North East File Collection - NEFC

User Tools

Site Tools

Trace: • r-2020-0599-ad-officer_report • teesworks_-_keywords_-_mitigation
teesworks_-_keywords_-_mitigation

{include:Teesworks - keywords - menu}

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:14:Any avoidance or mitigation measures proposed, how they may be TBC

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:41: mitigation measures for implementation following assessment.

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:44: also be considered. Where necessary, mitigation measures will be recommended for

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:44:  Any mitigation (or other) CO2 emissions savings throughout the operational life of

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:48:6.52 As appropriate, the EIA will inform the design as to where mitigation measures may

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:48: will also make recommendations for possible mitigation measures to be employed by

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:53: which opportunities for ecological mitigation and enhancement will be explored fully.

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:53: impact avoidance and/ or mitigation.

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:53: predicting and characterising potential ecological impacts and mitigation measures

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:53: accordance with relevant NPS. Following the implementation of mitigation and

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:54: Proposed Development will be identified and appropriate and proportionate mitigation

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:54: will be described where necessary. Mitigation and enhancement proposals will

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:54: consider wider strategic aims and options for mitigation of development in the South

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:54: accordance with relevant NPS. Following the implementation of mitigation and

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:55: Proposed Development will be identified and appropriate and proportionate mitigation

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:55: will be described where necessary. Mitigation and enhancement proposals will

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:55: consider wider strategic aims and options for mitigation of development in the South

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:57:  the formulation of mitigation measures, such as a Construction Worker Travel Plan

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:57: residual and cumulative impacts will be provided should the proposed mitigation not

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:59:6.120 Where the assessment indicates the need for mitigation as a result of significant

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:60: level of harm to that resource. The aim will then be to propose appropriate mitigation

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:60: heritage resource, taking into account any design or embedded mitigation.

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:61:6.130 Following the impact assessment process, any potential mitigation strategies

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:61: effects remaining after mitigation will be assessed according to accepted criteria for

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:64: as a result of changes to the design, including any mitigation measures that are

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:64: beneficial and adverse effects. The mitigation measures envisaged in order to

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:65: technical reports. A table outlining the proposed mitigation measures and how

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:66:7.12 The significance of effects before and after mitigation will be evaluated with reference

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:67: deemed ‘significant’, and where possible mitigation measures will be identified to

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:67: Mitigation and Enhancement Measures

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:67:7.23 The Mitigation and Enhancement Measures section will describe the measures that

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:67: available mitigation measures are known as ‘residual effects’. These will be

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:68: Consultation is an ongoing process, which enables mitigation measures to be

EN010103-001057-NZT DCO 6.4.1 ES Vol III Appendix 1A EIA Scoping Report Part 1.pdf:70: effects are identified, mitigation measures will be described where possible to reduce

EN010103-002386-Environment Agency - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 10.pdf:3: new nutrient load direct to the SPA and mitigation to ensure nutrient

EN010103-001063-NZT DCO 6.4.27 ES Vol III Appendix 12J GCN Report.pdf:4: and mitigation.

EN010103-001063-NZT DCO 6.4.27 ES Vol III Appendix 12J GCN Report.pdf:4: present and a European Protected Species Mitigation Licence (EPSML)

EN010103-001063-NZT DCO 6.4.27 ES Vol III Appendix 12J GCN Report.pdf:13: mitigation-licence.

EN010103-002421-NZT DCO 9.42 - Comments on D9 Submissions & Additional Submissions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:16: being updated to incorporate the proposed mitigation, secured by the draft

EN010103-002421-NZT DCO 9.42 - Comments on D9 Submissions & Additional Submissions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:49: marine archaeological mitigation cannot be detailed at this stage, but a methodology

EN010103-002421-NZT DCO 9.42 - Comments on D9 Submissions & Additional Submissions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:49: setting out the broad principles and methodology of the mitigation is outlined, in

EN010103-002421-NZT DCO 9.42 - Comments on D9 Submissions & Additional Submissions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:51: inform the marine archaeological mitigation response, the survey will be carried out

EN010103-002421-NZT DCO 9.42 - Comments on D9 Submissions & Additional Submissions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:60: pandemic / HCID mitigation measures. Signatures will be required to record that all

EN010103-002421-NZT DCO 9.42 - Comments on D9 Submissions & Additional Submissions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:60: pandemic / HCID procedures, then work must not take place until further mitigation

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:10: on that site“ (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:11: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:45: appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS in cetaceans including

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:45: porpoise population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:50:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:51: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:54: report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:59: screening is considered necessary to avoid a significant effect. Mitigation for visual

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:59: General Mitigation Measures

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:59:6.1.19 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise and

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:59: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:61: processes. Based on the analysis in Appendix F and the mitigation measures above it

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:67:6.1.48 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, Flood

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:67: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include:

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:70:6.1.55 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:72:6.3.4 The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) recommends a range of mitigation

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:72: Development as good practice mitigation, which will ensure that any temporary

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:73: standard mitigation measures included as part of the JNCC Guidelines, it is concluded

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:75: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites.

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:76: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:76: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:76: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:76: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:77: Stockton-on-Tees Local Plan & Policies The Appropriate Assessment identified that the Council would produce a Recreational Mitigation

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:77: the detailed strategic development mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue.

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:77: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy.

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:77: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA / Ramsar which has been

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:77: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:78: support them. Where likely adverse impacts are identified, avoidance or appropriate mitigation

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:78: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:78: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:79: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:80: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:81: ensure adequate mitigation is in place to mitigate any potential for cumulative effects.

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:81: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:82: Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be incorporated into

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:85: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:96: Development cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:118: dB. Visual disturbance also cannot be dismissed without mitigation. Paragraph 6.1.15 lists the specific noise and visual mitigation measures to be

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:118: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.46 to 6.1.48, including the preparation of a Construction

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:118: export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity of the SPA /

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:118: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:118: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the SPA /

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:122: likely to be very low. Furthermore, there are a range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on marine life, including harbour porpoise (see

EN010103-002552-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12) (1).pdf:122: b. Mitigation measures have been identified which will ensure no mortality or significant disturbance of harbour porpoise arises, and taking into

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:30: (e) carry out or construct any mitigation works.

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:48: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance.

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:51:Flood risk mitigation

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:51:preliminary works, until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction, has, for that

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:51:mitigation of flood risk during operation has, for that part, been submitted to and, after

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:51: (6) The authorised development must not be commissioned until the flood risk mitigation has

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:53:must commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and,

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:56:the piling mitigation measures in paragraph 10.8 of Chapter 10 of the environmental statement and

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:91: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:92: (h) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:103: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:104: (h) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:112: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:112: be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if any)

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:112: to submit for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme;

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:112: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme;

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:118:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:189: submit for Northern Gas Networks’ approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme

EN010103-002080-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with (D5) August 2022) - August 2022 (D6).pdf:189: © if a subsidence mitigation scheme is required, it shall be carried out as approved (such

EN010103-002528-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:41: 3.8.29. The Requirements closely relate to the mitigation set out in the Environmental Statement

EN010103-002528-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:43: 3.8.47. Requirement 12 (Flood risk mitigation) - this is not a model provision. It provides that no

EN010103-002528-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:43: commence until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction has, for that

EN010103-002528-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:44: consultation with Natural England, a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has

EN010103-002528-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:46: risk assessment and which is consistent with the piling mitigation measures in paragraph

EN010103-002346-Natural England - Other- An update to the Examining Authority regarding topics to be discussed at Issue Specific Hearing 6 1.pdf:1:incorporate the proposed mitigation, secured by the draft Requirement at Stage 2 (Appropriate

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:10: on that site” (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:11: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:46: detonations – without appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:47: population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling and

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:53:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:53: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:57: this report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:62: screening.. Mitigation for visual disturbance risk is set out in in paragraph 6.1.22.

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:63: General Mitigation Measures

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:63:6.1.226.1.19 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:63: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:65: mitigation measures above it can be concluded that there will be no adverse effect

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:71:6.1.516.1.48 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water,

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:71: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include:

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:71:6.1.536.1.50 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:74:6.3.4 The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) recommends a range of mitigation

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:74: Development as good practice mitigation, which will ensure that any temporary

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:74: standard mitigation measures included as part of the JNCC Guidelines, it is concluded

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:76: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites.

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:77: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:77: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:77: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:77: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:78: Stockton-on-Tees Local Plan & Policies The Appropriate Assessment identified that the Council would produce a Recreational Mitigation

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:78: the detailed strategic development mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue.

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:78: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy.

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:78: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA / Ramsar which has been

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:78: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:79: or appropriate mitigation measures may be required.

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:79: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:79: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:80: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:81: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:82: mitigation is in place to mitigate any potential for cumulative effects.

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:82: Development is considered to result in LSEs alone, such that adequate mitigation to address this

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:82: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:83: Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be incorporated into

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:85: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:96: cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects on site

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:118: threshold for SPA/Ramsar birds or result in visual disturbance and paragraph 6.1.22Paragraph 6.1.15 lists the specific noise and visual mitigation measures

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:118: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.5042 to 6.1.534453, including the preparation of a Construction

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:118: export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity of the SPA /

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:118: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:118: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the SPA/ /

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:122: likely to be very low. Furthermore, there are a range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on marine life, including harbour porpoise (see

EN010103-002258-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:122: b. Mitigation measures have been identified which will ensure no mortality or significant disturbance of harbour porpoise arises, and taking into

EN010103-000886-NZT DCO 6.2.1 ES Vol I Chapter 1 Introduction.pdf:6: measures envisaged in order to Design and Impact Avoidance’ and ‘Mitigation and

EN010103-002461-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 20.pdf:19: (h) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

EN010103-002551-NZT DCO 5.4 - DAS (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:67: 12 mitigation the mitigation of flood risk during

EN010103-001787-NZT DCO 8.7 - Historic England SoCG - June 2022.pdf:11: - Approach to mitigation.

EN010103-001787-NZT DCO 8.7 - Historic England SoCG - June 2022.pdf:12: deliver land-based heritage mitigation and marine mitigation

EN010103-001787-NZT DCO 8.7 - Historic England SoCG - June 2022.pdf:12: The parties agree the measures proposed for mitigation and

EN010103-001787-NZT DCO 8.7 - Historic England SoCG - June 2022.pdf:12: The parties agree the measures proposed for mitigation and

EN010103-001787-NZT DCO 8.7 - Historic England SoCG - June 2022.pdf:12:Approach to Mitigation The Applicant agrees to update the Framework CEMP to require

EN010103-002254-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:41: 3.8.30. The Requirements closely relate to the mitigation set out in the Environmental Statement

EN010103-002254-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:44: 3.8.48. Requirement 12 (Flood risk mitigation) - this is not a model provision. It provides that no

EN010103-002254-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:44: commence until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction has, for that

EN010103-002254-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:45: consultation with Natural England, a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has

EN010103-002254-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:46: risk assessment and which is consistent with the piling mitigation measures in paragraph

EN010103-002323-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:8: that requires mitigation, including through ‘nutrient neutrality’.

EN010103-002323-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:22: introducing a new nutrient load direct to the SPA and mitigation to ensure nutrient

EN010103-002323-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:25: quantify mitigation requirements of new developments. Natural England considers

EN010103-002323-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:25: estimated, options for mitigation may be considered. Table 6.2 provides a summary

EN010103-002323-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:37: quantify mitigation requirements of new developments. Natural England considers

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:9: effect on the integrity of a habitats site that requires mitigation, including

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:11: for these eventualities. As this will constitute additional mitigation for potential

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:11: appropriate mitigation measures in their Final CEMP. Once the Final CEMP

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:12: will incorporate appropriate mitigation measures for this eventuality into the Final

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:21:on the integrity of a habitats site that requires mitigation, including through nutrient neutrality.

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:21:and where there is considerable development pressure, mitigation solutions are likely to be needed to

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:22:on site integrity test without mitigation.

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:22:Mitigation through nutrient neutrality offers a potential solution. Nutrient neutrality is an approach which

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:22:enables decision makers to assess and quantify mitigation requirements of new developments. It allows

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:22: without mitigation. This will need to be explored as part of the HRA. Nutrient neutrality is an approach

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:22: which could be used as suitable mitigation for water quality impacts for development within the

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:23:approach between Natural England and these authorities on applying nutrient neutrality as a mitigation

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:23:being implemented and mitigation is being actively progressed, authorities may need to consider the

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:23:mitigation measures (see Annex A, para 6 for mitigation options).

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:23:mitigation provisions. The need for an Appropriate Assessment of proposals that includes mitigation

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:23:The application of nutrient neutrality as mitigation for water quality effects from development has been

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:23:planning permission which applied nutrient neutrality as mitigation did not satisfy the Habitats

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:24:appropriate assessment. Mitigation will be required if an adverse effect on the integrity of the site cannot

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:26: • Mitigation options

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:27:neutrality to be an effective mitigation measure which can be relied upon to enable development to

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:28: actual nutrient losses from the development or mitigation land to be taken into account.

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:28:potential mitigation solution to enable development that would otherwise adversely affect the

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:29:6.0. Mitigation Options

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:29:Mitigation to enable development to proceed within the affected catchments of the designated sites

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:29:temporary increases in nutrients on the affected sites. Suitable mitigation measures might include

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:29:monitoring and enforcing mitigation calculated for a minimum of 80 – 125 years. It does not,

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:29:however, follow that mitigation is not needed after that period, but rather the expectation is the

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:29:mitigation will continue indefinitely (e.g. through securing appropriate permanent land use change).

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:29:may require mitigation to be maintained for a shorter period providing the Competent Authority is

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:29:certain that adverse impacts on the integrity of a habitats site will not occur after the mitigation is

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:29:may not be possible to identify mitigation which will enable the development to be nutrient neutral.

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:29:developments, then consent should only be granted where other mitigation can effectively prevent

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:29:significance of the impacts or the scope of any mitigation which may be required. For large scale

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:31:Annex C: Habitats sites in unfavourable condition and where nutrient neutrality has been identified as a potential mitigation solution

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:31:and where nutrient neutrality is being deployed as mitigation.

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:34: Situations where Nutrient Neutrality may not be an appropriate Mitigation Measure

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:34: rather than to surface water. In these circumstances the mitigation would need to be

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:35: of the development. Therefore, potential mitigation options will likely be very limited.

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:35: mitigation could be targeted to a smaller area.

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:35: mitigation can be located will be restricted to a small area, providing much more

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:35: limited and perhaps in some cases no feasible opportunities for mitigation through

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:35: nutrient neutrality, although other mitigation measures may be possible.

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:35: where mitigation can be targeted thereby limiting potential nutrient neutrality

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:35: mitigation opportunities.

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:36: – mitigation is not required mitigation is required

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:37: YES Is there certain mitigation that will ensure

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:37: YES Is there certain mitigation that would make the plan

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:37: certain mitigation which Certain strategic NO

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:37: Is there certain mitigation

EN010103-001667-Natural England - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:38:the case in question and/or through consideration of appropriate mitigation.

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:1:18.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures …………………………………………… 18-20

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:2: potential for significant effects is identified, mitigation measures and residual

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:10: ES should set out proposals for suitable mitigation.

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:11: Suitable mitigation of impacts to non-designated

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:14: mitigation measures which have been embedded within the Proposed

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:14: mitigation).

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:15: embedded mitigation, is determined using the matrix at Table 18-4, which

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:15: implementation of mitigation and after the implementation of mitigation. The

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:15: first highlights where specific mitigation may be appropriate. The second

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:16: highlights where the mitigation has been effective in reducing effects to

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:16: As such, it is important to stress that mitigation does not automatically reduce

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:21:18.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:21: been eliminated and additional mitigation measures are not required.

EN010103-000910-NZT DCO 6.2.18 ES Vol Chapter 18 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage.pdf:21:18.7.3 The scope of mitigation will be discussed and approved with the

EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf:7: survey, design options and ecological mitigation, as described in Section

EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf:12: merit retention or mitigation); and

EN010103-001119-NZT DCO 6.4.20 ES Vol III Appendix 12C Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Part 1.pdf:12: low value at the site level and which do not require retention or mitigation

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:16: embedded mitigation or impact avoidance measures included within the design of

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:16: relevant). Table 25-1 also summarises any additional mitigation measures that have

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:16: number of long-term permanent and direct effects after mitigation. These relate to

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:51: associated with generating stations and that mitigation will therefore need to be

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:57: climate change adaptation and mitigation; and coastal change and flooding.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:90: the EIA, has identified some effects that require mitigation. However, the necessary

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:90: mitigation has either been embedded within the design of the Proposed

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:90: application process, no mitigation has been identified by the Applicants, the host

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:91: III, Appendix 25A (Document Ref. 6.4) confirms how the mitigation and commitments

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:92: Development, the mitigation measures (where required) and the residual effects.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:93: mitigation is required. It is considered that the Proposed Development will have

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:95: 25A, Document Ref. 6.4) confirms how the mitigation and commitments set out in

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:95: takes account of the mitigation measures that would be implemented during the

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:95: concluded that with the identified mitigation measures in place to address

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:98: interests, including through mitigation and consideration of reasonable alternatives;

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:98: of mitigation there will be no significant adverse effects upon species or habitats.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:100: published to ensure that appropriate flood risk mitigation measures have been

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:100: water drainage and flood risk mitigation for the Proposed Development, including

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:100: while further mitigation measures will be secured through the final Construction

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:105: appropriate flood risk mitigation and landscaping and biodiversity enhancement.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:109: are low with appropriate mitigation.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:110: Section 21.5 and Table 21-30 taking account of relevant mitigation.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:111:6.2.1066.2.109 Details of flood risk mitigation will be secured by Requirement 12

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:111: ‘Flood risk mitigation’ of the draft DCO and Requirement 11 will secure details of

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:111: surface and foul water drainage (taking account of flood risk mitigation).

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:115: an assessment of risk, taking account of mitigation measures and confirms whether

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:116: impacts on people and the environment without mitigation.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:116:  With the implementation of regulatory requirements and the mitigation set out

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:116:6.2.1336.2.136 At this stage no secondary mitigation measures (i.e. additional to the

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:116: embedded mitigation within the Proposed Development) has been identified as

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:118: mitigation outlined within Chapter 8 means the construction effects of the

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:118: Chapter 11 ‘Noise and Vibration’, ES Volume I) without adequate mitigation such

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:119:6.2.1436.2.146 Chapter 23 does not identify the need for any additional mitigation

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:120:6.2.1506.2.153 Taking account of mitigation no statutory nuisance effects are

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:120: considered likely to occur as a result of the Proposed Development. Mitigation is

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:120: both embedded within the design of the Proposed Development and mitigation and

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:122: mitigation and any residual effects

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:123: mitigation methods have been applied; Development will be designed such that that process emissions to air comply

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:123: considerations will also be important ecological receptors. Therefore, mitigation measures appropriate to

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:124: secure appropriate mitigation

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:124: whether mitigation measures are

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:124: mitigation. However, the annual average impact of NOx is under the threshold to be

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:125: No additional mitigation has been identified as necessary for the construction,

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:125: the embedded mitigation measures proposed.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:125: conservation mitigation measures should be included The HRA (which includes an Appropriate Assessment) concludes that there will

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:125: mitigation measures should be included Conservation’ and 15 ‘Ornithology’ of ES Volume I. The surveys that have

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:125: geological conservation interests implementation of appropriate mitigation and monitoring.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:126: through mitigation and consideration  Aquatic ecology – no likely significant effects on species or habitats

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:126: of reasonable alternatives. taking account of mitigation.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:126: mitigation.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:126: EN-5 (Section 2.7) considers the effects supervise and instruct the implementation of the mitigation measures in the

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:126: mitigation will be limited and not significant.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:128: steam (EN-1, 5.6 Infrastructure has the potential to ecological receptors. Appropriate mitigation measures will be applied through

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:128: identified premises or locations; Taking account of mitigation no statutory nuisance effects are considered

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:128: and likely to occur as a result of the Proposed Development. Mitigation is both

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:128: embedded within the design of the Proposed Development and mitigation and

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:132: water drainage and flood risk mitigation for the Proposed Development,

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:132: permanent measures, while further mitigation measures will be secured

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:133: an archaeological interest, the be removed. However, these are considered to be of low value and mitigation

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:133: affected should be able to be be of medium value. For this asset mitigation by design is recommended by

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:133: It is proposed that the scope of mitigation is discussed with and approved by

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:135: reasonable mitigation. - South Gare Breakwater (Viewpoint 5), England Coastal Path (Viewpoint 7)

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:138: Paragraph 5.10.9 states mitigation Site and parts of the connection corridors. Some of these areas, including the

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:138: account various proposed mitigation measures for the different stages

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:138: demonstration of good design through mitigation, are set out at Table 11-35 ‘Summary of Effects’. With mitigation,

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:140: 2.20.7 outlines mitigation measures for

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:141: (paragraph 2.9.12) mitigation measures

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:142: impacts. Development, and as such, no mitigation is required. It is considered that the

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:143: be considered whether mitigation

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:143: assessment and mitigation. modes when sourcing construction materials and in particular for the delivery

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:144: applicants to include mitigation maintenance activities, when a number of contractors will be on site.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:144: acceptable levels. stages of the Proposed Development (taking account of mitigation) are

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:145: of which form part of the proposed mitigation for traffic and transport effects.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:147: EN-4, Section 2.22 deals with water provided that the embedded mitigation measures set out in Chapter 9 are

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:148: Mitigation measures (paragraph 2.22.6)

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:152: mitigation measures may include

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:153: embedded mitigation) are shown to be neutral, slight (adverse) or

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:153: designated area of geological or Mitigation and best practice measures during construction will be secured

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:162: climate change, highlights that planning plays a mitigation and landscaping and biodiversity enhancement. Neither should it be

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:163: water or noise pollution and or impacts upon the natural environment, taking account of mitigation, are either

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:163: 202). Paragraph 19489 states mitigation is included within the Application in respect of the WWI rifle range

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:166: the NPPF. mitigation and control measures.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:167: beyond development minimise impacts and appropriate mitigation and control measures are

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:175: Plan Conservation biodiversity and ornithology and marine ecology. Taking account of mitigation no

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:176: mitigation, or geological conservation as there are no nationally, regionally or locally

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:177: mitigation, or where

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:178: interest. mitigation is included within the Application in respect of the WWI rifle

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:183: part of the appropriate mitigation is included within the Application in respect of

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:194: Plan and Light pollution will be water and human health. Taking account of mitigation, the EIA has not

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:201: mitigation or impact avoidance measures included within the design of the Proposed

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:201: also summarises any additional mitigation measures that have been identified in the

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:201: number of long-term permanent and direct effects after mitigation. These relate to

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:227: ExA as being acceptable subject in some cases to suitable mitigation measures being put in place to

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:234: structure (including any associated emission plume) after mitigation.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:252: account of relevant mitigation.

EN010103-001582-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022 (Tracked).pdf:255: mitigation scheme, developers must i)

EN010103-001735-Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council - EN010103-001527-NZT-ExQ1-editable-version.pdf:15: ii) If the mitigation and enhancement measures set out in section 19.7 of the ES [APP-

EN010103-001735-Redcar & Cleveland Borough Council - EN010103-001527-NZT-ExQ1-editable-version.pdf:25: further mitigation measures to be introduced in consultation with us as required.

EN010103-002729-Response from National Grid Electricity Transmission PLC EMAIL & Attachment.pdf:2: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to

EN010103-002729-Response from National Grid Electricity Transmission PLC EMAIL & Attachment.pdf:2: for National Grid's approval a ground mitigation scheme;

EN010103-002729-Response from National Grid Electricity Transmission PLC EMAIL & Attachment.pdf:3: monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme;

EN010103-002232-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 7.pdf:7: mitigation/compensation. Without prejudice to

EN010103-001853-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:24: for providing biodiversity mitigation and

EN010103-001853-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:35: • Requirement no. 12: Flood risk mitigation • Requirement no. 3 – Detailed design

EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (13).pdf:5:effect on marine ecological or ornithological receptors following mitigation.

EN010103-001238-Natural England Net Zero Teesside NSIP Redcar_Redacted.pdf:2:project and/or to flesh out mitigation proposals and to consider compensation proposals to provide a

EN010103-001238-Natural England Net Zero Teesside NSIP Redcar_Redacted.pdf:5:2.4. Further to the mitigation measures identified within the HRA to minimise the potential for noise

EN010103-001238-Natural England Net Zero Teesside NSIP Redcar_Redacted.pdf:5: Nature Conservation Committee mitigation measures for piling and geophys surveys

EN010103-001238-Natural England Net Zero Teesside NSIP Redcar_Redacted.pdf:5: mitigation strategy to ensure best practice is followed. This guidance is available here:

EN010103-001238-Natural England Net Zero Teesside NSIP Redcar_Redacted.pdf:6:5.1. Additional mitigation or compensation strategies may be required depending on the outcome of

EN010103-001238-Natural England Net Zero Teesside NSIP Redcar_Redacted.pdf:6: Environment Management Plan containing details of all environmental mitigation measures to be

EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:10: Mitigation including piling restrictions.

EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:16: measures outlined as embedded mitigation in Chapters 12 to 15

EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:16: are appropriate and that mitigation measures that would be

EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:17: until a scheme of protection and mitigation measures have been

EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:17: It is agreed that with the identified mitigation measures in place to

EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:18: and that the design and impact avoidance and mitigation

EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:19: demonstrates that the proposed mitigation measures are

EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:21: Development and that the impact avoidance and mitigation

EN010103-002069-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Tracked) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:22: It is agreed that the mitigation and management measures

EN010103-001590-NZT DCO 8.9 - NGG SoCG - May 2022.pdf:9: land contamination, flood risk or other required surveys and mitigations that may be

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:2:Table 9C- 33: Tees Estuary (S Bank) – Mitigation Measures Assessment …………. 103

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:5:9.1.19 A number of mitigation features are incorporated into the design of the

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:5: possible mitigation and monitoring options to alleviate adverse effects; and

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:7: mitigation measures identified by the Environment Agency.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:9: mitigation measures may be required to address these failing waterbodies.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:12: consideration embedded mitigation (measures that can reasonably be

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:12: mitigation (measures that would occur with or without input from the WFD

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:12: ─ A description of any additional mitigation that is required (if applicable)

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:14: deterioration that does not affect the overall against mitigation measures

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:14: Consideration will be given to mitigation

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:14: mitigation measures such as habitat creation

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:15: the ecological potential of a surface water body and the mitigation measures

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:15: Proposed Development are based on mitigation measures defined in the 2015

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:18: and any mitigation measures proposed to meet Good Ecological Potential;

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:18: require assessment of WFD compliance, or where mitigation or further

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:20: necessary mitigation.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:20: unacceptable physical impacts (without mitigation) on water bodies. Details

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:20: of this mitigation and best practice standards are described later in this

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:23:254] WFD Mitigation Measures: The proposal does not effluent whatsoever to Tees Estuary (Tees transitional WFD

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:23:not jeopardise the delivery of mitigation measures aiming and returned to the Tees Bay outfall). There is also potential

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:24:WFD Mitigation Measures:. The Proposed Development will no longer discharge any

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:24:jeopardise the delivery of mitigation measures aiming to waterbody). There is now only one option being taken forward

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:24:The Applicant should have regard to the mitigation WwTW and returned to the Tees Bay outfall).

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:24:more of a focus on chemical pollution risks. The EA construction phase mitigation section of Section 9.7 of this

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:33:Mitigation Measures: Details of mitigation measures for this waterbody were requested from the Environment Agency but none were provided.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:34:Mitigation Measures: Details of mitigation measures for this waterbody were requested from the Environment Agency but none were provided.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:34:Mitigation Measures: The Environment Agency have outlined mitigation measures to improve this waterbody. These are listed In Annex A Table A4 and include re-opening of culverts,

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:34:structures to improve ecology. None of the mitigation measures are currently in place, except for water level management.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:44: effect on the integrity of a habitats site that requires mitigation, including

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:48: mitigation, and the maintenance of those mitigating solutions. However,

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:55: Ecological Potential. There are currently no mitigation measures identified in

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:55: Protected Areas assessment). However, there are currently no mitigation

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:64: Ecological Potential. There are currently no mitigation measures identified in

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:70: mitigation measures from being implemented.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:71: environmental impacts may occur, if appropriate mitigation is not applied:

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:73: Construction Phase Mitigation

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:73: available good practice at that point in time. The principles of the mitigation

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:73: provide greater detail regarding the mitigation to be implemented to protect

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:73: by the adoption of the general mitigation measures which are outlined in the

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:74:9.7.19 Additional good practice guidance for mitigation to protect the water

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:75: unavoidable, in which case mitigation measures will be implemented to

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:77:9.7.23 Construction phase mitigation measures in relation to the hydrogeological

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:81:9.7.45 Key mitigation measures for minimising breakout (frac out) include:

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:81:9.7.46 These mitigation measures will be outlined in a detailed Bbreakout / Ffrack

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:81: programme to ensure that mitigation measures are operating as planned and

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:82:9.7.53 Overall, given that the construction phase mitigation measures described

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:83:9.7.54 If appropriate mitigation measures are implemented as described in

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:83: ‘Construction Phase Mitigation’ above, including water quality monitoring and

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:83: through the mitigation measures outlined above. As previously described,

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:83: outfall tunnel. Overall, this impact is considered minor given the mitigation

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:85: the mitigation (including use of a cofferdam to minimise dispersion of

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:85: sandeel. Taking into consideration the design mitigation, the resultant nature

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:87: drainage system. Given this mitigation, any residual impact would be

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:87: Tees Estuary. However, this risk is considered minor given the mitigation

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:87: appropriate mitigation measures are implemented as described in

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:87: ‘Construction Phase Mitigation’ above, including water quality monitoring,

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:88: drainage system. Given this mitigation, any residual impact would be

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:88:9.7.85 If appropriate mitigation measures are implemented as described in

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:88: ‘Construction Phase Mitigation’ above, including water quality monitoring,

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:89: given the mitigation outlined above, including best practice measures in the

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:89: mitigated. However, given the implementation of the best practise mitigation

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:89: described in ‘Construction Phase Mitigation’ above, including the Final

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:90: during HDD works, and best practice mitigation would be applied as outlined

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:90:9.7.93 With the implementation of the mitigation measures to be described in the

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:90: may occur, if appropriate mitigation is not applied:

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:90: Operation Phase Mitigation

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:90:9.7.95 A number of mitigation features would be incorporated into the design of the

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:96: appropriate measures as summarised in ‘Operation Phase Mitigation’ above.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:97: drainage system are outlined above under ‘Operation Phase Mitigation’.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:106: As outlined above in ‘Operation Phase Mitigation’ process water from the

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:111: bunded as outlined in ‘Operation Phase Mitigation’ above to prevent spread

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:112: Mitigation Measures / Reasons for not Achieving Good

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:112: although nNo mitigation measures have been provided by the Environment

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:112:9.7.192 The Environment Agency has provided mitigation measures for the Tees

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:112: implementation of these mitigation measures. It is concluded that the

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:112: mitigation measures.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:112:Mitigation Physical Local and Central It is proposed to use the existing water

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:116:Table 9C-3233: Tees Estuary (S Bank) – Mitigation Measures Assessment

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:116:Mitigation Measure Option Mitigation Measure Appraisal

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:116: mitigation measure

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:116: this mitigation measure.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:117:Mitigation Measure Option Mitigation Measure Appraisal

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:117: this mitigation measure.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:117:vegetation control technique implemented prevent this mitigation measure from

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:117:(vegetation control) implemented prevent this mitigation measure from

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:117: mitigation measure from being

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:117: implemented prevent this mitigation measure from

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:117:minimises habitat impact implemented prevent this mitigation measure from

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:117:prevents sediment transfer implemented prevent this mitigation measure from

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:117: mitigation measures described in the

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:117: effectively prevent this mitigation measure from

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:118:Mitigation Measure Option Mitigation Measure Appraisal

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:118: implemented prevent this mitigation measure from

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:118:channel morphological implemented prevent this mitigation measure from

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:118: this mitigation measure.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:118: mitigation measure.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:120: provided that the outlined mitigation measures are implemented.

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:120: groundwater body, provided that the outlined mitigation measures are

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:121:9.8.5 During construction, mThese mitigation measures include best practiscee to

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:124:Mitigation Measures Assessment Moderate or less

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:125:Mitigation Measures Assessment Moderate or Less

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:128:Mitigation Measures Assessment Moderate or Less

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:129:Table A4 Tees Estuary (S Bank) – Mitigation Measures

EN010103-002424-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:129:Mitigation Measure Option Mitigation Measure screening & status

EN010103-002046-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:41: 3.8.30. 3.8.32.The Requirements closely relate to the mitigation set out in the Environmental

EN010103-002046-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:44: 3.8.48. 3.8.50.Requirement 12 (Flood risk mitigation) - this is not a model provision. It provides that

EN010103-002046-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:44: commence until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction has, for that

EN010103-002046-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:45: until, after consultation with Natural England, a scheme of protection and mitigation

EN010103-002046-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:46: informed by a risk assessment and which is consistent with the piling mitigation measures

EN010103-002053-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Tracked - August 2022(D6).pdf:64: 12 mitigation the mitigation of flood risk during

EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:3:appropriate mitigation / compensation has not been considered.

EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:4:design stage, mitigation measures and/or compensation must be included to

EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:12:Operational Mitigation

EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:12:With reference to section 10.8.4 (Operational Mitigation) we acknowledge the

EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:14:gas corridor and electrical connection corridor. We welcome the mitigation

EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:15:demonstrate and provide assurances that landfill containment mitigation

EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:18:understood and therefore appropriate mitigation / compensation has not been

EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:19:possible. However, if this is not possible, appropriate mitigation will be required.

EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:19:detailed design stage, mitigation measures and/or compensation must be

EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:19:This assessment, and any necessary mitigation, will be secured through

EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:19:Issue: Section 14.5.19 sets out specific mitigation measures related to the

EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:23:WFD Mitigation Measures

EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:23:compliant with the WFD objectives. It also states that a number of mitigation

EN010103-001246-EA_NZT_OFFICIAL_171221_Redacted.pdf:23:delivery of mitigation measures aiming to attain WFD objectives, in particular DIN.

EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:16: impact avoidance measures outlined as embedded mitigation in

EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:16: the start of examination and that all mitigation measures that

EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:16: It is agreed that mitigation measures are included across both

EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:17: make appropriate recommendations for mitigation. It is agreed

EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:17: that mitigation measures are included in the draft DCO

EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:17: Risk Mitigation). It is agreed that the inclusion of these

EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:17: are appropriate to ensure that appropriate mitigation is

EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:17: Mitigation of adverse impacts on the water environment during

EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:18: mitigation measures proposed in Chapter 14 Marine Ecology

EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:18:mitigation for piling percussive/impact piling might be necessary to drive the pile to

EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:18: mitigation measures for piling shall be adopted during

EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:18: mitigation standard, the MMO are a consultee for this activity.

EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:58: mitigation; by way of example, for the piling at the intake –

EN010103-001586-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - May 2022.pdf:59: approach to the intake cofferdam piling and mitigation, are

EN010103-001104-NZT DCO 6.4.17 ES Vol III Appendix 11B Operational Noise Information.pdf:4: embedded mitigation, therefore it has been necessary to adjust the data

EN010103-001104-NZT DCO 6.4.17 ES Vol III Appendix 11B Operational Noise Information.pdf:7: included significant embedded mitigation; therefore, it has been

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:31:mitigation actions. Through these reviews, our of actions taken by management, are provided

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:31:change risk and incorporated the physical which we are continuously monitoring. controls and any additional mitigation actions,

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:32: and additional mitigations as reviewed by

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:33:Our operational principal risks have a low inherent likelihood of occurring. However, should an event occur, without effective prevention or mitigation

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:34: Asset failure We continue to focus on risk mitigation Embedded Group-wide process safety

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:35:considered the preventative and mitigating Mitigation actions Where a risk scenario would potentially exceed our financial risk capacity, we consider

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:35:controls and risk management actions in place reasonable management mitigation.

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:77:distinct elements: adaptation and mitigation child risks. This has enabled greater alignment to our strategic objectives. The adaptation activity, absorbed

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:77:standalone mitigation risk is aligned to our strategic objective, ‘enable the energy transition for all’. This has generated greater oversight, focus and

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:77: leadership of climate change within 2. Climate change mitigation risk

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:77: the energy sector. The mitigation risk relates to our Group-wide strategy for climate change including our

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:77:considering, and where necessary, adopting an individual adaptation and mitigation child risk. As WPD is new to the Group, we are still in the process

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:80:principal risk (mitigation) have evolved in line with resilience and changing environment, and the internal crisis management tool to respond

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:84: incidents and changing long-term hardening across the Group, with hardening, vegetation management, flood mitigation, side tap

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:85: change mitigation and adaptation objectives of

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:85: mitigation objective’s alignment to the principles

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:105: implementation of management’s Financial Position and Prospects Risk Mitigation Plan.

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:105:disclosure matters mitigation of business conduct issues as part of the controls framework.

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:118: • Successfully ensured the mitigation of all stranded costs resulting from the portfolio transactions

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:204:Main risks Description and mitigation

EN010103-002630-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6 - NG - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:287: greenhouse gas emissions mitigation, adaptation eliminating the disincentive a utility otherwise

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:121:Contractual arrangements are structured so as to maximize the risk mitigation benefits of netting between transactions wherever possible

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:182: mitigation actions or compensation, measure their satisfaction and

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:273:mainly include preventive measures but can also include mitigation from its operated Activities. In 2021, worldwide greenhouse gas (GHG)

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:277:preventive measures but can also include mitigation measures. They

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:278: identified and assessed, and prevention or mitigation measures are

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:285: The findings of the assessments and the implementation of the is to help identify improvements or useful additional mitigations. In

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:285: mitigation measures identified have been discussed with national and addition, a dialogue was initiated in 2020 with representatives of the

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:303:MITIGATION AND PREVENTIVE ACTIONS

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:330:mitigation and how they address their exposure to climate risk. Glenn

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:404: preventive measures but can also include mitigation measures. They protection checks, ground or aerial surveillance or in line inspections.

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:408: are identified and assessed, and prevention or mitigation measures external. Furthermore, in view of its activities and exposure,

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:423:Committee. If the level of risk requires it, they are subject to mitigation performance and that of its customers.

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:428: which is to identify the economic activities considered as sustainable, to climate change mitigation or climate change adaptation. It also

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:428: – climate change mitigation;

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:428: – complies with technical screening criteria that have been established objectives - climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation -

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:430: mitigation objective. of the delegated regulation (EU) 2021/2139 of 4 June 2021, in

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:431: substantial contribution to the objective of climate change mitigation from fossil fuel feedstock.

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:464: corruption and taking the appropriate mitigation measures. This process

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:482: risk analyses and if it describes mitigation strategies that are adapted

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:591: the appropriate mitigation measures. This process is performed by the relevant business people with

EN010103-001604-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 5 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – TOTAL GAS & POWER CHARTERING LIMITED.pdf:595: needed. These mainly include preventive measures but can also include mitigation measures. They

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:39:change mitigation potential of different blue hydrogen the CO2-containing gas streams present in the hydrogen

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:41:The evaluation of any methane-based mitigation option, in this

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:41:targets envisaged when evaluating climate mitigation options. Figure 1: Impacts on climate change associated with the production of NG-based

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:43:change mitigation shifts from long-term stabilization to carving If these conditions are not met, then green hydrogen should be

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:60: view of possible coordinated mitigation and restoration measures…’

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:61:As the TCA refers to ‘possible’ coordinated mitigation and restoration measures, this suggests that both

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:100: need for mitigation approaches to limit warming in both the near term (<2050) and Significance

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:100: in the context of near-term and long-term climate mitigation, as well as the net effect of This study clarifies the need for

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:100: governmental Panel on Climate Change radiative forcing, we show that the net histori- mitigation approaches to address

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:100: non-CO2 climate forcers emitted by non-FF sources. We find that mitigation measures gases (GHGs) are responsible for

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:100: tion with additional mitigation measures targeting short-lived climate pollutants and

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:100: avoids the 2 °C threshold altogether. These non-CO2 targeted measures when com- pollutants, in climate mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:100: demonstrates the need for a comprehensive CO2 and targeted non-CO2 mitigation non-FF-related sources, we find

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:100: climate mitigation j short-lived climate pollutants j fossil fuel radiative forcing j near-term warming j

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:100: preindustrial temperature (1), these impacts are being felt sooner and more intensely decarbonization with mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:101: focus of climate mitigation actions. The science of non-CO2 and aerosols (warming and cooling) in the context of the need

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:101: warming pollutants dates back to 1975 with the discovery of for near-term and long-term climate mitigation, and second,

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:101: lutants in climate mitigation, their contribution to warming as ozone precursors, CFCs, hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs),

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:101: Working Group III (WGIII: Mitigation of Climate Change), O3 precursors) and National Oceanic and Atmospheric

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:101: ambiguous in many mitigation studies due to study design, two examples, all of which adopt IPCC WGI estimates. 1)

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:101: CO2 mitigation and reduction in cooling aerosol emissions

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:101: (O3)—but these have not captured the attention of global mitigation from 1970 to 2010 significantly underrepresents the nearly

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:102: sider all sources of climate forcing when assessing mitigation approximately the same as GHG forcing due to non-FF sources.

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:102: tial effects of mitigation measures by source and implications for individual species from aerosol–cloud interaction (ERFaci) con-

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:103: Accurately attributing past warming is key to mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:103: ception is understandable: Our model shows that out of the cations of such unmasking for near- and long-term mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:103: magnitude of warming by non-CO2 GHGs coincidentally can- Mitigation Strategies in Time: Decarbonization

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:103: cels the cooling by all (FF & non-FF sources) aerosols (45–47) and Targeted Mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:103: climate mitigation. tions in non-FF pollutants (43). Few studies, however, have

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:104: mitigation scenario (such as the marker version of SSP1-1.9), compared to 0.1 to 0.4 °C in AR6. The impact of SLCP reduc-

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:104: tion-related mitigation targeting non-CO2 pollutants? We answer N2O reductions in our adapted mitigation scenario. Our meth-

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:104: this question by explicitly accounting for the associated reduc- ane mitigation benefit of ∼0.2 °C by 2050 is smaller than the

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:104: each mitigation approach. As described in SI Appendix, we use (38), suggesting that the sensitivity of RXM to methane is

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:104: scenario to quantify the nondecarbonization mitigation potential In contrast, pairing decarbonization with mitigation meas-

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:104: from methane and BC. This includes mitigation measures target- ures targeting CH4, BC, HFC, and N2O (not an SLCP due to

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:104: a reference case and SSP1-1.9 as the mitigation case, but do Pairing decarbonization measures with targeted measures can

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:104: avoided warming of 0.3 °C by 2040 from SLCP mitigation to be detected (57) over a decade earlier (∼2047) than

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:105: the SSP database (49) for reference scenario (SSP3-7.0), decarbonization-driven mitigation scenario (this study), and an “decarb+targeted” scenario including

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:105: aggressive decarbonization and targeted SLCP mitigation (adapted from SSP1-1.9). Historical curve (past simulated warming) is from figure SPM8.a (47, 64).

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:105: (B) Rate of warming (degrees Celsius per decade) in the reference SSP3, decarbonization only, and “decarb+targeted” mitigation cases.

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:105: thirds of non-CH4-induced ozone mitigation is also due to aerosols (58), 2) the future changes of background cloud field due

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:105: Fig. 3A shows that combining targeted mitigation strategies

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:105: bonization alone breaches 2.0 °C in 2045 in our scenario. hensive and inclusive CO2 and non-CO2 mitigation approach

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:105: The largest uncertainties in our analysis relate to the mitigation of non-CO2 pollutants, in particular SLCPs, and their role in

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:105: pathways chosen, both the reference limited climate policy sce- climate mitigation has been underappreciated due to misper-

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:105: nario and the low-emission mitigation scenarios. While current ception arising from inconsistencies between IPCC WGI and

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:105: mitigation policy focused on FF decarbonization alone versus tion due to coincidental cancelling of warming and cooling

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:106: By 2100, absent climate policy, FF will be the largest source Adopting a comprehensive mitigation approach that pairs

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:106: Pairing decarbonization with targeted SLCP mitigation in the “decarb+targeted” scenario analyzed here, would avoid

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:106: avoided warming from methane mitigation by 2050, less than Campbell, and Trina Thorbjornsen for research assistance.

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:106: half of SLCP mitigation potential, and none of the reductions

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:106: 2. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and 20. J. Rogelj et al., Disentangling the effects of CO2 and short-lived climate forcer mitigation. Proc.

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:106: 3. S. C. Herring et al., Explaining extreme events of 2016 from a climate perspective. Bull. Am. 21. J. Rogelj et al., “Mitigation pathways compatible with 1.5°C in the context of sustainable

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:106: 11. V. Ramanathan, Greenhouse effect due to chlorofluorocarbons: Climatic implications. Science 190, 26. S. C. Jackson, Climate change. Parallel pursuit of near-term and long-term climate mitigation.

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:106: Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the 30. Y. Xu, V. Ramanathan, Well below 2 °C: Mitigation strategies for avoiding dangerous to

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:106: 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report 33. IPCC, “Summary for policymakers” in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change.

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:107: 30–32 (2018). 53. C. M. McKenna, A. C. Maycock, P. M. Forster, C. J. Smith, K. B. Tokarska, Stringent mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:107: century. Nat. Geosci. 2, 294–300 (2009). after emission mitigation. Nat. Commun. 11, 3261 (2020).

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:117:Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is a climate change mitigation system with

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:117:the technology transfers into carbon mitigation, but progress on this has been slow

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:117:over the past decade 4. If CCS is to have a meaningful role in mitigation,

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:118:strategies for meeting climate change mitigation targets. This includes the

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:118:The mitigation potential of CCS for fossil fuel power generation in the energy sector

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:127:projects integrating CCS, whether for emissions mitigation or as an inherent stage of

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:127:mitigation. Hence, EOR is so far one of the economically feasible ways to capture and

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:130:delivered by CCS Infrastructure. Given the prominence of CCS in most mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:132:its contribution to mitigation at a given time are therefore of particular importance.

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:132:mitigation target of over 55% relative to 1990 by 2030 and the UK recently updated its

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:132:Anderson et al suggests that mitigation rates in countries such as the UK should be

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:141:2. Rogelj, J., et al. Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5°C in the Context of Sustainable

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:141:8. Anderson K., J.F. Broderick, and I. Stoddard, A factor of two: how the mitigation plans of

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:146: 2 Mitigation……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………9

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:149: assessment, mitigation and reporting1 in statutory

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:149: Change Mitigation and EIA overarching principles (as

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:150: Mitigation has taken a much more prominent

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:150: significance determination). Instead, mitigation the associated required pace of reductions9. This critical

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:150: to deliver proportionate EIAs. Mitigation is addressed project developers and stakeholders often asking: ‘what

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:151: maximising GHG emissions savings. GHG reductions are GHG mitigation measures are built in rather than bolted

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:151: likely to be greater if mitigation is considered at project on at a later stage, refer to IEMA’s EIA guide on Shaping

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:151: The need to ensure that GHG mitigation measures are

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:151: mitigation measures to be identified and implemented

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:151: the proposed project. To ensure that GHG mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:152: • Early mitigation is a key aspect of an EIA as

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:152: Mitigation it enables maximum GHG reduction

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:152: MITIGATION

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:152: Hierarchy? • PAS 2080, EIA GHG emissions mitigation and IEMA GHG

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:152: hierarchy provide a structure for effective mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:152: Mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:152: determined mitigation measures should be proposed

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:153: II – Mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:153: 2.1 Early design mitigation • Management of transport and travel demands

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:153: Mitigation should be considered at all stages of design

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:153: 2.2 Mitigation hierarchy

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:153: coordinator’ within the design team, who focuses on For EIA GHG emissions mitigation, PAS 2080 also

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:153: GHG mitigation is best achieved by taking a planned and

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:153: EIA to identify opportunities that direct GHG mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:153: mitigations listed in IEMA’s GHG Management Hierarchy, new construction required

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:153: reporting provides an example list of GHG mitigation technologies, materials and products) to minimise

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:154: as ‘Compensate’ in Figure 3) in the mitigation hierarchy. any residual emissions neutralised through offsets.

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:155: After following the mitigation hierarchy, projects can

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:155: effects, mitigation and compensation (if required)

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:156: • The transboundary nature of the impact stage, proposed mitigation measures that the developer

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:157: be determined and strategies for mitigation. These are

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:157: • Whether mitigation has already been agreed with the topic specialists may also reveal parallel activities where

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:158: mitigation strategies.

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:159: Accuracy 6. Consider mitigation opportunities and repeat steps 4

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:161: therefore contribute to climate change mitigation. Their

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:166: Step 6: Mitigation opportunities

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:166: (as discussed in Section 5.3, Step 4), mitigation measures

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:166: mitigation measures that are committed to need to be

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:166: mitigation measures, and new emissions calculations

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:166: where mitigation measures are agreed early in the design

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:167: IEMA’s 2010 principles on climate change mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:167: 30 IEMA (2010) Climate Change Mitigation & EIA. Available at: https://www.iema.net/document-download/33006

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:169: A project that follows a ‘business-as-usual’ or ‘do A project that achieves emissions mitigation that

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:170: significant effects by incorporating mitigation measures

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:171: committed mitigation represents best endeavours, to Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and transition risk

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:174: 6.5 Embedded or committed mitigation 6.6 Additional mitigation and residual effects

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:174: committed mitigation measures that form part of the effects, additional mitigation should be considered

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:174: mitigation to be considered and embedded at the As a matter of good practice, available mitigation to

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:174: As noted above, where there is embedded mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:174: Where embedded/committed mitigation is relied upon in the form of project commitments to GHG emission

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:174: clear judgement that this mitigation is: the project design at the time of assessment, further

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:174: 1. Evidenced in the design for the project detail of the potential mitigation measures to achieve

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:174: additional mitigation section and assessment of residual

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:174: 3. Realistic and achievable to deliver incorporation of additional mitigation, must be expressed

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:174: In some cases, mitigation commitments (especially in on the additional mitigation recommendations being

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:174: additional mitigation measures as set out above] and

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:174: be stated without this mitigation, and it should then fall the residual effect could be [reduced to not significant /

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:174: into the assessment of additional mitigation and residual negligible / beneficial]”.

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:175: When reporting on GHG emissions and mitigation in EIA,

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:175: • Further mitigation: the GHG reductions that could

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:175: mitigation (this will be expressed conditionally and

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:175: and demolition) to effects taking account the further mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:184: 1.6 Mitigation and Compensation Measures ……………………………………………….. 55

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:184: 1.6.1 Mitigation and Compensation Measures: In a nutshell ………………. 57

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:188:(Mitigation Measures) adverse effects on the environment

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:207: Mitigation or Compensation Measures, i.e. features or measures to avoid, prevent or reduce,

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:208: to the decision such as Mitigation, Compensation, and Monitoring Measures (Article 8a).

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:212: Alternatives, identification of Mitigation and Compensation Measures, as well as monitoring

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:221: Climate change – both mitigation and adaptation;

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:221: Climate change mitigation: this considers the impact the Project will have on climate change,

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:222:Climate change mitigation: Project impacts on climate change

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:223: Integration of climate change mitigation considerations into EIAs

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:223:The effective assessment of impacts on climate change mitigation within EIAs is heavily dependent

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:230: Directive, by adding the following factors in particular: climate change – both mitigation and

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:235:unfeasibility of the Project. In this regard, the costs of the Mitigation/Compensation Measures may

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:238:1.6 MITIGATION AND COMPENSATION MEASURES

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:238:as ‘Mitigation Measures’, with the exception of the last action, offsetting, which can be considered to

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:239:Directive references ‘mitigation and compensation measures’, noting that such measures should be

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:239:When considering Alternatives, such Mitigation Measures might influence how Alternatives are

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:239:Mitigation or Compensation Measure that reduces the impact of the Alternative. In addition, by

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:239:considering Mitigation Measures when considering all Alternatives, even feasible Alternatives may

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:239:Different types of Mitigation Measures act in different ways to reduce adverse impacts:

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:239:Box 34: Types of Mitigation Measures

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:240:Mitigation and Compensation Measures are assessed on the basis of how effective they are in reducing

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:240:identify risk management approaches and technologies that may be in turn be suggested as Mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:240: 1.6.1 Mitigation and Compensation Measures: In a nutshell

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:240: Mitigation and Compensation Measures should be considered when assessing Alternatives, both

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:240: Both Mitigation and Compensation Measures may be costly, and may influence the choice of

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:240: Mitigation and Compensation Measures may apply to both the construction and operational

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:240: A description of Mitigation and Compensation Measures for significant adverse effects must be

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:241: Recital 35 of the 2014 Directive amending the EIA Directive: ‘Member States should ensure that mitigation and compensation measures

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:243: (Habitats Directive) In particular, the monitoring of Mitigation or Compensation Measures will help

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:244:impacts will be, as well as the complexity of any Mitigation and Compensation Measures

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:245: ensure that any Mitigation or Compensation Measures for expected significant effects are carried

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:245: proposed Mitigation Measures, then additional measures may be proposed within the EIA Report.

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:246: impacts (nature, extent and magnitude), scope for mitigation, proposed Mitigation/Compensation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:246: Makes a commitment to mitigation (with a programme) and to monitoring;

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:247:include the description of the Project, the significant effects, Mitigation Measures, Monitoring

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:247: environment, the effects of the Project on the environment, the proposed Mitigation Measures, and the

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:270: Description of Mitigation and Compensation Measures;

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:278: Mitigation measures) ?

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:285: that all Mitigation Measures proposed have

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:287:4.13 Are Mitigation Measures considered in the

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:287: assessment of Alternatives? (more on mitigation in

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:288: SECTION 5 DESCRIPTION OF MITIGATION

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:288: potential for the mitigation of these effects

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:288:5.3 Have any proposed mitigation strategy’s

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:288:5.4 If the effect of Mitigation Measures on the

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:288: commitment to implement the mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:288: proposed or acknowledged that the Mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:288:5.6 Do the Mitigation Measures cover both the

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:288: proposed mitigation been explained?

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:288: implementation of mitigation including roles,

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:288:5.9 Where the mitigation of significant adverse

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:288: mitigation, have the reasons for this been

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:288: approaches to mitigation, including measures

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:288:Other Questions on Mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:289: SECTION 5 DESCRIPTION OF MITIGATION

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:290: duplication, monitoring of Mitigation Measures

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:291: environment, the proposed Mitigation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:299:demonstrate that first all practicable Mitigation Measures are taken to reduce the impact. Secondly, it

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:301:would be relevant for the establishment of Alternatives and Mitigation as well as Compensation

EN010103-001652-Climate Emergency Policy and Planning - Written Representations.pdf:302:for instance impacts related to risks of major accidents and disasters, Mitigation, and climate change

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:1:10.8 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures …………………………………………… 10-38

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:6: proposed mitigation measures must meet the

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:9: provide mitigation measures that would be of the likely

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:12: Resources are assessed against potential Impacts, Effects and Mitigation

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:19: mitigation measures have been applied. Effects after mitigation are referred

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:19: mitigation measures.

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:27: Assessment of Potential Impacts and Effects and Mitigation and

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:28: assessment of Impacts, Effects and identified Mitigation Measures are

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:28: implemented (i.e. they are 'embedded mitigation').

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:29: Further detail on mitigation and enhancement measures is presented in

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:35: the Site (without mitigation) include the following:

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:35: Remediation and construction phase effects (inclusive of mitigation) are

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:37: The potential impacts (without mitigation) that could arise during the

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:39: development so that appropriate mitigation measures can be taken.

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:39:10.8 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:39: Where the Effect is determined to be Moderate or higher mitigation measures

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:39: are required. Mitigation measures are summarised in the next section and

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:39: Construction Mitigation

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:39: Construction phase mitigation measures in relation to the geological and

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:42: Operational Mitigation

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:42: Mitigation measures relating to the operational risks identified previously in

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:42: Decommissioning Mitigation

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:44: effects (inclusive of mitigation) are shown to be Neutral/Slight (adverse).

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:45:Development Aspect / Resource Impact Magnitude of Mitigation measure Residual Nature

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:45: 14) mitigation

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:46:Development Aspect / Resource Impact Magnitude of Mitigation measure Residual Nature

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:46: 14) mitigation

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:47:Development Aspect / Resource Impact Magnitude of Mitigation measure Residual Nature

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:47: 14) mitigation

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:48:Development Aspect / Resource Impact Magnitude of Mitigation measure Residual Nature

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:48: 14) mitigation

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:49:Development Aspect / Resource Impact Magnitude of Mitigation measure Residual Nature

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:49: 14) mitigation

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:50:Development Aspect / Resource Impact Magnitude of Mitigation measure Residual Nature

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:50: 14) mitigation

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:50: Secondary Aquifer Pile mitigation measures as above.

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:50: – Undifferentiated Pile mitigation measures as above.

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:51:Development Aspect / Resource Impact Magnitude of Mitigation measure Residual Nature

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:51: 14) mitigation

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:52:Development Aspect / Resource Impact Magnitude of Mitigation measure Residual Nature

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:52: 14) mitigation

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:53:Development Aspect / Resource Impact Magnitude of Mitigation measure Residual Nature

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:53: 14) mitigation

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:54:Development Aspect / Resource Impact Magnitude of Mitigation measure Residual Nature

EN010103-000902-NZT DCO 6.2.10 ES Vol I Chapter 10 Geology and Contaminated Land.pdf:54: 14) mitigation

EN010103-002427-NZT-R17-Nov-2022.pdf:2: deterioration of the WFD Water Bodies, mitigation measures must be implemented.

EN010103-002427-NZT-R17-Nov-2022.pdf:2: b) Is the EA now in a position to confirm that, allowing for mitigation, there would

EN010103-002427-NZT-R17-Nov-2022.pdf:3: d) Is the EA satisfied that the Requirement secures any mitigation measures that

EN010103-002629-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 5 - Equinor - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:100:result of material losses or loss of life due to such attacks. prevention and mitigation controls, such as social distancing

EN010103-002629-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 5 - Equinor - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:112:summary of our climate-related risk factors is provided in framework. The precautionary approach and mitigation

EN010103-002629-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 5 - Equinor - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:221:Equinor uses risk mitigation tools to reduce or control credit risk both on a counterparty and portfolio level. The main tools include bank

EN010103-002629-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 5 - Equinor - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:340: • Climate Change mitigation*

