4.45 7.46 6.54 4.49 3.59 3.08
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:126:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 9.46 8.03 7.29 6.39 4.78 3.97
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:126:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:126:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:126:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:126:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:126:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:126:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:126:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.85 0.10 0.04 0.21 0.12 0.20
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:126:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 1.68 1.88 3.38 3.03 2.68 2.35
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:126:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 3.94 1.51 4.30 3.14 3.14 3.19
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:126:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 2.33 3.25 3.04 2.37 1.87 1.62
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:127: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:127:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 2.08 3.96 4.85 2.71 1.63 1.34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:127:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 3.02 2.86 2.99 1.96 1.01 1.01
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:127:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:127:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.79 1.86
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:127:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:127:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:127:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:127:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:127:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:127:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 1.95 0.00 0.54 1.61 2.63 4.29
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:127:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 2.69 0.00 0.00 0.02 1.44 2.52
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:127:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.16 3.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:128: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:128:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 1.33 0.91 0.10 0.98 1.48 1.70
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:128:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 0.89 0.88 0.18 0.40 0.86 1.04
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:128:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 4.37 5.81 1.20 3.98 8.12 9.07
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:128:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 5.07 5.32 0.80 3.15 6.66 7.96
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:128:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 3.85 5.39 0.79 3.66 7.78 9.05
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:128:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 4.04 4.91 2.11 2.77 7.17 8.82
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:128:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 3.56 5.15 0.62 2.92 7.77 8.83
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:128:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 3.98 5.02 1.64 2.00 7.44 8.36
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:128:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 3.15 1.44 0.54 5.50 8.08 9.02
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:128:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 5.25 4.71 1.86 2.84 4.81 5.23
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:128:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 3.82 3.72 1.36 1.01 3.87 4.72
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:128:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 5.80 4.58 1.99 1.76 4.45 5.50
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:129: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:129:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 1.73 1.71 1.71 1.63 1.37 1.03
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:129:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 1.08 1.31 1.30 1.15 0.94 0.71
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:129:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 8.52 9.82 9.55 8.84 7.57 5.67
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:129:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 7.66 9.03 9.33 8.79 7.60 5.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:129:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 8.75 10.17 10.26 9.44 7.79 5.72
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:129:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 8.32 10.35 9.86 8.87 7.59 5.84
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:129:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 8.62 10.15 10.35 9.64 7.98 5.86
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:129:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 8.53 10.54 9.82 9.03 7.85 6.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:129:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 9.70 10.02 10.44 9.85 7.69 5.02
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:129:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 5.16 6.12 5.49 4.90 4.27 3.35
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:129:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 4.73 6.81 6.43 5.64 4.74 3.73
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:129:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 5.59 7.30 6.85 5.92 4.86 3.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:130: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:130:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 0.77 0.66 0.59 0.49 0.39
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:130:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 0.55 0.50 0.46 0.40 0.32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:130:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 3.87 2.85 2.31 1.97 1.74
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:130:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 4.29 3.39 2.82 2.38 2.04
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:130:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 3.90 2.87 2.33 1.98 1.72
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:130:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 4.12 3.15 2.64 2.28 1.98
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:130:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 4.02 3.03 2.55 2.22 1.91
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:130:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 4.21 3.13 2.60 2.28 2.01
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:130:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 2.89 1.83 1.42 1.25 1.12
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:130:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 2.63 2.42 2.29 2.07 1.85
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:130:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 2.99 2.75 2.58 2.32 2.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:130:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 3.03 2.81 2.66 2.39 2.11
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:131: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:131:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 0.30 0.23 0.16 0.11 0.07
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:131:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 0.25 0.18 0.13 0.09 0.05
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:131:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 1.50 1.17 0.76 0.46 0.24
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:131:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 1.73 1.37 0.94 0.62 0.34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:131:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 1.47 1.16 0.79 0.52 0.29
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:131:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 1.68 1.31 0.90 0.59 0.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:131:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 1.59 1.23 0.85 0.57 0.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:131:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 1.70 1.34 0.92 0.61 0.35
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:131:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.98 0.79 0.57 0.40 0.24
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:131:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 1.64 1.38 1.04 0.75 0.46
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:131:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 1.82 1.54 1.17 0.86 0.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:131:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 1.84 1.54 1.18 0.87 0.54
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:132: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:132:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 0.03 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:132:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 0.02 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:132:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.08 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:132:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.13 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:132:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.11 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:132:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:132:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:132:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.13 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:132:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.09 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:132:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 0.18 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:132:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 0.21 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:132:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 0.22 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:133: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:133:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 1.6 0.09 28.0 126 0.02 28.8 3.4 48.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:133:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 3.7 0.06 38.6 9.6 0.02 33.4 5.8 42.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:133:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 27.9 2.68 144 188 1.56 36.8 311 767
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:133:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 60.4 14.9 492 429 12.8 41.1 828 2835
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:133:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 31.2 3.68 187 218 2.54 38.1 354 972
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:133:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 38.2 6.59 288 284 4.73 39.5 488 1502
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:133:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 35.5 6.58 280 290 4.36 37.9 503 1488
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:133:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 38.5 8.00 302 311 5.15 39.0 562 1695
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:133:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 26.9 1.38 85.5 88.3 0.87 37.9 198 426
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:133:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 5.4 0.20 26.2 24.0 0.04 27.9 12.8 59.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:133:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 5.0 0.17 24.2 25.6 0.02 24.7 10.4 50.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:133:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 5.5 0.24 24.4 23.7 0.03 27.1 12.8 55.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:134: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:134:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:134:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:134:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.047 0.111
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:134:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.060 0.060
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:134:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.013 0.072
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:134:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.072 0.094
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:134:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.025 0.069
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:134:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.041 0.063
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:134:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment <0.005 0.019
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:134:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:135: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:135:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:135:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:136: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:136:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment <1 1.08 <1 2.20 1.54 8.83
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:136:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 3.79
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:136:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 3190 1310 1590 2410 2730 2460
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:136:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 58200 4590 7910 4760 3580 3160
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:136:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 6210 1550 1710 2130 2500 2560
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:136:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 13900 2670 3030 3100 3160 2940
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:136:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 14900 2370 3210 3840 3700 3340
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:136:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 10200 1970 2410 2620 2450 2390
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:136:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 2850 346 550 938 1110 1120
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:136:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 15.2 10.5 7.92 23.2 35.0 56.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:137: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:137:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 4.43 11.1 <1 4.02 4.30 4.42
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:137:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 1.18 2.51 <1 2.14 1.48 1.98
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:137:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 1880 2140 849 7540 3400 6110
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:137:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 2230 2770 1200 47600 10900 30500
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:137:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 1750 1960 987 9310 3490 6890
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:137:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 2050 2390 928 13000 4960 9650
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:137:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 2400 2750 1550 14400 5420 10800
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:137:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 1630 1890 815 10500 3940 7990
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:137:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 873 943 400 3960 1700 3380
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:137:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 74.4 86.2 6.75 272 154 176
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:138: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:138:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 4.01 10.5 <1 13.2 1.89 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:138:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 1.64 1.75 <1 2.09 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:138:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 4910 2060 437 3730 2510 1820
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:138:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 16300 4420 513 12300 39400 2020
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:138:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 5030 2070 411 3770 4130 1670
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:138:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 6920 2830 499 6600 9160 2040
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:138:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 7620 3480 582 7900 9730 2120
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:138:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 5410 2360 385 5890 7070 1520
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:138:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 2800 906 200 1920 1520 722
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:138:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 122 46.4 11.4 43.4 42.7 21.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:139: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:139:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 2.65 <1 35.8 9.94 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:139:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 1.40 <1 6.70 1.84 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:139:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 3840 815 3700 4580 787
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:139:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 28400 943 24900 10900 499
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:139:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 6340 717 4500 4850 384
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:139:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 8280 880 7520 6680 720
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:139:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 8810 985 8150 6930 344
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:139:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 6600 635 6050 5150 382
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:139:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 1680 355 1730 1830 111
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:139:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 82.0 5.47 144 50.1 4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:140: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:140:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 15.6 8.96 8.00 22.2 33.9 59.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:140:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 2.49 6.16 5.71 18.4 27.1 54.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:141: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:141:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 75.9 94.5 8.88 294 174 189
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:141:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 69.9 86.7 7.03 261 158 170
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:142: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:142:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 131 59.5 11.4 43.4 46.6 19.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:142:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 107 54.8 11.0 35.5 36.6 16.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:143: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:143:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 86.6 6.49 162 52.5 1.80
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:143:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 75.4 5.79 144 43.6 36.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:144: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:144:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:144:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 0.00010 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:144:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.00473 0.00152 0.00452 0.00381 0.00069 0.00425 0.00050 0.00401
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:144:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.01255 0.00343 0.01211 0.01109 0.00233 0.01145 0.00125 0.01175
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:144:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.00508 0.00151 0.00537 0.00510 0.00082 0.00509 0.00065 0.00509
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:144:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.00712 0.00251 0.00734 0.00591 0.00114 0.00559 0.00082 0.00664
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:144:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.00660 0.00192 0.00700 0.00621 0.00118 0.00583 0.00074 0.00635
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:145: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:145:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00037 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:145:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00027 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:145:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.00116 0.00585 0.00039 0.00060 0.00101 0.00171 0.00292
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:145:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.00326 0.01478 0.00082 0.00118 0.00235 0.00980 0.00667
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:145:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.00151 0.00663 0.00057 0.00067 0.00107 0.00202 0.00331
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:145:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.00183 0.00954 0.00059 0.00110 0.00155 0.00381 0.00404
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:145:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.00195 0.00777 0.00058 0.00073 0.00164 0.00401 0.00474
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:146: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:146:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00018 0.00043 0.00014 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:146:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00014 0.00021 0.00011 0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:146:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.00060 0.00146 0.00092 0.00283 0.00523 0.00208 0.00067
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:146:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.00155 0.00404 0.00196 0.02010 0.02322 0.00717 0.00280
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:146:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.00086 0.00177 0.00096 0.00428 0.00686 0.00207 0.00082
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:146:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.00089 0.00232 0.00125 0.00871 0.01247 0.00379 0.00115
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:146:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.00101 0.00283 0.00124 0.00867 0.01212 0.00391 0.00124
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:147: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:147:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 0.00012 0.00020 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:147:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 0.00009 0.00018 0.00011
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:147:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.00236 0.00344 0.00294
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:147:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.00878 0.01096 0.01086
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:147:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.00270 0.00365 0.00314
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:147:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.00417 0.00570 0.00540
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:147:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.00431 0.00567 0.00536
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:148: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:148:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.00685 0.00207 0.00688 0.00629 0.00124 0.00617 0.00074 0.00627
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:148:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.00197 0.00086 0.00230 0.00227 0.00057 0.00221 0.00018 0.00205
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:148:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:148:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 0.00010 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:148:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 0.00011 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:149: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:149:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.00171 0.00819 0.00069 0.00058 0.00149 0.00432 0.00417
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:149:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.00061 0.00276 0.00052 0.00040 0.00096 0.00123 0.00173
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:149:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00031 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:149:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00043 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:149:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00048 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:150: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:150:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.00100 0.00270 0.00127 0.00881 0.01197 0.00348 0.00119
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:150:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.00041 0.00091 0.00096 0.00166 0.00337 0.00124 0.00031
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:150:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00023 0.00040 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:150:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00028 0.00053 0.00016 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:150:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00027 0.00056 0.00014 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:151: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:151:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.00440 0.00590 0.00555
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:151:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.00109 0.00169 0.00163
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:151:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 0.00012 0.00024 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:151:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 0.00019 0.00034 0.00011
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:151:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 0.00018 0.00033 0.00015
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:152: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:152:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:152:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:152:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.00514 0.00529 0.01860 0.005070 0.001110 0.01870 0.00285
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:152:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.000269 0.00147 0.00119 0.000284 0.000105 0.00126 0.00027
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:152:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.00312 0.00333 0.01210 0.00311 0.000804 0.01270 0.00174
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:152:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.00161 0.00221 0.00682 0.00213 0.00054 0.00780 0.00109
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:152:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.00119 0.00185 0.00492 0.00170 0.00038 0.00566 0.00081
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:152:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.00168 0.002590 0.00662 0.002230 0.000514 0.00758 0.00114
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:152:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.00061 0.00052 0.00317 0.000553 0.000193 0.00335 0.00048
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:152:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:152:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:152:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:153: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:153:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:153:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:153:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.00004 0.00498 0.003960 0.008350 0.201
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:153:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment <0.00002 0.00029 0.000146 0.000255 0.015
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:153:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.00003 0.00318 0.00190 0.003250 0.201
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:153:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.00005 0.00188 0.00090 0.00160 0.091
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:153:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.00005 0.00137 0.00072 0.00132 0.043
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:153:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.00005 0.00186 0.001000 0.001410 0.067
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:153:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment <0.00002 0.00063 0.000431 0.000507 0.221
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:153:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:153:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:153:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:154: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:155: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:155:Particle Size Analysis Wet Sediment Wet and dry sieving followed by laser diffraction analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:155:Organotins Wet Sediment Solvent extraction and derivatisation followed by GC-MS analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:155:Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) Wet Sediment Solvent extraction and clean up followed by GC-MS analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:155:Total Hydrocarbon Content (THC) Wet Sediment Ultra-violet fluorescence spectroscopy
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:156: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 7.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 8.5 0.00 11.71 0.00 1.92 2.58
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.38
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 8.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 8.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.15
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 8.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 8.5 0.00 28.34 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 8.5 0.00 33.25 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 8.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.77 2.23
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 8.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.51
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 9.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 8.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.71
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 8.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.52 3.93
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 8.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.73
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 8.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 7.9 0.00 0.00 17.94 5.51 9.91
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 8.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 8.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 8.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:157:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.60 0.86 0.65 0.77 0.84 0.63
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 2.16 1.91 2.52 3.22 2.87 2.57
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 3.25 3.52 1.04 3.00 1.77 1.85
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 0.00 2.27 2.66 3.29 1.97 1.32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.00 0.12 0.20 0.17 0.15 0.20
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 1.22 1.51 1.23 1.20 1.75 1.97
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 0.00 0.88 2.50 1.88 1.79 1.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 2.47 1.62 1.85 3.39 3.45 3.60
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 2.26 1.95 1.50 1.75 1.39 1.39
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 0.76 1.99 2.29 1.63 1.23 1.01
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 2.04 3.53 3.40 3.36 3.44 2.80
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 0.00 1.51 1.15 1.10 1.12 0.98
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 0.65 0.47 0.96 1.70 0.92 0.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 0.84 2.14 1.71 1.96 1.76 1.49
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 3.55 2.65 2.28 2.61 2.33 1.82
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 2.78 4.60 2.62 2.64 2.19 2.02
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 2.44 3.44 2.11 2.39 1.85 1.68
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 5.69 1.50 1.71 1.88 1.76 1.50
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 9.38 8.57 7.83 5.33 3.84 3.57
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 1.57 0.33 0.89 0.58 0.86 0.93
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 5.04 2.55 1.78 1.78 1.41 1.46
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:158:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 2.93 3.93 3.24 2.45 1.71 1.54
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 2.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.78
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 1.41 0.00 0.00 0.16 1.74 4.17
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 2.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 1.58 0.00 0.00 0.77 4.91 3.84
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 1.21 0.00 0.00 0.02 1.39 3.66
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 3.10 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.70 2.36
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.49 1.48
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.65 1.63
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 1.86 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.35 2.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.86 2.60
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 0.71 0.11 3.17 5.13 3.09 3.41
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 1.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 1.41 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.56 2.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.04 1.85 3.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.08 1.81 3.12
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 2.75 1.37 2.80 2.17 1.50 1.25
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 1.24 0.00 0.00 0.14 2.62 3.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:159:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 1.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 4.11 1.65 0.53 5.40 7.95 8.96
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 3.70 3.52 0.94 0.76 3.46 4.44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 5.52 5.13 2.29 1.88 4.54 5.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 0.58 1.18 0.09 0.08 2.59 5.95
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 3.61 4.73 0.47 4.03 7.20 8.17
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 4.50 5.51 1.68 2.99 5.18 5.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 3.92 5.12 1.52 3.01 5.47 6.45
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 4.47 3.67 1.65 1.82 4.19 5.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 3.03 2.89 0.44 1.72 3.44 4.22
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 2.40 2.85 0.54 1.36 2.92 3.68
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 1.70 2.64 0.34 0.22 2.24 3.90
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 3.98 4.36 0.65 2.43 5.42 6.61
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 3.75 4.10 1.01 4.46 5.42 5.61
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 3.90 3.22 0.45 0.86 4.42 6.60
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 3.08 2.72 0.37 1.05 4.35 5.93
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 4.43 4.00 2.04 2.10 4.67 5.49
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 4.08 4.95 1.27 2.75 4.87 5.71
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 4.97 4.87 1.22 2.83 4.78 5.89
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 1.13 0.78 0.07 0.64 1.01 1.24
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 0.00 0.06 5.94 18.77 15.97 11.73
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 3.52 3.49 0.65 1.10 5.87 8.16
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 4.63 4.44 2.52 2.39 4.78 5.60
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:160:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 1.71 2.14 0.13 0.06 2.36 5.35
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 9.65 9.77 10.06 9.63 7.77 5.29
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 4.76 6.49 6.21 5.45 4.50 3.49
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 5.27 6.59 6.08 5.35 4.51 3.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 8.11 12.02 11.95 9.98 7.38 5.07
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 8.47 8.95 9.82 9.83 8.31 5.97
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 5.53 6.21 6.32 6.10 5.35 4.18
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 6.26 7.08 6.99 6.42 5.39 4.04
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 5.61 6.86 6.93 6.35 5.26 3.91
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 4.40 5.02 5.21 4.94 4.11 3.01
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 4.18 4.65 4.89 4.80 4.08 2.97
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 5.19 7.59 8.35 7.53 5.68 3.79
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 6.67 7.00 7.52 7.50 6.51 4.87
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 5.46 5.10 5.54 5.97 5.53 4.26
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 7.25 9.27 9.20 8.06 6.42 4.69
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 6.33 7.98 8.15 7.45 6.03 4.43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 5.19 6.40 5.95 5.19 4.34 3.42
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 5.51 6.40 6.47 6.02 5.05 3.81
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 5.63 6.48 6.52 6.08 5.14 3.90
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 1.31 1.36 1.41 1.37 1.17 0.87
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 8.98 7.23 5.94 4.92 3.81 2.86
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 7.07 8.44 9.29 9.27 8.08 6.17
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 5.47 6.81 6.35 5.79 5.02 3.89
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:161:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 6.54 9.50 9.82 8.62 6.64 4.58
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 3.20 2.12 1.70 1.52 1.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 2.82 2.64 2.51 2.26 1.98
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 2.88 2.73 2.63 2.37 2.09
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 3.71 3.36 3.27 3.00 2.60
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 3.92 2.82 2.28 1.92 1.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 3.33 3.08 2.88 2.55 2.25
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 3.17 3.02 2.92 2.65 2.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 3.04 2.86 2.80 2.61 2.40
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 2.34 2.24 2.20 2.02 1.81
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 2.26 2.18 2.17 2.00 1.78
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 2.76 2.64 2.69 2.50 2.16
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 3.73 3.49 3.37 3.09 2.80
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 3.30 3.04 2.79 2.41 2.13
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 3.57 3.32 3.27 3.04 2.75
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 3.38 3.10 3.03 2.83 2.55
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 2.80 2.64 2.51 2.27 2.04
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 3.04 2.91 2.81 2.52 2.20
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 3.10 2.95 2.86 2.58 2.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 0.68 0.62 0.56 0.48 0.41
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 2.21 1.93 1.82 1.70 1.54
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 4.57 3.86 3.43 2.88 2.32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 3.04 2.81 2.72 2.53 2.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:162:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 3.29 3.06 3.17 3.09 2.82
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 1.20 0.98 0.71 0.50 0.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 1.72 1.43 1.08 0.80 0.49
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 1.82 1.51 1.14 0.82 0.50
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 2.16 1.72 1.27 0.93 0.58
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 1.37 1.06 0.72 0.47 0.26
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 1.97 1.65 1.23 0.88 0.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 2.11 1.78 1.35 0.98 0.60
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 2.18 1.87 1.44 1.06 0.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 1.61 1.37 1.05 0.78 0.48
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 1.55 1.29 0.97 0.70 0.43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 1.78 1.40 1.02 0.74 0.45
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 2.50 2.10 1.54 1.08 0.64
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 1.92 1.65 1.24 0.89 0.54
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 2.42 2.04 1.57 1.17 0.73
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 2.23 1.86 1.42 1.05 0.66
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 1.81 1.54 1.18 0.87 0.54
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 1.90 1.58 1.19 0.87 0.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 1.98 1.65 1.24 0.90 0.55
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 0.36 0.30 0.22 0.16 0.09
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 1.34 1.12 0.87 0.66 0.42
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 1.81 1.38 0.99 0.70 0.43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 2.12 1.82 1.38 1.01 0.62
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:163:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 2.43 1.99 1.49 1.10 0.68
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 0.20 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 0.20 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 0.23 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.09 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 0.20 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 0.23 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 0.26 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 0.19 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 0.16 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 0.18 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 0.24 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 0.20 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 0.29 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 0.26 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 0.21 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 0.21 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 0.21 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 0.04 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 0.18 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 0.17 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 0.24 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:164:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 0.27 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 24.1 0.80 67.4 77.3 0.71 32.9 166 264
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 7.4 0.19 29.8 29.1 0.05 28.8 19.7 65.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 4.8 0.23 21.3 19.6 0.02 24.8 12.2 48.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 2.6 0.06 21.3 5.4 0.03 20.4 4.1 29.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 23.2 1.74 123 139 1.24 34.5 239 461
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 6.3 0.23 26.0 20.9 0.04 30.2 13.9 49.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 5.4 0.21 23.1 18.4 0.02 27.7 13.5 48.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 7.7 0.24 27.9 20.0 0.02 34.0 14.7 55.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 5.1 0.16 22.6 22.3 0.01 25.4 9.1 45.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 4.3 0.13 24.3 19.1 0.02 24.6 8.1 45.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 2.9 0.08 20.4 6.1 0.03 19.4 3.5 30.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 8.5 0.45 47.1 36.0 0.25 34.4 25 89.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 10.1 0.31 29.8 24.2 0.03 31.9 17.5 79.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 5.4 0.16 26.7 28.7 0.03 28.0 9.9 49.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 5.3 0.12 24.3 21.5 0.02 27.5 9.1 48.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 4.9 0.15 20.4 22.3 0.02 22.1 296 39.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 5.2 0.18 23.1 18.2 0.01 27.5 15.2 51.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 6.5 0.29 25.3 26.4 0.02 28.4 15.4 59.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 7.9 0.13 28.6 7.9 0.02 27.5 6.9 42.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 3.4 0.09 28.0 8.4 0.02 32.4 6.1 49.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 1.5 0.10 23.2 29.8 <0.01 24.7 2.5 38.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 6.2 0.21 18.8 16.5 0.01 22.3 12.6 46.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:165:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 2.9 0.12 19.0 26.9 <0.01 20.4 3.2 33.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:166: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:166:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.024 0.031
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:166:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:166:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:166:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:166:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.033 0.117
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:166:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:167: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:167:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:167:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:167:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:167:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:167:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:167:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:167:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:167:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:167:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:167:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:168: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:168:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:168:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:168:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:168:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:168:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:168:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:168:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:169: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:169:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 35800 1920 2180 1540 1260 917
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:169:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 234 12.7 15.7 22.7 31.2 50.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:169:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 12.3 2.70 6.80 22.0 36.4 76.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:169:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 2.32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:170: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:170:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 876 1080 903 6380 2740 7160
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:170:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 60.6 77.1 11.7 221 129 151
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:170:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 88.9 126 7.66 367 232 203
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:170:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 1.46 2.59 <1 2.21 1.08 1.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:171: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:171:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 5720 1410 177 4930 10800 611
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:171:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 105 53.4 8.99 51.3 93.0 19.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:171:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 126 85.0 13.7 48.1 49.8 21.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:171:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 1.06 1.97 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:172: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:172:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 5290 489 7130 4130 232
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:172:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 83.4 6.81 140 53.8 3.42
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:172:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 105 4.93 214 59.3 11.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:172:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:173: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:173:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 13800 1350 1640 2930 3310 2740
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:173:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 18.8 3.95 9.82 21.7 26.7 30.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:173:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 14.3 3.84 17.0 34.2 43.1 46.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:173:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 27.6 6.68 11.1 20.3 26.8 30.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:173:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 3.56 1.24 4.05 16.0 20.0 34.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:173:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 2.33 <1 2.70 7.68 11.5 22.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:173:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 1.35 <1 1.31 3.48 5.25 14.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:173:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 6390 219 466 176 161 151
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:173:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 6.10 1.27 2.63 2.35 3.77 4.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:173:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 7.16 1.29 3.87 9.82 15.1 29.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:174: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:174:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 1890 2420 1790 6190 2690 5260
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:174:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 59.0 45.3 10.4 167 149 149
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:174:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 78.5 69.5 13.5 290 246 244
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:174:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 50.4 46.3 8.78 198 121 148
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:174:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 41.4 55.3 7.00 137 118 80.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:174:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 27.9 37.4 4.74 103 64.2 59.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:174:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 14.0 21.3 2.75 38.5 28.7 24.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:174:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 161 158 80.8 2480 559 1610
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:174:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 35.4 8.83 1.95 38.7 14.7 26.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:174:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 35.4 48.6 5.38 120 77.7 74.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:175: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:175:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 4200 2800 364 5680 3550 1870
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:175:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 162 32.8 5.33 35.5 23.1 14.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:175:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 246 51.8 8.89 50.1 39.3 23.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:175:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 130 35.7 5.94 38.6 32.6 15.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:175:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 60.5 38.3 6.11 37.0 17.5 11.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:175:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 38.8 24.1 4.10 14.7 12.5 7.21
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:175:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 16.2 13.3 2.37 7.89 5.88 3.41
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:175:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 813 202 <1 575 2880 82.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:175:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 32.8 2.97 <1 7.82 9.90 4.62
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:175:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 47.5 31.7 4.55 18.6 19.1 9.39
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:176: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:176:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 3630 1060 3340 6050 511
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:176:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 47.4 7.76 105 47.2 25.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:176:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 67.0 11.7 212 65.9 11.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:176:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 60.4 8.99 106 47.0 12.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:176:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 37.5 3.54 104 34.9 3.77
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:176:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 30.1 2.37 59.0 17.9 4.90
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:176:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 8.21 1.03 25.5 10.2 1.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:176:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 3970 60 2380 489 42.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:176:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 27.1 2.04 14.6 9.26 9.12
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:176:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 27.3 2.33 74.7 23.2 10.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:177: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:177:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 2.85 <1 2.27 5.18 7.99 15.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:177:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 3.23 <1 3.52 8.41 12.9 27.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:177:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 5.26 1.75 5.17 15.5 23.2 44.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:177:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 7.68 1.96 6.30 18.7 29.3 49.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:177:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:177:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 3.25
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:177:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1.32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:177:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 6.60 2.52 8.61 22.1 28.1 41.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:177:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1.81
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:178: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:178:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 18.4 25.6 3.16 73.8 44.6 42.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:178:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 32.2 43.1 5.20 102 72.3 63.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:178:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 53.7 73.4 7.51 219 147 125
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:178:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 66.9 85.2 9.65 244 155 135
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:178:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:178:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 1.83 3.88 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:178:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <1 1.30 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:178:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 62.8 70.2 10.0 247 203 183
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:178:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 1.83 2.83 1.28 4.05 3.34 3.89
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:179: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:179:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 25.9 16.3 2.41 10.0 8.87 4.54
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:179:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 38.0 28.5 4.57 17.1 15.8 8.24
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:179:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 78.3 46.5 7.11 33.5 26.9 11.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:179:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 88.0 53.9 8.71 36.6 29.6 16.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:179:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:179:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <1 3.56 <1 2.19 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:179:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:179:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 149 50.2 5.83 43.0 23.1 16.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:179:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 3.80 1.91 <1 1.29 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:180: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:180:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 20.0 1.59 40.1 12.4 12.99
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:180:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 20.5 1.99 65.1 21.2 16.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:180:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 58.6 3.85 138 40.0 9.90
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:180:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 68.2 6.20 150 44.9 15.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:180:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <1 <1 2.08 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:180:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <1 <1 7.86 1.96 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:180:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:180:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 68.8 10.2 166 51.3 34.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:180:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 1.73 <1 2.83 1.39 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:181: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:181:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.00229 0.00071 0.00234 0.00254 0.00031 0.00254 0.00037 0.00211
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:181:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00010
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:181:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 0.00010 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:181:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:181:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.00359 0.00124 0.00376 0.00370 0.00041 0.00336 0.00062 0.00364
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:181:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 0.00013 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:181:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:182: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:182:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.00049 0.00324 0.00021 0.00030 0.00048 0.00086 0.00156
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:182:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment <0.00008 0.00010 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00017 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:182:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00053 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:182:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00026 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:182:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.00083 0.00538 0.00043 0.00077 0.00090 0.00128 0.00257
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:182:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00060 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:182:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00048 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:183: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:183:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.00031 0.00135 0.00033 0.00137 0.00250 0.00097 0.00032
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:183:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00018 0.00023 0.00009 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:183:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00026 0.00055 0.00021 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:183:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00013 0.00022 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:183:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.00067 0.00212 0.00064 0.00237 0.00364 0.00176 0.00054
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:183:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00031 0.00053 0.00022 0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:183:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00028 0.00043 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:184: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:184:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.00112 0.00168 0.00129
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:184:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 0.00013 0.00017 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:184:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 0.00017 0.00037 0.00010
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:184:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 0.00010 0.00020 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:184:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.00194 0.00245 0.00200
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:184:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 0.00015 0.00034 0.00011
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:184:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 0.00014 0.00030 0.00010
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:185: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:185:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:185:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:185:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:185:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:185:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 0.00069 0.00011 0.00060 0.00045 <0.00008 0.00051 0.00013 0.00036
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:185:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:185:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:185:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:185:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:185:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:186: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:186:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00014 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:186:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00022 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:186:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00035 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:186:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00017 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:186:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment <0.00008 0.00064 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00043 0.00014
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:186:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00053 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:186:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:186:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00028 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:186:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00022 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:186:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00027 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:187: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:187:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00008 0.00016 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:187:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00017 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:187:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00012 0.00030 0.00009 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:187:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00013 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:187:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment <0.00008 0.00016 <0.00008 0.00038 0.00068 0.00036 0.00013
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:187:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00017 0.00038 0.00012 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:187:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:187:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00012 0.00023 0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:187:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00016 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:187:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00014 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:188: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:188:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment <0.00008 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:188:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 0.00009 0.00012 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:188:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 0.00012 0.00020 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:188:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment <0.00008 0.00013 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:188:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 0.00045 0.00063 0.00043
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:188:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 0.00014 0.00027 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:188:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:188:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 0.00009 0.00016 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:188:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment <0.00008 0.00012 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:188:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment <0.00008 0.00014 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:189: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:189:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:189:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:189:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:189:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:189:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 0.00009 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:189:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:190: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:190:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00035 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:190:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00026 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:190:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00039 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:190:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00022 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:190:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00025 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:190:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00018 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:191: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:191:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00012 0.00023 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:191:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00012 0.00029 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:191:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00016 0.00025 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:191:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00012 0.00023 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:191:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00010 0.00020 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:191:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00012 0.00021 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:192: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:192:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 0.00009 0.00019 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:192:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 0.00011 0.00020 0.00009
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:192:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 0.00012 0.00022 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:192:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 0.00010 0.00017 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:192:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment <0.00008 0.00016 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:192:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment <0.00008 0.00015 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.00069 0.00060 0.00362 0.00070 0.00023 0.00358 0.00053
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment <0.00002 0.000028 0.00008 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.00008 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.00177 0.00193 0.00900 0.00235 0.000716 0.01060 0.00132
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 0.00003 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.00003 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:193:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment <0.00002 0.00066 0.00045 0.00062 0.237
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.009
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.00006 0.00226 0.00136 0.003020 0.167
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:194:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:195: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:196: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:196:Particle Size Analysis Wet Sediment Wet and dry sieving followed by laser diffraction analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:196:Organotins Wet Sediment Solvent extraction and derivatisation followed by GC-MS analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:196:Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) Wet Sediment Solvent extraction and clean up followed by GC-MS analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:196:Total Hydrocarbon Content (THC) Wet Sediment Ultra-violet fluorescence spectroscopy
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:202:fauna associated with these and, on soft sediment areas, the collection of ten core samples for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:203:Sediment Characteristics
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:203:The survey area was characterised by heterogeneous sediment, the coarseness of which decreased
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:203:construction activities. Results of PSD analysis of the core samples indicated coarse sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:203:of 11.78 %. The coarseness of the sediment resulted in most core samples being classified as gravel or
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:203:with the Folk (British Geological Survey (BGS) modified). On the Wentworth scale, intertidal sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:203:on the Wentworth scale the North Tees Mudflat sediments were described as fine sand, very fine sand,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:203:The subtidal section of the survey area was characterised by the finest sediment, with most stations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:203:subtidal sediments were described as very coarse sand, fine sand, and medium silt.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:203:Sediment Chemistry
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:203:for a total of 31 sites and 84 samples. These were scheduled for PSD, pH and sediment chemistry
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:203:The concentration of metals in sediments exceeded the respective Cefas AL1 threshold at most
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:204:concentration of tributyltin (TBT) exceeded the Cefas AL1 threshold in the surface sediment at stations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:204:sandy and muddy sediments in brackish waters, along with the gastropod Peringia ulvae, which was
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:208:1.5 Environmental Quality Standards for Sediment Chemical Concentrations 6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:208: 3.2.1 Sediment Characteristics 13
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:208: 3.2.2 Sediment Hydrocarbons 13
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:208: 3.2.7 Sediment Macrofauna from Grab and Core Samples 14
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:208: 3.3.1 Sediment Macrofauna Data Rationalisation 16
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:208: 3.3.2 Sediment Macrofaunal Univariate Analysis 16
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:209:4.2 Sediment Characterisation 30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:209:4.3 Sediment Chemistry 41
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:209:4.4 Intertidal Sediment Macrofauna 44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:209:4.5 Subtidal Sediment Macrofauna 61
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:209:5.1 Sediment Characterisation 96
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:209:5.2 Sediment Chemistry 97
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:209: 5.2.1 Sediment Hydrocarbons 97
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:209: 5.2.2 Sediment Metals 97
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:209: 5.2.3 Sediment Polychlorinated Biphenyls 98
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:209: 5.2.4 Sediment Organotins 98
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:210:Appendix C Sediment Particle Size and Grab Sample Photographs
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:210:Appendix D Sediment Chemistry
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:210:D.2 Sediment Hydrocarbons
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:210:D.3 Sediment Metals
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:210:D.4 Sediment Polychlorinated Biphenyls
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:211:Figure 4.4: Sediment fractional composition 34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:211:Figure 4.5: Spatial; distribution of major sediment fractions 35
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:211:the sediment fractional proportions 40
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:212:Table 3.1: Sediment particle size distribution statistics 16
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:212:Table 4.8: Summary of sediment characteristics 31
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:212:Table 4.10: Summary of physical characteristics of sediment groups identified in multivariate analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:221:1.5 Environmental Quality Standards for Sediment Chemical Concentrations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:222: to describe the epifauna and/or conspicuous infauna associated with these. On soft sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:226: mixed sediments containing pebbles/cobbles) and only epifauna was recorded. Four quadrats
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:226: were positioned on sediment areas where epifauna was recorded as well as conspicuous
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:226: On soft sediments, core samples were taken using an 11.3 cm diameter, 0.01 m2, corer,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:226: sediment types observed on both the upper and the lower shore. Due to the presence of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:226: coarse sediment/hard substratum, cores shallower than the normal acceptable depth of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:228: undertake sediment quality analysis in support of marine licence applications in England.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:228:3.2.1 Sediment Characteristics
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:228: Sediment samples from grab and intertidal core samples were analysed for PSD using a
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:228: sediment classes (percentage gravel, sand and silt/clay), skewness, sorting coefficients and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:228: based on the Folk and Ward (1957) method. The sediment descriptions are based on the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:228: Sediment samples from vibrocores (VC) and boreholes (BH) were analysed for PSD using wet
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:228:3.2.2 Sediment Hydrocarbons
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:229:3.2.7 Sediment Macrofauna from Grab and Core Samples
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:230: remove fauna. The animals were separated by hand from the retained sediment by using a
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:230: combination of stereo microscopes for the fine sediments and in white trays for any coarser
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:230: material. Processed sediment was stored in the original formalin.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:230: Table 3.1 summarises the sediment PSD statistics that were calculated using Gradistat V8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:230: The Wentworth (1922) sediment classification is based on mean sediment particle size; the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:230: Folk (BGS modified) classification (Long, 2006) is based on percentages of main sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:231: Table 3.1: Sediment particle size distribution statistics
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:231: sediment grains resides above this point and half below
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:231:3.3.1 Sediment Macrofauna Data Rationalisation
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:231:3.3.2 Sediment Macrofaunal Univariate Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:232: Multivariate statistical techniques were applied to the sediment characteristics from the grab
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:232: the sediment data, transformation is used to reduce skewness of data; for the macrofaunal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:233: for intertidal (walkover, quadrat, core samples for macrofauna and sediment) and subtidal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:233: areas (grabs for macrofauna and sediment). Although, theoretically, a biotope can be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:233: habitats/biotopes (e.g. rock interspersed with coarse sediment) where the overall area was at
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:236: GS_17 was abandoned as the coarse sediment prevented the collection of an acceptable
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:241: Sediment samples from the VCs and BHs were recovered for chemical analysis. Samples were
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:245:4.2 Sediment Characterisation
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:245: Tables 4.8 and 4.9 present a summary of the particle size characteristics and sediment PSD.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:245: sediment classes were identified within the survey area with ‘sandy mud’ typifying 13 stations,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:245: stations had polymodal distributions (Table 4.9). At the sites where bimodal sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:245: 18.87 µm sediment fraction (medium silt) at eight sites and the 13.34 µm sediment fraction
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:245: 0.835 µm sediment fraction (clay) at 13 sites (Table 4.9; Figure 4.4).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:245: The median sediment particle size ranged from 15 µm (fine silt) at station GS_09 to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:245: particle size underpinned the Wentworth description, which identified four sediment classes,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:245: Of the 35 stations assessed, 22 had ‘very poorly sorted’ sediments, 10 had ‘poorly sorted’
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:245: sediments, two had ‘extremely poorly sorted’ sediments and one had ‘moderately sorted’
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:245: sediments. The sediment distribution was ‘symmetrical’ (15 stations), ‘very fine skewed’ (10
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:245: The survey area was overall characterised by heterogeneous sediment, the coarseness of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:245: presents the main sediment fractional composition for intertidal on the south bank, North
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:245: Tees Mudflat and subtidal areas. Figure 4.5 presents the distribution of the main sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:246: Table 4.8: Summary of sediment characteristics
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:249: Figure 4.4: Sediment fractional composition
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:250: Figure 4.5: Spatial; distribution of major sediment fractions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:251: Hierarchical clustering (cluster analysis) using Euclidean distance, was applied to the sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:251: PSD to investigate sedimentological characteristics. Data were not transformed. The
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:251: sediment fractions composition. For this reason, the grouping of the stations was obtained by
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:251: sandy gravel (Folk BGS modified), with a mean median sediment particle size of 10
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:251: modified), with a mean median sediment particle size of 602 µm (coarse sand) located in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:251: sandy mud (Folk BGS modified), with a mean median sediment particle size of 17.5 µm
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:251: sediment particle size of 149 µm (fine sand), in mean water depth of 1.7 m.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:253:Table 4.10: Summary of physical characteristics of sediment groups identified in multivariate analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:254: Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the sediment fractional proportional
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:254: Figure 4.7 presents the results of the PCA applied to the sediment fractions. The first principal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:254: gives a good representation of sediment distribution across the survey area.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:255: sediment fractional proportions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:256:4.3 Sediment Chemistry
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:256: The VC and BH sediment chemistry samples were analysed for PSD, pH, hydrocarbons,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:256: The PSD results of the VC and BH sediment samples are presented in Appendix D.1.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:256: Concentrations of THC and a suite of PAHs were analysed in sediments taken from several
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:257: The concentrations of the extractable metals in the sediment samples are summarised in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:258: The sediment pH within the survey area is presented in Appendix D.6.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:259:4.4 Intertidal Sediment Macrofauna
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:260: which comprised mixed sediments of muddy sand, sandy gravel and/or gravel, in the mid and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:260: (detailed in Section 3.3.5), in conjunction with the sediment characteristics (detailed in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:276:4.5 Subtidal Sediment Macrofauna
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:284: Littoral sediment Littoral Sand Mobile sand mobile sand (LS.LSa.MoSa.Ol)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:285: Littoral sediment Littoral mixed sediment gravelly sandy mud littoral gravelly sandy mud littoral gravelly sandy mud
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:285: sediment mud and sandy mud (SS.SMu.ISaMu.MelMagThy) (A5.334)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:287: the latter occurring in the coarse sediment’s interstices.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:288: conditions in channels of very fast flowing river mouths. The sediment is relatively coarse and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:288: in the sediment. Oligochaetes, including enchytraeid oligochaetes, constitute the infaunal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:288: infauna and sediment composition of which were assessed by means of core samples.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:288: mud, with an anoxic layer usually present within the first 5 cm of the sediment, which may be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:311:5.1 Sediment Characterisation
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:311: heterogeneous sediment comprising pebbles, cobbles, and boulders in a matrix of muddy
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:311: sand and gravel. The PSD analysis of the core samples indicated coarse sediment comprising
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:311: modified) classification reflected the coarseness of the sediment with most core samples
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:311: historic construction activities, which may have enhanced the coarseness of the sediment. No
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:311: The North Tees Mudflat section of the survey area also featured heterogeneous sediment,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:311: The subtidal section of the survey area featured the finest sediment, albeit with a degree of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:311: The heterogeneity of the sediment, across the entire survey area, was reflected in the sorting
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:311: coefficient, with most samples having poorly or very poorly sorted sediment. Two subtidal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:311: stations had extremely poorly sorted sediment, whereas one intertidal core had moderately
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:311: sorted sediment.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:311: sediment influx (Hein, 2007). These are likely to be associated with fluvial sediment input and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:312:5.2 Sediment Chemistry
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:312: The vibrocore and borehole sediment chemistry samples were collected from a total of 31
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:312:5.2.1 Sediment Hydrocarbons
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:312: Marine sediments contain hydrocarbons derived from many sources that enter the marine
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:312:5.2.2 Sediment Metals
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:312: in both dissolved and sedimentary forms. Some are essential to marine life while others have
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:312: atmospheric fallout (Brady et al., 2015). Other routes into marine sediments are from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:313:5.2.3 Sediment Polychlorinated Biphenyls
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:313:5.2.4 Sediment Organotins
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:313: The Cefas AL1 threshold was exceeded in the surface sediment at stations BH-31 and BH-34,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:314: sediments of estuaries to depths of 30 m (Ballerstedt, 2005), although a population of this
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:314: even in homogeneous sediments, owing to pheromones or local food abundance or as a
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:315: sedimentary habitats recorded, and with transitional areas owing to indistinct biotope
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:316: Of the sedimentary biotopes, ‘Hediste diversicolor and Corophium volutator in littoral gravelly
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:316: the Tees estuary’s intertidal sedimentary habitats been reclaimed for Infrastructure
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:316: The sedimentary biotope ‘Melinna palmata with Magelona spp. and Thyasira spp. in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:316: Sediment parameters, specifically grain size median and mud content, are the most
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:316: some parts of the North Sea, this species is reported to be absent in coarse grained sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:316: sediment particle size from the subtidal stations was 3036 µm and the mean mud content
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:319: bivalve is a subsurface and surface deposit-feeder, whose feeding activities result in sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:319: Euchone limnicola, which was first reported from California in fine mud sediments where the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:319: France, always in sandy and muddy sediments of harbours with a high degree of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:319: Gulf of St. Lawrence to Venezuela. It is found in mudflats and soft sediments of estuaries and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:321: The survey area was characterised by heterogeneous sediment, the coarseness of which
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:321: The subtidal section of the survey area had the finest sediment, with most stations being
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:321: A total of 31 sites and 84 samples was collected for sediment chemistry investigation.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:321: The concentration of sediment metals exceeded their respective Cefas AL1 threshold at most
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:322: intertidal section included rocky and sedimentary habitats, whereas the North Tees Mudflats
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:322: and subtidal sections features sedimentary habitats. No mudflat habitats were identified in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:323: analysis of unconsolidated sediment by sieving or laser granulometer. Berkshire: Kenneth Pye
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:323: pollution index for heavy metals in marine and estuarine sediments. Environmental
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:324: Deere-Jones, T. (2007). Review of some specific sediment and pollution monitoring related
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:325: Folk, R.L. (1954). The distinction between grain size and mineral composition in sedimentary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:325: size parameters. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 27(1), 3-26.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:326: GOV.UK. (2020, 14 September). Marine licensing: sediment analysis and sample plans.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:326: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-sample-plans.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:327: Long, D. (2006). BGS Detailed explanation of seabed sediment modified Folk classification.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:327: sediment_modified_folk_classification.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:328: of trends and concentrations of selected hazardous substances in sediments and biota.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:330: Tillin, H.M. (2016). Capitella capitata in enriched sublittoral muddy sediments. In Tyler-Walters
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:330: Wentworth, C.K. (1922). A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. Journal of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:331:Appendix C Sediment Particle Size and Grab Sample Photographs
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:331:Appendix D Sediment Chemistry
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:331:D.2 Sediment Hydrocarbons
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:331:D.3 Sediment Metals
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:331:D.4 Sediment Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:342: Sample Sediment Description (including stratigraphy)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:342: Date Station Fix No. Depth Depth Sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:342: cm Sediment Description Munsell Colour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:343: Sample Sediment Description (including stratigraphy)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:343: Date Station Fix No. Depth Depth Sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:343: cm Sediment Description Munsell Colour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:344: Sample Sediment Description (including stratigraphy)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:344: Date Station Fix No. Depth Depth Sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:344: cm Sediment Description Munsell Colour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:345: Sample Sediment Description (including stratigraphy)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:345: Date Station Fix No. Depth Depth Sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:345: cm Sediment Description Munsell Colour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:346: Sample Sediment Description (including stratigraphy)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:346: Date Station Fix No. Depth Depth Sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:346: cm Sediment Description Munsell Colour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:347: Sample Sediment Description (including stratigraphy)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:347: Date Station Fix No. Depth Depth Sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:347: cm Sediment Description Munsell Colour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:348: Sediment Particle Size and Grab
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:384: Sediment Chemistry
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:391:D.2 Sediment Hydrocarbons
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:393: Concentrations expressed as μg/kg dry sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:393: Cefas action levels available at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-sample-plans
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:396: Concentrations expressed as μg/kg dry sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:396: Cefas action levels available at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-sample-plans
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:397:D.3 Sediment Metals
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:398: Concentrations expressed in μg/g dry sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:398: Cefas action levels available at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-sample-plans
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:399:D.4 Sediment Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:400: Concentrations expressed as ng/g of dry sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:402: Concentrations expressed as ng/g of dry sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:404: Concentrations expressed as ng/g of dry sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:407: Cefas action levels available at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-sample-plans
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:410: Cefas action levels available at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-sample-plans
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1134-L.2021.00333 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation Request 2-62.pdf:1: • Sediment sampling data within the MMO’s standard template (zip folder name ‘BH01-
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1134-L.2021.00333 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation Request 2-62.pdf:1: 15_Sediment Sampling Results’).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1134-L.2021.00333 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation Request 2-62.pdf:2: Marine sediments to be dredged as part of Phase 1 of the scheme are to be disposed of at the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1134-L.2021.00333 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation Request 2-62.pdf:2: Marine sediments to be dredged as part of Phase 1 of the scheme are to be disposed of at the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1134-L.2021.00333 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation Request 2-62.pdf:4: sediments in Phase 1 (excluding that from the Tees Dock turning circle which was been included
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1134-L.2021.00333 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation Request 2-62.pdf:4: sediments in Phase 1 (excluding that from the Tees Dock turning circle which was been included
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1134-L.2021.00333 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation Request 2-62.pdf:5: support with the transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger or cutter suction dredger
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1134-L.2021.00333 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation Request 2-62.pdf:5: support with the transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger or cutter suction dredger
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1134-L.2021.00333 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation Request 2-62.pdf:5: avoid the risk of a jack-up barge 'punching' into the underlying sediments when berthed at the quay
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1134-L.2021.00333 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation Request 2-62.pdf:5: avoid the risk of a jack-up barge 'punching' into the underlying sediments when berthed at the quay
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:3: suspended sediment concentrations during previous consultations, and I noted in my previous
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:3: suspended sediment concentrations and plumes modelled within the original EIA, in order for
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:3: in relation to the Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling Technical Note), that “the
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:3: Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling Technical Note within this consultation, however,
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:3: sediment concentrations and plumes modelled within the original EIA, with the most up to date
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:3: Sediment Plume Modelling Technical Note submitted to support Variation 1, the capital dredging
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_Cefas_comments_for_action_RFI_19.pdf:3: response directs me to the Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling Technical Note
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:3:3.6 Capital dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils / landside materials within
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:4:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME 43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:4:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY 134
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:8:5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:8:6 Sediment sampling plan
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:9:effects on tidal currents and sediment transport may occur (i.e. the potential zone of influence). The
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:9: The study area for marine topics comprises the hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling domain,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:15:berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:22:3.6 Capital dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils /
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:22:estuarine (marine) sediments and excavation of soils / landside materials within the riverbank to create the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:22:A summary of the proposed design levels and dredge volumes for marine sediments is detailed in Section
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:22:3.6.1 Volume of marine sediments to be dredged
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:22:The total dredge volume for marine sediments is predicted to be approximately 1,800,000m3. As detailed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:22:marine sediment is anticipated to comprise Tidal Flat Deposits and Glacial Till. It is proposed that all areas
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:24:Table 3.2 Proposed volumes of marine sediments to be dredged (excluding over-dredge volumes)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:24:transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger to the offshore disposal site. It is assumed that
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:24:In addition to the removal of marine sediments, the proposed scheme will require the excavation of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:24:avoid the risk of a jack-up barge ‘punching’ into the underlying sediments when berthed at the quay during
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:25:sediments from the river channel would be deposited offshore within the Tees Bay C disposal site. As noted
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:33:suitable locations for the re-use of dredged sediment; three were located adjacent to the South Gare
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:51:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:51:This section presents the baseline conditions with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:51:While the proposed scheme has the potential to alter hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes, the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:51:The assessment of potential effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime has been made with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:51:that are relevant to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes, as presented within the NPS for Ports, are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:51:Where relevant, applicants should undertake coastal geomorphological and sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:51:shorelines where the proposal could inhibit sediment flow or have an impact on coastal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:52:Table 6.2 MPS requirements relevant to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:52:activity or development will have on coastal processes, including sediment movement.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:52:hydrodynamics and the sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:52:Table 6.3 North East Marine Plan policies relevant to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:52:A summary of consultation responses relevant to the assessment of hydrodynamics and sedimentary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:53: aspects of relevance to hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes, namely: on the tidal prism of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:53: as stop start thresholds for parameters such as suspended sediment and 13 and Section 7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:53:For hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes, the study area needs to cover all areas of river, adjacent
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:54:Figure 6.1 Study area for assessing potential effects on hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:54:There has been much previous work to characterise the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:54:Table 6.5 Review of existing information on the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:54:2002 Teesmouth Sediment Study. HR Wallingford, 1989
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:54: Further information relating to sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:55: Anglo American Harbour Facilities – modelling, sediment transport, bed change
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:55: Environmental Statement. modelling and modelling of sediment plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:57:sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary, carried out over many decades. This work is summarised below
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:57:Table 6.6 Review of existing information on the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:57:2002 Teesmouth Sediment Study. HR Wallingford, 1989
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:57: Further information relating to sediment contamination and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:57: Anglo American Harbour Facilities – Royal HaskoningDHV, modelling, wave modelling, sediment transport, bed change
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:57: Environmental Statement. 2014 modelling and modelling of sediment plume released from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:60: • Sediment plume modelling: The updated and verified 3D Tees Estuary Tidal Model was used to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:60: predict movement of suspended sediment from the proposed dredging and disposal activities by
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:60: coupling with a sediment plume model built in MIKE21-MT software. The sediment plume model
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:60:synthesised and used in combination with knowledge of other factors, such geological constraints, sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:60:the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime through an Expert Geomorphological Assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:62:of reaches require maintenance dredging to remove both sands and silts. The volume of sediments dredged
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:62:cumulatively (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2013). A notable proportion of this sediment is marine sand that is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:62:channel deepened to its present depth. The role of the River Tees in supplying fine sediment to the coastal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:62:to allow bypassing of sediment, but observed accumulations upstream, and a 24% reduction in the dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:62:requirement of the harbour, indicates that much of the river sediment is trapped by the structure (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:63:sediments) which is offset by maintenance dredging and disposal at offshore licenced disposal site Tees
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:66:Tees Bay and the Tees estuary attract sediment because the tidal current flows are generally quite low
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:66:the transport of sediment within Tees Bay, with an overall tendency for southerly directed transport because
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:66:sediment from the seabed enabling more to become transported by the tidal currents during these storms.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:66:subtleties locally influence sediment transport in these locations.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:71:bed upstream (flooding) flows are observed. These effects are important in supplying sediment to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:71:estuary from offshore (the main sediment supply).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:80:It is recognised that the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, as characterised within this
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:80:relative effect of the proposed scheme upon the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime will be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:80:the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime in a relative manner, using the baseline understanding
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:81:6.4.4 Sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:81:Suspended sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:81:In general, suspended sediment concentrations (SSCs) are low within the estuary and within Tees Bay.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:81:the highest suspended sediment levels occur close to high water. After storm periods, higher concentrations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:81:of suspended sediment have been noted around the Shell Jetty, but with little penetration further up the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:81: Suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:84:Sediment sources and transport
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:84:Historic bed sampling results in the vicinity of the proposed scheme show bed sediments in the area to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:84:Within the system the driving forces for sediment transport are the tidal flows, density driven currents, wave
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:85: with the implication that fluvial sediment input to the estuary has reduced (ABPmer, 2005).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:85: sediment into the estuary system. This material comes in on the flood tide, particularly during times
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:86:has also been utilised to move recently deposited accumulations of sediment to adjacent scour spots within
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:86:the river, thus maintaining sediment within the estuarine system and reducing the overall volumes of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:89:A review of the dredged sediment quality data is presented in Section 7.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:90:sedimentary regime arising from the demolition works is very low.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:90:6.5.2 Capital dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:Each year, between 25 – 30 million tonnes (wet weight) of dredged marine sediments from ports, harbours
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:offshore site will both result in sediment plumes. These effects have been investigated using numerical
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:modelling of the sediment dispersion associated with the dredging and disposal activities, as well as the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:changes in bed thickness when the suspended sediment falls from the plume to become deposited on the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:A MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model has been coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic model (MIKE3-HD)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:disturbance effects have been included. The dredging methods, schedule and sediment release settings
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:sediment releases have been made near continuously throughout the dredging operations (except for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:Results from the sediment dispersion modelling are discussed in turn for the dredging and disposal activities.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:Note that all the modelling plots in the following sections show the elevations in SSC or sediment deposition
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:108:The sediment plumes that arise from the four stages of the dredging could potentially affect areas of riverbed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:108:or seabed that are remote from the point of sediment release in terms of either increases in SSC or increases
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:108:in sediment deposition. This could affect water quality (in terms of increased turbidity) or aquatic ecology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:110:Sediment suspended within the dredging plumes will fall to the riverbed, either soon after disturbance or
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:110:spillage occurring during the dredging operation (for coarser-grained sediment fractions), or at a point in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:110:finer-grained sediment fractions). Figure 6.50 shows the maximum changes in riverbed thickness caused
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:110:by this deposition. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the dredged areas (from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:110:zone of influence from the sediment plumes.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:111:Figure 6.50 Maximum riverbed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:111:Within this maximum zone of influence from sediment plumes and bed deposition, the following receptors
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:111:could potentially be adversely affected by increases in SSC or increases in sediment deposition (or both
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:during Stage 4. Similarly it is only point 3 where any appreciable sediment deposition occurs, and this is at
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:and at Mudflat 3 it increases by a peak of 8mg/l (Figure 6.54). Sediment deposition on the mudflats is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:6.56). Sediment deposition at these locations is predicted to be immeasurable (Figure 6.57).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:background levels of concentrations (Figure 6.58). Sediment deposition at Location 6 (Middlesbrough
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:113:Overall changes of these magnitudes in SSC and sediment deposition are unlikely to cause significant
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:113:Figure 6.51 Location of points used for of timeseries analysis of changes in SSC and sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:114:Figure 6.53 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the water quality monitoring points
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:115:Figure 6.55 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the mudflat monitoring points
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:116:Figure 6.57 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the navigation (north bank) monitoring
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:117:Figure 6.59 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the navigation (south bank) monitoring
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:118:is licensed for the disposal of dredged sediment and is routinely monitored as part of a national programme.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:118:Therefore, plumes arising from disposal activities and subsequent sediment deposition is unlikely to be of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:118:activity commences and starts to form its own sediment plume (Plot H), the initial plume has moved
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:sediment plume associated with one release event (this example being from Stage 1). It can be seen that
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:much of the sediment falls to the bed within close proximity of the point of release, forming a small deposit
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:128:Figure 6.65 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from one disposal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:129:Figure6.66 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from one disposal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:129:Whilst turbidity and sediment deposition effects within the disposal site are to be expected (and indeed are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:130:changes in SSC and sediment deposition
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:131:The river dredging and offshore disposal activities will both cause plumes of sediment to form close to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:131:and all sediment particles suspended in the water column will eventually settle to the river or seabed,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:131:During dredging, there will be a release of sediment particles from the deliberate physical disturbance to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:131:point of sediment release, the enhanced SSC values are considerably lower because the coarser material
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:132:and the Oil Terminal. Other than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition on the riverbed will be of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:132:very minor magnitudes, in areas covering the same spatial extent as the sediment plumes. Where this
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:132:Overall, the changes in SSC and sediment deposition arising from the river dredging and offshore disposal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:132:sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:140: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is positive as it will help
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:141:6.6.4 Maintenance dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:141:maintenance dredging is likely to be due to the low levels of suspended sediment measured in this reach of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:This section presents the baseline conditions with regard to sediment and water quality of the Tees estuary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:and sedimentary regime (see Section 6) as well as recent survey data collected to inform other project EIAs
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:The assessment of potential impacts on marine sediment and water quality has been made with reference
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:Table 7.1 Summary of NPS requirements with regard to marine sediment and water quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143:Table 7.2 Summary of scoping consultation responses with regard to marine sediment and water
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: sediment and dissolved oxygen.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: proposed dredge on water and sediment quality are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: the findings of hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: sediment and create smothering effects / turbidity / sediment plumes.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: based on the anticipated sediment types to be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144: dispose of capital dredged sediment. Impacts
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144: As part of the application, the applicant will need to provide sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144:For marine sediment and water quality, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144:hydrodynamic and sediment dispersion modelling and is based on the maximum extent over which effects
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144:are predicted to occur (e.g. sediment plumes generated during capital dredging and effects on tidal currents
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144:The description of the existing environment with regard to sediment quality has been informed through desk-
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144:based review of existing sediment quality data. The most recent publicly available sediment quality data to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144:7.3.2.1 Sediment data
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144:The assessment of potential impacts associated with disturbance of sediment during the construction phase
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144: • Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQG) for the Protection of Aquatic Life (Canadian Council
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:145:can be quantified. Therefore, for EIA, in the same way, if contaminant levels in the sediments under
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:145:application of additional sediment quality guidelines (as outlined below) or undertaking more detailed water
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:145:The CSQG involved the derivation of interim marine sediment quality guidelines (ISQGs), or Threshold
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:145:contaminated sediments to a range of aquatic organisms exposed in laboratory tests and under field
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:145:conditions (CCME, 2002). As a result, these guidelines provide an indication of likely toxicity of sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:146:If additional assessment is indicated to be required as a result of recording elevated sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:146:above the lower Cefas Action Level 1, the undertaking of simple calculations using estimates of sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:146:losses from dredging equipment and concentrations of contaminants within the sediments to be dredged
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:147:The methodology used to assess the significance of the potential environmental impacts on marine sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:147:7.4.1 Sediment quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:147:Results of the sediment quality data from the NGCT marine licence application
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:147:PDT carried out a sediment quality survey in July 2019 to inform the marine licence application for the NGCT
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:147:the two schemes, specifically at the Tees Dock turning circle. Results from the NGCT sediment quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:147:survey are detailed below. The NGCT sediment quality sampling positions in relation to the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:148: ( 2019 sediment sampling locations for NGCT
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:148: A3 G1 NGCT Sediment sampling locations (2019)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:149:Table 7.6 Summary of sediment quality data from the NGCT sediment quality survey (2019)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:152:sediment samples recovered in 2006, with BDE209 concentrations ranging from <0.5µg/kg to 340µg/kg.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:152:that found in 2006. The MMO has recently confirmed that the sediment to be dredged from the NGCT
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:153:Summary of previous sediment quality surveys in the Tees
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:153:The findings of sediment quality surveys undertaken in support of previously consented schemes in the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:153:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:153:within Tees Dock. Though showing signs of minor contamination, it was determined that the ‘soft’ sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:153:The 2006 sediment quality survey undertaken to inform the 2008 HRO application involved the recovery of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:In general, suspended sediment concentrations are low within the estuary and within Tees Bay. The highest
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:within the estuary) and analysed in the laboratory for suspended sediment concentrations. The results
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:this period, concentrations of suspended sediment were very low. It should be noted however, that the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:Table 7.8 Suspended sediment concentrations recorded at Transect T8 in July 2020
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156: Suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:A site-specific sediment quality survey is proposed to be undertaken during 2020 to provide a detailed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:understanding of sediment quality within the proposed scheme footprint and validate the information set out
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:of sediment samples from 25 stations from the surface and at depth, with sampling positions equally spread
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:In the absence of the proposed scheme, there is no reason to believe that sediment and water quality within
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:sediment sampling being undertaken from the surface in accordance with the conditions on the maintenance
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:157:7.5.1 Dispersion and redistribution of sediment during capital dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:157:Capital dredging would result in the creation of sediment plumes. To consider the potential extent and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:157:Modelling was undertaken using a MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:158:Figure 7. 3 Plume of suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities during Stage 2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:160:Figure 7. 5 Plume of suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities during Stage
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:161:Figure 7.6 Plume of enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:162:Figure 7.7 Timeseries of changes in suspended sediment concentrations at water quality monitoring
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:162:sediment plume is not predicted to reach The Gares water quality monitoring point, no effects on the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:162:Additionally, a significant component of the dredged material is likely to be geological sediment, which is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:The concentrations of PAHs and metals within the sediments in the Tees estuary could potentially affect
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:An assessment to look at the potential for sediments exceeding Action Level 1 to cause EQS failures has
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:estimates of sediment losses from dredging equipment and concentrations of contaminants within the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:sediments to be dredged to provide an indication of the amount of contamination that could be released into
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:sediments and no account is made of any settlement of sediment that may occur immediately following
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:from these calculations that a risk is presented by the concentrations of zinc in the sediment and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:sediment as a result of the proposed scheme) although the maximum allowable concentration was not
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:164:sediment per day and maximum concentrations both in the water and in the sediment)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:164: in sediments in sediments concentration with baseline
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:164: Sediment data taken from NGCT 2019 (see Table 7.5)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:164: Calculated loss of sediment derived using indicative values for the mass of sediment resuspended per m 3 of dredged material in CIRIA guidance (John et al., 1999) in kg/m3. Worst case S-Factor for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:165:sediment per day and maximum concentrations in the water and in the sediment)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:165: sediments sediments concentration with baseline
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166:of zinc and benzo(b)fluoranthene (both sediment and water quality values) at low water volumes within the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166:estuary. If the calculations at mean low water are re-run using average concentrations (sediment and water
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166: • The calculations assume that all sediment remains in suspension. In reality, it is likely that some
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166: likely that some contamination will remain bound to sediment particles.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166: • The maximum concentration within the sediments used for each parameter does not occur across
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166: • The maximum values for water quality concentrations are not reflective of sediment conditions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166: releases less sediment into the water column.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166:Additionally, information from sediment plume modelling (see Section 7.5.1) indicates that only the Smiths
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166:7.5.4 Release of sediment during riverbank excavation to create the berth
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:As these works progress, there is the potential for sediment to be suspended when working in and around
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:7.6.1 Dispersion and redistribution of sediment during maintenance dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:191: • Impacts on marine ecology from increased suspended sediment during capital dredging and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:194:hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling undertaken. This section excludes consideration of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:195:Cross reference to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (Section 6) and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:195:the marine sediment and water quality assessment (Section 7) has been made when assessing potential
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:195:quay wall to create the berth pocket will remove both intertidal sediments and landside materials / soils.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:196: A5.44: Circalittoral mixed sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:196: A5.45: Deep circalittoral mixed sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:197: sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the Markey
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:197: sediments deposited during the Holocene, which overlie the glacial deposits from the last
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:197: and subsidence to south makes these sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:198:present in sediments from the survey area are rare and therefore, in this respect, the species present were
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:198:SS.SMu.ISaMU.Cap (Capitella capitata in enriched sublittoral muddy sediments) and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:198:sediment), where C. capitata dominated and was accompanied by large numbers of Ophryotrocha sp.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:198:These species are characteristic of fine sediments, usually with some level of organic pollution and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:199: would be indirectly affected (e.g. through sediment deposition during capital dredging).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:199:Sediment type
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:199:Sediment types, as classified using the Folk triangle (Folk, 1954) for each of the sample stations across the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:199:2019 survey area are provided in Figure 9.3. A variety of sediment types were present across the survey
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:199:Sediment biotopes
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:199:‘Capitella capitata and Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:201:Figure9.3 Comparison of Folk (Folk, 1954) sediment types as determined from PSD analysis of samples acquired during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey, 2019
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:202:Figure 9.4 Distribution of biotopes determined from PSD and macrobenthic analysis of samples recovered during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey, 2019
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:204:sediments and in estuarine environments (Wolff 1968, Hughes 1998). The beds can play an important role
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:204:walkovers have confirmed that the intertidal comprises intertidal mud and gravelly sediment with rocks and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:206: A2 – Littoral sediment A2.12 Estuarine coarse sediment shores
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:206:Occasional areas of impoverished coarse sediment was also found along the low-mid shore (Ocean
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:206:depths, which would continue to influence the benthic communities present within the subtidal sediments.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:208: A. islandica is found buried in sandy and muddy sediments from the low intertidal zone down to 400m
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:209:that impede the natural movement of sediments and poor transition of habitats). Although there are areas
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:9.5.2 Effects of increased suspended sediment concentrations during dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:will disturb sediment, which will result in localised and short-term increases in suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:Based on sediment quality sampling that was undertaken within the Tees estuary in July 2019 (as reported
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:in Section 7), it is not expected that any contaminated sediment would be released into the water column
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:ecology as a result of increased concentrations of suspended sediment within the water column (i.e.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:resuspended sediment which does not contain elevations beyond Action Level 2). The dredged sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:filter feeding molluscs). In addition, high concentrations of suspended sediment may impact on fish through
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:In general, sediment plumes induced by dredging are considered to pose only a limited risk to water quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:dredging periods. The sediment plume generated by dredging would likely be dispersed by tidal currents
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:upon disturbance of the sediment.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:during spring tides (Section 7.4.2). These are considerably lower than suspended sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:immediate vicinity of the dredger. Sediment plume modelling predicts different plume extents and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:suspended sediment concentrations depending on the stage of dredging (as described in Section 6). In all
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:cases, the sediment plume is predicted to be very narrow within the river, with the phase of dredging with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:The sediment plume modelling reported within Section 6 also extracted time series plots of changes in SSC
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:importance (where information is available) to increases in suspended sediment. This information is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:S. spinulosa relies on suspended particles for its tube growth. Increased suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:to increases in suspended sediment concentrations, according to this sensitivity review.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:A. islandica typically occurs in silty sediments, in sheltered to wave exposed conditions, where the surface
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:sediment likely gets resuspended regularly, and where accretion rates and moderate to high. A. islandica
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:can burrow in the sediment it lives in for several days, thereby it is able to avoid sudden changes in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:the proposed dredge is considered to be of low sensitivity to increases in suspended sediment.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:The dominant sediment biotope present within the dredge footprint is EUNIS biotope A5.323, Nephtys
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:resistance and resilience to changes in suspended sediment and was reported to be not sensitive (to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:changes in suspended sediment) (De-Bastos, 2016). As such, for the purposes of this assessment, the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:Given the temporary and localised nature of the predicted increase in suspended sediment, in addition to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:the low/very low sensitivity of the key species present in the estuary to increased suspended sediment, an
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:is 32.5ha. This is expected to cause a very limited extent of suspended sediment concentrations, and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:Some of the sediment that is suspended as a result of the dredging activities will be deposited to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:sediment fractions), or at a point in time within a few minutes to a few hours after this if it is carried in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:suspension by the prevailing currents (for finer-grained sediment fractions) (Section 6). The modelling
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:carried out on this, as reported in Section 6, indicates that much of the resuspended sediment is deposited
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:from the sediment plumes.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:(deposition) from the sediment plume model were extracted at a series of points within the affected river
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:reaches (relating to locations of mudflats, as shown on Figure 6.53). Sediment deposition at all of these
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:et al., 2004). This movement of water allows for any deposited sediment to be moved around and away
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:relatively quickly. However, some sediment may still be present long enough to damage the fronds of F.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:sediments at Seal Sands, Bran Sands or North Gare Sands, due to the limited footprint of dredging activities,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:up to a deposit of 5 cm because they are able to burrow and reposition within the new sediment (Whomersley
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:sediment. This information is presented below.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:MarLIN reports that even though smothering by fine sediments may temporarily limit the feeding, growth
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:sediments for up to several weeks, and that recovery would be almost immediate. As such, S. spinulosa is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:of sediments, with no effect on its growth or population structure being evident as a result of smothering
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:(Powilliet et al., 2006; 2009). As such, it is considered that a deposit of up to 30cm of fine sediments is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:A sudden smothering of 5cm of sediment would temporarily suspend the feeding and respiration of A. alba
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:species that characterise fine sediment habitats within estuarine areas (mainly polychaete and oligochaete
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:of fluctuating environmental conditions, such as periodic sediment disturbance due to storms and are not
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:concluded therefore, that the rates of sediment deposition, and the overall degree of sedimentation, that is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:component of the benthic community. Considering this, the predicted rates of sediment deposition, and the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:as a result of the deposition of fine sediments, with no impact in the longer term.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:215:may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment (Section 6.6.2). In areas adjacent to the north bank
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:215:The predicted changes to the rate of sedimentation within the navigation channel as a consequence of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:217:mammals from the offshore disposal of dredged sediments are assessed in Section 26.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:223:known prey for harbour porpoise, exhibit a strong association with particular surface sediments.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:235:widely, dependent on the dredger type, operational stage, or environmental conditions (e.g. sediment type,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:sediment within the water column. However, marine mammals often inhabit turbid environments.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments during dredging or other activities will
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:disturbance and temporary loss of seabed habitat; increased suspended sediment concentrations and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:sediment re-deposition; smothering and underwater noise.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:256: hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume effects would not extend to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:257: hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume effects would not extend to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:270: • hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (Section 6);
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:270: • marine sediment and water quality (Section 7);
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:279:Cross reference has been made, where relevant, to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:296:In summary, the largest sediment plumes are likely to arise during Stage 2 of the dredging (i.e. BHD and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:296:(it is not a sediment plume, rather a combined zone of influence). The sediment dispersion modelling of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:296:of this assessment, the sediment plume may be regarded as representing a temporary loss of foraging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:297:terns do not forage to any significant extent within the predicted range of the sediment plume. Likewise, the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:297:tern species as a result of increased suspended sediments during the construction phase.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:297:and re-suspension of sediment (Cook and Burton, 2010). However, common terns typically only dive to 1m
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:297:England, 2018a), and the area likely to be affected by the sediment plume at any one time represents around
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:12.5.3 Effects of sediment deposition on intertidal food resources
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:The deposition of fine sediment within intertidal areas due to capital dredging has the potential to affect
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:dredging, is presented in Section 6.5.2. Fine sediment will be deposited within minutes or hours if carried
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:invertebrate prey to birds feeding on the mudflats . The predicted minor accretion of sediment at North Tees
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:307:sediments are assessed in Sections 26. Potential cumulative impacts are addressed in Section 27.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:309: thresholds for parameters such as suspended sediment and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:309:informed by the hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling undertaken, as well as the understanding
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:310:Cross reference to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (Section 6), the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:312:inhabiting soft sediment environments.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:318:During capital dredging, approximately 1.8Mm3 of sediment (including approximately 1.27Mm3 of soft
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:318:details of the increase in SSC, including the visual output of sediment plume modelling for the capital
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:318:dredging, is provided in Section 6. The peak suspended sediment concentration within the Tees during the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:319:As detailed in the water quality assessment in Section 7, sediment quality testing from 2019 indicates that
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:319:it is very unlikely that disturbance of sediment during the dredging would result in exceedances of EQSs,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:319:sediment plume creating a ‘barrier’ effect could cause a significant disruption to the annual migration pattern,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:319:during a period of very hot and dry weather. Modelling of the sediment plume during capital dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:319:of suspended sediments are predicted to decrease significantly with increased distance from the dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:320:period. However, while unlikely, it has to be taken into account that sediment plumes encompassing the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:328:capital dredging activity will consequently result in an increase in sediment deposition, which has the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:328:fish/shellfish. The extent of sediment deposition above baseline levels is detailed in Section 6. The
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:328:maximum sediment deposition, illustrated in Figure 6.50, shows that much of the sediment falls to bed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:328:sediment deposition, it again can be assumed that feeding fish would be accustomed to similar conditions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:329:dominated by fucoid algae). The intertidal area comprises mud and gravelly sediment with some rocks.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:333:not match the advertised depths due to sedimentation within the channel).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is positive as it will help
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:343: sedimentary regime (see Section 6) the study area comprises all areas of river, adjacent coastline
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:346:heritage assets which may arise as a result of changes to hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:347:by-product of changes to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes resulting from a project) may also depend
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:352:Archaeology, 2014) suggested the presence of five sedimentary units:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:352: • Unit 2 Estuarine alluvium and peat (possible mid-Holocene sediments);
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:352: • Unit 3 Marine sediments/ Estuarine alluvium;
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:352: • Unit 4 Estuarine alluvium/ polluted fluvial sediments; and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:352:remains, preserved beneath later sediments. Given this potential, geoarchaeological assessment of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:359:directly and indirectly change the hydrodynamic and sedimentary process regimes, both locally and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:359:than those protected by sediment cover. Conversely, if increased sedimentation results in an exposed site
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:359:Potential effects upon the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime are assessed in Section 6. With regard
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:359:to effects during construction it is concluded that, other than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:360:hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary. Consequently, there is no pathway for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:360:additional, indirect impacts to heritage assets associated with changes in sediment deposition, over and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:360: • Reductions in baseline current speeds may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:421: • Effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:424:well as hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling reported in Section 6.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:425:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (as set out in Section 6)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:467:This would include dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils / landside material within the river
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:467:The total dredged volume for marine sediments is predicted to be approximately 1,800,000m3. Dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:467:the transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger to the offshore disposal site.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:478:The proposed scheme is predicted to generate up to approximately 1,800,000m3 of dredged sediment from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:478:been undertaken on a worst-case basis whereby all dredged sediment from the Tees estuary would be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:478:As the offshore disposal commences, a plume of sediment would be generated with the greatest
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:478:concentrations predicted at the end of the discharge period. The sediment plume is predicted to increase
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:478:commences and starts to form its own sediment plume, the initial plume has moved sufficiently far from its
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:478:deposition of sediment. As shown on Figure 6.66, deposited sediment from one disposal event is predicted
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:Based on the modelled effects of the sediment plume at the Tees Bay C disposal site described above, it is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:The PSD results show that the sediments within and adjacent to Tees Bay C comprise gravelly muddy sand,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482: sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:of the disposal site. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling has predicted some short-term build-up of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:sediment at the disposal site, however, this would be dispersed over time.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:sensitive to smothering or increases in suspended sediment.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485:for the assessment of potential impacts associated with offshore disposal of dredged sediments (see
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485:disposal of dredged sediments are likely to be less than those generated during dredging activities. The
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485:display a fleeing response, as a result of underwater noise during offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485:offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485:result of underwater noise associated with offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: sediments based on density of 0.014/km2 for reference population anticipated to be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:disposal of dredged sediments would be limited to the immediate vicinity of the vessels while they are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:dredged sediments on harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:sediments on marine mammals
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: sediments Negligible / Negligible
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: sediments (5% of (0.00003% of the NE England MU) based (permanent effect with less than 0.001% of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during offshore disposal of dredged sediments has been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:disturbance due to the disposal of dredged sediment into the disposal site to seals at Seal Sands, including
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:dredged sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:The offshore disposal of dredged material would temporarily increase the suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:Changes to marine mammals prey resource during offshore disposal of dredged sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:temporary loss of seabed habitat, increased suspended sediment concentrations and sediment re-
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:490:disturbance and increased suspended sediments on migratory fish).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:490: influencing the same area as affected by the sediment plume); and,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:492: of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of the approach channel, Approximately
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:493: effect on sediment transport or morphology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:494: the Tees navigation channel, the turning circle and Tees Dock to a hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:500:27.5.2 Hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:500: • dispersion of suspended sediment during capital dredging and deposition at the offshore disposal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:500: • changes to the sediment budget.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:500:(increased suspended sediment concentrations) are relevant to the CIA.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:500:Dispersion of suspended sediment and deposition on the seabed during capital dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:500:sediment which will disperse throughout the estuary according to the prevailing currents, prior to settling on
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:500:The extent of the sediment plume created by capital dredging is heavily dependent on the dredging plant
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:be used for dredging different sediment types as part of the same project. As noted in Section 6.5.2, it is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:important to note that figures showing the “maximum extent of sediment plume dispersion and deposition”
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:Consequently, for the purposes of this CIA, the maximum zones of influence of sediment plume dispersion
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:27.3 presents a summary of the results of the predictive modelling of suspended sediment concentration
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:of sediment plume dispersion and deposition onto the river and/or seabed during capital dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:sediment in the water column was predicted to be in close proximity to the dredger, with plume dispersion
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:resulting in a significantly reduced concentration of suspended sediment beyond the source of the plume.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:For the NGCT studies, significant deposition of sediment was also only predicted in close proximity to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:502:(right) as a result of the proposed scheme [Note: plots show sediment plume impacts arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:503: • effect of increases in suspended sediments during maintenance dredging on food resources of SPA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:503: • remobilisation and redistribution of sediments (which may be contaminated); and,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:503:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:503:sediment, and this measure would limit sediment release into the water column as far as practicable. The
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:503:sediment and water quality, marine ecology, ornithology, fish and fisheries) is discussed below.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:505:Changes to estuarine sediment budget
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:505:deposition of sediment which would be positive in areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, as it
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:505:offshore as a result. In addition, no changes to sediment transport in the predominantly sandy areas around
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:505:The Anglo American Harbour Facilities are predicted to result in a localised redistribution of sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:505:very small change in the overall fine sediment regime will not alter the present frequency of, or methodology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:505:used for, maintenance dredging, and no effect on sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:cumulative impacts to arise to the estuarine sediment budget as a result of the projects screened into the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:27.5.3 Marine sediment and water quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:In relation to marine sediment and water quality, the proposed scheme has the potential to result in the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506: • dispersion of suspended sediment during marine works, dredging and disposal; and,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506: • changes to water quality associated with the release of sediment contamination.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:addition, the predictions made for each project represent sediment plume dispersion under specific tidal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each project)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:In relation to sediment contamination, data collected to inform the EIAs indicates that concentrations are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:additional mitigation measures are identified to reduce any resulting sediment plume as far as possible and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:Smothering of benthic invertebrate communities due to deposition of sediment dispersed during
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:Sediment deposition resulting from the dredging for the proposed scheme will largely be within the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:less than 5cm, within the same area of river that is affected by the zone of influence from the sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:(deposition) from the sediment plume model were extracted at a series of points within the affected river
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:reaches (relating to locations of mudflats, as shown on Figure 6.51). Sediment deposition at all of these
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:The predicted footprints of sediment deposition for the NGCT and the Anglo American Harbour Facilities
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:This deposition is likely to be temporary due to the unconsolidated nature of the sediment, and the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:508:The proposed scheme is not predicted to have an effect on sediment supply into the estuary. The very
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:508:minor changes in the hydrodynamic regime, specifically currents, may lead to a slight increase in sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:508:The studies for the NGCT scheme concluded that there would not be a change in the supply of fine sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:508:sediment budget of the estuary and, therefore, was assessed that there would be no impact on morphology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:(i.e. dredging along the axis of the river rather than across it to ensure that, at any one time, sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:HaskoningDHV, 2015)). However, the additive effect of the sediment plumes from separate dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:sediment plumes may deter such species from migrating to and from spawning sites.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:the respective sediment plumes could result in an additive effect, as demonstrated in Figures 27.1 to 27.3.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:of the sediment plumes from separate dredging campaigns cannot be completely avoided if the campaigns
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:517:hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime (Section 27.5.2) concludes that no significant cumulative impacts
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:526: Intertidal soft sediments (400.13ha); Intertidal soft sediment (845.53ha),
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:526: reef (4.13ha); subtidal soft sediments reef (7170.93ha), Subtidal soft
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:526: (610.31ha). sediments (1219.64ha)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:526: 24.Reduce sediment resuspension
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:526: 26.Sediment management
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:528: sediments with INNS are already present
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:528: measures identified for the Tees estuary. habitats located within sediment plumes created
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:531: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is deemed to be a positive
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:532:Capital dredging within the river would result in sediment plumes. To consider the potential extent and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:532:Modelling was undertaken using a MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:534:Figure 28.4 Timeseries of changes in suspended sediment concentrations at water quality monitoring
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:534:The resuspension of sediment could also potentially affect dissolved oxygen levels in the water. This is due
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:534:represent a more conservative scenario, as sediment plume modelling outlined above indicates relatively
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:534:dissolved oxygen problem or where sediments have a high chemical oxygen demand and that in practice,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:534:high for dissolved oxygen and it is not anticipated that the sediments will have a high chemical oxygen
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:In terms of contaminants, the concentrations of PAHs and metals within the sediments in the Tees estuary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:and the lower CSQG. An assessment to look at the potential for the release of sediments exceeding Cefas
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:Action Level 1 to cause EQS failures was therefore undertaken to inform the marine sediment and water
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:maximum concentrations for baseline water quality and sediments in the estuary indicate that there is a risk
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:undertaken for high tide volumes in the estuary (for maximum sediment and water quality baseline
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:For high water with maximum water and sediment concentrations and use of average concentrations for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:both water and sediment quality, the estimated concentrations reduce below EQS. This indicates that the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535: • The calculations assume that all sediment remains in suspension. In reality, it is likely that some
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535: likely that some contamination will remain bound to sediment particles.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535: • The maximum concentration within the sediments used for each parameter does not occur across
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535: • The maximum values for water quality concentrations are not reflective of sediment conditions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535: releases less sediment into the water column.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:Additionally, sediment plume results for Smiths Dock monitoring point (point 3) indicated only temporary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:therefore the majority of the dredge would impact on the lower sensitivity habitat ‘subtidal soft sediment’ of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:berth pocket would remove 25,000m2 of intertidal sediments, of which there are 4,001,300m2 within the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:536:Subtidal sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:536:Results in 2019 indicate a variety of sediment types are present across the survey area and most samples
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:536:infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations were unable to be classified further than the EUNIS level 4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:536:assemblage may take place before the original topography is restored, if the exposed, underlying sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:536:composition and numbers following dredging, it is predicted that the sediment communities would recover
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:536:Intertidal sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:536:walkovers confirm that the intertidal area to be lost comprises intertidal mud and gravelly sediment with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:537:Sediment settlement
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:537:Sediment suspended within the dredging plumes will fall to the riverbed, either soon after disturbance or
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:537:spillage occurring during the dredging operation (for coarser-grained sediment fractions), or at a point in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:537:finer-grained sediment fractions. Figure 28.5 shows the maximum changes in riverbed thickness caused
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:537:by deposition. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the dredged areas (from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:538:zone of influence from the sediment plumes. As a result, a deterioration in ecological class status is not
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:538:Figure 28.5 Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:538:An increase in suspended sediment in the water column may lead to physiological effects in finfish, including
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:538:in sediment concentrations due to the natural fluctuations associated with tidal activity, discharge from the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:538:(including most adult finfish) are generally able to detect early onset of increased sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:539:peak migratory season, when a sediment plume creating a ‘barrier’ effect could cause a significant disruption
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:539: Reduce sediment resuspension disposal activities currently ongoing. Disposal would be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:539: Sediment management
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:541: Reduce sediment resuspension
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:541: Sediment management measures
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542: Reduce sediment resuspension
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542: Sediment management
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:543:wall would remove a small area of intertidal soft sediment, the measures outlined in Section 28.8 would
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:544: • Cumulative effects of sediment plumes and associated effects on water quality and fish
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:Section 27 considers the potential cumulative effects of the proposed schemes on sediment plumes and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:marine water quality. To summarise, whilst the sediment plumes could combine to cover a larger area of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:the estuary, additive effects in terms of increasing sediment peaks are not predicted. This is because the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:contaminated material has been identified in the Anglo American Harbour Facilities sediments (i.e. above
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:proposed project both include mitigation measures to dredge in long strips to reduce the effects of sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:Any project that requires dredging would disturb the marine communities within the sediments to be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:In terms of wider effects, significant deposition of sediment again is generally only predicted in close
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:547: Sediment transport Hydrodynamic modelling showed that the proposed scheme would give rise to only a small magnitude reduction in baseline flows varying during different phases of the tidal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:547: sediment at the North Tees mudflat which could be seen to be a positive effect in areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay. In the main channel, deposition will
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:547: Modelling for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities concluded that the only effects were likely to be localised redistribution of sediment deposition in response to predicted
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:547: sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees estuary.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:549:Whilst concentrations of contaminants in the sediments indicated a risk to water quality EQS’, assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:549:suspended sediment thus reducing the risk of significant water quality effects. Mitigation measures to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:550:would be sediment plumes associated with dredging simultaneously. However, on further consideration,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:559:proposed scheme nor the modelled extent of the maximum-expected sediment plume from the capital
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:559:Following modelling of noise levels and sediment dispersion, it has been concluded that the overall zone of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:559:influence of the proposed scheme will be determined by the sediment plume during dredging activities.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:562: of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of the approach channel, Approximately proposed scheme, in-combination effects to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:572:on tidal propagation, wave climate, current speeds and sediment budget of the estuarine system) has been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:572:and so will cause no effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:572:The capital dredging of the river will cause plumes of sediment to form. The plume effects arising from the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:572:river dredging are characterised by a short-lived localised increase in suspended sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:572:of sediment from the plumes on the river or seabed will be very small.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:573:The reductions in baseline current speeds may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment. In areas
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:573:Section 28), there is approximately 400ha of “intertidal sediment” habitat within the estuary. The area of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:575:requires use of TSHD and BHD on soft sediment in the channel and berth pocket) will result in plumes of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:575:The sediment dispersion modelling of Stage 2 dredging indicates that, at any given time, significant SSC
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:575:Full details of the sediment dispersion modelling are presented in Section 6.5.2.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:575:England, 2018a). The area affected by the sediment plume generated from proposed dredging, though
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:580:In terms of intra-project effects on foraging common terns, the zone of influence from the sediment plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:581: • effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:582:findings of invertebrate sampling undertaken on sediment samples from The Slems). The HRA undertaken
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:582:proposed scheme in combination with the NGCT scheme represents less than 1% of “intertidal sediment”
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:583:Effects on fish may be compounded by the combined sediment plumes of other projects or plans that may
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:584:An interaction between the sediment plumes would only occur in the unlikely event that the capital dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:584:sediment from Hartlepool channel is not considered sufficient to result in a lethal effect on fish, with any
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:584:sediment plumes occupy only half of the river cross section) has also been proposed for the NGCT project.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:585:29.6.4 In-combination effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:585:wide change in hydrodynamics. There is no predicted effect on the baseline sediment transport regime and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:585:of the Tees and the resultant effect on tidal flows and sediment transport.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:585:change the supply of fine sediment to the Tees, and the sediment predicted to deposit in its berth pocket
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:585:potential for an effect on the sediment budget of the estuary to arise and, therefore, there would be no
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:585:Sedimentary and hydrodynamic modelling undertaken for the consented Hartlepool approach channel
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:585:proposed scheme is predicted to be low. The magnitude of effect on the baseline sediment transport regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:585:sediment transport regime and seabed or shore morphology across the wider study area as a result of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:586:The zone of influence from predicted sediment plumes (including the combined plumes from the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:593:HR Wallingford (2002). Teesmouth Sediment Study. EX 4514.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:593:HR Wallingford (2006). Northern Gateway Container Terminal. Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:593:sediment plumes arising from dredging. Construction Industry Research and Information Association
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:597:Robertson, M.J., Scruton, R.S. and Clarke, K. (2006). Effect of sediment on freshwater fish and fish
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:598:Royal HaskoningDHV (2013). Cell 1 Sediment Transport Study. Phase 1: Scoping Report. Scarborough
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine).pdf:6:Description Marine sediments to be dredged as part of Phase 1
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine).pdf:7: dredge volume for marine sediments in Phase 1 (excluding
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine).pdf:8: will be required to support with the transport of sediment
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine).pdf:9: a jack-up barge 'punching' into the underlying sediments
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine).pdf:16: To restrict suspended sediment plumes to one side of the estuary at a time, in order to reduce loss of tern foraging habitat.