EN010103-002629-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 5 - Equinor - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:340:disclosed), 10 (climate change mitigation) and 11 (climate • Protection of water EN010103-002629-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 5 - Equinor - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:340: change mitigation and climate change adaption. EN010103-002629-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 5 - Equinor - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:342:mitigation and climate change adaption in the EU Taxonomy. facilities that produce electricity from wind power. Equinor is EN010103-Advice-00010-1-FINAL_210621 - Net Zero Teeside Meeting Note.pdf:2: mitigation measures required to facilitate the delivery of abnormal loads should be EN010103-Advice-00010-1-FINAL_210621 - Net Zero Teeside Meeting Note.pdf:2: mitigation measures are required to facilitate abnormal loads and any resultant EN010103-Advice-00010-1-FINAL_210621 - Net Zero Teeside Meeting Note.pdf:3: unclear whether any additional flood mitigation/compensation (for example EN010103-Advice-00010-1-FINAL_210621 - Net Zero Teeside Meeting Note.pdf:17: mitigation measures required to facilitate the considering worst case ship movements and any 6.2.16) paragraphs 16.2.20, 16.6.10 EN010103-Advice-00010-1-FINAL_210621 - Net Zero Teeside Meeting Note.pdf:17: whether any mitigation measures are required to EN010103-Advice-00010-1-FINAL_210621 - Net Zero Teeside Meeting Note.pdf:20: mitigation/compensation (for example met. 9.6.80 EN010103-Advice-00010-1-FINAL_210621 - Net Zero Teeside Meeting Note.pdf:21: • Clarity on the mitigation measures EN010103-002248-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:8: that requires mitigation, including through ‘nutrient neutrality’. EN010103-002248-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: nutrient load direct to the SPA and mitigation to ensure nutrient neutrality would be EN010103-002248-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:23: quantify mitigation requirements of new developments. Natural England considers EN010103-002248-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:23: estimated, options for mitigation may be considered. Table 6.2 provides a summary EN010103-002248-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:28: the mitigation measures that will be employed where possible to avoid adverse EN010103-002189-Marine Management Organistation - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 6.pdf:5: marine mammal mitigation protocol are submitted as two separate documents EN010103-002189-Marine Management Organistation - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 6.pdf:6: (b) whether any mitigation was deployed, including feedback on practicalities EN010103-002189-Marine Management Organistation - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 6.pdf:6: of deployment of equipment and efficacy of the mitigation where reasonably EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:7: and which is consistent with the piling mitigation measures in paragraph 10.8 of EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:13: marine mammal mitigation EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:14: whether any mitigation was EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:14: mitigation where reasonably EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: the decision-making process, must be distinguished from the need for all mitigation EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: mitigation. In this case the only impacts would arise as a result of development EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: of securing any mitigation shown to be necessary through the process of EIA and EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:22: parties), it would also inevitably be better placed to determine what mitigation (if EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:23: mitigation as a result. We address the latter point further below, in response to what EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:24: appropriate vehicle for assessing whether further mitigation is required and if so EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:24: securing such mitigation. If further mitigation is considered necessary by the EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:24: does not (and could not) suggest otherwise. The possibility that further mitigation EN010103-002247-NZT DCO 9.35 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 7 Submissions - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:25: reached with Orsted as to the appropriate mitigation/compensation as a result of EN010103-001587-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG - May 2022.pdf:10:  Mitigation including piling restrictions. EN010103-001587-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG - May 2022.pdf:16: measures outlined as embedded mitigation in Chapters 12 to 15 EN010103-001587-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG - May 2022.pdf:16: are appropriate and that mitigation measures that would be EN010103-001587-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG - May 2022.pdf:17: It is agreed that with the identified mitigation measures in place to EN010103-001587-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG - May 2022.pdf:18: impact avoidance and mitigation measures identified and EN010103-001587-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG - May 2022.pdf:18: and demonstrates that the proposed mitigation measures are EN010103-001587-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG - May 2022.pdf:20: Land Contamination Development and that the impact avoidance and mitigation EN010103-001587-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG - May 2022.pdf:20: Construction It is agreed that the mitigation and management measures EN010103-002639-NZT DCO 8.18 - CATS SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:8: to seek appropriate solutions and mitigations. EN010103-002460-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 19.pdf:11: in respect of requirements to secure mitigation. On 6 March 2014, a EN010103-002460-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 19.pdf:22: provision for mitigation, cascading down to requirements 27 and the EN010103-002460-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 19.pdf:23: outweigh its effects given mitigation secured through DCO EN010103-002460-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 19.pdf:25: mitigation to address the few issues raised. EN010103-002460-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 19.pdf:35: mitigation. EN010103-002460-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 19.pdf:36: secure mitigation REP-494. EN010103-002460-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 19.pdf:36: mitigation measures EN010103-002460-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 19.pdf:39: plans required to secure appropriate mitigation have been captured in EN010103-002460-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 19.pdf:42: mitigations sought by the Wilton party and the public interest in the EN010103-002460-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 19.pdf:63: (h) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any EN010103-002460-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 19.pdf:67: MMMP Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:5:effect on marine ecological or ornithological receptors following mitigation. EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:2:5.6 Management and Mitigation Plan ……………………………………………………….. 5-9 EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:3: mitigation and construction management measures were accounted for in the EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:3: such mitigation measures are carried out and that they are effective. EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:4: together with any additional mitigation measures proposed to reduce EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:4: legislation and the mitigation measures set out within the ES and this EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:4: mitigation measures; EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:4: relevant environmental legislation and the mitigation measures set out within EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:11:5.7 Management and Mitigation Plan EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:11:5.7.1 This section of the Framework CEMP sets out the mitigation and management measures to be included as a minimum in the Final EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:11: CEMP. It also illustrates how the monitoring strategy will be set out and the responsible party identified for each mitigation/ EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:11:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:12:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:12: appropriate techniques/mitigation suitable for the prevention of dust EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:13:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:14:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:14: appendix. The WMP will provide greater detail regarding the mitigation EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:15:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:15: unavoidable, in which case mitigation measures will be implemented EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:16:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:17:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:18:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:19:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:20:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:20: implemented to ensure that mitigation measures are operating as EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:21:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:22:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:23:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:23: plan will outline key pollution mitigation measures to be adopted EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:24:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:24: assessment to be undertaken, before remediation or mitigation EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:24:  Specific mitigation measures may be required in the form of treating/ EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:25:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:26:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:27:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:28:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:29:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:29: order to identify specific mitigation measures (including construction EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:30:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:31:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:32:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:33:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:34:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:34:  The standard JNCC mitigation measures for explosives, piling and EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:35:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:36:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:36: qualifying species)): discovered, appropriate mitigation would be implemented to ensure EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:37:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:38:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:39:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:40:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:41:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:42:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:43:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:44:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:45:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:46:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:47:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:48:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:49:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:49: be provided by the contractor as mitigation. EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:50:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001020-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP.pdf:50: dampening down as part of dust mitigation); EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (7).pdf:5:effect on marine ecological or ornithological receptors following mitigation. EN010103-001060-NZT DCO 6.4.25 ES Vol III Appendix 12H Supplementary Habitat Information Report Coatham Sands Part 1.pdf:8: granted. Where an adverse effect, after mitigation, on the site’s notified EN010103-001060-NZT DCO 6.4.25 ES Vol III Appendix 12H Supplementary Habitat Information Report Coatham Sands Part 1.pdf:11: relevant stakeholders) final specifications for habitat mitigation and EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:1:5.6 Management and Mitigation Plan …………………………………………………. 5-105-9 EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:2: mitigation and construction management measures were accounted for in the EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:2: such mitigation measures are carried out and that they are effective. EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:3: together with any additional mitigation measures proposed to reduce EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:3: legislation and the mitigation measures set out within the ES and this EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:4: mitigation measures; EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:4: the relevant environmental legislation and the mitigation measures set out EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:11:5.7 Management and Mitigation Plan EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:11:5.7.1 This section of the Framework CEMP sets out the mitigation and management measures to be included as a minimum in the Final EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:11: CEMP. It also illustrates how the monitoring strategy will be set out and the responsible party identified for each mitigation/ EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:11:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:12:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:12: appropriate techniques/mitigation suitable for the prevention of dust EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:13:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:14:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:14: appendix. The WMP will provide greater detail regarding the mitigation EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:15:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:15: unavoidable, in which case mitigation measures will be implemented EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:16:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:17:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:18:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:19:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:20:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:20: implemented to ensure that mitigation measures are operating as EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:21:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:22:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:23:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:23: plan will outline key pollution mitigation measures to be adopted EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:24:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:24: assessment to be undertaken, before remediation or mitigation EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:24: • Specific mitigation measures may be required in the form of treating/ EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:25:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:26:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:27:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:28:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:29:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:29: order to identify specific mitigation measures (including construction EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:30:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:31:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:32:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:32:habitat mitigation to establish once Rrequirement 4 of the draft DCO EN010103/2.1 Rev 5, the monitoring agreed as part of the works Applicants EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:33:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:33: A management plan for the maintenance of grassland mitigation will be A management plan for the Applicants EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:34:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:34:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:34:Impact of frac outs and resultant loss Further additional mitigation measures will include: To be confirmed in Final Appointed Contractors EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:35:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:35: and Ramsar site, the following mitigation is also proposed: EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:36:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:37:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:38:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: • The standard JNCC mitigation measures for explosives, piling and EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:39:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:39:UXO clearance methodology The mitigation presented, replicates conditions 23 of Schedules 10 and UXO clearance methodology Appointed Contractor EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:39: • a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:40:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:40:Designated Sites from Horizontal processesoperations:Further additional mitigation measures will include: EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:41:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:41: the SPA and Ramsar, the following mitigation is also proposed: EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:42:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:43:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:43: qualifying species)): discovered, appropriate mitigation would be implemented to ensure EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:44:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:44:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:45:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:46:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:47:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:48:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:49:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:50:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:51:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:52:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:52:habitat mitigation to establish once of rRequirement 4 of the draft DCO EN010103/2.1 Rev 5, the agreed as part of the works Applicants EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:53:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:53: require further investigation or mitigation, no construction EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:53: until provision has been made for such mitigation or the EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:54:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:55:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:56:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:57:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:57: be provided by the contractor as mitigation. EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:58:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001979-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) August 2022 (D5).pdf:58: dampening down as part of dust mitigation); EN010103-001922-Natural England.pdf:2:- the Pre-submission Screening Service (PSS) for European Protected Species mitigation licence applications. EN010103-002623-DLA Piper UK LLP - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 12 1.pdf:11: (h) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation EN010103-001903-NZT DCO 8.18 - CATS SoCG (Tracked) July 2022 (D4).pdf:8: to seek appropriate solutions and mitigations. EN010103-001644-Historic England - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:1: ii) If the mitigation and EN010103-001644-Historic England - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:2: construction mitigation and enhancement of the EN010103-001644-Historic England - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:2: As DML R15 delivers mitigation EN010103-001644-Historic England - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:3: investigation or mitigation, no EN010103-001644-Historic England - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:3: such mitigation or the further EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:1:20.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures …………………………………………… 20-34 EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:10: Development and any mitigation measures such chapter. EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:11: such mitigation would be secured. and Transport. EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:35:20.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:35: Development, and as such no specific mitigation is required. EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:35:20.7.2 No other additional mitigation measures, over and above that stated in the EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:35: Contractors as mitigation. EN010103-000904-NZT DCO 6.2.20 ES Vol I Chapter 20 Socio-economics.pdf:35:20.7.4 Other possible mitigation could be considered to benefit local residents. A EN010103-Advice-00001-2-TNZT - 200318 - Meeting note 18 March 2020.pdf:2:justify any approach taken in the application documents including any mitigation for this EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf:4: minimum requirements for survey and mitigation. EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf:5: mitigation. EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf:24: Natural England and Defra (2020) Bats: surveys and mitigation for EN010103-001109-NZT DCO 6.4.21 ES Vol III Appendix 12D Bat Survey Report Part 1.pdf:24: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/bats-surveys-and-mitigation-for-development- EN010103-001239-South Tees Development Corporation - Relevant Representation to NZT DCO - 17.12.21.pdf:14: • Requirement no. 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001239-South Tees Development Corporation - Relevant Representation to NZT DCO - 17.12.21.pdf:17: necessary mitigation identified and imposed. EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:3:Table 9C- 32: Tees Estuary (S Bank) – Mitigation Measures Assessment …………… 93 EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:6:9.1.19 A number of mitigation features are incorporated into the design of the EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:6: of possible mitigation and monitoring options to alleviate adverse effects; EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:8: mitigation measures identified by the Environment Agency. EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:10: mitigation measures may be required to address these failing waterbodies. EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:13: consideration embedded mitigation (measures that can reasonably be EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:13: mitigation (measures that would occur with or without input from the WFD EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:13: ─ A description of any additional mitigation that is required (if applicable) EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:15: deterioration that does not affect the overall against mitigation measures EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:15: Consideration will be given to mitigation EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:15: mitigation measures such as habitat creation EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:16: the ecological potential of a surface water body and the mitigation measures EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:16: Proposed Development are based on mitigation measures defined in the 2015 EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:19: and any mitigation measures proposed to meet Good Ecological Potential; EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:19: require assessment of WFD compliance, or where mitigation or further EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:20: necessary mitigation. EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:20: unacceptable physical impacts (without mitigation) on water bodies. Details EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:20: of this mitigation and best practice standards are described later in this EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:30:Mitigation Measures: Details of mitigation measures for this waterbody were requested from the Environment Agency but none were provided. EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:31:Mitigation Measures: Details of mitigation measures for this waterbody were requested from the Environment Agency but none were provided. EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:31:Mitigation Measures: The Environment Agency have outlined mitigation measures to improve this waterbody. These are listed In Annex A Table A4 and include re-opening of culverts, EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:31:structures to improve ecology. None of the mitigation measures are currently in place, except for water level management. EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:43: mitigation, and the maintenance of those mitigating solutions. However, EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:49: Ecological Potential. There are currently no mitigation measures identified in EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:56: Ecological Potential. There are currently no mitigation measures identified in EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:61: mitigation measures from being implemented. EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:61: environmental impacts may occur, if appropriate mitigation is not applied: EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:63: Construction Phase Mitigation EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:64: available good practice at that point in time. The principles of the mitigation EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:64: provide greater detail regarding the mitigation to be implemented to protect EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:64: by the adoption of the general mitigation measures which are outlined in the EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:65:9.7.19 Additional good practice guidance for mitigation to protect the water EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:66: unavoidable, in which case mitigation measures will be implemented to EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:68:9.7.23 Construction phase mitigation measures in relation to the hydrogeological EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:70: programme to ensure that mitigation measures are operating as planned and EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:71:9.7.41 Overall, given that the construction phase mitigation measures described EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:71:9.7.42 If appropriate mitigation measures are implemented as described in EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:71: ‘Construction Phase Mitigation’ above, including water quality monitoring, EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:72: outfall tunnel. Overall, this impact is considered minor given the mitigation EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:73: the mitigation (including use of a cofferdam to minimise dispersion of EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:74: sandeel. Taking into consideration the design mitigation, the resultant nature EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:76: drainage system. Given this mitigation, any residual impact would be EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:76: Tees Estuary. However, this risk is considered minor given the mitigation EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:76: appropriate mitigation measures are implemented as described in EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:76: ‘Construction Phase Mitigation’ above, including water quality monitoring, EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:77: drainage system. Given this mitigation, any residual impact would be EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:77:9.7.73 If appropriate mitigation measures are implemented as described in EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:77: ‘Construction Phase Mitigation’ above, including water quality monitoring, EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:77: given the mitigation outlined above, including best practice measures in the EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:77: mitigated. However, given the implementation of the best practise mitigation EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:77: described in ‘Construction Phase Mitigation’ above, including the Final EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:78:9.7.81 With the implementation of the mitigation measures to be described in the EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:79: may occur, if appropriate mitigation is not applied: EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:79: Operation Phase Mitigation EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:79:9.7.83 A number of mitigation features would be incorporated into the design of the EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:84: appropriate measures as summarised in ‘Operation Phase Mitigation’ above. EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:85: drainage system are outlined above under ‘Operation Phase Mitigation’. EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:88:9.7.135 As outlined above in ‘Operation Phase Mitigation’ process water from the EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:92: bunded as outlined in ‘Operation Phase Mitigation’ above to prevent spread EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:92: Mitigation Measures / Reasons for not Achieving Good EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:92:9.7.156 No mitigation measures have been provided by the Environment Agency for EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:92:9.7.158 The Environment Agency has provided mitigation measures for the Tees EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:93: implementation of these mitigation measures. It is concluded that the EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:93: mitigation measures. EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:93:Mitigation Physical Local and Central It is proposed to use the existing water EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:96:Table 9C- 32: Tees Estuary (S Bank) – Mitigation Measures Assessment EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:96:Mitigation Measure Option Mitigation Measure Appraisal EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:96: mitigation measure EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:96: this mitigation measure. EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:96: this mitigation measure. EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:96:vegetation control technique implemented prevent this mitigation measure from EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:96:(vegetation control) implemented prevent this mitigation measure from EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:96: mitigation measure from being EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:97:Mitigation Measure Option Mitigation Measure Appraisal EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:97: implemented prevent this mitigation measure from EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:97:minimises habitat impact implemented prevent this mitigation measure from EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:97:prevents sediment transfer implemented prevent this mitigation measure from EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:97: mitigation measures described in the EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:97: effectively prevent this mitigation measure from EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:97: implemented prevent this mitigation measure from EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:97:channel morphological implemented prevent this mitigation measure from EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:98:Mitigation Measure Option Mitigation Measure Appraisal EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:98: this mitigation measure. EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:98: mitigation measure. EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:99: Sandstone WFD groundwater body, provided that the outlined mitigation EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:99:9.8.2 These mitigation measures include best practise to be adopted during EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:102:Mitigation Measures Assessment Moderate or less EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:103:Mitigation Measures Assessment Moderate or Less EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:105:Mitigation Measures Assessment Moderate or Less EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:106:Table A4 Tees Estuary (S Bank) – Mitigation Measures EN010103-001064-NZT DCO 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment.pdf:106:Mitigation Measure Option Mitigation Measure screening & status EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:42: scheme itself, or to mitigation or Appendix 10.3, 14.5 and 14.9. EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:133: environmental mitigation measures proposed in these documents?” - A total of 15 EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:152: safeguarding systems and embedded mitigation such as fire EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:156: implementation of the mitigation measures in the CEMP. protection EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:157: with mitigation, construction effects on receptors are reduced EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:162: Taking account of embedded mitigation within the design of the Proposed Development, with and access land management’; 6 EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:164:  Ecological mitigation involving ‘Net Gain’ must Development will not result in adverse effects on Conservation; and EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:165: the biodiversity protection, mitigation and Assessment EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:167: the Site boundary. Emissions of nitrous mitigation and enhancement measures to be and Biodiversity EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:173: review. visual mitigation has been identified as needed EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:173: PP. Additional N-deposition mitigation – classed as a Report at Stage 2 were provided and where not EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:173: mitigation measure. possible, a scope/specification was provided, if EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:175: PP. N-deposition mitigation through emissions EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:175: use of this mitigation. EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:178: historical and evidential values. mitigation is included within the Application in EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:179: to impacts on settings. Suitable mitigation of all in terms of any marine heritage. EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:179: suitable mitigation of impacts will be developed EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:179: As part of the mitigation it would be EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:180: mitigation measures should be agreed with PD EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:182: biodiversity protection, mitigation and EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:186: developers' proposed mitigation for the EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:190: mitigation to prevent disruption. overlap/interface areas with SABIC. The Applicants Tunnels. Programme and EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:192: mitigation to ensure negative effects on the discussions have taken place since Stage 2 and EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:193: should be undertaken and the Proposed mitigation and enhancement measures to be Ref. 5.12). EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:194: mitigation hierarchy. It is recommended that biodiversity EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:213: mitigation and enhancement. EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:221: mitigation and enhancement. EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:245: identify any mitigation that is necessary to control or reduce the environmental effects of the EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:315: mitigation that is necessary to control or reduce those environmental effects. The EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:368: mitigation that is necessary to control or reduce those environmental effects. The EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:395:having the opportunity to help shape, the Environmental Assessment and related mitigation EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:395:be beneficial for NZT to incorporate the principles of the strategies and guidelines, and any mitigation EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:410: from NZT. It will also identify any mitigation the Stage 2 Consultation on NZT. There will EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:431: from NZT. It will also identify any mitigation proposed application, people living in the EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:542:connections; hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures; temporary EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:546:connections; hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures; temporary EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:600:mitigation of all impacts will be required to be put forward in the Construction EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:601:suitable mitigation of impacts will be developed and put forward as part of the EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:601:Historic England also advises that as part of the mitigation it would be appropriate for EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:610:the information that may be required in terms of survey and mitigation requirements. EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:613:included in the final ES, along with the developers’ proposed mitigation for the temporary loss of the EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:626: 6. During the construction phase NZT Power & NZNS Storage will apply the following mitigation EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:627:the CO2 storage site in the North Sea is to be consented separately, we advise that all marine safety risk mitigation EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:638:safeguarded under the planning mitigation hierarchy. EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:666: mitigation is put in place to prevent this from happening. EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:669:therefore be designed in such a way, and include appropriate safeguards and mitigation, EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:685: order to determine the level of significance of the effect and whether additional mitigation is EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:687: identifies that the impacts will be managed by appropriate construction mitigation measures EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:688: opportunities for mitigation and compensation can be fully considered and hopefully EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:689:11.1 This chapter advises that the proposed development will incorporate embedded mitigation EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:736: from NZT. It will also identify any mitigation proposed application, people living in the EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:748: its Non-Technical Summary or the environmental mitigation measures proposed in EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:781: avoid or reduce any impacts (mitigation) EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:782: mitigation. No effects on human EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:782: practice measures to control noise and appropriate mitigation EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:782: mitigation. EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:802: as mitigation). EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:803: Management Plan (CEMP), no significant effects are predicted. and will inform the need for any additional mitigation measures. EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:803:Geology and • With mitigation measures in place and the application of • With mitigation measures in place and the application of a CEMP, EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:803:Noise and Vibration • Using best practice measures to control construction noise • With mitigation no significant adverse noise effects are EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:803:Aquatic Ecology • Potential adverse effects on aquatic ecology receptors • With mitigation measures applied, no significant adverse effects EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:803:Marine Ecology and • Potential adverse effects on marine ecology receptors • With mitigation measures applied, no significant adverse effects EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:803:Ornithology • With suitable mitigation it is not expected that construction • In advance of detailed engineering design and assessment it is EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:803: construction. air quality effects on habitats; mitigation to be considered as EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:803:Archaeology and • With mitigation, there will be no significant effects on • There will be no significant effects on archaeology and cultural EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:803:Marine Heritage • With mitigation, there will be no significant effects on marine • There will be no significant effects on marine heritage assets EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:825: Report, its Non-Technical Summary or the environmental mitigation measures EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:831: its Non-Technical Summary or the environmental mitigation measures proposed in EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:837:connections; hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures; temporary EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:847:connections; hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:848: plans and/or any other documentation submitted will be made hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures; temporary contractor EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:849:less than seven days from the date hereof the Highway Authority hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures; temporary contractor car, van, EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:851: connections; hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures; temporary contractor facilities and construction laydown areas; vehicle access roads, crossings, parking and EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:890:connections; hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures; temporary EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:1047:connections; hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures; temporary EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:1050:connections; hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures; temporary EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:1133:To conclude, we look forward to working with the applicants/agents to identify appropriate mitigation EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:1146:included in the final ES, along with the developers’ proposed mitigation for the temporary loss of the EN010103-001152-NZT DCO 5.1 - Consultation Report.pdf:1163:involves offshore elements (beyond Mean Low Water Mark), all marine safety risk mitigation EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:10: Mitigation including piling restrictions. EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:16: measures outlined as embedded mitigation in Chapters 12 to 15 EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:16: are appropriate and that mitigation measures that would be EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:17: must commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:17: It is agreed that with the identified mitigation measures in place to EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:18: and that the design and impact avoidance and mitigation EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:18: proposed mitigation measures are adequate to mitigate flood risk. EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:20: mitigation measures identified and specified by control measures EN010103-002238-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Tracked) 2022 (D8).pdf:21: It is agreed that the mitigation and management measures EN010103-000891-NZT DCO 6.2.5 ES Vol I Chapter 5 Construction Programme and Management.pdf:26: Chapter 11: Noise and Vibration sets out specific mitigation and control EN010103-002255-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:41: 3.8.30. The Requirements closely relate to the mitigation set out in the Environmental Statement EN010103-002255-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:44: 3.8.48. Requirement 12 (Flood risk mitigation) - this is not a model provision. It provides that no EN010103-002255-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:44: commence until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction has, for that EN010103-002255-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:45: consultation with Natural England, a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has EN010103-002255-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:46: risk assessment and which is consistent with the piling mitigation measures in paragraph EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:13: and with mitigation measures implemented as part of a CEMP, these effects would EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:15: of noise sensitive receptors would mean that, with the application of mitigation EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:19: later than the expiration of 3 years appropriate mitigation EN010103-002406-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Tracked).pdf:30: process emissions control, maintenance, construction will take up to 28 cumulative effects will be the application of mitigation EN010103-002286-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:23: for providing biodiversity mitigation and EN010103-002286-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:34: • Requirement no. 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001711-Environment Agency - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:5: adopted, and appropriate mitigation and method EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:1:16.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures …………………………………………. 16-41 EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:2: “5.13.2 The consideration and mitigation of transport impacts is an essential EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:2: appropriate on the assessment and mitigation. EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:3: NSIP. Where the proposed mitigation measures are insufficient to reduce the EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:16: required. Any mitigation measures required to facilitate wharf at the Redcar Bulk Terminal (RBT). Information on this EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:19: with the developers’ proposed mitigation for the EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:33:16.5.1 The Applicants would implement a range of good practice mitigation EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:42:16.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:42:16.7.1 No additional mitigation measures or enhancement measures other than EN010103-000908-NZT DCO 6.2.16 ES Vol I Chapter 16 Traffic and Transportation.pdf:43: of any proposed mitigation measures. In line with the significance criteria EN010103-002550-NZT DCO 5.4 - DAS (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:60: 12 mitigation the mitigation of flood risk during EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:29:BIO.1.37 Applicants Table 5A-8 of ES Appendix 5A: Framework CEMP APP-246 contains details of mitigation EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:29: Teesside A/ Sofia Offshore Wind Farm as the mitigation measures for the Proposed EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:30: The Applicants are requested to explain whether these measures constitute mitigation for the EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:30: 6.1.18 of the report refers to mitigation for visual disturbance from the effects of the HDD bore EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:31:BIO.1.52 Applicants Para 6.1.47 of the HRA Report AS-194 identifies the mitigation measures for water quality EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:48: Should this mitigation measure also be referenced in ES Appendix 25A APP-347 as a EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:48: DLV.1.15 Applicants ES Chapter 17 APP-099 paragraph 17.7.5 states that no additional mitigation is identified in EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:48: visual impacts associated with a fossil fuel generation stations and mitigation is therefore to EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:50: as moderate or higher will require further investigation and mitigation measures. The EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:53: ii) If the mitigation and enhancement measures set out in section 19.7 of the ES [APP- EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:53: Response • The MMO defer to Historic England on the appropriateness of the assessments and mitigation EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:56: mitigation into the CO2 gathering network; EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:71: mitigation measures aiming to attain WFD objectives, including Dissolved Inorganic EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:74: for re-mobilisation of contamination beneath the site and mitigation of this? EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:76:WE.1.33 Applicants Could the Applicants explain the proposed approach to mitigation of the potential short term, EN010103-001683-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:77: construction to slight adverse (not significant) residual effect, or whether additional mitigation is EN010103-002285-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:23: for providing biodiversity mitigation and EN010103-002285-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:34: • Requirement no. 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:3: actions and communication channels will be available 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:8: A range of pollution control and mitigation measures EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:9: working methods and mitigation in the DEMP. EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:17: and application of adequate mitigation measures will EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:17: adequate mitigation measures will be enforced through EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:17: appropriate mitigation according to the risk of dust EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18: monitoring to verify that mitigation measures are EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:21:ES Chapters 9 - Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water The Site will implement security mitigations to reduce DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement 8: EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:22:Resources, 21 - Climate Change associated with the construction of the Proposed 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28: is recorded as present, mitigation measures, including EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:33:ES Chapter 10 - Geology, Hydrogeology and The following additional operational mitigations will be DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:33:ES Chapter 10 - Geology, Hydrogeology and An Ecological Risk Assessment and Mitigation DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:35: vibration mitigation measures for the Proposed 21: Control of noise and vibration (construction) EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:36: determine the most appropriate mitigation options. 21: Control of Noise and Vibration (Operation) EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:36: identified mitigations. Habitat monitoring may also be EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:38: Protected Species Mitigation Licence (depending on EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:39: mitigation requirements (e.g. provision of replacement EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:40: mitigation measures will be applied to prevent the EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:43: down to non-significant.the mitigation proposed will Requirement 15: Protected speciesCondition 23 : UXO EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:44: required mitigation measures, at the time of a UXO Coastal Access Act 2009 EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:44: Development as good practice mitigation.provides a EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:45: works and a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:46: mitigation would be implemented to ensure that they EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:48: mitigation and enhancement measures within the EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:51: embedded mitigations and design impact avoidance EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:52: on/inform mitigation and emergency response Detailed Design EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:53: Document Ref. 6.4) will be used to inform the detailed 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:58: outline key pollution mitigation measures to be EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:63: will be stored outside of the 1 in 200 year floodplain 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:63: the floodplain, the River Tees and Greatham Creek. 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:63: ground construction, suitable de-watering methods will 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:64: at all times when working in excavations. When 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:64: watercourses would comply with relevant guidance 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:64: least one designated Flood Warden would be 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:64: measures aimed at preventing an increase in flood risk 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:66: mitigation proposals are agreed with all required EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:66:ES Appendix 5A -– Framework CEMP Specific mitigation measures may be required in the DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:74: • The standard JNCC mitigation measures for 21: Control of Noise and Vibration (Construction) EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:75: mitigation would be implemented to avoid disturbance EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:79:ES Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP An appropriate archaeological mitigation strategy, for DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:83:ES Appendix 8A - Air Quality Construction Appropriate mitigation measures for managing the DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:84: a Flood Risk Management Action Plan/ Method 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:84: developments within a designated floodplain (as in the 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:85: and from the PCC Site is affected by surface water 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:85: maintenance of the drainage system will be 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:85: ground development within strata where groundwater 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:85: is recorded as present, mitigation measures, including EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:86:ES Appendix 9A - FRA A number of additional mitigation strategies will be DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002312-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Tracked Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:86: considered during the design process for the Proposed 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002321-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:8: that requires mitigation, including through ‘nutrient neutrality’. EN010103-002321-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:22: introducing a new nutrient load direct to the SPA and mitigation to ensure nutrient EN010103-002321-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:25: quantify mitigation requirements of new developments. Natural England considers EN010103-002321-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:25: estimated, options for mitigation may be considered. Table 6.2 provides a summary EN010103-002321-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:37: quantify mitigation requirements of new developments. Natural England considers EN010103-001133-NZT DCO 6.4.44 ES Vol III Appendix 20A Economics Benefits Report.pdf:8: M&R Mitigation and remediation EN010103-001133-NZT DCO 6.4.44 ES Vol III Appendix 20A Economics Benefits Report.pdf:25: ● measuring, monitoring and verification (MMV)/mitigation and remediation (M&R) equipment, such EN010103-002651-SABIC Protective Provisions 1.pdf:6: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossing and any mitigation measures which EN010103-002651-SABIC Protective Provisions 1.pdf:14: (h) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any EN010103-001715-South Tees Development Corporation - Responses to comments on Relevant Representations.pdf:39: Requirement no. 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001715-South Tees Development Corporation - Responses to comments on Relevant Representations.pdf:44: preparatory works with all necessary mitigation identified and EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:5: mitigation. EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:9: Mitigation - paragraph ‘The applicant should include appropriate mitigation measures as an integral part of the proposed EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:10: Mitigation - paragraph ‘Where the applicant cannot demonstrate that appropriate mitigation measures will be put in place the SoS EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:10: In addition to the mitigation measures set out in EN-1, design of the cooling system should include intake and EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:10: Mitigation - paragraph ‘In circumstances where the habitat to be crossed contains ancient woodland, trees subject to a Tree EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:11: SoS Decision Making – The SoS should ensure that this issue has been considered in the ES and that appropriate mitigation EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:14: should be avoided. Where this is not possible mitigation, or lastly compensation, must be provided as EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:15: necessary, land has been identified to provide appropriate strategic mitigation; or (b) The applicant can EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:15: strategic mitigation cannot be identified, the Council will work with the Tees Estuary Partnership and relevant EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:15: i. It can be determined through Appropriate Assessment, taking into account mitigation, the EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:16: iii. mitigation, or where necessary compensation, is provided for the impact. EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:16: Where development on a site is approved, mitigation or where necessary, compensatory measures will be EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:16: should be avoided. Where this is not possible, mitigation and lastly compensation, must be provided as EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:17: Light Pollution satisfactory mitigation measures can be demonstrated. EN010103-001105-NZT DCO 6.4.18 ES Vol III Appendix 12A Legislation and Planning Policy Relevant to Ecology.pdf:19: requirements for survey and mitigation, including the need to consider objectives for no net loss and EN010103-002641-NZT DCO 8.37 - SoCG - North Sea Midstream Partners - Final - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:8: and mitigations. EN010103-001062-NZT DCO 6.4.26 ES Vol III Appendix 12I Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Coatham Dunes.pdf:4:6 Mitigation 22 EN010103-001062-NZT DCO 6.4.26 ES Vol III Appendix 12I Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Coatham Dunes.pdf:4:6.1 Proposed Mitigation 22 EN010103-001062-NZT DCO 6.4.26 ES Vol III Appendix 12I Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Coatham Dunes.pdf:6: evaluates the assemblages present and makes comment on mitigation of the proposed CO2 export pipeline EN010103-001062-NZT DCO 6.4.26 ES Vol III Appendix 12I Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Coatham Dunes.pdf:23:Any mitigation proposals would need to reflect this complex relationship, or allow this to occur through natural EN010103-001062-NZT DCO 6.4.26 ES Vol III Appendix 12I Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Coatham Dunes.pdf:29:6 Mitigation EN010103-001062-NZT DCO 6.4.26 ES Vol III Appendix 12I Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Coatham Dunes.pdf:29:6.1 Proposed Mitigation EN010103-001062-NZT DCO 6.4.26 ES Vol III Appendix 12I Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Coatham Dunes.pdf:29:Mitigation should in the first instance focus on avoidance. The sensitive dune system habitats should be avoided EN010103-001062-NZT DCO 6.4.26 ES Vol III Appendix 12I Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Coatham Dunes.pdf:64:areas within this land parcel and which could inform appropriate levels of mitigation or biodiversity net gain to EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:30: (e) carry out or construct any mitigation works. EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:47: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:50:Flood risk mitigation EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:50:preliminary works, until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction, has, for that EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:50:mitigation of flood risk during operation has, for that part, been submitted to and, after EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:50: (6) The authorised development must not be commissioned until the flood risk mitigation has EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:52:must commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and, EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:55:the piling mitigation measures in paragraph 10.8 of Chapter 10 of the environmental statement and EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:90: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:91: (h) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:101: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:102: (h) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:110: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:110: be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if any) EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:110: to submit for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:110: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:116:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:187: submit for Northern Gas Networks’ approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme EN010103-002043-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO August 2022 (D6).pdf:187: © if a subsidence mitigation scheme is required, it shall be carried out as approved (such EN010103-002237-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Clean) 2022 (D8).pdf:10: Mitigation including piling restrictions. EN010103-002237-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Clean) 2022 (D8).pdf:16: measures outlined as embedded mitigation in Chapters 12 to 15 EN010103-002237-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Clean) 2022 (D8).pdf:16: are appropriate and that mitigation measures that would be EN010103-002237-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Clean) 2022 (D8).pdf:16: must commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation EN010103-002237-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Clean) 2022 (D8).pdf:17: impact avoidance and mitigation measures identified and EN010103-002237-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Clean) 2022 (D8).pdf:18: proposed mitigation measures are adequate to mitigate flood risk. EN010103-002237-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Clean) 2022 (D8).pdf:19: Development and that the impact avoidance and mitigation EN010103-002237-NZT DCO 8.5 - SoCG - Environment Agency September (Clean) 2022 (D8).pdf:20: It is agreed that the mitigation and management measures EN010103-002376-Adrian Miller - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ3 (if required).pdf:3: mitigation measures are put in place in the Construction Worker Travel Plan to EN010103-002376-Adrian Miller - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ3 (if required).pdf:3: mitigation for workers coming from the west via Westgate Roundabout. EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:1:15.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures …………………………………………… 15-87 EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:4: • include appropriate mitigation measures as an integral part of the EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:4: appropriate integral mitigation measures will be put in place then EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:6: the significance of predicted impacts and determining the level of mitigation EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:8: (including mitigation for other environmental disciplines). If necessary, EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:9: or mitigation e.g. for purposes of ensuring no net loss of biodiversity); and EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:9: priority that they do not require retention or mitigation at the relevant EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:10: effective mitigation is both possible and enforceable. A permanent effect EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:21: • Key mitigation was summarised (CEMP, ECoW, EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:59: effects on these, in accordance with the ‘mitigation hierarchy’7 (see Appendix EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:59: The mitigation hierarchy is implemented to achieve no overall negative impact on biodiversity or a net gain and is based on EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:60: necessary licences and permits are summarised in Section 15.9: Mitigation EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:61: mitigation would be implemented to ensure that they are not disturbed or EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:62: measures for noise mitigation in the Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA / EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:63: mitigation over and above that which is inherent to the design, or otherwise EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:63: and the mitigation otherwise committed in Chapter 8: Air Quality and Chapter EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:64: above in Table 15-5). Where mitigation has been identified as necessary in EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:64: then it can be assumed that there is a commitment to provide this mitigation, EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:69:and flood risk. depend for foraging, breeding or mitigation and avoidance measures set and Water Resources, Section 9.6 EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:86: embedded mitigation and design. These measures are described in detail in EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:88:15.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:88: Construction Mitigation EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:88:15.7.2 Mitigation for habitat losses are discussed below with respect to the impacts EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:89: appropriate mitigation to ensure that these are not impacted by EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:91: Operational Mitigation EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:91:15.7.12 Give the findings of the above impact assessment, mitigation measures are EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:91: Decommissioning Mitigation EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:91:15.7.13 Any necessary mitigation requirements would be determined and agreed at EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:91: and mitigation in the DEMP. This is discussed further within Chapter 4: EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:91: and biodiversity mitigation and enhancement proposals. The measures EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:92: mitigation, including pre site clearance nesting bird checks, and work to be EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:92: construction, the success of committed landscape and biodiversity mitigation EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:97: impact pathways and requirements/commitments for mitigation during EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:98: mitigation measures. No significant residual effects on ornithological EN010103-000901-NZT DCO 6.2.15 ES Vol I Chapter 15 Ornithology.pdf:99: Mitigation Toolkit: Informing Estuarine Planning & Construction Projects EN010103-001514-TEXT_ISH2_Session1_NetZeroTeeside_11052022.pdf:4:prevention, mitigation or compensation, which not covered by the DCO has currently drafted the EN010103-002071-NZT DCO 8.37 - SoCG - North Sea Midstream Partners Deadline 6 Submission.pdf:8: and mitigations. EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:9: assessment. This will inform detailed design and mitigation at the construction stage EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:10: include any necessary contingency action or mitigation measures arising EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:11: (m) any other management or mitigation plans set out in the framework construction EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:12: which is consistent with the piling mitigation measures in paragraph 10.8 of Chapter 10 EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:19: mitigation), asserting that such mitigation (considered in the assessment to include EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:19: viability of such mitigation included in paragraph 13 of bp's submission to Deadline EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:19: at Orsted's discretion as developer meaning the effectiveness of such mitigation EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:19: effect where Orsted were unable to implement the identified potential mitigation, EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:47: intrusive ecological mitigation, So far as the Applicant is aware, the only DCO where such low-level preparatory works have themselves been made EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:56: 052] expressed confidence that The Applicant’s preferred drafting specifically requires the MMO to be satisfied that mitigation avoids adverse effects EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:57: Design Scenario for some The Applicant confirms that no further design, alternatives or mitigation options are currently under consideration or EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:58: alternatives or mitigation options EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:64: Applicant therefore consider It is not common practice to clarify how each mitigation measure resulting from the EIA process is secured in the DCO EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:65: affect the receptors directly. Based on the commitment by these projects to implement detailed mitigation and EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:65: HE.2.5 Applicant Conditions securing best practice The Applicant notes that best-practice mitigation relevant to marine archaeology are detailed in Table 9.9 of A2.9: EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:65: mitigation of impact on marine Marine Archaeology (APP-021), alongside references to the DCO and DML conditions within which these commitments EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:65: archaeology receptors are secured C1.1: Draft DCO including Draft DMLs (REP4-050). These mitigations are expanded on in F2.4: Outline EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:65: best practice mitigation should be The Applicant continues to welcome dialogue on the delivery of the proposed mitigations and notes that Condition EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:65: Statement: Volume A4, Annex commencement of construction activities. As such, the Applicant considers that best-practice mitigations in relation to EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:65: MA-C2, MA-C-3, MA-C-6 (All on these mitigations prior to the start of construction. EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:69: HE.2.10 Applicant Further mitigation: built heritage The Applicant does not intend to make any further updates to the Outline WSI for Onshore Archaeology (APP-235, EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:81: ME.2.2 Applicant Herring spawning mitigation The Applicant has responded to all relevant points in the MMO’s Deadline 4 submission (REP4-052) within G5.3 EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:85: ME.2.6 Applicant, Offshore Infrastructure lighting As outlined by Natural England in their Relevant Representation (RR-029), mitigation measures outlined in the OSPAR EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:94: contends that relevant mitigation EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:97: relevant river basin catchments. the integrity of a habitats site that requires mitigation, including through nutrient EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:126: site-specific evidence has been undertaken to ensure that there is no risk to this maintenance activities are considered and necessary mitigation measures are EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:129: and for a limited period of time. Landscape mitigation planting is proposed and aimed EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:132: mitigation) and buffer zone adequacy at the Birkhill ancient woodland; EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:136: and (iv) a final targeted consultation in July 2021. taken on a precautionary basis. With the mitigation measures identified in the ES EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:146: controlled through implementation of the appropriate noise mitigation EN010103-002074-NZT DCO 9.28 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 5 Submissions August 2022 (D6).pdf:149: making these comments without any evidence to support them. Our clients hereby the noise mitigation measures secured in the DCO. EN010103-002510-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:24: for providing biodiversity mitigation and EN010103-002510-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:34: • Requirement no. 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-002533-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Tracked Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:63: with generating stations and that mitigation will therefore need to be aimed EN010103-002533-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Tracked Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:79: Further mitigation measures would be expected to be undertaken by EN010103-002533-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Tracked Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:89: Mitigation Works. EN010103-002429-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 11.pdf:3: mitigation would not be appropriate, as it would impact on the renewable energy contribution and EN010103-002429-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 11.pdf:3: render the project far less commercially competitive. Even with application of the mitigation EN010103-002429-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 11.pdf:7: opportunity to fully consider the relevant issues and to apply appropriate mitigations and EN010103-002429-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 11.pdf:7: issues and propose protections with the advisors to the decision maker. Appropriate mitigations EN010103-001544-Stockton Borough Council - Local Impact Reports (LIRs) from Local Authorities.pdf:2: a. If necessary, land has been identified to provide appropriate strategic mitigation; or EN010103-001544-Stockton Borough Council - Local Impact Reports (LIRs) from Local Authorities.pdf:2: 3. Should it become apparent that proposals for strategic mitigation cannot be EN010103-001544-Stockton Borough Council - Local Impact Reports (LIRs) from Local Authorities.pdf:5: c. Appropriate surface water drainage mitigation measures are incorporated and EN010103-001544-Stockton Borough Council - Local Impact Reports (LIRs) from Local Authorities.pdf:8: mitigation, the proposal would not result in adverse effects on the site's integrity, EN010103-001544-Stockton Borough Council - Local Impact Reports (LIRs) from Local Authorities.pdf:8: iii. mitigation, or where necessary compensation, is provided for the impact. EN010103-001544-Stockton Borough Council - Local Impact Reports (LIRs) from Local Authorities.pdf:8: Where development on a site is approved, mitigation or where necessary, EN010103-001544-Stockton Borough Council - Local Impact Reports (LIRs) from Local Authorities.pdf:9: cumulative should be avoided. Where this is not possible, mitigation and lastly EN010103-001544-Stockton Borough Council - Local Impact Reports (LIRs) from Local Authorities.pdf:10: sited near to sensitive developments or areas unless satisfactory mitigation measures EN010103-001544-Stockton Borough Council - Local Impact Reports (LIRs) from Local Authorities.pdf:10: mitigation can be achieved that would bring pollution within acceptable levels. EN010103-001544-Stockton Borough Council - Local Impact Reports (LIRs) from Local Authorities.pdf:10: a. Any issues will be satisfactorily addressed by appropriate mitigation measures to EN010103-001544-Stockton Borough Council - Local Impact Reports (LIRs) from Local Authorities.pdf:10: adverse impact would occur or mitigation can be put in place to minimise this impact EN010103-001544-Stockton Borough Council - Local Impact Reports (LIRs) from Local Authorities.pdf:11: DCO articles, requirements and DCO obligations. Where specific mitigation or compensatory EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:9: on that site“ (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:10: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:44: appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS in cetaceans including EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:44: population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling and EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:49:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:50: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:54: report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:59: General Mitigation Measures EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:59:6.1.18 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise and EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:59: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:65:6.1.45 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, Flood EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:65: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include: EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:65:6.1.47 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:66: necessary mitigation measures. The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:66: recommends a range of mitigation techniques to minimise the risk of injury or EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:67: (approx. 102km) and the standard mitigation measures included in the Marine EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:69: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites. EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:70: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:70: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:70: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:70: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:71: Map (Adopted January 2019) – The Mitigation Strategy to address potential adverse effects on the SPA/Ramsar from recreation. EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:71: the detailed strategic development line with mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue. EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:71: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy. EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:71: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA which has been deemed EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:71: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:72: or appropriate mitigation measures may be required. EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:72: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:72: and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:73: and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:74: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:75: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:75: Development. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:78: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:88: cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects on site EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:110: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.43 to 6.1.46, including the preparation of a Construction EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:110: export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity of the SPA / EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:110: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:110: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:113: range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on marine life, including harbour porpoise (see paragraph 6.3.2-6.3.3). Given this, it is concluded EN010103-001196-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:113: b. Since any marine licence will require mitigation measures to ensure no mortality or significant disturbance of harbour porpoise arises, and taking EN010103-001466-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons - Apr 2022.pdf:61: with generating stations and that mitigation will therefore need to be aimed EN010103-001466-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons - Apr 2022.pdf:77: Further mitigation measures would be expected to be undertaken by EN010103-001466-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons - Apr 2022.pdf:86: Mitigation Works. EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:15: • to identify and collate the residual effects after mitigation for each of the EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:15: • to set out the proposed mitigation and/ or monitoring measures including EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:15: sites and their locations, together with any mitigation or compensation EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:17: before and after mitigation will be evaluated; however, paragraph 7.22 is EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:17: mitigation. For the avoidance of doubt, the Inspectorate advises that the ES EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:17: reports on the significance of effects both before and after mitigation is applied. EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:18: Mitigation EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:18:3.3.22 Specific mitigation measures relating to the different environmental aspects EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:18: as the design process for the Proposed Development progresses, mitigation EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:18:3.3.23 Any mitigation relied upon for the purposes of the assessment should be EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:18: explained in detail within the ES. The likely efficacy of the mitigation proposed EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:18: of mitigation. This is necessary to allow the reader to understand the efficacy EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:18: (in assessment terms) of the proposed mitigation measures and therefore what EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:18: would happen if any of the proposed mitigation should fail or not be delivered. EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:18:3.3.24 The ES should also address how any mitigation proposed is secured, with EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:31: mitigation measures that would be required to protect sensitive EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:35: mitigation. Effort should be made to agree the need for and scope of EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:39: bodies, including Natural England. Any necessary mitigation EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:40: impacts to trees and woodland and describe any mitigation measures EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:45: required and the types of vehicles required. Any mitigation measures EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:48:4.8.8 Para 6.120 Mitigation The Scoping Report explains that measures will be proposed to EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:48: If mitigation plans are proposed, drafts of these documents should be EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:50:4.9.6 Para 6.124 Mitigation The Inspectorate notes the potential for physical impacts to EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:53: and 6.137 the Proposed Development and any mitigation measures such as EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:53: diversions are proposed, their duration and how such mitigation EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:69:assessed and mitigation measure applied. We would expect the FRA to: EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:69: 4. We would expect mitigation measures to be applied for all sites and again EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:73:influence any mitigation and betterment with the proposed development. EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:73:the environment and not just to mitigate. The level of mitigation/compensation for EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:75:works, considerable justification for this, together with details of mitigation and EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:75:mitigation measures agreed with the relevant body in this case the EA, to prevent EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:75:All appropriate mitigation to prevent entrainment of marine organisms on the EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:76:November, in any given year, a silt mitigation plan must be in place and/or an EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:76:DCO application, so an informed decision can be made regarding any mitigation EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:82:environmental constraints”. This is without specific reference to mitigation or compensation for EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:85:5.3.18 The applicant should include appropriate mitigation measures as an integral part of the EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:90:and propose appropriate mitigation. Tees Archaeology has been consulted and has EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:90:should be given to any environmental mitigation measures that may be required. EN010103-001015-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 1.pdf:102: - Confirmation of any mitigation that is likely to be considered for use or installed as EN010103-002000-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:41: 3.8.32. The Requirements closely relate to the mitigation set out in the Environmental Statement EN010103-002000-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:43: 3.8.50. Requirement 12 (Flood risk mitigation) - this is not a model provision. It provides that no EN010103-002000-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:43: commence until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction has, for that EN010103-002000-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:45: until, after consultation with Natural England, a scheme of protection and mitigation EN010103-002000-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:46: informed by a risk assessment and which is consistent with the piling mitigation measures EN010103-001913-NZT DCO 9.18 - Further information to Historic Environment Questions July 2022 (D4).pdf:10: additional mitigation was not required. EN010103-001913-NZT DCO 9.18 - Further information to Historic Environment Questions July 2022 (D4).pdf:10: stated that the scope of mitigation required would be agreed with the EN010103-001913-NZT DCO 9.18 - Further information to Historic Environment Questions July 2022 (D4).pdf:11: remains and therefore mitigation, set out in a Written Scheme of EN010103-001913-NZT DCO 9.18 - Further information to Historic Environment Questions July 2022 (D4).pdf:12: investigation or mitigation, no construction operations are to take EN010103-001913-NZT DCO 9.18 - Further information to Historic Environment Questions July 2022 (D4).pdf:12: such mitigation or the further investigation and recording of the EN010103-001913-NZT DCO 9.18 - Further information to Historic Environment Questions July 2022 (D4).pdf:25: areas requiring marine archaeological mitigation cannot be detailed at this EN010103-001913-NZT DCO 9.18 - Further information to Historic Environment Questions July 2022 (D4).pdf:25: methodology of the mitigation is outlined, in accordance with the EN010103-001913-NZT DCO 9.18 - Further information to Historic Environment Questions July 2022 (D4).pdf:27: marine archaeological mitigation response, the survey will be carried out EN010103-001913-NZT DCO 9.18 - Further information to Historic Environment Questions July 2022 (D4).pdf:36: mitigation measures. Signatures will be required to record that all site EN010103-001913-NZT DCO 9.18 - Further information to Historic Environment Questions July 2022 (D4).pdf:36: until further mitigation is put in place to remain compliant. EN010103-002349-15431_393333 EN010103 Natural England update to ExA for ISH6 on Nutrient Neutrality - 17 October 2022.pdf:1:incorporate the proposed mitigation, secured by the draft Requirement at Stage 2 (Appropriate EN010103-001024-NZT DCO 6.4.9 ES Vol III Appendix 9A Flood Risk Assessment Part 1.pdf:79:• Please provide details of any mitigation measures being proposed by the Environment Agency to EN010103-001024-NZT DCO 6.4.9 ES Vol III Appendix 9A Flood Risk Assessment Part 1.pdf:85:2019 mitigation measures update can be found in the sharefile link – no measures are currently in place EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:29: set out in the statement takes account of Government policy relating to the mitigation of, and adaptation to, climate change.” EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:58: -(2), 15(3), 16(5), 21(2)-(3) and 23 and cover monitoring of such matters as ecological mitigation, ground contamination EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:58: mitigation, archaeological interest, noise, and CCR. These matters are addressed where appropriate in the Panel's report and EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:58: remedial measures may be taken, or to ensure that mitigation measures are effective. The 2017 Regulations do not require EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:58: “Member States should ensure that mitigation and compensation measures are implemented, and EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:113: • Detailed registers in place to accurately identify key risks, and with mitigations EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:113: populated. The cluster should demonstrate where mitigations are already in place and EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:113: mitigations that will be put in place to ensure strong cyber resilience. EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:113: • Clear adherence to safety regulations, and identification and mitigation of any residual EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:179: information from the Applicant on 13 July 2021 in respect of: mitigation and EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:191: implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, including but not limited EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:191: Contingency Plan ER 8.4.10. The proposed mitigation measures related to the EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:213: will include proposals for climate change mitigation and renewable EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:218: 76. Many of the impacts of the proposed development do not involve direct loss of assets. They are the subject of mitigation EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:218: measures in the Outline Environmental Management Plan (“OEMP”) and the Detailed Archaeological Mitigation Strategy EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:220: of policies” in the development plan, subject to appropriate mitigation being carried out by IP1 of potential harmful effects EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:221: (2) Whether the mitigation strategy, and its effectiveness in the protection of WHS archaeology, is appropriate; EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:221: 92. In relation to the second main issue, the Panel judged the proposed mitigation strategy to be adequate, provided that issues EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:227: notwithstanding the mitigation proposed. There would therefore be conflict with the Wiltshire Core EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:228: second main heritage issue, to do with the mitigation strategy, and were relied upon by the SST. He accepted the views of EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:230: that the harm to heritage assets, including the OUV, is less than substantial and that the mitigation EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:230: the NPSNN and that reasonable mitigation has been included to minimise harm to the landscape. EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:238: engineering works together with the mitigation proposed, and their effect upon the setting of assets and the landscape in EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:238: in itself affects the impact on relevant assets, as well as the mitigation proposed for those elements of the scheme (see e.g. EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:254: 5.7.327]. The ExA is also content overall with the mitigation strategy, apart from the proposed approach to artefact sampling EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:254: arising from the future baseline would not be significant, and that adequate mitigation has been arranged in respect of in- EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:255: appropriate safeguards be built into the Development across the dDCO, OEMP and the Detailed Archaeological Mitigation EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:255: mitigation under the Site Specific Written Schemes of Investigation (“SSWSIs”) will be supported by the use of innovative EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:256: acknowledging some Scientific Committee experts are not content with the mitigation proposed and also that the ExA was EN010103-001575-NZT DCO 9.2 - Written Summary ISH1 - May 2022.pdf:257: matter and is satisfied that the mitigation measures included in the updated OEMP and DAMS as submitted by the Applicant EN010103-000892-NZT DCO 6.2.6 ES Vol I Chapter 6 Alternatives and Design Evolution.pdf:2: mitigation hierarchy), while maintaining operational efficiency and cost- EN010103-000892-NZT DCO 6.2.6 ES Vol I Chapter 6 Alternatives and Design Evolution.pdf:18: construction, Site Boundary changes, biodiversity mitigation and EN010103-002652-Huntsman Protective Provisions.pdf:6: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossing and any mitigation measures which EN010103-002652-Huntsman Protective Provisions.pdf:14: (h) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any EN010103-001962-c 16 May 2022.pdf:5: mitigations when reaching a decision on the NZT DCO. Schedule 2 EN010103-001962-c 16 May 2022.pdf:6: Farm would form part of the mitigation in carrying out an EN010103-001469-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:49:3.8.333.8.32 The Requirements closely relate to the mitigation set out in the Environmental EN010103-001469-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:52:3.8.513.8.50 Requirement 12 (Flood risk mitigation) - this is not a model provision. It EN010103-001469-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:52: preliminary works, may commence until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk EN010103-001469-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Apr 2022.pdf:53: England, a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and EN010103-001059-NZT DCO 6.4.24 ES Vol III Appendix 12G Water Vole and Otter Survey Report.pdf:5: 2 Natural England and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2014) Otters: surveys and mitigation for development projects. EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:30: (e) carry out or construct any mitigation works. EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:48: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:51:Flood risk mitigation EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:51:preliminary works, until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction, has, for that EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:51:mitigation of flood risk during operation has, for that part, been submitted to and, after EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:51: (6) The authorised development must not be commissioned until the flood risk mitigation has EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:52: and which must include any necessary contingency action or mitigation measures arising EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:54:must commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and, EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:54: (l) any other management or mitigation plans set out in the framework construction EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:57:the piling mitigation measures in paragraph 10.8 of Chapter 10 of the environmental statement and EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:97: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:98:methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol has been submitted to and approved in EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:99: (2) The UXO clearance methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol must be EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:99: (4) The marine mammal mitigation protocol submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) must EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:99:methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol approved pursuant to sub-paragraph (1). EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:99: (b) whether any mitigation was deployed, including feedback on practicalities of deployment EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:99: of equipment and efficacy of the mitigation where reasonably practicable, or justification EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:111: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:112:methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol has been submitted to and approved in EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:112: (2) The UXO clearance methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol must be EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:112: (4) The marine mammal mitigation protocol submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) must EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:112:methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol approved pursuant to sub-paragraph (1). EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:112: (b) whether any mitigation was deployed, including feedback on practicalities of deployment EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:112: of equipment and efficacy of the mitigation where reasonably practicable, or justification EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:121: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:121: be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if any) EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:121: to submit for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:121: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:126:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:130:“ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid Gas (such approval EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:130:not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:130:to submit for National Grid Gas’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:130:ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:133:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:176: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossing and any mitigation measures which EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:217: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossing and any mitigation measures which EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:232: submit for Northern Gas Networks’ approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme EN010103-002526-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:232: © if a subsidence mitigation scheme is required, it must be carried out as approved (such EN010103-000825-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2.pdf:65: University collaborations, including the Carbon Mitigation Initiative (CMI), an independent EN010103-000825-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2.pdf:67: mitigation plans. EN010103-000825-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2.pdf:68:and implement risk mitigation plans where appropriate. various group requirements and training covering areas such as anti-bribery EN010103-000825-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2.pdf:86:The chairman, senior independent director strengthen through mitigation of group think, bp EN010103-000825-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2.pdf:103:System of internal control their management and mitigation in depth with EN010103-000825-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2.pdf:130:noted that bp’s system of internal control and risk potential mitigations that management the date of approval of the financial statements EN010103-000825-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2.pdf:130:eliminate, the risk of failure to achieve business the company over this period. Mitigations EN010103-000825-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2.pdf:143: and mitigation programme throughout 2019 and 2020, which addresses the vast majority of these user access EN010103-000825-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2.pdf:143: of changes and evidence of testing. Management has continued to perform retrospective mitigation throughout 2020. EN010103-000825-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2.pdf:144: • Management’s mitigation procedures, which demonstrated that segregation of duties across the development and EN010103-000825-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 2.pdf:144: Accordingly, we were satisfied with the results of the remediation to date and the mitigation such that we continued to EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:16: impact avoidance measures outlined as embedded mitigation in EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:16: the start of examination and that all mitigation measures that EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:16: It is agreed that mitigation measures are included across both EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17: make appropriate recommendations for mitigation. It is agreed EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17: that mitigation measures are included in the draft DCO EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17: Risk Mitigation). It is agreed that the inclusion of these EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17: are appropriate to ensure that appropriate mitigation is EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17: Mitigation of adverse impacts on the water environment during EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:18: mitigation measures proposed in Chapter 14 Marine Ecology EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:18: mitigation for piling percussive/impact piling might be necessary to drive the pile to EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:18: mitigation measures for piling shall be adopted during EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:18: mitigation standard, the MMO are a consultee for this activity. EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:57: mitigation; by way of example, for the piling at the intake – EN010103-002235-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:58: approach to the intake cofferdam piling and mitigation, are EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:13: and with mitigation measures implemented as part of a CEMP, these effects would EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18: later than the expiration of 3 years appropriate mitigation EN010103-002320-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Tacked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29: storage, power generation, power export, end of 2023. It is anticipated that this scheme to generate application of mitigation measures EN010103-001990-NZT DCO 9.22 - Written Summary of ISH3 - August 2022(D5).pdf:76: recognise the disparity between the circumstances/mitigation envisaged at EN010103-001990-NZT DCO 9.22 - Written Summary of ISH3 - August 2022(D5).pdf:78: the parties do not reach commercial agreement as to the mitigation With regard to the provision summarised in (h) in the adjoining column, it is EN010103-001142-NZT DCO 6.4.31 ES Vol III Appendix 14C Marine Mammal Baseline.pdf:6: levels with mitigation, then an EPS licence is required. In the UK, EPS EN010103-001142-NZT DCO 6.4.31 ES Vol III Appendix 14C Marine Mammal Baseline.pdf:41: investigation into occurrence, causes and mitigation. Sea Mammal EN010103-001902-NZT DCO 8.18 - CATS SoCG (Clean) July 2022 (D4).pdf:8: to seek appropriate solutions and mitigations. EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:9: should be agreed with NE and mitigation identified if EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:10: should be assessed and any mitigation proposed. EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:13: control and mitigation measures for construction and EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:13: listed below, the proposed control and mitigation measures for EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:14: specific points listed below, the proposed control and mitigation EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:14: It is agreed that through the proposed control and mitigation EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:16: Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17: licence and any marine licence will require mitigation measures EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17: Effectan. A requirement for d mmitigation for borehole collapse EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17: mitigation. Further information regarding how the HHD is EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:18: prevention of mitigation for cases of HHD bore collapse failure EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:18: The CEMP will also be amended at include the mitigation EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: enhancing the mitigation such as through use of additional EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: Deadline 2 to specify any required mitigation which would EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20:Mitigation and Enhancement in the Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy [Document 4.15, Rev EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: European Protected Species Mitigation Licence EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: and associated mitigation requirements (e.g. provision of EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:21: It is agreed that the biodiversity protection, mitigation and EN010103-002240-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:21: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-001927-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:1:fluid during horizontal directional drilling and the potential requirement for mitigation. It is noted that EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:3:13.1.15. This report does not seek to include recommendations, specify mitigation, or EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:4: • inform the options for impact avoidance, mitigation and/ or compensation EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:5: requirements for survey and mitigation. EN010103-000889-NZT DCO 6.4.28 ES Vol III Appendix 13A Aquatic Ecology Supplementary Desk Study and Field Survey Report.pdf:27: consider mitigation that will protect all other fish species present in Dabholm EN010103-002462-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA.pdf:12: (h) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation EN010103-001546-Marine Management Organistation - Comments on Relevant Representations (RRs).pdf:3: • Mitigation is required if dredging is to occur concurrently with other dredging EN010103-001546-Marine Management Organistation - Comments on Relevant Representations (RRs).pdf:3: concerns within their Relevant Representation and that mitigation to lessen the EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (4).pdf:5:effect on marine ecological or ornithological receptors following mitigation. EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:10: on that site“ (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:11: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:45: appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS in cetaceans including EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:45: porpoise population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:50:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:51: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:54: report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:59: screening is considered necessary to avoid a significant effect. Mitigation for visual EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:59: General Mitigation Measures EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:59:6.1.19 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise and EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:59: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:61: processes. Based on the analysis in Appendix F and the mitigation measures above it EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:67:6.1.48 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, Flood EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:67: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include: EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:67:6.1.50 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:70:6.3.4 The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) recommends a range of mitigation EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:70: Development as good practice mitigation, which will ensure that any temporary EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:70: standard mitigation measures included as part of the JNCC Guidelines, it is concluded EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:72: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites. EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:73: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:73: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:73: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:73: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:74: Stockton-on-Tees Local Plan & Policies The Appropriate Assessment identified that the Council would produce a Recreational Mitigation EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:74: the detailed strategic development mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue. EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:74: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy. EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:74: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA / Ramsar which has been EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:74: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:75: support them. Where likely adverse impacts are identified, avoidance or appropriate mitigation EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:75: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:75: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:77: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: ensure adequate mitigation is in place to mitigate any potential for cumulative effects. EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: Development. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:81: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:92: cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects on site EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:114: dB. Paragraph 6.1.15 lists the specific noise and visual mitigation measures to be implemented. EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:114: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.42 to 6.1.4453, including the preparation of a Construction EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:114: export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity of the SPA / EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:114: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:114: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the SPA / EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:117: likely to be very low. Furthermore, there are a range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on marine life, including harbour porpoise (see EN010103-002062-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:117: b. Mitigation measures have been identified which will ensure no mortality or significant disturbance of harbour porpoise arises, and taking into EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:13: and with mitigation measures implemented as part of a CEMP, these effects would EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18: later than the expiration of 3 years appropriate mitigation EN010103-002319-NZT DCO 9.34 - Updated List of Developments (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29: storage, power generation, power export, end of 2023. It is anticipated that this scheme to generate application of mitigation measures EN010103-001994-NZT DCO 9.26 - Riparian Mammal Report - August 2022(D5).pdf:8: a European Protected Species Mitigation Licence (EPSML). A licence is only likely to EN010103-001994-NZT DCO 9.26 - Riparian Mammal Report - August 2022(D5).pdf:8: requirements for survey and mitigation. EN010103-001994-NZT DCO 9.26 - Riparian Mammal Report - August 2022(D5).pdf:9: survey and mitigation. EN010103-001994-NZT DCO 9.26 - Riparian Mammal Report - August 2022(D5).pdf:25: water vole and to inform specification of the final mitigation requirements, including EN010103-001994-NZT DCO 9.26 - Riparian Mammal Report - August 2022(D5).pdf:25: mitigation prior to construction. EN010103-001994-NZT DCO 9.26 - Riparian Mammal Report - August 2022(D5).pdf:27: Dean, M., Strachan, R., Gow, D. & Andrews, R., (2016) The Water Vole Mitigation EN010103-001994-NZT DCO 9.26 - Riparian Mammal Report - August 2022(D5).pdf:27: Natural England and Defra (2015) Water voles: surveys and mitigation for EN010103-001994-NZT DCO 9.26 - Riparian Mammal Report - August 2022(D5).pdf:27: Natural England and Defra (2019) Otters: Surveys and Mitigation for Development EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:14: • to identify and collate the residual effects after mitigation for each of the EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:14: • to set out the proposed mitigation and/ or monitoring measures including EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:14: sites and their locations, together with any mitigation or compensation EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:16: before and after mitigation will be evaluated; however, paragraph 7.22 is EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:16: mitigation. For the avoidance of doubt, the Inspectorate advises that the ES EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:16: reports on the significance of effects both before and after mitigation is applied. EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:17: Mitigation EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:17:3.3.22 Specific mitigation measures relating to the different environmental aspects EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:17: as the design process for the Proposed Development progresses, mitigation EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:17:3.3.23 Any mitigation relied upon for the purposes of the assessment should be EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:17: explained in detail within the ES. The likely efficacy of the mitigation proposed EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:17: of mitigation. This is necessary to allow the reader to understand the efficacy EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:17: (in assessment terms) of the proposed mitigation measures and therefore what EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:17: would happen if any of the proposed mitigation should fail or not be delivered. EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:17:3.3.24 The ES should also address how any mitigation proposed is secured, with EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:30: mitigation measures that would be required to protect sensitive EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:34: mitigation. Effort should be made to agree the need for and scope of EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:38: bodies, including Natural England. Any necessary mitigation EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:39: impacts to trees and woodland and describe any mitigation measures EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:44: required and the types of vehicles required. Any mitigation measures EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:47:4.8.8 Para 6.120 Mitigation The Scoping Report explains that measures will be proposed to EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:47: If mitigation plans are proposed, drafts of these documents should be EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:49:4.9.6 Para 6.124 Mitigation The Inspectorate notes the potential for physical impacts to EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:52: and 6.137 the Proposed Development and any mitigation measures such as EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:52: diversions are proposed, their duration and how such mitigation EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:68:assessed and mitigation measure applied. We would expect the FRA to: EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:68: 4. We would expect mitigation measures to be applied for all sites and again EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:72:influence any mitigation and betterment with the proposed development. EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:72:the environment and not just to mitigate. The level of mitigation/compensation for EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:74:works, considerable justification for this, together with details of mitigation and EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:74:mitigation measures agreed with the relevant body in this case the EA, to prevent EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:74:All appropriate mitigation to prevent entrainment of marine organisms on the EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:75:November, in any given year, a silt mitigation plan must be in place and/or an EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:75:DCO application, so an informed decision can be made regarding any mitigation EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:81:environmental constraints”. This is without specific reference to mitigation or compensation for EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:84:5.3.18 The applicant should include appropriate mitigation measures as an integral part of the EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:89:and propose appropriate mitigation. Tees Archaeology has been consulted and has EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:89:should be given to any environmental mitigation measures that may be required. EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:101: - Confirmation of any mitigation that is likely to be considered for use or installed as EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:120: and should identify such mitigation measures as may be required in order to avoid, minimise EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:120:proposals for mitigation of any impacts and if appropriate, compensation measures. Contact the EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:121:results, impact assessments and appropriate accompanying mitigation strategies included as part of EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:121:standing advice for protected species which includes links to guidance on survey and mitigation. EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:121:therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation proposals for Habitats and Species EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:121:  Full details of any mitigation or compensation that might be required. EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:128:developer to identify appropriate mitigation solutions. EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:130:information, risk assessments, proposed mitigation measures, conclusions and residual EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:132:impacts for health and inequalities and where resulting mitigation measures are mutually EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:133:monitoring and mitigation during these phases. Construction and decommissioning will be EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:135:mitigation measures should be outlined. EN010103-000013-EN010103_Scoping Opinion.pdf:150:PD Teesport Ltd should be consulted directly concerning the above, as well as any proposed risk mitigation EN010103-001659-National Highways - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:2: finalising assessment / mitigation with a view to reaching resolution in the near EN010103-001659-National Highways - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:3: Network, consideration was not given to the potential mitigation strategies (including EN010103-001659-National Highways - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ1.pdf:3: the overall mitigation measures. These Framework Plans have been reviewed and EN010103-000824-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons.pdf:59: structures associated with generating stations and that mitigation will therefore need to EN010103-000824-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons.pdf:74: the CO2 Export Pipeline. Further mitigation measures would be expected to be EN010103-000824-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons.pdf:83: • Booklet No.5 - Reducing the Adverse Effects of Public Development: Mitigation Works. EN010103-000893-NZT DCO 6.2.7 ES Vol I Chapter 7 Legislative Context and Planning Policy.pdf:8: generating station and that mitigation will therefore need to be aimed at EN010103-000893-NZT DCO 6.2.7 ES Vol I Chapter 7 Legislative Context and Planning Policy.pdf:9: historic environment; climate change adaptation and mitigation; and coastal EN010103-000893-NZT DCO 6.2.7 ES Vol I Chapter 7 Legislative Context and Planning Policy.pdf:35: cumulative. Where this is not possible mitigation, or compensation EN010103-000893-NZT DCO 6.2.7 ES Vol I Chapter 7 Legislative Context and Planning Policy.pdf:35: impacts; no reasonable alternatives are available; and mitigation, or EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:10: on that site” (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:11: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:45: appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS in cetaceans including EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:45: porpoise population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:50:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:51: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:55: report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:60: screening is considered necessary to avoid a significant effect. Mitigation for visual EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:60: General Mitigation Measures EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:60:6.1.19 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise and EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:60: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:62: processes. Based on the analysis in Appendix F and the mitigation measures above it EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:68:6.1.48 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, Flood EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:68: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include: EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:71:6.1.496.1.55 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:73:6.3.4 The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) recommends a range of mitigation EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:73: Development as good practice mitigation, which will ensure that any temporary EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:74: standard mitigation measures included as part of the JNCC Guidelines, it is concluded EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:76: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites. EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:77: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:77: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:77: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:77: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:78: Stockton-on-Tees Local Plan & Policies The Appropriate Assessment identified that the Council would produce a Recreational Mitigation EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:78: the detailed strategic development mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue. EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:78: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy. EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:78: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA / Ramsar which has been EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:78: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:79: support them. Where likely adverse impacts are identified, avoidance or appropriate mitigation EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:79: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:79: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:80: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:81: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:82: ensure adequate mitigation is in place to mitigate any potential for cumulative effects. EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:82: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:83: Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be incorporated into EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:86: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:97: Development cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:119: due to the HDD would be a relatively quiet 58 dB. Visual disturbance also cannot be dismissed without mitigation. Paragraph 6.1.15 lists the specific noise EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:119: and visual mitigation measures to be implemented. EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:119: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.42 46 to 6.1.44 48and 6.1.54, including the preparation of a EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:119: of the CO2 export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:119: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:119: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the SPA / EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:123: likely to be very low. Furthermore, there are a range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on marine life, including harbour porpoise (see EN010103-002553-NZT DCO 5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:123: b. Mitigation measures have been identified which will ensure no mortality or significant disturbance of harbour porpoise arises, and taking into EN010103-001987-NZT DCO 8.34 - Position Statement Orsted Hornsea Project 4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:7: appropriate mitigations and protections. There is no transparency in the storage EN010103-001727-DLA Piper UK LLP - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words 1.pdf:9: impacts and means of mitigation that are anticipated to arise most frequently, but they are not EN010103-001727-DLA Piper UK LLP - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words 1.pdf:9: therefore consider other impacts and means of mitigation where it determines that the impact is EN010103-001727-DLA Piper UK LLP - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words 1.pdf:37: (h) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:9: vegetation planting as a visual screening mitigation measure; instead, the focus has been on enhancing the EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:14: pollution mitigation plan. IC explains further that NE has accepted any leak of drilling fluid would be to the Tees EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:14: measures to address potential frac-out. The potential drilling method and mitigation outlined below differ from EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:14: mitigation of potential impacts on the Teesside and Cleveland Coast SPA and Ramsar site associated with HDD EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:16: The Applicants and the ExA discussed whether the HDD mitigations apply to the deemed marine licences. EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:16: confirm whether mitigation to address the risks of HDD collapsing and releasing bore fluid will be included in the EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:18: In response to a question from the ExA on potential mitigation options for nutrient neutrality, the Applicants confirm EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:18: they would not want to prejudge mitigation options at this stage but are considering options. EN010103-001992-NZT DCO 9.24 - Written Summary of ISH4 August 2022 (D5).pdf:27: later than the expiration of 3 years from mitigation where necessary.“ EN010103-001892-NZT DCO 8.1 - RCBC SoCG (Clean) July 2022 (D4).pdf:17: mitigation measures are included to mitigate flood risk. EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:4: actions and communication channels will be available 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:9: A range of pollution control and mitigation measures EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:10: working methods and mitigation in the DEMP. EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:17: and application of adequate mitigation measures will EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:18: adequate mitigation measures will be enforced through EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:18: appropriate mitigation according to the risk of dust EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:19: monitoring to verify that mitigation measures are EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:22:ES Chapters 9 - Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water The Site will implement security mitigations to reduce DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement 8: EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:23:Resources, 21 - Climate Change associated with the construction of the Proposed 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:28: is recorded as present, mitigation measures, including EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:34:ES Chapter 10 - Geology, Hydrogeology and The following additional operational mitigations will be DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:34:ES Chapter 10 - Geology, Hydrogeology and An Ecological Risk Assessment and Mitigation DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:35: vibration mitigation measures for the Proposed 21: Control of noise and vibration (construction) EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:36: determine the most appropriate mitigation options. 21: Control of Noise and Vibration (Operation) EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:37: identified mitigations. Habitat monitoring may also be EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:39: Protected Species Mitigation Licence (depending on EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:39: mitigation requirements (e.g. provision of replacement EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:41: mitigation measures will be applied to prevent the EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:43:Conservation mitigation proposed will replicate that already identified 16: Construction Environmental Management Plan and EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:45: works and a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:46: mitigation would be implemented to ensure that they EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:48: mitigation and enhancement measures within the EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:51: embedded mitigations and design impact avoidance EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:52: on/inform mitigation and emergency response Detailed Design EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:53: Document Ref. 6.4) will be used to inform the detailed 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:59: outline key pollution mitigation measures to be EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:63: will be stored outside of the 1 in 200 year floodplain 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:63: the floodplain, the River Tees and Greatham Creek. 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:63: ground construction, suitable de-watering methods will 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:64: at all times when working in excavations. When 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:64: watercourses would comply with relevant guidance 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:64: least one designated Flood Warden would be 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:64: measures aimed at preventing an increase in flood risk 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:66: mitigation proposals are agreed with all required EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:66:ES Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP Specific mitigation measures may be required in the DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:74: • The standard JNCC mitigation measures for 21: Control of Noise and Vibration (Construction) EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:75: mitigation would be implemented to avoid disturbance EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:79:ES Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP An appropriate archaeological mitigation strategy, for DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:83:ES Appendix 8A - Air Quality Construction Appropriate mitigation measures for managing the DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:84: a Flood Risk Management Action Plan/ Method 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:84: developments within a designated floodplain (as in the 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:85: and from the PCC Site is affected by surface water 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:85: maintenance of the drainage system will be 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:85: ground development within strata where groundwater 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:85: is recorded as present, mitigation measures, including DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:86:ES Appendix 9A - FRA A number of additional mitigation strategies will be DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002176-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Clean).pdf:86: considered during the design process for the Proposed 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002532-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Clean Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:62: with generating stations and that mitigation will therefore need to be aimed EN010103-002532-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Clean Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:78: Further mitigation measures would be expected to be undertaken by EN010103-002532-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons Clean Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:87: Mitigation Works. EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:1:12.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures …………………………………………… 12-50 EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:3:  include appropriate mitigation measures as an integral part of the EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:3: appropriate mitigation measures will be put in place then appropriate EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:7: design (including mitigation for other environmental disciplines). If EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:8: or mitigation e.g. for purposes of ensuring no net loss of biodiversity); EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:8: priority that they do not require retention or mitigation at the relevant EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:8: effective mitigation is both possible and enforceable. A permanent effect EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:11: ecological mitigation, compensation and enhancement. EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:17:site and any necessary surveys. Appropriate mitigation is specified in EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:17:eradication/ control measures detailed in the ES. Section 12.7: Mitigation and Enhancement, EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:17:woodland and describe any mitigation measures Volume I, Document Ref. 6.2). No loss of EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:18:impacts and mitigation measures have been semi-aquatic species great crested newt, EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:18:protected and priority habitats, such as intertidal considered and assessed. Mitigation is EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:19:impacts cannot be avoided, then mitigation should effects. Freshwater and marine habitats and EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:19:be suggested, and only where mitigation can be species are addressed within the scope of EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:19:ensure measures are implemented, it is in Section 12.7: Mitigation and Enhancement EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:35: effects on these, in accordance with the ‘mitigation hierarchy’ (see Appendix EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:36: necessary licences and permits are summarised in Section 12.7: Mitigation EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:36: construction effect on habitats and species. A mitigation plan setting out the EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:37: mitigation over and above that which is inherent to the design, or otherwise EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:37: and the mitigation otherwise committed to in Chapter 8: Air Quality and EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:37: Where mitigation has been identified as necessary in other chapters to EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:37: assumed that there is a commitment to provide this mitigation, and that it EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:45: to make a detailed programme of mitigation mandatory. EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:45: during vegetation clearance (see mitigation), and there is sufficient suitable EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:45: are potentially suitable for common lizard. Appropriate mitigation would be EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:45: applied as outlined in Section 12.7: Mitigation and Enhancements Measures. EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:45: This conclusion does not remove the need for precautionary mitigation to EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:46:12.6.51 In compliance with legal requirements, effective mitigation will be applied to EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:51:12.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:51: Construction Mitigation EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:51: Licence or a European Protected Species Mitigation Licence (depending on EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:51: mitigation requirements (e.g. provision of replacement roosts) have been EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:52: Operation Mitigation EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:52:12.7.9 Given the findings of the above impact assessment, mitigation measures are EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:53: Decommissioning Mitigation EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:53:12.7.10 Any necessary mitigation requirements would be determined and agreed at EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:53: and mitigation in the DEMP. This is discussed further within Chapter 4: EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:53: approach to site appropriate landscape and biodiversity mitigation and EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:53: would be employed to oversee the delivery of all necessary mitigation, EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:56:12.10.1 With implementation of appropriate mitigation and monitoring, following EN010103-000898-NZT DCO 6.2.12 ES Vol I Chapter 12 Terrestrial Ecology.pdf:56: INCA (2019). Reptile Mitigation Strategy Report ID INCA 201931. Redcar: EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:27: (e) carry out or construct any mitigation works. EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:42: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:44:Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:44:preliminary works, until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction, has, for that EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:44: (3) No part of the authorised development may be commissioned until a scheme for the mitigation EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:45: (6) The authorised development must not be commissioned until the flood risk mitigation has been EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:46:commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and, EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:50:the piling mitigation measures in paragraph 10.8 of Chapter 10 of the environmental statement and EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:83: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion zones EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:84: (h) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing auditory EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:95: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion zones EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:96: (h) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing auditory EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:104:“ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:104:be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if any) for EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:104:for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:104:monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:109:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:185: submit for Northern Gas Networks’ approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme EN010103-001918-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with June 2022) - July 2022 (D4).pdf:185: © if a subsidence mitigation scheme is required, it shall be carried out as approved (such EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:30: (e) carry out or construct any mitigation works. EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:47: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:50:Flood risk mitigation EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:50:preliminary works, until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction, has, for that EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:50:mitigation of flood risk during operation has, for that part, been submitted to and, after EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:50: (6) The authorised development must not be commissioned until the flood risk mitigation has EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:51: reports, and which must include any necessary contingency action or mitigation measures EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:53:must commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and, EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:53: (l) any other management or mitigation plans set out in the framework construction EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:56:the piling mitigation measures in paragraph 10.8 of Chapter 10 of the environmental statement and EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:93: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:94:and marine mammal mitigation protocol has been submitted to and approved in writing by the EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:94: (2) The UXO clearance methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol must be EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95: (4) The marine mammal mitigation protocol submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) must EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95:methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol approved pursuant to sub-paragraph (1). EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95: (b) whether any mitigation was deployed, including feedback on practicalities of deployment EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:95: of equipment and efficacy of the mitigation where reasonably practicable, or justification EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:105: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:106:and marine mammal mitigation protocol has been submitted to and approved in writing by the EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:106: (2) The UXO clearance methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol must be EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:107: (4) The marine mammal mitigation protocol submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) must EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:107:methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol approved pursuant to sub-paragraph (1). EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:107: (b) whether any mitigation was deployed, including feedback on practicalities of deployment EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:107: of equipment and efficacy of the mitigation where reasonably practicable, or justification EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:115: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:115: be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if any) EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:115: to submit for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:115: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:121:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:196: submit for Northern Gas Networks’ approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme EN010103-002251-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:196: © if a subsidence mitigation scheme is required, it must be carried out as approved (such EN010103-001914-NZT DCO 9.19 - Further Response to Written Question GEN.1.37 - July 2022 (D4).pdf:18: later than the expiration of 3 years from mitigation where necessary.” EN010103-001468-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Tracked - Apr 2022.pdf:64: 12 mitigation the mitigation of flood risk during EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:14: mitigation measures have been proposed in this chapter (paragraph 14.5) in EN010103-001240-EN010103_Marine_Management_Organisation_Relevant_Representation_17122021_Redacted.pdf:15: highlight that this mitigation may be required as a condition within the DML. EN010103-002052-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Clean - August 2022(D6).pdf:62: 12 mitigation the mitigation of flood risk during EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:1:19.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures ……………………………………………. 19-21 EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:2: identified, mitigation measures and residual impacts are presented. EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:4: respond to those effects with appropriate mitigation. EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:8: mitigation measures which have been embedded within the Proposed EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:8: mitigation). EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:9: embedded mitigation, is determined using the matrix at Table 19-4, which EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:22:19.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:22: assessment would inform a proportionate mitigation scope which may entail EN010103-000903-NZT DCO 6.2.19 ES Vol I Chapter 19 Marine Heritage.pdf:22:19.7.3 An appropriate and proportionate mitigation strategy will be agreed with the EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:29: (e) carry out or construct any mitigation works. EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:47: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:50:Flood risk mitigation EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:50:preliminary works, until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction, has, for that EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:50: (3) No part of the authorised development may be commissioned until a scheme for the mitigation EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:50: (6) The authorised development must not be commissioned until the flood risk mitigation has been EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:51: which must include any necessary contingency action or mitigation measures arising from EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:52:commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and, EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:53: (l) any other management or mitigation plans set out in the framework construction EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:56:the piling mitigation measures in paragraph 10.8 of Chapter 10 of the environmental statement and EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:97: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion zones EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:98:and marine mammal mitigation protocol has been submitted to and approved in writing by the MMO EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:98: (2) The UXO clearance methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol must be submitted EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:98: (4) (h)a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing The EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:98:marine mammal mitigation protocol submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) must include details EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:98:methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol approved pursuant to sub-paragraph (1). EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:99: (b) whether any mitigation was deployed, including feedback on practicalities of deployment EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:99: of equipment and efficacy of the mitigation where reasonably practicable, or justification EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:111: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion zones EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:112:methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol has been submitted to and approved in EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:112: (2) The UXO clearance methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol must be submitted EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:113: (4) (h)a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing The EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:113:marine mammal mitigation protocol submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) must include details EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:113:methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol approved pursuant to sub-paragraph (1). EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:113: (b) whether any mitigation was deployed, including feedback on practicalities of deployment EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:113: of equipment and efficacy of the mitigation where reasonably practicable, or justification EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:121: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:121: be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if any) for EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:121: for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:121: monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:126:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:206: to submit for Northern Gas Networks’ approval a ground subsidence mitigation EN010103-002252-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:206: © if a subsidence mitigation scheme is required, it shall must be carried out as approved (such EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:10: on that site“ (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:11: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:45: appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS in cetaceans including EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:45: porpoise population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:50:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:51: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:54: report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:59: screening is considered necessary to avoid a significant effect. Mitigation for visual EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:59: General Mitigation Measures EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:59:6.1.19 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise and EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:59: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:61: processes. Based on the analysis in Appendix F and the mitigation measures above it EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:67:6.1.48 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, Flood EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:67: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include: EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:69:6.1.496.1.54 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:71:6.3.4 The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) recommends a range of mitigation EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:71: Development as good practice mitigation, which will ensure that any temporary EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:72: standard mitigation measures included as part of the JNCC Guidelines, it is concluded EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:74: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites. EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:75: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:75: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:75: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:75: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:76: Stockton-on-Tees Local Plan & Policies The Appropriate Assessment identified that the Council would produce a Recreational Mitigation EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:76: the detailed strategic development mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue. EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:76: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy. EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:76: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA / Ramsar which has been EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:76: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:77: support them. Where likely adverse impacts are identified, avoidance or appropriate mitigation EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:77: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:77: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:78: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:79: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:80: ensure adequate mitigation is in place to mitigate any potential for cumulative effects. EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:80: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:81: Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be incorporated into EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:84: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:95: Development cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:117: due to the HDD would be a relatively quiet 58 dB. Visual disturbance also cannot be dismissed without mitigation. Paragraph 6.1.15 lists the specific noise EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:117: and visual mitigation measures to be implemented. EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:117: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.42 46 to 6.1.44 48and 6.1.54, including the preparation of a EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:117: of the CO2 export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:117: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:117: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the SPA / EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:121: likely to be very low. Furthermore, there are a range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on marine life, including harbour porpoise (see EN010103-002331-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:121: b. Mitigation measures have been identified which will ensure no mortality or significant disturbance of harbour porpoise arises, and taking into EN010103-001879-Marine Management Organistation - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 3.pdf:3: mitigation has been secured in the DML or where this can be found in the EN010103-001187-NZT DCO 5.11 Indicative Lighting Strategy - Reprovided(2).pdf:32: 24-hour operations are located near sensitive locations, application of mitigation EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:66: impacts may have an adverse effect on the integrity of a habitats site that requires mitigation, including EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:67: mitigation measures for this eventuality into the Final CEMP. Natural England advises that this should also EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:90: of mitigation that are anticipated to arise most frequently, but they are not intended to provide a list of EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:91: and means of mitigation where it determines that the impact is relevant and important to its decision. EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:102: 5.1.2 Requirement no. 12: Flood risk mitigation Applicants have proposed robust protections that it considers will safeguard STDC’s interests, but will continue to EN010103-001859-9.12 - Applicants comments on written Representations - June 2022 (D3).pdf:105: no evidence of a severe impact on the highway network without mitigation being secured by way of access/egress Proposed Development by the Applicants. The Applicants confirmed a requirement for 1,200 parking spaces (at EN010103-002410-NZT DCO - 9.46 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Third Written Questions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:16: would not impact buried archaeological remains and that therefore mitigation EN010103-002410-NZT DCO - 9.46 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Third Written Questions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:22: the mitigation measures outlined (or equivalent), the Applicants and EN010103-002410-NZT DCO - 9.46 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Third Written Questions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:22: - Subject to the HRA being updated to take the proposed mitigation EN010103-002410-NZT DCO - 9.46 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Third Written Questions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:23: updated to incorporate the proposed mitigation secured by the draft EN010103-002410-NZT DCO - 9.46 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Third Written Questions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:31: a. The applicant could consider abstraction-point mitigation for nitrogen, if mitigation is required. EN010103-002410-NZT DCO - 9.46 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Third Written Questions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:31: c. We would expect a construction phase and operational phase site pollution plan to include consideration of the discharge of fire water and mitigation measures to prevent adverse impacts in the EN010103-002410-NZT DCO - 9.46 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Third Written Questions - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:32:- the Pre-submission Screening Service (PSS) for European Protected Species mitigation licence applications. EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:10: effect on one or more receptors, mitigation measures are identified where EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:10: happening. The use of such mitigation will be secured through Requirements EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:30: construction. Site Boundary changes, biodiversity mitigation and EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:33:7.2.8 No additional mitigation other than the use of the CEMP has been identified EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:36:7.4.5 Impacts will be managed by appropriate construction mitigation measures EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:36:7.4.7 The potential impacts (without mitigation) that could arise during the EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:37: without further mitigation measures being applied. EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:38: mitigated by design and no further mitigation is required. EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:39: sites have been mitigated by design and no further mitigation is required. EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:40: Development. Therefore, no additional mitigation is necessary besides the EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:40: embedded mitigation. EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:41: sound mitigation, and in general the temporary nature of the impacts the EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:42: impact pathways and the proposed embedded mitigation to be used during EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:43: mitigation measures (cladding for example) and the location of the PCC Site. EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:46: the development PCC Site due to its scale. Mitigation is therefore not possible EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:47: assets has been eliminated and additional mitigation measures are not EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:47: assets has been eliminated and additional mitigation measures are not EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:51: Development will incorporate appropriate standards and mitigation measures EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:51:7.17.3 The Proposed Development incorporates embedded mitigation measures to EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:53: implementation of mitigation where mitigation measures are proposed) have EN010103-001161-NZT DCO 6.1 ES Non-Technical Summary.pdf:53:8.1.3 A number of environmental impact avoidance, design and mitigation measures EN010103-001467-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement - Clean - Apr 2022.pdf:62: 12 mitigation the mitigation of flood risk during EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:27: (e) carry out or construct any mitigation works. EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:42: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:44:Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:44:preliminary works, until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction, has, for that EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:45:mitigation of flood risk during operation has, for that part, been submitted to and, after EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:45: (6) The authorised development must not be commissioned until the flood risk mitigation has EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:46:must commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and, EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:92: © delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:93: (g) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:107: © delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:108: (g) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:116: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:116: be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if any) EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:116: to submit for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:116: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001471-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with Oct 2021 version) - Apr 2022.pdf:122:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:18: report is that the full 3% expansion may occur over the full depth of slag material, with mitigation EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:19: construction worker end-users if mitigation measures are not implemented to reduce the risk of EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:22: Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy: Net Zero Teesside. EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:22: Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy for Net Zero Teesside. EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:80:source of construction material, but mitigation may be necessary and should be considered for the various design aspects EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:80:and where appropriate included in connection with various aspects of construction. Mitigation measures may include but EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:85:advised that unless proven otherwise, mitigation will be required to avoid an unacceptable risk during development. EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:85:development/construction works. Mitigation and monitoring will be required to eliminate, reduce, control or manage EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:85:(RPE) for ground workers. Mitigation will also be required to minimise the risk of off-site migration. EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:88:arsenic and lead at the site which may pose a risk to construction workers and potential end-users if mitigation EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:93:consequences (no barriers in place or of limited effectiveness) and then again assuming mitigation in place and EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:93:and revised as scheme design progresses. Risks and mitigation measures identified in this report should be EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:96:Risk Category Risk Title Risk Type Discipline Causes Event Unmitigated Consequences Prob Imp Sev Mitigation/Realisation Overview Prob Imp Sev EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:96: Review UXO Risk Assessment and Risk Mitigation Strategy Report (6 Alpha Associates). EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:97:Risk Category Risk Title Risk Type Discipline Causes Event Unmitigated Consequences Prob Imp Sev Mitigation/Realisation Overview Prob Imp Sev EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:97: Construction Environmental Mitigation Plan and Verification Report on completion of the works. EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:97:7. Soil contamination Construction workers Threat Construction 2 3 6 Mitgate through design, Health and Safety documentation, Construction Environmental Mitigation Plan 1 3 3 EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:98:Risk Category Risk Title Risk Type Discipline Causes Event Unmitigated Consequences Prob Imp Sev Mitigation/Realisation Overview Prob Imp Sev EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:98:10. Other conditions – sensitive Threat Construction Ecological damage. 3 3 9 Development of Ecological Risk Assessment and Mitigation Strategy and implementation in Construction Environmental Mitigation 2 3 6 EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:100:Risk Category Risk Title Risk Type Discipline Causes Event Unmitigated Consequences Prob Imp Sev Mitigation/Realisation Overview Prob Imp Sev EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:100: , Construction Environmental Mitigation Plan and Verification Report on completion of the works EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:101:Risk Category Risk Title Risk Type Discipline Causes Event Unmitigated Consequences Prob Imp Sev Mitigation/Realisation Overview Prob Imp Sev EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:102:Risk Category Risk Title Risk Type Discipline Causes Event Unmitigated Consequences Prob Imp Sev Mitigation/Realisation Overview Prob Imp Sev EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:102: Special environmental / ecological requir . - Baseline ecological assessment, Development of Ecological Risk Assessment and Mitigation Strategy and implementation in Co EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:102: ements. 4) Adverse effect on protected wildlife (dune habitat and migr nstruction Environmental Mitigation Plan. EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:107:mitigation measures such as a detailed UXO risk strategy and probing for obstructions in the Made Ground before EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:114:It is assumed the FEED contractor will include mitigation measures for this within the design as detailed below, or EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:114:excellent source of construction material, but mitigation may be necessary and should be considered for the various EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:121:pose a risk to construction workers and potential construction worker end-users if mitigation measures are not EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:121:works. Mitigation and monitoring will be required to eliminate, reduce, control or manage the risk, or in the last EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:121:workers. Mitigation will also be required to minimise the risk of off-site migration. EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:121:A risk register has been provided that provides required mitigation against the risk identified. Risks have been EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:246:practice including for groundworkers to assess site specific risk to health and incorporate appropriate mitigation. EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:253:advised that unless proven otherwise, mitigation will be required to avoid an unacceptable risk during development. EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:253:Mitigation and monitoring will be required to eliminate, reduce, control or manage the risk, or in the last resort provide EN010103-001738-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1b Preliminary Onshore Ground Investigation for GIR Report - June 2022.pdf:253:suitable personal protective equipment (PPE)/respiratory protective equipment (RPE) for ground workers. Mitigation EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (9).pdf:5:effect on marine ecological or ornithological receptors following mitigation. EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:1:11.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures …………………………………………… 11-62 EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:6: NPS EN-1 that “The primary mitigation for noise from fossil fuel generating EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:6: The mitigation of construction and EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:6:  At particular times of the day, evening and Avoidance and 11.7: Mitigation and EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:7:guidance which also give examples of mitigation EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:25: mitigation was already included within the available data, therefore it has been EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:27: classified both before and after mitigation measures have been applied. EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:29: projects (with embedded mitigation) and sound pressure level (SPL) plant EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:31: from a comparable site with embedded mitigation included and corrected EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:31: to a lower level of mitigation as a conservative approach. EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:31: application of appropriate mitigation as outlined within this chapter will result in EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:31:11.3.77 In relation to both construction and operational effects, mitigation, if considered EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:34: appropriateness of mitigation. Effort defined in Section 11.3. EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:40: required outside of normal working hours. Embedded mitigation to be included EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:42: identify specific noise and vibration mitigation measures for the Proposed EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:42: mitigation measures set out in this section for construction noise will also be EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:42: appropriate mitigation during the decommissioning stage. EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:42:11.5.10 During the detailed design stage, embedded mitigation will be included through EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:46: is appointed in order to identify specific mitigation measures to be included in EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:51: appropriate embedded mitigation is in place during the works have already been EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:52: mitigation is in place during the works have already been discussed in Section EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:52: Therefore, appropriate mitigation as discussed in Section 11.5 will be required EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:56: mitigation measures are proposed in addition to those listed in Section 11.5: EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:56: the control and mitigation of vibration, within the Final CEMP. Potential EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:57: measures to ensure that appropriate mitigation is in place during the works EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:57: sites. A level of embedded sound mitigation was already included within EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:58: additional specifically designed mitigation in place. EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:58: the addition of any specifically designed acoustic mitigation. EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:61: Potential measures to ensure that appropriate mitigation is in place during EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:64:11.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:65:11.7.4 Residual effects after mitigation are described in Section 11.9: Residual EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:65: Levels, without specific mitigation in place. In addition, the predicted change EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:65: has been identified to ensure that appropriate mitigation is developed to EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:65: achieve the limit values once the contractor is appointed. Mitigation EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:66: mitigation. Through comparison and correlation with data from other current EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:67: appropriate mitigation to reduce noise and vibration during the construction EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:67:Development Environment Classification Mitigation/ Classification of Nature EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:67: (following to mitigation (if identified) after mitigation effect(s) EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:67: and industrial daytime preparation of the that the mitigation EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:67: and industrial during daytime preparation of the that the mitigation EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:67: and industrial daytime preparation of the that the mitigation EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:68:Development Environment Classification Mitigation/ Classification of Nature EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:68: (following to mitigation (if identified) after mitigation effect(s) EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:68: and industrial daytime preparation of the that the mitigation EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:68: and industrial daytime preparation of the that the mitigation EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:69:Development Environment Classification Mitigation/ Classification of Nature EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:69: (following to mitigation (if identified) after mitigation effect(s) EN010103-000897-NZT DCO 6.2.11 ES Vol I Chapter 11 Noise and Vibration.pdf:69: decommission during daytime the that the mitigation EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:1:25.2 Significant Environmental Effects and Proposed Mitigation Measures ……. 25-1 EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:2: Proposed Mitigation Measures EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:2: embedded mitigation or impact avoidance measures included in the design EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:2: additional mitigation measures that have been identified in the technical EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:2: major) effect has been reduced to a ‘not significant’ effect following mitigation. EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:4:Development Environmental Impact Classification Mitigation/ enhancement Classification of residual effect Nature of effect(s) EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:4:stage (following development design of effect prior (if identified) after mitigation (Lt/ Mt/ St and P/ T EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:4: to mitigation and D/ In) EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:4: chemical spillages (Tees adverse and WMP (embedded mitigation), water EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:5:Development Environmental Impact Classification Mitigation/ enhancement Classification of residual effect Nature of effect(s) EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:5:stage (following development design of effect prior (if identified) after mitigation (Lt/ Mt/ St and P/ T EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:5: to mitigation and D/ In) EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:5:Construction No significant effects are predicted to occur with use of embedded mitigation (e.g. pollution control measures). EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:5:Operation No significant effects are predicted to occur with use of embedded mitigation (e.g. pollution control measures). EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:5:Decommissioning No significant effects are predicted to occur with use of embedded mitigation (e.g. pollution control measures). EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:5: Effects to pinnipeds, adoption of the JNCC standard mitigation EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:5: construction phase. mitigation that they should be carried out EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:6:Development Environmental Impact Classification Mitigation/ enhancement Classification of residual effect Nature of effect(s) EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:6:stage (following development design of effect prior (if identified) after mitigation (Lt/ Mt/ St and P/ T EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:6: to mitigation and D/ In) EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:6:Construction Impact on recreational users Moderate No potential mitigation has been identified Moderate adverse (significant) St, T, D EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:6:Construction Impact on recreational users Moderate No potential mitigation has been identified Moderate adverse (significant) St, T, D EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:6:Construction Impact on recreational users Moderate No potential mitigation has been identified Moderate adverse (significant) St, T, D EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:7:Development Environmental Impact Classification Mitigation/ enhancement Classification of residual effect Nature of effect(s) EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:7:stage (following development design of effect prior (if identified) after mitigation (Lt/ Mt/ St and P/ T EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:7: to mitigation and D/ In) EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:7:Opening Impact on recreational users Moderate Partial mitigation through layout and design Moderate adverse (significant) Lt, P, D EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:7:Operation Impact on recreational users Moderate Partial mitigation through layout and design Moderate adverse (significant) Lt, P, D EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:8:Development Environmental Impact Classification Mitigation/ enhancement Classification of residual effect Nature of effect(s) EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:8:stage (following development design of effect prior (if identified) after mitigation (Lt/ Mt/ St and P/ T EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:8: to mitigation and D/ In) EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:9:Development Environmental Impact Classification Mitigation/ enhancement Classification of residual effect Nature of effect(s) EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:9:stage (following development design of effect prior (if identified) after mitigation (Lt/ Mt/ St and P/ T EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:9: to mitigation and D/ In) EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:9:Operation Operation employment Moderate No potential mitigation has been identified Moderate beneficial (significant) P, Lt, D/In EN010103-000918-NZT DCO 6.2.25 ES Vol I Chapter 25 Summary of Significant Effects.pdf:9: Visual impact on Moderate Partial mitigation through layout and design Moderate adverse (significant) Lt, P, D EN010103-001470-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Apr 2022.pdf:48:3.8.32 The Requirements closely relate to the mitigation set out in the Environmental EN010103-001470-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Apr 2022.pdf:51:3.8.50 Requirement 12 (Flood risk mitigation) - this is not a model provision. It provides that EN010103-001470-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Apr 2022.pdf:51: may commence until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction EN010103-001470-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Apr 2022.pdf:51: protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and approved in writing EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:43: development on heritage assets, and they agree with the mitigation methodology EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:43:15.2.2 The Applicants also note that Tees Archaeology agree with the proposed mitigation EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:68: controls and mitigations where required. EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:76: Teesside but is seeking to secure mitigations to protect its road EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:95: appropriate mitigation / compensation has not been considered. EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:95: design stage, mitigation measures and/or compensation must be habitat. If the outfall requires replacement, this would be installed as EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:96: concentrations In order to assess the suspended sediment to be localised and minor and no additional mitigation is proposed EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:98: Mitigation Measures The proposal does not appear to include any WFD Mitigation Measures EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:99: the delivery of mitigation measures aiming to attain WFD objectives, neutrality in the Tees Estuary from any discharge to the Tees Bay or EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:99: Hydrogeological regime may impact groundwater. In terms of mitigation and enhancement, the response from the EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:101: considered to be ‘medium’. Landfill Gas The proposed development pipelines running north of the Tees and appropriate risk mitigation EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:111: Operational Mitigation With reference to section 10.8.4 (Operational EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:111: Mitigation) we acknowledge the preparation and implementation of EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:114: We welcome the mitigation highlighted in the form of ground EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:115: provide assurances that landfill containment mitigation measures EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:119: not be fully understood and therefore appropriate mitigation / on habitat conditions (open, lack of cover); Further evidence will be EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:119: Furthermore, the Applicant has committed to updating the precautionary mitigation approach for water vole as set out in EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:121: appropriate mitigation will be required. Solution: The Applicant EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:121: possible at the detailed design stage, mitigation measures and/or EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:121: assessment, and any necessary mitigation, will be secured through EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:122: Sampling Issue: Section 14.5.19 sets out specific mitigation measures See response above. EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:127: WFD Mitigation Measures Redirection of effluent from Bran Sands to the North Sea does not EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:127: states that a number of mitigation features are incorporated into the EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:128: jeopardise the delivery of mitigation measures aiming to attain WFD EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:129: regard to the mitigation measure opportunities identified in the Tees EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:129: This report identifies the mitigation opportunities applicable to the Noted. EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:129: implementing such mitigation measures to restore habitats in the EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:130: mitigation project in the Holme Fleet catchment. Further to this, this EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:138: project and/or to flesh out mitigation proposals and to consider EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:143: 2.4. Further to the mitigation measures identified within the HRA to Comment 2.4.1 EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:143: mitigation measures for piling and geophys surveys will be followed EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:143: should be incorporated into the proposed mitigation strategy to EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:144: Additional mitigation or compensation strategies may be required EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:145: Management Plan containing details of all environmental mitigation Environment Management Plan containing details of all EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:145: measures to be adopted. This will ensure there will be no environmental mitigation measures to be adopted. This will ensure EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:175: appropriate safeguards and mitigation provided. Notwithstanding EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:216: Requirement no. 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:220: mitigation identified and imposed. EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:248: echosounders, side scan sonar, and USBL). The MMO note not subject to JNCC mitigation requirements as it is thought the higher EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:253: good practice and design mitigation measures have been detail on pin pile drilling campaign (if required). Impact piling methods will not EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:255: MMO would like to highlight that this mitigation may be EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:266: and PM network peak hours, the Applicants have already provided the mitigation EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:266: is mitigation presented within the Appendix 16B Framework Construction Worker EN010103-001579-NZT DCO 9.6 - Applicants' Comments on RRs - May 2022.pdf:274: mentioned in the Environmental Statement and no mitigation is EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (12).pdf:5:effect on marine ecological or ornithological receptors following mitigation. EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:16: impact avoidance measures outlined as embedded mitigation in EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:16: the start of examination and that all mitigation measures that EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:16: It is agreed that mitigation measures are included across both EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:17: make appropriate recommendations for mitigation. It is agreed EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:17: that mitigation measures are included in the draft DCO EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:17: Risk Mitigation). It is agreed that the inclusion of these EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:17: are appropriate to ensure that appropriate mitigation is EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:17: Mitigation of adverse impacts on the water environment during EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:18: mitigation measures proposed in Chapter 14 Marine Ecology EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:18: mitigation for piling percussive/impact piling might be necessary to drive the pile to EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:18: mitigation measures for piling shall be adopted during EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:18: mitigation standard, the MMO are a consultee for this activity. EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:21: h) (a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:58: mitigation; by way of example, for the piling at the intake – EN010103-002067-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:59: approach to the intake cofferdam piling and mitigation, are EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:13:Any avoidance or mitigation measures proposed, how they may be TBC EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:40: mitigation measures for implementation following assessment. EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:43: also be considered. Where necessary, mitigation measures will be recommended for EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:43:  Any mitigation (or other) CO2 emissions savings throughout the operational life of EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:47:6.52 As appropriate, the EIA will inform the design as to where mitigation measures may EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:47: will also make recommendations for possible mitigation measures to be employed by EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:52: which opportunities for ecological mitigation and enhancement will be explored fully. EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:52: impact avoidance and/ or mitigation. EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:52: predicting and characterising potential ecological impacts and mitigation measures EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:52: accordance with relevant NPS. Following the implementation of mitigation and EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:53: Proposed Development will be identified and appropriate and proportionate mitigation EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:53: will be described where necessary. Mitigation and enhancement proposals will EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:53: consider wider strategic aims and options for mitigation of development in the South EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:53: accordance with relevant NPS. Following the implementation of mitigation and EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:54: Proposed Development will be identified and appropriate and proportionate mitigation EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:54: will be described where necessary. Mitigation and enhancement proposals will EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:54: consider wider strategic aims and options for mitigation of development in the South EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:56:  the formulation of mitigation measures, such as a Construction Worker Travel Plan EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:56: residual and cumulative impacts will be provided should the proposed mitigation not EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:58:6.120 Where the assessment indicates the need for mitigation as a result of significant EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:59: level of harm to that resource. The aim will then be to propose appropriate mitigation EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:59: heritage resource, taking into account any design or embedded mitigation. EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:60:6.130 Following the impact assessment process, any potential mitigation strategies EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:60: effects remaining after mitigation will be assessed according to accepted criteria for EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:63: as a result of changes to the design, including any mitigation measures that are EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:63: beneficial and adverse effects. The mitigation measures envisaged in order to EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:64: technical reports. A table outlining the proposed mitigation measures and how EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:65:7.12 The significance of effects before and after mitigation will be evaluated with reference EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:66: deemed ‘significant’, and where possible mitigation measures will be identified to EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:66: Mitigation and Enhancement Measures EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:66:7.23 The Mitigation and Enhancement Measures section will describe the measures that EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:66: available mitigation measures are known as ‘residual effects’. These will be EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:67: Consultation is an ongoing process, which enables mitigation measures to be EN010103-000005-EN010103_Scoping Report.pdf:69: effects are identified, mitigation measures will be described where possible to reduce EN010103-001730-Written Representation (CATS North Sea Limited).pdf:17:restrictions and guidance documentation. This will often result in additional CATS mitigation such as EN010103-001730-Written Representation (CATS North Sea Limited).pdf:29:written consent of the CATS pipelines team. Mitigation such as enclosure and flame proof mats may EN010103-001730-Written Representation (CATS North Sea Limited).pdf:29:Directional drilling techniques must be reviewed in detail to understand the mitigation in place for EN010103-001730-Written Representation (CATS North Sea Limited).pdf:32:technique can undermine topsoil and mitigation must be in place to stop people and equipment falling EN010103-002441-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA.pdf:11: impacts and means of mitigation that are anticipated to arise most frequently, but they are not EN010103-002441-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA.pdf:11: therefore consider other impacts and means of mitigation where it determines that the impact is EN010103-002198-Report on the Implications for European Sites (RIES).pdf:14: habitat loss through use of HDD techniques constituted mitigation. The EN010103-002198-Report on the Implications for European Sites (RIES).pdf:14: Guidance Note – The handling of mitigation in Habitats Regulations Appraisal – the People Over Wind CJEU EN010103-002198-Report on the Implications for European Sites (RIES).pdf:15: qualifying features during construction referred to mitigation for visual disturbance to bird EN010103-002198-Report on the Implications for European Sites (RIES).pdf:15: in the absence of mitigation. The Applicants EN010103-002198-Report on the Implications for European Sites (RIES).pdf:20: export pipeline, mitigation measures including noise EN010103-002198-Report on the Implications for European Sites (RIES).pdf:21: on the basis that with mitigation in place, effects from the EN010103-002198-Report on the Implications for European Sites (RIES).pdf:21: mitigation in place, there would be no AEoI from noise or EN010103-002198-Report on the Implications for European Sites (RIES).pdf:21: subject to mitigation measures that would be secured EN010103-002198-Report on the Implications for European Sites (RIES).pdf:21: roosting and loafing SPA/Ramsar site birds. Mitigation EN010103-002198-Report on the Implications for European Sites (RIES).pdf:26: excessive nutrient levels require mitigation, including through EN010103-002198-Report on the Implications for European Sites (RIES).pdf:30: the SPA/Ramsar site with the effects would not arise as mitigation proposed for the EN010103-002198-Report on the Implications for European Sites (RIES).pdf:32: works and low number of UXO detonations. Mitigation is EN010103-002198-Report on the Implications for European Sites (RIES).pdf:32: Mitigation Protocol (MMMP). EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:8: and mitigation actions and is committed not EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:28: detection and quantification of the mitigation actions) in order to improve EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:29:the associated mitigations. The process, regulated by the “Management System Guideline (MSG) Integrat- EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:29:of the mitigation actions) and allows to measure the impact with respect to the achievement of the objectives EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:66: est projects are considered the most significant at internationally level within climate change mitigation EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:116:operational and financial performance. We invite our investors taxation of CO2 emissions as a mitigation action of the clima- EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:133:designs being changed, and potential GHG mitigation invest- lues of Eni’s Oil & Gas properties under different stress-test sce- EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:139: CHANGE 144-150 tools, guidelines and related mitigation actions sustainable approach, EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:139: Art. 3.2,  NFI - People (employment, diversity tools, guidelines and related mitigation actions and sustainable EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:139: FOR THE (circular economy, waste, water, tools, guidelines and related mitigation actions sustainable approach, EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:139: Art. 3.2, whistleblowing ), pp. 162-164 tools, guidelines and related mitigation actions and sustainable EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:139: Art. 3.1, Suppliers, p. 165 tools, guidelines and related mitigation actions and sustainable EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:139: AND ANTI- and tax strategy, pp. 166-167 tools, guidelines and related mitigation actions and sustainable EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:139: COMMUNITIES of local development, pp. 168-169 tools, guidelines and related mitigation actions and sustainable EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:142: emissions and more efficient energy enhancement, development and sharing impacts and mitigation actions (risk-based EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:144:Main ESG risks and related mitigation actions EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:149:gy consumption model with a low carbon footprint will favour preventive mitigation interventions to counter the phenome- EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:160:preparedness, followed by mitigation, response and recovery. that the interactions between environmental aspects (such as EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:161:stages. Through the application of the Mitigation Hierarchy, Eni upstream start-up activities in Angola. The increase in sea EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:161:the Mitigation Hierarchy. Consultation and collaboration with tion in surface water withdrawals of more than 19 Mm3 at EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:165:sets out the principles contained in the Code of Ethics for sup- or mitigation measures. In this regard, the “Security & Hu- EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:170:of the pandemic has destabilized health, social and economic order to find possible alternatives and mitigation measures; EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:170:which Eni operates, with the common goal of fostering local tion of related prevention or mitigation measures, in line with EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:223:Expected loss (% net of counterpart risk mitigation factors) 0.9 0.6 6.2 58.6 29.7 22.4 EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:223:Expected loss (% net of counterpart risk mitigation factors) 0.3 0.1 1.1 58.9 31.6 20.1 EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:224:Trade and other receivables are stated net of the allowance for counterpart risk mitigation factors amounting to €1,016 million EN010103-000820-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 6.pdf:258:and the hedging and mitigation instruments. reducing, these derivatives are reclassified in proprietary EN010103-001512-TEXT_ISH1_Session2_NetZeroTeesside_10052022.pdf:7:the context of those impacts. And thirdly, whether mitigations are possible and necessary in order to EN010103-001512-TEXT_ISH1_Session2_NetZeroTeesside_10052022.pdf:9:mitigations. But certainly a matter that we're very happy to to continue to discuss with applicants and EN010103-001512-TEXT_ISH1_Session2_NetZeroTeesside_10052022.pdf:9:whether mitigations are required to make this project acceptable. And I think it is accepted that you key EN010103-001512-TEXT_ISH1_Session2_NetZeroTeesside_10052022.pdf:10:moment, there's reference, for example, to mitigation or deliverability. issues, and how to respond to EN010103-001512-TEXT_ISH1_Session2_NetZeroTeesside_10052022.pdf:10:that without knowing quite what lies behind it, what sort of mitigation might be appropriate for DCO, that EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:10: on that site” (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:11: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:42: Additional mitigation measures will include engaging competent and experienced EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:46: appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS in cetaceans including EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:46: population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling and EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:52:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:53: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:56: this report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:61: screening.. Mitigation for visual disturbance risk is set out in in paragraph 6.1.22. EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:62: General Mitigation Measures EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:62:6.1.226.1.19 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:62: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:64: processes. Based on the analysis in Appendix F and the mitigation measures above it EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:70:6.1.476.1.48 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:70: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include: EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:71:6.1.496.1.50 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:72: necessary mitigation measures. To determine whether impulsive sound sources EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:73: mitigation techniques to minimise the risk of injury or disturbance to marine EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:73: will be adopted for the Proposed Development as good practice mitigation, which EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:74: 102km) and the standard mitigation measures included inas part of the Marine EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites. EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:77: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:77: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:77: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:77: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: Stockton-on-Tees Local Plan & Policies The Appropriate Assessment identified that the Council would produce a Recreational Mitigation EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: the detailed strategic development mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue. EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy. EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA / Ramsar which has been EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: or appropriate mitigation measures may be required. EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:80: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:81: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:82: potential for cumulative effects will be identified to ensure adequate mitigation is in place to EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:82: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:83: Development. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:85: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:96: cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects on site EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:118: threshold for SPA/Ramsar birds or result in visual disturbance and paragraph 6.1.22Paragraph 6.1.15 lists the specific noise and visual mitigation measures EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:118: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.4642 to 6.1.494453, including the preparation of a Construction EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:118: export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity of the SPA / EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:118: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:118: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the SPA/ / EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:122: likely to be very low. Furthermore, the application for a Marine License will includethere are a range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on EN010103-002063-NZT DCO 7.12 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Change Request) (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:122: b. Since any marine licence will require mitigationMitigation measures tohave been identified which will ensure no mortality or significant disturbance EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:5:effect on marine ecological or ornithological receptors following mitigation. EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:21:bodies. We believe that working together and sharing knowledge We describe which accommodations or mitigations were made, if any, EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:26: cancelled projects and potential impairment of certain assets. Overall, mitigation of the risk is addressed through our EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:30: (including weather events), earthquakes, social unrest, pandemic diseases, criminal actions by external us to develop mitigation strategies aimed at ensuring that EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:31: mitigation plans for identified brand and reputation risks at EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:31: civil unrest and environmental and climate activism (including disruptions by non-governmental and security risks. Further mitigations include strengthening EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:33: subsidiaries and entities in which Shell has an interest. These subsidiaries and entities may also insure operations and make risk mitigation recommendations, EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:77:Shell. It comprises Shell’s holdings and treasury organisation, self- operations and make risk mitigation recommendations, where relevant, EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:84: Mitigation of physical risks, whether or not related Chronic risks, such as rising temperatures and rising Additionally, the impact of physical climate change EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:84: Acute risks, such as flooding and droughts, wildfires We have performed analyses addressing a range of and mitigation actions are based on our current EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:85:intensity of the energy mix and the mitigation of residual emissions using ■ supply of solar and wind energy; EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:90: and potential impact) and mitigation plans; and for Shell’s current portfolio. EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:91: – Gbaran asset, Nigeria: improvement project including allows management to take a holistic view and to optimise risk mitigation EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:96:We believe our targets support the more ambitious goal of the Paris before 2035 include only mitigation actions directly involving Shell. EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:109:widely, including with contractors. We implement mitigations at the site with equivalent environmental frameworks required by local regulations. EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:110:ecosystems by applying the mitigation hierarchy. This is a decision-making we develop water-management action plans for using less fresh water, EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:110:follow the mitigation hierarchy. If there is an impact on biodiversity, the At the end of 2021, four of our major facilities were in areas where there EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:113: and have developed appropriate mitigation plans to follow if needed. EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:114:as low as reasonably practicable. Risk mitigation includes strengthening and achieving business success. Shell aims to work with suppliers, EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:121:that disability remains a priority for company leaders. Shell belongs position, pragmatic, risk-based mitigations have been implemented EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:160: goods, (ii) C&P digital tools are designed to ensure that potential risks projects that are focused on Infrastructure and emissions mitigations to EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:174:and related policies, and how pay and benefits align with culture. against competitors. To assist in the mitigation of reputational risk and EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:211: that were identified by management on page 199, and the possible mitigation steps and assumptions regarding the availability of future funding EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:248:In general, it is expected that sufficient deferred tax liabilities and Mitigation of physical risks, whether or not related to climate change, EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:272:dedicated teams in place to quickly identify and respond to cases of credit deterioration. Mitigation measures are defined and implemented for EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:274:for mitigation of future purchases, sales and inventory. The losses in the designated in cash flow hedging relationships and the net carrying EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:305:rules in preparing our disclosure. But in our view the resulting information have been approved for the first two objectives, climate change mitigation EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:306: for the climate mitigation and climate adaptation objectives. Activities are EN010103-001603-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 4 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – SHELL U.K. LIMITED.pdf:306:Total 261,504 25,393 5,299 address the climate mitigation objective. EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:14: biodiversity mitigation and enhancement EN010103-000817-NZT DCO - Section_55_Checklist (19.07.21).pdf:23: embedded mitigation in place and the EN010103-001713-South Tees Development Corporation - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:7: 5.1.2 Requirement no. 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001713-South Tees Development Corporation - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:10: activities, there is no evidence of a severe impact on the highway network without mitigation EN010103-000829-NZT DCO 5.4 - Design and Access Statement.pdf:59: 12 mitigation the mitigation of flood risk during EN010103-001684-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to comments on Relevant Representations.pdf:3: MMO notes at Table 19-7 that there assessments and mitigation as the EN010103-001684-Marine Management Organisation - Responses to comments on Relevant Representations.pdf:3: ii) If the mitigation and EN010103-002174-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:12: 122. It is noted that the Applicant disagrees with Hornsea Four’s position that the mitigation EN010103-002174-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:12:3.2 Hornsea Four maintains its position that the suggested mitigation would not be appropriate as it EN010103-001951-NZT-Action-Points-ISH4.pdf:1:11 Confirm whether mitigation to Applicants DL5 EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:7: We require formal monitoring of the employee travel plan with further mitigation measures EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:8:We require formal monitoring of the CWTP with further mitigation measures to be EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:8:We require formal monitoring of the CTMP with further mitigation measures to be EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:9:Appropriate mitigation measures to be considered, to ensure no increase in flood risk EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:10:the mitigation of odorous emissions and potentially contaminated dust during further GI EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:11:during the construction phase with embedded mitigation to be included in a Construction EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:11:vibration mitigation measures for the Proposed Development (including construction EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:11:mitigation; therefore, it has been necessary to adjust the data to represent an unmitigated EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:12:before the addition of any specifically designed acoustic mitigation. EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:13:construction and demolition works has shown that without mitigation there could be a EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:13:However, appropriate mitigation measures for managing these risks will be set out in the EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:16: the impact on landscapes and visual amenity. While it is recognised that mitigation for EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:18: mitigation for construction and demolition noise will be implanted through the EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:18: mitigation in these developments that has been stripped out to provide a worst case EN010103-001609-Redcar and Clevland Council Local Impact Report.pdf:19:9.28 The LLFA also note mitigation measures that are set out within section 9.9.13 of the EN010103-002360-NZT ISH6 S1.pdf:15:effectively mitigation will be taken into an update of the HRA such that we can then also we've agreed EN010103-002360-NZT ISH6 S1.pdf:18:think we can move on to this proposed mitigation. Yes. That's where I take over. EN010103-002360-NZT ISH6 S1.pdf:22:on a scheme of mitigation by a requirement in the DCO that we haven't really got any detail about. So EN010103-002360-NZT ISH6 S1.pdf:22:requirement is capable of being discharged, and that a form of mitigation will have to come forward EN010103-002360-NZT ISH6 S1.pdf:22:In a situation where there is uncertainty as to whether acceptable mitigation can be delivered, it then EN010103-002360-NZT ISH6 S1.pdf:23:A good mitigation I appreciate the scheme could change potentially quite substantially, and that you're EN010103-002360-NZT ISH6 S1.pdf:24:As long as that the mitigation is secured by the requirement, and at the moment, we don't, we've got EN010103-002360-NZT ISH6 S1.pdf:27:One last probably minor point was the terminology around mitigation. This has been described as a EN010103-002360-NZT ISH6 S1.pdf:27:Mitigation Scheme. EN010103-002360-NZT ISH6 S1.pdf:27:This requirement and is it really mitigation in an HRA sense. EN010103-002360-NZT ISH6 S1.pdf:28:mitigation. Yes. So those therefore weeds can't just screen out effects on because we're effectively EN010103-002253-NZT DCO 2.1e - Schedule of Changes to DCO - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:4: - any other management or mitigation plans set out in the framework construction environmental EN010103-002253-NZT DCO 2.1e - Schedule of Changes to DCO - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:6:Schedule 2, (Requirements), Requirement 32 An additional limb has been included to specify that the plan submitted must include details of mitigation EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:29: (e) carry out or construct any mitigation works. EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:44: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:46:Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:46:preliminary works, until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction, has, for that EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:47:mitigation of flood risk during operation has, for that part, been submitted to and, after EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:47: (6) The authorised development must not be commissioned until the flood risk mitigation has EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:49:must commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and, EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:52:the piling mitigation measures in paragraph 10.8 of Chapter 10 of the environmental statement and EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:86: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:87: (h) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:98: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:99: (h) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:107: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:107: be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if any) EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:107: to submit for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:107: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001794-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:113:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-002068-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Clean) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:10: Mitigation including piling restrictions. EN010103-002068-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Clean) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:16: including effect on measures outlined as embedded mitigation in Chapters 12 to 15 EN010103-002068-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Clean) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:16: are appropriate and that mitigation measures that would be EN010103-002068-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Clean) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:17: must commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation EN010103-002068-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Clean) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:17: It is agreed that with the identified mitigation measures in place to EN010103-002068-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Clean) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:18: that the design and impact avoidance and mitigation measures EN010103-002068-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Clean) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:18: proposed mitigation measures are adequate to mitigate flood risk. EN010103-002068-NZT DCO 8.5 - Environment Agency SoCG (Clean) August 2-22 (D6).pdf:20: It is agreed that the mitigation and management measures EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:9: on that site“ (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:10: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:44: appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS in cetaceans including EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:44: population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling and EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:49:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:50: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:54: report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:59:6.1.146.1.18 Mitigation for visual disturbance risk is set out in paragraph 6.1.22. EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:59: General Mitigation Measures EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:59:6.1.176.1.21 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:60: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:66:6.1.446.1.48 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:66: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include: EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:66:6.1.466.1.50 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:67: necessary mitigation measures. The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:67: recommends a range of mitigation techniques to minimise the risk of injury or EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:68: (approx. 102km) and the standard mitigation measures included in the Marine EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:70: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites. EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:71: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:71: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:71: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:71: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:72: Map (Adopted January 2019) – The Mitigation Strategy to address potential adverse effects on the SPA/Ramsar from recreation. EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:72: the detailed strategic development line with mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue. EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:72: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy. EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:72: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA which has been deemed EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:72: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:73: or appropriate mitigation measures may be required. EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:73: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:73: and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:74: and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:75: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:76: available, the potential for cumulative effects will be identified to ensure adequate mitigation is in EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:76: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:77: Development. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:79: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:89: cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects on site EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:111: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.463 to 6.1.496, including the preparation of a Construction EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:111: export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity of the SPA / EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:111: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:111: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:114: range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on marine life, including harbour porpoise (see paragraph 6.3.2-6.3.3). Given this, it is concluded EN010103-001478-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Tracked.pdf:114: b. Since any marine licence will require mitigation measures to ensure no mortality or significant disturbance of harbour porpoise arises, and taking EN010103-001138-NZT DCO 6.4.47 ES Vol III Appendix 24B Assessment of Cumulative Effects Stages 1-3.pdf:5: appropriate mitigation EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:8: co-exist and so what mitigation/avoidance measures to EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:19:31. The mitigation suggested is to have more or larger turbines in the remainder of Hornsea EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:23: and carbon storage can co-exist and so what mitigation/avoidance measures to EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:178:landscaping works, ecological mitigation works, archaeological investigations, intrusive EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:179:“outline marine mammal mitigation protocol” means the document certified as the outline EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:179:marine mammal mitigation protocol by the Secretary of State for the purposes of this Order EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:196: Schedule 8 (land of which temporary possession may be taken), or any mitigation works; EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:197: (g) carry out mitigation works required pursuant to the requirements in Part 3 of Schedule 1 EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:197: as the works relate to mitigation works identified in the environmental statement or EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:215:reflecting the survey results and ecological mitigation has been submitted to and approved by the EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:218:relevant planning authority, a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:218: (a) any necessary noise attenuation and mitigation measures to be taken to minimise noise EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:218: (b) a scheme for monitoring attenuation and mitigation measures provided under sub- EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:219:Ministry of Defence radar mitigation EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:219:Ministry of Defence, confirms satisfaction that appropriate mitigation will be implemented and EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:219:with the Ministry of Defence to ensure that the approved mitigation is implemented. EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:219: “appropriate mitigation” means measures to prevent or remove any unacceptable effects which EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:219: “approved mitigation” means the detailed Radar Mitigation Scheme (RMS) that will set out EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:219:approved mitigation for the life of the authorised development. EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:220:Claxby Radar Mitigation EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:220:appropriate mitigation will be implemented and maintained for the required period and that EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:220:arrangements have been put in place with NATS to ensure that the approved mitigation is EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:220:mitigation for the required period. EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:220: “appropriate mitigation” means measures to mitigate any adverse effects which the operation EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:220: “approved mitigation” means the detailed Primary Radar Mitigation Scheme setting out the EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:220: appropriate mitigation approved by the Secretary of State and confirmed in accordance with EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:220: mitigation to be in place. EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:237:62 landscaping and ecological mitigation or EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:241:165 landscaping and ecological mitigation or EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:242: landscaping and ecological mitigation or EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:243: landscaping and ecological mitigation or EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:260: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:261: to submit for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:261: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:268: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:268: to submit for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:268: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:272:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:292: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by Dogger Bank (such approval not to EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:292: mitigation scheme; EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:292: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; and EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:295:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:328:“outline marine mammal mitigation protocol” means the document certified as the outline EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:328:marine mammal mitigation protocol by the Secretary of State for the purposes of this Order EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:339: (v) any exclusion zones or micro-siting requirements identified in any mitigation project EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:340: installation works and having regard to any mitigation scheme pursuant to sub- EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:340: relevant stage, a piling marine mammal mitigation protocol for that stage, in accordance EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:340: with the outline marine mammal mitigation protocol, the intention of which is to prevent EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:341: writing to the MMO and the MMO is satisfied that the plan provides such mitigation as is EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:341: (d) delivery of any mitigation including, where necessary, identification and modification of EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:342: and the approval of any necessary mitigation required as a result of the further site EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:345:and there has been a failure of the mitigations set out in the marine mammal mitigation protocol, EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:345:all piling activity must cease until an update to the marine mammal mitigation protocol and further EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:351:“outline marine mammal mitigation protocol” means the document certified as the outline EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:351:marine mammal mitigation protocol by the Secretary of State for the purposes of this Order EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:365: (vi) any exclusion zones or micrositing requirements identified in any mitigation scheme EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:366: having regard to any mitigation scheme pursuant to sub-paragraph 13(1)(f); EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:366: relevant stage, a piling marine mammal mitigation protocol for that stage, in accordance EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:366: with the outline marine mammal mitigation protocol, the intention of which is to prevent EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:367: writing to the MMO and the MMO is satisfied that the plan provides such mitigation as is EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:367: (d) delivery of any mitigation including, where necessary, identification and modification of EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:368: and the approval of any necessary mitigation required as a result of the further site EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:371:and there has been a failure of the mitigations set out in the marine mammal mitigation protocol, EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:371:all piling activity must cease until an update to the marine mammal mitigation protocol and further EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:374: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by Hornsea Four (such approval EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:374: Four’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:374: in the ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; and EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:377:mitigation scheme save that Hornsea Four retains the right to carry out any further EN010103-002037-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:385:REP6-011 the outline marine mammal mitigation 2 27 July 2022 EN010103-001172-EN010103 - The ‘Net Zero Teesside Project’ - Final Section 55 Checklist.pdf:14: implementation of the mitigation EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:18: undertaken in accordance with the environmental commitments identified in through the Draft DCO. The commitments register summarises the mitigation EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:18: the Commitments Register (Appendix 25A) AS-033. mitigation (i.e. identified through the iterative EIA process and incorporated into EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:18: are tertiary mitigation measures (i.e. legal requirements or standard practices EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:18: The Draft DCO will secure secondary mitigation and control measures needed EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:18: is through Schedule 2 (Requirements) where a range of mitigation schemes EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:18: may occur. Many of the mitigation schemes (e.g. Construction Environmental EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:18: framework mitigation schemes that form part of the ES, Volume III EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:18: of the Requirements, it has the authority to refuse the mitigation schemes until it EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:18: chapters and the framework mitigation schemes. EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:46: from the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management highlighting the need for appropriate mitigation and compensation measures in EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:47: noted the CIEEM guidelines were updated in 2022. guidance does not affect the conclusions reached or the mitigation strategy. The EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:47: mitigation strategy allows, for example, for top-up ecology surveys and EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:52: Statement (as set out in Section 12 of the Deemed Marine Licence) within ES because all of the mitigation proposed in Chapter 14 is documented in the EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:53: mitigation measures which are required. With regard to monitoring, it is stated Impact Avoidance of ES Chapter 14, Marine Ecology APP-096, the standard EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:53: Proposed Development as good practice and design mitigation. This would EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:54: mitigation measures for the Proposed Development would fully address all EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:55: modelling and associated mitigation for the Proposed Development as EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:56: BIO.1.43 Applicants The revised HRA Report AS-194/195 states that likely significant effects from Horizontal Direct Drilling is not being considered purely as mitigation that helps EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:56: mitigation for the effects on the SPA/ Ramsar site and if so, why this matter has EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:57: Ramsar site. However, paragraph 6.1.18 of the report refers to mitigation for to visual disturbance’. In fact the potential for likely significant effects through EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:57: visual disturbance from the effects of the HDD bore under the Tees for the CO2 visual disturbance during construction in the absence of mitigation is identified to EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:57:  Mitigation for construction period visual disturbance is then referenced in EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:57: Guidance Note - The handling of mitigation in Habitats Regulations Appraisal – the People Over Wind CJEU judgement | NatureScot (as Scottish Natural Heritage) (2019) EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:60: necessary (e.g. for quieter plant), further enhancing the mitigation such as EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:61: BIO.1.52 Applicants Para 6.1.47 of the HRA Report AS-194 identifies the mitigation measures for Pond 14 was the only open water identified during surveys in the dunes, with all EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:61: Delivery of mitigation measures to protect water quality of all waterbodies is EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:91: Should this mitigation measure also be referenced in ES Appendix 25A [APP- EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:92: DLV.1.15 Applicants ES Chapter 17 APP-099 paragraph 17.7.5 states that no additional mitigation The potential for offsite planting adjacent to this location and receptor was EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:92: is identified in respect of the moderate adverse visual effects to receptors at considered as part of development of the mitigation strategy. However, this was EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:92: stations and mitigation is therefore to reduce visual intrusion of the buildings on landscaping and planting is not considered appropriate in this context. EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:96: controlled waters and human health mitigation measures. EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:96: 092] states that only risk classified as moderate or higher will require further receptors and sets out mitigation measures. This assessment was EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:96: investigation and mitigation measures. The requirement in NPS EN-1 is that necessarily based on desk study information as only limited ground EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:96: and associated quantitative risk assessment and may include mitigation EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:100: Planning Department, to agree the scope of mitigation, but there has been no EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:100: ii) If the mitigation and enhancement measures set out in section 19.7 EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:105: embedded mitigation into the CO2 gathering network; EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:105: practicable’ (ALARP) or to a tolerable level: C-4 (security measures), specific control or mitigation is considered necessary to be applied EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:141: measures to enhance or restore any waterbodies. account all mitigation and enhancement measures when determining EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:141: the delivery of mitigation measures aiming to attain WFD objectives, recent consultation with the Environment Agency with regard to their EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:141: site, was diverted to Tees Bay via the discharge pipeline. What ii) Mitigation measures were not provided in response to a data request EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:150: site and mitigation of this? bedrock and not penetrate the Magnesian Limestone or intercept EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:151: demonstration of appropriate working practices and mitigation measures in order EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:153: Please could the Applicant explain any additional measures that would be in mitigation measures that will be implemented. These would be outlined within a EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:153: remediation and the best practice industry standard mitigation measures, no EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:153: additional mitigation measures have been proposed. It will not be possible to EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:153: mitigation measures already set out in the ES APP-091 and CEMP. The EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:155: WE.1.33 Applicants Could the Applicants explain the proposed approach to mitigation of the potential Redcar Coatham is located at the southern end of Coatham Sands, with the EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:155: temporary moderate adverse effect to Tees Bay and Belasis Beck arising from Framework CEMP of the ES. Additional mitigation was also included in Section EN010103-001780-NZT DCO 9.7 - Applicants' Response to ExA's FWQs - June 2022.pdf:155: significant) residual effect, or whether additional mitigation is required (and, if so, to be set out within the Water Management Plan, secured within the CEMP. This EN010103-002529-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:41: 3.8.29. 3.8.30.The Requirements closely relate to the mitigation set out in the Environmental EN010103-002529-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:44: 3.8.47. 