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine).pdf:16: dredged area must been taken to ensure there has been no movement of contaminated sediment outside of the area
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine).pdf:16: bounded by Schedule 8. Any movement of contaminated sediment must be removed using an enclosed bucket and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:2: • Sediment sampling results for 15 no. boreholes;
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:2:MLV1 was supported by further sediment plume modelling, presented in the Hydrodynamic and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:2:Sediment Plume Modelling Report (see Appendix D). This updated modelling was undertaken to reflect
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:6:inhabiting soft sediment environments.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:9:at the furthest point from the midline of the current channel. The hydrodynamic and sediment plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:9:demonstrates that the trajectory of suspended sediment is influenced predominantly by river and tidal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:9:currents, and so is transported in a direction parallel with the river banks. Sediment plumes are therefore
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:11:pocket where there is currently existing land which will remove both intertidal sediments and landside
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:12:The early benthic survey in 2006 confirmed that none of the species present in sediments from the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:12:SS.SMu.ISaMU.Cap (Capitella capitata in enriched sublittoral muddy sediments) and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:12:sediment), where C. capitata dominated and was accompanied by large numbers of Ophryotrocha spp.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:12:The presence of these species typifies fine sediment habitats, usually with some level of organic pollution
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:14: • Effects of increased suspended sediment concentrations during dredging; and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:14:identified given the necessity to remove the structures and sediments from within the footprint to deliver
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:5.2.2 Effects of increased suspended sediment concentrations during dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:The sediment plume modelling undertaken for the original EIA Report predicted that highest
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:concentration of suspended sediment would be between 100-200 mg/L within the immediate vicinity of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:cases, the modelling indicates that sediments suspended as a result of dredging activities is predicted to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:the sediment plume, including the following:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:suspended sediment concentrations. In light of this, as well as considering the temporary and localised
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:nature of the predicted increase in suspended sediment concentrations, the EIA Report concludes an
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:effect of negligible significance with regard to increased suspended sediment concentrations. Therefore,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:The updated hydrodynamic and sediment plume modelling presented within the modelling note
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:from THSD to cutter suction dredger (CSD). The sediment loss rate (‘S-factor’) for CSD is taken as 6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:taken as a worst case scenario for the hydrodynamic and sediment plume modelling undertaken in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:benthic receptors due to deposition of suspended sediments caused by dredging and disposal activities.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:This is because of the temporary and localised nature of the predicted increase in suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:excavators, the volume of suspended sediment associated with the dredging of this material is expected
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:sediment dispersion associated with the dredging for Phase 1 and Phase 2 together. This is supported
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:by the updated sediment plume modelling submitted in support of MLV1 (see Appendix D), which
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:sensitivity of species within the Tees estuary to changes in suspended sediment concentrations, it is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:smothering for up to several weeks, exhibiting immediate recovery once deposition of fine sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:stops. Field experiments conclude that smothering of A. islandica by fine sediment has no effect on its
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:growth or population structure, with deposits of up to 30cm of fine sediment unlikely to have a negative
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:The review also identifies that, whilst smothering of A. alba with up to 5cm of fine sediment would
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:will increase under MLV2, the updated sediment plume modelling submitted in support of MLV1 (see
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:arise as a result of the deposition of fine sediments, with no effect in the longer term. As such, the effect
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:16:hydrodynamic and sediment plume modelling report prepared and submitted in support of MLV1 (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:18:CIRIA (2000). Scoping the assessment of sediment plumes from dredging (C547).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:18:Royal HaskoningDHV (2022). South Bank Quay Technical Note: Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:28:extent and impact of any sediment plumes that could affect migrating species.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:28:Sediment quality testing from 2019 indicates that it is unlikely that disturbance of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:28:sediment during dredging will result in risks of physiological effects on fish from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:30:Appendix D Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:31:Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:33:3 Sediment Regime 5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:33:3.2 Sediment Data 5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:33:3.4.3 Sediment Release Assumptions 10
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:33:3.4.4 Sediment Property Representation 10
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:33:Table 3-4: Sediment settling velocity and critical bed shear stress 10
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:Figure 3-3 Sediment release schedule for dredger 9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:Figure 3-4 Sediment release schedule at offshore disposal site 9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:Figure 3-5 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:Figure 3-6 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-surface layer)arising
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:Figure 3-7 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:Figure 3-8 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-surface layer) arising
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:Figure 3-9 Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:Figure 3-10 Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:Figure 3-11 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:from disposal activities under the previously assessed project with all sediment release at the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:Figure 3-12 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:from disposal activities under the proposed project variation to Phase 1 with all sediment release
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:Figure 3-13 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:from disposal activities under the proposed project variation to Phase 1 with sediment release at
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:Figure 3-14 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from disposal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:activities under the previously assessed project with all sediment release at the centre of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:Figure 3-15 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from disposal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:activities under the proposed project variation to Phase 1 with all sediment release at the centre
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:Figure 3-16 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from disposal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:34:activities under the proposed project variation to Phase 1 with sediment release at random points
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:35:The numerical modelling study was reported in Chapter 6: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Processes
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:35:of the EIA Report and the accompanying Appendix 5: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:35: movement of suspended sediment from the proposed dredging and disposal activities by coupling with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:35: a sediment plume model built in MIKE3-MT software. The sediment plume model was run for the entire
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:35:consideration of hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes. The wider study area: (i) extends
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:36: potential spill rate of sediment from the dredging process;
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:37:The effects of these changes in approach to Phase 1 upon the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime have
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:37:been re-assessed using a combination of expert geomorphological assessment (EGA) and sediment plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:38: of sediment. In the main channel the deposition will require periodic dredging to maintain the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:38:Full details were provided within Chapter 6: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Processes of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:38:Report and the accompanying Appendix 5: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Plume Modelling of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:39:3 Sediment Regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:39:This section of the report describes the updated sediment dispersion modelling exercise for Phase 1 of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:39:South Bank Wharf development project that was undertaken to investigate the suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:39:as well as the deepening of parts of the Tees Dock turning area. The sediment transport model was built in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:39:3.2 Sediment Data
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:39:Based on the ground investigation data, for the sediment dispersion modelling, the following particle size
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:39:Sediment Category Sediment Size (mm) Soft material Hard material
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:39:The sediment dispersion model built in MIKE3-MT is coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic model built in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:40:The sediment dispersion model has been run for a three-month period to cover the full duration of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:40:The sediment dispersion model has been setup with four layers in order to differentiate between suspended
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:40:sediment concentrations (SSC) throughout the water column, e.g. near the sea bed and near the water
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:40:In order to simulate the sediment dispersion close to natural conditions, wave disturbance effect has been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:40:The dredging method, dredging schedule and details of the sediment release settings for the sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:41:The sediment will be dredged using a Cutter Suction Dredger (CSD).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:42:maintenance. Figure 3-3 shows the sediment release schedules for the dredger at the South Bank Quay
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:42:sediment release schedules for the transport barge at the offshore disposal site.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:43: Figure 3-3 Sediment release schedule for dredger
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:43: Figure 3-4 Sediment release schedule at offshore disposal site
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:44:3.4.3 Sediment Release Assumptions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:44:The following assumptions have been made for the simulation of sediment plumes arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:44:areas along multiple lines which means the sediment release will be more dispersed and thus the sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:44:3.4.4 Sediment Property Representation
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:44:The five sediment fractions, critical bed shear stresses and fall velocities used in the sediment dispersion
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:44:model to represent bed sediments are shown in Table 3-4. The critical bed shear stress and fall velocities
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:44:Table 3-4: Sediment settling velocity and critical bed shear stress
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:44: Sediment Grading Sediment Settling Critical Shear
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:44:This section describes the CSD dredge and disposal cycle for the two different soil types. The sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:44:release rate, sediment loss rate and discharge sediment rate are the same for each of the dredge areas,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:44:site. The dredger disperses sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 1.11 kg/s. The
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:44:sediment loss rate (the so-called ‘S-factor’) is taken as 6 kg/m3 for the CSD which follows the CIRIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:45:site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 2038.333 kg/s. The barge will then take 80
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:45:disperses sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 2.5 kg/s. The sediment loss rate
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:45:site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 11,891.67 kg/s. The barge will then take 80
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:45:Results from the updated sediment dispersion modelling for proposed variations to the Phase 1 project are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:45:following sections show the elevations in SSC or sediment deposition due to these activities above baseline
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:45:For SSC and sediment deposition, maximum ‘zone of influence’ plots are presented in following sections.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:47: Figure 3-5 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from dredging activities under the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:48:Figure 3-6 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-surface layer)arising from dredging activities under the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:49:Figure 3-7 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from dredging activities under the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:50: Figure 3-8 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-surface layer) arising from dredging activities under the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:51:bed thickness caused by the deposition of sediment from the plumes created by river dredging. It can be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:51:seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the dredged areas (from where it will be re-dredged
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:51:sediment plumes.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:51: Figure 3-9 Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging activities under the previously
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:52:to within the footprint of the dredged areas, from where the re-deposited sediment will be dredged and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:52: Figure 3-10 Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging activities under the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:52:licensed for the disposal of dredged sediment and is routinely monitored as part of a national programme.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:52:Therefore, plumes arising from disposal activities and subsequent sediment deposition is unlikely to be of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:53: Figure 3-11 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from disposal activities under the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:53:previously assessed project with all sediment release at the centre of the disposal site Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:54: Figure 3-12 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from disposal activities under the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:54: proposed project variation to Phase 1 with all sediment release at the centre of the disposal site updated modelling
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:55: Figure 3-13 Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from disposal activities under the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:55: proposed project variation to Phase 1 with sediment release at random points within the disposal site updated modelling
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:56:shows the maximum changes in sea bed thickness caused by deposition of material from the sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:56:much of the sediment falls to the bed within the disposal area, forming a mound on the sea bed. Deposition
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:56:the sediment plume. In reality, disposals will be at different points within the licensed area, and so such a
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:56: Figure 3-14 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from disposal activities under the previously
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:56: assessed project with all sediment release at the centre of the disposal site Phases 1 and 2, reproduced from EIA Report
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:57: Figure 3-15 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from disposal activities under the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:57: project variation to Phase 1 with all sediment release at the centre of the disposal site updated modelling
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:58: Figure 3-16 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from disposal activities under the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:58: project variation to Phase 1 with sediment release at random points within the disposal site updated modelling
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:59:cause plumes of sediment to form close to the release points of material into the water column. These
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:59:plumes will disperse under wave and current action and all sediment particles suspended in the water
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:59:Full details were provided within Chapter 6: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Processes of the EIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:59:Report and the accompanying Appendix 5: Hydrodynamics and Sedimentary Plume Modelling of the
MLA_2020_00506-Returns.pdf:6: of contaminated sediment outside of the area bounded
MLA_2020_00506-Returns.pdf:6: by Schedule 8. Any movement of contaminated sediment
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:2: • Capital dredging of approximately 1,800,000m3 of marine sediments with offshore disposal into the Tees Bay C disposal
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:6:including sediment
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:7: • Intertidal mixed sediments footprint is within close proximity to the North Tees mudflat,
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:8: • Common Tern (B) suspended sediments during dredging represents a very localised,
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:8: temporary and short-term disturbance, with any suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:9: • Intertidal mixed sediments • Water column
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:9: sediments (water clarity). However, any changes will be localised
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:9: sediment transport patterns. The magnitude of changes in water
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:9: baseline sediment transport patterns, except for the principal effect
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:10: • Sanderling the baseline sediment transport process or morphological function
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:10: • Intertidal mixed sediments • Water column
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:10: not sufficient to cause far-field effects on the baseline sediment
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:10: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:11: area will be habituated to fluctuating sediment levels. The
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:11: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:12: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:12: sediment transport patterns, except for the principal effect of a likely
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:12: baseline sediment transport process or morphological function of
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:13:another sediment • Salicornia and other annuals colonising mud there are the following features:
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:13: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:13: • Intertidal mixed sediments No other supporting habitats were identified. Due to the presence of
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:13: temporary loss of marine sediment. The construction activities
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:14: • Intertidal mixed sediments
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:15: • Intertidal mixed sediments a land barrier there should be no pathway for potential impacts to
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:15: far-field effects on the baseline sediment transport process,
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:15: • Intertidal mixed sediments No Likely Significant Effect concluded.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:17:including sediment • Little Tern (B)
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:18: • Common Tern (B) suspended sediments during dredging represents a very localised,
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:18: sediment likely to rapidly settle back on the bed following
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:18: • Intertidal mixed sediments
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:18: baseline sediment transport patterns, except for the principal effect
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:19: the baseline sediment transport process or morphological function
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:19: Changes in suspended sediment (water clarity) submitted with this application. Licence application
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:20: dredged sediment will be reused as part of this project. considered further here.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:21:Terminal m3 of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of the approach scheme, in-combination effects to the interest features of
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:22:to above water noise, barrier to species movement, visual disturbance water flow (tidal current) changes, including sediment transport considerations and
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:22:changes in suspended sediments (water clarity).
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:25:sediment (water will cause plumes of sediment to measures for the proposed scheme in the
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:25: characterised by a short-lived one time, sediment plumes occupy only
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:25: sediment concentrations by the barriers to species movement.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:25:including sediment • Gadwall order of a few hundred mg/l at the
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:25: • Black-headed gull ensure sediment plumes are only
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:25: Subtidal coarse sediment plume effects will be observed
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:26: Changes in suspended sediment (water clarity) submitted with this application. Licence application
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:26: as the dredged sediment will be reused as part of this works.
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:28:(NGCT) million m3 of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of scheme, in-combination effects to the interest features of
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:28: million m3 of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of
MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:29: • Dredging along the axis of the River Tees will be undertaken to ensure sediment plumes are only occurring in half of the river during capital dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1139 South Bank Quay Phase 1 FIR 18 Response.pdf:1:The ground investigations to take sediment samples were undertaken between February and March 2022
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1139 South Bank Quay Phase 1 FIR 18 Response.pdf:2: sediment sampling plan associated with proposed change in dredge footprint” was submitted to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1139 South Bank Quay Phase 1 FIR 18 Response.pdf:2:impacts to marine water and sediment quality. As the new dredge volume for Phase 1 is less than the total
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1139 South Bank Quay Phase 1 FIR 18 Response.pdf:2:marine water and sediment quality. However, updated sedimentary plume modelling to take account of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1139 South Bank Quay Phase 1 FIR 18 Response.pdf:2:conclusions presented within the Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling report remain valid for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1139 South Bank Quay Phase 1 FIR 18 Response.pdf:2:hydrodynamic and sediment plume model?
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 18.pdf:2: Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling report remain valid for MLV2.” Please clarify
MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 18.pdf:2: and sediment plume model?
MLA_2020_00506-Cefas RFI South Bank Phase 1 & 2-15.pdf:1: due to the sediment disposal, though this would be the most important
MLA_2020_00506-Cefas RFI South Bank Phase 1 & 2-15.pdf:2: Cefas recommend that you present a revised sediment dispersion model
MLA_2020_00506-Cefas RFI South Bank Phase 1 & 2-15.pdf:2:Conclusions about sediment quality largely rely on the assessment of previous
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:1: 2. Will the removal of bank material via dredging change the level of suspended sediment compared
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:1: sediment plume modelling (document reference PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1100), on page 8 it
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:2:sediment quality as well as hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes. Following this, consideration was
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:2:2.1 Marine Water and Sediment Quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:2:Sediment sampling of the original dredge area was undertaken in September and analysed in October of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:2:Further sediment sampling of the material proposed to be dredged between the existing OSPAR line and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:3:determinand. However, this has been mitigated through a commitment to dispose of sediment to land
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:3:where the sediment is location within identified ‘hotspots’ of AL2 exceedances.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:3:2.2 Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Processes
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:3:The Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2022) submitted in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:3:support of MLV1 (MLA/2020/00506/1) considered sedimentary processes in the event that 1,200,000m3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:3:Phase 1. Whilst the changes applied for within MLV2 are for a total of 1,347,000m3 of sediment to be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:3:Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2022). As such, the model
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:3:conclusions presented within the Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling report remain valid for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:3:current OSPAR line. It is considered that the only potential increases in suspended sediment and effects
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:4:In light of the review of the marine water and sediment quality assessment and hydrodynamic and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:4:sedimentary processes, it is considered that the conclusions of previous assessments presented within
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:4:1,133,000m3), mainly resulting from the additional volume of sediment associated with dredging the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:4:OSPAR material. As noted in Section 2.4, the Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume Modelling report (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:4:reason it is considered that the sediment plume modelling presented within the Hydrodynamic and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:4:Sediment Plume Modelling report submitted in support of MLV1 remains valid and applicable for MLV2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:4:considered that the sediment quality is within the parameters assessed within the EIA Report (Royal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:5:and sediment quality and hydrodynamic or sedimentary processes (as per Section 2.1 and Section 2.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:5:3 Suspended Sediment Levels
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:5:and Sediment Plume Modelling report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2022). Whilst MLV2 requests an increase
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:5:Sediment Plume Modelling report. As such, there is no change to the required durations of dredging as
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:6:Royal HaskoningDHV (2022) South Bank Quay Technical Note: Hydrodynamic and Sediment Plume
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:7:Appendix A – Sediment Sample Analysis Comparison Tables
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1137-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay Marine Licence Variation 2 RFI 17-66.pdf:7:* Sediments identified with concentrations in excess of AL2 will be removed to land, in accordance with the
MLA_2020_00506-Sample plan response_MLA_2021_00506 & 507_Updated -39.pdf:3: of sediments. Based on the information submitted (as described above), the
MLA_2020_00506-Sample plan response_MLA_2021_00506 & 507_Updated -39.pdf:4: 2.6. Surface samples should be taken from the upper layer of in-situ sediment using a
MLA_2020_00506-Sample plan response_MLA_2021_00506 & 507_Updated -39.pdf:5: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-
MLA_2020_00506-Sample plan response_MLA_2021_00506 & 507_Updated -39.pdf:5: This list indicates the laboratories which have been validated to undertake sediment
MLA_2020_00506-Sample plan response_MLA_2021_00506 & 507_Updated -39.pdf:5: 4.2. Irrespective of which validated laboratory is used to undertake sediment analysis,
MLA_2020_00506-Sample plan response_MLA_2021_00506 & 507_Updated -39.pdf:5: in analysing certain chemicals for sediment samples. Please be mindful of this when
MLA_2020_00506-Sample plan response_MLA_2021_00506 & 507_Updated -39.pdf:5: changes in the quantity and quality of sediments, there may be a need for surface
MLA_2020_00506-Sample plan response_MLA_2021_00506 & 507_Updated -39.pdf:5: sediments to be re-sampled and analysed if the project has not commenced within
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine)-45.pdf:6:Description Marine sediments to be dredged as part of Phase 1
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine)-45.pdf:7: dredge volume for marine sediments in Phase 1 (excluding
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine)-45.pdf:8: to support with the transport of sediment dredged using
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine)-45.pdf:9: a jack-up barge 'punching' into the underlying sediments
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine)-45.pdf:15: To restrict suspended sediment plumes to one side of the estuary at a time, in order to reduce loss of tern foraging habitat.
MLA_2020_00506-Decision Letter (Marine)-43.pdf:4: Suspended sediment concentrations
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:10:surfaces (indicated by, for example, surviving peat deposits), preserved beneath later sediments. Given
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:18:take into account all available information including geology, hydrology and sediment transport and should
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:24:It is envisaged that up to three barges will be required to support with the transport of sediment dredged
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:25:In addition to the removal of marine sediments, the proposed scheme will require the excavation of
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:26: Leave marine growth, rust, sediment or concretion intact; and,
PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:27: Marine growth, rust, sediment or concretion should be left intact;
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:2: To restrict suspended sediment
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:2:area of the estuary impacted by any sediment plumes resulting from dredging activities therefore this
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:2:dredging associated with the South Bank project that sediment suspended within the dredging plumes will
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:3:grained sediment fractions), or at a point in time within a few minutes to a few hours after this if it is carried
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:3:in suspension by the prevailing currents (for finer-grained sediment fractions) (Royal HaskoningDHV,
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:3:Linked to the relatively limited extent of the sediment plume, the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020)
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:3:alongside the fact that a significant component of the dredged material is geological sediment which is
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:4:summarise, it is predicted that whilst the sediment plumes could combine to cover a larger area of the
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:4:estuary, additive effects in terms of increasing sediment peaks were not predicted. This is because the
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:4:Figure 2-2 Time series plots showing short term nature of sediment peaks (green is Smith’s Dock Water Quality monitoring point,
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:5:the tidal sequence, the highest suspended sediment levels occur close to high water. After storm periods,
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:5:higher concentrations of suspended sediment have been noted around the Shell Jetty, but with little
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:6:sensitive to dredging related sediment plumes.
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:6:being The Effects of Turbidity and Suspended Sediments on ESA-Listed Species from Projects Occurring
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:6:in the analysis of projects that generate suspended sediments. Concentrations in the literature are not,
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:6: move away from the sediment generating activity. If
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:8:given that modelling indicates that the majority of the sediment will fall to the riverbed, either soon after
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:10: 4. NOAA Fisheries (2018) The effects of turbidity and suspended sediments on ESA-Listed
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:11: 8. Wilber DH, Clarke, DG. 2001. Biological effects of suspended sediments: a review of suspended
PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:11: sediment impacts on fish and shellfish with relation to dredging activities in estuaries. North
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:3:A sediment quality sampling plan request was submitted to the MMO to confirm the
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:3:scope of sediment quality survey and analysis required - reference SAM/2020/00026
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:The marine sediments to be dredged as part of Phase 1 of the proposed scheme are to
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:You should provide analysis of the sediment to enable a determination to be made about whether the material is
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:Sediment quality data used to inform the assessment is attached.
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:You should provide analysis of the sediment to enable a determination to be made about whether the material is
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:Sediment quality data from the NGCT marine licence application has been submitted as
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:a proxy in the absence of site specific sediment quality data at the point of application.
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:Sediment quality data from the proposed dredge footprint will be provided once
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:19:dredge volume for marine sediments in Phase 1 (excluding that from the Tees Dock
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:19:barges will be required to support with the transport of sediment dredged using the
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:21:You should provide analysis of the sediment to enable a determination to be made about whether the material is
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:21:Sediment quality data from the NGCT marine licence application has been used to
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:21:inform the impact assessment. Sediment quality data from the proposed dredge
MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:24:‘punching’ into the underlying sediments when berthed at the quay during the
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine)-58.pdf:6:Description Marine sediments to be dredged as part of Phase 1
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine)-58.pdf:7: dredge volume for marine sediments in Phase 1 (excluding
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine)-58.pdf:8: will be required to support with the transport of sediment
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine)-58.pdf:9: a jack-up barge 'punching' into the underlying sediments
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine)-58.pdf:16: To restrict suspended sediment plumes to one side of the estuary at a time, in order to reduce loss of tern foraging habitat.
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine)-58.pdf:16: dredged area must been taken to ensure there has been no movement of contaminated sediment outside of the area
MLA_2020_00506-Licence Document (Marine)-58.pdf:16: bounded by Schedule 8. Any movement of contaminated sediment must be removed using an enclosed bucket and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:3:7.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime 7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:3:7.2 Marine sediment and water quality 8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:9: • Capital dredging of approximately 1,800,000m3 of marine sediments with offshore disposal into
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:10: • Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:10: • Marine sediment and water quality.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:11:7.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:11:The assessment of potential effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime has been undertaken
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:11:cause no effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:11:The capital dredging of the river and the offshore disposal of dredged sediments both will cause plumes of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:11:sediment to form. The plume effects arising from the river dredging are characterised by a short-lived
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:11:localised increase in suspended sediment concentrations by the order of a few hundred mg/l at the point of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:11:magnitude over a few hours after disposal. Deposition thicknesses of sediment from the plumes on the river
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:combined with the creation of a new berth pocket at the quay, may lead to a small increase in sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:deposition rates and hence a requirement for more sediment to be dredged annually from this local reach.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:There is no predicted effect on the baseline sediment transport regime and seabed or shore morphology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:7.2 Marine sediment and water quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:The assessment of potential impacts associated with marine sediment and water quality has been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:undertaken with reference to publicly available sediment and water quality data. A site-specific sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:survey were not available at the time of writing, it has been assumed that the sediment quality within the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:A potential impact on water quality has been identified due to the resuspension of sediment, principally as
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:exceeding water quality standards was deemed to be low. Additionally, sediment plume modelling shows
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:time before the suspended sediment concentrations return to baseline values. No significant impacts are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:resuspension of sediments. Such measures include dredging in long strips to ensure the plume is located
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:and capital dredging, increased suspended sediment concentrations and increased sediment deposition.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:scheme footprint and the results of the hydrodynamic and sediment plume modelling, an impact of minor
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:ecological receptors as a result of increased suspended sediment concentrations or sediment deposition
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:15:Impacts on fish resources within the subtidal area, as a result of increased suspended sediment, would only
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:17:Indirect impacts to heritage assets from changes to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime are also
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:Based on the findings of hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling, the disposal of dredged material
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:12:Sediment that meets the appropriate criteria is likely to be disposed at sea, given that it is unlikely that there
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:12:are any local development schemes that require to large quantity of sediment created by the scheme. A
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:12:sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2019 to inform the EIA for the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:12:advance of a site-specific sediment quality survey being undertaken during 2020.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:16: • Dredging and offshore disposal of marine sediments.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:23: Sediment: Potential for contamination in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:23: Sediment – 1,800,000m3 of sediment excavated made ground.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:23: Non-hazardous electrical and electronic Potential for some excavated sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:33:Dredged sediment is proposed to be disposed offshore; this will be subject to a marine licence from the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:33:MMO. Should it be determined by the MMO’s advisors that the dredged sediment is not suitable for offshore
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:33:Any hazardous excavated material or hazardous sediment that is not suitable for use on site would be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:51: disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be set back into
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52:a berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:54: • Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:58: material. As part of the marine licence application, the applicant will need to provide sediment sample analysis results to ensure the material is suitable
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:58: exceed the Cefas Action Level 2 guidelines for contaminated sediment. This can be determined after sediment samples have been tested.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61: 4.1. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:The potential effects of the proposed scheme on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime will be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:The re-calibrated 3D Tees Estuary Tidal Model will be used to predict movement of suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:from the proposed dredging and disposal activity by coupling a sediment plume model built in MIKE21-MT
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:software. Sediment release rates will be estimated based on seabed and river conditions. The model will
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61: 4.2. Marine water and sediment quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:The findings from the sediment quality survey (to be undertaken in accordance with a sampling plan agreed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:sedimentary regime assessment to determine the implications of the proposed scheme on water quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:(in particular the effect of resuspension and dispersion of sediment during dredging and disposal activities).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:estuary. Assuming that the concentrations of contaminants in sediment will be similar to those previously
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:will be given to tributyltin (TBT) concentrations within sediments as the current water quality classification
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:62:The findings from the sediment and water quality assessments and marine ecology assessments will be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (particularly the plume dispersion modelling to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:determine impacts on feeding terns which are an interest feature of the SPA), the sediment quality survey,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:64:The findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment will inform consideration as to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:65:The potential impact of offshore disposal on bathymetry, benthic ecology, water and sediment quality and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:65:sediment plume modelling will, however, be used to inform impacts to water quality as a result of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:66:the Tees transitional waterbody. The findings from the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:66:assessment, water and sediment quality assessment and marine ecology assessment will feed into the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:68: 4. SEDIMENTATION/SILTATION ALLOWANCE OF 0.6m
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:79:channel and to create a berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be set back into the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:81: • offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:92: 7.3 Suspended Sediment Conversion ………………………………………………………………………………………..20
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:108:7.3 Suspended Sediment Conversion
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:130:Hydrodynamic and sedimentary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:131:Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:133:5.2 Sediment Data 51
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:133:5.4.3 Sediment Release Assumptions 57
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:133:5.4.4 Sediment Property Representation 57
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:134:Table 5-4: Sediment settling velocity and critical bed shear stress 57
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.3: Sediment release schedule for dredger 56
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.4: Sediment release schedule at offshore disposal site 56
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.5: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.6: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.7: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.8: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.9: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.10: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-surface layer) arising
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.11: Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.12: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.13: Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:139: movement of suspended sediment from the proposed dredging and disposal activities by coupling with
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:139: a sediment plume model built in MIKE3-MT software. The sediment plume model was run for the entire
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:139:consideration of hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes. The wider study area: (i) extends
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:174:Section 6 (Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Processes) of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:189: of sediment. In the main channel the deposition will require periodic dredging to maintain the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:191:This section of the report describes the sediment dispersion modelling exercise that was undertaken to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:191:investigate the suspended sediment transport effects of the proposed dredging of the channel and the berth
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:191:sediment transport model was built in MIKE3-MT software developed by DHI.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:191:5.2 Sediment Data
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:192:Based on the ground investigation data, for the sediment dispersion modelling, the following particle size
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:192:Sediment Category Sediment Size (mm) Soft material Hard material
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:192:The sediment dispersion model built in MIKE3-MT is coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic model built in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:192:The sediment dispersion model has been run for a four-month period to cover the full duration of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:192:The sediment dispersion model has been setup with 4 layers in order to differentiate between suspended
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:192:sediment concentrations throughout the water column, e.g. near the sea bed and near the water surface.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:192:In order to simulate the sediment dispersion close to natural conditions, wave disturbance effect has been
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:193:The dredging method, dredging schedule and details of the sediment release settings for the sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:193:The sediment will be dredged using two types of dredgers. The soft soil material below a depth of -5mCD
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:194:Figure 5.3 and Figure 5.4 show the sediment release schedules for the dredgers at the South Bank Wharf
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:196: Figure 5.3: Sediment release schedule for dredger
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:196: Figure 5.4: Sediment release schedule at offshore disposal site
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:5.4.3 Sediment Release Assumptions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:The following assumptions have been made for the simulation of sediment plumes arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:which means the sediment release will be more dispersed and thus the sediment concentration will be less.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:5.4.4 Sediment Property Representation
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:The five sediment fractions, critical bed shear stresses and fall velocities used in the sediment dispersion
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:model to represent bed sediments are shown in Table 5-4. The critical bed shear stress and fall velocities
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:Table 5-4: Sediment settling velocity and critical bed shear stress
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197: Sediment Sediment Settling Critical Shear
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:operation sailing back and forth to the offshore disposal site. The dredger disperses sediment into the water
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:column at a sediment release rate of 5.6 kg/s. The sediment loss rate (the so-called ‘S-factor’) is taken as
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:disposal site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 3,705kg/s. The barge will then take
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:198:site. The dredger disperses sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 5.6 kg/s. The
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:198:sediment loss rate (the so-called ‘S-factor’) is taken as 25kg/m3 for the Backhoe which follows the CIRIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:198:disposal site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 3,705kg/s. The barge will then take
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:198:disperses sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 2.2 kg/s. The sediment loss rate
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:198:disposal site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 4,913kg/s. The barge will then take
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:198:site. The dredger disperses sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 5.6 kg/s. The
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:198:sediment loss rate (the so-called ‘S-factor’) is taken as 25kg/m3 for the Backhoe which follows the CIRIA
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:198:disposal site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 3,705kg/s. The barge will then take
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:199:sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 4.5kg/s. The sediment loss rate (the so-called
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:199:minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 7,690kg/s. The TSHD will then take 55 minutes to sail back to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:199:sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 4.5kg/s. The sediment loss rate (the so-called
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:199:minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 7,690kg/s. The TSHD will then take 55 minutes to sail back to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:200:sailing, disposal and downtime) so that sediment releases have been made near continuously throughout
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:200:Results from the sediment dispersion modelling are discussed in turn for the river dredging and offshore
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:200:sediment concentration (SSC) or sediment deposition due to these activities above baseline levels.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:200:For SSC and sediment deposition, two types of analysis were undertaken:
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:200: Sedimentary Processes) of the Environmental Statement (ES).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:201: Figure 5.5: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:202: Figure 5.6: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:203: Figure 5.7: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:204: Figure 5.8: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:205: Figure 5.9: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from dredging activities
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:206: Figure 5.10: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-surface layer) arising from dredging activities
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:207:Figure 5.11 shows the maximum changes in river bed thickness caused by the deposition of sediment from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:207:the plumes created by river dredging. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:207:that is affected by the zone of influence from the sediment plumes.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:207: Figure 5.11: Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging activities during
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:208:licensed for the disposal of dredged sediment and is routinely monitored as part of a national programme.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:208:Therefore, plumes arising from disposal activities and subsequent sediment deposition is unlikely to be of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:208:sediment plume for this worst case. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:208:similar zone to the sediment plume. In reality, disposals will be at different points within the licensed area,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:209: Figure 5.12: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from disposal activities
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:210: Figure 5.13: Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging activities during
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:210:The river dredging and offshore disposal activities will both cause plumes of sediment to form close to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:210:and all sediment particles suspended in the water column will eventually settle to the river or sea bed,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:210:During dredging, there will be release of sediment particles from the deliberate physical disturbance to the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:211:point of sediment release, the enhanced SSC values are considerably lower because the coarser material
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:211:than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition on the river bed will be of very minor magnitudes, in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:211:areas covering the same spatial extent as the sediment plumes. Where this occurs in the river channel or
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:211:Overall, the changes in SSC and sediment deposition arising from the river dredging and offshore disposal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:237:Sediment sampling plan
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:238:sample plan to inform a sediment quality and benthic ecology survey in the Tees
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:239: 1.1. The advice relates to sampling to inform a sediment quality and benthic ecology
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:239: of sediments. Based on the information submitted (as described above), the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:240: 2.7. Surface samples should be taken from the upper layer of in-situ sediment using a
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:241: 3.3. Results were also discussed form a sediment quality survey that was undertaken in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:241: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:241: This list indicates the laboratories which have been validated to undertake sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:242: 4.2. Irrespective of which validated laboratory is used to undertake sediment analysis,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:242: (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:242: changes in the quantity and quality of sediments, there may be a need for surface
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:242: sediments to be re-sampled and analysed if the project has not commenced within
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:286: pollutants or sediments enter surface waters.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:291: 4. SEDIMENTATION/SILTATION ALLOWANCE OF 0.6m
MLA_2020_00506-RE_ South Bank Phase 1 Variation MLA_2020_00506_1 - SEAL advice_PDF_redacted_Redacted-65.pdf:2:dredged area to ensure there has been no movement of contaminated sediment into the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:271: sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be set back into the riverbank). The
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:350: • offshore disposal of dredged sediments; and,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:351:footprint as undifferentiated Triassic Rocks. This is a sedimentary Bedrock formed approximately 200 to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:357:such as natural flood management, habitat improvements, RDP reduction (sediment and nutrients),
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:384:Is 1% or more of any lower sensitivity habitat No – the area impacted is considered to be soft intertidal and soft subtidal sediment of which
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:385:entering it or could affect fish migrating through the See comments in water quality below. There may be temporary sediment resuspension but
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:385: would be supported through the use of divers. There is the possibility of sediment plumes
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:386: and temporary. Any sediment resuspension is unlikely to last more than a few hours per
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:386:through sediment disturbance or building works) crew will be trained in spill response. In addition, all vessels will ensure that suitable bunding
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:386: Sediment samples available from the NGCT project collected in 2019 are likely to contain
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:386:If your activity uses or releases chemicals (for example contaminants above action level 1.There is the possibility of sediment plumes during the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:386:through sediment disturbance or building works) demolition works but these are only expected to be localised to the working area and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:386:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants temporary. Any sediment resuspension is unlikely to last more than a few hours per pile.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:387:outside the estuary but could delay or prevent fish There is the possibility of sediment plumes during the dredging works. Possibility of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:388: There is the possibility of sediment plumes during the dredging works
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:388:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:388: Yes Sediment samples are likely to contain contaminants above Cefas Action Level 1 (see
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:388:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:388:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:389:Could impact on normal fish behaviour like movement, sediment spill. Additionally, where possible material would be removed in the dry. Any effects
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:390: sediment spill. Additionally, where possible material would be removed in the dry. Any effects
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:390:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:390:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:390:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:392:Could affect water clarity, temperature, salinity, oxygen There is the possibility that small localised disturbance of sediment could occur as a result
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:392:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:392:Quality Standards Directive (EQSD) list Any marine sediments that are disturbed are likely to have contaminant levels greater than
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:392:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:392:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:393: and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:394:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:394:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:394:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:396:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:396:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:396:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:398:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:398:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:398:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:1: Benthic (including marine invasive non-native species) and sediment contaminant survey data
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:3:Chapter 7: Marine Sediment and Water Quality
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:3: of sediment contaminants are less clear, particularly in regards to heavy metals
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:3: Please re-consult Natural England when the results of the contaminant sediment
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:3:Sediment rather than PDBEs.
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:4: To restrict suspended sediment plumes to one side of the estuary at a time, and
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:6: To restrict suspended sediment plumes to one side of the estuary at a time, in
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:7: Water flow (tidal current changes) including sediment transport.
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:9: suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:9: including sediment Please provide clarity as to the meaning of the underlined phase above.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:3:2 SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY 2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:3:2.1.1 Site-specific sediment quality survey 2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:3:2.1.2.1 Sediment results 2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:3:3.2.2 Effects of increased suspended sediment concentrations during dredging on marine species and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:5:The marine sediment and water quality assessment, marine ecology assessment and fisheries assessment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:5:application could be submitted to the MMO. Site-specific sediment quality, benthic ecology (including
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:6:2 SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:6:2.1.1 Site-specific sediment quality survey
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:6:A site-specific sediment quality survey was undertaken between 30th November and the 7th December 2020.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:6:As directed by the MMO in its sampling plan (reference SAM/2020/00026), sediment samples were
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:6:The results of the site-specific sediment quality data, water quality data and the updated water quality
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:6:2.1.2.1 Sediment results
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:6:The full set of sediment quality data is presented in Appendix 1. Table 2.1 provides a summary of the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:6:sediment quality data for the samples requested by the MMO; Table 2.2 provides a summary of the results
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:7: Sediment Sampling Locations and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:8:Table 2.1 Summary of site-specific sediment quality data used in water quality assessment (collected
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:9:Table 2.2 Summary of site-specific sediment data used in water quality assessment for additional
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:11:the case following an interim review of the sediment quality data in April 2021.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:11:the re-suspension of sediment as the material is removed. An enclosed grab results in virtually no release
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:11:of sediment as the material is dredged. The results from this borehole (BH34) have therefore been excluded
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:12:Sediment from BH34 contained elevated concentrations of ICES7 (sum of seven congeners) and ICES25
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:12:There are no Action Levels for PBDEs and therefore an assessment against sediment quality guidelines is
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:13:sediment losses from dredging equipment and concentrations of contaminants within the sediments to be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:13:simple quantitative assessment of potential sediment disturbance on water quality in the context of EQS
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:14:The tool characterises multiple transfers of chemicals from sediment to water which cumulatively determine
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:14: • estimation of chemical load associated with disturbed sediment partitioning (once sediments are
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:14: those sediment particles that are disturbed into the water column.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:14:With respect to metals, the risks to water quality relating to sediment disturbance activities primarily derive
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:15:sediment concentration of 40mg/l is used in the tool (see Figure 2.3).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:16:Figure 2.3 Time series of changes in suspended sediment concentrations at water quality monitoring
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:16:sediment concentrations are at 40mg/l, there is the risk of an EQS failure, however, compliance would be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:16:achieved when suspended sediment concentrations reduce to 31mg/l (see maximum acceptable sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:16:uplift column in Appendix 2). It can be seen in Figure 2.2 that the suspended sediment plume is predicted
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:16:to be relatively localised to the dredging activity and suspended sediment concentrations reduce to typically
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:17:However, sediment plume modelling does not predict long term and large scale extents of elevated
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:17:lower levels of contaminants, therefore the risk to EQS is only during dredging of the finer sediments in the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:17:of contaminants in sediment at that location. As reported earlier, and enclosed grab results in virtually no
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:17:release of sediment as the material is dredged. No further mitigation measures are required. The residual
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:18:the footprint of the proposed scheme included rocky and sedimentary habitats (elaborated on in Section
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:18:3.1.5), whereas the North Tees Mudflat and subtidal sections featured sedimentary habitats.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:21:infralittoral muddy sediment’. Although these biotopes are different to those recorded in the 2020 site-
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:22:pebble and cobble sized sediments in an admixture of mud, sand and gravel. Much of this material is likely
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:24:and sediment) biotopes. The main species and algal cover reported in the EIA Report for the proposed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:24:and capital dredging, effects from increased suspended sediment concentrations, and effects from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:25: increased suspended sediment “Effects of smothering following
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:25: physical removal of Changes in suspended sediment Smothering
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:26: increased suspended sediment “Effects of smothering following
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:26: physical removal of Changes in suspended sediment Smothering
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:27:3.2.2 Effects of increased suspended sediment concentrations during dredging
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:27:suspended sediment during dredging is expected to be in the form of a narrow plume within the river, which
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:27:suspended sediment concentrations to a level that will change the WFD scale for one year (the benchmark
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:27:Although the intertidal fucoid biotopes are of medium sensitivity to changes to suspended sediments, the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:receptors from increased suspended sediments remains at negligible significance.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:when smothered depends on several factors. If the silt content of the smothering sediment is high and water
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:content low, then it is unlikely that the species will be able to migrate to the surface of the sediment if buried
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:deeper than 5cm (Jackson, 2000). If, however, the smothering sediment is looser with more water content,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:C. volutator can be heavily affected by smothering, where sedimentation rates of 2 to 2.5cm/month in an
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:However, this experiment was carried out in a setting of sedimentation induced by the blockage or significant
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:reduction in water flow, rather than deposition of sediments within the water column in an unobstructed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:ability to photosynthesise if sediment settles on the fronds. For the barnacle (Semibalanus balanoides)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:28:biotope, barnacles are filter feeders, so any settlement on sediment will reduce their ability to feed
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:34: detailed in the EIA Report following review of the site-specific sediment quality data. As such, the conclusion
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:45: • Sediment data quality to inform the water quality assessment (Section 2).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:45:The site-specific sediment quality data is presented in Section 2 (and Appendix 1) of this report alongside
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:45:Agency. Given that Section 2 of this report considers the sediment quality data in the context of WFD EQSs,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:45:parameters, the short term nature of the sediment plume and limited spatial extent would limit any EQS
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:45:sediment concentrations that were likely to exceed EQS. As a consequence, a non-temporary deterioration
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:45:deterioration in species composition and numbers following dredging, it is predicted that the sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:48:Environment Agency (2019) Evidence. SeDiChem Technical Report SC180002: Impact of sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:50:Sediment quality data
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:51: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 8.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 8.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 7.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 8.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 7.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 8.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 8.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.94 4.83
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 9.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.28 2.98
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 7.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 8.7 0.00 0.00 8.72 0.00 5.68
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 8.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 8.6 0.00 0.00 9.07 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 7.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 8.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 8.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 8.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.87 0.43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:52:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 9.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.59 3.09
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 2.32 2.56 2.63 2.04 1.63 1.52
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 1.44 2.38 1.82 1.79 1.54 1.69
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 1.25 2.24 2.11 2.59 2.01 1.93
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 4.53 1.52 0.98 1.28 1.19 1.26
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 2.57 0.85 0.69 1.53 1.56 1.86
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:53:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 1.30 2.07 2.83 2.62 2.49 2.27
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 2.64 6.51
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.49
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 0.90 3.47 1.07 2.99 17.78 21.83
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.99
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 1.26 1.65 9.37 20.86 19.31 12.54
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 1.52 3.54 3.57 6.92 8.70 7.19
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 2.05
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 1.67 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.86 2.38
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.47
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 1.01 0.09 3.12 3.46 3.72 6.04
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 2.10 1.02 5.97 28.48 35.18 13.11
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.98
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.95
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.19
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 1.44 0.10 2.60 3.27 1.72 4.67
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:54:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 1.78 0.94 3.80 3.84 2.25 6.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 4.06 0.93 1.47 7.47 8.89 10.22
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 5.13 2.30 0.21 3.21 6.70 7.72
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 4.17 1.54 0.89 7.13 9.42 10.75
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 3.19 3.81 0.62 3.23 7.87 9.56
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 9.83 2.23 0.42 0.91 2.36 3.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 6.00 1.92 0.94 6.83 8.57 9.78
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 3.29 0.91 0.30 5.08 8.15 9.35
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 5.80 1.88 0.61 1.01 0.58 0.91
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 7.80 4.11 2.10 3.71 3.21 3.56
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 5.46 1.46 0.64 6.23 8.05 9.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 3.36 2.70 0.48 1.38 3.65 5.09
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 4.46 2.89 0.23 3.83 7.96 9.44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 5.91 4.62 1.37 2.96 3.97 4.38
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 4.14 1.05 0.43 0.72 0.49 0.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 2.85 1.82 0.65 6.00 9.20 10.99
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 4.46 1.93 0.44 5.16 8.09 9.15
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 3.83 1.22 1.06 6.70 8.41 9.96
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 4.71 1.04 0.44 5.48 7.97 9.26
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 6.19 3.93 0.57 3.92 5.10 6.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:55:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 4.79 3.78 1.84 1.98 3.71 4.26
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 10.40 10.01 10.00 9.41 7.49 5.08
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 7.84 8.28 8.99 8.94 7.61 5.62
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 10.39 10.23 10.16 9.19 7.16 4.91
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 9.12 10.41 9.76 8.80 7.57 5.93
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 2.96 3.80 4.12 4.12 3.68 2.81
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 9.37 9.78 9.66 8.77 7.04 5.04
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 9.65 9.84 10.66 10.43 8.56 6.02
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 0.55 0.85 0.71 0.63 0.62 0.45
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 3.21 3.41 3.34 3.06 2.53 1.86
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 9.44 9.38 9.78 9.28 7.46 5.20
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 5.37 6.48 6.60 6.04 4.94 3.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 9.03 10.04 10.44 9.79 8.10 5.96
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 4.18 5.00 4.70 4.21 3.60 2.79
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 0.50 0.62 0.65 0.64 0.58 0.42
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 9.73 10.23 9.78 8.76 7.14 5.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 9.11 9.34 10.04 9.76 8.09 5.81
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 9.78 9.70 9.97 9.46 7.63 5.34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 9.49 9.57 10.10 9.74 7.96 5.61
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 6.02 6.87 7.01 6.35 5.14 3.78
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:56:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 4.19 4.98 4.57 4.06 3.49 2.74
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 3.09 2.08 1.70 1.54 1.42
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 3.91 3.01 2.53 2.17 1.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 3.12 2.17 1.73 1.50 1.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 4.31 3.31 2.72 2.30 2.01
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 2.12 1.90 1.72 1.46 1.23
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 3.36 2.41 1.94 1.68 1.50
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 3.92 2.84 2.32 2.00 1.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 0.34 0.40 0.39 0.29 0.18
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 1.47 1.45 1.45 1.31 1.12
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 3.42 2.52 2.07 1.78 1.58
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 2.83 2.66 2.60 2.40 2.14
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 4.05 2.92 2.30 1.93 1.67
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 2.23 2.10 2.02 1.84 1.67
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 0.33 0.35 0.36 0.29 0.20
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 3.70 2.77 2.26 1.94 1.70
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 3.93 2.94 2.37 2.00 1.77
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 3.48 2.51 2.05 1.79 1.61
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 3.69 2.70 2.24 1.96 1.77
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 2.70 2.17 1.87 1.62 1.41
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:57:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 2.19 2.01 1.85 1.62 1.43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 1.25 1.03 0.76 0.54 0.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 1.59 1.26 0.87 0.58 0.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 1.15 0.94 0.69 0.49 0.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 1.73 1.39 0.98 0.65 0.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 1.05 0.84 0.60 0.40 0.23
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 1.33 1.11 0.84 0.61 0.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 1.52 1.22 0.85 0.57 0.32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 0.11 0.08 0.06 0.05 0.04
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 0.93 0.74 0.54 0.39 0.23
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 1.39 1.14 0.83 0.57 0.34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 1.86 1.54 1.16 0.84 0.52
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 1.44 1.16 0.84 0.58 0.34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 1.52 1.31 1.00 0.72 0.44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 0.12 0.07 0.03 0.02 0.01
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 1.48 1.21 0.88 0.62 0.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 1.56 1.25 0.84 0.52 0.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 1.41 1.16 0.85 0.60 0.36
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 1.57 1.30 0.95 0.67 0.40
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 1.22 1.02 0.78 0.58 0.36
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:58:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 1.27 1.09 0.83 0.61 0.38
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.13 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.14 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 0.08 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.15 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 0.02 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 0.09 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.13 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 0.20 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.13 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 0.17 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.15 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.10 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.14 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.15 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 0.15 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:59:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 0.15 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 23.0 0.72 57.5 63.8 0.58 32.7 142 238
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 13.8 0.37 45.8 40.9 0.37 41.9 74.7 131
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 25.2 0.43 52.6 51.6 0.47 33.4 129 185
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 23.4 2.31 165 180 1.58 32.0 177 381
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 9.4 0.20 15.8 23.1 0.17 13.8 42.2 63.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 23.0 0.51 52.4 55.3 0.51 29.5 153 208
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 25.1 0.91 74.8 93.7 0.92 33.2 168 281
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 4.2 0.21 9.5 13.7 0.04 11.4 13.1 47.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 5.1 0.19 15.1 15.5 0.02 20.0 10.3 53.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 23.9 0.67 59.2 67.7 0.60 31.2 150 244
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 7.4 0.30 27.5 35.9 0.09 28.3 19.6 68.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 21.0 0.98 78.7 100 0.88 30.6 177 312
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 5.6 0.21 20.3 18.8 0.02 24.1 14.5 59.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 3.2 0.13 9.0 10.6 <0.01 10.0 8.2 46.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 23.5 0.79 74.0 79.7 0.76 34.1 162 264
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 23.6 0.81 73.3 78.4 0.91 30.8 171 282
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 23.0 0.79 65.0 68.7 0.67 31.0 160 262
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 23.9 0.85 71.1 77.8 0.77 33.5 184 292
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 11.0 0.26 32.8 36.3 0.20 25.4 65.1 110
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:60:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 7.3 0.18 24.3 24.4 <0.01 29.0 15.1 63.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:61: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:61:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.014 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:61:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 0.013 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:61:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.024 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:61:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.038 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:61:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:61:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.014 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:61:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.036 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:61:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:61:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:61:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.019 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:62: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:62:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment <0.005 0.020
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:62:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.048 0.030
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:62:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 0.008 0.011
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:62:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 0.006 0.017
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:62:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.031 0.030
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:62:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.065 0.043
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:62:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.027 0.016
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:62:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.036 0.025
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:62:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 0.009 0.015
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:62:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment <0.005 0.020
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:63: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:63:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 274 227 373 823 835 800
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:63:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 230 161 306 583 633 623
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:63:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 219 194 320 806 798 798
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:63:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 796 806 882 1630 1440 1420
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:63:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 117 83.8 326 676 653 558
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:63:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 331 219 350 767 805 818
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:63:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 554 353 524 1000 1060 1110
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:63:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 6.34 14.1 7.96 16.1 17.4 21.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:63:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 6.42 2.51 6.93 19.8 23.2 35.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:63:VC-07 MMO1 000-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 499 300 396 759 808 818
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:64: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:64:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 655 780 381 3480 1630 2760
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:64:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 489 601 243 2740 1310 2150
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:64:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 666 782 365 3670 1720 2840
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:64:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 1150 1420 528 7780 3300 6050
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:64:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 476 514 242 1150 908 938
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:64:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 669 778 332 3270 1540 2630
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:64:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 803 979 512 3830 1880 2960
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:64:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 31.4 33.6 5.64 97.1 91.0 85.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:64:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 45.8 56.6 4.69 191 171 156
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:64:VC-07 MMO1 000-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 649 769 452 3400 1540 2600
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:65: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:65:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 2250 753 132 1350 429 559
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:65:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 1750 563 103 948 351 413
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:65:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 2280 865 133 1330 388 541
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:65:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 4530 1320 247 2190 1220 964
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:65:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 807 674 100 1170 205 371
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:65:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 2210 738 141 1280 453 569
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:65:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 2520 989 178 1610 692 729
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:65:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 85.1 28.6 4.51 21.6 15.2 9.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:65:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 151 42.5 10.4 32.5 21.5 11.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:65:VC-07 MMO1 000-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 2200 731 138 1340 569 525
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:66: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:66:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 1220 240 1440 1450 214
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:66:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 1040 182 1210 1230 174
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:66:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 1260 223 1510 1300 182
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:66:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 3010 420 2980 2680 124
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:66:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 514 180 1020 1470 118
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:66:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 1160 234 1430 1400 217
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:66:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 1500 338 1780 1880 106
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:66:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 22.4 3.93 64.1 33.0 33.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:66:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 56.7 8.48 137 41.9 30.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:66:VC-07 MMO1 000-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 1250 236 1470 1490 48.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:67: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:67:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 54.6 10.4 17.9 33.3 41.9 58.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:67:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 748 578 834 1320 1450 1330
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:67:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 11.4 5.75 11.1 34.4 43.0 55.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:67:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 2.12 2.24 1.87 4.46 5.32 6.14
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:67:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 399 320 489 1030 1080 1070
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:67:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 765 348 667 1390 1480 1340
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:67:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 406 292 402 881 975 965
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:67:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 389 281 471 1000 1030 1140
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:67:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 67.6 193 77.3 123 131 139
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:67:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 10.0 4.06 6.89 24.5 35.7 59.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:68: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:68:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 66.0 80.5 14.6 229 129 157
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:68:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 1040 1260 622 4700 2090 3550
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:68:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 84.1 91.5 12.1 288 208 204
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:68:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 9.51 11.1 1.93 36.3 32.9 32.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:68:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 830 971 472 3490 1690 2700
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:68:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 1110 1360 611 4130 2090 3300
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:68:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 759 896 482 3080 1490 2430
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:68:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 792 950 423 3430 1640 2650
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:68:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 114 135 58.3 607 330 441
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:68:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 81.7 101 10.1 257 153 152
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:69: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:69:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 111 56.7 10.7 56.3 48.0 25.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:69:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 2570 1300 227 2060 905 963
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:69:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 181 65.2 12.0 59.6 34.4 22.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:69:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 32.9 8.97 1.41 6.65 5.12 2.69
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:69:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 2380 984 174 1760 541 740
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:69:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 2710.0 1320 240 2290 842 1020
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:69:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 2080 851 162 1460 510 681
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:69:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 2140.0 979 172 1690 528 716
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:69:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 336 138 23.0 205 126 86.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:69:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 101.0 65.1 11.8 41.9 34.1 20.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:70: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:70:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 63.4 10.5 134 76.6 10.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:70:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 2060 454 2230 2730 498
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:70:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 77.8 13.7 170 70.3 21.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:70:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment 8.15 1.23 26.1 10.3 50.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:70:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 1340 292 1660 1970 312
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:70:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 1880 531 2190 2690 224
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:70:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 1190 284 1400 1650 237
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:70:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 1320 293 1630 1920 150
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:70:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 236 38.1 288 245 127
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:70:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 66.7 7.78 150 50.5 15.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:71: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:71:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.00116 0.00041 0.00117 0.00081 0.00010 0.00094 0.00009 0.00094
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:71:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 0.00100 0.00034 0.00087 0.00089 0.00015 0.00058 0.00016 0.00088
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:71:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.00102 0.00035 0.00099 0.00106 0.00011 0.00102 0.00019 0.00074
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:71:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.00286 0.00085 0.00264 0.00242 0.00030 0.00252 0.00039 0.00214
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:71:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 0.00052 0.00012 0.00049 0.00030 <0.00008 0.00045 0.00011 0.00049
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:71:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.00112 0.00041 0.00113 0.00116 0.00022 0.00129 0.00021 0.00102
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:71:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.00189 0.00056 0.00114 0.00155 0.00013 0.00174 0.00018 0.00172
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:71:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:71:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:71:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.00125 0.00051 0.00126 0.00110 0.00031 0.00106 0.00016 0.00100
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:72: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:72:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.00021 0.00165 0.00011 0.00021 0.00022 0.00078 0.00078
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:72:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 0.00016 0.00107 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00011 0.00057 0.00059
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:72:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.00017 0.00127 0.00008 <0.00008 0.00017 0.00041 0.00039
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:72:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.00058 0.00393 0.00025 0.00039 0.00055 0.00184 0.00191
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:72:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 0.00014 0.00081 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00031 0.00017
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:72:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.00032 0.00181 0.00010 0.00014 0.00025 0.00105 0.00080
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:72:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.00038 0.00208 0.00012 0.00021 0.00034 0.00113 0.00109
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:72:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00015 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:72:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00038 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:72:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.00030 0.00169 0.00012 0.00017 0.00028 0.00075 0.00068
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:73: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:73:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.00020 0.00056 0.00021 0.00076 0.00199 0.00060 0.00013
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:73:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment <0.00008 0.00029 <0.00008 0.00045 0.00123 0.00052 0.00015
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:73:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.00013 0.00037 0.00014 0.00050 0.00128 0.00045 0.00013
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:73:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.00051 0.00129 0.00076 0.00196 0.00475 0.00149 0.00044
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:73:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00017 0.00044 0.00015 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:73:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.00011 0.00049 0.00021 0.00077 0.00196 0.00060 0.00021
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:73:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.00032 0.00063 0.00030 0.00089 0.00227 0.00066 0.00029
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:73:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00010 0.00017 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:73:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00016 0.00045 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:73:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.00014 0.00057 0.00019 0.00063 0.00176 0.00056 0.00022
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:74: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:74:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.00084 0.00142 0.00111
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:74:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 0.00056 0.00108 0.00064
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:74:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.00051 0.00087 0.00073
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:74:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.00203 0.00326 0.00239
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:74:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment 0.00025 0.00041 0.00024
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:74:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.00076 0.00150 0.00090
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:74:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.00103 0.00186 0.00131
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:74:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment 0.00011 0.00013 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:74:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment 0.00015 0.00035 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:74:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.00068 0.00126 0.00072
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:75: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:75:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 0.00021 <0.00008 0.00018 0.00012 <0.00008 0.00015 <0.00008 0.00015
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:75:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.00170 0.00062 0.00135 0.00112 0.00019 0.00141 0.00018 0.00122
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:75:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 0.00010 <0.00008 0.00006 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00004 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:75:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:75:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.00199 0.00063 0.00156 0.00158 0.00035 0.00266 0.00031 0.00154
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:75:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.00181 0.00064 0.00174 0.00144 0.00027 0.00181 0.00027 0.00106
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:75:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.00132 0.00050 0.00106 0.00114 0.00026 0.00147 0.00014 0.00104
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:75:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.00166 0.00060 0.00160 0.00167 0.00027 0.00160 0.00029 0.00134
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:75:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 0.00045 0.00011 0.00040 0.00036 <0.00008 0.00039 0.00009 0.00027
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:75:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:76: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:76:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment <0.00008 0.00026 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00058 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:76:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.00040 0.00241 0.00017 0.00023 0.00034 0.00101 0.00107
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:76:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00064 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:76:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:76:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.00042 0.00279 0.00018 0.00034 0.00046 0.00067 0.00176
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:76:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.00055 0.00247 0.00012 0.00020 0.00057 0.00097 0.00138
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:76:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.00038 0.00214 0.00015 0.00021 0.00026 0.00059 0.00088
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:76:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.00043 0.00244 0.00009 0.00037 0.00036 0.00073 0.00097
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:76:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00047 0.00022
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:76:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00033 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:77: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:77:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00029 0.00074 0.00023 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:77:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.00028 0.00088 0.00028 0.00090 0.00237 0.00087 0.00024
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:77:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00024 0.00070 0.00019 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:77:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00010 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:77:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.00037 0.00118 0.00044 0.00070 0.00177 0.00056 0.00021
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:77:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.00036 0.00088 0.00042 0.00102 0.00249 0.00089 0.00028
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:77:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.00025 0.00060 0.00023 0.00068 0.00170 0.00054 0.00019
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:77:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.00021 0.00072 0.00026 0.00077 0.00202 0.00072 0.00025
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:77:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment <0.00008 0.00019 <0.00008 0.00027 0.00075 0.00029 0.00009
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:77:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00015 0.00033 0.00012 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:78: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:78:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 0.00027 0.00056 0.00016
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:78:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.00113 0.00181 0.00134
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:78:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment 0.00023 0.00048 0.00012
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:78:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:78:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.00083 0.00128 0.00098
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:78:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.00118 0.00194 0.00147
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:78:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.00078 0.00126 0.00105
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:78:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.00092 0.00168 0.00111
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:78:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 0.00032 0.00060 0.00037
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:78:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 0.00011 0.00027 0.00009
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment 0.00071 0.00060 0.00346 0.00058 0.00021 0.00405 0.00046
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment 0.00132 0.001040 0.00525 0.000969 0.000345 0.00565 0.00064
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment 0.00049 0.00040 0.00264 0.000367 0.000153 0.00296 0.00040
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.001440 0.00195 0.00622 0.001770 0.000428 0.00702 0.00079
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment 0.00075 0.00059 0.00352 0.00054 0.00022 0.00379 0.00047
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment 0.00140 0.00113 0.00585 0.00109 0.00041 0.00629 0.00079
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment 0.00074 0.00057 0.00340 0.000532 0.000214 0.00392 0.00051
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment 0.000046 0.00002 0.00019 0.000050 <0.00002 0.00018 0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.00326 0.00263 0.01110 0.00269 0.000650 0.01100 0.00130
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment <0.00002 0.00003 0.00005 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.00006 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.00087 0.00069 0.00364 0.000713 0.000221 0.00411 0.00047
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.001870 0.00149 0.00816 0.001880 0.000601 0.00919 0.00099
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.00075 0.00058 0.00321 0.00058 0.000187 0.00333 0.00044
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment 0.00088 0.00067 0.00422 0.00075 0.00027 0.00517 0.00067
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment 0.00007 0.00008 0.00033 0.00009 0.00002 0.00032 0.00004
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:79:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment 0.00002 0.00003 0.00006 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.00006 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-02 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.001 Sediment <0.00002 0.00074 0.00042 0.00055 0.139
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-02 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.002 Sediment <0.00002 0.00103 0.000492 0.000899 0.090
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-04 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.003 Sediment <0.00002 0.00053 0.000355 0.000436 0.109
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-04 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.004 Sediment 0.00005 0.00131 0.000567 0.000682 0.054
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-04 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.005 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-06 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.006 Sediment <0.00002 0.00075 0.00041 0.00080 0.127
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-06 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.007 Sediment <0.00002 0.00124 0.00058 0.00082 0.164
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-06 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00825.008 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.003
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-06 MMO4 2.50-2.80 MAR00825.009 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-07 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.010 Sediment <0.00002 0.00072 0.000415 0.000591 0.159
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-07 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.011 Sediment <0.00002 0.00004 <0.00002 0.000030 0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-08B MMO1 0.00-0.20 MAR00825.012 Sediment 0.00004 0.00216 0.00112 0.002350 0.230
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-08B MMO2 1.00-1.20 MAR00825.013 Sediment <0.00002 0.00004 <0.00002 0.00002 0.002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-08B MMO3 2.00-2.20 MAR00825.014 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-09 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.015 Sediment 0.00002 0.00069 0.000378 0.000571 0.202
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-09 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00825.016 Sediment 0.00006 0.00163 0.000670 0.002110 0.220
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-10 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.017 Sediment 0.00002 0.00058 0.00035 0.000563 0.250
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-11 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.018 Sediment <0.00002 0.00089 0.00046 0.00070 0.243
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-15A MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.019 Sediment <0.00002 0.00007 0.00003 0.00007 0.033
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:80:VC-17 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00825.020 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000039 0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:81: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:82: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:82:Particle Size Analysis Wet Sediment Wet and dry sieving followed by laser diffraction analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:82:Organotins Wet Sediment Solvent extraction and derivatisation followed by GC-MS analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:82:Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) Wet Sediment Solvent extraction and clean up followed by GC-MS analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:82:Total Hydrocarbon Content (THC) Wet Sediment Ultra-violet fluorescence spectroscopy
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:83: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 7.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 8.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 8.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.52
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 7.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 8.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 8.9 0.00 5.26 0.00 2.10 4.90
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 8.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.18 11.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 9.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 7.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 8.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.49
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.09 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 8.0 0.00 4.55 0.00 0.00 3.25
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.30 1.51
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.35 0.61
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 8.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.01 6.52
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 8.8 0.00 11.60 0.00 0.00 6.74
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 7.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 8.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.70
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 7.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 8.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.79
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 8.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 8.5 0.00 12.19 1.50 1.01 5.08
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.62
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 8.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.70
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 8.8 0.00 0.00 7.77 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:84:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 8.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 2.37 3.77 4.74 5.61 6.30 7.12
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 6.05 5.02 5.54 6.43 6.06 6.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 5.66 4.68 5.43 6.27 6.00 5.96
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 0.00 1.92 1.05 1.48 0.86 0.83
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 0.00 1.93 0.72 0.63 0.88 0.75
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 0.00 1.71 1.60 1.45 1.73 1.58
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 1.13 0.99 1.97 2.38 1.79 1.64
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 0.69 1.02 1.36 0.97 0.99 0.94
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 2.88 2.80 3.19 3.12 3.11 3.18
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 5.82 5.28 4.96 3.75 3.28 3.18
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 1.16 2.16 2.95 3.25 3.96 4.89
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 2.94 1.65 1.84 2.11 1.69 1.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 4.60 3.12 2.75 2.48 2.04 1.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 3.25 4.93 5.45 5.00 4.62 4.01
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 2.62 3.58 5.02 6.13 7.45 7.17
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 0.00 0.32 0.70 2.29 4.65 7.71
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 4.46 5.13 4.06 3.53 3.25 3.64
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 4.97 6.64 5.72 5.98 5.37 4.67
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.33 1.24 0.99 1.07 1.37 1.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 1.82 1.63 1.92 2.76 2.28 2.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:85:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 2.56 2.08 1.88 1.70 1.71 1.50
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 1.74
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 3.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 6.66 12.79 11.31 7.89 5.36 2.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 4.97 4.72 7.60 4.07 2.80 2.61
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 4.61 5.56 6.67 2.77 2.44 1.49
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 0.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.31 3.80
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.55
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 1.37 0.00 0.00 0.78 3.95 4.32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 1.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.77 4.54
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 0.87 0.20 2.74 2.08 4.55 2.63
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 2.63 0.00 0.00 0.32 1.55 1.60
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 2.23 0.00 0.00 0.91 3.38 1.94
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 3.99 14.34 12.91 5.88 3.00 2.17
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 1.24 0.00 0.00 0.55 2.33 3.64
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 1.01 0.02 1.19 1.06 1.14 2.27
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71 4.70
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 2.85 0.77 3.64 3.75 2.28 2.59
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 2.17
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 5.56 6.79 6.16 5.55 3.21 2.26
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 7.51 6.64 5.09 4.56 6.05 6.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 2.87 4.79 4.09 4.50 6.56 6.25
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 3.25 4.92 7.66 5.45 2.32 2.63
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 1.73 0.01 0.75 1.03 2.12 2.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 1.94 0.07 2.70 3.41 0.68 3.13
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:86:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 1.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 5.44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 6.48 2.33 1.67 8.05 9.06 10.11
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 5.38 2.17 0.19 3.08 7.05 8.73
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 2.81 0.85 0.72 1.80 1.67 1.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 3.43 0.65 1.43 7.27 8.56 10.40
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 3.91 0.70 0.45 5.89 8.48 10.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 2.21 1.48 0.41 1.19 1.69 2.03
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 1.97 0.92 0.23 1.62 1.78 2.18
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 3.55 3.52 1.84 3.22 5.45 7.08
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 4.35 1.36 0.67 6.49 8.61 10.36
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 3.27 2.31 0.45 4.47 7.67 10.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.70 5.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 5.50 4.38 1.20 3.83 5.35 6.14
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 3.86 3.69 1.36 1.90 4.68 6.22
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 7.07 5.45 3.67 7.20 6.17 6.44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 2.70 2.41 0.87 1.67 3.92 5.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 2.47 2.19 0.36 0.93 2.75 4.25
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 2.27 0.71 0.22 1.92 2.51 3.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 3.96 3.22 0.61 2.37 3.74 5.26
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 2.10 0.48 0.11 2.04 4.03 5.47
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 6.28 1.45 0.77 6.22 7.76 9.38
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 2.47 1.09 0.18 1.90 3.22 4.43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 5.51 2.40 0.81 6.21 7.99 9.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 2.35 1.03 0.12 0.32 1.40 2.48
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 7.49 2.39 1.72 3.33 2.81 3.55
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 4.53 1.02 0.55 1.70 1.66 2.12
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 2.19 0.85 0.08 1.13 1.83 2.48
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 6.14 2.77 1.49 5.74 6.11 7.71
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 5.14 2.81 0.50 3.36 3.73 5.23
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:87:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 5.65 4.15 2.91 3.24 4.94 6.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 9.28 9.49 9.28 8.30 6.52 4.55
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 8.46 9.13 9.22 8.73 7.44 5.70
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 1.62 1.56 1.47 1.32 1.07 0.80
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 10.00 9.45 9.69 9.40 7.71 5.40
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 9.53 9.41 10.10 9.70 7.94 5.69
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 2.04 2.36 2.12 1.82 1.53 1.23
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 2.33 2.15 2.21 2.23 1.92 1.44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 6.25 7.42 7.66 7.28 6.25 4.82
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 9.43 9.32 9.75 9.15 7.40 5.31
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 8.90 10.03 10.54 9.75 7.99 5.86
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 5.76 8.60 8.50 8.64 8.56 7.09
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 5.89 6.88 6.36 5.78 5.13 4.15
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 6.16 7.89 7.52 6.59 5.42 4.19
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 4.78 5.46 4.92 4.15 3.49 2.75
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 5.59 7.16 6.63 5.83 4.93 3.78
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 4.20 4.95 5.39 5.28 4.55 3.47
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 3.63 3.71 3.72 3.37 2.60 1.78
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 5.18 6.13 6.14 5.54 4.49 3.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 5.76 6.44 6.14 5.30 4.19 3.08
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 8.46 9.02 9.24 8.55 6.99 5.11
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 4.75 5.75 5.82 5.10 3.90 2.68
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 8.92 9.80 10.06 9.13 7.25 5.13
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 2.70 3.62 3.58 3.21 2.72 2.11
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 3.34 3.17 3.40 3.53 3.10 2.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 2.06 2.08 2.22 2.15 1.75 1.23
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 3.03 3.27 3.42 3.31 2.73 1.92
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 7.07 7.06 7.99 7.97 6.55 4.56
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 5.13 5.47 5.84 5.57 4.54 3.24
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:88:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 5.71 6.97 6.64 5.91 5.01 3.99
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 2.94 2.06 1.65 1.44 1.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 4.27 3.54 3.04 2.55 2.15
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 0.61 0.55 0.51 0.43 0.35
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 3.42 2.40 2.00 1.81 1.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 3.86 2.87 2.35 1.99 1.73
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 1.00 0.91 0.83 0.70 0.56
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 1.12 1.05 1.00 0.85 0.68
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 3.80 3.46 3.25 2.97 2.73
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 3.57 2.61 2.14 1.90 1.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 4.04 3.01 2.42 2.04 1.81
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 5.75 5.44 5.16 4.82 4.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 3.31 3.00 2.77 2.50 2.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 3.35 3.08 2.90 2.59 2.27
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 2.20 2.04 1.96 1.78 1.59
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 2.93 2.70 2.54 2.22 1.85
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 2.64 2.31 2.10 1.85 1.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 1.32 1.24 1.20 1.04 0.84
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 2.54 2.37 2.30 2.12 1.91
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 2.29 1.96 1.76 1.55 1.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 3.47 2.50 1.97 1.66 1.48
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 1.92 1.74 1.72 1.62 1.47
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 3.38 2.41 1.92 1.63 1.43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 1.63 1.42 1.26 1.08 0.93
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 1.55 1.20 1.05 0.92 0.79
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 0.83 0.64 0.56 0.49 0.42
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 1.41 1.32 1.33 1.24 1.11
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 2.96 2.17 1.76 1.44 1.19
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 2.51 2.44 2.39 2.16 1.90
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:89:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 3.25 2.97 2.75 2.43 2.13
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 1.11 0.92 0.68 0.49 0.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 1.79 1.41 0.98 0.65 0.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 0.27 0.20 0.14 0.10 0.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 1.46 1.20 0.89 0.64 0.39
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 1.48 1.19 0.83 0.56 0.32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 0.45 0.35 0.26 0.19 0.12
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 0.52 0.39 0.27 0.19 0.11
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 2.50 2.16 1.66 1.21 0.74
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 1.61 1.36 1.00 0.70 0.42
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 1.59 1.29 0.89 0.59 0.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 4.64 3.95 2.66 1.60 0.78
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 2.07 1.78 1.36 0.98 0.60
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 1.95 1.62 1.23 0.91 0.57
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 1.41 1.19 0.91 0.67 0.41
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 1.50 1.15 0.80 0.54 0.31
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 1.48 1.27 0.98 0.72 0.45
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 0.65 0.49 0.34 0.24 0.14
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 1.69 1.43 1.10 0.82 0.51
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 1.21 1.03 0.81 0.61 0.38
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 1.31 1.09 0.81 0.58 0.35
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 1.29 1.08 0.83 0.62 0.39
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 1.23 1.00 0.73 0.51 0.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 0.81 0.68 0.52 0.39 0.24
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 0.67 0.54 0.39 0.28 0.17
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 0.34 0.27 0.20 0.14 0.09
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 0.96 0.79 0.59 0.44 0.27
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.97 0.75 0.53 0.36 0.21
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 1.66 1.40 1.07 0.79 0.49
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:90:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 1.86 1.56 1.20 0.88 0.55
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.14 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 0.02 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 0.15 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 0.05 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 0.04 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 0.29 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.16 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 0.25 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 0.23 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 0.23 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 0.16 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 0.18 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 0.06 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 0.20 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 0.15 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.14 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 0.16 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 0.10 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 0.06 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 0.04 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 0.10 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.08 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 0.19 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:91:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 0.22 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 25.0 0.63 50.0 62.5 0.45 30.7 143 222
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 23.6 0.81 76.5 99.9 0.63 31.2 129 204
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 4.9 0.08 35.5 13.9 0.07 41.9 13.1 60.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 27.1 0.36 50.6 51.7 0.45 33.2 124 184
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 26.6 0.84 71.4 89.8 0.94 26.9 141 236
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 8.3 0.24 31.2 18.9 0.08 39.1 21.8 77.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 4.8 0.20 22.7 17.1 <0.01 29.1 8.7 52.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 5.7 0.24 25.2 21.4 <0.01 33.9 14.1 51.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 26.7 0.42 46.2 46.1 0.38 30.8 153 192
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 26.2 1.00 77.9 113 0.86 33.4 169 311
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 8.3 0.32 35.0 30.2 0.02 47.3 29.2 81.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 6.9 0.23 29.4 23.5 <0.01 40.8 21.9 64.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 5.8 0.20 23.5 27.6 <0.01 28.4 11.2 52.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 5.7 0.24 22.6 24.1 <0.01 27.3 14.0 57.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 8.6 0.70 72.4 174 0.61 29.3 45.4 147
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 4.6 0.11 25.2 20.6 <0.01 32.8 6.7 60.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 3.9 0.10 18.8 9.3 0.02 21.5 8.9 39.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 5.9 0.15 20.3 24.3 <0.01 24.5 10.9 49.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 5.4 0.12 20.6 22.0 <0.01 23.1 4.7 38.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 21.3 1.31 113 120 1.06 30.6 200 340
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 4.2 0.10 21.6 107 <0.01 26.6 8.5 47.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 22.3 0.87 72.3 78.5 0.84 31.2 171 274
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 5.0 0.10 21.4 13.9 <0.01 24.2 7.7 44.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 2.2 0.09 16.9 9.4 <0.01 18.9 3.7 28.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 5.5 0.12 20.4 71.8 <0.01 22.9 6.3 40.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 7.7 0.07 26.6 11.6 <0.01 29.8 9.3 45.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 20.1 1.05 91.4 98.1 1.02 29.0 175 304
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 6.2 0.22 21.3 33.2 <0.01 25.7 13.9 53.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:92:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 6.2 0.30 23.2 34.9 <0.01 28.7 14.6 59.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:93: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:93:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.023 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:93:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.052 0.013
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:93:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 0.006 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:93:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 0.014 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:93:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.009 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:93:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 0.008 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:93:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:93:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment <0.005 0.007
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:93:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.017 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:93:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.027 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:94: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:94:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:94:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:94:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 0.006 0.006
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:94:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 0.006 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:94:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 0.021 0.013
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:94:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 0.006 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:94:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 0.008 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:94:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 0.006 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:94:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 0.006 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:94:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.039 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:95: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:95:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 0.007 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:95:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.021 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:95:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 0.008 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:95:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:95:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 0.006 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:95:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 0.006 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:95:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.041 0.037
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:95:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 0.006 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:95:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 0.009 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:96: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:96:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 217 155 293 665 680 685
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:96:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 1060 1240 1170 1380 1090 996
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:96:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 3.28 7.46 3.97 4.87 4.62 3.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:96:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 213 175 288 635 648 615
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:96:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 320 196 330 629 623 650
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:96:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 9.40 3.90 14.9 16.7 19.3 20.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:96:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 1.25 <1 1.61 2.39 2.60 6.47
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:96:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 11.9 2.45 11.9 34.1 43.1 47.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:96:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 218 189 264 562 557 540
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:96:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 608 491 674 1180 1130 1220
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:97: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:97:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 588 673 326 3300 1570 2610
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:97:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 801 1090 568 12000 4940 8610
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:97:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 3.86 4.79 2.40 47.0 22.7 35.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:97:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 552 627 307 2980 1460 2300
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:97:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 449 566 271 2680 1270 2050
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:97:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 19.8 22.4 8.85 103 52.2 76.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:97:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 4.01 5.98 1.43 19.1 10.2 13.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:97:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 82.6 64.2 12.2 146 184 146
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:97:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 509 576 251 3340 1550 2640
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:97:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 952 1130 418 6580 2790 4780
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:98: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:98:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 2290 713 121 1160 358 478
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:98:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 6150 1510 118 2840 1730 544
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:98:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 26.5 5.53 <1 9.64 8.14 2.20
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:98:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 2090 706 112 1140 344 435
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:98:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 1690 709 97.7 1250 468 400
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:98:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 55.2 22.1 3.66 34.4 16.3 12.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:98:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 9.6 4.68 <1 4.73 2.69 1.64
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:98:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 180 49.4 6.67 52.1 27.1 26.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:98:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 2320 639 102 995 349 389
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:98:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 3840 1160 192 1730 862 751
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:99: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:99:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 1140 184 1340 1170 85.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:99:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 4820 271 4570 2830 89.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:99:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment 13.90 1.13 20.8 14.8 5.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:99:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 1020 177 1380 1150 219
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:99:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 1020 196 1290 1270 290
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:99:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 46.5 4.91 53.3 62.2 38.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:99:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 7.40 <1 10.0 6.94 3.87
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:99:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 24.9 14.1 138 67.2 8.47
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:99:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 1130 146 1310 999 231
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:99:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 2710 391 2490 2010 71.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:100: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:100:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 43.1 12.4 32.4 135 211 287
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:100:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 40.9 11.6 30.1 131 195 266
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:100:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 3.96 1.75 3.36 13.7 18.3 36.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:100:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 8.89 2.88 9.15 35.4 42.3 57.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:100:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 646 474 547 615 647 590
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:100:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 3.82
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:100:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 56.2 65.1 78.6 143 165 163
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:100:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 4.12 1.83 3.30 13.1 18.9 37.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:100:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment <1 1.38 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:100:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 1300 1930 2020 4490 4530 4190
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:101: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:101:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 450 514 47.8 2100 1050 1110
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:101:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 437 487 47.7 2010 1040 1050
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:101:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 46.6 55.6 6.65 112 85.6 74.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:101:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 88.6 96.4 11.3 246 241 213
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:101:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 435 564 263 2470 1080 1770
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:101:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 1.89 3.56 <1 4.54 3.81 3.48
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:101:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 121 145 69.7 428 199 310
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:101:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 46.4 60.2 6.10 157 102 89.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:101:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment <1 1 <1 5.42 3.72 5.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:101:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 2840 3680 1800 9790 4610 6910
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:102: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:102:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 684 342 62.5 200 323 123
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:102:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 675 334 49.4 187 305 112
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:102:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 52.7 34.7 7.03 22.7 20.7 13.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:102:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 202 70.1 12.4 53.5 30.0 25.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:102:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 1430 621 95.5 1070 837 404
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:102:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 2.57 2.90 <1 1.42 1.12 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:102:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 244 143 26.3 207 75.1 112
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:102:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 56.4 43.9 5.85 23.5 21.5 12.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:102:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 3.80 <1 <1 1.22 1.28 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:102:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 6120 3790 638 8190 1830 2870
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:103: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:103:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 665 29.6 995 285 21.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:103:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 771 27.5 940 279 9.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:103:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment 25.5 3.98 82.6 28.4 98.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:103:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 52.8 15.0 195 63.9 49.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:103:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 1070 195 1240 1470 36.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:103:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment 1.70 <1 2.89 2.04 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:103:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 181 47.3 207 268 42.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:103:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment 45.7 3.48 94.9 30.2 5.94
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:103:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 3.13 <1 3.21 1.61 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:103:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 3850 1270 5550 9040 1280
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:104: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:104:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 14.9 14.2 15.9 26.5 22.9 42.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:104:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 503 281 644 1110 1250 1270
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:104:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 1.96 2.36 1.21 1.45 1.34 1.70
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:104:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 3.19 3.15 1.03 1.30 1.04 2.50
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:104:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment <1 3.53 <1 1.03 1.02 1.34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:104:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment <1 1.88 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:104:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 427 415 424 684 817 739
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:104:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 9.46 6.07 7.03 20.3 24.3 46.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:104:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 5.67 3.16 4.98 17.6 23.0 51.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:105: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:105:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 27.7 46.2 10.9 404 109 271
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:105:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 895 1070 503 3630 1920 2940
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:105:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment <1 1.78 <1 6.79 4.09 8.59
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:105:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 1.41 2.36 1.01 11.0 4.78 10.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:105:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 1.01 1.69 <1 8.50 3.68 6.78
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:105:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment <1 <1 <1 3.69 2.19 3.73
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:105:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 535 628 425 1550 695 1100
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:105:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 47.7 69.1 10.4 200 124 128
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:105:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 53.5 77.0 8.28 208 134 122
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:106: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:106:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 208 57.5 5.16 39.7 21.4 15.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:106:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 2510 1150 191 1980 611 829
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:106:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 4.56 1.87 <1 2.21 2.59 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:106:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 8.27 3.21 <1 2.87 2.71 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:106:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 5.49 1.69 <1 2.92 1.37 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:106:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 2.88 1.19 <1 <1 1.06 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:106:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 778 664 123 1250 447 516
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:106:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 89.9 53.2 6.42 37.3 28.4 13.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:106:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 82.8 52.8 6.29 33.4 25.9 12.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:107: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:107:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 184 7.00 90.4 52.3 16.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:107:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 1410 358 2100 2200 408
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:107:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment 3.23 <1 4.38 3.27 2.21
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:107:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment 5.43 <1 6.53 3.73 1.14
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:107:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment 3.25 <1 3.84 2.64 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:107:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 1.31 <1 2.12 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:107:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 767 230 1030 1550 372
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:107:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 61.4 6.81 114 42.0 6.09
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:107:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 62.1 5.80 123 37.0 11.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:108: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:108:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.00093 0.00038 0.00091 0.00081 0.00012 0.00095 <0.00008 0.00078
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:108:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.00203 0.00071 0.00200 0.00163 0.00030 0.00179 0.00015 0.00177
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:108:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:108:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 0.00081 0.00024 0.00086 0.00079 0.00016 0.00078 <0.00008 0.00064
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:108:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.00208 0.00060 0.00172 0.00159 0.00022 0.00154 0.00015 0.00138
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:108:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 0.00020 <0.00008 0.00019 0.00017 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00009
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:108:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:108:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:108:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.00067 0.00030 0.00082 0.00069 <0.00008 0.00054 0.00012 0.00064
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:108:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.00502 0.00067 0.00312 0.00234 0.00052 0.00436 0.00099 0.00376
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:109: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:109:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.00020 0.00135 <0.00008 0.00018 0.00026 0.00040 0.00066
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:109:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.00038 0.00300 0.00018 0.00027 0.00048 0.00095 0.00122
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:109:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:109:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 0.00019 0.00123 <0.00008 0.00023 0.00015 0.00034 0.00041
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:109:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.00042 0.00252 0.00016 0.00021 0.00033 0.00104 0.00095
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:109:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment <0.00008 0.00021 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00019 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:109:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00016 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:109:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00039 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:109:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.00017 0.00128 0.00011 0.00015 0.00020 0.00035 0.00051
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:109:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.00156 0.00670 0.00023 0.00055 0.00083 0.00078 0.00174
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:110: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:110:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.00014 0.00046 0.00014 0.00050 0.00143 0.00037 0.00012
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:110:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.00027 0.00095 0.00039 0.00113 0.00282 0.00095 0.00029
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:110:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00017 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:110:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment <0.00008 0.00024 0.00015 0.00043 0.00108 0.00032 0.00012
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:110:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.00017 0.00072 0.00026 0.00098 0.00264 0.00086 0.00035
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:110:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00011 0.00028 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:110:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00025 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:110:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00014 0.00044 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:110:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.00018 0.00029 0.00020 0.00037 0.00103 0.00037 0.00013
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:110:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.00045 0.00124 0.00030 0.00089 0.00226 0.00071 0.00026
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:111: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:111:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.00052 0.00091 0.00070
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:111:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.00129 0.00200 0.00153
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:111:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment <0.00008 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:111:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 0.00044 0.00079 0.00056
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:111:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.00131 0.00199 0.00136
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:111:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment 0.00016 0.00031 0.00009
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:111:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment 0.00010 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:111:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment 0.00012 0.00028 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:111:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.00043 0.00075 0.00057
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:111:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.00119 0.00248 0.00134
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:112: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:112:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 0.00020 <0.00008 0.00011 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:112:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:112:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:112:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:112:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 0.00122 0.00029 0.00107 0.00086 0.00015 0.00087 <0.00008 0.00083
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:112:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:112:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:112:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:112:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 0.00013 0.00009 0.00018 0.00012 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:112:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.00179 0.00054 0.00198 0.00161 0.00032 0.00195 0.00035 0.00162
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:113: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:113:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00080 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:113:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00026 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:113:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00028 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:113:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00034 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:113:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 0.00021 0.00147 <0.00008 0.00011 0.00017 0.00073 0.00051
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:113:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00014 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:113:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00014 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:113:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00016 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:113:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment <0.00008 0.00009 0.00009 0.00012 <0.00008 0.00027 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:113:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.00052 0.00283 0.00019 0.00025 0.00059 0.00084 0.00149
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:114: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:114:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00039 0.00100 0.00044 0.00010
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:114:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00011 0.00036 0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:114:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00009 0.00027 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:114:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00012 0.00037 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:114:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 0.00009 0.00034 0.00012 0.00069 0.00174 0.00068 0.00022
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:114:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00012 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:114:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00009 0.00023 0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:114:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00022 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:114:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00011 0.00028 0.00014 0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:114:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.00032 0.00090 0.00044 0.00100 0.00230 0.00084 0.00028
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:115: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:115:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment 0.00035 0.00067 0.00026
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:115:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment 0.00017 0.00022 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:115:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment <0.00008 0.00020 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:115:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment 0.00011 0.00024 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:115:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 0.00094 0.00141 0.00090
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:115:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:115:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment <0.00008 0.00014 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:115:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment <0.00008 0.00013 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:115:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment 0.00018 0.00029 0.00016
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:115:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.00112 0.00167 0.00130
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:116: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:116:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 0.00009 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:116:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.00152 0.00054 0.00146 0.00121 0.00027 0.00122 0.00014 0.00127
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:116:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:116:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:116:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:116:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:116:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.00195 0.00050 0.00152 0.00190 0.00026 0.00154 0.00023 0.00180
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:116:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:116:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:117: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:117:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00031 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:117:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.00029 0.00229 0.00011 0.00022 0.00034 0.00054 0.00092
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:117:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00002 <0.00008 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:117:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:117:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:117:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00025 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:117:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.00042 0.00305 0.00012 0.00020 0.00050 0.00063 0.00126
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:117:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00024 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:117:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00022 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:118: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:118:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00013 0.00032 0.00012 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:118:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.00020 0.00051 0.00030 0.00069 0.00165 0.00054 0.00021
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:118:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00010 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:118:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00009 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:118:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00010 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:118:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00009 0.00023 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:118:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.00035 0.00095 0.00046 0.00084 0.00188 0.00067 0.00025
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:118:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00023 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:118:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00009 0.00030 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:119: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:119:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment 0.00014 0.00025 0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:119:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.00085 0.00132 0.00107
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:119:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:119:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment <0.00008 0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:119:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment <0.00008 0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:119:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment 0.00010 0.00018 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:119:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.00111 0.00172 0.00146
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:119:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment 0.00008 0.00018 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:119:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment 0.00008 0.00019 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment 0.00053 0.00048 0.00295 0.00047 0.00018 0.00324 0.00046
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment 0.00063 0.001210 0.00463 0.001140 0.000291 0.00478 0.00067
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment 0.000457 0.00034 0.00282 0.000355 0.000164 0.00313 0.00049
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment 0.00134 0.00135 0.00671 0.00153 0.000450 0.00739 0.00089
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment 0.00035 0.00030 0.00214 0.000327 0.000119 0.00243 0.00036
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment 0.003330 0.00320 0.01520 0.003430 0.000951 0.01570 0.00199
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 0.000677 0.00083 0.00247 0.000928 0.000175 0.00290 0.00036
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment 0.00023 0.00019 0.00096 0.00019 <0.00002 0.00116 0.00015
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.004380 0.00366 0.01250 0.003650 0.000810 0.01200 0.00164
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment 0.00138 0.001090 0.00568 0.001180 0.000361 0.00558 0.00070
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.00270 0.00181 0.00837 0.00182 0.00050 0.00798 0.00095
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:120:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-01 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.001 Sediment <0.00002 0.00058 0.00040 0.00057 0.209
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-01 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.002 Sediment <0.00002 0.00080 0.000398 0.000425 0.033
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-01 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.003 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-03 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.004 Sediment <0.00002 0.00053 0.000422 0.000459 0.123
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-03 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.005 Sediment <0.00002 0.00127 0.00060 0.001080 0.107
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-03 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.006 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-03 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.007 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-04 MMO4 2.50-3.00 MAR00829.008 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-05 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.009 Sediment <0.00002 0.00041 0.000310 0.000356 0.126
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-05 MMO2 1.00-1.30 MAR00829.010 Sediment <0.00002 0.00283 0.001510 0.002140 0.157
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-05 MMO3 2.00-2.30 MAR00829.011 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-05 MMO4 2.30-2.60 MAR00829.012 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-07 MMO3 1.50-1.80 MAR00829.013 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-08B MMO4 2.20-2.50 MAR00829.014 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-09 MMO3 2.05-2.35 MAR00829.015 Sediment 0.00004 0.00060 0.000246 0.000324 0.012
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-10 MMO2 1.30-1.60 MAR00829.016 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-11 MMO2 0.70-1.00 MAR00829.017 Sediment <0.00002 0.00023 0.00013 0.00025 0.009
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-12 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.018 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-12 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.019 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-13 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.020 Sediment 0.00012 0.00335 0.001920 0.004800 0.147
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-13 MMO2 0.50-0.80 MAR00829.021 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-14 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.022 Sediment <0.00002 0.00101 0.000489 0.000789 0.253
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-15A MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.023 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-16 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.024 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-18 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.025 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-18 MMO2 0.30-0.85 MAR00829.026 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-19 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.027 Sediment 0.00002 0.00146 0.00080 0.00173 0.234
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-20 MMO1 0.00-0.30 MAR00829.028 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.00004 0.004
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:121:VC-20 MMO2 0.80-1.10 MAR00829.029 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:122: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:123: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:123:Particle Size Analysis Wet Sediment Wet and dry sieving followed by laser diffraction analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:123:Organotins Wet Sediment Solvent extraction and derivatisation followed by GC-MS analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:123:Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) Wet Sediment Solvent extraction and clean up followed by GC-MS analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:123:Total Hydrocarbon Content (THC) Wet Sediment Ultra-violet fluorescence spectroscopy
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:124: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:125: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:125:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 8.5 13.63 9.42 2.80 0.78 7.72
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:125:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 8.6 0.00 0.00 15.95 6.96 10.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:125:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 8.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:125:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 8.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:125:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:125:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:125:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 8.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:125:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:125:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 7.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.11 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:125:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.27 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:125:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 8.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.41 1.25
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:125:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 8.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.74
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:126: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:126:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 4.45 7.46 6.54 4.49 3.59 3.08
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:126:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 9.46 8.03 7.29 6.39 4.78 3.97
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:126:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:126:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:126:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:126:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:126:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:126:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:126:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.85 0.10 0.04 0.21 0.12 0.20
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:126:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 1.68 1.88 3.38 3.03 2.68 2.35
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:126:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 3.94 1.51 4.30 3.14 3.14 3.19
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:126:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 2.33 3.25 3.04 2.37 1.87 1.62
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:127: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:127:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 2.08 3.96 4.85 2.71 1.63 1.34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:127:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 3.02 2.86 2.99 1.96 1.01 1.01
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:127:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:127:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.04 0.79 1.86
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:127:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:127:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.26
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:127:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:127:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:127:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:127:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 1.95 0.00 0.54 1.61 2.63 4.29
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:127:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 2.69 0.00 0.00 0.02 1.44 2.52
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:127:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 1.12 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.16 3.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:128: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:128:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 1.33 0.91 0.10 0.98 1.48 1.70
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:128:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 0.89 0.88 0.18 0.40 0.86 1.04
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:128:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 4.37 5.81 1.20 3.98 8.12 9.07
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:128:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 5.07 5.32 0.80 3.15 6.66 7.96
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:128:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 3.85 5.39 0.79 3.66 7.78 9.05
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:128:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 4.04 4.91 2.11 2.77 7.17 8.82
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:128:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 3.56 5.15 0.62 2.92 7.77 8.83
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:128:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 3.98 5.02 1.64 2.00 7.44 8.36
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:128:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 3.15 1.44 0.54 5.50 8.08 9.02
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:128:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 5.25 4.71 1.86 2.84 4.81 5.23
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:128:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 3.82 3.72 1.36 1.01 3.87 4.72
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:128:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 5.80 4.58 1.99 1.76 4.45 5.50
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:129: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:129:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 1.73 1.71 1.71 1.63 1.37 1.03
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:129:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 1.08 1.31 1.30 1.15 0.94 0.71
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:129:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 8.52 9.82 9.55 8.84 7.57 5.67
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:129:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 7.66 9.03 9.33 8.79 7.60 5.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:129:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 8.75 10.17 10.26 9.44 7.79 5.72
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:129:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 8.32 10.35 9.86 8.87 7.59 5.84
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:129:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 8.62 10.15 10.35 9.64 7.98 5.86
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:129:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 8.53 10.54 9.82 9.03 7.85 6.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:129:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 9.70 10.02 10.44 9.85 7.69 5.02
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:129:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 5.16 6.12 5.49 4.90 4.27 3.35
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:129:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 4.73 6.81 6.43 5.64 4.74 3.73
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:129:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 5.59 7.30 6.85 5.92 4.86 3.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:130: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:130:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 0.77 0.66 0.59 0.49 0.39
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:130:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 0.55 0.50 0.46 0.40 0.32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:130:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 3.87 2.85 2.31 1.97 1.74
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:130:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 4.29 3.39 2.82 2.38 2.04
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:130:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 3.90 2.87 2.33 1.98 1.72
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:130:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 4.12 3.15 2.64 2.28 1.98
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:130:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 4.02 3.03 2.55 2.22 1.91
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:130:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 4.21 3.13 2.60 2.28 2.01
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:130:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 2.89 1.83 1.42 1.25 1.12
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:130:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 2.63 2.42 2.29 2.07 1.85
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:130:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 2.99 2.75 2.58 2.32 2.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:130:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 3.03 2.81 2.66 2.39 2.11
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:131: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:131:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 0.30 0.23 0.16 0.11 0.07
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:131:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 0.25 0.18 0.13 0.09 0.05
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:131:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 1.50 1.17 0.76 0.46 0.24
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:131:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 1.73 1.37 0.94 0.62 0.34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:131:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 1.47 1.16 0.79 0.52 0.29
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:131:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 1.68 1.31 0.90 0.59 0.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:131:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 1.59 1.23 0.85 0.57 0.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:131:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 1.70 1.34 0.92 0.61 0.35
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:131:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.98 0.79 0.57 0.40 0.24
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:131:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 1.64 1.38 1.04 0.75 0.46
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:131:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 1.82 1.54 1.17 0.86 0.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:131:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 1.84 1.54 1.18 0.87 0.54
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:132: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:132:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 0.03 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:132:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 0.02 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:132:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.08 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:132:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.13 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:132:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.11 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:132:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:132:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:132:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.13 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:132:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.09 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:132:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 0.18 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:132:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 0.21 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:132:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 0.22 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:133: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:133:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 1.6 0.09 28.0 126 0.02 28.8 3.4 48.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:133:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 3.7 0.06 38.6 9.6 0.02 33.4 5.8 42.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:133:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 27.9 2.68 144 188 1.56 36.8 311 767
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:133:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 60.4 14.9 492 429 12.8 41.1 828 2835
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:133:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 31.2 3.68 187 218 2.54 38.1 354 972
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:133:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 38.2 6.59 288 284 4.73 39.5 488 1502
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:133:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 35.5 6.58 280 290 4.36 37.9 503 1488
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:133:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 38.5 8.00 302 311 5.15 39.0 562 1695
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:133:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 26.9 1.38 85.5 88.3 0.87 37.9 198 426
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:133:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 5.4 0.20 26.2 24.0 0.04 27.9 12.8 59.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:133:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 5.0 0.17 24.2 25.6 0.02 24.7 10.4 50.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:133:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 5.5 0.24 24.4 23.7 0.03 27.1 12.8 55.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:134: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:134:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:134:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:134:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.047 0.111
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:134:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.060 0.060
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:134:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.013 0.072
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:134:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.072 0.094
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:134:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.025 0.069
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:134:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.041 0.063
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:134:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment <0.005 0.019
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:134:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:135: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:135:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:135:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:136: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:136:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment <1 1.08 <1 2.20 1.54 8.83
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:136:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 3.79
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:136:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 3190 1310 1590 2410 2730 2460
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:136:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 58200 4590 7910 4760 3580 3160
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:136:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 6210 1550 1710 2130 2500 2560
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:136:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 13900 2670 3030 3100 3160 2940
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:136:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 14900 2370 3210 3840 3700 3340
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:136:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 10200 1970 2410 2620 2450 2390
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:136:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 2850 346 550 938 1110 1120
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:136:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 15.2 10.5 7.92 23.2 35.0 56.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:137: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:137:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 4.43 11.1 <1 4.02 4.30 4.42
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:137:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 1.18 2.51 <1 2.14 1.48 1.98
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:137:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 1880 2140 849 7540 3400 6110
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:137:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 2230 2770 1200 47600 10900 30500
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:137:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 1750 1960 987 9310 3490 6890
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:137:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 2050 2390 928 13000 4960 9650
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:137:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 2400 2750 1550 14400 5420 10800
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:137:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 1630 1890 815 10500 3940 7990
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:137:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 873 943 400 3960 1700 3380
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:137:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 74.4 86.2 6.75 272 154 176
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:138: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:138:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 4.01 10.5 <1 13.2 1.89 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:138:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 1.64 1.75 <1 2.09 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:138:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 4910 2060 437 3730 2510 1820
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:138:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 16300 4420 513 12300 39400 2020
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:138:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 5030 2070 411 3770 4130 1670
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:138:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 6920 2830 499 6600 9160 2040
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:138:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 7620 3480 582 7900 9730 2120
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:138:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 5410 2360 385 5890 7070 1520
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:138:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 2800 906 200 1920 1520 722
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:138:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 122 46.4 11.4 43.4 42.7 21.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:139: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:139:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 2.65 <1 35.8 9.94 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:139:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 1.40 <1 6.70 1.84 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:139:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 3840 815 3700 4580 787
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:139:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 28400 943 24900 10900 499
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:139:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 6340 717 4500 4850 384
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:139:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 8280 880 7520 6680 720
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:139:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 8810 985 8150 6930 344
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:139:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 6600 635 6050 5150 382
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:139:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 1680 355 1730 1830 111
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:139:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 82.0 5.47 144 50.1 4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:140: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:140:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 15.6 8.96 8.00 22.2 33.9 59.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:140:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 2.49 6.16 5.71 18.4 27.1 54.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:141: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:141:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 75.9 94.5 8.88 294 174 189
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:141:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 69.9 86.7 7.03 261 158 170
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:142: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:142:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 131 59.5 11.4 43.4 46.6 19.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:142:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 107 54.8 11.0 35.5 36.6 16.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:143: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:143:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 86.6 6.49 162 52.5 1.80
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:143:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 75.4 5.79 144 43.6 36.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:144: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:144:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:144:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 0.00010 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:144:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.00473 0.00152 0.00452 0.00381 0.00069 0.00425 0.00050 0.00401
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:144:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.01255 0.00343 0.01211 0.01109 0.00233 0.01145 0.00125 0.01175
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:144:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.00508 0.00151 0.00537 0.00510 0.00082 0.00509 0.00065 0.00509
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:144:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.00712 0.00251 0.00734 0.00591 0.00114 0.00559 0.00082 0.00664
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:144:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.00660 0.00192 0.00700 0.00621 0.00118 0.00583 0.00074 0.00635
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:145: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:145:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00037 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:145:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00027 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:145:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.00116 0.00585 0.00039 0.00060 0.00101 0.00171 0.00292
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:145:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.00326 0.01478 0.00082 0.00118 0.00235 0.00980 0.00667
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:145:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.00151 0.00663 0.00057 0.00067 0.00107 0.00202 0.00331
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:145:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.00183 0.00954 0.00059 0.00110 0.00155 0.00381 0.00404
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:145:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.00195 0.00777 0.00058 0.00073 0.00164 0.00401 0.00474
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:146: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:146:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00018 0.00043 0.00014 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:146:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00014 0.00021 0.00011 0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:146:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.00060 0.00146 0.00092 0.00283 0.00523 0.00208 0.00067
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:146:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.00155 0.00404 0.00196 0.02010 0.02322 0.00717 0.00280
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:146:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.00086 0.00177 0.00096 0.00428 0.00686 0.00207 0.00082
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:146:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.00089 0.00232 0.00125 0.00871 0.01247 0.00379 0.00115
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:146:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.00101 0.00283 0.00124 0.00867 0.01212 0.00391 0.00124
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:147: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:147:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment 0.00012 0.00020 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:147:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment 0.00009 0.00018 0.00011
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:147:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.00236 0.00344 0.00294
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:147:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.00878 0.01096 0.01086
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:147:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.00270 0.00365 0.00314
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:147:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.00417 0.00570 0.00540
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:147:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.00431 0.00567 0.00536
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:148: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:148:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.00685 0.00207 0.00688 0.00629 0.00124 0.00617 0.00074 0.00627
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:148:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.00197 0.00086 0.00230 0.00227 0.00057 0.00221 0.00018 0.00205
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:148:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:148:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 0.00010 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:148:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 0.00011 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:149: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:149:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.00171 0.00819 0.00069 0.00058 0.00149 0.00432 0.00417
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:149:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.00061 0.00276 0.00052 0.00040 0.00096 0.00123 0.00173
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:149:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00031 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:149:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00043 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:149:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00048 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:150: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:150:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.00100 0.00270 0.00127 0.00881 0.01197 0.00348 0.00119
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:150:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.00041 0.00091 0.00096 0.00166 0.00337 0.00124 0.00031
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:150:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00023 0.00040 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:150:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00028 0.00053 0.00016 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:150:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00027 0.00056 0.00014 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:151: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:151:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.00440 0.00590 0.00555
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:151:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.00109 0.00169 0.00163
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:151:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment 0.00012 0.00024 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:151:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment 0.00019 0.00034 0.00011
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:151:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment 0.00018 0.00033 0.00015
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:152: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:152:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:152:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:152:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.00514 0.00529 0.01860 0.005070 0.001110 0.01870 0.00285
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:152:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment 0.000269 0.00147 0.00119 0.000284 0.000105 0.00126 0.00027
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:152:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.00312 0.00333 0.01210 0.00311 0.000804 0.01270 0.00174
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:152:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.00161 0.00221 0.00682 0.00213 0.00054 0.00780 0.00109
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:152:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.00119 0.00185 0.00492 0.00170 0.00038 0.00566 0.00081
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:152:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.00168 0.002590 0.00662 0.002230 0.000514 0.00758 0.00114
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:152:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment 0.00061 0.00052 0.00317 0.000553 0.000193 0.00335 0.00048
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:152:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:152:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:152:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:153: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:153:BH-08 / ES201 / 1.60m-1.80m MAR00856.001 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:153:BH-09 / ES202 / 2.30m-3.00m MAR00856.002 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:153:BH-34 / ES203 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00856.003 Sediment 0.00004 0.00498 0.003960 0.008350 0.201
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:153:BH-34 / ES204 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00856.004 Sediment <0.00002 0.00029 0.000146 0.000255 0.015
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:153:BH-34 / ES205 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.005 Sediment 0.00003 0.00318 0.00190 0.003250 0.201
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:153:BH-34 / ES206 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00856.006 Sediment 0.00005 0.00188 0.00090 0.00160 0.091
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:153:BH-34 / ES207 / 4.00m-4.50m MAR00856.007 Sediment 0.00005 0.00137 0.00072 0.00132 0.043
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:153:BH-34 / ES208 / 5.00m-5.50m MAR00856.008 Sediment 0.00005 0.00186 0.001000 0.001410 0.067
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:153:BH-33 / ES214 / 0.00m-1.00m MAR00856.009 Sediment <0.00002 0.00063 0.000431 0.000507 0.221
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:153:BH-33 / ES215 / 1.00m-1.70m MAR00856.010 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:153:BH-33 / ES216 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00856.011 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.000
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:153:BH-33 / ES217 / 3.00m-3.30m MAR00856.012 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:154: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:155: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:155:Particle Size Analysis Wet Sediment Wet and dry sieving followed by laser diffraction analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:155:Organotins Wet Sediment Solvent extraction and derivatisation followed by GC-MS analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:155:Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) Wet Sediment Solvent extraction and clean up followed by GC-MS analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:155:Total Hydrocarbon Content (THC) Wet Sediment Ultra-violet fluorescence spectroscopy
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:156: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 7.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 8.5 0.00 11.71 0.00 1.92 2.58
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.38
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 8.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 8.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.15
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 8.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 8.5 0.00 28.34 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 8.5 0.00 33.25 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 8.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.77 2.23
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 8.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.51
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 9.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 8.7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 8.5 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.71
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 8.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.52 3.93
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 8.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.73
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 8.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 7.9 0.00 0.00 17.94 5.51 9.91
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 8.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 8.2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 8.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:157:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 8.3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.60 0.86 0.65 0.77 0.84 0.63
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 2.16 1.91 2.52 3.22 2.87 2.57
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 3.25 3.52 1.04 3.00 1.77 1.85
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 0.00 2.27 2.66 3.29 1.97 1.32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.00 0.12 0.20 0.17 0.15 0.20
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 1.22 1.51 1.23 1.20 1.75 1.97
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 0.00 0.88 2.50 1.88 1.79 1.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 2.47 1.62 1.85 3.39 3.45 3.60
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 2.26 1.95 1.50 1.75 1.39 1.39
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 0.76 1.99 2.29 1.63 1.23 1.01
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 2.04 3.53 3.40 3.36 3.44 2.80
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 0.00 1.51 1.15 1.10 1.12 0.98
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 0.65 0.47 0.96 1.70 0.92 0.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 0.84 2.14 1.71 1.96 1.76 1.49
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 3.55 2.65 2.28 2.61 2.33 1.82
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 2.78 4.60 2.62 2.64 2.19 2.02
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 2.44 3.44 2.11 2.39 1.85 1.68
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 5.69 1.50 1.71 1.88 1.76 1.50
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 9.38 8.57 7.83 5.33 3.84 3.57
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 1.57 0.33 0.89 0.58 0.86 0.93
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 5.04 2.55 1.78 1.78 1.41 1.46
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:158:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 2.93 3.93 3.24 2.45 1.71 1.54
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 2.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.78
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 1.41 0.00 0.00 0.16 1.74 4.17
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 2.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 1.58 0.00 0.00 0.77 4.91 3.84
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 1.21 0.00 0.00 0.02 1.39 3.66
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 3.10 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.70 2.36
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 0.88 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.49 1.48
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.65 1.63
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 1.86 0.00 0.00 0.01 1.35 2.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 1.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.86 2.60
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 0.71 0.11 3.17 5.13 3.09 3.41
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 0.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.56
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 1.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.57
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 1.41 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.56 2.06
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 1.26 0.00 0.00 0.04 1.85 3.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 1.05 0.00 0.00 0.08 1.81 3.12
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 2.75 1.37 2.80 2.17 1.50 1.25
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 1.24 0.00 0.00 0.14 2.62 3.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:159:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 1.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 4.11 1.65 0.53 5.40 7.95 8.96
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 3.70 3.52 0.94 0.76 3.46 4.44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 5.52 5.13 2.29 1.88 4.54 5.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 0.58 1.18 0.09 0.08 2.59 5.95
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 3.61 4.73 0.47 4.03 7.20 8.17
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 4.50 5.51 1.68 2.99 5.18 5.88
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 3.92 5.12 1.52 3.01 5.47 6.45
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 4.47 3.67 1.65 1.82 4.19 5.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 3.03 2.89 0.44 1.72 3.44 4.22
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 2.40 2.85 0.54 1.36 2.92 3.68
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 1.70 2.64 0.34 0.22 2.24 3.90
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 3.98 4.36 0.65 2.43 5.42 6.61
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 3.75 4.10 1.01 4.46 5.42 5.61
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 3.90 3.22 0.45 0.86 4.42 6.60
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 3.08 2.72 0.37 1.05 4.35 5.93
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 4.43 4.00 2.04 2.10 4.67 5.49
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 4.08 4.95 1.27 2.75 4.87 5.71
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 4.97 4.87 1.22 2.83 4.78 5.89
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 1.13 0.78 0.07 0.64 1.01 1.24
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 0.00 0.06 5.94 18.77 15.97 11.73
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 3.52 3.49 0.65 1.10 5.87 8.16
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 4.63 4.44 2.52 2.39 4.78 5.60
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:160:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 1.71 2.14 0.13 0.06 2.36 5.35
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 9.65 9.77 10.06 9.63 7.77 5.29
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 4.76 6.49 6.21 5.45 4.50 3.49
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 5.27 6.59 6.08 5.35 4.51 3.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 8.11 12.02 11.95 9.98 7.38 5.07
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 8.47 8.95 9.82 9.83 8.31 5.97
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 5.53 6.21 6.32 6.10 5.35 4.18
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 6.26 7.08 6.99 6.42 5.39 4.04
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 5.61 6.86 6.93 6.35 5.26 3.91
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 4.40 5.02 5.21 4.94 4.11 3.01
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 4.18 4.65 4.89 4.80 4.08 2.97
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 5.19 7.59 8.35 7.53 5.68 3.79
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 6.67 7.00 7.52 7.50 6.51 4.87
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 5.46 5.10 5.54 5.97 5.53 4.26
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 7.25 9.27 9.20 8.06 6.42 4.69
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 6.33 7.98 8.15 7.45 6.03 4.43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 5.19 6.40 5.95 5.19 4.34 3.42
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 5.51 6.40 6.47 6.02 5.05 3.81
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 5.63 6.48 6.52 6.08 5.14 3.90
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 1.31 1.36 1.41 1.37 1.17 0.87
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 8.98 7.23 5.94 4.92 3.81 2.86
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 7.07 8.44 9.29 9.27 8.08 6.17
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 5.47 6.81 6.35 5.79 5.02 3.89
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:161:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 6.54 9.50 9.82 8.62 6.64 4.58
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 3.20 2.12 1.70 1.52 1.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 2.82 2.64 2.51 2.26 1.98
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 2.88 2.73 2.63 2.37 2.09
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 3.71 3.36 3.27 3.00 2.60
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 3.92 2.82 2.28 1.92 1.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 3.33 3.08 2.88 2.55 2.25
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 3.17 3.02 2.92 2.65 2.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 3.04 2.86 2.80 2.61 2.40
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 2.34 2.24 2.20 2.02 1.81
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 2.26 2.18 2.17 2.00 1.78
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 2.76 2.64 2.69 2.50 2.16
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 3.73 3.49 3.37 3.09 2.80
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 3.30 3.04 2.79 2.41 2.13
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 3.57 3.32 3.27 3.04 2.75
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 3.38 3.10 3.03 2.83 2.55
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 2.80 2.64 2.51 2.27 2.04
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 3.04 2.91 2.81 2.52 2.20
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 3.10 2.95 2.86 2.58 2.28
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 0.68 0.62 0.56 0.48 0.41
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 2.21 1.93 1.82 1.70 1.54
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 4.57 3.86 3.43 2.88 2.32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 3.04 2.81 2.72 2.53 2.33
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:162:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 3.29 3.06 3.17 3.09 2.82
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 1.20 0.98 0.71 0.50 0.30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 1.72 1.43 1.08 0.80 0.49
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 1.82 1.51 1.14 0.82 0.50
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 2.16 1.72 1.27 0.93 0.58
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 1.37 1.06 0.72 0.47 0.26
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 1.97 1.65 1.23 0.88 0.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 2.11 1.78 1.35 0.98 0.60
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 2.18 1.87 1.44 1.06 0.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 1.61 1.37 1.05 0.78 0.48
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 1.55 1.29 0.97 0.70 0.43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 1.78 1.40 1.02 0.74 0.45
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 2.50 2.10 1.54 1.08 0.64
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 1.92 1.65 1.24 0.89 0.54
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 2.42 2.04 1.57 1.17 0.73
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 2.23 1.86 1.42 1.05 0.66
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 1.81 1.54 1.18 0.87 0.54
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 1.90 1.58 1.19 0.87 0.53
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 1.98 1.65 1.24 0.90 0.55
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 0.36 0.30 0.22 0.16 0.09
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 1.34 1.12 0.87 0.66 0.42
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 1.81 1.38 0.99 0.70 0.43
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 2.12 1.82 1.38 1.01 0.62
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:163:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 2.43 1.99 1.49 1.10 0.68
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.12 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 0.20 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 0.20 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 0.23 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.09 0.01 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 0.20 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 0.23 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 0.26 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 0.19 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 0.16 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 0.18 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 0.24 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 0.20 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 0.29 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 0.26 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 0.21 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 0.21 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 0.21 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 0.04 0.00 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 0.18 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 0.17 0.02 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 0.24 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:164:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 0.27 0.03 0.00
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 24.1 0.80 67.4 77.3 0.71 32.9 166 264
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 7.4 0.19 29.8 29.1 0.05 28.8 19.7 65.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 4.8 0.23 21.3 19.6 0.02 24.8 12.2 48.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 2.6 0.06 21.3 5.4 0.03 20.4 4.1 29.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 23.2 1.74 123 139 1.24 34.5 239 461
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 6.3 0.23 26.0 20.9 0.04 30.2 13.9 49.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 5.4 0.21 23.1 18.4 0.02 27.7 13.5 48.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 7.7 0.24 27.9 20.0 0.02 34.0 14.7 55.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 5.1 0.16 22.6 22.3 0.01 25.4 9.1 45.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 4.3 0.13 24.3 19.1 0.02 24.6 8.1 45.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 2.9 0.08 20.4 6.1 0.03 19.4 3.5 30.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 8.5 0.45 47.1 36.0 0.25 34.4 25 89.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 10.1 0.31 29.8 24.2 0.03 31.9 17.5 79.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 5.4 0.16 26.7 28.7 0.03 28.0 9.9 49.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 5.3 0.12 24.3 21.5 0.02 27.5 9.1 48.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 4.9 0.15 20.4 22.3 0.02 22.1 296 39.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 5.2 0.18 23.1 18.2 0.01 27.5 15.2 51.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 6.5 0.29 25.3 26.4 0.02 28.4 15.4 59.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 7.9 0.13 28.6 7.9 0.02 27.5 6.9 42.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 3.4 0.09 28.0 8.4 0.02 32.4 6.1 49.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 1.5 0.10 23.2 29.8 <0.01 24.7 2.5 38.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 6.2 0.21 18.8 16.5 0.01 22.3 12.6 46.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:165:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 2.9 0.12 19.0 26.9 <0.01 20.4 3.2 33.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:166: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:166:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.024 0.031
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:166:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:166:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:166:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:166:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.033 0.117
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:166:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:167: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:167:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:167:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:167:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:167:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:167:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:167:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:167:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:167:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:167:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:167:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:168: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:168:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:168:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:168:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:168:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:168:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:168:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:168:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment <0.005 <0.005
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:169: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:169:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 35800 1920 2180 1540 1260 917
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:169:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 234 12.7 15.7 22.7 31.2 50.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:169:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 12.3 2.70 6.80 22.0 36.4 76.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:169:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 2.32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:170: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:170:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 876 1080 903 6380 2740 7160
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:170:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 60.6 77.1 11.7 221 129 151
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:170:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 88.9 126 7.66 367 232 203
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:170:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 1.46 2.59 <1 2.21 1.08 1.76
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:171: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:171:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 5720 1410 177 4930 10800 611
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:171:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 105 53.4 8.99 51.3 93.0 19.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:171:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 126 85.0 13.7 48.1 49.8 21.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:171:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 1.06 1.97 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:172: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:172:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 5290 489 7130 4130 232
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:172:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 83.4 6.81 140 53.8 3.42
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:172:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 105 4.93 214 59.3 11.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:172:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:173: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:173:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 13800 1350 1640 2930 3310 2740
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:173:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 18.8 3.95 9.82 21.7 26.7 30.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:173:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 14.3 3.84 17.0 34.2 43.1 46.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:173:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 27.6 6.68 11.1 20.3 26.8 30.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:173:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 3.56 1.24 4.05 16.0 20.0 34.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:173:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 2.33 <1 2.70 7.68 11.5 22.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:173:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 1.35 <1 1.31 3.48 5.25 14.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:173:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 6390 219 466 176 161 151
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:173:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 6.10 1.27 2.63 2.35 3.77 4.65
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:173:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 7.16 1.29 3.87 9.82 15.1 29.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:174: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:174:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 1890 2420 1790 6190 2690 5260
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:174:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 59.0 45.3 10.4 167 149 149
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:174:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 78.5 69.5 13.5 290 246 244
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:174:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 50.4 46.3 8.78 198 121 148
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:174:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 41.4 55.3 7.00 137 118 80.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:174:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 27.9 37.4 4.74 103 64.2 59.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:174:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 14.0 21.3 2.75 38.5 28.7 24.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:174:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 161 158 80.8 2480 559 1610
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:174:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 35.4 8.83 1.95 38.7 14.7 26.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:174:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 35.4 48.6 5.38 120 77.7 74.5
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:175: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:175:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 4200 2800 364 5680 3550 1870
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:175:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 162 32.8 5.33 35.5 23.1 14.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:175:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 246 51.8 8.89 50.1 39.3 23.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:175:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 130 35.7 5.94 38.6 32.6 15.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:175:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 60.5 38.3 6.11 37.0 17.5 11.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:175:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 38.8 24.1 4.10 14.7 12.5 7.21
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:175:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 16.2 13.3 2.37 7.89 5.88 3.41
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:175:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 813 202 <1 575 2880 82.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:175:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 32.8 2.97 <1 7.82 9.90 4.62
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:175:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 47.5 31.7 4.55 18.6 19.1 9.39
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:176: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:176:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 3630 1060 3340 6050 511
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:176:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 47.4 7.76 105 47.2 25.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:176:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 67.0 11.7 212 65.9 11.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:176:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment 60.4 8.99 106 47.0 12.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:176:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 37.5 3.54 104 34.9 3.77
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:176:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 30.1 2.37 59.0 17.9 4.90
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:176:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment 8.21 1.03 25.5 10.2 1.37
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:176:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 3970 60 2380 489 42.7
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:176:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 27.1 2.04 14.6 9.26 9.12
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:176:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment 27.3 2.33 74.7 23.2 10.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:177: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:177:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 2.85 <1 2.27 5.18 7.99 15.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:177:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 3.23 <1 3.52 8.41 12.9 27.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:177:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 5.26 1.75 5.17 15.5 23.2 44.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:177:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 7.68 1.96 6.30 18.7 29.3 49.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:177:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:177:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 3.25
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:177:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1.32
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:177:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 6.60 2.52 8.61 22.1 28.1 41.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:177:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 1.81
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:178: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:178:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 18.4 25.6 3.16 73.8 44.6 42.1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:178:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 32.2 43.1 5.20 102 72.3 63.2
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:178:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 53.7 73.4 7.51 219 147 125
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:178:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 66.9 85.2 9.65 244 155 135
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:178:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:178:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 1.83 3.88 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:178:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <1 1.30 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:178:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 62.8 70.2 10.0 247 203 183
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:178:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 1.83 2.83 1.28 4.05 3.34 3.89
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:179: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:179:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 25.9 16.3 2.41 10.0 8.87 4.54
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:179:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 38.0 28.5 4.57 17.1 15.8 8.24
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:179:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 78.3 46.5 7.11 33.5 26.9 11.3
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:179:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 88.0 53.9 8.71 36.6 29.6 16.9
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:179:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:179:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <1 3.56 <1 2.19 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:179:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:179:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 149 50.2 5.83 43.0 23.1 16.0
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:179:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 3.80 1.91 <1 1.29 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:180: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:180:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 20.0 1.59 40.1 12.4 12.99
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:180:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment 20.5 1.99 65.1 21.2 16.6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:180:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment 58.6 3.85 138 40.0 9.90
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:180:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 68.2 6.20 150 44.9 15.8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:180:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <1 <1 2.08 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:180:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <1 <1 7.86 1.96 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:180:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <1 <1 <1 <1 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:180:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 68.8 10.2 166 51.3 34.4
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:180:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment 1.73 <1 2.83 1.39 <1
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:181: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:181:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.00229 0.00071 0.00234 0.00254 0.00031 0.00254 0.00037 0.00211
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:181:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00010
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:181:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 0.00010 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:181:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:181:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.00359 0.00124 0.00376 0.00370 0.00041 0.00336 0.00062 0.00364
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:181:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 0.00013 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:181:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:182: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:182:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.00049 0.00324 0.00021 0.00030 0.00048 0.00086 0.00156
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:182:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment <0.00008 0.00010 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00017 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:182:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00053 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:182:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00026 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:182:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.00083 0.00538 0.00043 0.00077 0.00090 0.00128 0.00257
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:182:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00060 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:182:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00048 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:183: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:183:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.00031 0.00135 0.00033 0.00137 0.00250 0.00097 0.00032
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:183:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00018 0.00023 0.00009 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:183:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00026 0.00055 0.00021 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:183:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00013 0.00022 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:183:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.00067 0.00212 0.00064 0.00237 0.00364 0.00176 0.00054
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:183:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00031 0.00053 0.00022 0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:183:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00028 0.00043 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:184: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:184:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.00112 0.00168 0.00129
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:184:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment 0.00013 0.00017 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:184:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment 0.00017 0.00037 0.00010
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:184:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment 0.00010 0.00020 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:184:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.00194 0.00245 0.00200
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:184:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment 0.00015 0.00034 0.00011
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:184:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment 0.00014 0.00030 0.00010
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:185: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:185:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:185:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:185:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:185:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:185:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 0.00069 0.00011 0.00060 0.00045 <0.00008 0.00051 0.00013 0.00036
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:185:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:185:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:185:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:185:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:185:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:186: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:186:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00014 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:186:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00022 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:186:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00035 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:186:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00017 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:186:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment <0.00008 0.00064 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00043 0.00014
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:186:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00053 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:186:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:186:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00028 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:186:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00022 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:186:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00027 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:187: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:187:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00008 0.00016 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:187:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00017 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:187:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00012 0.00030 0.00009 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:187:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00013 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:187:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment <0.00008 0.00016 <0.00008 0.00038 0.00068 0.00036 0.00013
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:187:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00017 0.00038 0.00012 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:187:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:187:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00012 0.00023 0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:187:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00016 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:187:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00014 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:188: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:188:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment <0.00008 0.00011 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:188:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment 0.00009 0.00012 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:188:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment 0.00012 0.00020 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:188:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment <0.00008 0.00013 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:188:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment 0.00045 0.00063 0.00043
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:188:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment 0.00014 0.00027 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:188:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:188:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment 0.00009 0.00016 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:188:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment <0.00008 0.00012 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:188:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment <0.00008 0.00014 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:189: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:189:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:189:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:189:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:189:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:189:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment 0.00009 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:189:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:190: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:190:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00035 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:190:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00026 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:190:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00039 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:190:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00022 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:190:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00025 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:190:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00018 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:191: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:191:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00012 0.00023 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:191:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00012 0.00029 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:191:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00016 0.00025 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:191:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00012 0.00023 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:191:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00010 0.00020 0.00010 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:191:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment <0.00008 <0.00008 <0.00008 0.00012 0.00021 <0.00008 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:192: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:192:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment 0.00009 0.00019 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:192:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment 0.00011 0.00020 0.00009
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:192:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment 0.00012 0.00022 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:192:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment 0.00010 0.00017 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:192:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment <0.00008 0.00016 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:192:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment <0.00008 0.00015 <0.00008
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment 0.00069 0.00060 0.00362 0.00070 0.00023 0.00358 0.00053
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment <0.00002 0.000028 0.00008 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.00008 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.00177 0.00193 0.00900 0.00235 0.000716 0.01060 0.00132
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 0.00003 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.00003 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:193:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-32 / ES218 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.001 Sediment <0.00002 0.00066 0.00045 0.00062 0.237
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-32 / ES219 / 1.00m-1.50m MAR00874.002 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.009
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-32 / ES220 / 2.00m-2.50m MAR00874.003 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-32 / ES221 / 3.00m-3.50m MAR00874.004 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-31 / ES222 / 0.00m-0.80m MAR00874.005 Sediment 0.00006 0.00226 0.00136 0.003020 0.167
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-31 / ES223 / 1.00m-1.60m MAR00874.006 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-31 / ES224 / 2.00m-2.30m MAR00874.007 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-31 / ES225 / 3.30m-3.70m MAR00874.008 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 0.001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-31 / ES226 / 4.00m-4.30m MAR00874.009 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-31 / ES227 / 5.00m-5.30m MAR00874.010 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-31 / ES228 / 6.10m-6.40m MAR00874.011 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-30 / ES229 / 0.00m-0.50m MAR00874.012 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-30 / ES230 / 0.95m-1.25m MAR00874.013 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-30 / ES231 / 2.00m-2.20m MAR00874.014 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-30 / ES232 / 3.00m-3.20m MAR00874.015 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-30 / ES233 / 4.00m-4.20m MAR00874.016 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-30 / ES234 / 5.00m-5.20m MAR00874.017 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-30 / ES235 / 6.00m-6.20m MAR00874.018 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-30 / ES236 / 6.80m-7.00m MAR00874.019 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-10 / ES237 / 2.30m-2.50m MAR00874.020 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-11 / ES238 / 2.40m-2.60m MAR00874.021 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-12 / ES239 / 2.25m-2.50m MAR00874.022 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:194:BH-13 / ES240 / 3.90m-4.10m MAR00874.023 Sediment <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.00002 <0.0001
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:195: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:196: Customer Reference MMO Marine Sediment Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:196:Particle Size Analysis Wet Sediment Wet and dry sieving followed by laser diffraction analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:196:Organotins Wet Sediment Solvent extraction and derivatisation followed by GC-MS analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:196:Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) Wet Sediment Solvent extraction and clean up followed by GC-MS analysis.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:196:Total Hydrocarbon Content (THC) Wet Sediment Ultra-violet fluorescence spectroscopy
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:202:fauna associated with these and, on soft sediment areas, the collection of ten core samples for
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:203:Sediment Characteristics
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:203:The survey area was characterised by heterogeneous sediment, the coarseness of which decreased
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:203:construction activities. Results of PSD analysis of the core samples indicated coarse sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:203:of 11.78 %. The coarseness of the sediment resulted in most core samples being classified as gravel or
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:203:with the Folk (British Geological Survey (BGS) modified). On the Wentworth scale, intertidal sediments
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:203:on the Wentworth scale the North Tees Mudflat sediments were described as fine sand, very fine sand,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:203:The subtidal section of the survey area was characterised by the finest sediment, with most stations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:203:subtidal sediments were described as very coarse sand, fine sand, and medium silt.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:203:Sediment Chemistry
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:203:for a total of 31 sites and 84 samples. These were scheduled for PSD, pH and sediment chemistry
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:203:The concentration of metals in sediments exceeded the respective Cefas AL1 threshold at most
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:204:concentration of tributyltin (TBT) exceeded the Cefas AL1 threshold in the surface sediment at stations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:204:sandy and muddy sediments in brackish waters, along with the gastropod Peringia ulvae, which was
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:208:1.5 Environmental Quality Standards for Sediment Chemical Concentrations 6
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:208: 3.2.1 Sediment Characteristics 13
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:208: 3.2.2 Sediment Hydrocarbons 13
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:208: 3.2.7 Sediment Macrofauna from Grab and Core Samples 14
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:208: 3.3.1 Sediment Macrofauna Data Rationalisation 16
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:208: 3.3.2 Sediment Macrofaunal Univariate Analysis 16
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:209:4.2 Sediment Characterisation 30
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:209:4.3 Sediment Chemistry 41
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:209:4.4 Intertidal Sediment Macrofauna 44
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:209:4.5 Subtidal Sediment Macrofauna 61
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:209:5.1 Sediment Characterisation 96
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:209:5.2 Sediment Chemistry 97
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:209: 5.2.1 Sediment Hydrocarbons 97
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:209: 5.2.2 Sediment Metals 97
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:209: 5.2.3 Sediment Polychlorinated Biphenyls 98
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:209: 5.2.4 Sediment Organotins 98
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:210:Appendix C Sediment Particle Size and Grab Sample Photographs
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:210:Appendix D Sediment Chemistry
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:210:D.2 Sediment Hydrocarbons
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:210:D.3 Sediment Metals
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:210:D.4 Sediment Polychlorinated Biphenyls
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:211:Figure 4.4: Sediment fractional composition 34
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:211:Figure 4.5: Spatial; distribution of major sediment fractions 35
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:211:the sediment fractional proportions 40
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:212:Table 3.1: Sediment particle size distribution statistics 16
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:212:Table 4.8: Summary of sediment characteristics 31
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:212:Table 4.10: Summary of physical characteristics of sediment groups identified in multivariate analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:221:1.5 Environmental Quality Standards for Sediment Chemical Concentrations
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:222: to describe the epifauna and/or conspicuous infauna associated with these. On soft sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:226: mixed sediments containing pebbles/cobbles) and only epifauna was recorded. Four quadrats
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:226: were positioned on sediment areas where epifauna was recorded as well as conspicuous
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:226: On soft sediments, core samples were taken using an 11.3 cm diameter, 0.01 m2, corer,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:226: sediment types observed on both the upper and the lower shore. Due to the presence of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:226: coarse sediment/hard substratum, cores shallower than the normal acceptable depth of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:228: undertake sediment quality analysis in support of marine licence applications in England.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:228:3.2.1 Sediment Characteristics
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:228: Sediment samples from grab and intertidal core samples were analysed for PSD using a
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:228: sediment classes (percentage gravel, sand and silt/clay), skewness, sorting coefficients and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:228: based on the Folk and Ward (1957) method. The sediment descriptions are based on the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:228: Sediment samples from vibrocores (VC) and boreholes (BH) were analysed for PSD using wet
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:228:3.2.2 Sediment Hydrocarbons
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:229:3.2.7 Sediment Macrofauna from Grab and Core Samples
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:230: remove fauna. The animals were separated by hand from the retained sediment by using a
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:230: combination of stereo microscopes for the fine sediments and in white trays for any coarser
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:230: material. Processed sediment was stored in the original formalin.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:230: Table 3.1 summarises the sediment PSD statistics that were calculated using Gradistat V8
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:230: The Wentworth (1922) sediment classification is based on mean sediment particle size; the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:230: Folk (BGS modified) classification (Long, 2006) is based on percentages of main sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:231: Table 3.1: Sediment particle size distribution statistics
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:231: sediment grains resides above this point and half below
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:231:3.3.1 Sediment Macrofauna Data Rationalisation
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:231:3.3.2 Sediment Macrofaunal Univariate Analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:232: Multivariate statistical techniques were applied to the sediment characteristics from the grab
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:232: the sediment data, transformation is used to reduce skewness of data; for the macrofaunal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:233: for intertidal (walkover, quadrat, core samples for macrofauna and sediment) and subtidal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:233: areas (grabs for macrofauna and sediment). Although, theoretically, a biotope can be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:233: habitats/biotopes (e.g. rock interspersed with coarse sediment) where the overall area was at
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:236: GS_17 was abandoned as the coarse sediment prevented the collection of an acceptable
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:241: Sediment samples from the VCs and BHs were recovered for chemical analysis. Samples were
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:245:4.2 Sediment Characterisation
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:245: Tables 4.8 and 4.9 present a summary of the particle size characteristics and sediment PSD.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:245: sediment classes were identified within the survey area with ‘sandy mud’ typifying 13 stations,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:245: stations had polymodal distributions (Table 4.9). At the sites where bimodal sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:245: 18.87 µm sediment fraction (medium silt) at eight sites and the 13.34 µm sediment fraction
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:245: 0.835 µm sediment fraction (clay) at 13 sites (Table 4.9; Figure 4.4).