3.8.48.Requirement 12 (Flood risk mitigation) - this is not a model provision. It provides that EN010103-002529-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:44: commence until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction has, for that EN010103-002529-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:45: until, after consultation with Natural England, a scheme of protection and mitigation EN010103-002529-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:46: informed by a risk assessment and which is consistent with the piling mitigation measures EN010103-001025-NZT DCO 6.4.9 ES Vol III Appendix 9A Flood Risk Assessment Part 2.pdf:27:vulnerability/flood zones classifications for the proposed development. We will review the CEMP once published to ensure that appropriate flood risk mitigation measures have been considered. EN010103-001025-NZT DCO 6.4.9 ES Vol III Appendix 9A Flood Risk Assessment Part 2.pdf:28:• Specific mitigation measures required by the Council for the proposed development; and EN010103-001521-NZT-Rule_8-FINAL.pdf:16: • feasible and deliverable mitigation and method for securing such mitigation EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:29: (e) carry out or construct any mitigation works. EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:44: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:47:Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:47:preliminary works, until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction, has, for that EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:47:mitigation of flood risk during operation has, for that part, been submitted to and, after EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:47: (6) The authorised development must not be commissioned until the flood risk mitigation has EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:49:must commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and, EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:52:the piling mitigation measures in paragraph 10.8 of Chapter 10 of the environmental statement and EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:87: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:88: (h) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:99: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:100: (h) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:108: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:108: be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if any) EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:108: to submit for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:108: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:114:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:187: submit for Northern Gas Networks’ approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme EN010103-001919-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO July 2022 (D4).pdf:187: © if a subsidence mitigation scheme is required, it shall be carried out as approved (such EN010103-002506-NZT DCO 7.15.1 - Third ES Addendum Volume I (Main Report) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: mitigation measures EN010103-002506-NZT DCO 7.15.1 - Third ES Addendum Volume I (Main Report) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: of mitigation measures baseline, which includes EN010103-002506-NZT DCO 7.15.1 - Third ES Addendum Volume I (Main Report) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:20: proposed mitigation EN010103-002506-NZT DCO 7.15.1 - Third ES Addendum Volume I (Main Report) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:33: mitigation measures EN010103-002506-NZT DCO 7.15.1 - Third ES Addendum Volume I (Main Report) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:33: mitigation measures. EN010103-001159-NZT DCO 5.7 - Carbon Capture Readiness Assessment.pdf:23: and if required appropriate mitigation employed. EN010103-000828-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum.pdf:46:3.8.30 The Requirements closely relate to the mitigation set out in the Environmental EN010103-000828-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum.pdf:49:3.8.48 Requirement 12 (Flood risk mitigation) - this is not a model provision. It provides that EN010103-000828-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum.pdf:49: may commence until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction EN010103-000828-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum.pdf:50: protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and approved in writing EN010103-001744-NZT DCO 9.8 Appendix GH.1.1a Factual Report Part 16 - June 2022.pdf:549:mitigation of UXO risk. EN010103-002029-Environment Agency - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 5.pdf:5:and / or proportionate mitigation measures arising from the monitoring EN010103-002060-NZT DCO 7.11.1 Second Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I August 2022 (D6).pdf:18: mitigation measures assessed in the original EN010103-002060-NZT DCO 7.11.1 Second Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I August 2022 (D6).pdf:19: mitigation measures EN010103-002060-NZT DCO 7.11.1 Second Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I August 2022 (D6).pdf:19: of mitigation measures baseline, which includes EN010103-002060-NZT DCO 7.11.1 Second Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I August 2022 (D6).pdf:20: proposed mitigation EN010103-002060-NZT DCO 7.11.1 Second Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I August 2022 (D6).pdf:26: mitigation the effect on than the Order Limits and EN010103-002060-NZT DCO 7.11.1 Second Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I August 2022 (D6).pdf:33: mitigation measures EN010103-002060-NZT DCO 7.11.1 Second Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I August 2022 (D6).pdf:33: of the changes. mitigation measures. EN010103-001111-NZT DCO 6.4.22 ES Vol III Appendix 12E Reptile Survey Report.pdf:3: impact avoidance, mitigation and/or habitat compensation to achieve legal EN010103-001111-NZT DCO 6.4.22 ES Vol III Appendix 12E Reptile Survey Report.pdf:4: and minimum requirements for reptile survey and mitigation. EN010103-001111-NZT DCO 6.4.22 ES Vol III Appendix 12E Reptile Survey Report.pdf:12: Natural England and Defra (2015) Reptiles: Survey and Mitigation for EN010103-001910-NZT DCO 9.15 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 3 Submissions July 2022 (D4).pdf:12:3.2.7 2.2.1 - The Applicants note the response regarding the integration of mitigation for EN010103-001910-NZT DCO 9.15 - Applicants' Responses to Deadline 3 Submissions July 2022 (D4).pdf:12: competent contractors. This mitigation has already been integrated into the EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:4:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:5:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:6:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:7:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:8:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:9:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:10:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:11:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:12:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:12: Mitigation Plan, Asbestos EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:13:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:14:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:15:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:15: Mitigation Strategy and EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:15: Mitigation Plan. EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:16:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:17:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:18:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:18: Environmental Mitigation EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:19:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:20:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:21:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:22:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:23:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:24:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:24: Environmental Mitigation EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:25:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:26:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:27:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:28:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:29:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:30:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:30: Environmental Mitigation EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:31:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:32:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:33:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:34:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:35:Identified Geotechnical Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001108-NZT DCO 6.4.15 ES Vol III Appendix 10D Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:35: Environmental Mitigation EN010103-001792-NZT DCO 2.1a - Schedule of Changes to the draft DCO - June 2022.pdf:7: with the piling mitigation measures in paragraph 10.8 of Chapter 10 of the ES, the EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:16: impact avoidance measures outlined as embedded mitigation in EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:16: the start of examination and that all mitigation measures that EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:16: It is agreed that mitigation measures are included across both EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:17: make appropriate recommendations for mitigation. It is agreed EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:17: that mitigation measures are included in the draft DCO EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:17: Risk Mitigation). It is agreed that the inclusion of these EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:17: are appropriate to ensure that appropriate mitigation is EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:17: Mitigation of adverse impacts on the water environment during EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:18: mitigation measures proposed in Chapter 14 Marine Ecology EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:18: mitigation for piling percussive/impact piling might be necessary to drive the pile to EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:18: mitigation measures for piling shall be adopted during EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:18: mitigation standard, the MMO are a consultee for this activity. EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:21: h) (a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:58: mitigation; by way of example, for the piling at the intake – EN010103-002066-NZT DCO 8.4 - Marine Management Organisation SoCG (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:59: approach to the intake cofferdam piling and mitigation, are EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:21: i) As mitigation to address the impact of visual disturbance on breeding EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:21: should be noted that this mitigation relates to solely to addressing the HDD EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:22: iv) Indicative Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy REP5-011; mitigation and enhancement. The Landscape and Biodiversity Plan is the EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:23: regarding the mitigation to be implemented to protect the water environment EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:25: The key GHG mitigation measure within the Proposed Development is EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:26: The quantification of other mitigation measures embedded within the EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:53: Development, nor as mitigation of any effects. Only the part of the network that EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:54: highlighted at D5 REP5-034. Marine Ecology in the Appropriate Assessment and potential mitigation EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:54: been updated to include references to the mitigation proposed through EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:54: the use of JNCC Guidelines to inform mitigation regarding UXO. The EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:59: “any other management or mitigation plans set out in the framework EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:60: mitigation… differ from those discussed at a meeting with Natural England on located on-shore. On-going work with potential HDD contractors confirmed EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:61: Please provide further details of how the HDD method and mitigation has steel conductor pipe. The mud pressure within the bore will also be lower EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:62: would not impact buried archaeological remains and that therefore mitigation EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:63: ii)Could any remaining former industrial Infrastructure on and around the mitigation. As regards any potential for the Applicants to deliver part EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:66: decommissioning environmental management plan must address mitigation for potential EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:77: later than the expiration of 3 years mitigation where necessary.” EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:111:(e.g. user emissions), mitigations and solutions (e.g. whether redundancy, if any, is merited) EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:112:subject to the risk allocation and mitigation measures incorporated into the ERR and wider EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:116:revenue gaps in the earlier years and the need to use Risk Mitigation Mechanisms (RMMs) EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:131:In the May 2021 document we presented Risk Mitigation Mechanisms (RMMs) to mitigate the EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:131:model in the early operational phase does not preclude changes to these mitigation measures EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:131:determining the extent of and appropriate ERR mitigations for structural revenue risks. EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:132:Mutualisation was not proposed as a mitigation for utilisation build-up in the May 2021 EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:135:fee. Despite the low risk these RMMs still offer important mitigations to revenue risk for EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:139:emphasis on mitigation measures such as the mutualisation of costs among a remaining pool EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:159:RMM Risk Mitigation Mechanism EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:164: Hazard Hazard Receptor Sensitivity Potential ICCI impact of an ICCI of impact Significance mitigation EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:165: Hazard Hazard Receptor Sensitivity Potential ICCI impact of an ICCI of impact Significance mitigation EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:218: s.14 of the CCA 2008 from the “National low carbon transition and mitigation plan”, EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:280:B02 15.07.22 Clarity added regarding offshore works and mitigation EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:281:4 BENTONITE BREAKOUT MITIGATION …………………………………………………………………………………………. 6 EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:282:mitigation measures for the Morlais cable landfall. EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:284: 4 BENTONITE BREAKOUT MITIGATION EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:284: Mitigation measures discussed in the following pages EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:285:Risk Mitigation Measures EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:293: Item Risk Risk Mitigation Measures Reduced Risk EN010103-002078-NZT DCO - 9.27 Applicants’ Response to the ExA's Second Written Questions - August 2022 (D6).pdf:293: Score ‘2’ = Severe, A Major bentonite breakout is very unlikely if all the mitigation measures are followed. However, there is always a chance that for example an old borehole was missed EN010103-002624-DLA Piper UK LLP - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 12 2.pdf:12: (h) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation EN010103-001930-NZT ISH3 S2.pdf:2:how that might be addressed would be part of the mitigation. So in carrying out an assessment of the EN010103-001112-NZT DCO 6.4.23 ES Vol III Appendix 12F Terrestrial Invertebrate Survey Report.pdf:4:6.2 Mitigation Hierarchy 18 EN010103-002049-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:63: with generating stations and that mitigation will therefore need to be aimed EN010103-002049-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: Further mitigation measures would be expected to be undertaken by EN010103-002049-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:88: Mitigation Works. EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:29:BIO.1.37 Applicants Table 5A-8 of ES Appendix 5A: Framework CEMP APP-246 contains details of mitigation EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:29: Teesside A/ Sofia Offshore Wind Farm as the mitigation measures for the Proposed EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:30: The Applicants are requested to explain whether these measures constitute mitigation for the EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:30: 6.1.18 of the report refers to mitigation for visual disturbance from the effects of the HDD bore EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:31:BIO.1.52 Applicants Para 6.1.47 of the HRA Report AS-194 identifies the mitigation measures for water quality EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:47: Should this mitigation measure also be referenced in ES Appendix 25A APP-347 as a EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:48: DLV.1.15 Applicants ES Chapter 17 APP-099 paragraph 17.7.5 states that no additional mitigation is identified in EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:48: visual impacts associated with a fossil fuel generation stations and mitigation is therefore to EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:50: as moderate or higher will require further investigation and mitigation measures. The EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:52: ii) If the mitigation and enhancement measures set out in section 19.7 of the ES [APP- EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:56: mitigation into the CO2 gathering network; EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:70: mitigation measures aiming to attain WFD objectives, including Dissolved Inorganic EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:73: for re-mobilisation of contamination beneath the site and mitigation of this? EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:76:WE.1.33 Applicants Could the Applicants explain the proposed approach to mitigation of the potential short term, EN010103-001526-NZT-ExQ1.pdf:76: construction to slight adverse (not significant) residual effect, or whether additional mitigation is EN010103-001798-NZT DCO 9.9 - Applicants' Comments on LIRs - June 2022.pdf:8: phase. While the mitigation of Infrastructure developments is EN010103-001798-NZT DCO 9.9 - Applicants' Comments on LIRs - June 2022.pdf:10: embedded mitigation in these developments that has been AND DISCUSSIONS WITH DESIGNERS AT THESE SITES AND EN010103-001798-NZT DCO 9.9 - Applicants' Comments on LIRs - June 2022.pdf:11: this solution not be achievable through the final design solution, MITIGATION WILL BE SECURED BY REQUIREMENTS 11 EN010103-001798-NZT DCO 9.9 - Applicants' Comments on LIRs - June 2022.pdf:11: The LLFA note the mitigation measures set out within the ES EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf:32: being considered as a mitigation method to meet the proposed ELVs so EN010103-001022-NZT DCO 6.4.7 ES Vol III Appendix 8B Air Quality - Operation Phase.pdf:33: mitigation approach The assessment presents the worst case results for EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (11).pdf:5:effect on marine ecological or ornithological receptors following mitigation. EN010103-001946-NZT ISH4 S2.pdf:12:pollution mitigation plans and the event in the what we consider the unlikely event that there was a EN010103-001946-NZT ISH4 S2.pdf:13:assessment and that there's going to be air pollution mitigation plan. EN010103-001946-NZT ISH4 S2.pdf:14:while they noted that it deadline three, the applicants agreed that mitigation release from HDD will be in EN010103-001946-NZT ISH4 S2.pdf:21:you started to think about what mitigation could be put in place or compensation? Potentially? Yes, yes, EN010103-001946-NZT ISH4 S2.pdf:21:exactly that. Would we need to do any compensation or mitigation as appropriate? And what that would EN010103-001946-NZT ISH4 S2.pdf:21:So would you like to share your thoughts on mitigation, and if it is even likely to be possible, I wouldn't EN010103-001946-NZT ISH4 S2.pdf:21:compensation mitigation with nurturing the no because we want to set out our position as to whether EN010103-001946-NZT ISH4 S2.pdf:23:effects of existing discharges into the WM good. So it's outside of the effects and mitigation of our EN010103-001946-NZT ISH4 S2.pdf:24:but there's no level of effect predicted that is driving any additional mitigation beyond standard best EN010103-001946-NZT ISH4 S2.pdf:38:Number 11 applicants confirm whether mitigation for release from HDD will be included in the genes EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:10: on that site“ (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:11: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:45: appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS in cetaceans including EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:45: porpoise population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:50:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:51: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:55: report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:60: screening is considered necessary to avoid a significant effect. Mitigation for visual EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:60: General Mitigation Measures EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:60:6.1.19 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise and EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:60: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:62: processes. Based on the analysis in Appendix F and the mitigation measures above it EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:68:6.1.48 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, Flood EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:68: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include: EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:71:6.1.496.1.55 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:73:6.3.4 The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) recommends a range of mitigation EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:73: Development as good practice mitigation, which will ensure that any temporary EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:74: standard mitigation measures included as part of the JNCC Guidelines, it is concluded EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:76: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites. EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:77: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:77: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:77: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:77: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:78: Stockton-on-Tees Local Plan & Policies The Appropriate Assessment identified that the Council would produce a Recreational Mitigation EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:78: the detailed strategic development mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue. EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:78: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy. EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:78: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA / Ramsar which has been EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:78: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:79: support them. Where likely adverse impacts are identified, avoidance or appropriate mitigation EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:79: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:79: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:80: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:81: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:82: ensure adequate mitigation is in place to mitigate any potential for cumulative effects. EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:82: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:83: Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be incorporated into EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:86: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:97: Development cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:119: due to the HDD would be a relatively quiet 58 dB. Visual disturbance also cannot be dismissed without mitigation. Paragraph 6.1.15 lists the specific noise EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:119: and visual mitigation measures to be implemented. EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:119: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.42 46 to 6.1.44 48and 6.1.54, including the preparation of a EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:119: of the CO2 export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:119: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:119: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the SPA / EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:123: likely to be very low. Furthermore, there are a range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on marine life, including harbour porpoise (see EN010103-002509-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:123: b. Mitigation measures have been identified which will ensure no mortality or significant disturbance of harbour porpoise arises, and taking into EN010103-001939-NZT ISH3 S3.pdf:12:to ensure that the clearance doesn't doesn't occur without the appropriate methodology and mitigation EN010103-001107-NZT DCO 6.4.14 ES Vol III Appendix 10C Contaminated Land Environmental Risk Assessment.pdf:3:Industry Substance / Class Receptor Risk Mitigation Options EN010103-001107-NZT DCO 6.4.14 ES Vol III Appendix 10C Contaminated Land Environmental Risk Assessment.pdf:4:Industry Substance / Class Receptor Risk Mitigation Options EN010103-001107-NZT DCO 6.4.14 ES Vol III Appendix 10C Contaminated Land Environmental Risk Assessment.pdf:5:Industry Substance / Class Receptor Risk Mitigation Options EN010103-001107-NZT DCO 6.4.14 ES Vol III Appendix 10C Contaminated Land Environmental Risk Assessment.pdf:6:Industry Substance / Class Receptor Risk Mitigation Options EN010103-001844-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Comments on Applicants responses to ExA ExQ1, Statement of Commonality, other IP WRs and dDCO.pdf:8: or biodiversity mitigation in the future to carry out maintenance within the Sembcorp Pipeline EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:10: should be agreed with NE and mitigation identified if EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:11: should be assessed and any mitigation proposed. EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:14: control and mitigation measures for construction and EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:14: listed below, the proposed control and mitigation measures for EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:15: specific points listed below, the proposed control and mitigation EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:15: It is agreed that through the proposed control and mitigation EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:17: Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:18: licence will require mitigation measures to ensure no mortality EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:18: mitigation for cases of HHD bore collapse. EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:18: required mitigation which would result from construction EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:19:Mitigation and Enhancement in the Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy APP-079. This EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:19: European Protected Species Mitigation Licence EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:19: and associated mitigation requirements (e.g. provision of EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:20: It is agreed that the biodiversity protection, mitigation and EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:20: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:32: mitigation may be needed to address construction noise LAeq. RW explained that EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:33: successful habitat mitigation and management plans; this includes the Breagh Gas EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:35: • Construction noise peaks will not exceed this, but mitigation may be needed to EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:43: considering mitigation, we will need to follow the AA to consider this. of 10-15 kgN/ha/yr EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:44: be a need for noise mitigation (possibly operational arising from the consider Nitrogen EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:44: mitigation levels throughout the project to reduce levels further where specifically with EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:45: investigated; mitigation for disturbance during the construction of the EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:45: mitigation and considering a winter restriction for the area – we EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:47: very soon as it relates to the levels of mitigation which are applied at EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:60: may be required in terms of survey and mitigation EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:68:• Appropriate Assessment Report being produced to include standard mitigation (e.g. to protect water EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:68:• Details of any proposed noise mitigation such as the potential need for noise fence at PCC site near EN010103-001588-NZT DCO 8.6 - NE SoCG - May 2022.pdf:69:• Mitigation for disturbance of the birds of the Teesmouth SPA through installation of the CO2 export EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:9: on that site” (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:10: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:44: appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS in cetaceans including EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:44: population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling and EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:49:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:50: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:54: report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:59: General Mitigation Measures EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:59:6.1.18 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise and EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:59: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:65:6.1.45 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, Flood EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:65: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include: EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:65:6.1.47 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:66: necessary mitigation measures. The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:66: recommends a range of mitigation techniques to minimise the risk of injury or EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:67: (approx. 102km) and the standard mitigation measures included in the Marine EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:69: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites. EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:70: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:70: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:70: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:70: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:71: Map (Adopted January 2019) – The Mitigation Strategy to address potential adverse effects on the SPA/Ramsar from recreation. EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:71: the detailed strategic development line with mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue. EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:71: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy. EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:71: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA which has been deemed EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:71: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:72: or appropriate mitigation measures may be required. EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:72: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:72: and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:73: and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:74: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:75: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:75: Development. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:78: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:88: cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects on site EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:110: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.43 to 6.1.46, including the preparation of a Construction EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:110: export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity of the SPA / EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:110: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:110: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:113: range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on marine life, including harbour porpoise (see paragraph 6.3.2-6.3.3). Given this, it is concluded EN010103-000885-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Report.pdf:113: b. Since any marine licence will require mitigation measures to ensure no mortality or significant disturbance of harbour porpoise arises, and taking EN010103-001963-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 4.pdf:3:2.4 The assessment states that “Without mitigation, where Hornsea Project Four were prevented from EN010103-001963-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 4.pdf:3: mitigation including “..the relocation of its proposed turbines from the Exclusion Area to the EN010103-001963-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 4.pdf:4: Offshore Wind Farm, but concludes that with their suggested mitigation, the residual significance EN010103-001963-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 4.pdf:4: consider the mitigation suggested (the relocation of turbines to the residual part of the EN010103-001999-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:41: 3.8.32. The Requirements closely relate to the mitigation set out in the Environmental Statement EN010103-001999-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:43: 3.8.50. Requirement 12 (Flood risk mitigation) - this is not a model provision. It provides that no EN010103-001999-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:43: commence until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction has, for that EN010103-001999-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:45: consultation with Natural England, a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has EN010103-001999-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:46: risk assessment and which is consistent with the piling mitigation measures in paragraph EN010103-001860-9.13 - Sensitivity Test Construction Traffic Modelling - June 2022(D3).pdf:8: the sensitivity tests and identify if any mitigation is required. EN010103-000890-NZT DCO 6.2 ES Vol I Cover and Contents.pdf:8:BLiCL Bat Low-Impact Class Licence - a mitigation class licence that allows EN010103-000890-NZT DCO 6.2 ES Vol I Cover and Contents.pdf:9:BPM Best Practicable Means - actions undertaken and mitigation measures EN010103-000890-NZT DCO 6.2 ES Vol I Cover and Contents.pdf:14:EPSML European Protected Species Mitigation Licence EN010103-000890-NZT DCO 6.2 ES Vol I Cover and Contents.pdf:21:Mitigation Measures intended to avoid, reduce and, where possible, remedy EN010103-000890-NZT DCO 6.2 ES Vol I Cover and Contents.pdf:27: impacts of a development after mitigation. EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:1:5.6 Management and Mitigation Plan ……………………………………………………… 5-10 EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:2: mitigation and construction management measures were accounted for in the EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:2: such mitigation measures are carried out and that they are effective. EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:3: together with any additional mitigation measures proposed to reduce EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:3: legislation and the mitigation measures set out within the ES and this EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:4: mitigation measures; EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:4: relevant environmental legislation and the mitigation measures set out within EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:11:5.7 Management and Mitigation Plan EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:11:5.7.1 This section of the Framework CEMP sets out the mitigation and management measures to be included as a minimum in the Final EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:11: CEMP. It also illustrates how the monitoring strategy will be set out and the responsible party identified for each mitigation/ EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:11:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:12:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:12: appropriate techniques/mitigation suitable for the prevention of dust EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:13:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:14:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:14: appendix. The WMP will provide greater detail regarding the mitigation EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:15:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:15: unavoidable, in which case mitigation measures will be implemented EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:16:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:17:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:18:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:19:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:20:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:20: implemented to ensure that mitigation measures are operating as EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:21:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:22:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:23:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:23: plan will outline key pollution mitigation measures to be adopted EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:24:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:24: assessment to be undertaken, before remediation or mitigation EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:24: • Specific mitigation measures may be required in the form of treating/ EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:25:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:26:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:27:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:28:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:29:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:29: order to identify specific mitigation measures (including construction EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:30:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:31:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:32:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:32:habitat mitigation to establish once Requirement 4 of the DCO , the monitoring requirement identified in the agreed as part of the works Applicants EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:33:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:34:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:35:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:35: • The standard JNCC mitigation measures for explosives, piling and EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:36:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:36:UXO clearance methodology The mitigation presented, replicates conditions 23 of Schedules 10 and UXO clearance methodology Appointed Contractor EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:36: • a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:37:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:38:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:38: qualifying species)): discovered, appropriate mitigation would be implemented to ensure EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:39:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:39:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:40:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:41:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:42:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:43:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:44:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:45:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:46:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:47:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:47:habitat mitigation to establish once of Requirement 4 of the DCO , the monitoring requirement identified agreed as part of the works Applicants EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:48:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:48: require further investigation or mitigation, no construction EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:48: until provision has been made for such mitigation or the EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:49:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:50:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:51:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:52:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:52: be provided by the contractor as mitigation. EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:53:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-001978-NZT DCO 6.4.5 ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) August 2022 (D5).pdf:53: dampening down as part of dust mitigation); EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:1:2.5 Development Design, Impact Avoidance and Mitigation …………………………. 2-4 EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:4: • mitigation and enhancement measures; EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:5: Mitigation EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:5: implemented (i.e. they are 'embedded mitigation'). EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:5: then been given to any further mitigation (over and above anything identified EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:5: effects identified. These measures are described in the Mitigation and EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:6: mitigation) are then assessed and presented at the end of Chapters 8 to 24. EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:6: effect has been classified both before and after mitigation measures have EN010103-000887-NZT DCO 6.2.2 ES Vol I Chapter 2 Assessment Methodology.pdf:6: been applied. Effects after mitigation are referred to as ‘residual effects’. EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:10: on that site“ (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:11: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:45: appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS in cetaceans including EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:45: population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling and EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:51:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:51: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:55: report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:60: barrier itself will provide screening. Mitigation for visual disturbance risk is set out in EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:61: General Mitigation Measures EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:61:6.1.22 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise and EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:61: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:63: processes. Based on the analysis in Appendix F and the mitigation measures above it EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:69:6.1.53 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, Flood EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:69: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include: EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:69:6.1.55 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:71:6.3.4 The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) recommends a range of mitigation EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:72: Development as good practice mitigation, which will ensure that any temporary EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:72: standard mitigation measures included as part of the JNCC Guidelines, it is concluded EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:74: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites. EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:75: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:75: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:75: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:75: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: Map (Adopted January 2019) – The Mitigation Strategy to address potential adverse effects on the SPA/Ramsar from recreation. EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: the detailed strategic development line with mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue. EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy. EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA which has been deemed EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:77: or appropriate mitigation measures may be required. EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:77: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:77: and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:80: available, the potential for cumulative effects will be identified to ensure adequate mitigation is in EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:80: Development is considered to result in LSEs alone, such that adequate mitigation to address this EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:80: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:81: Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be incorporated into EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:83: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:93: cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects on site EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:115: SPA/Ramsar birds or result in visual disturbance and paragraph 6.1.22 lists the specific noise and visual mitigation measures to be implemented. EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:115: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.50 to 6.1.53, including the preparation of a Construction EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:115: export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity of the SPA / EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:115: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:115: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:119: likely to be very low. Furthermore, there are a range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on marine life, including harbour porpoise (see EN010103-002056-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:119: b. Mitigation measures have been identified which will ensure no mortality or significant disturbance of harbour porpoise arises, and taking into EN010103-002045-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:41: 3.8.30. The Requirements closely relate to the mitigation set out in the Environmental Statement EN010103-002045-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:43: 3.8.48. Requirement 12 (Flood risk mitigation) - this is not a model provision. It provides that no EN010103-002045-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:43: commence until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction has, for that EN010103-002045-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:44: consultation with Natural England, a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has EN010103-002045-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean) August 2022 (D6).pdf:46: risk assessment and which is consistent with the piling mitigation measures in paragraph EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:28: (e) carry out or construct any mitigation works. EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:42: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:44:Flood risk mitigation EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:44:preliminary works, until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction, has, for that EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:45:mitigation of flood risk during operation has, for that part, been submitted to and, after EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:45: (6) The authorised development must not be commissioned until the flood risk mitigation has EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:46:must commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and, EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:88: © delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:90: (g) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:103: © delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:104: (g) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:111: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:111: be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if any) EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:111: to submit for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:111: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-000827-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order.pdf:117:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:9: on that site” (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:10: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:44: appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS in cetaceans including EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:44: population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling and EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:49:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:50: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:53: report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:58:6.1.19 Mitigation for visual disturbance risk is set out in in paragraph 6.1.22. EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:58: General Mitigation Measures EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:58:6.1.22 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise and EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:59: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:65:6.1.49 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, Flood EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:65: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include: EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:65:6.1.51 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:66: necessary mitigation measures. The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:66: recommends a range of mitigation techniques to minimise the risk of injury or EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:67: (approx. 102km) and the standard mitigation measures included in the Marine EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:69: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites. EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:70: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:70: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:70: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:70: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:71: Map (Adopted January 2019) – The Mitigation Strategy to address potential adverse effects on the SPA/Ramsar from recreation. EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:71: the detailed strategic development line with mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue. EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:71: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy. EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:71: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA which has been deemed EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:71: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:72: or appropriate mitigation measures may be required. EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:72: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:72: and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:73: and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:74: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:75: cumulative effects will be identified to ensure adequate mitigation is in place to mitigate any EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:75: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:76: Development. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:78: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:88: cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects on site EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:110: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.46 to 6.1.49, including the preparation of a Construction EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:110: export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity of the SPA / EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:110: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:110: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:113: range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on marine life, including harbour porpoise (see paragraph 6.3.2-6.3.3). Given this, it is concluded EN010103-001479-NZT DCO 5.13 Habitat Regulations Assessment Report Rev 3 Final 2022-04-26.pdf:113: b. Since any marine licence will require mitigation measures to ensure no mortality or significant disturbance of harbour porpoise arises, and taking EN010103-002463-DLA Piper UK LLP - Other- Protective provisions position statement requested by ExA 1.pdf:12: (h) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:10: on that site“ (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:11: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:42: mitigate potential collapse/boring fluid release. Additional mitigation measures will EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:45: appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS in cetaceans including EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:45: population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling and EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:51:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:51: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:55: report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:60: barrier itself will provide screening. Mitigation for visual disturbance risk is set out in EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:61: General Mitigation Measures EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:61:6.1.22 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise and EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:61: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:67:6.1.49 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, Flood EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:67: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include: EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:67:6.1.51 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:68: necessary mitigation measures. The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:68: recommends a range of mitigation techniques to minimise the risk of injury or EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:69: (approx. 102km) and the standard mitigation measures included in the Marine EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:71: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites. EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:72: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:72: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:72: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:72: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:73: Map (Adopted January 2019) – The Mitigation Strategy to address potential adverse effects on the SPA/Ramsar from recreation. EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:73: the detailed strategic development line with mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue. EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:73: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy. EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:73: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA which has been deemed EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:73: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:74: or appropriate mitigation measures may be required. EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:74: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:74: and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:75: and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:76: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:77: cumulative effects will be identified to ensure adequate mitigation is in place to mitigate any EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:77: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:78: Development. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:80: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:90: cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects on site EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:112: SPA/Ramsar birds or result in visual disturbance and paragraph 6.1.22 lists the specific noise and visual mitigation measures to be implemented. EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:112: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.46 to 6.1.49, including the preparation of a Construction EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:112: export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity of the SPA / EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:112: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:112: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:115: range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on marine life, including harbour porpoise (see paragraph 6.3.2-6.3.3). Given this, it is concluded EN010103-001849-5.13 - HRA Report (Clean) - June 2022(D3).pdf:115: b. Since any marine licence will require mitigation measures to ensure no mortality or significant disturbance of harbour porpoise arises, and taking EN010103-002313-NZT DCO 8.1 - RCBC SoCG Sept 2022 (D9) - final signed.pdf:17: mitigation measures are included to mitigate flood risk. EN010103-001145-NZT DCO 6.4.34 ES Vol III Appendix 15A Ornithology Baseline Part 1.pdf:7: survey, design options and ecological mitigation. For more information on EN010103-001106-NZT DCO 6.4.19 ES Vol III Appendix 12B Ecological Impact Assessment Methods.pdf:4: design (including mitigation for other environmental disciplines). If EN010103-001106-NZT DCO 6.4.19 ES Vol III Appendix 12B Ecological Impact Assessment Methods.pdf:6: or mitigation); and EN010103-001106-NZT DCO 6.4.19 ES Vol III Appendix 12B Ecological Impact Assessment Methods.pdf:6: priority that they do not require retention or mitigation at the relevant EN010103-001106-NZT DCO 6.4.19 ES Vol III Appendix 12B Ecological Impact Assessment Methods.pdf:7: mitigation is both possible and enforceable. A permanent effect is one EN010103-001106-NZT DCO 6.4.19 ES Vol III Appendix 12B Ecological Impact Assessment Methods.pdf:9: Application of the Mitigation Hierarchy EN010103-001106-NZT DCO 6.4.19 ES Vol III Appendix 12B Ecological Impact Assessment Methods.pdf:9:12.1.26 The identification and specification of mitigation proposals in this EN010103-001106-NZT DCO 6.4.19 ES Vol III Appendix 12B Ecological Impact Assessment Methods.pdf:9: mitigation hierarchy i.e.: EN010103-001106-NZT DCO 6.4.19 ES Vol III Appendix 12B Ecological Impact Assessment Methods.pdf:9: timing of working (sometimes termed as embedded mitigation or EN010103-001106-NZT DCO 6.4.19 ES Vol III Appendix 12B Ecological Impact Assessment Methods.pdf:9: mitigation by design); EN010103-001106-NZT DCO 6.4.19 ES Vol III Appendix 12B Ecological Impact Assessment Methods.pdf:9: magnitude (non-embedded mitigation); and EN010103-001585-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC TVCA Teesworks SoCG - May 2022.pdf:22: for providing biodiversity mitigation and EN010103-001585-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC TVCA Teesworks SoCG - May 2022.pdf:29: • Requirement no. 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001215-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:48:3.8.33 The Requirements closely relate to the mitigation set out in the Environmental EN010103-001215-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:51:3.8.51 Requirement 12 (Flood risk mitigation) - this is not a model provision. It provides that EN010103-001215-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:51: may commence until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction EN010103-001215-NZT DCO 2.2 - Explanatory Memorandum - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:52: protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and approved in writing EN010103-001871-Hartlepool Borough Council.pdf:2: ii) If the mitigation and enhancement The proposed mitigation EN010103-002246-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Tracked) - Sept 2022 (D8).pdf:17: later than the expiration of 3 years appropriate mitigation EN010103-001977-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:4: Biodiversity Strategy APP-079 has been updated with the mitigation EN010103-001977-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:4: In response to BIO.1.11, the results of the surveys and associated mitigation EN010103-001977-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:11: Development and the specification of biodiversity specific mitigation and EN010103-001977-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:11: and biodiversity impact avoidance, mitigation and enhancement is as follows: EN010103-001977-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:15:4.1.3 Avoidance and mitigation of potential impacts on the environment through, for EN010103-001977-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:15: identified as present or potentially present at the Site to inform mitigation EN010103-001977-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:16: implementation of any necessary mitigation prior to construction. EN010103-001977-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:16: avoidance or mitigation would be discussed and agreed with Redcar and Cleveland EN010103-001977-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:17: completion of pre-construction mitigation. This will therefore be addressed in the EN010103-001977-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:18: occupy the same habitats. As an example, nesting bird mitigation will be EN010103-001977-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:18: implemented in a manner that is consistent with the mitigation required for common EN010103-001977-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:19: appropriate mitigation has been agreed with the CoW and (if appropriate) Natural EN010103-001977-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:19: • in situations where the above breeding bird mitigation is not possible, the CoW EN010103-001977-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:19: mitigation to ensure that these are not impacted by construction activities. All EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (6).pdf:5:effect on marine ecological or ornithological receptors following mitigation. EN010103-002064-NZT DCO 8.1 - RCBC SoCG - August 2022(D6) - Final - Clean.pdf:17: mitigation measures are included to mitigate flood risk. EN010103-002065-NZT DCO 8.1 - RCBC SoCG - August 2022(D6) - Final - Tracked.pdf:17: mitigation measures are included to mitigate flood risk. EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:5: Mitigation Measures intended to avoid, reduce and, where possible, remedy EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:6: impacts of a development after mitigation. EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:8: Without appropriate embedded mitigation and controls, various types of potential EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:8: However, through the embedded mitigation in place and the controls provided for, EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:14: mitigation measures and residual effects, whether embedded within the design of EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:14: the Proposed Development or additional mitigation secured though requirements EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:14: practice mitigation measures would be in place during any decommissioning works, EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:14: and no additional mitigation has been identified as necessary for the EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:15: detailed assessments of these potential statutory nuisances and identify mitigation EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:16: mitigation, no statutory nuisance is considered likely to occur. EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:17: Proposed Development and summarises the embedded and additional mitigation EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:17: specific mitigation measures are proposed. EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:18: adverse. Additional mitigation measures are therefore not required. EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:18:4.3.7 The potential impacts and mitigation for nuisance from smoke, fumes, gases, dust, EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:19: outlined above. No additional mitigation has been identified as necessary for the EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:20: during construction of the Proposed Development, in the absence of mitigation, EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:20: management of dust and particulates and application of adequate mitigation EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:21: ecological receptors. Therefore, mitigation measures appropriate to the scale of EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:21:4.4.11 The assessment concludes that the plant design will provide sufficient mitigation and EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:21: additional mitigation measures are not required. No significant effects were EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:22: construction and decommissioning phases. The likelihood and mitigation measures EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:22: decommissioning phases. Odour sources and mitigation measures to be EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:24: additional mitigation is required. EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:26: through embedded mitigation no statutory nuisance effects are considered likely to EN010103-001153-NZT DCO 5.9 - Statutory Nuisance Statement.pdf:26: reporting. Embedded mitigation and appropriate controls will be secured by EN010103-001766-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix PPL.1.3a - South Tees Regeneration Master Plan - June 2022.pdf:56:Building on the overview of physical environmental likely adverse impacts addressed using the mitigation The Fleet within Coatham Marsh LWS, but surveys in 2007 coverage of open grasslands and bare/colonising EN010103-001766-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix PPL.1.3a - South Tees Regeneration Master Plan - June 2022.pdf:56:such that the designations do not necessarily represent 2.12.8 REPTILES cannot be avoided, robust mitigation needs to be put in EN010103-001766-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix PPL.1.3a - South Tees Regeneration Master Plan - June 2022.pdf:62:needed to fully capitalise on the development potential. mitigation; EN010103-001766-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix PPL.1.3a - South Tees Regeneration Master Plan - June 2022.pdf:155:Sustainability and emissions mitigation is a key focus of the Once captured, the carbon dioxide gas is then compressed EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:1:5.7 Management and Mitigation Plan ……………………………………………………… 5-10 EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:2: mitigation and construction management measures were accounted for in the EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:2: such mitigation measures are carried out and that they are effective. EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:3: together with any additional mitigation measures proposed to reduce EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:3: legislation and the mitigation measures set out within the ES and this EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:4: mitigation measures; EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:4: relevant environmental legislation and the mitigation measures set out within EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:11:5.7 Management and Mitigation Plan EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:11:5.7.1 This section of the Framework CEMP sets out the mitigation and management measures to be included as a minimum in the Final EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:11: CEMP. It also illustrates how the monitoring strategy will be set out and the responsible party identified for each mitigation/ EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:11:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:12:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:12: appropriate techniques/mitigation suitable for the prevention of dust EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:13:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:14:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:14: appendix. The WMP will provide greater detail regarding the mitigation EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:15:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:15: unavoidable, in which case mitigation measures will be implemented EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:16:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:17:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: implemented to ensure that mitigation measures are operating as EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:21:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:22:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:23:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:23: plan will outline key pollution mitigation measures to be adopted EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:24:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:24: assessment to be undertaken, before remediation or mitigation EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:24: • Specific mitigation measures may be required in the form of treating/ EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:25:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:26:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29: order to identify specific mitigation measures (including construction EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:30:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:31:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:32:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:33:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:33: as necessary (e.g. for quieter plant), further enhancing the mitigation EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:33:habitat mitigation to establish once Requirement 4 of the DCO , the monitoring requirement identified in the agreed as part of the works Applicants EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:34:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:35:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:36:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:37:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:37: • The standard JNCC mitigation measures for explosives, piling and EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:38:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:38:UXO clearance methodology The mitigation presented, replicates conditions 23 of Schedules 10 and UXO clearance methodology Appointed Contractor EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:38: • a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:39:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:40:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:41:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:41: qualifying species)): discovered, appropriate mitigation would be implemented to ensure EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:42:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:42:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:43:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:44:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:45:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:46:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:47:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:48:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:49:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:50:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:51:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:51:habitat mitigation to establish once of Requirement 4 of the DCO , the monitoring requirement identified agreed as part of the works Applicants EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:52:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:52: require further investigation or mitigation, no construction EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:52: until provision has been made for such mitigation or the EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:53:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:54:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:55:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:56:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:56: be provided by the contractor as mitigation. EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:57:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002309-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:57: dampening down as part of dust mitigation); EN010103-001983-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:24: for providing biodiversity mitigation and EN010103-001983-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Tracked.pdf:36: mitigation an approval function over these requirements. EN010103-001563-NZT DCO 8.21 - INEOS Nitriles SoCG - May 2022.pdf:9: controls and mitigation. EN010103-002730-Response from National Gas Transmission PLC EMAIL & Attachment.pdf:2: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Gas (such approval not to EN010103-002730-Response from National Gas Transmission PLC EMAIL & Attachment.pdf:3: for National Gas's approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002730-Response from National Gas Transmission PLC EMAIL & Attachment.pdf:3: monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002730-Response from National Gas Transmission PLC EMAIL & Attachment.pdf:6:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme save EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:107: adaption finance; mitigation; finance, technology transfer and capacity-building for EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:107: mitigation and adaptation; loss and damage; implementation; collaboration; and EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:107: COP26 relating to mitigation: setting out the steps and commitments that Parties will take EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:107: COP26 under the theme of mitigation include 23: EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:123:4.1 CCUS is critical for decarbonising UK industry, providing mitigation against rising CO2 EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:131: ability to construct relief wells represent a low probability risk mitigation against well failure EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:132: (ALARP) level. The principle of risk mitigation to ALARP would be part of the safety case, EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:142: former, and concludes that with the necessary mitigation in place the impact of NEP on EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:144: 11.11.13 (decommissioning), and does not identify any mitigation, but assumes that (i) with EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:145: could be achieved. The residual impacts (assuming mitigation is possible to allow co- EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:145: to the application of such mitigation the impact is admitted to be 'moderate' or 'large' and EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:145:16.9 For the reasons set out in Section 7 of this paper, NEP's position is that no such mitigation EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:145:16.10 The mitigation relied upon by Orsted to enable co-existence to be successfully achieved in EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:170:maximise mitigation against local heterogeneities, or compartmentalization. Dynamic EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:172:summarised in Table 2, along with the mitigations that have been incorporated within the EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:172: Category Concern Risk Impact Mitigations incorporated EN010103-001776-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GEN.1.2 Position Statement Hornsea Project Four and BP - June 2022.pdf:186:consider other possible mitigations such as installation of navigation lighting on all turbine EN010103-002521-NZT DCO 9.48 - Applicants' Comments on D11 Submissons - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:13: the SPA and mitigation to ensure nutrient EN010103-002521-NZT DCO 9.48 - Applicants' Comments on D11 Submissons - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:17: methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol has been submitted to and EN010103-002521-NZT DCO 9.48 - Applicants' Comments on D11 Submissons - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:17: (2) The UXO clearance methodology and marine mammal mitigation EN010103-002521-NZT DCO 9.48 - Applicants' Comments on D11 Submissons - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:31: to incorporate the proposed mitigation, secured by the draft Requirement at Stage 2 EN010103-001120-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 1.pdf:5: propose mitigation where necessary in relation to the traffic impact of the EN010103-001120-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 1.pdf:5: • formulation of mitigation measures. EN010103-001120-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 1.pdf:6: “5.13.2 The consideration and mitigation of transport impacts is an essential EN010103-001120-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 1.pdf:6: appropriate on the assessment and mitigation. EN010103-001120-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 1.pdf:6: of a new energy NSIP. Where the proposed mitigation measures are EN010103-001120-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 1.pdf:47: any management or mitigation measures is a figure generally accepted in EN010103-001120-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 1.pdf:78:16.11.1 A number of mitigation measures have been identified to minimise the impact of EN010103-001120-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 1.pdf:79: when construction mitigation measures are implemented and will therefore not EN010103-001120-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 1.pdf:89:vehicle without any management or mitigation measures is a figure generally accepted in the construction industry. EN010103-001854-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:24: for providing biodiversity mitigation and EN010103-001854-8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:35: • Requirement no. 12: Flood risk mitigation the DCO. EN010103-001121-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 2.pdf:4:determine whether mitigation measures may be required and will be assessed further on in this TM. EN010103-001121-NZT DCO 6.4.36 ES Vol III Appendix 16A Transportation Assessment Part 2.pdf:4:any management or mitigation measures is a figure generally accepted in the construction industry. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:16: mitigation or impact avoidance measures included within the design of the Proposed EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:16: also summarises any additional mitigation measures that have been identified in the EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:16: number of long-term permanent and direct effects after mitigation. These relate to EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:49: generating stations and that mitigation will therefore need to be aimed at reducing EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:55: climate change adaptation and mitigation; and coastal change and flooding. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:87: has identified some effects that require mitigation. However, the necessary EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:87: mitigation has either been embedded within the design of the Proposed EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:87: application process, no mitigation has been identified by the Applicants, the host EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:88: III, Appendix 25A (Document Ref. 6.4) confirms how the mitigation and commitments EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:89: Development, the mitigation measures (where required) and the residual effects. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:90: mitigation is required. It is considered that the Proposed Development will have EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:92: Document Ref. 6.4) confirms how the mitigation and commitments set out in the ES EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:92: takes account of the mitigation measures that would be implemented during the EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:92: concluded that with the identified mitigation measures in place to address EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:95: interests, including through mitigation and consideration of reasonable alternatives; EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:95: mitigation there will be no significant adverse effects upon species or habitats. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:97: published to ensure that appropriate flood risk mitigation measures have been EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:97: drainage and flood risk mitigation for the Proposed Development, including EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:97: while further mitigation measures will be secured through the final Construction EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:102: appropriate flood risk mitigation and landscaping and biodiversity enhancement. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:106: mitigation. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:107: Section 21.5 and Table 21-30 taking account of relevant mitigation. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:108:6.2.109 Details of flood risk mitigation will be secured by Requirement 12 ‘Flood risk EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:108: mitigation’ of the draft DCO and Requirement 11 will secure details of surface and EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:108: foul water drainage (taking account of flood risk mitigation). EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:112: taking account of mitigation measures and confirms whether the risk has been EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:113: impacts on people and the environment without mitigation. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:113: • With the implementation of regulatory requirements and the mitigation set out EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:113:6.2.136 At this stage no secondary mitigation measures (i.e. additional to the embedded EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:113: mitigation within the Proposed Development) has been identified as being required EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:114: mitigation outlined within Chapter 8 means the construction effects of the EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:115: Chapter 11 ‘Noise and Vibration’, ES Volume I) without adequate mitigation such EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:116:6.2.146 Chapter 23 does not identify the need for any additional mitigation over and above EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:117:6.2.153 Taking account of mitigation no statutory nuisance effects are considered likely to EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:117: occur as a result of the Proposed Development. Mitigation is both embedded within EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:117: the design of the Proposed Development and mitigation and controls will be secured EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:118: mitigation and any residual effects EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:119: mitigation methods have been applied; Development will be designed such that that process emissions to air comply EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:119: considerations will also be important ecological receptors. Therefore, mitigation measures appropriate to EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:120: secure appropriate mitigation EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:120: whether mitigation measures are EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:120: mitigation. However, the annual average impact of NOx is under the threshold to be EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:121: No additional mitigation has been identified as necessary for the construction, EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:121: the embedded mitigation measures proposed. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:121: conservation mitigation measures should be included The HRA (which includes an Appropriate Assessment) concludes that there will EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:121: mitigation measures should be included Conservation’ and 15 ‘Ornithology’ of ES Volume I. The surveys that have EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:121: geological conservation interests implementation of appropriate mitigation and monitoring. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:122: through mitigation and consideration • Aquatic ecology – no likely significant effects on species or habitats EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:122: of reasonable alternatives. taking account of mitigation. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:122: mitigation. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:122: EN-5 (Section 2.7) considers the effects supervise and instruct the implementation of the mitigation measures in the EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:122: mitigation will be limited and not significant. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:124: steam (EN-1, 5.6 Infrastructure has the potential to ecological receptors. Appropriate mitigation measures will be applied through EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:124: identified premises or locations; Taking account of mitigation no statutory nuisance effects are considered EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:124: and likely to occur as a result of the Proposed Development. Mitigation is both EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:124: embedded within the design of the Proposed Development and mitigation and EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:128: water drainage and flood risk mitigation for the Proposed Development, EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:128: permanent measures, while further mitigation measures will be secured EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:129: an archaeological interest, the be removed. However, these are considered to be of low value and mitigation EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:129: affected should be able to be be of medium value. For this asset mitigation by design is recommended by EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:129: It is proposed that the scope of mitigation is discussed with and approved by EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:131: reasonable mitigation. - South Gare Breakwater (Viewpoint 5), England Coastal Path (Viewpoint 7) EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:134: Paragraph 5.10.9 states mitigation Site and parts of the connection corridors. Some of these areas, including the EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:134: account various proposed mitigation measures for the different stages EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:134: demonstration of good design through mitigation, are set out at Table 11-35 ‘Summary of Effects’. With mitigation, EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:136: 2.20.7 outlines mitigation measures for EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:137: (paragraph 2.9.12) mitigation measures EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:138: consider all relevant socio-economic decommissioning of the Proposed Development, and as such, no mitigation is EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:139: be considered whether mitigation EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:139: assessment and mitigation. modes when sourcing construction materials and in particular for the delivery EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:140: applicants to include mitigation maintenance activities, when a number of contractors will be on site. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:140: acceptable levels. stages of the Proposed Development (taking account of mitigation) are EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:141: of which form part of the proposed mitigation for traffic and transport effects. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:143: EN-4, Section 2.22 deals with water provided that the embedded mitigation measures set out in Chapter 9 are EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:144: Mitigation measures (paragraph 2.22.6) EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:148: mitigation measures may include EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:149: embedded mitigation) are shown to be neutral, slight (adverse) or EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:149: designated area of geological or Mitigation and best practice measures during construction will be secured EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:158: climate change, that planning plays a key role in mitigation and landscaping and biodiversity enhancement. Neither should it be EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:159: instability. impacts upon the natural environment, taking account of mitigation, are either EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:159: states that where a development mitigation is included within the Application in respect of the WWI rifle range EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:162: the NPPF. mitigation and control measures. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:163: beyond development minimise impacts and appropriate mitigation and control measures are EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:171: Plan Conservation biodiversity and ornithology and marine ecology. Taking account of mitigation no EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:172: mitigation, or geological conservation as there are no nationally, regionally or locally EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:173: mitigation, or where EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:174: interest. mitigation is included within the Application in respect of the WWI rifle EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:179: part of the appropriate mitigation is included within the Application in respect of EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:190: Plan and Light pollution will be water and human health. Taking account of mitigation, the EIA has not EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:197: mitigation or impact avoidance measures included within the design of the Proposed EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:197: also summarises any additional mitigation measures that have been identified in the EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:197: number of long-term permanent and direct effects after mitigation. These relate to EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:223: ExA as being acceptable subject in some cases to suitable mitigation measures being put in place to EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:230: structure (including any associated emission plume) after mitigation. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:248: account of relevant mitigation. EN010103-001581-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement - May 2022.pdf:251: mitigation scheme, developers must i) EN010103-001765-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix PPL.1.3b - South Tees Area SPD - June 2022.pdf:6: the SPD and to identify mitigation and enhancement measures to improve its EN010103-001765-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix PPL.1.3b - South Tees Area SPD - June 2022.pdf:37: mitigation of likely cumulative impacts on the natural environment. Net environmental EN010103-001765-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix PPL.1.3b - South Tees Area SPD - June 2022.pdf:37: mitigation hierarchy (NPPF para.118) and to ensure the presence of invasive plant EN010103-001765-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix PPL.1.3b - South Tees Area SPD - June 2022.pdf:52: Such effects should be addressed using the mitigation hierarchy defined within the EN010103-001765-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix PPL.1.3b - South Tees Area SPD - June 2022.pdf:57: STDC7 and Local Plan Policy N4. Adequate mitigation or compensation will be EN010103-001765-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix PPL.1.3b - South Tees Area SPD - June 2022.pdf:62: Environmental mitigation. EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:10: on that site” (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:11: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:45: appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS in cetaceans including EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:45: porpoise population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:50:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:51: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:54: report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:59: screening is considered necessary to avoid a significant effect. Mitigation for visual EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:59: General Mitigation Measures EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:59:6.1.19 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise and EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:59: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:61: processes. Based on the analysis in Appendix F and the mitigation measures above it EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:67:6.1.48 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, Flood EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:67: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include: EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:69:6.1.54 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:71:6.3.4 The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) recommends a range of mitigation EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:71: Development as good practice mitigation, which will ensure that any temporary EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:72: standard mitigation measures included as part of the JNCC Guidelines, it is concluded EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:74: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites. EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:75: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:75: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:75: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:75: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:76: Stockton-on-Tees Local Plan & Policies The Appropriate Assessment identified that the Council would produce a Recreational Mitigation EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:76: the detailed strategic development mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue. EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:76: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy. EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:76: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA / Ramsar which has been EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:76: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:77: support them. Where likely adverse impacts are identified, avoidance or appropriate mitigation EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:77: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:77: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:78: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:79: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:80: ensure adequate mitigation is in place to mitigate any potential for cumulative effects. EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:80: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:81: Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be incorporated into EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:84: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:95: Development cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:117: dB. Visual disturbance also cannot be dismissed without mitigation. Paragraph 6.1.15 lists the specific noise and visual mitigation measures to be EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:117: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.46 to 6.1.48, including the preparation of a Construction EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:117: export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity of the SPA / EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:117: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:117: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the SPA / EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:121: likely to be very low. Furthermore, there are a range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on marine life, including harbour porpoise (see EN010103-002330-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Clean) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:121: b. Mitigation measures have been identified which will ensure no mortality or significant disturbance of harbour porpoise arises, and taking into EN010103-001954-Redcar and Cleveland Council - Revised Application Guide (clean and tracked versions).pdf:10: the mitigation of odorous emissions and potentially contaminated dust during further GI EN010103-001156-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy.pdf:10: Development and the specification of biodiversity specific mitigation and EN010103-001156-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy.pdf:10: and biodiversity impact avoidance, mitigation and enhancement is as follows: EN010103-001156-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy.pdf:14:4.1.3 Avoidance and mitigation of potential impacts on the environment through, for EN010103-001156-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy.pdf:14: identified as present or potentially present at the Site to inform mitigation EN010103-001156-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy.pdf:14: implementation of any necessary mitigation prior to construction. EN010103-001156-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy.pdf:15: mitigation would be discussed and agreed with Redcar and Cleveland Council or EN010103-001156-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy.pdf:15: completion of pre-construction mitigation. This will therefore be addressed in the EN010103-001156-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy.pdf:16: the same habitats. As an example, nesting bird mitigation will be implemented in a EN010103-001156-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy.pdf:16: manner that is consistent with the mitigation required for common lizard. EN010103-001156-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy.pdf:17: appropriate mitigation has been agreed with the CoW and (if appropriate) Natural EN010103-001156-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy.pdf:17:  in situations where the above breeding bird mitigation is not possible, the CoW EN010103-001156-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy.pdf:17: mitigation to ensure that these are not impacted by construction activities. All EN010103-002006-NZT-ExQ2-FINAL.pdf:14: i) As mitigation to address the impact of visual disturbance on breeding birds and species EN010103-002006-NZT-ExQ2-FINAL.pdf:32:GH.2.5 Applicants In the response to ISH4 REP5-027 the Applicants state that the ‘method and mitigation… EN010103-002006-NZT-ExQ2-FINAL.pdf:32: Please provide further details of how the HDD method and mitigation has changed, and EN010103-002006-NZT-ExQ2-FINAL.pdf:33: archaeological remains and that therefore mitigation set out in a Written Scheme of EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:1:23.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures …………………………………………… 23-21 EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:7: information, assessments, proposed mitigation measures and residual EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:12: mitigation measures are mutually supportive. hours. EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:19: information, assessments, proposed mitigation measures and residual EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:20: outlined in Table 23-4 and Table 23-5. However, the embedded mitigation EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:21: Ref. 6.2) without adequate mitigation such as use of enclosures, design EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:22:23.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:22:23.7.1 Mitigation measures are set out in the relevant technical chapters of the ES. EN010103-000907-NZT DCO 6.2.23 ES Vol I Chapter 23 Population and Human Health.pdf:22: No additional mitigation has been identified in this chapter. EN010103-001976-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:10: Development and the specification of biodiversity specific mitigation and EN010103-001976-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:10: and biodiversity impact avoidance, mitigation and enhancement is as follows: EN010103-001976-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:14:4.1.3 Avoidance and mitigation of potential impacts on the environment through, for EN010103-001976-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:14: identified as present or potentially present at the Site to inform mitigation EN010103-001976-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:15: implementation of any necessary mitigation prior to construction. EN010103-001976-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:15: mitigation would be discussed and agreed with Redcar and Cleveland Council or EN010103-001976-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:16: completion of pre-construction mitigation. This will therefore be addressed in the EN010103-001976-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:17: the same habitats. As an example, nesting bird mitigation will be implemented in a EN010103-001976-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:17: manner that is consistent with the mitigation required for common lizard. EN010103-001976-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:18: appropriate mitigation has been agreed with the CoW and (if appropriate) Natural EN010103-001976-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:18: • in situations where the above breeding bird mitigation is not possible, the CoW EN010103-001976-NZT DCO 5.12 - Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:18: mitigation to ensure that these are not impacted by construction activities. All EN010103-002422-NZT DCO 9.47 - Sensitivity Assessment of Construction Programme - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:8: The effectiveness of the mitigation proposed for within the EN010103-002185-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Response to SWQ GEN.2.2(i) - Sept 2022 (D7).pdf:18: later than the expiration of 3 years appropriate mitigation EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:17: impact avoidance measures outlined as embedded mitigation in EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:17: the start of examination and that all mitigation measures that EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:17: It is agreed that mitigation measures are included across both EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:18: make appropriate recommendations for mitigation. It is agreed EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:18: that mitigation measures are included in the draft DCO EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:18: Risk Mitigation). It is agreed that the inclusion of these EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:18: are appropriate to ensure that appropriate mitigation is EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:18: Mitigation of adverse impacts on the water environment during EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: mitigation measures proposed in Chapter 14 Marine Ecology EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: mitigation for piling percussive/impact piling might be necessary to drive the pile to EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: mitigation measures for piling shall be adopted during EN010103-002635-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:19: mitigation standard, the MMO are a consultee for this activity. EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:39:connections; hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures; temporary EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:49:connections; hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:50: plans and/or any other documentation submitted will be made hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures; temporary contractor EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:51:less than seven days from the date hereof the Highway Authority hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures; temporary contractor car, van, EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:53: connections; hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures; temporary contractor facilities and construction laydown areas; vehicle access roads, crossings, parking and EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:60:connections; hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures; temporary EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:97:connections; hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures; temporary EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:102:connections; hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures; temporary EN010103-001162-NZT DCO 1.4 - Notices for Non-Statutory_Statutory Publicity.pdf:117:connections; hard and soft landscaping; biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures; temporary EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:9: should be agreed with NE and mitigation identified if EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:10: should be assessed and any mitigation proposed. EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:13: control and mitigation measures for construction and EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:13: listed below, the proposed control and mitigation measures for EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:14: specific points listed below, the proposed control and mitigation EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:14: It is agreed that through the proposed control and mitigation EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:16: Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17: requirement for mitigation for HDD failure and drilling mud EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:18: The CEMP will also be amended at include the mitigation EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:19: enhancing the mitigation such as through use of additional EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20:Mitigation and Enhancement in the Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy [Document 4.15, EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:20: It is agreed that the biodiversity protection, mitigation and EN010103-002239-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:21: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:9: should be agreed with NE and mitigation identified if EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:10: should be assessed and any mitigation proposed. EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:14: control and mitigation measures for construction and EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:14: listed below, the proposed control and mitigation measures for EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:15: specific points listed below, the proposed control and mitigation EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:15: It is agreed that through the proposed control and mitigation EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:17: Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:18: requirement for mitigation for HDD failure and drilling mud EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:19: The CEMP will also be amended at include the mitigation EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:20: enhancing the mitigation such as through use of additional EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:21:Mitigation and Enhancement in the Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy [Document 4.15, EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:21: It is agreed that the biodiversity protection, mitigation and EN010103-002637-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:22: biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-000821-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 7.pdf:32:assessment period. This work informs our viability statement (see pages in the business and enhance the monitoring and mitigation of risks. EN010103-000821-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 7.pdf:33:account controls, any additional mitigation actions and may be influenced by internal or external developments. EN010103-000821-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 7.pdf:33: effectiveness of our controls and additional mitigations as attention in relation to the ethnic diversity of both our management and field force population. EN010103-000821-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 7.pdf:34: effectiveness of our controls and additional mitigations as EN010103-000821-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 7.pdf:35:Our operational principal risks have a low likelihood of occurring. However, should an event occur, without effective prevention or mitigation controls, it would be EN010103-000821-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 7.pdf:35:Catastrophic asset failure results in a significant This year, we continued to focus on risk mitigation actions designed to reduce the risk and help meet our EN010103-000821-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 7.pdf:62:of prime importance to us. We measure the safety of our employees and mitigation, chronic disease prevention, support for a healthy lifestyle EN010103-000821-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 7.pdf:66: Risk Mitigation: The BMS defines and sets minimum requirements compliance and environmental sustainability performance requirements for EN010103-000821-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 7.pdf:69:climate objectives including a climate change mitigation and adaptation networks. This could increase overall system costs and reduce EN010103-000821-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 7.pdf:89: • Received updates on ethics and business conduct, including whistleblowing to help monitor the management and mitigation EN010103-000821-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 7.pdf:92:financial scenario planning and risk mitigation. In November, the Committee invited a credit EN010103-000821-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 7.pdf:93:• SEH risks and mitigation; and traffic accident while working on behalf of the update in relation to the Company’s progress EN010103-000821-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 7.pdf:266: greenhouse gas emissions mitigation, adaptation and finance starting in EN010103-001687-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words 1.pdf:4: appropriate mitigations and protections. EN010103-001589-NZT DCO 8.8 - NGET - SoCG - May 2022.pdf:9: mitigations that may be required to enable its scope based on the division of EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:4: actions and communication channels will be available 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:9: A range of pollution control and mitigation measures EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:10: working methods and mitigation in the DEMP. EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:17: and application of adequate mitigation measures will EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:18: adequate mitigation measures will be enforced through EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:18: appropriate mitigation according to the risk of dust EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:19: monitoring to verify that mitigation measures are EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:22:ES Chapters 9 - Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water The Site will implement security mitigations to reduce DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement 8: EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:23:Resources, 21 - Climate Change associated with the construction of the Proposed 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:29: is recorded as present, mitigation measures, including EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:34:ES Chapter 10 - Geology, Hydrogeology and The following additional operational mitigations will be DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:34:ES Chapter 10 - Geology, Hydrogeology and An Ecological Risk Assessment and Mitigation DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:36: vibration mitigation measures for the Proposed 21: Control of noise and vibration (construction) EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:37: determine the most appropriate mitigation options. DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:37: identified mitigations. Habitat monitoring may also be EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:39: Protected Species Mitigation Licence (depending on EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:39: mitigation requirements (e.g. provision of replacement EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:41: mitigation measures will be applied to prevent the EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:44: down to non-significant.the mitigation proposed will Requirement 15: Protected speciesCondition 23 : UXO EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:45: required mitigation measures, at the time of a UXO 2009 EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:45: Development as good practice mitigation.provides a EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:46: works and a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:47: mitigation would be implemented to ensure that they EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:48: mitigation and enhancement measures within the EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:52: embedded mitigations and design impact avoidance EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:53: on/inform mitigation and emergency response Detailed Design EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:54: Document Ref. 6.4) will be used to inform the detailed 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:59: outline key pollution mitigation measures to be EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:64: will be stored outside of the 1 in 200 year floodplain 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:64: the floodplain, the River Tees and Greatham Creek. 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:64: ground construction, suitable de-watering methods will 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:64: at all times when working in excavations. When 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:64: watercourses would comply with relevant guidance 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:65: least one designated Flood Warden would be 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:65: measures aimed at preventing an increase in flood risk 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:67: mitigation proposals are agreed with all required EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:67:ES Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP Specific mitigation measures may be required in the DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:75: • The standard JNCC mitigation measures for 21: Control of Noise and Vibration (Construction) EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:76: mitigation would be implemented to avoid disturbance EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:80:ES Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP An appropriate archaeological mitigation strategy, for DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:84:ES Appendix 8A - Air Quality Construction Appropriate mitigation measures for managing the DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:85: a Flood Risk Management Action Plan/ Method 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:85: developments within a designated floodplain (as in the 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:85: and from the PCC Site is affected by surface water 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:86: maintenance of the drainage system will be 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:86: ground development within strata where groundwater 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:86: is recorded as present, mitigation measures, including DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:86:ES Appendix 9A - FRA A number of additional mitigation strategies will be DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement EN010103-002177-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Sept 2022(D7) (Tracked).pdf:86: considered during the design process for the Proposed 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:4:Development be available for operational personnel dealing with emergencies. Procedures will be subject to Requirement 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:7: mitigation measures similar to those during construction will be put in place to avoid, reduce or EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:7: of relevant working methods and mitigation in the DEMP. EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:13: dust and particulates and application of adequate mitigation measures will be enforced through EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:14:Quality application of adequate mitigation measures will be enforced through the Final CEMP, and Requirement 16: Construction EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:14: through the application of appropriate mitigation according to the risk of dust emissions from environmental management plan EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:15:Water Resources,14 - construction water quality monitoring to verify that mitigation measures are operating as environmental management plan EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:17:ES Chapters 9 - Surface The Site will implement security mitigations to reduce the risk of any vandalism that could lead DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:18:Water, Flood Risk and Proposed Development will be located in Flood Zone 1 where practical. During the construction Requirement 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:23:Water, Flood Risk and groundwater is recorded as present, mitigation measures, including some of those outlined in Requirement 13: Contaminated land and EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:26:ES Chapter 10 - Geology, The following additional operational mitigations will be implemented to manage potential DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:27:ES Chapter 10 - Geology, An Ecological Risk Assessment and Mitigation Strategy will be developed and implemented in DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:28:and Vibration is appointed in order to identify specific noise and vibration mitigation measures for the Requirement 16: Construction EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:29: appropriate mitigation options. The findings of the further assessment will inform the design Vibration (Construction) EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:29: oversee the delivery of all identified mitigations. Habitat monitoring may also be needed for a DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:31: European Protected Species Mitigation Licence (depending on the magnitude of the bat EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:31: associated mitigation requirements (e.g. provision of replacement roosts) have been met. EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:32: mitigation measures will be applied to prevent the importation, export, or spread within the Site EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:35:Ecology and Nature disposal activities, and any required mitigation measures, at the time of a UXO anomaly being EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:35: Development as good practice mitigation. EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:36: nests before works commence. If nests were discovered, appropriate mitigation would be DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:37: and biodiversity mitigation and enhancement measures within the Landscape and Biodiversity EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:41: facilities as well as the off-Site receptors. The following embedded mitigations and design EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:41:ES Chapter 22 - Major Consultation with relevant parties will occur to agree on/inform mitigation and emergency DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:42:accidents & natural the detailed design of the Proposed Development in terms of surface water management and Requirement 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:46:Framework CEMP commencement of construction works. The plan will outline key pollution mitigation measures to Requirement 16: Construction EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:49:Framework CEMP floodplain extent and only moved to the temporary works area immediately prior to use. Requirement 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:49:Framework CEMP Greatham Creek. Requirement 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:50:Framework CEMP methods will be used. Any significant groundwater dewatering required will be undertaken in Requirement 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:50:Framework CEMP excavations. When working in excavations a banksman is to be present at all times. Requirement 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:50:Framework CEMP relevant guidance during construction, including the Environment Agency GPP Agency’s Requirement 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:50:Framework CEMP be appointed who is familiar with the risks and remains vigilant to news reports and Requirement 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:50:Framework CEMP flood risk during the construction works. Requirement 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:52: undertaken, before remediation or mitigation proposals are agreed with all required EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:52:ES Appendix 5A - Specific mitigation measures may be required in the form of treating/ remediating any DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:61:  The standard JNCC mitigation measures for explosives, piling and geophysical surveys Environmental Management Plan EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:62: mitigation would be implemented to avoid disturbance or destruction before any works can Requirement 15: Protected Species EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:65:ES Appendix 5A - An appropriate archaeological mitigation strategy, for the identified impacts arising from DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:68:ES Appendix 8A - Air Appropriate mitigation measures for managing the construction dusk risks will be set out in the DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:69:FRA, 5A - Framework Method Statement which will provide details of the response to an impending flood and include: Requirement 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:69: the case of some areas of the Site), a system for monitoring flood warnings should be Requirement 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:69: surface water flooding during higher return period events. Should flooding occur in this location Requirement 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:69: incorporated in general site management and remains the responsibility of the operator. A Requirement 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:70: groundwater is recorded as present, mitigation measures, including those outlined in British Requirement 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:70:ES Appendix 9A - FRA A number of additional mitigation strategies will be considered during the design process for the DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): EN010103-001151-NZT DCO 6.4.49 ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register.pdf:70: Proposed Development to help maintain operations at the Site in the event of an extreme flood. Requirement 12: Flood Risk Mitigation EN010103-001875-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council.pdf:10: the mitigation of odorous emissions and potentially contaminated dust during further GI EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:6: and should identify such mitigation measures as may be required in order to avoid, minimise EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:6:proposals for mitigation of any impacts and if appropriate, compensation measures. Contact the EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:7:results, impact assessments and appropriate accompanying mitigation strategies included as part of EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:7:standing advice for protected species which includes links to guidance on survey and mitigation. EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:7:therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation proposals for Habitats and Species EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:7:  Full details of any mitigation or compensation that might be required. EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:14:developer to identify appropriate mitigation solutions. EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:16:information, risk assessments, proposed mitigation measures, conclusions and residual EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:18:impacts for health and inequalities and where resulting mitigation measures are mutually EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:19:monitoring and mitigation during these phases. Construction and decommissioning will be EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:21:mitigation measures should be outlined. EN010103-001017-NZT DCO 6.4.2 ES Vol III Appendix 1B EIA Scoping Opinion Part 3.pdf:36:PD Teesport Ltd should be consulted directly concerning the above, as well as any proposed risk mitigation EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:13: and with mitigation measures implemented as part of a CEMP, these effects would EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:15: of noise sensitive receptors would mean that, with the application of mitigation EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:19: later than the expiration of 3 years appropriate mitigation EN010103-002405-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:30: process emissions control, maintenance, construction will take up to 28 cumulative effects will be the application of mitigation EN010103-001686-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:5: application of mitigations/protections. Hornsea Four is in the process of finalizing a report on the EN010103-001686-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:9: offshore elements of the NZT Project will be acceptable without some mitigation. Hornsea Four EN010103-001686-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:9: of possible protections and mitigations and an assessment of the overall acceptability of the EN010103-001686-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:9: proposals with and without those protections and mitigations, must be carried out so that a decision EN010103-001686-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:10: consider the relevant issues and to apply appropriate mitigations and protections. There is no EN010103-001686-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:30: adaption finance; mitigation; finance, technology transfer and capacity-building for EN010103-001686-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:30: mitigation and adaptation; loss and damage; implementation; collaboration; and EN010103-001686-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:30: COP26 relating to mitigation: setting out the steps and commitments that Parties will take EN010103-001686-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:30: COP26 under the theme of mitigation include 23: EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:15: mitigation or impact avoidance measures included within the design of the Proposed EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:15: also summarises any additional mitigation measures that have been identified in the EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:15: number of long-term permanent and direct effects after mitigation. These relate to EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:46: generating stations and that mitigation will therefore need to be aimed at reducing EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:48: climate change adaptation and mitigation; and coastal change and flooding. EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:78: has identified some effects that require mitigation. However, the necessary EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:78: mitigation has either been embedded within the design of the Proposed EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:78: application process, no mitigation has been identified by the Applicants, the host EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:78: III, Appendix 25A (Document Ref. 6.4) confirms how the mitigation and commitments EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:79: Development, the mitigation measures (where required) and the residual effects. EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:80: mitigation is required. It is considered that the Proposed Development will have EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:82: Document Ref. 6.4) confirms how the mitigation and commitments set out in the ES EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:83: takes account of the mitigation measures that would be implemented during the EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:83: concluded that with the identified mitigation measures in place to address EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:85: interests, including through mitigation and consideration of reasonable alternatives; EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:85: mitigation there will be no significant adverse effects upon species or habitats. EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:87: published to ensure that appropriate flood risk mitigation measures have been EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:88: drainage and flood risk mitigation for the Proposed Development, including EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:88: while further mitigation measures will be secured through the final Construction EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:92: appropriate flood risk mitigation and landscaping and biodiversity enhancement. EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:96: mitigation. EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:98: Section 21.5 and Table 21-30 taking account of relevant mitigation. EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:99:6.2.107 Details of flood risk mitigation will be secured by Requirement 12 ‘Flood risk EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:99: mitigation’ of the draft DCO and Requirement 11 will secure details of surface and EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:99: foul water drainage (taking account of flood risk mitigation). EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:103: taking account of mitigation measures and confirms whether the risk has been EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:103: impacts on people and the environment without mitigation. EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:104: • With the implementation of regulatory requirements and the mitigation set out EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:104:6.2.134 At this stage no secondary mitigation measures (i.e. additional to the embedded EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:104: mitigation within the Proposed Development) has been identified as being required EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:105: mitigation outlined within Chapter 8 means the construction effects of the EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:105: Chapter 11 ‘Noise and Vibration’, ES Volume I) without adequate mitigation such EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:106:6.2.144 Chapter 23 does not identify the need for any additional mitigation over and above EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:107:6.2.151 Taking account of mitigation no statutory nuisance effects are considered likely to EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:107: occur as a result of the Proposed Development. Mitigation is both embedded within EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:107: the design of the Proposed Development and mitigation and controls will be secured EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:109: mitigation and any residual effects EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:110: mitigation methods have been applied; Development will be designed such that that process emissions to air comply EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:110: considerations will also be important ecological receptors. Therefore, mitigation measures appropriate to EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:111: secure appropriate mitigation EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:111: whether mitigation measures are EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:111: mitigation. However, the annual average impact of NOx is under the threshold to be EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:112: No additional mitigation has been identified as necessary for the construction, EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:112: the embedded mitigation measures proposed. EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:112: conservation mitigation measures should be included The HRA (which includes an Appropriate Assessment) concludes that there will EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:112: mitigation measures should be included Conservation’ and 15 ‘Ornithology’ of ES Volume I. The surveys that have EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:112: geological conservation interests implementation of appropriate mitigation and monitoring. EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:113: through mitigation and consideration • Aquatic ecology – no likely significant effects on species or habitats EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:113: of reasonable alternatives. taking account of mitigation. EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:113: mitigation. EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:113: EN-5 (Section 2.7) considers the effects supervise and instruct the implementation of the mitigation measures in the EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:113: mitigation will be limited and not significant. EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:115: steam (EN-1, 5.6 Infrastructure has the potential to ecological receptors. Appropriate mitigation measures will be applied through EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:115: identified premises or locations; Taking account of mitigation no statutory nuisance effects are considered EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:115: and likely to occur as a result of the Proposed Development. Mitigation is both EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:115: embedded within the design of the Proposed Development and mitigation and EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:119: water drainage and flood risk mitigation for the Proposed Development, EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:119: permanent measures, while further mitigation measures will be secured EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:120: applicant should carry out an be removed. However, these are considered to be of low value and mitigation EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:120: adequately understood from the be of medium value. For this asset mitigation by design is recommended by EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:120: Paragraph 5.8.11 states that the SoS It is proposed that the scope of mitigation is discussed with and approved by EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:122: reasonable mitigation. - South Gare Breakwater (Viewpoint 5), England Coastal Path (Viewpoint 7) EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:125: Paragraph 5.10.9 states mitigation Site and parts of the connection corridors. Some of these areas, including the EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:125: account various proposed mitigation measures for the different stages EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:125: demonstration of good design through mitigation, are set out at Table 11-35 ‘Summary of Effects’. With mitigation, EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:127: 2.20.7 outlines mitigation measures for EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:128: (paragraph 2.9.12) mitigation measures EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:129: consider all relevant socio-economic decommissioning of the Proposed Development, and as such, no mitigation is EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:130: be considered whether mitigation EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:130: assessment and mitigation. modes when sourcing construction materials and in particular for the delivery EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:131: applicants to include mitigation maintenance activities, when a number of contractors will be on site. EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:131: acceptable levels. stages of the Proposed Development (taking account of mitigation) are EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:132: of which form part of the proposed mitigation for traffic and transport effects. EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:134: EN-4, Section 2.22 deals with water provided that the embedded mitigation measures set out in Chapter 9 are EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:135: Mitigation measures (paragraph 2.22.6) EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:139: mitigation measures may include EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:140: embedded mitigation) are shown to be neutral, slight (adverse) or EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:140: designated area of geological or Mitigation and best practice measures during construction will be secured EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:149: climate change, that planning plays a key role in mitigation and landscaping and biodiversity enhancement. Neither should it be EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:150: biodiversity and preventing new impacts upon the natural environment, taking account of mitigation, are either EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:150: 202). Paragraph 189 states that mitigation is included within the Application in respect of the WWI rifle range EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:153: the NPPF. mitigation and control measures. EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:154: beyond development minimise impacts and appropriate mitigation and control measures are EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:162: Conservation biodiversity and ornithology and marine ecology. Taking account of mitigation no EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:162: mitigation, or geological conservation as there are no nationally, regionally or locally EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:164: mitigation, or where EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:165: interest. mitigation is included within the Application in respect of the WWI rifle EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:169: part of the appropriate mitigation is included within the Application in respect of EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:180: and Light pollution will be water and human health. Taking account of mitigation, the EIA has not EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:186: mitigation or impact avoidance measures included within the design of the Proposed EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:186: also summarises any additional mitigation measures that have been identified in the EN010103-000831-NZT DCO 5.3 - Planning Statement.pdf:186: number of long-term permanent and direct effects after mitigation. These relate to EN010103-001280-Rule 6 Letter.pdf:16: construction and the adequacy of proposed mitigation measures. EN010103-001280-Rule 6 Letter.pdf:16: • Adequacy and security of proposed mitigation, monitoring and management. EN010103-001280-Rule 6 Letter.pdf:18: • The approach to and effectiveness of mitigation measures. EN010103-001280-Rule 6 Letter.pdf:18: • Mitigation, including the emergency action plans, measures for the CO2 EN010103-001280-Rule 6 Letter.pdf:18: • Mitigation measures and their effectiveness. EN010103-001280-Rule 6 Letter.pdf:36: • Any possible issues of prevention, mitigation or compensation which EN010103-001280-Rule 6 Letter.pdf:43: • monitoring, mitigation and enhancement including EN010103-001280-Rule 6 Letter.pdf:44: • approach to mitigation. EN010103-001280-Rule 6 Letter.pdf:46: • feasible and deliverable mitigation and method for securing such mitigation EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:28: (e) carry out or construct any mitigation works. EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:42: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:44:Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:44:preliminary works, until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction, has, for that EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:45:mitigation of flood risk during operation has, for that part, been submitted to and, after EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:45: (6) The authorised development must not be commissioned until the flood risk mitigation has EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:46:must commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and, EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:88: © delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:90: (g) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:103: © delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:104: (g) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:111: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:111: be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if any) EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:111: to submit for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:111: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001214-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft Development Consent Order - Oct 2021 Rev.2.0.pdf:117:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (8).pdf:5:effect on marine ecological or ornithological receptors following mitigation. EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:9: on that site“ (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:11: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:42: mitigate potential collapse/boring fluid release. Additional mitigation measures will EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:45: appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS in cetaceans including EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:45: population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling and EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:51:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:51: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:55: report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:60: barrier itself will provide screening. Mitigation for visual disturbance risk is set out in EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:61: General Mitigation Measures EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:61:6.1.22 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise and EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:61: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:67:6.1.49 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, Flood EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:67: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include: EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:67:6.1.51 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:68: necessary mitigation measures. The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:68: recommends a range of mitigation techniques to minimise the risk of injury or EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:69: (approx. 102km) and the standard mitigation measures included in the Marine EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:71: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites. EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:72: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:72: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:72: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:72: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:73: Map (Adopted January 2019) – The Mitigation Strategy to address potential adverse effects on the SPA/Ramsar from recreation. EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:73: the detailed strategic development line with mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue. EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:73: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy. EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:73: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA which has been deemed EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:73: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:74: or appropriate mitigation measures may be required. EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:74: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:74: and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:75: and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:76: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:77: cumulative effects will be identified to ensure adequate mitigation is in place to mitigate any EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:77: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:78: Development. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:80: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:90: cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects on site EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:112: SPA/Ramsar birds, or result in visual disturbance and paragraph 6.1.22 lists the specific noise and visual mitigation measures to be implemented. EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:112: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.46 to 6.1.49, including the preparation of a Construction EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:112: export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity of the SPA / EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:112: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:112: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:115: range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on marine life, including harbour porpoise (see paragraph 6.3.2-6.3.3). Given this, it is concluded EN010103-001850-5.13 - HRA Report (Tracked) - June 2022(D3).pdf:115: b. Since any marine licence will require mitigation measures to ensure no mortality or significant disturbance of harbour porpoise arises, and taking EN010103-Advice-00009-1-210419 - Net Zero Teesside FINAL with draft docs feedback.pdf:24: As a general point regarding the description of proposed mitigation EN010103-Advice-00009-1-210419 - Net Zero Teesside FINAL with draft docs feedback.pdf:24: agreement with Natural England regarding proposed mitigation EN010103-Advice-00009-1-210419 - Net Zero Teesside FINAL with draft docs feedback.pdf:25: set out the mitigation measures required to on the integrity of the Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA / Ramsar”. EN010103-Advice-00009-1-210419 - Net Zero Teesside FINAL with draft docs feedback.pdf:26: proposed mitigation measures would be secured, with reference to EN010103-001915-NZT DCO 9.20 - Applicants response to Orsted HP4 D3 Submission July 2022 (D4).pdf:8:NEP Project in the Overlap Zone is feasible with certain mitigations, and has drafted EN010103-001915-NZT DCO 9.20 - Applicants response to Orsted HP4 D3 Submission July 2022 (D4).pdf:10:identifies potential mitigation for those effects, and then considers the likely residual EN010103-001915-NZT DCO 9.20 - Applicants response to Orsted HP4 D3 Submission July 2022 (D4).pdf:10:Without mitigation, where Hornsea Project Four were prevented from constructing EN010103-001915-NZT DCO 9.20 - Applicants response to Orsted HP4 D3 Submission July 2022 (D4).pdf:11:Mitigation EN010103-001915-NZT DCO 9.20 - Applicants response to Orsted HP4 D3 Submission July 2022 (D4).pdf:11:possible, the potential mitigation considered available to Orsted includes: EN010103-002643-NZT DCO 9.51 - Applicants' Response to ExA's RFI dated 2 Nov 2022 - Nov 22 (D13).pdf:8: alternatives and identifying potential mitigation measures). EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf:4: the same and will control dust through mitigation that is standard practice on EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf:10: the area, for each activity to determine the level of mitigation that should be EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf:10: of mitigation measures from IAQM guidance. For all but the smallest of sites EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf:27: demolition works has shown that without mitigation there could be a short- EN010103-001021-NZT DCO 6.4.6 ES Vol III Appendix 8A Air Quality - Construction Phase.pdf:27:8.6.3 However, appropriate mitigation measures for managing these risks will be EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (10).pdf:5:effect on marine ecological or ornithological receptors following mitigation. EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:1:13.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures …………………………………………… 13-38 EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:3: • include appropriate mitigation measures as an integral part of the EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:3: appropriate mitigation measures will be put in place then appropriate EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:7: or mitigation e.g. for purposes of ensuring no net loss of biodiversity); and EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:7: priority that they do not require retention or mitigation at the relevant EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:7: effective mitigation is both possible and enforceable. A permanent effect EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:11: with objectives for ecological mitigation, compensation and enhancement. EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:15:of impacts and mitigation measures have been EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:31: effects on these, in accordance with the ‘mitigation hierarchy’ see Appendix EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:33: After the implementation of these mitigation measures, with which the EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:33: Mitigation features are incorporated into the design of the Proposed EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:33: After the implementation of these mitigation measures and considering that EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:34: including dust and particulates, and the application of adequate mitigation EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:34: control and mitigation measures similar to those during construction will be EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:34: 13.8: Mitigation and Enhancement Measures). EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:39: appropriate mitigation is embedded into the design of the Proposed EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:39:13.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:39: construction, operation and decommissioning no additional mitigation in EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:40: addition to the embedded mitigation (as outlined in Section 13.5: EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:40: implementation of mitigation measures outlined in Appendix 5A: Framework EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:40: Given the findings of the above impact assessment, mitigation measures are EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:40: Any necessary mitigation requirements would be determined and agreed at EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:40: mitigation in the DEMP. This is discussed further within Chapter 4: Proposed EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:40: landscape and biodiversity mitigation and enhancement proposals including EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:41: Therefore, no additional mitigation is necessary besides the current design EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:41: mitigation. EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:42: Mitigation – Applying Best Practice Online. Available at: EN010103-000899-NZT DCO 6.2.13 ES Vol I Chapter 13 Aquatic Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:42: https://transform.iema.net/article/mitigation-applying-best-practice EN010103-001982-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:23: for providing biodiversity mitigation and EN010103-001982-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG - August 2022(D5) - Clean.pdf:34: • Requirement no. 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001821-Marine Management Organistation - Comments on WRs.pdf:3: 2.2.1 It is noted that the applicant has confirmed any mitigation required for the EN010103-001821-Marine Management Organistation - Comments on WRs.pdf:3: poses a risk to the marine environment that any mitigation is included within EN010103-002050-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:60: structures associated with generating stations and that mitigation will therefore need to EN010103-002050-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:75: the CO2 Export Pipeline. Further mitigation measures would be expected to be EN010103-002050-NZT DCO 3.2 - Statement of Reasons (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:84: • Booklet No.5 - Reducing the Adverse Effects of Public Development: Mitigation Works. EN010103-001958-Environment Agency - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 4.pdf:6: action and / or mitigation measures arising from the monitoring; EN010103-001958-Environment Agency - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 4.pdf:8:installation of a groundwater monitoring network and any further mitigation if EN010103-001824-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Comments on the Applicants’ dDCO.pdf:18:hamper the use of 4D seismic for MMV? For this latter point, there could also be a mitigation to turn off those EN010103-002039-South Tees Development Corporation - Responses to the ExA’s ExQ2.pdf:11: measures and mitigation is in place (for e.g. EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:7: impacts and proposed mitigation, where necessary to reduce EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:7: responsible. This is rewarded in the market place. 105] identify the environmental impacts and proposed mitigation, EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:8: The assessment reports that with appropriate mitigation all risks are EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:8: appropriate, recovered, and loss has been halted. practice mitigation no significant adverse effects to marine EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:8: biodiverse biological communities and the with proposed mitigation to minimise these impacts. No significant EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:9: and SSSI and where effects have been identified, mitigation has also EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:12: impacts, proposals should state the case for aquaculture should follow the steps in the mitigation hierarchy EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:13: they are compatible with the dredging activity. or egress from these sites. NE-DD-1 ensures continued safe access appropriate mitigation has been identified. EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:18: will be supported. Where proposals may cause significance. This consideration will not be limited to designated provides information on the mitigation proposed. Paragraph EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:19: Seascape and their surroundings and should not have a the seascape and landscape of the north east inshore and offshore been assessed and where necessary, mitigation has been proposed. EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:19: landscape significant adverse impact on the character and marine plan areas. It will make sure that an area’s value, quality and The details of the assessment and associated mitigation are EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:21: that provide a flood defence or carbon coastal erosion and change. NE-CC-1 requires proposals to manage and SSSI and where effects have been identified, mitigation has also EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:23: result in increased air pollution or increased impacts of climate change. NE-AIR-1 ensures that proposals operation, however, mitigation is proposed during construction to EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:24: plan areas, must include measures to, in order of mitigation is proposed. EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:24: cause deterioration of water quality must stress on water bodies such that, in parts of the north east marine on water resources and Section 9.7 (Mitigation and Enhancement) EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:24: demonstrate that they will, in order of plan areas, water quality requires improvement. NE-WQ-1 supports identifies the mitigation proposed to minimise impacts. EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:27: Biodiversity habitats and priority species will be supported. in the north east marine plan areas is important as it reduces practice mitigation no significant adverse effects to marine EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:29: disturbance or displacement must demonstrate cause declines in some highly mobile species. NE-DIST-1 reduces the with proposed mitigation to minimise these impacts. EN010103-001861-9.14 - Assessment against North East Marine Plan - June 2022(D3).pdf:29: Underwater noise impulsive sound must contribute data to the UK human enjoyment of marine areas. NE-UWN-1 supports the 093], bullet 5, included imbedded mitigation as part of the Proposed EN010103-001304-NZT DCO - Notification of Proposed Changes - Document -Final - 18.02.22.pdf:23: Likely Significant Effects (post-mitigation) is likely on the basis that the EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:1:22.9 Mitigation and Monitoring ………………………………………………………………. 22-40 EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:3: consequences these could pose and the required mitigation. Further detailed EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:5: whilst taking into account any proposed embedded mitigation measures. The EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:5: • Identification of prevention, minimisation and/or mitigation measures; EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:5: monitoring and safeguarding systems and embedded mitigation such as fire, EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:6: environmental effect of the event in the absence of mitigation. However, the EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:6: whilst considering the proposed mitigation and whether the proposed EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:6: embedded mitigation measures need augmenting further. This is because EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:6: mitigation would reduce the likelihood of the maximum severity of harm, EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:6: mitigation results in an appropriate level of risk reduction based on EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:7:Report confirms that accidental events such as Embedded mitigation and design impact avoidance EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:7: reasonably practicable mitigation measures. EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:9: action plans will include mitigation of risks EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:11: engineering mitigations to address credible ranges in environmental EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:13: of hazards and the development of risk mitigation measures for preventing EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:17:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:17:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:18:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:18:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:19:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:19:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:20:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:20:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:21:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:21:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:22:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:22:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:23:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:23:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:24:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:24:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:25:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:25:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:26:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:26:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:27:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:27:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:28:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:28:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:29:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:29:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:30:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:30:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:31:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:31:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:32:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:32:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:33:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:33:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:33: mitigation and emergency EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:34:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:34:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:34: facilities which are in vicinity to on/inform mitigation and EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:35:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:35:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:36:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:36:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:37:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence Embedded Mitigation Mitigated to Tolerability EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:37:Ref. (High Level) before Mitigation Measures and References ALARP? EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:37: planned to follow the recent are the key mitigation EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:39: design of the pipeline will incorporate embedded mitigation to ensure risks EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:41:22.9 Mitigation and Monitoring EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:41: people and the environment without mitigation. EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:42: Secondary Mitigation EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:42:22.9.6 At this stage no secondary mitigation measures (i.e. additional to the EN010103-000906-NZT DCO 6.2.22 ES Vol I Chapter 22 Major Accidents and Natural Disasters.pdf:42: embedded mitigation within the Proposed Development) have been identified EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:1:5.7 Management and Mitigation Plan ……………………………………………………… 5-10 EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:2: mitigation and construction management measures were accounted for in the EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:2: such mitigation measures are carried out and that they are effective. EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:3: together with any additional mitigation measures proposed to reduce EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:3: legislation and the mitigation measures set out within the ES and this EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:4: mitigation measures; EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:4: relevant environmental legislation and the mitigation measures set out within EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:11:5.7 Management and Mitigation Plan EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:11:5.7.1 This section of the Framework CEMP sets out the mitigation and management measures to be included as a minimum in the Final EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:11: CEMP. It also illustrates how the monitoring strategy will be set out and the responsible party identified for each mitigation/ EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:11:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:12:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:12: appropriate techniques/mitigation suitable for the prevention of dust EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:13:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:14:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:14: appendix. The WMP will provide greater detail regarding the mitigation EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:15:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:15: unavoidable, in which case mitigation measures will be implemented EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:16:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:17:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:19:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:20: implemented to ensure that mitigation measures are operating as EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:21:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:22:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:23:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:23: plan will outline key pollution mitigation measures to be adopted EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:24:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:24: assessment to be undertaken, before remediation or mitigation EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:24: • Specific mitigation measures may be required in the form of treating/ EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:25:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:26:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:28:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:29: order to identify specific mitigation measures (including construction EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:30:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:31:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:32:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:33:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:33: as necessary (e.g. for quieter plant), further enhancing the mitigation EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:34:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:34:habitat mitigation to establish once Rrequirement 4 of the draft DCO EN010103/2.1 Rev 5, the monitoring agreed as part of the works Applicants EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:34: A management plan for the maintenance of grassland mitigation will be A management plan for the Applicants EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:35:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:35:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:36:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:37:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:37: • The standard JNCC mitigation measures for explosives, piling and EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:38:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:38:UXO clearance methodology The mitigation presented, replicates conditions 23 of Schedules 10 and UXO clearance methodology Appointed Contractor EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:38: • a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:39:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:40:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:41:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:41: qualifying species)): discovered, appropriate mitigation would be implemented to ensure EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:42:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:42:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:43:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:44:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:45:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:46:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:47:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:48:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:49:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:50:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:51:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:51:habitat mitigation to establish once of Requirement 4 of the DCO , the monitoring requirement identified agreed as part of the works Applicants EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:52:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:52: require further investigation or mitigation, no construction EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:52: until provision has been made for such mitigation or the EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:53:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:54:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:55:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:56:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:56: be provided by the contractor as mitigation. EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:57:Potential Impact Mitigation/ Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirement Responsibility EN010103-002310-NZT DCO 6.4.5 - ES Vol III Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP (Tracked) Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:57: dampening down as part of dust mitigation); EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:30: (e) carry out or construct any mitigation works. EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:46: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:49:Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:49:preliminary works, until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction, has, for that EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:49:mitigation of flood risk during operation has, for that part, been submitted to and, after EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:49: (6) The authorised development must not be commissioned until the flood risk mitigation has EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:51:must commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and, EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:54:the piling mitigation measures in paragraph 10.8 of Chapter 10 of the environmental statement and EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:89: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:90: (h) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:101: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:102: (h) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:110: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:110: be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if any) EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:110: to submit for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:110: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:116:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:187: submit for Northern Gas Networks’ approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme EN010103-001996-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - August 2022(D5).pdf:187: © if a subsidence mitigation scheme is required, it shall be carried out as approved (such EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:2:Table 9C- 33: Tees Estuary (S Bank) – Mitigation Measures Assessment …………. 103 EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:5:9.1.19 A number of mitigation features are incorporated into the design of the EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:5: possible mitigation and monitoring options to alleviate adverse effects; and EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:7: mitigation measures identified by the Environment Agency. EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:9: mitigation measures may be required to address these failing waterbodies. EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:12: consideration embedded mitigation (measures that can reasonably be EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:12: mitigation (measures that would occur with or without input from the WFD EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:12: ─ A description of any additional mitigation that is required (if applicable) EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:14: deterioration that does not affect the overall against mitigation measures EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:14: Consideration will be given to mitigation EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:14: mitigation measures such as habitat creation EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:15: the ecological potential of a surface water body and the mitigation measures EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:15: Proposed Development are based on mitigation measures defined in the 2015 EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:18: and any mitigation measures proposed to meet Good Ecological Potential; EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:18: require assessment of WFD compliance, or where mitigation or further EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:19: necessary mitigation. EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:19: unacceptable physical impacts (without mitigation) on water bodies. Details EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:19: of this mitigation and best practice standards are described later in this EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:22:254] WFD Mitigation Measures: The proposal does not effluent whatsoever to Tees Estuary (Tees transitional WFD EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:22:not jeopardise the delivery of mitigation measures aiming and returned to the Tees Bay outfall). There is also potential EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:23:WFD Mitigation Measures:. The Proposed Development will no longer discharge any EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:23:jeopardise the delivery of mitigation measures aiming to waterbody). There is now only one option being taken forward EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:23:The Applicant should have regard to the mitigation WwTW and returned to the Tees Bay outfall). EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:23:more of a focus on chemical pollution risks. The EA construction phase mitigation section of Section 9.7 of this EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:32:Mitigation Measures: Details of mitigation measures for this waterbody were requested from the Environment Agency but none were provided. EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:33:Mitigation Measures: Details of mitigation measures for this waterbody were requested from the Environment Agency but none were provided. EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:33:Mitigation Measures: The Environment Agency have outlined mitigation measures to improve this waterbody. These are listed In Annex A Table A4 and include re-opening of culverts, EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:33:structures to improve ecology. None of the mitigation measures are currently in place, except for water level management. EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:43: effect on the integrity of a habitats site that requires mitigation, including EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:47: mitigation, and the maintenance of those mitigating solutions. However, EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:53: However, there are currently no mitigation measures identified in the EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:62: Ecological Potential. There are currently no mitigation measures identified in EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:68: mitigation measures from being implemented. EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:68: environmental impacts may occur, if appropriate mitigation is not applied: EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:70: Construction Phase Mitigation EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:70: available good practice at that point in time. The principles of the mitigation EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:70: provide greater detail regarding the mitigation to be implemented to protect EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:70: by the adoption of the general mitigation measures which are outlined in the EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:71:9.7.19 Additional good practice guidance for mitigation to protect the water EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:72: unavoidable, in which case mitigation measures will be implemented to EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:74:9.7.23 Construction phase mitigation measures in relation to the hydrogeological EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:78:9.7.45 Key mitigation measures for minimising breakout include: EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:78:9.7.46 These mitigation measures will be outlined in a detailed management plan, EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:78: programme to ensure that mitigation measures are operating as planned and EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:79:9.7.53 Overall, given that the construction phase mitigation measures described EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:79:9.7.54 If appropriate mitigation measures are implemented as described in EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:79: ‘Construction Phase Mitigation’ above, including water quality monitoring and EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:80: mitigation measures outlined above. As previously described, the impact to EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:80: outfall tunnel. Overall, this impact is considered minor given the mitigation EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:81: the mitigation, no adverse impact is anticipated at the water body scale. EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:82: sandeel. Taking into consideration the design mitigation, the resultant nature EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:84: drainage system. Given this mitigation, any residual impact would be EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:84: Tees Estuary. However, this risk is considered minor given the mitigation EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:84: appropriate mitigation measures are implemented as described in EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:84: ‘Construction Phase Mitigation’ above, including water quality monitoring, EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:85: drainage system. Given this mitigation, any residual impact would be EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:85:9.7.85 If appropriate mitigation measures are implemented as described in EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:85: ‘Construction Phase Mitigation’ above, including water quality monitoring, EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:85: given the mitigation outlined above, including best practice measures in the EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:85: mitigated. However, given the implementation of the best practise mitigation EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:85: described in ‘Construction Phase Mitigation’ above, including the Final EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:86: during HDD works, and best practice mitigation would be applied as outlined EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:86:9.7.93 With the implementation of the mitigation measures to be described in the EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:87: may occur, if appropriate mitigation is not applied: EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:87: Operation Phase Mitigation EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:87:9.7.95 A number of mitigation features would be incorporated into the design of the EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:93: appropriate measures as summarised in ‘Operation Phase Mitigation’ above. EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:93: drainage system are outlined above under ‘Operation Phase Mitigation’. EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:106: bunded as outlined in ‘Operation Phase Mitigation’ above to prevent spread EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:106: Mitigation Measures / Reasons for not Achieving Good EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:107: prevent improvement. However, although no mitigation measures have been EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:107:9.7.192 The Environment Agency has provided mitigation measures for the Tees EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:107: implementation of these mitigation measures. It is concluded that the EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:107: mitigation measures. EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:107:Mitigation Physical Local and Central It is proposed to use a replacement new EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:110:Table 9C-33: Tees Estuary (S Bank) – Mitigation Measures Assessment EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:110:Mitigation Measure Option Mitigation Measure Appraisal EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:111:Mitigation Measure Option Mitigation Measure Appraisal EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:111: mitigation measure EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:111: this mitigation measure. EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:111: this mitigation measure. EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:111:vegetation control technique implemented prevent this mitigation measure from EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:111:(vegetation control) implemented prevent this mitigation measure from EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:111: mitigation measure from being EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:111: implemented prevent this mitigation measure from EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:111:minimises habitat impact implemented prevent this mitigation measure from EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:112:Mitigation Measure Option Mitigation Measure Appraisal EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:112:prevents sediment transfer implemented prevent this mitigation measure from EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:112: mitigation measures described in the EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:112: effectively prevent this mitigation measure from EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:112: implemented prevent this mitigation measure from EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:112:channel morphological implemented prevent this mitigation measure from EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:112: this mitigation measure. EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:112: mitigation measure. EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:114: provided that the outlined mitigation measures are implemented. EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:115:9.8.5 During construction, mitigation measures include best practice to be adopted EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:118:Mitigation Measures Assessment Moderate or less EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:119:Mitigation Measures Assessment Moderate or Less EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:122:Mitigation Measures Assessment Moderate or Less EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:123:Table A4 Tees Estuary (S Bank) – Mitigation Measures EN010103-002423-NZT DCO - 6.4.11 ES Vol III Appendix 9C WFD Assessment - Oct 2022 (D11) (Clean).pdf:123:Mitigation Measure Option Mitigation Measure screening & status EN010103-001784-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG - June 2022.pdf:8: Stage 2 consultation – the types of mitigation they would require to be EN010103-001784-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG - June 2022.pdf:11: Mitigation measures As identified above, the further information reviewed as EN010103-001784-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG - June 2022.pdf:12: mitigation measures. They have been reviewed and are EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:10: on that site” (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:11: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:46: appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS in cetaceans including EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:46: porpoise population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:51:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:52: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:55: report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:60: screening is considered necessary to avoid a significant effect. Mitigation for visual EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:60: General Mitigation Measures EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:60:6.1.19 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise and EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:60: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:62: processes. Based on the analysis in Appendix F and the mitigation measures above it EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:68:6.1.48 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, Flood EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:68: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include: EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:68:6.1.50 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:71:6.3.4 The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) recommends a range of mitigation EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:71: Development as good practice mitigation, which will ensure that any temporary EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:71: standard mitigation measures included as part of the JNCC Guidelines, it is concluded EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:73: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites. EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:74: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:74: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:74: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:74: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:75: Stockton-on-Tees Local Plan & Policies The Appropriate Assessment identified that the Council would produce a Recreational Mitigation EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:75: the detailed strategic development mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue. EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:75: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy. EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:75: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA / Ramsar which has been EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:75: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:76: support them. Where likely adverse impacts are identified, avoidance or appropriate mitigation EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:76: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:76: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:77: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:78: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:79: ensure adequate mitigation is in place to mitigate any potential for cumulative effects. EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:79: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:79: Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be incorporated into EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:82: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:93: cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects on site EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:115: dB. Paragraph 6.1.15 lists the specific noise and visual mitigation measures to be implemented. EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:115: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.42 to 6.1.4453, including the preparation of a Construction EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:115: export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity of the SPA / EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:115: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:115: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the SPA / EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:118: likely to be very low. Furthermore, there are a range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on marine life, including harbour porpoise (see EN010103-002257-NZT DCO - 5.13 - HRA (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:118: b. Mitigation measures have been identified which will ensure no mortality or significant disturbance of harbour porpoise arises, and taking into EN010103-001155-NZT DCO 5.11 - Indicative Lighting Strategy.pdf:34: 24-hour operations are located near sensitive locations, application of mitigation EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:29: (e) carry out or construct any mitigation works. EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:46: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:49:Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:49:preliminary works, until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction, has, for that EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:49: (3) No part of the authorised development may be commissioned until a scheme for the mitigation EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:49: (6) The authorised development must not be commissioned until the flood risk mitigation has been EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:51:commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and, EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:54:the piling mitigation measures in paragraph 10.8 of Chapter 10 of the environmental statement and EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:89: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion zones EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:90: (h) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing auditory EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:101: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion zones EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:102: (h) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing auditory EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:110: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:110: be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if any) for EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:110: for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:110: monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:115:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:188: submit for Northern Gas Networks’ approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme EN010103-001997-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with July 2022) - August 2022(D5).pdf:188: © if a subsidence mitigation scheme is required, it shall be carried out as approved (such EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:9: should be agreed with NE and mitigation identified if EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:10: should be assessed and any mitigation proposed. EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:14: control and mitigation measures for construction and EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:14: listed below, the proposed control and mitigation measures for EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:15: specific points listed below, the proposed control and mitigation EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:15: It is agreed that through the proposed control and mitigation EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:17: Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:18: requirement for mitigation for HDD failure and drilling mud EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:19: The CEMP will also be amended at include the mitigation EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:20: enhancing the mitigation such as through use of additional EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:21:Mitigation and Enhancement in the Landscape and Biodiversity Strategy [Document 4.15, EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:21: It is agreed that the biodiversity protection, mitigation and EN010103-002512-NZT DCO 8.6 - Natural England SoCG - Final (signed) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:22: biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:120:Contractual arrangements are structured so as to maximize the risk mitigation benefits of netting between transactions wherever possible EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:181: mitigation actions or compensation, measure their satisfaction and EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:272:mainly include preventive measures but can also include mitigation from its operated Activities. In 2021, worldwide greenhouse gas (GHG) EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:276:preventive measures but can also include mitigation measures. They EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:277: identified and assessed, and prevention or mitigation measures are EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:284: The findings of the assessments and the implementation of the is to help identify improvements or useful additional mitigations. In EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:284: mitigation measures identified have been discussed with national and addition, a dialogue was initiated in 2020 with representatives of the EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:302:MITIGATION AND PREVENTIVE ACTIONS EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:329:mitigation and how they address their exposure to climate risk. Glenn EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:403: preventive measures but can also include mitigation measures. They protection checks, ground or aerial surveillance or in line inspections. EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:407: are identified and assessed, and prevention or mitigation measures external. Furthermore, in view of its activities and exposure, EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:422:Committee. If the level of risk requires it, they are subject to mitigation performance and that of its customers. EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:427: which is to identify the economic activities considered as sustainable, to climate change mitigation or climate change adaptation. It also EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:427: – climate change mitigation; EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:427: – complies with technical screening criteria that have been established objectives - climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation - EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:429: mitigation objective. of the delegated regulation (EU) 2021/2139 of 4 June 2021, in EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:430: substantial contribution to the objective of climate change mitigation from fossil fuel feedstock. EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:463: corruption and taking the appropriate mitigation measures. This process EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:481: risk analyses and if it describes mitigation strategies that are adapted EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:590: the appropriate mitigation measures. This process is performed by the relevant business people with EN010103-002628-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4 - Total - Nov 2022 (D13).pdf:594: needed. These mainly include preventive measures but can also include mitigation measures. They EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:29: (e) carry out or construct any mitigation works. EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:47: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:50:Flood risk mitigation EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:50:preliminary works, until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction, has, for that EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:50:mitigation of flood risk during operation has, for that part, been submitted to and, after EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:50: (6) The authorised development must not be commissioned until the flood risk mitigation has EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:51: and which must include any necessary contingency action or mitigation measures arising EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:53:must commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and, EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:53: (l) any other management or mitigation plans set out in the framework construction EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:56:the piling mitigation measures in paragraph 10.8 of Chapter 10 of the environmental statement and EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:96: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:97:and marine mammal mitigation protocol has been submitted to and approved in writing by the EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:97: (2) The UXO clearance methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol must be EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:97: (4) The marine mammal mitigation protocol submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) must EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:97:methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol approved pursuant to sub-paragraph (1). EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:97: (b) whether any mitigation was deployed, including feedback on practicalities of deployment EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:97: of equipment and efficacy of the mitigation where reasonably practicable, or justification EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:108: (d) delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:109:and marine mammal mitigation protocol has been submitted to and approved in writing by the EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:109: (2) The UXO clearance methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol must be EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:109: (4) The marine mammal mitigation protocol submitted pursuant to sub-paragraph (1) must EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:109:methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol approved pursuant to sub-paragraph (1). EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:109: (b) whether any mitigation was deployed, including feedback on practicalities of deployment EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:109: of equipment and efficacy of the mitigation where reasonably practicable, or justification EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:118: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:118: be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if any) EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:118: to submit for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:118: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:125: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid Gas (such approval EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:125: not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:125: to submit for National Grid Gas’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:125: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:128:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:171: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossing and any mitigation measures which EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:211: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossing and any mitigation measures which EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:225: submit for Northern Gas Networks’ approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme EN010103-002525-NZT DCO 2.1 - Final draft DCO (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:225: © if a subsidence mitigation scheme is required, it must be carried out as approved (such EN010103-002245-NZT DCO - 9.34 Updated List of Developments (Clean) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17: later than the expiration of 3 years appropriate mitigation EN010103-001549-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Post-hearing submissions including written summaries of oral case put at any of the hearings held on 10 and 11 May 2022 1.pdf:6: mitigations are possible and necessary in order to EN010103-001549-Orsted Hornsea Project Four Limited - Post-hearing submissions including written summaries of oral case put at any of the hearings held on 10 and 11 May 2022 1.pdf:10:technical evidence on impacts and potential mitigations EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:2:24.5 Effects and Mitigation Review…………………………………………………………. 24-14 EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:2:Table 24C- 4: Effects and Mitigation Review (Onshore Scheme) …………………… 24-15 EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:2:Table 24C- 5: Impacts and Mitigation Review (Offshore Scheme) …………………. 24-22 EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:5: elements, the potential environmental effects and proposed mitigation. The EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:6:24.2.11 The assessment takes into account the mitigation which has already been EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:6: reduce or offset potential adverse effects. Full details of mitigation relevant EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:16:24.5 Effects and Mitigation Review EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:16: construction impacts have been identified and mitigation and management EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:16:24.5.2 A range of additional mitigation measures would be employed associated EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:16: reference to operational mitigation is made. EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:16: mitigation for the onshore scheme and the offshore scheme respectively. EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:17:Table 24C- 4: Effects and Mitigation Review (Onshore Scheme) EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:17:Topic Potential impacts that could act in Proposed mitigation measures for onshore scheme (The Proposed Development) EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:17: • emissions from construction vehicles and the Final CEMP. For Air Quality specifically, key construction mitigation includes: EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:17: Concentration (SSC); construction mitigation includes: EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:18:Topic Potential impacts that could act in Proposed mitigation measures for onshore scheme (The Proposed Development) EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:18: • changes to hydrogeological regimes (e.g. in the Final CEMP. For Geology and Hydrogeology specifically, key construction mitigation EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:18: • specific mitigation measures (as outlined within the Framework CEMP, Appendix 5A, ES EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:18: • predicted changes in road traffic noise levels in the Final CEMP. For Noise and Vibration specifically, key construction mitigation includes: EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:19:Topic Potential impacts that could act in Proposed mitigation measures for onshore scheme (The Proposed Development) EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:19: details of construction methods are known, in order to identify specific mitigation measures EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:19:Conservation adjacent to / within the onshore scheme site; construction mitigation includes: EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:20:Topic Potential impacts that could act in Proposed mitigation measures for onshore scheme (The Proposed Development) EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:20: • disturbance to receptors; in the Final CEMP. For Aquatic Ecology specifically, key construction mitigation includes: EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:20: • physical disturbance to benthic habitats and included in the Final CEMP. For Marine Ecology specifically, key construction mitigation EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:21:Topic Potential impacts that could act in Proposed mitigation measures for onshore scheme (The Proposed Development) EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:21: • the standard JNCC mitigation measures for explosives, piling and geophysical surveys EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:21: sensitive species;; in the Final CEMP. For Ornithology specifically, key construction mitigation includes: EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:21: in the Final CEMP. For Traffic and Transportation specifically, key construction mitigation EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:22:Topic Potential impacts that could act in Proposed mitigation measures for onshore scheme (The Proposed Development) EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:22: • temporary and / or permanent changes to in the Final CEMP. For Landscape and Visual Amenity specifically, key construction mitigation EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:23:Topic Potential impacts that could act in Proposed mitigation measures for onshore scheme (The Proposed Development) EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:23: • with mitigation, detailed assessment • appropriate standard and best practice control measures during construction are outlined in EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:23: assets during construction. mitigation includes: EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:23: in the Final CEMP. For Marine Heritage specifically, key construction mitigation includes: EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:23: • an appropriate archaeological mitigation strategy, for the identified impacts arising from EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:23: • disturbance to local business; in the Final CEMP. For Socioeconomics specifically, key construction mitigation includes: EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:24:Topic Potential impacts that could act in Proposed mitigation measures for onshore scheme (The Proposed Development) EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:24: contractor as mitigation EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:24:Table 24C- 5: Impacts and Mitigation Review (Offshore Scheme) EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:24:Topic Potential impacts that could act in- Potential mitigation measures to be considered for offshore scheme EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:24: • emissions from construction equipment At this early stage in the offshore scheme, a list of potential mitigation measures has not yet been EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:24: and vessels; developed. A preliminary list of likely mitigation to be employed has been developed based on the EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:24: • contamination of water bodies; and available environmental information. For Air Quality specifically, key construction mitigation may EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:24: mitigation measures (where necessary); EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:25:Topic Potential impacts that could act in- Potential mitigation measures to be considered for offshore scheme EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:25: • disturbance to other local marine users; At this early stage in the offshore scheme, a list of potential mitigation measures has not yet been EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:25:Disturbance • temporary restrictions to fishing grounds; developed. A preliminary list of likely mitigation to be employed has been developed based on the EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:25: mitigation may include: EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:25: mitigation measures (where necessary); EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:25: • release of / disturbance of historical At this early stage in the offshore scheme, a list of potential mitigation measures has not yet been EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:25: contaminants; developed. A preliminary list of likely mitigation to be employed has been developed based on the EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:25:Leakage other contaminants leading to pollution of mitigation may include: EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:25: • deterioration of local habitats and other control and mitigation (where necessary); EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:26:Topic Potential impacts that could act in- Potential mitigation measures to be considered for offshore scheme EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:26: • disturbance to historical contaminant At this early stage in the offshore scheme, a list of potential mitigation measures has not yet been EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:26: contained with seabed sediments; developed. A preliminary list of likely mitigation to be employed has been developed based on the EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:26: • generation of non-hazardous and available environmental information. For Waste specifically, key construction mitigation may EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:26: mitigation measures (where necessary); EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:26: • noise disturbance to receptors from vessel At this early stage in the offshore scheme, a list of potential mitigation measures has not yet been EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:26: movements, piling and drilling; developed. A preliminary list of likely mitigation to be employed has been developed based on the EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:26: habitat; mitigation may include: EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:26: species; mitigation measures (where necessary); EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:27:Topic Potential impacts that could act in- Potential mitigation measures to be considered for offshore scheme EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:27: offshore scheme; this will help identify the need for activity-specific mitigation and the need for EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:27: • it is anticipated that a Marine Mammal Mitigation Plan (MMMP) will be required and secured via EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:27: formulation of activity-specific mitigation and seasonal constraints, as required. EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:27: • accidental release of fuels, chemicals, and At this early stage in the offshore scheme, a list of potential mitigation measures has not yet been EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:27: other contaminants leading to pollution of developed. A preliminary list of likely mitigation to be employed has been developed based on the EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:27: the Marine Environment; available environmental information. For Water Quality specifically, key construction mitigation may EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:27: deterioration of localised water quality; and and mitigation (where necessary); EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:28:Topic Potential impacts that could act in- Potential mitigation measures to be considered for offshore scheme EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:28: • detrimental impacts to fisheries resources; At this early stage in the offshore scheme, a list of potential mitigation measures has not yet been EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:28: • temporary restrictions to fishing grounds; developed. A preliminary list of likely mitigation to be employed has been developed based on the EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:28: available environmental information. For Fisheries specifically, key construction mitigation may EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:28: • through mitigation detailed for topics such as Wildlife Disturbance and Water Quality above, EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:29:Topic Potential impacts that could act in- Potential mitigation measures to be considered for offshore scheme EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:29: mitigation measures (where necessary); and EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:29: • permanent and / or temporary loss of At this early stage in the offshore scheme, a list of potential mitigation measures has not yet been EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:29: archaeological features. developed. A preliminary list of likely mitigation to be employed has been developed based on the EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:29: construction mitigation may include: EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:29: mitigation measures (where necessary); EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:29: • disturbance to other local marine users; At this early stage in the offshore scheme, a list of potential mitigation measures has not yet been EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:29: • temporary restrictions to fishing grounds; developed. A preliminary list of likely mitigation to be employed has been developed based on the EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:29: key construction mitigation may include: EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:29: mitigation measures (where necessary); and EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:30:Topic Potential impacts that could act in- Potential mitigation measures to be considered for offshore scheme EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:32: the application of embedded mitigation that has been designed into the EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:40: Document Ref. 6.4). On this basis, specific details of mitigation are not EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:42: construction plant; and quality; any required mitigation, please refer EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:42: Export Corridor; and quality such as those associated any required mitigation, please refer EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:43: and land quantity and quality • changes to hydrogeological regimes any required mitigation, please refer EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:44: phase. • predicted changes in road traffic any required mitigation, please refer EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:45: Connection. deterioration of habitat; any required mitigation, please refer EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:46: activities; to habitat and species; any required mitigation, please refer EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:46: the marine construction works • disturbance to ecological receptors any required mitigation, please refer EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:48: • disturbance to ecological receptors any required mitigation, please refer EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:50: • HGV traffic generated by any required mitigation, please refer EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:51: scale. Mitigation is therefore not EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:51: any required mitigation, please refer EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:51: changes to their setting and any required mitigation, please refer EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:52: permanent loss of heritage designated or undesignated any required mitigation, please refer EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:52: and (significant) short-term effect in the any required mitigation, please refer EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:53: • pipeline inspection plans will be detrimental impacts on appropriate control and mitigation EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:54: the likely application of mitigation EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:54: • accidental releases including from appropriate control and mitigation EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:55: in the ESIA, with appropriate mitigation EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:56: installation of the offshore CO2 • noise disturbance to receptors appropriate control and mitigation EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:56: mitigation and the need for any EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:57: Mitigation Plan (MMMP) will be required EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:57: of activity-specific mitigation and EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:58: mitigation, no significant effects are EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:58: fisheries. • introduction of invasive and It is anticipated that the mitigation EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:58: marine water quality best-practice and mitigation, no EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:59: • disturbance to ecological It is anticipated that the mitigation EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:59: • UXO clearance; targeting grounds within • detrimental impacts to It is anticipated that the mitigation EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:59: fisheries-specific mitigation would be EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:60: mitigation, no significant effects are EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:60: seabed sediments; appropriate control and mitigation EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:61: interest archaeological features. appropriate control and mitigation EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:62: recreational traffic and marine users; appropriate control and mitigation EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:63: mitigation, no significant effects are EN010103-001150-NZT DCO 6.4.48 ES Vol III Appendix 24C Statement of Combined Effects.pdf:65: engagement and formal consultation, the requirement for detailed mitigation EN010103-002342-NZT ExQ3 final.pdf:14: archaeological remains and that therefore mitigation set out in a Written Scheme of EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (14).pdf:5:effect on marine ecological or ornithological receptors following mitigation. EN010103-001637-ClientEarth - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:26: Schedule 8 (land of which temporary possession may be taken), or any mitigation works. EN010103-001637-ClientEarth - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:74: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-001637-ClientEarth - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:74: to submit for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001637-ClientEarth - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:74: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001637-ClientEarth - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:269: Generator has taken and/or proposes to take to comply with Condition 46.3 (Mitigation) EN010103-001637-ClientEarth - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:271: Generator has taken and/or proposes to take to comply with Condition 46.3 (Mitigation) EN010103-001637-ClientEarth - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:272: should take to comply with Condition 46.3 (Mitigation) and the EN010103-001637-ClientEarth - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:289: (Mitigation) and the Reasonable and Prudent Standard), the information referred to or EN010103-001637-ClientEarth - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:292: Generator has taken and/or proposes to take to comply with Condition 46.3 (Mitigation) EN010103-001637-ClientEarth - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:302: Generator has taken and/or proposes to take to comply with Condition 46.3 (Mitigation) EN010103-001637-ClientEarth - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:326: (A) has complied, and will comply, with the general mitigation obligation set out in Condition EN010103-001637-ClientEarth - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:326: Generator has taken, or proposes to take, in order to comply with the general mitigation EN010103-001637-ClientEarth - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:326: will comply, with such general mitigation obligation or Reasonable and Prudent Standard. EN010103-001637-ClientEarth - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:326:Mitigation EN010103-001637-ClientEarth - Written Representations (WRs), including summaries of all WRs exceeding 1500 words.pdf:326: regarding such mitigation as the DPA Counterparty may reasonably request. EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:16: impact avoidance measures outlined as embedded mitigation in EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:16: the start of examination and that all mitigation measures that EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:16: It is agreed that mitigation measures are included across both EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17: make appropriate recommendations for mitigation. It is agreed EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17: that mitigation measures are included in the draft DCO EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17: Risk Mitigation). It is agreed that the inclusion of these EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17: are appropriate to ensure that appropriate mitigation is EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:17: Mitigation of adverse impacts on the water environment during EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:18: mitigation measures proposed in Chapter 14 Marine Ecology EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:18: mitigation for piling percussive/impact piling might be necessary to drive the pile to EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:18: mitigation measures for piling shall be adopted during EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:18: mitigation standard, the MMO are a consultee for this activity. EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:21: h) (a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:58: mitigation; by way of example, for the piling at the intake – EN010103-002236-NZT DCO 8.4 - MMO SoCG (Tracked) - Sept 2022(D8).pdf:59: approach to the intake cofferdam piling and mitigation, are EN010103-001241-SembcorpRepresentation_NZTApplication_171221(115054462.1).pdf:2:effects must be eliminated and appropriate safeguards and mitigation provided. EN010103-002294-ExA Q2 Historic England.pdf:3:HE 2.3 that construction activity would not impact buried archaeological remains and that therefore mitigation set out in a Written EN010103-002294-ExA Q2 Historic England.pdf:3: mitigation strategy” as mentioned in Paragraph 19.7.3 in Environmental Statement Chapter 19 (Marine Heritage). EN010103-002622-DLA Piper UK LLP - Comments on any other information submitted at Deadline 12.pdf:11: (h) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation EN010103-001906-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG July 2022 (Final) (D4).pdf:10: included the Stage 2 provided clarification on the types of mitigation they would EN010103-001906-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG July 2022 (Final) (D4).pdf:13: Mitigation measures As identified above, the further information reviewed as part of EN010103-001906-NZT DCO 8.33 - National Highways SoCG July 2022 (Final) (D4).pdf:14: the overall mitigation measures. They have been reviewed and EN010103-001291-National Highways.pdf:7:mitigation measures is a figure that is ‘generally’ accepted within the construction EN010103-002407-NZT DCO - 9.43 Written Summary of Oral Submissions at ISH5 - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:26: iii) any other management or mitigation plans set out in the EN010103-002407-NZT DCO - 9.43 Written Summary of Oral Submissions at ISH5 - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:27: September 2022 PD-017, this mitigation for the HDD option was not EN010103-002407-NZT DCO - 9.43 Written Summary of Oral Submissions at ISH5 - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:33: include details of mitigation for any potential noise impacts. The EN010103-002407-NZT DCO - 9.43 Written Summary of Oral Submissions at ISH5 - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:39: clearance methodology and marine mammal mitigation protocol has been EN010103-002407-NZT DCO - 9.43 Written Summary of Oral Submissions at ISH5 - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:39: (2) The UXO clearance methodology and marine mammal mitigation EN010103-Advice-00002-1-TNZT - 200318 - Meeting note 18 March 2020.pdf:2:justify any approach taken in the application documents including any mitigation for this EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:11: on that site“ (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:12: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:42: collapse/boring fluid release. Additional mitigation measures will include engaging EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:46: appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS in cetaceans including EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:46: population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling and EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:52:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:52: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:56: report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:61: barrier itself will provide screening. Mitigation for visual disturbance risk is set out in EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:62: General Mitigation Measures EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:62:6.1.22 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise and EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:62: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:64: processes. Based on the analysis in Appendix F and the mitigation measures above it EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:70:6.1.496.1.53 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:70: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include: EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:71:6.1.516.1.55 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:72: necessary mitigation measures. To determine whether impulsive sound sources EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:73: mitigation techniques to minimise the risk of injury or disturbance to marine EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:73: will be adopted for the Proposed Development as good practice mitigation, which EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:74: 102km) and the standard mitigation measures included inas part of the Marine EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:76: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites. EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:77: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:77: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:77: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:77: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: Map (Adopted January 2019) – The Mitigation Strategy to address potential adverse effects on the SPA/Ramsar from recreation. EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: the detailed strategic development line with mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue. EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy. EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA which has been deemed EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:78: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: or appropriate mitigation measures may be required. EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:79: and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:80: and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:81: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:82: cumulative effects will be identified to ensure adequate mitigation is in place to mitigate any EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:82: Development is considered to result in LSEs alone, such that adequate mitigation to address this EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:82: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:83: Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be incorporated into EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:85: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:95: cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects on site EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:117: SPA/Ramsar birds or result in visual disturbance and paragraph 6.1.22 lists the specific noise and visual mitigation measures to be implemented. EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:117: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.4650 to 6.1.4953, including the preparation of a Construction EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:117: export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity of the SPA / EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:117: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:117: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:121: likely to be very low. Furthermore, the application for a Marine License will includethere are a range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on EN010103-002057-NZT DCO 5.13 - Habitats Regulations Assessment Report (Tracked) August 2022 (D6).pdf:121: b. Since any marine licence will require mitigationMitigation measures tohave been identified which will ensure no mortality or significant disturbance EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:27: (e) carry out or construct any mitigation works. EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:42: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:44:Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:44:preliminary works, until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction, has, for that EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:45:mitigation of flood risk during operation has, for that part, been submitted to and, after EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:45: (6) The authorised development must not be commissioned until the flood risk mitigation has EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:46:must commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and, EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:82: © delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:84: (g) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:94: © delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:95: (g) a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:102: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:102: be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if any) EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:102: to submit for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:102: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001472-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO - Apr 2022.pdf:108:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-002511-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:24: for providing biodiversity mitigation and EN010103-002511-NZT DCO 8.3 - STDC SoCG (Tracked) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:36: • Requirement no. 12: Flood risk mitigation EN010103-002183-NZT DCO 9.32 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 6 Submissions - Sept 2022(D7).pdf:28: mitigation/compensation. Without prejudice to the submissions made by bp EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf:124:Contractual arrangements are structured so as to maximize the risk mitigation benefits of netting between transactions wherever possible EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf:170:to its sustainability commitments and policies. mitigation actions or compensation, measure their satisfaction and EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf:251:include preventive measures but can also include mitigation measures financial performance (refer to point 5.6 of chapter 5), in accordance with EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf:255: mainly include preventive measures but can also include mitigation EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf:273:Mitigation and preventive actions decent work and the respect for human rights in its supply chain by EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf:358: 2/ Mitigation measures: Tanzania. Those emissions are estimated at 0.2 million tons of CO2e EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf:359: the project’s impact on primate habitats and corresponding mitigation projects. In a ruling issued on January 30, 2020, the Nanterre court EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf:359: mitigation measures described in the assessment; particularly in terms of biodiversity protection and land acquisition. EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf:371:but can also include mitigation measures and may be technical or EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf:374: and assessed, and prevention or mitigation measures are implemented in All Group subsidiaries must ensure that they implement the Group’s PSR EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf:389:and technologies, is assessed for consistency with the goals of the Committee. If the level of risk requires it, they are subject to mitigation EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf:398: identifying any risks of corruption and taking the appropriate mitigation or the Group Ethics Committee. Both employees and third parties can EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf:411:activities of less than 30 kt CO2e/year are excluded. from risk analyses and if it describes mitigation strategies that are EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf:488: risks of corruption and taking the appropriate mitigation measures. This process is performed by the relevant EN010103-000818-NZT DCO 3.3 - Funding Statement - Appendix 4.pdf:490:EM-EP- systems used to identify and whether further measures are needed. These mainly include preventive measures but can also include mitigation EN010103-001129-NZT DCO 6.4.40 ES Vol III Appendix 17B LVIA Proposed Methodology.pdf:14: Little or no scope for adequate mitigation. EN010103-001129-NZT DCO 6.4.40 ES Vol III Appendix 17B LVIA Proposed Methodology.pdf:14: Partial mitigation is possible. EN010103-001129-NZT DCO 6.4.40 ES Vol III Appendix 17B LVIA Proposed Methodology.pdf:14: Partial or full mitigation is possible. EN010103-001129-NZT DCO 6.4.40 ES Vol III Appendix 17B LVIA Proposed Methodology.pdf:15: Full mitigation is possible. EN010103-001129-NZT DCO 6.4.40 ES Vol III Appendix 17B LVIA Proposed Methodology.pdf:16: account mitigation measures and change over time. The level of effect is EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:28: (e) carry out or construct any mitigation works. EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:42: © biodiversity and habitat mitigation and impact avoidance. EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:44:Flood risk mitigation EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:44:preliminary works, until a scheme for the mitigation of flood risk during construction, has, for that EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:45:mitigation of flood risk during operation has, for that part, been submitted to and, after EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:45: (6) The authorised development must not be commissioned until the flood risk mitigation has EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:47:must commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation measures has been submitted to and, EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:50:the piling mitigation measures in paragraph 10.8 of Chapter 10 of the environmental statement and EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:86: (d) ©delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:87: (h) (g)a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:98: (d) ©delivery of any mitigation including the use of archaeological construction exclusion EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:100: (h) (g)a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol (MMMP) with the intention of preventing EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:107: “ground mitigation scheme” means a scheme approved by National Grid (such approval not to EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:107: be unreasonably withheld or delayed) setting out the necessary mitigation measures (if any) EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:107: to submit for National Grid’s approval a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:107: ground monitoring scheme as requiring a ground mitigation scheme; EN010103-001793-NZT DCO 2.1 - Draft DCO (Comparison with April 2022) - June 2022.pdf:113:authorised development the undertaker shall implement an appropriate ground mitigation scheme EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:15: and a discussion of potential mitigation measures. EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:20: Possible Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:20:10.6.57 Arcadis suggested that the main mitigation methods that could be used to EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:24: • Mitigation of any identified ground gas risk (subject to confirmation due EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:213: mitigation bunds are expected to be formed to screen the main generation EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:216: considered as part of ecological mitigation works. EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:218: Mitigation for protection of groundwater is warranted where there are active EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:218:10.10.49 Mitigation may be required to protect Infrastructure such as concrete, steel, EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:245: mitigation measures. EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:245: proven otherwise, mitigation will be required to avoid an unacceptable risk EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:245: investigation and if the hazards are proven; mitigation will be required to EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:245: groundworks are planned in order to design appropriate mitigation. EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:246: site users in the PCC Site without mitigation from ingestion and dermal EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:247: the most appropriate mitigation. If unexpected gross contamination is EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:247: provide mitigation (for example removal of sources and / or increasing pile EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:248: spaces. Mitigation by excavation and pumping of tanks may be required if EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:248: mitigation is proposed. EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:249: Conversely, chloride attacks the steel reinforcement itself. Mitigation for EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:249: reduction in strength. Mitigation for acid attack on concrete usually involves EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:249: the most common mitigation appears to be application of a coating to avoid EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:249: Mitigation would be dependent on the results of the risk assessment EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:251:Industry Substance / Class Receptor Risk Mitigation Options EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:252:Industry Substance / Class Receptor Risk Mitigation Options EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:253:Industry Substance / Class Receptor Risk Mitigation EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:253:Industry Substance / Class Receptor Risk Mitigation EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:254:Industry Substance / Class Receptor Risk Mitigation EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:254:Industry Substance / Class Receptor Risk Mitigation EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:255:Industry Substance / Class Receptor Risk Mitigation EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:256:Industry Substance / Class Receptor Risk Mitigation EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:257: mitigation. EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:259:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:260:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:261:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:262:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:263:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:264:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:265:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:266:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:267:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:268:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:269:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:270:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:271:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:272:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:273:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:274:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:275:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:276:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:277:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-001073-NZT DCO 6.4.12 ES Vol III Appendix 10A PSSR.pdf:278:Identified Cause Risk before Control Consequence Mitigation Measures EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:1:9.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures …………………………………………….. 9-91 EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:1:Table 9-17: Pollution Hazard Indices and the Total Pollutant Mitigation Index EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:3: • identification of potential mitigation and enhancement measures; and EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:3: effects reported at the end of this chapter take account of embedded mitigation EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:3: and the implementation of additional mitigation measures as described in this EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:5: the water environment and potential mitigation measures. EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:6: climate change mitigation and adaptation (paragraph 20d); EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:8: mitigation of flooding elsewhere are taken; prioritising use of SuDS; EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:10: appropriate mitigation measures and that there would not be EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:19:which therefore, required mitigation. EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:23: • Step 2 – Select SuDS with a total pollution mitigation index that equals or EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:23: takes into account proposed mitigation measures where the water body is not EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:24: adverse effects are predicted, options for mitigation have been considered and EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:24: with identified mitigation in place have also been assessed. EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:27: Development and to allow for the identification of necessary mitigation. EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:27: unacceptable physical impacts (without mitigation) on water bodies. Details EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:27: of this mitigation and best practice standards are described later in this report. EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:63: mitigation, and the maintenance of those mitigating solutions. However, again EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:67: the design (i.e. embedded mitigation) or are standard construction or EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:67: operational practices (i.e. essential mitigation). These measures have, EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:67: secured through the draft DCO. The construction mitigation measures will be EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:68: available good practice at that point in time. The principles of the mitigation EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:68: mitigation to be implemented to protect the water environment from adverse EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:68: by the adoption of the general mitigation measures which are outlined in the EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:69:9.5.10 Additional good practice guidance for mitigation to protect the water EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:72: programme to ensure that mitigation measures are operating as planned and EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:73:9.5.31 A number of mitigation features would be incorporated into the design of the EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:78: impacts may occur if appropriate mitigation is not applied: EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:80:9.6.17 With the embedded mitigation measures described in Section 9.5 in place, it EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:81: worked on directly, and given the proposed mitigation, any impact from EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:81: suspended sediment in runoff would be negligible with the mitigation EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:81:9.6.19 Given the embedded mitigation to deal with fine sediment from runoff and EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:81:9.6.21 If appropriate mitigation measures are implemented as described in Section EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:81: waterbodies. Despite mitigation measures the risk of a chemical spillage EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:81:9.6.23 Given the embedded mitigation to deal with chemical spillages there is EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:82: mitigation as described in the FRA, Final CEMP and WMP, this risk can be EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:83: and mitigation measures (see Section 9.5), this risk can be effectively EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:83: measures outlined in the CEMP and WMP and other flood risk mitigation as EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:83: may occur if appropriate mitigation is not applied: EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:85: mitigation index must meet or surpass the pollution hazard index. Under the EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:85: basis, the mitigation index fails to meet the pollution hazard index for EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:86:Table 9-17: Pollution Hazard Indices and the Total Pollutant Mitigation Index for EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:86: Total Mitigation EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:86: Final Mitigation EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:92: occur. Appropriate mitigation measures are therefore required to be EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:92: mitigation measures, including those outlined in British Standard 8102 EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:93: provided that the appropriate mitigation is implemented. EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:93:9.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:93:9.7.1 Mitigation of adverse impacts on the water environment during the EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:94:9.7.4 The need for a number of additional mitigation strategies will be considered EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:98: practice mitigation is implemented on the above construction sites through EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:98: waterbodies. As such, provided that all the mitigation measures are EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:98: provided that the embedded mitigation measures are implemented as outlined EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:99: Additional Mitigation Residual Effect EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:99: Risk) mitigation) EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:99: High (embedded mitigation), EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:99: Greatham Creek, Mucky (embedded mitigation), EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:100: Additional Mitigation Residual Effect EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:100: Risk) mitigation) EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:100: (embedded mitigation). EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:100: (embedded mitigation). EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:101: Additional Mitigation Residual Effect EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:101: Risk) mitigation) EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:101: (embedded mitigation). EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:101:Accidental Spillages (embedded mitigation). EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:101: (embedded mitigation). EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:101:discharges from the (embedded mitigation). EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:102: Additional Mitigation Residual Effect EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:102: Risk) mitigation) EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:102: (embedded mitigation) EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:102: (embedded mitigation) EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:103: Additional Mitigation Residual Effect EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:103: Risk) mitigation) EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:103:during operation (embedded mitigation) EN010103-000895-NZT DCO 6.2.9 ES Vol I Chapter 9 Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources.pdf:103:waterbodies during (embedded mitigation) EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:1:8.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures …………………………………………….. 8-41 EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:7: consideration of significant air emissions, their mitigation and any residual EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:7: effects, the predicted absolute emission levels after application of mitigation, EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:7: with the relevant authorities to secure appropriate mitigation measures to EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:13: design stage and through embedded mitigation where possible, including the EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:13: further in Mitigation and Enhancement Measures of this Chapter. EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:14: to determine the level of good practice mitigation required for adequate EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:14: with no mitigation, and recommends mitigation measures appropriate to the EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:14: no additional mitigation (beyond the identified development design and EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:14:  Determine the level of mitigation required based on the level of risk, to EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:19: aim is to bring forward a scheme, to include mitigation measures as EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:19: determine the level of mitigation required to avoid significant impacts on EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:19: receptors. The guidance indicates that application of appropriate mitigation EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:33: application of adequate mitigation measures will be enforced through EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:35:8.5.14 Appropriate best practice mitigation measures will be applied during any EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:35: Requirement in the draft DCO (Document Ref. 2.1); no additional mitigation EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:35: ecological receptors. Therefore, mitigation measures appropriate to the scale EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:42:8.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:42: particulates, and the application of adequate mitigation measures will be EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:42: mitigation according to the risk of dust emissions from Site activities as EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:42: mitigation has been identified as necessary for the construction phase of the EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:43:8.7.5 No specific additional mitigation has been identified as necessary for the EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:43: embedded mitigation measured outlined in Section 8.6: Likely Impacts and EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:43: applied across UK construction sites. No additional mitigation has been EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:43:8.10.2 Consistent with construction mitigation, it has been assumed that relevant EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:43: best practice mitigation measures would be in place during any EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:43: decommissioning works. No additional mitigation has been identified as EN010103-000894-NZT DCO 6.2.8 ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Air Quality.pdf:44: would be as reported within the Mitigation and Enhancement Measures EN010103-001602-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 3 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – EQUINOR NEW ENERGY LIMITED.pdf:101:result of material losses or loss of life due to such attacks. prevention and mitigation controls, such as social distancing EN010103-001602-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 3 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – EQUINOR NEW ENERGY LIMITED.pdf:113:summary of our climate-related risk factors is provided in framework. The precautionary approach and mitigation EN010103-001602-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 3 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – EQUINOR NEW ENERGY LIMITED.pdf:222:Equinor uses risk mitigation tools to reduce or control credit risk both on a counterparty and portfolio level. The main tools include bank EN010103-001602-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 3 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – EQUINOR NEW ENERGY LIMITED.pdf:341: • Climate Change mitigation* EN010103-001602-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 3 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – EQUINOR NEW ENERGY LIMITED.pdf:341:disclosed), 10 (climate change mitigation) and 11 (climate • Protection of water