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:245: The median sediment particle size ranged from 15 µm (fine silt) at station GS_09 to
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:245: particle size underpinned the Wentworth description, which identified four sediment classes,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:245: Of the 35 stations assessed, 22 had ‘very poorly sorted’ sediments, 10 had ‘poorly sorted’
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:245: sediments, two had ‘extremely poorly sorted’ sediments and one had ‘moderately sorted’
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:245: sediments. The sediment distribution was ‘symmetrical’ (15 stations), ‘very fine skewed’ (10
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:245: The survey area was overall characterised by heterogeneous sediment, the coarseness of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:245: presents the main sediment fractional composition for intertidal on the south bank, North
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:245: Tees Mudflat and subtidal areas. Figure 4.5 presents the distribution of the main sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:246: Table 4.8: Summary of sediment characteristics
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:249: Figure 4.4: Sediment fractional composition
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:250: Figure 4.5: Spatial; distribution of major sediment fractions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:251: Hierarchical clustering (cluster analysis) using Euclidean distance, was applied to the sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:251: PSD to investigate sedimentological characteristics. Data were not transformed. The
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:251: sediment fractions composition. For this reason, the grouping of the stations was obtained by
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:251: sandy gravel (Folk BGS modified), with a mean median sediment particle size of 10
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:251: modified), with a mean median sediment particle size of 602 µm (coarse sand) located in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:251: sandy mud (Folk BGS modified), with a mean median sediment particle size of 17.5 µm
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:251: sediment particle size of 149 µm (fine sand), in mean water depth of 1.7 m.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:253:Table 4.10: Summary of physical characteristics of sediment groups identified in multivariate analysis
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:254: Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the sediment fractional proportional
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:254: Figure 4.7 presents the results of the PCA applied to the sediment fractions. The first principal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:254: gives a good representation of sediment distribution across the survey area.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:255: sediment fractional proportions
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:256:4.3 Sediment Chemistry
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:256: The VC and BH sediment chemistry samples were analysed for PSD, pH, hydrocarbons,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:256: The PSD results of the VC and BH sediment samples are presented in Appendix D.1.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:256: Concentrations of THC and a suite of PAHs were analysed in sediments taken from several
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:257: The concentrations of the extractable metals in the sediment samples are summarised in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:258: The sediment pH within the survey area is presented in Appendix D.6.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:259:4.4 Intertidal Sediment Macrofauna
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:260: which comprised mixed sediments of muddy sand, sandy gravel and/or gravel, in the mid and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:260: (detailed in Section 3.3.5), in conjunction with the sediment characteristics (detailed in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:276:4.5 Subtidal Sediment Macrofauna
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:284: Littoral sediment Littoral Sand Mobile sand mobile sand (LS.LSa.MoSa.Ol)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:285: Littoral sediment Littoral mixed sediment gravelly sandy mud littoral gravelly sandy mud littoral gravelly sandy mud
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:285: sediment mud and sandy mud (SS.SMu.ISaMu.MelMagThy) (A5.334)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:287: the latter occurring in the coarse sediment’s interstices.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:288: conditions in channels of very fast flowing river mouths. The sediment is relatively coarse and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:288: in the sediment. Oligochaetes, including enchytraeid oligochaetes, constitute the infaunal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:288: infauna and sediment composition of which were assessed by means of core samples.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:288: mud, with an anoxic layer usually present within the first 5 cm of the sediment, which may be
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:311:5.1 Sediment Characterisation
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:311: heterogeneous sediment comprising pebbles, cobbles, and boulders in a matrix of muddy
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:311: sand and gravel. The PSD analysis of the core samples indicated coarse sediment comprising
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:311: modified) classification reflected the coarseness of the sediment with most core samples
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:311: historic construction activities, which may have enhanced the coarseness of the sediment. No
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:311: The North Tees Mudflat section of the survey area also featured heterogeneous sediment,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:311: The subtidal section of the survey area featured the finest sediment, albeit with a degree of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:311: The heterogeneity of the sediment, across the entire survey area, was reflected in the sorting
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:311: coefficient, with most samples having poorly or very poorly sorted sediment. Two subtidal
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:311: stations had extremely poorly sorted sediment, whereas one intertidal core had moderately
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:311: sorted sediment.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:311: sediment influx (Hein, 2007). These are likely to be associated with fluvial sediment input and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:312:5.2 Sediment Chemistry
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:312: The vibrocore and borehole sediment chemistry samples were collected from a total of 31
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:312:5.2.1 Sediment Hydrocarbons
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:312: Marine sediments contain hydrocarbons derived from many sources that enter the marine
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:312:5.2.2 Sediment Metals
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:312: in both dissolved and sedimentary forms. Some are essential to marine life while others have
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:312: atmospheric fallout (Brady et al., 2015). Other routes into marine sediments are from
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:313:5.2.3 Sediment Polychlorinated Biphenyls
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:313:5.2.4 Sediment Organotins
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:313: The Cefas AL1 threshold was exceeded in the surface sediment at stations BH-31 and BH-34,
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:314: sediments of estuaries to depths of 30 m (Ballerstedt, 2005), although a population of this
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:314: even in homogeneous sediments, owing to pheromones or local food abundance or as a
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:315: sedimentary habitats recorded, and with transitional areas owing to indistinct biotope
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:316: Of the sedimentary biotopes, ‘Hediste diversicolor and Corophium volutator in littoral gravelly
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:316: the Tees estuary’s intertidal sedimentary habitats been reclaimed for Infrastructure
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:316: The sedimentary biotope ‘Melinna palmata with Magelona spp. and Thyasira spp. in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:316: Sediment parameters, specifically grain size median and mud content, are the most
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:316: some parts of the North Sea, this species is reported to be absent in coarse grained sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:316: sediment particle size from the subtidal stations was 3036 µm and the mean mud content
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:319: bivalve is a subsurface and surface deposit-feeder, whose feeding activities result in sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:319: Euchone limnicola, which was first reported from California in fine mud sediments where the
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:319: France, always in sandy and muddy sediments of harbours with a high degree of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:319: Gulf of St. Lawrence to Venezuela. It is found in mudflats and soft sediments of estuaries and
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:321: The survey area was characterised by heterogeneous sediment, the coarseness of which
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:321: The subtidal section of the survey area had the finest sediment, with most stations being
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:321: A total of 31 sites and 84 samples was collected for sediment chemistry investigation.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:321: The concentration of sediment metals exceeded their respective Cefas AL1 threshold at most
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:322: intertidal section included rocky and sedimentary habitats, whereas the North Tees Mudflats
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:322: and subtidal sections features sedimentary habitats. No mudflat habitats were identified in
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:323: analysis of unconsolidated sediment by sieving or laser granulometer. Berkshire: Kenneth Pye
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:323: pollution index for heavy metals in marine and estuarine sediments. Environmental
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:324: Deere-Jones, T. (2007). Review of some specific sediment and pollution monitoring related
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:325: Folk, R.L. (1954). The distinction between grain size and mineral composition in sedimentary
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:325: size parameters. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 27(1), 3-26.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:326: GOV.UK. (2020, 14 September). Marine licensing: sediment analysis and sample plans.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:326: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-sample-plans.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:327: Long, D. (2006). BGS Detailed explanation of seabed sediment modified Folk classification.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:327: sediment_modified_folk_classification.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:328: of trends and concentrations of selected hazardous substances in sediments and biota.
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:330: Tillin, H.M. (2016). Capitella capitata in enriched sublittoral muddy sediments. In Tyler-Walters
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:330: Wentworth, C.K. (1922). A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. Journal of
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:331:Appendix C Sediment Particle Size and Grab Sample Photographs
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:331:Appendix D Sediment Chemistry
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:331:D.2 Sediment Hydrocarbons
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:331:D.3 Sediment Metals
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:331:D.4 Sediment Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:342: Sample Sediment Description (including stratigraphy)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:342: Date Station Fix No. Depth Depth Sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:342: cm Sediment Description Munsell Colour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:343: Sample Sediment Description (including stratigraphy)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:343: Date Station Fix No. Depth Depth Sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:343: cm Sediment Description Munsell Colour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:344: Sample Sediment Description (including stratigraphy)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:344: Date Station Fix No. Depth Depth Sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:344: cm Sediment Description Munsell Colour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:345: Sample Sediment Description (including stratigraphy)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:345: Date Station Fix No. Depth Depth Sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:345: cm Sediment Description Munsell Colour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:346: Sample Sediment Description (including stratigraphy)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:346: Date Station Fix No. Depth Depth Sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:346: cm Sediment Description Munsell Colour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:347: Sample Sediment Description (including stratigraphy)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:347: Date Station Fix No. Depth Depth Sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:347: cm Sediment Description Munsell Colour
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:348: Sediment Particle Size and Grab
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:384: Sediment Chemistry
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:391:D.2 Sediment Hydrocarbons
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:393: Concentrations expressed as μg/kg dry sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:393: Cefas action levels available at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-sample-plans
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:396: Concentrations expressed as μg/kg dry sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:396: Cefas action levels available at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-sample-plans
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:397:D.3 Sediment Metals
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:398: Concentrations expressed in μg/g dry sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:398: Cefas action levels available at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-sample-plans
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:399:D.4 Sediment Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:400: Concentrations expressed as ng/g of dry sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:402: Concentrations expressed as ng/g of dry sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:404: Concentrations expressed as ng/g of dry sediment
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:407: Cefas action levels available at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-sample-plans
MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:410: Cefas action levels available at https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-sample-plans
MLA_2020_00506-MMO VARIATION OBJECTION_S_Rennie.pdf:2:Marine Life and Marine Ecosystems- Sediment Testing
MLA_2020_00506-MMO VARIATION OBJECTION_S_Rennie.pdf:3:mitigated through a commitment to dispose of sediment to
MLA_2020_00506-MMO VARIATION OBJECTION_S_Rennie.pdf:3:land where the sediment is at a location within identified
MLA_2020_00506-MMO VARIATION OBJECTION_S_Rennie.pdf:4:sediment exceeding AL2 and AL1 Nor mitigates FURTHER
MLA_2020_00506-MMO VARIATION OBJECTION_S_Rennie.pdf:17:starting, spewing toxic sediment clouds, down river to sea, 1ST September-
R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:31: Intertidal – Littoral mixed sediments 2.50 High distinctiveness habitat
R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:37:nature and comprises mixed sediments. It is assumed that similar extent of replacement intertidal
R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:31: Intertidal – Littoral mixed sediments 2.50 High distinctiveness habitat
R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:37:nature and comprises mixed sediments. It is assumed that similar extent of replacement intertidal
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:19: habitat across Teesworks, including intertidal sediment and intertidal hard structures such
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:37: Intertidal – Littoral mixed sediments 2.50 High distinctiveness habitat
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:43:nature and comprises mixed sediments. It is assumed that similar extent of replacement intertidal
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:50:for the intertidal sediment and did not consider the jetty as a habitat area.
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:50:intertidal hard structures and intertidal sediment, the former being the wooden jetty, which extends
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:50:intertidal sediment is shown in Photograph 1. Condition assessments for both categories of habitat
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:51: Photograph 1. A typical view of the jetty and the intertidal sediment
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:52:Artificial structures are present that are impeding the natural movement of sediments or water,
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:53:3. Inter tidal sediment
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:53:the correct classification of the habitat would be “artificial mixed sediments”. This scores 2 for
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:53:intertidal sediment BM3.0 uses the following five criteria:
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:53:Artificial structures are present that are impeding the natural movement of sediments or water,
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:53:The intertidal sediment is not in a local strategy but is considered to be ecologically desirable in this
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:54:Intertidal sediment = 2.5*2*2*1.1 = 11.00 BDUs
R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:54: reduction in the value of the intertidal sediment due to the removal of the connectivity
R-2021-0830-CD-INCA21-09 Quay 1 South Bank biodiversity units Rev A.pdf:2:within the red line boundary; these are Intertidal Sediment (specifically, artificial littoral mixed
R-2021-0830-CD-INCA21-09 Quay 1 South Bank biodiversity units Rev A.pdf:2:sediments); Modified Grassland and Other Neutral Grassland, the latter habitat comprising three
R-2021-0830-CD-INCA21-09 Quay 1 South Bank biodiversity units Rev A.pdf:2:Intertidal Sediment, though occurring within the river is classed as a Habitat Unit and its loss
R-2021-0830-CD-INCA21-09 Quay 1 South Bank biodiversity units Rev A.pdf:2:Intertidal sediment 1.5 7.59
R-2021-1096-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-ZZ-RP-C-0006-S4-P01-Asset_Maintenance_Plan.pdf:6: is formed of a coarse aggregate substrate designed to accrete tidal sediment and
R-2021-1096-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-ZZ-RP-C-0006-S4-P01-Asset_Maintenance_Plan.pdf:9: shall enable the channel to form its own sinuous path and accrete sediment which over time
R-2021-1096-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-ZZ-RP-C-0006-S4-P01-Asset_Maintenance_Plan.pdf:9: will form sidebars and vegetate. This will promote sediment transport and reduce the
R-2021-1096-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-ZZ-RP-C-0006-S4-P01-Asset_Maintenance_Plan.pdf:9: requirement for periodic sediment removal.
R-2021-1096-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-ZZ-RP-C-0006-S4-P01-Asset_Maintenance_Plan.pdf:11: no requirements for routine maintenance of the channel in terms of sediment management or
R-2021-1096-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-ZZ-RP-C-0006-S4-P01-Asset_Maintenance_Plan.pdf:12: consists of a coarse aggregate deign to accrete tidal sediment and promote the establishment
R-2021-1096-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-ZZ-RP-C-0006-S4-P01-Asset_Maintenance_Plan.pdf:12: eel passage. It is anticipated the stilling basin will accrete sediment over time however this
R-2021-1096-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-ZZ-RP-C-0006-S4-P01-Asset_Maintenance_Plan.pdf:12: will be flushed out during storm events. Hence, routine sediment management shall not be
R-2021-1096-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-ZZ-RP-C-0006-S4-P01-Asset_Maintenance_Plan.pdf:12: of bank and the 1:3 side slopes. Although the channel will over time accrete sediment forming
R-2021-1096-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-ZZ-RP-C-0006-S4-P01-Asset_Maintenance_Plan.pdf:13: Removal of sediment within channel As required As determined by
R-2021-1096-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-DR-C-0303-A1-C01-South_Bank_Details_Sheet_3_of_4.pdf:1: PROMOTE SEDIMENT ACCRETION AND
R-2021-1096-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-DR-C-0303-A1-C01-South_Bank_Details_Sheet_3_of_4.pdf:1: LOW FLOW CHANNEL FORMED OF Dn50 350-500mm AGGREGATE SUBSTRATE TO PROMOTE SEDIMENT Client
R-2021-1096-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-DR-C-0304-A1-C01-South_Bank_Details_Sheet_4_of_4.pdf:1: 1 PROMOTE SEDIMENT ACCRETION AND AID DEVELOPMENT OF AN OPEN 1 VEGETATED VERGE
R-2021-1096-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-DR-C-0304-A1-C01-South_Bank_Details_Sheet_4_of_4.pdf:1: ESTABLISH THROUGH TIDAL SEDIMENT ACCREATION AND SELF VEGETATION TO WALL AT A DISTANCE
R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:8:sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the Market Weighton Axis. The
R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:8:complex of peats, estuarine and marine sediments deposited during the Holocene, which overlie
R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:8:sedimentation due to fluctuations in relative sea level during the mid-Holocene, from approximately
R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:8:the north and subsidence to the south makes these sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea-
R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Supplementary Environmental Statement September 2020 Volume 3 Technical Appendices Section 4 Biodiversity and Ecology.pdf:6: Sediment Sampling
R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Supplementary Environmental Statement September 2020 Volume 3 Technical Appendices Section 4 Biodiversity and Ecology.pdf:7:RE: The Slems Sediment Samples
R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Supplementary Environmental Statement September 2020 Volume 3 Technical Appendices Section 4 Biodiversity and Ecology.pdf:7:The Slems sediment samples have been processed using a 0.5 mm net sieve. All remaining material
R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Supplementary Environmental Statement September 2020 Volume 3 Technical Appendices Section 4 Biodiversity and Ecology.pdf:7:from the initial sediment samples have been sorted to identify any living organisms contained within
R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Supplementary Environmental Statement September 2020 Volume 3 Technical Appendices Section 4 Biodiversity and Ecology.pdf:9:No Redshank or other waders were seen on any survey and it is assumed that the sediment does not
TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-H8-FN-Z-0001-S4-P01-Scope_of_Works_under_MMO_jurisdiction.pdf:2: The invert is formed of a coarse granular aggregate to aid tidal sediment accretion. The
TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-H8-FN-Z-0001-S4-P01-Scope_of_Works_under_MMO_jurisdiction.pdf:3: The contributing watercourses have a minimal sediment load due to the urban nature
Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 6 mitigation.pdf:3: sediments in surface would be retained within the site, remove silt and other suspended solids, as
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:11: • Sediment availability/ transport
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:18: channel designed to trap sediments and the bed (and surrounding land) is heavily
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:23: bed sediments are impacting on water quality. These are impacting
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:30: (sediment release, fuel leaks etc.).
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:31: The sediment regime locally
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:32: affecting the sediment erosional,
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:32: The sediment regime into the
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:33: channel could cause sediment
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:34: sediment), affecting BOD. This
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:34: could cause sediment disturbance
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:34: Environment sediment disturbance and
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:35: Triclosan High channel online could cause sediment
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:35: Benzene Good sediment disturbance and temporarily
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:38: quality and it is known that the sediments and
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:38: pollution events (sediment release, fuel leaks etc.)
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:38: sediment and flow regime locally on site. This may
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:38: build-up of sediment in surface water bodies due to
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:38: inability to transport any fine sediment away may
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:38: result in increased sediment suspension, potentially
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:39: cause excessive build up of sediment in surface water
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:40: sheet piling and sediments contaminated from the
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:40: The sediment regime locally onsite will be impacted by
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:40: affect the sediment erosional, depositional and transport
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: could cause sediment disturbance and temporarily reduce
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:44: caused by increases in suspended sediment, reduced
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:44: suspended sediment causing increases in nutrients
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:45: sediment suspension in the water body, potentially
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:46: Morphology: River Direct The sediment regime into the Tees is unlikely to be
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:51: of the underlying sediment throughout the reach if it
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:51: The sediment regime locally onsite will be impacted during
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:51: channel that will locally affect the sediment erosional,
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:51: changes in flows, changes in sediment deposition and scour
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:51: build-up of sediment in surface water bodies and the loss of
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:52: channel online could cause sediment disturbance and
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:53: caused by increases in suspended sediment,
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:54: sediment causing increases in nutrients that are
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:56: and SSSI - There is potential for localised increases in sediment
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:56: transport and deposition through sediment
CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:60: outfall and how they affect any sediment or habitat locally, potentially through scour
TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:8: is 20m wide, with a granular aggregate underlay to prevent sediment flow into the estuary
TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:16: flood bank could temporarily cause the suspension of sediments in the channel. Contamination caused by the removal undertaken as part of the
TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:16: Common tern Sterna suspension of sediments in the channel. Contamination caused by the removal of the estuarine bank will be temporary alone.
TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:17: flood bank could temporarily cause the suspension of sediments in the channel. Contamination caused by the removal undertaken as part of the
TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:24: sediment, dust, surface water
MLA_2022_00248-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:sediments produced as a result of construction, i.e. through disturbance of known
MLA_2022_00248-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:14:development and River Tees dredging activities. There may be residual risk of sediment
R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:75: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:85: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:94: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:343:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:521:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:657: Nutrient Release and Sediment Oxygen Demand in a Eutrophic Land-Locked
R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:657: DETSC 2040 Sediment Oxygen Demand contains nutrients to promote bacterial growth. The oxygen level in the supernatant liquid is monitored for up to n/a Not Accredited
R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:657: Sediment Oxygen Demand and Biochemical Oxygen Demand: Patterns of Oxygen
R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:662: DETSC 2325 Mercury in Soil Atomic Fluorescence Spectroscopy particulates and diluted to volume. Treatment with tin (II) chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour PSA Method – Millennium Merlin Method for Mercury in Sludge, Soils and Sediments 0.05 mg/kg MCERTS(Soils)
R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:663: mineral soil material – Method by sieving and sedimentation
R-2022-0342-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0395-03-GE Plot.pdf:666: Fluorescence Spectroscopy Sediments.
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:25: sediment and standing open water and canals, present within the Teesmouth
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:36: fine sediments do not typically support higher plants if subject to continual,
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:36: unconsolidated sediments. The modelled increase in concentrations of NOx
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:36: fine sediments do not typically support higher plants if subject to continual,
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:37: unconsolidated sediments.
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:43: preparation of a pollutants, water and sediment management protocol to
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:43: mobilisation of, sediment
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:51: habitat type littoral sediment are not considered to be sensitive to increased
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:51: levels of NOx. Littoral sediment includes habitats of shingle (mobile cobbles
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:73: sedimentary, sandstone, sandstone/mudstone, boulder
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:73: Geomorphology and landscape lowland, coastal, floodplain, subtidal sediments (including
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:73: sandbank/mudbank), intertidal sediments (including
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:74:Describe the functions and values of the wetland in groundwater recharge, flood control, sediment trapping, shoreline
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:77:and spread of Enteromorpha algal mats and water/sediment quality issues.
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_2of2.pdf:7:strong influence on sediment dynamics and result in both dune systems showing a
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:54: include the preparation of a pollutants, water and sediment management protocol
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:55: of, sediment
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:55: construction works to prevent excessive sediment input and mitigate impacts
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:107: sediments in surface water runoff.
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:108: to prevent excessive sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil or
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:16: due to noise and also air pollution construction works will disturb sediments
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:17: to prevent excessive sediment input
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:17: prevent excessive sediment input and
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:20: The potential for discharge into the Tees Estuary may result in pollution, dependent • The proposed works are unlikely to disturb sediments as no in- channel works are proposed and thus the risk to
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:20: Direct and works to prevent excessive sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil • The completion of a construction works under the management of a Construction Environmental Management Plan
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:20: • Pollution prevention measures shall be implemented during construction works to prevent excessive sediment input
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:20: works to prevent excessive sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:20: works to prevent excessive sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil Operation
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:20: shall be implemented during construction works to prevent excessive sediment
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:20: excessive sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil or fluid leaks.
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:21: shall be implemented during construction works to prevent excessive sediment
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:21: • It is unlikely that the proposed construction works will disturb sediments as there will be no in-channel works.
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:21: dependent on the nature of the discharged materials. Discharges into the • Pollution prevention measures shall be implemented during construction works to prevent excessive sediment input
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:21: substances identified as works to prevent excessive sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil
R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:21: sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil or fluid leaks.
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:13: within this area. Water run‐off from the area will be made to flow into a sediment tank. The
R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:15: Booms will be placed around drainage inlets to prevent sedimentation from run off
R-2022-0779-CD-COMPLIANCE OFFICER REPORT.pdf:1:i Sediment Management Plan
R-2022-0779-CD-Sep 22 - CEMP - Steel House Park and Ride Relocation of stockpile mounds.pdf:17:associated sediment transport from runoff and subsequently drainage during site activities:
R-2022-0779-CD-COMPLIANCE DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2:i Sediment Management Plan
R-2022-0779-CD-DOC (CEMP) Covering Letter September 2022.pdf:1: i. Sediment Management Plan
R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:31: Intertidal – Littoral mixed sediments 2.50 High distinctiveness habitat
R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:37:nature and comprises mixed sediments. It is assumed that similar extent of replacement intertidal
R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:31: Intertidal – Littoral mixed sediments 2.50 High distinctiveness habitat
R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:37:nature and comprises mixed sediments. It is assumed that similar extent of replacement intertidal
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:19: habitat across Teesworks, including intertidal sediment and intertidal hard structures such
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:37: Intertidal – Littoral mixed sediments 2.50 High distinctiveness habitat
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:43:nature and comprises mixed sediments. It is assumed that similar extent of replacement intertidal
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:50:for the intertidal sediment and did not consider the jetty as a habitat area.
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:50:intertidal hard structures and intertidal sediment, the former being the wooden jetty, which extends
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:50:intertidal sediment is shown in Photograph 1. Condition assessments for both categories of habitat
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:51: Photograph 1. A typical view of the jetty and the intertidal sediment
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:52:Artificial structures are present that are impeding the natural movement of sediments or water,
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:53:3. Inter tidal sediment
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:53:the correct classification of the habitat would be “artificial mixed sediments”. This scores 2 for
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:53:intertidal sediment BM3.0 uses the following five criteria:
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:53:Artificial structures are present that are impeding the natural movement of sediments or water,
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:53:The intertidal sediment is not in a local strategy but is considered to be ecologically desirable in this
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:54:Intertidal sediment = 2.5*2*2*1.1 = 11.00 BDUs
R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:54: reduction in the value of the intertidal sediment due to the removal of the connectivity
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:3:7.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime 7
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:3:7.2 Marine sediment and water quality 8
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:9: • Capital dredging of approximately 1,800,000m3 of marine sediments with offshore disposal into
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:10: • Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:10: • Marine sediment and water quality.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:11:7.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:11:The assessment of potential effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime has been undertaken
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:11:cause no effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:11:The capital dredging of the river and the offshore disposal of dredged sediments both will cause plumes of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:11:sediment to form. The plume effects arising from the river dredging are characterised by a short-lived
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:11:localised increase in suspended sediment concentrations by the order of a few hundred mg/l at the point of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:11:magnitude over a few hours after disposal. Deposition thicknesses of sediment from the plumes on the river
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:combined with the creation of a new berth pocket at the quay, may lead to a small increase in sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:deposition rates and hence a requirement for more sediment to be dredged annually from this local reach.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:There is no predicted effect on the baseline sediment transport regime and seabed or shore morphology
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:7.2 Marine sediment and water quality
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:The assessment of potential impacts associated with marine sediment and water quality has been
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:undertaken with reference to publicly available sediment and water quality data. A site-specific sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:survey were not available at the time of writing, it has been assumed that the sediment quality within the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:A potential impact on water quality has been identified due to the resuspension of sediment, principally as
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:exceeding water quality standards was deemed to be low. Additionally, sediment plume modelling shows
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:time before the suspended sediment concentrations return to baseline values. No significant impacts are
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:resuspension of sediments. Such measures include dredging in long strips to ensure the plume is located
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:and capital dredging, increased suspended sediment concentrations and increased sediment deposition.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:scheme footprint and the results of the hydrodynamic and sediment plume modelling, an impact of minor
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:ecological receptors as a result of increased suspended sediment concentrations or sediment deposition
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:15:Impacts on fish resources within the subtidal area, as a result of increased suspended sediment, would only
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:17:Indirect impacts to heritage assets from changes to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime are also
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:Based on the findings of hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling, the disposal of dredged material
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:This section presents the baseline conditions with regard to sediment and water quality of the Tees estuary
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:and sedimentary regime (see Section 6) as well as recent survey data collected to inform other project EIAs
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:The assessment of potential impacts on marine sediment and water quality has been made with reference
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:Table 7.1 Summary of NPS requirements with regard to marine sediment and water quality
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2:Table 7.2 Summary of scoping consultation responses with regard to marine sediment and water
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: sediment and dissolved oxygen.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: proposed dredge on water and sediment quality are
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: the findings of hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: sediment and create smothering effects / turbidity / sediment plumes.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: based on the anticipated sediment types to be
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3: dispose of capital dredged sediment. Impacts
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3: As part of the application, the applicant will need to provide sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3:For marine sediment and water quality, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3:hydrodynamic and sediment dispersion modelling and is based on the maximum extent over which effects
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3:are predicted to occur (e.g. sediment plumes generated during capital dredging and effects on tidal currents
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3:The description of the existing environment with regard to sediment quality has been informed through desk-
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3:based review of existing sediment quality data. The most recent publicly available sediment quality data to
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3:7.3.2.1 Sediment data
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3:The assessment of potential impacts associated with disturbance of sediment during the construction phase
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3: • Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQG) for the Protection of Aquatic Life (Canadian Council
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:4:can be quantified. Therefore, for EIA, in the same way, if contaminant levels in the sediments under
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:4:application of additional sediment quality guidelines (as outlined below) or undertaking more detailed water
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:4:The CSQG involved the derivation of interim marine sediment quality guidelines (ISQGs), or Threshold
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:4:contaminated sediments to a range of aquatic organisms exposed in laboratory tests and under field
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:4:conditions (CCME, 2002). As a result, these guidelines provide an indication of likely toxicity of sediments
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:5:If additional assessment is indicated to be required as a result of recording elevated sediment concentrations
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:5:above the lower Cefas Action Level 1, the undertaking of simple calculations using estimates of sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:5:losses from dredging equipment and concentrations of contaminants within the sediments to be dredged
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:The methodology used to assess the significance of the potential environmental impacts on marine sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:7.4.1 Sediment quality
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:Results of the sediment quality data from the NGCT marine licence application
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:PDT carried out a sediment quality survey in July 2019 to inform the marine licence application for the NGCT
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:the two schemes, specifically at the Tees Dock turning circle. Results from the NGCT sediment quality
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:survey are detailed below. The NGCT sediment quality sampling positions in relation to the proposed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:7: ( 2019 sediment sampling locations for NGCT
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:7: A3 G1 NGCT Sediment sampling locations (2019)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:8:Table 7.6 Summary of sediment quality data from the NGCT sediment quality survey (2019)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:11:sediment samples recovered in 2006, with BDE209 concentrations ranging from <0.5µg/kg to 340µg/kg.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:11:that found in 2006. The MMO has recently confirmed that the sediment to be dredged from the NGCT
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12:Summary of previous sediment quality surveys in the Tees
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12:The findings of sediment quality surveys undertaken in support of previously consented schemes in the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12:within Tees Dock. Though showing signs of minor contamination, it was determined that the ‘soft’ sediments
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12:The 2006 sediment quality survey undertaken to inform the 2008 HRO application involved the recovery of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:In general, suspended sediment concentrations are low within the estuary and within Tees Bay. The highest
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:within the estuary) and analysed in the laboratory for suspended sediment concentrations. The results
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:this period, concentrations of suspended sediment were very low. It should be noted however, that the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:Table 7.8 Suspended sediment concentrations recorded at Transect T8 in July 2020
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15: Suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:A site-specific sediment quality survey is proposed to be undertaken during 2020 to provide a detailed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:understanding of sediment quality within the proposed scheme footprint and validate the information set out
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:of sediment samples from 25 stations from the surface and at depth, with sampling positions equally spread
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:In the absence of the proposed scheme, there is no reason to believe that sediment and water quality within
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:sediment sampling being undertaken from the surface in accordance with the conditions on the maintenance
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:16:7.5.1 Dispersion and redistribution of sediment during capital dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:16:Capital dredging would result in the creation of sediment plumes. To consider the potential extent and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:16:Modelling was undertaken using a MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:17:Figure 7. 3 Plume of suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities during Stage 2
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:19:Figure 7. 5 Plume of suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities during Stage
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:20:Figure 7.6 Plume of enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21:Figure 7.7 Timeseries of changes in suspended sediment concentrations at water quality monitoring
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21:sediment plume is not predicted to reach The Gares water quality monitoring point, no effects on the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21:Additionally, a significant component of the dredged material is likely to be geological sediment, which is
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:The concentrations of PAHs and metals within the sediments in the Tees estuary could potentially affect
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:An assessment to look at the potential for sediments exceeding Action Level 1 to cause EQS failures has
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:estimates of sediment losses from dredging equipment and concentrations of contaminants within the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:sediments to be dredged to provide an indication of the amount of contamination that could be released into
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:sediments and no account is made of any settlement of sediment that may occur immediately following
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:from these calculations that a risk is presented by the concentrations of zinc in the sediment and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:sediment as a result of the proposed scheme) although the maximum allowable concentration was not
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:23:sediment per day and maximum concentrations both in the water and in the sediment)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:23: in sediments in sediments concentration with baseline
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:23: Sediment data taken from NGCT 2019 (see Table 7.5)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:23: Calculated loss of sediment derived using indicative values for the mass of sediment resuspended per m 3 of dredged material in CIRIA guidance (John et al., 1999) in kg/m3. Worst case S-Factor for
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:24:sediment per day and maximum concentrations in the water and in the sediment)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:24: sediments sediments concentration with baseline
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25:of zinc and benzo(b)fluoranthene (both sediment and water quality values) at low water volumes within the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25:estuary. If the calculations at mean low water are re-run using average concentrations (sediment and water
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: • The calculations assume that all sediment remains in suspension. In reality, it is likely that some
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: likely that some contamination will remain bound to sediment particles.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: • The maximum concentration within the sediments used for each parameter does not occur across
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: • The maximum values for water quality concentrations are not reflective of sediment conditions
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: releases less sediment into the water column.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25:Additionally, information from sediment plume modelling (see Section 7.5.1) indicates that only the Smiths
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25:7.5.4 Release of sediment during riverbank excavation to create the berth
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:As these works progress, there is the potential for sediment to be suspended when working in and around
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:7.6.1 Dispersion and redistribution of sediment during maintenance dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:5: Intertidal soft sediments (400.13ha); Intertidal soft sediment (845.53ha),
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:5: reef (4.13ha); subtidal soft sediments reef (7170.93ha), Subtidal soft
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:5: (610.31ha). sediments (1219.64ha)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:5: 24.Reduce sediment resuspension
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:5: 26.Sediment management
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:7: sediments with INNS are already present
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:7: measures identified for the Tees estuary. habitats located within sediment plumes created
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:10: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is deemed to be a positive
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:11:Capital dredging within the river would result in sediment plumes. To consider the potential extent and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:11:Modelling was undertaken using a MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:13:Figure 28.4 Timeseries of changes in suspended sediment concentrations at water quality monitoring
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:13:The resuspension of sediment could also potentially affect dissolved oxygen levels in the water. This is due
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:13:represent a more conservative scenario, as sediment plume modelling outlined above indicates relatively
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:13:dissolved oxygen problem or where sediments have a high chemical oxygen demand and that in practice,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:13:high for dissolved oxygen and it is not anticipated that the sediments will have a high chemical oxygen
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:In terms of contaminants, the concentrations of PAHs and metals within the sediments in the Tees estuary
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:and the lower CSQG. An assessment to look at the potential for the release of sediments exceeding Cefas
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:Action Level 1 to cause EQS failures was therefore undertaken to inform the marine sediment and water
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:maximum concentrations for baseline water quality and sediments in the estuary indicate that there is a risk
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:undertaken for high tide volumes in the estuary (for maximum sediment and water quality baseline
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:For high water with maximum water and sediment concentrations and use of average concentrations for
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:both water and sediment quality, the estimated concentrations reduce below EQS. This indicates that the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14: • The calculations assume that all sediment remains in suspension. In reality, it is likely that some
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14: likely that some contamination will remain bound to sediment particles.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14: • The maximum concentration within the sediments used for each parameter does not occur across
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14: • The maximum values for water quality concentrations are not reflective of sediment conditions
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14: releases less sediment into the water column.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:Additionally, sediment plume results for Smiths Dock monitoring point (point 3) indicated only temporary
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:therefore the majority of the dredge would impact on the lower sensitivity habitat ‘subtidal soft sediment’ of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:berth pocket would remove 25,000m2 of intertidal sediments, of which there are 4,001,300m2 within the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:15:Subtidal sediments
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:15:Results in 2019 indicate a variety of sediment types are present across the survey area and most samples
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:15:infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations were unable to be classified further than the EUNIS level 4
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:15:assemblage may take place before the original topography is restored, if the exposed, underlying sediments
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:15:composition and numbers following dredging, it is predicted that the sediment communities would recover
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:15:Intertidal sediments
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:15:walkovers confirm that the intertidal area to be lost comprises intertidal mud and gravelly sediment with
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:16:Sediment settlement
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:16:Sediment suspended within the dredging plumes will fall to the riverbed, either soon after disturbance or
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:16:spillage occurring during the dredging operation (for coarser-grained sediment fractions), or at a point in
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:16:finer-grained sediment fractions. Figure 28.5 shows the maximum changes in riverbed thickness caused
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:16:by deposition. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the dredged areas (from
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:17:zone of influence from the sediment plumes. As a result, a deterioration in ecological class status is not
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:17:Figure 28.5 Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:17:An increase in suspended sediment in the water column may lead to physiological effects in finfish, including
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:17:in sediment concentrations due to the natural fluctuations associated with tidal activity, discharge from the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:17:(including most adult finfish) are generally able to detect early onset of increased sediment concentrations
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:18:peak migratory season, when a sediment plume creating a ‘barrier’ effect could cause a significant disruption
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:18: Reduce sediment resuspension disposal activities currently ongoing. Disposal would be
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:18: Sediment management
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:20: Reduce sediment resuspension
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:20: Sediment management measures
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21: Reduce sediment resuspension
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21: Sediment management
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:22:wall would remove a small area of intertidal soft sediment, the measures outlined in Section 28.8 would
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:23: • Cumulative effects of sediment plumes and associated effects on water quality and fish
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:Section 27 considers the potential cumulative effects of the proposed schemes on sediment plumes and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:marine water quality. To summarise, whilst the sediment plumes could combine to cover a larger area of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:the estuary, additive effects in terms of increasing sediment peaks are not predicted. This is because the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:contaminated material has been identified in the Anglo American Harbour Facilities sediments (i.e. above
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:proposed project both include mitigation measures to dredge in long strips to reduce the effects of sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:Any project that requires dredging would disturb the marine communities within the sediments to be
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:In terms of wider effects, significant deposition of sediment again is generally only predicted in close
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:26: Sediment transport Hydrodynamic modelling showed that the proposed scheme would give rise to only a small magnitude reduction in baseline flows varying during different phases of the tidal
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:26: sediment at the North Tees mudflat which could be seen to be a positive effect in areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay. In the main channel, deposition will
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:26: Modelling for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities concluded that the only effects were likely to be localised redistribution of sediment deposition in response to predicted
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:26: sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees estuary.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:28:Whilst concentrations of contaminants in the sediments indicated a risk to water quality EQS’, assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:28:suspended sediment thus reducing the risk of significant water quality effects. Mitigation measures to
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:29:would be sediment plumes associated with dredging simultaneously. However, on further consideration,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:2:not match the advertised depths due to sedimentation within the channel).
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is positive as it will help
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1:The proposed scheme is predicted to generate up to approximately 1,800,000m3 of dredged sediment from
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1:been undertaken on a worst-case basis whereby all dredged sediment from the Tees estuary would be
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1:As the offshore disposal commences, a plume of sediment would be generated with the greatest
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1:concentrations predicted at the end of the discharge period. The sediment plume is predicted to increase
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1:commences and starts to form its own sediment plume, the initial plume has moved sufficiently far from its
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1:deposition of sediment. As shown on Figure 6.66, deposited sediment from one disposal event is predicted
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:Based on the modelled effects of the sediment plume at the Tees Bay C disposal site described above, it is
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:The PSD results show that the sediments within and adjacent to Tees Bay C comprise gravelly muddy sand,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5: sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:of the disposal site. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling has predicted some short-term build-up of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:sediment at the disposal site, however, this would be dispersed over time.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:sensitive to smothering or increases in suspended sediment.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8:for the assessment of potential impacts associated with offshore disposal of dredged sediments (see
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8:disposal of dredged sediments are likely to be less than those generated during dredging activities. The
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8:display a fleeing response, as a result of underwater noise during offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8:offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: sediments
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8:result of underwater noise associated with offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: sediments based on density of 0.014/km2 for reference population anticipated to be
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:disposal of dredged sediments would be limited to the immediate vicinity of the vessels while they are
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:dredged sediments on harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:sediments on marine mammals
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: sediments Negligible / Negligible
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: sediments (5% of (0.00003% of the NE England MU) based (permanent effect with less than 0.001% of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during offshore disposal of dredged sediments has been
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:disturbance due to the disposal of dredged sediment into the disposal site to seals at Seal Sands, including
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:dredged sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:The offshore disposal of dredged material would temporarily increase the suspended sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:Changes to marine mammals prey resource during offshore disposal of dredged sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:temporary loss of seabed habitat, increased suspended sediment concentrations and sediment re-
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:17:Chapter 6 – Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:17:hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary and describes the
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:17:sedimentary processes, the significance of such changes or effects have not
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:17:Similarly in establishing the sedimentary regime the following assessments
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:17:took place; suspended sediment concentrations, sediment sources and
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:18: Capital dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:18: Maintenance dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:18:Matters relating to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime are not matters
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:18:sedimentary regime will be regulated through the Marine Licence and any
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:18:Chapter 7 – Marine Sediment and Water Quality
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:18:This chapter deals with the conditions with regard to sediment and water
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:18:hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (Chapter 6) as well as recent survey
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:19:In establishing the baseline with regard to marine sediment and water quality
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:19:various data sources have been used to examine the following: sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:19:Sediment data survey work was carried out in 2019 for the Northern Gateway
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:19:An assessment has also been made of suspended sediment concentrations.
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:20:period, concentrations of suspended sediment were very low as illustrated in
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:20:redistribution of sediment during capital dredging, effects on water quality
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:20:during capital dredging, release of sediment during riverbank excavation to
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:20:Consideration has been given to the dispersal and redistribution of sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:20:material is likely to be geological sediment, which is unlikely to contain
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:21:potential for sediment loss during the process and the likely amount of
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:21:It is acknowledged that there is the potential for sediment to be suspended
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:21:sediment during maintenance dredging and surface water discharge to the
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:22:Matters relating to marine sediment and water quality within the Tees Estuary
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:23:view that matters relating to marine sediment and water quality within the
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:28: Impacts on marine ecology from increased suspended sediment during
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:29:berth pocket will remove both intertidal sediments and landside materials /
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:30:suspended sediment concentrations during dredging on marine species and
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:30:habitats, effects of increased suspended sediment concentrations during
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:30:increase in suspended sediment concentrations. Matters relating to this have
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:30:predicted increase in suspended sediment, in addition to the low/very low
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:30:sediment, an impact of negligible significance is predicted.
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:32:With regard to suspended sediment concentrations no mitigation measures
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:33:dredged sediments have been considered within Chapter 26 of the ES.
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:35:in suspended sediments during dredging or other activities will have a
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:41: hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (Chapter 6)
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:41: marine sediment and water quality (Chapter 7)
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:42:sediment deposition on intertidal food resources and construction-phase
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:43:With regard to deposition of sediment on intertidal food resources, the ES
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:52:the channel; however it is recognised that these do vary due to sedimentation
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:54: slight increase in deposition of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:60: deposition of sediment:
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:75: Effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:91:large volume of dredged sediment. It is predicted that the volume of material
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:91:disposal of the sediment offshore, hydrodynamic modelling has taken place,
R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:92:The modelling that has been carried out in relation to the resulting sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Design and Access Statement November 2020.PDF:6: There would, therefore, be a requirement for dredging of estuarine (marine) sediments and
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Design and Access Statement November 2020.PDF:6: jack-up barge ‘punching’ into the underlying sediments when berthed at the quay during the
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 4_Metocean survey report.pdf:5: 7.3 Suspended Sediment Conversion ………………………………………………………………………………………..20
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 4_Metocean survey report.pdf:21:7.3 Suspended Sediment Conversion
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:4: Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime;
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:9:works could potentially release chemicals within the sediment into the water column.
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:11:can alter flow regimes, release contaminants accrued within the sediment, and
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:11:create smothering effects/turbidity/sediment plumes, thereby damaging benthic
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:11:sediment sample analysis results to ensure the material is suitable for disposal to
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:11:Level 2 guidelines for contaminated sediment. This can be determined after
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:11:sediment samples have been tested. If no disposal site exists, the applicant can
R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:11:the beneficial use / disposal of the sediment should be clearly defined within the
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:1:sample plan to inform a sediment quality and benthic ecology survey in the Tees
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:2: 1.1. The advice relates to sampling to inform a sediment quality and benthic ecology
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:2: of sediments. Based on the information submitted (as described above), the
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:3: 2.7. Surface samples should be taken from the upper layer of in-situ sediment using a
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:4: 3.3. Results were also discussed form a sediment quality survey that was undertaken in
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:4: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:4: This list indicates the laboratories which have been validated to undertake sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:5: 4.2. Irrespective of which validated laboratory is used to undertake sediment analysis,
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:5: (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:5: changes in the quantity and quality of sediments, there may be a need for surface
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:5: sediments to be re-sampled and analysed if the project has not commenced within
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:1:Is 1% or more of any lower sensitivity habitat No – the area impacted is considered to be soft intertidal and soft subtidal sediment of which
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:2:entering it or could affect fish migrating through the See comments in water quality below. There may be temporary sediment resuspension but
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:2: would be supported through the use of divers. There is the possibility of sediment plumes
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:3: and temporary. Any sediment resuspension is unlikely to last more than a few hours per
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:3:through sediment disturbance or building works) crew will be trained in spill response. In addition, all vessels will ensure that suitable bunding
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:3: Sediment samples available from the NGCT project collected in 2019 are likely to contain
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:3:If your activity uses or releases chemicals (for example contaminants above action level 1.There is the possibility of sediment plumes during the
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:3:through sediment disturbance or building works) demolition works but these are only expected to be localised to the working area and
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:3:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants temporary. Any sediment resuspension is unlikely to last more than a few hours per pile.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:4:outside the estuary but could delay or prevent fish There is the possibility of sediment plumes during the dredging works. Possibility of
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:5: There is the possibility of sediment plumes during the dredging works
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:5:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:5: Yes Sediment samples are likely to contain contaminants above Cefas Action Level 1 (see
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:5:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:5:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:6:Could impact on normal fish behaviour like movement, sediment spill. Additionally, where possible material would be removed in the dry. Any effects
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:7: sediment spill. Additionally, where possible material would be removed in the dry. Any effects
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:7:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:7:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:7:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:9:Could affect water clarity, temperature, salinity, oxygen There is the possibility that small localised disturbance of sediment could occur as a result
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:9:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:9:Quality Standards Directive (EQSD) list Any marine sediments that are disturbed are likely to have contaminant levels greater than
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:9:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:9:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:10: and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:11:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:11:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:11:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:13:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:13:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:13:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:15:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:15:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:15:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:1:Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:3:5.2 Sediment Data 51
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:3:5.4.3 Sediment Release Assumptions 57
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:3:5.4.4 Sediment Property Representation 57
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:4:Table 5-4: Sediment settling velocity and critical bed shear stress 57
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.3: Sediment release schedule for dredger 56
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.4: Sediment release schedule at offshore disposal site 56
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.5: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.6: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.7: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.8: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.9: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.10: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-surface layer) arising
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.11: Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.12: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.13: Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:9: movement of suspended sediment from the proposed dredging and disposal activities by coupling with
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:9: a sediment plume model built in MIKE3-MT software. The sediment plume model was run for the entire
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:9:consideration of hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes. The wider study area: (i) extends
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:44:Section 6 (Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Processes) of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:59: of sediment. In the main channel the deposition will require periodic dredging to maintain the
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:61:This section of the report describes the sediment dispersion modelling exercise that was undertaken to
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:61:investigate the suspended sediment transport effects of the proposed dredging of the channel and the berth
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:61:sediment transport model was built in MIKE3-MT software developed by DHI.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:61:5.2 Sediment Data
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:62:Based on the ground investigation data, for the sediment dispersion modelling, the following particle size
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:62:Sediment Category Sediment Size (mm) Soft material Hard material
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:62:The sediment dispersion model built in MIKE3-MT is coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic model built in
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:62:The sediment dispersion model has been run for a four-month period to cover the full duration of the
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:62:The sediment dispersion model has been setup with 4 layers in order to differentiate between suspended
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:62:sediment concentrations throughout the water column, e.g. near the sea bed and near the water surface.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:62:In order to simulate the sediment dispersion close to natural conditions, wave disturbance effect has been
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:63:The dredging method, dredging schedule and details of the sediment release settings for the sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:63:The sediment will be dredged using two types of dredgers. The soft soil material below a depth of -5mCD
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:64:Figure 5.3 and Figure 5.4 show the sediment release schedules for the dredgers at the South Bank Wharf
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:66: Figure 5.3: Sediment release schedule for dredger
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:66: Figure 5.4: Sediment release schedule at offshore disposal site
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:5.4.3 Sediment Release Assumptions
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:The following assumptions have been made for the simulation of sediment plumes arising from dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:which means the sediment release will be more dispersed and thus the sediment concentration will be less.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:5.4.4 Sediment Property Representation
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:The five sediment fractions, critical bed shear stresses and fall velocities used in the sediment dispersion
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:model to represent bed sediments are shown in Table 5-4. The critical bed shear stress and fall velocities
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:Table 5-4: Sediment settling velocity and critical bed shear stress
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67: Sediment Sediment Settling Critical Shear
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:operation sailing back and forth to the offshore disposal site. The dredger disperses sediment into the water
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:column at a sediment release rate of 5.6 kg/s. The sediment loss rate (the so-called ‘S-factor’) is taken as
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:disposal site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 3,705kg/s. The barge will then take
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:68:site. The dredger disperses sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 5.6 kg/s. The
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:68:sediment loss rate (the so-called ‘S-factor’) is taken as 25kg/m3 for the Backhoe which follows the CIRIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:68:disposal site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 3,705kg/s. The barge will then take
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:68:disperses sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 2.2 kg/s. The sediment loss rate
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:68:disposal site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 4,913kg/s. The barge will then take
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:68:site. The dredger disperses sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 5.6 kg/s. The
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:68:sediment loss rate (the so-called ‘S-factor’) is taken as 25kg/m3 for the Backhoe which follows the CIRIA
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:68:disposal site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 3,705kg/s. The barge will then take
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:69:sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 4.5kg/s. The sediment loss rate (the so-called
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:69:minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 7,690kg/s. The TSHD will then take 55 minutes to sail back to
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:69:sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 4.5kg/s. The sediment loss rate (the so-called
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:69:minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 7,690kg/s. The TSHD will then take 55 minutes to sail back to
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:70:sailing, disposal and downtime) so that sediment releases have been made near continuously throughout
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:70:Results from the sediment dispersion modelling are discussed in turn for the river dredging and offshore
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:70:sediment concentration (SSC) or sediment deposition due to these activities above baseline levels.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:70:For SSC and sediment deposition, two types of analysis were undertaken:
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:70: Sedimentary Processes) of the Environmental Statement (ES).
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:71: Figure 5.5: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:72: Figure 5.6: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:73: Figure 5.7: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:74: Figure 5.8: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:75: Figure 5.9: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from dredging activities
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:76: Figure 5.10: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-surface layer) arising from dredging activities
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:77:Figure 5.11 shows the maximum changes in river bed thickness caused by the deposition of sediment from
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:77:the plumes created by river dredging. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:77:that is affected by the zone of influence from the sediment plumes.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:77: Figure 5.11: Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging activities during
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:78:licensed for the disposal of dredged sediment and is routinely monitored as part of a national programme.
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:78:Therefore, plumes arising from disposal activities and subsequent sediment deposition is unlikely to be of
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:78:sediment plume for this worst case. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:78:similar zone to the sediment plume. In reality, disposals will be at different points within the licensed area,
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:79: Figure 5.12: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from disposal activities
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:80: Figure 5.13: Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging activities during
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:80:The river dredging and offshore disposal activities will both cause plumes of sediment to form close to the
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:80:and all sediment particles suspended in the water column will eventually settle to the river or sea bed,
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:80:During dredging, there will be release of sediment particles from the deliberate physical disturbance to the
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:81:point of sediment release, the enhanced SSC values are considerably lower because the coarser material
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:81:than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition on the river bed will be of very minor magnitudes, in
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:81:areas covering the same spatial extent as the sediment plumes. Where this occurs in the river channel or
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:81:Overall, the changes in SSC and sediment deposition arising from the river dredging and offshore disposal
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:1: • Effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:4:well as hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling reported in Section 6.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:5:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (as set out in Section 6)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:1: • Impacts on marine ecology from increased suspended sediment during capital dredging and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:4:hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling undertaken. This section excludes consideration of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:5:Cross reference to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (Section 6) and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:5:the marine sediment and water quality assessment (Section 7) has been made when assessing potential
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:5:quay wall to create the berth pocket will remove both intertidal sediments and landside materials / soils.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:7: sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the Markey
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:7: sediments deposited during the Holocene, which overlie the glacial deposits from the last
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:7: and subsidence to south makes these sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:8:present in sediments from the survey area are rare and therefore, in this respect, the species present were
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:8:SS.SMu.ISaMU.Cap (Capitella capitata in enriched sublittoral muddy sediments) and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:8:sediment), where C. capitata dominated and was accompanied by large numbers of Ophryotrocha sp.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:8:These species are characteristic of fine sediments, usually with some level of organic pollution and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:9: would be indirectly affected (e.g. through sediment deposition during capital dredging).
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:9:Sediment type
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:9:Sediment types, as classified using the Folk triangle (Folk, 1954) for each of the sample stations across the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:9:2019 survey area are provided in Figure 9.3. A variety of sediment types were present across the survey
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:9:Sediment biotopes
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:9:‘Capitella capitata and Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:11:Figure9.3 Comparison of Folk (Folk, 1954) sediment types as determined from PSD analysis of samples acquired during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey, 2019
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:12:Figure 9.4 Distribution of biotopes determined from PSD and macrobenthic analysis of samples recovered during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey, 2019
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:14:sediments and in estuarine environments (Wolff 1968, Hughes 1998). The beds can play an important role
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:14:walkovers have confirmed that the intertidal comprises intertidal mud and gravelly sediment with rocks and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:16: A2 – Littoral sediment A2.12 Estuarine coarse sediment shores
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:16:Occasional areas of impoverished coarse sediment was also found along the low-mid shore (Ocean
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:16:depths, which would continue to influence the benthic communities present within the subtidal sediments.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:18: A. islandica is found buried in sandy and muddy sediments from the low intertidal zone down to 400m
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:19:that impede the natural movement of sediments and poor transition of habitats). Although there are areas
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:9.5.2 Effects of increased suspended sediment concentrations during dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:will disturb sediment, which will result in localised and short-term increases in suspended sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:Based on sediment quality sampling that was undertaken within the Tees estuary in July 2019 (as reported
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:in Section 7), it is not expected that any contaminated sediment would be released into the water column
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:ecology as a result of increased concentrations of suspended sediment within the water column (i.e.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:resuspended sediment which does not contain elevations beyond Action Level 2). The dredged sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:filter feeding molluscs). In addition, high concentrations of suspended sediment may impact on fish through
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:In general, sediment plumes induced by dredging are considered to pose only a limited risk to water quality
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:dredging periods. The sediment plume generated by dredging would likely be dispersed by tidal currents
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:upon disturbance of the sediment.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:during spring tides (Section 7.4.2). These are considerably lower than suspended sediment concentrations
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:immediate vicinity of the dredger. Sediment plume modelling predicts different plume extents and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:suspended sediment concentrations depending on the stage of dredging (as described in Section 6). In all
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:cases, the sediment plume is predicted to be very narrow within the river, with the phase of dredging with
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:The sediment plume modelling reported within Section 6 also extracted time series plots of changes in SSC
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:importance (where information is available) to increases in suspended sediment. This information is
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:S. spinulosa relies on suspended particles for its tube growth. Increased suspended sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:to increases in suspended sediment concentrations, according to this sensitivity review.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:A. islandica typically occurs in silty sediments, in sheltered to wave exposed conditions, where the surface
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:sediment likely gets resuspended regularly, and where accretion rates and moderate to high. A. islandica
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:can burrow in the sediment it lives in for several days, thereby it is able to avoid sudden changes in
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:the proposed dredge is considered to be of low sensitivity to increases in suspended sediment.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:The dominant sediment biotope present within the dredge footprint is EUNIS biotope A5.323, Nephtys
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:resistance and resilience to changes in suspended sediment and was reported to be not sensitive (to
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:changes in suspended sediment) (De-Bastos, 2016). As such, for the purposes of this assessment, the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:Given the temporary and localised nature of the predicted increase in suspended sediment, in addition to
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:the low/very low sensitivity of the key species present in the estuary to increased suspended sediment, an
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:is 32.5ha. This is expected to cause a very limited extent of suspended sediment concentrations, and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:Some of the sediment that is suspended as a result of the dredging activities will be deposited to the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:sediment fractions), or at a point in time within a few minutes to a few hours after this if it is carried in
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:suspension by the prevailing currents (for finer-grained sediment fractions) (Section 6). The modelling
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:carried out on this, as reported in Section 6, indicates that much of the resuspended sediment is deposited
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:from the sediment plumes.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:(deposition) from the sediment plume model were extracted at a series of points within the affected river
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:reaches (relating to locations of mudflats, as shown on Figure 6.53). Sediment deposition at all of these
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:et al., 2004). This movement of water allows for any deposited sediment to be moved around and away
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:relatively quickly. However, some sediment may still be present long enough to damage the fronds of F.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:sediments at Seal Sands, Bran Sands or North Gare Sands, due to the limited footprint of dredging activities,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:up to a deposit of 5 cm because they are able to burrow and reposition within the new sediment (Whomersley
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:sediment. This information is presented below.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:MarLIN reports that even though smothering by fine sediments may temporarily limit the feeding, growth
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:sediments for up to several weeks, and that recovery would be almost immediate. As such, S. spinulosa is
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:of sediments, with no effect on its growth or population structure being evident as a result of smothering
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:(Powilliet et al., 2006; 2009). As such, it is considered that a deposit of up to 30cm of fine sediments is
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:A sudden smothering of 5cm of sediment would temporarily suspend the feeding and respiration of A. alba
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:species that characterise fine sediment habitats within estuarine areas (mainly polychaete and oligochaete
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:of fluctuating environmental conditions, such as periodic sediment disturbance due to storms and are not
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:concluded therefore, that the rates of sediment deposition, and the overall degree of sedimentation, that is
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:component of the benthic community. Considering this, the predicted rates of sediment deposition, and the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:as a result of the deposition of fine sediments, with no impact in the longer term.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:25:may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment (Section 6.6.2). In areas adjacent to the north bank
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:25:The predicted changes to the rate of sedimentation within the navigation channel as a consequence of the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:11:Sediment that meets the appropriate criteria is likely to be disposed at sea, given that it is unlikely that there
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:11:are any local development schemes that require to large quantity of sediment created by the scheme. A
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:11:sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2019 to inform the EIA for the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:11:advance of a site-specific sediment quality survey being undertaken during 2020.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:15: • Dredging and offshore disposal of marine sediments.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:22: Sediment: Potential for contamination in
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:22: Sediment – 1,800,000m3 of sediment excavated made ground.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:22: Non-hazardous electrical and electronic Potential for some excavated sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:32:Dredged sediment is proposed to be disposed offshore; this will be subject to a marine licence from the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:32:MMO. Should it be determined by the MMO’s advisors that the dredged sediment is not suitable for offshore
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:32:Any hazardous excavated material or hazardous sediment that is not suitable for use on site would be
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:This section presents the baseline conditions with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:While the proposed scheme has the potential to alter hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes, the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:The assessment of potential effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime has been made with
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:that are relevant to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes, as presented within the NPS for Ports, are
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:Where relevant, applicants should undertake coastal geomorphological and sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:shorelines where the proposal could inhibit sediment flow or have an impact on coastal
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:2:Table 6.2 MPS requirements relevant to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:2:activity or development will have on coastal processes, including sediment movement.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:2:hydrodynamics and the sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:2:Table 6.3 North East Marine Plan policies relevant to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:2:A summary of consultation responses relevant to the assessment of hydrodynamics and sedimentary
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3: aspects of relevance to hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes, namely: on the tidal prism of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3: as stop start thresholds for parameters such as suspended sediment and 13 and Section 7
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3:For hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes, the study area needs to cover all areas of river, adjacent
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:4:Figure 6.1 Study area for assessing potential effects on hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:4:There has been much previous work to characterise the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:4:Table 6.5 Review of existing information on the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:4:2002 Teesmouth Sediment Study. HR Wallingford, 1989
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:4: Further information relating to sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:5: Anglo American Harbour Facilities – modelling, sediment transport, bed change
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:5: Environmental Statement. modelling and modelling of sediment plume
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:7:sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary, carried out over many decades. This work is summarised below
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:7:Table 6.6 Review of existing information on the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:7:2002 Teesmouth Sediment Study. HR Wallingford, 1989
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:7: Further information relating to sediment contamination and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:7: Anglo American Harbour Facilities – Royal HaskoningDHV, modelling, wave modelling, sediment transport, bed change
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:7: Environmental Statement. 2014 modelling and modelling of sediment plume released from
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10: • Sediment plume modelling: The updated and verified 3D Tees Estuary Tidal Model was used to
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10: predict movement of suspended sediment from the proposed dredging and disposal activities by
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10: coupling with a sediment plume model built in MIKE21-MT software. The sediment plume model
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10:synthesised and used in combination with knowledge of other factors, such geological constraints, sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10:the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime through an Expert Geomorphological Assessment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:12:of reaches require maintenance dredging to remove both sands and silts. The volume of sediments dredged
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:12:cumulatively (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2013). A notable proportion of this sediment is marine sand that is
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:12:channel deepened to its present depth. The role of the River Tees in supplying fine sediment to the coastal
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:12:to allow bypassing of sediment, but observed accumulations upstream, and a 24% reduction in the dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:12:requirement of the harbour, indicates that much of the river sediment is trapped by the structure (Royal
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:13:sediments) which is offset by maintenance dredging and disposal at offshore licenced disposal site Tees
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:16:Tees Bay and the Tees estuary attract sediment because the tidal current flows are generally quite low
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:16:the transport of sediment within Tees Bay, with an overall tendency for southerly directed transport because
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:16:sediment from the seabed enabling more to become transported by the tidal currents during these storms.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:16:subtleties locally influence sediment transport in these locations.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:21:bed upstream (flooding) flows are observed. These effects are important in supplying sediment to the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:21:estuary from offshore (the main sediment supply).
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:30:It is recognised that the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, as characterised within this
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:30:relative effect of the proposed scheme upon the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime will be
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:30:the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime in a relative manner, using the baseline understanding
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:31:6.4.4 Sedimentary regime
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:31:Suspended sediment concentrations
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:31:In general, suspended sediment concentrations (SSCs) are low within the estuary and within Tees Bay.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:31:the highest suspended sediment levels occur close to high water. After storm periods, higher concentrations
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:31:of suspended sediment have been noted around the Shell Jetty, but with little penetration further up the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:31: Suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:34:Sediment sources and transport
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:34:Historic bed sampling results in the vicinity of the proposed scheme show bed sediments in the area to
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:34:Within the system the driving forces for sediment transport are the tidal flows, density driven currents, wave
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:35: with the implication that fluvial sediment input to the estuary has reduced (ABPmer, 2005).
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:35: sediment into the estuary system. This material comes in on the flood tide, particularly during times
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:36:has also been utilised to move recently deposited accumulations of sediment to adjacent scour spots within
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:36:the river, thus maintaining sediment within the estuarine system and reducing the overall volumes of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:39:A review of the dredged sediment quality data is presented in Section 7.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:40:sedimentary regime arising from the demolition works is very low.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:40:6.5.2 Capital dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:Each year, between 25 – 30 million tonnes (wet weight) of dredged marine sediments from ports, harbours
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:offshore site will both result in sediment plumes. These effects have been investigated using numerical
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:modelling of the sediment dispersion associated with the dredging and disposal activities, as well as the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:changes in bed thickness when the suspended sediment falls from the plume to become deposited on the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:A MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model has been coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic model (MIKE3-HD)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:disturbance effects have been included. The dredging methods, schedule and sediment release settings
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:sediment releases have been made near continuously throughout the dredging operations (except for
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:Results from the sediment dispersion modelling are discussed in turn for the dredging and disposal activities.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:Note that all the modelling plots in the following sections show the elevations in SSC or sediment deposition
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:58:The sediment plumes that arise from the four stages of the dredging could potentially affect areas of riverbed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:58:or seabed that are remote from the point of sediment release in terms of either increases in SSC or increases
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:58:in sediment deposition. This could affect water quality (in terms of increased turbidity) or aquatic ecology
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:60:Sediment suspended within the dredging plumes will fall to the riverbed, either soon after disturbance or
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:60:spillage occurring during the dredging operation (for coarser-grained sediment fractions), or at a point in
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:60:finer-grained sediment fractions). Figure 6.50 shows the maximum changes in riverbed thickness caused
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:60:by this deposition. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the dredged areas (from
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:60:zone of influence from the sediment plumes.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:61:Figure 6.50 Maximum riverbed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:61:Within this maximum zone of influence from sediment plumes and bed deposition, the following receptors
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:61:could potentially be adversely affected by increases in SSC or increases in sediment deposition (or both
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:during Stage 4. Similarly it is only point 3 where any appreciable sediment deposition occurs, and this is at
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:and at Mudflat 3 it increases by a peak of 8mg/l (Figure 6.54). Sediment deposition on the mudflats is
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:6.56). Sediment deposition at these locations is predicted to be immeasurable (Figure 6.57).
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:background levels of concentrations (Figure 6.58). Sediment deposition at Location 6 (Middlesbrough
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:63:Overall changes of these magnitudes in SSC and sediment deposition are unlikely to cause significant
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:63:Figure 6.51 Location of points used for of timeseries analysis of changes in SSC and sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:64:Figure 6.53 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the water quality monitoring points
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:65:Figure 6.55 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the mudflat monitoring points
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:66:Figure 6.57 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the navigation (north bank) monitoring
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:67:Figure 6.59 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the navigation (south bank) monitoring
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:68:is licensed for the disposal of dredged sediment and is routinely monitored as part of a national programme.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:68:Therefore, plumes arising from disposal activities and subsequent sediment deposition is unlikely to be of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:68:activity commences and starts to form its own sediment plume (Plot H), the initial plume has moved
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:sediment plume associated with one release event (this example being from Stage 1). It can be seen that
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:much of the sediment falls to the bed within close proximity of the point of release, forming a small deposit
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:78:Figure 6.65 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from one disposal
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:79:Figure6.66 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from one disposal
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:79:Whilst turbidity and sediment deposition effects within the disposal site are to be expected (and indeed are
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:80:changes in SSC and sediment deposition
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:81:The river dredging and offshore disposal activities will both cause plumes of sediment to form close to the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:81:and all sediment particles suspended in the water column will eventually settle to the river or seabed,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:81:During dredging, there will be a release of sediment particles from the deliberate physical disturbance to the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:81:point of sediment release, the enhanced SSC values are considerably lower because the coarser material
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:82:and the Oil Terminal. Other than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition on the riverbed will be of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:82:very minor magnitudes, in areas covering the same spatial extent as the sediment plumes. Where this
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:82:Overall, the changes in SSC and sediment deposition arising from the river dredging and offshore disposal
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:82:sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:90: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is positive as it will help
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:91:6.6.4 Maintenance dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:91:maintenance dredging is likely to be due to the low levels of suspended sediment measured in this reach of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:8: • offshore disposal of dredged sediments; and,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:9:footprint as undifferentiated Triassic Rocks. This is a sedimentary Bedrock formed approximately 200 to
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:15:such as natural flood management, habitat improvements, RDP reduction (sediment and nutrients),
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:1: • hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (Section 6);
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:1: • marine sediment and water quality (Section 7);
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:10:Cross reference has been made, where relevant, to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27:In summary, the largest sediment plumes are likely to arise during Stage 2 of the dredging (i.e. BHD and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27:(it is not a sediment plume, rather a combined zone of influence). The sediment dispersion modelling of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27:of this assessment, the sediment plume may be regarded as representing a temporary loss of foraging
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:28:terns do not forage to any significant extent within the predicted range of the sediment plume. Likewise, the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:28:tern species as a result of increased suspended sediments during the construction phase.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:28:and re-suspension of sediment (Cook and Burton, 2010). However, common terns typically only dive to 1m
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:28:England, 2018a), and the area likely to be affected by the sediment plume at any one time represents around
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:12.5.3 Effects of sediment deposition on intertidal food resources
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:The deposition of fine sediment within intertidal areas due to capital dredging has the potential to affect
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:dredging, is presented in Section 6.5.2. Fine sediment will be deposited within minutes or hours if carried
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:invertebrate prey to birds feeding on the mudflats . The predicted minor accretion of sediment at North Tees
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1112_Appendix 10_Transport Statement.pdf:5: sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be set back into the riverbank). The
R-2020-0685-ESM-CON LAND 685.pdf:2:to ensure no pollutants or sediments enter surface waters.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:13: hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume effects would not extend to
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:14: hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume effects would not extend to
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:10: There would, therefore, be a requirement for dredging of estuarine (marine) sediments and
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:10: jack-up barge ‘punching’ into the underlying sediments when berthed at the quay during the
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: structures and capital dredging, increased suspended sediment concentrations and increased
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: sediment deposition. Based on the sensitivity of the benthic communities and habitats expected
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: sediment plume modelling, an impact of minor adverse significance is predicted with regard to
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: increased suspended sediment concentrations or sediment deposition during construction.
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26:5.29 Impacts on fish resources within the subtidal area, as a result of increased suspended sediment,
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28:5.48 Indirect impacts to heritage assets from changes to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: Marine Sediment and Water Quality
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30:5.64 The assessment of potential impacts associated with marine sediment and water quality has
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: been undertaken with reference to publicly available sediment and water quality data. A
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: potential impact on water quality has been identified due to the resuspension of sediment,
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: Additionally, sediment plume modelling shows relatively limited areas of high suspended solids
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: concentrations, which only occur for a matter of hours at a time before the suspended sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: process to minimise the potential for resuspension of sediments. Such measures include
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:1:mammals from the offshore disposal of dredged sediments are assessed in Section 26.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:7:known prey for harbour porpoise, exhibit a strong association with particular surface sediments.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:19:widely, dependent on the dredger type, operational stage, or environmental conditions (e.g. sediment type,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:sediment within the water column. However, marine mammals often inhabit turbid environments.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments during dredging or other activities will
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:disturbance and temporary loss of seabed habitat; increased suspended sediment concentrations and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:sediment re-deposition; smothering and underwater noise.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:3:3.6 Capital dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils / landside materials within
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:4:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME 43
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:4:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY 134
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:8:5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:8:6 Sediment sampling plan
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:9:effects on tidal currents and sediment transport may occur (i.e. the potential zone of influence). The
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:9: The study area for marine topics comprises the hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling domain,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:40: pollutants or sediments enter surface waters.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:45: 4. SEDIMENTATION/SILTATION ALLOWANCE OF 0.6m
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:6:HR Wallingford (2002). Teesmouth Sediment Study. EX 4514.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:6:HR Wallingford (2006). Northern Gateway Container Terminal. Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:6:sediment plumes arising from dredging. Construction Industry Research and Information Association
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:10:Robertson, M.J., Scruton, R.S. and Clarke, K. (2006). Effect of sediment on freshwater fish and fish
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:11:Royal HaskoningDHV (2013). Cell 1 Sediment Transport Study. Phase 1: Scoping Report. Scarborough
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:1:berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:8:3.6 Capital dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils /
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:8:estuarine (marine) sediments and excavation of soils / landside materials within the riverbank to create the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:8:A summary of the proposed design levels and dredge volumes for marine sediments is detailed in Section
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:8:3.6.1 Volume of marine sediments to be dredged
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:8:The total dredge volume for marine sediments is predicted to be approximately 1,800,000m3. As detailed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:8:marine sediment is anticipated to comprise Tidal Flat Deposits and Glacial Till. It is proposed that all areas
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:10:Table 3.2 Proposed volumes of marine sediments to be dredged (excluding over-dredge volumes)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:10:transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger to the offshore disposal site. It is assumed that
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:10:In addition to the removal of marine sediments, the proposed scheme will require the excavation of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:10:avoid the risk of a jack-up barge ‘punching’ into the underlying sediments when berthed at the quay during
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:11:sediments from the river channel would be deposited offshore within the Tees Bay C disposal site. As noted
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:19:suitable locations for the re-use of dredged sediment; three were located adjacent to the South Gare
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:1:disturbance and increased suspended sediments on migratory fish).