EN010103-001602-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 3 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – EQUINOR NEW ENERGY LIMITED.pdf:341: change mitigation and climate change adaption.

EN010103-001602-NZT DCO 9.4 - APPENDIX 3 LATEST AUDITED ACCOUNTS – EQUINOR NEW ENERGY LIMITED.pdf:343:mitigation and climate change adaption in the EU Taxonomy. facilities that produce electricity from wind power. Equinor is

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:1:14.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures …………………………………………… 14-98

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:6: geological conservation interests, including through mitigation and

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:6: of the mitigation hierarchy and (as set out in paragraph 5.3.18 of NPS EN-1)

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:6: can achieved by the application of appropriate mitigation to ensure that:

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:6:14.2.7 Where appropriate mitigation cannot be applied, it would be expected that

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:6: abstraction and discharge of cooling water. In addition to the mitigation

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:6: Further mitigation measures should be specific to minimise fish impingement

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:12:  identify appropriate mitigation to reduce any likely ecological impacts;

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:13: value to merit retention or mitigation e.g. for the purpose of ensuring no

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:14: Development, and any mitigation measures necessary have been identified.

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:19: Where it is considered that mitigation is required,

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:20:not just to mitigate. The level of mitigation / measures to offset loss of marine biodiversity

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:20: mitigation and enhancement. It also confirms that

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:20:intertidal habitat: The EA is committed to no net mitigation measures relevant to the assessment

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:20:works, considerable justification for this, together and Impact Avoidance and 14.7: Mitigation and

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:20:with details of mitigation and compensation would Enhancement Measures of this ES chapter.

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:20: assessment and key mitigation has been

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:21:pathways, and necessary mitigation measures An overview of the likely impacts and effects to

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:21: chapter with information about relevant mitigation

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:21: and Impact Avoidance and 14.7: Mitigation and

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:21:mitigation plan and / or appropriate water quality the DML; the draft DML has been subject to

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:21: anticipated that if necessary, any silt mitigation

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:21:mitigation for potential adverse effects. Proposed Development on the introduction and

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:23: Good practice and design mitigation measures

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:26:mitigation for activities such as piling adjacent to extent of any underwater noise impacts arising

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:27:suitable mitigation and prevention measures Tees and there will be no risk of entrainment of

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:27: appropriate landscape and biodiversity mitigation

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:42: mitigation hierarchy and relevant planning policy.

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:42: mitigation measures to be executed during the construction phase in order to

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:43: mitigation measures are intended to minimise the impacts of the Proposed

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:44:14.5.14 The standard JNCC mitigation measures for explosives and geophysical

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:44: assessment, and any necessary mitigation, will be secured through conditions

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:45:14.5.19 Specific mitigation measures related to the management of construction site

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:46: Development on marine ecological receptors in the absence of any mitigation,

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:47:  in light of the in-built mitigation proposed (summarised in paragraphs

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:54: considered to be no requirement for additional mitigation, enhancement or

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:58:14.6.46 Taking into consideration the design mitigation, the resultant nature of impact

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:59:14.6.50 Taking into consideration the design mitigation, the resultant nature of impact

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:60: several design and good practice mitigation measures are intended to avoid

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:60: This design mitigation of the Proposed Development is summarised in

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:60: Ref. 6.2). Including the mitigation outlined above and in Section 14.5:

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:60:14.6.61 However, considering the design and good practice mitigation outlined above

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:65: mitigation measures, at the time of a UXO anomaly being discovered. This is

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:68: Standard JNCC mitigation measures for using explosives shall be applied in

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:68:14.6.91 Considering the good practice and design mitigation proposed, the potential

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:74: mitigation. This would include measures such as a marine mammal

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:75:14.6.115 Based on the information and mitigation outlined above, the risk of

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:75: adopted for the Proposed Development as good practice mitigation. Crucially,

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:76: distances. It is anticipated that this, and a range of other potential mitigation,

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:76: the adoption of the JNCC standard mitigation measures (JNCC, 2010, the

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:76:14.6.122 To reduce the likelihood of impact it is proposed as additional mitigation

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:76: Tees Estuary, and the adoption of standard JNCC mitigation Guidelines for

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:82:14.6.147 As design mitigation, it is proposed that construction and operational

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:82:14.6.149 Given the design mitigation outlined above, any changes in visual stimuli

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:83:14.6.159 With the implementation of the good practice mitigation measures

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:100:14.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:100:14.7.3 The following additional mitigation and enhancement measures have been

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:101: Underwater Sound Mitigation Measures

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:101: SSSI, specific mitigation measures will be considered. An assessment of the

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:101: necessary mitigation, will be secured through conditions included on the draft

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:106: considerations presented above, and the mitigation and enhancement

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:112:14.10.35 As part of proposed design and good practice mitigation measures,

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:112: proposed design and good practice mitigation measures, any indirect effects

EN010103-000900-NZT DCO 6.2.14 ES Vol I Chapter 14 Marine Ecology and Nature Conservation.pdf:114:14.11.1 Having taken into account the design, good practice mitigation and additional

EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (5).pdf:5:effect on marine ecological or ornithological receptors following mitigation.

EN010103-001418-Eversheds Sutherland on behalf of EDF.pdf:4: mitigation is proposed.

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:3: mitigation measures in place.”

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:6: the identification and (where necessary) mitigation of likely significant effects.

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:13: any mitigation measures.

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:30: the same and will control dust through mitigation that is standard practice on

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:32:ID Scope of air quality cumulative assessment Assessment of cumulative Proposed mitigation Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:33:ID Scope of air quality cumulative assessment Assessment of cumulative Proposed mitigation Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:34:ID Scope of air quality cumulative assessment Assessment of cumulative Proposed mitigation Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:35:ID Scope of air quality cumulative assessment Assessment of cumulative Proposed mitigation Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:38: and operation. No additional mitigation measures are proposed, and no

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:39:ID Scope of surface water, flood risk and Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation Residual Cumulative

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:39:1 - NZT Scoped in – Potential for cumulative Impacts of the breakout of the HDD bores for Mitigation as presented in Construction: Temporary

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:39: WBM as reported in Chapter 9: Surface Water, additional mitigation

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:39:2 – York Potash Scoped in – Potential for cumulative Construction: There would be potential for a Mitigation as presented in Construction: Temporary

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:39: Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water Resources additional mitigation of fine sediment). All

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:40:ID Scope of surface water, flood risk and Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation Residual Cumulative

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:40:4 – Dogger Scoped in - The cable routes to Construction: There would be potential for a Mitigation as presented in Construction: Temporary

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:40: significant cumulative effects during construction additional mitigation fine sediment). All other

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:41:ID Scope of surface water, flood risk and Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation Residual Cumulative

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:41:17 - HCA Scoped in – This is adjacent to a Construction: There would be negligible impact Mitigation as presented in Construction: All

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:41: discharges to this waterbody. significant), No significant cumulative effects additional mitigation significant) upon all

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:42:ID Scope of surface water, flood risk and Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation Residual Cumulative

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:43:ID Scope of surface water, flood risk and Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation Residual Cumulative

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:44: that standard and good practice mitigation is implemented on the above

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:44: with the proposed mitigation in place, there will remain a temporary and

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:44: the mitigation measures are implemented for all developments, the

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:45:24.5.34 As such no additional mitigation measures are proposed above that outlined

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:47:ID Scope of noise cumulative Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation applicable to Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:47:2 – York Potash Scoped in -Large construction at a Construction: The significance of the No additional mitigation proposed for Construction:

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:48:ID Scope of noise cumulative Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation applicable to Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:49:ID Scope of noise cumulative Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation applicable to Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:50:ID Scope of noise cumulative Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation applicable to Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:54:ID Scope of Terrestrial Ecology and Nature Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation applicable to Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:55:ID Scope of Terrestrial Ecology and Nature Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation applicable to Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:56:ID Scope of Terrestrial Ecology and Nature Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation applicable to Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:56:77 – Redcar Scoped in - point source combustion Negligible cumulative air quality effects upon No additional mitigation required for No residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:57:ID Scope of Terrestrial Ecology and Nature Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation applicable to Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:59: mitigation measures are proposed, and no significant residual cumulative

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:60:ID Scope of aquatic ecology cumulative Assessment of cumulative effect Proposed mitigation applicable Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:61:ID Scope of aquatic ecology cumulative Assessment of cumulative effect Proposed mitigation applicable Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:62:ID Scope of aquatic ecology cumulative Assessment of cumulative effect Proposed mitigation applicable Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:63:ID Scope of aquatic ecology cumulative Assessment of cumulative effect Proposed mitigation applicable Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:64:ID Scope of aquatic ecology cumulative Assessment of cumulative effect Proposed mitigation applicable Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:65: no mitigation above that described at Section 13.8 ‘Mitigation and

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:66: mitigation measures are proposed, and no significant residual cumulative

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:68:ID Scope of marine ecology cumulative Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation applicable Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:69:ID Scope of marine ecology cumulative Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation applicable Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:70:ID Scope of marine ecology cumulative Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation applicable Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:71:ID Scope of marine ecology cumulative Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation applicable Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:72:ID Scope of marine ecology cumulative Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed mitigation applicable Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:75: above and the mitigation and enhancement measures outlined in Chapter

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:75: 14, Section 14.7: Mitigation and Enhancement Measures (ES Volume I,

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:77: mitigation measures are proposed about that specified within Chapter 15:

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:84:Viewpoint Developments included in Sensitivity of Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed Proposed mitigation Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:84:Viewpoint York Potash (ID 2) High: Construction: Structures associated with the demolition No additional mitigation Construction:

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:84:Viewpoint Graythorp Energy from High: Construction: The structures associated with the No additional mitigation Construction:

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:85:Viewpoint Developments included in Sensitivity of Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed Proposed mitigation Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:85:Viewpoint York Potash (ID 2) High: Construction: The structures associated with the No additional mitigation Construction:

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:86:Viewpoint Developments included in Sensitivity of Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed Proposed mitigation Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:86:Viewpoint York Potash (ID 2) High: Construction: The construction of the Redcar Energy No additional mitigation Construction:

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:87:Viewpoint Developments included in Sensitivity of Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed Proposed mitigation Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:87:Viewpoint Cumulative Developments High: Construction: The activity associated with the STDC No additional mitigation Construction:

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:88:Viewpoint Developments included in Sensitivity of Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed Proposed mitigation Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:88:Viewpoint York Potash (ID 2) High: Construction: The construction activity and completed No additional mitigation Construction:

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:89:Viewpoint Developments included in Sensitivity of Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed Proposed mitigation Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:89:Viewpoint York Potash overhead Medium: Construction: The construction activity and completed No additional mitigation Construction:

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:90:Viewpoint Developments included in Sensitivity of Assessment of cumulative effect with the Proposed Proposed mitigation Residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:91: Development alone, no mitigation above that which is outlined at Chapter 17:

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:95:24.6.4 When considering combined effects, the mitigation measures as set out in

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:95: Chapters 8 to 23 (including embedded mitigation measures built into the

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:95: account. Therefore, only residual effects (post-mitigation) are considered.

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:95:24.6.6 Mitigation of any combined effects identified is best achieved through

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:95: assessment concluded that, without mitigation, dust impacts would be ‘low to

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:95: mitigation measures applied as part of the CEMP, there would be no residual

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:99:Receptor Value/ Summary of potential residual effects* Mitigation Magnitude of combined effect Combined

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:99:NSR1 - 58 High NR NR Minor adverse NR NR NR No additional mitigation measures No combined effect NA

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:99: during night-time of mitigation through the CEMP

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:99:NSR3 -131 High NR NR Minor adverse NR NR NR No additional mitigation measures No combined effect NA

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:99: during night-time. of mitigation through the CEMP

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:99:NSR4 – March High NR NR Minor adverse NR NR NR No additional mitigation measures No combined effect NA

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:99: / nigh-time works of mitigation through the CEMP

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:99:Viewpoint 2 - , High NR NR NR NR Short-term, minor NR No additional mitigation measures No combined effect NA

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:99:Teesmouth recreational users of mitigation through the CEMP

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:99:Viewpoint 5 - Low NR NR NR NR Short-term, Minor adverse No additional mitigation measures There would be combined Minor adverse

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:99:vicinity of South during construction of mitigation through the CEMP Marine Club in the vicinity of

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:100:Receptor Value/ Summary of potential residual effects* Mitigation Magnitude of combined effect Combined

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:100:Viewpoint 7 – High NR NR NR NR Short-term, NR No additional mitigation measures No combined effect NA

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:100:Redcar Seafront during construction of mitigation through the CEMP

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:100:Receptor Value/ Summary of potential residual effects* Mitigation Magnitude of Combined

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:100:NSR4 – Marsh House High NR NA Minor adverse NA NA NR No additional mitigation No combined NA

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:100:Viewpoint 3 - Teesmouth High NR NA NR NA Minor adverse effects on visual receptors, including NR No additional mitigation No combined NA

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:100:Viewpoint 7 – England High NR NA NR NA Moderate adverse effects on visual receptors, NR No additional mitigation No combined NA

EN010103-000917-NZT DCO 6.2.24 ES Vol I Chapter 24 Cumulative and Combined Effects.pdf:100:Employees of local Medium NR NA NR NA NR There would be a moderate No additional mitigation No combined NA

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:10: on that site” (paragraph 40). This establishes that 'mitigation measures' cannot be

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:11: available mitigation that would address the potential effect, allowing for a conclusion

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:45: appropriate mitigation measures in place – might lead to TTS in cetaceans including

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:45: porpoise population numbers. At that point the standard JNCC mitigation for piling

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:50:4.3.13 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:51: rapid dispersion. Mitigation approaches such as biological treatment and retention

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:54: report. For some this was simply due to the need for mitigation measures to be

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:59: screening is considered necessary to avoid a significant effect. Mitigation for visual

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:59: General Mitigation Measures

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:59:6.1.19 Further mitigation measures for noise impacts are set out in Chapter 11: Noise and

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:59: noise levels at the birds. A list of relevant measures for noise mitigation in the

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:61: processes. Based on the analysis in Appendix F and the mitigation measures above it

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:67:6.1.48 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, Flood

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:67: construction/decommissioning periods. The provided mitigation measures include:

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:69:6.1.55 Considering the specific mitigation measures identified in Chapters 13 (Aquatic

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:72:6.3.4 The Joint Nature Conservation Committee (JNCC) recommends a range of mitigation

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:72: Development as good practice mitigation, which will ensure that any temporary

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:72: standard mitigation measures included as part of the JNCC Guidelines, it is concluded

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:75: construction of either a sub-sea consenting process and will include any necessary mitigation measures to protect European sites.

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:76: North Sea SAC) or that sufficient mitigation measures can be implemented to ensure that no

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:76: Development will be removed due to the presence of the identified mitigation no actual ‘in

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:76: combination’ effect can arise in practice. For example, the DCO has included mitigation to ensure

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:76: Development contains adequate mitigation to protect European sites, no ‘in combination’ effect

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:77: Stockton-on-Tees Local Plan & Policies The Appropriate Assessment identified that the Council would produce a Recreational Mitigation

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:77: the detailed strategic development mitigation strategies developed elsewhere to address the same issue.

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:77: provided within the plan period. Mitigation Strategy.

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:77: Since there is an existing Recreational Mitigation Strategy for the SPA / Ramsar which has been

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:77: Development also includes mitigation to ensure it will not have an adverse effect on integrity via

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:78: support them. Where likely adverse impacts are identified, avoidance or appropriate mitigation

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:78: mitigation measure to ensure that it will not result in adverse effects on integrity, no in

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:78: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:79: Interest and No Alternatives. This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:80: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:81: ensure adequate mitigation is in place to mitigate any potential for cumulative effects.

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:81: This Appropriate Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:82: Assessment has identified the mitigation and avoidance measures that will be incorporated into

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:85: reduce ammonia emissions, it is concluded that with the identified mitigation

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:96: Development cannot be excluded. Therefore, it is considered that appropriate assessment and mitigation measures will be required to avoid adverse effects

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:118: dB. Visual disturbance also cannot be dismissed without mitigation. Paragraph 6.1.15 lists the specific noise and visual mitigation measures to be

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:118: reach the pools in the dune system. Mitigation measures are identified in paragraphs 6.1.46 to 6.1.48, including the preparation of a Construction

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:118: export pipeline and a Water Management Plan (WMP). Considering these mitigation measures there will be no adverse effects on the integrity of the SPA /

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:118: d. Since construction noise levels will fall well below the 70 dB disturbance threshold with mitigation in place, and no other projects are identified to be

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:118: water quality, the mitigation measures will ensure that no pollution occurs and thus there is no scope for ‘in combination’ effects on integrity of the SPA /

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:122: likely to be very low. Furthermore, there are a range of mitigation measures to avoid impacts on marine life, including harbour porpoise (see

EN010103-002508-NZT DCO 7.16 - HRA for Change Request (Clean) - Nov 2022 (D12).pdf:122: b. Mitigation measures have been identified which will ensure no mortality or significant disturbance of harbour porpoise arises, and taking into

EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:5:effect on marine ecological or ornithological receptors following mitigation.

EN010103-002022-UK Health Security Agency's - Responses to the ExA's ExQ2.pdf:1:demonstrated mitigation measures to ensure risk is ‘as low as reasonably practicable’

EN010103-002022-UK Health Security Agency's - Responses to the ExA's ExQ2.pdf:3:emergency plan to assess public health risks and that appropriate mitigation and

EN010103-002022-UK Health Security Agency's - Responses to the ExA's ExQ2.pdf:3:Permitting Regulations, with accident mitigation and management forming part of this

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:8:• 6 Alpha (2020). Onshore Unexploded Ordnance Threat and Risk Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy:

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:16:during open cut excavation unless suitable construction methods or mitigation are employed.

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:19:suitable, suitable or potentially suitable with adequate mitigation. Mitigation measures identified may include:

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:20:‘traffic light’ system of red (not suitable), orange (suitable with mitigation) and green (suitable) has been adopted.

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:20:The full assessment undertaken including a summary of pros, cons and mitigation measures considered for each

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:23:below. However, mitigation measures for making safe and removal of UXO within open excavations can be

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:24:the raft foundation to help accommodate heave or collapse ground movements. Mitigation measures to lessen the

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:24:Ground and replacement with chemically inert Engineered Fill. Additional mitigation in the form of ground treatment

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:25:However, both options require mitigation to prevent potential ground instability from heave or collapse, soil

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:31:movements from settlement or heave. Mitigation measures such as local excavation and compaction beneath and

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:32:cased piles or bored cased and sleeved piles. Additional mitigation measures such as a detailed UXO risk strategy

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:33:Shallow Foundations Strip Footing Yes, with mitigation, if no long No No

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:33: Pad Footing Yes, with mitigation, if no long No No

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:33: Raft Foundation Yes, with mitigation: Yes, with mitigation No

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:33:Deep Foundations Driven Piles No Yes, with mitigation Yes, with mitigation

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:33: CFA Piles No Yes, with mitigation Yes, with mitigation

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:33: Bored Cased Piles No Yes, with mitigation Yes, with mitigation

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:34: 2. CFA piles. Mitigation may be required for ground instability from heave or collapse, ground obstructions

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:34: 3. Bored cased piles (with or without sleeves). Mitigation may be required for ground instability from heave

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:34: 4. Driven cast-in-situ piles, Mitigation may be required for obstructions, for example by making allowance for

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:34: 2. CFA piles. Mitigation may be required for ground instability from heave or collapse, ground obstructions

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:34: 3. Bored cased piles (with or without sleeves). Mitigation may be required for ground instability from heave

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:34: 4. Driven cast-in-situ piles, Mitigation may be required for obstructions, for example by making allowance for

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:36:6 Alpha (2020). Onshore Unexploded Ordnance Threat and Risk Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy: Net

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:45: ← GP 04-60 → ← Desk Study → Cost Automated Summary Pros Cons Mitigation and Conclusion

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:45: Suitable for all load cases. May be unsuitable due to soft/compressible Layers. Mitigation may be low load structures. creep movements or dynamic loading. subject to dynamic loading.

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:45: Suitable for all load cases. Mitigation may be required for ground instability from heave or collapse Suitable for Low Threat low load structures. Suitable with mitigation.

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:45:Driven Piles ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✖ ✔ ✔ ✖ ✔ ✖ M ✔ ✔ ✔ ✖ collapse and ground obstructions or voids. Mitigation may be required for UXO. May be prohibitively

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:45: Suitable for all load cases. Mitigation may be required for ground instability from heave or effective.

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:45: Suitable for all load cases. Mitigation may be required for ground instability from heave or

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:45: Suitable for all load cases. Mitigation may be required for UXO, soil contamination and groundwater effective.

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:45:Excavation and Replacement ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✖ ✔ M ✖ ✖ ✖ ✖ groundwater, soil contamination and groundwater contamination. Mitigation may be required for UXO.

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:45:Vibro-replacement - stone columns ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✖ ✔ ✔ M M ✖ M ✖ ✔ M ✖ shallow groundwater. Mitigation may be required for ground instability from heave or collapse,

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:45: ground obstructions or voids and shallow groundwater. Mitigation may be required for ground

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:45:Dynamic Compaction ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✖ ✔ ✖ M M ✖ M ✔ ✔ ✔ ✖ ground obstructions or voids. Mitigation may be required for ground instability from heave or

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:47: ← GP 04-60 → ← Desk Study → Cost Automated Summary Pros Cons Mitigation and Conclusion

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:47:Pad Footing ✔ ✖ ✖ ✖ ✔ ✖ ✔ M M M ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ soft/compressible Layers. Mitigation may be required for

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:47: Suitable for all load cases. Mitigation may be required

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:47: Different shapes and sizes available. Mitigation required for the following:

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:47: and ground obstructions or voids. Mitigation may be installation.

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:47: Suitable for all load cases. Mitigation may be required

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:47: Suitable for all load cases. Mitigation may be required Casing between potentially contaminated groundwater and underlying aquifer reduces the risk to

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:47: Suitable for all load cases. Mitigation may be required ground.

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:47: contamination and groundwater contamination. Mitigation foundations. for stability of excavations during construction. This may also restrict working.

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:47:Vibro-replacement - stone columns ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✖ ✔ ✔ M M ✖ M ✖ ✔ M ✔ groundwater. Mitigation may be required for ground Speeds up consolidation settlement. and result in difficult construction conditions.

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:47:Deep Soil Mixing - lime or cement columns ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✖ ✔ ✖ M M ✖ M ✖ ✔ ✔ ✔ obstructions or voids and shallow groundwater. Mitigation

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:48: ← GP 04-60 → ← Desk Study → Cost Automated Summary Pros Cons Mitigation and Conclusion

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:48:Dynamic Compaction ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✖ ✔ ✖ M M ✖ M ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ obstructions or voids. Mitigation may be required for

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:50: ← GP 04-60 → ← Desk Study → Cost Automated Summary Pros Cons Mitigation and Conclusion

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:50: Provides partial mitigation posed by large obstructions at depth within the Made May not be suitable for long term creep and dynamic loading. Adequate Design.

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:50: loading. Mitigation may be required decommissioning to be controlled. Removal off site possible through contractor RAMS Ground improvement may be required to provide adequate bearing and

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:50: Prefabricated sections are delivered and assembled during installation via locking of dissipated. Mitigation required for the following:

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:50: obstructions or voids. Mitigation contaminated soils. Damage to slender pile sections possible. This may be partly mitigated by advanced probing before

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:50: Mitigation may be required for

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:50: Mitigation may be required for

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:50: Mitigation may be required for UXO, UXO risk to be established through detailed risk assessment and

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:50: Mitigation may be required for UXO. Does not remove the risk of long term settlement on loading occurring in both the made ground and/or loose /

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:51: ← GP 04-60 → ← Desk Study → Cost Automated Summary Pros Cons Mitigation and Conclusion

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:51: shallow groundwater. Mitigation may and result in difficult construction conditions.

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:51: Mitigation may be required for Can act as drains.

EN010103-001771-NZT DCO 9.8 - Appendix GH.1.2 Foundations Options Report - June 2022.pdf:51: voids. Mitigation may be required

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:3: actions and communication channels will be available 12: Flood risk mitigation

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:8: A range of pollution control and mitigation measures

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:9: working methods and mitigation in the DEMP.

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:16: and application of adequate mitigation measures will

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:17: adequate mitigation measures will be enforced through

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:17: appropriate mitigation according to the risk of dust

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:18: monitoring to verify that mitigation measures are

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:21:ES Chapters 9 - Surface Water, Flood Risk and Water The Site will implement security mitigations to reduce DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement 8:

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:22:Resources, 21 - Climate Change associated with the construction of the Proposed 12: Flood risk mitigation

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: is recorded as present, mitigation measures, including

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:33:ES Chapter 10 - Geology, Hydrogeology and The following additional operational mitigations will be DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:33:ES Chapter 10 - Geology, Hydrogeology and An Ecological Risk Assessment and Mitigation DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:34: vibration mitigation measures for the Proposed 21: Control of noise and vibration (construction)

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:35: determine the most appropriate mitigation options. 21: Control of Noise and Vibration (Operation)

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:36: identified mitigations. Habitat monitoring may also be

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:38: Protected Species Mitigation Licence (depending on

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:38: mitigation requirements (e.g. provision of replacement

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:40: mitigation measures will be applied to prevent the

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:42:Conservation mitigation proposed will replicate that already identified 16: Construction Environmental Management Plan and

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:44: works and a Marine Mammal Mitigation Protocol

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:45: mitigation would be implemented to ensure that they

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:47: mitigation and enhancement measures within the

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:50: embedded mitigations and design impact avoidance

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:51: on/inform mitigation and emergency response Detailed Design

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:52: Document Ref. 6.4) will be used to inform the detailed 12: Flood Risk Mitigation

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:57: outline key pollution mitigation measures to be

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:62: will be stored outside of the 1 in 200 year floodplain 12: Flood Risk Mitigation

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:62: the floodplain, the River Tees and Greatham Creek. 12: Flood Risk Mitigation

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:62: ground construction, suitable de-watering methods will 12: Flood Risk Mitigation

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:63: at all times when working in excavations. When 12: Flood Risk Mitigation

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:63: watercourses would comply with relevant guidance 12: Flood Risk Mitigation

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:63: least one designated Flood Warden would be 12: Flood Risk Mitigation

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:63: measures aimed at preventing an increase in flood risk 12: Flood Risk Mitigation

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:65: mitigation proposals are agreed with all required

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:65:ES Appendix 5A – Framework CEMP Specific mitigation measures may be required in the DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:73: • The standard JNCC mitigation measures for 21: Control of Noise and Vibration (Construction)

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:74: mitigation would be implemented to avoid disturbance

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:78:ES Appendix 5A - Framework CEMP An appropriate archaeological mitigation strategy, for DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:82:ES Appendix 8A - Air Quality Construction Appropriate mitigation measures for managing the DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:83: a Flood Risk Management Action Plan/ Method 12: Flood Risk Mitigation

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:83: developments within a designated floodplain (as in the 12: Flood Risk Mitigation

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:84: and from the PCC Site is affected by surface water 12: Flood Risk Mitigation

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:84: maintenance of the drainage system will be 12: Flood Risk Mitigation

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:84: ground development within strata where groundwater 12: Flood Risk Mitigation

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:84: is recorded as present, mitigation measures, including DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:85:ES Appendix 9A - FRA A number of additional mitigation strategies will be DCO Schedule 2 (Document Ref. 2.1): Requirement

EN010103-002311-NZT DCO 6.4.49 - ES Vol III Appendix 25A Commitments Register Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:85: considered during the design process for the Proposed 12: Flood Risk Mitigation

EN010103-001134-NZT DCO 6.4.45 ES Vol III Appendix 20B- Navigational Risk Assessment Part 1.pdf:27: between these vessels and third parties. Mitigation, in the form of dredging,

EN010103-001134-NZT DCO 6.4.45 ES Vol III Appendix 20B- Navigational Risk Assessment Part 1.pdf:28:Activity Risk Control / Mitigation

EN010103-001134-NZT DCO 6.4.45 ES Vol III Appendix 20B- Navigational Risk Assessment Part 1.pdf:29:Activity Risk Control / Mitigation

EN010103-001797-NZT DCO 9.10 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 1 submissions - June 2022.pdf:14: potential mitigations within the Net Zero Teeside DCO examination.“

EN010103-002322-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:8: that requires mitigation, including through ‘nutrient neutrality’.

EN010103-002322-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:17: a new nutrient load direct to the SPA and mitigation to ensure nutrient neutrality

EN010103-002322-NZT DCO 9.36 - Nutrient Nitrogen Briefing Paper Clean Oct 2022 (D9).pdf:27: quantify mitigation requirements of new developments. Natural England considers

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:27:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence before Embedded Mitigation Measures Mitigated to Tolerability

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:27:Ref. (High Level) Mitigation and References ALARP?

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:27:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence before Embedded Mitigation Measures Mitigated to Tolerabilit

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:27:Ref. (High Level) Mitigation and References ALARP? y

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:28:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence before Embedded Mitigation Measures Mitigated to Tolerabilit

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:28:Ref. (High Level) Mitigation and References ALARP? y

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:29:Scenario Risk Event Risk Description Risks and Consequence before Embedded Mitigation Measures Mitigated to Tolerabilit

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:29:Ref. (High Level) Mitigation and References ALARP? y

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:32: mitigation measures assessed in the original

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:32: cases, the mitigation

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:33: mitigation measures

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:34: mitigation measures

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:34: proposed mitigation

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:47: mitigation the effect on

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:54: mitigation measures

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:54: of the changes. mitigation measures.

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:63:11.9 Additional Mitigation, Monitoring and Enhancement Measures ……………… 11-7

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:71:11.9 Additional Mitigation, Monitoring and

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:71:11.9.1 No additional mitigation/ monitoring or enhancement measures are required

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:72: Vibration (i.e. not significant) on the basis that mitigation is employed such

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:72: mitigation guidance is followed.

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:75:15.9 Additional Mitigation, Monitoring and Enhancement Measures ……………. 15-10

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:78:15.2.4 Draft NPS EN-1 retains the focus on mitigation measures for biodiversity but

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:78:15.2.8 Paragraph 5.4.18 specifies changes in mitigation requirements for birds. The

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:78: Furthermore, mitigation measures should look to preserve and enhance

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:81: 6.2.15) APP-097. Mitigation for construction activities will be secured via a

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:86:15.9 Additional Mitigation, Monitoring and

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:86:15.9.1 No additional mitigation/ monitoring or enhancement measures are required

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:87: (i.e. not significant) on the basis that mitigation is employed and the Section

EN010103-001332-NZT DCO 7.8.1 - Environmental Statement Addendum - Volume I - Apr 2022.pdf:87: 15.5 and 15.7 mitigation guidance is followed.

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:3: and Assessment (IEMA) for climate change mitigation (IEMA, 2017) and

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:5: GHG emissions mitigation, adaptation and finance starting in the year 2020.

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:5: It requires all signatories to strengthen their climate change mitigation

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:6: their intended domestic GHG mitigation targets. In 2020, the UK

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:6: and the importance of relevant mitigation.

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:7: Government (2019b), this describes how to identify suitable mitigation and

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:11:  consider mitigation in accordance with the hierarchy for managing project

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:11: mitigation measures to increase resilience to climate change.

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:14:Environment Agency Recommended installation of Section 21.3: Mitigation and

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:21: activities (including dampening down as part of dust mitigation);

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:23:21.3.37 At this stage, limited specific additional mitigation measures have been

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:23: predicted to occur and then highlights the mitigation and enhancement

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:35: Mitigation and Enhancement Measures

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:35:21.3.69 The management of GHG emissions and the application of mitigation

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:36: mitigation has been identified as necessary for the construction phase of

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:39:Forestry Encourage consideration of climate change impacts Section 21.4: Mitigation and

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:46: embedded and good practice mitigation measures (primary and tertiary

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:46: mitigation) are accounted for. Definitions of likelihood are set out in Table

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:46: mitigation Likely Low Medium Medium High High

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:47: mitigation measures (secondary mitigation) is identified.

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:47: mitigation in place, the ICCI remains significant or the residual effect has

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:47:21.4.37 Where relevant, mitigation measures or mechanisms to reduce the potential

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:49:21.4.40 At this stage, limited specific mitigation measures have been identified for

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:49: Mitigation and Enhancement Measures

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:49: outside of the Site, no further mitigation measures have been proposed for

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:51: mitigation

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:52: mitigation

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:53: mitigation

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:56:Environment Commitments to rainwater harvesting systems are Section 21.5: Mitigation and

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:57: assessed and mitigation measures have been identified.

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:60: mitigation measures for incorporation into the design of the Proposed

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:61: vulnerability takes into account the mitigation measures that have been

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:61: example, mitigation measures for potential flooding impacts on the

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:61: occur and then highlights any mitigation and enhancement measures that

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:62:21.5.35 At this stage, limited specific mitigation measures have been identified for

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:63: Mitigation and Enhancement Measures

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:63:21.5.39 The management of impacts and the application of mitigation/adaption

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:64: Mitigation or

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:65: Mitigation or

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:66: Mitigation or

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:67: Mitigation or

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:68: Mitigation or

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:69: Mitigation or

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:70: Mitigation or

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:71: Mitigation or

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:72: Mitigation or

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:73: Mitigation or

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:74: Mitigation or

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:75: Mitigation or

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:76: Mitigation or

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:77: Mitigation or

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:78: Mitigation or

EN010103-000905-NZT DCO 6.2.21 ES Vol I Chapter 21 Climate Change.pdf:79: mitigation has been identified as necessary for any stage of the Proposed

EN010103-002075-NZT DCO 9.29 - Cumulative GHG Onshore and Offshore Assessment August 2022 (D6).pdf:15: emphasis on mitigation and whether emissions from a project align with the UK’s net

EN010103-002075-NZT DCO 9.29 - Cumulative GHG Onshore and Offshore Assessment August 2022 (D6).pdf:18: emissions mitigation going beyond reduction trajectories for the UK to meet net zero

EN010103-002438-South Tees Development Corporation - Other- STDC’s Final Summary of Outstanding Objections and Closing Submissions.pdf:5: 3.7.6 Requirement no. 12 – Flood risk mitigation

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:1:17.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures …………………………………………… 17-54

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:2:17.2.4 In terms of mitigation, EN-1 encourages the reduction in scale of the buildings

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:3: impacts associated with a fossil fuel generating station. Mitigation is therefore

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:13: mitigation plans are landscape and visual

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:55:17.7 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:55: Mitigation is therefore to reduce the visual intrusion of the buildings in the

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:55:17.7.4 The following mitigation measures will be undertaken as part of design

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:56:17.7.5 No potential additional mitigation has been identified for Viewpoints 5, 7 and

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:71:Development Environmental effect (following development Classification of effect Mitigation/ Classification of residual Nature of

EN010103-000909-NZT DCO 6.2.17 ES Vol I Chapter 17 Landscape and Visual Amenity.pdf:71:Stage design and impact avoidance measures) prior to mitigation enhancement effect after mitigation effect(s)*

EN010103-002409-NZT DCO - 9.45 Written Summary of Oral Submission for ISH6 - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:7: - Subject to the addition of a draft requirement to secure the use of the mitigation measures outlined (or

EN010103-002409-NZT DCO - 9.45 Written Summary of Oral Submission for ISH6 - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:7: - Subject to the HRA being updated to take the proposed mitigation secured by the draft requirement into

EN010103-002409-NZT DCO - 9.45 Written Summary of Oral Submission for ISH6 - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:7: HPKC addressed the Examining Authority on the proposed mitigation to address potential nutrient impacts on Seal

EN010103-002409-NZT DCO - 9.45 Written Summary of Oral Submission for ISH6 - Oct 2022 (D11).pdf:10: outlined mitigation measures are implemented. Furthermore, as all relevant WFD water bodies are either at their

EN010103-001234-NZT - Regulation 32 Transboundary Screening.pdf:5:effect on marine ecological or ornithological receptors following mitigation.

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:32: runoff. Standard mitigation measures to minimise the risk to water resources

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:33: mitigation measures to reduce the potential for adverse effects on surface water and

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:34:3.2.28 Further specific mitigation guidance is identified in Chapter 9: Surface Water, Flood

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:34: construction/decommissioning periods. The mitigation measures include:

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:34: groundwater quality. Mitigation measures will be included in the CEMP to control

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:35:3.3.2 In the absence of mitigation, similar water quality issues are likely to be relevant for

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:35:3.3.3 Mitigation measures will be included in the operational phase to minimise the risk of

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:35:3.3.4 With the implementation of these mitigation and control measures, it is considered

EN010103-001912-NZT DCO 9.17 - Hydrogeological Impact Assessment July 2022 (D4).pdf:40: • It is concluded that with the mitigation measures in place to address construction,

EN010103-001993-NZT DCO 9.25 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 4 Submissions - August 2022(D5).pdf:12: potential mitigation considered available to Orsted includes:

EN010103-001993-NZT DCO 9.25 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 4 Submissions - August 2022(D5).pdf:18: (b) delivery of any mitigation

EN010103-001993-NZT DCO 9.25 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 4 Submissions - August 2022(D5).pdf:20: (h) a Marine Mammal Mitigation

EN010103-001993-NZT DCO 9.25 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 4 Submissions - August 2022(D5).pdf:21: JNCC standard mitigation

EN010103-001993-NZT DCO 9.25 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 4 Submissions - August 2022(D5).pdf:22: 1.2.2 For policy NE-FISH-3, the MMO The mitigation for NE-FISH-3 is secured

EN010103-001993-NZT DCO 9.25 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 4 Submissions - August 2022(D5).pdf:22: mitigation has been secured in the Schedules 10 and 11, conditions 3 and

EN010103-001993-NZT DCO 9.25 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 4 Submissions - August 2022(D5).pdf:22: DML or where this can be found in the Parts 3. The construction mitigation is

EN010103-001993-NZT DCO 9.25 - Applicants' Comments on Deadline 4 Submissions - August 2022(D5).pdf:27: mitigation of odorous emissions and testing of man-made deposits and

EN010103-001893-NZT DCO 8.1 - RCBC SoCG (Tracked) July 2022 (D4).pdf:17: mitigation measures are included to mitigate flood risk.

EN010103-001114-NZT DCO 6.4.13 ES Vol III Appendix 10B Contaminated Land- Conceptual Site Model.pdf:8:Development Infrastructure Mitigation may be required to protect Infrastructure such as

EN010103-001114-NZT DCO 6.4.13 ES Vol III Appendix 10B Contaminated Land- Conceptual Site Model.pdf:25: classified as moderate or higher will require further investigation or mitigation

EN010103-002636-NZT DCO 8.5 - EA SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:10: Mitigation including piling restrictions.

EN010103-002636-NZT DCO 8.5 - EA SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:17: water habitat measures outlined as embedded mitigation in Chapters 12 to 15

EN010103-002636-NZT DCO 8.5 - EA SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:17: are appropriate and that mitigation measures that would be

EN010103-002636-NZT DCO 8.5 - EA SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:18: must commence until a scheme of protection and mitigation

EN010103-002636-NZT DCO 8.5 - EA SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:19: impact avoidance and mitigation measures identified and

EN010103-002636-NZT DCO 8.5 - EA SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:19: proposed mitigation measures are adequate to mitigate flood risk.

EN010103-002636-NZT DCO 8.5 - EA SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:20: Development and that the impact avoidance and mitigation

EN010103-002636-NZT DCO 8.5 - EA SoCG - Final (signed) - Oct 2022 (D13).pdf:21: It is agreed that the mitigation and management measures

EN010103-001576-NZT DCO 9.3 - Written Summary ISH2 - May 2022.pdf:22: mechanisms for ensuring that the mitigation assumed for the purposes of assessing the

EN010103-001576-NZT DCO 9.3 - Written Summary ISH2 - May 2022.pdf:23: mitigation’; 13 ‘Contaminated land and ground water’; 14 ‘Archaeology’; 15 ‘Protected

EN010103-001576-NZT DCO 9.3 - Written Summary ISH2 - May 2022.pdf:24: and foul water drainage’; 12(3) ’Flood risk mitigation’; 22 ‘Control of noise – operation’ (in

EN010103-001945-NZT ISH4 S1.pdf:9:But with this in mind, we do question the design approaches and the proposed mitigation in respect to

EN010103-001945-NZT ISH4 S1.pdf:31:over 100 metres high. So from a landscaping perspective, we haven't identified any mitigation that

EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library (2).pdf:6: 6.2.17 - ES Chapter 17 - Mitigation Schedule - Final - November

EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library (2).pdf:12: Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table

EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library (2).pdf:12: Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: Development has not identified the need for mitigation (in addition to that which is embedded in

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:24: require mitigation to create acceptable conditions;

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:31: effects that require mitigation. However, the necessary mitigation has either been embedded

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:31: no other mitigation that would warrant a development consent obligation in order to make the

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:31: Proposed Development acceptable in planning terms. Chapter 17 ‘Mitigation Register’ of ES

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:31: Volume I (Application Document Ref. 6.2.17) confirms how the mitigation and commitments set

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: the mitigation measures (where required) and the residual effects. Chapter 17 ‘Mitigation

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: Register’ of ES Volume I (Application Document Ref. 6.2.17) sets out how that mitigation will

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:33: • The significant effects of the Proposed Development, including after mitigation (where

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:33: Chapter 17 ‘Mitigation Register’ of ES Volume I (Application Document Ref. 6.2.17) sets out

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:33: how that mitigation will be secured.