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:1: influencing the same area as affected by the sediment plume); and,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:3: of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of the approach channel, Approximately
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:4: effect on sediment transport or morphology
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:5: the Tees navigation channel, the turning circle and Tees Dock to a hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:11:27.5.2 Hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:11: • dispersion of suspended sediment during capital dredging and deposition at the offshore disposal
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:11: • changes to the sediment budget.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:11:(increased suspended sediment concentrations) are relevant to the CIA.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:11:Dispersion of suspended sediment and deposition on the seabed during capital dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:11:sediment which will disperse throughout the estuary according to the prevailing currents, prior to settling on
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:11:The extent of the sediment plume created by capital dredging is heavily dependent on the dredging plant
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:be used for dredging different sediment types as part of the same project. As noted in Section 6.5.2, it is
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:important to note that figures showing the “maximum extent of sediment plume dispersion and deposition”
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:Consequently, for the purposes of this CIA, the maximum zones of influence of sediment plume dispersion
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:27.3 presents a summary of the results of the predictive modelling of suspended sediment concentration
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:of sediment plume dispersion and deposition onto the river and/or seabed during capital dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:sediment in the water column was predicted to be in close proximity to the dredger, with plume dispersion
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:resulting in a significantly reduced concentration of suspended sediment beyond the source of the plume.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:For the NGCT studies, significant deposition of sediment was also only predicted in close proximity to the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:13:(right) as a result of the proposed scheme [Note: plots show sediment plume impacts arising from dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:14: • effect of increases in suspended sediments during maintenance dredging on food resources of SPA
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:14: • remobilisation and redistribution of sediments (which may be contaminated); and,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:14:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:14:sediment, and this measure would limit sediment release into the water column as far as practicable. The
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:14:sediment and water quality, marine ecology, ornithology, fish and fisheries) is discussed below.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:16:Changes to estuarine sediment budget
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:16:deposition of sediment which would be positive in areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, as it
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:16:offshore as a result. In addition, no changes to sediment transport in the predominantly sandy areas around
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:16:The Anglo American Harbour Facilities are predicted to result in a localised redistribution of sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:16:very small change in the overall fine sediment regime will not alter the present frequency of, or methodology
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:16:used for, maintenance dredging, and no effect on sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:cumulative impacts to arise to the estuarine sediment budget as a result of the projects screened into the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:27.5.3 Marine sediment and water quality
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:In relation to marine sediment and water quality, the proposed scheme has the potential to result in the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17: • dispersion of suspended sediment during marine works, dredging and disposal; and,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17: • changes to water quality associated with the release of sediment contamination.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:addition, the predictions made for each project represent sediment plume dispersion under specific tidal
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each project)
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:In relation to sediment contamination, data collected to inform the EIAs indicates that concentrations are
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:additional mitigation measures are identified to reduce any resulting sediment plume as far as possible and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:Smothering of benthic invertebrate communities due to deposition of sediment dispersed during
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:Sediment deposition resulting from the dredging for the proposed scheme will largely be within the proposed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:less than 5cm, within the same area of river that is affected by the zone of influence from the sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:(deposition) from the sediment plume model were extracted at a series of points within the affected river
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:reaches (relating to locations of mudflats, as shown on Figure 6.51). Sediment deposition at all of these
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:The predicted footprints of sediment deposition for the NGCT and the Anglo American Harbour Facilities
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:This deposition is likely to be temporary due to the unconsolidated nature of the sediment, and the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:19:The proposed scheme is not predicted to have an effect on sediment supply into the estuary. The very
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:19:minor changes in the hydrodynamic regime, specifically currents, may lead to a slight increase in sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:19:The studies for the NGCT scheme concluded that there would not be a change in the supply of fine sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:19:sediment budget of the estuary and, therefore, was assessed that there would be no impact on morphology
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:(i.e. dredging along the axis of the river rather than across it to ensure that, at any one time, sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:HaskoningDHV, 2015)). However, the additive effect of the sediment plumes from separate dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:sediment plumes may deter such species from migrating to and from spawning sites.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:the respective sediment plumes could result in an additive effect, as demonstrated in Figures 27.1 to 27.3.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:of the sediment plumes from separate dredging campaigns cannot be completely avoided if the campaigns
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:28:hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime (Section 27.5.2) concludes that no significant cumulative impacts
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:9:proposed scheme nor the modelled extent of the maximum-expected sediment plume from the capital
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:9:Following modelling of noise levels and sediment dispersion, it has been concluded that the overall zone of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:9:influence of the proposed scheme will be determined by the sediment plume during dredging activities.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:12: of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of the approach channel, Approximately proposed scheme, in-combination effects to the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:22:on tidal propagation, wave climate, current speeds and sediment budget of the estuarine system) has been
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:22:and so will cause no effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:22:The capital dredging of the river will cause plumes of sediment to form. The plume effects arising from the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:22:river dredging are characterised by a short-lived localised increase in suspended sediment concentrations
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:22:of sediment from the plumes on the river or seabed will be very small.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:23:The reductions in baseline current speeds may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment. In areas
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:23:Section 28), there is approximately 400ha of “intertidal sediment” habitat within the estuary. The area of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:25:requires use of TSHD and BHD on soft sediment in the channel and berth pocket) will result in plumes of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:25:The sediment dispersion modelling of Stage 2 dredging indicates that, at any given time, significant SSC
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:25:Full details of the sediment dispersion modelling are presented in Section 6.5.2.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:25:England, 2018a). The area affected by the sediment plume generated from proposed dredging, though
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:30:In terms of intra-project effects on foraging common terns, the zone of influence from the sediment plume
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:31: • effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:32:findings of invertebrate sampling undertaken on sediment samples from The Slems). The HRA undertaken
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:32:proposed scheme in combination with the NGCT scheme represents less than 1% of “intertidal sediment”
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:33:Effects on fish may be compounded by the combined sediment plumes of other projects or plans that may
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:34:An interaction between the sediment plumes would only occur in the unlikely event that the capital dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:34:sediment from Hartlepool channel is not considered sufficient to result in a lethal effect on fish, with any
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:34:sediment plumes occupy only half of the river cross section) has also been proposed for the NGCT project.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:35:29.6.4 In-combination effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:35:wide change in hydrodynamics. There is no predicted effect on the baseline sediment transport regime and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:35:of the Tees and the resultant effect on tidal flows and sediment transport.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:35:change the supply of fine sediment to the Tees, and the sediment predicted to deposit in its berth pocket
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:35:potential for an effect on the sediment budget of the estuary to arise and, therefore, there would be no
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:35:Sedimentary and hydrodynamic modelling undertaken for the consented Hartlepool approach channel
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:35:proposed scheme is predicted to be low. The magnitude of effect on the baseline sediment transport regime
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:35:sediment transport regime and seabed or shore morphology across the wider study area as a result of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:36:The zone of influence from predicted sediment plumes (including the combined plumes from the proposed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:1: disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be set back into
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2:a berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:4: • Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:8: material. As part of the marine licence application, the applicant will need to provide sediment sample analysis results to ensure the material is suitable
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:8: exceed the Cefas Action Level 2 guidelines for contaminated sediment. This can be determined after sediment samples have been tested.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11: 4.1. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:The potential effects of the proposed scheme on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime will be
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:The re-calibrated 3D Tees Estuary Tidal Model will be used to predict movement of suspended sediment
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:from the proposed dredging and disposal activity by coupling a sediment plume model built in MIKE21-MT
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:software. Sediment release rates will be estimated based on seabed and river conditions. The model will
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11: 4.2. Marine water and sediment quality
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:The findings from the sediment quality survey (to be undertaken in accordance with a sampling plan agreed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:sedimentary regime assessment to determine the implications of the proposed scheme on water quality
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:(in particular the effect of resuspension and dispersion of sediment during dredging and disposal activities).
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:estuary. Assuming that the concentrations of contaminants in sediment will be similar to those previously
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:will be given to tributyltin (TBT) concentrations within sediments as the current water quality classification
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:12:The findings from the sediment and water quality assessments and marine ecology assessments will be
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (particularly the plume dispersion modelling to
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:determine impacts on feeding terns which are an interest feature of the SPA), the sediment quality survey,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:14:The findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment will inform consideration as to
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:15:The potential impact of offshore disposal on bathymetry, benthic ecology, water and sediment quality and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:15:sediment plume modelling will, however, be used to inform impacts to water quality as a result of the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:16:the Tees transitional waterbody. The findings from the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:16:assessment, water and sediment quality assessment and marine ecology assessment will feed into the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:18: 4. SEDIMENTATION/SILTATION ALLOWANCE OF 0.6m
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:6:channel and to create a berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments and
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be set back into the
R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:8: • offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:8:This would include dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils / landside material within the river
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:8:The total dredged volume for marine sediments is predicted to be approximately 1,800,000m3. Dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:8:the transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger to the offshore disposal site.
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:1: •Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime;
R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:4:environment. It can alter flow regimes, release contaminants accrued within the sediment,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:1:sediments are assessed in Sections 26. Potential cumulative impacts are addressed in Section 27.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:3: thresholds for parameters such as suspended sediment and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:3:informed by the hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling undertaken, as well as the understanding
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:4:Cross reference to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (Section 6), the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:6:inhabiting soft sediment environments.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:12:During capital dredging, approximately 1.8Mm3 of sediment (including approximately 1.27Mm3 of soft
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:12:details of the increase in SSC, including the visual output of sediment plume modelling for the capital
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:12:dredging, is provided in Section 6. The peak suspended sediment concentration within the Tees during the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:13:As detailed in the water quality assessment in Section 7, sediment quality testing from 2019 indicates that
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:13:it is very unlikely that disturbance of sediment during the dredging would result in exceedances of EQSs,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:13:sediment plume creating a ‘barrier’ effect could cause a significant disruption to the annual migration pattern,
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:13:during a period of very hot and dry weather. Modelling of the sediment plume during capital dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:13:of suspended sediments are predicted to decrease significantly with increased distance from the dredging
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:14:period. However, while unlikely, it has to be taken into account that sediment plumes encompassing the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:22:capital dredging activity will consequently result in an increase in sediment deposition, which has the
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:22:fish/shellfish. The extent of sediment deposition above baseline levels is detailed in Section 6. The
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:22:maximum sediment deposition, illustrated in Figure 6.50, shows that much of the sediment falls to bed
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:22:sediment deposition, it again can be assumed that feeding fish would be accustomed to similar conditions
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:23:dominated by fucoid algae). The intertidal area comprises mud and gravelly sediment with some rocks.
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:5: sedimentary regime (see Section 6) the study area comprises all areas of river, adjacent coastline
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:8:heritage assets which may arise as a result of changes to hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:9:by-product of changes to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes resulting from a project) may also depend
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:14:Archaeology, 2014) suggested the presence of five sedimentary units:
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:14: • Unit 2 Estuarine alluvium and peat (possible mid-Holocene sediments);
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:14: • Unit 3 Marine sediments/ Estuarine alluvium;
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:14: • Unit 4 Estuarine alluvium/ polluted fluvial sediments; and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:14:remains, preserved beneath later sediments. Given this potential, geoarchaeological assessment of
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:21:directly and indirectly change the hydrodynamic and sedimentary process regimes, both locally and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:21:than those protected by sediment cover. Conversely, if increased sedimentation results in an exposed site
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:21:Potential effects upon the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime are assessed in Section 6. With regard
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:21:to effects during construction it is concluded that, other than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:22:hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary. Consequently, there is no pathway for
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:22:additional, indirect impacts to heritage assets associated with changes in sediment deposition, over and
R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:22: • Reductions in baseline current speeds may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment:
R-2019-0427-FFM-60686_01 - Planning Statement - 28.06.19.pdf:22: runoff from the mounds could result in elevated levels of suspended sediment. A number of
R-2019-0427-FFM-60686_01 - Planning Statement - 28.06.19.pdf:22: working practices and techniques are suggested to minimise and mitigate the effects of sediment
R-2019-0427-FFM-60686_01 - Planning Statement - 28.06.19.pdf:22: of soils into the mounds. Measures for dealing with the management of sediment in the drainage
R-2019-0427-FFM-60686_01 - Planning Statement - 28.06.19.pdf:22: sediment from surface water runoff.
R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix D1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF:116:Notes: Groundwater flooding may either be associated with shallow unconsolidated sedimentary aquifers
R-2019-0427-FFM-1 Appendix C1 Enviro Insight Report.PDF:83:Notes: Groundwater flooding may either be associated with shallow unconsolidated sedimentary aquifers
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P02.pdf:95: S = Soils, Made Ground and sediments Volatile Pesticides
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P02.pdf:105:drains during the works to ensure no pollutants or sediments enter the surface water network. This will
R-2019-0427-FFM-Management and Maintenance Plan v2.PDF:1: Remove sediment from pre-treatment devices. Six monthly, or as required
R-2019-0427-FFM-Management and Maintenance Plan v2.PDF:1: Remove litter and debris and inspect for sediment. Six monthly, or as required
R-2019-0427-FFM-Management and Maintenance Plan v2.PDF:1: Remove sediment from inlets, outlets and forebay. Annually
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:3:5. Sediment Management 22
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:4:5.2 Sediment Removal 23
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:5:the requirements with respect to the sediment management. The application also seeks to obtain permission
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:6: To identify the requirement for silt and sedimentation management;
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:20:ponds, which will be contribute to the removal of suspended sediment from the surface water discharge from
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:21:attenuation pond, which will be contribute to the removal of suspended sediment from the surface water
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:21:contribute to the removal of suspended sediment from the surface water discharge from these sites.
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:22:5. Sediment Management
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:22:Sediment pollution could be generated on site from several sources, but primarily the runoff from the
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:22:exposes storage mounds are anticipated to result in elevated levels of suspended sediment. It is considered
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:22:best practice to ensure that this sediment laden runoff is not allowed to directly flow into the Fleet, Lackenby
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:22:Channel or the Knitting Wife Beck. In addition, it is anticipated that higher level of suspended sediment may
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:22:This section of the document provides the methodology by which any sediment laden flows will be managed,
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:22:is intended to minimise and mitigate the effects of sediment pollution into the nearby watercourses.
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:23:discharged into the sedimentation pond. If wash waster is considered to be contaminated, then it is to be
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:23:5.2 Sediment Removal
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:23:During the placement and storage of the soils, sediment management will need to be provided. This is to be
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:23:Other secondary method could be employed to assist in the removal of sediment from surface water runoff,
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:24:sediment management measures are to be described in the CEMP.
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:26:It is anticipated that the runoff from the storage mounds will contain significant levels of sediment and
R-2019-0427-FFM-R 2019 0427 FFM 8 8 2019.pdf:3:The Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage strategy, Section 5 Sediment Management,
R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:25:sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the Market Weighton Axis.
R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:25:complex of peats, estuarine and marine sediments deposited during the Holocene, which overlie
R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:25:sedimentation due to fluctuations in relative sea level during the mid-Holocene, from approximately
R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:25:the north and subsidence to the south makes these sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea
R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:30:to result in increased sedimentation rather than an increase in pollutants. This would be dealt with
R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:30:sedimentation from the mudstone reach Dabholm Gut any potential impact is likely to be beneficial
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P01.pdf:93: S = Soils, Made Ground and sediments Volatile Pesticides
R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P01.pdf:102:drains during the works to ensure no pollutants or sediments enter the surface water network. This will
R-2021-0624-NM-19944164_1.pdf:2:diversity and abundance of physical habitats offered by vegetation, sediment, vegetation –
R-2021-0624-NM-19944164_1.pdf:2:sediment-related physical features, and hydraulic habitats that can be observed at low flow.
R-2022-0186-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-DR-C-0303-A1-C01-South_Bank_Details_Sheet_3_of_4.pdf:1: PROMOTE SEDIMENT ACCRETION AND
R-2022-0186-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-DR-C-0303-A1-C01-South_Bank_Details_Sheet_3_of_4.pdf:1: LOW FLOW CHANNEL FORMED OF Dn50 350-500mm AGGREGATE SUBSTRATE TO PROMOTE SEDIMENT Client
R-2022-0186-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-DR-C-0304-A1-C01-South_Bank_Details_Sheet_4_of_4.pdf:1: 1 PROMOTE SEDIMENT ACCRETION AND AID DEVELOPMENT OF AN OPEN 1 VEGETATED VERGE
R-2022-0186-CD-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-DR-C-0304-A1-C01-South_Bank_Details_Sheet_4_of_4.pdf:1: ESTABLISH THROUGH TIDAL SEDIMENT ACCREATION AND SELF VEGETATION TO WALL AT A DISTANCE
R-2021-0166-FFM-Environmental Risk Assessment.pdf:25:sediment suspension as samples were filtered on the second monitoring round. The TPH and PAH
R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:7:sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the Market Weighton Axis. The
R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:7:complex of peats, estuarine and marine sediments deposited during the Holocene, which overlie
R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:7:sedimentation due to fluctuations in relative sea level during the mid-Holocene, from approximately
R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:7:the north and subsidence to the south makes these sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea
R-2021-0166-FFM-Ground Remediation Options Report.pdf:27:During groundworks the Contractor shall take measures to prevent surface water and sediment run off from
R-2022-0494-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:4: Sediment Management plan: The Sediment Management Plan should
R-2022-0494-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:4: sediments and minimise the transport of material downstream. The
R-2022-0494-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:13: i Sediment Management Plan
R-2022-0494-FFM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2: i Sediment Management Plan
R-2022-0494-FFM-EA_R20220494FFM_OFFICIAL_130722.pdf:1: • Sediment Management plan: The Sediment Management Plan should
R-2022-0494-FFM-EA_R20220494FFM_OFFICIAL_130722.pdf:1: sediments and minimise the transport of material downstream. The plan
R-2022-0494-FFM-19293141_1.pdf:21: A1080. The weir will have a significant effect on flood levels and sediment deposition within
R-2022-0494-FFM-19293141_1.pdf:34: A1080. The weir will have a significant effect on flood levels and sediment deposition within
R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:8:Hood’s Bay and are sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of
R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:8:Hartlepool foreshore there is complex of peats, estuarine and marine sediments deposited
R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:8:environmental records at Hartlepool indicate changes in sedimentation due to fluctuations in
R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:8:subsidence to the south makes these sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea level
R-2022-0494-FFM-21089271_1.pdf:132: Sedimentation by Pipette - BS:1377-2:1990* Determination of Maximum Dry
R-2022-0494-FFM-21089271_1.pdf:134: Sieving Sedimentation
R-2022-0494-FFM-21089271_1.pdf:135: Sieving Sedimentation
R-2022-0494-FFM-21089271_1.pdf:136: Sieving Sedimentation
R-2022-0494-FFM-21089271_1.pdf:137: Sieving Sedimentation
R-2022-0494-FFM-21089271_1.pdf:138: Sieving Sedimentation
R-2022-0494-FFM-21089271_1.pdf:139: Sieving Sedimentation
R-2022-0494-FFM-21089271_1.pdf:140: Sieving Sedimentation
R-2022-0494-FFM-21089271_1.pdf:141: Sieving Sedimentation
R-2022-0494-FFM-21089271_1.pdf:142: Sieving Sedimentation
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Response.pdf:5:the MMO including hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, water and sediment quality,
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Report.pdf:6:MMO including hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, water and sediment quality,
R-2022-0205-SC-Screening Opinion Report.pdf:10:MMO including hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, water and sediment quality,
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:5: Increased suspended sediment concentrations (SSC) 42
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:5: Release of sediment bound contaminants 42
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:15: determined). This would require localised mobilisation of sediment through airlift or
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:28: sediment sequences within the Tees basin, frequently deeply buried below modern
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:42:Increased suspended sediment concentrations (SSC)
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:42: resuspension and deposition of sediments and potentially formation of sediment plumes
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:42: sediments enter from Tees Bay. It is also immediately adjacent to the regularly dredged
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:42:Release of sediment bound contaminants
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:42: disturbance of sediments and/or removal of mattressing as a result of the Proposed
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:42: 6.2.6 Sediment contaminant sampling and analysis undertaken in 2014 for the York Potash
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:42: into the dredged Tees channel, revealed sediments to contain relatively high levels of
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:43: result of the removal of piles, these are anticipated to be from the upper sediment layers
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:43: Cefas Guideline Action Levels for the disposal of dredged material (Cefas, 2000); Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:43:ES%20Section%207%20Marine%20sediment%20and%20water%20quality.pdf Accessed January 2022
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:49: 6.9.2 The proposed works within the Tees Estuary would affect only sediments previously
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:92: demolition and sedimental disruption.
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:94: the Tees Estuary River will require pollution prevention and sediment control measures to be
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:109: responses) in relation to migratory fish and potentially sediment bound contaminant
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:109:Release of sediment and/or mattress bound contaminants
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:109:to be from the upper sediment layers within the Site. It is considered reasonable that any
R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:110: responses) in relation to migratory fish and potentially sediment bound contaminant
R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:178:estimation is based on stream sediment data collected from small streams at a sampling density of 1 per 2.5
R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:178:km2; this is the case for most of Scotland, Wales and southern England. The stream sediment data are
R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:170:estimation is based on stream sediment data collected from small streams at a sampling density of 1 per 2.5
R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:170:km2; this is the case for most of Scotland, Wales and southern England. The stream sediment data are
R-2021-1048-FFM-4153 & 4154 Area A Former Steelworks Redcar Contract 1 & 2 (Area A) (Final report).pdf:4: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2021-1048-FFM-4153 & 4154 Area A Former Steelworks Redcar Contract 1 & 2 (Area A) (Final report).pdf:5: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2021-1048-FFM-4153 & 4154 Area A Former Steelworks Redcar Contract 1 & 2 (Area A) (Final report).pdf:14: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2021-1048-FFM-4153 & 4154 Area A Former Steelworks Redcar Contract 1 & 2 (Area A) (Final report).pdf:23: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2021-1048-FFM-4153 & 4154 Area A Former Steelworks Redcar Contract 1 & 2 (Area A) (Final report).pdf:450:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2021-1048-FFM-4153 & 4154 Area A Former Steelworks Redcar Contract 1 & 2 (Area A) (Final report).pdf:628:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2021-1048-FFM-4153 & 4154 Area A Former Steelworks Redcar Contract 1 & 2 (Area A) (Final report).pdf:990: chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which and Sediments
R-2021-1048-FFM-4153 & 4154 Area A Former Steelworks Redcar Contract 1 & 2 (Area A) (Final report).pdf:1000: Fluorescence mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which is then and Sediments.
R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf:5: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 5
R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf:18: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf:27: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf:555:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf:1261:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf:1270:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf:1280:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf:1289:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf:1298:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:170:estimation is based on stream sediment data collected from small streams at a sampling density of 1 per 2.5
R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:170:km2; this is the case for most of Scotland, Wales and southern England. The stream sediment data are
R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-05-Rem_Strat_LWoW.pdf:35:sediment run off, and sheen potentially resulting from site activities. If identified further assessment as
R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:7:sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the Market Weighton Axis. The
R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:7:complex of peats, estuarine and marine sediments deposited during the Holocene, which overlie
R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:7:sedimentation due to fluctuations in relative sea level during the mid-Holocene, from approximately
R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:7:the north and subsidence to the south makes these sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea
R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000004_App_B-1_Part9.pdf:68:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000005_App_B-2_Part2.pdf:83: chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which and Sediments
R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000005_App_B-2_Part2.pdf:93: Fluorescence mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which is then and Sediments.
R-2021-0100-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-01-Prairie_ESA_Addendum.pdf:34: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2021-0100-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-01-Prairie_ESA_Addendum.pdf:42: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2021-0100-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-01-Prairie_ESA_Addendum.pdf:51: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2021-0100-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-01-Prairie_ESA_Addendum.pdf:583:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2021-0100-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-01-Prairie_ESA_Addendum.pdf:1365: chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which and Sediments
R-2021-0100-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-01-Prairie_ESA_Addendum.pdf:1375: Fluorescence mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which is then and Sediments.
R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000005_App_B-2_Part1.pdf:4: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000005_App_B-2_Part1.pdf:11: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000005_App_B-2_Part1.pdf:21: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000005_App_B-2_Part1.pdf:102:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000004_App_B-1_Part12.pdf:66: chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which and Sediments
R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000004_App_B-1_Part12.pdf:76: Fluorescence mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which is then and Sediments.
R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000004_App_B-1_Part1.pdf:4: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000004_App_B-1_Part1.pdf:12: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000004_App_B-1_Part1.pdf:21: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf:18: Particle Size Distribution by Sedimentation Tests;
R-2021-0067-CD-Jan 20212366 CEMP Metals Recovery Processing Area.pdf:18:associated sediment transport from runoff and subsequently drainage during site activities:
R-2021-0067-CD-Jan 20212366 CEMP Metals Recovery Processing Area.pdf:21:To prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other substance relating to construction
R-2021-0067-CD-Jan 20212366 CEMP Metals Recovery Processing Area.pdf:22:To prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other substance relating to construction
R-2021-0067-CD-Jan 20212366 CEMP Metals Recovery Processing Area.pdf:22:To prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other substance relating to construction
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:3:5. Sediment Management 22
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:4:5.2 Sediment Removal 23
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:5:the requirements with respect to the sediment management. The application also seeks to obtain permission
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:6: To identify the requirement for silt and sedimentation management;
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:20:ponds, which will be contribute to the removal of suspended sediment from the surface water discharge from
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:21:attenuation pond, which will be contribute to the removal of suspended sediment from the surface water
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:21:contribute to the removal of suspended sediment from the surface water discharge from these sites.
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:22:5. Sediment Management
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:22:Sediment pollution could be generated on site from several sources, but primarily the runoff from the
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:22:exposes storage mounds are anticipated to result in elevated levels of suspended sediment. It is considered
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:22:best practice to ensure that this sediment laden runoff is not allowed to directly flow into the Fleet, Lackenby
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:22:Channel or the Knitting Wife Beck. In addition, it is anticipated that higher level of suspended sediment may
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:22:This section of the document provides the methodology by which any sediment laden flows will be managed,
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:22:is intended to minimise and mitigate the effects of sediment pollution into the nearby watercourses.
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:23:discharged into the sedimentation pond. If wash waster is considered to be contaminated, then it is to be
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:23:5.2 Sediment Removal
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:23:During the placement and storage of the soils, sediment management will need to be provided. This is to be
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:23:Other secondary method could be employed to assist in the removal of sediment from surface water runoff,
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:24:sediment management measures are to be described in the CEMP.
R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:26:It is anticipated that the runoff from the storage mounds will contain significant levels of sediment and
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:97: S = Soils, Made Ground and sediments Volatile Pesticides
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:107:drains during the works to ensure no pollutants or sediments enter the surface water network. This will
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:121:The Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage strategy, Section 5 Sediment Management,
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:135:transferred to the holding bays for storage. It is also understood that periodically, sediment (including
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:722:Sample 8AB2 was not ammenable for analysis of free cyanide levels due to high sediment content.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:5: • Measures to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off and
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:5: • Contaminated liquids or sediments will be directed away from
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:13: b Measures to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off and any other substances
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:13: c The requirement for contaminated liquids or sediments will be directed away from the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:34: contaminated water body bed sediments, trade / industrial
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:34: highly contaminated water and sediments. As such, the
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:36: and to be filled with contaminated sediments, the introduction of further material to this
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:41: sediments in within the site, or suspended solids, as well as capture
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:50: sediment suspended solids, as well as capture any magnitude of change and so
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:52: sediment as capture any spills/oil and grease, prior to Moderate magnitude of
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:29: Management Plan (CEMP), which will outline measures to prevent sediment, dust,
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:29: iii. Contaminated liquids or sediments produced as a result of construction, i.e. through
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:37: measures to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other substance
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:39: Teesmouth Pollution of riverine Indirect pollution as a result of sediment, Major Direction of sediments and contaminated Negligible
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:39: level measures to prevent sediment and dust
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:39: Teesmouth Pollution of riverine Indirect pollution as a result of sediment, Major Direction of sediments and contaminated Negligible
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:39: level measures to prevent sediment and dust
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:43: construction-related harm migratory fish commuting through effect at a sediment and dust entering the river.
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:53:prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other substance relating
R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:53:iii. Contaminated liquids or sediments produced as a result of construction, i.e.
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 4).PDF:6: Sediment Sampling
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 4).PDF:7:RE: The Slems Sediment Samples
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 4).PDF:7:The Slems sediment samples have been processed using a 0.5 mm net sieve. All remaining material
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 4).PDF:7:from the initial sediment samples have been sorted to identify any living organisms contained within
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 4).PDF:9:No Redshank or other waders were seen on any survey and it is assumed that the sediment does not
R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:28: 3 Appendix 4.3: Ecoteknica UK Ltd: The Slems Sediment Samples;
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 6 HRA Screening Report(1).pdf:29: • Sediment release from piling and dredging;
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 6 HRA Screening Report(1).pdf:29: • Changes to coastal processes and sediment transport pathways.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:134: suspended sediment release on or adjacent to the proposed development. This
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:138: spillages, mobilisation of contaminants and sediment by disturbance of contaminated
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:139: sediments in and grease, prior to discharge.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:143: and sediment any spills/oil and grease, prior to discharge.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:144: and sediment any spills/oil and grease, prior to discharge.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:154: of sediment into surface water receptors through runoff from the site;
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:157: Phytoplankton Direct and Indirect excessive sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil or fluid leaks.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:158: coastal bed sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil or fluid leaks.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:158: sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil or fluid leaks.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:158: sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil or fluid leaks.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:158: sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil or fluid leaks.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:159: sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil or fluid leaks.
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:160: Pollution by all priority prevent excessive sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil or fluid
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:160: prevent excessive sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil or fluid
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:161: prevent excessive sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil or fluid
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:161: prevent excessive sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil or fluid
R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:251: excessive sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil or fluid leaks.
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 6 HRA Screening Report.pdf:29: • Sediment release from piling and dredging;
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 6 HRA Screening Report.pdf:29: • Changes to coastal processes and sediment transport pathways.
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 10 Desk Based Assessment.pdf:8:The site lies on Mercia Mudstone, a sedimentary bedrock laid down over 200 million
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:8: • Sediment availability/transport
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:27: sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:28: construction works to prevent excessive sediment input and mitigate
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:28: construction works to prevent excessive sediment input and mitigate
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:28: construction works to prevent excessive sediment input and mitigate
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:28: construction works to prevent excessive sediment input and mitigate
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:28: construction works to prevent excessive sediment input and mitigate
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:29: Specific Pollutants construction works to prevent excessive sediment input and
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:29: construction works to prevent excessive sediment input and
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:29: construction works to prevent excessive sediment input and
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:29: construction works to prevent excessive sediment input and
R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:32: visible indicating sediment input.
R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:30: • Sediment release from piling and dredging;
R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:30: • Changes to coastal processes and sediment transport pathways.
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:52: increased suspended sediment release on or adjacent to the proposed
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:56: sediment into surface water receptors through runoff from the site;
R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:74: • pollution prevention in terms of sediment / oil / fluid leaks
R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:31: Intertidal – Littoral mixed sediments 2.50 High distinctiveness habitat
R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:37:nature and comprises mixed sediments. It is assumed that similar extent of replacement intertidal
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:19: habitat across Teesworks, including intertidal sediment and intertidal hard structures such
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:37: Intertidal – Littoral mixed sediments 2.50 High distinctiveness habitat
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:43:nature and comprises mixed sediments. It is assumed that similar extent of replacement intertidal
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:50:for the intertidal sediment and did not consider the jetty as a habitat area.
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:50:intertidal hard structures and intertidal sediment, the former being the wooden jetty, which extends
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:50:intertidal sediment is shown in Photograph 1. Condition assessments for both categories of habitat
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:51: Photograph 1. A typical view of the jetty and the intertidal sediment
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:52:Artificial structures are present that are impeding the natural movement of sediments or water,
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:53:3. Inter tidal sediment
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:53:the correct classification of the habitat would be “artificial mixed sediments”. This scores 2 for
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:53:intertidal sediment BM3.0 uses the following five criteria:
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:53:Artificial structures are present that are impeding the natural movement of sediments or water,
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:53:The intertidal sediment is not in a local strategy but is considered to be ecologically desirable in this
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:54:Intertidal sediment = 2.5*2*2*1.1 = 11.00 BDUs
R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:54: reduction in the value of the intertidal sediment due to the removal of the connectivity
R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:31: Intertidal – Littoral mixed sediments 2.50 High distinctiveness habitat
R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:37:nature and comprises mixed sediments. It is assumed that similar extent of replacement intertidal
R-2021-0057-VC-FAO-JBAU-XX-XX-TN-Z-0001-S3-P01-South_Tees_Stockpile_5_FRA.PDF:4:5 Sediment Management 4
R-2021-0057-VC-FAO-JBAU-XX-XX-TN-Z-0001-S3-P01-South_Tees_Stockpile_5_FRA.PDF:9:5 Sediment Management
R-2021-0057-VC-FAO-JBAU-XX-XX-TN-Z-0001-S3-P01-South_Tees_Stockpile_5_FRA.PDF:9: Management of sediment pollution associated with the construction of the South Bank
R-2021-0057-VC-FAO-JBAU-XX-XX-TN-Z-0001-S3-P01-South_Tees_Stockpile_5_FRA.PDF:10: Runoff from the storage mounds will contain sediment and this will be managed in
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils_Part1.pdf:41: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils_Part1.pdf:47: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils_Part1.pdf:57: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils_Part1.pdf:179:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils.pdf:41: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils.pdf:47: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils.pdf:57: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils.pdf:179:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils.pdf:342: chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which and Sediments
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils.pdf:352: Fluorescence mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which is then and Sediments.
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils_Part2.pdf:61: chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which and Sediments
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils_Part2.pdf:71: Fluorescence mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which is then and Sediments.
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0181-MPA_ROA and Strategy.pdf:31:(through the Lackenby Channel) measures shall be deployed to prevent sediment, dust, surface water
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0181-MPA_ROA and Strategy.pdf:32:During groundworks the Contractor shall take measures to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0181-MPA_ROA and Strategy.pdf:33: • measures to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other substance relating to
R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0223-01-MPA_Deep_Soils.pdf:33:Surface water monitoring was completed co-located with the sediment sampling and the results are presented
R-2023-0224-CD-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:40:Eroded sediments (incl. silt) will be retained on site with erosion and sediment control structures (e.g. such
R-2023-0224-CD-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:40:as sediment traps, silt fences, swales, settlement tanks, cut off ditches etc.).
R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:14: earthworks sedimentation sump / silt trap in a controlled fashion. No silt or mud shall be allowed
R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:14: from contamination, including sediment, prior to discharging into site
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:32:6.18 The broad habitat for shoveler is listed as supralittoral sediment and the relevant nitrogen critical load
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:32: The broad habitat is listed as supralittoral sediment. As noted above, examination of the coastal
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:38: Supralittoral sediment - Coastal stable 8 10
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:38: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type)
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:40: TCC3 sediment – 0.0102 1.03 0.0109 0.20 0.223 1.998 1.56 1.04 0.211 1.05% 1.25 63%
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:41: sediment 0.00335 1.07 0.00354 0.28 0.223 1.998 1.56 1.07 0.284 0.34% n/a n/a
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:50: Supralittoral sediment - Coastal
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:50: TCC9 Cleveland Coast Supralittoral sediment (acidic 0.314 8 10 3.93% 3.14% 8.4 8.71 109% 87%
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:52: TCC3 sediment – 0.0143 1.03 0.0152 0.20 0.223 1.998 1.56 1.04 0.215 1.48% 1.26 63%
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:53: sediment 0.00842 1.07 0.00894 0.28 0.223 1.998 1.56 1.08 0.289 0.87% n/a n/a
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:54: Supralittoral sediment – Coastal
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:55: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:55: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:58: Supralittoral sediment –
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:58: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:58: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:60: TCC3 Supralittoral sediment – Coastal stable dune 0.0637 0.0838 0.138
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:60: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:60: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:65:18 The APIS website advises the following for littoral and supralittoral sediments 1. No expected negative impact on species due to impacts on the species' broad habitat. 2. Potential positive impact on species
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:72: TCC9 for Sandwich tern and little tern (for supralittoral sediment). There are predicted exceedances
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:72: of the long-term (30 ug/m2) and short-term (75 ug/m2) Critical Level for supralittoral sediment. At
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:72: channel. The removal of sediment will inevitably result in the removal of nutrients contained within
R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:72: those sediments.
R-2023-0224-CD-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:15:a central sedimentation/settling tank. Water shall then be recycled from the tank and re-used
R-2023-0224-CD-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:26: Stair sedimentation
R-2023-0224-CD-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:30: Stair sedimentation
R-2023-0224-CD-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:37: sedimentation
R-2023-0224-CD-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:86: Stair sedimentation
R-2023-0224-CD-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:89: Remove litter and debris and inspect for sediment, oil and significant storm
R-2023-0224-CD-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:89: Inspect sediment accumulation rate and establish months of operations,
R-2023-0224-CD-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:89: Remove sediments from inlets, outlet and forebay Annually or As required
R-2023-0224-CD-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:89: Remove sediments from inlets, outlets, forebay and main Every 5 years or As
R-2023-0224-CD-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:90: Inspection of tank for debris and sediment build-up,
R-2023-0224-CD-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:90: Inspection of tank for debris and sediment build-up, Annually and following
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:27: sediment - Coastal stable dune grasslands 8 10 0.223 1.998 1.56
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:27: sediment - Shifting coastal dunes
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:28: sediment - Coastal stable dune grasslands 10 15 0.856 4.856 4
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:28: sediment - Coastal stable dune grasslands 8 10 0.223 1.998 1.56
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:28: sediment - Shifting coastal dunes
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:28:TCC1 – TCC13 (a) sediment - Coastal stable dune grasslands 10 15 0.856 4.856 4
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:28: sediment - Pioneer, low-mid, mid-upper 20 30 acidity impacts on broad
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:28: Eurasian teal - Wintering - Littoral sediment -
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:28: Red Knot - Wintering - Littoral sediment -
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:29: Sanderling - Wintering - Littoral sediment -
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:29: sediment - Pioneer, low-mid, mid-upper 20 30 due to acidity impacts on broad
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:29: Supralittoral sediment (Ammophila arenaria -
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:29: Supralittoral sediment (Ammophila arenaria -
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:29: Supralittoral sediment (Festuca rubra -
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:29: Supralittoral sediment (Phleum arenarium -
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Supralittoral sediment (Ammophila arenaria
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Supralittoral sediment (Elymus farctus ssp.
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Supralittoral sediment (Leymus arenarius
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Supralittoral sediment (Salix repens - Holcus
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Littoral sediment (Annual Salicornia Saltmarsh) 20 30
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Littoral sediment (Elytrigia atherica saltmarsh) 20 30
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Littoral sediment (Elytrigia repens saltmarsh) 20 30
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Littoral sediment (Puccinellia maritima
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Littoral sediment (Puccinellia maritima
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Littoral sediment (Suaeda Maritima Saltmarsh) 20 30
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:31: Littoral sediment (Transitional low marsh
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:31: Supralittoral sediment (Honkenya peploides -
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:31: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type)
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:31: Nonbreeding – Littoral sediment
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:31: Littoral sediment
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:31: Nonbreeding – Littoral sediment
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:31: sediment
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:31: Breeding – Littoral sediment
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:32: Littoral sediment
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:32: Littoral sediment
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:86:6.18 The broad habitat for shoveler is listed as supralittoral sediment and the relevant nitrogen critical load
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:86: The broad habitat is listed as supralittoral sediment. As noted above, examination of the coastal
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:92: Supralittoral sediment - Coastal stable 8 10
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:92: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type)
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:94: TCC3 sediment – 0.0102 1.03 0.0109 0.20 0.223 1.998 1.56 1.04 0.211 1.05% 1.25 63%
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:95: sediment 0.00335 1.07 0.00354 0.28 0.223 1.998 1.56 1.07 0.284 0.34% n/a n/a
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:104: Supralittoral sediment - Coastal
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:104: TCC9 Cleveland Coast Supralittoral sediment (acidic 0.314 8 10 3.93% 3.14% 8.4 8.71 109% 87%
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:106: TCC3 sediment – 0.0143 1.03 0.0152 0.20 0.223 1.998 1.56 1.04 0.215 1.48% 1.26 63%
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:107: sediment 0.00842 1.07 0.00894 0.28 0.223 1.998 1.56 1.08 0.289 0.87% n/a n/a
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:108: Supralittoral sediment – Coastal
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:109: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:109: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:112: Supralittoral sediment –
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:112: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:112: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:114: TCC3 Supralittoral sediment – Coastal stable dune 0.0637 0.0838 0.138
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:114: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:114: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:161:18 The APIS website advises the following for littoral and supralittoral sediments 1. No expected negative impact on species due to impacts on the species' broad habitat. 2. Potential positive impact on species
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:168: TCC9 for Sandwich tern and little tern (for supralittoral sediment). There are predicted exceedances
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:168: of the long-term (30 ug/m2) and short-term (75 ug/m2) Critical Level for supralittoral sediment. At
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:168: channel. The removal of sediment will inevitably result in the removal of nutrients contained within
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:168: those sediments.
R-2023-0224-CD-1425_PL104_C - Finished Floor Levels.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0224-CD-1425_PL101_N - Site Layout.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:20: navigable channel. The removal of sediment will by default result in the removal of nutrients
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:20: contained within those sediments.
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:26: sediment - Coastal 10 15
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:27: TCC9 sediment - Coastal 10 15 0.168 1.68% 1.12% 8.4 8.57 86% 57%
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:31: sediment -
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:32: TCC10 sediment - 0.00372 0.00411 0.20 0.856 4.856 4.00 1.03 0.204 0.16% n/a n/a
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:63: navigable channel. The removal of sediment will by default result in the removal of nutrients
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:63: contained within those sediments.
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:69: sediment - Coastal 10 15
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:70: TCC9 sediment - Coastal 10 15 0.308 3.08% 2.05% 8.4 8.71 87% 58%
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:73: sediment -
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:74: TCC10 sediment - 0.00476 1.03 0.00520 0.20 0.856 4.856 4.00 1.03 0.205 0.21% n/a n/a
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:79: TCC3 sediment - Coastal 0.0637 0.637% 0.425% n/a n/a
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:79: sediment - Coastal
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:80: TCC12 sediment - Coastal 0.0164 0.164% 0.109% n/a n/a
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:85: TCC3 sediment - Coastal 0.138 1.38% 0.92% 9.10 91% n/a
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:85: sediment - Coastal
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:86: TCC12 sediment - Coastal 0.0475 0.475% 0.316% n/a n/a n/a n/a
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:87: TCC3 Supralittoral sediment 0.0637 0.0838 0.138
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:87: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:88: TCC12 sediment (acidic type)) 0.0164 0.0356 0.0475
R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (2 of 3).pdf:88: Supralittoral sediment
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Heritage_Statement_Part_1of2.pdf:25: Alluvium Sediment laid down by a river. Can range from sands and gravels deposited
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:15: result of leaks / spills and sedimentation during construction. The construction of
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:94: include the preparation of a pollutants, water and sediment management protocol
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:95: of, sediment
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:95: construction works to prevent excessive sediment input and mitigate impacts
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:147: sediments in surface water runoff.
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:148: to prevent excessive sediment input and mitigate impacts in the event of oil or
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:38: sedimentary, sandstone, sandstone/mudstone, boulder
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:38: Geomorphology and landscape lowland, coastal, floodplain, subtidal sediments (including
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:38: sandbank/mudbank), intertidal sediments (including
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:39:Describe the functions and values of the wetland in groundwater recharge, flood control, sediment trapping, shoreline
R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:42:and spread of Enteromorpha algal mats and water/sediment quality issues.
R-2021-0316-VC-Metals Recovery Area Stockpile 2 FRA and DS Addendum.pdf:4:5 Sediment Management 5
R-2021-0316-VC-Metals Recovery Area Stockpile 2 FRA and DS Addendum.pdf:10:5 Sediment Management
R-2021-0316-VC-Metals Recovery Area Stockpile 2 FRA and DS Addendum.pdf:10: Management of sediment pollution associated with the construction of the Metals Recovery
R-2021-0316-VC-Metals Recovery Area Stockpile 2 FRA and DS Addendum.pdf:11: Runoff from the storage mound will contain sediment and this will be managed in
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:93:Sample 8AB2 was not ammenable for analysis of free cyanide levels due to high sediment content.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:297: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:307: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:316: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:893:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1394: chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which and Sediments
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1404: Fluorescence mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which is then and Sediments.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1436:sediment suspension as samples were filtered on the second monitoring round. The TPH and PAH
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1528:S3-BHB04d was filtered at the well head to remove sediment entrainment; no sample was collected from S3-
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1528:monitoring visit after the samples were filtered at the well head to reduce sediment entrainment.
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1754: S = Soils, Made Ground and sediments Volatile Pesticides
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1764:drains during the works to ensure no pollutants or sediments enter the surface water network. This will
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1885:The Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage strategy, Section 5 Sediment Management,
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2031:estimation is based on stream sediment data collected from small streams at a sampling density of 1 per 2.5
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:2031:km2; this is the case for most of Scotland, Wales and southern England. The stream sediment data are
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:27: submission will be once application disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:35: • Measures will be implemented to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off and other
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:37: that; “Measures will be implemented to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off and
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:20: anticipat sediments and construction and operation
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:31: 2 Measures will be implemented to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off and other
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby HRA Rev A(1).PDF:8:sediment, dust, surface water run-off and other substances from entering watercourses”. Given this
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:36: contaminated water body bed sediments, trade / industrial
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:36: highly contaminated water and sediments in light of the
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:39: Measures will be implemented to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off and other
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:48:Kinkerdale Beck sediments in surface retained within the site. The remove silt and other suspended solids, as
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:55: and sediment suspended solids, as well as
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:56: and sediment well as capture any spills/oil
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:8:sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the Market Weighton Axis. The
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:8:complex of peats, estuarine and marine sediments deposited during the Holocene, which overlie
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:8:sedimentation due to fluctuations in relative sea level during the mid-Holocene, from approximately
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:8:the north and subsidence to the south makes these sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:15: Measures will be implemented to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off and other
R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: d to berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments has been
R-2020-0270-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:103: S = Soils, Made Ground and sediments Volatile Pesticides
R-2020-0270-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:drains during the works to ensure no pollutants or sediments enter the surface water network. This will
R-2020-0270-FFM-DLX-JBAU-00-00-DR-C-0004-S3-P01-Holme_Beck_Plan_&_Section_3_of_3.PDF:1: SEDIMENT OVER FLOW
R-2020-0270-FFM-DXL-JBAU-00-00-C-RP-0001-S03-P01-FRA_and_Design_Justification.PDF:15: proposed to include a sediment forebay into the design.
R-2020-0270-FFM-DXL-JBAU-00-00-C-RP-0001-S03-P01-FRA_and_Design_Justification.PDF:17: sediment. This will be contained within a low flow channel capable of conveying the Q10
R-2020-0270-FFM-DXL-JBAU-00-00-C-RP-0001-S03-P01-FRA_and_Design_Justification.PDF:49: SEDIMENT OVER FLOW
R-2020-0270-FFM-DXL-JBAU-00-00-C-RP-0001-S03-P01-FRA_and_Design_Justification.PDF:52: Sediment Desilting of channel 0-1
R-2020-0270-FFM-DXL-JBAU-00-00-C-RP-0001-S03-P01-FRA_and_Design_Justification.PDF:53: Sediment Desilting of basin 0-1
R-2020-0270-FFM-DXL-JBAU-00-00-C-RP-0001-S03-P01-FRA_and_Design_Justification.PDF:53: Sediment Sediment removal within the 1
R-2020-0270-FFM-DXL-JBAU-00-00-C-RP-0001-S03-P01-FRA_and_Design_Justification.PDF:53: Sediment Sediment removal within the 1
R-2021-0432-FFM-10035118-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0250-02-EP_Deployment - Supporting Information.pdf:8:tanks, sediment handling, oil water separator and where required treatment using secondary treatment via
R-2021-0432-FFM-10035118-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0250-02-EP_Deployment - Supporting Information.pdf:15: Water Treatment Plant to remove free phase hydrocarbons and suspended sediments.
R-2021-0432-FFM-10035118-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0250-02-EP_Deployment - Supporting Information.pdf:19: Sediment and LNAPL capture
R-2021-0432-FFM-10035118-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0250-02-EP_Deployment - Supporting Information.pdf:32: Contamination of or surface water features Effect of contaminant on underlying aquifer quality and to contain contaminated sediments an
R-2021-0432-FFM-19736928_1.PDF:14:high sediment load environment and also be capable of withstanding some rainfall events that exceed its
R-2021-0432-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-SP-ZZ-0258-P1-Water Treatment Prairie Excavations -Se....pdf:3:sediment collected shall be variable in composition and quantity. The water treatment system design
R-2021-0432-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-SP-ZZ-0258-P1-Water Treatment Prairie Excavations -Se....pdf:4: • Dewatering Pumps: pump(s) shall be required to uplift water and suspended sediments from
R-2021-0432-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-SP-ZZ-0258-P1-Water Treatment Prairie Excavations -Se....pdf:4: the excavation / settlement lagoon. The pump(s) will abstract water and sediments and send
R-2021-0432-FFM-170988 - Prairie WTP - OM Manual_Issued.pdf:8: backwash SF-01 and SF-02, in order to remove accumulated sediments and improve
R-2021-0432-FFM-170988 - Prairie WTP - OM Manual_Issued.pdf:18: treatment plant off, let sediments settle and connect a vacuum tanker to both of the
R-2021-0432-FFM-170988 - Prairie WTP - OM Manual_Issued.pdf:24: through the water treatment plant once sediments are settled. Tank T5 is fitted with
R-2021-0432-FFM-4155 The Former SSI Steelworks, Redcar - Contract 3 (Final Report).PDF:4: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2021-0432-FFM-4155 The Former SSI Steelworks, Redcar - Contract 3 (Final Report).PDF:14: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2021-0432-FFM-4155 The Former SSI Steelworks, Redcar - Contract 3 (Final Report).PDF:23: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2021-0432-FFM-4155 The Former SSI Steelworks, Redcar - Contract 3 (Final Report).PDF:600:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2021-0432-FFM-4155 The Former SSI Steelworks, Redcar - Contract 3 (Final Report).PDF:1101: chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which and Sediments
R-2021-0432-FFM-4155 The Former SSI Steelworks, Redcar - Contract 3 (Final Report).PDF:1111: Fluorescence mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which is then and Sediments.
R-2021-0432-FFM-Redcar Steelworks-AUK-XX-XX-RP-GE-0001-02-SSI3_GI_SCR.PDF:43:S3-BHB04d was filtered at the well head to remove sediment entrainment; no sample was collected from S3-
R-2021-0432-FFM-Redcar Steelworks-AUK-XX-XX-RP-GE-0001-02-SSI3_GI_SCR.PDF:43:monitoring visit after the samples were filtered at the well head to reduce sediment entrainment.
R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:152:estimation is based on stream sediment data collected from small streams at a sampling density of 1 per 2.5
R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:152:km2; this is the case for most of Scotland, Wales and southern England. The stream sediment data are
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:3:5. Sediment Management 22
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:4:5.2 Sediment Removal 23
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:5:the requirements with respect to the sediment management. The application also seeks to obtain permission
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:6: To identify the requirement for silt and sedimentation management;
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:20:ponds, which will be contribute to the removal of suspended sediment from the surface water discharge from
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:21:attenuation pond, which will be contribute to the removal of suspended sediment from the surface water
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:21:contribute to the removal of suspended sediment from the surface water discharge from these sites.
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:22:5. Sediment Management
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:22:Sediment pollution could be generated on site from several sources, but primarily the runoff from the
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:22:exposes storage mounds are anticipated to result in elevated levels of suspended sediment. It is considered
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:22:best practice to ensure that this sediment laden runoff is not allowed to directly flow into the Fleet, Lackenby
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:22:Channel or the Knitting Wife Beck. In addition, it is anticipated that higher level of suspended sediment may
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:22:This section of the document provides the methodology by which any sediment laden flows will be managed,
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:22:is intended to minimise and mitigate the effects of sediment pollution into the nearby watercourses.
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:23:discharged into the sedimentation pond. If wash waster is considered to be contaminated, then it is to be
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:23:5.2 Sediment Removal
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:23:During the placement and storage of the soils, sediment management will need to be provided. This is to be
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:23:Other secondary method could be employed to assist in the removal of sediment from surface water runoff,
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:24:sediment management measures are to be described in the CEMP.
R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:26:It is anticipated that the runoff from the storage mounds will contain significant levels of sediment and
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part6.PDF:24:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part6.PDF:111: chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which and Sediments
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part6.PDF:121: Fluorescence mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which is then and Sediments.
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part4.PDF:57:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part6.PDF:40: chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which and Sediments
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part6.PDF:50: Fluorescence mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which is then and Sediments.
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part5.PDF:128: chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which and Sediments
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part5.PDF:138: Fluorescence mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which is then and Sediments.
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part5.PDF:145: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part5.PDF:152: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part5.PDF:162: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part1.PDF:34: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part1.PDF:42: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part1.PDF:51: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part4.PDF:23:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part2.PDF:11: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part2.PDF:19: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part2.PDF:28: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL133_C - Vehicle Swept Path Analysis_Weighbridge to Fuel Oil - Articulated Tanker.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL305_C - Site Wide Elevations N and E.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL136_A - Vehicle Swept Path Analysis_Weighbridge to Inspection Bay.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL104_C - Finished Floor Levels.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL201_C - Site Sections A-A and B-B.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL306_C - Site Wide Elevations S and W.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL135_A - Vehicle Swept Path Analysis_Weighbridge to WTS and Tipping Hall - Articulated and RCV.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL106_B - Planning Layout Key.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL107 - STDC Fencing Layout.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL101_N - Site Layout.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL102_G - Proposed Fencing Layout.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:27: sediment - Coastal stable dune grasslands 8 10 0.223 1.998 1.56
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:27: sediment - Shifting coastal dunes
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:28: sediment - Coastal stable dune grasslands 10 15 0.856 4.856 4
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:28: sediment - Coastal stable dune grasslands 8 10 0.223 1.998 1.56
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:28: sediment - Shifting coastal dunes
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:28:TCC1 – TCC13 (a) sediment - Coastal stable dune grasslands 10 15 0.856 4.856 4
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:28: sediment - Pioneer, low-mid, mid-upper 20 30 acidity impacts on broad
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:28: Eurasian teal - Wintering - Littoral sediment -
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:28: Red Knot - Wintering - Littoral sediment -
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:29: Sanderling - Wintering - Littoral sediment -
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:29: sediment - Pioneer, low-mid, mid-upper 20 30 due to acidity impacts on broad
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:29: Supralittoral sediment (Ammophila arenaria -
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:29: Supralittoral sediment (Ammophila arenaria -
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:29: Supralittoral sediment (Festuca rubra -
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:29: Supralittoral sediment (Phleum arenarium -
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Supralittoral sediment (Ammophila arenaria
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Supralittoral sediment (Elymus farctus ssp.
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Supralittoral sediment (Leymus arenarius
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Supralittoral sediment (Salix repens - Holcus
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Littoral sediment (Annual Salicornia Saltmarsh) 20 30
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Littoral sediment (Elytrigia atherica saltmarsh) 20 30
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Littoral sediment (Elytrigia repens saltmarsh) 20 30
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Littoral sediment (Puccinellia maritima
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Littoral sediment (Puccinellia maritima
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:30: Littoral sediment (Suaeda Maritima Saltmarsh) 20 30
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:31: Littoral sediment (Transitional low marsh
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:31: Supralittoral sediment (Honkenya peploides -
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:31: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type)
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:31: Nonbreeding – Littoral sediment
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:31: Littoral sediment
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:31: Nonbreeding – Littoral sediment
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:31: sediment
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:31: Breeding – Littoral sediment
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:32: Littoral sediment
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:32: Littoral sediment
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:112: navigable channel. The removal of sediment will by default result in the removal of nutrients
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:112: contained within those sediments.
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:118: sediment - Coastal 10 15
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:119: TCC9 sediment - Coastal 10 15 0.168 1.68% 1.12% 8.4 8.57 86% 57%
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:123: sediment -
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:124: TCC10 sediment - 0.00372 0.00411 0.20 0.856 4.856 4.00 1.03 0.204 0.16% n/a n/a
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:155: navigable channel. The removal of sediment will by default result in the removal of nutrients
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:155: contained within those sediments.
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:161: sediment - Coastal 10 15
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:162: TCC9 sediment - Coastal 10 15 0.308 3.08% 2.05% 8.4 8.71 87% 58%
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:165: sediment -
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:166: TCC10 sediment - 0.00476 1.03 0.00520 0.20 0.856 4.856 4.00 1.03 0.205 0.21% n/a n/a
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:171: TCC3 sediment - Coastal 0.0637 0.637% 0.425% n/a n/a
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:171: sediment - Coastal
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:172: TCC12 sediment - Coastal 0.0164 0.164% 0.109% n/a n/a
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:177: TCC3 sediment - Coastal 0.138 1.38% 0.92% 9.10 91% n/a
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:177: sediment - Coastal
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:178: TCC12 sediment - Coastal 0.0475 0.475% 0.316% n/a n/a n/a n/a
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:179: TCC3 Supralittoral sediment 0.0637 0.0838 0.138
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:179: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:180: TCC12 sediment (acidic type)) 0.0164 0.0356 0.0475
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:180: Supralittoral sediment
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:271:6.18 The broad habitat for shoveler is listed as supralittoral sediment and the relevant nitrogen critical load
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:271: The broad habitat is listed as supralittoral sediment. As noted above, examination of the coastal
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:277: Supralittoral sediment - Coastal stable 8 10
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:277: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type)
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:279: TCC3 sediment – 0.0102 1.03 0.0109 0.20 0.223 1.998 1.56 1.04 0.211 1.05% 1.25 63%
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:280: sediment 0.00335 1.07 0.00354 0.28 0.223 1.998 1.56 1.07 0.284 0.34% n/a n/a
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:289: Supralittoral sediment - Coastal
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:289: TCC9 Cleveland Coast Supralittoral sediment (acidic 0.314 8 10 3.93% 3.14% 8.4 8.71 109% 87%
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:291: TCC3 sediment – 0.0143 1.03 0.0152 0.20 0.223 1.998 1.56 1.04 0.215 1.48% 1.26 63%
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:292: sediment 0.00842 1.07 0.00894 0.28 0.223 1.998 1.56 1.08 0.289 0.87% n/a n/a
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:293: Supralittoral sediment – Coastal
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:294: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:294: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:297: Supralittoral sediment –
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:297: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:297: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:299: TCC3 Supralittoral sediment – Coastal stable dune 0.0637 0.0838 0.138
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:299: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:299: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:346:18 The APIS website advises the following for littoral and supralittoral sediments 1. No expected negative impact on species due to impacts on the species' broad habitat. 2. Potential positive impact on species
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:353: TCC9 for Sandwich tern and little tern (for supralittoral sediment). There are predicted exceedances
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:353: of the long-term (30 ug/m2) and short-term (75 ug/m2) Critical Level for supralittoral sediment. At
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:353: channel. The removal of sediment will inevitably result in the removal of nutrients contained within
R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:353: those sediments.
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL126_A - Ash Loading Plans.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL131_C - Vehicle Swept Path Analysis_Weighbridge to Silos - Articulated Tanker.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL105_C - EV Charging Layout.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:15:a central sedimentation/settling tank. Water shall then be recycled from the tank and re-used
R-2023-0253-RMM-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:26: Stair sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:30: Stair sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:37: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:86: Stair sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:89: Remove litter and debris and inspect for sediment, oil and significant storm
R-2023-0253-RMM-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:89: Inspect sediment accumulation rate and establish months of operations,
R-2023-0253-RMM-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:89: Remove sediments from inlets, outlet and forebay Annually or As required
R-2023-0253-RMM-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:89: Remove sediments from inlets, outlets, forebay and main Every 5 years or As
R-2023-0253-RMM-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:90: Inspection of tank for debris and sediment build-up,
R-2023-0253-RMM-212018-DC-RP-C-01_P07-Drainage Strategy Report COMPRESSED.pdf:90: Inspection of tank for debris and sediment build-up, Annually and following
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL118_B - ERF Roof Plan.pdf:1: Sedimentation Tanks
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL103_C - Access and Circulation.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL132_C - Vehicle Swept Path Analysis_Weighbridge to IBA and Ammonia - Articulated Tanker.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:40:Eroded sediments (incl. silt) will be retained on site with erosion and sediment control structures (e.g. such
R-2023-0253-RMM-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:40:as sediment traps, silt fences, swales, settlement tanks, cut off ditches etc.).
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL134_C - Vehicle Swept Path Analysis_Car Park - Visitors Coach and Cars.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:32:6.18 The broad habitat for shoveler is listed as supralittoral sediment and the relevant nitrogen critical load
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:32: The broad habitat is listed as supralittoral sediment. As noted above, examination of the coastal
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:38: Supralittoral sediment - Coastal stable 8 10
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:38: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type)
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:40: TCC3 sediment – 0.0102 1.03 0.0109 0.20 0.223 1.998 1.56 1.04 0.211 1.05% 1.25 63%
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:41: sediment 0.00335 1.07 0.00354 0.28 0.223 1.998 1.56 1.07 0.284 0.34% n/a n/a
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:50: Supralittoral sediment - Coastal
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:50: TCC9 Cleveland Coast Supralittoral sediment (acidic 0.314 8 10 3.93% 3.14% 8.4 8.71 109% 87%
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:52: TCC3 sediment – 0.0143 1.03 0.0152 0.20 0.223 1.998 1.56 1.04 0.215 1.48% 1.26 63%
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:53: sediment 0.00842 1.07 0.00894 0.28 0.223 1.998 1.56 1.08 0.289 0.87% n/a n/a
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:54: Supralittoral sediment – Coastal
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:55: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:55: Supralittoral sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:58: Supralittoral sediment –
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:58: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:58: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:60: TCC3 Supralittoral sediment – Coastal stable dune 0.0637 0.0838 0.138
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:60: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:60: sediment (acidic type))
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:65:18 The APIS website advises the following for littoral and supralittoral sediments 1. No expected negative impact on species due to impacts on the species' broad habitat. 2. Potential positive impact on species
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:72: TCC9 for Sandwich tern and little tern (for supralittoral sediment). There are predicted exceedances
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:72: of the long-term (30 ug/m2) and short-term (75 ug/m2) Critical Level for supralittoral sediment. At
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:72: channel. The removal of sediment will inevitably result in the removal of nutrients contained within
R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:72: those sediments.
R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:14: earthworks sedimentation sump / silt trap in a controlled fashion. No silt or mud shall be allowed
R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:14: from contamination, including sediment, prior to discharging into site
R-2023-0253-RMM-1425_PL130_C - Vehicle Swept Path Analysis_Weighbridge to Tipping Hall - Articulated and RCV.pdf:1: sedimentation
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:7: • Capital dredging of approximately 1,800,000m3 of marine sediments with offshore disposal
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:28:structures and capital dredging, increased suspended sediment concentrations and increased sediment
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:28:and the results of the hydrodynamic and sediment plume modelling, the EIA has predicted an impact
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:28:ecological receptors as a result of increased suspended sediment concentrations or sediment deposition
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:29:areas. Impacts on fish resources within the subtidal area, as a result of increased suspended sediment,
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:29:Adverse impacts may be expected as a result of temporary increases in suspended sediment during
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:36: concentrations of contaminants in sediment at that location.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:38: defined by the MMO) given the elevated concentrations of contaminants in sediment at
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:41: sedimentation and erosion.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:51: Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:51: and so will cause no effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:51: The capital dredging of the river and the offshore disposal of dredged sediments both will cause
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:51: plumes of sediment to form. The plume effects arising from the river dredging are characterised by
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:51: a short-lived localised increase in suspended sediment concentrations by the order of a few hundred
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:51: Marine sediment and water quality
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:51: A potential impact on water quality has been identified due to the resuspension of sediment,
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:51: impact, the risk of exceeding water quality standards was deemed to be low. Additionally, sediment
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:51: occur for a matter of hours at a time before the suspended sediment concentrations return to
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:51: There is a possibility that some contaminants present in sediment could exceed their respective
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:51: environmental quality standard (EQS) during capital dredging. However, sediment plume modelling
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:52: lower levels of contaminants, therefore the risk to EQS is only during dredging of the finer sediments
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:60: watercourse of surface water drain. Treatment facilities, such as sediment traps or
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:61: the MMO) given the elevated concentrations of contaminants in sediment at that location.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:62:The following measures will be implemented to minimise the release of sediment during riverbank
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:85: sediments with offshore disposal into the Tees Bay C disposal site.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:98: Sediment Visual assessment will be Low Avoidance of unnecessary
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:99: Dredging N/A Contaminated sediment
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:159: • International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:161:The International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships' Ballast Water and Sediments (the
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:161:control of ships' ballast water and sediments. Vessels must have ballast water management plans and
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:162: • Capital dredging of approximately 1,800,000m3 of marine sediments with offshore disposal into the
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:163:Tees Bay and the Tees estuary attract sediment as the tidal current flows are generally quite low compared
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:166: Annelida First reported from California in fine mud sediments where the species constructed a mucoid tube
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:166: Australia, New Zealand, UK, and France, always in sandy and muddy sediments of harbours with a
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:166: Streblospio benedicti Non-native mudflats and soft sediments of estuaries and coastal waters and can tolerate a wide range of Western Atlantic
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:166: and surface deposit-feeder, whose feeding activities result in sediment resuspension through GS13, GS15, GS21, GS24, GS26)
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:169: (and the resulting disturbance of sediments) to create the berth pocket
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:169: intertidal sediments estuary via tidal currents. None of the species found within the
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:169: to create the berth intertidal sediments during the site-specific survey are contained on
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:170: sediment would likely re-settle in areas close to the excavation activity
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:170: A number of marine INNS were identified within the subtidal sediments
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:170: within sediments to other areas of the Tees (due to resuspension of
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:170: sediments) and the Tees Bay C offshore disposal site (due to offshore
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:170: sediments within the proposed berth pocket, material is to be removed
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:170: suspended sediment during dredging, which will minimise the risk of
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:170: marine sediments
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:170: suspended sediment would likely re-settle in areas close to the
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:172: the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments Convention, developed and
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:172: approved Ballast Water and Sediments Management Plan and records of such
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:184:2 Marine sediment and water quality
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:185: contaminants in sediment at that location.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:185:2.2 Minimise release of sediment • Control measures to be put in place to reduce Contractor
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:7: • Capital dredging of approximately 1,800,000m3 of marine sediments with offshore disposal
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:28:structures and capital dredging, increased suspended sediment concentrations and increased sediment
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:28:and the results of the hydrodynamic and sediment plume modelling, the EIA has predicted an impact
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:28:ecological receptors as a result of increased suspended sediment concentrations or sediment deposition
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:29:areas. Impacts on fish resources within the subtidal area, as a result of increased suspended sediment,
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:29:Adverse impacts may be expected as a result of temporary increases in suspended sediment during
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:36: the MMO) given the elevated concentrations of contaminants in sediment at that location.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:38: defined by the MMO) given the elevated concentrations of contaminants in sediment at
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:41: sedimentation and erosion.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:51: Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:51: and so will cause no effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:51: The capital dredging of the river and the offshore disposal of dredged sediments both will cause
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:51: plumes of sediment to form. The plume effects arising from the river dredging are characterised by
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:51: a short-lived localised increase in suspended sediment concentrations by the order of a few hundred
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:51: Marine sediment and water quality
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:51: A potential impact on water quality has been identified due to the resuspension of sediment,
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:51: impact, the risk of exceeding water quality standards was deemed to be low. Additionally, sediment
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:51: occur for a matter of hours at a time before the suspended sediment concentrations return to
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:51: There is a possibility that some contaminants present in sediment could exceed their respective
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:51: environmental quality standard (EQS) during capital dredging. However, sediment plume modelling
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:52: lower levels of contaminants, therefore the risk to EQS is only during dredging of the finer sediments
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:60: watercourse of surface water drain. Treatment facilities, such as sediment traps or
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:61: the MMO) given the elevated concentrations of contaminants in sediment at that location.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:62:The following measures will be implemented to minimise the release of sediment during riverbank
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:85: sediments with offshore disposal into the Tees Bay C disposal site.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:98: Sediment Visual assessment will be Low Avoidance of unnecessary
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:99: Dredging N/A Contaminated sediment
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:156:2 Marine sediment and water quality
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:157: contaminants in sediment at that location.
R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:157:2.2 Minimise release of sediment • Control measures to be put in place to reduce Contractor
R-2021-1077-CD-21156 FHA v1.PDF:21: Supralittoral Sediment Coastal Vegetated Shingle
R-2020-0318-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-01-Prairie_ESA_Addendum.pdf:34: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2020-0318-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-01-Prairie_ESA_Addendum.pdf:42: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2020-0318-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-01-Prairie_ESA_Addendum.pdf:51: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2020-0318-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-01-Prairie_ESA_Addendum.pdf:583:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2020-0318-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-01-Prairie_ESA_Addendum.pdf:1365: chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which and Sediments
R-2020-0318-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-01-Prairie_ESA_Addendum.pdf:1375: Fluorescence mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which is then and Sediments.
R-2020-0318-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:103: S = Soils, Made Ground and sediments Volatile Pesticides
R-2020-0318-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:drains during the works to ensure no pollutants or sediments enter the surface water network. This will
R-2020-0318-FFM-ROA and Remediation Strategy.PDF:41:During groundworks the Contractor shall take measures to prevent surface water and sediment run off
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:11: • Sediment availability/ transport
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:18: channel designed to trap sediments and the bed (and surrounding land) is heavily
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:23: bed sediments are impacting on water quality. These are impacting
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:30: (sediment release, fuel leaks etc.).
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:31: The sediment regime locally
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:32: affecting the sediment erosional,
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:32: The sediment regime into the
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:33: channel could cause sediment
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:34: sediment), affecting BOD. This
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:34: could cause sediment disturbance
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:34: Environment sediment disturbance and
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:35: Triclosan High channel online could cause sediment
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:35: Benzene Good sediment disturbance and temporarily
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:38: quality and it is known that the sediments and
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:38: pollution events (sediment release, fuel leaks etc.)
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:38: sediment and flow regime locally on site. This may
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:38: build-up of sediment in surface water bodies due to
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:38: inability to transport any fine sediment away may
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:38: result in increased sediment suspension, potentially
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:39: cause excessive build up of sediment in surface water
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:40: sheet piling and sediments contaminated from the
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:40: The sediment regime locally onsite will be impacted by
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:40: affect the sediment erosional, depositional and transport
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: could cause sediment disturbance and temporarily reduce
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:44: caused by increases in suspended sediment, reduced
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:44: suspended sediment causing increases in nutrients
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:45: sediment suspension in the water body, potentially
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:46: Morphology: River Direct The sediment regime into the Tees is unlikely to be
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:51: of the underlying sediment throughout the reach if it
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:51: The sediment regime locally onsite will be impacted during
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:51: channel that will locally affect the sediment erosional,
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:51: changes in flows, changes in sediment deposition and scour
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:51: build-up of sediment in surface water bodies and the loss of
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:52: channel online could cause sediment disturbance and
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:53: caused by increases in suspended sediment,
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:54: sediment causing increases in nutrients that are
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:56: and SSSI - There is potential for localised increases in sediment
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:56: transport and deposition through sediment
R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:60: outfall and how they affect any sediment or habitat locally, potentially through scour
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:17: remove suspended sediment before discharge to surface water or to ground. If oil is observed in the
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:21: for infiltration, adsorption, biodegradation and sedimentation within the sub-base and reduce peak
R-2023-0291-ESM-PD Teeside Heritage Statement 0323.pdf:11: rise and fall of the tide. They consist of unconsolidated sediment, mainly mud and/or sand.
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf:128:estimation is based on stream sediment data collected from small streams at a sampling density of 1 per 2.5
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 A. Groundsure.pdf:128:km2; this is the case for most of Scotland, Wales and southern England. The stream sediment data are
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 9 - Water.pdf:27:biodegradation and sedimentation within the sub-surface.
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 9 - Water.pdf:27:surface runoff. They also offer a degree of filtration, adsorption, biodegradation and sedimentation. A
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:32: by the rise and fall of the tide. They consist of unconsolidated sediment, mainly mud and/or sand. They
R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:54: • Management of the site drainage to prevent sediment laden / contaminated runoff entering
R-2020-0799-CD-Nov 2020 - 2383 - CEMP - Prairie Phase 2 Works Prairie Rev 2 (1).pdf:20:To prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other substance relating to construction
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:13: within this area. Water run‐off from the area will be made to flow into a sediment tank. The
R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:15: Booms will be placed around drainage inlets to prevent sedimentation from run off
R-2022-0237-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0452-01-P4_GI_AD Part 2.pdf:9: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2022-0237-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0452-01-P4_GI_AD Part 2.pdf:18: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2022-0237-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0452-01-P4_GI_AD Part 2.pdf:27: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2022-0237-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0452-01-P4_GI_AD Part 6.pdf:2:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2022-0237-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0452-01-P4_GI_AD Part 13.pdf:76: Nutrient Release and Sediment Oxygen Demand in a Eutrophic Land-Locked
R-2022-0237-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0452-01-P4_GI_AD Part 13.pdf:76: DETSC 2040 Sediment Oxygen Demand contains nutrients to promote bacterial growth. The oxygen level in the supernatant liquid is monitored for up to n/a Not Accredited
R-2022-0237-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0452-01-P4_GI_AD Part 13.pdf:76: Sediment Oxygen Demand and Biochemical Oxygen Demand: Patterns of Oxygen
R-2022-0237-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0452-01-P4_GI_AD Part 13.pdf:81: DETSC 2325 Mercury in Soil Atomic Fluorescence Spectroscopy particulates and diluted to volume. Treatment with tin (II) chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour PSA Method – Millennium Merlin Method for Mercury in Sludge, Soils and Sediments 0.05 mg/kg MCERTS(Soils)
R-2022-0237-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0452-01-P4_GI_AD Part 13.pdf:82: mineral soil material – Method by sieving and sedimentation
R-2022-0237-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0452-01-P4_GI_AD Part 13.pdf:85: Fluorescence Spectroscopy Sediments.