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:34: harm to biodiversity and geological conversation interests, including through mitigation and

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:36: how the Proposed Development has been designed, including the mitigation embedded in its

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:36: contributing to mitigating those effects. This includes appropriate flood risk mitigation and

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:41: Development taking account of the implementation of mitigation measures, either embedded

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: • any significant air emissions, their mitigation and any residual effects need to be developed and approved by RCBC in accordance with Requirement 13 of the draft

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: mitigation methods have been applied; development is phased, on the phase 1 CCGT itself during construction of the phase 2 CCGT.

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: • existing air quality levels and the relative change in air quality from existing As such mitigation measures are recommended to control these emissions; residual effects are

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: Paragraph 5.2.10 requires decisions to take account of any relevant statutory the vicinity are also insignificant. Overall, no specific mitigation is required above and beyond

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: with the relevant authorities to secure appropriate mitigation measures to allow

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: Consideration should be given whether mitigation measures are needed for close to the Site boundary at that time, noting that existing human receptors are too distant

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: both operational and construction emissions. A construction management plan to be impacted. As such mitigation measures are recommended to control these emissions;

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: may help codify mitigation. residual effects are considered to be, at worst, minor and likely not significant.

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:44: Biodiversity and geological Paragraph 5.3.18 of EN-1 states that during construction appropriate mitigation ES Volume III, Annex H includes a Habitats Regulations Assessment (‘HRA’) (Application

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:44: mitigation measures should be included to ensure that the risk of disturbance or of the potential effects of the Proposed Development upon ecology. The assessment has been

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:44: harm to biodiversity and geological conservation interests through mitigation notable habitats and species.

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:44: No specific mitigation is therefore required, as all the effects of the Proposed Development are

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:44: and will be developed to include standard mitigation and good practice in relation to advice on

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:46: landscape, including by reasonable mitigation. The key impact is from the heat recovery steam generators housing and from the stacks. However,

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:46: Paragraph 5.10.9 states mitigation measures should be considered for

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:47: • where possible contribute to improvements to health and quality of life barrier on the western site boundary to reduce noise at Grangetown. On-plant mitigation such

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:47: EN-2, Section 2.7 covers noise and vibration in relation to fossil fuel generating embedded mitigation measures the resulting noise levels are not expected to result in significant

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:47: on to state that (paragraph 2.9.12) mitigation measures that should be followed,

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:48: Paragraph 5.12.9 states that it should be considered whether mitigation aspiration that developments at Wilton will act as drivers of the Tees Valley economy.

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:48: as appropriate on the assessment and mitigation.

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:48: Paragraph 5.13.6 also requires applicants to include mitigation measures to The impact on daily traffic flows would be less than 30% for both scenarios assessed, during

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:55: location. The effects (including cumulative effects) of pollution on health, the The ES confirms that with appropriate mitigation, where required, the Proposed Development

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:58: No specific mitigation is therefore required, as all the effects of the Proposed Development are not significant. A

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:58: draft CEMP has been prepared and will be developed to include standard mitigation and good practice in relation to

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:59: designed, including the mitigation embedded in its design, to minimise and mitigate impacts.

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:59: This includes appropriate flood risk mitigation and surface water attenuation that will assist in terms of reducing

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:60: levels of noise or vibration or which would add air, land and water. The Proposed Development includes mitigation measures where necessary and will be controlled

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:60: circumstances that may require mitigation to

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:62: mitigation has been proposed as part of the Proposed Development. The environmental impact of the Proposed

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:62: No specific mitigation is therefore required, as all the effects of the Proposed Development are not significant. A

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:62: mitigation and good practice in relation to advice on construction with regards to nesting birds and mammals.

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:68: water drainage and flood risk mitigation;

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:68: 6.4.27) identifies where particular requirements will secure mitigation measures and commitments

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:68:7.12 Development consent obligations can be used where they will deliver mitigation that addresses

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:68: Development has not identified the need for mitigation (in addition to that which is embedded in

EN010082-000211-EN010082-5.5-Planning Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:69: • In view of the above, including the mitigation that has been embedded in the design of

EN010082-000499-_DOC_40066269(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Clean).pdf:17: mitigation scheme to be implemented in the event ground nesting birds

EN010082-000499-_DOC_40066269(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Clean).pdf:18: either assumes as standard best practice mitigation or recommends as

EN010082-000499-_DOC_40066269(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Clean).pdf:18: additional mitigation see Chapter 17 APP-059

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:15: landscaping areas and potential off-site mitigation or compensation

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:17: describe the control processes and mitigation procedures for storing

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:22: the specific mitigation measures proposed to avoid or reduce those

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:23: identified in the ES which measures are ‘embedded’ mitigation and

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:23: which are ‘further’ mitigation measures, and these terms should each

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:24:  set out the mitigation measures proposed (in addition to

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:24: enable the Applicant to cross-refer the proposed mitigation to

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:24:  identify and collate the residual effects following mitigation on

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:24: sites and their locations, together with any mitigation or

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:27: also states that if contamination is found on the site mitigation

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:29: considered to constitute a significant effect, pre-mitigation effects are

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:29:3.50 Column 5 of Table 6.1 refers to the delivery of mitigation through

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:30: DCO. Proposed mitigation measures must be clearly identified and

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:30:3.51 The proposals considered under the heading of ‘Permanent Mitigation’

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:30:3.52 The SoS notes the intention for some proposed mitigation measures

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:30: relevant construction mitigation will be ‘defined’ in a CEMP. Draft

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:31: to discuss potential effects on LWSs and any mitigation proposed with

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:31: Applicant intends to describe in the ES the ecological mitigation

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:31: The Applicant should also consider the potential to deliver mitigation

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:31: mitigation measures is secured.

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:37: Proposed Development and any mitigation measures such as skills

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:38:3.100 Section 6.9.3 of the Scoping Report confirms that mitigation

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:39: other ES assessments as relevant. For example, landscape mitigation

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:43: agree appropriate requirements to secure necessary mitigation. It

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:43: term mitigation or compensation proposals.

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:47: relevant statutory consultees and take into account mitigation

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:57: options and alternative mitigation measures. The justification for the

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:57: Mitigation Measures

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:57:A1.44 Mitigation measures may fall into certain categories namely: avoid;

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:57: Mitigation measures should not be developed in isolation as they may

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:57: out any mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce and where

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:57: residual effects with mitigation in place. Any proposed mitigation

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:57:A1.45 The effectiveness of mitigation should be apparent. Only mitigation

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:57:A1.46 It would be helpful if the mitigation measures proposed could be

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:57: mitigation measures proposed either in each of the specialist reports

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:57: or collating these within a summary section on mitigation.

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:58: mitigation actions. Where effective consultation is carried out in

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:58: may be able to identify possible mitigation measures to address the

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:59: Table X: to identify and collate the residual impacts after mitigation

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:59: Table XXX: to set out the mitigation measures proposed, as well as

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:59: the Applicant to cross refer mitigation to specific provisions proposed

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:59: with any mitigation or compensation measures, are to be found in the

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:81: design of any required mitigation measures; and opportunities for securing wider

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:88: sites and should identify such mitigation measures as may be required in order to avoid,

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:88:proposals for mitigation of any impacts and if appropriate, compensation measures. Contact the

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:89:results, impact assessments and appropriate accompanying mitigation strategies included as part of

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:89:standing advice for protected species which includes links to guidance on survey and mitigation.

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:89:therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation proposals for Habitats and Species

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:89:  Full details of any mitigation or compensation that might be required.

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:96:mitigation measures, conclusions and residual impacts, relating to human health.

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:99:monitoring and mitigation during these phases. Construction and decommissioning

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:102:receptors and control and mitigation measures should be outlined.

EN010082-000012-Scoping Opinion.pdf:104:Group, consideration was given to mitigation options such as the 'corridor option'

EN010082-000377-2.1 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO with proposed change - tracked Rev 2.pdf:15:including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form

EN010082-000377-2.1 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO with proposed change - tracked Rev 2.pdf:15: (2) The ground nesting birds survey and mitigation scheme must include an implementation

EN010082-000377-2.1 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO with proposed change - tracked Rev 2.pdf:17: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:6: mitigation built in to the project design.

EN010082-000361-Appendix A - DCO 6.3.14_Tees CCPP_ES_Annex H_HRA_UPDATED 230418.pdf:19: Table H3.1. No mitigation measures have been relied upon to reach the

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:17 SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES 1

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:3:17 SUMMARY OF MITIGATION MEASURES

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: In order to demonstrate that all necessary controls and mitigation have been

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: identified and secured, a tabulated summary of mitigation measures for the

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: mitigation summary table:

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: • provides an audit trail of the controls and mitigation measures on which

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: Table 17.1 includes a topic by topic summary of the mitigation measures

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: include suitable mitigation of significant environmental effects.

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:5:Table 17.1 Mitigation Summary Table

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:5:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:6:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: mitigation measures and management procedures

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: environmental impacts. Mitigation measures

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:7:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:9:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:10:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: appropriate mitigation identified. Moreover, the groundwater

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:11:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 1, risk requiring vapour / gas mitigation measures, Contractor groundwater

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: 6, Section gas mitigation measures would be applied.

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:12:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:13:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: mitigation of erosion and dust generation during

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:14:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:14: Chapter include mitigation measures for avoiding spills and plan (‘CEMP’)

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:15:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:16:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:18:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:19:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:20:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:21:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:21: 92. Volume Dust mitigation measures from the following Construction Main Works CEMP 13.Construction

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:22:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:23:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:23: 8.4.7 providing mitigation to Gangetown

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:24:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:24: 1, developed to include standard mitigation and good Contractor CEMP environment management

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:25:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:26:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:27:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:28:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000188-EN010082-6.2.17-ES Chapter 17-Mitigation Schedule-Final-November 2017.pdf:29:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference

EN010082-000379-6.2.5 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 5 Project Description - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:23: environmental (HSE) management plan. This plan will identify the mitigation

EN010082-000379-6.2.5 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 5 Project Description - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:23: safety and environmental impacts. Mitigation measures committed to in the

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:3: 57 4.12.6 itigation mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:7: 5.5. Mitigation and the Sweetman Judgement ……………………………………….. 100

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:30: appropriate objectives and mechanisms for mitigation and compensation.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:36: issue and any mitigation measures proposed. It comments on matters

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:41: relevant satisfactory mitigation where appropriate.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:43: design and mitigation proposals include in the ES and secured in the DCO

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:47: ingestion). As a consequence the mitigation measures from the IAQM

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:47: necessary mitigation measures are secured later in this report.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:48: further mitigation REP2-080.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:49: emissions and mitigation measures will be similar those applied during

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:51: consequence the mitigation measures from the IAQM guidance for a high

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:51:4.9.41. Q1.1.21 PD-008 sought further explanation of how dust mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:51: proposed mitigation measures in the ES air quality chapter APP-049.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:51: mitigation that will be used during the construction works is proven and

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:51: 080]. I am content that dust mitigation during construction have been

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:51: predicted, no further mitigation of air quality emissions is considered

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:52: further mitigation is deemed necessary.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:57: this reason, no specific mitigation is required. It was further agreed that

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:57: mitigation set out in the ES. No matters to resolve were identified.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:57: For this reason a level of mitigation appropriate to a high risk

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:61:4.10.10. No specific mitigation is therefore required, on the basis that all the

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:61: CEMP Table L4.6, REP7-002 contains standard mitigation and good

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:61: the biodiversity mitigation set out in the ES .

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:66: design, mitigation and opportunities for securing wider heritage benefits

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:68: prepare such design and landscape mitigation proposals as can

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:70:4.13.17. Section 11.5 of ES Chapter 11 AS-013 sets out proposed mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:74: mitigation measures proposed to address landscape and visual effects

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:74: landscape and visual effects and provide reasonable mitigation. NPS EN-2

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:75: planning authority (RCBC) to give further consideration to mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:78: mitigation. The effects during operation are expected to be limited to

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:80: to how proposed mitigation would be secured during construction and

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:80: mitigation measures set out in BS 8225 version 2, REP2-008. The

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:80: Applicant also submitted an updated verson of Table 17.1 (‘Mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:80: Summary Table’) REP2-005, including reference to how mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:82: these mitigation measures, the ES concludes that significant effects as a

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:82:4.15.1. NPS EN-1 states that the consideration and mitigation of transport

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:84: implement mitigation measures to remediate the watercourses within the

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:84: to provide specific mitigation measures in respect of relevant water

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:95: mitigation and superseded the NSER submitted with the dDCO

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:98:  Mitigation measures, including implications of C-323/7 – People Over

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:108:5.5. Mitigation and the Sweetman Judgement

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:108: Proposed Development. This ruled that mitigation measures (referred to

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:108: that no mitigation measures have been relied upon REP4-011. In

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:108: mitigation measures have been relied upon to reach the conclusions in

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:109: “further mitigation” (i.e. further to the embedded measures) is required

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:109: 010], which explicitly states that no further mitigation measures in

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:109:5.5.8. Requirement 13(2)(f) of the dDCO REP8-009 refers to “…mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:109: Mitigation Summary Table REP2-006. As described in paragraphs 3.0.8

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:116: development, so there is no need for mitigation. The development

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:122: would be addressed through mitigation. Lateral movement of the stacks

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:122: assessed and what mitigation would be necessary Ref Q1.2.23. The

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:123: minimum measures of dust mitigation during construction. At Deadline 2

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:123: dust mitigation measures in tabular form (Table L4.3). The Applicant

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:123: commented that the dust mitigation that will be used during the

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:123: Mitigation Summary Table APP-059 including air quality are addressed

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:123: securing mitigation during the construction phase(s), through

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:137: 6.2.17 - ES Chapter 17 - Mitigation Schedule - Final - November

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:143: Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:143: Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:174:including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form part

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:174: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata.pdf:175: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000520-8.46 - DOC_140207101(1)_DCO changes summary.pdf:6:Schedule 1 Insertion “mitigation and management” These words have been included to provide greater certainty as to what the CEMP will

EN010082-Advice-00004-1-Tees CCPP note of site visit and meeting on 2 March 2017.pdf:3:(ES) where proposed mitigation measures are secured in the DCO, and that the

EN010082-000173-EN010082-6.2.2-ES Chapter 2-Legislation Policy and Guidance-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: account of mitigation measures and also cumulative effects. The ES

EN010082-000173-EN010082-6.2.2-ES Chapter 2-Legislation Policy and Guidance-Final-November 2017.pdf:15: Climate change Climate change Advises how to identify suitable mitigation

EN010082-000173-EN010082-6.2.2-ES Chapter 2-Legislation Policy and Guidance-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: require mitigation to create acceptable conditions.

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:3:L4.5 MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN L18

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:4: A range of ‘standard’ or best practice mitigation and construction management

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:4: ensure that such mitigation measures are carried out and to demonstrate that they

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:5: process through finalised construction methods and other mitigation

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:5: x monitoring of effectiveness of mitigation measures;

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:6: environmental legislation and the mitigation measures set out within the ES. It

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:13: This includes mitigation that is embedded into the design of the Project through

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:15: x the environmental controls and mitigation measures in the final CEMP;

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:17: enable the effectiveness of environmental mitigation to be evaluated, and if

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:19: could potentially exceed the noise limits even with mitigation in place, the

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:19: Detailed mitigation measures would be determined once detailed construction

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:21:L4.5 MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:21:L50 This section of the framework CEMP sets out the mitigation and management

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:21: monitoring each mitigation/ enhancement measure.

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:22: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:23: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirements Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:24: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:25: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:25: Vibration due to construction Mitigation measures will be undertaken to mitigate noise. To be confirmed in detailed

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:26: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:26: residents in advance. Mitigation relating to out-of-hours the risk of potential

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:27: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:27: potentially exceed the noise limits even with mitigation in place, x communication

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:28: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:28: mitigation will be

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:28: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:29: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:30: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:31: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:31: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:31: Potential for obtrusive glare, upward Mitigation shall be delivered through Compliance with industry To be confirmed in detailed To be confirmed in detailed

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:31: mitigation would be implemented to ensure that they are not

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:32: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:32: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:33: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:33: working and emergency procedures for the control and mitigation of erosion and dust

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:33: material until a site investigation has been carried out and appropriate mitigation identified.

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:33: In the unlikely event that soil gas is identified as a risk requiring vapour / gas mitigation

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:33: measures, monitoring would be carried out and the necessary gas mitigation measures

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:34: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:34: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:34: Potential to impact on sensitive Mitigation measure will be developed to ensure that All To be confirmed in detailed To be confirmed in detailed

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:35: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:36: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:36: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:37: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:37: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000576-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Clean).pdf:38: x description of activity based triggers for implementation of mitigation

EN010082-000540-EN010082-090818 Environment Agency Response to ExA Second WQs.pdf:6: seems highly unlikely that it will be possible to implement mitigation measures to remediate the

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: mitigation and how its benefits may be enhanced;

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: Investigate mitigation options

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: management and mitigation measures of known effectiveness could be

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:14: modifications have been made or mitigation measures have been agreed and

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:15: revised to include embedded mitigation measures reflecting a clear

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:3.55 In addition, at a more impact or topic specific level, mitigation options are

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: mitigation objective can be achieved different technical, economic and

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: 3. Mitigation: what can be done about it?

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:3.57 Where significant residual effects remain, further options for mitigation are

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:19: with mitigation or looking at different mitigation

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:19:to assess or to prioritise in the assessment (scoping in mitigation options, especially when after initial assessment some

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:19:In predicting magnitude the effect of all the project mitigation

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:19:criteria and standards. For exceedances, further mitigation In the absence of quantified standards, significance can be evaluated through

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:19:medium, large) may be adopted based on widely recognised magnitude can be reduced further. Different mitigation options may be examined and

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:19:Some activities will result in changes to the environment that design to develop suitable mitigation and re-evaluating impacts and effects.

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:21:3.6.3 Mitigation

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:21: environmentally acceptable, technically feasible and cost effective mitigation

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:21: specialists undertaking the assessments have identified mitigation measures

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:21:3.66 Mitigation measures are developed to avoid, minimise, reduce or remedy (eg

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:21: context, mitigation measures are taken to include design measures and

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:21: provides a summary of mitigation measures to be undertaken by the Project.

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:22: significance, specific mitigation measures such as engineering controls are

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:22: and financial feasibility of mitigation measures. Effects assessed to be of

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:22:3.68 The mitigation measures developed during the EIA process, as well as

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:22: planned and designed fully inclusive of all proposed mitigation.

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:22:3.69 Residual effects, once mitigation measures have been applied, are classified as

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:22: effects are still significant, the mitigation options considered and the reasons

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:22: mitigation measures the Project is committed to that are relevant to that

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:22: warranting careful attention to ensure conditions regarding mitigation and

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:23: mitigation will typically be achieved using normal good practice, eg via the

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:23: scope to reduce the significance of the effect through practicable mitigation

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:25: • Stage 6: proposed mitigation for impacts that contribute to cumulative

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:25: informing the Project design and its environmental mitigation. Figure 3.4

EN010082-000174-EN010082-6.2.3-ES Chapter 3-EIA Approach-Final-November 2017.pdf:45: been adopted with mitigation measures developed accordingly.

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:6.6 MITIGATION 6-67

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: identified, proposed mitigation measures listed and an assessment of the

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:5:Environment Agency Section 3.3.4 of the submitted scoping report discusses three available methods for cooling Mitigation measures relevant

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: on all receptors and describe monitoring and mitigation during these phases. Construction

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: site mitigation measures will be incorporated into the construction programme, which contamination. The density

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: the assessment and used in the development of appropriate mitigation.

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: into account any mitigation measures proposed;

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: mitigation measures to reduce pollution levels will be required in order to

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:21: mitigation measures have been considered necessary, beyond the standard

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:42: following sub-sections with a view to identifying mitigation that may be

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:42: mitigation for the three phases (namely construction, operation and

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:42: to include potential activities which could, in the absence of mitigation,

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: occurring. In addition, other specific additional mitigation, such as method

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: and clearing of Made Ground, which could, in the absence of mitigation,

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:45: • describe the waste minimisation / mitigation actions which are anticipated

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:45: addition, other specific additional mitigation options with respect to water

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:46:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:46: Linkage Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:47:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:47: Linkage Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:48:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:48: Linkage Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:49:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:49: Linkage Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:50:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:50: Linkage Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:51:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:51: Linkage Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:52:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:52: Linkage Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:54: mitigation.

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:55:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:55: Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:56:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:56: Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:57:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:57: Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:58:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:58: Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:60: which could, in the absence of mitigation, influence surface water quality

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:62:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:62: Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:63:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:63: Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:64:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:64: Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:65:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:65: Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:66:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:66: Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:67:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:67: Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:68:Activity Potential Effect / Pathway Likelihood Receptor Magnitude Key Mitigations Magnitude Final

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:68: Mitigation Mitigation

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:69: states that if contamination is encountered on the site, mitigation measures

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:70: absence of mitigation, for lateral migration of contaminants to affect adjacent

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:70:6.6 MITIGATION

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:70:6.169 This section provides provisional mitigation measures for the Project in

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:70: mitigation measures will follow the principles of negative impact mitigation,

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:71: area after the impact has occurred. If all other mitigation fails, it may be

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:71:6.171 Mitigation will be achieved through professional judgement in the design of

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:72: carried out and appropriate mitigation identified. Moreover, the safety

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:72: gas mitigation measures, monitoring would be carried out and the

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:72: necessary gas mitigation measures would be applied.

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:73: control and mitigation of erosion and dust generation during excavations and

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:73: include mitigation measures for avoiding spills and leaks of materials used

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:75:6.185 The mitigation measures to avoid, minimise and reduce potential negative

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:75: contractor. It will include mitigation measures for avoiding spills and leaks of

EN010082-000177-EN010082-6.2.6-ES Chapter 6-Ground Conditions, Water Resources and Flooding-Final-November 2017.pdf:76: the routine working and emergency procedures for the control and mitigation

EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library.pdf:6: 6.2.17 - ES Chapter 17 - Mitigation Schedule - Final - November

EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library.pdf:12: Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table

EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library.pdf:12: Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table

EN010082-000496-_CONSENTORDER_40063542(1)_DEADLINE 2_ DCOv2.pdf:15:including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form

EN010082-000496-_CONSENTORDER_40063542(1)_DEADLINE 2_ DCOv2.pdf:15: (2) The ground nesting birds survey and mitigation scheme must include an implementation

EN010082-000496-_CONSENTORDER_40063542(1)_DEADLINE 2_ DCOv2.pdf:15: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000496-_CONSENTORDER_40063542(1)_DEADLINE 2_ DCOv2.pdf:16: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:3: detected, the Scoping Report states that mitigation

EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (1).pdf:3: Scoping Report states that mitigation measures secured

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: the Project site are described, potential effects identified, proposed mitigation

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: site boundary. No mitigation has been assumed for construction plant in the

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: mitigation.

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: that appropriate noise mitigation is included so that the plant design meets

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: levels supplied by potential suppliers and include the mitigation in

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: this effect occurring, by use of appropriate mitigation such as by altering the

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: unavoidable, mitigation measures to reduce pollution levels will be required

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: normal operation) and with the level of noise mitigation described in

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:35: for any DCO Requirements to be complied with. The types of mitigation that

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:35:8.4.7 Summary of Mitigation Measures and Residual Significance of Effects

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:35: effects or requirements to comply with legislation, mitigation may be

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:35: required. The mitigation is described and the significance of the residual

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:35: effect after mitigation applied is assessed.

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:38:Table 8.14 Mitigation and Residual Effects

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:38:Phase Receptor and Impacts Mitigation Measures Residual Significance

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:39:Phase Receptor and Impacts Mitigation Measures Residual Significance

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:40:Phase Receptor and Impacts Mitigation Measures Residual Significance

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:40:Construction Traffic noise changes at NSRs No mitigation measures required Not significant

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:41: Grangetown. On-plant mitigation such as placing key items in buildings or

EN010082-000179-EN010082-6.2.8-ES-Chapter 8-Noise and Vibration-Final-November 2017.pdf:41: enclosures has also been employed. As a result of these embedded mitigation

EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: identified, proposed mitigation measures listed and an assessment of the

EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: proposed mitigation measures, conclusions and residual impacts, relating

EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: mitigation measures to reduce pollution levels will be required in order to

EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:14.68 Recommendations, or mitigation measures, are also developed during the EIA

EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:31: susceptible to damage due to ingress of dust, mitigation measures for a high

EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:31: construction dust would be transported especially with mitigation in place.

EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: warrant further mitigation. This is illustrated in Figure 7.5 and Figure 7.6 for

EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:38:14.158 In addition to those mitigation measures set out in the ES for topics like noise

EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:38:14.7.1 Construction Mitigation

EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:38:14.7.2 Operational Mitigation

EN010082-000185-EN010082-6.2.14-ES Chapter 14-Human Health-Final-November 2017.pdf:39: amenable to mitigation measures (as summarised in Chapter 17).

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: (ES). A range of ‘standard’ or best practice mitigation and construction

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: and auditing activities designed to ensure that such mitigation measures are

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: process through finalised construction methods and other mitigation

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: • monitoring of effectiveness of mitigation measures;

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: environmental legislation and the mitigation measures set out within the ES. It

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: these occurrences, specific noise mitigation measures will be put in place to

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:7:L2.5 MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:7:L26 This section of the framework CEMP sets out the mitigation and management

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: monitoring each mitigation/ enhancement measure.

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: Vibration due to Mitigation measures will be To be confirmed To be confirmed

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:9:Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:11: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: discovered, appropriate mitigation

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000210-EN010082-6.3.20-ES Annex L-CEMP-Final-November 2017.pdf:14: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000193-EN010082-6.3.3-ES Annex C-Flood Risk Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf:7:  ensuring opportunities to contribute to the mitigation of flooding

EN010082-000193-EN010082-6.3.3-ES Annex C-Flood Risk Assessment-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: appropriate, mitigation measures to manage any identified risks are proposed.

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:3:L4.5 MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN L18

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:4: A range of ‘standard’ or best practice mitigation and construction management

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:4: ensure that such mitigation measures are carried out and to demonstrate that they

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:5: process through finalised construction methods and other mitigation

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:5:  monitoring of effectiveness of mitigation measures;

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:5: environmental legislation and the mitigation measures set out within the ES. It

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:13: This includes mitigation that is embedded into the design of the Project through

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:15:  the environmental controls and mitigation measures in the final CEMP;

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:17: enable the effectiveness of environmental mitigation to be evaluated, and if

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:20: mitigation measures will be put in place to reduce potential noise impacts at

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:21:L4.5 MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:21:L50 This section of the framework CEMP sets out the mitigation and management

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:21: monitoring each mitigation/ enhancement measure.

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:22: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:23: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:24: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:24: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:25: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:25: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:25: Vibration due to construction activities Mitigation measures will be undertaken to mitigate noise. To be confirmed in To be confirmed in

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:26: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:26: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:27: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:28: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:28: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirements Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:28: Potential for obtrusive glare, upward Mitigation shall be delivered through compliance with industry To be confirmed in detailed To be confirmed in detailed

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:29: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirements Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:29: discovered, appropriate mitigation would be

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:29: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:30: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:30: working and emergency procedures for the control and mitigation of erosion and dust

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:30: material until a site investigation has been carried out and appropriate mitigation identified.

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:30: In the unlikely event that soil gas is identified as a risk requiring vapour / gas mitigation

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:30: measures, monitoring would be carried out and the necessary gas mitigation measures

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:31: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:31: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirements Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:31: Potential to impact on sensitive Mitigation measure will be developed to ensure that all To be confirmed in detailed To be confirmed in detailed

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:32: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirements Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:33: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirements Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:34: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirements Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:34: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirements Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:34: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirements Responsibility

EN010082-000404-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - UPDATED.pdf:35:  description of activity based triggers for implementation of mitigation

EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library (3).pdf:6: 6.2.17 - ES Chapter 17 - Mitigation Schedule - Final - November

EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library (3).pdf:12: Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table

EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library (3).pdf:12: Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table

EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: effects identified, proposed mitigation measures listed and an assessment of

EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: Development and any mitigation measures such as skills and training programmes that would promote local employment. This

EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:5:SoS Section 6.9.3 of the Scoping Report confirms that mitigation measures will be set out in a CEMP and a Traffic Management Plan, Noted.

EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: effects should be set out as well as proposed avoidance or mitigation

EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:19:13.2.10 Mitigation Measures

EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:19:13.51 Where significant adverse effects are assessed, mitigation measures are

EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:19: outlined. Mitigation measures are described discretely to address

EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:41: Site. Further detailed assessment on disaster scenarios and mitigation

EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:42:13.4.6 Summary of Mitigation Measures and Residual Significance of Effects

EN010082-000184-EN010082-6.2.13-ES Chapter 13-Socio Economic Characteristics-Final-November 2017.pdf:42:13.122 The assessment seeks to identify suitable mitigation to reduce, remove or

EN010082-000556-7.4 - Tees CCPP - Environment Agency SoCG - DRAFT UNSIGNED - 22.08.18.pdf:10: Applicant under the WFD to provide specific mitigation measures in respect of relevant water bodies.

EN010082-000556-7.4 - Tees CCPP - Environment Agency SoCG - DRAFT UNSIGNED - 22.08.18.pdf:10: and mitigation strategies where such effects are identified.

EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:20: the phase 1 CCGT itself during construction of the phase 2 CCGT. As such, mitigation measures have

EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:20: mitigation, will be (at worst) minor and not significant.

EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:20: insignificant. Overall, it is agreed that no specific mitigation is required above and beyond that inherent

EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:20: boundary at that time. Human receptors are too distant to be impacted. As such, mitigation measures are

EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:21: reduce noise at Grangetown. On-plant mitigation, such as placing key items in buildings or enclosures,

EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:21: has also been employed. As a result of these embedded mitigation measures, the resulting noise levels are

EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:21: mitigation measures.

EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:25:19.4 No specific mitigation is therefore required, as all the effects of the Proposed Development are not

EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:25: further developed to include standard mitigation and good practice in relation to advice on construction

EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:28:22.3 For situations where the potential for major accidents was identified, the embedded mitigation and

EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:28: accident situations was also considered. Where necessary, additional mitigation have been identified to

EN010082-000525-7.3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:28:22.5 The assessment concludes that appropriate mitigation, management and/or regulatory controls would be

EN010082-000551-8.54 - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (v3).pdf:19: mitigation scheme to be implemented in the event ground nesting birds are

EN010082-000551-8.54 - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (v3).pdf:20: Statement either assumes as standard best practice mitigation or

EN010082-000551-8.54 - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (v3).pdf:20: recommends as additional mitigation see Chapter 17 APP-059

EN010082-000583-8.63 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Tracked - Version 6.pdf:13: the authorised development may commence until either additional mitigation

EN010082-000583-8.63 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Tracked - Version 6.pdf:13: mitigation measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures must be

EN010082-000583-8.63 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Tracked - Version 6.pdf:15:including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form

EN010082-000583-8.63 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Tracked - Version 6.pdf:15: (2) The ground nesting birds survey and mitigation scheme must include an implementation

EN010082-000583-8.63 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Tracked - Version 6.pdf:16: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000583-8.63 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Tracked - Version 6.pdf:16: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000393-7 7 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Historic England - DRAFT.pdf:3: Need for further surveys and/or mitigation…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 4

EN010082-000393-7 7 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Historic England - DRAFT.pdf:5: • the need for further surveys and/or mitigation.

EN010082-000393-7 7 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Historic England - DRAFT.pdf:7: were unlikely to be any buried archaeological remains surviving on the Site and that no mitigation

EN010082-000393-7 7 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Historic England - DRAFT.pdf:7: would be not significant. Mitigation above and beyond that set out to reduce possible landscape and

EN010082-000393-7 7 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Historic England - DRAFT.pdf:7: Need for further surveys and/or mitigation.

EN010082-000393-7 7 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Historic England - DRAFT.pdf:7: There is no need for any further surveys or mitigation – see statement above.

EN010082-000393-7 7 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Historic England - DRAFT.pdf:15: design of any required mitigation measures; and opportunities for securing wider

EN010082-000650-The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Order 2019 (Final) (Validated).pdf:15: including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required has been submitted

EN010082-000650-The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Order 2019 (Final) (Validated).pdf:16: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000650-The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Order 2019 (Final) (Validated).pdf:16: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000651-Tees CCPP HRA FINAL April 2019 (1).pdf:6: that mitigation measures (referred to in the judgment as measures which are intended

EN010082-000651-Tees CCPP HRA FINAL April 2019 (1).pdf:6: mitigation measures as referred to in the Sweetman Judgement, but rather they should

EN010082-000651-Tees CCPP HRA FINAL April 2019 (1).pdf:6: respect of the definition of mitigation measures. The Secretary of State also notes

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:1:Updated Mitigation Summary Table

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:2:Table 17.1 Mitigation Summary Table

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:2: Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:2: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:3: Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:3: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:4:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:4: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:4: 5, Section the mitigation measures and management (‘CEMP’)

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:4: safety and environmental impacts. Mitigation

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:5:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:5: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:6:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:6: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:7:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:7: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:8:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:8: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:9:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:9: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:9: appropriate mitigation identified. Moreover, the 10.Contaminated

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:10:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:10: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:10: 1, a risk requiring vapour / gas mitigation Contractor land and

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:10: 6, Section the necessary gas mitigation measures would be

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:11:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:11: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:12:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:12: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:13:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:13: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:14:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:14: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:14: the control and mitigation of erosion and dust 14.Waste

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:14: Chapter contractor. It will include mitigation measures management plan

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:15:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:15: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:16:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:16: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:17:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:17: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:18:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:18: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:19:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:19: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:20:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:20: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:21:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:21: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:22:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:22: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:23:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:23: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:24:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:24: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:25:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:25: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:25: 92. 5.95 Volume Dust mitigation measures from the following Construction Main Works CEMP 13.Construction Tertiary

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:26:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:26: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:27:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:27: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:27: 8.4.7 reinstated thereby providing mitigation to

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:28:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:28: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:29:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:29: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:29: 1, developed to include standard mitigation and Contractor CEMP environment

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:30:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:30: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:31:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:31: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:32:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:32: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:33:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:33: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:34:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:34: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:35:Item Source Mitigation or Measure to prevent, reduce, offset Project Stage Who Securing DCO Reference Type of

EN010082-000405-8.10 - Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table.pdf:35: and minimise impacts Mechanism Mitigation1

EN010082-000388-7 2 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with NE - Signed_Redacted.pdf:10: mitigation is therefore required, as all of the effects of the Proposed Development are not significant.

EN010082-000388-7 2 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with NE - Signed_Redacted.pdf:10: Annex L) has been prepared and would be further developed to include standard mitigation and

EN010082-000388-7 2 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with NE - Signed_Redacted.pdf:10: 2.16 It is therefore agreed that no specific mitigation is required and the impacts of the Project on ecology

EN010082-000388-7 2 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with NE - Signed_Redacted.pdf:12: biodiversity mitigation set out in the ES, in terms of controlling the effects of the Project that are of

EN010082-000194-EN010082-6.3.4-ES Annex D1-Phase 1 Final-November 2017.pdf:25: deposited therein, or any capping / gas mitigation measures implemented on

EN010082-000555-8.50 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Comments on Responses to the ExA's SWQs - Deadline 6 - FINAL - 22.08.18.pdf:9: further mitigation is required. matter. Where the Competent Authority is unsure whether our position on this at the Issue Specific Hearing on 13 June 2018

EN010082-000555-8.50 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Comments on Responses to the ExA's SWQs - Deadline 6 - FINAL - 22.08.18.pdf:9: b) The Applicant’s position is that the Sweetman 13(2)(f) to potential mitigation measures to protect controlled

EN010082-000555-8.50 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Comments on Responses to the ExA's SWQs - Deadline 6 - FINAL - 22.08.18.pdf:9: screening exercise, on the basis that no mitigation are not intended to avoid or reduce a potential adverse significant

EN010082-000555-8.50 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Comments on Responses to the ExA's SWQs - Deadline 6 - FINAL - 22.08.18.pdf:10: is not relying on any mitigation to reach the conclusions of guidance from the courts at the moment as to what constitutes preparing application documents and submissions made as part of

EN010082-000555-8.50 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Comments on Responses to the ExA's SWQs - Deadline 6 - FINAL - 22.08.18.pdf:10: refers to '…mitigation measures designed to protect Competent Authority to take their own legal advice on this implications of the recent Sweetman judgements. We confirmed

EN010082-000555-8.50 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Comments on Responses to the ExA's SWQs - Deadline 6 - FINAL - 22.08.18.pdf:10: Updated Mitigation Summary Table REP2-006 as primary certain matters are avoidance or reduction measures, it will need and this is summarised in our written summary of oral case at

EN010082-000555-8.50 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Comments on Responses to the ExA's SWQs - Deadline 6 - FINAL - 22.08.18.pdf:10: and/or tertiary mitigation. The Applicant has confirmed that to consider whether to carry out an appropriate assessment to paragraph 2.86 onwards REP4-011.

EN010082-000555-8.50 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Comments on Responses to the ExA's SWQs - Deadline 6 - FINAL - 22.08.18.pdf:10: To what extent does NE agree that the proposed measures to 13(2)(f) to potential mitigation measures to protect controlled

EN010082-000555-8.50 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Comments on Responses to the ExA's SWQs - Deadline 6 - FINAL - 22.08.18.pdf:12: position with regard to WFD issues. mitigation measures in respect of relevant water bodies.

EN010082-000555-8.50 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Comments on Responses to the ExA's SWQs - Deadline 6 - FINAL - 22.08.18.pdf:12: possible to implement mitigation measures to remediate the Clean Up Initiative that took place in February 2018. This was

EN010082-000651-Tees CCPP HRA FINAL April 2019.pdf:6: that mitigation measures (referred to in the judgment as measures which are intended

EN010082-000651-Tees CCPP HRA FINAL April 2019.pdf:6: mitigation measures as referred to in the Sweetman Judgement, but rather they should

EN010082-000651-Tees CCPP HRA FINAL April 2019.pdf:6: respect of the definition of mitigation measures. The Secretary of State also notes

EN010082-000143-EN010082-1.2-Application Guide-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: Chapter 17 Mitigation Register

EN010082-000542-EN010082 Tees CCPP SWQ Appendix 2.pdf:2:mitigation measures to remediate the watercourses within the proposed site. It is

EN010082-000542-EN010082 Tees CCPP SWQ Appendix 2.pdf:2:contributions by the applicant to assist in the delivery of mitigation measures

EN010082-000542-EN010082 Tees CCPP SWQ Appendix 2.pdf:2:The mitigation measures that the applicant could support outside of the proposed

EN010082-000542-EN010082 Tees CCPP SWQ Appendix 2.pdf:3:mitigation measures within the waterbody which we are unaware of but which

EN010082-000396-8 5 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Comments on Relevant Reps - FINAL (2).pdf:7: commitment to mitigation identified in the ES – relevant to noise, lighting and traffic. The requirements (similar to

EN010082-000396-8 5 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Comments on Relevant Reps - FINAL (2).pdf:14: hazard assessments unless the circumstances are covered by specific regulations. As this The assessment concluded that given the embedded mitigation and management procedures proposed as part of the

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:10:  Confirm the closest human health receptor points and the process. On the basis of the ‘high’ risk rating, mitigation is recommended suitable for a ‘high’ risk site, and on this basis impacts are

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:10: significance of effect prior to mitigation and as a residual effect (for negligible.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:10:Q1.1.14 Applicant What distances have been considered in the context of the construction dust As detailed in the previous question, from the outset it was decided that the site would need to adopt mitigation suitable for a ‘high’

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:10: Council mitigation. Please explain with reference to relevant guidance, criteria and quality standards are exceeded, or where there is a substantial worsening of air quality. NPS EN-1 does not define ‘substantial’, and

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:10: Applicant National Policy Statements (‘NPSs’), why further mitigation is not proposed. this has been determined on the basis of guidance from the IAQM as discussed below for the purposes of the EIA. Of note is that at

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:11: appear to be few or no sensitive receptors, this is deemed sufficient justification for not warranting further mitigation.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:11: described in paragraph 7.109 of the ES APP-049 require mitigation measures to manage and mitigate dust emissions. The frameworks CEMP set out the proposed management measures.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:11: Please provide in tabular form how the proposed mitigation will be secured in development. The requirements includes that the detailed CEMP must accord with the principles set out in the framework CEMP,

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:11: the Development Consent Order (DCO) and the relevant references. including the mitigation and management measures contained therein.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:11: It follows that the proposed mitigation for dust emissions is secured by Requirement 13 of the draft DCO. The proposed measures are

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:11:Q1.1.20 Applicant Explain what (if any) mitigation is proposed to limit the effects of operational The turbine technology to be selected for the Proposed Power Plant will be state-of-the-art in terms of meeting current BAT for NOx

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:11: mitigation is proposed, why not? not significant. The impact assessment considers these embedded measures and therefore are included in the ES assessment and HRA

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:11: Have any mitigation measures (either embedded or further mitigation) been impacts, no further mitigation is required.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:12:Q1.1.21 Applicant Dust from construction is identified in the ES (7.130) APP-049 as having a The framework CEMP APP-081 has been updated to reflect the proposed mitigation measures in the ES air quality chapter [APP-

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:12: Redcar and potentially significant effect if unmitigated. Whilst construction mitigation is 049].

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:12: Council APP-081, there is no reference to air quality impacts and mitigation/control The updated framework CEMP (version 2) APP-081 has been submitted for Deadline 2 of the Examination.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:12: quality chapter of the ES. Given the conclusions in ES paragraph 7.125 that The dust mitigation that will be used during the construction works is proven and has been used extensively on construction projects

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:12: IAQM mitigation measures will be adopted, why does the CEMP not specify throughout the UK. This includes in urban areas and on very large construction projects.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:12: the effects are not significant for the large majority of locations’. footprint of the significant impacts, and that the plant meets BAT, no further mitigation is deemed necessary.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:12:Q1.1.24 Applicant In Table 17.1 APP-059 there is only one construction mitigation measure for The updated framework CEMP (version 2) APP-081 has been submitted for Deadline 2 of the Examination.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:15: Natural England low, the impact would be high without mitigation.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:18: sensitive receptor. In the event of the former resulting in higher noise impacts additional mitigation would be included to

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:21: the impact be assessed and what mitigation would be necessary? An updated draft DCO APP-005 (Rev 2) has been submitted for Deadline 2 of the Examination.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:23: Ensure that all relevant measures included within the Mitigation Summary Table (17.1) APP-059 including air quality and stipulated

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:23:  Ensure that all relevant measures included within the Mitigation The updated framework CEMP (version 2) APP-081 has been submitted for Deadline 2 of the Examination.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:24:  Req. 13 (2)(a)(ii) refers to the need to minimise the impacts of The CEMP has been updated further aligning the Mitigation Summary table with the CEMP.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:24: refers to measures designed to minimise the noise impacts of The framework CEMP APP-081 has been updated further aligning the Mitigation Summary table with the CEMP. The updated

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:24: permitted by Req.13 (2) (iv) would not result in any likely significant focussing on Contractor driven mitigation measures. The CoCP will be developed following the appointment of an EPC contractor.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:24: relevant statutory consultees. The potential impact to the environment would be assessed, appropriate mitigation measures designed

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:26: acoustic walls achieve their objectives / meet an appropriate standard? The Western Acoustic Wall will be designed (after technology selection) to contribute to the overall noise mitigation to ensure the far

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:27: of the overall noise mitigation to ensure the far field noise limit is met. The DCO requires any necessary works to be carried out to the

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:27:Q1.3.43 Applicant Paragraph 1.27 of the Planning Statement APP-036 states that the DCO There mitigation measures proposed as part of the Project are set out in ES Volume 1, Chapter 17 APP-059. All are embedded in the

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:28: not identified the need for mitigation in order to make it acceptable in

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:28: mitigation ‘in addition to that which is embedded in

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:28: It follows that a development consent obligation has not been considered necessary for the purpose of securing mitigation measures.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:28: Cleveland Borough mitigation measures such as skills and training programmes would promote promote employment and skills development opportunities for local residents associated with the authorised development. It must be

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:31:Q1.4.13 Applicant It is indicated in section 13.4.6 of the ES APP-055 that suitable mitigation The Project is only anticipated to result in beneficial socio-economic effects and therefore there are no adverse effects to mitigate and

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:31: judged to be significant whereas minor and negligible impacts are considered “In predicting magnitude the effect of all the project mitigation in place (i.e. committed to by Sembcorp) will be taken into account.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:31: effects of minor significance and above are considered to be significant for the standards. For exceedances, further mitigation must be incorporated by the project to reduce the magnitude of the impact (and the

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:31: of all proposed mitigation. However, this approach does not identify the “In the absence of quantified standards, significance can be evaluated through considering the magnitude of an impact in combination

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:31: significance of effects prior to mitigation which is necessary to assess the with the importance/quality/value of the receptor or resource that is affected, also considering the response (or sensitivity) of a

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:31: effectiveness of proposed mitigation. resource or a receptor to a particular impact. Effects of more than minor significance may warrant re-examination to see if an impact

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:32: mitigation and confirms the overall significance of residual effects. approaches and criteria applied across different environmental and socio-economic topics vary.”

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:32: “primary and tertiary mitigation* should be included in the project description and can be taken as read in assessing effects. The

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:32: basis for the EIA should be that both these forms of mitigation definitely will be delivered: thus, any effects that might have arisen

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:32: without these forms of mitigation do not need to be identified as ‘potential effects’, as there should be no potential for them to arise”.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:32: The EIA and ES has adopted this approach and has therefore not reported the significance of effects in the absence of mitigation where

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:32: mitigation has been committed to and is incorporated fully into a project in terms of its design, construction working methods and

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:32: APP-059 to confirm the mitigation type and how this has been factored into the technical assessments.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:32: *”Primary mitigation is an intrinsic part of the project design – it should be described in the design evolution narrative and included

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:32: “Tertiary mitigation will be required regardless of any EIA assessment, as it is imposed, for example as a result of legislative

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:34: should update the CEMP to include all relevant mitigation measures  ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ROLE OF THE CONTRACTOR;

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:34: responsibilities be established at framework stage? The CEMP has been expanded to include all mitigation measures presented in the Management and Mitigation Plan APP-059. Given

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:34:  Does the Management and Mitigation Plan (section 1.2.5) adequately that this is a framework CEMP it was deliberately high level with the view that the specific mitigation measures would be addressed in

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:34: reflect Table 17.1 of the ES APP-059: Mitigation Summary Table? the final CEMP.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:34:  Update the Mitigation Summary Table (Table 17.1) to cross

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:34: reference each mitigation measure to the relevant paragraph in the Table 17.1 APP-059 has been designed based on those mitigation measures presented at the end of each technical chapter. The

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:34: framework CEMP. In revising Table 17.1 identify and distinguish mitigation measures in the CEMP have been developed based on the detail presented in Table 17.1. However the CEMP has now been

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:34: between embedded mitigation measures and ‘further’ mitigation. expanded, as requested, to include specific mitigation measure that are considered to be good practice on construction sites. The

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:34: (Previously suggested in the Scoping Opinion APP-063.) overarching principles for each mitigation measure within the CEMP are contained within Table 17.1.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:34:  Why does the Management and Mitigation Plan (section 1.2.5) not

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:35:Q1.5.16 Applicant Section L2.5 of Annex L APP-081 purports to set out mitigation and The CEMP has been expanded to include all mitigation measures presented in the Management and Mitigation Plan. A consistency

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:35: Redcar and management measures to be included as a minimum in the CEMP. Some of check has been completed cross checking Table 17.1 APP-059 with the mitigation measures presented in the CEMP. Given that this

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:35: Cleveland Borough the mitigation / enhancement measures are vague or simply a repetition of is a framework CEMP it was deliberately high level with the view that the specific mitigation measures would be addressed in the

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:35: relate to the mitigation measures set out in Table 17.1 of the ES? The updated framework CEMP APP-081 has been submitted for Deadline 2 of the Examination.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:40:Q1.7.25 Applicant Table 15.3 of the ES APP-057 describes the mitigation in the event of a gas We have used the wrong word, we meant an ‘exclusion’ zone – access for construction personnel and equipment will be carefully

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:42:Q1.8.8 Applicant Paragraph 11.65 of the ES APP-053 describes the mitigation measures These are included in the updated CEMP.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:43: Section 11.65 APP-053 provides mitigation measures for construction lighting and states ‘restricting construction site lighting

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:43: outside normal working hours as far as practicable to the minimum required for safety and security’. Outline mitigation measures are

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:47: so, what assumptions were made regarding this barrier and how would these required through contractual arrangements. Detailed design of the noise mitigation will allow for optimisation of the barrier design

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:47:Q1.9.10 Applicant Table 8.14 of the ES APP-050 sets out the mitigation measures to reduce Please see attached updated CEMP. The updated framework CEMP APP-081 has been submitted for Deadline 2 of the Examination.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:47: Please set out in tabular form how the individual mitigation measures would

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:47: Please ensure that all mitigation measures relevant to construction are

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:47: would be expected to be subject to similar mitigation measures as applied during construction.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:48: the building walls. Other alternative or complimentary acoustic mitigation could be provided to absorb noise reflecting off the indoor

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:48:  Is there a need for acoustically upgraded cladding material and what surfaces, which would also reduce the noise from this source. The detailed specifications for the mitigation measures that are required

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:48: potential contractors based on their experience and the types of mitigation authority before development commences, this will include plant design. In addition, Requirement 20(2) ensures that the agreed

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:48:Q1.9.18 Applicant Table 8.14 APP-050 identifies mitigation works for the operational phase Detailed engineering design for an enclosure was not available during the ES noise study APP-050. A reasonable approach was used

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:48: they would be monitored and enforced. The mitigation measures that would be considered where appropriate would draw on common guidance such as BS5228 where

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:49: Mitigation measures identified as part of the HIA are secured within the draft DCO APP-005 by Requirements 13, 6, 15, 30 and 29,

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:49: To conclude, decommissioning will be a planned and managed process involving activities and mitigation similar to construction

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:50:Q1.10.10 Applicant How will the HIA mitigation measures set out in 14.7 APP-056 be The HIA recommendations at 14.7 are construction mitigation and operational mitigation.

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:50: Mitigation measures identified as part of the HIA are secured within the draft DCO APP-005 by Requirements 13, 6, 15, 30 and 29,

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:52:Q1.11.5 Applicant The proposed mitigation measures identified in Table 10.13 of the ES APP- ES Chapter 10 paragraphs 10.11-10.13 [APP-052 details that all AILs will be shipped from abroad to Teesport and then via the

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:55: nuisance effects following the implementation of identified mitigation’ and ‘the mitigation committed …will ensure no significant statutory nuisance effects will occur”

EN010082-000397-8 6 - Tees CCP - Applicant's Response to ExA's WQs - Deadline 2 - FINAL.pdf:55: ‘the mitigation committed … will ensure no statutory nuisance effects are

EN010082-000651-Tees CCPP HRA FINAL April 2019 (2).pdf:6: that mitigation measures (referred to in the judgment as measures which are intended

EN010082-000651-Tees CCPP HRA FINAL April 2019 (2).pdf:6: mitigation measures as referred to in the Sweetman Judgement, but rather they should

EN010082-000651-Tees CCPP HRA FINAL April 2019 (2).pdf:6: respect of the definition of mitigation measures. The Secretary of State also notes

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: of the scheme itself, or to mitigation or

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:71: site boundary to reduce noise at Grangetown. On-plant mitigation, such as placing key

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:71: As a result of the embedded mitigation measures, the resulting noise levels are not

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:75: site boundary to reduce noise at Grangetown. On-plant mitigation such as placing

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:75: As a result of the embedded mitigation measures, the resulting noise levels are not

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:83: that mitigation during the construction phase will be ment 20.

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:83: review all proposed mitigation measures.

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:84: town. On-plant mitigation such as placing key items in

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:84: As a result of the embedded mitigation measures,

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:90: ferred roads to use and any mitigation measures required.

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:95: has taken place with consultees and how issues have been addressed and where mitigation has

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:296: to assess or to prioritise in the assessment (scoping in mitigation options, especially when after initial assessment some

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:296: In predicting magnitude the effect of all the project mitigation

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:296: criteria and standards. For exceedances, further mitigation In the absence of quantified standards, significance can be evaluated through

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:296: medium, large) may be adopted based on widely recognised magnitude can be reduced further. Different mitigation options may be examined and

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:296: Some activities will result in changes to the environment that design to develop suitable mitigation and re-evaluating impacts and effects.

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:300: edge; this mitigation feature will be retained for the Project and an additional

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:303: Overall, no specific mitigation is required above and beyond that inherent in

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:303: optimisation of the layout of the site and design of plant mitigation including:

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:303: • on-plant mitigation such as placing key items in buildings or enclosures

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:303: As a result of these embedded mitigation measures the resulting noise levels

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:327: acknowledged that mitigation during the construction phase will be

EN010082-000216-EN010082-5.1-Consultation Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:328: review all proposed mitigation measures.

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:3:L4.5 MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN L18

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:4: A range of ‘standard’ or best practice mitigation and construction management

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:4: ensure that such mitigation measures are carried out and to demonstrate that they

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:5: process through finalised construction methods and other mitigation

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:5:  monitoring of effectiveness of mitigation measures;

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:6: environmental legislation and the mitigation measures set out within the ES. It

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:13: This includes mitigation that is embedded into the design of the Project through

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:15:  the environmental controls and mitigation measures in the final CEMP;

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:17: enable the effectiveness of environmental mitigation to be evaluated, and if

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:19: could potentially exceed the noise limits even with mitigation in place, the

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:19: Detailed mitigation measures would be determined once detailed construction

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:21:L4.5 MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:21:L49 This section of the framework CEMP sets out the mitigation and management

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:21: monitoring each mitigation/ enhancement measure.

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:22: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:23: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirements Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:24: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:25: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:25: Vibration due to construction Mitigation measures will be undertaken to mitigate noise. To be confirmed in detailed To be confirmed in detailed

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:26: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:26: residents in advance. Mitigation relating to out-of-hours

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:27: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:27: potentially exceed the noise limits even with mitigation in place,

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:27: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:28: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:29: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:29: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:29: Potential for obtrusive glare, upward Mitigation shall be delivered through Compliance with industry To be confirmed in detailed To be confirmed in detailed

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:30: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:30: mitigation would be implemented to ensure that they are not

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:30: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:31: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:31: working and emergency procedures for the control and mitigation of erosion and dust

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:31: material until a site investigation has been carried out and appropriate mitigation identified.

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:32: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:32: In the unlikely event that soil gas is identified as a risk requiring vapour / gas mitigation

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:32: measures, monitoring would be carried out and the necessary gas mitigation measures

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:33: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:33: Potential to impact on sensitive Mitigation measure will be developed to ensure that All To be confirmed in detailed To be confirmed in detailed

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:34: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:35: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:35: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:35: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:36: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000515-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Clean v3.pdf:37:  description of activity based triggers for implementation of mitigation

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:3:L4.5 MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN L18

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:4: A range of ‘standard’ or best practice mitigation and construction management

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:4: ensure that such mitigation measures are carried out and to demonstrate that they

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:5: process through finalised construction methods and other mitigation

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:5:  monitoring of effectiveness of mitigation measures;

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:6: environmental legislation and the mitigation measures set out within the ES. It

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:13: This includes mitigation that is embedded into the design of the Project through

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:15:  the environmental controls and mitigation measures in the final CEMP;

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:17: enable the effectiveness of environmental mitigation to be evaluated, and if

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:20: hours. In the event of these occurrences, specific noise mitigation measures will

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:20: potentially exceed the noise limits even with mitigation in place, the Applicant

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:20: mitigation measures would be determined once detailed construction and

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:21:L2.7L4.5 MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:21:L26L49 This section of the framework CEMP sets out the mitigation and management

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:21: monitoring each mitigation/ enhancement measure.

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:22: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:23: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requi

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:24: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:25: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:25: Vibration due to construction Mitigation measures will be undertaken to mitigate noise. To be confirmed in deta

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:26: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:26: residents in advance. Mitigation relating to out-of-hours

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:27: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:27: potentially exceed the noise limits even with mitigation in place,

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:27: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:28: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:29: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:30: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:31: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:31: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:31: Potential for obtrusive glare, upward Mitigation shall be delivered through Compliance with industry To be confirmed in deta

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:31: If nests were discovered, appropriate mitigation would be

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:32: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:32: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:33: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:33: working and emergency procedures for the control and mitigation of erosion and dust

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:33: material until a site investigation has been carried out and appropriate mitigation identified.

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:34: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:34: In the unlikely event that soil gas is identified as a risk requiring vapour / gas mitigation

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:34: measures, monitoring would be carried out and the necessary gas mitigation measures

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:35: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:35: Potential to impact on sensitive Mitigation measure will be developed to ensure that • All To be confirmed in deta

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:36: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:37: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:37: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:37: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:38: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring

EN010082-000516-6.3.19 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Final-2018 - Tracked v3.pdf:40:  description of activity based triggers for implementation of mitigation

EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:3: detected, the Scoping Report states that mitigation

EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (3).pdf:3: Scoping Report states that mitigation measures secured

EN010082-000430-Redcar and Cleveland Local Impact Report - signed_Redacted.pdf:9: the statutory consultees, the implementation of the mitigation proposed within the

EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: effects and provisional mitigation. However, a key purpose of the PEIR was

EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: • Chapter 17 summarises the mitigation measures proposed to avoid,

EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:14: reasons for selecting the chosen option, normally addressed under the of alternatives (e.g. for mitigation

EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:A description of the measures envisaged to A description of the measures envisaged to introduced above and beyond the mitigation are described in Chapter 5.

EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:17:significant adverse effects on the environment. any identified significant adverse effects on addressed under the 2009 EIA Mitigation measures specific to

EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: analysis). That description should explain the specified, monitoring has Mitigation measures are also

EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: the environment are avoided, prevented, cornerstone of mitigation and in Chapter 17 and their means of

EN010082-000172-EN010082-6.2.1-ES Chapter 1-Introduction-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: the mitigation is effective and Requirements.

EN010082-000533-TEES - 180724 - Tees Second Written Questions - Final.pdf:5: mitigation is required.

EN010082-000533-TEES - 180724 - Tees Second Written Questions - Final.pdf:6: Applicant’s HRA screening exercise, on the basis that no mitigation measures

EN010082-000533-TEES - 180724 - Tees Second Written Questions - Final.pdf:6: mitigation to reach the conclusions of the NSER. The ExA notes that the draft DCO

EN010082-000533-TEES - 180724 - Tees Second Written Questions - Final.pdf:6: (R13)(2)(f) refers to '…mitigation measures designed to protect controlled waters’,

EN010082-000533-TEES - 180724 - Tees Second Written Questions - Final.pdf:6: with such measures described in the Updated Mitigation Summary Table REP2-006

EN010082-000533-TEES - 180724 - Tees Second Written Questions - Final.pdf:7: as primary and/or tertiary mitigation. The Applicant has confirmed that the River

EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:3: 3.5 MITIGATION AND C-323/7 – PEOPLE OVER WIND, PETER

EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:6: 001], which included some minor clarifications regarding mitigation and

EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:7: • Applicant - Updated Mitigation Summary Table REP2-006.

EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:12: • Mitigation measures, including implications of C-323/7 – People

EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:23:3.5 Mitigation and C-323/7 – People Over Wind, Peter

EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:23: meaning that mitigation measures (referred to in the judgment as

EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:24: that no mitigation measures have been relied upon REP4-011. In

EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:24: H.1.45 of the NSER REP1-001, which confirms that ‘No mitigation

EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:24: that no “further mitigation” (i.e. further to the embedded measures) is

EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:24: no further mitigation measures in respect to air quality were required

EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:25:3.5.9 Requirement 13(2)(f) of the dDCO REP6-008 refers to “…mitigation

EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:25: Updated Mitigation Summary Table REP2-006. As described in

EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:32: The Applicant has confirmed that the air quality assessment and HRA report take account of “embedded mitigation” in

EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:32: Judgement it is unclear to what extent “embedded mitigation” can be relied on to exclude likely significant effects. NE

EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:33: In addition (as described in footnote (b)), it remains unclear whether embedded mitigation (stack height and turbine

EN010082-000562-Report on the Implications for European Sites.pdf:46:Applicant states that no “further mitigation” (i.e. further to the embedded measures) is required in respect to emissions

EN010082-000373-6.2.5 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 5 - Project Description - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:23: environmental (HSE) management plan. This plan will identify the mitigation

EN010082-000373-6.2.5 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 5 - Project Description - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:23: safety and environmental impacts. Mitigation measures committed to in the

EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:10: states that no further mitigation is required.

EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:10: mitigation measures have been relied upon REP4-011. Can NE

EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:11: on any mitigation to reach the conclusions of the NSER. The ExA notes

EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:11: that the draft DCO (R13)(2)(f) refers to '…mitigation measures designed to

EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:11: Mitigation Summary Table REP2-006 as primary and/or tertiary

EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:11: mitigation. The Applicant has confirmed that the River Tees is

EN010082-000536-8.46 - Tees CCPP - Applicant's Response to ExA's Second WQs - Deadline 5 - FINAL - 07.08.18.pdf:14: monitoring or mitigation will be established in consultation with the RCBC officer.

EN010082-000337-Rule 8 Letter.pdf:14: Feasible and deliverable mitigation and method for securing such

EN010082-000337-Rule 8 Letter.pdf:14: mitigation within the Development Consent Order

EN010082-000337-Rule 8 Letter.pdf:15: d) If any mitigation measures have been relied upon to reach the

EN010082-000337-Rule 8 Letter.pdf:15: should be revised to include the precise mitigation measures relied

EN010082-000650-The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Order 2019 (Final) (Validated) (2).pdf:15: including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required has been submitted

EN010082-000650-The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Order 2019 (Final) (Validated) (2).pdf:16: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000650-The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Order 2019 (Final) (Validated) (2).pdf:16: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000489-Applicant's response to the council's late D2 submission.pdf:8: APP-055 indicates that mitigation measures such plan detailing arrangements to promote employment and skills development WBD

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: mitigation measures listed and an assessment of the significance of residual

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: same mitigation measures would be applied.

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: mitigation would be applied and thus is more than sufficient. Scenario Two

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: mitigation measures required. locations and routes to the Project

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: consideration and mitigation of transport impacts is an essential part of Government’s

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: Additionally, mitigation measures may be required but are secondary to

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:14: effects will be broadly similar to construction and the same mitigation

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:25: provisional mitigation measures suggested to limit the impacts.

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: effects will be broadly similar to construction and the same mitigation

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: assessed further, though the mitigation measures employed for both Scenario

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:29:10.5.5 Mitigation Measures – Construction Phase

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:31:10.5.8 Mitigation Measures – Operational Phase

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:31:10.141 No specific mitigation measures have been identified as necessary as a result

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:32:10.5.13 Summary of Mitigation Measures and Residual Significance of Effects

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: significance of effects or requirements to comply with legislation, mitigation

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: will be required. The mitigation is described and the significance of the

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: residual effect after mitigation applied is assessed.

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:33:Table 10.13 Mitigation and Residual Effects

EN010082-000181-EN010082-6.2.10-ES Chapter 10-Traffic and Transport-Final-November 2017.pdf:33:Phase Receptor and Impacts Mitigation Measures Residual Significance

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:3: 57 4.12.6 itigation mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:7: 5.5. Mitigation and the Sweetman Judgement ……………………………………….. 100

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:30: appropriate objectives and mechanisms for mitigation and compensation.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:36: issue and any mitigation measures proposed. It comments on matters

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:41: relevant satisfactory mitigation where appropriate.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:43: design and mitigation proposals include in the ES and secured in the DCO

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:47: ingestion). As a consequence the mitigation measures from the IAQM

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:47: necessary mitigation measures are secured later in this report.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:48: further mitigation REP2-080.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:49: emissions and mitigation measures will be similar those applied during

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:51: consequence the mitigation measures from the IAQM guidance for a high

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:51:4.9.41. Q1.1.21 PD-008 sought further explanation of how dust mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:51: proposed mitigation measures in the ES air quality chapter APP-049.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:51: mitigation that will be used during the construction works is proven and

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:51: 080]. I am content that dust mitigation during construction have been

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:51: predicted, no further mitigation of air quality emissions is considered

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:52: further mitigation is deemed necessary.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:57: this reason, no specific mitigation is required. It was further agreed that

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:57: mitigation set out in the ES. No matters to resolve were identified.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:57: For this reason a level of mitigation appropriate to a high risk

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:61:4.10.10. No specific mitigation is therefore required, on the basis that all the

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:61: CEMP Table L4.6, REP7-002 contains standard mitigation and good

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:61: the biodiversity mitigation set out in the ES .

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:66: design, mitigation and opportunities for securing wider heritage benefits

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:68: prepare such design and landscape mitigation proposals as can

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:70:4.13.17. Section 11.5 of ES Chapter 11 AS-013 sets out proposed mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:74: mitigation measures proposed to address landscape and visual effects

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:74: landscape and visual effects and provide reasonable mitigation. NPS EN-2

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:75: planning authority (RCBC) to give further consideration to mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:78: mitigation. The effects during operation are expected to be limited to

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:80: to how proposed mitigation would be secured during construction and

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:80: mitigation measures set out in BS 8225 version 2, REP2-008. The

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:80: Applicant also submitted an updated verson of Table 17.1 (‘Mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:80: Summary Table’) REP2-005, including reference to how mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:82: these mitigation measures, the ES concludes that significant effects as a

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:82:4.15.1. NPS EN-1 states that the consideration and mitigation of transport

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:84: implement mitigation measures to remediate the watercourses within the

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:84: to provide specific mitigation measures in respect of relevant water

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:95: mitigation and superseded the NSER submitted with the dDCO

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:98:  Mitigation measures, including implications of C-323/7 – People Over

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:108:5.5. Mitigation and the Sweetman Judgement

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:108: Proposed Development. This ruled that mitigation measures (referred to

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:108: that no mitigation measures have been relied upon REP4-011. In

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:108: mitigation measures have been relied upon to reach the conclusions in

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:109: “further mitigation” (i.e. further to the embedded measures) is required

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:109: 010], which explicitly states that no further mitigation measures in

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:109:5.5.8. Requirement 13(2)(f) of the dDCO REP8-009 refers to “…mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:109: Mitigation Summary Table REP2-006. As described in paragraphs 3.0.8

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:116: development, so there is no need for mitigation. The development

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:122: would be addressed through mitigation. Lateral movement of the stacks

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:122: assessed and what mitigation would be necessary Ref Q1.2.23. The

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:123: minimum measures of dust mitigation during construction. At Deadline 2

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:123: dust mitigation measures in tabular form (Table L4.3). The Applicant

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:123: commented that the dust mitigation that will be used during the

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:123: Mitigation Summary Table APP-059 including air quality are addressed

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:123: securing mitigation during the construction phase(s), through

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:137: 6.2.17 - ES Chapter 17 - Mitigation Schedule - Final - November

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:143: Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:143: Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:174:including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form part

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:174: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (1).pdf:175: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:8: sufficient to warrant further mitigation. Please explain with

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:8: Statements, why further mitigation is not proposed. Environment Agency “Air emissions risk assessment for your

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:9: having a potentially significant effect if unmitigated. Whilst that dust mitigation from IAQM for ‘High Risk’ sites will be adopted, (Application Document Ref: 8.6) submitted at Deadline 2 of the Examination.

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:9: construction mitigation is proposed through the Construction however enforcement under the Environmental Protection Act, for

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:9: reference to air quality impacts and mitigation/control measures

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:9: 7.125 that IAQM mitigation measures will be adopted, why does

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:9: impact would be high without mitigation. Does Requirement 11 in

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:12: indicates that mitigation measures such as skills and training comment after Deadline 3 if necessary.

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:14: mitigation measures stipulated in the ES. Please also give

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:15:  Does the Management and Mitigation Plan (section 1.2.5)

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:15: adequately reflect Table 17.1 of the ES APP-059: Mitigation

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:15:  Update the Mitigation Summary Table (Table 17.1) to cross

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:15: reference each mitigation measure to the relevant paragraph in

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:15: distinguish between embedded mitigation measures and

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:15: ‘further’ mitigation. (Previously suggested in the Scoping

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:15:  Why does the Management and Mitigation Plan (section 1.2.5)

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:15:1.5.16 Section L2.5 of Annex L APP-081 purports to set out mitigation The Council consider that they will be able to provide further comments Please refer to the Applicant’s Response to Examining Authority’s Written Questions

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:15: CEMP. Some of the mitigation / enhancement measures are vague

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:16: the mitigation measures set out in Table 17.1 of the ES?

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:18: the industry sector. Again is it acknowledged that mitigation during

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:19: be undertaken to review all proposed mitigation measures.

EN010082-000476-Applicant’s Comments on Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:21:1.11.5 The proposed mitigation measures identified in Table 10.13 of the The management of AILs to the Wilton International site is not Please refer to the Applicant’s Response to Examining Authority’s Written Questions

EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:15.5 MITIGATION AND MONITORING 15-24

EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: barriers / controls to mitigation risk to an acceptable level (typically referred

EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: mitigation are in place to prevent the source pathway receptor effect from

EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: which could compromise the integrity of embedded mitigation and therefore

EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:16: any significant residual risks and accordingly the need for further mitigation /

EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: major accident without suitable mitigation, management or regulatory

EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:20:15.4.1 Safety and Risk Management Framework - Embedded Mitigation

EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:21: • Mitigation.

EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:22:15.61 The table also includes the management and mitigation measures embedded

EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:23: Risk Hazard Source Consequence Embedded Mitigation Additional mitigation

EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:24:Risk Hazard Source Consequence Embedded Mitigation Additional mitigation

EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:25: Risk Hazard Source Consequence Embedded Mitigation Additional mitigation

EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: effects and propose suitable mitigation methods. Notwithstanding this, it is

EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:26:15.5 MITIGATION AND MONITORING

EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:26:15.70 The mitigation measures required to manage the potential major accident or

EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: thus considered ‘embedded’ mitigation. There are some recommendations to

EN010082-000186-EN010082-6.2.15-ES Chapter 15-Major Accidents-Final-November 2017.pdf:27:15.72 Given the embedded mitigation and management procedures it is considered

EN010082-000524-_DOC_150670236(1)_DEADLINE 4_ DCO (Validated).pdf:15:including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form

EN010082-000524-_DOC_150670236(1)_DEADLINE 4_ DCO (Validated).pdf:15: (2) The ground nesting birds survey and mitigation scheme must include an implementation

EN010082-000524-_DOC_150670236(1)_DEADLINE 4_ DCO (Validated).pdf:15: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000524-_DOC_150670236(1)_DEADLINE 4_ DCO (Validated).pdf:16: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:5: mitigation and as a residual effect (for both Scenario 1 and 2).

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:6: Borough Council is not considered to be sufficient to warrant further mitigation. Please explain with reference to

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:6: Applicant relevant guidance, criteria and National Policy Statements, why further mitigation is not proposed.

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:6: of the ES APP-049 require mitigation measures to be implemented.

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:6: Please provide in tabular form how the proposed mitigation will be secured in the Development

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:7:Q1.1.20 Applicant Explain what (if any) mitigation is proposed to limit the effects of operational emissions on designated

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:7: ecological sites which are sensitive to NOx. If no mitigation is proposed, why not?

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:7: Have any mitigation measures (either embedded or further mitigation) been relied upon to reach the

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:7: Redcar and Cleveland effect if unmitigated. Whilst construction mitigation is proposed through the Construction

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:7: mitigation/control measures within the draft CEMP. The CEMP is also not referred to in the air quality

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:7: chapter of the ES. Given the conclusions in ES paragraph 7.125 that IAQM mitigation measures will be

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:8:Q1.1.24 Applicant In Table 17.1 APP-059 there is only one construction mitigation measure for air quality – why is this

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:11: Natural England although the likelihood of impact is low, the impact would be high without mitigation.

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:16: from those assessed in the ES APP-042 how would the impact be assessed and what mitigation

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:18:  Ensure that all relevant measures included within the Mitigation Summary Table (17.1) [APP-

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:21: a development consent obligation as the EIA has not identified the need for mitigation in order to

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:22:Q1.4.1 Redcar and Cleveland Table 13.1 of the Environmental Statement (ES) APP-055 indicates that mitigation measures such as

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:24:Q1.4.13 Applicant It is indicated in section 13.4.6 of the ES APP-055 that suitable mitigation will reduce, remove or

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:25: on the Project as planned and designed fully inclusive of all proposed mitigation. However, this

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:25: approach does not identify the significance of effects prior to mitigation which is necessary to assess

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:25: the effectiveness of proposed mitigation.

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:25:  Provide a table which identifies the significance of effects prior to mitigation and confirms the

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:27: mitigation measures stipulated in the ES. Please also give consideration to the inclusion of such

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:27:  Does the Management and Mitigation Plan (section 1.2.5) adequately reflect Table 17.1 of the

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:27: ES APP-059: Mitigation Summary Table?

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:27:  Update the Mitigation Summary Table (Table 17.1) to cross reference each mitigation measure

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:28: distinguish between embedded mitigation measures and ‘further’ mitigation. (Previously

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:28:  Why does the Management and Mitigation Plan (section 1.2.5) not address air quality?

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:28:Q1.5.16 Applicant Section L2.5 of Annex L APP-081 purports to set out mitigation and management measures to be

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:29: Redcar and Cleveland included as a minimum in the CEMP. Some of the mitigation / enhancement measures are vague or

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:29: defined. Please provide greater clarity. In addition, how do these measures relate to the mitigation

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:35:Q1.7.25 Applicant Table 15.3 of the ES APP-057 describes the mitigation in the event of a gas transmission pipeline

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:38:Q1.8.8 Applicant Paragraph 11.65 of the ES APP-053 describes the mitigation measures proposed to address

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:42:Q1.9.10 Applicant Table 8.14 of the ES APP-050 sets out the mitigation measures to reduce noise.

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:42: Please set out in tabular form how the individual mitigation measures would be secured through the

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:42: DCO during both construction and operational phases. Please ensure that all mitigation measures

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:44: mitigation required will be developed during the detailed design process to ensure that the plant

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:44:Q1.9.18 Applicant Table 8.14 APP-050 identifies mitigation works for the operational phase including that gas turbines

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:46:Q1.10.10 Applicant How will the HIA mitigation measures set out in 14.7 APP-056 be appropriately secured through the

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:48:Q1.11.5 Applicant The proposed mitigation measures identified in Table 10.13 of the ES APP-056 for abnormal

EN010082-000350-Placeholder for ExA's Written Questions.pdf:52: mitigation’ and ‘the mitigation committed … will ensure no statutory nuisance effects are likely to

EN010082-000369-2.1 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO with proposed change - clean Rev 2.pdf:15:including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form

EN010082-000369-2.1 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO with proposed change - clean Rev 2.pdf:15: (2) The ground nesting birds survey and mitigation scheme must include an implementation

EN010082-000369-2.1 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO with proposed change - clean Rev 2.pdf:17: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000497-_DOC_40064625(1)_DEADLINE 2_ DCO showing changes.pdf:16:including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form

EN010082-000497-_DOC_40064625(1)_DEADLINE 2_ DCO showing changes.pdf:16: (2) The ground nesting birds survey and mitigation scheme must include an implementation

EN010082-000497-_DOC_40064625(1)_DEADLINE 2_ DCO showing changes.pdf:16: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000497-_DOC_40064625(1)_DEADLINE 2_ DCO showing changes.pdf:17: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000589-2.1 - Tees CCPP - Draft Development Consent Order – Final (Version 7).pdf:15:including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form part

EN010082-000589-2.1 - Tees CCPP - Draft Development Consent Order – Final (Version 7).pdf:15: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000589-2.1 - Tees CCPP - Draft Development Consent Order – Final (Version 7).pdf:16: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000316-TEES - Final Rule 6 letter.pdf:8: • Mitigation measures, including the level of detail provided in the

EN010082-000316-TEES - Final Rule 6 letter.pdf:18:• Feasible and deliverable mitigation and method for securing such

EN010082-000316-TEES - Final Rule 6 letter.pdf:18: mitigation within the Development Consent Order

EN010082-000316-TEES - Final Rule 6 letter.pdf:19: d) If any mitigation measures have been relied upon to reach the

EN010082-000316-TEES - Final Rule 6 letter.pdf:19: should be revised to include the precise mitigation measures relied

EN010082-000316-TEES - Final Rule 6 letter.pdf:26:5.6 Table 15.3 of the ES APP-057 describes the mitigation in the

EN010082-000316-TEES - Final Rule 6 letter.pdf:26: (pre and post mitigation) are compared.

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:8: mitigation for a High Risk site.

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:8: Air quality and dust levels should be considered not only on site but also off-site, including along access roads Mitigation measures are set out in

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:12: Redcar and Cleveland Borough Air Quality: The air quality assessment has screened out a number of emissions as dictated by the Secretary of Construction phase mitigation is

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:12: for the industry sector. Again is it acknowledged that mitigation during the construction phase will be

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:13: early stage and that design and mitigation decisions will satisfy both regimes.

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:26: mitigation based on the potential for effects. The assessment of the potential

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:38: consequence the mitigation measures for a high risk site will need to be

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:43: considered to be sufficient to warrant further mitigation.

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:45: dust, PM 10 and PM 2.5 emissions and impacts, and mitigation will be similar to

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52:7.4.8 Summary of Mitigation Measures and Residual Significance of Effects

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52:7.124 No specific mitigation measures are required related to traffic and air quality.

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52:7.125 Mitigation is required for mitigation of dust, PM 10 and PM 2.5 emissions during

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52: On this basis, best practice mitigation will need to be adopted. Dust, PM 10 and

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52: PM 2.5 mitigation measures from the following guidance document for ‘High

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52:7.126 No further mitigation measures are required over and above the base Project

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52: effects or requirements to comply with legislation, mitigation will be required.

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52: The mitigation is described and the significance of the residual effect after

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52: mitigation applied is assessed.

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:53:Table 7.19 Mitigation and Residual Effects

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:53: Phase Receptor and Impacts Mitigation Measures Residual Significance

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:53: Construction Impacts associated with dust Mitigation as per IAQM (2014) guidance At worst Minor, or Not significant

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:53: but due to low PEC no mitigation required

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:53: identified. Therefore no mitigation required.

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:53: Decommissioning Impacts associated with dust Mitigation as per IAQM (2014) guidance (or At worst Minor, or Not significant

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:54: As such mitigation measures are recommended to control these emissions;

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:54: specific mitigation is required above and beyond that inherent in good design

EN010082-000380-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 Air Quality - tracked Rev 2 with figures.pdf:54: impacted. As such mitigation measures are recommended to control these

EN010082-000554-8.51 - Draft DCO - Clean (v5).pdf:13: (4) No phase of the authorised development may commence until either additional mitigation

EN010082-000554-8.51 - Draft DCO - Clean (v5).pdf:13:planning authority/environment agency that no additional mitigation measures are required. Any

EN010082-000554-8.51 - Draft DCO - Clean (v5).pdf:13:additional mitigation measures must be carried out as agreed.

EN010082-000554-8.51 - Draft DCO - Clean (v5).pdf:15:including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form

EN010082-000554-8.51 - Draft DCO - Clean (v5).pdf:15: (2) The ground nesting birds survey and mitigation scheme must include an implementation

EN010082-000554-8.51 - Draft DCO - Clean (v5).pdf:15: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000554-8.51 - Draft DCO - Clean (v5).pdf:16: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000144-EN010082-2.1-Draft Development Consent Order-Final-November 2017.pdf:14:and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form phase of the construction environment

EN010082-000144-EN010082-2.1-Draft Development Consent Order-Final-November 2017.pdf:15:(2) The ground nesting birds survey and mitigation scheme must include an implementation timetable, and

EN010082-000144-EN010082-2.1-Draft Development Consent Order-Final-November 2017.pdf:16:assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect controlled waters) to be

EN010082-000650-The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Order 2019 (Final) (Validated) (3).pdf:15: including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required has been submitted

EN010082-000650-The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Order 2019 (Final) (Validated) (3).pdf:16: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000650-The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Order 2019 (Final) (Validated) (3).pdf:16: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000552-8.53 - Explanatory Memorandum - Clean (v3).pdf:18: mitigation scheme to be implemented in the event ground nesting birds

EN010082-000552-8.53 - Explanatory Memorandum - Clean (v3).pdf:19: either assumes as standard best practice mitigation or recommends as

EN010082-000552-8.53 - Explanatory Memorandum - Clean (v3).pdf:19: additional mitigation see Chapter 17 APP-059

EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:13:2.110 Table 15.3 of the ES APP-057 describes the mitigation in the event of a gas transmission pipeline

EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:14: (pre and post mitigation) are compared.

EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:15: sources, progressively incorporating additional mitigation in order to achieve acceptable levels at the

EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:15: south orientation presented in the Application, together with the mitigation, achieves acceptable levels

EN010082-000398-8 7 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case (ISH 10 04 18) - FINAL.pdf:17: impacts additional mitigation would be included to reduce the noise level in the approved

EN010082-000477-Applicant’s Comments on the Environment Agency’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:16: account? habitat enhancement framework that aims to deliver WFD mitigation employed, no significant adverse effects are predicted in relation to ecology – see ES, Volume

EN010082-000477-Applicant’s Comments on the Environment Agency’s Responses to the Examiner’s Written Questions D3.pdf:16: No specific mitigation is therefore required, on the basis that all the effects of the Proposed

EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: identified, proposed mitigation measures listed and an assessment of the

EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: Scoping Opinion should be described and assessed in the ES. The Applicant’s attention is drawn (see Section 9.5). Other than standard mitigation to be

EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: consider sites which have been designated for their geological importance. The to the breeding bird season) no other specific mitigation is

EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: Applicant is advised to discuss potential effects on LWSs and any mitigation required, as all effects were found to be ‘Not significant’.

EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:7:Scoping Opinion describe in the ES the ecological mitigation proposals for the Proposed not require mitigation.

EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: The Applicant should also consider the potential to deliver mitigation through

EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: appropriate, how the delivery of all mitigation measures is secured.

EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: information on the interpretation of the mitigation hierarchy (avoid – mitigate

EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:34:9.5.7 Summary of Mitigation Measures

EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:34:9.89 No specific mitigation is required, as all the effects of the Project are Not

EN010082-000180-EN010082-6.2.9-ES Chapter 9-Ecology and Nature Conservation-Final-November 2017.pdf:34: standard mitigation and good practice in relation to advice on construction

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: with mitigation or looking at different mitigation

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:to assess or to prioritise in the assessment (scoping in mitigation options, especially when after initial assessment some

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:In predicting magnitude the effect of all the project mitigation

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:criteria and standards. For exceedances, further mitigation In the absence of quantified standards, significance can be evaluated through

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:medium, large) may be adopted based on widely recognised magnitude can be reduced further. Different mitigation options may be examined and

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:8:Some activities will result in changes to the environment that design to develop suitable mitigation and re-evaluating impacts and effects.

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: edge; this mitigation feature will be retained for the Project and an additional

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:15:0.48 Overall, no specific mitigation is required above and beyond that inherent in

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:15: optimisation of the layout of the site and design of plant mitigation including:

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:15: • on-plant mitigation such as placing key items in buildings or enclosures

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:15:0.53 As a result of the design, layout and embedded mitigation measures the

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:19: are amenable to mitigation measures.

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:19:0.76 However, in addition to those mitigation measures set out in the ES for the

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:20: embedded mitigation and management within the design of the Project was

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:20: was also considered. Where necessary, additional mitigation has been

EN010082-000170-EN010082-6.1-ES Non Technical Summary-Final-November 2017.pdf:21:0.83 The assessment concluded that appropriate mitigation, management and/or

EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf:8: significant noise impacts. The ExA noted the mitigation measures such as site layout, enclosures and

EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf:9:2.28 The ExA noted that the scope of the noise mitigation measures would be agreed through a requirement in

EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf:11: Requirement 13 and dust mitigation measures. The ExA confirmed that his concerns had been resolved

EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf:12: carried out by the Applicant, on the basis that no mitigation measures have been relied upon.

EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf:12:2.87 CB referred to paragraph H1.45 HRA REP1-001, which confirms explicitly that no mitigation has been

EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf:12:2.88 CB referenced ES Chapter 7 paragraph 7.126 [APP-049which explicitly states that no further mitigation

EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf:14: Mitigation relating to out-of-hours working/abnormal or emergency construction traffic (WQ 1.9.19)

EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf:14: notified to the council and local communities in advance and be subject to noise mitigation measures set

EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf:14: in terms of noise mitigation, within any constraints dictated by the need to protect the safety of the local

EN010082-000517-8.43 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Env Matters ISH - FINAL - 05.07.18.pdf:14:2.113 The ExA requested that this differentiation is worked into the proposed mitigation measures.

EN010082-000537-8.47 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Clean (v4).pdf:13: (4) No phase of the authorised development may commence until either additional mitigation

EN010082-000537-8.47 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Clean (v4).pdf:13:planning authority/environment agency that no additional mitigation measures are required. Any

EN010082-000537-8.47 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Clean (v4).pdf:13:additional mitigation measures must be carried out.as agreed.

EN010082-000537-8.47 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Clean (v4).pdf:15:including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form

EN010082-000537-8.47 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Clean (v4).pdf:15: (2) The ground nesting birds survey and mitigation scheme must include an implementation

EN010082-000537-8.47 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Clean (v4).pdf:15: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000537-8.47 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Clean (v4).pdf:16: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000595-8.71 - Tees CCPP - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (Version 4).pdf:20: mitigation scheme to be implemented in the event ground nesting birds are

EN010082-000595-8.71 - Tees CCPP - Explanatory Memorandum - Tracked (Version 4).pdf:21: mitigation or recommends as additional mitigation see Chapter 17

EN010082-000197-EN010082-6.3.7-ES Annex D4-Waste Management Plan-Final-November 2017.pdf:7:D1.3 WASTE MINIMISATION ACTIONS AND MITIGATION

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:3:L4.5 MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN L18

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:4: A range of ‘standard’ or best practice mitigation and construction management

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:4: ensure that such mitigation measures are carried out and to demonstrate that they

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:5: process through finalised construction methods and other mitigation

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:5:  monitoring of effectiveness of mitigation measures;

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:6: environmental legislation and the mitigation measures set out within the ES. It

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:13: This includes mitigation that is embedded into the design of the Project through

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:15:  the environmental controls and mitigation measures in the final CEMP;

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:17: enable the effectiveness of environmental mitigation to be evaluated, and if

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:19: could potentially exceed the noise limits even with mitigation in place, the

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:19: Detailed mitigation measures would be determined once detailed construction

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:21:L4.5 MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:21:L50 This section of the framework CEMP sets out the mitigation and management

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:21: monitoring each mitigation/ enhancement measure.

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:22: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:23: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirements Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:24: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:25: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:25: Vibration due to construction Mitigation measures will be undertaken to mitigate noise. To be confirmed in detailed To be confirmed in detailed

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:26: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:26: residents in advance. Mitigation relating to out-of-hours RCBC officer based

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:27: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:27: potentially exceed the noise limits even with mitigation in place, out of hours activity

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:28: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:28: mitigation will be

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:28: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:29: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:30: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:31: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:31: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:31: Potential for obtrusive glare, upward Mitigation shall be delivered through Compliance with industry To be confirmed in detailed To be confirmed in detailed

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:31: mitigation would be implemented to ensure that they are not

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:32: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:32: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:33: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:33: working and emergency procedures for the control and mitigation of erosion and dust

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:33: material until a site investigation has been carried out and appropriate mitigation identified.

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:33: In the unlikely event that soil gas is identified as a risk requiring vapour / gas mitigation

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:33: measures, monitoring would be carried out and the necessary gas mitigation measures

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:34: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:34: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:34: Potential to impact on sensitive Mitigation measure will be developed to ensure that All To be confirmed in detailed To be confirmed in detailed

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:35: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:36: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:36: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:37: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:37: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000577-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP - Version 5 (Tracked).pdf:38:  description of activity based triggers for implementation of mitigation

EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library (1).pdf:6: 6.2.17 - ES Chapter 17 - Mitigation Schedule - Final - November

EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library (1).pdf:12: Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table

EN010082-000274-Internal Examination Library (1).pdf:12: Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table

EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:2: assessment and to include the necessary mitigation.

EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: tested mitigation measures (e.g. for waste management, storage of fuels

EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: These mitigation measures will also serve to protect surface water

EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: mitigation. As a result of this embedded mitigation the resulting noise

EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: assessment concluded that appropriate mitigation, management and

EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:5: cumulative effects demonstrated that the mitigation measures planned for the

EN010082-000189-EN010082-6.2.18-ES_Chapter 18-Conclusions-Final-November 2017.pdf:5:18.12 The ES sets out the mitigation measures that the Project is committed to

EN010082-000474-Historic England D3 Submission.pdf:1: historic environment; the nature and design of any required mitigation measures;

EN010082-000409-8.14 - Table 3.2 update.pdf:1: this basis, best practice mitigation will need to be adopted. Dust,

EN010082-000409-8.14 - Table 3.2 update.pdf:1: PM10 and PM2.5 mitigation measures from the following guidance

EN010082-000409-8.14 - Table 3.2 update.pdf:1: mitigation in place, and a comprehensive Construction

EN010082-000409-8.14 - Table 3.2 update.pdf:2: mitigation. The residual effect would also be not be

EN010082-000409-8.14 - Table 3.2 update.pdf:2: significant direct effects were predicted (pre-mitigation) in

EN010082-000409-8.14 - Table 3.2 update.pdf:3: change from scoping. of two trains compared to one. effects (pre-mitigation) on qualifying interest features of

EN010082-000409-8.14 - Table 3.2 update.pdf:3: scoping. the effects pre-mitigation and the residual effects

EN010082-000409-8.14 - Table 3.2 update.pdf:3: development in comparison to Scenario 2. mitigation and residual) and therefore it can be deduced that

EN010082-000409-8.14 - Table 3.2 update.pdf:4: backgrounds separated by up mitigation would be applied and thus is more than o Scenario Two – first CCGT operational, construction of

EN010082-000409-8.14 - Table 3.2 update.pdf:4: in no significant pre-mitigation or residual effects. Scenario 2

EN010082-000199-EN010082-6.3.9-ES Annex E2-Greenhouse Gas Statement_Final-November 2017.pdf:3:E1.6 The very high (63.7%) efficiency of the Project illustrates that mitigation of

EN010082-000196-EN010082-6.3.6-ES Annex D3-Site Condition Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:35: regarding capping, monitoring or gas mitigation measures are provided. No further assessment of

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:2:1.1.15 warrant further mitigation. Please explain with reference to relevant

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:2: guidance, criteria and National Policy Statements, why further mitigation

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:2: mitigation is proposed through the Construction Environmental

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:2: impacts and mitigation/control measures within the draft CEMP. The

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:2: conclusions in ES paragraph 7.125 that IAQM mitigation measures will be

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:3:1.2.11 likelihood of impact is low, the impact would be high without mitigation.

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:6: mitigation measures such as skills and training programmes would

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:9: the CEMP to include all relevant mitigation measures stipulated in the

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:9:  Does the Management and Mitigation Plan (section 1.2.5) adequately

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:9: reflect Table 17.1 of the ES APP-059: Mitigation Summary Table?

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:9:  Update the Mitigation Summary Table (Table 17.1) to cross reference

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:9: each mitigation measure to the relevant paragraph in the framework

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:9: mitigation measures and ‘further’ mitigation. (Previously suggested in

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:9:  Why does the Management and Mitigation Plan (section 1.2.5) not

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:10: Section L2.5 of Annex L APP-081 purports to set out mitigation and

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:10: of the mitigation / enhancement measures are vague or simply a

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:10: addition, how do these measures relate to the mitigation measures set

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:17: The proposed mitigation measures identified in Table 10.13 of the ES

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:21:The applicant has produced a Statutory Nuisance Statement which states that dust mitigation from IAQM for ‘High Risk’ sites will be adopted, however

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:33:which is BAT for the industry sector. Again is it acknowledged that mitigation during the construction phase will be required and will be incorporated into the

EN010082-000429-Copy of EXA Questions 1.pdf:33:to review all proposed mitigation measures.

EN010082-000498-_DOC_40066241(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Tracked).pdf:17: mitigation scheme to be implemented in the event ground nesting birds

EN010082-000498-_DOC_40066241(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Tracked).pdf:18: standard best practice mitigation or recommends as additional mitigation.

EN010082-000498-_DOC_40066241(1)_DEADLINE 2_ EM v2 (Formatted - Tracked).pdf:18: best practice mitigation or recommends as additional mitigation see

EN010082-000389-7 3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - DRAFT.pdf:20: the phase 1 CCGT itself during construction of the phase 2 CCGT. As such, mitigation measures have

EN010082-000389-7 3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - DRAFT.pdf:20: mitigation, will be (at worst) minor and not significant.

EN010082-000389-7 3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - DRAFT.pdf:20: insignificant. Overall, it is agreed that no specific mitigation is required above and beyond that inherent

EN010082-000389-7 3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - DRAFT.pdf:20: boundary at that time. Human receptors are too distant to be impacted. As such, mitigation measures are

EN010082-000389-7 3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - DRAFT.pdf:21: reduce noise at Grangetown. On-plant mitigation, such as placing key items in buildings or enclosures,

EN010082-000389-7 3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - DRAFT.pdf:21: has also been employed. As a result of these embedded mitigation measures, the resulting noise levels are

EN010082-000389-7 3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - DRAFT.pdf:25: No specific mitigation is therefore required, as all the effects of the Proposed Development are not

EN010082-000389-7 3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - DRAFT.pdf:25: further developed to include standard mitigation and good practice in relation to advice on construction

EN010082-000389-7 3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - DRAFT.pdf:28: For situations where the potential for major accidents was identified, the embedded mitigation and

EN010082-000389-7 3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - DRAFT.pdf:28: accident situations was also considered. Where necessary, additional mitigation have been identified to

EN010082-000389-7 3 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with Redcar Cleveland - DRAFT.pdf:28: The assessment concludes that appropriate mitigation, management and/or regulatory controls would be

EN010082-000387-7 1 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with TVWT - Signed_Redacted.pdf:9: 2.17 No specific mitigation is therefore required, as all the effects of the Proposed Development are not

EN010082-000387-7 1 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with TVWT - Signed_Redacted.pdf:9: Ref. 6.3 – Annex L) has been prepared and would be developed to include standard mitigation and

EN010082-000387-7 1 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with TVWT - Signed_Redacted.pdf:9: significant and acceptable, and that no specific mitigation is necessary.