R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:14:Bay and are sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the
R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:14:Hartlepool foreshore there is complex of peats, estuarine and marine sediments deposited
R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:14:environmental records at Hartlepool indicate changes in sedimentation due to fluctuations in
R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:14:subsidence to the south makes these sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea level
EA MLA_2020_00507 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:1: Site specific sediment surveys and assessments
EA MLA_2020_00507 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:1:i) Site specific sediment surveys and assessments
EA MLA_2020_00507 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:specific sediment surveys. The EIA notes in paragraph 7.4.3 that a site-specific sediment
EA MLA_2020_00507 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:Requirement: Submit additional suite of site-specific sediment quality surveys
EA MLA_2020_00507 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:3:In respect to the impacts of sediment deposition resulting from the Stages 1 to 4 of the
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:1: Benthic (including marine invasive non-native species) and sediment contaminant survey data
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:3:Chapter 7: Marine Sediment and Water Quality
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:3: of sediment contaminants are less clear, particularly in regards to heavy metals
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:3: Please re-consult Natural England when the results of the contaminant sediment
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:3:Sediment rather than PDBEs.
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:4: To restrict suspended sediment plumes to one side of the estuary at a time, and
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:6: To restrict suspended sediment plumes to one side of the estuary at a time, in
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:7: Water flow (tidal current changes) including sediment transport.
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:9: suspended sediment
338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:9: including sediment Please provide clarity as to the meaning of the underlined phase above.
20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:1: birds, fish, mammals) or other physical (e.g., morphology, bathymetry) or chemical (sediment
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:2: suspended sediment brought in from the sea. Short term peaks in suspended sediment (during
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:2: sediment to pass but which has been shown to have trapped SSC upstream and to have
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:2: detrimentally affected fine-grained sediment transport onto the intertidal marshes and mudflats
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:3: are presented principally as changes in suspended sediment concentration (SSC), the principal
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:4: Again, concern is largely focused on the water quality issue of the sediment plume, which is
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:4:26. Disposal assessments do not present the maximum bed thickness change due to the sediment
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:5: on flow and sedimentation, but it is not clear that these have been modelled together, or simply
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:7: the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime will be constant throughout such changes.”
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:7:47. In Section 7.4.1 Sediment Quality, (p144) the application states that concentrations of PDBE209
20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:7:50. However, I do recognise that the volume of sediment to be extracted is (in total) very large for
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:3: i. Changes in marine water quality (i.e. increased suspended sediment) due to dredging
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5:20. For the proposed development, an additional 1.8 million (M) m3 of marine sediment is predicted to
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: be dredged from the Tees, resulting in sediment plumes. The effects of the plumes have been
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: modelled using a sediment dispersion model run for the entire four-month dredging period covering
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: on the sediment plume model presented, the applicant concluded that peak concentrations from
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: low SSC from 0 to 8.5 mg/l. Modelling of the sediment plume during capital dredging indicates that
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: activities be undertaken simultaneously, the sediment plumes, could result in additive effect which
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: impact as far as possible. However, it is stated that ‘the additive effect of the sediment plumes from
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:6: a time in order to reduce the extent and impact of the sediment plume. However, in my opinion,
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:6: season (e.g. salmon), as a result of increased suspended sediment concentrations, poor water
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:6:25. I recommend that the applicant presents a revised sediment dispersion model that includes the
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:7: suspended sediment concentrations and the extent of the plume across the river channel will be
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:7: avoidance reactions and move away from the vicinity of adverse sediment conditions, if refuge
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:7: conditions are present (Sigler et al., 1984; Bash et al., 2001). The effects of suspended sediment
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:7: metabolic pathways in high sediment environments. The authors concluded that the ability of
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:7: relevant, suspended sediment-generated turbidities.
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:11:54. The benthic surveys and sediment sampling used to inform the assessment on marine ecology
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:12:Berg, L. (1982). The effect of exposure to short-term pulses of suspended sediment on the behaviour
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:12:Berli, B.I. et al. (2014). Acute exposure to a common suspended sediment affects the swimming
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:12:Henley, W.E., Patterson, M.A., Neves, R.J., and Dennis L. (2000). Effects of Sedimentation and
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:12:Gilmour, J. (1999). Experimental investigation into the effects of suspended sediment on fertilisation,
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:13:Salmon & Trout Conservation (2017). The impact of excess fine sediment on invertebrates and fish
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:14: pocket to a depth of 15.6m bCD (below Chart Datum). The total volume for marine sediments
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:14:marine sediments
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:14:Elevated concentrations of suspended sediment can have the following physical effects on all life stage
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:14: suspended sediment concentration, water velocity and gill dimensions (Appleby and Scarratt,
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:15:Settlement of sediment around areas of dredging and disposal can have the following impacts:
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:15: i. Smothering of benthic foraging grounds by settlement of sediment.
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:15: ii. Smothering of benthic eggs and larvae by settlement of sediment.
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:15: iii. Reduced oxygen levels in water due to release of sediments containing high organic matter.
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:15: iv. Exposure to contaminants contained within dredged sediment.
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:15: v. Re-suspension of sediments causes nutrient enrichment promoting the formation of algal
20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:15: vi. Resuspension of sediments resulting from dredging can smother organisms and hinder
MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:8:transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger to the offshore disposal site.
MLA-2020-00507.pdf:1: These fishing operations are unlikely to be affected by the activities, EIA shows sediment
MLA-2020-00507.pdf:1: this is unlikely to be impacted by the works as the sediment plume is unlikely to travel that
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:1: disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be set back
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:2:9. The report provided gives a clear overview of sediment quality in the Tees river, and potential
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:3:13. The report uses a range of data from marine licensing sediment sampling and targeted
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:3: sediment survey work conducted in the Tees within the last 10 years, to give a broad overview
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:3: of the quality and chemical composition of sediment within the River. These data include
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:3:16. Conclusions about sediment quality largely rely on the assessment of previous licensing
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:3: sediment management options alternative to disposal to adhere to the waste hierarchy
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:4: cumulative impact to ecological receptors from the disposal of dredged sediment offshore.
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:4: sediment. For cumulative operations of this scale, some modelling to determine the likely
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:5: receive disposed sediment of Tees Bay C (TY150) cannot be answered in this consultation,
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:5: and would likely require sediment and plume dispersal modelling as part of a cumulative
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:5:31. The sediment data presented for this application have been reported in the MMO Results
20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:6: (TY150) to receive the volumes of sediment proposed by both the NGCT and South Bank
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:3:7.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime 7
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:3:7.2 Marine sediment and water quality 8
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:9: • Capital dredging of approximately 1,800,000m3 of marine sediments with offshore disposal into
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:10: • Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:10: • Marine sediment and water quality.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:11:7.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:11:The assessment of potential effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime has been undertaken
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:11:cause no effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:11:The capital dredging of the river and the offshore disposal of dredged sediments both will cause plumes of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:11:sediment to form. The plume effects arising from the river dredging are characterised by a short-lived
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:11:localised increase in suspended sediment concentrations by the order of a few hundred mg/l at the point of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:11:magnitude over a few hours after disposal. Deposition thicknesses of sediment from the plumes on the river
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:combined with the creation of a new berth pocket at the quay, may lead to a small increase in sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:deposition rates and hence a requirement for more sediment to be dredged annually from this local reach.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:There is no predicted effect on the baseline sediment transport regime and seabed or shore morphology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:7.2 Marine sediment and water quality
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:The assessment of potential impacts associated with marine sediment and water quality has been
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:undertaken with reference to publicly available sediment and water quality data. A site-specific sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:survey were not available at the time of writing, it has been assumed that the sediment quality within the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:A potential impact on water quality has been identified due to the resuspension of sediment, principally as
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:exceeding water quality standards was deemed to be low. Additionally, sediment plume modelling shows
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:time before the suspended sediment concentrations return to baseline values. No significant impacts are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:12:resuspension of sediments. Such measures include dredging in long strips to ensure the plume is located
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:and capital dredging, increased suspended sediment concentrations and increased sediment deposition.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:scheme footprint and the results of the hydrodynamic and sediment plume modelling, an impact of minor
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:ecological receptors as a result of increased suspended sediment concentrations or sediment deposition
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:15:Impacts on fish resources within the subtidal area, as a result of increased suspended sediment, would only
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:17:Indirect impacts to heritage assets from changes to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime are also
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:Based on the findings of hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling, the disposal of dredged material
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:3:3.6 Capital dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils / landside materials within
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:4:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME 43
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:4:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY 134
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:8:5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:8:6 Sediment sampling plan
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:9:effects on tidal currents and sediment transport may occur (i.e. the potential zone of influence). The
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:9: The study area for marine topics comprises the hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling domain,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:15:berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:22:3.6 Capital dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils /
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:22:estuarine (marine) sediments and excavation of soils / landside materials within the riverbank to create the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:22:A summary of the proposed design levels and dredge volumes for marine sediments is detailed in Section
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:22:3.6.1 Volume of marine sediments to be dredged
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:22:The total dredge volume for marine sediments is predicted to be approximately 1,800,000m3. As detailed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:22:marine sediment is anticipated to comprise Tidal Flat Deposits and Glacial Till. It is proposed that all areas
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:24:Table 3.2 Proposed volumes of marine sediments to be dredged (excluding over-dredge volumes)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:24:transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger to the offshore disposal site. It is assumed that
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:24:In addition to the removal of marine sediments, the proposed scheme will require the excavation of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:24:avoid the risk of a jack-up barge ‘punching’ into the underlying sediments when berthed at the quay during
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:25:sediments from the river channel would be deposited offshore within the Tees Bay C disposal site. As noted
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:33:suitable locations for the re-use of dredged sediment; three were located adjacent to the South Gare
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:51:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:51:This section presents the baseline conditions with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:51:While the proposed scheme has the potential to alter hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes, the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:51:The assessment of potential effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime has been made with
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:51:that are relevant to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes, as presented within the NPS for Ports, are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:51:Where relevant, applicants should undertake coastal geomorphological and sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:51:shorelines where the proposal could inhibit sediment flow or have an impact on coastal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:52:Table 6.2 MPS requirements relevant to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:52:activity or development will have on coastal processes, including sediment movement.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:52:hydrodynamics and the sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:52:Table 6.3 North East Marine Plan policies relevant to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:52:A summary of consultation responses relevant to the assessment of hydrodynamics and sedimentary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:53: aspects of relevance to hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes, namely: on the tidal prism of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:53: as stop start thresholds for parameters such as suspended sediment and 13 and Section 7
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:53:For hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes, the study area needs to cover all areas of river, adjacent
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:54:Figure 6.1 Study area for assessing potential effects on hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:54:There has been much previous work to characterise the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:54:Table 6.5 Review of existing information on the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:54:2002 Teesmouth Sediment Study. HR Wallingford, 1989
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:54: Further information relating to sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:55: Anglo American Harbour Facilities – modelling, sediment transport, bed change
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:55: Environmental Statement. modelling and modelling of sediment plume
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:57:sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary, carried out over many decades. This work is summarised below
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:57:Table 6.6 Review of existing information on the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:57:2002 Teesmouth Sediment Study. HR Wallingford, 1989
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:57: Further information relating to sediment contamination and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:57: Anglo American Harbour Facilities – Royal HaskoningDHV, modelling, wave modelling, sediment transport, bed change
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:57: Environmental Statement. 2014 modelling and modelling of sediment plume released from
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:60: • Sediment plume modelling: The updated and verified 3D Tees Estuary Tidal Model was used to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:60: predict movement of suspended sediment from the proposed dredging and disposal activities by
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:60: coupling with a sediment plume model built in MIKE21-MT software. The sediment plume model
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:60:synthesised and used in combination with knowledge of other factors, such geological constraints, sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:60:the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime through an Expert Geomorphological Assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:62:of reaches require maintenance dredging to remove both sands and silts. The volume of sediments dredged
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:62:cumulatively (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2013). A notable proportion of this sediment is marine sand that is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:62:channel deepened to its present depth. The role of the River Tees in supplying fine sediment to the coastal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:62:to allow bypassing of sediment, but observed accumulations upstream, and a 24% reduction in the dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:62:requirement of the harbour, indicates that much of the river sediment is trapped by the structure (Royal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:63:sediments) which is offset by maintenance dredging and disposal at offshore licenced disposal site Tees
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:66:Tees Bay and the Tees estuary attract sediment because the tidal current flows are generally quite low
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:66:the transport of sediment within Tees Bay, with an overall tendency for southerly directed transport because
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:66:sediment from the seabed enabling more to become transported by the tidal currents during these storms.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:66:subtleties locally influence sediment transport in these locations.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:71:bed upstream (flooding) flows are observed. These effects are important in supplying sediment to the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:71:estuary from offshore (the main sediment supply).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:80:It is recognised that the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, as characterised within this
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:80:relative effect of the proposed scheme upon the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime will be
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:80:the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime in a relative manner, using the baseline understanding
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:81:6.4.4 Sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:81:Suspended sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:81:In general, suspended sediment concentrations (SSCs) are low within the estuary and within Tees Bay.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:81:the highest suspended sediment levels occur close to high water. After storm periods, higher concentrations
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:81:of suspended sediment have been noted around the Shell Jetty, but with little penetration further up the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:81: Suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:84:Sediment sources and transport
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:84:Historic bed sampling results in the vicinity of the proposed scheme show bed sediments in the area to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:84:Within the system the driving forces for sediment transport are the tidal flows, density driven currents, wave
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:85: with the implication that fluvial sediment input to the estuary has reduced (ABPmer, 2005).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:85: sediment into the estuary system. This material comes in on the flood tide, particularly during times
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:86:has also been utilised to move recently deposited accumulations of sediment to adjacent scour spots within
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:86:the river, thus maintaining sediment within the estuarine system and reducing the overall volumes of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:89:A review of the dredged sediment quality data is presented in Section 7.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:90:sedimentary regime arising from the demolition works is very low.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:90:6.5.2 Capital dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:91:Each year, between 25 – 30 million tonnes (wet weight) of dredged marine sediments from ports, harbours
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:91:offshore site will both result in sediment plumes. These effects have been investigated using numerical
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:91:modelling of the sediment dispersion associated with the dredging and disposal activities, as well as the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:91:changes in bed thickness when the suspended sediment falls from the plume to become deposited on the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:91:A MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model has been coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic model (MIKE3-HD)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:91:disturbance effects have been included. The dredging methods, schedule and sediment release settings
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:91:sediment releases have been made near continuously throughout the dredging operations (except for
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:91:Results from the sediment dispersion modelling are discussed in turn for the dredging and disposal activities.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:91:Note that all the modelling plots in the following sections show the elevations in SSC or sediment deposition
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:108:The sediment plumes that arise from the four stages of the dredging could potentially affect areas of riverbed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:108:or seabed that are remote from the point of sediment release in terms of either increases in SSC or increases
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:108:in sediment deposition. This could affect water quality (in terms of increased turbidity) or aquatic ecology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:110:Sediment suspended within the dredging plumes will fall to the riverbed, either soon after disturbance or
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:110:spillage occurring during the dredging operation (for coarser-grained sediment fractions), or at a point in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:110:finer-grained sediment fractions). Figure 6.50 shows the maximum changes in riverbed thickness caused
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:110:by this deposition. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the dredged areas (from
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:110:zone of influence from the sediment plumes.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:111:Figure 6.50 Maximum riverbed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:111:Within this maximum zone of influence from sediment plumes and bed deposition, the following receptors
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:111:could potentially be adversely affected by increases in SSC or increases in sediment deposition (or both
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:112:during Stage 4. Similarly it is only point 3 where any appreciable sediment deposition occurs, and this is at
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:112:and at Mudflat 3 it increases by a peak of 8mg/l (Figure 6.54). Sediment deposition on the mudflats is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:112:6.56). Sediment deposition at these locations is predicted to be immeasurable (Figure 6.57).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:112:background levels of concentrations (Figure 6.58). Sediment deposition at Location 6 (Middlesbrough
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:113:Overall changes of these magnitudes in SSC and sediment deposition are unlikely to cause significant
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:113:Figure 6.51 Location of points used for of timeseries analysis of changes in SSC and sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:114:Figure 6.53 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the water quality monitoring points
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:115:Figure 6.55 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the mudflat monitoring points
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:116:Figure 6.57 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the navigation (north bank) monitoring
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:117:Figure 6.59 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the navigation (south bank) monitoring
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:118:is licensed for the disposal of dredged sediment and is routinely monitored as part of a national programme.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:118:Therefore, plumes arising from disposal activities and subsequent sediment deposition is unlikely to be of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:118:activity commences and starts to form its own sediment plume (Plot H), the initial plume has moved
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:126:sediment plume associated with one release event (this example being from Stage 1). It can be seen that
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:126:much of the sediment falls to the bed within close proximity of the point of release, forming a small deposit
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:128:Figure 6.65 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from one disposal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:129:Figure6.66 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from one disposal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:129:Whilst turbidity and sediment deposition effects within the disposal site are to be expected (and indeed are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:130:changes in SSC and sediment deposition
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:131:The river dredging and offshore disposal activities will both cause plumes of sediment to form close to the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:131:and all sediment particles suspended in the water column will eventually settle to the river or seabed,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:131:During dredging, there will be a release of sediment particles from the deliberate physical disturbance to the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:131:point of sediment release, the enhanced SSC values are considerably lower because the coarser material
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:132:and the Oil Terminal. Other than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition on the riverbed will be of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:132:very minor magnitudes, in areas covering the same spatial extent as the sediment plumes. Where this
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:132:Overall, the changes in SSC and sediment deposition arising from the river dredging and offshore disposal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:132:sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:140: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is positive as it will help
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:141:6.6.4 Maintenance dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:141:maintenance dredging is likely to be due to the low levels of suspended sediment measured in this reach of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:142:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:142:This section presents the baseline conditions with regard to sediment and water quality of the Tees estuary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:142:and sedimentary regime (see Section 6) as well as recent survey data collected to inform other project EIAs
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:142:The assessment of potential impacts on marine sediment and water quality has been made with reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:142:Table 7.1 Summary of NPS requirements with regard to marine sediment and water quality
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:143:Table 7.2 Summary of scoping consultation responses with regard to marine sediment and water
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:143: sediment and dissolved oxygen.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:143: proposed dredge on water and sediment quality are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:143: the findings of hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:143: sediment and create smothering effects / turbidity / sediment plumes.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:143: based on the anticipated sediment types to be
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:144: dispose of capital dredged sediment. Impacts
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:144: As part of the application, the applicant will need to provide sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:144:For marine sediment and water quality, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:144:hydrodynamic and sediment dispersion modelling and is based on the maximum extent over which effects
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:144:are predicted to occur (e.g. sediment plumes generated during capital dredging and effects on tidal currents
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:144:The description of the existing environment with regard to sediment quality has been informed through desk-
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:144:based review of existing sediment quality data. The most recent publicly available sediment quality data to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:144:7.3.2.1 Sediment data
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:144:The assessment of potential impacts associated with disturbance of sediment during the construction phase
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:144: • Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQG) for the Protection of Aquatic Life (Canadian Council
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:145:can be quantified. Therefore, for EIA, in the same way, if contaminant levels in the sediments under
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:145:application of additional sediment quality guidelines (as outlined below) or undertaking more detailed water
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:145:The CSQG involved the derivation of interim marine sediment quality guidelines (ISQGs), or Threshold
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:145:contaminated sediments to a range of aquatic organisms exposed in laboratory tests and under field
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:145:conditions (CCME, 2002). As a result, these guidelines provide an indication of likely toxicity of sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:146:If additional assessment is indicated to be required as a result of recording elevated sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:146:above the lower Cefas Action Level 1, the undertaking of simple calculations using estimates of sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:146:losses from dredging equipment and concentrations of contaminants within the sediments to be dredged
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:147:The methodology used to assess the significance of the potential environmental impacts on marine sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:147:7.4.1 Sediment quality
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:147:Results of the sediment quality data from the NGCT marine licence application
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:147:PDT carried out a sediment quality survey in July 2019 to inform the marine licence application for the NGCT
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:147:the two schemes, specifically at the Tees Dock turning circle. Results from the NGCT sediment quality
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:147:survey are detailed below. The NGCT sediment quality sampling positions in relation to the proposed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:148: ( 2019 sediment sampling locations for NGCT
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:148: A3 G1 NGCT Sediment sampling locations (2019)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:149:Table 7.6 Summary of sediment quality data from the NGCT sediment quality survey (2019)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:152:sediment samples recovered in 2006, with BDE209 concentrations ranging from <0.5µg/kg to 340µg/kg.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:152:that found in 2006. The MMO has recently confirmed that the sediment to be dredged from the NGCT
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:153:Summary of previous sediment quality surveys in the Tees
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:153:The findings of sediment quality surveys undertaken in support of previously consented schemes in the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:153:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:153:within Tees Dock. Though showing signs of minor contamination, it was determined that the ‘soft’ sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:153:The 2006 sediment quality survey undertaken to inform the 2008 HRO application involved the recovery of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:156:In general, suspended sediment concentrations are low within the estuary and within Tees Bay. The highest
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:156:within the estuary) and analysed in the laboratory for suspended sediment concentrations. The results
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:156:this period, concentrations of suspended sediment were very low. It should be noted however, that the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:156:Table 7.8 Suspended sediment concentrations recorded at Transect T8 in July 2020
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:156: Suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:156:A site-specific sediment quality survey is proposed to be undertaken during 2020 to provide a detailed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:156:understanding of sediment quality within the proposed scheme footprint and validate the information set out
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:156:of sediment samples from 25 stations from the surface and at depth, with sampling positions equally spread
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:156:In the absence of the proposed scheme, there is no reason to believe that sediment and water quality within
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:156:sediment sampling being undertaken from the surface in accordance with the conditions on the maintenance
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:157:7.5.1 Dispersion and redistribution of sediment during capital dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:157:Capital dredging would result in the creation of sediment plumes. To consider the potential extent and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:157:Modelling was undertaken using a MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:158:Figure 7. 3 Plume of suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities during Stage 2
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:160:Figure 7. 5 Plume of suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities during Stage
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:161:Figure 7.6 Plume of enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:162:Figure 7.7 Timeseries of changes in suspended sediment concentrations at water quality monitoring
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:162:sediment plume is not predicted to reach The Gares water quality monitoring point, no effects on the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:162:Additionally, a significant component of the dredged material is likely to be geological sediment, which is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:163:The concentrations of PAHs and metals within the sediments in the Tees estuary could potentially affect
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:163:An assessment to look at the potential for sediments exceeding Action Level 1 to cause EQS failures has
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:163:estimates of sediment losses from dredging equipment and concentrations of contaminants within the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:163:sediments to be dredged to provide an indication of the amount of contamination that could be released into
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:163:sediments and no account is made of any settlement of sediment that may occur immediately following
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:163:from these calculations that a risk is presented by the concentrations of zinc in the sediment and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:163:sediment as a result of the proposed scheme) although the maximum allowable concentration was not
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:164:sediment per day and maximum concentrations both in the water and in the sediment)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:164: in sediments in sediments concentration with baseline
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:164: Sediment data taken from NGCT 2019 (see Table 7.5)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:164: Calculated loss of sediment derived using indicative values for the mass of sediment resuspended per m 3 of dredged material in CIRIA guidance (John et al., 1999) in kg/m3. Worst case S-Factor for
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:165:sediment per day and maximum concentrations in the water and in the sediment)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:165: sediments sediments concentration with baseline
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:166:of zinc and benzo(b)fluoranthene (both sediment and water quality values) at low water volumes within the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:166:estuary. If the calculations at mean low water are re-run using average concentrations (sediment and water
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:166: • The calculations assume that all sediment remains in suspension. In reality, it is likely that some
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:166: likely that some contamination will remain bound to sediment particles.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:166: • The maximum concentration within the sediments used for each parameter does not occur across
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:166: • The maximum values for water quality concentrations are not reflective of sediment conditions
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:166: releases less sediment into the water column.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:166:Additionally, information from sediment plume modelling (see Section 7.5.1) indicates that only the Smiths
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:166:7.5.4 Release of sediment during riverbank excavation to create the berth
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:167:As these works progress, there is the potential for sediment to be suspended when working in and around
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:168:7.6.1 Dispersion and redistribution of sediment during maintenance dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:191: • Impacts on marine ecology from increased suspended sediment during capital dredging and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:194:hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling undertaken. This section excludes consideration of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:195:Cross reference to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (Section 6) and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:195:the marine sediment and water quality assessment (Section 7) has been made when assessing potential
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:195:quay wall to create the berth pocket will remove both intertidal sediments and landside materials / soils.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:197: sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the Markey
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:197: sediments deposited during the Holocene, which overlie the glacial deposits from the last
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:197: and subsidence to south makes these sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:198:present in sediments from the survey area are rare and therefore, in this respect, the species present were
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:198:SS.SMu.ISaMU.Cap (Capitella capitata in enriched sublittoral muddy sediments) and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:198:sediment), where C. capitata dominated and was accompanied by large numbers of Ophryotrocha sp.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:198:These species are characteristic of fine sediments, usually with some level of organic pollution and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:199: would be indirectly affected (e.g. through sediment deposition during capital dredging).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:199:Sediment type
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:199:Sediment types, as classified using the Folk triangle (Folk, 1954) for each of the sample stations across the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:199:2019 survey area are provided in Figure 9.3. A variety of sediment types were present across the survey
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:199:Sediment biotopes
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:199:‘Capitella capitata and Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:201:Figure9.3 Comparison of Folk (Folk, 1954) sediment types as determined from PSD analysis of samples acquired during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey, 2019
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:202:Figure 9.4 Distribution of biotopes determined from PSD and macrobenthic analysis of samples recovered during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey, 2019
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:204:sediments and in estuarine environments (Wolff 1968, Hughes 1998). The beds can play an important role
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:204:walkovers have confirmed that the intertidal comprises intertidal mud and gravelly sediment with rocks and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:206: A2 – Littoral sediment A2.12 Estuarine coarse sediment shores
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:206:Occasional areas of impoverished coarse sediment was also found along the low-mid shore (Ocean
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:206:depths, which would continue to influence the benthic communities present within the subtidal sediments.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:208: A. islandica is found buried in sandy and muddy sediments from the low intertidal zone down to 400m
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:209:that impede the natural movement of sediments and poor transition of habitats). Although there are areas
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:210:9.5.2 Effects of increased suspended sediment concentrations during dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:210:will disturb sediment, which will result in localised and short-term increases in suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:210:Based on sediment quality sampling that was undertaken within the Tees estuary in July 2019 (as reported
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:210:in Section 7), it is not expected that any contaminated sediment would be released into the water column
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:210:ecology as a result of increased concentrations of suspended sediment within the water column (i.e.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:210:resuspended sediment which does not contain elevations beyond Action Level 2). The dredged sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:210:filter feeding molluscs). In addition, high concentrations of suspended sediment may impact on fish through
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:210:In general, sediment plumes induced by dredging are considered to pose only a limited risk to water quality
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:210:dredging periods. The sediment plume generated by dredging would likely be dispersed by tidal currents
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:210:upon disturbance of the sediment.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:211:during spring tides (Section 7.4.2). These are considerably lower than suspended sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:211:immediate vicinity of the dredger. Sediment plume modelling predicts different plume extents and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:211:suspended sediment concentrations depending on the stage of dredging (as described in Section 6). In all
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:211:cases, the sediment plume is predicted to be very narrow within the river, with the phase of dredging with
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:211:The sediment plume modelling reported within Section 6 also extracted time series plots of changes in SSC
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:211:importance (where information is available) to increases in suspended sediment. This information is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:211:S. spinulosa relies on suspended particles for its tube growth. Increased suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:211:to increases in suspended sediment concentrations, according to this sensitivity review.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:211:A. islandica typically occurs in silty sediments, in sheltered to wave exposed conditions, where the surface
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:211:sediment likely gets resuspended regularly, and where accretion rates and moderate to high. A. islandica
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:211:can burrow in the sediment it lives in for several days, thereby it is able to avoid sudden changes in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:211:the proposed dredge is considered to be of low sensitivity to increases in suspended sediment.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:The dominant sediment biotope present within the dredge footprint is EUNIS biotope A5.323, Nephtys
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:resistance and resilience to changes in suspended sediment and was reported to be not sensitive (to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:changes in suspended sediment) (De-Bastos, 2016). As such, for the purposes of this assessment, the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:Given the temporary and localised nature of the predicted increase in suspended sediment, in addition to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:the low/very low sensitivity of the key species present in the estuary to increased suspended sediment, an
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:is 32.5ha. This is expected to cause a very limited extent of suspended sediment concentrations, and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:Some of the sediment that is suspended as a result of the dredging activities will be deposited to the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:sediment fractions), or at a point in time within a few minutes to a few hours after this if it is carried in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:suspension by the prevailing currents (for finer-grained sediment fractions) (Section 6). The modelling
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:carried out on this, as reported in Section 6, indicates that much of the resuspended sediment is deposited
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:from the sediment plumes.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:(deposition) from the sediment plume model were extracted at a series of points within the affected river
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:reaches (relating to locations of mudflats, as shown on Figure 6.53). Sediment deposition at all of these
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:et al., 2004). This movement of water allows for any deposited sediment to be moved around and away
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:relatively quickly. However, some sediment may still be present long enough to damage the fronds of F.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:213:sediments at Seal Sands, Bran Sands or North Gare Sands, due to the limited footprint of dredging activities,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:213:up to a deposit of 5 cm because they are able to burrow and reposition within the new sediment (Whomersley
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:213:sediment. This information is presented below.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:213:MarLIN reports that even though smothering by fine sediments may temporarily limit the feeding, growth
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:213:sediments for up to several weeks, and that recovery would be almost immediate. As such, S. spinulosa is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:213:of sediments, with no effect on its growth or population structure being evident as a result of smothering
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:213:(Powilliet et al., 2006; 2009). As such, it is considered that a deposit of up to 30cm of fine sediments is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:213:A sudden smothering of 5cm of sediment would temporarily suspend the feeding and respiration of A. alba
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:213:species that characterise fine sediment habitats within estuarine areas (mainly polychaete and oligochaete
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:213:of fluctuating environmental conditions, such as periodic sediment disturbance due to storms and are not
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:213:concluded therefore, that the rates of sediment deposition, and the overall degree of sedimentation, that is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:214:component of the benthic community. Considering this, the predicted rates of sediment deposition, and the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:214:as a result of the deposition of fine sediments, with no impact in the longer term.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:215:may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment (Section 6.6.2). In areas adjacent to the north bank
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:215:The predicted changes to the rate of sedimentation within the navigation channel as a consequence of the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:217:mammals from the offshore disposal of dredged sediments are assessed in Section 26.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:223:known prey for harbour porpoise, exhibit a strong association with particular surface sediments.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:235:widely, dependent on the dredger type, operational stage, or environmental conditions (e.g. sediment type,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:sediment within the water column. However, marine mammals often inhabit turbid environments.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments during dredging or other activities will
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:disturbance and temporary loss of seabed habitat; increased suspended sediment concentrations and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:sediment re-deposition; smothering and underwater noise.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:256: hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume effects would not extend to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:257: hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume effects would not extend to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:270: • hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (Section 6);
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:270: • marine sediment and water quality (Section 7);
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:279:Cross reference has been made, where relevant, to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:296:In summary, the largest sediment plumes are likely to arise during Stage 2 of the dredging (i.e. BHD and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:296:(it is not a sediment plume, rather a combined zone of influence). The sediment dispersion modelling of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:296:of this assessment, the sediment plume may be regarded as representing a temporary loss of foraging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:297:terns do not forage to any significant extent within the predicted range of the sediment plume. Likewise, the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:297:tern species as a result of increased suspended sediments during the construction phase.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:297:and re-suspension of sediment (Cook and Burton, 2010). However, common terns typically only dive to 1m
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:297:England, 2018a), and the area likely to be affected by the sediment plume at any one time represents around
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:298:12.5.3 Effects of sediment deposition on intertidal food resources
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:298:The deposition of fine sediment within intertidal areas due to capital dredging has the potential to affect
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:298:dredging, is presented in Section 6.5.2. Fine sediment will be deposited within minutes or hours if carried
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:306:invertebrate prey to birds feeding on the mudflats . The predicted minor accretion of sediment at North Tees
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:307:sediments are assessed in Sections 26. Potential cumulative impacts are addressed in Section 27.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:309: thresholds for parameters such as suspended sediment and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:309:informed by the hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling undertaken, as well as the understanding
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:310:Cross reference to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (Section 6), the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:312:inhabiting soft sediment environments.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:318:During capital dredging, approximately 1.8Mm3 of sediment (including approximately 1.27Mm3 of soft
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:318:details of the increase in SSC, including the visual output of sediment plume modelling for the capital
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:318:dredging, is provided in Section 6. The peak suspended sediment concentration within the Tees during the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:319:As detailed in the water quality assessment in Section 7, sediment quality testing from 2019 indicates that
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:319:it is very unlikely that disturbance of sediment during the dredging would result in exceedances of EQSs,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:319:sediment plume creating a ‘barrier’ effect could cause a significant disruption to the annual migration pattern,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:319:during a period of very hot and dry weather. Modelling of the sediment plume during capital dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:319:of suspended sediments are predicted to decrease significantly with increased distance from the dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:320:period. However, while unlikely, it has to be taken into account that sediment plumes encompassing the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:328:capital dredging activity will consequently result in an increase in sediment deposition, which has the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:328:fish/shellfish. The extent of sediment deposition above baseline levels is detailed in Section 6. The
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:328:maximum sediment deposition, illustrated in Figure 6.50, shows that much of the sediment falls to bed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:328:sediment deposition, it again can be assumed that feeding fish would be accustomed to similar conditions
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:329:dominated by fucoid algae). The intertidal area comprises mud and gravelly sediment with some rocks.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:333:not match the advertised depths due to sedimentation within the channel).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:337: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is positive as it will help
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:343: sedimentary regime (see Section 6) the study area comprises all areas of river, adjacent coastline
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:346:heritage assets which may arise as a result of changes to hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:347:by-product of changes to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes resulting from a project) may also depend
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:352:Archaeology, 2014) suggested the presence of five sedimentary units:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:352: • Unit 2 Estuarine alluvium and peat (possible mid-Holocene sediments);
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:352: • Unit 3 Marine sediments/ Estuarine alluvium;
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:352: • Unit 4 Estuarine alluvium/ polluted fluvial sediments; and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:352:remains, preserved beneath later sediments. Given this potential, geoarchaeological assessment of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:359:directly and indirectly change the hydrodynamic and sedimentary process regimes, both locally and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:359:than those protected by sediment cover. Conversely, if increased sedimentation results in an exposed site
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:359:Potential effects upon the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime are assessed in Section 6. With regard
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:359:to effects during construction it is concluded that, other than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:360:hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary. Consequently, there is no pathway for
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:360:additional, indirect impacts to heritage assets associated with changes in sediment deposition, over and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:360: • Reductions in baseline current speeds may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:421: • Effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:424:well as hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling reported in Section 6.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:425:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (as set out in Section 6)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:467:This would include dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils / landside material within the river
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:467:The total dredged volume for marine sediments is predicted to be approximately 1,800,000m3. Dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:467:the transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger to the offshore disposal site.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:478:The proposed scheme is predicted to generate up to approximately 1,800,000m3 of dredged sediment from
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:478:been undertaken on a worst-case basis whereby all dredged sediment from the Tees estuary would be
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:478:As the offshore disposal commences, a plume of sediment would be generated with the greatest
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:478:concentrations predicted at the end of the discharge period. The sediment plume is predicted to increase
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:478:commences and starts to form its own sediment plume, the initial plume has moved sufficiently far from its
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:478:deposition of sediment. As shown on Figure 6.66, deposited sediment from one disposal event is predicted
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:479:Based on the modelled effects of the sediment plume at the Tees Bay C disposal site described above, it is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:479:The PSD results show that the sediments within and adjacent to Tees Bay C comprise gravelly muddy sand,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:482: sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:482:of the disposal site. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling has predicted some short-term build-up of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:482:sediment at the disposal site, however, this would be dispersed over time.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:482:sensitive to smothering or increases in suspended sediment.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:485:for the assessment of potential impacts associated with offshore disposal of dredged sediments (see
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:485:disposal of dredged sediments are likely to be less than those generated during dredging activities. The
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:485:display a fleeing response, as a result of underwater noise during offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:485:offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:485: sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:485:result of underwater noise associated with offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:485: sediments based on density of 0.014/km2 for reference population anticipated to be
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486:disposal of dredged sediments would be limited to the immediate vicinity of the vessels while they are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486:dredged sediments on harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486:sediments on marine mammals
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: sediments Negligible / Negligible
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: sediments (5% of (0.00003% of the NE England MU) based (permanent effect with less than 0.001% of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during offshore disposal of dredged sediments has been
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487:disturbance due to the disposal of dredged sediment into the disposal site to seals at Seal Sands, including
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:dredged sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:The offshore disposal of dredged material would temporarily increase the suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:Changes to marine mammals prey resource during offshore disposal of dredged sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:temporary loss of seabed habitat, increased suspended sediment concentrations and sediment re-
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:490:disturbance and increased suspended sediments on migratory fish).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:490: influencing the same area as affected by the sediment plume); and,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:492: of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of the approach channel, Approximately
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:493: effect on sediment transport or morphology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:494: the Tees navigation channel, the turning circle and Tees Dock to a hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:500:27.5.2 Hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:500: • dispersion of suspended sediment during capital dredging and deposition at the offshore disposal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:500: • changes to the sediment budget.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:500:(increased suspended sediment concentrations) are relevant to the CIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:500:Dispersion of suspended sediment and deposition on the seabed during capital dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:500:sediment which will disperse throughout the estuary according to the prevailing currents, prior to settling on
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:500:The extent of the sediment plume created by capital dredging is heavily dependent on the dredging plant
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:501:be used for dredging different sediment types as part of the same project. As noted in Section 6.5.2, it is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:501:important to note that figures showing the “maximum extent of sediment plume dispersion and deposition”
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:501:Consequently, for the purposes of this CIA, the maximum zones of influence of sediment plume dispersion
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:501:27.3 presents a summary of the results of the predictive modelling of suspended sediment concentration
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:501:of sediment plume dispersion and deposition onto the river and/or seabed during capital dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:501:sediment in the water column was predicted to be in close proximity to the dredger, with plume dispersion
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:501:resulting in a significantly reduced concentration of suspended sediment beyond the source of the plume.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:501:For the NGCT studies, significant deposition of sediment was also only predicted in close proximity to the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:502:(right) as a result of the proposed scheme [Note: plots show sediment plume impacts arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:503: • effect of increases in suspended sediments during maintenance dredging on food resources of SPA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:503: • remobilisation and redistribution of sediments (which may be contaminated); and,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:503:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:503:sediment, and this measure would limit sediment release into the water column as far as practicable. The
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:503:sediment and water quality, marine ecology, ornithology, fish and fisheries) is discussed below.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:505:Changes to estuarine sediment budget
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:505:deposition of sediment which would be positive in areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, as it
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:505:offshore as a result. In addition, no changes to sediment transport in the predominantly sandy areas around
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:505:The Anglo American Harbour Facilities are predicted to result in a localised redistribution of sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:505:very small change in the overall fine sediment regime will not alter the present frequency of, or methodology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:505:used for, maintenance dredging, and no effect on sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:506:cumulative impacts to arise to the estuarine sediment budget as a result of the projects screened into the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:506:27.5.3 Marine sediment and water quality
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:506:In relation to marine sediment and water quality, the proposed scheme has the potential to result in the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:506: • dispersion of suspended sediment during marine works, dredging and disposal; and,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:506: • changes to water quality associated with the release of sediment contamination.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:506:addition, the predictions made for each project represent sediment plume dispersion under specific tidal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:506:where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each project)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:506:In relation to sediment contamination, data collected to inform the EIAs indicates that concentrations are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:506:additional mitigation measures are identified to reduce any resulting sediment plume as far as possible and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:507:Smothering of benthic invertebrate communities due to deposition of sediment dispersed during
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:507:Sediment deposition resulting from the dredging for the proposed scheme will largely be within the proposed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:507:less than 5cm, within the same area of river that is affected by the zone of influence from the sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:507:(deposition) from the sediment plume model were extracted at a series of points within the affected river
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:507:reaches (relating to locations of mudflats, as shown on Figure 6.51). Sediment deposition at all of these
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:507:The predicted footprints of sediment deposition for the NGCT and the Anglo American Harbour Facilities
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:507:This deposition is likely to be temporary due to the unconsolidated nature of the sediment, and the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:508:The proposed scheme is not predicted to have an effect on sediment supply into the estuary. The very
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:508:minor changes in the hydrodynamic regime, specifically currents, may lead to a slight increase in sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:508:The studies for the NGCT scheme concluded that there would not be a change in the supply of fine sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:508:sediment budget of the estuary and, therefore, was assessed that there would be no impact on morphology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:513:(i.e. dredging along the axis of the river rather than across it to ensure that, at any one time, sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:513:HaskoningDHV, 2015)). However, the additive effect of the sediment plumes from separate dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:514:sediment plumes may deter such species from migrating to and from spawning sites.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:514:the respective sediment plumes could result in an additive effect, as demonstrated in Figures 27.1 to 27.3.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:514:of the sediment plumes from separate dredging campaigns cannot be completely avoided if the campaigns
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:517:hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime (Section 27.5.2) concludes that no significant cumulative impacts
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:526: Intertidal soft sediments (400.13ha); Intertidal soft sediment (845.53ha),
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:526: reef (4.13ha); subtidal soft sediments reef (7170.93ha), Subtidal soft
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:526: (610.31ha). sediments (1219.64ha)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:526: 24.Reduce sediment resuspension
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:526: 26.Sediment management
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:528: sediments with INNS are already present
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:528: measures identified for the Tees estuary. habitats located within sediment plumes created
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:531: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is deemed to be a positive
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:532:Capital dredging within the river would result in sediment plumes. To consider the potential extent and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:532:Modelling was undertaken using a MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:534:Figure 28.4 Timeseries of changes in suspended sediment concentrations at water quality monitoring
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:534:The resuspension of sediment could also potentially affect dissolved oxygen levels in the water. This is due
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:534:represent a more conservative scenario, as sediment plume modelling outlined above indicates relatively
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:534:dissolved oxygen problem or where sediments have a high chemical oxygen demand and that in practice,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:534:high for dissolved oxygen and it is not anticipated that the sediments will have a high chemical oxygen
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:535:In terms of contaminants, the concentrations of PAHs and metals within the sediments in the Tees estuary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:535:and the lower CSQG. An assessment to look at the potential for the release of sediments exceeding Cefas
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:535:Action Level 1 to cause EQS failures was therefore undertaken to inform the marine sediment and water
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:535:maximum concentrations for baseline water quality and sediments in the estuary indicate that there is a risk
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:535:undertaken for high tide volumes in the estuary (for maximum sediment and water quality baseline
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:535:For high water with maximum water and sediment concentrations and use of average concentrations for
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:535:both water and sediment quality, the estimated concentrations reduce below EQS. This indicates that the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:535: • The calculations assume that all sediment remains in suspension. In reality, it is likely that some
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:535: likely that some contamination will remain bound to sediment particles.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:535: • The maximum concentration within the sediments used for each parameter does not occur across
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:535: • The maximum values for water quality concentrations are not reflective of sediment conditions
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:535: releases less sediment into the water column.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:535:Additionally, sediment plume results for Smiths Dock monitoring point (point 3) indicated only temporary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:535:therefore the majority of the dredge would impact on the lower sensitivity habitat ‘subtidal soft sediment’ of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:535:berth pocket would remove 25,000m2 of intertidal sediments, of which there are 4,001,300m2 within the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:536:Subtidal sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:536:Results in 2019 indicate a variety of sediment types are present across the survey area and most samples
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:536:infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations were unable to be classified further than the EUNIS level 4
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:536:assemblage may take place before the original topography is restored, if the exposed, underlying sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:536:composition and numbers following dredging, it is predicted that the sediment communities would recover
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:536:Intertidal sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:536:walkovers confirm that the intertidal area to be lost comprises intertidal mud and gravelly sediment with
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:537:Sediment settlement
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:537:Sediment suspended within the dredging plumes will fall to the riverbed, either soon after disturbance or
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:537:spillage occurring during the dredging operation (for coarser-grained sediment fractions), or at a point in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:537:finer-grained sediment fractions. Figure 28.5 shows the maximum changes in riverbed thickness caused
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:537:by deposition. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the dredged areas (from
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:538:zone of influence from the sediment plumes. As a result, a deterioration in ecological class status is not
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:538:Figure 28.5 Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:538:An increase in suspended sediment in the water column may lead to physiological effects in finfish, including
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:538:in sediment concentrations due to the natural fluctuations associated with tidal activity, discharge from the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:538:(including most adult finfish) are generally able to detect early onset of increased sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:539:peak migratory season, when a sediment plume creating a ‘barrier’ effect could cause a significant disruption
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:539: Reduce sediment resuspension disposal activities currently ongoing. Disposal would be
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:539: Sediment management
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:541: Reduce sediment resuspension
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:541: Sediment management measures
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:542: Reduce sediment resuspension
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:542: Sediment management
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:543:wall would remove a small area of intertidal soft sediment, the measures outlined in Section 28.8 would
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:544: • Cumulative effects of sediment plumes and associated effects on water quality and fish
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:545:Section 27 considers the potential cumulative effects of the proposed schemes on sediment plumes and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:545:marine water quality. To summarise, whilst the sediment plumes could combine to cover a larger area of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:545:the estuary, additive effects in terms of increasing sediment peaks are not predicted. This is because the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:545:contaminated material has been identified in the Anglo American Harbour Facilities sediments (i.e. above
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:545:proposed project both include mitigation measures to dredge in long strips to reduce the effects of sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:545:Any project that requires dredging would disturb the marine communities within the sediments to be
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:545:In terms of wider effects, significant deposition of sediment again is generally only predicted in close
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:547: Sediment transport Hydrodynamic modelling showed that the proposed scheme would give rise to only a small magnitude reduction in baseline flows varying during different phases of the tidal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:547: sediment at the North Tees mudflat which could be seen to be a positive effect in areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay. In the main channel, deposition will
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:547: Modelling for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities concluded that the only effects were likely to be localised redistribution of sediment deposition in response to predicted
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:547: sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees estuary.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:549:Whilst concentrations of contaminants in the sediments indicated a risk to water quality EQS’, assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:549:suspended sediment thus reducing the risk of significant water quality effects. Mitigation measures to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:550:would be sediment plumes associated with dredging simultaneously. However, on further consideration,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:559:proposed scheme nor the modelled extent of the maximum-expected sediment plume from the capital
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:559:Following modelling of noise levels and sediment dispersion, it has been concluded that the overall zone of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:559:influence of the proposed scheme will be determined by the sediment plume during dredging activities.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:562: of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of the approach channel, Approximately proposed scheme, in-combination effects to the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:572:on tidal propagation, wave climate, current speeds and sediment budget of the estuarine system) has been
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:572:and so will cause no effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:572:The capital dredging of the river will cause plumes of sediment to form. The plume effects arising from the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:572:river dredging are characterised by a short-lived localised increase in suspended sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:572:of sediment from the plumes on the river or seabed will be very small.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:573:The reductions in baseline current speeds may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment. In areas
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:573:Section 28), there is approximately 400ha of “intertidal sediment” habitat within the estuary. The area of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:575:requires use of TSHD and BHD on soft sediment in the channel and berth pocket) will result in plumes of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:575:The sediment dispersion modelling of Stage 2 dredging indicates that, at any given time, significant SSC
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:575:Full details of the sediment dispersion modelling are presented in Section 6.5.2.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:575:England, 2018a). The area affected by the sediment plume generated from proposed dredging, though
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:580:In terms of intra-project effects on foraging common terns, the zone of influence from the sediment plume
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:581: • effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:582:findings of invertebrate sampling undertaken on sediment samples from The Slems). The HRA undertaken
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:582:proposed scheme in combination with the NGCT scheme represents less than 1% of “intertidal sediment”
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:583:Effects on fish may be compounded by the combined sediment plumes of other projects or plans that may
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:584:An interaction between the sediment plumes would only occur in the unlikely event that the capital dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:584:sediment from Hartlepool channel is not considered sufficient to result in a lethal effect on fish, with any
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:584:sediment plumes occupy only half of the river cross section) has also been proposed for the NGCT project.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:585:29.6.4 In-combination effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:585:wide change in hydrodynamics. There is no predicted effect on the baseline sediment transport regime and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:585:of the Tees and the resultant effect on tidal flows and sediment transport.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:585:change the supply of fine sediment to the Tees, and the sediment predicted to deposit in its berth pocket
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:585:potential for an effect on the sediment budget of the estuary to arise and, therefore, there would be no
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:585:Sedimentary and hydrodynamic modelling undertaken for the consented Hartlepool approach channel
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:585:proposed scheme is predicted to be low. The magnitude of effect on the baseline sediment transport regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:585:sediment transport regime and seabed or shore morphology across the wider study area as a result of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:586:The zone of influence from predicted sediment plumes (including the combined plumes from the proposed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:593:HR Wallingford (2002). Teesmouth Sediment Study. EX 4514.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:593:HR Wallingford (2006). Northern Gateway Container Terminal. Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:593:sediment plumes arising from dredging. Construction Industry Research and Information Association
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:597:Robertson, M.J., Scruton, R.S. and Clarke, K. (2006). Effect of sediment on freshwater fish and fish
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:598:Royal HaskoningDHV (2013). Cell 1 Sediment Transport Study. Phase 1: Scoping Report. Scarborough
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:12:Sediment that meets the appropriate criteria is likely to be disposed at sea, given that it is unlikely that there
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:12:are any local development schemes that require to large quantity of sediment created by the scheme. A
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:12:sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2019 to inform the EIA for the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:12:advance of a site-specific sediment quality survey being undertaken during 2020.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:16: • Dredging and offshore disposal of marine sediments.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:23: Sediment: Potential for contamination in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:23: Sediment – 1,800,000m3 of sediment excavated made ground.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:23: Non-hazardous electrical and electronic Potential for some excavated sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:33:Dredged sediment is proposed to be disposed offshore; this will be subject to a marine licence from the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:33:MMO. Should it be determined by the MMO’s advisors that the dredged sediment is not suitable for offshore
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:33:Any hazardous excavated material or hazardous sediment that is not suitable for use on site would be
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:51: disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be set back into
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:52:a berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:54: • Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:58: material. As part of the marine licence application, the applicant will need to provide sediment sample analysis results to ensure the material is suitable
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:58: exceed the Cefas Action Level 2 guidelines for contaminated sediment. This can be determined after sediment samples have been tested.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61: 4.1. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:The potential effects of the proposed scheme on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime will be
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:The re-calibrated 3D Tees Estuary Tidal Model will be used to predict movement of suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:from the proposed dredging and disposal activity by coupling a sediment plume model built in MIKE21-MT
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:software. Sediment release rates will be estimated based on seabed and river conditions. The model will
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61: 4.2. Marine water and sediment quality
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:The findings from the sediment quality survey (to be undertaken in accordance with a sampling plan agreed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:sedimentary regime assessment to determine the implications of the proposed scheme on water quality
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:(in particular the effect of resuspension and dispersion of sediment during dredging and disposal activities).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:estuary. Assuming that the concentrations of contaminants in sediment will be similar to those previously
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:61:will be given to tributyltin (TBT) concentrations within sediments as the current water quality classification
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:62:The findings from the sediment and water quality assessments and marine ecology assessments will be
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (particularly the plume dispersion modelling to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:determine impacts on feeding terns which are an interest feature of the SPA), the sediment quality survey,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:64:The findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment will inform consideration as to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:65:The potential impact of offshore disposal on bathymetry, benthic ecology, water and sediment quality and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:65:sediment plume modelling will, however, be used to inform impacts to water quality as a result of the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:66:the Tees transitional waterbody. The findings from the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:66:assessment, water and sediment quality assessment and marine ecology assessment will feed into the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:68: 4. SEDIMENTATION/SILTATION ALLOWANCE OF 0.6m
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:79:channel and to create a berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:80: sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be set back into the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:81: • offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:92: 7.3 Suspended Sediment Conversion ………………………………………………………………………………………..20
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:108:7.3 Suspended Sediment Conversion
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:130:Hydrodynamic and sedimentary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:131:Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:133:5.2 Sediment Data 51
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:133:5.4.3 Sediment Release Assumptions 57
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:133:5.4.4 Sediment Property Representation 57
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:134:Table 5-4: Sediment settling velocity and critical bed shear stress 57
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.3: Sediment release schedule for dredger 56
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.4: Sediment release schedule at offshore disposal site 56
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.5: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.6: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.7: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.8: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.9: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.10: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-surface layer) arising
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.11: Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.12: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:137:Figure 5.13: Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:139: movement of suspended sediment from the proposed dredging and disposal activities by coupling with
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:139: a sediment plume model built in MIKE3-MT software. The sediment plume model was run for the entire
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:139:consideration of hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes. The wider study area: (i) extends
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:174:Section 6 (Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Processes) of the EIA Report.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:189: of sediment. In the main channel the deposition will require periodic dredging to maintain the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:191:This section of the report describes the sediment dispersion modelling exercise that was undertaken to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:191:investigate the suspended sediment transport effects of the proposed dredging of the channel and the berth
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:191:sediment transport model was built in MIKE3-MT software developed by DHI.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:191:5.2 Sediment Data
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:192:Based on the ground investigation data, for the sediment dispersion modelling, the following particle size
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:192:Sediment Category Sediment Size (mm) Soft material Hard material
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:192:The sediment dispersion model built in MIKE3-MT is coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic model built in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:192:The sediment dispersion model has been run for a four-month period to cover the full duration of the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:192:The sediment dispersion model has been setup with 4 layers in order to differentiate between suspended
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:192:sediment concentrations throughout the water column, e.g. near the sea bed and near the water surface.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:192:In order to simulate the sediment dispersion close to natural conditions, wave disturbance effect has been
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:193:The dredging method, dredging schedule and details of the sediment release settings for the sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:193:The sediment will be dredged using two types of dredgers. The soft soil material below a depth of -5mCD
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:194:Figure 5.3 and Figure 5.4 show the sediment release schedules for the dredgers at the South Bank Wharf
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:196: Figure 5.3: Sediment release schedule for dredger
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:196: Figure 5.4: Sediment release schedule at offshore disposal site
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:5.4.3 Sediment Release Assumptions
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:The following assumptions have been made for the simulation of sediment plumes arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:which means the sediment release will be more dispersed and thus the sediment concentration will be less.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:5.4.4 Sediment Property Representation
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:The five sediment fractions, critical bed shear stresses and fall velocities used in the sediment dispersion
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:model to represent bed sediments are shown in Table 5-4. The critical bed shear stress and fall velocities
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:Table 5-4: Sediment settling velocity and critical bed shear stress
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197: Sediment Sediment Settling Critical Shear
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:operation sailing back and forth to the offshore disposal site. The dredger disperses sediment into the water
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:column at a sediment release rate of 5.6 kg/s. The sediment loss rate (the so-called ‘S-factor’) is taken as
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:197:disposal site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 3,705kg/s. The barge will then take
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:198:site. The dredger disperses sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 5.6 kg/s. The
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:198:sediment loss rate (the so-called ‘S-factor’) is taken as 25kg/m3 for the Backhoe which follows the CIRIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:198:disposal site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 3,705kg/s. The barge will then take
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:198:disperses sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 2.2 kg/s. The sediment loss rate
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:198:disposal site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 4,913kg/s. The barge will then take
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:198:site. The dredger disperses sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 5.6 kg/s. The
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:198:sediment loss rate (the so-called ‘S-factor’) is taken as 25kg/m3 for the Backhoe which follows the CIRIA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:198:disposal site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 3,705kg/s. The barge will then take
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:199:sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 4.5kg/s. The sediment loss rate (the so-called
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:199:minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 7,690kg/s. The TSHD will then take 55 minutes to sail back to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:199:sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 4.5kg/s. The sediment loss rate (the so-called
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:199:minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 7,690kg/s. The TSHD will then take 55 minutes to sail back to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:200:sailing, disposal and downtime) so that sediment releases have been made near continuously throughout
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:200:Results from the sediment dispersion modelling are discussed in turn for the river dredging and offshore
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:200:sediment concentration (SSC) or sediment deposition due to these activities above baseline levels.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:200:For SSC and sediment deposition, two types of analysis were undertaken:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:200: Sedimentary Processes) of the Environmental Statement (ES).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:201: Figure 5.5: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:202: Figure 5.6: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:203: Figure 5.7: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:204: Figure 5.8: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:205: Figure 5.9: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from dredging activities
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:206: Figure 5.10: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-surface layer) arising from dredging activities
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:207:Figure 5.11 shows the maximum changes in river bed thickness caused by the deposition of sediment from
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:207:the plumes created by river dredging. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:207:that is affected by the zone of influence from the sediment plumes.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:207: Figure 5.11: Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging activities during
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:208:licensed for the disposal of dredged sediment and is routinely monitored as part of a national programme.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:208:Therefore, plumes arising from disposal activities and subsequent sediment deposition is unlikely to be of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:208:sediment plume for this worst case. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:208:similar zone to the sediment plume. In reality, disposals will be at different points within the licensed area,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:209: Figure 5.12: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from disposal activities
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:210: Figure 5.13: Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging activities during
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:210:The river dredging and offshore disposal activities will both cause plumes of sediment to form close to the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:210:and all sediment particles suspended in the water column will eventually settle to the river or sea bed,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:210:During dredging, there will be release of sediment particles from the deliberate physical disturbance to the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:211:point of sediment release, the enhanced SSC values are considerably lower because the coarser material
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:211:than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition on the river bed will be of very minor magnitudes, in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:211:areas covering the same spatial extent as the sediment plumes. Where this occurs in the river channel or
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:211:Overall, the changes in SSC and sediment deposition arising from the river dredging and offshore disposal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:237:Sediment sampling plan
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:238:sample plan to inform a sediment quality and benthic ecology survey in the Tees
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:239: 1.1. The advice relates to sampling to inform a sediment quality and benthic ecology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:239: of sediments. Based on the information submitted (as described above), the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:240: 2.7. Surface samples should be taken from the upper layer of in-situ sediment using a
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:241: 3.3. Results were also discussed form a sediment quality survey that was undertaken in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:241: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:241: This list indicates the laboratories which have been validated to undertake sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:242: 4.2. Irrespective of which validated laboratory is used to undertake sediment analysis,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:242: (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:242: changes in the quantity and quality of sediments, there may be a need for surface
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:242: sediments to be re-sampled and analysed if the project has not commenced within
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:286: pollutants or sediments enter surface waters.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:291: 4. SEDIMENTATION/SILTATION ALLOWANCE OF 0.6m
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:2:Disposal assessments do not present the maximum bed thickness change due to the sediment disposal,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:2:prior to the modelling, we envisaged that the disposed sediment would mostly remain within, or very close
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:2:that the most important potential coastal process impact would be changes in suspended sediment plumes,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:2:suspended sediment plumes; that being each disposal within the licensed disposal site being released at
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:2:bed thickness caused by deposition of material from the sediment plume associated with one single release
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:3:site used for of timeseries analysis of changes in SSC and sediment deposition (reproduced from ES
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:4:Additional figure Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the offshore disposal site
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:4:different points will be used for subsequent deposits and therefore the maximum SSC and sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:4:Corresponding with these patterns, sediment deposition under this worst case is greatest just beyond the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:5: This reach already experiences deposition of sediments sufficient to necessitate maintenance
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:5: (curtailing sediment supply elsewhere), and we believe that because the anticipated increase in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:6:These results have been compared against the critical velocities for sediment motion.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:7: • In the baseline, the maximum peak currents of 0.20m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:7: • With the scheme, the maximum peak currents of 0.15m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:9: • In the baseline, the maximum peak currents of 0.21m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:9: • With the scheme, the maximum peak currents of 0.19m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:11: • In the baseline, the maximum peak currents of 0.36m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:11: • With the scheme, the maximum peak currents of 0.35m/s are sufficient to mobilise sediments in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:13: • Given this, there will not be an increased risk of erosion of existing sediments; rather there may
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:15:screened into the assessment. The individual plots from sediment dispersion modelling undertaken for
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:15:each project are presented and discussed. It is not practicable to undertake a combined sediment plume
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:15:addition, the predictions made for each project represent sediment plume dispersion under specific tidal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:16:scenario where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:16:We would also like to reiterate that the sediment plumes shown in Section 6 of the EIA Report are maximum
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:16:suspended sediment from any stage of the dredging). It is important to note that this type of figure does
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:16:Cefas recommend that you present a revised sediment dispersion model that includes the dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:19:Conclusions about sediment quality largely rely on the assessment of previous licensing sample data as
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:20:The site specific sediment quality survey results have been provided to the MMO (with the exception of
MLA_2020_00507-Decision Letter (Marine)-16.pdf:3: Suspended sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:3:3.6 Capital dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils / landside materials within
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:4:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME 43
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:4:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY 134
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:8:5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:8:6 Sediment sampling plan
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:9:effects on tidal currents and sediment transport may occur (i.e. the potential zone of influence). The
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:9: The study area for marine topics comprises the hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling domain,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:15:berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:22:3.6 Capital dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils /
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:22:estuarine (marine) sediments and excavation of soils / landside materials within the riverbank to create the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:22:A summary of the proposed design levels and dredge volumes for marine sediments is detailed in Section
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:22:3.6.1 Volume of marine sediments to be dredged
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:22:The total dredge volume for marine sediments is predicted to be approximately 1,800,000m3. As detailed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:22:marine sediment is anticipated to comprise Tidal Flat Deposits and Glacial Till. It is proposed that all areas
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:24:Table 3.2 Proposed volumes of marine sediments to be dredged (excluding over-dredge volumes)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:24:transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger to the offshore disposal site. It is assumed that
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:24:In addition to the removal of marine sediments, the proposed scheme will require the excavation of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:24:avoid the risk of a jack-up barge ‘punching’ into the underlying sediments when berthed at the quay during
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:25:sediments from the river channel would be deposited offshore within the Tees Bay C disposal site. As noted
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:33:suitable locations for the re-use of dredged sediment; three were located adjacent to the South Gare
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:51:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:51:This section presents the baseline conditions with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:51:While the proposed scheme has the potential to alter hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes, the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:51:The assessment of potential effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime has been made with
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:51:that are relevant to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes, as presented within the NPS for Ports, are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:51:Where relevant, applicants should undertake coastal geomorphological and sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:51:shorelines where the proposal could inhibit sediment flow or have an impact on coastal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:52:Table 6.2 MPS requirements relevant to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:52:activity or development will have on coastal processes, including sediment movement.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:52:hydrodynamics and the sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:52:Table 6.3 North East Marine Plan policies relevant to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:52:A summary of consultation responses relevant to the assessment of hydrodynamics and sedimentary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:53: aspects of relevance to hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes, namely: on the tidal prism of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:53: as stop start thresholds for parameters such as suspended sediment and 13 and Section 7
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:53:For hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes, the study area needs to cover all areas of river, adjacent
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:54:Figure 6.1 Study area for assessing potential effects on hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:54:There has been much previous work to characterise the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:54:Table 6.5 Review of existing information on the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:54:2002 Teesmouth Sediment Study. HR Wallingford, 1989
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:54: Further information relating to sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:55: Anglo American Harbour Facilities – modelling, sediment transport, bed change
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:55: Environmental Statement. modelling and modelling of sediment plume
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:57:sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary, carried out over many decades. This work is summarised below
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:57:Table 6.6 Review of existing information on the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:57:2002 Teesmouth Sediment Study. HR Wallingford, 1989
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:57: Further information relating to sediment contamination and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:57: Anglo American Harbour Facilities – Royal HaskoningDHV, modelling, wave modelling, sediment transport, bed change
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:57: Environmental Statement. 2014 modelling and modelling of sediment plume released from
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:60: • Sediment plume modelling: The updated and verified 3D Tees Estuary Tidal Model was used to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:60: predict movement of suspended sediment from the proposed dredging and disposal activities by
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:60: coupling with a sediment plume model built in MIKE21-MT software. The sediment plume model
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:60:synthesised and used in combination with knowledge of other factors, such geological constraints, sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:60:the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime through an Expert Geomorphological Assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:62:of reaches require maintenance dredging to remove both sands and silts. The volume of sediments dredged
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:62:cumulatively (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2013). A notable proportion of this sediment is marine sand that is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:62:channel deepened to its present depth. The role of the River Tees in supplying fine sediment to the coastal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:62:to allow bypassing of sediment, but observed accumulations upstream, and a 24% reduction in the dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:62:requirement of the harbour, indicates that much of the river sediment is trapped by the structure (Royal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:63:sediments) which is offset by maintenance dredging and disposal at offshore licenced disposal site Tees
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:66:Tees Bay and the Tees estuary attract sediment because the tidal current flows are generally quite low
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:66:the transport of sediment within Tees Bay, with an overall tendency for southerly directed transport because
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:66:sediment from the seabed enabling more to become transported by the tidal currents during these storms.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:66:subtleties locally influence sediment transport in these locations.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:71:bed upstream (flooding) flows are observed. These effects are important in supplying sediment to the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:71:estuary from offshore (the main sediment supply).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:80:It is recognised that the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, as characterised within this
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:80:relative effect of the proposed scheme upon the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime will be
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:80:the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime in a relative manner, using the baseline understanding
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:81:6.4.4 Sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:81:Suspended sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:81:In general, suspended sediment concentrations (SSCs) are low within the estuary and within Tees Bay.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:81:the highest suspended sediment levels occur close to high water. After storm periods, higher concentrations
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:81:of suspended sediment have been noted around the Shell Jetty, but with little penetration further up the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:81: Suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:84:Sediment sources and transport
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:84:Historic bed sampling results in the vicinity of the proposed scheme show bed sediments in the area to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:84:Within the system the driving forces for sediment transport are the tidal flows, density driven currents, wave
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:85: with the implication that fluvial sediment input to the estuary has reduced (ABPmer, 2005).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:85: sediment into the estuary system. This material comes in on the flood tide, particularly during times
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:86:has also been utilised to move recently deposited accumulations of sediment to adjacent scour spots within
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:86:the river, thus maintaining sediment within the estuarine system and reducing the overall volumes of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:89:A review of the dredged sediment quality data is presented in Section 7.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:90:sedimentary regime arising from the demolition works is very low.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:90:6.5.2 Capital dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:Each year, between 25 – 30 million tonnes (wet weight) of dredged marine sediments from ports, harbours
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:offshore site will both result in sediment plumes. These effects have been investigated using numerical
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:modelling of the sediment dispersion associated with the dredging and disposal activities, as well as the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:changes in bed thickness when the suspended sediment falls from the plume to become deposited on the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:A MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model has been coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic model (MIKE3-HD)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:disturbance effects have been included. The dredging methods, schedule and sediment release settings
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:sediment releases have been made near continuously throughout the dredging operations (except for
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:Results from the sediment dispersion modelling are discussed in turn for the dredging and disposal activities.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:91:Note that all the modelling plots in the following sections show the elevations in SSC or sediment deposition
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:108:The sediment plumes that arise from the four stages of the dredging could potentially affect areas of riverbed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:108:or seabed that are remote from the point of sediment release in terms of either increases in SSC or increases
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:108:in sediment deposition. This could affect water quality (in terms of increased turbidity) or aquatic ecology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:110:Sediment suspended within the dredging plumes will fall to the riverbed, either soon after disturbance or
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:110:spillage occurring during the dredging operation (for coarser-grained sediment fractions), or at a point in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:110:finer-grained sediment fractions). Figure 6.50 shows the maximum changes in riverbed thickness caused
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:110:by this deposition. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the dredged areas (from
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:110:zone of influence from the sediment plumes.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:111:Figure 6.50 Maximum riverbed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:111:Within this maximum zone of influence from sediment plumes and bed deposition, the following receptors
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:111:could potentially be adversely affected by increases in SSC or increases in sediment deposition (or both
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:during Stage 4. Similarly it is only point 3 where any appreciable sediment deposition occurs, and this is at
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:and at Mudflat 3 it increases by a peak of 8mg/l (Figure 6.54). Sediment deposition on the mudflats is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:6.56). Sediment deposition at these locations is predicted to be immeasurable (Figure 6.57).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:112:background levels of concentrations (Figure 6.58). Sediment deposition at Location 6 (Middlesbrough
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:113:Overall changes of these magnitudes in SSC and sediment deposition are unlikely to cause significant
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:113:Figure 6.51 Location of points used for of timeseries analysis of changes in SSC and sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:114:Figure 6.53 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the water quality monitoring points
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:115:Figure 6.55 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the mudflat monitoring points
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:116:Figure 6.57 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the navigation (north bank) monitoring
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:117:Figure 6.59 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the navigation (south bank) monitoring
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:118:is licensed for the disposal of dredged sediment and is routinely monitored as part of a national programme.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:118:Therefore, plumes arising from disposal activities and subsequent sediment deposition is unlikely to be of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:118:activity commences and starts to form its own sediment plume (Plot H), the initial plume has moved
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:sediment plume associated with one release event (this example being from Stage 1). It can be seen that
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:much of the sediment falls to the bed within close proximity of the point of release, forming a small deposit
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:128:Figure 6.65 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from one disposal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:129:Figure6.66 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from one disposal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:129:Whilst turbidity and sediment deposition effects within the disposal site are to be expected (and indeed are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:130:changes in SSC and sediment deposition
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:131:The river dredging and offshore disposal activities will both cause plumes of sediment to form close to the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:131:and all sediment particles suspended in the water column will eventually settle to the river or seabed,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:131:During dredging, there will be a release of sediment particles from the deliberate physical disturbance to the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:131:point of sediment release, the enhanced SSC values are considerably lower because the coarser material
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:132:and the Oil Terminal. Other than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition on the riverbed will be of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:132:very minor magnitudes, in areas covering the same spatial extent as the sediment plumes. Where this
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:132:Overall, the changes in SSC and sediment deposition arising from the river dredging and offshore disposal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:132:sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:140: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is positive as it will help
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:141:6.6.4 Maintenance dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:141:maintenance dredging is likely to be due to the low levels of suspended sediment measured in this reach of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:This section presents the baseline conditions with regard to sediment and water quality of the Tees estuary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:and sedimentary regime (see Section 6) as well as recent survey data collected to inform other project EIAs
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:The assessment of potential impacts on marine sediment and water quality has been made with reference
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142:Table 7.1 Summary of NPS requirements with regard to marine sediment and water quality
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143:Table 7.2 Summary of scoping consultation responses with regard to marine sediment and water
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: sediment and dissolved oxygen.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: proposed dredge on water and sediment quality are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: the findings of hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: sediment and create smothering effects / turbidity / sediment plumes.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: based on the anticipated sediment types to be
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144: dispose of capital dredged sediment. Impacts
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144: As part of the application, the applicant will need to provide sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144:For marine sediment and water quality, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144:hydrodynamic and sediment dispersion modelling and is based on the maximum extent over which effects
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144:are predicted to occur (e.g. sediment plumes generated during capital dredging and effects on tidal currents
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144:The description of the existing environment with regard to sediment quality has been informed through desk-
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144:based review of existing sediment quality data. The most recent publicly available sediment quality data to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144:7.3.2.1 Sediment data
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144:The assessment of potential impacts associated with disturbance of sediment during the construction phase
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:144: • Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQG) for the Protection of Aquatic Life (Canadian Council
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:145:can be quantified. Therefore, for EIA, in the same way, if contaminant levels in the sediments under
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:145:application of additional sediment quality guidelines (as outlined below) or undertaking more detailed water
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:145:The CSQG involved the derivation of interim marine sediment quality guidelines (ISQGs), or Threshold
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:145:contaminated sediments to a range of aquatic organisms exposed in laboratory tests and under field
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:145:conditions (CCME, 2002). As a result, these guidelines provide an indication of likely toxicity of sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:146:If additional assessment is indicated to be required as a result of recording elevated sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:146:above the lower Cefas Action Level 1, the undertaking of simple calculations using estimates of sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:146:losses from dredging equipment and concentrations of contaminants within the sediments to be dredged
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:147:The methodology used to assess the significance of the potential environmental impacts on marine sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:147:7.4.1 Sediment quality
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:147:Results of the sediment quality data from the NGCT marine licence application
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:147:PDT carried out a sediment quality survey in July 2019 to inform the marine licence application for the NGCT
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:147:the two schemes, specifically at the Tees Dock turning circle. Results from the NGCT sediment quality
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:147:survey are detailed below. The NGCT sediment quality sampling positions in relation to the proposed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:148: ( 2019 sediment sampling locations for NGCT
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:148: A3 G1 NGCT Sediment sampling locations (2019)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:149:Table 7.6 Summary of sediment quality data from the NGCT sediment quality survey (2019)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:152:sediment samples recovered in 2006, with BDE209 concentrations ranging from <0.5µg/kg to 340µg/kg.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:152:that found in 2006. The MMO has recently confirmed that the sediment to be dredged from the NGCT
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:153:Summary of previous sediment quality surveys in the Tees
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:153:The findings of sediment quality surveys undertaken in support of previously consented schemes in the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:153:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:153:within Tees Dock. Though showing signs of minor contamination, it was determined that the ‘soft’ sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:153:The 2006 sediment quality survey undertaken to inform the 2008 HRO application involved the recovery of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:In general, suspended sediment concentrations are low within the estuary and within Tees Bay. The highest
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:within the estuary) and analysed in the laboratory for suspended sediment concentrations. The results
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:this period, concentrations of suspended sediment were very low. It should be noted however, that the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:Table 7.8 Suspended sediment concentrations recorded at Transect T8 in July 2020
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156: Suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:A site-specific sediment quality survey is proposed to be undertaken during 2020 to provide a detailed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:understanding of sediment quality within the proposed scheme footprint and validate the information set out
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:of sediment samples from 25 stations from the surface and at depth, with sampling positions equally spread
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:In the absence of the proposed scheme, there is no reason to believe that sediment and water quality within
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:156:sediment sampling being undertaken from the surface in accordance with the conditions on the maintenance
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:157:7.5.1 Dispersion and redistribution of sediment during capital dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:157:Capital dredging would result in the creation of sediment plumes. To consider the potential extent and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:157:Modelling was undertaken using a MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:158:Figure 7. 3 Plume of suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities during Stage 2
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:160:Figure 7. 5 Plume of suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities during Stage
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:161:Figure 7.6 Plume of enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:162:Figure 7.7 Timeseries of changes in suspended sediment concentrations at water quality monitoring
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:162:sediment plume is not predicted to reach The Gares water quality monitoring point, no effects on the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:162:Additionally, a significant component of the dredged material is likely to be geological sediment, which is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:The concentrations of PAHs and metals within the sediments in the Tees estuary could potentially affect
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:An assessment to look at the potential for sediments exceeding Action Level 1 to cause EQS failures has
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:estimates of sediment losses from dredging equipment and concentrations of contaminants within the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:sediments to be dredged to provide an indication of the amount of contamination that could be released into
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:sediments and no account is made of any settlement of sediment that may occur immediately following
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:from these calculations that a risk is presented by the concentrations of zinc in the sediment and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:sediment as a result of the proposed scheme) although the maximum allowable concentration was not
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:164:sediment per day and maximum concentrations both in the water and in the sediment)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:164: in sediments in sediments concentration with baseline
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:164: Sediment data taken from NGCT 2019 (see Table 7.5)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:164: Calculated loss of sediment derived using indicative values for the mass of sediment resuspended per m 3 of dredged material in CIRIA guidance (John et al., 1999) in kg/m3. Worst case S-Factor for
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:165:sediment per day and maximum concentrations in the water and in the sediment)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:165: sediments sediments concentration with baseline
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166:of zinc and benzo(b)fluoranthene (both sediment and water quality values) at low water volumes within the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166:estuary. If the calculations at mean low water are re-run using average concentrations (sediment and water
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166: • The calculations assume that all sediment remains in suspension. In reality, it is likely that some
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166: likely that some contamination will remain bound to sediment particles.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166: • The maximum concentration within the sediments used for each parameter does not occur across
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166: • The maximum values for water quality concentrations are not reflective of sediment conditions
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166: releases less sediment into the water column.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166:Additionally, information from sediment plume modelling (see Section 7.5.1) indicates that only the Smiths
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166:7.5.4 Release of sediment during riverbank excavation to create the berth
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:As these works progress, there is the potential for sediment to be suspended when working in and around
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:7.6.1 Dispersion and redistribution of sediment during maintenance dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:191: • Impacts on marine ecology from increased suspended sediment during capital dredging and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:194:hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling undertaken. This section excludes consideration of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:195:Cross reference to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (Section 6) and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:195:the marine sediment and water quality assessment (Section 7) has been made when assessing potential
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:195:quay wall to create the berth pocket will remove both intertidal sediments and landside materials / soils.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:196: A5.44: Circalittoral mixed sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:196: A5.45: Deep circalittoral mixed sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:197: sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the Markey
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:197: sediments deposited during the Holocene, which overlie the glacial deposits from the last
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:197: and subsidence to south makes these sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:198:present in sediments from the survey area are rare and therefore, in this respect, the species present were
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:198:SS.SMu.ISaMU.Cap (Capitella capitata in enriched sublittoral muddy sediments) and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:198:sediment), where C. capitata dominated and was accompanied by large numbers of Ophryotrocha sp.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:198:These species are characteristic of fine sediments, usually with some level of organic pollution and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:199: would be indirectly affected (e.g. through sediment deposition during capital dredging).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:199:Sediment type
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:199:Sediment types, as classified using the Folk triangle (Folk, 1954) for each of the sample stations across the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:199:2019 survey area are provided in Figure 9.3. A variety of sediment types were present across the survey
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:199:Sediment biotopes
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:199:‘Capitella capitata and Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:201:Figure9.3 Comparison of Folk (Folk, 1954) sediment types as determined from PSD analysis of samples acquired during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey, 2019
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:202:Figure 9.4 Distribution of biotopes determined from PSD and macrobenthic analysis of samples recovered during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey, 2019
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:204:sediments and in estuarine environments (Wolff 1968, Hughes 1998). The beds can play an important role
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:204:walkovers have confirmed that the intertidal comprises intertidal mud and gravelly sediment with rocks and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:206: A2 – Littoral sediment A2.12 Estuarine coarse sediment shores
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:206:Occasional areas of impoverished coarse sediment was also found along the low-mid shore (Ocean
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:206:depths, which would continue to influence the benthic communities present within the subtidal sediments.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:208: A. islandica is found buried in sandy and muddy sediments from the low intertidal zone down to 400m
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:209:that impede the natural movement of sediments and poor transition of habitats). Although there are areas
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:9.5.2 Effects of increased suspended sediment concentrations during dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:will disturb sediment, which will result in localised and short-term increases in suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:Based on sediment quality sampling that was undertaken within the Tees estuary in July 2019 (as reported
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:in Section 7), it is not expected that any contaminated sediment would be released into the water column
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:ecology as a result of increased concentrations of suspended sediment within the water column (i.e.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:resuspended sediment which does not contain elevations beyond Action Level 2). The dredged sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:filter feeding molluscs). In addition, high concentrations of suspended sediment may impact on fish through
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:In general, sediment plumes induced by dredging are considered to pose only a limited risk to water quality
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:dredging periods. The sediment plume generated by dredging would likely be dispersed by tidal currents
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:upon disturbance of the sediment.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:during spring tides (Section 7.4.2). These are considerably lower than suspended sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:immediate vicinity of the dredger. Sediment plume modelling predicts different plume extents and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:suspended sediment concentrations depending on the stage of dredging (as described in Section 6). In all
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:cases, the sediment plume is predicted to be very narrow within the river, with the phase of dredging with
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:The sediment plume modelling reported within Section 6 also extracted time series plots of changes in SSC
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:importance (where information is available) to increases in suspended sediment. This information is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:S. spinulosa relies on suspended particles for its tube growth. Increased suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:to increases in suspended sediment concentrations, according to this sensitivity review.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:A. islandica typically occurs in silty sediments, in sheltered to wave exposed conditions, where the surface
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:sediment likely gets resuspended regularly, and where accretion rates and moderate to high. A. islandica
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:can burrow in the sediment it lives in for several days, thereby it is able to avoid sudden changes in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:211:the proposed dredge is considered to be of low sensitivity to increases in suspended sediment.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:The dominant sediment biotope present within the dredge footprint is EUNIS biotope A5.323, Nephtys
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:resistance and resilience to changes in suspended sediment and was reported to be not sensitive (to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:changes in suspended sediment) (De-Bastos, 2016). As such, for the purposes of this assessment, the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:Given the temporary and localised nature of the predicted increase in suspended sediment, in addition to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:the low/very low sensitivity of the key species present in the estuary to increased suspended sediment, an
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:is 32.5ha. This is expected to cause a very limited extent of suspended sediment concentrations, and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:Some of the sediment that is suspended as a result of the dredging activities will be deposited to the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:sediment fractions), or at a point in time within a few minutes to a few hours after this if it is carried in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:suspension by the prevailing currents (for finer-grained sediment fractions) (Section 6). The modelling
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:carried out on this, as reported in Section 6, indicates that much of the resuspended sediment is deposited
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:from the sediment plumes.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:(deposition) from the sediment plume model were extracted at a series of points within the affected river
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:reaches (relating to locations of mudflats, as shown on Figure 6.53). Sediment deposition at all of these
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:et al., 2004). This movement of water allows for any deposited sediment to be moved around and away
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:relatively quickly. However, some sediment may still be present long enough to damage the fronds of F.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:sediments at Seal Sands, Bran Sands or North Gare Sands, due to the limited footprint of dredging activities,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:up to a deposit of 5 cm because they are able to burrow and reposition within the new sediment (Whomersley
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:sediment. This information is presented below.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:MarLIN reports that even though smothering by fine sediments may temporarily limit the feeding, growth
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:sediments for up to several weeks, and that recovery would be almost immediate. As such, S. spinulosa is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:of sediments, with no effect on its growth or population structure being evident as a result of smothering
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:(Powilliet et al., 2006; 2009). As such, it is considered that a deposit of up to 30cm of fine sediments is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:A sudden smothering of 5cm of sediment would temporarily suspend the feeding and respiration of A. alba
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:species that characterise fine sediment habitats within estuarine areas (mainly polychaete and oligochaete
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:of fluctuating environmental conditions, such as periodic sediment disturbance due to storms and are not
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:213:concluded therefore, that the rates of sediment deposition, and the overall degree of sedimentation, that is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:component of the benthic community. Considering this, the predicted rates of sediment deposition, and the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:as a result of the deposition of fine sediments, with no impact in the longer term.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:215:may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment (Section 6.6.2). In areas adjacent to the north bank
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:215:The predicted changes to the rate of sedimentation within the navigation channel as a consequence of the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:217:mammals from the offshore disposal of dredged sediments are assessed in Section 26.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:223:known prey for harbour porpoise, exhibit a strong association with particular surface sediments.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:235:widely, dependent on the dredger type, operational stage, or environmental conditions (e.g. sediment type,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:sediment within the water column. However, marine mammals often inhabit turbid environments.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments during dredging or other activities will
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:disturbance and temporary loss of seabed habitat; increased suspended sediment concentrations and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:sediment re-deposition; smothering and underwater noise.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:256: hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume effects would not extend to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:257: hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume effects would not extend to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:270: • hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (Section 6);
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:270: • marine sediment and water quality (Section 7);
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:279:Cross reference has been made, where relevant, to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:296:In summary, the largest sediment plumes are likely to arise during Stage 2 of the dredging (i.e. BHD and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:296:(it is not a sediment plume, rather a combined zone of influence). The sediment dispersion modelling of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:296:of this assessment, the sediment plume may be regarded as representing a temporary loss of foraging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:297:terns do not forage to any significant extent within the predicted range of the sediment plume. Likewise, the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:297:tern species as a result of increased suspended sediments during the construction phase.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:297:and re-suspension of sediment (Cook and Burton, 2010). However, common terns typically only dive to 1m
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:297:England, 2018a), and the area likely to be affected by the sediment plume at any one time represents around
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:12.5.3 Effects of sediment deposition on intertidal food resources
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:The deposition of fine sediment within intertidal areas due to capital dredging has the potential to affect
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:dredging, is presented in Section 6.5.2. Fine sediment will be deposited within minutes or hours if carried
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:invertebrate prey to birds feeding on the mudflats . The predicted minor accretion of sediment at North Tees
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:307:sediments are assessed in Sections 26. Potential cumulative impacts are addressed in Section 27.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:309: thresholds for parameters such as suspended sediment and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:309:informed by the hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling undertaken, as well as the understanding
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:310:Cross reference to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (Section 6), the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:312:inhabiting soft sediment environments.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:318:During capital dredging, approximately 1.8Mm3 of sediment (including approximately 1.27Mm3 of soft
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:318:details of the increase in SSC, including the visual output of sediment plume modelling for the capital
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:318:dredging, is provided in Section 6. The peak suspended sediment concentration within the Tees during the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:319:As detailed in the water quality assessment in Section 7, sediment quality testing from 2019 indicates that
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:319:it is very unlikely that disturbance of sediment during the dredging would result in exceedances of EQSs,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:319:sediment plume creating a ‘barrier’ effect could cause a significant disruption to the annual migration pattern,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:319:during a period of very hot and dry weather. Modelling of the sediment plume during capital dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:319:of suspended sediments are predicted to decrease significantly with increased distance from the dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:320:period. However, while unlikely, it has to be taken into account that sediment plumes encompassing the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:328:capital dredging activity will consequently result in an increase in sediment deposition, which has the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:328:fish/shellfish. The extent of sediment deposition above baseline levels is detailed in Section 6. The
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:328:maximum sediment deposition, illustrated in Figure 6.50, shows that much of the sediment falls to bed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:328:sediment deposition, it again can be assumed that feeding fish would be accustomed to similar conditions
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:329:dominated by fucoid algae). The intertidal area comprises mud and gravelly sediment with some rocks.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:333:not match the advertised depths due to sedimentation within the channel).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is positive as it will help
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:343: sedimentary regime (see Section 6) the study area comprises all areas of river, adjacent coastline
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:346:heritage assets which may arise as a result of changes to hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:347:by-product of changes to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes resulting from a project) may also depend
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:352:Archaeology, 2014) suggested the presence of five sedimentary units:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:352: • Unit 2 Estuarine alluvium and peat (possible mid-Holocene sediments);
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:352: • Unit 3 Marine sediments/ Estuarine alluvium;
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:352: • Unit 4 Estuarine alluvium/ polluted fluvial sediments; and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:352:remains, preserved beneath later sediments. Given this potential, geoarchaeological assessment of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:359:directly and indirectly change the hydrodynamic and sedimentary process regimes, both locally and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:359:than those protected by sediment cover. Conversely, if increased sedimentation results in an exposed site
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:359:Potential effects upon the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime are assessed in Section 6. With regard
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:359:to effects during construction it is concluded that, other than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:360:hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary. Consequently, there is no pathway for
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:360:additional, indirect impacts to heritage assets associated with changes in sediment deposition, over and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:360: • Reductions in baseline current speeds may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment:
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:421: • Effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:424:well as hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling reported in Section 6.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:425:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (as set out in Section 6)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:467:This would include dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils / landside material within the river
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:467:The total dredged volume for marine sediments is predicted to be approximately 1,800,000m3. Dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:467:the transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger to the offshore disposal site.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:478:The proposed scheme is predicted to generate up to approximately 1,800,000m3 of dredged sediment from
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:478:been undertaken on a worst-case basis whereby all dredged sediment from the Tees estuary would be
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:478:As the offshore disposal commences, a plume of sediment would be generated with the greatest
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:478:concentrations predicted at the end of the discharge period. The sediment plume is predicted to increase
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:478:commences and starts to form its own sediment plume, the initial plume has moved sufficiently far from its
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:478:deposition of sediment. As shown on Figure 6.66, deposited sediment from one disposal event is predicted
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:Based on the modelled effects of the sediment plume at the Tees Bay C disposal site described above, it is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:The PSD results show that the sediments within and adjacent to Tees Bay C comprise gravelly muddy sand,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482: sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:of the disposal site. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling has predicted some short-term build-up of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:sediment at the disposal site, however, this would be dispersed over time.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:sensitive to smothering or increases in suspended sediment.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485:for the assessment of potential impacts associated with offshore disposal of dredged sediments (see
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485:disposal of dredged sediments are likely to be less than those generated during dredging activities. The
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485:display a fleeing response, as a result of underwater noise during offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485:offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485:result of underwater noise associated with offshore disposal of dredged sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:485: sediments based on density of 0.014/km2 for reference population anticipated to be
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:disposal of dredged sediments would be limited to the immediate vicinity of the vessels while they are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:dredged sediments on harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:sediments on marine mammals
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: sediments Negligible / Negligible
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: sediments (5% of (0.00003% of the NE England MU) based (permanent effect with less than 0.001% of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during offshore disposal of dredged sediments has been
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:disturbance due to the disposal of dredged sediment into the disposal site to seals at Seal Sands, including
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:dredged sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:The offshore disposal of dredged material would temporarily increase the suspended sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:Changes to marine mammals prey resource during offshore disposal of dredged sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:temporary loss of seabed habitat, increased suspended sediment concentrations and sediment re-
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:490:disturbance and increased suspended sediments on migratory fish).
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:490: influencing the same area as affected by the sediment plume); and,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:492: of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of the approach channel, Approximately
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:493: effect on sediment transport or morphology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:494: the Tees navigation channel, the turning circle and Tees Dock to a hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:500:27.5.2 Hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:500: • dispersion of suspended sediment during capital dredging and deposition at the offshore disposal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:500: • changes to the sediment budget.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:500:(increased suspended sediment concentrations) are relevant to the CIA.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:500:Dispersion of suspended sediment and deposition on the seabed during capital dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:500:sediment which will disperse throughout the estuary according to the prevailing currents, prior to settling on
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:500:The extent of the sediment plume created by capital dredging is heavily dependent on the dredging plant
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:be used for dredging different sediment types as part of the same project. As noted in Section 6.5.2, it is
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:important to note that figures showing the “maximum extent of sediment plume dispersion and deposition”
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:Consequently, for the purposes of this CIA, the maximum zones of influence of sediment plume dispersion
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:27.3 presents a summary of the results of the predictive modelling of suspended sediment concentration
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:of sediment plume dispersion and deposition onto the river and/or seabed during capital dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:sediment in the water column was predicted to be in close proximity to the dredger, with plume dispersion
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:resulting in a significantly reduced concentration of suspended sediment beyond the source of the plume.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:501:For the NGCT studies, significant deposition of sediment was also only predicted in close proximity to the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:502:(right) as a result of the proposed scheme [Note: plots show sediment plume impacts arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:503: • effect of increases in suspended sediments during maintenance dredging on food resources of SPA
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:503: • remobilisation and redistribution of sediments (which may be contaminated); and,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:503:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:503:sediment, and this measure would limit sediment release into the water column as far as practicable. The
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:503:sediment and water quality, marine ecology, ornithology, fish and fisheries) is discussed below.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:505:Changes to estuarine sediment budget
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:505:deposition of sediment which would be positive in areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, as it
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:505:offshore as a result. In addition, no changes to sediment transport in the predominantly sandy areas around
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:505:The Anglo American Harbour Facilities are predicted to result in a localised redistribution of sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:505:very small change in the overall fine sediment regime will not alter the present frequency of, or methodology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:505:used for, maintenance dredging, and no effect on sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:cumulative impacts to arise to the estuarine sediment budget as a result of the projects screened into the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:27.5.3 Marine sediment and water quality
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:In relation to marine sediment and water quality, the proposed scheme has the potential to result in the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506: • dispersion of suspended sediment during marine works, dredging and disposal; and,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506: • changes to water quality associated with the release of sediment contamination.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:addition, the predictions made for each project represent sediment plume dispersion under specific tidal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each project)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:In relation to sediment contamination, data collected to inform the EIAs indicates that concentrations are
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:additional mitigation measures are identified to reduce any resulting sediment plume as far as possible and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:Smothering of benthic invertebrate communities due to deposition of sediment dispersed during
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:Sediment deposition resulting from the dredging for the proposed scheme will largely be within the proposed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:less than 5cm, within the same area of river that is affected by the zone of influence from the sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:(deposition) from the sediment plume model were extracted at a series of points within the affected river
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:reaches (relating to locations of mudflats, as shown on Figure 6.51). Sediment deposition at all of these
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:The predicted footprints of sediment deposition for the NGCT and the Anglo American Harbour Facilities
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:This deposition is likely to be temporary due to the unconsolidated nature of the sediment, and the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:508:The proposed scheme is not predicted to have an effect on sediment supply into the estuary. The very
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:508:minor changes in the hydrodynamic regime, specifically currents, may lead to a slight increase in sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:508:The studies for the NGCT scheme concluded that there would not be a change in the supply of fine sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:508:sediment budget of the estuary and, therefore, was assessed that there would be no impact on morphology
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:(i.e. dredging along the axis of the river rather than across it to ensure that, at any one time, sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:HaskoningDHV, 2015)). However, the additive effect of the sediment plumes from separate dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:sediment plumes may deter such species from migrating to and from spawning sites.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:the respective sediment plumes could result in an additive effect, as demonstrated in Figures 27.1 to 27.3.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:of the sediment plumes from separate dredging campaigns cannot be completely avoided if the campaigns
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:517:hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime (Section 27.5.2) concludes that no significant cumulative impacts
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:526: Intertidal soft sediments (400.13ha); Intertidal soft sediment (845.53ha),
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:526: reef (4.13ha); subtidal soft sediments reef (7170.93ha), Subtidal soft
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:526: (610.31ha). sediments (1219.64ha)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:526: 24.Reduce sediment resuspension
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:526: 26.Sediment management
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:528: sediments with INNS are already present
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:528: measures identified for the Tees estuary. habitats located within sediment plumes created
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:531: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is deemed to be a positive
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:532:Capital dredging within the river would result in sediment plumes. To consider the potential extent and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:532:Modelling was undertaken using a MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:534:Figure 28.4 Timeseries of changes in suspended sediment concentrations at water quality monitoring
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:534:The resuspension of sediment could also potentially affect dissolved oxygen levels in the water. This is due
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:534:represent a more conservative scenario, as sediment plume modelling outlined above indicates relatively
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:534:dissolved oxygen problem or where sediments have a high chemical oxygen demand and that in practice,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:534:high for dissolved oxygen and it is not anticipated that the sediments will have a high chemical oxygen
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:In terms of contaminants, the concentrations of PAHs and metals within the sediments in the Tees estuary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:and the lower CSQG. An assessment to look at the potential for the release of sediments exceeding Cefas
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:Action Level 1 to cause EQS failures was therefore undertaken to inform the marine sediment and water
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:maximum concentrations for baseline water quality and sediments in the estuary indicate that there is a risk
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:undertaken for high tide volumes in the estuary (for maximum sediment and water quality baseline
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:For high water with maximum water and sediment concentrations and use of average concentrations for
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:both water and sediment quality, the estimated concentrations reduce below EQS. This indicates that the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535: • The calculations assume that all sediment remains in suspension. In reality, it is likely that some
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535: likely that some contamination will remain bound to sediment particles.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535: • The maximum concentration within the sediments used for each parameter does not occur across
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535: • The maximum values for water quality concentrations are not reflective of sediment conditions
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535: releases less sediment into the water column.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:Additionally, sediment plume results for Smiths Dock monitoring point (point 3) indicated only temporary
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:therefore the majority of the dredge would impact on the lower sensitivity habitat ‘subtidal soft sediment’ of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:535:berth pocket would remove 25,000m2 of intertidal sediments, of which there are 4,001,300m2 within the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:536:Subtidal sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:536:Results in 2019 indicate a variety of sediment types are present across the survey area and most samples
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:536:infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations were unable to be classified further than the EUNIS level 4
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:536:assemblage may take place before the original topography is restored, if the exposed, underlying sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:536:composition and numbers following dredging, it is predicted that the sediment communities would recover
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:536:Intertidal sediments
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:536:walkovers confirm that the intertidal area to be lost comprises intertidal mud and gravelly sediment with
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:537:Sediment settlement
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:537:Sediment suspended within the dredging plumes will fall to the riverbed, either soon after disturbance or
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:537:spillage occurring during the dredging operation (for coarser-grained sediment fractions), or at a point in
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:537:finer-grained sediment fractions. Figure 28.5 shows the maximum changes in riverbed thickness caused
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:537:by deposition. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the dredged areas (from
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:538:zone of influence from the sediment plumes. As a result, a deterioration in ecological class status is not
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:538:Figure 28.5 Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:538:An increase in suspended sediment in the water column may lead to physiological effects in finfish, including
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:538:in sediment concentrations due to the natural fluctuations associated with tidal activity, discharge from the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:538:(including most adult finfish) are generally able to detect early onset of increased sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:539:peak migratory season, when a sediment plume creating a ‘barrier’ effect could cause a significant disruption
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:539: Reduce sediment resuspension disposal activities currently ongoing. Disposal would be
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:539: Sediment management
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:541: Reduce sediment resuspension
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:541: Sediment management measures
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542: Reduce sediment resuspension
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542: Sediment management
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:543:wall would remove a small area of intertidal soft sediment, the measures outlined in Section 28.8 would
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:544: • Cumulative effects of sediment plumes and associated effects on water quality and fish
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:Section 27 considers the potential cumulative effects of the proposed schemes on sediment plumes and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:marine water quality. To summarise, whilst the sediment plumes could combine to cover a larger area of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:the estuary, additive effects in terms of increasing sediment peaks are not predicted. This is because the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:contaminated material has been identified in the Anglo American Harbour Facilities sediments (i.e. above
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:proposed project both include mitigation measures to dredge in long strips to reduce the effects of sediment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:Any project that requires dredging would disturb the marine communities within the sediments to be
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:In terms of wider effects, significant deposition of sediment again is generally only predicted in close
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:547: Sediment transport Hydrodynamic modelling showed that the proposed scheme would give rise to only a small magnitude reduction in baseline flows varying during different phases of the tidal
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:547: sediment at the North Tees mudflat which could be seen to be a positive effect in areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay. In the main channel, deposition will
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:547: Modelling for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities concluded that the only effects were likely to be localised redistribution of sediment deposition in response to predicted
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:547: sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees estuary.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:549:Whilst concentrations of contaminants in the sediments indicated a risk to water quality EQS’, assessment
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:549:suspended sediment thus reducing the risk of significant water quality effects. Mitigation measures to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:550:would be sediment plumes associated with dredging simultaneously. However, on further consideration,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:559:proposed scheme nor the modelled extent of the maximum-expected sediment plume from the capital
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:559:Following modelling of noise levels and sediment dispersion, it has been concluded that the overall zone of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:559:influence of the proposed scheme will be determined by the sediment plume during dredging activities.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:562: of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of the approach channel, Approximately proposed scheme, in-combination effects to the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:572:on tidal propagation, wave climate, current speeds and sediment budget of the estuarine system) has been
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:572:and so will cause no effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:572:The capital dredging of the river will cause plumes of sediment to form. The plume effects arising from the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:572:river dredging are characterised by a short-lived localised increase in suspended sediment concentrations
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:572:of sediment from the plumes on the river or seabed will be very small.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:573:The reductions in baseline current speeds may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment. In areas
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:573:Section 28), there is approximately 400ha of “intertidal sediment” habitat within the estuary. The area of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:575:requires use of TSHD and BHD on soft sediment in the channel and berth pocket) will result in plumes of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:575:The sediment dispersion modelling of Stage 2 dredging indicates that, at any given time, significant SSC
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:575:Full details of the sediment dispersion modelling are presented in Section 6.5.2.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:575:England, 2018a). The area affected by the sediment plume generated from proposed dredging, though
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:580:In terms of intra-project effects on foraging common terns, the zone of influence from the sediment plume
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:581: • effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:582:findings of invertebrate sampling undertaken on sediment samples from The Slems). The HRA undertaken
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:582:proposed scheme in combination with the NGCT scheme represents less than 1% of “intertidal sediment”
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:583:Effects on fish may be compounded by the combined sediment plumes of other projects or plans that may
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:584:An interaction between the sediment plumes would only occur in the unlikely event that the capital dredging
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:584:sediment from Hartlepool channel is not considered sufficient to result in a lethal effect on fish, with any
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:584:sediment plumes occupy only half of the river cross section) has also been proposed for the NGCT project.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:585:29.6.4 In-combination effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:585:wide change in hydrodynamics. There is no predicted effect on the baseline sediment transport regime and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:585:of the Tees and the resultant effect on tidal flows and sediment transport.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:585:change the supply of fine sediment to the Tees, and the sediment predicted to deposit in its berth pocket
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:585:potential for an effect on the sediment budget of the estuary to arise and, therefore, there would be no
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:585:Sedimentary and hydrodynamic modelling undertaken for the consented Hartlepool approach channel
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:585:proposed scheme is predicted to be low. The magnitude of effect on the baseline sediment transport regime
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:585:sediment transport regime and seabed or shore morphology across the wider study area as a result of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:586:The zone of influence from predicted sediment plumes (including the combined plumes from the proposed
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:593:HR Wallingford (2002). Teesmouth Sediment Study. EX 4514.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:593:HR Wallingford (2006). Northern Gateway Container Terminal. Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:593:sediment plumes arising from dredging. Construction Industry Research and Information Association
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:597:Robertson, M.J., Scruton, R.S. and Clarke, K. (2006). Effect of sediment on freshwater fish and fish
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:598:Royal HaskoningDHV (2013). Cell 1 Sediment Transport Study. Phase 1: Scoping Report. Scarborough
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:271: sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be set back into the riverbank). The
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:350: • offshore disposal of dredged sediments; and,
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:351:footprint as undifferentiated Triassic Rocks. This is a sedimentary Bedrock formed approximately 200 to
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:357:such as natural flood management, habitat improvements, RDP reduction (sediment and nutrients),
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:384:Is 1% or more of any lower sensitivity habitat No – the area impacted is considered to be soft intertidal and soft subtidal sediment of which
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:385:entering it or could affect fish migrating through the See comments in water quality below. There may be temporary sediment resuspension but
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:385: would be supported through the use of divers. There is the possibility of sediment plumes
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:386: and temporary. Any sediment resuspension is unlikely to last more than a few hours per
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:386:through sediment disturbance or building works) crew will be trained in spill response. In addition, all vessels will ensure that suitable bunding
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:386: Sediment samples available from the NGCT project collected in 2019 are likely to contain
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:386:If your activity uses or releases chemicals (for example contaminants above action level 1.There is the possibility of sediment plumes during the
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:386:through sediment disturbance or building works) demolition works but these are only expected to be localised to the working area and
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:386:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants temporary. Any sediment resuspension is unlikely to last more than a few hours per pile.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:387:outside the estuary but could delay or prevent fish There is the possibility of sediment plumes during the dredging works. Possibility of
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:388: There is the possibility of sediment plumes during the dredging works
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:388:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:388: Yes Sediment samples are likely to contain contaminants above Cefas Action Level 1 (see
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:388:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:388:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:389:Could impact on normal fish behaviour like movement, sediment spill. Additionally, where possible material would be removed in the dry. Any effects
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:390: sediment spill. Additionally, where possible material would be removed in the dry. Any effects
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:390:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:390:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:390:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:392:Could affect water clarity, temperature, salinity, oxygen There is the possibility that small localised disturbance of sediment could occur as a result
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:392:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:392:Quality Standards Directive (EQSD) list Any marine sediments that are disturbed are likely to have contaminant levels greater than
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:392:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:392:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:393: and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary.
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:394:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:394:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:394:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:396:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:396:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:396:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:398:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:398:through sediment disturbance or building works)
MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:398:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:3:A sediment quality sampling plan request was submitted to the MMO to confirm the
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:3:scope of sediment quality survey and analysis required - reference SAM/2020/00026
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:12:The marine sediments to be dredged as part of Phase 2 of the proposed scheme
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:14:You should provide analysis of the sediment to enable a determination to be made about whether the material is
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:14:Sediment quality data used to inform the assessment is attached.
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:dredge volume for marine sediments in Phase 2 is predicted to be approximately
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:barges will be required to support with the transport of sediment dredged using the
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:20:You should provide analysis of the sediment to enable a determination to be made about whether the material is
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:20:Sediment quality data from the NGCT marine licence application has been used to
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:20:inform the impact assessment. Sediment quality data from the proposed dredge
MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:21:‘punching’ into the underlying sediments when berthed at the quay during the
MLA_2020_00507-Licence Document (Marine)-14.pdf:6:Description Marine sediments to be dredged as part of Phase 2 of the
MLA_2020_00507-Licence Document (Marine)-14.pdf:8: dredge volume for marine sediments in Phase 2 will be
MLA_2020_00507-Licence Document (Marine)-14.pdf:8: with the transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe
MLA_2020_00507-Licence Document (Marine)-14.pdf:8: a jack-up barge 'punching' into the underlying sediments
MLA_2020_00507-Licence Document (Marine)-14.pdf:14: To restrict suspended sediment plumes to one side of the estuary at a time, in order to reduce loss of tern foraging
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:3:3.6 Capital dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils / landside materials within
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:4:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME 43
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:4:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY 134
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:8:5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:8:6 Sediment sampling plan
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:9:effects on tidal currents and sediment transport may occur (i.e. the potential zone of influence). The
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:9: The study area for marine topics comprises the hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling domain,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:15:berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:22:3.6 Capital dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils /
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:22:estuarine (marine) sediments and excavation of soils / landside materials within the riverbank to create the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:22:A summary of the proposed design levels and dredge volumes for marine sediments is detailed in Section
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:22:3.6.1 Volume of marine sediments to be dredged
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:22:The total dredge volume for marine sediments is predicted to be approximately 1,800,000m3. As detailed
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:22:marine sediment is anticipated to comprise Tidal Flat Deposits and Glacial Till. It is proposed that all areas
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:24:Table 3.2 Proposed volumes of marine sediments to be dredged (excluding over-dredge volumes)
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:24:transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger to the offshore disposal site. It is assumed that
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:24:In addition to the removal of marine sediments, the proposed scheme will require the excavation of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:24:avoid the risk of a jack-up barge ‘punching’ into the underlying sediments when berthed at the quay during
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:25:sediments from the river channel would be deposited offshore within the Tees Bay C disposal site. As noted
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:33:suitable locations for the re-use of dredged sediment; three were located adjacent to the South Gare
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:51:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:51:This section presents the baseline conditions with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:51:While the proposed scheme has the potential to alter hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes, the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:51:The assessment of potential effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime has been made with
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:51:that are relevant to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes, as presented within the NPS for Ports, are
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:51:Where relevant, applicants should undertake coastal geomorphological and sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:51:shorelines where the proposal could inhibit sediment flow or have an impact on coastal
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:52:Table 6.2 MPS requirements relevant to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:52:activity or development will have on coastal processes, including sediment movement.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:52:hydrodynamics and the sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:52:Table 6.3 North East Marine Plan policies relevant to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:52:A summary of consultation responses relevant to the assessment of hydrodynamics and sedimentary
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:53: aspects of relevance to hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes, namely: on the tidal prism of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:53: as stop start thresholds for parameters such as suspended sediment and 13 and Section 7
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:53:For hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes, the study area needs to cover all areas of river, adjacent
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:54:Figure 6.1 Study area for assessing potential effects on hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:54:There has been much previous work to characterise the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:54:Table 6.5 Review of existing information on the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:54:2002 Teesmouth Sediment Study. HR Wallingford, 1989
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:54: Further information relating to sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:55: Anglo American Harbour Facilities – modelling, sediment transport, bed change
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:55: Environmental Statement. modelling and modelling of sediment plume
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:57:sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary, carried out over many decades. This work is summarised below
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:57:Table 6.6 Review of existing information on the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:57:2002 Teesmouth Sediment Study. HR Wallingford, 1989
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:57: Further information relating to sediment contamination and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:57: Anglo American Harbour Facilities – Royal HaskoningDHV, modelling, wave modelling, sediment transport, bed change
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:57: Environmental Statement. 2014 modelling and modelling of sediment plume released from
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:60: • Sediment plume modelling: The updated and verified 3D Tees Estuary Tidal Model was used to
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:60: predict movement of suspended sediment from the proposed dredging and disposal activities by
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:60: coupling with a sediment plume model built in MIKE21-MT software. The sediment plume model
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:60:synthesised and used in combination with knowledge of other factors, such geological constraints, sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:60:the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime through an Expert Geomorphological Assessment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:62:of reaches require maintenance dredging to remove both sands and silts. The volume of sediments dredged
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:62:cumulatively (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2013). A notable proportion of this sediment is marine sand that is
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:62:channel deepened to its present depth. The role of the River Tees in supplying fine sediment to the coastal
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:62:to allow bypassing of sediment, but observed accumulations upstream, and a 24% reduction in the dredging
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:62:requirement of the harbour, indicates that much of the river sediment is trapped by the structure (Royal
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:63:sediments) which is offset by maintenance dredging and disposal at offshore licenced disposal site Tees
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:66:Tees Bay and the Tees estuary attract sediment because the tidal current flows are generally quite low
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:66:the transport of sediment within Tees Bay, with an overall tendency for southerly directed transport because
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:66:sediment from the seabed enabling more to become transported by the tidal currents during these storms.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:66:subtleties locally influence sediment transport in these locations.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:71:bed upstream (flooding) flows are observed. These effects are important in supplying sediment to the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:71:estuary from offshore (the main sediment supply).
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:80:It is recognised that the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, as characterised within this
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:80:relative effect of the proposed scheme upon the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime will be
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:80:the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime in a relative manner, using the baseline understanding
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:81:6.4.4 Sedimentary regime
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:81:Suspended sediment concentrations
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:81:In general, suspended sediment concentrations (SSCs) are low within the estuary and within Tees Bay.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:81:the highest suspended sediment levels occur close to high water. After storm periods, higher concentrations
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:81:of suspended sediment have been noted around the Shell Jetty, but with little penetration further up the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:81: Suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l)
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:84:Sediment sources and transport
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:84:Historic bed sampling results in the vicinity of the proposed scheme show bed sediments in the area to
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:84:Within the system the driving forces for sediment transport are the tidal flows, density driven currents, wave
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:85: with the implication that fluvial sediment input to the estuary has reduced (ABPmer, 2005).
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:85: sediment into the estuary system. This material comes in on the flood tide, particularly during times
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:86:has also been utilised to move recently deposited accumulations of sediment to adjacent scour spots within
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:86:the river, thus maintaining sediment within the estuarine system and reducing the overall volumes of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:89:A review of the dredged sediment quality data is presented in Section 7.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:90:sedimentary regime arising from the demolition works is very low.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:90:6.5.2 Capital dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:91:Each year, between 25 – 30 million tonnes (wet weight) of dredged marine sediments from ports, harbours
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:91:offshore site will both result in sediment plumes. These effects have been investigated using numerical
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:91:modelling of the sediment dispersion associated with the dredging and disposal activities, as well as the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:91:changes in bed thickness when the suspended sediment falls from the plume to become deposited on the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:91:A MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model has been coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic model (MIKE3-HD)
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:91:disturbance effects have been included. The dredging methods, schedule and sediment release settings
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:91:sediment releases have been made near continuously throughout the dredging operations (except for
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:91:Results from the sediment dispersion modelling are discussed in turn for the dredging and disposal activities.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:91:Note that all the modelling plots in the following sections show the elevations in SSC or sediment deposition
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:108:The sediment plumes that arise from the four stages of the dredging could potentially affect areas of riverbed
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:108:or seabed that are remote from the point of sediment release in terms of either increases in SSC or increases
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:108:in sediment deposition. This could affect water quality (in terms of increased turbidity) or aquatic ecology
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:110:Sediment suspended within the dredging plumes will fall to the riverbed, either soon after disturbance or
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:110:spillage occurring during the dredging operation (for coarser-grained sediment fractions), or at a point in
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:110:finer-grained sediment fractions). Figure 6.50 shows the maximum changes in riverbed thickness caused
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:110:by this deposition. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the dredged areas (from
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:110:zone of influence from the sediment plumes.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:111:Figure 6.50 Maximum riverbed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:111:Within this maximum zone of influence from sediment plumes and bed deposition, the following receptors
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:111:could potentially be adversely affected by increases in SSC or increases in sediment deposition (or both
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:112:during Stage 4. Similarly it is only point 3 where any appreciable sediment deposition occurs, and this is at
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:112:and at Mudflat 3 it increases by a peak of 8mg/l (Figure 6.54). Sediment deposition on the mudflats is
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:112:6.56). Sediment deposition at these locations is predicted to be immeasurable (Figure 6.57).
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:112:background levels of concentrations (Figure 6.58). Sediment deposition at Location 6 (Middlesbrough
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:113:Overall changes of these magnitudes in SSC and sediment deposition are unlikely to cause significant
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:113:Figure 6.51 Location of points used for of timeseries analysis of changes in SSC and sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:114:Figure 6.53 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the water quality monitoring points
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:115:Figure 6.55 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the mudflat monitoring points
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:116:Figure 6.57 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the navigation (north bank) monitoring
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:117:Figure 6.59 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the navigation (south bank) monitoring
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:118:is licensed for the disposal of dredged sediment and is routinely monitored as part of a national programme.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:118:Therefore, plumes arising from disposal activities and subsequent sediment deposition is unlikely to be of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:118:activity commences and starts to form its own sediment plume (Plot H), the initial plume has moved
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:126:sediment plume associated with one release event (this example being from Stage 1). It can be seen that
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:126:much of the sediment falls to the bed within close proximity of the point of release, forming a small deposit
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:126:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:128:Figure 6.65 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from one disposal
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:129:Figure6.66 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from one disposal
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:129:Whilst turbidity and sediment deposition effects within the disposal site are to be expected (and indeed are
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:130:changes in SSC and sediment deposition
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:131:The river dredging and offshore disposal activities will both cause plumes of sediment to form close to the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:131:and all sediment particles suspended in the water column will eventually settle to the river or seabed,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:131:During dredging, there will be a release of sediment particles from the deliberate physical disturbance to the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:131:point of sediment release, the enhanced SSC values are considerably lower because the coarser material
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:132:and the Oil Terminal. Other than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition on the riverbed will be of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:132:very minor magnitudes, in areas covering the same spatial extent as the sediment plumes. Where this
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:132:Overall, the changes in SSC and sediment deposition arising from the river dredging and offshore disposal
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:132:sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:140: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is positive as it will help
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:141:6.6.4 Maintenance dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:141:maintenance dredging is likely to be due to the low levels of suspended sediment measured in this reach of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:142:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:142:This section presents the baseline conditions with regard to sediment and water quality of the Tees estuary
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:142:and sedimentary regime (see Section 6) as well as recent survey data collected to inform other project EIAs
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:142:The assessment of potential impacts on marine sediment and water quality has been made with reference
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:142:Table 7.1 Summary of NPS requirements with regard to marine sediment and water quality
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:143:Table 7.2 Summary of scoping consultation responses with regard to marine sediment and water
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:143: sediment and dissolved oxygen.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:143: proposed dredge on water and sediment quality are
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:143: the findings of hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:143: sediment and create smothering effects / turbidity / sediment plumes.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:143: based on the anticipated sediment types to be
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:144: dispose of capital dredged sediment. Impacts
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:144: As part of the application, the applicant will need to provide sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:144:For marine sediment and water quality, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:144:hydrodynamic and sediment dispersion modelling and is based on the maximum extent over which effects
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:144:are predicted to occur (e.g. sediment plumes generated during capital dredging and effects on tidal currents
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:144:The description of the existing environment with regard to sediment quality has been informed through desk-
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:144:based review of existing sediment quality data. The most recent publicly available sediment quality data to
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:144:7.3.2.1 Sediment data
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:144:The assessment of potential impacts associated with disturbance of sediment during the construction phase
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:144: • Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQG) for the Protection of Aquatic Life (Canadian Council
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:145:can be quantified. Therefore, for EIA, in the same way, if contaminant levels in the sediments under
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:145:application of additional sediment quality guidelines (as outlined below) or undertaking more detailed water
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:145:The CSQG involved the derivation of interim marine sediment quality guidelines (ISQGs), or Threshold
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:145:contaminated sediments to a range of aquatic organisms exposed in laboratory tests and under field
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:145:conditions (CCME, 2002). As a result, these guidelines provide an indication of likely toxicity of sediments
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:146:If additional assessment is indicated to be required as a result of recording elevated sediment concentrations
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:146:above the lower Cefas Action Level 1, the undertaking of simple calculations using estimates of sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:146:losses from dredging equipment and concentrations of contaminants within the sediments to be dredged
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:147:The methodology used to assess the significance of the potential environmental impacts on marine sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:147:7.4.1 Sediment quality
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:147:Results of the sediment quality data from the NGCT marine licence application
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:147:PDT carried out a sediment quality survey in July 2019 to inform the marine licence application for the NGCT
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:147:the two schemes, specifically at the Tees Dock turning circle. Results from the NGCT sediment quality
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:147:survey are detailed below. The NGCT sediment quality sampling positions in relation to the proposed
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:148: ( 2019 sediment sampling locations for NGCT
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:148: A3 G1 NGCT Sediment sampling locations (2019)
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:149:Table 7.6 Summary of sediment quality data from the NGCT sediment quality survey (2019)
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:152:sediment samples recovered in 2006, with BDE209 concentrations ranging from <0.5µg/kg to 340µg/kg.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:152:that found in 2006. The MMO has recently confirmed that the sediment to be dredged from the NGCT
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:153:Summary of previous sediment quality surveys in the Tees
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:153:The findings of sediment quality surveys undertaken in support of previously consented schemes in the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:153:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:153:within Tees Dock. Though showing signs of minor contamination, it was determined that the ‘soft’ sediments
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:153:The 2006 sediment quality survey undertaken to inform the 2008 HRO application involved the recovery of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:156:In general, suspended sediment concentrations are low within the estuary and within Tees Bay. The highest
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:156:within the estuary) and analysed in the laboratory for suspended sediment concentrations. The results
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:156:this period, concentrations of suspended sediment were very low. It should be noted however, that the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:156:Table 7.8 Suspended sediment concentrations recorded at Transect T8 in July 2020
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:156: Suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l)
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:156:A site-specific sediment quality survey is proposed to be undertaken during 2020 to provide a detailed
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:156:understanding of sediment quality within the proposed scheme footprint and validate the information set out
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:156:of sediment samples from 25 stations from the surface and at depth, with sampling positions equally spread
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:156:In the absence of the proposed scheme, there is no reason to believe that sediment and water quality within
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:156:sediment sampling being undertaken from the surface in accordance with the conditions on the maintenance
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:157:7.5.1 Dispersion and redistribution of sediment during capital dredging
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:157:Capital dredging would result in the creation of sediment plumes. To consider the potential extent and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:157:Modelling was undertaken using a MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:158:Figure 7. 3 Plume of suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities during Stage 2
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:160:Figure 7. 5 Plume of suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities during Stage
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:161:Figure 7.6 Plume of enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:162:Figure 7.7 Timeseries of changes in suspended sediment concentrations at water quality monitoring
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:162:sediment plume is not predicted to reach The Gares water quality monitoring point, no effects on the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:162:Additionally, a significant component of the dredged material is likely to be geological sediment, which is
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:163:The concentrations of PAHs and metals within the sediments in the Tees estuary could potentially affect
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:163:An assessment to look at the potential for sediments exceeding Action Level 1 to cause EQS failures has
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:163:estimates of sediment losses from dredging equipment and concentrations of contaminants within the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:163:sediments to be dredged to provide an indication of the amount of contamination that could be released into
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:163:sediments and no account is made of any settlement of sediment that may occur immediately following
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:163:from these calculations that a risk is presented by the concentrations of zinc in the sediment and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:163:sediment as a result of the proposed scheme) although the maximum allowable concentration was not
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:164:sediment per day and maximum concentrations both in the water and in the sediment)
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:164: in sediments in sediments concentration with baseline
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:164: Sediment data taken from NGCT 2019 (see Table 7.5)
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:164: Calculated loss of sediment derived using indicative values for the mass of sediment resuspended per m 3 of dredged material in CIRIA guidance (John et al., 1999) in kg/m3. Worst case S-Factor for
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:165:sediment per day and maximum concentrations in the water and in the sediment)
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:165: sediments sediments concentration with baseline
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:166:of zinc and benzo(b)fluoranthene (both sediment and water quality values) at low water volumes within the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:166:estuary. If the calculations at mean low water are re-run using average concentrations (sediment and water
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:166: • The calculations assume that all sediment remains in suspension. In reality, it is likely that some
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:166: likely that some contamination will remain bound to sediment particles.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:166: • The maximum concentration within the sediments used for each parameter does not occur across
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:166: • The maximum values for water quality concentrations are not reflective of sediment conditions
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:166: releases less sediment into the water column.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:166:Additionally, information from sediment plume modelling (see Section 7.5.1) indicates that only the Smiths
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:166:7.5.4 Release of sediment during riverbank excavation to create the berth
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:167:As these works progress, there is the potential for sediment to be suspended when working in and around
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:168:7.6.1 Dispersion and redistribution of sediment during maintenance dredging
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:191: • Impacts on marine ecology from increased suspended sediment during capital dredging and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:194:hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling undertaken. This section excludes consideration of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:195:Cross reference to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (Section 6) and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:195:the marine sediment and water quality assessment (Section 7) has been made when assessing potential
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:195:quay wall to create the berth pocket will remove both intertidal sediments and landside materials / soils.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:197: sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the Markey
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:197: sediments deposited during the Holocene, which overlie the glacial deposits from the last
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:197: and subsidence to south makes these sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:198:present in sediments from the survey area are rare and therefore, in this respect, the species present were
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:198:SS.SMu.ISaMU.Cap (Capitella capitata in enriched sublittoral muddy sediments) and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:198:sediment), where C. capitata dominated and was accompanied by large numbers of Ophryotrocha sp.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:198:These species are characteristic of fine sediments, usually with some level of organic pollution and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:199: would be indirectly affected (e.g. through sediment deposition during capital dredging).
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:199:Sediment type
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:199:Sediment types, as classified using the Folk triangle (Folk, 1954) for each of the sample stations across the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:199:2019 survey area are provided in Figure 9.3. A variety of sediment types were present across the survey
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:199:Sediment biotopes
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:199:‘Capitella capitata and Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:201:Figure9.3 Comparison of Folk (Folk, 1954) sediment types as determined from PSD analysis of samples acquired during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey, 2019
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:202:Figure 9.4 Distribution of biotopes determined from PSD and macrobenthic analysis of samples recovered during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey, 2019
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:204:sediments and in estuarine environments (Wolff 1968, Hughes 1998). The beds can play an important role
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:204:walkovers have confirmed that the intertidal comprises intertidal mud and gravelly sediment with rocks and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:206: A2 – Littoral sediment A2.12 Estuarine coarse sediment shores
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:206:Occasional areas of impoverished coarse sediment was also found along the low-mid shore (Ocean
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:206:depths, which would continue to influence the benthic communities present within the subtidal sediments.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:208: A. islandica is found buried in sandy and muddy sediments from the low intertidal zone down to 400m
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:209:that impede the natural movement of sediments and poor transition of habitats). Although there are areas
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:210:9.5.2 Effects of increased suspended sediment concentrations during dredging
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:210:will disturb sediment, which will result in localised and short-term increases in suspended sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:210:Based on sediment quality sampling that was undertaken within the Tees estuary in July 2019 (as reported
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:210:in Section 7), it is not expected that any contaminated sediment would be released into the water column
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:210:ecology as a result of increased concentrations of suspended sediment within the water column (i.e.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:210:resuspended sediment which does not contain elevations beyond Action Level 2). The dredged sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:210:filter feeding molluscs). In addition, high concentrations of suspended sediment may impact on fish through
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:210:In general, sediment plumes induced by dredging are considered to pose only a limited risk to water quality
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:210:dredging periods. The sediment plume generated by dredging would likely be dispersed by tidal currents
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:210:upon disturbance of the sediment.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:211:during spring tides (Section 7.4.2). These are considerably lower than suspended sediment concentrations
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:211:immediate vicinity of the dredger. Sediment plume modelling predicts different plume extents and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:211:suspended sediment concentrations depending on the stage of dredging (as described in Section 6). In all
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:211:cases, the sediment plume is predicted to be very narrow within the river, with the phase of dredging with
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:211:The sediment plume modelling reported within Section 6 also extracted time series plots of changes in SSC
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:211:importance (where information is available) to increases in suspended sediment. This information is
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:211:S. spinulosa relies on suspended particles for its tube growth. Increased suspended sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:211:to increases in suspended sediment concentrations, according to this sensitivity review.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:211:A. islandica typically occurs in silty sediments, in sheltered to wave exposed conditions, where the surface
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:211:sediment likely gets resuspended regularly, and where accretion rates and moderate to high. A. islandica
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:211:can burrow in the sediment it lives in for several days, thereby it is able to avoid sudden changes in
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:211:the proposed dredge is considered to be of low sensitivity to increases in suspended sediment.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:The dominant sediment biotope present within the dredge footprint is EUNIS biotope A5.323, Nephtys
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:resistance and resilience to changes in suspended sediment and was reported to be not sensitive (to
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:changes in suspended sediment) (De-Bastos, 2016). As such, for the purposes of this assessment, the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:Given the temporary and localised nature of the predicted increase in suspended sediment, in addition to
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:the low/very low sensitivity of the key species present in the estuary to increased suspended sediment, an
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:is 32.5ha. This is expected to cause a very limited extent of suspended sediment concentrations, and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:Some of the sediment that is suspended as a result of the dredging activities will be deposited to the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:sediment fractions), or at a point in time within a few minutes to a few hours after this if it is carried in
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:suspension by the prevailing currents (for finer-grained sediment fractions) (Section 6). The modelling
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:carried out on this, as reported in Section 6, indicates that much of the resuspended sediment is deposited
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:from the sediment plumes.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:(deposition) from the sediment plume model were extracted at a series of points within the affected river
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:reaches (relating to locations of mudflats, as shown on Figure 6.53). Sediment deposition at all of these
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:et al., 2004). This movement of water allows for any deposited sediment to be moved around and away
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:relatively quickly. However, some sediment may still be present long enough to damage the fronds of F.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:213:sediments at Seal Sands, Bran Sands or North Gare Sands, due to the limited footprint of dredging activities,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:213:up to a deposit of 5 cm because they are able to burrow and reposition within the new sediment (Whomersley
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:213:sediment. This information is presented below.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:213:MarLIN reports that even though smothering by fine sediments may temporarily limit the feeding, growth
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:213:sediments for up to several weeks, and that recovery would be almost immediate. As such, S. spinulosa is
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:213:of sediments, with no effect on its growth or population structure being evident as a result of smothering
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:213:(Powilliet et al., 2006; 2009). As such, it is considered that a deposit of up to 30cm of fine sediments is
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:213:A sudden smothering of 5cm of sediment would temporarily suspend the feeding and respiration of A. alba
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:213:species that characterise fine sediment habitats within estuarine areas (mainly polychaete and oligochaete
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:213:of fluctuating environmental conditions, such as periodic sediment disturbance due to storms and are not
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:213:concluded therefore, that the rates of sediment deposition, and the overall degree of sedimentation, that is
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:214:component of the benthic community. Considering this, the predicted rates of sediment deposition, and the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:214:as a result of the deposition of fine sediments, with no impact in the longer term.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:215:may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment (Section 6.6.2). In areas adjacent to the north bank
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:215:The predicted changes to the rate of sedimentation within the navigation channel as a consequence of the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:217:mammals from the offshore disposal of dredged sediments are assessed in Section 26.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:223:known prey for harbour porpoise, exhibit a strong association with particular surface sediments.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:235:widely, dependent on the dredger type, operational stage, or environmental conditions (e.g. sediment type,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:sediment within the water column. However, marine mammals often inhabit turbid environments.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments during dredging or other activities will
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:disturbance and temporary loss of seabed habitat; increased suspended sediment concentrations and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:sediment re-deposition; smothering and underwater noise.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:256: hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume effects would not extend to
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:257: hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume effects would not extend to
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:270: • hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (Section 6);
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:270: • marine sediment and water quality (Section 7);
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:279:Cross reference has been made, where relevant, to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:296:In summary, the largest sediment plumes are likely to arise during Stage 2 of the dredging (i.e. BHD and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:296:(it is not a sediment plume, rather a combined zone of influence). The sediment dispersion modelling of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:296:of this assessment, the sediment plume may be regarded as representing a temporary loss of foraging
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:297:terns do not forage to any significant extent within the predicted range of the sediment plume. Likewise, the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:297:tern species as a result of increased suspended sediments during the construction phase.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:297:and re-suspension of sediment (Cook and Burton, 2010). However, common terns typically only dive to 1m
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:297:England, 2018a), and the area likely to be affected by the sediment plume at any one time represents around
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:298:12.5.3 Effects of sediment deposition on intertidal food resources
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:298:The deposition of fine sediment within intertidal areas due to capital dredging has the potential to affect
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:298:dredging, is presented in Section 6.5.2. Fine sediment will be deposited within minutes or hours if carried
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:306:invertebrate prey to birds feeding on the mudflats . The predicted minor accretion of sediment at North Tees
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:307:sediments are assessed in Sections 26. Potential cumulative impacts are addressed in Section 27.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:309: thresholds for parameters such as suspended sediment and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:309:informed by the hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling undertaken, as well as the understanding
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:310:Cross reference to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (Section 6), the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:312:inhabiting soft sediment environments.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:318:During capital dredging, approximately 1.8Mm3 of sediment (including approximately 1.27Mm3 of soft
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:318:details of the increase in SSC, including the visual output of sediment plume modelling for the capital
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:318:dredging, is provided in Section 6. The peak suspended sediment concentration within the Tees during the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:319:As detailed in the water quality assessment in Section 7, sediment quality testing from 2019 indicates that
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:319:it is very unlikely that disturbance of sediment during the dredging would result in exceedances of EQSs,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:319:sediment plume creating a ‘barrier’ effect could cause a significant disruption to the annual migration pattern,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:319:during a period of very hot and dry weather. Modelling of the sediment plume during capital dredging
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:319:of suspended sediments are predicted to decrease significantly with increased distance from the dredging
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:320:period. However, while unlikely, it has to be taken into account that sediment plumes encompassing the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:328:capital dredging activity will consequently result in an increase in sediment deposition, which has the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:328:fish/shellfish. The extent of sediment deposition above baseline levels is detailed in Section 6. The
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:328:maximum sediment deposition, illustrated in Figure 6.50, shows that much of the sediment falls to bed
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:328:sediment deposition, it again can be assumed that feeding fish would be accustomed to similar conditions
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:329:dominated by fucoid algae). The intertidal area comprises mud and gravelly sediment with some rocks.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:333:not match the advertised depths due to sedimentation within the channel).
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:337: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is positive as it will help
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:343: sedimentary regime (see Section 6) the study area comprises all areas of river, adjacent coastline
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:346:heritage assets which may arise as a result of changes to hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:347:by-product of changes to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes resulting from a project) may also depend
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:352:Archaeology, 2014) suggested the presence of five sedimentary units:
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:352: • Unit 2 Estuarine alluvium and peat (possible mid-Holocene sediments);
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:352: • Unit 3 Marine sediments/ Estuarine alluvium;
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:352: • Unit 4 Estuarine alluvium/ polluted fluvial sediments; and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:352:remains, preserved beneath later sediments. Given this potential, geoarchaeological assessment of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:359:directly and indirectly change the hydrodynamic and sedimentary process regimes, both locally and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:359:than those protected by sediment cover. Conversely, if increased sedimentation results in an exposed site
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:359:Potential effects upon the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime are assessed in Section 6. With regard
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:359:to effects during construction it is concluded that, other than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:360:hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary. Consequently, there is no pathway for
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:360:additional, indirect impacts to heritage assets associated with changes in sediment deposition, over and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:360: • Reductions in baseline current speeds may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment:
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:421: • Effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:424:well as hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling reported in Section 6.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:425:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (as set out in Section 6)
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:467:This would include dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils / landside material within the river
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:467:The total dredged volume for marine sediments is predicted to be approximately 1,800,000m3. Dredging
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:467:the transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger to the offshore disposal site.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:478:The proposed scheme is predicted to generate up to approximately 1,800,000m3 of dredged sediment from
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:478:been undertaken on a worst-case basis whereby all dredged sediment from the Tees estuary would be
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:478:As the offshore disposal commences, a plume of sediment would be generated with the greatest
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:478:concentrations predicted at the end of the discharge period. The sediment plume is predicted to increase
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:478:commences and starts to form its own sediment plume, the initial plume has moved sufficiently far from its
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:478:deposition of sediment. As shown on Figure 6.66, deposited sediment from one disposal event is predicted
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:479:Based on the modelled effects of the sediment plume at the Tees Bay C disposal site described above, it is
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:479:The PSD results show that the sediments within and adjacent to Tees Bay C comprise gravelly muddy sand,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:482: sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:482:of the disposal site. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling has predicted some short-term build-up of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:482:sediment at the disposal site, however, this would be dispersed over time.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:482:sensitive to smothering or increases in suspended sediment.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:485:for the assessment of potential impacts associated with offshore disposal of dredged sediments (see
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:485:disposal of dredged sediments are likely to be less than those generated during dredging activities. The
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:485:display a fleeing response, as a result of underwater noise during offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:485:offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:485: sediments
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:485:result of underwater noise associated with offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:485: sediments based on density of 0.014/km2 for reference population anticipated to be
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486:disposal of dredged sediments would be limited to the immediate vicinity of the vessels while they are
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486:dredged sediments on harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486:sediments on marine mammals
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: sediments Negligible / Negligible
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: sediments (5% of (0.00003% of the NE England MU) based (permanent effect with less than 0.001% of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during offshore disposal of dredged sediments has been
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487:disturbance due to the disposal of dredged sediment into the disposal site to seals at Seal Sands, including
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:dredged sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:The offshore disposal of dredged material would temporarily increase the suspended sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:Changes to marine mammals prey resource during offshore disposal of dredged sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:temporary loss of seabed habitat, increased suspended sediment concentrations and sediment re-
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:490:disturbance and increased suspended sediments on migratory fish).
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:490: influencing the same area as affected by the sediment plume); and,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:492: of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of the approach channel, Approximately
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:493: effect on sediment transport or morphology
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:494: the Tees navigation channel, the turning circle and Tees Dock to a hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:500:27.5.2 Hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:500: • dispersion of suspended sediment during capital dredging and deposition at the offshore disposal
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:500: • changes to the sediment budget.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:500:(increased suspended sediment concentrations) are relevant to the CIA.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:500:Dispersion of suspended sediment and deposition on the seabed during capital dredging
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:500:sediment which will disperse throughout the estuary according to the prevailing currents, prior to settling on
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:500:The extent of the sediment plume created by capital dredging is heavily dependent on the dredging plant
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:501:be used for dredging different sediment types as part of the same project. As noted in Section 6.5.2, it is
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:501:important to note that figures showing the “maximum extent of sediment plume dispersion and deposition”
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:501:Consequently, for the purposes of this CIA, the maximum zones of influence of sediment plume dispersion
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:501:27.3 presents a summary of the results of the predictive modelling of suspended sediment concentration
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:501:of sediment plume dispersion and deposition onto the river and/or seabed during capital dredging
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:501:sediment in the water column was predicted to be in close proximity to the dredger, with plume dispersion
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:501:resulting in a significantly reduced concentration of suspended sediment beyond the source of the plume.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:501:For the NGCT studies, significant deposition of sediment was also only predicted in close proximity to the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:502:(right) as a result of the proposed scheme [Note: plots show sediment plume impacts arising from dredging
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:503: • effect of increases in suspended sediments during maintenance dredging on food resources of SPA
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:503: • remobilisation and redistribution of sediments (which may be contaminated); and,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:503:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:503:sediment, and this measure would limit sediment release into the water column as far as practicable. The
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:503:sediment and water quality, marine ecology, ornithology, fish and fisheries) is discussed below.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:505:Changes to estuarine sediment budget
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:505:deposition of sediment which would be positive in areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, as it
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:505:offshore as a result. In addition, no changes to sediment transport in the predominantly sandy areas around
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:505:The Anglo American Harbour Facilities are predicted to result in a localised redistribution of sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:505:very small change in the overall fine sediment regime will not alter the present frequency of, or methodology
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:505:used for, maintenance dredging, and no effect on sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:506:cumulative impacts to arise to the estuarine sediment budget as a result of the projects screened into the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:506:27.5.3 Marine sediment and water quality
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:506:In relation to marine sediment and water quality, the proposed scheme has the potential to result in the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:506: • dispersion of suspended sediment during marine works, dredging and disposal; and,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:506: • changes to water quality associated with the release of sediment contamination.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:506:addition, the predictions made for each project represent sediment plume dispersion under specific tidal
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:506:where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each project)
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:506:In relation to sediment contamination, data collected to inform the EIAs indicates that concentrations are
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:506:additional mitigation measures are identified to reduce any resulting sediment plume as far as possible and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:507:Smothering of benthic invertebrate communities due to deposition of sediment dispersed during
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:507:Sediment deposition resulting from the dredging for the proposed scheme will largely be within the proposed
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:507:less than 5cm, within the same area of river that is affected by the zone of influence from the sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:507:(deposition) from the sediment plume model were extracted at a series of points within the affected river
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:507:reaches (relating to locations of mudflats, as shown on Figure 6.51). Sediment deposition at all of these
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:507:The predicted footprints of sediment deposition for the NGCT and the Anglo American Harbour Facilities
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:507:This deposition is likely to be temporary due to the unconsolidated nature of the sediment, and the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:508:The proposed scheme is not predicted to have an effect on sediment supply into the estuary. The very
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:508:minor changes in the hydrodynamic regime, specifically currents, may lead to a slight increase in sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:508:The studies for the NGCT scheme concluded that there would not be a change in the supply of fine sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:508:sediment budget of the estuary and, therefore, was assessed that there would be no impact on morphology
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:513:(i.e. dredging along the axis of the river rather than across it to ensure that, at any one time, sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:513:HaskoningDHV, 2015)). However, the additive effect of the sediment plumes from separate dredging
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:514:sediment plumes may deter such species from migrating to and from spawning sites.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:514:the respective sediment plumes could result in an additive effect, as demonstrated in Figures 27.1 to 27.3.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:514:of the sediment plumes from separate dredging campaigns cannot be completely avoided if the campaigns
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:517:hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime (Section 27.5.2) concludes that no significant cumulative impacts
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:526: Intertidal soft sediments (400.13ha); Intertidal soft sediment (845.53ha),
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:526: reef (4.13ha); subtidal soft sediments reef (7170.93ha), Subtidal soft
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:526: (610.31ha). sediments (1219.64ha)
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:526: 24.Reduce sediment resuspension
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:526: 26.Sediment management
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:528: sediments with INNS are already present
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:528: measures identified for the Tees estuary. habitats located within sediment plumes created
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:531: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is deemed to be a positive
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:532:Capital dredging within the river would result in sediment plumes. To consider the potential extent and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:532:Modelling was undertaken using a MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:534:Figure 28.4 Timeseries of changes in suspended sediment concentrations at water quality monitoring
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:534:The resuspension of sediment could also potentially affect dissolved oxygen levels in the water. This is due
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:534:represent a more conservative scenario, as sediment plume modelling outlined above indicates relatively
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:534:dissolved oxygen problem or where sediments have a high chemical oxygen demand and that in practice,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:534:high for dissolved oxygen and it is not anticipated that the sediments will have a high chemical oxygen
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:535:In terms of contaminants, the concentrations of PAHs and metals within the sediments in the Tees estuary
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:535:and the lower CSQG. An assessment to look at the potential for the release of sediments exceeding Cefas
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:535:Action Level 1 to cause EQS failures was therefore undertaken to inform the marine sediment and water
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:535:maximum concentrations for baseline water quality and sediments in the estuary indicate that there is a risk
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:535:undertaken for high tide volumes in the estuary (for maximum sediment and water quality baseline
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:535:For high water with maximum water and sediment concentrations and use of average concentrations for
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:535:both water and sediment quality, the estimated concentrations reduce below EQS. This indicates that the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:535: • The calculations assume that all sediment remains in suspension. In reality, it is likely that some
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:535: likely that some contamination will remain bound to sediment particles.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:535: • The maximum concentration within the sediments used for each parameter does not occur across
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:535: • The maximum values for water quality concentrations are not reflective of sediment conditions
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:535: releases less sediment into the water column.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:535:Additionally, sediment plume results for Smiths Dock monitoring point (point 3) indicated only temporary
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:535:therefore the majority of the dredge would impact on the lower sensitivity habitat ‘subtidal soft sediment’ of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:535:berth pocket would remove 25,000m2 of intertidal sediments, of which there are 4,001,300m2 within the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:536:Subtidal sediments
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:536:Results in 2019 indicate a variety of sediment types are present across the survey area and most samples
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:536:infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations were unable to be classified further than the EUNIS level 4
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:536:assemblage may take place before the original topography is restored, if the exposed, underlying sediments
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:536:composition and numbers following dredging, it is predicted that the sediment communities would recover
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:536:Intertidal sediments
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:536:walkovers confirm that the intertidal area to be lost comprises intertidal mud and gravelly sediment with
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:537:Sediment settlement
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:537:Sediment suspended within the dredging plumes will fall to the riverbed, either soon after disturbance or
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:537:spillage occurring during the dredging operation (for coarser-grained sediment fractions), or at a point in
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:537:finer-grained sediment fractions. Figure 28.5 shows the maximum changes in riverbed thickness caused
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:537:by deposition. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the dredged areas (from
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:538:zone of influence from the sediment plumes. As a result, a deterioration in ecological class status is not
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:538:Figure 28.5 Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:538:An increase in suspended sediment in the water column may lead to physiological effects in finfish, including
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:538:in sediment concentrations due to the natural fluctuations associated with tidal activity, discharge from the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:538:(including most adult finfish) are generally able to detect early onset of increased sediment concentrations
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:539:peak migratory season, when a sediment plume creating a ‘barrier’ effect could cause a significant disruption
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:539: Reduce sediment resuspension disposal activities currently ongoing. Disposal would be
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:539: Sediment management
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:541: Reduce sediment resuspension
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:541: Sediment management measures
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:542: Reduce sediment resuspension
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:542: Sediment management
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:543:wall would remove a small area of intertidal soft sediment, the measures outlined in Section 28.8 would
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:544: • Cumulative effects of sediment plumes and associated effects on water quality and fish
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:545:Section 27 considers the potential cumulative effects of the proposed schemes on sediment plumes and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:545:marine water quality. To summarise, whilst the sediment plumes could combine to cover a larger area of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:545:the estuary, additive effects in terms of increasing sediment peaks are not predicted. This is because the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:545:contaminated material has been identified in the Anglo American Harbour Facilities sediments (i.e. above
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:545:proposed project both include mitigation measures to dredge in long strips to reduce the effects of sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:545:Any project that requires dredging would disturb the marine communities within the sediments to be
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:545:In terms of wider effects, significant deposition of sediment again is generally only predicted in close
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:547: Sediment transport Hydrodynamic modelling showed that the proposed scheme would give rise to only a small magnitude reduction in baseline flows varying during different phases of the tidal
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:547: sediment at the North Tees mudflat which could be seen to be a positive effect in areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay. In the main channel, deposition will
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:547: Modelling for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities concluded that the only effects were likely to be localised redistribution of sediment deposition in response to predicted
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:547: sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees estuary.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:549:Whilst concentrations of contaminants in the sediments indicated a risk to water quality EQS’, assessment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:549:suspended sediment thus reducing the risk of significant water quality effects. Mitigation measures to
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:550:would be sediment plumes associated with dredging simultaneously. However, on further consideration,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:559:proposed scheme nor the modelled extent of the maximum-expected sediment plume from the capital
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:559:Following modelling of noise levels and sediment dispersion, it has been concluded that the overall zone of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:559:influence of the proposed scheme will be determined by the sediment plume during dredging activities.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:562: of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of the approach channel, Approximately proposed scheme, in-combination effects to the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:572:on tidal propagation, wave climate, current speeds and sediment budget of the estuarine system) has been
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:572:and so will cause no effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:572:The capital dredging of the river will cause plumes of sediment to form. The plume effects arising from the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:572:river dredging are characterised by a short-lived localised increase in suspended sediment concentrations
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:572:of sediment from the plumes on the river or seabed will be very small.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:573:The reductions in baseline current speeds may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment. In areas
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:573:Section 28), there is approximately 400ha of “intertidal sediment” habitat within the estuary. The area of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:575:requires use of TSHD and BHD on soft sediment in the channel and berth pocket) will result in plumes of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:575:The sediment dispersion modelling of Stage 2 dredging indicates that, at any given time, significant SSC
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:575:Full details of the sediment dispersion modelling are presented in Section 6.5.2.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:575:England, 2018a). The area affected by the sediment plume generated from proposed dredging, though
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:580:In terms of intra-project effects on foraging common terns, the zone of influence from the sediment plume
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:581: • effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:582:findings of invertebrate sampling undertaken on sediment samples from The Slems). The HRA undertaken
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:582:proposed scheme in combination with the NGCT scheme represents less than 1% of “intertidal sediment”
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:583:Effects on fish may be compounded by the combined sediment plumes of other projects or plans that may
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:584:An interaction between the sediment plumes would only occur in the unlikely event that the capital dredging
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:584:sediment from Hartlepool channel is not considered sufficient to result in a lethal effect on fish, with any
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:584:sediment plumes occupy only half of the river cross section) has also been proposed for the NGCT project.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:585:29.6.4 In-combination effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:585:wide change in hydrodynamics. There is no predicted effect on the baseline sediment transport regime and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:585:of the Tees and the resultant effect on tidal flows and sediment transport.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:585:change the supply of fine sediment to the Tees, and the sediment predicted to deposit in its berth pocket
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:585:potential for an effect on the sediment budget of the estuary to arise and, therefore, there would be no
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:585:Sedimentary and hydrodynamic modelling undertaken for the consented Hartlepool approach channel
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:585:proposed scheme is predicted to be low. The magnitude of effect on the baseline sediment transport regime
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:585:sediment transport regime and seabed or shore morphology across the wider study area as a result of
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:586:The zone of influence from predicted sediment plumes (including the combined plumes from the proposed
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:593:HR Wallingford (2002). Teesmouth Sediment Study. EX 4514.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:593:HR Wallingford (2006). Northern Gateway Container Terminal. Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:593:sediment plumes arising from dredging. Construction Industry Research and Information Association
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:597:Robertson, M.J., Scruton, R.S. and Clarke, K. (2006). Effect of sediment on freshwater fish and fish
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:598:Royal HaskoningDHV (2013). Cell 1 Sediment Transport Study. Phase 1: Scoping Report. Scarborough
R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:3:Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime
R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:3:flow regimes, release contaminants accrued within the sediment, and create smothering
R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:3:hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime of the Estuary.
R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:Marine Water and Sediment Quality
R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:We are pleased to see that a sediment quality survey would be carried out to accompany
R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment. It states that if the sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:strategies is to ascertain the acceptability of depositing the sediment offshore. Therefore
R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:5:stop start thresholds for parameters such as suspended sediment and dissolved oxygen
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:1: disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be set back into
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:2:a berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:4: • Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:8: material. As part of the marine licence application, the applicant will need to provide sediment sample analysis results to ensure the material is suitable
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:8: exceed the Cefas Action Level 2 guidelines for contaminated sediment. This can be determined after sediment samples have been tested.
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:11: 4.1. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:11:The potential effects of the proposed scheme on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime will be
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:11:The re-calibrated 3D Tees Estuary Tidal Model will be used to predict movement of suspended sediment
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:11:from the proposed dredging and disposal activity by coupling a sediment plume model built in MIKE21-MT
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:11:software. Sediment release rates will be estimated based on seabed and river conditions. The model will
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:11: 4.2. Marine water and sediment quality
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:11:The findings from the sediment quality survey (to be undertaken in accordance with a sampling plan agreed
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:11:sedimentary regime assessment to determine the implications of the proposed scheme on water quality
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:11:(in particular the effect of resuspension and dispersion of sediment during dredging and disposal activities).