EN010082-000387-7 1 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with TVWT - Signed_Redacted.pdf:10: plant mitigation, such as placing key items in buildings or enclosures, has also been employed. As a

EN010082-000387-7 1 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with TVWT - Signed_Redacted.pdf:10: result of these embedded mitigation measures, the resulting noise levels are not expected to result in

EN010082-000387-7 1 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with TVWT - Signed_Redacted.pdf:11: comprise mitigation measures. This is on the basis that impacts on ecology associated with the

EN010082-000387-7 1 - Tees CCPP - SoCG with TVWT - Signed_Redacted.pdf:11: Proposed Development are not significant and acceptable, and no specific mitigation is necessary.

EN010082-000475-The Applicant's Cover letter_Redacted.pdf:2:measurement, maximum permitted noise levels and mitigation measures. This secures the ability of

EN010082-000650-The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Order 2019 (Final) (Validated) (1).pdf:15: including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required has been submitted

EN010082-000650-The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Order 2019 (Final) (Validated) (1).pdf:16: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000650-The Tees Combined Cycle Power Plant Order 2019 (Final) (Validated) (1).pdf:16: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000594-8.69 - Draft Development Consent Order - Tracked (Version 7).pdf:15:proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form phasepart of the

EN010082-000594-8.69 - Draft Development Consent Order - Tracked (Version 7).pdf:15: (2) The ground nesting birds survey and mitigation schemestatement must include an

EN010082-000594-8.69 - Draft Development Consent Order - Tracked (Version 7).pdf:15: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures designed

EN010082-000594-8.69 - Draft Development Consent Order - Tracked (Version 7).pdf:16: and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect controlled

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:6:firstly in the absence of mitigation and then subject to recommended mitigation.

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:12:considers the potential ecological impacts without mitigation. It then lists a series of appropriate

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:12:mitigation measures and re-assesses the impacts on the basis of that mitigation being implemented.

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:13:Little Ringed Plover, without mitigation. Mitigation may therefore be required to ensure compliance

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:13:Mitigation

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:13:birds were found to be present. Subject to this mitigation the risk of harm to nesting birds is

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:13:ii) No other mitigation is required for works on the Project site.

EN010082-000203-EN010082-6.3.13-ES Annex G2-Ecological Appraisal_Final.pdf:13:avoided through the use of the mitigation described above.

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:8: mitigation for a High Risk site.

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:8: Air quality and dust levels should be considered not only on site but also off-site, including along access roads Mitigation measures are set out in

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:12:Redcar and Cleveland Borough Air Quality: The air quality assessment has screened out a number of emissions as dictated by the Secretary of Construction phase mitigation is

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:12: for the industry sector. Again is it acknowledged that mitigation during the construction phase will be required

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:13: early stage and that design and mitigation decisions will satisfy both regimes.

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:26: mitigation based on the potential for effects. The assessment of the potential

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:38: consequence the mitigation measures for a high risk site will need to be

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:43: considered to be sufficient to warrant further mitigation.

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:45: dust, PM 10 and PM 2.5 emissions and impacts, and mitigation will be similar to

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52:7.4.8 Summary of Mitigation Measures and Residual Significance of Effects

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52:7.124 No specific mitigation measures are required related to traffic and air quality.

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52:7.125 Mitigation is required for mitigation of dust, PM 10 and PM 2.5 emissions during

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52: On this basis, best practice mitigation will need to be adopted. Dust, PM 10 and

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52: PM 2.5 mitigation measures from the following guidance document for ‘High

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52:7.126 No further mitigation measures are required over and above the base Project

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52: effects or requirements to comply with legislation, mitigation will be required.

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52: The mitigation is described and the significance of the residual effect after

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:52: mitigation applied is assessed.

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:53:Table 7.19 Mitigation and Residual Effects

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:53:Phase Receptor and Impacts Mitigation Measures Residual Significance

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:53:Construction Impacts associated with dust Mitigation as per IAQM (2014) guidance At worst Minor, or Not significant

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:53: due to low PEC no mitigation required

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:53: identified. Therefore no mitigation required.

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:53:Decommissioning Impacts associated with dust Mitigation as per IAQM (2014) guidance (or At worst Minor, or Not significant

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:54: As such mitigation measures are recommended to control these emissions;

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:54: specific mitigation is required above and beyond that inherent in good design

EN010082-000374-6.2.7 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 7 - Air Quality - clean Rev 2 with figures.pdf:54: impacted. As such mitigation measures are recommended to control these

EN010082-000368-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3.pdf:10: Chapter 17 Mitigation

EN010082-000651-Tees CCPP HRA FINAL April 2019 (3).pdf:6: that mitigation measures (referred to in the judgment as measures which are intended

EN010082-000651-Tees CCPP HRA FINAL April 2019 (3).pdf:6: mitigation measures as referred to in the Sweetman Judgement, but rather they should

EN010082-000651-Tees CCPP HRA FINAL April 2019 (3).pdf:6: respect of the definition of mitigation measures. The Secretary of State also notes

EN010082-000538-8.48 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Tracked (v4).pdf:13:mitigation measures put forward under sub-paragraph (3) are agreed or it has been agreed

EN010082-000538-8.48 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Tracked (v4).pdf:13:with the relevant planning authority/environment agency that no additional mitigation

EN010082-000538-8.48 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Tracked (v4).pdf:13:measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures must be carried out.as agreed.

EN010082-000538-8.48 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Tracked (v4).pdf:15:including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form

EN010082-000538-8.48 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Tracked (v4).pdf:15: (2) The ground nesting birds survey and mitigation scheme must include an implementation

EN010082-000538-8.48 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Tracked (v4).pdf:15: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000538-8.48 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Tracked (v4).pdf:16: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000588-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3 - FINAL.pdf:9: 6.2.17 Environmental Statement – Chapter 17 Mitigation Register 1.0 1.0 22.11.17 – Original Submission

EN010082-000588-1.2 - Tees CCPP - Application Guide - Rev 3 - FINAL.pdf:10: 8.10 Updated Mitigation Table - 1.0 16.05.18 – Deadline 2

EN010082-000205-EN010082-6.3.15-ES Annex H-HRA-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: any mitigation built in to the project design.

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:2:11.5 MITIGATION 49

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: mitigation measures to reduce the impacts are discussed in Section 11.4 and

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:7:response relevant. For example, landscape mitigation could have impacts on ecological receptors.

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: associated with a fossil fuel generating station. Mitigation is therefore to reduce the

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: account of mitigation measures committed to at this stage of the design

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: process, with Section 11.5 summarising that mitigation).

EN010082-000182-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Final-November 2017.pdf:50:11.5 MITIGATION

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:2:11.5 MITIGATION 49

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:3: mitigation measures to reduce the impacts are discussed in Section 11.4 and

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:7:response relevant. For example, landscape mitigation could have impacts on ecological receptors.

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:10: associated with a fossil fuel generating station. Mitigation is therefore to reduce the

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:32: account of mitigation measures committed to at this stage of the design

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:32: process, with Section 11.5 summarising that mitigation).

EN010082-000290-EN010082-6.2.11-ES_Chapter 11-Land and Visual Amenity-Rev 2 -January 2018.pdf:50:11.5 MITIGATION

EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:3: detected, the Scoping Report states that mitigation

EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening (2).pdf:3: Scoping Report states that mitigation measures secured

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:5:5.5 MITIGATION 39

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:14: mitigation measures, scope of the assessment

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:38: require mitigation to create acceptable conditions.

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:44:to assess or to prioritise in the assessment (scoping in mitigation

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:44:In predicting magnitude the effect of all the project mitigation

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:44:criteria and standards. For exceedances, further mitigation In the absence of quantified standards, significance can be evaluated through

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:44:medium, large) may be adopted based on widely recognised magnitude can be reduced further. Different mitigation options may be examined and

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:44:Some activities will result in changes to the environment that design to develop suitable mitigation and re-evaluating impacts and effects.

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:45:5.5 MITIGATION

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:46: EIA, the specialists undertaking the assessments will identify mitigation

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:46: Residual effects, once mitigation measures have been incorporated into the

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:46: as appropriate. Where effects are still significant, the mitigation options

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:46: In addition to the specific mitigation measures identified for each of the

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:51:adopted with mitigation measures developed accordingly.

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:56:of further mitigation measures if assessed to be necessary.

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:56:operational effects and details of further mitigation if assessed to be necessary.

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:56:mitigation plan to be agreed with the local authorities prior to the onset of

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:56:decommissioning. Designing the decommissioning mitigation in the future

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:58:strategic drainage objectives, additional mitigation will be incorporated into

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:58:the Project. If necessary, such mitigation will aim to apply a SUDS approach

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:58:Potential Mitigation Measures

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:58:Potential embedded mitigation measures which will be included during the

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:59: otherwise for further, specific mitigation measures will be determined

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:67: In the event that contamination is detected, mitigation measures (see below

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:67:6.3.6 Mitigation and Monitoring

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:68:during the removal of existing foundations and mitigation measures will be

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:68:Permanent Mitigation

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:68:Construction Mitigation

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:68: site, measures will be put in place to provide suitable mitigation. This

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:69: Implementation of the mitigation measures identified above will ensure that

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:70: A summary of the residual effects, monitoring and mitigation is provided in

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:70:Table 6.1 Ground Conditions and Contaminated Land Mitigation and Monitoring

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:70: Impact Type Key Potential Mitigation Residual Means by which

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:70: Effects Effect mitigation will

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:70: mitigation)

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:77: Without mitigation the ecological effects that are assessed as being likely to be

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:78: mitigation measures will be recommended to address any adverse effects

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:85:this effect occurring, by use of appropriate mitigation such as by altering the

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:91: of significant effects arising, and provide mitigation to control emissions to an

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:93: remains surviving on the Project site and that no mitigation measures would

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:124: mitigation measures of known effectiveness will be put in place, the EIA will

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:125:and flood risk assessment / mitigation of the flood risk and drainage including from / to natu

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:125: Mitigation will be defined in a Decommissio

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:133:  suggest mitigation if tenable / deliverable.

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:134:  Stage 6: proposed mitigation for impacts that contribute to cumulative

EN010082-000191-EN010082-6.3.1-ES Annex A-Scoping Report-Final-November 2017.pdf:135:informing the Project design and its environmental mitigation. Figure A1.1

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:2: mitigation measures to reduce the impacts are discussed in Section 11.4 and

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:6: response relevant. For example, landscape mitigation could have impacts on ecological receptors.

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:9: associated with a fossil fuel generating station. Mitigation is therefore to reduce the

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:31: account of mitigation measures committed to at this stage of the design

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:31: process, with Section 11.5 summarising that mitigation).

EN010082-000381-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 LVIA - tracked Rev 3 with figures.pdf:49:11.5 MITIGATION

EN010082-000549-Natural England Response to D5.pdf:3: mitigation is required. unsure whether certain matters are avoidance or reduction

EN010082-000549-Natural England Response to D5.pdf:3: basis that no mitigation measures have been relied upon [REP4-

EN010082-000549-Natural England Response to D5.pdf:3: Agency relying on any mitigation to reach the conclusions of the NSER. guidance from the courts at the moment as to what

EN010082-000549-Natural England Response to D5.pdf:3: Natural England '…mitigation measures designed to protect controlled waters’,

EN010082-000549-Natural England Response to D5.pdf:3: with such measures described in the Updated Mitigation

EN010082-000549-Natural England Response to D5.pdf:3: mitigation. The Applicant has confirmed that the River Tees is unsure whether certain matters are avoidance or reduction

EN010082-000467-160518 EN010082 Environment Agency Response to ExAs Written Questions.pdf:15: framework that aims to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives. We would welcome any

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:3:L4.5 MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN L18

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:4: A range of ‘standard’ or best practice mitigation and construction management

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:4: ensure that such mitigation measures are carried out and to demonstrate that they

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:5: process through finalised construction methods and other mitigation

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:5:  monitoring of effectiveness of mitigation measures;

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:6: environmental legislation and the mitigation measures set out within the ES. It

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:13: This includes mitigation that is embedded into the design of the Project through

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:15:  the environmental controls and mitigation measures in the final CEMP;

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:17: enable the effectiveness of environmental mitigation to be evaluated, and if

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:19: could potentially exceed the noise limits even with mitigation in place, the

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:19: Detailed mitigation measures would be determined once detailed construction

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:21:L4.5 MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:21:L50 This section of the framework CEMP sets out the mitigation and management

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:21: monitoring each mitigation/ enhancement measure.

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:22: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:23: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirements Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:24: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:25: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:25: Vibration due to construction Mitigation measures will be undertaken to mitigate noise. To be confirmed in detailed To be confirmed in detailed

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:26: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:26: residents in advance. Mitigation relating to out-of-hours

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:27: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:27: potentially exceed the noise limits even with mitigation in place,

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:27: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:28: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:29: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:30: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:30: Potential for obtrusive glare, upward Mitigation shall be delivered through Compliance with industry To be confirmed in detailed To be confirmed in detailed

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:30: mitigation would be implemented to ensure that they are not

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:30: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:31: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:31: working and emergency procedures for the control and mitigation of erosion and dust

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:32: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:32: material until a site investigation has been carried out and appropriate mitigation identified.

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:32: In the unlikely event that soil gas is identified as a risk requiring vapour / gas mitigation

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:32: measures, monitoring would be carried out and the necessary gas mitigation measures

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:33: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:33: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:33: Potential to impact on sensitive Mitigation measure will be developed to ensure that All To be confirmed in detailed To be confirmed in detailed

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:34: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:35: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:35: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:35: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:36: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000558-6.3.20 - Annex L CEMP Clean v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:37:  description of activity based triggers for implementation of mitigation

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:2: mitigation measures to reduce the impacts are discussed in Section 11.4 and

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:6:response relevant. For example, landscape mitigation could have impacts on ecological receptors.

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:9: associated with a fossil fuel generating station. Mitigation is therefore to reduce the

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:31: account of mitigation measures committed to at this stage of the design

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:31: process, with Section 11.5 summarising that mitigation).

EN010082-000375-6.2.11 - Tees CCPP - ES Chapter 11 - LVIA - clean Rev 3 with figures.pdf:49:11.5 MITIGATION

EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:4:Without appropriate mitigation and controls, with the exception of ‘keeping of

EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:4:Any potential statutory nuisances would be controlled through the mitigation

EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:7: (ES), including any relevant mitigation measures and residual effects, whether

EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: implementation of the identified mitigation measures that the Project has

EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:9: arise for this type of project and/or the mitigation committed to by the Project

EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:10:1.16 As set out in Volume I, Chapter 7 of the ES, with the proposed mitigation in

EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: mitigation from IAQM (2014) for ‘High Risk’ sites will be adopted, which will

EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:10: mitigation.

EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:10:1.19 No further mitigation measures are therefore required for operation over and

EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:11:1.29 Mitigation measures which are embedded in the Project design include:

EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: implementation of the identified embedded mitigation measures.

EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: appropriate mitigation and management systems as described in this

EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: Mitigation measures for the Project will be secured by the appropriate DCO

EN010082-000215-EN010082-5.9-Statutory Nuisance Statement-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: appropriate mitigation.

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: landscaping areas and potential off-site mitigation or compensation

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:19: describe the control processes and mitigation procedures for storing

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:24: the specific mitigation measures proposed to avoid or reduce those

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:25: identified in the ES which measures are ‘embedded’ mitigation and

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:25: which are ‘further’ mitigation measures, and these terms should each

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:26:  set out the mitigation measures proposed (in addition to

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: enable the Applicant to cross-refer the proposed mitigation to

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:26:  identify and collate the residual effects following mitigation on

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: sites and their locations, together with any mitigation or

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:29: also states that if contamination is found on the site mitigation

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:31: considered to constitute a significant effect, pre-mitigation effects are

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:31:3.50 Column 5 of Table 6.1 refers to the delivery of mitigation through

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: DCO. Proposed mitigation measures must be clearly identified and

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:32:3.51 The proposals considered under the heading of ‘Permanent Mitigation’

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:32:3.52 The SoS notes the intention for some proposed mitigation measures

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: relevant construction mitigation will be ‘defined’ in a CEMP. Draft

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:33: to discuss potential effects on LWSs and any mitigation proposed with

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:33: Applicant intends to describe in the ES the ecological mitigation

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:33: The Applicant should also consider the potential to deliver mitigation

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:33: mitigation measures is secured.

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:39: Proposed Development and any mitigation measures such as skills

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:40:3.100 Section 6.9.3 of the Scoping Report confirms that mitigation

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:41: other ES assessments as relevant. For example, landscape mitigation

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:45: agree appropriate requirements to secure necessary mitigation. It

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:45: term mitigation or compensation proposals.

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:49: relevant statutory consultees and take into account mitigation

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:59: options and alternative mitigation measures. The justification for the

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:59: Mitigation Measures

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:59:A1.44 Mitigation measures may fall into certain categories namely: avoid;

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:59: Mitigation measures should not be developed in isolation as they may

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:59: out any mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce and where

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:59: residual effects with mitigation in place. Any proposed mitigation

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:59:A1.45 The effectiveness of mitigation should be apparent. Only mitigation

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:59:A1.46 It would be helpful if the mitigation measures proposed could be

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:59: mitigation measures proposed either in each of the specialist reports

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:59: or collating these within a summary section on mitigation.

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:60: mitigation actions. Where effective consultation is carried out in

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:60: may be able to identify possible mitigation measures to address the

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:61: Table X: to identify and collate the residual impacts after mitigation

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:61: Table XXX: to set out the mitigation measures proposed, as well as

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:61: the Applicant to cross refer mitigation to specific provisions proposed

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:61: with any mitigation or compensation measures, are to be found in the

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:83: design of any required mitigation measures; and opportunities for securing wider

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:90: sites and should identify such mitigation measures as may be required in order to avoid,

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:90:proposals for mitigation of any impacts and if appropriate, compensation measures. Contact the

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:91:results, impact assessments and appropriate accompanying mitigation strategies included as part of

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:91:standing advice for protected species which includes links to guidance on survey and mitigation.

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:91:therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation proposals for Habitats and Species

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:91:  Full details of any mitigation or compensation that might be required.

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:98:mitigation measures, conclusions and residual impacts, relating to human health.

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:101:monitoring and mitigation during these phases. Construction and decommissioning

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:104:receptors and control and mitigation measures should be outlined.

EN010082-000192-EN010082-6.3.2-ES Annex B-Scoping Opinion-Final-November 2017.pdf:106:Group, consideration was given to mitigation options such as the 'corridor option'

EN010082-000519-8.45 - CONSENTORDER_150335454(1)_DEADLINE 4_ DCOv3.pdf:15:including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form

EN010082-000519-8.45 - CONSENTORDER_150335454(1)_DEADLINE 4_ DCOv3.pdf:15: (2) The ground nesting birds survey and mitigation scheme must include an implementation

EN010082-000519-8.45 - CONSENTORDER_150335454(1)_DEADLINE 4_ DCOv3.pdf:15: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000519-8.45 - CONSENTORDER_150335454(1)_DEADLINE 4_ DCOv3.pdf:16: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:3: mitigation measures listed and an assessment of the significance of residual

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:4: mitigation measures would be required during development. It was therefore

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:6: mitigation measures; and opportunities for securing wider benefits for the future conservation and management noted and are addressed within this

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: mitigation measures; and opportunities for securing wider benefits for the future conservation and management

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: • identification of the need for mitigation and recommendations for

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: mitigation;

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:22: no mitigation measures were required prior to development. There are no

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:31:12.4.8 Summary of Mitigation Measures and Residual Significance of Effects

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:31: referred to herein do not require specific mitigation above and beyond that

EN010082-000183-EN010082-6.2.12-ES Chapter 12-Cultural Heritage-Final-November 2017.pdf:32: significance and therefore effects will be not significant. Mitigation above and

EN010082-000145-EN010082-2.2-Explanatory Memorandum-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: and mitigation scheme to be implemented in the event ground nesting

EN010082-000145-EN010082-2.2-Explanatory Memorandum-Final-November 2017.pdf:17: mitigation or recommends as additional mitigation.

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:3:L4.5 MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN L18

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:4: A range of ‘standard’ or best practice mitigation and construction management

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:4: ensure that such mitigation measures are carried out and to demonstrate that they

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:5: process through finalised construction methods and other mitigation

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:5:  monitoring of effectiveness of mitigation measures;

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:6: environmental legislation and the mitigation measures set out within the ES. It

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:13: This includes mitigation that is embedded into the design of the Project through

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:15:  the environmental controls and mitigation measures in the final CEMP;

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:17: enable the effectiveness of environmental mitigation to be evaluated, and if

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:19: could potentially exceed the noise limits even with mitigation in place, the

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:19: Detailed mitigation measures would be determined once detailed construction

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:21:L4.5 MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION PLAN

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:21:L50 This section of the framework CEMP sets out the mitigation and management

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:21: monitoring each mitigation/ enhancement measure.

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:22: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:23: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Requirements Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:24: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:25: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:25: Vibration due to construction Mitigation measures will be undertaken to mitigate noise. To be confirmed in detailed To be confirmed in detailed

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:26: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:26: residents in advance. Mitigation relating to out-of-hours

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:27: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:27: potentially exceed the noise limits even with mitigation in place,

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:27: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:28: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:29: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:30: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:30: Potential for obtrusive glare, upward Mitigation shall be delivered through Compliance with industry To be confirmed in detailed To be confirmed in detailed

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:30: mitigation would be implemented to ensure that they are not

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:30: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:31: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:31: working and emergency procedures for the control and mitigation of erosion and dust

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:32: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:32: material until a site investigation has been carried out and appropriate mitigation identified.

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:32: In the unlikely event that soil gas is identified as a risk requiring vapour / gas mitigation

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:32: measures, monitoring would be carried out and the necessary gas mitigation measures

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:33: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:33: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:33: Potential to impact on sensitive Mitigation measure will be developed to ensure that All To be confirmed in detailed To be confirmed in detailed

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:34: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:35: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:35: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:35: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:36: Potential Impact Mitigation/Enhancement Measure Monitoring Responsibility

EN010082-000557-6.3.20 - Tees CCPP - Annex L CEMP Tracked v4 - 22.08.18.pdf:37:  description of activity based triggers for implementation of mitigation

EN010082-000365-8.2 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Schedule of Amended Document & Plans - Rev 1.pdf:11: 17 Mitigation Register

EN010082-000175-EN010082-6.2.4-ES Chapter 4-Overview of Environmental and Socio-economic Baseline-Final-November.pdf:8: mitigation feature will be retained for the Project. Its acoustic properties will

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:3: 57 4.12.6 itigation mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:7: 5.5. Mitigation and the Sweetman Judgement ……………………………………….. 100

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:30: appropriate objectives and mechanisms for mitigation and compensation.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:36: issue and any mitigation measures proposed. It comments on matters

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:41: relevant satisfactory mitigation where appropriate.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:43: design and mitigation proposals include in the ES and secured in the DCO

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:47: ingestion). As a consequence the mitigation measures from the IAQM

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:47: necessary mitigation measures are secured later in this report.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:48: further mitigation REP2-080.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:49: emissions and mitigation measures will be similar those applied during

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:51: consequence the mitigation measures from the IAQM guidance for a high

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:51:4.9.41. Q1.1.21 PD-008 sought further explanation of how dust mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:51: proposed mitigation measures in the ES air quality chapter APP-049.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:51: mitigation that will be used during the construction works is proven and

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:51: 080]. I am content that dust mitigation during construction have been

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:51: predicted, no further mitigation of air quality emissions is considered

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:52: further mitigation is deemed necessary.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:57: this reason, no specific mitigation is required. It was further agreed that

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:57: mitigation set out in the ES. No matters to resolve were identified.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:57: For this reason a level of mitigation appropriate to a high risk

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:61:4.10.10. No specific mitigation is therefore required, on the basis that all the

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:61: CEMP Table L4.6, REP7-002 contains standard mitigation and good

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:61: the biodiversity mitigation set out in the ES .

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:66: design, mitigation and opportunities for securing wider heritage benefits

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:68: prepare such design and landscape mitigation proposals as can

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:70:4.13.17. Section 11.5 of ES Chapter 11 AS-013 sets out proposed mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:74: mitigation measures proposed to address landscape and visual effects

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:74: landscape and visual effects and provide reasonable mitigation. NPS EN-2

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:75: planning authority (RCBC) to give further consideration to mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:78: mitigation. The effects during operation are expected to be limited to

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:80: to how proposed mitigation would be secured during construction and

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:80: mitigation measures set out in BS 8225 version 2, REP2-008. The

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:80: Applicant also submitted an updated verson of Table 17.1 (‘Mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:80: Summary Table’) REP2-005, including reference to how mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:82: these mitigation measures, the ES concludes that significant effects as a

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:82:4.15.1. NPS EN-1 states that the consideration and mitigation of transport

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:84: implement mitigation measures to remediate the watercourses within the

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:84: to provide specific mitigation measures in respect of relevant water

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:95: mitigation and superseded the NSER submitted with the dDCO

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:98:  Mitigation measures, including implications of C-323/7 – People Over

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:108:5.5. Mitigation and the Sweetman Judgement

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:108: Proposed Development. This ruled that mitigation measures (referred to

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:108: that no mitigation measures have been relied upon REP4-011. In

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:108: mitigation measures have been relied upon to reach the conclusions in

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:109: “further mitigation” (i.e. further to the embedded measures) is required

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:109: 010], which explicitly states that no further mitigation measures in

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:109:5.5.8. Requirement 13(2)(f) of the dDCO REP8-009 refers to “…mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:109: Mitigation Summary Table REP2-006. As described in paragraphs 3.0.8

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:116: development, so there is no need for mitigation. The development

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:122: would be addressed through mitigation. Lateral movement of the stacks

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:122: assessed and what mitigation would be necessary Ref Q1.2.23. The

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:123: minimum measures of dust mitigation during construction. At Deadline 2

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:123: dust mitigation measures in tabular form (Table L4.3). The Applicant

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:123: commented that the dust mitigation that will be used during the

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:123: Mitigation Summary Table APP-059 including air quality are addressed

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:123: securing mitigation during the construction phase(s), through

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:137: 6.2.17 - ES Chapter 17 - Mitigation Schedule - Final - November

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:143: Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:143: Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:174:including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form part

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:174: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (2).pdf:175: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: mitigation for a High Risk site.

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:8: Air quality and dust levels should be considered not only on site but also off-site, including along access roads Mitigation measures are set out in

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:12:Redcar and Cleveland Borough Air Quality: The air quality assessment has screened out a number of emissions as dictated by the Secretary of Construction phase mitigation is

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:12: for the industry sector. Again is it acknowledged that mitigation during the construction phase will be required

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:13: early stage and that design and mitigation decisions will satisfy both regimes.

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:26: mitigation based on the potential for effects. The assessment of the potential

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:38: consequence the mitigation measures for a high risk site will need to be

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:43: considered to be sufficient to warrant further mitigation.

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:45: dust, PM10 and PM2.5 emissions and impacts, and mitigation will be similar to

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:52:7.4.8 Summary of Mitigation Measures and Residual Significance of Effects

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:52:7.124 No specific mitigation measures are required related to traffic and air quality.

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:52:7.125 Mitigation is required for mitigation of dust, PM10 and PM2.5 emissions during

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:52: On this basis, best practice mitigation will need to be adopted. Dust, PM10 and

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:52: PM2.5 mitigation measures from the following guidance document for ‘High

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:52:7.126 No further mitigation measures are required over and above the base Project

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:52: effects or requirements to comply with legislation, mitigation will be required.

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:52: The mitigation is described and the significance of the residual effect after

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:52: mitigation applied is assessed.

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:53:Table 7.19 Mitigation and Residual Effects

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:53:Phase Receptor and Impacts Mitigation Measures Residual Significance

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:53:Construction Impacts associated with dust Mitigation as per IAQM (2014) guidance At worst Minor, or Not significant

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:53: due to low PEC no mitigation required

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:53: identified. Therefore no mitigation required.

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:53:Decommissioning Impacts associated with dust Mitigation as per IAQM (2014) guidance (or At worst Minor, or Not significant

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:55: As such mitigation measures are recommended to control these emissions;

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:55: specific mitigation is required above and beyond that inherent in good design

EN010082-000178-EN010082-6.2.7-ES Chapter 7-Air Quality-Final-November 2017.pdf:55: impacted. As such mitigation measures are recommended to control these

EN010082-000518-8.44 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Draft DCO - ISH - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:8: referencing exercise of mitigation measures that are incorporated within the CEMP against those

EN010082-000518-8.44 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Draft DCO - ISH - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:8: mitigation measures included in Table 17.1 in Chapter 17 of the Environmental Statement (‘ES’).

EN010082-000518-8.44 - Tees CCPP - Written Summary of Oral Case - Draft DCO - ISH - FINAL - 06.07.18.pdf:8: 2.36.1 the Code of Construction Practice must now specify mitigation and management measures;

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:3:5.5 MITIGATION 39

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:12: mitigation measures, scope of the assessment

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:36: require mitigation to create acceptable conditions.

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:42:to assess or to prioritise in the assessment (scoping in mitigation

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:42:In predicting magnitude the effect of all the project mitigation

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:42:criteria and standards. For exceedances, further mitigation In the absence of quantified standards, significance can be evaluated through

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:42:medium, large) may be adopted based on widely recognised magnitude can be reduced further. Different mitigation options may be examined and

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:42:Some activities will result in changes to the environment that design to develop suitable mitigation and re-evaluating impacts and effects.

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:43:5.5 MITIGATION

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:44: EIA, the specialists undertaking the assessments will identify mitigation

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:44: Residual effects, once mitigation measures have been incorporated into the

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:44: as appropriate. Where effects are still significant, the mitigation options

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:44: In addition to the specific mitigation measures identified for each of the

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:49:adopted with mitigation measures developed accordingly.

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:54:of further mitigation measures if assessed to be necessary.

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:54:operational effects and details of further mitigation if assessed to be necessary.

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:54:mitigation plan to be agreed with the local authorities prior to the onset of

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:54:decommissioning. Designing the decommissioning mitigation in the future

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:56:strategic drainage objectives, additional mitigation will be incorporated into

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:56:the Project. If necessary, such mitigation will aim to apply a SUDS approach

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:56:Potential Mitigation Measures

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:56:Potential embedded mitigation measures which will be included during the

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:57: otherwise for further, specific mitigation measures will be determined

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:65: In the event that contamination is detected, mitigation measures (see below

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:65:6.3.6 Mitigation and Monitoring

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:66:during the removal of existing foundations and mitigation measures will be

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:66:Permanent Mitigation

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:66:Construction Mitigation

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:66: site, measures will be put in place to provide suitable mitigation. This

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:67: Implementation of the mitigation measures identified above will ensure that

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:68: A summary of the residual effects, monitoring and mitigation is provided in

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:68:Table 6.1 Ground Conditions and Contaminated Land Mitigation and Monitoring

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:68: Impact Type Key Potential Mitigation Residual Means by which

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:68: Effects Effect mitigation will

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:68: mitigation)

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:75: Without mitigation the ecological effects that are assessed as being likely to be

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:76: mitigation measures will be recommended to address any adverse effects

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:83:this effect occurring, by use of appropriate mitigation such as by altering the

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:89: of significant effects arising, and provide mitigation to control emissions to an

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:91: remains surviving on the Project site and that no mitigation measures would

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:122: mitigation measures of known effectiveness will be put in place, the EIA will

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:123:and flood risk assessment / mitigation of the flood risk and drainage including from / to natu

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:123: Mitigation will be defined in a Decommissio

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:131:  suggest mitigation if tenable / deliverable.

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:132:  Stage 6: proposed mitigation for impacts that contribute to cumulative

EN010082-000019-Scoping Report.pdf:133:informing the Project design and its environmental mitigation. Figure A1.1

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:3: 57 4.12.6 itigation mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:7: 5.5. Mitigation and the Sweetman Judgement ……………………………………….. 100

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:30: appropriate objectives and mechanisms for mitigation and compensation.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:36: issue and any mitigation measures proposed. It comments on matters

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:41: relevant satisfactory mitigation where appropriate.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:43: design and mitigation proposals include in the ES and secured in the DCO

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:47: ingestion). As a consequence the mitigation measures from the IAQM

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:47: necessary mitigation measures are secured later in this report.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:48: further mitigation REP2-080.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:49: emissions and mitigation measures will be similar those applied during

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:51: consequence the mitigation measures from the IAQM guidance for a high

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:51:4.9.41. Q1.1.21 PD-008 sought further explanation of how dust mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:51: proposed mitigation measures in the ES air quality chapter APP-049.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:51: mitigation that will be used during the construction works is proven and

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:51: 080]. I am content that dust mitigation during construction have been

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:51: predicted, no further mitigation of air quality emissions is considered

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:52: further mitigation is deemed necessary.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:57: this reason, no specific mitigation is required. It was further agreed that

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:57: mitigation set out in the ES. No matters to resolve were identified.

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:57: For this reason a level of mitigation appropriate to a high risk

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:61:4.10.10. No specific mitigation is therefore required, on the basis that all the

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:61: CEMP Table L4.6, REP7-002 contains standard mitigation and good

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:61: the biodiversity mitigation set out in the ES .

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:66: design, mitigation and opportunities for securing wider heritage benefits

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:68: prepare such design and landscape mitigation proposals as can

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:70:4.13.17. Section 11.5 of ES Chapter 11 AS-013 sets out proposed mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:74: mitigation measures proposed to address landscape and visual effects

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:74: landscape and visual effects and provide reasonable mitigation. NPS EN-2

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:75: planning authority (RCBC) to give further consideration to mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:78: mitigation. The effects during operation are expected to be limited to

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:80: to how proposed mitigation would be secured during construction and

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:80: mitigation measures set out in BS 8225 version 2, REP2-008. The

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:80: Applicant also submitted an updated verson of Table 17.1 (‘Mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:80: Summary Table’) REP2-005, including reference to how mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:82: these mitigation measures, the ES concludes that significant effects as a

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:82:4.15.1. NPS EN-1 states that the consideration and mitigation of transport

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:84: implement mitigation measures to remediate the watercourses within the

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:84: to provide specific mitigation measures in respect of relevant water

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:95: mitigation and superseded the NSER submitted with the dDCO

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:98:  Mitigation measures, including implications of C-323/7 – People Over

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:108:5.5. Mitigation and the Sweetman Judgement

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:108: Proposed Development. This ruled that mitigation measures (referred to

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:108: that no mitigation measures have been relied upon REP4-011. In

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:108: mitigation measures have been relied upon to reach the conclusions in

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:109: “further mitigation” (i.e. further to the embedded measures) is required

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:109: 010], which explicitly states that no further mitigation measures in

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:109:5.5.8. Requirement 13(2)(f) of the dDCO REP8-009 refers to “…mitigation

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:109: Mitigation Summary Table REP2-006. As described in paragraphs 3.0.8

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:116: development, so there is no need for mitigation. The development

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:122: would be addressed through mitigation. Lateral movement of the stacks

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:122: assessed and what mitigation would be necessary Ref Q1.2.23. The

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:123: minimum measures of dust mitigation during construction. At Deadline 2

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:123: dust mitigation measures in tabular form (Table L4.3). The Applicant

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:123: commented that the dust mitigation that will be used during the

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:123: Mitigation Summary Table APP-059 including air quality are addressed

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:123: securing mitigation during the construction phase(s), through

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:137: 6.2.17 - ES Chapter 17 - Mitigation Schedule - Final - November

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:143: Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:143: Tees CCPP - Updated Mitigation Table

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:174:including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form part

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:174: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000654-TEES Final Recommendation Report and Errata (3).pdf:175: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:1: 1.1.15 warrant further mitigation. Please explain with reference to relevant

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:1: guidance, criteria and National Policy Statements, why further mitigation

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:2: mitigation is proposed through the Construction Environmental

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:2: impacts and mitigation/control measures within the draft CEMP. The

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:2: conclusions in ES paragraph 7.125 that IAQM mitigation measures will be The applicant has produced a Statutory Nuisance Statement which states that dust mitigation from IAQM for ‘High Risk’ sites will be adopted, however

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:2:1.2.11 likelihood of impact is low, the impact would be high without mitigation. Requirement 11 is considered to be appropriate in addressing this matter

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:4: mitigation measures such as skills and training programmes would development opportunities assocaited with the development. This providing it is agreed with the LPA and implemented by the developer is conisdered to be

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:6: the CEMP to include all relevant mitigation measures stipulated in the

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:6:  Does the Management and Mitigation Plan (section 1.2.5) adequately

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:6: reflect Table 17.1 of the ES APP-059: Mitigation Summary Table?

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:6:  Update the Mitigation Summary Table (Table 17.1) to cross reference

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:6: each mitigation measure to the relevant paragraph in the framework

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:6: mitigation measures and ‘further’ mitigation. (Previously suggested in

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:6:  Why does the Management and Mitigation Plan (section 1.2.5) not

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:7: Section L2.5 of Annex L APP-081 purports to set out mitigation and

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:7: of the mitigation / enhancement measures are vague or simply a

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:7: addition, how do these measures relate to the mitigation measures set

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:9: construction sources around the site which was thought to be a more which is BAT for the industry sector. Again is it acknowledged that mitigation during the construction phase will be required and will be incorporated into the

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:9: to review all proposed mitigation measures.

EN010082-000471-Copy of EXA Questions Updated.pdf:11: The proposed mitigation measures identified in Table 10.13 of the ES

EN010082-000176-EN010082-6.2.5-ES Chapter 5 -Project Description-Final-November 2017.pdf:23: environmental (HSE) management plan. This plan will identify the mitigation

EN010082-000176-EN010082-6.2.5-ES Chapter 5 -Project Description-Final-November 2017.pdf:23: safety and environmental impacts. Mitigation measures committed to in the

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:6: Grangetown. All these mitigation measures are equally relevant for the

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:6: requested change. On-plant mitigation such as placing key items in buildings

EN010082-000366-8.3 - Tees CCPP - Non-Material Change - Implication of Non-Mat Change - Final Issue.pdf:6: higher than those predicted in the ES. As a result of these mitigation measures

EN010082-000553-8.52 - Draft DCO - Tracked (v5).pdf:13: (4) No phase of the authorised development may commence until either additional mitigation

EN010082-000553-8.52 - Draft DCO - Tracked (v5).pdf:13:planning authority/environment agency that no additional mitigation measures are required. Any

EN010082-000553-8.52 - Draft DCO - Tracked (v5).pdf:13:additional mitigation measures must be carried out. as agreed.

EN010082-000553-8.52 - Draft DCO - Tracked (v5).pdf:15:proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form phase of the

EN010082-000553-8.52 - Draft DCO - Tracked (v5).pdf:15: (2) The ground nesting birds survey and mitigation scheme must include an implementation

EN010082-000553-8.52 - Draft DCO - Tracked (v5).pdf:15: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures designed

EN010082-000553-8.52 - Draft DCO - Tracked (v5).pdf:16: and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect controlled

EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening.pdf:3: detected, the Scoping Report states that mitigation

EN010082-000314-TEES - Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening.pdf:3: Scoping Report states that mitigation measures secured

EN010082-000493-Agenda for Issue Specific Hearing.pdf:3: o Mitigation relating to out-of-hours working/abnormal or emergency

EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:13: on the historic environment; the nature and design of any required mitigation

EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:24: identified, the embedded mitigation and management within the

EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:24: mitigation has been identified to reduce the accident/hazard risks

EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:25: appropriate mitigation, management and/or regulatory controls

EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:25: to reduce noise at Grangetown. On-plant mitigation such as

EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:25: employed. As a result of these embedded mitigation measures

EN010082-000510-CONSULTATION REPORT FOR NON-MATERIAL CHANGE.pdf:73: historic environment; the nature and design of any required mitigation measures;

EN010082-000171-EN010082-6.2 ES Volume 1 Chapters-Final-November 2017.pdf:3:CHAPTER 17 MITIGATION REGISTER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17.1

EN010082-000582-8.62 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Clean - Version 6.pdf:15:including any proposed survey and mitigation scheme that may be required (which may form

EN010082-000582-8.62 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Clean - Version 6.pdf:15: (2) The ground nesting birds survey and mitigation scheme must include an implementation

EN010082-000582-8.62 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Clean - Version 6.pdf:15: (a) a code of construction practice, specifying mitigation and management measures

EN010082-000582-8.62 - Tees CCPP - Draft DCO - Clean - Version 6.pdf:16: control and an assessment of the risks to, and mitigation measures designed to protect

TR030002-000733-York Potash Limited (Annual Report and Accounts). Appendix 2.pdf:23: the extremely high levels of mitigation that we have built into the

TR030002-000733-York Potash Limited (Annual Report and Accounts). Appendix 2.pdf:24:On a similar vein, the financial mitigation put in place through the

TR030002-000733-York Potash Limited (Annual Report and Accounts). Appendix 2.pdf:37: of the Company mitigation factors

TR030002-000772-York Potash Ltd.pdf:10:Mitigation and Monitoring Ref 5(2)(q) 6.12 7 September 2015

TR030002-001873-Decision holding letter (2).pdf:5: ecological mitigation or enhancement works referred to in the

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:11: appropriate mitigation. When considering such effects, a precautionary approach is adopted.

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:11: mitigation options is carried out to determine adverse effect on the integrity of the site. If these

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:11: mitigation options cannot avoid adverse effects then development consent can only be given if the

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:20: that such measures could provide a form of mitigation for impacts that would arise to the intertidal

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:20: foreshore in the Tees estuary due to the construction of the port terminal. This potential mitigation is

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:37: accordance with the Natural England Mitigation Guidelines, 2001.

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:38: with reference to bat survey and mitigation guidance (Bat Conservation

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:38: Trust, 2012; English Nature, 2004) and the Bat Mitigation Guidelines

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:42: accordance with the Natural England mitigation Guidelines,

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:43: carried out with reference to bat survey and mitigation guidance

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:43: Bat Mitigation Guidelines IN136 (Natural England, 2006) of

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:44: dawn emergence/re- Survey Report (INCA, carried out with reference to bat survey and mitigation guidance

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:44: monthly activity Report (INCA, 2014d) Bat Mitigation Guidelines IN136 (Natural England, 2006) of

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:45: dawn emergence/re- carried out with reference to bat survey and mitigation guidance

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:45: monthly activity Bat Mitigation Guidelines IN136 (Natural England, 2006) of

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:52: A number of road transport mitigation measures are proposed to be implemented as part

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:54: minimise the number of off-site vehicle movements. In addition, mitigation measures to

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:54: As set out for the Mine, a number of road transport mitigation measures would be

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:92: adjustments to the functioning of the lagoon should be examined, with a view to providing mitigation for

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:97: operational phase. This potential mitigation measure will be further explored during the EIA studies for

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:97: assessment. However, mitigation measures would be adopted to minimise the potential for significant

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:97:10.3.59 As part of the lighting design, the below key mitigation strategies would be adopted to assist with

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:99:10.4.4 Nevertheless the potential for mitigation measures to be implemented given the intertidal loss that

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:99: consultation with Natural England on this matter has provided direction on the nature of mitigation that

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:100: lighting has not yet been fully investigated; however, it is envisaged that mitigation measures (in terms

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:100: elevated levels of some contaminants, it is likely that specific mitigation would be required to limit the

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:100: options for mitigation of the loss of intertidal foreshore (due to the footprint of the port terminal) have

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:114: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:114: York Potash Limited recognises that further mitigation options are available to reduce emissions from

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:115: mitigation options include the use of catalysed NOx emission reduction techniques, alternative fuel

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:115:10.5.67 Based on the scale and duration of the effect, with such mitigation measures in place, it is concluded

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:118: nitrogen and acid deposition in the North York Moors (prior to mitigation), but the dominant

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:118: of the SAC. Moreover, mitigation measures are available to reduce the influence of this effect.

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:120: lighting philosophy and mitigation strategies, the lighting systems installed would be designed and

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:121: Mitigation measures (i.e. acoustic screens) would be installated and these would futher reduce the low

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:128:11.4.22 Mitigation measures to limit the suspension and subsequent deposition of sediment during capital

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:128: project, mitigation comprises the use of specialist dredging equipment (i.e. an enclosed grab loading

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:129: impact assessed accordingly. There may be a requirement for specific mitigation to be applied during

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:130: place for the adjacent Coatham Boatling Lake) were deemed to be part of the mitigation, namely

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:130:11.4.34 Given the above mitigation and conclusion of the assessment for the Tuned In! facility, it is concluded

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:131: English Nature (2004) Bat mitigation guidelines.

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:131: HGBI (1998). Evaluating Local Mitigation/Translocation Programmes: Maintaining Best Practice and

TR030002-000571-Doc 7.3 Appendix 3 - Habitats Regulation Assessment Sept 2014.pdf:132:Natural England (2006) IN136 Bat Mitigation Guidelines Advice Note.

TR030002-000469-Section 6 App 6.3 Land Quality Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:29: additional gas mitigation measures.

TR030002-000469-Section 6 App 6.3 Land Quality Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:30: health and controlled waters, to inform the need for mitigation measures and to ensure appropriate

TR030002-000468-Section 6 App 6.2 Land Quality Generic Risk Assessment.pdf:22: Monitoring of the ground gas regime is required to establish gas flow rates and to inform mitigation measures.

TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:7: and mitigation measures proposed where appropriate. It also considers potential impacts of the

TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:8: Section 6 potential options for flood risk mitigation are explored for the site, with conclusions presented

TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:24: Dabholm Gut. Therefore, for the majority of the site, additional flood risk mitigation measures are not

TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:24: site could see increased flood risk as a result of the development and, therefore, mitigation (drainage)

TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:24: the development, only commonly used mitigation measures are suggested. The residual flood risk here

TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:24: a failure of one of the site flood risk mitigation measures.

TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:25:6.4.1 In summary, the mitigation described above would be applied at the site. This would ensure that the

TR030002-000499-Section 17 App 17.1 Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:26: its potential impacts, given the information currently available. Mitigation has been identified where

TR030002-000481-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:6: Mitigation A Construction Traffic Management Plan is

TR030002-000481-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:11: assessment and mitigation.

TR030002-000481-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:15: adequately assessed and reported so as to ensure that the mitigation of any impact is compliant with

TR030002-000481-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:31: types which could be exacerbated by the development and if mitigation may be appropriate and

TR030002-000481-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:37: Embedded mitigation

TR030002-000481-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:37:6.1.3 In context with the sustainable transport review in Section 4, the following embedded mitigation

TR030002-000481-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:37: influence accident frequency and whether further mitigation may be appropriate. Annex 14 of this TA

TR030002-000481-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:40: junction is considered to be operating beyond its desirable capacity and mitigation measures may be

TR030002-000481-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:47:7.2.12 Embedded mitigation is proposed to reduce the impact of employees driving direct to the Mine and

TR030002-000481-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:48: accident frequency and whether further mitigation may be appropriate.

TR030002-000481-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:57: operation. No impacts are identified that require mitigation (over and above those embedded in the

TR030002-000481-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:57: developments within the defined local study area. No impacts are identified that require mitigation (over

TR030002-000481-Section 12 App 12.2 Transport Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:57: facilities. Potential impacts have been mitigated by the inclusion of embedded mitigation in the

TR030002-001873-Decision holding letter (3).pdf:5: ecological mitigation or enhancement works referred to in the

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:31: “mitigation and monitoring strategy” means the mitigation and monitoring strategy certified by

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:52: (h) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12);

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:52: (m) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12); and

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:54: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:58:with the local planning any additional mitigation measures required

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:58:pursuant to (3) then phase 2(a) and (b) shall not be carried out until either additional mitigation

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:60:planning authority that no additional measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:60:earthworks or site levelling but excluding ecological mitigation works, until a Construction

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:60:6.10) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance tracker (Document 6.8A), has been

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:60: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:60:and ecological mitigation or enhancement works) until a Construction Traffic Management Plan

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:61:management plan for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:61:out in the outline ecological management plan (Document 6.11) and incorporating the mitigation

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:61:phase, and to identify the requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order to avoid any

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:61:mitigation agreed following the survey. The agreed mitigation shall then be carried out in

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:84: (3) The lagoon habitat enhancement plan must accord with the mitigation and monitoring strategy

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:86:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:88:accordance with principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12) and

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:103: National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:103:(2)(e), a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:103:(referred to in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:103:approval, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:103: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:103:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:103:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-000778-151009 TR030002 Tata Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:103:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:1: x The generic approach taken to the derivation of mitigation measures and the assessment of

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:2: x A description of mitigation measures proposed to “prevent, reduce and where possible,

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:3: x The identification of mitigation measures (where required) to reduce the significance of, or

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:3: x The evaluation of impacts, post-mitigation, to determine the significance of residual impacts.

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10: significance (as defined above); albeit that appropriate mitigation, where available, should be sought for

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10: Mitigation

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10:4.3.33 Mitigation measures have been proposed, where they are available and practical, in those cases where

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10: adverse impacts have been identified. It is important to note that mitigation measures applied should

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10: be proportionate to the scale of the impact predicted. Appropriate mitigation measures have been

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10:4.3.34 ‘Mitigation through design’ is an important factor in ensuring that the environmental impacts of a

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10: and the iteration of the engineering and environmental impact studies, mitigation has been built into the

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10: design of the proposed scheme. This mitigation is described in Section 3 and the impact assessment

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10: potentially remain, further issue-specific mitigation measures are defined.

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10:4.3.35 Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10: industry standard or ‘embedded’ mitigation often applies in these cases (and is set out herein). It is

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10: cumulatively with other pressures on a receptor and, in this event, mitigation may be required.

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10:4.3.36 Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this ES where the EIA

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10: process has identified an adverse impact and mitigation is available (see above). In some cases, in

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10: order to ensure that the mitigation measures are successful or where there is significant uncertainty

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10:4.3.37 Where further mitigation measures are identified, the significance of the residual environmental impact

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:10: (i.e. the post-mitigation impact) is assessed.

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:11: additional mitigation. Inter-relationships have been assessed within the relevant sections of the topic

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:12: x potential to prevent achieving WFD status objectives by impacting upon proposed mitigation

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:13: x potential to incorporate mitigation measures included in the appropriate River Basin

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:13: mitigation options is carried out to determine adverse effect on the integrity of the site. If these

TR030002-000439-ES Section 4 Approach to EIA.pdf:13: mitigation options cannot avoid adverse effects then development consent can only be given if the tests

TR030002-000748-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 2.pdf:1:in order to obtain their input into the likely consequences of the construction activities and the mitigation

TR030002-000748-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 2.pdf:1:developed. Any required mitigation measures will be provided to the Principal Contractor as part of the

TR030002-000748-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 2.pdf:15:7.0 Management / Mitigation Measures

TR030002-000748-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 2.pdf:15:There are a number of management and mitigation measures that can be implemented in order to

TR030002-000748-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 2.pdf:24:  The Harbour Master confirmed that provided that identified management and mitigation

TR030002-000748-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 2.pdf:28: Reduction or mitigation of the consequences of an incident.

TR030002-000425-Doc 5.2 Funding Statement Appendix 2 - Investor Presentation February 2015.pdf:18: • Mitigations built into mine design,

TR030002-000018-Examination Library (4).pdf:22:REP2-006 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring

TR030002-000018-Examination Library (4).pdf:26:REP4-060 York Potash Ltd - 6.12A Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy Rev 4

TR030002-000759-Document 8.3 Applicants Response to Written Representations.pdf:6: i) revised Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (Document 6.12);

TR030002-000759-Document 8.3 Applicants Response to Written Representations.pdf:6:the mitigation referred to by Natural England is appropriately secured.

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:4:the CEMP must identify and deliver the mitigation provided in the ES and a certified

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:5:Article 38 and by ensuring that every mitigation measure to be delivered through the

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:5:been assessed and relied upon for mitigation in the ES. The applicant is requested

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:5:(operational) mitigation, in relation to noise and visual disturbance to waterbird

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:5:mechanism for delivery of operational mitigation?

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:5:The LVIA states that mitigation relating to lighting and relevant to marine & coastal

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:5:(9.6.22) states that the mitigation principles to minimise the potential significant

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:5:such operational lighting mitigation measures will be secured through the DCO and

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:5:securing and delivering operational mitigation?

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:5:mitigation to be delivered through the EMP, having regard to the mitigation identified

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:5:EMP to deliver mitigation which is in accordance with the principles set out in an

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:5:mitigation provided in the ES and in a certified copy of the Governance Tracker.

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:5:form part of the Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS).

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:6:amended to include the provision that the CEMP shall include the mitigation

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:6:addressing the proposed mitigation.

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:11:Proposed mitigation measures for operational and construction noise and vibration

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:12:Mitigation

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:12:mechanism to secure and deliver the mitigation identified in the LVIA. However,

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:12:requirement 2 in the DCO, which refers to various mitigation measures at a general

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:12:level, does not refer back to the specific landscape and visual impacts mitigation in

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:12:requirement 3 as well, to secure mitigation in relation to phase 2 of the development.

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:12:Requirements 2 and 3 in the draft DCO as securing the mitigation identified in the

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:12:Requirements 2 and 3 are appropriate to secure the identified mitigation in the LVIA?

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:12:visual impacts mitigation contained within chapter 20 (Landscape and Visual) of the

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:12:changed to better relate them to the proposed mitigation measures.

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:12:Mitigation

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:12:The LVIA includes reference to offsite planting as proposed mitigation (20.5.30;

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:12:benefit) and what the residual effects post mitigation would be. It is noted that the

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:13:it is unclear whether this mitigation forms part of the DCO application or would be

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:13:If the applicant is relying on this mitigation, but it would not be delivered through the

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:13:If the applicant is relying on mitigation provided through off-site planting, please can

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:13:mitigation measures that would be located on land outside the control of the

TR030002-000713-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Response to the Examining Authority's First Written Questions).pdf:13:these mitigation measures be considered to reduce/offset any associated impacts?

TR030002-000567-Doc 7.3 Project Position Statement.pdf:9: from the mine. In addition, mitigation options at the mine surface

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:6:mitigation works’, to provide a definition of the scope of works covered by this

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:6:planning authority provided that such alternative does not prevent the mitigation

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:6:delivery of the construction mitigation identified in the governance tracker

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:6:management mitigation plan’, please can the Applicant clarify if this is the same

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:6:as the Marine Mammal Mitigation Plan (MMMP)? If not, please can the Applicant

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:6:REP1-031 to include the marine management mitigation plan? If this is simply

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:6:management mitigation plan’?

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:6:If the ‘marine management mitigation plan’ is not the same as the MMMP,

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:6:a separate requirement, to provide clarity on the mitigation required (via the

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:8:identified in the draft DCO and DML to deliver the mitigation identified in the

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:12:Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS)

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:12: Deadline 2 adequately secures the relevant mitigation relied on to reach the

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:13:mitigation measures which would need to feature in the construction lighting

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:14: required to form part of the mitigation relied upon in the Applicant’s HRA to

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:15: mitigation measures identified in the Updated Governance Tracker [REP1-

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:15: Should the EMP be updated to reflect these mitigation measures, noting they

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:15: Is NE satisfied with the means of securing these mitigation measures?

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:16:NE has advised the Applicant on how to secure the mitigation within the DCO

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:16:NE’s WR and the mitigation referred to in section 6.2.3, the Applicant has stated

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:16:mitigation referred to by NE is appropriately secured:

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:16:their response to NE’s WR (above) are appropriate to secure the mitigation

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:17:measure was an enhancement measure and is not a mitigation measure required

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:17:should be included in the MMS although agreeing it was not a mitigation

TR030002-000412-ExA Second Round Questions.pdf:18:Noise, vibration and air quality - proposed mitigation measures

TR030002-000105-141121_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and EA.pdf:2:meaningful mitigation and compensation proposals to address the proposed loss and

TR030002-000105-141121_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and EA.pdf:2:mitigation proposed, including how it would be delivered through the draft DCO.

TR030002-000479-Section 10 App 10.2 Terrestrial ecology survey reports.pdf:78:stop the proposed activity until mitigation is agreed with Natural England.

TR030002-000479-Section 10 App 10.2 Terrestrial ecology survey reports.pdf:132:stop the proposed activity until mitigation is agreed with Natural England.

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:5:1.1.1 This Schedule sets out the controls, mitigation, enhancement and other measures identified in the

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:6:1 No mitigation measures outlined within this section. N/A

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:6:2 No mitigation measures outlined within this section. N/A

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:6:3 No mitigation measures outlined within this section. N/A

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:6:4 No mitigation measures outlined within this section. N/A

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:6:5 No mitigation measures outlined within this section. N/A

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:7:9 Further monitoring of the ground gas regime so that mitigation measures can be implemented. Requirement 8 (revised)

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:8:14 The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume is selection of the dredge method. Contaminated Deemed Marine Licence (Schedule 5)

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:9:22 The mitigation measures relevant to Section 7 are also of relevance to this Section. Deemed Marine Licence (Schedule 5)

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:9: mammals prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:10:28 The mitigation measures relevant to Section 7 are also of relevance to this section. Deemed Marine Licence (Schedule 5)

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:10:30 As mitigation for the potential impact of construction phase noise disturbance, it is proposed that Construction Environmental Management Plan

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:11:31 As mitigation for potential visual disturbance to waterbirds, it is proposed that temporary visual barriers Construction Environmental Management Plan

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:11: should be noted that the barriers positioned for mitigation of potential noise disturbance as described in

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:11: item 30 will also serve as a visual screen; the same locations are appropriate as mitigation for both

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:11: would be retained on site. Where lighting levels are found to be inadequate or excessive, mitigation

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:12:36 A Decommissioning Plan would be developed and further mitigation may be recommended if Requirement 11

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:12: also have to incorporate other mitigation measures to respond to additional sensitivities that may need

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:13:45 The mitigation measures relevant to Section 7 are also of relevance to this section. N/A

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:14: mammals prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:14:50 Mitigation measures relating to communications include the following: Construction Environmental Management Plan

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:14:51 Mitigation measures relating to dust management include the following: Construction Environmental Management Plan

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:16: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate.

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:16:52 Mitigation measures specific to demolition include the following: Construction Environmental Management Plan

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:16:53 Mitigation measures specific to earthworks include the following: Construction Environmental Management Plan

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:16:54 Mitigation measures specific to construction include the following: Construction Environmental Management Plan

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:17:55 Mitigation measures specific to trackout include the following: Construction Environmental Management Plan

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:17:56 Mitigation measures specific to Non Road Mobile Machinery (NRMM) include the following: Construction Environmental Management Plan

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:18:57 Construction phase road traffic emissions mitigation include: Construction Traffic Management Plan

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:20: investigation of mitigation measures to reduce the noise emission levels from the activity or activities,

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:20: the implementation of mitigation to re-assess the noise levels against the guideline noise levels.

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:21:66 The impermeable area of the site would be increased due to the works. As mitigation, an adequate Design approval (Requirement 2 and

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:22:73 No mitigation measures are required for this topic. N/A

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:23:74 The following mitigation measures have been incorporated into the proposed scheme to assist with Design approval (Requirement 2 and

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:23: A lighting mitigation strategy would be employed across the scheme as set out in Appendix 20.4 of the

TR030002-000801-Document 6.8B - Governance Tracker.pdf:24: order to allow continued safe use of the routes. No further mitigation measures are required.

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:7: “ecological mitigation works” means the mitigation measures set out in the outline ecological

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:7: “mitigation and managementmonitoring strategy” means the mitigation and

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:26: (i)(h) the mitigation and managementmonitoring strategy; and (Document 6.12A);

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:28: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:33:planning any additional mitigation measures required

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:33:pursuant to (3) then phase 2(a) and (b) must not be carried out until either additional mitigation

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:33:planning authority that no additional measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:33:earthworks or site levelling but excluding archaeological soil movement and ecological mitigation

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:33:statement,management plan (Document 6.10A) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:33: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:34:provided that such alteration does not prevent the mitigation during construction referred to in the

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:34:and ecological mitigation or enhancement works referred to in the outline ecological management

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:34:management planplans for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:34:environmental statement for that phase (including a marine mammal mitigation plan but not

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:34:management plan (Document 6.11B) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:34:and when changes to any habitat creationecological enhancement or mitigation works are proposed

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:34:by the decommissioning phase, and to identify the requirement for mitigation to be implemented in

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:34:ecological surveys being undertaken and the scope of mitigation agreed following the survey. The

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:34:agreed mitigation shall then be carried out in accordance with an agreed timetable.

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:53:construction monitoring information) must accord with the mitigation and managementmonitoring

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:55:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:57:enhancement plan and the principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:74: National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:74:a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence (referred to

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:74:in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for approval, such

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:74:approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme must be

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:74: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:74:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:74:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:74:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:80: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures which

TR030002-000895-160113_TR03002_Draft DCO (Comparite with First Draft DCO (Document 4.1)).pdf:95: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000719-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 3.pdf:1: Deviation Construction Traffic Mitigation and

TR030002-000719-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 3.pdf:1: Mitigation Plan

TR030002-000813-Document 6.11A - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:5:produced to set out the principles of the mitigation (as defined in the Harbour Facilities Environmental

TR030002-000813-Document 6.11A - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:5:with separately in the Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (Appendix 3.1 of the HRA (Document 6.3)).

TR030002-000813-Document 6.11A - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:6:marine mammals). The following mitigation measures have been proposed within the ES to minimise

TR030002-000813-Document 6.11A - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:6:that it is satisfied with the proposed mitigation with regard to marine mammals. Natural England also

TR030002-000813-Document 6.11A - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:6:stated that all mitigation should be included (in more detail) within a Marine Mammal Mitigation Plan. The

TR030002-000813-Document 6.11A - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:6:Marine Mammal Mitigation Plan is to be included within the EMP to be submitted pursuant to Requirement

TR030002-000813-Document 6.11A - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:6:(including bats, otters, reptiles and breeding birds). The following mitigation / enhancement measures

TR030002-000813-Document 6.11A - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:7:The following mitigation / enhancement measures have been proposed within the ES to minimise impacts

TR030002-000813-Document 6.11A - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:7:The following mitigation / enhancement measures have been proposed within the ES to minimise impacts

TR030002-000813-Document 6.11A - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:8:The following mitigation / enhancement measures have been proposed within the ES to minimise impacts

TR030002-000813-Document 6.11A - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:8:The following mitigation / enhancement measures have been proposed within the ES to minimise impacts

TR030002-000813-Document 6.11A - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:9:Natural England stated within its Representation to PINS in June 2015 that suitable mitigation measures

TR030002-000813-Document 6.11A - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:9:This outline EMP sets out the principles of the mitigation identified in the ES (Document 6.4) required to

TR030002-000800-Document 4.2B - Explanatory Memorandum (Clean).pdf:22: refer to a lagoon habitat enhancement plan which is to accord with the mitigation

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:3:6 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES ………………………………………………… 13

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:4: (ESs) produced, together with measures to ensure that appropriate corrective actions or mitigation

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:4: disturbance, pollution or impact on habitats, and details of mitigation measures.

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:4: Harbour facilities CEMP, including the management processes, mitigation measures, potential

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:5: activities of the Harbour facilities and those mitigation measures which have been recommended to

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:7: that appropriate resources are available, and any necessary environmental controls or mitigation

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:10: Risk Assessments introduced in Section 4.1 and the relevant mitigation measures identified in

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:11: the environmental risks and mitigation measures will be largely the same. Tasks Sheets support

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:14:  agreed controls, protection and mitigation measures (including those in the CEMP) are in

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:14: to verify that the required methods and mitigation measures are being implemented effectively.

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:16:6 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:16:6.1.1 The mitigation measures presented in Table 6-1 have been developed from the mitigation

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:17:Table 6-1 Summary of mitigation measures for Harbour facilities

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:17: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:17:1 No mitigation measures outlined within this section.

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:17:2 No mitigation measures outlined within this section.

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:17:3 No mitigation measures outlined within this section.

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:17:4 No mitigation measures outlined within this section.

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:17:5 No mitigation measures outlined within this section.

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:18: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:18:8 Further monitoring of the ground gas regime so that mitigation measures can be implemented.

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:19: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:19:12 The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume is selection of the dredge method. Contaminated sediments are to be dredged using an

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:20: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:20:19 The mitigation measures relevant to Section 7 are also of relevance to this Section.

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:20: noise (JNCC, 2010). This would include checking for marine mammals prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:20:25 The mitigation measures relevant to Section 7 are also of relevance to this section.

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:21: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:21:27 As mitigation for the potential impact of noise disturbance, it is proposed that noise attenuation barriers would be position:

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:21: be retained on site. Where lighting levels are found to be inadequate or excessive, mitigation strategies to remedy the effects would be

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:21:32 A Decommissioning Plan would be developed and further mitigation may be recommended if necessary depending on site-specific circumstances

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:22: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:22:40 The mitigation measures relevant to Section 7 are also of relevance to this section.

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:22: noise (JNCC, 2010). This would include checking for marine mammals prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:23: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:23:46 Mitigation measures relating to communications include the following:

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:23:47 Mitigation measures relating to dust management include the following:

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:24: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:25: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:25:  Ensure an adequate water supply on the site for effective dust/particulate matter suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:25:48 Mitigation measures specific to demolition include the following:

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:25:49 Mitigation measures specific to earthworks include the following:

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:25:50 Mitigation measures specific to construction include the following:

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:25:51 Mitigation measures specific to trackout include the following:

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:26: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:26:52 Mitigation measures specific to Non Road Mobile Machinery (NRMM) include the following:

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:26:53 Construction phase road traffic emissions mitigation include:

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:27: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:28: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:28: compliance/complaint (where operationally safe to do so) and/or the investigation of mitigation measures to reduce the noise emission levels from

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:28: survey would be undertaken as soon as possible following the implementation of mitigation to re-assess the noise levels against the guideline

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:29: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:30: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:30:66 The mitigation measures relevant to Section 7 are also of relevance to this section to prevent impacts to water abstractions.

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:30:67 No mitigation measures are required for this topic.

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:30:68 The following mitigation measures have been incorporated into the proposed scheme to assist with integrating proposed structures into their

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:31: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:31: A lighting mitigation strategy would be employed across the scheme as set out in Appendix 20.4 of the ES, to reduce lighting impacts during the

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:31: implemented in order to allow continued safe use of the routes. No further mitigation measures are required.

TR030002-000470-Section 6 App 6.4 CEMP.pdf:32: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000053-141105_TR030002_Comments_s51_Advice.pdf:9: or to mitigation or compensatory measures

TR030002-000053-141105_TR030002_Comments_s51_Advice.pdf:15:all necessary mitigation identified in the ES is effectively secured by the DCO.

TR030002-000053-141105_TR030002_Comments_s51_Advice.pdf:26:mitigated (if possible) and therefore how this mitigation could be secured and

TR030002-000053-141105_TR030002_Comments_s51_Advice.pdf:29:• Consideration of potential mitigation in the form of enhancing the habitat in the

TR030002-000053-141105_TR030002_Comments_s51_Advice.pdf:29: stage, this potential mitigation is currently being investigated. The Planning

TR030002-000053-141105_TR030002_Comments_s51_Advice.pdf:29: Inspectorate expects that the potential for any such mitigation would have been

TR030002-000053-141105_TR030002_Comments_s51_Advice.pdf:29: Harbour Facility, if the applicant intends to include this mitigation as part of the

TR030002-000053-141105_TR030002_Comments_s51_Advice.pdf:32:• There are some references to the use of mitigation as part of the assessment (e.g.

TR030002-000053-141105_TR030002_Comments_s51_Advice.pdf:32: description of all mitigation measures relied on in the HRA, with reference to how

TR030002-000053-141105_TR030002_Comments_s51_Advice.pdf:32: evidence of agreement with Natural England on the suitability of the mitigation

TR030002-000751-Document 1.4B Document List.pdf:9:Mitigation and Monitoring Ref 5(2)(q) 6.12 7 September 2015

TR030002-001866-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order Amendment Application Statement.pdf:32: works plan) are not required as mitigation for the

TR030002-000734-York Potash Limited (SoCG & Appendices 1-8).pdf:47: Where pollution is unavoidable, mitigation measures to reduce pollution levels will be

TR030002-000734-York Potash Limited (SoCG & Appendices 1-8).pdf:56:combination with other plans and programmes. Any proposed mitigation measures

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:11:Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude of Significance of Commentary Proposed mitigation

TR030002-000503-Section 20 App 20.3 Visual assessment.pdf:12:Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude of Significance of Commentary Proposed mitigation

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:44:mitigations.

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:49: The Company’s response to these issues, and the mitigation measures

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:92: Economic impacts and mitigation 22

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:98: AND HAS THE LEAST ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT. EXTENSIVE MITIGATION

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:99: the polyhalite for granulation. dust mitigation. plant at Wilton by a conveyor facility.

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:101: AND MITIGATION

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:101: possible and also integrating mitigation encourage reptiles to move onto areas of see pages 18 and 19 for more details.

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:101:ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:101: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:101: proposed mitigation measures. Part of the SuDS. 9, 14 and 15. • 

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:177: demonstrated the attention being given to mitigation measures during the impact ever seen. it the tractors that travel having to cut through temporary

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:179: area on a year round mitigation measures construction

TR030002-000671-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 1 to 9.pdf:193: Yorkshire Potash in respect of ecological concerns and their mitigation. I note

TR030002-000459-ES Section 24 References.pdf:3:English Nature (2001) Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines.

TR030002-000459-ES Section 24 References.pdf:3:English Nature (2004) Bat mitigation guidelines.

TR030002-000459-ES Section 24 References.pdf:5:Natural England (2006) IN136 Bat Mitigation Guidelines Advice Note.

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:20: mitigation or compensation schemes.

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:22: identify and describe the control processes and mitigation

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:24: should be given to the need for any mitigation where appropriate

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:24: construction phase, including consideration of any mitigation

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:24: operation phase, including consideration of any mitigation where

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:26:3.6 The Scoping Report identifies potential mitigation measures within

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:26: mitigation measures should be taken into account in the

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:26: assessment. To demonstrate that a mitigation measure is

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:27: appendix, a Table showing how mitigation identified in ES would

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:27: placed on a plan to deliver the mitigation, for example the use of a

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:29: • detailed description of the potential Impacts and mitigation

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:32:3.40 Mitigation measures should be addressed and the SoS advises that

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:32: any mitigation measures are effective and can be secured through

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:36:3.71 Consideration should be given to appropriate mitigation measures

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:36: Plan (CEMP) to deliver this mitigation. Only deliverable mitigation

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:38: methodology and proposed mitigation are agreed in consultation

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:40: these PRoW and any mitigation measures proposed to minimise

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:44: to agree appropriate requirements to secure necessary mitigation.

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:45: submission of revised short or long term mitigation or

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:46: the relevant statutory consultees and take into account mitigation

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:66:ix) that ‘The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:70:with details of mitigation and compensation would need to be included to secure support.

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:70:migration times, or measurable mitigation measures put into place. In addition, we consider

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:82: following the application of mitigation.

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:90:proposal to ensure that opportunities for mitigation, compensation and enhancement to the natural

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:92: special interest within these sitesthese sites and should identify such mitigation measures as

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:94:  Consideration, and subsequent mitigation, should also be given to any visual impacts on

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:94:proposals for mitigation of any impacts and if appropriate, compensation measures. Contact the

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:94:Advice for further information on what information may be required in terms of survey and mitigation

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:95:needs to conduct an assessment, based on a full draft mitigation licence application, in advance of

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:95:therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation proposals for Habitats and Species

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:95:  Full details of any mitigation or compensation that might be required.

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:107:key information, risk assessments, proposed mitigation measures, conclusions and

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:110:monitoring and mitigation during these phases. Construction and decommissioning

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:112:receptors and control and mitigation measures should be outlined.

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:115:Group, consideration was given to mitigation options such as the 'corridor option'

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:130:and alternative mitigation measures. The justification for the final choice

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:131:Mitigation Measures

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:131:Mitigation measures may fall into certain categories namely: avoid;

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:131:and should be identified as such in the specialist topics. Mitigation

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:131:than one topic area. For each topic, the ES should set out any mitigation

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:131:mitigation in place. Any proposed mitigation should be discussed and

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:131:The effectiveness of mitigation should be apparent. Only mitigation

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:131:It would be helpful if the mitigation measures proposed could be cross

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:131:describing the mitigation measures proposed either in each of the

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:131:mitigation.

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:132:of detailed surveys and recommended mitigation actions. Where effective

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:132:example the local community may be able to identify possible mitigation

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:132:Table X to identify and collate the residual impacts after mitigation on

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:132:Table XXX to set out the mitigation measures proposed, as well as

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:132: enable the applicant to cross refer mitigation to specific

TR030002-000463-Section 4 App 4.2 Scoping Opinion.pdf:132: together with any mitigation or compensation measures, are

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:16: 10.3.63 As mitigation for the potential impact of noise (and visual) disturbance, it is proposed that noise

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:16: 10.3.66 The effect of the proposed mitigation on piling noise at ecologically sensitive receptors (see Figure

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:16: a summary of the calculated pre- and post-mitigation noise levels during percussive piling for the quay

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:17: mitigation) construction noise Residual impact

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:18: mitigation) construction noise Residual impact

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:18: mitigation) Residual impact

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:20:10.3.76 With the above mitigation strategy in place, in combination with the use of barriers to provide an

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:21:10.3.86 Nevertheless, following discussion with Natural England, mitigation measures have been investigated

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:30:11.3.5 No mitigation is proposed for the effect of the MHF given the very minor effect predicted and that the

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:31:11.3.16 Mitigation measures to limit the suspension and subsequent deposition of sediment during capital

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:31: project, mitigation comprises the use of specialist dredging equipment (i.e. an enclosed grab loading

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:32: practicable. This mitigation also applies to the dredging of the silts (overlying geological material) to be

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:33: place for the adjacent Coatham Boatling Lake) were deemed to be part of the mitigation, namely

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:33:11.3.28 Given the above mitigation and conclusion of the assessment for the Tuned In! facility, it is concluded

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:45:Bran Sands lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:47:Lagoon Mitigation and

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:48:Document title: York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:48:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:49: 1.1 Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy ………………………………………………………………………… 2

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:49:5 Other Mitigation Measures of Relevance to SPA Interest Features…………………. 24

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:49: 5.1 Mitigation for indirect effects …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 25

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:49:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:50:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:51:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:52:1.1 Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:52:This Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS) has been prepared in response to

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:52:mitigation proposals for Bran Sands lagoon outlined within the HRA. The MMS should be read in conjunction

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:52:effects of the proposed scheme. The distinction between the use of the terms ‘mitigation’ and ‘habitat enhancement’ has

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:52:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:53:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:54:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:55:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:56:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:57:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:58:objective of mitigation proposed is set out.

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:58:Table 3.1 Predicted direct effects of the Harbour facilities on SPA interest features and mitigation

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:58:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:59:In addition to providing a function as mitigation for elements of the Harbour facilities proposals, the

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:59:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:60:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:61:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:63:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:64:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:65:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:69:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:70:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:71:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:72:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:73:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:74:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:75:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:77:5 Other Mitigation Measures

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:77:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:78:Other Mitigation Measures of Relevance to SPA Interest

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:78:5.1 Mitigation for indirect effects

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:78:Noise attenuation barriers are proposed as mitigation for the potential impact of noise and visual disturbance

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:78:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:79:Other Mitigation Measures of Relevance to SPA Interest

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:79:It is predicted that with these mitigation measures in place, the risk of indirect impacts on waterbirds would

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:79:would occur (3 to 4 months) in combination with the mitigation proposed.

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:79:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:81:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:82:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:83:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:85:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:86:Royal Haskoning and HR Wallingford (2011). Mitigation and monitoring for the Stour and Orwell Estuaries

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:86:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:87:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:88:emissions mitigation at DNF and the MTS Intermediate Shaft Sites. The SEI will be

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:89: 3. Harbour DCO mitigation (habitat enhancement in Bran Sands lagoon)

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:89:DH raised questions about the mitigation (habitat enhancement) proposed and how this

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:89:SAJ proposed that RHDHV develop a Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy for issue to NE, in

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:90:Following production of the Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy, a site meeting (NE/MMO/EA)

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:90: Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy).

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:90: (2) YPL development of firm proposals for mitigation. However, on this latter point, NE is

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:90: hopeful that that the Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy and site visit will give enough

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:90: confidence that the mitigation is deliverable.

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:90: b) MS to develop template for Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (by 21/1/15)

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:90: c) MS/SJ prepare Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (by 29/1/15), with the

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:90:Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy meets NE’s requirements, NE is likely to be able to advise

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:90:which will include the Harbour HRA (accompanied by the together with the Mitigation and

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:90:consider the potential for further visual mitigation and that this, should such mitigation be

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:91: information to support the production of an outline Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:91:conclude that the mitigation is practically achievable. Following the teleconference with you on 15

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:91:adding more detail on aspects of the evidence, assessment and mitigation in the HRA. To this end

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:91:we welcome your offer to produce draft the Heads of Terms of a mitigation and monitoring strategy

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:92:Mitigation Measures - Construction

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:92:Mitigation Measures - Operation

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:92:the mitigation is confusing, notwithstanding your explanation that it is used because the

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:92:and set out primarily – for Habitats Regulations purposes - as mitigation for the impacts of the

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:92:In order to avoid misunderstanding, we use the term mitigation throughout the rest of this response,

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:93:It is important that the mitigation and monitoring strategy includes:

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:93:  The aims of the mitigation and what a successful proposal will look like i.e.

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:93: o Describe the specific element of mitigation required for the loss of the habitats on the

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:93: o Describe mitigation for the range of potential impacts affecting Bran Sands Lagoon

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:93: o To ensure the success of the mitigation proposal for Bran Sands lagoon Natural

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:93: o Natural England requires clarity on the time it will take for the mitigation proposal to

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:93: by invertebrates. As a general principle, establishment of mitigation should be

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:94: establish a baseline and assess the success of the mitigation in terms of invertebrate

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:95:Your ref: Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:95:  York Potash Harbour Facilities Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy dated 29 January 2015

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:95:The Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS), site visit and meeting have most usefully addressed

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:95:ES and now the MMS on the mitigation and monitoring. You have undertaken to update the MSS

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:96:described above, will demonstrate that mitigation for HRA matters can be secured and is

TR030002-000675-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_2 of 2.pdf:99:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:10: The development proposals include appropriate mitigation to ensure that

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:10: localised effect that is capable of being addressed through mitigation

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:29: ES proposes mitigation measures to prevent and reduce these effects.

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:43: the NPS advises that the adequacy of the mitigation proposed should be

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:47: highway authority, as appropriate, on the assessment and mitigation. In

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:47: consideration should be given to whether mitigation measures are

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:50: location, mitigation and consideration of alternatives. Where

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:50: 7. Climate change adaption and mitigation – an assessment should

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:62: consider the adequacy of the mitigation proposed in such an event,

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:64: mitigation measures are proposed. A number of controls would, in any

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:77: states that mitigation can be incorporated through good design,

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:77: series of mitigation measures which have been built into the design

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:83: applications. This should include information on any mitigation

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:86: this as a basis for the assessment and identification of mitigation that

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:86: necessary, identify mitigation measures which are specific and relevant

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:86: therefore be concluded that the mitigation measures detailed in the ES

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:86: second is a range of additional mitigation measures which will ensure

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:87:7.108 Environmental mitigation measures identified within the ES to address

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:88: significant effects have been identified, recorded and mitigation

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:89: identified appropriate mitigation to ensure that the potential effects on

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:90: development. Mitigation measures proposed within the ES (e.g.

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:90: Best practice guidance and the implementation of mitigation

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:90: mitigation measures built into the DCO or through the operation of the

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:95: opportunities unique to the site to provide environmental mitigation to

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:98: appropriate, mitigation and enhancement measures have been

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:101:8.10 It has also been shown that appropriate mitigation measures have been

TR030002-000566-Doc 7.1 Planning Statement.pdf:127: mitigation against and adaption to climate change whilst also balancing

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:5:  potential to prevent achieving WFD status objectives by impacting upon proposed mitigation

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:5:  potential to incorporate mitigation measures included in the appropriate River Basin Management

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:6: and, if appropriate, reasons for failure and mitigation measures identified by the Environment

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:7:  The potential for the scheme to impact upon proposed WFD mitigation measures and

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:8: suitable mitigation measures must be identified, with reference to appropriate guidance (such as the

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:8:1.2.17 This stage summarises the results of the assessment and any mitigation measures that are required to

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:15:Mitigation measures assessment Moderate or less Good

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:15:Mitigation measures in place*

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:16:Mitigation measures not in place*

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:16:According to the latest “reasons for not achieving good status” database, failure to pass the mitigation measures

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:21: mitigation measures critical assessment?

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:25: mitigation

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:25:  There is the potential for the presence of the new quay wall to impact on wave mitigation

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:28: mitigation measures habitats

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:28: mitigation measures habitats

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:29:4.1.4 The water body is not designated artificial or heavily modified, and therefore no mitigation measures

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:29:4.1.6 Without mitigation, there is the potential to cause the deterioration of status in the Tees transitional

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:30: Proposed mitigation measures

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:30:4.1.8 The following mitigation measures are recommended in order to ensure that the impacts described in

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:30:4.1.9 Without mitigation, the proposed development activities at the harbour facilities could cause impacts to

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:30: the quality elements of the Tees Estuary (S Bank) water body. The implementation of mitigation

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:31:Surface water The construction of the small individual The potential increase of sediments to the None. Implementation of mitigation

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:32: The construction of the temporary compounds The accidental release of potentially Any deterioration in the Implementation of mitigation

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:32: The construction and surface water The release of sediments into the water body Any deterioration in the Implementation of mitigation

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:33: potential to adversely impact upon the biological to the relatively small area over which the Mitigation measures relating to wheel washing will

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:34: quality elements are identified in Table 7. The main potential impacts of the scheme without mitigation

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:36: assessed in Tables 16 to 18 respectively. The main potential impacts of the scheme without mitigation

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:36:  Potential impacts on mitigation measures in place (related to Heavily Modified designation).

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:36: elements, concentrations of dissolved inorganic nitrogen and the overall mitigation measures

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:37: Impacts on mitigation measures that are in place (associated with the water body being heavily

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:37:4.1.18 There are a number of mitigation measures in place which relate to dredging and disposal within the

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:37: Proposed mitigation measures

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:37:4.1.20 The following mitigation measures are proposed to protect the Tees estuary water body:

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:37: accordance with mitigation measures identified by the Environment Agency for this water body

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:41: has the potential to impact upon the physico- contaminating materials during the construction physico-chemical status of mitigation measures

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:46: in water body status is clearly stated. Mitigation measures to prevent deterioration in water body status

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:46: is likely to be significantly reduced by the implementation of the mitigation measures described in

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:46: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:46: the proposed scheme is compliant with the WFD, the following mitigation measures are recommended:

TR030002-000464-Section 4 App 4.3 WFD compliance assessment.pdf:47:5.1.4 The implementation of these mitigation measures is expected to significantly reduce the impact to the

TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (5).pdf:5:would be no significant impact and no mitigation measures are considered to be required

TR030002-000860-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.11B - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:6:produced to set out the principles of the mitigation (as defined in the Harbour Facilities Environmental

TR030002-000860-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.11B - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:6:with separately in the Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (Document 6.12A).

TR030002-000860-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.11B - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:7:marine mammals). The following mitigation measures have been proposed within the ES to minimise

TR030002-000860-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.11B - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:7:that it is satisfied with the proposed mitigation with regard to marine mammals. Natural England also

TR030002-000860-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.11B - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:7:stated that all mitigation should be included (in more detail) within a Marine Mammal Mitigation Plan. The

TR030002-000860-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.11B - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:7:Marine Mammal Mitigation Plan is to be included within the EMP to be submitted pursuant to Requirement

TR030002-000860-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.11B - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:7:(including bats, otters, reptiles and breeding birds). The following mitigation / enhancement measures

TR030002-000860-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.11B - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:8:The following mitigation / enhancement measures have been proposed within the ES to minimise impacts

TR030002-000860-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.11B - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:8:The following mitigation / enhancement measures have been proposed within the ES to minimise impacts

TR030002-000860-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.11B - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:9:The following mitigation / enhancement measures have been proposed within the ES to minimise impacts

TR030002-000860-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.11B - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:9:The following mitigation / enhancement measures have been proposed within the ES to minimise impacts

TR030002-000860-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.11B - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:10:Natural England stated within its Representation to PINS in June 2015 that suitable mitigation measures

TR030002-000860-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.11B - Outline Ecological Management Plan.pdf:10:This outline EMP sets out the principles of the mitigation identified in the ES (Document 6.4) required to

TR030002-001873-Decision holding letter.pdf:5: ecological mitigation or enhancement works referred to in the

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:8: “mitigation and managementmonitoring strategy” means the mitigation and

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:26: (i)(h) the mitigation and managementmonitoring strategy; and (Document 6.12);

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:26: (m) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12); and

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:28: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:32:planning any additional mitigation measures required

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:33:pursuant to (3) then phase 2(a) and (b) shall not be carried out until either additional mitigation

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:33:planning authority that no additional measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:33:earthworks or site levelling but excluding archaeological soil movement and ecological mitigation

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:33:statement,management plan (Document 6.10) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:33: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:34:and ecological mitigation or enhancement works) until a Construction Traffic Management Plan

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:34:management plan for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:34:set out in the outline ecological management plan (Document 6.11) and incorporating the mitigation

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:34:phase, and to identify the requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order to avoid any

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:34:local planning authority prior to any ecological surveys being undertaken and the scope of mitigation

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:34:agreed following the survey. The agreed mitigation shall then be carried out in accordance with an

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:52: (3) The ecological managementlagoon habitat enhancement plan must accord with the mitigation

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:54:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:56:accordance with principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12) and

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:72: National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:72:a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence (referred to

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:72:in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for approval, such

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:72:approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme must be

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:72: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:72:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:72:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-000750-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Tracked).pdf:72:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:6:1.1.1 This Schedule sets out the controls, mitigation, enhancement and other measures identified in the

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:7:1 No mitigation measures outlined within this section. N/A

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:7:2 No mitigation measures outlined within this section. N/A

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:7:3 No mitigation measures outlined within this section. N/A

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:7:4 No mitigation measures outlined within this section. N/A

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:7:5 No mitigation measures outlined within this section. N/A

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:8:9 Further monitoring of the ground gas regime so that mitigation measures can be implemented. Requirement 8 (revised)

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:9:14 The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume is selection of the dredge method. Contaminated Deemed Marine Licence (Schedule 5)

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:10:22 The mitigation measures relevant to Section 7 are also of relevance to this Section. Deemed Marine Licence (Schedule 5)

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:10: mammals prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:11:28 The mitigation measures relevant to Section 7 are also of relevance to this section. Deemed Marine Licence (Schedule 5)

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:11:30 As mitigation for the potential impact of construction phase noise (and visual) disturbance, it is Construction Environmental Management Plan

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:12: would be retained on site. Where lighting levels are found to be inadequate or excessive, mitigation

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:13:35 A Decommissioning Plan would be developed and further mitigation may be recommended if Requirement 11

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:13: also have to incorporate other mitigation measures to respond to additional sensitivities that may need

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:14:44 The mitigation measures relevant to Section 7 are also of relevance to this section. N/A

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:15: mammals prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:15:49 Mitigation measures relating to communications include the following: Construction Environmental Management Plan

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:15:50 Mitigation measures relating to dust management include the following: Construction Environmental Management Plan

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:17: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate.

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:17:51 Mitigation measures specific to demolition include the following: Construction Environmental Management Plan

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:17:52 Mitigation measures specific to earthworks include the following: Construction Environmental Management Plan

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:17:53 Mitigation measures specific to construction include the following: Construction Environmental Management Plan

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:18:54 Mitigation measures specific to trackout include the following: Construction Environmental Management Plan

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:18:55 Mitigation measures specific to Non Road Mobile Machinery (NRMM) include the following: Construction Environmental Management Plan

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:19:56 Construction phase road traffic emissions mitigation include: Construction Traffic Management Plan

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:20: investigation of mitigation measures to reduce the noise emission levels from the activity or activities,

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:21: the implementation of mitigation to re-assess the noise levels against the guideline noise levels.

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:22:65 The impermeable area of the site would be increased due to the works. As mitigation, an adequate Design approval (Requirement 2 and

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:23:72 No mitigation measures are required for this topic. N/A

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:23:73 The following mitigation measures have been incorporated into the proposed scheme to assist with Design approval (Requirement 2 and

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:24: A lighting mitigation strategy would be employed across the scheme as set out in Appendix 20.4 of the

TR030002-000710-York Potash Limited (Document 6.8A).pdf:25: order to allow continued safe use of the routes. No further mitigation measures are required.

TR030002-000790-150821 TR030002 CATS Parties Protective Provisions.pdf:6: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures which are

TR030002-000018-Examination Library.pdf:22:REP2-006 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring

TR030002-000018-Examination Library.pdf:26:REP4-060 York Potash Ltd - 6.12A Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy Rev 4

TR030002-000757-Document 8.3 Appendix 4 - No 2 Tunnel Note.pdf:4:mitigation measures.

TR030002-000757-Document 8.3 Appendix 4 - No 2 Tunnel Note.pdf:4:Once the residual risks have been assessed, the requirement for further mitigation measures can

TR030002-000757-Document 8.3 Appendix 4 - No 2 Tunnel Note.pdf:4:be assessed (if required). Possible additional mitigation measures may include the following:

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:5:6 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES ………………………………………………… 13

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:6: (ESs) produced, together with measures to ensure that appropriate corrective actions or mitigation

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:6: disturbance, pollution or impact on habitats, and details of mitigation measures.

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:6: Harbour facilities CEMP, including the management processes, mitigation measures, potential

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:7: activities of the Harbour facilities and those mitigation measures which have been recommended to

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:9: that appropriate resources are available, and any necessary environmental controls or mitigation

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:12: Risk Assessments introduced in Section 4.1 and the relevant mitigation measures identified in

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:13: the environmental risks and mitigation measures will be largely the same. Tasks Sheets support

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:16:  agreed controls, protection and mitigation measures (including those in the CEMP) are in

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:16: to verify that the required methods and mitigation measures are being implemented effectively.

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:18:6 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:18: The mitigation measures presented in Table 6-1 have been developed from the mitigation

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:19:Table 6-1 Summary of mitigation measures for Harbour facilities

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:19: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:20: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:20:13 As mitigation for the potential impact of construction phase noise (and visual) disturbance, it is proposed that noise attenuation barriers would be

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:21: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:21: be retained on site. Where lighting levels are found to be inadequate or excessive, mitigation strategies to remedy the effects would be

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:21:18 The mitigation measures relevant to Section 7 are also of relevance to this section.

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:21:20 Mitigation measures relating to communications include the following:

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:22: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:22:21 Mitigation measures relating to dust management include the following:

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:23: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:23:  Ensure an adequate water supply on the site for effective dust/particulate matter suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:23:22 Mitigation measures specific to demolition include the following:

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:23:23 Mitigation measures specific to earthworks include the following:

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:23:24 Mitigation measures specific to construction include the following:

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:24: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:24:25 Mitigation measures specific to trackout include the following:

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:24:26 Mitigation measures specific to Non Road Mobile Machinery (NRMM) include the following:

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:25: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:26: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:26: compliance/complaint (where operationally safe to do so) and/or the investigation of mitigation measures to reduce the noise emission levels from

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:26: survey would be undertaken as soon as possible following the implementation of mitigation to re-assess the noise levels against the guideline

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:27: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000725-York Potash Limited (Document 6.10).pdf:27:32 The mitigation measures relevant to Section 7 are also of relevance to this section to prevent impacts to water abstractions.

TR030002-000110-130729 York Potash meeting - Minutes of the meeting with key statutory bodies.pdf:4: mitigation to be identified that may make a proposal acceptable. NE advised that more

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:2:with greater safeguards in place to protect assets and secure mitigation. He agrees with the

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:3:effects on air quality and emissions after mitigation, either in relation to the scheme or

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:3:these issues at ER 5.3.1-17. He notes that a significant number of necessary mitigation and

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:4:Climate change mitigation and adaptation, coastal change and flood risk

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:4:related matters, taking into account the mitigation embodied in the design of the

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:4:the mitigation that would be secured through the CEMP, the scheme should not give rise to

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:4:mitigation and monitoring are implemented (ER 5.6).

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:4:the mitigation that would be secured under the CEMP and the Environmental Permit, there

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:4:heritage assets, he agrees that, after mitigation secured by requirement 10 and a condition

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:5:harm as a result of noise and vibration taking into account the mitigation that would be

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:6:subject to the mitigation to be secured through the Construction Traffic Management Plan

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:6:subject to the proposed mitigation no adverse considerations arise from the transport

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:6:would be governed by the CEMP, would generally provide mitigation against most risks to

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:6:mitigation measures that would be secured by the requirements and the DML, the proposals

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:7:Ramsar sites, taking into account the mitigation and monitoring measures referred to at ER

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:7:mitigation measures relied on by the applicant are fully delivered through the Order and the

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:7:proposed by the applicant to secure the proposed mitigation measures and monitoring are

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:7:socio-economic benefits and that any adverse impacts would be capable of mitigation in

TR030002-001854-Secretary of State’s Decision Letter and Statement of Reasons.pdf:10:operations may have impacts that should be subject to mitigation measures that would be

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:1: the proposed scheme. Mitigation measures are detailed and a discussion of the residual impacts

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:5: x Any development by YPL should include appropriate mitigation so as not

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:13: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:15: mitigation of risk.