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:11:estuary. Assuming that the concentrations of contaminants in sediment will be similar to those previously
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:11:will be given to tributyltin (TBT) concentrations within sediments as the current water quality classification
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:12:The findings from the sediment and water quality assessments and marine ecology assessments will be
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:13:hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (particularly the plume dispersion modelling to
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:13:determine impacts on feeding terns which are an interest feature of the SPA), the sediment quality survey,
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:14:The findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment will inform consideration as to
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:15:The potential impact of offshore disposal on bathymetry, benthic ecology, water and sediment quality and
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:15:sediment plume modelling will, however, be used to inform impacts to water quality as a result of the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:16:the Tees transitional waterbody. The findings from the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:16:assessment, water and sediment quality assessment and marine ecology assessment will feed into the
R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:18: 4. SEDIMENTATION/SILTATION ALLOWANCE OF 0.6m
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 4_Metocean survey report.pdf:5: 7.3 Suspended Sediment Conversion ………………………………………………………………………………………..20
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 4_Metocean survey report.pdf:21:7.3 Suspended Sediment Conversion
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:1:sediments are assessed in Sections 26. Potential cumulative impacts are addressed in Section 27.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:3: thresholds for parameters such as suspended sediment and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:3:informed by the hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling undertaken, as well as the understanding
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:4:Cross reference to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (Section 6), the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:6:inhabiting soft sediment environments.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:12:During capital dredging, approximately 1.8Mm3 of sediment (including approximately 1.27Mm3 of soft
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:12:details of the increase in SSC, including the visual output of sediment plume modelling for the capital
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:12:dredging, is provided in Section 6. The peak suspended sediment concentration within the Tees during the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:13:As detailed in the water quality assessment in Section 7, sediment quality testing from 2019 indicates that
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:13:it is very unlikely that disturbance of sediment during the dredging would result in exceedances of EQSs,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:13:sediment plume creating a ‘barrier’ effect could cause a significant disruption to the annual migration pattern,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:13:during a period of very hot and dry weather. Modelling of the sediment plume during capital dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:13:of suspended sediments are predicted to decrease significantly with increased distance from the dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:14:period. However, while unlikely, it has to be taken into account that sediment plumes encompassing the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:22:capital dredging activity will consequently result in an increase in sediment deposition, which has the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:22:fish/shellfish. The extent of sediment deposition above baseline levels is detailed in Section 6. The
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:22:maximum sediment deposition, illustrated in Figure 6.50, shows that much of the sediment falls to bed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:22:sediment deposition, it again can be assumed that feeding fish would be accustomed to similar conditions
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:23:dominated by fucoid algae). The intertidal area comprises mud and gravelly sediment with some rocks.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1112_Appendix 10_Transport Statement.pdf:5: sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be set back into the riverbank). The
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:1:sample plan to inform a sediment quality and benthic ecology survey in the Tees
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:2: 1.1. The advice relates to sampling to inform a sediment quality and benthic ecology
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:2: of sediments. Based on the information submitted (as described above), the
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:3: 2.7. Surface samples should be taken from the upper layer of in-situ sediment using a
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:4: 3.3. Results were also discussed form a sediment quality survey that was undertaken in
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:4: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:4: This list indicates the laboratories which have been validated to undertake sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:5: 4.2. Irrespective of which validated laboratory is used to undertake sediment analysis,
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:5: (https://www.gov.uk/guidance/marine-licensing-sediment-analysis-and-
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:5: changes in the quantity and quality of sediments, there may be a need for surface
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 6_Sediment sampling plan.pdf:5: sediments to be re-sampled and analysed if the project has not commenced within
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:1: disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be set back into
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:2:a berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:4: • Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:8: material. As part of the marine licence application, the applicant will need to provide sediment sample analysis results to ensure the material is suitable
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:8: exceed the Cefas Action Level 2 guidelines for contaminated sediment. This can be determined after sediment samples have been tested.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11: 4.1. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:The potential effects of the proposed scheme on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime will be
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:The re-calibrated 3D Tees Estuary Tidal Model will be used to predict movement of suspended sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:from the proposed dredging and disposal activity by coupling a sediment plume model built in MIKE21-MT
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:software. Sediment release rates will be estimated based on seabed and river conditions. The model will
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11: 4.2. Marine water and sediment quality
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:The findings from the sediment quality survey (to be undertaken in accordance with a sampling plan agreed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:sedimentary regime assessment to determine the implications of the proposed scheme on water quality
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:(in particular the effect of resuspension and dispersion of sediment during dredging and disposal activities).
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:estuary. Assuming that the concentrations of contaminants in sediment will be similar to those previously
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:11:will be given to tributyltin (TBT) concentrations within sediments as the current water quality classification
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:12:The findings from the sediment and water quality assessments and marine ecology assessments will be
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (particularly the plume dispersion modelling to
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:determine impacts on feeding terns which are an interest feature of the SPA), the sediment quality survey,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:14:The findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment will inform consideration as to
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:15:The potential impact of offshore disposal on bathymetry, benthic ecology, water and sediment quality and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:15:sediment plume modelling will, however, be used to inform impacts to water quality as a result of the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:16:the Tees transitional waterbody. The findings from the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:16:assessment, water and sediment quality assessment and marine ecology assessment will feed into the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:18: 4. SEDIMENTATION/SILTATION ALLOWANCE OF 0.6m
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:1: • Impacts on marine ecology from increased suspended sediment during capital dredging and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:4:hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling undertaken. This section excludes consideration of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:5:Cross reference to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime assessment (Section 6) and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:5:the marine sediment and water quality assessment (Section 7) has been made when assessing potential
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:5:quay wall to create the berth pocket will remove both intertidal sediments and landside materials / soils.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:7: sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the Markey
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:7: sediments deposited during the Holocene, which overlie the glacial deposits from the last
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:7: and subsidence to south makes these sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:8:present in sediments from the survey area are rare and therefore, in this respect, the species present were
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:8:SS.SMu.ISaMU.Cap (Capitella capitata in enriched sublittoral muddy sediments) and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:8:sediment), where C. capitata dominated and was accompanied by large numbers of Ophryotrocha sp.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:8:These species are characteristic of fine sediments, usually with some level of organic pollution and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:9: would be indirectly affected (e.g. through sediment deposition during capital dredging).
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:9:Sediment type
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:9:Sediment types, as classified using the Folk triangle (Folk, 1954) for each of the sample stations across the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:9:2019 survey area are provided in Figure 9.3. A variety of sediment types were present across the survey
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:9:Sediment biotopes
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:9:‘Capitella capitata and Tubificoides spp. in reduced salinity infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:11:Figure9.3 Comparison of Folk (Folk, 1954) sediment types as determined from PSD analysis of samples acquired during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey, 2019
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:12:Figure 9.4 Distribution of biotopes determined from PSD and macrobenthic analysis of samples recovered during the NGCT sediment and marine ecology survey, 2019
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:14:sediments and in estuarine environments (Wolff 1968, Hughes 1998). The beds can play an important role
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:14:walkovers have confirmed that the intertidal comprises intertidal mud and gravelly sediment with rocks and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:16: A2 – Littoral sediment A2.12 Estuarine coarse sediment shores
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:16:Occasional areas of impoverished coarse sediment was also found along the low-mid shore (Ocean
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:16:depths, which would continue to influence the benthic communities present within the subtidal sediments.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:18: A. islandica is found buried in sandy and muddy sediments from the low intertidal zone down to 400m
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:19:that impede the natural movement of sediments and poor transition of habitats). Although there are areas
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:9.5.2 Effects of increased suspended sediment concentrations during dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:will disturb sediment, which will result in localised and short-term increases in suspended sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:Based on sediment quality sampling that was undertaken within the Tees estuary in July 2019 (as reported
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:in Section 7), it is not expected that any contaminated sediment would be released into the water column
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:ecology as a result of increased concentrations of suspended sediment within the water column (i.e.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:resuspended sediment which does not contain elevations beyond Action Level 2). The dredged sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:filter feeding molluscs). In addition, high concentrations of suspended sediment may impact on fish through
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:In general, sediment plumes induced by dredging are considered to pose only a limited risk to water quality
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:dredging periods. The sediment plume generated by dredging would likely be dispersed by tidal currents
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:upon disturbance of the sediment.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:during spring tides (Section 7.4.2). These are considerably lower than suspended sediment concentrations
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:immediate vicinity of the dredger. Sediment plume modelling predicts different plume extents and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:suspended sediment concentrations depending on the stage of dredging (as described in Section 6). In all
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:cases, the sediment plume is predicted to be very narrow within the river, with the phase of dredging with
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:The sediment plume modelling reported within Section 6 also extracted time series plots of changes in SSC
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:importance (where information is available) to increases in suspended sediment. This information is
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:S. spinulosa relies on suspended particles for its tube growth. Increased suspended sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:to increases in suspended sediment concentrations, according to this sensitivity review.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:A. islandica typically occurs in silty sediments, in sheltered to wave exposed conditions, where the surface
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:sediment likely gets resuspended regularly, and where accretion rates and moderate to high. A. islandica
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:can burrow in the sediment it lives in for several days, thereby it is able to avoid sudden changes in
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:21:the proposed dredge is considered to be of low sensitivity to increases in suspended sediment.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:The dominant sediment biotope present within the dredge footprint is EUNIS biotope A5.323, Nephtys
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:resistance and resilience to changes in suspended sediment and was reported to be not sensitive (to
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:changes in suspended sediment) (De-Bastos, 2016). As such, for the purposes of this assessment, the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:Given the temporary and localised nature of the predicted increase in suspended sediment, in addition to
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:the low/very low sensitivity of the key species present in the estuary to increased suspended sediment, an
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:is 32.5ha. This is expected to cause a very limited extent of suspended sediment concentrations, and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:Some of the sediment that is suspended as a result of the dredging activities will be deposited to the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:sediment fractions), or at a point in time within a few minutes to a few hours after this if it is carried in
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:suspension by the prevailing currents (for finer-grained sediment fractions) (Section 6). The modelling
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:carried out on this, as reported in Section 6, indicates that much of the resuspended sediment is deposited
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:from the sediment plumes.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:(deposition) from the sediment plume model were extracted at a series of points within the affected river
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:reaches (relating to locations of mudflats, as shown on Figure 6.53). Sediment deposition at all of these
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:et al., 2004). This movement of water allows for any deposited sediment to be moved around and away
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:relatively quickly. However, some sediment may still be present long enough to damage the fronds of F.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:sediments at Seal Sands, Bran Sands or North Gare Sands, due to the limited footprint of dredging activities,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:up to a deposit of 5 cm because they are able to burrow and reposition within the new sediment (Whomersley
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:sediment. This information is presented below.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:MarLIN reports that even though smothering by fine sediments may temporarily limit the feeding, growth
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:sediments for up to several weeks, and that recovery would be almost immediate. As such, S. spinulosa is
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:of sediments, with no effect on its growth or population structure being evident as a result of smothering
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:(Powilliet et al., 2006; 2009). As such, it is considered that a deposit of up to 30cm of fine sediments is
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:A sudden smothering of 5cm of sediment would temporarily suspend the feeding and respiration of A. alba
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:species that characterise fine sediment habitats within estuarine areas (mainly polychaete and oligochaete
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:of fluctuating environmental conditions, such as periodic sediment disturbance due to storms and are not
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:23:concluded therefore, that the rates of sediment deposition, and the overall degree of sedimentation, that is
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:component of the benthic community. Considering this, the predicted rates of sediment deposition, and the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:as a result of the deposition of fine sediments, with no impact in the longer term.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:25:may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment (Section 6.6.2). In areas adjacent to the north bank
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:25:The predicted changes to the rate of sedimentation within the navigation channel as a consequence of the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:3:7.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime 7
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:3:7.2 Marine sediment and water quality 8
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:9: • Capital dredging of approximately 1,800,000m3 of marine sediments with offshore disposal into
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:10: • Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:10: • Marine sediment and water quality.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:11:7.1 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:11:The assessment of potential effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime has been undertaken
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:11:cause no effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:11:The capital dredging of the river and the offshore disposal of dredged sediments both will cause plumes of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:11:sediment to form. The plume effects arising from the river dredging are characterised by a short-lived
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:11:localised increase in suspended sediment concentrations by the order of a few hundred mg/l at the point of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:11:magnitude over a few hours after disposal. Deposition thicknesses of sediment from the plumes on the river
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:combined with the creation of a new berth pocket at the quay, may lead to a small increase in sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:deposition rates and hence a requirement for more sediment to be dredged annually from this local reach.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:There is no predicted effect on the baseline sediment transport regime and seabed or shore morphology
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:7.2 Marine sediment and water quality
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:The assessment of potential impacts associated with marine sediment and water quality has been
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:undertaken with reference to publicly available sediment and water quality data. A site-specific sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:survey were not available at the time of writing, it has been assumed that the sediment quality within the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:A potential impact on water quality has been identified due to the resuspension of sediment, principally as
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:exceeding water quality standards was deemed to be low. Additionally, sediment plume modelling shows
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:time before the suspended sediment concentrations return to baseline values. No significant impacts are
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:12:resuspension of sediments. Such measures include dredging in long strips to ensure the plume is located
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:and capital dredging, increased suspended sediment concentrations and increased sediment deposition.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:scheme footprint and the results of the hydrodynamic and sediment plume modelling, an impact of minor
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:ecological receptors as a result of increased suspended sediment concentrations or sediment deposition
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:15:Impacts on fish resources within the subtidal area, as a result of increased suspended sediment, would only
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:17:Indirect impacts to heritage assets from changes to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime are also
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:Based on the findings of hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling, the disposal of dredged material
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:1:disturbance and increased suspended sediments on migratory fish).
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:1: influencing the same area as affected by the sediment plume); and,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:3: of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of the approach channel, Approximately
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:4: effect on sediment transport or morphology
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:5: the Tees navigation channel, the turning circle and Tees Dock to a hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:11:27.5.2 Hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:11: • dispersion of suspended sediment during capital dredging and deposition at the offshore disposal
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:11: • changes to the sediment budget.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:11:(increased suspended sediment concentrations) are relevant to the CIA.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:11:Dispersion of suspended sediment and deposition on the seabed during capital dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:11:sediment which will disperse throughout the estuary according to the prevailing currents, prior to settling on
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:11:The extent of the sediment plume created by capital dredging is heavily dependent on the dredging plant
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:be used for dredging different sediment types as part of the same project. As noted in Section 6.5.2, it is
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:important to note that figures showing the “maximum extent of sediment plume dispersion and deposition”
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:Consequently, for the purposes of this CIA, the maximum zones of influence of sediment plume dispersion
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:27.3 presents a summary of the results of the predictive modelling of suspended sediment concentration
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:of sediment plume dispersion and deposition onto the river and/or seabed during capital dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:sediment in the water column was predicted to be in close proximity to the dredger, with plume dispersion
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:resulting in a significantly reduced concentration of suspended sediment beyond the source of the plume.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:12:For the NGCT studies, significant deposition of sediment was also only predicted in close proximity to the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:13:(right) as a result of the proposed scheme [Note: plots show sediment plume impacts arising from dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:14: • effect of increases in suspended sediments during maintenance dredging on food resources of SPA
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:14: • remobilisation and redistribution of sediments (which may be contaminated); and,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:14:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:14:sediment, and this measure would limit sediment release into the water column as far as practicable. The
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:14:sediment and water quality, marine ecology, ornithology, fish and fisheries) is discussed below.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:16:Changes to estuarine sediment budget
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:16:deposition of sediment which would be positive in areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, as it
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:16:offshore as a result. In addition, no changes to sediment transport in the predominantly sandy areas around
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:16:The Anglo American Harbour Facilities are predicted to result in a localised redistribution of sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:16:very small change in the overall fine sediment regime will not alter the present frequency of, or methodology
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:16:used for, maintenance dredging, and no effect on sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:cumulative impacts to arise to the estuarine sediment budget as a result of the projects screened into the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:27.5.3 Marine sediment and water quality
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:In relation to marine sediment and water quality, the proposed scheme has the potential to result in the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17: • dispersion of suspended sediment during marine works, dredging and disposal; and,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17: • changes to water quality associated with the release of sediment contamination.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:addition, the predictions made for each project represent sediment plume dispersion under specific tidal
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:where sediment plumes combine at peak concentration (as predicted by the EIA studies for each project)
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:In relation to sediment contamination, data collected to inform the EIAs indicates that concentrations are
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:additional mitigation measures are identified to reduce any resulting sediment plume as far as possible and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:Smothering of benthic invertebrate communities due to deposition of sediment dispersed during
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:Sediment deposition resulting from the dredging for the proposed scheme will largely be within the proposed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:less than 5cm, within the same area of river that is affected by the zone of influence from the sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:(deposition) from the sediment plume model were extracted at a series of points within the affected river
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:reaches (relating to locations of mudflats, as shown on Figure 6.51). Sediment deposition at all of these
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:The predicted footprints of sediment deposition for the NGCT and the Anglo American Harbour Facilities
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:This deposition is likely to be temporary due to the unconsolidated nature of the sediment, and the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:19:The proposed scheme is not predicted to have an effect on sediment supply into the estuary. The very
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:19:minor changes in the hydrodynamic regime, specifically currents, may lead to a slight increase in sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:19:The studies for the NGCT scheme concluded that there would not be a change in the supply of fine sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:19:sediment budget of the estuary and, therefore, was assessed that there would be no impact on morphology
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:(i.e. dredging along the axis of the river rather than across it to ensure that, at any one time, sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:HaskoningDHV, 2015)). However, the additive effect of the sediment plumes from separate dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:sediment plumes may deter such species from migrating to and from spawning sites.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:the respective sediment plumes could result in an additive effect, as demonstrated in Figures 27.1 to 27.3.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:of the sediment plumes from separate dredging campaigns cannot be completely avoided if the campaigns
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:28:hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime (Section 27.5.2) concludes that no significant cumulative impacts
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:3:3.6 Capital dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils / landside materials within
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:4:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME 43
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:4:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY 134
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:8:5 Hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:8:6 Sediment sampling plan
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:9:effects on tidal currents and sediment transport may occur (i.e. the potential zone of influence). The
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:9: The study area for marine topics comprises the hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling domain,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:1: • Effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:4:well as hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume modelling reported in Section 6.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:5:The findings of the EIA with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (as set out in Section 6)
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:4: Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime;
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:9:works could potentially release chemicals within the sediment into the water column.
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:11:can alter flow regimes, release contaminants accrued within the sediment, and
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:11:create smothering effects/turbidity/sediment plumes, thereby damaging benthic
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:11:sediment sample analysis results to ensure the material is suitable for disposal to
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:11:Level 2 guidelines for contaminated sediment. This can be determined after
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:11:sediment samples have been tested. If no disposal site exists, the applicant can
R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:11:the beneficial use / disposal of the sediment should be clearly defined within the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:13: hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume effects would not extend to
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:14: hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume effects would not extend to
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Design and Access Statement November 2020.PDF:6: There would, therefore, be a requirement for dredging of estuarine (marine) sediments and
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Design and Access Statement November 2020.PDF:6: jack-up barge ‘punching’ into the underlying sediments when berthed at the quay during the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:11:Sediment that meets the appropriate criteria is likely to be disposed at sea, given that it is unlikely that there
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:11:are any local development schemes that require to large quantity of sediment created by the scheme. A
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:11:sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2019 to inform the EIA for the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:11:advance of a site-specific sediment quality survey being undertaken during 2020.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:15: • Dredging and offshore disposal of marine sediments.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:22: Sediment: Potential for contamination in
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:22: Sediment – 1,800,000m3 of sediment excavated made ground.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:22: Non-hazardous electrical and electronic Potential for some excavated sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:32:Dredged sediment is proposed to be disposed offshore; this will be subject to a marine licence from the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:32:MMO. Should it be determined by the MMO’s advisors that the dredged sediment is not suitable for offshore
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1111_Appendix 1_Waste Report.pdf:32:Any hazardous excavated material or hazardous sediment that is not suitable for use on site would be
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:1:Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:3:5.2 Sediment Data 51
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:3:5.4.3 Sediment Release Assumptions 57
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:3:5.4.4 Sediment Property Representation 57
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:4:Table 5-4: Sediment settling velocity and critical bed shear stress 57
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.3: Sediment release schedule for dredger 56
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.4: Sediment release schedule at offshore disposal site 56
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.5: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.6: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.7: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.8: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.9: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.10: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-surface layer) arising
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.11: Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.12: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:7:Figure 5.13: Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:9: movement of suspended sediment from the proposed dredging and disposal activities by coupling with
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:9: a sediment plume model built in MIKE3-MT software. The sediment plume model was run for the entire
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:9:consideration of hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes. The wider study area: (i) extends
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:44:Section 6 (Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Processes) of the EIA Report.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:59: of sediment. In the main channel the deposition will require periodic dredging to maintain the
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:61:This section of the report describes the sediment dispersion modelling exercise that was undertaken to
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:61:investigate the suspended sediment transport effects of the proposed dredging of the channel and the berth
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:61:sediment transport model was built in MIKE3-MT software developed by DHI.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:61:5.2 Sediment Data
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:62:Based on the ground investigation data, for the sediment dispersion modelling, the following particle size
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:62:Sediment Category Sediment Size (mm) Soft material Hard material
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:62:The sediment dispersion model built in MIKE3-MT is coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic model built in
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:62:The sediment dispersion model has been run for a four-month period to cover the full duration of the
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:62:The sediment dispersion model has been setup with 4 layers in order to differentiate between suspended
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:62:sediment concentrations throughout the water column, e.g. near the sea bed and near the water surface.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:62:In order to simulate the sediment dispersion close to natural conditions, wave disturbance effect has been
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:63:The dredging method, dredging schedule and details of the sediment release settings for the sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:63:The sediment will be dredged using two types of dredgers. The soft soil material below a depth of -5mCD
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:64:Figure 5.3 and Figure 5.4 show the sediment release schedules for the dredgers at the South Bank Wharf
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:66: Figure 5.3: Sediment release schedule for dredger
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:66: Figure 5.4: Sediment release schedule at offshore disposal site
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:5.4.3 Sediment Release Assumptions
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:The following assumptions have been made for the simulation of sediment plumes arising from dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:which means the sediment release will be more dispersed and thus the sediment concentration will be less.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:5.4.4 Sediment Property Representation
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:The five sediment fractions, critical bed shear stresses and fall velocities used in the sediment dispersion
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:model to represent bed sediments are shown in Table 5-4. The critical bed shear stress and fall velocities
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:Table 5-4: Sediment settling velocity and critical bed shear stress
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67: Sediment Sediment Settling Critical Shear
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:operation sailing back and forth to the offshore disposal site. The dredger disperses sediment into the water
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:column at a sediment release rate of 5.6 kg/s. The sediment loss rate (the so-called ‘S-factor’) is taken as
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:67:disposal site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 3,705kg/s. The barge will then take
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:68:site. The dredger disperses sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 5.6 kg/s. The
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:68:sediment loss rate (the so-called ‘S-factor’) is taken as 25kg/m3 for the Backhoe which follows the CIRIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:68:disposal site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 3,705kg/s. The barge will then take
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:68:disperses sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 2.2 kg/s. The sediment loss rate
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:68:disposal site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 4,913kg/s. The barge will then take
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:68:site. The dredger disperses sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 5.6 kg/s. The
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:68:sediment loss rate (the so-called ‘S-factor’) is taken as 25kg/m3 for the Backhoe which follows the CIRIA
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:68:disposal site, discharge for 10 minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 3,705kg/s. The barge will then take
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:69:sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 4.5kg/s. The sediment loss rate (the so-called
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:69:minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 7,690kg/s. The TSHD will then take 55 minutes to sail back to
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:69:sediment into the water column at a sediment release rate of 4.5kg/s. The sediment loss rate (the so-called
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:69:minutes with a discharge sediment rate of 7,690kg/s. The TSHD will then take 55 minutes to sail back to
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:70:sailing, disposal and downtime) so that sediment releases have been made near continuously throughout
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:70:Results from the sediment dispersion modelling are discussed in turn for the river dredging and offshore
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:70:sediment concentration (SSC) or sediment deposition due to these activities above baseline levels.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:70:For SSC and sediment deposition, two types of analysis were undertaken:
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:70: Sedimentary Processes) of the Environmental Statement (ES).
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:71: Figure 5.5: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:72: Figure 5.6: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:73: Figure 5.7: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:74: Figure 5.8: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:75: Figure 5.9: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from dredging activities
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:76: Figure 5.10: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-surface layer) arising from dredging activities
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:77:Figure 5.11 shows the maximum changes in river bed thickness caused by the deposition of sediment from
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:77:the plumes created by river dredging. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:77:that is affected by the zone of influence from the sediment plumes.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:77: Figure 5.11: Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging activities during
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:78:licensed for the disposal of dredged sediment and is routinely monitored as part of a national programme.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:78:Therefore, plumes arising from disposal activities and subsequent sediment deposition is unlikely to be of
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:78:sediment plume for this worst case. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:78:similar zone to the sediment plume. In reality, disposals will be at different points within the licensed area,
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:79: Figure 5.12: Maximum enhanced suspended sediment concentrations (near-bed layer) arising from disposal activities
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:80: Figure 5.13: Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging activities during
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:80:The river dredging and offshore disposal activities will both cause plumes of sediment to form close to the
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:80:and all sediment particles suspended in the water column will eventually settle to the river or sea bed,
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:80:During dredging, there will be release of sediment particles from the deliberate physical disturbance to the
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:81:point of sediment release, the enhanced SSC values are considerably lower because the coarser material
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:81:than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition on the river bed will be of very minor magnitudes, in
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:81:areas covering the same spatial extent as the sediment plumes. Where this occurs in the river channel or
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 5_Hydro-dynamic and sedimentary plume modelling report.pdf:81:Overall, the changes in SSC and sediment deposition arising from the river dredging and offshore disposal
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:8:This would include dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils / landside material within the river
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:8:The total dredged volume for marine sediments is predicted to be approximately 1,800,000m3. Dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:8:the transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger to the offshore disposal site.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:17:Chapter 6 – Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:17:hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary and describes the
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:17:sedimentary processes, the significance of such changes or effects have not
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:17:Similarly in establishing the sedimentary regime the following assessments
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:17:took place; suspended sediment concentrations, sediment sources and
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:18: Capital dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:18: Maintenance dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:18:Matters relating to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime are not matters
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:18:sedimentary regime will be regulated through the Marine Licence and any
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:18:Chapter 7 – Marine Sediment and Water Quality
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:18:This chapter deals with the conditions with regard to sediment and water
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:18:hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (Chapter 6) as well as recent survey
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:19:In establishing the baseline with regard to marine sediment and water quality
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:19:various data sources have been used to examine the following: sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:19:Sediment data survey work was carried out in 2019 for the Northern Gateway
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:19:An assessment has also been made of suspended sediment concentrations.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:20:period, concentrations of suspended sediment were very low as illustrated in
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:20:redistribution of sediment during capital dredging, effects on water quality
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:20:during capital dredging, release of sediment during riverbank excavation to
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:20:Consideration has been given to the dispersal and redistribution of sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:20:material is likely to be geological sediment, which is unlikely to contain
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:21:potential for sediment loss during the process and the likely amount of
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:21:It is acknowledged that there is the potential for sediment to be suspended
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:21:sediment during maintenance dredging and surface water discharge to the
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:22:Matters relating to marine sediment and water quality within the Tees Estuary
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:23:view that matters relating to marine sediment and water quality within the
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:28: Impacts on marine ecology from increased suspended sediment during
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:29:berth pocket will remove both intertidal sediments and landside materials /
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:29:suspended sediment concentrations during dredging on marine species and
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:30:habitats, effects of increased suspended sediment concentrations during
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:30:increase in suspended sediment concentrations. Matters relating to this have
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:30:predicted increase in suspended sediment, in addition to the low/very low
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:30:sediment, an impact of negligible significance is predicted.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:32:With regard to suspended sediment concentrations no mitigation measures
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:33:dredged sediments have been considered within Chapter 26 of the ES.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:34:in suspended sediments during dredging or other activities will have a
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:41: hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (Chapter 6)
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:41: marine sediment and water quality (Chapter 7)
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:42:sediment deposition on intertidal food resources and construction-phase
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:43:With regard to deposition of sediment on intertidal food resources, the ES
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:51:the channel; however it is recognised that these do vary due to sedimentation
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:54: slight increase in deposition of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:60: deposition of sediment:
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:75: Effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:91:large volume of dredged sediment. It is predicted that the volume of material
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:91:disposal of the sediment offshore, hydrodynamic modelling has taken place,
R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:92:The modelling that has been carried out in relation to the resulting sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:2:not match the advertised depths due to sedimentation within the channel).
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is positive as it will help
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:7 MARINE SEDIMENT AND WATER QUALITY
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:This section presents the baseline conditions with regard to sediment and water quality of the Tees estuary
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:and sedimentary regime (see Section 6) as well as recent survey data collected to inform other project EIAs
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:The assessment of potential impacts on marine sediment and water quality has been made with reference
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1:Table 7.1 Summary of NPS requirements with regard to marine sediment and water quality
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2:Table 7.2 Summary of scoping consultation responses with regard to marine sediment and water
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: sediment and dissolved oxygen.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: proposed dredge on water and sediment quality are
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: the findings of hydrodynamic and sedimentary plume
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: sediment and create smothering effects / turbidity / sediment plumes.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: based on the anticipated sediment types to be
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3: dispose of capital dredged sediment. Impacts
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3: As part of the application, the applicant will need to provide sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3:For marine sediment and water quality, the study area comprises the likely maximum extent over which
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3:hydrodynamic and sediment dispersion modelling and is based on the maximum extent over which effects
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3:are predicted to occur (e.g. sediment plumes generated during capital dredging and effects on tidal currents
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3:The description of the existing environment with regard to sediment quality has been informed through desk-
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3:based review of existing sediment quality data. The most recent publicly available sediment quality data to
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3:7.3.2.1 Sediment data
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3:The assessment of potential impacts associated with disturbance of sediment during the construction phase
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:3: • Canadian Sediment Quality Guidelines (CSQG) for the Protection of Aquatic Life (Canadian Council
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:4:can be quantified. Therefore, for EIA, in the same way, if contaminant levels in the sediments under
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:4:application of additional sediment quality guidelines (as outlined below) or undertaking more detailed water
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:4:The CSQG involved the derivation of interim marine sediment quality guidelines (ISQGs), or Threshold
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:4:contaminated sediments to a range of aquatic organisms exposed in laboratory tests and under field
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:4:conditions (CCME, 2002). As a result, these guidelines provide an indication of likely toxicity of sediments
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:5:If additional assessment is indicated to be required as a result of recording elevated sediment concentrations
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:5:above the lower Cefas Action Level 1, the undertaking of simple calculations using estimates of sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:5:losses from dredging equipment and concentrations of contaminants within the sediments to be dredged
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:The methodology used to assess the significance of the potential environmental impacts on marine sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:7.4.1 Sediment quality
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:Results of the sediment quality data from the NGCT marine licence application
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:PDT carried out a sediment quality survey in July 2019 to inform the marine licence application for the NGCT
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:the two schemes, specifically at the Tees Dock turning circle. Results from the NGCT sediment quality
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:6:survey are detailed below. The NGCT sediment quality sampling positions in relation to the proposed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:7: ( 2019 sediment sampling locations for NGCT
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:7: A3 G1 NGCT Sediment sampling locations (2019)
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:8:Table 7.6 Summary of sediment quality data from the NGCT sediment quality survey (2019)
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:11:sediment samples recovered in 2006, with BDE209 concentrations ranging from <0.5µg/kg to 340µg/kg.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:11:that found in 2006. The MMO has recently confirmed that the sediment to be dredged from the NGCT
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12:Summary of previous sediment quality surveys in the Tees
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12:The findings of sediment quality surveys undertaken in support of previously consented schemes in the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12:A sediment quality survey was undertaken in the Tees estuary during July 2014 to inform the EIA for the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12:within Tees Dock. Though showing signs of minor contamination, it was determined that the ‘soft’ sediments
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:12:The 2006 sediment quality survey undertaken to inform the 2008 HRO application involved the recovery of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:In general, suspended sediment concentrations are low within the estuary and within Tees Bay. The highest
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:within the estuary) and analysed in the laboratory for suspended sediment concentrations. The results
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:this period, concentrations of suspended sediment were very low. It should be noted however, that the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:Table 7.8 Suspended sediment concentrations recorded at Transect T8 in July 2020
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15: Suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l)
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:A site-specific sediment quality survey is proposed to be undertaken during 2020 to provide a detailed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:understanding of sediment quality within the proposed scheme footprint and validate the information set out
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:of sediment samples from 25 stations from the surface and at depth, with sampling positions equally spread
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:In the absence of the proposed scheme, there is no reason to believe that sediment and water quality within
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:15:sediment sampling being undertaken from the surface in accordance with the conditions on the maintenance
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:16:7.5.1 Dispersion and redistribution of sediment during capital dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:16:Capital dredging would result in the creation of sediment plumes. To consider the potential extent and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:16:Modelling was undertaken using a MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:17:Figure 7. 3 Plume of suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities during Stage 2
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:19:Figure 7. 5 Plume of suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities during Stage
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:20:Figure 7.6 Plume of enhanced suspended sediment concentrations arising from dredging activities
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21:Figure 7.7 Timeseries of changes in suspended sediment concentrations at water quality monitoring
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21:sediment plume is not predicted to reach The Gares water quality monitoring point, no effects on the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21:Additionally, a significant component of the dredged material is likely to be geological sediment, which is
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:The concentrations of PAHs and metals within the sediments in the Tees estuary could potentially affect
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:An assessment to look at the potential for sediments exceeding Action Level 1 to cause EQS failures has
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:estimates of sediment losses from dredging equipment and concentrations of contaminants within the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:sediments to be dredged to provide an indication of the amount of contamination that could be released into
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:sediments and no account is made of any settlement of sediment that may occur immediately following
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:from these calculations that a risk is presented by the concentrations of zinc in the sediment and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:sediment as a result of the proposed scheme) although the maximum allowable concentration was not
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:23:sediment per day and maximum concentrations both in the water and in the sediment)
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:23: in sediments in sediments concentration with baseline
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:23: Sediment data taken from NGCT 2019 (see Table 7.5)
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:23: Calculated loss of sediment derived using indicative values for the mass of sediment resuspended per m 3 of dredged material in CIRIA guidance (John et al., 1999) in kg/m3. Worst case S-Factor for
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:24:sediment per day and maximum concentrations in the water and in the sediment)
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:24: sediments sediments concentration with baseline
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25:of zinc and benzo(b)fluoranthene (both sediment and water quality values) at low water volumes within the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25:estuary. If the calculations at mean low water are re-run using average concentrations (sediment and water
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: • The calculations assume that all sediment remains in suspension. In reality, it is likely that some
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: likely that some contamination will remain bound to sediment particles.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: • The maximum concentration within the sediments used for each parameter does not occur across
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: • The maximum values for water quality concentrations are not reflective of sediment conditions
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: releases less sediment into the water column.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25:Additionally, information from sediment plume modelling (see Section 7.5.1) indicates that only the Smiths
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25:7.5.4 Release of sediment during riverbank excavation to create the berth
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:As these works progress, there is the potential for sediment to be suspended when working in and around
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:7.6.1 Dispersion and redistribution of sediment during maintenance dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:9:proposed scheme nor the modelled extent of the maximum-expected sediment plume from the capital
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:9:Following modelling of noise levels and sediment dispersion, it has been concluded that the overall zone of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:9:influence of the proposed scheme will be determined by the sediment plume during dredging activities.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:12: of sediment from the riverbed, realignment of the approach channel, Approximately proposed scheme, in-combination effects to the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:22:on tidal propagation, wave climate, current speeds and sediment budget of the estuarine system) has been
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:22:and so will cause no effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:22:The capital dredging of the river will cause plumes of sediment to form. The plume effects arising from the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:22:river dredging are characterised by a short-lived localised increase in suspended sediment concentrations
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:22:of sediment from the plumes on the river or seabed will be very small.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:23:The reductions in baseline current speeds may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment. In areas
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:23:Section 28), there is approximately 400ha of “intertidal sediment” habitat within the estuary. The area of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:25:requires use of TSHD and BHD on soft sediment in the channel and berth pocket) will result in plumes of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:25:The sediment dispersion modelling of Stage 2 dredging indicates that, at any given time, significant SSC
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:25:Full details of the sediment dispersion modelling are presented in Section 6.5.2.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:25:England, 2018a). The area affected by the sediment plume generated from proposed dredging, though
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:30:In terms of intra-project effects on foraging common terns, the zone of influence from the sediment plume
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:31: • effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:32:findings of invertebrate sampling undertaken on sediment samples from The Slems). The HRA undertaken
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:32:proposed scheme in combination with the NGCT scheme represents less than 1% of “intertidal sediment”
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:33:Effects on fish may be compounded by the combined sediment plumes of other projects or plans that may
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:34:An interaction between the sediment plumes would only occur in the unlikely event that the capital dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:34:sediment from Hartlepool channel is not considered sufficient to result in a lethal effect on fish, with any
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:34:sediment plumes occupy only half of the river cross section) has also been proposed for the NGCT project.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:35:29.6.4 In-combination effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:35:wide change in hydrodynamics. There is no predicted effect on the baseline sediment transport regime and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:35:of the Tees and the resultant effect on tidal flows and sediment transport.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:35:change the supply of fine sediment to the Tees, and the sediment predicted to deposit in its berth pocket
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:35:potential for an effect on the sediment budget of the estuary to arise and, therefore, there would be no
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:35:Sedimentary and hydrodynamic modelling undertaken for the consented Hartlepool approach channel
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:35:proposed scheme is predicted to be low. The magnitude of effect on the baseline sediment transport regime
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:35:sediment transport regime and seabed or shore morphology across the wider study area as a result of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:36:The zone of influence from predicted sediment plumes (including the combined plumes from the proposed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:8: • offshore disposal of dredged sediments; and,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:9:footprint as undifferentiated Triassic Rocks. This is a sedimentary Bedrock formed approximately 200 to
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:15:such as natural flood management, habitat improvements, RDP reduction (sediment and nutrients),
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:1:Is 1% or more of any lower sensitivity habitat No – the area impacted is considered to be soft intertidal and soft subtidal sediment of which
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:2:entering it or could affect fish migrating through the See comments in water quality below. There may be temporary sediment resuspension but
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:2: would be supported through the use of divers. There is the possibility of sediment plumes
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:3: and temporary. Any sediment resuspension is unlikely to last more than a few hours per
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:3:through sediment disturbance or building works) crew will be trained in spill response. In addition, all vessels will ensure that suitable bunding
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:3: Sediment samples available from the NGCT project collected in 2019 are likely to contain
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:3:If your activity uses or releases chemicals (for example contaminants above action level 1.There is the possibility of sediment plumes during the
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:3:through sediment disturbance or building works) demolition works but these are only expected to be localised to the working area and
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:3:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants temporary. Any sediment resuspension is unlikely to last more than a few hours per pile.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:4:outside the estuary but could delay or prevent fish There is the possibility of sediment plumes during the dredging works. Possibility of
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:5: There is the possibility of sediment plumes during the dredging works
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:5:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:5: Yes Sediment samples are likely to contain contaminants above Cefas Action Level 1 (see
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:5:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:5:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:6:Could impact on normal fish behaviour like movement, sediment spill. Additionally, where possible material would be removed in the dry. Any effects
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:7: sediment spill. Additionally, where possible material would be removed in the dry. Any effects
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:7:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:7:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:7:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:9:Could affect water clarity, temperature, salinity, oxygen There is the possibility that small localised disturbance of sediment could occur as a result
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:9:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:9:Quality Standards Directive (EQSD) list Any marine sediments that are disturbed are likely to have contaminant levels greater than
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:9:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:9:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:10: and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary.
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:11:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:11:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:11:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:13:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:13:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:13:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:15:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:15:through sediment disturbance or building works)
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:15:consider if: It disturbs sediment with contaminants
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:6:HR Wallingford (2002). Teesmouth Sediment Study. EX 4514.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:6:HR Wallingford (2006). Northern Gateway Container Terminal. Hydrodynamic and sedimentation studies.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:6:sediment plumes arising from dredging. Construction Industry Research and Information Association
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:10:Robertson, M.J., Scruton, R.S. and Clarke, K. (2006). Effect of sediment on freshwater fish and fish
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:11:Royal HaskoningDHV (2013). Cell 1 Sediment Transport Study. Phase 1: Scoping Report. Scarborough
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:5: Intertidal soft sediments (400.13ha); Intertidal soft sediment (845.53ha),
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:5: reef (4.13ha); subtidal soft sediments reef (7170.93ha), Subtidal soft
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:5: (610.31ha). sediments (1219.64ha)
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:5: 24.Reduce sediment resuspension
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:5: 26.Sediment management
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:7: sediments with INNS are already present
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:7: measures identified for the Tees estuary. habitats located within sediment plumes created
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:10: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is deemed to be a positive
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:11:Capital dredging within the river would result in sediment plumes. To consider the potential extent and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:11:Modelling was undertaken using a MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:13:Figure 28.4 Timeseries of changes in suspended sediment concentrations at water quality monitoring
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:13:The resuspension of sediment could also potentially affect dissolved oxygen levels in the water. This is due
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:13:represent a more conservative scenario, as sediment plume modelling outlined above indicates relatively
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:13:dissolved oxygen problem or where sediments have a high chemical oxygen demand and that in practice,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:13:high for dissolved oxygen and it is not anticipated that the sediments will have a high chemical oxygen
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:In terms of contaminants, the concentrations of PAHs and metals within the sediments in the Tees estuary
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:and the lower CSQG. An assessment to look at the potential for the release of sediments exceeding Cefas
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:Action Level 1 to cause EQS failures was therefore undertaken to inform the marine sediment and water
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:maximum concentrations for baseline water quality and sediments in the estuary indicate that there is a risk
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:undertaken for high tide volumes in the estuary (for maximum sediment and water quality baseline
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:For high water with maximum water and sediment concentrations and use of average concentrations for
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:both water and sediment quality, the estimated concentrations reduce below EQS. This indicates that the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14: • The calculations assume that all sediment remains in suspension. In reality, it is likely that some
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14: likely that some contamination will remain bound to sediment particles.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14: • The maximum concentration within the sediments used for each parameter does not occur across
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14: • The maximum values for water quality concentrations are not reflective of sediment conditions
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14: releases less sediment into the water column.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:Additionally, sediment plume results for Smiths Dock monitoring point (point 3) indicated only temporary
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:therefore the majority of the dredge would impact on the lower sensitivity habitat ‘subtidal soft sediment’ of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:14:berth pocket would remove 25,000m2 of intertidal sediments, of which there are 4,001,300m2 within the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:15:Subtidal sediments
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:15:Results in 2019 indicate a variety of sediment types are present across the survey area and most samples
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:15:infralittoral muddy sediment’. Several stations were unable to be classified further than the EUNIS level 4
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:15:assemblage may take place before the original topography is restored, if the exposed, underlying sediments
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:15:composition and numbers following dredging, it is predicted that the sediment communities would recover
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:15:Intertidal sediments
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:15:walkovers confirm that the intertidal area to be lost comprises intertidal mud and gravelly sediment with
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:16:Sediment settlement
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:16:Sediment suspended within the dredging plumes will fall to the riverbed, either soon after disturbance or
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:16:spillage occurring during the dredging operation (for coarser-grained sediment fractions), or at a point in
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:16:finer-grained sediment fractions. Figure 28.5 shows the maximum changes in riverbed thickness caused
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:16:by deposition. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the dredged areas (from
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:17:zone of influence from the sediment plumes. As a result, a deterioration in ecological class status is not
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:17:Figure 28.5 Maximum river bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:17:An increase in suspended sediment in the water column may lead to physiological effects in finfish, including
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:17:in sediment concentrations due to the natural fluctuations associated with tidal activity, discharge from the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:17:(including most adult finfish) are generally able to detect early onset of increased sediment concentrations
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:18:peak migratory season, when a sediment plume creating a ‘barrier’ effect could cause a significant disruption
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:18: Reduce sediment resuspension disposal activities currently ongoing. Disposal would be
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:18: Sediment management
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:20: Reduce sediment resuspension
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:20: Sediment management measures
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21: Reduce sediment resuspension
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21: Sediment management
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:22:wall would remove a small area of intertidal soft sediment, the measures outlined in Section 28.8 would
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:23: • Cumulative effects of sediment plumes and associated effects on water quality and fish
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:Section 27 considers the potential cumulative effects of the proposed schemes on sediment plumes and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:marine water quality. To summarise, whilst the sediment plumes could combine to cover a larger area of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:the estuary, additive effects in terms of increasing sediment peaks are not predicted. This is because the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:contaminated material has been identified in the Anglo American Harbour Facilities sediments (i.e. above
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:proposed project both include mitigation measures to dredge in long strips to reduce the effects of sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:Any project that requires dredging would disturb the marine communities within the sediments to be
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:In terms of wider effects, significant deposition of sediment again is generally only predicted in close
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:26: Sediment transport Hydrodynamic modelling showed that the proposed scheme would give rise to only a small magnitude reduction in baseline flows varying during different phases of the tidal
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:26: sediment at the North Tees mudflat which could be seen to be a positive effect in areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay. In the main channel, deposition will
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:26: Modelling for the Anglo American Harbour Facilities concluded that the only effects were likely to be localised redistribution of sediment deposition in response to predicted
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:26: sediment supply to intertidal areas throughout the Tees estuary.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:28:Whilst concentrations of contaminants in the sediments indicated a risk to water quality EQS’, assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:28:suspended sediment thus reducing the risk of significant water quality effects. Mitigation measures to
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:29:would be sediment plumes associated with dredging simultaneously. However, on further consideration,
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:6:channel and to create a berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments and
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:7: sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be set back into the
R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:8: • offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1:The proposed scheme is predicted to generate up to approximately 1,800,000m3 of dredged sediment from
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1:been undertaken on a worst-case basis whereby all dredged sediment from the Tees estuary would be
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1:As the offshore disposal commences, a plume of sediment would be generated with the greatest
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1:concentrations predicted at the end of the discharge period. The sediment plume is predicted to increase
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1:commences and starts to form its own sediment plume, the initial plume has moved sufficiently far from its
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:1:deposition of sediment. As shown on Figure 6.66, deposited sediment from one disposal event is predicted
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:Based on the modelled effects of the sediment plume at the Tees Bay C disposal site described above, it is
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:The PSD results show that the sediments within and adjacent to Tees Bay C comprise gravelly muddy sand,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5: sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:of the disposal site. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary modelling has predicted some short-term build-up of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:sediment at the disposal site, however, this would be dispersed over time.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:sensitive to smothering or increases in suspended sediment.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8:for the assessment of potential impacts associated with offshore disposal of dredged sediments (see
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8:disposal of dredged sediments are likely to be less than those generated during dredging activities. The
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8:display a fleeing response, as a result of underwater noise during offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8:offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: sediments
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8:result of underwater noise associated with offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:8: sediments based on density of 0.014/km2 for reference population anticipated to be
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:dredged sediments is negligible / very low for harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:disposal of dredged sediments would be limited to the immediate vicinity of the vessels while they are
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:dredged sediments on harbour porpoise, minke whale, grey seal and harbour seal, has been assessed as
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:sediments on marine mammals
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: sediments Negligible / Negligible
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: sediments (5% of (0.00003% of the NE England MU) based (permanent effect with less than 0.001% of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:potential increase in collision risk with vessels during offshore disposal of dredged sediments has been
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: sediments Harbour Negligible / Negligible
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:disturbance due to the disposal of dredged sediment into the disposal site to seals at Seal Sands, including
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:dredged sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:The offshore disposal of dredged material would temporarily increase the suspended sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments will have a negligible impact on
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:Changes to marine mammals prey resource during offshore disposal of dredged sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:temporary loss of seabed habitat, increased suspended sediment concentrations and sediment re-
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:1: • hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime (Section 6);
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:1: • marine sediment and water quality (Section 7);
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:10:Cross reference has been made, where relevant, to the findings of the hydrodynamic and sedimentary
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27:In summary, the largest sediment plumes are likely to arise during Stage 2 of the dredging (i.e. BHD and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27:(it is not a sediment plume, rather a combined zone of influence). The sediment dispersion modelling of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27:of this assessment, the sediment plume may be regarded as representing a temporary loss of foraging
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:28:terns do not forage to any significant extent within the predicted range of the sediment plume. Likewise, the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:28:tern species as a result of increased suspended sediments during the construction phase.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:28:and re-suspension of sediment (Cook and Burton, 2010). However, common terns typically only dive to 1m
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:28:England, 2018a), and the area likely to be affected by the sediment plume at any one time represents around
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:12.5.3 Effects of sediment deposition on intertidal food resources
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:The deposition of fine sediment within intertidal areas due to capital dredging has the potential to affect
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:dredging, is presented in Section 6.5.2. Fine sediment will be deposited within minutes or hours if carried
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:invertebrate prey to birds feeding on the mudflats . The predicted minor accretion of sediment at North Tees
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:40: pollutants or sediments enter surface waters.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:45: 4. SEDIMENTATION/SILTATION ALLOWANCE OF 0.6m
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:10: There would, therefore, be a requirement for dredging of estuarine (marine) sediments and
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:10: jack-up barge ‘punching’ into the underlying sediments when berthed at the quay during the
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: structures and capital dredging, increased suspended sediment concentrations and increased
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: sediment deposition. Based on the sensitivity of the benthic communities and habitats expected
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: sediment plume modelling, an impact of minor adverse significance is predicted with regard to
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: increased suspended sediment concentrations or sediment deposition during construction.
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26:5.29 Impacts on fish resources within the subtidal area, as a result of increased suspended sediment,
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28:5.48 Indirect impacts to heritage assets from changes to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: Marine Sediment and Water Quality
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30:5.64 The assessment of potential impacts associated with marine sediment and water quality has
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: been undertaken with reference to publicly available sediment and water quality data. A
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: potential impact on water quality has been identified due to the resuspension of sediment,
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: Additionally, sediment plume modelling shows relatively limited areas of high suspended solids
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: concentrations, which only occur for a matter of hours at a time before the suspended sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: process to minimise the potential for resuspension of sediments. Such measures include
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:1:berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay (to be
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:8:3.6 Capital dredging of marine sediments and excavation of soils /
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:8:estuarine (marine) sediments and excavation of soils / landside materials within the riverbank to create the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:8:A summary of the proposed design levels and dredge volumes for marine sediments is detailed in Section
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:8:3.6.1 Volume of marine sediments to be dredged
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:8:The total dredge volume for marine sediments is predicted to be approximately 1,800,000m3. As detailed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:8:marine sediment is anticipated to comprise Tidal Flat Deposits and Glacial Till. It is proposed that all areas
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:10:Table 3.2 Proposed volumes of marine sediments to be dredged (excluding over-dredge volumes)
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:10:transport of sediment dredged using the backhoe dredger to the offshore disposal site. It is assumed that
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:10:In addition to the removal of marine sediments, the proposed scheme will require the excavation of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:10:avoid the risk of a jack-up barge ‘punching’ into the underlying sediments when berthed at the quay during
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:11:sediments from the river channel would be deposited offshore within the Tees Bay C disposal site. As noted
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:19:suitable locations for the re-use of dredged sediment; three were located adjacent to the South Gare
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:5: sedimentary regime (see Section 6) the study area comprises all areas of river, adjacent coastline
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:8:heritage assets which may arise as a result of changes to hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:9:by-product of changes to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes resulting from a project) may also depend
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:14:Archaeology, 2014) suggested the presence of five sedimentary units:
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:14: • Unit 2 Estuarine alluvium and peat (possible mid-Holocene sediments);
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:14: • Unit 3 Marine sediments/ Estuarine alluvium;
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:14: • Unit 4 Estuarine alluvium/ polluted fluvial sediments; and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:14:remains, preserved beneath later sediments. Given this potential, geoarchaeological assessment of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:21:directly and indirectly change the hydrodynamic and sedimentary process regimes, both locally and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:21:than those protected by sediment cover. Conversely, if increased sedimentation results in an exposed site
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:21:Potential effects upon the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime are assessed in Section 6. With regard
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:21:to effects during construction it is concluded that, other than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:22:hydrodynamics and sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary. Consequently, there is no pathway for
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:22:additional, indirect impacts to heritage assets associated with changes in sediment deposition, over and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:22: • Reductions in baseline current speeds may lead to a slight increase in deposition of sediment:
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:1:mammals from the offshore disposal of dredged sediments are assessed in Section 26.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:7:known prey for harbour porpoise, exhibit a strong association with particular surface sediments.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:19:widely, dependent on the dredger type, operational stage, or environmental conditions (e.g. sediment type,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:sediment within the water column. However, marine mammals often inhabit turbid environments.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:relied upon solely. Therefore, any increases in suspended sediments during dredging or other activities will
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:disturbance and temporary loss of seabed habitat; increased suspended sediment concentrations and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:sediment re-deposition; smothering and underwater noise.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:6 HYDRODYNAMIC AND SEDIMENTARY REGIME
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:This section presents the baseline conditions with regard to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:While the proposed scheme has the potential to alter hydrodynamic and sedimentary processes, the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:The assessment of potential effects on the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime has been made with
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:that are relevant to the hydrodynamic and sedimentary regimes, as presented within the NPS for Ports, are
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:Where relevant, applicants should undertake coastal geomorphological and sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:1:shorelines where the proposal could inhibit sediment flow or have an impact on coastal
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:2:Table 6.2 MPS requirements relevant to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:2:activity or development will have on coastal processes, including sediment movement.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:2:hydrodynamics and the sedimentary regime.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:2:Table 6.3 North East Marine Plan policies relevant to hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:2:A summary of consultation responses relevant to the assessment of hydrodynamics and sedimentary
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3: aspects of relevance to hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes, namely: on the tidal prism of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3: as stop start thresholds for parameters such as suspended sediment and 13 and Section 7
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3:For hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes, the study area needs to cover all areas of river, adjacent
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:4:Figure 6.1 Study area for assessing potential effects on hydrodynamics and sedimentary processes
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:4:There has been much previous work to characterise the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:4:Table 6.5 Review of existing information on the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:4:2002 Teesmouth Sediment Study. HR Wallingford, 1989
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:4: Further information relating to sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:5: Anglo American Harbour Facilities – modelling, sediment transport, bed change
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:5: Environmental Statement. modelling and modelling of sediment plume
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:7:sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary, carried out over many decades. This work is summarised below
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:7:Table 6.6 Review of existing information on the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:7:2002 Teesmouth Sediment Study. HR Wallingford, 1989
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:7: Further information relating to sediment contamination and
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:7: Anglo American Harbour Facilities – Royal HaskoningDHV, modelling, wave modelling, sediment transport, bed change
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:7: Environmental Statement. 2014 modelling and modelling of sediment plume released from
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10: • Sediment plume modelling: The updated and verified 3D Tees Estuary Tidal Model was used to
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10: predict movement of suspended sediment from the proposed dredging and disposal activities by
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10: coupling with a sediment plume model built in MIKE21-MT software. The sediment plume model
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10:synthesised and used in combination with knowledge of other factors, such geological constraints, sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:10:the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime through an Expert Geomorphological Assessment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:12:of reaches require maintenance dredging to remove both sands and silts. The volume of sediments dredged
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:12:cumulatively (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2013). A notable proportion of this sediment is marine sand that is
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:12:channel deepened to its present depth. The role of the River Tees in supplying fine sediment to the coastal
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:12:to allow bypassing of sediment, but observed accumulations upstream, and a 24% reduction in the dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:12:requirement of the harbour, indicates that much of the river sediment is trapped by the structure (Royal
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:13:sediments) which is offset by maintenance dredging and disposal at offshore licenced disposal site Tees
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:16:Tees Bay and the Tees estuary attract sediment because the tidal current flows are generally quite low
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:16:the transport of sediment within Tees Bay, with an overall tendency for southerly directed transport because
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:16:sediment from the seabed enabling more to become transported by the tidal currents during these storms.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:16:subtleties locally influence sediment transport in these locations.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:21:bed upstream (flooding) flows are observed. These effects are important in supplying sediment to the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:21:estuary from offshore (the main sediment supply).
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:30:It is recognised that the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime, as characterised within this
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:30:relative effect of the proposed scheme upon the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime will be
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:30:the baseline hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime in a relative manner, using the baseline understanding
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:31:6.4.4 Sedimentary regime
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:31:Suspended sediment concentrations
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:31:In general, suspended sediment concentrations (SSCs) are low within the estuary and within Tees Bay.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:31:the highest suspended sediment levels occur close to high water. After storm periods, higher concentrations
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:31:of suspended sediment have been noted around the Shell Jetty, but with little penetration further up the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:31: Suspended sediment concentrations (mg/l)
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:34:Sediment sources and transport
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:34:Historic bed sampling results in the vicinity of the proposed scheme show bed sediments in the area to
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:34:Within the system the driving forces for sediment transport are the tidal flows, density driven currents, wave
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:35: with the implication that fluvial sediment input to the estuary has reduced (ABPmer, 2005).
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:35: sediment into the estuary system. This material comes in on the flood tide, particularly during times
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:36:has also been utilised to move recently deposited accumulations of sediment to adjacent scour spots within
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:36:the river, thus maintaining sediment within the estuarine system and reducing the overall volumes of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:39:A review of the dredged sediment quality data is presented in Section 7.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:40:sedimentary regime arising from the demolition works is very low.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:40:6.5.2 Capital dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:Each year, between 25 – 30 million tonnes (wet weight) of dredged marine sediments from ports, harbours
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:offshore site will both result in sediment plumes. These effects have been investigated using numerical
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:modelling of the sediment dispersion associated with the dredging and disposal activities, as well as the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:changes in bed thickness when the suspended sediment falls from the plume to become deposited on the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:A MIKE3-MT sediment dispersion model has been coupled with the 3D hydrodynamic model (MIKE3-HD)
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:disturbance effects have been included. The dredging methods, schedule and sediment release settings
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:sediment releases have been made near continuously throughout the dredging operations (except for
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:Results from the sediment dispersion modelling are discussed in turn for the dredging and disposal activities.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:41:Note that all the modelling plots in the following sections show the elevations in SSC or sediment deposition
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:58:The sediment plumes that arise from the four stages of the dredging could potentially affect areas of riverbed
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:58:or seabed that are remote from the point of sediment release in terms of either increases in SSC or increases
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:58:in sediment deposition. This could affect water quality (in terms of increased turbidity) or aquatic ecology
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:60:Sediment suspended within the dredging plumes will fall to the riverbed, either soon after disturbance or
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:60:spillage occurring during the dredging operation (for coarser-grained sediment fractions), or at a point in
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:60:finer-grained sediment fractions). Figure 6.50 shows the maximum changes in riverbed thickness caused
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:60:by this deposition. It can be seen that much of the sediment falls to the bed within the dredged areas (from
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:60:zone of influence from the sediment plumes.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:61:Figure 6.50 Maximum riverbed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from dredging
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:61:Within this maximum zone of influence from sediment plumes and bed deposition, the following receptors
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:61:could potentially be adversely affected by increases in SSC or increases in sediment deposition (or both
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:during Stage 4. Similarly it is only point 3 where any appreciable sediment deposition occurs, and this is at
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:and at Mudflat 3 it increases by a peak of 8mg/l (Figure 6.54). Sediment deposition on the mudflats is
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:6.56). Sediment deposition at these locations is predicted to be immeasurable (Figure 6.57).
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:62:background levels of concentrations (Figure 6.58). Sediment deposition at Location 6 (Middlesbrough
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:63:Overall changes of these magnitudes in SSC and sediment deposition are unlikely to cause significant
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:63:Figure 6.51 Location of points used for of timeseries analysis of changes in SSC and sediment
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:64:Figure 6.53 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the water quality monitoring points
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:65:Figure 6.55 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the mudflat monitoring points
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:66:Figure 6.57 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the navigation (north bank) monitoring
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:67:Figure 6.59 Timeseries of changes in sediment deposition at the navigation (south bank) monitoring
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:68:is licensed for the disposal of dredged sediment and is routinely monitored as part of a national programme.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:68:Therefore, plumes arising from disposal activities and subsequent sediment deposition is unlikely to be of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:68:activity commences and starts to form its own sediment plume (Plot H), the initial plume has moved
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:sediment plume associated with one release event (this example being from Stage 1). It can be seen that
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:much of the sediment falls to the bed within close proximity of the point of release, forming a small deposit
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:76:is negligible, whilst to the north it covers a similar zone to the sediment plume for this disposal event, which
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:78:Figure 6.65 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from one disposal
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:79:Figure6.66 Maximum sea bed thickness change due to sediment deposition arising from one disposal
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:79:Whilst turbidity and sediment deposition effects within the disposal site are to be expected (and indeed are
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:80:changes in SSC and sediment deposition
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:81:The river dredging and offshore disposal activities will both cause plumes of sediment to form close to the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:81:and all sediment particles suspended in the water column will eventually settle to the river or seabed,
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:81:During dredging, there will be a release of sediment particles from the deliberate physical disturbance to the
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:81:point of sediment release, the enhanced SSC values are considerably lower because the coarser material
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:82:and the Oil Terminal. Other than within the dredged areas, sediment deposition on the riverbed will be of
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:82:very minor magnitudes, in areas covering the same spatial extent as the sediment plumes. Where this
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:82:Overall, the changes in SSC and sediment deposition arising from the river dredging and offshore disposal
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:82:sedimentary regime of the Tees estuary.
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:90: of sediment. In areas adjacent to the north bank opposite the quay, this is positive as it will help
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:91:6.6.4 Maintenance dredging and offshore disposal of dredged sediments
R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:91:maintenance dredging is likely to be due to the low levels of suspended sediment measured in this reach of
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:1: •Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime;
R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:4:environment. It can alter flow regimes, release contaminants accrued within the sediment,
R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:8:sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the Market Weighton Axis. The
R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:9:complex of peats, estuarine and marine sediments deposited during the Holocene, which overlie
R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:9:sedimentation due to fluctuations in relative sea level during the mid-Holocene, from approximately
R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:9:the north and subsidence to the south makes these sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea
R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:188:estimation is based on stream sediment data collected from small streams at a sampling density of 1 per 2.5
R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:188:km2; this is the case for most of Scotland, Wales and southern England. The stream sediment data are
R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:170:estimation is based on stream sediment data collected from small streams at a sampling density of 1 per 2.5
R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:170:km2; this is the case for most of Scotland, Wales and southern England. The stream sediment data are
R-2022-0755-CD-Aug 22 - CEMP - Land West of Warrenby - Site Preparation Remediation Works.pdf:18:associated sediment transport from runoff and subsequently drainage during site activities:
R-2022-0755-CD-Aug 22 - CEMP - Land West of Warrenby - Site Preparation Remediation Works.pdf:21:To prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other substance relating to construction
R-2022-0755-CD-Aug 22 - CEMP - Land West of Warrenby - Site Preparation Remediation Works.pdf:21:To prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other substance relating to construction
R-2022-0755-CD-Aug 22 - CEMP - Land West of Warrenby - Site Preparation Remediation Works.pdf:22:To prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other substance relating to construction
R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-06-Rem_Strat_LWoW(1).pdf:36:sediment run off, and sheen potentially resulting from site activities. If identified further assessment as
R-2019-0331-SCP-Letter to RCBC 19.05.20 Scoping Request FINAL.pdf:15: • Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime;
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:1: •Hydrodynamic and Sedimentary Regime;
R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:4:environment. It can alter flow regimes, release contaminants accrued within the sediment,
R-2019-0331-SCP-114582 (3).pdf:3:sediment, and create smothering effects, thereby damaging benthic habitats and
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0066-01-Prairie ROA and Strategy.PDF:41:During groundworks the Contractor shall take measures to prevent surface water and sediment run off
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part6.PDF:24:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part6.PDF:111: chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which and Sediments
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part6.PDF:121: Fluorescence mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which is then and Sediments.
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part2.PDF:11: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part2.PDF:19: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part2.PDF:28: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part5.PDF:128: chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which and Sediments
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part5.PDF:138: Fluorescence mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which is then and Sediments.
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part5.PDF:145: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part5.PDF:152: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part5.PDF:162: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part1.PDF:34: Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation 4
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part1.PDF:42: Particle Size Distribution Sedimentation BS 1377 Part 2 1990
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part1.PDF:51: Sedimentary Metamorphic Igneous
R-2021-0879-FF-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0-P01 (Part 2).pdf:3: S = Soils, Made Ground and sediments Volatile Pesticides
R-2021-0879-FF-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0-P01 (Part 2).pdf:12:drains during the works to ensure no pollutants or sediments enter the surface water network. This will
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part6.PDF:40: chloride reduces mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which and Sediments
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part6.PDF:50: Fluorescence mercury (II) to mercury (0) vapour which is then and Sediments.
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0117-02-Prairie_ESA_Addendum_Part4.PDF:23:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part4.PDF:57:Particle Size Distribution Sieving and Sedimentation
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.2 Outline Drainage Strategy.pdf:9: provide reduction in runoff flows, thus aiding sediment removal.
R-2020-0411-FFM-EA R_2020_0411_FFM v2 10 November 2020 OFFICIAL .pdf:2:Scouring could remobilise contaminated sediments and effected water quality. Ecological
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:9: sediment,
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:9: sediments
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:13: use of settling tanks or ponds to remove sediment, temporary interceptors and a hydraulic brake.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:14: 400.13ha of Intertidal soft sediment, 26.93ha of rocky shore, 4.13ha of subtidal rocky reef and
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:14: 610.31ha of subtidal soft sediments, which are lower sensitivity habitats.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:15: include water quality impacts (e.g. elevated suspended sediments, release of contaminants,
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:17: • use of sediment fences along existing watercourses when working nearby to prevent
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:17: sediment being washed into watercourses;
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:17: • covers for lorries transporting materials to / from site to prevent releases of dust/sediment to
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:17: ponds to remove any sediment;
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:17: construction. This will include the use of settling tanks and /or ponds to remove sediment, temporary
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:19: classification. This may include the use of settling tanks or ponds to remove sediment, temporary
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:25: Lower sensitivity habitats present 0.77ha cobbles, gravel and shingle, 400.13ha Intertidal soft sediment, 26.93ha Rocky shore, 4.13ha Subtidal
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:25: rocky reef, 610.31ha Subtidal soft sediments
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:27: clam, cockle and oyster beds intertidal soft sediments like sand and mud
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:27: polychaete reef subtidal soft sediments like sand and mud
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:27: Note that a footprint may also be a temperature or sediment plume. For dredging activity, a footprint is 1.5 times the dredge area.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:30:(for example through sediment disturbance
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:30:It disturbs sediment with contaminants above Cefas Impact assessment not There will be no disturbance of sediment within the Tees Estuary. Where
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:31: (for example through sediment disturbance
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 2 Project Description.pdf:24: • Dust suppression equipment would be used to reduce the migration of sediment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 2 Project Description.pdf:24: areas where construction drainage systems has features to remove sediment and
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 2 Project Description.pdf:24: therefore, reduce the risk of sediment discharging into the surrounding
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 2 Project Description.pdf:24: include the use of settling tanks and /or ponds to remove sediment, temporary
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:19: on water quality of nearby watercourses and ecological habitats through introducing sediments or
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:19: excavation, wheel washing, and dust and mud on site. Suspended sediments can reach surface
R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:19: include measures to control runoff from the construction works and thereby movement of sediment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:18: • Dust suppression equipment would be used to reduce the migration of sediment within the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:18: drainage systems has features to remove sediment and therefore, reduce the risk of sediment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:18: remove sediment, temporary interceptors and hydraulic brakes.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:20: a potential increase in sediment being present within the runoff, there is no obvious pathway to the
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:20: and providing suitable temporary drainage network including oil / sediment interceptors.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:21: construction phase to ensure no discharge of pollutants or increase in suspended sediment
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:24: watercourses through accidental release of sediment, appropriate mitigation measures have been
R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:25: tanks and /or ponds to remove sediment, temporary interceptors and hydraulic brakes.
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:152:estimation is based on stream sediment data collected from small streams at a sampling density of 1 per 2.5
R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:152:km2; this is the case for most of Scotland, Wales and southern England. The stream sediment data are
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:54: elevated concentrations of fine sediment;
R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:76: • temporary water quality (sediment run-off, other possible emissions to water)
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:27: submission will be once application disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:40: that; “Measures will be implemented to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off and
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:32: 2 Measures will be implemented to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run -off and other
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:28: submission will be once application disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:36: contaminated water body bed sediments, trade / industrial
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:36: highly contaminated water and sediments. For both
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:38: Measures will be implemented to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off and other
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:47:Holme Beck Culvert, sediments in surface retained within the site. The remove silt and other suspended solids, as
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:53: and sediment suspended solids, as well
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:54: and sediment suspended solids, as well
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13: 2 Measures will be implemented to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off and other
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:20: d to berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments has been
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point HRA Rev B(1).PDF:8:sediment, dust, surface water run-off and other substances from entering watercourses”. Given this
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:15: and are sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the Market
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:16: there is complex of peats, estuarine and marine sediments deposited during the Holocene,
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:16: indicate changes in sedimentation due to fluctuations in relative sea level during the mid-
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:16: sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea level change.
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:26: 2 Measures will be implemented to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off and other
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:27: measures, in particular that; “Measures will be implemented to prevent sediment, dust, surface
R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:18: anticipat sediments and construction and operation
R-2023-0277-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-623-01-Data Gap Areas GQRA.pdf:433:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
R-2023-0277-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-623-01-Data Gap Areas GQRA.pdf:444:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
R-2023-0277-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-623-01-Data Gap Areas GQRA.pdf:461:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
R-2023-0277-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-623-01-Data Gap Areas GQRA.pdf:477:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
R-2023-0277-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-623-01-Data Gap Areas GQRA.pdf:496:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
R-2023-0277-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-623-01-Data Gap Areas GQRA.pdf:514:clay or other organic rich matrices. For waters this can be due to oxidants, surfactants, organic rich sediments or remediation fluids. Acceptable
R-2021-0906-CD-TSWK-STDC-LAC-ZZ-DO-PL-0001.pdf:4: will proceed by temporary shut down of the treatment plant, allowing the sediments to
R-2021-0906-CD-TSWK-STDC-LAC-ZZ-DO-PL-0001.pdf:19: backwash SF-01 and SF-02, in order to remove accumulated sediments and improve
R-2021-0906-CD-TSWK-STDC-LAC-ZZ-DO-PL-0001.pdf:29: treatment plant off, let sediments settle and connect a vacuum tanker to both of the
R-2021-0906-CD-TSWK-STDC-LAC-ZZ-DO-PL-0001.pdf:35: through the water treatment plant once sediments are settled. Tank T5 is fitted with
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:22: d to berth pocket), offshore disposal of dredged sediments has been
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:39: contaminated water body bed sediments, trade / industrial
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:42: Measures will be implemented to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off and
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:53:Gill Beck, Dabholm Beck, sediments in surface retained within the site. The remove silt and other suspended solids,
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:61: and sediment suspended solids, as well as
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:62: and sediment - Dabholm Beck, Dabholm well as capture any spills/oil
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:62: and sediment
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:66: and sediment contaminated soils are
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13: 2 Measures will be implemented to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off and other
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:27: submission will be once application disposal of dredged sediments and construction and operation of a new quay
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:31: 8 Measures will be implemented to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off and other
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:18: anticipat sediments and construction and operation
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:15: and are sedimentologically distinct from rocks of the same age to the south of the Market
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:15: there is complex of peats, estuarine and marine sediments deposited during the Holocene,
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:15: indicate changes in sedimentation due to fluctuations in relative sea level during the mid-
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:15: sediments crucial in interpreting Holocene sea level change.
R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:26: 2 Measures will be implemented to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off and other
R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:15:measures to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other
R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:15:to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other substance
R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:16:to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other substance
R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:16:to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other substance
R-2020-0465-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:103: S = Soils, Made Ground and sediments Volatile Pesticides
R-2020-0465-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:drains during the works to ensure no pollutants or sediments enter the surface water network. This will
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:35: prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other substance relating
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:35:• Contaminated liquids or sediments produced as a result of construction, i.e.
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:37: measures to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:38:prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other substance relating to
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:38:prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other substance relating to
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:39:prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other substance relating to
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:42: Teesmouth and Site clearance and remediation Loss and/or disturbance of Significant adverse Direction of sediments and contaminated No significant
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:42: and Ramsar (sediment, oil, dust) entering the within the proposed construction.
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:42: Lackenby Channel. commuting activities, and/or sediment and dust entering the River Tees
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:42: Teesmouth and Site clearance and remediation Loss and/or disturbance of Significant adverse Direction of sediments and contaminated No significant
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:42: (sediment, oil, dust) to enter the within the proposed construction and operation.
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:42: hydrological connection of the support foraging and measures to prevent sediment and dust
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:43: sediment and dust entering the Lackenby
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:43: waterbird species from development that support population sediment and dust entering The Slems and following the
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:43: Tees. prevent sediment and dust entering the River
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:44: Tees. prevent sediment and dust entering the River
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:44: Tees. prevent sediment and dust entering the River
R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:51: measures to prevent sediment, dust, surface water run-off, or any other
R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:24: sediment and standing open water and canals, present within the Teesmouth
R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:35: fine sediments do not typically support higher plants if subject to continual,
R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:35: unconsolidated sediments. The modelled increase in concentrations of NOx
R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:35: fine sediments do not typically support higher plants if subject to continual,
R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:36: unconsolidated sediments.
R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:42: preparation of a pollutants, water and sediment management protocol to
R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:42: mobilisation of, sediment
R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:50: habitat type littoral sediment are not considered to be sensitive to increased
R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:50: levels of NOx. Littoral sediment includes habitats of shingle (mobile cobbles
R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:72: sedimentary, sandstone, sandstone/mudstone, boulder
R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:72: Geomorphology and landscape lowland, coastal, floodplain, subtidal sediments (including
R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:72: sandbank/mudbank), intertidal sediments (including
R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:73:Describe the functions and values of the wetland in groundwater recharge, flood control, sediment trapping, shoreline
R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:76:and spread of Enteromorpha algal mats and water/sediment quality issues.