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:15: Mitigation measures and residual risk

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:16: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:16:18.5.19 No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact. However, the controls

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:16: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:17:18.6.6 With an appropriate mitigation strategy in place (such as that outlined above), it is anticipated that the

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:17: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:17:18.6.8 No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:18: mitigation of risk and would be applied to decommissioning activities.

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:18: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:20:Table 18-2 Summary of impacts, mitigation measures and residual impacts with regard to Infrastructure

TR030002-000453-ES Section 18 Infrastructure.pdf:20:Impact Sensitivity Magnitude Significance of Mitigation

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:3:5 LIGHTING APPRAISAL, MITIGATION AND RESIDUAL EFFECTS ……………………. 21

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:9:  Lighting appraisal, mitigation and residual effects; and

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:9: mitigation techniques that are proposed. This section provides an understanding of the predicted

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:9: residual effects on the representative viewpoints as a result of the Site lighting, following mitigation.

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:9: identifying any of the assessed viewpoints which require further mitigation.

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:20: found to be inadequate or excessive, mitigation strategies to remedy the effects would be implemented.

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:22:4.3.3 Whilst every effort will be made to limit the spill light due to this project through mitigation during the

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:26:5 LIGHTING APPRAISAL, MITIGATION AND RESIDUAL EFFECTS

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:26: mitigation strategies are proposed. The mitigation strategies identified are specific to each viewpoint,

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:26:5.1.4 Finally, the residual impacts of the proposed lighting, taking into account the mitigation strategies

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:27: mitigation.

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:28: Adverse mitigation to reduce the impact opportunity over the long term.

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:28: available. If no mitigation is

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:39: Viewpoint 6 – Construction phase mitigation

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:39:5.6.8 The following mitigation techniques would be adopted to reduce the overall effect of the proposed

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:39:5.6.9 Based on the mitigation strategies identified above, if the strategies are applied through the design and

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:42: Viewpoint 8 – Construction phase mitigation

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:42:5.7.9 The following mitigation techniques would be adopted to reduce the overall effect of the proposed

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:42:5.7.10 Based on the mitigation strategies identified above, if the strategies are applied through the design and

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:45: Viewpoint 10 – Construction phase mitigation

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:45:5.8.9 The following mitigation techniques would be adopted to reduce the overall effect of the proposed

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:45:5.8.10 Based on the mitigation strategies identified above, if the strategies are applied through the design and

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:48: Viewpoint 14 – Construction phase mitigation

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:48:5.9.9 As above, the following mitigation techniques would be adopted to reduce the overall effect of the

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:48:5.9.10 Based on the mitigation strategies identified above, if the strategies are applied through the design and

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:50: Viewpoint 15 – Construction phase mitigation

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:50:5.10.9 The following mitigation techniques would be adopted to reduce the overall effect of the proposed

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:51:5.10.10 Based on the mitigation strategies identified above, if the strategies are applied through the design and

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:54: Viewpoint 17 – Construction phase mitigation

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:54:5.11.10 The following mitigation techniques would be adopted to reduce the overall effect of the proposed

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:54:5.11.11 Based on the mitigation strategies identified above, if the strategies are applied through the design and

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:61:6.6 To summarise the lighting assessment and mitigation strategies identified during the construction

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:61: phase, and the key mitigation principles that would need to be adopted in order to assist with reducing

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:71: LAGOON MITIGATION AND MONITORING STRATEGY DRAFT

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:72: LAGOON MITIGATION AND MONITORING STRATEGY DRAFT

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:77: LAGOON MITIGATION AND MONITORING STRATEGY DRAFT

TR030002-000504-Section 20 App 20.4 Technical lighting assessment.pdf:78: LAGOON MITIGATION AND MONITORING STRATEGY DRAFT

TR030002-000869-151216 TR030002 Tata Steel UK and Redcar Bulk Terminal - Comments on ExA_s dDCO.pdf:9: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures

TR030002-000861-SABIC UK Petrochemicals Limited.PDF:14: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures

TR030002-000861-SABIC UK Petrochemicals Limited.PDF:32: 2.1.6 Although the protective provisions offered by the Applicant provide some mitigation

TR030002-000861-SABIC UK Petrochemicals Limited.PDF:47: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures

TR030002-000572-Doc 7.3 Appendix 4 - Economic Impact Report.pdf:47: has also announced plans to develop facilities nomics, taking into account planned mitigation.

TR030002-000572-Doc 7.3 Appendix 4 - Economic Impact Report.pdf:51: and the potential for labour market displacement will develop mitigation measures in partnership

TR030002-000572-Doc 7.3 Appendix 4 - Economic Impact Report.pdf:53: Enhancement and Mitigation increasing demand for relevant courses and

TR030002-000572-Doc 7.3 Appendix 4 - Economic Impact Report.pdf:53: benefits and providing mitigation to address • Train - Work with educational institutions and

TR030002-000572-Doc 7.3 Appendix 4 - Economic Impact Report.pdf:60:any potential mitigation measures into account. based on the central cost and price case, are

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:1: on these features, and sets out proposed mitigation and enhancement measures. Legislation relevant

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:1: x consideration of mitigation measures to minimise negative impacts and enhancement measures

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:1: mitigation into account, including habitat loss, disturbance of animals and off-site impacts from

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:4:those required for mitigation.

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:5:provision of bat boxes and enhancement measures beyond those required for mitigation.

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:5:Principal Importance. Natural England advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation proposals for Habitats

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:5: loss or damage to scarce or valuable habitat which may require mitigation, such as areas of SSSI or Local Wildlife Sites. Natural

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:13:10.3.36 The assessment also takes into account the likely success of any proposed mitigation. Monitoring

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:13: requirements and criteria for measuring the success of mitigation are identified where appropriate.

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:13:10.3.37 Enhancement measures (i.e. measures that are in addition to mitigation requirements) are also

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:13: identified. The residual impact assessment (i.e. following mitigation) reflects the predicted impact of the

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25: to verify that no protected species could be impacted and to identify the requirement for mitigation to be

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25: there is likely to be loss or damage to scarce or valuable habitat which may require mitigation, such as

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:26: Impact Sensitivity Magnitude Significanc Mitigation Significance of

TR030002-000445-ES Section 10 Terrestrial ecology.pdf:27:Impact Sensitivity Magnitude Significanc Mitigation Significance of

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:8: “mitigation and monitoring strategy” means the mitigation and monitoring strategy certified by

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:26: (h) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12);

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:28: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:32:planning any additional mitigation measures required

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:32:pursuant to (3) then phase 2(a) and (b) shall not be carried out until either additional mitigation

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:33:planning authority that no additional measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:33:earthworks or site levelling but excluding ecological mitigation works, until a Construction

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:33:6.10) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance tracker (Document 6.8A), has

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:33: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:33:provided that such alternative does not prevent the mitigation during construction referred to in the

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:33: 7. None of the authorised development is to commence (excluding ecological mitigation or

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:34:management plan for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:34:environmental statement for that phase (including a marine management mitigation plan but not

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:34:management plan (Document 6.11) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:34:England. In the case of any ecological mitigation or enhancement works below mean high water

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:34:phase, and to identify the requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order to avoid any

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:34:local planning authority prior to any ecological surveys being undertaken and the scope of mitigation

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:34:agreed following the survey. The agreed mitigation shall then be carried out in accordance with an

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:51: (3) The lagoon habitat enhancement plan must accord with the mitigation and monitoring strategy

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:53:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:55:works in accordance with principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:70: National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:70:a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence (referred to

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:70:in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for approval, such

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:70:approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme must be

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:70: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:70:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:70:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-000769-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:70:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must

TR030002-000858-Huntsman Polyurethanes (UK) Limited.PDF:14: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures

TR030002-000858-Huntsman Polyurethanes (UK) Limited.PDF:32: 2.1.6 Although the protective provisions offered by the Applicant provide some mitigation

TR030002-000858-Huntsman Polyurethanes (UK) Limited.PDF:47: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures

TR030002-000689-York Potash Ltd (4).pdf:19: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures which

TR030002-000689-York Potash Ltd (4).pdf:32: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures which

TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf:10:mitigation in relation to visual and landscape effects. In particular, the

TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf:10:Authority questions whether or not there is a reliance on mitigation measures

TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf:10:mitigation measures be considered to reduce/offset any associated impacts?

TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf:11:mitigation is proposed for the disturbance of non- designated assets that may

TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf:12:8.24 Suggested mitigation measures are as follows:

TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf:15:8.47 With the proposed package of mitigation in place, the residual impacts in

TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf:15:implementation of the transport strategy alongside a package of mitigation the

TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf:17:impact to residential properties within the Dormanstown area. Mitigation

TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf:17:The mitigation may be achieved via the requirements incorporated in the

TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf:19:rates and to inform mitigation measures.

TR030002-000736-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council (Local Impact Report).pdf:20:identified mitigation measures to avoid such impacts where possible. There

TR030002-Advice-00003-1-141111_TR030002_York Potash Natural England Teleconference final.pdf:2:  No mitigation proposal has been seen as yet, although Natural England has

TR030002-Advice-00003-1-141111_TR030002_York Potash Natural England Teleconference final.pdf:2:  A recent significant constraint to mitigation has been identified with respect to

TR030002-000422-Doc 5.1 Statement of Reasons.pdf:39: described in the Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (see

TR030002-000018-Examination Library (5).pdf:22:REP2-006 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring

TR030002-000018-Examination Library (5).pdf:26:REP4-060 York Potash Ltd - 6.12A Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy Rev 4

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:1: and access. Mitigation measures are detailed where required and a discussion of the residual impacts

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:1: some open land can perform many functions (such as wildlife, recreation, flood risk mitigation,

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:3:be sought, including the need for any diversion or stopping up and mitigation measures.

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:11: Mitigation measures and residual impacts

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:11:21.5.9 With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, a residual impact of negligible significance

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:12: Mitigation measures and residual impacts

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:12:21.5.12 No mitigation measures are required beyond the proposed implementation of a Traffic Management

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:12: recreational users of footpaths and cycle paths, as mitigation measures outlined in Section 13.5 would

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:13: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:13:21.5.20 The best practice mitigation measures outlined within Sections 13.5, 14.5 and 20.10 are of relevance

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:13: to this impact. With the implementation of the mitigation measures proposed, the residual impact is

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:13: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:13:21.6.2 No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:14: Mitigation measures and residual impacts

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:14:21.6.5 No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:14: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:14:21.6.10 The mitigation measures outlined in Sections 13.6, 14.6 and 20.10 are also of relevance to this impact.

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:14: With the implementation of mitigation measures outlined within these sections, the combined residual

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:15: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:15:21.7.6 With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, a residual impact of negligible significance

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:16: would be managed through the implementation of mitigation measures as part of the decommissioning

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:16: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:16:21.7.11 The mitigation measures outlined in Sections 13, 14 and 20 are also of relevance to this impact. With

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:16: the implementation of mitigation measures outlined within these sections, the combined residual impact

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:16: combined indirect impact of minor adverse (pre-mitigation) would occur during the construction,

TR030002-000456-ES Section 21 Recreation and access.pdf:16: implementation of mitigation measures, the residual impact would be minor adverse (during

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:1: therefore, is excluded from further consideration within this section. Mitigation measures are detailed

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:3:recommend tidal restrictions during key mitigation periods, or measurable mitigation measures put in place.

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:4:undertaken with appropriate mitigation provided.

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:5:enhance biodiversity. Natural England advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation proposals for Habitats and Importance

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:25: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:25: and backhoe. The use of an enclosed grab has been built into the design as embedded mitigation, in

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:25: order to minimise the dispersion of contaminated material during dredging. Mitigation measures

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:26:11.5.15 With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, the residual impact would be of negligible

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:27: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:27:11.5.23 Mitigation measures are limited and the potential impacts are unavoidable consequences of the

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:43: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:43: take place in order to allow the migration of juvenile salmon and sea trout. Furthermore, as mitigation

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:43:11.5.49 With the implementation of the mitigation measures outlined above, a residual impact of minor adverse

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:44: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:44: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:44:11.5.55 No mitigation measures are proposed. There would be no residual impact.

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:45: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:45: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:45:11.6.6 No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:46: controlled through the implementation of mitigation measures, as outlined within Section 7.

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:46: mitigation measures are outlined, and the residual impact presented.

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:47:Table 11-16 Summary of potential impacts, impact significance, mitigation measures and residual impacts to fisheries an

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:47:Impact Sensitivity of Magnitude of Significance of Mitigation

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:47:Direct uptake and High Subtidal Subtidal Mitigation measures are limited and the poten

TR030002-000446-ES Section 11 Fisheries and fishing activity.pdf:48:Impact Sensitivity of Magnitude of Significance of Mitigation

TR030002-000883-151231 TR030002 CATS Parties Submission.pdf:10:The level of risk mitigation that can be 7.4 to 7.15 5.4 PPs form a single layer of protection – identification of the location of the CATS

TR030002-000883-151231 TR030002 CATS Parties Submission.pdf:10:form of the protective provisions) risk mitigation of greater than 0.001 per opportunity is an overly simplistic and

TR030002-000883-151231 TR030002 CATS Parties Submission.pdf:10:separate and subsequent human errors are occur places greater risk mitigation on a single human layer of protection than

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:5:“ecological mitigation works” means the mitigation measures set out in the outline ecological

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:6: “mitigation and monitoring strategy” means the mitigation and monitoring strategy certified

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:25: (h) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A);

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:31:planning authority and agree with the local planning any additional mitigation measures required.

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:31:not be carried out until either additional mitigation measures have been agreed with the local

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:31:measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures required must be carried out as agreed.

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:32:earthworks or site levelling but excluding ecological mitigation works, until a Construction

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:32:and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance tracker, has been submitted to and

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:32: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:32:requirements etc) provided that such amendment does not diminish the mitigation during

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:32: 7. None of the authorised development is to commence (excluding ecological mitigation or

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:33:management plans for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:33:environmental statement for that phase (including a marine mammal mitigation plan but not

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:33:incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance tracker have been submitted to and

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:33:amendments to any ecological enhancement or mitigation measures are proposed below the level

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:33:decommissioning phase, and to identify any requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:33:being undertaken and, following the surveys, the scope of mitigation including an implementation

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:33:agreed mitigation must be carried out as agreed.

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:45:information) must accord with the mitigation and monitoring strategy.

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:47:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (that is, an

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:49:enhancement plan and the principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy and agreed

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:64: for National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:64:(2)(e), a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:64:(referred to in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:64:approval, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:64: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:64:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:64:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:64:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:68: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:78: (h) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-001865-The York Potash Harbour Facilities Order 2016 - Tracked Changes showing non-material amendments.pdf:83: (h) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000294-151124 TR030002 Agenda for DCO Hearing.pdf:1: secure mitigation will also be considered.

TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document.pdf:5:would be no significant impact and no mitigation measures are considered to be required

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:6:1.1.1 This Schedule sets out the controls, mitigation, enhancement and other measures identified in the

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:7:1 No mitigation measures outlined within this section. N/A

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:7:2 No mitigation measures outlined within this section. N/A

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:7:3 No mitigation measures outlined within this section. N/A

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:7:4 No mitigation measures outlined within this section. N/A

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:7:5 No mitigation measures outlined within this section. N/A

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:8:8 Further monitoring of the ground gas regime so that mitigation measures can be implemented. CEMP Requirement 6

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:9:12 The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume is selection of the dredge method. Contaminated MMO Licence Sch 4

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:10:19 The mitigation measures relevant to Section 7 are also of relevance to this Section. MMO Licence Sch 4

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:10: mammals prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:11:25 The mitigation measures relevant to Section 7 are also of relevance to this section. MMO Licence Sch 4

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:11:27 As mitigation for the potential impact of noise disturbance, it is proposed that noise attenuation barriers CEMP Requirement 6

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:11: inadequate or excessive, mitigation strategies to remedy the effects would be implemented.

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:12:32 A Decommissioning Plan would be developed and further mitigation may be recommended if Requirement 11

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:13:40 The mitigation measures relevant to Section 7 are also of relevance to this section. N/A

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:13: mammals prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:14:45 Mitigation measures relating to communications include the following: CEMP Requirement 6

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:14:46 Mitigation measures relating to dust management include the following: CEMP Requirement 6

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:15: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate.

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:16:47 Mitigation measures specific to demolition include the following: CEMP Requirement 6

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:16:48 Mitigation measures specific to earthworks include the following: CEMP Requirement 6

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:16:490 Mitigation measures specific to construction include the following: CEMP Requirement 6

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:16:50 Mitigation measures specific to trackout include the following: CEMP Requirement 6

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:17:51 Mitigation measures specific to Non Road Mobile Machinery (NRMM) include the following: CEMP Requirement 6

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:17:52 Construction phase road traffic emissions mitigation include: CTMP Requirement 7

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:19: investigation of mitigation measures to reduce the noise emission levels from the activity or activities,

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:19: the implementation of mitigation to re-assess the noise levels against the guideline noise levels.

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:22:65 No mitigation measures are required for this topic. N/A

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:22:66 The following mitigation measures have been incorporated into the proposed scheme to assist with Design approval Requirement 2

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:23: A lighting mitigation strategy would be employed across the scheme as set out in Appendix 20.4 of the

TR030002-000564-Doc 6.8 Governance Tracker.pdf:23: order to allow continued safe use of the routes. No further mitigation measures are required.

TR030002-000099-141104_TR030002_Meeting_Note.pdf:2:proposed mitigation, however they may not have reached full agreement in time for

TR030002-000099-141104_TR030002_Meeting_Note.pdf:3:series of mitigation scenarios which are being developed for discussion with NE, and a

TR030002-000099-141104_TR030002_Meeting_Note.pdf:3:mitigation tracker had been developed to inform requirements in the DCO.

TR030002-000099-141104_TR030002_Meeting_Note.pdf:3:Pins welcomed the use of a mitigation tracker to identify how mitigation relied upon

TR030002-000099-141104_TR030002_Meeting_Note.pdf:3:similar mitigation tracker in relation to mitigation identified and relied upon in the ES

TR030002-000099-141104_TR030002_Meeting_Note.pdf:4:be amended to reflect the contents of the mitigation tracker.

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:8: of the Harbour facilities. It is concluded that potential impacts – with mitigation / appropriate

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:8: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:8:4.6. Mitigation measures to minimise the risk of impacts to human health from elevated

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:9:  further monitoring of the ground gas regime so that suitable mitigation measures can be

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:9:  implementation of the generic environmental risk mitigation identified above.

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:9:4.7. With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, the residual impacts are predicted

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:9: agreement on the findings of the impact assessment and mitigation measures proposed.

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:10: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:11:5.8. With the implementation of the controls and mitigation measures outlined above, the residual

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:11: appropriate. There is agreement on the findings of the impact assessment and mitigation

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:12: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:13: Sands lagoon (included within the DCO and detailed in the Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:16: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:16:7.10. Mitigation measures with regard to this impact are limited and the potential impacts are

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:16: submission of the Harbour facilities ES. With the implementation of the above mitigation

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:18: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:18:8.4. Mitigation measures proposed with regard to the potential flood hazard to construction

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:18: With the implementation of the above mitigation, there is no residual impact. No other

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:18: mitigation measures are proposed.

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:18: agreement on the findings of the impact assessment and mitigation measures proposed.

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:19:9.6. A range of mitigation measures were recommended. Assuming the implementation of these

TR030002-000722-York Potash Limited 4.pdf:19: mitigation measures, the WFD compliance assessment concluded that the proposed scheme

TR030002-000841-151214 TR030002 MMO - Response to ExA's questions.pdf:5: The MMO is content that the drafted DCO and DML set out its provisions and mitigation for protection of the marine environment. In

TR030002-000862-INEOS UK SNS Limited (INEOS) - formerly DEA UK SNS Limited (DEA).PDF:14: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures

TR030002-000862-INEOS UK SNS Limited (INEOS) - formerly DEA UK SNS Limited (DEA).PDF:32: 2.1.6 Although the protective provisions offered by the Applicant provide some mitigation

TR030002-000862-INEOS UK SNS Limited (INEOS) - formerly DEA UK SNS Limited (DEA).PDF:47: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures

TR030002-000866-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 8.9 - Applicants Responses to Rule 17 Letter and Comments on the RIES.pdf:4:include the latest version of the mitigation measures required for the (Document 4.1D).

TR030002-000866-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 8.9 - Applicants Responses to Rule 17 Letter and Comments on the RIES.pdf:4:certified will need to include the latest version of the mitigation measures Tracker (Document 6.8B).

TR030002-000866-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 8.9 - Applicants Responses to Rule 17 Letter and Comments on the RIES.pdf:5:mitigation measures required for the Harbour Facility development, which

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:1: phases of the proposed scheme. Where relevant, mitigation measures are detailed and a discussion

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:13: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:13:17.4.19 No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance with

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:13: mitigation measures outlined below.

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:13: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:14: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:14:17.5.10 No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:15: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:15:17.5.17 No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:16: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:16:17.6.3 No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance with

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:17:Impact Sensitivity of Magnitude of Significance Mitigation Residual

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:17:Flooding at and Low Low Negligible No mitigation required No residual

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:17:Potential for Low Low Negligible No mitigation required Negligible

TR030002-000452-ES Section 17 Coastal protection and flood defence.pdf:17:Flooding at and Low Low Negligible No mitigation required Negligible

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:4: mitigation/enhancement measures proposed and agreed are fully referenced and appropriately

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:5:measures in Bran sands lagoon together with other mitigation, would not Document 6.5 (Appendices to ES)

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:5:date, and with the mitigation proposed, no protected species will be Document 6.5 (Appendices to ES)

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:9: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:10:4.8. With the implementation of the controls and mitigation measures outlined above, the residual

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:10: appropriate. There is agreement on the findings of the impact assessment and mitigation

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:11: significance of the potential impact (without mitigation) would be of moderate adverse

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:11: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:15: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:15: predicted effects of the measures are described in a Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS)

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:16: Mitigation for potential disturbance impacts

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:16:6.18. As mitigation for the potential impact of noise (and visual disturbance) during construction

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:16: waterbird assemblage, assuming that all mitigation measures are fully delivered.

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:17:  Appropriate habitat enhancements and mitigation measures have been identified that are

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:17: that it is satisfied that, in light of the mitigation proposed, the project is unlikely to have a

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:19: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:19: minor beneficial significance, a number of mitigation measures / control measures are

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:19: appropriate. There is agreement on the findings of the impact assessment and mitigation

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:19: that any protected species will be impacted by the development with the mitigation measures

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:20: both options. Mitigation measures designed into the project were taken into account in the

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:20: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000738-York Potash Limited 3.pdf:20:8.5. The following mitigation measures have been incorporated into the proposed scheme to assist

TR030002-000864-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 8.8 - Applicants Comments on ExA DCO.pdf:4: governance tracker and a previous version of the Mitigation and Monitoring

TR030002-000864-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 8.8 - Applicants Comments on ExA DCO.pdf:5:mitigation during construction referred to in the environmental statement

TR030002-000291-151123 TR030002 Explanatory note for Risk Assessment of the interaction of York Potash & CATS pipeline.pdf:4:associated with major accident hazards, as in this case. The PPs are a form of mitigation that should

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:15:AND MITIGATION

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:37: to ensure that all mitigation measures, particularly those required as statutory requirements detailed within the

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:37: There will need to be a clear mechanism for enforceability and it will not be sufficient to defer consideration of mitigation

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:38: justify the assessment conclusion. Further information, assessment and consideration of mitigation options is required, and

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:38: and open quay options). The document would include detailed construction methodology, machinery and mitigation (soft

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:39: – NE note that acoustic barriers are proposed and more detail will be needed on this mitigation measure once the design is

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:39: advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation proposals for Habitats and Species of Principal Importance should

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:40: and enhancement measures beyond those required for mitigation as described in section 2.2.

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:40: considering marine licence applications, in order to seek their views on marine impacts and mitigation. These bodies include

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:41: the sediment analyses results for contaminants. Dependant on the levels of contamination, mitigation measures may be

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:42: Potential mitigation measures, page 163: The MMO would defer to NE on the impacts of underwater noise on marine

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:42: 5.11 Mitigation and monitoring - The PER includes some mitigation measures however given that some assessments

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:42: aware that depending on the outcomes of the full EIA, additional mitigation measures may be required. The applicant

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:42: should ensure mitigation forms part of the ES and all recommended mitigation is transferred to the DCO.

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:43:024-01 Agency to ensure that all mitigation measures, particularly those required as 'statutory requirements detailed within the

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:43: Currently there is little assessment of any suitable alternatives or mitigation. The PER does not acknowledge the need to

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:43: mitigation and compensation need to be included. In addition there is also loss of subtidal habitat, which should also be

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:43: considered in the context of mitigation or compensation requirements.

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:43: impact of migratory fish should be undertaken with appropriate mitigation provided.

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:43: beyond those required for mitigation as described in section 2.2. Measures to enhance the biodiversity of the site should be

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:44: addressed and, where necessary, suitable mitigation has been proposed. However, it has been noted that the report does

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:46: the national economy. Accordingly, any development by York Potash should include appropriate mitigation, so as not to

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:56: SUEZ and consider possible alternatives, appropriate mitigation, and protective provisions in the DCO. Therefore it does not

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:59: phases of the development. A full noise mitigation scheme shall be provided with the formal EIA report which shall detail

TR030002-000673-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 22 to 31.pdf:59: mitigation for the construction and operational phases. Full methodologies and raw data shall be provided with the EIA.4.

TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:1:15.1.2 Where considered appropriate, proposed mitigation measures are detailed and residual impacts are

TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:9: assessment and the development of appropriate mitigation.

TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:22: prehistoric/historic land surfaces to be present and formed the basis for appropriate mitigation

TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:23: Potential mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:24: Potential mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:28: interest. The mitigation proposed for the anticipated impacts to this asset comprises historic

TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:29: not indicate or represent assets that may be subject to impact and no mitigation has been

TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:29: the archaeological and heritage resource, as well as key mitigation measures and residual impacts.

TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:30: Table 15-7 Summary of mitigation measures

TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:30:Description of Impact Key Mitigation Measures

TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:30: (prior to mitigation)

TR030002-000450-ES Section 15 Archaeology and heritage.pdf:30: No specific further mitigation has been reco

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:1: mitigation measures and the residual effects that could remain after mitigation.

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:1: x mitigation and enhancement options.

TR030002-000454-ES Section 19 Socioeconomics.pdf:5: assessment to both demonstrate the maximum scale of beneficial impacts and ensure mitigation

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:5: 1.7 Step 3: Site-Specific Mitigation …………………………………………………………………………………… 12

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:8: determine the risk of dust impacts before the implementation of mitigation measures. The assigned risk

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:13: each activity (demolition, earthworks, construction and trackout), before mitigation is applied, was

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:13: determined. The risks of dust soiling and human health before mitigation are summarised in Tables

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:13: Table A13.1.7 Summary Dust Risk Table to Define Site-specific Mitigation

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:13:1.7 Step 3: Site-Specific Mitigation

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:13:1.7.1 The specific mitigation measures to be embedded within the scheme were defined with reference to the

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:13: identification of the site as a low, medium or high risk site. The embedded mitigation measures for the

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:14: worst. The impact descriptions used to determine the significance of the scheme with mitigation in

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:14: Table A13.1.8 Impact Descriptors for Each Activity with Mitigation, at Individual Receptors

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:14:1.8.2 The risks identified were used to determine the specifics of the embedded mitigation required as part of

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:14: Table A13.1.9 Summary Significance Table, With Mitigation

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:14: annual mean air quality objective (40µg.m-3). Mitigation is proposed as part of the design of the

TR030002-000492-Section 13 App 13.1 Air quality assessment methodology.pdf:14: scheme, and with the effective implementation of the mitigation and the existing low background

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:11:that the CEMP must identify and deliver the mitigation provided in the ES and a

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:11:the list within Article 38 and by ensuring that every mitigation measure to be

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:11:what has been assessed and relied upon for mitigation in the ES. The applicant

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:12:permanent (operational) mitigation, in relation to noise and visual disturbance to

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:12:appropriate mechanism for delivery of operational mitigation?

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:12:The LVIA states that mitigation relating to lighting and relevant to marine &

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:12:lighting, whereas chapter 9 (9.6.22) states that the mitigation principles to

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:12:Please can the applicant clarify how such operational lighting mitigation

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:12:operational mitigation?

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:12:the mitigation to be delivered through the EMP, having regard to the mitigation

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:12:the EMP to deliver mitigation which is in accordance with the principles set out in

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:12:the mitigation provided in the ES and in a certified copy of the Governance

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:12:which form part of the Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:14:Securing mitigation measures

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:14:how each mitigation measure relied on in the ES will be secured through the

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:15:mitigation measures relied upon in the ES would be secured through the DCO

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:15:revised Governance Tracker should also identify the mitigation measures relied

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:15:identify the relationship between ES/HRA mitigation and requirements and

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:15:plans identified in the draft DCO and DML to deliver the mitigation identified in

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:19:The Mitigation section of the Environmental Statement references the need to

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:19:Please provide a Table identifying where all the mitigation measures relied upon

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:20:mitigation measure would be secured in the DCO. The Applicant is asked to

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:22:Securing dredging mitigation through the DML

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:22:for securing this mitigation is appropriate? If not, please can the MMO identify

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:22:mitigation may be required.” To which the applicant responds ‘noted’.

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:23:this mitigation is required.

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:24:sufficient mitigation for the DCO scheme.

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:24:the need for further ecological mitigation and enhancement

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:25:mitigation measures outlined in the ES are considered appropriate by NE. Is a

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:25:The Environmental Statement confirms that the proposed ecological mitigation

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:26:be regarded as mitigation.

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:26:provisions are to be regarded as necessary mitigation? If you are not satisfied,

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:26:Mitigation measures during construction

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:27:Mitigation proposed to minimise the light effect on Bran Sands lagoon and

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:27:site. Where lighting levels are found to be inadequate or excessive, mitigation

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:27:However, it is not clear what these ‘mitigation strategies’ are or how they would

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:27:The Applicant is requested to clarify what these mitigation strategies are and

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:27:Mitigation measures during operation

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:27:acoustic noise barriers used as mitigation during construction.

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:27:Mitigation measures during decommissioning

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:27:how the proposed mitigation measures would be secured and delivered through

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:28:mitigation measures would be secured and delivered through the draft DCO. If

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:30:assessed and how any mitigation required is secured through the No

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:30:Proposed mitigation measures for operational and construction noise and

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:31:Mitigation

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:31:mechanism to secure and deliver the mitigation identified in the LVIA. However,

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:31:requirement 2 in the DCO, which refers to various mitigation measures at a

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:31:mitigation in chapter 20 of the ES. Furthermore requirement 2 refers only to

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:31:refer to requirement 3 as well, to secure mitigation in relation to phase 2 of the

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:32:both Requirements 2 and 3 in the draft DCO as securing the mitigation identified

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:32:Requirements 2 and 3 are appropriate to secure the identified mitigation in the

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:32:Mitigation

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:32:The LVIA includes reference to offsite planting as proposed mitigation (20.5.30;

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:32:receptors will benefit) and what the residual effects post mitigation would be. It

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:32:draft requirements, so it is unclear whether this mitigation forms part of the DCO

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:32:If the applicant is relying on this mitigation, but it would not be delivered

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:32:If the applicant is relying on mitigation provided through off-site planting, please

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:33:NYMNP, prior to mitigation, these are predicted to arise due to a combination of

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:35:mitigation is proposed as the loss of habitat at the MHF is described as ‘very

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:36:the mitigation measures which the Tuned In! facility has secured and delivered,

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:36:Reliance on Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS)

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:36:Habitat enhancement measures in the form of the Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:36:Cleveland Coast SPA and the objective of the mitigation proposed through the

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:36:features) and the mitigation proposed also relate to the qualifying criteria of the

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:36:provide mitigation for elements of the harbour facility development by providing

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:37:Securing and delivering the mitigation identified in the Bran Sands Lagoon MMS

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:38:Mitigation has been proposed in the form of noise attenuation barriers, likely to

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:39:The Governance Tracker, in relation to mitigation identified in the ES, identifies

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:39:includes in Table 6.1 a summary of mitigation measures identified in the ES. This

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:39:list matches the list of mitigation measures in the Governance Tracker (Doc 6.8).

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:39:However, not every mitigation measure listed in Table 6.1 has been identified as

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:39:mitigation measures to be delivered through the CEMP? If so, please can the

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:39:applicant revise Table 6.1 to only include the mitigation measures to be secured

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:40:The Governance Tracker (Doc 6.8) identifies that in relation to mitigation

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:40:where lighting levels are found to be inadequate or excessive, mitigation

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:40:Requirement 6 what mitigation measures would be identified and used to

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:40:Please can the applicant clarify how the lighting mitigation measures identified in

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:41:England advised that with the proposed mitigation measures in place, it could

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:41:combination with the mitigation proposed.

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:41:assumptions or mitigation relied upon in their response?

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:42:criteria for that site. The footnotes also do not clearly identify the mitigation

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:42:more detailed footnotes identifying the specific information and mitigation

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:42:Absence of adverse effects – securing mitigation

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:42:proposed development provided that intended mitigation measures are

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:42:Requirements that satisfactorily guarantee that the mitigation measures would

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:42:be secured? If not please specify any additional mitigation measures and a

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:43:mitigation measures on any European Sites for both the project alone and in-

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:45:number of mitigation measures are proposed to ensure any potential impacts of

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:45:how each mitigation measure proposed in the WFD Compliance Assessment

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:45:mitigation measures proposed in the WFD Compliance Assessment is sufficient?

TR030002-000410-ExA First Round Questions.pdf:45:deliver the mitigation measures proposed.

TR030002-000847-York Potash Ltd - Constructability Notes - BP CATS Pipeline Southern Route.pdf:9: mitigation and/or modifications to the cathodic protection are to be implemented such as the installation

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:5:“ecological mitigation works” means the mitigation measures set out in the outline ecological

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:6: “mitigation and monitoring strategy” means the mitigation and monitoring strategy certified

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:25: (h) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A);

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:31:planning authority and agree with the local planning any additional mitigation measures required

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:31:not be carried out until either additional mitigation measures have been agreed with the local

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:31:measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures required must be carried out as agreed.

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:31:earthworks or site levelling but excluding ecological mitigation works, until a Construction

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:31:and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance tracker, has been submitted to and

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:31: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:31:requirements etc.) provided that such amendment does not diminish the mitigation during

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:32: 7. None of the authorised development is to commence (excluding ecological mitigation or

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:32:management plans for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:32:environmental statement for that phase (including a marine mammal mitigation plan but not

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:32:incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance tracker have been submitted to and

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:32:amendments to any ecological enhancement or mitigation measures are proposed below the level

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:32:decommissioning phase, and to identify any requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:32:being undertaken and, following the surveys, the scope of mitigation including an implementation

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:32:agreed mitigation must be carried out as agreed.

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:45: information) must accord with the mitigation and monitoring strategy.

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:48:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (that is, an

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:50:enhancement plan and the principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy and agreed

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:66: for National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:66:(2)(e), a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:66:(referred to in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:66:approval, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:66: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:66:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:66:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:66:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:71: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:81: (h) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-001855-Development Consent Order as made by the Secretary of State.pdf:86: (h) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000764-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council.pdf:3:applicant regarding Point 54 of the CEMP mitigation table with reference to

TR030002-000500-Section 19 App 19.1 Socio economic legislation_policy_guidance.pdf:51: has also announced plans to develop facilities nomics, taking into account planned mitigation.

TR030002-000500-Section 19 App 19.1 Socio economic legislation_policy_guidance.pdf:55: and the potential for labour market displacement will develop mitigation measures in partnership

TR030002-000500-Section 19 App 19.1 Socio economic legislation_policy_guidance.pdf:57: Enhancement and Mitigation increasing demand for relevant courses and

TR030002-000500-Section 19 App 19.1 Socio economic legislation_policy_guidance.pdf:57: benefits and providing mitigation to address • Train - Work with educational institutions and

TR030002-000500-Section 19 App 19.1 Socio economic legislation_policy_guidance.pdf:64:any potential mitigation measures into account. based on the central cost and price case, are

TR030002-000752-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 1.pdf:6:The principal mitigation measure for the identified polyhalite export delays would be to increase the available tidal

TR030002-000752-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 1.pdf:9:are no identified issues, then this gives confidence that the developments can progress without further mitigation.

TR030002-000752-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 1.pdf:28: the two vessels really were in danger of a collision and some mitigation methods were required to enable safe

TR030002-000752-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 1.pdf:28:arrives at a point later or earlier or some other form of mitigation measures.

TR030002-000752-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 1.pdf:39:Mitigation of these delays (either for Phase 1 or Phase 2 of the polyhalite exports) would principally require dredging.

TR030002-000752-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 1.pdf:59:further mitigation. Should any issues be identified then analysis of the simulation can provide information

TR030002-000752-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 1.pdf:59:on potential mitigation measures.

TR030002-000732-DEA UK SNS Limited (Written Representation).pdf:26: made in respect of associated costs such as environmental mitigation.

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:6: “ecological mitigation works” means the mitigation measures set out in the outline ecological

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:7: “mitigation and monitoring strategy” means the mitigation and monitoring strategy certified by

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:26: (h) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A);

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:28: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:32:planning any additional mitigation measures required

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:32:pursuant to (3) then phase 2(a) and (b) must not be carried out until either additional mitigation

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:33:planning authority that no additional measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:33:earthworks or site levelling but excluding ecological mitigation works, until a Construction

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:33:6.10A) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance tracker (Document 6.8B), has

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:33: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:33:that such alteration does not prevent the mitigation during construction referred to in the

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:33: 7. None of the authorised development is to commence (excluding ecological mitigation or

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:management plans for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:environmental statement for that phase (including a marine mammal mitigation plan but not

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:management plan (Document 6.11B) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:enhancement or mitigation works are proposed below mean high water springs also the MMO in

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:decommissioning phase, and to identify the requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:undertaken and the scope of mitigation agreed following the survey. The agreed mitigation shall

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:53:information) must accord with the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A).

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:55:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:57:enhancement plan and the principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:73: National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:73:a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence (referred to

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:73:in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for approval, such

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:73:approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme must be

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:73: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:73:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:73:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:73:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:78: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures which

TR030002-000898-160113_TR030002_Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:92: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:7: 5.4 CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION, COASTAL CHANGE

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:7: 6.7 SECURING MITIGATION AND MONITORING THROUGH THE DCO ………… 93

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:12: the Bran Sands lagoon where ecological mitigation works are

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:13: mitigation measures.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:18: securing mitigation or to more fully detail Protective Provisions.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:18: to provide ornithological mitigation relied on to reach the conclusion in

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:19: both these documents simply add detail to the mitigation measures

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:19: practice, as does the subsequent provision of a draft Mitigation and

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:19: provide safeguards and limitations including further mitigation.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:20: protect assets and secure mitigation.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:27: appropriate objectives and mechanisms for mitigation and

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:31: those that are, the EIA process has identified mitigation measures

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:33:  Ensuring that all necessary mitigation measures including on-

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:33: European Sites after taking account of the intended mitigation

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:34: additional details and assurances that necessary mitigation would be

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:34: and mitigation is secured.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:35: devised by the applicant or safeguards and mitigation that would be

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:36: mitigation measures, including off-site planting, that are secured in

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:37: development. Mitigation and Requirements were also agreed.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:42: environment, climate change adaption and mitigation, coastal change

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:44: habitat23, it would clearly provide necessary mitigation to future proof

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:44: sufficient mitigation in relation to ecological considerations. A habitat

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:45: proposed mitigation would be secured. Ms Christie's initial

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:45: mitigation measures.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:48: significant air emissions, means of mitigation and any residual effects,

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:48: traffic. Predicted absolute emissions after mitigation are required to be

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:49:5.2.4 After allowing for the mitigation that would be applied during

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:49: site plant after mitigation, such as ensuring that diesel particulate

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:49: 1-hour mean objective is unlikely to be exceeded. The mitigation

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:51: effects in relation to these matters after mitigation whether in relation

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:52: mitigation there would be no outstanding issue in respect of this

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:53: movement away from the noise source. Mitigation measures are

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:53: DML that is Schedule 5 to the draft DCO. After such mitigation the

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:53: dredging having regard to the intended mitigation is assessed as

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:53: piling activities. Mitigation envisaged in the ES included possible use of

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:54: impact after mitigation is assessed as moderate beneficial even

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:54: after mitigation the impact would be of negligible significance. Screen

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:55:5.3.13 Mitigation measures proposed include undertaking any ground

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:55: constructional mitigation measures are set out in the Outline

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:55: satisfied that, in the light of proposed mitigation measures, including

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:55: were sought to guarantee achievement of the intended mitigation and

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:56: mitigation and monitoring and EA deferring to the position of NE and

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:56: being secured as mitigation. There should be no harm to the

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:56:5.4 CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION, COASTAL

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:57: run auxiliary generators. Thus, this extent of mitigation would be

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:57: assessment requirements in relation to climate change mitigation are

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:57: reduction measures have been applied and mitigation measures

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:59: further mitigation would be required to address residual risk. The

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:59: respect of these considerations after allowing for the mitigation

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:60: after mitigation through the measures contained in the CEMP.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:61: additional mitigation measures in their first response. The applicant

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:61: to ExA Q1’ REP2-015 that the mitigation includes acoustic barriers

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:61:5.5.7 Having regard to these considerations including the mitigation that

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:61: However, mitigation would be available through the prohibition of

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:62: Mitigation is suggested through use of enclosed grab dredging to avoid

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:62: periods for salmonids is also suggested as contributing to mitigation.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:62: With active mitigation measures, including detailed operational

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:62: other mitigation intended, all of which would need to be secured.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:62: mitigation and monitoring and EA deferring to the position of NE and

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:63: required under the Environmental Permit, so that suitable mitigation

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:63: of generic environmental risk mitigation, residual impacts are

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:64:5.7.4 Consequently, having regard to the mitigation that will be secured

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:65: November 2014 did not locate any structures. Mitigation by way of

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:65: apart from the Dolphin mooring bollard. It recommends mitigation to

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:65:5.8.7 A requirement to secure the mitigation perceived to be necessary was

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:66: sufficient mitigation. Consequently, I consider that the assessment

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:66: historic environment. After the mitigation that would be secured

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:67:5.9.5 In terms of mitigation, the intended off-site planting secured through

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:68: was eventually withdrawn, it is whether off-site mitigation including

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:68: such mitigation would be anticipated is either highway land, land

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:68: off-site mitigation proposed in the Development Consent Obligation

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:68: the light of intended mitigation, should not in itself give rise to such

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:73: significant adverse impacts on health and quality of life, mitigation of

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:73: be of negligible significance after mitigation. The mitigation measures

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:73: consequence of such considerations in the light of the mitigation that

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:74: mitigation and while they will reduce risk, they argue that they are not

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:80: mitigation is secured. This would be through the Construction Traffic

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:80: specified in Requirement 5. Other mitigation measures would be

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:81: Wind Farm development. Mitigation and Requirements were also

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:82:5.15.10 Overall, I am satisfied that subject to the intended mitigation no

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:83: the CEMP would generally provide mitigation against most risks to the

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:84: environmental mitigation measures described in paragraph 4.1.8

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:85:5.17.4 The mitigation measures referred to would include the detailed design

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:85: secure necessary monitoring and mitigation REP2-017. The MMO

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:85: responses and that monitoring and mitigation is secured REP2-019

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:86: weigh against the making of the DCO. The required mitigations are

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:93:6.6.4 The applicant is relying on a number of mitigation measures to reach

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:93: mitigation to address the following effects:

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:94: Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS). A draft MMS was provided

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:94: attenuation barriers as mitigation for the potential impact of noise and

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:95: REP6-027, and incorporating the mitigation identified in the

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:95: APP-127 and APP-128 describe the mitigation measures which would

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:96: confirms that these operational mitigation measures would be

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:96: set out in the outline EMP REP4-059 and incorporate the mitigation

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:96: mitigation measures identified in the HRA Report REP6-004.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:97: measure, not a mitigation measure, and therefore are not proposed as

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:97: not a mitigation measure (Response to Question HRA 1.13, [REP1-

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:97:6.7 SECURING MITIGATION AND MONITORING THROUGH THE DCO

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:97: applicant is relying on a number of mitigation measures to reach the

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:97: Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS), which both the

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:97: applicant and NE agree are ‘mitigation’.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:97:6.7.3 The section above provides information on the mitigation measures

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:97: section considers how the mitigation measures would be secured and

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:97: the proposed mitigation measures, would not result in an adverse

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:98: assumption that all mitigation measures relied upon by the applicant

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:98:  the adequacy of the mechanisms securing the mitigation

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:98: provisions to ensure that the mitigation measures are successful.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:98: Adequacy of mechanisms to secure the mitigation measures

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:98: APP-016 setting out how the proposed mitigation measures would be

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:98: course of the examination as the proposed mitigation strategy has

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:98:6.7.7 To deliver the mitigation measures relied upon to conclude no adverse

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:98: to secure the mitigation required in order to conclude no adverse

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:99: proposed mitigation strategy, and taking account of advice from NE

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:99: appropriate to secure and deliver through the DCO, the mitigation

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:99: mitigation measures are successful. The MMS states that responsibility

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:99: mitigation identified in the MMS is to be implemented by the applicant

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:100: adequately secured in the DCO, to ensure that the mitigation

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:100: mitigation and monitoring measures secured in the version of the

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:100: qualifying interests, having regard to the mitigation and

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:101: of securing off-site mitigation that is or may be required. I also

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:102: tests of good design and in section 5.2 that mitigation through the

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:102: marine ecology a significant number of mitigation measures would be

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:102: Obligation, but that provided that these monitoring and mitigation

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:102:7.1.6 With the design and mitigation measures that would be secured

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:102: there should be no issue with regard to nuisance given the mitigation

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:102: regard to fisheries provided that mitigation and monitoring are

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:103: there would be no significant adverse impact after mitigation and in

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:103: management or mitigation with regard to waste management

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:103: would arise after mitigation.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:103: mitigation and monitoring measures secured in the version of the

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:103: qualifying interests, having regard to the mitigation and

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:103: capable of satisfactory mitigation. The detailed wording in the DCO to

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:103: secure mitigation and monitoring will be considered in section 9 of this

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:104: benefits and any adverse impacts appear capable of mitigation in

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:119: undertake necessary mitigation or to effect the construction of the

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:123: is in securing mitigation for the inter-tidal habitat that would be lost

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:123: including the mitigation which will be achieved through the Portrack

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:143: sufficient mitigation and while they will reduce risk they are not a

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:145: the ‘Hierarchy of Control’ to risk mitigation;

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:145:  The level of risk mitigation that can be claimed for administrative

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:158: required for mitigation. Consequently, I consider that in Classes 7a for

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:159: provisions in the DML so that all mitigation and monitoring measures

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:162: enhancement works) covers essential on-site mitigation measures.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:163: Plan to secure mitigation and ongoing monitoring. Requirement 10

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:167: relation to mitigation safeguards. The MMO could always issue a

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:173: the mitigation secured in the DCO or accompanying Development

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:173: mitigation.

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:173: and any adverse impacts appear capable of mitigation overall and at

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:202:REP2-006 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:206:REP4-060 York Potash Ltd - 6.12A Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy Rev 4

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:214: MMS Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:221:“ecological mitigation works” means the mitigation measures set out in the outline ecological

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:222: “mitigation and monitoring strategy” means the mitigation and monitoring strategy certified

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:241: (h) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A);

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:243: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:247:authority and agree with the local planning any additional mitigation measures required

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:247:pursuant to (3) then phase 2(a) and (b) must not be carried out until either additional mitigation

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:248:planning authority that no additional measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:248:earthworks or site levelling but excluding ecological mitigation works, until a Construction

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:248:6.10A) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance tracker (Document 6.8B), has

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:248: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:248:that such alteration does not prevent the mitigation during construction referred to in the

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:248: 7. None of the authorised development is to commence (excluding ecological mitigation or

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:249:management plans for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:249:environmental statement for that phase (including a marine mammal mitigation plan but not

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:249:management plan (Document 6.11B) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:249:enhancement or mitigation works are proposed below mean high water springs also the MMO in

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:249:decommissioning phase, and to identify the requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:249:undertaken and the scope of mitigation agreed following the survey. The agreed mitigation shall

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:263:information) must accord with the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A).

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:265:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:267:enhancement plan and the principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:284: for National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:284:(2)(e), a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:284:(referred to in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:284:approval, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:284: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:284:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:284:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:284:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:289: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures

TR030002-001856-Examining Authority’s Recommendation Report.pdf:303: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000726-York Potash Limited (Document 6.11).pdf:6:produced to set out the principles of the mitigation (as defined in the Harbour Facilities Environmental

TR030002-000726-York Potash Limited (Document 6.11).pdf:6:with separately in the Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (Appendix 3.1 of the HRA (Document 6.3)).

TR030002-000726-York Potash Limited (Document 6.11).pdf:6:marine mammals). The following mitigation measures have been proposed within the ES to minimise

TR030002-000726-York Potash Limited (Document 6.11).pdf:7:that it is satisfied with the proposed mitigation with regard to marine mammals. Natural England also

TR030002-000726-York Potash Limited (Document 6.11).pdf:7:stated that all mitigation should be included (in more detail) within a Marine Mammal Mitigation Plan. The

TR030002-000726-York Potash Limited (Document 6.11).pdf:7:Marine Mammal Mitigation Plan is to be included within the EMP to be submitted pursuant to Requirement

TR030002-000726-York Potash Limited (Document 6.11).pdf:7:(including bats, otters, reptiles and breeding birds). The following mitigation / enhancement measures

TR030002-000726-York Potash Limited (Document 6.11).pdf:8:The following mitigation / enhancement measures have been proposed within the ES to minimise impacts

TR030002-000726-York Potash Limited (Document 6.11).pdf:8:The following mitigation / enhancement measures have been proposed within the ES to minimise impacts

TR030002-000726-York Potash Limited (Document 6.11).pdf:8:The following mitigation / enhancement measures have been proposed within the ES to minimise impacts

TR030002-000726-York Potash Limited (Document 6.11).pdf:9:Natural England stated within its Representation to PINS in June 2015 that suitable mitigation measures

TR030002-000726-York Potash Limited (Document 6.11).pdf:9:This outline EMP sets out the principles of the mitigation identified in the ES (Document 6.4) required to

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:7: “ecological mitigation works” means the mitigation measures set out in the outline ecological

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:8: “mitigation and monitoring strategy” means the mitigation and monitoring strategy certified by

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:27: (h) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A);

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:29: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:33:planning any additional mitigation measures required

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:33:pursuant to (3) then phase 2(a) and (b) must not be carried out until either additional mitigation

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:planning authority that no additional measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:earthworks or site levelling but excluding ecological mitigation works, until a Construction

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:6.1010A) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance tracker (Document 6.8A8B),

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:that such alternativealteration does not prevent the mitigation during construction referred to in the

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34: 7. None of the authorised development is to commence (excluding ecological mitigation or

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:35:management plans for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:35:environmental statement for that phase (including a marine mammal mitigation plan but not

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:35:management plan (Document 6.11A11B) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:35:enhancement or mitigation works are proposed below mean high water springs also the MMO in

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:35:decommissioning phase, and to identify the requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:35:undertaken and the scope of mitigation agreed following the survey. The agreed mitigation shall

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:54:information) must accord with the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A).

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:56:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:58:enhancement plan and the principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:74: National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:74:a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence (referred to

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:74:in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for approval, such

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:74:approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme must be

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:74: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:74:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:74:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:74:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:79: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures which

TR030002-000854-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:94: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000693-151120 TR030002 Tata Steel - covering email.pdf:6:  Failure to consider or detail mitigation as required in respect of acknowledged

TR030002-000693-151120 TR030002 Tata Steel - covering email.pdf:14: the likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation

TR030002-000714-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:3:mitigation provided in the ES and a

TR030002-000714-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:4:ensuring that every mitigation

TR030002-000714-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:4:relied upon for mitigation in the

TR030002-000714-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:4:permanent (operational) mitigation,

TR030002-000714-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:5:operational mitigation?

TR030002-000714-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:5:The LVIA states that mitigation

TR030002-000714-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:5:mitigation principles to minimise

TR030002-000714-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:5:mitigation measures will be

TR030002-000714-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:5:operational mitigation?

TR030002-000714-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:5:EMP identifying the mitigation to

TR030002-000714-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:5:having regard to the mitigation

TR030002-000714-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:6:to deliver mitigation which is in

TR030002-000714-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:6:mitigation provided in the ES and

TR030002-000714-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:6:Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and

TR030002-000714-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:8: Water, the The Mitigation section of the

TR030002-000018-Examination Library (3).pdf:22:REP2-006 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring

TR030002-000018-Examination Library (3).pdf:26:REP4-060 York Potash Ltd - 6.12A Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy Rev 4

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:7: “ecological mitigation works” means the mitigation measures set out in the outline ecological

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:8: “mitigation and monitoring strategy” means the mitigation and monitoring strategy certified by

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:27: (h) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A);

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:29: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:33:planning any additional mitigation measures required

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:33:pursuant to (3) then phase 2(a) and (b) must not be carried out until either additional mitigation

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34:planning authority that no additional measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34:earthworks or site levelling but excluding ecological mitigation works, until a Construction

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34:6.10A) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance tracker (Document 6.8B), has

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34:that such alteration does not prevent the mitigation during construction referred to in the

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34: 7. None of the authorised development is to commence (excluding ecological mitigation or

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:35:management plans for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:35:environmental statement for that phase (including a marine mammal mitigation plan but not

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:35:management plan (Document 6.11B) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:35:enhancement or mitigation works are proposed below mean high water springs also the MMO in

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:35:decommissioning phase, and to identify the requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:35:undertaken and the scope of mitigation agreed following the survey. The agreed mitigation shall

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:54:information) must accord with the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A).

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:56:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:58:enhancement plan and the principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:74: National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:74:a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence (referred to

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:74:in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for approval, such

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:74:approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme must be

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:74: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:74:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:74:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:74:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:79: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures which

TR030002-000863-York Potash Limited - Document 4.1D - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:93: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:1: describes inbuilt mitigation measures that have been taken into account during assessment of the

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:6:20.4.4 Mitigation measures to be employed in the construction, operation and decommissioning stages are

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:23:20.10 Mitigation measures

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:23: following mitigation measures have been incorporated into the proposed scheme to assist with

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:24:20.10.6 A lighting mitigation strategy would be employed across the scheme as set out at paragraph 6.6 of

TR030002-000455-ES Section 20 Landscape and visual environment.pdf:25: Mitigation measures would be employed to minimise adverse visual effects associated with the

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:34: mitigation provided in the ES and a accompanies this response.

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:34: every mitigation measure to be delivered

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:34: mitigation in the ES. The applicant is

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:35: permanent (operational) mitigation, in

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:35: CEMP is the appropriate mechanism for mechanism for delivery of operational mitigation. The

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:35: delivery of operational mitigation? Outline CEMP has been revised (see new Document

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:35: 6.10) so as not to refer to operational mitigation and the

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:35: The LVIA states that mitigation relating to Governance Tracker has been updated (see Document

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:35: ornithology and terrestrial ecology would relation to operational mitigation.

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:36: mitigation principles to minimise the

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:36: operational lighting mitigation measures Requirements governing lighting.

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:36: mitigation?

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:36: mitigation to be delivered through the

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:36: EMP, having regard to the mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:37: EMP to deliver mitigation which is in

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:37: mitigation provided in the ES and in a

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:37: Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS). Ecological Management Plan).

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:38: plan referred to in the draft DML of the DML will be required to comply with the Mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:38: of the ecological mitigation works.

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:38: authorised development) and how they the Harbour facilities. This is set out in the Mitigation and

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:42:ES 1.5 Applicant Securing mitigation measures

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:42: each mitigation measure relied on in the

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:43: identifying how mitigation measures relied

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:43: the mitigation measures relied upon in the

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:43: relationship between ES/HRA mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:43: deliver the mitigation identified in the ES

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:60: Agency The Mitigation section of the The works within Bran Sands lagoon will be covered by

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:61: development and, therefore, mitigation is required in the

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:62: all the mitigation measures relied upon in Tracker has been updated (see Document 6.8A) to

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:62: the FRA are secured through the DCO identify where the mitigation measures proposed in the

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:65: therefore it is unclear how this mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:67:HWF 1.8 Applicant Securing dredging mitigation through the

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:69: identified for securing this mitigation is

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:70: additional mitigation may be required.” To

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:70: mitigation is required.

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:72: practice guidance was not undertaken. to understand the potential risks/impacts and mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:72: would need to collect to undertake the studies/mitigation measures (e.g. gas protection

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:74: inform the design of any mitigation that may be

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:75: sufficient mitigation for the DCO scheme.

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:77: in the Applicants view, are not required as mitigation or

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:78: The mitigation measures proposed in the context of the

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:78:Ec 1.2 Applicant the need for further ecological mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:79: through the DCO, given that the mitigation DCO refer to mitigation proposed for marine mammals.

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:81: that the proposed ecological mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:81: of created habitats for a minimum years. Section 6 of the Mitigation and Monitoring

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:82: be regarded as mitigation.

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:83: necessary mitigation? If you are not

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:83: mitigation measures proposed and that no protected

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:84: effects. to decommissioning to enable appropriate mitigation to be

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:84:Ec 1.12 Applicant Mitigation measures during construction Please refer to the revised Governance Tracker

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:84: Mitigation proposed to minimise the light (Document 6.8A).

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:85: excessive, mitigation strategies to remedy

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:85: clear what these ‘mitigation strategies’ are

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:85: these mitigation strategies are and how

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:85:Ec 1.13 Applicant Mitigation measures during operation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:86: barriers used as mitigation during

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:87:Ec 1.14 Applicant Mitigation measures during

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:87: proposed mitigation measures would be

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:87: the proposed decommissioning mitigation (Document 6.8A).

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:92: and how any mitigation required is 14.5 of the Environmental Statement (Document 6.4).

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:92:NV 1.3 Redcar & Proposed mitigation measures for

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:96:LVA 1.5 Applicant Mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:96: mitigation identified in the LVIA. However,

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:96: various mitigation measures at a general

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:96: landscape and visual impacts mitigation in

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:97: well, to secure mitigation in relation to

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:97: securing the mitigation identified in the

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:97: secure the identified mitigation in the LVIA?

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:97:LVA 1.6 Applicant Mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:97: planting as proposed mitigation (20.5.30;

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:97: mitigation would be. It is noted that the

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:98: so it is unclear whether this mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:98: If the applicant is relying on this mitigation, improvements to the public realm and landscaping in the

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:98: If the applicant is relying on mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:100: NYMNP, prior to mitigation, these are

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:106: mitigation is proposed as the loss of

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:108: As the HRA Report notes that the Tuned The mitigation measures related to the Tuned In! facility

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:108: the mitigation measures which the Tuned

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:109: In! facility has secured and delivered, The following provides further detail of the mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:110:1.10 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS)

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:110: form of the Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:110: the objective of the mitigation proposed

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:111: the predicted effects arising from the Harbour facilities and the mitigation proposed relate to the

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:111: features) and the mitigation proposed also Ramsar site and the Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:111: provide mitigation for elements of the

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:112: and other mitigation identified (in the HRA and MMS).

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:112:HRA Applicant Securing and delivering the mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:116: Mitigation has been proposed in the form

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:116: they are relying on these barriers in the represent mitigation for potential visual disturbance

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:117: ES). Please can the applicant explain referring to the noise mitigation measures (which include

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:117: mitigation identified in the ES, identifies at are required to include “details of methods to control noise

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:118: mitigation measures identified in the ES.

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:118: This list matches the list of mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:118: (Doc 6.8). However, not every mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:118: Please can the applicant clarify whether Table 6.1 would be used to identify the mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:118: mitigation measures to be delivered updated Outline CEMP (new Document 6.10)

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:118: the mitigation measures to be secured

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:119: (paragraph 10.3.65). Please can the this is a mitigation measure that can be implemented and,

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:121: identifies that in relation to mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:121: or excessive, mitigation strategies to

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:122: mitigation measures would be identified

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:122: lighting mitigation measures identified in 6.8A) at item 31.

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:124: mitigation measures in place, it could only

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:125: combination with the mitigation proposed.

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:125: or mitigation relied upon in their

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:127: identify the mitigation relied upon by the

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:127: information and mitigation measures relied

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:128:1.21 Environment mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:128: a result of the proposed development intended mitigation measures are implemented, subject

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:128: provided that intended mitigation to assessments in relation to additional species that may

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:128: satisfactorily guarantee that the mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:128: please specify any additional mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:129: effect on the integrity after mitigation

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:131: capital and maintenance dredging strategy identifies as being one of the mitigation measures in place

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:132: clarification on how the need to update the the mitigation measures in place for the water body, as

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:132: Marine number of mitigation measures are entitled ‘Appendix 4.3 – Water Framework Directive’) to

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:133: how each mitigation measure proposed in

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:133: mitigation measures proposed in the WFD

TR030002-000711-Applicants Response to First Questions.pdf:133: the mitigation measures proposed.

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:5: and mitigation of impacts.

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:7: Accordingly, mitigation measures for the noise as a result of

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:7: implementation of appropriate noise mitigation and monitoring, the

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:9: health and suggests a mitigation strategy. With the implementation of

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:9: mitigation suggested, an overall negligible to slight adverse effect has

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:9: of the ES). A range of embedded mitigation measures would be

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:9: mitigation measures would be incorporated into the contractual

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:9: construction phase. The proposed mitigation measures, along with a

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:9: the ES, with the implementation of the mitigation measures, the

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:9: mitigation measures have been proposed. Paragraph 13.3.77 of

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:9: mitigation measures proposed, the residual impacts from NRMM are

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:10: mitigation measures, paragraph 13.3.88 of Section 13 of the ES

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:11: considered to be not significant. No road traffic mitigation measures

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:12: Appendix 20.4). Mitigation principles have been suggested to assist

TR030002-000562-Doc 6.2 Section 79(1) of Environmental Protection Act 1990 Statement.pdf:13: development. Taking into account the mitigation measures contained in the

TR030002-000741-Huntsman Polyurethanes (IK) Limited (2).pdf:23: made in respect of associated costs such as environmental mitigation.

TR030002-000018-Examination Library (2).pdf:22:REP2-006 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring

TR030002-000018-Examination Library (2).pdf:26:REP4-060 York Potash Ltd - 6.12A Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy Rev 4

TR030002-000870-151216 TR030002 CATS Parties - Statement of difference and Young Lady Report.pdf.pdf:5: Control’ to risk mitigation;

TR030002-000870-151216 TR030002 CATS Parties - Statement of difference and Young Lady Report.pdf.pdf:5: 3.3.3 The level of risk mitigation that can be claimed for administrative controls (in the

TR030002-000870-151216 TR030002 CATS Parties - Statement of difference and Young Lady Report.pdf.pdf:10: The Level Of Risk Mitigation That Can Be Claimed For Administrative Controls (In

TR030002-000870-151216 TR030002 CATS Parties - Statement of difference and Young Lady Report.pdf.pdf:11: this dramatically overstates the risk mitigation that can be realistically claimed for

TR030002-000870-151216 TR030002 CATS Parties - Statement of difference and Young Lady Report.pdf.pdf:11:7.10 To put such a claim into context, the maximum risk mitigation that is commonly claimed for a

TR030002-000870-151216 TR030002 CATS Parties - Statement of difference and Young Lady Report.pdf.pdf:11: risk mitigation provided by a SIF is Safety Integrity Level (SIL) and is described in IEC

TR030002-000870-151216 TR030002 CATS Parties - Statement of difference and Young Lady Report.pdf.pdf:11: the CATS pipeline results in a risk mitigation of 1E-6 per opportunity. This approach suggests

TR030002-000870-151216 TR030002 CATS Parties - Statement of difference and Young Lady Report.pdf.pdf:12: errors are required clearly overstates the risk mitigation that can be claimed for the PPs and

TR030002-000870-151216 TR030002 CATS Parties - Statement of difference and Young Lady Report.pdf.pdf:12: risk mitigation presented by independent verification of the PPs. Groupthink is a widely

TR030002-000870-151216 TR030002 CATS Parties - Statement of difference and Young Lady Report.pdf.pdf:12: for the mitigation provided. Guidance on quantified human reliability analysis (QHRA) by the

TR030002-000870-151216 TR030002 CATS Parties - Statement of difference and Young Lady Report.pdf.pdf:13: mitigation of 1-in-1 million can be claimed for the PPs has been shown to be erroneous due to

TR030002-000870-151216 TR030002 CATS Parties - Statement of difference and Young Lady Report.pdf.pdf:13: mitigation than the most reliable SIF as defined by IEC 61508:2010.

TR030002-000870-151216 TR030002 CATS Parties - Statement of difference and Young Lady Report.pdf.pdf:16: mitigation of risk posed by the Proposed Development.

TR030002-000870-151216 TR030002 CATS Parties - Statement of difference and Young Lady Report.pdf.pdf:22: mitigation that can be claimed for layers of protection with high dependency. This value is 0.5

TR030002-000687-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:1: (Document 6.10) 6.9A) and Limits of Deviation Construction Traffic (Document 6.11A) Mitigation and

TR030002-000687-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:1: Mitigation Plan) Enhancement Plan

TR030002-000498-Section 16 App 16.1 Marine navigation risk assessment.pdf:8:The principal mitigation measure for the identified polyhalite export delays would be to increase the available tidal

TR030002-000498-Section 16 App 16.1 Marine navigation risk assessment.pdf:41:Mitigation of these delays (either for Phase 1 or Phase 2 of the polyhalite exports) would principally require dredging.

TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (3).pdf:5:would be no significant impact and no mitigation measures are considered to be required

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:1: proposed scheme. Mitigation measures are detailed where required and a discussion of the residual

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:2: proposed mitigation are agreed in consultation with PD Ports

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:9: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:9:16.5.8 No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:11: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:11:16.6.7 No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:11: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:11: of the hydrodynamic modelling work undertaken (see Section 5), it is considered that mitigation

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:12:16.8.4 No mitigation measures are proposed for any of the impacts identified, given their negligible

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:12:16.8.5 Table 16-5 presents a summary of the potential impacts, mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:13:Table 16-5 Summary of potential impacts, mitigation measures and residual impacts during the construction, opera

TR030002-000451-ES Section 16 Commercial navigation.pdf:13:Impact Sensitivity of receptor Magnitude of effect Significance of impact Mitigation

TR030002-000747-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:3:HWF Applicant Securing dredging mitigation through the MMO are content with the applicant’s response. The dredging plant for the

TR030002-000747-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:4: this mitigation is appropriate? If not, please

TR030002-000747-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:5: Management the WFD Compliance Assessment, a number of the mitigation measures.

TR030002-000747-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:5: Organisation of mitigation measures are proposed to The MMO has discussed and is consistent with the EA on this matter.

TR030002-000747-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:5: mitigation measure proposed in the WFD

TR030002-000747-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:6:mitigation measures proposed in the WFD

TR030002-000747-Marine Management Organisation.pdf:6:the mitigation measures proposed.

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:1: proposed scheme. Where potentially significant impacts are identified, mitigation measures are

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:1: x mitigation measures to reduce the significance of noise impacts.

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:5: Where pollution is unavoidable, mitigation measures to reduce pollution levels will be required in

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:7:Natural England notes acoustic barriers are proposed. More detail on this mitigation measure will be required. Section 14.5

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:7:The proposed methodology and scope of assessment has been agreed. A full noise mitigation scheme shall be Section 14.4

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:37: Mitigation and residual impacts during construction

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:43: an initial version of which is provided in Appendix 6.4. Conventional mitigation measures implemented

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:45: investigation of mitigation measures to reduce the noise emission levels from the activity or activities,

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:45: the implementation of mitigation to re-assess the noise levels against the guideline noise levels.

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:49:14.5.22 Tables 14-25 to 14-28 indicate that, following the application of suitable mitigation, as outlined above

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:50: Mitigation and residual impact

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:57:14.7.4 Where appropriate, consideration was given to mitigation measures and residual impacts were

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:58:Impact Mitigation

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:58: x Following the application of suitable mitigation, as ou

TR030002-000449-ES Section 14 Noise and vibration.pdf:59:Impact Mitigation

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:6: “ecological mitigation works” means the mitigation measures set out in the outline ecological

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:7: “mitigation and monitoring strategy” means the mitigation and monitoring strategy certified by

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:26: (h) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.1212A);

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:28: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:32:planning any additional mitigation measures required

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:32:pursuant to (3) then phase 2(a) and (b) shallmust not be carried out until either additional mitigation

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:33:planning authority that no additional measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:33:earthworks or site levelling but excluding ecological mitigation works, until a Construction

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:33:6.10) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance tracker (Document 6.8A), has

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:33: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:33:provided that such alternative does not prevent the mitigation during construction referred to in the

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:33: 7. None of the authorised development is to commence (excluding ecological mitigation or

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:management planplans for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:environmental statement for that phase (including a marine managementmammal mitigation plan

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:ecological management plan (Document 6.1111A) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:the case of any ecological mitigation or enhancement works below mean high water springs the

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:and when changes to any ecological enhancement or mitigation works are proposed below mean

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:decommissioning phase, and to identify the requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:ecological surveys being undertaken and the scope of mitigation agreed following the survey. The

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:34:agreed mitigation shall then be carried out in accordance with an agreed timetable.

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:55:information) must accord with the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.1212A).

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:57:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:59:enhancement plan and the principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:75: National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:75:a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence (referred to

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:75:in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for approval, such

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:75:approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme must be

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:75: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:75:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:75:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:75:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must

TR030002-000840-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Tracked).pdf:79: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures which

TR030002-000705-Applicant response to First Questions - Appendix 7.pdf:11:Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy, included ass Appendix 3.1 3 to the Harbour facilitiees Habitats Regulations

TR030002-001873-Decision holding letter (1).pdf:5: ecological mitigation or enhancement works referred to in the

TR030002-000739-TATA Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:16:· Ensuring that all necessary mitigation measures including on-going requirements are secured

TR030002-000739-TATA Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:17:of the intended mitigation measures, in view of the sites’ conservation objectives.

TR030002-000739-TATA Steel UK Limited and Others.pdf:19: requirement for compensation/mitigation in respect of loss of intertidal habitat.

TR030002-000672-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 10 to 21.pdf:26: Environmental impacts and mitigation  14

TR030002-000672-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 10 to 21.pdf:38: AND MITIGATION

TR030002-000672-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement Appendices - 10 to 21.pdf:38:ENVIRONOMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:10: scheme options (as well as possible mitigation measures).

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:37: mitigation measures will be developed and details provided in the ES. The residual

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:37: • Detailed description of the potential impacts and mitigation measures identified

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:38: Mitigation To identify appropriate and practicable The provision of solutions to

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:38: measures mitigation measures and enhancement minimise adverse impacts as far

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:52: identification of any required mitigation measures.

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:52:5.2.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:52: It is likely that mitigation measures will be implemented through appropriate design and

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:52: Agency and CIRIA will be used to inform the design of mitigation measures, in addition

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:52: to consultation with key stakeholders. Likely mitigation measures include:

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:53: and soil, with particular focus on mitigation of pollution;

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:57:5.3.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:57: The main form of mitigation to limit sediment plume generation due to dredging is

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:63:5.4.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:63: mitigation measures.

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:64: The requirement for such mitigation measures will be considered based on the findings

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:68:5.5.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:68: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:68: determined that significant impacts have the potential to arise, the following mitigation

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:71:5.6.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:71: The requirement for mitigation measures to be implemented during the construction and

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:71: terrestrial ecology). Mitigation measures will be identified during the EIA process, but

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:74:5.7.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:74: The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume generation due to dredging is the

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:74: The requirement for mitigation measures to be implemented will be determined on the

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:76: baseline traffic) and permanent mitigation measures are required.

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:76: increase in baseline traffic) and short term mitigation measures are required.

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:76: increase is above 30%, but does not lead to disruption. No mitigation measures are

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:76: Insignificant No perceivable impact. No mitigation measures are required.

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:76: peak hour. Mitigation measures will be proposed where it has been demonstrated that

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:77:5.8.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:77: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:77: significant impacts have potential to arise, the following mitigation measures may reduce

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:77: The above list is not intended to represent an exhaustive list of potential mitigation

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:77: measures; however such mitigation measures have potential to effectively manage the

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:80:5.9.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:80: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:80: is determined that significant impacts have potential to arise, the following mitigation

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:81: alongside any mitigation measures.

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:82:5.10.4 Potential mitigation measures for key impacts

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:82: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:82: significant impacts have potential to arise, mitigation measures may reduce the

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:82: During the construction phase, potential mitigation measures to reduce the significance

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:85:5.11.4 Potential mitigation measures for key impacts

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:85: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:88:5.12.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:88: There are a wide range of mitigation measures that can be implemented to mitigate the

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:90:5.13.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:90: for mitigation measures to be implemented will be fully investigated during the EIA.

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:93:5.14.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:93: The requirement for mitigation measures to be implemented as part of the proposed

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:93: Potential mitigation measures could include ensuring contractors are aware of the

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:93: water abstractions. Such mitigation measures are considered likely to effectively

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:94:5.15.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:94: economics, it is considered that mitigation measures are unlikely to be required.

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:99:5.17.5 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:99: Specific mitigation measures could be implemented to avoid potential conflicts between

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:99: route. The requirement for such mitigation measures will be fully investigated during the

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:101: status. UKTAG has adopted the ‘mitigation measures approach’ for classifying HMWBs

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:101: this mitigation is in place, then the water body may be classified as achieving ‘good’ or

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:101: ‘better’ ecological potential. If this level of mitigation is not in place, then the water body

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:102: mitigation measures in place (for heavily modified water bodies) would need to be

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:102: (potential hydrodynamic, water quality impacts, marine ecology, mitigation

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:102: (hydrodynamic effects, mitigation measures in place).

TR030002-000462-Section 4 App 4.1 Environmental Scoping Report.pdf:102: • Maintenance dredging required (water quality, mitigation measures in place).

TR030002-000839-Huntsman Polyurethanes (UK) Ltd - Deadline 4 Submission.pdf:11: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures which are

TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (4).pdf:5:would be no significant impact and no mitigation measures are considered to be required

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:1: scheme on local air quality. Mitigation measures are detailed and a discussion of residual impacts

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:2: x “any significant air emissions, their mitigation and any residual effects, distinguishing between the

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:3: x the predicted absolute emission levels from the proposed project, after mitigation methods have

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:4: x The future air quality with the development in place (with mitigation).

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:4: conditions or planning obligation, if the proposed development (including mitigation) would not lead to

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:4: Where pollution is unavoidable, mitigation measures to reduce pollution levels will be required in

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:4: proposed mitigation measures must meet the requirements of the Habitats Regulations.

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:5: Only deliverable mitigation measures should be taken into account in Sections 13.5 and 13.6, Appendix 6.4

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:11: adoption of good working practices on site. This approach assumes that mitigation measures, beyond

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:11: x Determine site specific mitigation.

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:11: x Examine the residual effects to determine whether or not additional mitigation is required.

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:17:13.3.39 For amenity effects (including that of dust), the aim is to bring forward a scheme, including mitigation

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:17: Conventional good practice mitigation is included within the design of the project and, therefore, the

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:17: assessment undertaken includes the effective implementation of these mitigation measures.

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:17: Table 13-3 Effect descriptors for each activity with mitigation, at individual receptors

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:22: the approach to the assessment assumed that mitigation would be available to be applied as required

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:22: Mitigation measures for the various stages of the construction process are outlined in this section.

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:22: These mitigation measures are an inherent part of the construction process, and the assessment

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:25: The significance of impacts with mitigation applied was determined by combining the dust emission

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:25: Table 13-11 Summary dust risk table to define site-specific mitigation

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:25: human health, with the implementation of mitigation, were determined and are summarised in Table

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:25: Table 13-12 Summary of construction phase dust impacts at the harbour facilities site, with mitigation

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:25: Construction phase fugitive dust and particulate matter - mitigation

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:25:13.3.64 A range of embedded mitigation measures would be employed in the construction phase; which is

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:25: mitigation measures would be incorporated into the contractual specifications and be mandatory

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:25:13.3.65 The proposed mitigation measures, along with a detailed overview of the dust management at the site,

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:27: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate.

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:28:13.3.67 With the implementation of the mitigation measures outlined above, the impact of construction phase

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:28:13.3.70 NRMM and onsite plant would be well maintained and additional mitigation measures are

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:28: Construction phase NRMM emissions – mitigation

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:29:13.3.77 With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, the residual impacts from NRMM are

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:31: Construction phase road traffic emissions – mitigation

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:31:13.3.86 A number of road transport mitigation measures are embedded within the YPP to reduce the impact of

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:31:13.3.87 No additional road traffic emissions mitigation measures are proposed to further reduce the impact of

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:34: Operational phase road traffic emissions - mitigation

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:34: DMRB (Highways Agency, 2007) and EPUK (EPUK, 2010) criteria, and no road traffic mitigation

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:37: Operational phase fugitive dust and particulate matter – mitigation

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:37: Decommissioning phase – mitigation

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:37: than for the construction phase. However it is recommended that the mitigation measures provided for

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:37: available at this stage; however it is recommended that the mitigation measures proposed for the

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:38: associated with demolition, earthworks, construction and trackout were identified and mitigation

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:38: at receptor locations. With the implementation of the mitigation measures proposed any impact is

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:38: associated with the construction phase. Mitigation measures were recommended and with the

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:39: emissions. Relevant mitigation measures were recommended and the residual impact of the

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:39: Impact Mitigation

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:39: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:39: Impacts on Local Air Mitigation measures

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:40: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000448-ES Section 13 Air quality.pdf:40: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:8: “mitigation and monitoring strategy” means the mitigation and monitoring strategy certified by

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:26: (h) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12);

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:26: (m) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12); and

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:28: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:32:planning any additional mitigation measures required

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:32:pursuant to (3) then phase 2(a) and (b) shall not be carried out until either additional mitigation

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:33:planning authority that no additional measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:33:earthworks or site levelling but excluding ecological mitigation works, until a Construction

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:33:6.10) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance tracker (Document 6.8A), has

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:33: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:33:provided that such alternative does not prevent the mitigation during construction referred to in the

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:33:and ecological mitigation or enhancement works referred to in the outline ecological management

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:34:management plan for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:34:environmental statement for that phase (including a marine management mitigation plan but not

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:34:management plan (Document 6.11) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:34:England. In the case of any habitat creationecological mitigation or enhancement works below

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:34:phase, and to identify the requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order to avoid any

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:34:local planning authority prior to any ecological surveys being undertaken and the scope of mitigation

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:34:agreed following the survey. The agreed mitigation shall then be carried out in accordance with an

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:51: (3) The lagoon habitat enhancement plan must accord with the mitigation and monitoring strategy

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:53:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:55:works in accordance with principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:70: National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:70:a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence (referred to

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:70:in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for approval, such

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:70:approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme must be

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:70: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:70:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:70:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-000771-York Potash Ltd (3).pdf:70:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:31: pond (Great crested newt mitigation guidelines, English Nature, 2001), more recent

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:34:  Identification of the potential for effective mitigation including fit with existing

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:37:minehead site, providing an opportunity for effective mitigation during the construction

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:37:phase. The effectiveness of such mitigation would only be quantifiable following the

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:38: screening. Suitable noise mitigation (earth bunds and screens) around the minehead

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:38: At this stage it is not possible to specify exact mitigation measures for vibration likely to

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:42:Mitigation opportunities during the construction stage would be very limited, due to the

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:49:mitigation (earth bunds and screens) around the minehead site will aid a reduction in

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:49:At this stage it is not possible to specify exact mitigation measures for vibration likely to

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:53:Mitigation opportunities during the construction stage would be limited, due to the open

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:60:noise mitigation (earth bunds and screens) around the minehead site will aid a reduction

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:60:At this stage it is not possible to specify exact mitigation measures for vibration likely to

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:65:Mitigation opportunities during the construction stage would be limited, due to the open

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:72:during operation of the minehead. The effective use of noise mitigation (earth bunds and

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:72:At this stage it is not possible to specify exact mitigation measures for vibration likely to

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:76:Mitigation opportunities during the construction stage would be very limited, due to the

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:76:Suitable mitigation is expected to take longer to establish at this site.

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:81: concerns. With this mitigation it is considered that the access is adequate to

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:83:mitigation (earth bunds and screens) around the minehead site will aid a reduction in

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:83:existing woodland noise mitigation and the remoteness of nearby receptors.

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:83:At this stage it is not possible to specify exact mitigation measures for vibration likely to

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:88:would provide a degree of inherent mitigation during both construction and operational

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:88:for large scale mitigation planting, enabling effective screening to be achieved whilst

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:94:Presents a potential environmental risk and requires further investigation or specific mitigation

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:94: settlements settlements Noise mitigation already

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:96: mitigation options very mitigation options limited. construction mitigation mitigation options very mitigation options

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:96: likely to be required within required within National Park mitigation options available). likely to be required within required within National

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:96: preference, on the basis that that mitigation could take

TR030002-000578-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 3.pdf:96: mitigation could take longer considerably longer to

TR030002-000569-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2a - MDT Planning Statement.pdf:6: environmental impact and proposed mitigation measures. Section 9 considers the alternative sites

TR030002-000569-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2a - MDT Planning Statement.pdf:18: development and mitigation, provide competitive returns to a willing land owner and willing

TR030002-000569-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2a - MDT Planning Statement.pdf:84: this area in its current form. Mitigation and enhancement measures have been proposed in the

TR030002-000569-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2a - MDT Planning Statement.pdf:84: therefore been given to the development of mitigation measures to which commitment would be

TR030002-000569-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2a - MDT Planning Statement.pdf:86: mitigation YPL has taken very seriously the need to limit impacts on the National Park. The extent

TR030002-000763-Document 4.2A Draft Explanatory Memorandum (Clean).pdf:23: mitigation referred to by Natural England in its representations will be

TR030002-000763-Document 4.2A Draft Explanatory Memorandum (Clean).pdf:23: lagoon habitat enhancement plan which is to accord with the mitigation and

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:1:Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:2:Lagoon Mitigation and

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:3:Document title: York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:3:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:4: 1.1 Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy ………………………………………………………………………… 2

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:4:5 Other Mitigation Measures of Relevance to SPA Interest Features…………………. 24

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:4: 5.1 Mitigation for indirect effects …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 25

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:4:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:5:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:6:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:7:1.1 Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:7:This Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS) has been prepared in response to

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:7:mitigation proposals for Bran Sands lagoon outlined within the HRA. The MMS should be read in

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:7:effects of the proposed scheme. The distinction between the use of the terms ‘mitigation’ and ‘habitat enhancement’ has

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:7:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:8:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:9:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:10:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:11:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:12:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:13:objective of mitigation proposed is set out.

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:13:Table 3.1 Predicted direct effects of the Harbour facilities on SPA interest features and mitigation

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:13:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:14:In addition to providing a function as mitigation for elements of the Harbour facilities proposals, the

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:14:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:15:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:16:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:17:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:18:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:19:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:22:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:23:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:24:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:25:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:26:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:27:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:28:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:29:5 Other Mitigation Measures

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:29:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:30:Other Mitigation Measures of Relevance to SPA Interest

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:30:5.1 Mitigation for indirect effects

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:30:Noise attenuation barriers are proposed as mitigation for the potential impact of noise and visual disturbance

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:30:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:31:Other Mitigation Measures of Relevance to SPA Interest

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:31:It is predicted that with these mitigation measures in place, the risk of indirect impacts on waterbirds would

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:31:would occur (3 to 4 months) in combination with the mitigation proposed.

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:31:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:32:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:33:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:34:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:35:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:36:Royal Haskoning and HR Wallingford (2011). Mitigation and monitoring for the Stour and Orwell Estuaries

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:36:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:37:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:38:emissions mitigation at DNF and the MTS Intermediate Shaft Sites. The SEI will be

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:39: 3. Harbour DCO mitigation (habitat enhancement in Bran Sands lagoon)

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:39:DH raised questions about the mitigation (habitat enhancement) proposed and how this

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:39:SAJ proposed that RHDHV develop a Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy for issue to NE, in

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:40:Following production of the Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy, a site meeting (NE/MMO/EA)

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:40: Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy).

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:40: (2) YPL development of firm proposals for mitigation. However, on this latter point, NE is

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:40: hopeful that that the Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy and site visit will give enough

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:40: confidence that the mitigation is deliverable.

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:40: b) MS to develop template for Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (by 21/1/15)

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:40: c) MS/SJ prepare Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (by 29/1/15), with the

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:40:Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy meets NE’s requirements, NE is likely to be able to advise

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:40:which will include the Harbour HRA (accompanied by the together with the Mitigation and

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:40:consider the potential for further visual mitigation and that this, should such mitigation be

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:41: information to support the production of an outline Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:41:conclude that the mitigation is practically achievable. Following the teleconference with you on 15

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:41:adding more detail on aspects of the evidence, assessment and mitigation in the HRA. To this end

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:41:we welcome your offer to produce draft the Heads of Terms of a mitigation and monitoring strategy

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:42:Mitigation Measures - Construction

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:42:Mitigation Measures - Operation

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:42:the mitigation is confusing, notwithstanding your explanation that it is used because the

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:42:and set out primarily – for Habitats Regulations purposes - as mitigation for the impacts of the

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:42:In order to avoid misunderstanding, we use the term mitigation throughout the rest of this response,

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:43:It is important that the mitigation and monitoring strategy includes:

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:43:  The aims of the mitigation and what a successful proposal will look like i.e.

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:43: o Describe the specific element of mitigation required for the loss of the habitats on the

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:43: o Describe mitigation for the range of potential impacts affecting Bran Sands Lagoon

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:43: o To ensure the success of the mitigation proposal for Bran Sands lagoon Natural

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:43: o Natural England requires clarity on the time it will take for the mitigation proposal to

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:43: by invertebrates. As a general principle, establishment of mitigation should be

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:44: establish a baseline and assess the success of the mitigation in terms of invertebrate

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:45:Your ref: Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:45:  York Potash Harbour Facilities Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy dated 29 January 2015

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:45:The Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS), site visit and meeting have most usefully addressed

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:45:ES and now the MMS on the mitigation and monitoring. You have undertaken to update the MSS

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:46:described above, will demonstrate that mitigation for HRA matters can be secured and is

TR030002-000799-Document 6.12A - Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy - Rev 4.pdf:49:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000018-Examination Library (1).pdf:22:REP2-006 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring

TR030002-000018-Examination Library (1).pdf:26:REP4-060 York Potash Ltd - 6.12A Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy Rev 4

TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (2).pdf:5:would be no significant impact and no mitigation measures are considered to be required

TR030002-001873-Decision holding letter (4).pdf:5: ecological mitigation or enhancement works referred to in the

TR030002-000868-CATS Parties - young lady report.pdf:35: safety management aspects, risk management and mitigation. Importantly, as part

TR030002-000868-CATS Parties - young lady report.pdf:35: The key mitigation measures adopted to manage the hazard were:

TR030002-000868-CATS Parties - young lady report.pdf:35: The key mitigation measures adopted to manage the hazard were:

TR030002-000865-York Potash Limited.pdf:13:Mitigation and Monitoring Ref 5(2)(q) 6.12 7 September 2015

TR030002-000865-York Potash Limited.pdf:13:Mitigation and Monitoring Ref 5(2)(q) 6.12A 6 November 2015

TR030002-000846-York Potash Ltd - Constructability Notes - BP CATS Pipeline Northern Route.pdf:9: mitigation and/or modifications to the cathodic protection are to be implemented such as the installation

TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:5:  Iterative development of design changes and/or mitigation measures to avoid,

TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:5:  Re-assessment of effects, on the assumption of established mitigation

TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:6: or within views over time, including the effects that may be associated with landscape mitigation

TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:13: 11. Duration and Permanency of Effects, Assessment of Mitigation Measures and Residual

TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:13: Built-in mitigation measures are taken into account as part of the initial assessment of effects.

TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:13: The longer term effect of mitigation measures, for example planting works, is identified separately

TR030002-000501-Section 20 App 20.1 LVIA methodology.pdf:14: 13. Iterative EIA Process and Mitigation Design

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:1: proposed scheme. Where relevant, mitigation measures are detailed and a discussion of the residual

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:4:Natural England notes acoustic barriers are proposed. More detail on this mitigation measure will be required. Piling has only been con

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:24: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:24:9.5.4 The mitigation measures that are proposed to limit sediment release during capital dredging (see

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:24: Section 7.5) would mitigate this potential impact. These mitigation measures have been taken into

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:24: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:24:9.5.6 No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27:9.5.18 As mitigation for the potential impact of noise disturbance, it is proposed that noise attenuation barriers

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27: mitigation on piling noise has been modelled, and the results of the noise assessment are presented in

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27: mitigation) Mitigated effect

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:28: Receptor mitigation) Mitigated effect

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:31: mitigation would reduce construction noise levels at the modelled ecologically sensitive locations to a

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:33: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:33:9.5.30 The mitigation described above in relation to minimising construction noise would also mitigate the

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:33: inadequate or excessive, mitigation strategies to remedy the effects would be implemented.

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35:9.6.9 It is concluded that no further mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35:9.6.15 It is concluded that no further mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36: further mitigation can be applied to the operational activities at the port that would result in noise

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:9.6.21 Following discussion with Natural England, mitigation measures have been investigated and built into

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36: the design as embedded mitigation to minimise the potential for any significant disturbance to areas

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36: used by waterbirds during the operational phase. Such embedded mitigation is described below.

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:9.6.24 No mitigation measures are required in excess of those outlined above, which are proposed to be built

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37: into the scheme design as embedded mitigation. It is concluded that there would be no residual

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:9.6.28 Maximum permitted vessel speed in the Tees is controlled and managed by PD Ports and no mitigation

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:38: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:38:9.6.34 In light of the lack of predicted effect, no mitigation measures are considered necessary. No residual

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:39: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:39: to incorporate other mitigation measures to respond to additional sensitivities that may need to be

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:39: assessment included in Section 14.7) would be very low (with mitigation embedded as described).

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:39: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:39:9.7.4 Mitigation has been incorporated into the assessment of the potential impact and further mitigation may

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:40: between the works and Bran Sands lagoon and Dabholm Gut. With mitigation, these potential impacts

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:42:Impact Sensitivity of Magnitude of Significance Mitigation

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:43:Impact Sensitivity of Magnitude of Significance Mitigation

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:43:Visual disturbance - - No impact No mitigation is required in addition to that embedded

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:44:Impact Sensitivity of Magnitude of Significance Mitigation

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:44:Noise and visual Very high Very low Negligible In addition to the embedded mitigation, a Decommissi

TR030002-000444-ES Section 9 Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:44:disturbance to developed and further mitigation may be recommende

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:1: is excluded from further consideration within this section. Mitigation measures are detailed where

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:5:justification together with details for mitigation and compensation would need to be included to secure support.

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:7:There is little assessment of any suitable alternatives or mitigation. The PER does not acknowledge the need to compensate for

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:7:loss of mudflat. Further assessment required together with justification for the preferred option. Details of mitigation and

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:7:compensation need to be included. The loss of subtidal habitat also needs to be considered in the context of mitigation or

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:7:provision of intertidal habitat and habitat creation, beyond those required for mitigation as described in Section 2.2 [of the response

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:8:Natural England advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation proposals for Habitats and Species of Principal Importance

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:9:bat boxes, provision of intertidal habitat and habitat creation and enhancement measures beyond those required for mitigation.

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:46: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:50: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:57: high. Without mitigation, an impact of moderate adverse significance is, therefore, predicted to arise

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:57: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:57: commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area within which a marine mammal could

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:57:8.5.53 With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, a residual impact of minor adverse

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:57: implementation of the mitigation measures outlined below.

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:57: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:58:8.5.58 With the above mitigation measures in place, it is anticipated that the risk of a significant pollution event

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:58: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:58:8.6.3 No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:59: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:59: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:61:Impact Mitigation

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:62:Impact Mitigation

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:62:disturbance to marine High Very low Negligible No mitigation measures are required.

TR030002-000443-ES Section 8 Marine ecology.pdf:62:community following Low Low Negligible No mitigation measures are possible.

TR030002-000835-Environment Agency - Deadline 4 Submission.pdf:2:adequately secures the relevant mitigation relied on to reach the

TR030002-000372-Rule 17 Letter.pdf:5: will need to include the latest version of the mitigation measures required for

TR030002-000372-Rule 17 Letter.pdf:5: mitigation measures required for the Harbour Facility development, which have

TR030002-000372-Rule 17 Letter.pdf:5: latest version of the mitigation measures required for the Harbour Facility

TR030002-000372-Rule 17 Letter.pdf:6: Section 3.5 (waterbird populations) in the outline Ecological Mitigation Plan

TR030002-000372-Rule 17 Letter.pdf:6: visual and lighting mitigation measures identified in the applicant’s HRA Report,

TR030002-000372-Rule 17 Letter.pdf:6: the mitigation in order to conclude no adverse effect on site integrity of the

TR030002-000253-Regulation 24 Transboundary Screening document (1).pdf:5:would be no significant impact and no mitigation measures are considered to be required

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:10: or minimise any adverse impacts (mitigation measures) are identified.

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:10:  A description of mitigation measures employed to avoid or reduce any perceived significant

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:10:1.4.6 Where negative impacts are predicted to occur, where possible, mitigation is identified to reduce the

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:10: impact as far as possible. Mitigation tends to be in two forms; mitigation that is built into the design of

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:10: the project to reduce impacts that are identified at an early stage and mitigation that is proposed in

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:11:proposed mitigation measures, to provide a residual impact.

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:14:2.3.9 The assessment assumed that a range of environmental risk mitigation measures would be embedded

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:14: within the works; in addition, further mitigation measures would be adopted, including the development

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:15: control and management) and implementing appropriate mitigation measures (e.g. use of an enclosed

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:16: that the implementation of mitigation measures (i.e. adhering to JNCC ‘soft start’ guidelines) would

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:17: With this mitigation in place, potential disturbance related impacts are predicted to be of negligible

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:18: is likely to be loss or damage to scarce or valuable habitat which may require mitigation, such as Local

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:18: (without mitigation) or of minor beneficial significance.

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:19: of its impact on fish can be controlled through the implementation of appropriate mitigation measures,

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:19: and trackout were identified and mitigation measures recommended. As a consequence, the impact is

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:20: Mitigation measures were recommended and, together with the temporary and short term requirement

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:23: With an appropriate mitigation strategy in place, it is anticipated that the risk of an indirect impact

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:24: Sands site during the construction, operation and decommissioning phases of the scheme. Mitigation

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:30: With regard to protected species (specifically reptiles and birds), appropriate mitigation would reduce

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:32: suitable mitigation measures (e.g. timing restrictions) would reduce this potential cumulative impact to a

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:33: significantly by the implementation of suitable mitigation measures (e.g. prevention of the rapid release

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:37: design of the Harbour facilities. Where possible mitigation has been designed in to the project to

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:37: operation and decommissioning phases of the scheme. Mitigation measures would be

TR030002-000561-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_2 of 2.pdf:38: identified mitigation measures to avoid such impacts where possible. The EIA also highlighted where,

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:37: compared to a range of gas characteristic situations to determine what mitigation measures would be

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:39: Environmental risk mitigation

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:40: mitigation measures are considered necessary for a particular potential impact, these are highlighted.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:41: mitigation, this option could result in a reduced tidal range within the lagoon and potentially also, an

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:41: mitigation for this impact would therefore be required.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:41: high. However, given the mitigation that would be adopted during the construction phase, it is

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:44: Mitigation and residual impact

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:44:6.5.33 In addition to the environmental risk mitigation measures described above, an asbestos management

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:44: of this additional mitigation would reduce the magnitude of this effect to very low for all receptors (on

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:44: Mitigation and residual impact

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:44:6.5.37 In addition to the environmental risk mitigation measures described above, further monitoring of the gas

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:44: regime will be undertaken so that mitigation measures can be implemented. These measures would

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:47: works would incorporate the risk mitigation principles referred to in Section 6.5; therefore any impacts

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:47:6.6.19 The decommissioning works for the conveyor would incorporate the risk mitigation principles referred to

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:47: in Section 6.5. Furthermore additional mitigation measures are proposed as part of the construction

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:47: to determine the need for additional mitigation measures. These mitigation measures would also be

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:49: a range of environmental risk mitigation measures would be embedded within the project; in addition,

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:49: further mitigation measures would be adopted, including the development of an asbestos management

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:50:Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:50: Adverse mitigation measures can be implemented.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:50: Medium Low Implementation of gas mitigation measures.

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:51:Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

TR030002-000441-ES Section 6 Hydrology_hydrogeology_land quality.pdf:51: mitigation measures can be implemented.

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:4: 3.4 Consultation on the HRA Screening report, draft HRA and development of a Mitigation and

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:7:Appendix 3.1 Bran Sands lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:14: mitigation. When considering such effects, a precautionary approach is adopted.

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:14: impacts, an assessment of mitigation options is carried out to determine adverse effect on the

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:14: integrity of the site. If these mitigation options cannot avoid adverse effects then development

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:38:2.2.13 The Harbour facilities project also includes mitigation and habitat enhancement proposals in Bran

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:38: waterbirds. They also represent mitigation for the predicted impact of the quay construction on intertidal

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:41:3.4 Consultation on the HRA Screening report, draft HRA and development of a Mitigation and

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:42: England which focussed on the habitat enhancement and mitigation proposals for Bran Sands lagoon

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:42: outlined within the draft HRA, and led to the production of a Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS)

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:50: ecology within the NYMNP, prior to mitigation (refer to the HRA that was submitted with the planning

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:72: A number of road transport mitigation measures are proposed to be implemented

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:74: mitigation measures to control dust impacts would be implemented and adhered to

TR030002-000674-Doc 6.3 Habitats Regulations Assessment_1 of 2.pdf:74: As set out for the Mine, a number of road transport mitigation measures would be

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:8: scheme options (as well as possible mitigation measures).

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:35: mitigation measures will be developed and details provided in the ES. The residual

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:35: • Detailed description of the potential impacts and mitigation measures identified

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:36: Mitigation To identify appropriate and practicable The provision of solutions to

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:36: measures mitigation measures and enhancement minimise adverse impacts as far

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:50: identification of any required mitigation measures.

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:50:5.2.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:50: It is likely that mitigation measures will be implemented through appropriate design and

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:50: Agency and CIRIA will be used to inform the design of mitigation measures, in addition

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:50: to consultation with key stakeholders. Likely mitigation measures include:

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:51: and soil, with particular focus on mitigation of pollution;

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:55:5.3.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:55: The main form of mitigation to limit sediment plume generation due to dredging is

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:61:5.4.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:61: mitigation measures.

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:62: The requirement for such mitigation measures will be considered based on the findings

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:66:5.5.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:66: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:66: determined that significant impacts have the potential to arise, the following mitigation

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:69:5.6.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:69: The requirement for mitigation measures to be implemented during the construction and

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:69: terrestrial ecology). Mitigation measures will be identified during the EIA process, but

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:72:5.7.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:72: The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume generation due to dredging is the

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:72: The requirement for mitigation measures to be implemented will be determined on the

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:74: baseline traffic) and permanent mitigation measures are required.

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:74: increase in baseline traffic) and short term mitigation measures are required.

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:74: increase is above 30%, but does not lead to disruption. No mitigation measures are

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:74: Insignificant No perceivable impact. No mitigation measures are required.

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:74: peak hour. Mitigation measures will be proposed where it has been demonstrated that

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:75:5.8.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:75: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:75: significant impacts have potential to arise, the following mitigation measures may reduce

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:75: The above list is not intended to represent an exhaustive list of potential mitigation

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:75: measures; however such mitigation measures have potential to effectively manage the

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:78:5.9.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:78: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:78: is determined that significant impacts have potential to arise, the following mitigation

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:79: alongside any mitigation measures.

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:80:5.10.4 Potential mitigation measures for key impacts

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:80: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:80: significant impacts have potential to arise, mitigation measures may reduce the

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:80: During the construction phase, potential mitigation measures to reduce the significance

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:83:5.11.4 Potential mitigation measures for key impacts

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:83: The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation measures to

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:86:5.12.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:86: There are a wide range of mitigation measures that can be implemented to mitigate the

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:88:5.13.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:88: for mitigation measures to be implemented will be fully investigated during the EIA.

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:91:5.14.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:91: The requirement for mitigation measures to be implemented as part of the proposed

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:91: Potential mitigation measures could include ensuring contractors are aware of the

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:91: water abstractions. Such mitigation measures are considered likely to effectively

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:92:5.15.4 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:92: economics, it is considered that mitigation measures are unlikely to be required.

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:97:5.17.5 Potential mitigation measures for key issues

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:97: Specific mitigation measures could be implemented to avoid potential conflicts between

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:97: route. The requirement for such mitigation measures will be fully investigated during the

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:99: status. UKTAG has adopted the ‘mitigation measures approach’ for classifying HMWBs

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:99: this mitigation is in place, then the water body may be classified as achieving ‘good’ or

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:99: ‘better’ ecological potential. If this level of mitigation is not in place, then the water body

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:100: mitigation measures in place (for heavily modified water bodies) would need to be

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:100: (potential hydrodynamic, water quality impacts, marine ecology, mitigation

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:100: (hydrodynamic effects, mitigation measures in place).

TR030002-000074-131202_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Report.pdf:100: • Maintenance dredging required (water quality, mitigation measures in place).

TR030002-000106-141120_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and MMO.pdf:2:the potential impacts arising from the Harbour Facility and the mitigation proposed,

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:8: impacts, alongside a package of mitigation measures identified to

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:9: careful design of the development, including a range of mitigation

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:15: Prroposed Mitigation

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:26: work and assessments undertaken and the mitigation strategies proposed.

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:52: package of highways transport mitigation measures is provided at Appendix 3

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:52:7.23 With the proposed package of mitigation outlined above and detailed in

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:52: designed to reduce potential impacts, alongside a package of mitigation

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:54:7.35 Mitigation proposed during construction would take the form of a landscaping

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:62: movements. Mitigation measures are proposed and these are aimed at

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:66: of the development, including a range of mitigation measures, would mean that

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:75: Severance Proposed d mitigation forr the effects off Minnor Adverse

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:75: Proposedd mitigation forr the effects off

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:75: Proposed d mitigation forr the effects off

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:75: an Amenity Proposed d mitigation forr pedestrian amenity Minnor Adverse

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:75: Proposedd mitigation forr the effects off

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:76: Fear and Intimidation Proposed mitigation for the effects of fear Minor Adverse

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:76: Mitigation for the effects of fear and

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:76: (see above) the mitigation measures

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:76: Proposed mitigation for the effects of fear

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:76: Pedestrian Delay No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:76: Highway Safety No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:76: Driver Delay Proposed mitigation for the effects of driver Minor Adverse

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:76: Severance No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:76: Pedestrian Amenity No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:76: Fear and Intimidation No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:76: Pedestrian Delay No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:76: Highway Safety No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:76: Driver Delay No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:76: Severance No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:77: Pedestrian Amenity Proposed mitigation for pedestrian amenity Minor Adverse

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:77: Fear and Intimidation No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:77: Pedestrian Delay No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:77: Highway Safety No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000573-Doc 7.3 Appendix 5 - MHF Planning Statement.pdf:77: Driver Delay No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:10: draft DCO, the term “ecological mitigation works”, (Document 4.1C). The ecological mitigation works are those

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:11: mitigation during construction referred to in the

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:11: construction mitigation identified in the

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:11: include reference to the “marine management mammal mitigation plan.” This has been corrected, please see

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:11: mitigation plan”, please can the Applicant clarify if revised draft DCO (Document 4.1C) which incorporates a

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:11: this is the same as the Marine Mammal Mitigation version of requirement 9 agreed with the MMO and NE.

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:11: include the marine management mitigation plan?

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:11: DCO the term “marine management mitigation

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:11: IPs (in particular the If the “marine management mitigation plan” is not

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:12: requirement, to provide clarity on the mitigation

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:13: and DML to deliver the mitigation identified in the

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:18:HRA 2.4 Applicant Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS)

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:18: 1. Please can the Applicant clarify whether 1. Please see further amended Mitigation and Monitoring

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:19: mitigation relied on to reach the

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:20: and APP-128] describes the mitigation measures

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:21: form part of the mitigation relied upon in

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:22: incorporate the mitigation measures

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:22: these mitigation measures, noting they Management Plan now incorporates a new section

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:22: these mitigation measures?

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:23: mitigation within the DCO requirements (see

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:24:mitigation referred to in section 6.2.3, the

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:24:mitigation referred to by NE is appropriately

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:24:mitigation required by NE within the DCO to

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:25: a mitigation measure required to ensure no

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:25: a mitigation measure for which the HRA had to

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:27: mitigation measures

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:68: mitigation and/or modifications to the cathodic protection are to be implemented such as the installation

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:77: mitigation and/or modifications to the cathodic protection are to be implemented such as the installation

TR030002-000826-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:83:on common tern have been considered as part of the HRA and mitigation and habitat enhancement

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:2:the term ‘ecological mitigation works’, to provide a definition of

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:3:prevent the mitigation during construction referred to in the

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:3:construction mitigation identified in the governance tracker

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:3:reference to the ‘marine management mitigation plan’, please sensible that RCBC should consult MMO and in the DML, MMO should

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:3:Mammal Mitigation Plan (MMMP)? If not, please can the

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:3: The marine mammal mitigation plan.

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:4:marine management mitigation plan? If this is simply a For the avoidance of doubt, in agreement with the MMO and the

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:4:DCO the term ‘marine management mitigation plan’? statutory bodies that need to secure it are correctly referenced:

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:4:If the ‘marine management mitigation plan’ is not the same as 9.—(1) No phase of the authorised development is to commence until a written

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:4: ecological management plan for any ecological mitigation or enhancement

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:4:the MMMP and should the minimum information to be provided marine mammal management mitigation plan but not including the lagoon

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:4:requirement, to provide clarity on the mitigation required (via in Schedule 5) drafted in accordance with the principles set out in the outline

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:4:the Governance Tracker)? ecological management plan (Document 6.11) and incorporating the mitigation

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:4: ecological enhancement or mitigation works are proposed below MHWS the

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:4: the case of any habitat creationecological mitigation or enhancement works

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:4: requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order to avoid any impacts.

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:5: any ecological surveys being undertaken and the scope of mitigation agreed

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:5: following the survey. The agreed mitigation shall then be carried out in

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:5:deliver the mitigation identified in the Environmental Statement

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:9:Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS)

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:10:mitigation relied on to reach the (ab) details of the enhancement of habitat in the lagoon for water birds and a

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:10:addresses their previous concerns raised in relation to the monitoring information) must accord fully with the mitigation and monitoring

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:11: enhancement plan and principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:12:describes the mitigation measures which would need to

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:14:REP1-042 and incorporate the mitigation measures identified

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:14:reflect these mitigation measures, noting they are secured by

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:14:Is NE satisfied with the means of securing these mitigation

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:14:To: The Applicant and HRA 2.12 which would resolve the matter of securing the mitigation,

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:14:NE has advised the Applicant on how to secure the mitigation

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:14:NE’s written representation). are appropriate to secure the mitigation in order to conclude no adverse

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:15:at DL1, in response to NE’s WR and the mitigation referred

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:15:mitigation referred to by NE is appropriately secured:

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:15:secure the mitigation required by NE within the DCO to conclude no

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:16:and is not a mitigation measure required to ensure no adverse supplied):

TR030002-000782-151104 TR030002 Natural England Response to ExA's second round of questions.pdf:16:was not a mitigation measure for which the HRA had to rely on suspended deck of the quay (should an open quay structure be

TR030002-000742-SABIC UK Petrochemicals Limited 2.pdf:23: made in respect of associated costs such as environmental mitigation.

TR030002-000836-DEA UK SNS Limited - Deadline 4 Submission.pdf:11: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures which are

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:6: “ecological mitigation works” means the mitigation measures set out in the outline ecological

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:7: “mitigation and monitoring strategy” means the mitigation and monitoring strategy certified by

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:26: (h) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A);

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:28: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:32:planning any additional mitigation measures required

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:32:pursuant to (3) then phase 2(a) and (b) must not be carried out until either additional mitigation

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:33:planning authority that no additional measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:33:earthworks or site levelling but excluding ecological mitigation works, until a Construction

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:33:6.1010A) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance tracker (Document 6.8A8B),

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:33: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:33:that such alternativealteration does not prevent the mitigation during construction referred to in the

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:33: 7. None of the authorised development is to commence (excluding ecological mitigation or

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:34:management plans for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:34:environmental statement for that phase (including a marine mammal mitigation plan but not

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:34:management plan (Document 6.11A11B) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:34:enhancement or mitigation works are proposed below mean high water springs also the MMO in

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:34:decommissioning phase, and to identify the requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:34:undertaken and the scope of mitigation agreed following the survey. The agreed mitigation shall

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:53:information) must accord with the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A).

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:55:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:57:enhancement plan and the principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:73: National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:73:a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence (referred to

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:73:in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for approval, such

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:73:approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme must be

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:73: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:73:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:73:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:73:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:78: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures which

TR030002-000894-160113_TR030002 Draft DCO (Comparite with Deadline 4 Draft DCO (Document 4.1C)).pdf:94: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:18: mitigation or compensation schemes.

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:20: identify and describe the control processes and mitigation

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:22: should be given to the need for any mitigation where appropriate

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:22: construction phase, including consideration of any mitigation

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:22: operation phase, including consideration of any mitigation where

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:24:3.6 The Scoping Report identifies potential mitigation measures within

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:24: mitigation measures should be taken into account in the

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:24: assessment. To demonstrate that a mitigation measure is

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:25: appendix, a Table showing how mitigation identified in ES would

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:25: placed on a plan to deliver the mitigation, for example the use of a

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:27: • detailed description of the potential Impacts and mitigation

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:30:3.40 Mitigation measures should be addressed and the SoS advises that

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:30: any mitigation measures are effective and can be secured through

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:34:3.71 Consideration should be given to appropriate mitigation measures

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:34: Plan (CEMP) to deliver this mitigation. Only deliverable mitigation

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:36: methodology and proposed mitigation are agreed in consultation

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:38: these PRoW and any mitigation measures proposed to minimise

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:42: to agree appropriate requirements to secure necessary mitigation.

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:43: submission of revised short or long term mitigation or

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:44: the relevant statutory consultees and take into account mitigation

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:64:ix) that ‘The EIA will determine the requirement for the implementation of mitigation

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:68:with details of mitigation and compensation would need to be included to secure support.

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:68:migration times, or measurable mitigation measures put into place. In addition, we consider

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:80: following the application of mitigation.

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:88:proposal to ensure that opportunities for mitigation, compensation and enhancement to the natural

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:90: special interest within these sitesthese sites and should identify such mitigation measures as

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:92:  Consideration, and subsequent mitigation, should also be given to any visual impacts on

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:92:proposals for mitigation of any impacts and if appropriate, compensation measures. Contact the

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:92:Advice for further information on what information may be required in terms of survey and mitigation

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:93:needs to conduct an assessment, based on a full draft mitigation licence application, in advance of

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:93:therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation proposals for Habitats and Species

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:93:  Full details of any mitigation or compensation that might be required.

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:105:key information, risk assessments, proposed mitigation measures, conclusions and

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:108:monitoring and mitigation during these phases. Construction and decommissioning

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:110:receptors and control and mitigation measures should be outlined.

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:113:Group, consideration was given to mitigation options such as the 'corridor option'

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:128:and alternative mitigation measures. The justification for the final choice

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:129:Mitigation Measures

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:129:Mitigation measures may fall into certain categories namely: avoid;

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:129:and should be identified as such in the specialist topics. Mitigation

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:129:than one topic area. For each topic, the ES should set out any mitigation

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:129:mitigation in place. Any proposed mitigation should be discussed and

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:129:The effectiveness of mitigation should be apparent. Only mitigation

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:129:It would be helpful if the mitigation measures proposed could be cross

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:129:describing the mitigation measures proposed either in each of the

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:129:mitigation.

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:130:of detailed surveys and recommended mitigation actions. Where effective

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:130:example the local community may be able to identify possible mitigation

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:130:Table X to identify and collate the residual impacts after mitigation on

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:130:Table XXX to set out the mitigation measures proposed, as well as

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:130: enable the applicant to cross refer mitigation to specific

TR030002-000072-140113_TR030002_York Potash Harbour Facilities_Scoping Opinion Report.pdf:130: together with any mitigation or compensation measures, are

TR030002-000360-Rule 6 letter.pdf:6: • Ensuring that all necessary mitigation measures including on-going

TR030002-000360-Rule 6 letter.pdf:6: after taking account of the intended mitigation measures, in view of the sites’

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:9: proposals, combined with the suite of mitigation, both integrated within

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:9: design mitigation incorporated into the scheme minimises its visual

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:9: 27 With the proposed mitigation measures in place (such as implementation of

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:10: environmental mitigation; and uses modern architecture that assists with

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:11: alongside a package of mitigation measures identified to address

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:13: National Park; incorporates environmental mitigation measures through an

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:33: mitigation strategies proposed.

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:70: a) The scheme includes in-built mitigation designed to reduce the visual

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:71: c) With the proposed mitigation in place, including the implementation of

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:82: mitigation, both integrated within scheme design and proposed as a result

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:84:  The adoption of minimum levels of site lighting with further mitigation

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:86: design mitigation incorporated into the scheme minimises its visual

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:87:Receptors Type of effect Mitigation impact after impact

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:87: mitigation (adverse/bene

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:88:Receptors Type of effect Mitigation impact after impact

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:88: mitigation (adverse/bene

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:89:6.60 From this, with the proposed mitigation measures in place (such as

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:95: ‘worst case’ scenario) after any mitigation measures have been taken into

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:99: design principles alongside in-built environmental mitigation; and uses

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:103: minimising the adverse effects of highway mitigation. The full response of

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:104: embedded mitigation measures that have been developed by YPL into a

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:105: Description of Key Mitigation Measures Maximum

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:105: Severance Proposed mitigation for the effects of Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:105: Proposed mitigation for the effects of

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:105: Proposed mitigation for the effects of

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:105: Pedestrian Amenity Proposed mitigation for pedestrian amenity Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:105: Proposed mitigation for the effects of

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:105: Fear and Intimidation Proposed mitigation for the effects of fear Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:105: Mitigation for the effects of fear and

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:106: (see above) the mitigation measures

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:106: Proposed mitigation for the effects of fear

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:106: Pedestrian Delay No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:106: Highway Safety No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:106: Driver Delay Proposed mitigation for the effects of driver Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:106: Severance No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:106: Pedestrian Amenity No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:106: Fear and Intimidation No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:106: Pedestrian Delay No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:106: Highway Safety No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:106: Driver Delay No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:106: Severance No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:106: Pedestrian Amenity Proposed mitigation for pedestrian amenity Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:106: Fear and Intimidation No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:106: Pedestrian Delay No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:107: Highway Safety No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:107: Driver Delay No mitigation further to that embedded within Minor Adverse

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:107:6.114 With the proposed package of mitigation detailed in Table 6.1 above, it is

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:107: mitigation measures identified to address outstanding adverse impact, the

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:113:6.138 As part of the off-site highway mitigation works, it is proposed to upgrade

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:117: the operating Project, and in some cases, given the nature of the mitigation

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:117: desired effect, with mitigation proposed to minimise the impact of both

TR030002-000568-Doc 7.3 Appendix 1 - Mine and MTS Planning Statement.pdf:140: Where pollution is unavoidable, mitigation measures to reduce pollution levels

TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:7: in the submission with detail of proposed mitigation provided in the

TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:63: mitigation measures proposed lead it to conclude that it was not

TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:64: mudflats. Further, it requested that information on the mitigation or

TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:64: proposed for mitigation. This approach was supported by the EA in its

TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:64: required for mitigation.

TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:65: needs to be assessed and potential mitigation incorporated into the

TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:65: that adequate mitigation is proposed.

TR030002-000670-Doc 6.1 Consultation Statement - Main Text.pdf:68: and mitigation provided where appropriate.

TR030002-000755-Document 4.2A Draft Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked).pdf:23: mitigation referred to by Natural England in its representations will be

TR030002-000755-Document 4.2A Draft Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked).pdf:24: lagoon habitat enhancement plan which is to accord with the mitigation and

TR030002-000837-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council - Deadline 4 Submission.pdf:2:the construction mitigation identified in the governance tracker (Document 6.8A) and

TR030002-000837-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council - Deadline 4 Submission.pdf:2:would not prevent delivery of appropriate construction mitigation.”

TR030002-000837-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council - Deadline 4 Submission.pdf:3:the draft DCO and DML to deliver the mitigation identified in the Environmental

TR030002-000837-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council - Deadline 4 Submission.pdf:3:The documentation and in particular the DCO are sufficient to deliver the mitigation

TR030002-000837-Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council - Deadline 4 Submission.pdf:5:Noise, vibration and air quality - proposed mitigation measures

TR030002-000107-141128_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and Applicant.pdf:3:mitigation and would not form part of the DCO application, the implications of this

TR030002-000107-141128_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and Applicant.pdf:3:The applicant confirmed that they will provide a mitigation tracker table with the DCO

TR030002-000107-141128_TR030002_Teleconference meeting note_PINS and Applicant.pdf:3:application to assist in demonstrating how any mitigation measures relied on in the

TR030002-000842-151211 TR030002 Natural England - Response to ExA's queries on the RIES.pdf:4:3.5 (waterbird populations) in the outline Ecological Mitigation Plan provided at

TR030002-000842-151211 TR030002 Natural England - Response to ExA's queries on the RIES.pdf:4:mitigation measures identified in the applicant’s HRA Report, as required by NE in

TR030002-000842-151211 TR030002 Natural England - Response to ExA's queries on the RIES.pdf:4:(waterbird populations) in the outline Ecological Mitigation Plan is adequate to incorporate the

TR030002-000842-151211 TR030002 Natural England - Response to ExA's queries on the RIES.pdf:4:operational visual and lighting mitigation measures identified in the applicant’s HRA Report.

TR030002-000842-151211 TR030002 Natural England - Response to ExA's queries on the RIES.pdf:5:4.35 of the RIES, are appropriate to secure the mitigation in order to conclude no

TR030002-000842-151211 TR030002 Natural England - Response to ExA's queries on the RIES.pdf:5:to secure the mitigation in order to conclude no adverse effect on site integrity of the Teesmouth

TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5: result of the offshore disposal of dredged material and no mitigation measures are considered to be

TR030002-000457-ES Section 22 Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:6: the construction works as a whole on commercial navigation, as reported in Section 16, and mitigation

TR030002-000560-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_1 of 2.pdf:11: LAGOON MITIGATION AND MONITORING STRATEGY DRAFT

TR030002-000560-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_1 of 2.pdf:12: LAGOON MITIGATION AND MONITORING STRATEGY DRAFT

TR030002-000560-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_1 of 2.pdf:17: LAGOON MITIGATION AND MONITORING STRATEGY DRAFT

TR030002-000560-Doc 6.7 Environmental Statement Non Technical Summary_1 of 2.pdf:18: LAGOON MITIGATION AND MONITORING STRATEGY DRAFT

TR030002-000435-ES Section 1 Introduction.pdf:1: any adverse impacts (mitigation measures) have been identified.

TR030002-000435-ES Section 1 Introduction.pdf:5:are then identified and assessed and, where appropriate, mitigation measures are defined. The

TR030002-000435-ES Section 1 Introduction.pdf:5:mitigation measures are implemented) are then set out. Section 22 lists the references cited within this

TR030002-000483-Section 12 App 12.3 Construction Traffic Management Plan.pdf:18:3.5.1 Proposed mitigation measures for controlling dust and dirt arising from vehicle movements off-site,

TR030002-000483-Section 12 App 12.3 Construction Traffic Management Plan.pdf:18: approved, funding would be made available to implement targeted mitigation under an agreement with

TR030002-000483-Section 12 App 12.3 Construction Traffic Management Plan.pdf:18: be applied to be education, training and publicity. The types of mitigation that could be employed

TR030002-000483-Section 12 App 12.3 Construction Traffic Management Plan.pdf:25: additional mitigation measures proposed.

TR030002-000570-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2b - MDT Planning Statement Appendices.pdf:38: moderated. There is support for the proposed landscape mitigation

TR030002-000570-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2b - MDT Planning Statement Appendices.pdf:169:Potential mitigation measures may not have a high likelihood of counter-acting these expected

TR030002-000570-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2b - MDT Planning Statement Appendices.pdf:169:suitable mitigation measures may not exist such as for the predicted decrease in nitrogen uptake in

TR030002-000570-Doc 7.3 Appendix 2b - MDT Planning Statement Appendices.pdf:169:crops. Where mitigation techniques are available their sustainability and security (increased food

TR030002-000756-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 3.pdf:8: Reduction or mitigation of the consequences of an incident.

TR030002-000756-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 3.pdf:10: o Consider appropriate mitigation activities.

TR030002-000756-Document 8.3 Appendix 5 - Shipping Notes Part 3.pdf:14: changes Grounding, hull failure, loss of cargo forecasting Consider appropriate mitigation activities

TR030002-000773-York Potash Ltd (4).pdf:8: would not prevent the delivery of mitigation identified in the Governance Tracker,

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:8: “mitigation and monitoring strategy” means the mitigation and monitoring strategy certified by

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:26: (h) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12);

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:26: (m) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12); and

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:28: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:32:planning any additional mitigation measures required

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:32:pursuant to (3) then phase 2(a) and (b) shall not be carried out until either additional mitigation

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:33:planning authority that no additional measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:33:earthworks or site levelling but excluding ecological mitigation works, until a Construction

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:33:6.10) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance tracker (Document 6.8A), has

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:33: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:33:and ecological mitigation or enhancement works) until a Construction Traffic Management Plan

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:34:management plan for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:34:set out in the outline ecological management plan (Document 6.11) and incorporating the mitigation

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:34:phase, and to identify the requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order to avoid any

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:34:local planning authority prior to any ecological surveys being undertaken and the scope of mitigation

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:34:agreed following the survey. The agreed mitigation shall then be carried out in accordance with an

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:51: (3) The lagoon habitat enhancement plan must accord with the mitigation and monitoring strategy

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:53:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:55:accordance with principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12) and

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:70: National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:70:a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence (referred to

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:70:in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for approval, such

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:70:approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme must be

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:70: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:70:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:70:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-000754-Document 4.1A Draft DCO (Clean).pdf:70:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must

TR030002-000676-Doc 7.2 - Summary of Proposals Document.pdf:2: Environmental impacts and mitigation  14

TR030002-000676-Doc 7.2 - Summary of Proposals Document.pdf:14: AND MITIGATION

TR030002-000676-Doc 7.2 - Summary of Proposals Document.pdf:14:ENVIRONOMENTAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1: mitigation measures are detailed and a discussion of the residual impacts is presented, where

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:10:found to be detrimental, additional mitigation may be

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21: present above geological deposits. This method has been proposed as mitigation due to the negligible

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: Mitigation and residual impact

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: is minimised during dredging. The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume is selection of the

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25: CSD or backhoe, or a combination of these methods. There is no further mitigation that can be applied

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27: Mitigation and residual impact

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:28: the above mitigation measures, it is considered that the residual impact would be of negligible

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:29: Mitigation and residual impact

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:29:7.6.7 Mitigation is not required and, therefore, the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:30: Mitigation and residual impact

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:30: Mitigation and residual impact

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:30: Mitigation measures and residual impact

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:30:7.7.3 No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:31:7.7.5 To minimise the risk of spillages or leakages from occurring, the same mitigation measures described

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:31: mitigation measures presented in this section of the ES, the potential impacts of the proposed scheme

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:32:Impact Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

TR030002-000442-ES Section 7 Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:33:Impact Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:14: the Ruswarp site, there should be opportunity to provide potentially effective mitigation

TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:15: based on the conclusion that the mitigation measures for the operational mine “could take

TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:15: mitigation (i.e. provision of woodland) are the most appropriate given its stated landscape

TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:109: established. The most effective mitigation is to conduct cover drilling ahead of the tunnel face

TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:113: higher risk areas that require greater mitigation measures to prevent harm to employees

TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:130: risk. Mitigation measures will require a number of test Access development crosses the major Donovan fault

TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:130: could present potential hydrogeological, water ingress, construction. Mitigation measures will require a test

TR030002-000576-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 1.pdf:130: Mitigation measures will require a test holes drilled

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:4: authority and any additional mitigation agreed with the local planning

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:6:longer being considered we are further satisfied that no mitigation

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:6:Natural England considers that the MMMP should be secured via The MMMP (Marine Mammal Mitigation Plan) is specifically referred to

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:7:bats have been sufficiently mitigated via the lighting mitigation

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:7:There are two elements to the mitigation at the proposed Port

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:7:development: The mitigation is included in the Outline Ecological Management Plan

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:7:mitigation:

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:7:Natural England considers therefore that the measures at Bran Please see also replacement Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:7:Sands Lagoon are for the most part mitigation. The positive (Document 6.12).

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:7:undertaken in line with the Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:10:by the mitigation measures proposed within the Supplementary

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:10:The applicant agreed at meetings and in writing that they intend The provision of nesting platforms is already referred to in Mitigation

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:10:While it cannot be categorised as a mitigation measure, the (meaning that these measures could be implemented within an open

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:11:construction mitigations measures and enhancement measures in with the Applicant’s response to HRA 1.18.

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:11:we see these measures as mitigation, throughout our discussions

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:11:enhancement will make improvements beyond mitigation of

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:11:mitigation measures proposed in the HRA (which includes noise

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:12:deliverability of the mitigation measures previously agreed and provision of revised screening and integrity matrices in response to

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:12:detailed in Section 6.2.4-6.2.11 on how to secure the mitigation Applicant’s view is that the HRA already addresses the point made in

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:12:confirmed that references to the Mitigation and Monitoring Applicant assumes Natural England’s reference to section 6.2.2 is

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:19: questions whether or not there is a reliance on mitigation measures

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:21:CEMP shall include the mitigation identified in the Environmental

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:21:an outline EMP addressing the proposed mitigation.

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:24:However, the Environmental Protection the mitigation measures that were taken into account in the

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:24:carried out during operational and construction works to ensure (Document 6.4)). For this reason, no specific mitigation (e.g. noise

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:25:notified of any instances of non-compliance, or of complaints from ES arises from construction of the conveyor, for which mitigation is

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:25:visual impacts mitigation contained within chapter 20 (Landscape

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:25:mitigation measures.

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:25:mitigation measures that would be located on land outside the

TR030002-000765-Document 8.4 Applicants Responses to Other Responses to ExA Q1.pdf:25:control of the Applicant, then can these mitigation measures be

TR030002-000784-151105 TR030002 MMO - Response to ExA Q2.pdf:3: MMMP and should the minimum information ecological management plans for any ecological mitigation or enhancement

TR030002-000784-151105 TR030002 MMO - Response to ExA Q2.pdf:3: secured via this or a separate requirement, marine mammal mitigation plan but not including the lagoon habitat enhancement

TR030002-000784-151105 TR030002 MMO - Response to ExA Q2.pdf:3: to provide clarity on the mitigation required works which are licensed under the deemed marine licence in Schedule 5)

TR030002-000784-151105 TR030002 MMO - Response to ExA Q2.pdf:3: management plan (Document 6.11) and incorporating the mitigation identified in

TR030002-000784-151105 TR030002 MMO - Response to ExA Q2.pdf:3: Council and, when changes to any ecological enhancement or mitigation works

TR030002-000784-151105 TR030002 MMO - Response to ExA Q2.pdf:3: for mitigation to be implemented in order to avoid any impacts. The scope of

TR030002-000784-151105 TR030002 MMO - Response to ExA Q2.pdf:3: undertaken and the scope of mitigation agreed following the survey. The agreed

TR030002-000784-151105 TR030002 MMO - Response to ExA Q2.pdf:3: mitigation shall then be carried out in accordance with an agreed timetable.

TR030002-000784-151105 TR030002 MMO - Response to ExA Q2.pdf:4: RCBC) mitigation identified in the Environmental

TR030002-000784-151105 TR030002 MMO - Response to ExA Q2.pdf:6: EA, the 2 adequately secures the relevant mitigation 3. Yes subject to 5. below

TR030002-000784-151105 TR030002 MMO - Response to ExA Q2.pdf:6: measures might be because the measures mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12)

TR030002-000784-151105 TR030002 MMO - Response to ExA Q2.pdf:7: outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12) and agreed

TR030002-000856-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 8.10 - Schedule of Changes to the Draft DCO.pdf:19: effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures which are

TR030002-000856-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 8.10 - Schedule of Changes to the Draft DCO.pdf:40: effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures which are proposed

TR030002-000390-North Yorkshire County Council.pdf:4:“Whilst the LHA is satisfied with the conclusions and the mitigation to be provided in the TA,

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:10:  Identify the potential for effective mitigation including fit with existing landscape

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:12:Mitigation opportunities during the construction stage would be very limited, due to the open,

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:12:to provide mitigation for the operational stage but this would adversely affect the presently

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:13:Mitigation opportunities during the construction stage would be limited, due to the open

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:13:Woodland planting could also be considered to provide mitigation for the operational stage

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:14:Mitigation opportunities during the construction stage would be limited, due to the open and

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:14:the approved mitigation measures for the A171 park and ride scheme located immediately

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:15:Mitigation opportunities during the construction stage would be very limited, due to the steep,

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:15:site, compared to alternative sites, this suggests that effective mitigation mounding may be

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:15:own right. Large scale woodland planting could be considered to provide mitigation for the

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:16:provide a degree of inherent mitigation during both construction and operational stages of

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:16:the Ugglebarnby Ridge could provide an armature for large scale mitigation planting,

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:17:order of preference. Weight is given to the presence of natural site mitigation and the

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:17:potential for new mitigation measures that could fit with prevailing landscape character over

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:17:and incised valley landform. Whilst mitigation measures would reflect the characteristics of

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:19:4. Landscape character and visual effects during the operational period (no mitigation)

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:19:containment of lower operational buildings by surrounding tree cover. Without mitigation,

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:20:operational features (buildings and vehicles using the site) being visible until mitigation

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:20:slightly longer time period for mitigation planting to become effective at site 3 than site 5).

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:20:effective mitigation measures to fit with prevailing landscape character and achieve long

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:21:effective mitigation and assimilation into the landscape. Site 3 would be second preferred

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:22: mitigation).

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:22:6 Potential for effective mitigation 1 3

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:23:for complimentary mitigation measures, which could achieve early visual containment of the

TR030002-000579-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Appendices to Alternative Sites Assessment - Part 4.pdf:23:effects on landscape and visual receptors. Mitigation for these alternatives would take

TR030002-000274-DCO Hearing Agenda 25 September 2015.pdf:1: 1. The views of statutory consultees, as to whether mitigation sought is

TR030002-000274-DCO Hearing Agenda 25 September 2015.pdf:1: proposed DCO, as to whether mitigation sought is now sufficiently

TR030002-000274-DCO Hearing Agenda 25 September 2015.pdf:1: secure mitigation will also be considered.

TR030002-000881-Document 1.4G - Document List.pdf:11:Mitigation and Monitoring Ref 5(2)(q) 6.12 7 September 2015

TR030002-000881-Document 1.4G - Document List.pdf:11:Mitigation and Monitoring Ref 5(2)(q) 6.12A 6 November 2015

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:5:6 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES ………………………………………………… 13

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:6: (ESs) produced, together with measures to ensure that appropriate corrective actions or mitigation

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:6: disturbance, pollution or impact on habitats, and details of mitigation measures.

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:6: Harbour facilities CEMP, including the management processes, mitigation measures, potential

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:7: activities of the Harbour facilities and those mitigation measures which have been recommended to

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:9: that appropriate resources are available, and any necessary environmental controls or mitigation

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:12: Risk Assessments introduced in Section 4.1 and the relevant mitigation measures identified in

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:13: the environmental risks and mitigation measures will be largely the same. Tasks Sheets support

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:16:  agreed controls, protection and mitigation measures (including those in the CEMP) are in

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:16: to verify that the required methods and mitigation measures are being implemented effectively.

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:18:6 ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION MEASURES

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:18:6.1.1 The mitigation measures presented in Table 6-1 have been developed from the mitigation

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:19:Table 6-1 Summary of mitigation measures for Harbour facilities

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:19: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:20: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:20:13 As mitigation for the potential impact of construction phase noise disturbance, it is proposed that temporary noise attenuation barriers would be

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:21: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:21:14 As mitigation for potential visual disturbance to waterbirds, it is proposed that temporary visual barriers are positioned in the same locations as

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:21: identified under item 13 for the noise attenuation barriers (it should be noted that the barriers positioned for mitigation of potential noise

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:21: disturbance as described in item 13 will also serve as a visual screen; the same locations are appropriate as mitigation for both noise and visual

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:21: levels are found to be inadequate or excessive, mitigation strategies to remedy the effects would be implemented, such as re-directing luminaires

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:22: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:22:19 The mitigation measures relevant to Section 7 are also of relevance to this section.

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:22:21 Mitigation measures relating to communications include the following:

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:22:22 Mitigation measures relating to dust management include the following:

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:23: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:23:  Ensure an adequate water supply on the site for effective dust/particulate matter suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:24: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:24:23 Mitigation measures specific to demolition include the following:

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:24:24 Mitigation measures specific to earthworks include the following:

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:24:25 Mitigation measures specific to construction include the following:

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:24:26 Mitigation measures specific to trackout include the following:

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:25: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:25:27 Mitigation measures specific to Non Road Mobile Machinery (NRMM) include the following:

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:26: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:26: compliance/complaint (where operationally safe to do so) and/or the investigation of mitigation measures to reduce the noise emission levels from

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:27: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:27: survey would be undertaken as soon as possible following the implementation of mitigation to re-assess the noise levels against the guideline

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:28: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:28:33 The mitigation measures relevant to Section 7 are also of relevance to this section to prevent impacts to water abstractions.

TR030002-000857-151216 TR030002 York Potash Ltd - Document 6.10A - Outline Construction Environmental Management Plan.pdf:29: Environmental Statement: Proposed mitigation or best practice measures

TR030002-000478-Section 10 App 10.1 Terrestrial ecology legislation.pdf:3: and Species Regulations a bat; deliberate disturbance of European Protected Species: Mitigation Licensing- How to g

TR030002-000478-Section 10 App 10.1 Terrestrial ecology legislation.pdf:3:protected Bat Mitigation Guidelines (English Nature 2004)

TR030002-000478-Section 10 App 10.1 Terrestrial ecology legislation.pdf:3: and Species Regulations an otter; deliberate disturbance of European Protected Species: Mitigation Licensing- How to g

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:11:Securing and delivering HRA mitigation through the DCO

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:11: Woods SAC. However, the applicant is relying on a number of mitigation

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:11: the Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS), which

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:11: both the applicant and NE agree are ‘mitigation’.

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:11:2.12 NE’s proposed some amendments to the mitigation strategy prior to the

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:11: mitigation measures relied on in the applicant’s HRA would be secured and

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:11: concerns regarding securing the mitigation measures REP1-015.

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:11: the Deemed Marine Licence (DML), to ensure that all mitigation measures

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:11: on the mitigation measures that the applicant has relied upon in their HRA

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:11: Ramsar sites and how these mitigation measures would be secured and

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:16: that this conclusion was reliant on the assumption that all mitigation

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:17:Securing and delivering HRA mitigation through the MMS

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:17: creation would be delivered through a Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:17: MMS, could be amended to improve the suitability of the mitigation [RR-

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:18:4.12 Section 5 of the MMS describes ‘Other Mitigation Measures of Relevance to

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:18: barriers as mitigation for the potential impact of noise and visual

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:19: incorporating the mitigation identified in the Governance Tracker,

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:19: certainty, the HRA does not assume that this is a mitigation measure that

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:19: Report APP-127 and APP-128 describes the mitigation measures which

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:20: are not a mitigation measure and therefore are not proposed as part of

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:20: contribution to biodiversity, although NE agreed it is not a mitigation

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:21: Securing the mitigation in the MMS through the DCO/DML

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:22:Operational mitigation

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:23: these operational mitigation measures into the Ecological Management

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:23: these operational mitigation measures would be delivered through the

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:23: incorporate the mitigation measures identified in the Updated Governance

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:24:Adequacy of mitigation measures

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:24: proposed mitigation measure in Bran Sands lagoon together with other

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:24: mitigation would not result in an adverse effect on the integrity of the

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:24:4.35 In response to the mitigation measures identified in NE’s Written

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:24: following mechanisms in place, the mitigation referred to by NE is

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:25: mitigation, ongoing monitoring and management of the site. On this basis,

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:25: secure the mitigation in order to conclude no adverse effect on site

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:32: delivered through a Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS). A draft MMS was provided in Appendix 3.1 of the

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:32: mitigation RR-007. The proposed changes were set out in sections 6.14-6.16 of the applicant’s SoCG with NE [REP1-

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:35: attenuation barriers as mitigation for the potential impact of noise and visual disturbance during the construction phase

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:35: mitigation measures which would need to feature in the construction lighting design strategy to mitigate effects on SPA

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:36: Second Written Questions REP4-009 that the applicant will need to incorporate these operational mitigation

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:36: Item 37 of the Updated Governance Tracker REP4-061 confirms that these operational mitigation measures would be

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:36: EMP REP4-059 and incorporate the mitigation measures identified in the Updated Governance Tracker REP4-061.

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:37: into account the proposed mitigation measure in Bran Sands lagoon together with other mitigation would not result in

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:38: In response to the mitigation measures identified in NE’s Written Representation REP1-015, the applicant explained

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:38: that with the following mechanisms in place, the mitigation referred to by NE is appropriately secured: the revised MMS

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:38: mitigation, ongoing monitoring and management of the site. On this basis, NE would be able to consider that the

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:38: mechanisms are appropriate to secure the mitigation in order to conclude no adverse effect on site integrity of the

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:42: • York Potash Limited (Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy) REP2-006

TR030002-000249-York Potash_RIES_25 Nov 2015.pdf:43: • York Potash Limited (Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy – Rev 4) [REP4-

TR030002-000688-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:10:Mitigation and Monitoring Ref 5(2)(q) 6.12 7 September 2015

TR030002-000688-York Potash Ltd (2).pdf:10:Mitigation and Monitoring Ref 5(2)(q) 6.12A 6 November 2015

TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf:2: highway authority, as appropriate, on the assessment and mitigation. consultation.

TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf:5: facilities embedded mitigation to mitigate the project’s potential traffic impact.

TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf:6: adequately assessed and reported so as to ensure that the mitigation of any impact is compliant with

TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf:8: 4 Mitigation measures details of travel planning measures to mitigate A CTMP is included as Appendix 12.3.

TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf:22: mitigation to encourage car share take up (Appendix 12.3 refers).

TR030002-000447-ES Section 12 Traffic and transport.pdf:24: types which could be exacerbated by the development and if mitigation may be appropriate and

TR030002-000111-130523_Meeting Note_York Potash Pipeline teleconference with applicant and Natural England.pdf:2:Mitigation in the HRA

TR030002-000111-130523_Meeting Note_York Potash Pipeline teleconference with applicant and Natural England.pdf:2:PINS noted that mitigation in the form of construction techniques is identified in the

TR030002-000111-130523_Meeting Note_York Potash Pipeline teleconference with applicant and Natural England.pdf:3:appropriate mitigation measures, this should not be done until agreement on the

TR030002-000111-130523_Meeting Note_York Potash Pipeline teleconference with applicant and Natural England.pdf:3:PINS stressed the importance of accurate cross-referencing between mitigation

TR030002-000111-130523_Meeting Note_York Potash Pipeline teleconference with applicant and Natural England.pdf:3:mitigation would be secured through the draft DCO, PINS suggested that the applicant

TR030002-000111-130523_Meeting Note_York Potash Pipeline teleconference with applicant and Natural England.pdf:3:ES and/or HRA Report, setting out the mitigation measures that would be required,

TR030002-000111-130523_Meeting Note_York Potash Pipeline teleconference with applicant and Natural England.pdf:3:confirmed that the HRA Report would identify any mitigation which is proposed to be

TR030002-000494-Section 15 App 15.1 Archaeology desk based appraisal.pdf:16: with the SMR officer that no mitigation measures are needed prior to development regarding

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:3:The Mitigation section of the Environmental Statement references the need to secure

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:5:enhancement measures proposed are to be regarded as mitigation.

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:5:undertaking to the extent that its provisions are to be regarded as necessary mitigation? If

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:6:Absence of adverse effects – securing mitigation

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:6:development provided that intended mitigation measures are implemented, subject to

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:6:and/or Requirements that satisfactorily guarantee that the mitigation measures would be

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:6:secured? If not please specify any additional mitigation measures and a means by which to

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:7:mitigation measures are proposed to ensure any potential impacts of the proposed

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:7:The Applicant is asked to provide for Deadline 1 a Table identifying how each mitigation

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:7:requirements/conditions identified in the DCO/DML to secure and deliver the mitigation

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:7:wording that would you consider appropriate to secure and deliver the mitigation measures

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:13: of the Harbour facilities. It is concluded that potential impacts – with mitigation / appropriate

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:13: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:13:4.6. Mitigation measures to minimise the risk of impacts to human health from elevated

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:14:  further monitoring of the ground gas regime so that suitable mitigation measures can be

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:14:  implementation of the generic environmental risk mitigation identified above.

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:14:4.7. With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, the residual impacts are predicted

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:14: agreement on the findings of the impact assessment and mitigation measures proposed.

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:15: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:16:5.8. With the implementation of the controls and mitigation measures outlined above, the residual

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:16: appropriate. There is agreement on the findings of the impact assessment and mitigation

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:17: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:18: Sands lagoon (included within the DCO and detailed in the Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:21: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:21:7.10. Mitigation measures with regard to this impact are limited and the potential impacts are

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:21: submission of the Harbour facilities ES. With the implementation of the above mitigation

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:23: Mitigation measures

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:23:8.4. Mitigation measures proposed with regard to the potential flood hazard to construction

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:23: With the implementation of the above mitigation, there is no residual impact. No other

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:23: mitigation measures are proposed.

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:23: agreement on the findings of the impact assessment and mitigation measures proposed.

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:24:9.6. A range of mitigation measures were recommended. Assuming the implementation of these

TR030002-000701-Environment Agency.pdf:24: mitigation measures, the WFD compliance assessment concluded that the proposed scheme

TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:9: 20.10 Mitigation measures …………………………………………………………………………………………………. 713

TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:19:Figure 9-5 Noise mitigation barriers

TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:21:Table 11-16 Summary of potential impacts, impact significance, mitigation measures

TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:23:Table 13-3 Effect descriptors for each activity with mitigation, at individual receptors

TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:23:Table 13-11 Summary dust risk table to define site-specific mitigation

TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:23: site, with mitigation

TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:27:Table 15-7 Summary of mitigation measures

TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:27:Table 16-5 Summary of potential impacts, mitigation measures and residual

TR030002-000434-ES Contents_index.pdf:28:Table 18-2 Summary of impacts, mitigation measures and residual impacts with

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:6: “ecological mitigation works” means the mitigation measures set out in the outline ecological

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:7: “mitigation and monitoring strategy” means the mitigation and monitoring strategy certified by

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:26: (h) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A);

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:28: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:32:planning any additional mitigation measures required

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:32:pursuant to (3) then phase 2(a) and (b) must not be carried out until either additional mitigation

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:33:planning authority that no additional measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:33:earthworks or site levelling but excluding ecological mitigation works, until a Construction

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:33:6.10) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance tracker (Document 6.8A), has

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:33: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:33:that such alternative does not prevent the mitigation during construction referred to in the

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:33: 7. None of the authorised development is to commence (excluding ecological mitigation or

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34:management plans for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34:environmental statement for that phase (including a marine mammal mitigation plan but not

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34:management plan (Document 6.11A) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34:enhancement or mitigation works are proposed below mean high water springs also the MMO in

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34:decommissioning phase, and to identify the requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34:undertaken and the scope of mitigation agreed following the survey. The agreed mitigation shall

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:52:information) must accord with the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A).

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:54:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:56:enhancement plan and the principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:72: National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:72:a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence (referred to

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:72:in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for approval, such

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:72:approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme must be

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:72: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:72:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:72:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:72:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must

TR030002-000820-Document 4.1C - Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:76: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures which

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:28:4.1.5 Where significant cumulative impacts have been identified, mitigation measures and monitoring

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:71:5.3.28 This assessment of potential effects on Special Qualities takes account of proposed mitigation. Where

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:72:  Mitigation Summary – a summary of identified mitigation measures, to mitigate any significant

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:80:5.3.45 In consultation with North Yorkshire County Council (NYCC), a number of mitigation measures have

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:81: or negligible significance, as mitigation in the form of green screening with vegetation matures. As this

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:82: Mitigation

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:83:5.3.70 This indicates that, without mitigation, tourism numbers are expected fall, but the impacts would be

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:87: bespoke embedded mitigation measures to achieve the policy aim. The Transport Strategy consists of

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:87:6.2.5 The Transport Strategy has informed a series of embedded mitigation measures which have, in turn,

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:87: mitigation are contained in Section 6.5.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:94: mitigation measures to reduce the impacts. Prior to movement of loads, full consultation would be

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:107: types which could be exacerbated by the development and if mitigation may be appropriate and

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:121:6.4.47 Embedded mitigation is being developed to reduce the impact of employees driving direct to the Mine

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:129: Embedded mitigation

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:129: 6.5.1 In line with the transport strategy for the development, the following embedded mitigation measures are

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:139: They are, therefore, considered further below to identify whether mitigation measures may be required.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:140: considered to be operating beyond its desirable capacity and mitigation measures may be required.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:152:6.6.1 In line with the transport strategy for the development, the following embedded mitigation measures are

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:154: Description of Impact Key Mitigation Measures

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:154: No mitigation further to that embedded within the scheme design is

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:155:Description of Impact Key Mitigation Measures

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:155: No mitigation further to that embedded within the scheme design is

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:157: guidance and specify best-practice mitigation to reduce any impacts at nearby residential receptors.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:158: Mitigation measures are also embedded within the scheme design for the MHF.

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:158: Therefore it is predicted that, with the adoption of best-practice mitigation measures, any cumulative

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:161: MHF. Mitigation measures to minimise the risk of dust impacts at nearby receptors were included

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:161: mitigation was also proposed as part of the MHF impact assessment. It is considered that with the

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:161: implementation of the embedded controls and mitigation measures proposed, impacts as a result of

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:166: mitigation applied at each individual site in the form of adherence to best practice for

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:167: YPP components individually significance mitigation

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:169: mitigation measures have been identified, including sediment management, measures to manage

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:169: the construction phase (i.e. mitigation measures embedded within the scheme design and drainage

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:173: located within the existing heavy industrial area of Wilton and best-practice mitigation measures would

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:190: construction) impacts with respect to landscape and amenity, the residual impact after mitigation (and

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:198: assessment was undertaken in accordance with national guidance to specify best-practice mitigation

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:198: evening or night time HGV movements are proposed. Noise mitigation measures are also

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:208: undertaken in accordance with industry guidance to specify best-practice mitigation to reduce the

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:208: impacts on nearby receptors. Mitigation measures are also embedded within the scheme design for

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:208: the Harbour facilities. It is therefore considered that, with the adoption of best-practice mitigation

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:210:19.2.2 All of the above were predicted, after the implementation of appropriate mitigation, to be of negligible or

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:212: Given this mitigation and the very low to low sensitivity of the bedrock and superficial aquifers,

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:219:20.3.6 However, a series of mitigation measures are embedded within the scheme designs for the proposed

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:220: Wilton and the Harbour facilities would be controlled by mitigation measures embedded in the scheme

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:226: may use, along with associated indirect impacts such as noise disturbance. Without mitigation, the

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:226: Mitigation

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:226:21.3.6 Mitigation for protected species, specifically reptiles and birds, is included within the Harbour facilities

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:226:21.3.7 With the implementation of these mitigation measures, and the knowledge that similar mitigation

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:257: an assessment of the significance of such impacts and recommendation of appropriate mitigation

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:270: significance. Mitigation incorporated into each project to avoid dispersion of contaminated sediments

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:270: Mitigation and residual impact

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:270:26.4.8 Mitigation to limit the dispersion of dredged sediment for the QEII Berth Development project (i.e. the

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:270: is considered that there is no requirement for bespoke (non-standard) mitigation measures. As noted

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:274: Mitigation and residual impact

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:274:27.4.7 The mitigation described in Section 26 with regard to limiting suspended sediment increase and

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:275: Mitigation and residual impact

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:275:27.4.10 The mitigation described in Section 27 with regard to limiting suspended sediment increase and

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:275: significance (before mitigation).

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:276: and, potentially, an overall longer duration of piling impact. Without mitigation, the cumulative impact

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:276: Mitigation and residual impact

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:276:27.4.19 Mitigation for the predicted underwater noise impact is proposed within ES Section 11.5 In order to

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:276: place in order to allow the migration of juvenile salmon and sea trout. Furthermore, as mitigation of the

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:276: commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area within which a marine mammal could

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:276:27.4.21 With regard to mitigation of cumulative impact, should the piling works for the Harbour facilities overlap

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:276:27.4.22 With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, a residual impact of minor adverse

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:279: Mitigation and residual impact

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:279:28.4.2 The mitigation described in Section 27 with regard to limiting suspended sediment increase and

TR030002-000507-Doc 6.6 Environmental Statement_CIA.pdf:281:29.4.4 For any marine construction works, a range of mitigation measures are typically required as standard

TR030002-000495-Section 15 App 15.2 Northern Gateway Archaeological Appraisal.pdf:5:6 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT AND MITIGATION

TR030002-000495-Section 15 App 15.2 Northern Gateway Archaeological Appraisal.pdf:5: 6.3 Mitigation of significant impacts

TR030002-000495-Section 15 App 15.2 Northern Gateway Archaeological Appraisal.pdf:7: archaeology and thus no further mitigation will be required in these areas.

TR030002-000495-Section 15 App 15.2 Northern Gateway Archaeological Appraisal.pdf:10: decisions regarding the future of this site and for the formulation of a mitigation

TR030002-000495-Section 15 App 15.2 Northern Gateway Archaeological Appraisal.pdf:10: nature and scale of the proposed redevelopment, a mitigation strategy will be

TR030002-000495-Section 15 App 15.2 Northern Gateway Archaeological Appraisal.pdf:16:6 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT AND MITIGATION

TR030002-000495-Section 15 App 15.2 Northern Gateway Archaeological Appraisal.pdf:17:6.3 Mitigation of significant impacts

TR030002-000896-160113_TR030002_Response to Examining Authority's Rule 8.pdf:14:Mitigation and Monitoring Ref 5(2)(q) 6.12 7 September 2015

TR030002-000896-160113_TR030002_Response to Examining Authority's Rule 8.pdf:14:Mitigation and Monitoring Ref 5(2)(q) 6.12A 6 November 2015

TR030002-000761-Environment Agency.pdf:3: Assessment, a number of mitigation measures are proposed to ensure any

TR030002-000761-Environment Agency.pdf:3: each mitigation measure proposed in the WFD Compliance Assessment

TR030002-000761-Environment Agency.pdf:3: and deliver the mitigation measures proposed in the WFD Compliance

TR030002-000761-Environment Agency.pdf:3: consider appropriate to secure and deliver the mitigation measures

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:1: between those impacts, may give rise to a need for additional mitigation.

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:1: directly captured. Further inter-relationships (and the potential need for additional mitigation) in the context of these

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:1: environmental receptors (i.e. no significant effects on ecology, for example, were predicted). Best practice mitigation

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:2:has been proposed and no additional mitigation measures are considered to be required over and above this.

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:2:are proposed in Sections 7 and 11. It is considered that sufficient mitigation would be provided at source. However,

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:3:of the proposed scheme. However, it is considered that additional mitigation measures, beyond those outlined within

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:3:individual impacts with mitigation in place (e.g. the screening proposed during the construction phase would provide

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:3:mitigation for both noise and visual effects). Moreover, the project includes habitat enhancement proposals designed

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:3:operation of the proposed scheme. However, with the mitigation proposed in the respective sections listed above in

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:3:to arise. Hence, additional mitigation is not considered to be required.

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:4:sufficient mitigation would be provided at source.

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:4:an assessment of interactive effects). Mitigation measures which are aimed at traffic management, reducing traffic

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:5:adequately mitigated (without the requirement for further mitigation).

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:5:Mitigation measures which are aimed at traffic management, reducing total flows and minimising congestion would

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:5:Other mitigation measures targeted at noise reduction would also have a benefit on the ecological environment.

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:5:not be so significant as to require mitigation beyond that which is proposed in the individual sections listed above.

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:6:mitigation would be provided at source (see Section 15).

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:6:mitigation would be provided at source.

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:6:and flood defence. No mitigation measures beyond those set out in Section 17 are required.

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:6:Infrastructure. No mitigation measures beyond those set out in Section 18 are required.

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:7: disposal of dredged material (however, see Fisheries above). No additional mitigation measures are considered to be

TR030002-000458-ES Section 23 Impact interrelationships.pdf:7: exist, no additional mitigation measures are required over and above those measures outlined within

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:19: proposals and explains the mitigation measures to be applied, that will reduce

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:53: mine, requiring extensive mitigation that can prejudice mine viability. For

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:59: even with mitigation measures employed, it is appropriate to avoid principal

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:70: to define a series of mitigation measures designed to reduce any significant

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:94: identifies the potential for effective mitigation where required, having regard to

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:96: effective mitigation during the construction phase.

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:98:7.95 It is considered that mitigation opportunities would be limited due to the open,

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:103:7.123 Similar to the conclusions applied to Site 1, mitigation measures during the

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:104: scope of mitigation – to the north traffic would need to pass south of the

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:105: the implementation of mitigation measures.

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:107:7.153 Mitigation opportunities during the construction stage would be limited, due to

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:109: implementation of mitigation measures.

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:111:7.179 Effective mitigation would be limited due to the steep, open and outward facing

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:114:7.197 Noise mitigation measures are proposed, including the use of earth bunds and

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:114: mitigation measures proposed will reduce the potential for significant adverse

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:117: and its potential for complimentary mitigation measures, which could achieve

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:118: proposed to develop on any of these protected areas and mitigation measures

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:118: mounding and woodland planting would provide additional mitigation in this

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:118: around the site and mitigation measures are proposed to ensure the integrity of

TR030002-000575-Doc 7.3 Appendix 7 - Alternative Sites Assessment.pdf:119: wooded structure of the site and its potential for complementary mitigation

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:1:Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:3:Lagoon Mitigation and

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:4:Document title: York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:4:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:5: 1.1 Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy ………………………………………………………………………… 2

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:5:5 Other Mitigation Measures of Relevance to SPA Interest Features…………………. 24

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:5: 5.1 Mitigation for indirect effects …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 25

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:5:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:6:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:7:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:8:1.1 Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:8:This Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS) has been prepared in response to

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:8:mitigation proposals for Bran Sands lagoon outlined within the HRA. The MMS should be read in conjunction

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:8:effects of the proposed scheme. The distinction between the use of the terms ‘mitigation’ and ‘habitat enhancement’ has

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:8:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:9:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:10:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:11:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:12:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:13:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:14:objective of mitigation proposed is set out.

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:14:Table 3.1 Predicted direct effects of the Harbour facilities on SPA interest features and mitigation

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:14:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:15:In addition to providing a function as mitigation for elements of the Harbour facilities proposals, the

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:15:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:16:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:17:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:18:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:19:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:20:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:23:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:24:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:25:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:26:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:27:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:28:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:29:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:30:5 Other Mitigation Measures

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:30:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:31:Other Mitigation Measures of Relevance to SPA Interest

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:31:5.1 Mitigation for indirect effects

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:31:Noise attenuation barriers are proposed as mitigation for the potential impact of noise and visual disturbance

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:31:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:32:Other Mitigation Measures of Relevance to SPA Interest

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:32:It is predicted that with these mitigation measures in place, the risk of indirect impacts on waterbirds would

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:32:would occur (3 to 4 months) in combination with the mitigation proposed.

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:32:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:33:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:34:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:35:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:36:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:37:Royal Haskoning and HR Wallingford (2011). Mitigation and monitoring for the Stour and Orwell Estuaries

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:37:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:38:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:39:emissions mitigation at DNF and the MTS Intermediate Shaft Sites. The SEI will be

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:40: 3. Harbour DCO mitigation (habitat enhancement in Bran Sands lagoon)

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:40:DH raised questions about the mitigation (habitat enhancement) proposed and how this

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:40:SAJ proposed that RHDHV develop a Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy for issue to NE, in

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:41:Following production of the Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy, a site meeting (NE/MMO/EA)

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:41: Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy).

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:41: (2) YPL development of firm proposals for mitigation. However, on this latter point, NE is

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:41: hopeful that that the Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy and site visit will give enough

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:41: confidence that the mitigation is deliverable.

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:41: b) MS to develop template for Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (by 21/1/15)

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:41: c) MS/SJ prepare Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (by 29/1/15), with the

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:41:Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy meets NE’s requirements, NE is likely to be able to advise

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:41:which will include the Harbour HRA (accompanied by the together with the Mitigation and

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:41:consider the potential for further visual mitigation and that this, should such mitigation be

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:42: information to support the production of an outline Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:42:conclude that the mitigation is practically achievable. Following the teleconference with you on 15

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:42:adding more detail on aspects of the evidence, assessment and mitigation in the HRA. To this end

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:42:we welcome your offer to produce draft the Heads of Terms of a mitigation and monitoring strategy

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:43:Mitigation Measures - Construction

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:43:Mitigation Measures - Operation

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:43:the mitigation is confusing, notwithstanding your explanation that it is used because the

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:43:and set out primarily – for Habitats Regulations purposes - as mitigation for the impacts of the

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:43:In order to avoid misunderstanding, we use the term mitigation throughout the rest of this response,

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:44:It is important that the mitigation and monitoring strategy includes:

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:44:  The aims of the mitigation and what a successful proposal will look like i.e.

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:44: o Describe the specific element of mitigation required for the loss of the habitats on the

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:44: o Describe mitigation for the range of potential impacts affecting Bran Sands Lagoon

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:44: o To ensure the success of the mitigation proposal for Bran Sands lagoon Natural

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:44: o Natural England requires clarity on the time it will take for the mitigation proposal to

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:44: by invertebrates. As a general principle, establishment of mitigation should be

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:45: establish a baseline and assess the success of the mitigation in terms of invertebrate

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:46:Your ref: Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:46:  York Potash Harbour Facilities Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy dated 29 January 2015

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:46:The Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (MMS), site visit and meeting have most usefully addressed

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:46:ES and now the MMS on the mitigation and monitoring. You have undertaken to update the MSS

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:47:described above, will demonstrate that mitigation for HRA matters can be secured and is

TR030002-000758-Document 6.12 Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy.pdf:50:York Potash Harbour Facilities: Bran Sands Lagoon Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy © HaskoningDHV UK Ltd

TR030002-000838-SABIC UK Petrochemicals Ltd - Deadline 4 Submission.pdf:11: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures which are

TR030002-000834-Document 4.2B - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked).pdf:23: mitigation referred to by Natural England in its representations will be

TR030002-000834-Document 4.2B - Explanatory Memorandum (Tracked).pdf:24: which is to accord with the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12).

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:5:“ecological mitigation works” means the mitigation measures set out in the outline ecological

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:6: “mitigation and monitoring strategy” means the mitigation and monitoring strategy certified

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:25: (h) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A);

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:27: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:32:authority and agree with the local planning any additional mitigation measures required

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:32:pursuant to (3) then phase 2(a) and (b) must not be carried out until either additional mitigation

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:33:planning authority that no additional measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:33:earthworks or site levelling but excluding ecological mitigation works, until a Construction

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:33:6.10) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance tracker (Document 6.8A8B),

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:33: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:33:that such alternative does not prevent the mitigation during construction referred to in the

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:33: 7. None of the authorised development is to commence (excluding ecological mitigation or

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:34:management plans for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:34:environmental statement for that phase (including a marine mammal mitigation plan but not

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:34:management plan (Document 6.11A) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:34:enhancement or mitigation works are proposed below mean high water springs also the MMO in

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:34:decommissioning phase, and to identify the requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:34:undertaken and the scope of mitigation agreed following the survey. The agreed mitigation shall

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:53:information) must accord with the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A).

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:55:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:57:enhancement plan and the principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:74: for National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:74:(2)(e), a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:74:(referred to in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:74:approval, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:74: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:74:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:74:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:74:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must

TR030002-000371-141125_York_Potash_ExAs_Draft_DCO.PDF:78: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:7: “mitigation and management strategy” means the mitigation and management strategy

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:22: (i) the mitigation and management strategy; and

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:28:earthworks or site levelling but excluding archaeological soil movement and ecological mitigation

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:28: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:28:movement and ecological mitigation or enhancement works) until a Construction Traffic

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:29:management plan for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:29:decommissioning phase, and to identify the requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:29:scope of mitigation agreed following the survey. The agreed mitigation shall then be carried out

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:34: (3) The ecological management plan must accord with the mitigation and management strategy.

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:37:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:51: for National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:51:a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence (referred to

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:51:in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for approval, such

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:51:approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme must be

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:51: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:51:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:51:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-000427-Doc 4.1 Draft DCO (including requirements).pdf:51:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must be

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:8: significance of environmental impacts or the effectiveness of mitigation.14

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:22:section 2.5 Natural England is satisfied that appropriate mitigation has been

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:22:in Natural England’s Relevant Representation section 2.6, suitable mitigation

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:22:regarding marine mammals and the Marine Mammal Mitigation Plan (MMMP) in our

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:23: been in discussion with the applicant about the mitigation and enhancement

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:24: adequacy of the mitigation measures proposed through the

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:24: mitigation and enhancement measures at Bran Sands Lagoon.

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:24: issues including the securing of mitigation and enhancement measures

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:25:6.2.4. Natural England raised concerns about the securing of all mitigation

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:25:6.2.5. All documents referred to need to be correctly identified – it is a ‘Mitigation

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:25: and Monitoring Strategy’ – not a Mitigation and Management Strategy

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:25: construction or operational activities and the elements of mitigation required

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:25: for them. For instance, lighting and noise mitigation is proposed in the HRA

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:25: mitigation requirements for marine mammals and lighting mitigation

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:25: and suggest that the mitigation / enhancement measures should be clearly

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:28:structures) that will be installed. Natural England welcomes the mitigation and

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:28:site for SPA birds. We are satisfied that no further mitigation measures are required

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:32:dredging activities. If dredging is found to be detrimental, additional further satisfied that no mitigation will be required.

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:32:mitigation may be required.” To which the applicant responds ‘noted’.

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:32:to whether this mitigation is required.

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:32:that the mitigation measures outlined in the ES are considered

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:33:To: The Applicant have been sufficiently mitigated via the lighting mitigation which is

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:33:To: Natural England There are two elements to the mitigation at the proposed Port

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:33:proposed enhancement measures described in the Environmental mitigation:

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:33:mitigation.  Disturbance impacts, comprising noise, lighting and

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:33: Lagoon are for the most part mitigation. The positive management

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:34: Mitigation and Monitoring Strategy (Appendix 3.1 of Document 6.3). In

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:34:be regarded as necessary mitigation? If you are not satisfied, what do England are content in principle as we have already described and

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:36:to the transport routes identified on Figure 5.1, the potential emissions MTS applications. These concerns were resolved by the mitigation

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:36:ecology within NYMNP, prior to mitigation, these are predicted to arise

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:37:The HRA infers that artificial nesting platforms can be provided While it cannot be categorised as a mitigation measure, the provision

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:38:To: The Applicant construction mitigations measures and enhancement measures in

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:38: see these measures as mitigation, throughout our discussions over

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:38:Ramsar sites. The screening matrices for these sites identify a likely enhancement will make improvements beyond mitigation of benefit to

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:39:The Bran Sands lagoon MMS stipulates that the ES and HRA were mitigation measures proposed in the HRA (which includes noise

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:39:proposed mitigation measures in place, it could only be concluded that there would be some effects, these would not constitute an adverse

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:39:mitigation proposed.

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:39:assumptions or mitigation relied upon in their response?

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:39:Absence of adverse effects – securing mitigation

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:39:prospective view that no adverse effects are anticipated on any of the mitigation measures previously agreed and submitted, and how

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:39:intended mitigation measures are implemented, subject to on how to secure the mitigation within the DCO requirements. In

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:39:assessments in relation to additional species that may be affected addition the applicant has confirmed that references to the Mitigation

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:40:mitigation measures would be secured? If not please specify any

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:40:additional mitigation measures and a means by which to secure them.

TR030002-000698-Natural England 1.pdf:40:Effects/adverse effect on the integrity after mitigation measures on

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:6: “ecological mitigation works” means the mitigation measures set out in the outline ecological

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:7: “mitigation and monitoring strategy” means the mitigation and monitoring strategy certified by

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:26: (h) the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A);

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:28: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:32:planning any additional mitigation measures required

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:32:pursuant to (3) then phase 2(a) and (b) must not be carried out until either additional mitigation

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:33:planning authority that no additional measures are required. Any additional mitigation measures

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:33:earthworks or site levelling but excluding ecological mitigation works, until a Construction

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:33:6.10A) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance tracker (Document 6.8B), has

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:33: (i) details of mitigation measures to protect biodiversity interests within the site and adjacent

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:33:that such alteration does not prevent the mitigation during construction referred to in the

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:33: 7. None of the authorised development is to commence (excluding ecological mitigation or

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34:management plans for any ecological mitigation or enhancement measures included in the

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34:environmental statement for that phase (including a marine mammal mitigation plan but not

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34:management plan (Document 6.11B) and incorporating the mitigation identified in the governance

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34:enhancement or mitigation works are proposed below mean high water springs also the MMO in

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34:decommissioning phase, and to identify the requirement for mitigation to be implemented in order

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:34:undertaken and the scope of mitigation agreed following the survey. The agreed mitigation shall

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:53:information) must accord with the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document 6.12A).

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:55:search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:57:enhancement plan and the principles outlined in the mitigation and monitoring strategy (Document

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:73: National Grid’s approval a ground subsidence mitigation scheme in respect of such

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:73:a scheme setting out necessary mitigation measures (if any) for such ground subsidence (referred to

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:73:in this paragraph as a “mitigation scheme”) must be submitted to National Grid for approval, such

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:73:approval not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed; and any mitigation scheme must be

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:73: (5) If the monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme would conflict with any aspect of any ground

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:73:subsidence monitoring scheme or ground subsidence mitigation scheme approved by the local

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:73:monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme to National Grid for its approval, such approval not to be

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:73:unreasonably withheld or delayed; and the revised monitoring scheme or mitigation scheme must

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:78: likely effect of the dredging on the protected crossings and any mitigation measures which

TR030002-000897-160113_TR03002_Draft Development Consent Order (Clean).pdf:92: (viii) the effectiveness, cost and reasonableness of proposals for mitigation arising from any

TR030002-001873-Decision holding letter (5).pdf:5: ecological mitigation or enhancement works referred to in the

TR030002-000417-Doc 1.5 s55 Checklist.pdf:20: “Taking into account the mitigation measures contained in the

TR030002-000879-Document 8 12 - Applicants responses to other parties submissions for deadline 6.pdf:17:The Level Of Risk Mitigation That Can Be Claimed For Administrative Controls (In The Form

TR030002-000879-Document 8 12 - Applicants responses to other parties submissions for deadline 6.pdf:21: Mitigation

TR030002-000879-Document 8 12 - Applicants responses to other parties submissions for deadline 6.pdf:25:temperature, and fire and explosion safety. defined risk acceptance criteria, and evaluate mitigation

TR030002-000879-Document 8 12 - Applicants responses to other parties submissions for deadline 6.pdf:25:risks in the early stages of project design, incorporating the risk mitigation measures, such as Safety Critical Elements,

EIA_2017_00041-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:6:Potential impacts and proposed mitigation

I&BPB6776R001F01_NGCT scoping document.pdf:8: development during the operational phase and draw comparisons with the approved forecast data to inform the mitigation requirements. It is not

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:13:27 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES 462

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:21:27.1 Summary of potential impacts, impact significance, mitigation 463

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:21: the construction phase, proposed preventative and mitigation

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:21: the operational phase, proposed preventative and mitigation

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:34: identified and assessed and, where appropriate and practicable, mitigation

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:34: that the recommended mitigation measures are implemented) are then stated.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:35: summary of the potential impacts, mitigation measures and residual impacts for

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:48: • A description of any mitigation measures that would avoid or reduce potential

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:127: are unavoidable, LPA's and developers should consider the possible mitigation

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:129: planning permission should only be granted where adequate mitigation measures are

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:132: however mitigation measures are proposed and these will reduce the impact to be of

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:134: mitigation is proposed in the form of borehole analysis to ascertain whether important

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:139: no mitigation is required. Similar assessment work was undertaken for rail

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:140: likely effects of their proposals on flood risk to others and on whether mitigation

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:150: possible enhanced, and where possible appropriate mitigation measures are

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:156: provided there are appropriate mitigation measures put into place to minimise the risk

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:161: mitigation, of prime importance is the need to schedule reclamation work outside of

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:161: 11. In relation to mammals no specific mitigation measures are proposed as survey work

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:165: The policy further adds that where pollution is unavoidable, mitigation measures to

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:170: developer may be required to undertake flood mitigation measures where

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:171: mitigation measures are not practicable, then the development will not be permitted.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:172: and where flood mitigation measures are impracticable will not be permitted by the

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:173: includes mitigation measures to prevent any potential adverse impacts on the

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:177: mitigation measures. Statement (Royal

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:184: mitigation measures can be implemented to ameliorate adverse environmental

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:188: any mitigation measures that may be required in order to mitigate a potential

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:195: be influenced by the overflow loss rates. In any case, mitigation of these rates is

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:256:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:257:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:258:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:258: 2. No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:258:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:258: 3. No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of minor

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:258:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:258: 2. No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:276: mitigation measures in place.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:278:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:278: that the above mitigation measures are adhered to, the residual impact is

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:281:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:281: the impact assessment in the ES, if the mitigation measures stated above are

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:296:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:296: 13. There are no mitigation measures that can be taken therefore the residual

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:299:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:299:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:300:Mitigation and residual risk

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:300: 4. No mitigation measures are required and no residual impact is predicted.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:300:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:301:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:301: consequence of draining the lagoon, no mitigation is required and there would

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:301:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:301: 2. No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:302:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:302: 7. No mitigation is required and it is predicted that there would be no residual

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:305:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:305: 6. No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:306:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:306: 3. No further mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:323:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324: 6. No mitigation is possible and the residual impact would be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:324: 3. No mitigation is possible and the residual impact would be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:325:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:326: 5. No mitigation is required and the residual impact would be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:327:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:328:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:328: 4. No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:328:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:330:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:330: 9. No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:330:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:330: 2. No mitigation is required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:331:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:331: 4. No mitigation is required. There would be an impact of minor beneficial

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:350:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:350: 3. No mitigation measures are required and it is predicted that there would be no

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:351:Mitigation measures and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:351:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:351: 4. No mitigation is required and no residual impact is predicted.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:352:Mitigation measures

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:352: 4. No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:352:Mitigation measures

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:352: 4. No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:353:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:355:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:355: 9. No mitigation measures are possible and it is predicted that there would be a

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:355:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:355: 2. No mitigation measures are possible and the residual impact would be of

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:356:Mitigation measures and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:356: no other mitigation is possible. The residual impact would be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:356:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:356: 3. No mitigation is required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:361:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:361: 6. It is recommended that a number of mitigation measures are adopted. Of most

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:362: 7. Given the findings of the ecological surveys, no specific mitigation measures are

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:362: the current surveys). Mitigation measures may then be required depending on

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:362: 8. As a consequence of the above programme of mitigation measures, in particular

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:362:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:362: 3. No mitigation measures are possible and the residual impact would be of

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:363:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:363: 3. No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:369:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:369: 3. There are no mitigation measures that can be taken to reduce the potential

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:370:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:370: fish within the estuary would be affected. Should this mitigation measures be

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:371:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:371: 5. No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:372:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:372:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:372: 2. No mitigation is required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:373:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:374:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:374: and other forms of light pollution, no mitigation measures are required. The

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:376:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:376: 4. There are a wide range of mitigation measures that will be specifically

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:377:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:377: 5. No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:378:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:378: 3. No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:378:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:385:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:385: 2. No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:385:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:385: 2. No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:385:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:386:Mitigation measures

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:386: 2. No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:389:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:389:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:389: properly controlled by the VTS and no specific mitigation measures are deemed

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:392:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:392: 4. No mitigation measures are possible and the residual impact would be of

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:396:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:396: 20. In light of the above assessment, it is concluded that at this junction, mitigation is

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:396: 21. With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, it is predicted that

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:396: 22. In light of the above assessment, it is concluded that at this junction, mitigation is

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:396: 23. With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, it is predicted that

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:397: 25. With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, it is predicted that

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:397:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:397: 3. No mitigation is required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:399:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:399: 3. No mitigation is required and there will be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:402:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:402: 14. No mitigation is required and the residual impact will be of negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:403:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:403: 4. No mitigation is required and there will be no impact in this respect.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:414:Mitigation and residual Impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:414: 22. The assessment shows that no specific mitigation in respect of day-time

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:415:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:415: 2. No mitigation measures are required; there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:415:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:415: 4. No mitigation measures are required; there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:416:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:416: 2. No mitigation measures are required; there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:417:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:417: it is concluded that the implementation of mitigation measures is not required.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:419:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:419: 9. It is concluded that no mitigation measures are required and the residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:420:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:420: 3. No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:420:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:420: 7. No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:422:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:422: 16. No mitigation measures are required therefore the impact remains at negligible.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:423:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:423: 2. Since no mitigation measures are required, the impact remains at no impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:424:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:424: 10. No mitigation measures are required therefore the impact remains at negligible.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:425:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:425: 3. No mitigation measures are required therefore the impact remains at no impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:427:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:427: 6. No mitigation measures are required therefore the impact remains at no impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:428:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:428: 2. No mitigation measures are required therefore the impact remains at no impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:437:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:441:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:446:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:446: 32. Mitigation measures are not considered necessary; the residual impact would be

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:449:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:449: 3. Given the nature of the existing environment, no specific mitigation measures

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:450:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:450: 5. No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:452:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:452: 2. No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:454:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:454: 7. No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:454:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:454: 3. No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:455:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:455: 6. No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:457:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:459:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:459: quay wall, there are no further mitigation measures that can be taken therefore

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:460:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:460: 4. No mitigation is required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:460:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:460: 3. No mitigation is required and no residual impact is predicted.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:461:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:461:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:461: 2. No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:461:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:461: 4. No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:462:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:462: 5. No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:472:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:472: 6. No mitigation is required and the residual impact would be of minor beneficial

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:473: Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:473: 7. No mitigation is required. The residual impact would, therefore, be of moderate

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:474: Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:474: 7. No mitigation is required. The residual impact would therefore be of minor

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:475: Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:475: 9. No mitigation is required. The residual impact would therefore be of moderate

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:475: Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:475: 11. No mitigation is required. The residual impact would therefore be of moderate

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:476: Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:476: 5. No mitigation is required. The residual impact would therefore be of moderate

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:488:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:488: 4. No mitigation measures are required and there will be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:488:Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:488: 4. No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact will be of

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:489: Mitigation and residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:489: 2. No mitigation measures are required and there will be no residual impact.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:491:27 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:491: is stated, along with any mitigation measures that are recommended to reduce

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:491: potential impact remaining following mitigation) is also stated.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:492:Table 27.1 Summary of potential impacts, impact significance, mitigation measures and residual impacts

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:492:Impact Significance Mitigation Residual impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:495:Potential for risk to humans and Moderate adverse Various mitigation measures Minor adverse

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:500:Direct loss of ecological interest Minor to moderate adverse A number of mitigation Minor adverse

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:504:Impacts on ambient noise levels Negligible to no impact depending on location of sensitive No specific mitigation will be No impact

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:506:Generation of dust during Negligible A number of mitigation Negligible

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:516: mitigation measures have been described.

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:517: associated with the construction phase, proposed preventative and mitigation measures, the significance of potential

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:517:Sub - feature Attribute Target Potential effect during the Preventative Mitigation Significance Implications for

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:518:Sub - feature Attribute Target Potential effect during the Preventative Mitigation Significance Implications for

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:519:Sub - feature Attribute Target Potential effect during the Preventative Mitigation Significance Implications for

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:520:Sub - feature Attribute Target Potential effect during the Preventative Mitigation Significance Implications for

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:521: associated with the operational phase, proposed preventative and mitigation measures, the significance of potential residual

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:521:Sub - feature Attribute Target Potential effect during the Preventative Mitigation Significance Implications for

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:522:Sub - feature Attribute Target Potential effect during the Preventative Mitigation Significance Implications for

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:523:Sub - feature Attribute Target Potential effect during the Preventative Mitigation Significance Implications for

NGCT_Final_ES at KK with figs.pdf:535: With respect to disturbance during construction, mitigation would ensure that no

20171212 MMO Letter with additional comments Teesport Scoping.pdf:1: mitigation and compensation would need to be included.

20171212 MMO Letter with additional comments Teesport Scoping.pdf:2: September, in any given year, a Silt Mitigation Plan must be in

20171212 MMO Letter with additional comments Teesport Scoping.pdf:3: from the noise source). No mitigation measures were proposed

20171212 MMO Letter with additional comments Teesport Scoping.pdf:3: that as part of the assessment, potential mitigation measures

20171212 MMO Letter with additional comments Teesport Scoping.pdf:3:resource help inform if any mitigation is required, e.g. for fish receptors.

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:14:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:14:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:14:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:14:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:20:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:20:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:20:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:20:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:Please refer to the EIA Report where proposed mitigation measures are detailed, where

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:26:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:26:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:26:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2020_00079-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:26:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:9:then identified and assessed and, where appropriate and practicable, mitigation measures are defined. The

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:9:residual impacts (potential impacts remaining assuming the proposed mitigation measures are effectively

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:31:structure, there is likely to be more piles (which may be percussive), but the same mitigation measures

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:47: • The generic approach taken to the derivation of mitigation measures and the assessment of

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:48: • The identification of mitigation measures (where required) to reduce the significance of, or avoid,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:48: • The evaluation of impacts, post-mitigation, to determine the significance of residual impacts.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:52:significance (as defined above); albeit that appropriate mitigation, where available, should be sought for all

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:Mitigation

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:Mitigation measures have been proposed, where available and practical, in those cases where adverse

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:impacts have been identified. It is important to note that the mitigation measures applied should be

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:‘Mitigation through design’ is an important factor in ensuring that the environmental impacts of a proposed

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:engineering and environmental impact studies, mitigation has been built into the design of the proposed

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:scheme. Where significant impacts potentially remain, further issue-specific mitigation measures are

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:industry standard or ‘embedded’ mitigation often applies in these cases (and is set out herein). It is also

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:other pressures on a receptor and, in this event, mitigation may be required.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:is relevant to the treatment of mitigation in HRA. The CJEU ruling determined that “…it is not appropriate,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:the harmful effects…” is interpreted as meaning any mitigation measures that are not clearly an intrinsic part

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:of the design of a plan or project. The effect of this ruling is that mitigation measures, which are not clearly

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:process has identified an adverse impact and mitigation is available (see above). In some cases, in order

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:to ensure that the mitigation measures are successful or where there is significant uncertainty with respect

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:Where further mitigation measures are identified, the significance of the residual environmental impact (i.e.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:53:the post-mitigation impact) is assessed.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:55:additional mitigation. Inter-relationships have been assessed within the relevant sections of the topic

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:93:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:93:The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume is selection of the dredging method. As noted above,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:95:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:95:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:96:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:96:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of minor adverse significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:96:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:96:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of minor beneficial significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:96:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:96:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:97:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:97:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:97:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:97:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:98:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:98:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:101:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:101:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:103: mitigation measures described in the site investigation report relate only to the

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:105: works, considerable justification for this, together with details of mitigation and

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:105: than caused by other piling methods, such as percussive piling. mitigation, where required.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:127:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:129:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:130:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:130:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance. Although

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:130:mitigation measures are not required, studies undertaken to assess the impacts of the proposed scheme

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:132:high. Without mitigation, an impact of moderate adverse significance is predicted to arise.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:132:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:132:a pre-piling search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:132:of a marine mammal check and the establishment of a mitigation zone would further reduce the potential

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:132:The JNCC’s 2010 guidance states that a mitigation zone is an area in which a marine mammal observer

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:132:mammals are detected within the mitigation zone or until 20 minutes after the last visual or acoustic detection

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:133:are satisfied the animals have left the mitigation zone before they advise the crew to commence piling

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:133:piling or reduce the power if a marine mammal is detected in the mitigation zone (it is deemed to have

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:133:With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, a residual impact of minor adverse significance

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:134:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:134:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:134:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:135:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:135:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:136:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:136:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:137:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:137:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:137:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:137:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:138:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:138:There are no mitigation measures that can be adopted to minimise potential operational phase noise

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:138:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:138:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:139: the survey and any necessary mitigation

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:144: • Identifying mitigation measures, as required.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:144: mitigation measures.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:159:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:159:Mitigation of the plume effects by reducing the size of the dredger, and thus reducing the rate of overflow,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:159:and tending to be more confined to the shallower waters. Mitigation of the suspended sediment generated

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:160:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:160:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:160:No mitigation measures are required. However, as set out in Section 9, the studies undertaken to assess

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:162:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:162:As mitigation for the potential impact of noise disturbance during the construction phase, it is proposed that

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:162:The acoustic barriers were found to reduce the pre-mitigation construction noise levels (predicted to arise

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:162:With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, it can be concluded that the potential for

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:163:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:163:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:165:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:165:No mitigation measures are possible and it is predicted that there would be a residual impact of negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:165:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:165:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:166:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:166:Other than the normal controls on navigation already exercised by PDT, no other mitigation is possible. The

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:166:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:166:community) is an unavoidable consequence of the proposed scheme. There are no mitigation measures

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact, taking into account the effect of the habitat

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:168: mitigation is required, e.g. for fish receptors.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:168: between March and September, in any given year, a Silt Mitigation Plan must be in undertaken at any time of the year.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:169: as mitigation where appropriate.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:186:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:187:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:187:The following mitigation measure is proposed to reduce the potential for behavioural disturbance or injury

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:188:With the implementation of the above mitigation measure, water quality will only be impacted on one side

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:188:Mitigation of the plume effects by reducing the size of the TSHD, and thus reducing the rate of overflow, is

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:190:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:190:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:190:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance. However,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:191:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:191:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:192:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:193:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:193:of the proposed scheme. There are no mitigation measures that can be implemented. The residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:194:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:194:pollution, no mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:194:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:194:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:199:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:199:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:199:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:199:No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:199:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:199:No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:200:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:200:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:201:Mitigation was secured for the NGCT by condition. The transport related conditions specified by RCBC are:

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:202:the same mitigation strategy proposed within the original TA.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:202:It is, therefore, concluded that the 2006 transport impact assessments and mitigation remain valid.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:203:presented an updated summary of the likely impacts. This informed the programme of mitigation presented

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:204:be no impact and no mitigation is required.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:205:A draft outline methodology for the mitigation proposed above is included in Section 6 of the WSI. Prior to

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:205: Impact Mitigation Residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:210:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:210:No mitigation measures are required, however, PDT would adopt measures to minimise the risk to water

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:210:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:210:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:218:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:218:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:219:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:219:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of moderate beneficial significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:219:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:219:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:220:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:220:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:221:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:226:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:226:No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:226:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:226:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact to the Hartlepool power station

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:227:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:227:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:227:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:227:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:227:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:227:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:236: Impact Mitigation Residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:240:Mitigation and best practice measures recommended in relevant guidance and set out in existing container

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:241:impact on the mitigation strategies that are already in place.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:253:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:253:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:256:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:256:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:257:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:257:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:257:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:257:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:260:occurring, or where mitigation measures are still operating; and reasonably foreseeable future plans and

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:266:assessment of the significance of such impacts and recommendation of appropriate mitigation measures

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:269:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:269:project, mitigation comprises the use of specialist dredging equipment (i.e. an enclosed grab loading into a

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:271:and location of the dredger. Mitigation incorporated into each project (and enforced through the permissions

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:271:Mitigation and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:272:for NGCT. Consequently, it is concluded that there is no requirement for non-standard mitigation measures.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:273:each scheme when considered alone. Without mitigation, the cumulative impact could be of major adverse

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:273:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:273:establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area within which a marine mammal could be exposed to sound

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:274:mitigation measures identified for both individual projects would reduce the significance of the potential

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:275:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:275:There is a range of mitigation measures that are typically adopted during construction works to manage the

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:276:consequence of the NGCT. No further mitigation measures are considered to be necessary.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:277:mitigation measures are recommended to reduce this risk as far as possible, namely:

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:278:geology (and consequently controlled waters, including the groundwater body). With these mitigation

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:279: projects. Where there are adverse impacts, an assessment of mitigation options is carried out to

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:279: determine adverse effect on the integrity of the site. If these mitigation options cannot avoid adverse

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:280:reduce the harmful effects of the plan or project on that site”. As such, no such mitigation measures have

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:296:disturbance impact would not represent a population level impact. Although mitigation measures are not

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:298:With the above mitigation strategy in place, in combination with the use of barriers to provide an acoustic

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:298:11 presents an important foraging ground for common and Sandwich tern, the following mitigation measures

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:299:Mitigation of the plume effects by reducing the size of the dredger, and thus reducing the rate of overflow,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:299:the shallower waters. Mitigation of the suspended sediment generated by reducing the size of the dredger,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:300:loss of habitat used by waterbirds (but not the same habitat). No mitigation measures were proposed for

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:303:identified as a risk in this EIA Report for the NGCT project. The mitigation measures proposed for the York

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:317:carried out and the survey and any necessary mitigation measures shall be

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:318:migratory fishery and detailing the mitigation measures necessary to offset any

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:318:and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The agreed mitigation

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:323: • RHDHV/PDT does not consider that a silt mitigation

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:327: mitigation and compensation would need to be included.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:328: September, in any given year, a Silt Mitigation Plan must be in

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:329: from the noise source). No mitigation measures were proposed

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:329: that as part of the assessment, potential mitigation measures

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:329:resource help inform if any mitigation is required, e.g. for fish receptors.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:338: any mitigation measures that may be required in order to mitigate a potential

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:345: be influenced by the overflow loss rates. In any case, mitigation of these rates is

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:430: • The metric sits within a decision framework based on the mitigation hierarchy: it informs

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:430: decision-making where application of the mitigation hierarchy and good practice principles has

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:567:1.2.3 Mitigation was secured by condition. The transport related conditions specified by RCBC

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:570: and the Delivery adequately assessed and reported so as to ensure that the mitigation of any impact is compliant

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:580: to the conditioned mitigation measures.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:580: development with the same mitigation strategy proposed within the original TA.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:581: accommodate the 2017 proposed development with the same mitigation strategy proposed

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:582:6.2.3 It is, therefore, concluded that the 2006 transport impact assessments and mitigation remain

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:590:5 Impact Assessment and Mitigation Summary 9

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:593:mitigation works with regard to Marine Archaeology included the requirement for a sampling strategy to be

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:595:previously unknown archaeology. Consequently, no mitigation was deemed to be required in these areas.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:600:5 Impact Assessment and Mitigation Summary

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:600:will be no impact and no mitigation is required.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:600:no mitigation is recommended prior to demolition.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:600:archaeology. Consequently, no mitigation is recommended.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:600:such no mitigation is recommended.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:600:The draft outline methodology for proposed mitigation is included as a Scheme of Investigation below.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:603: Stage 5: Production of a geoarchaeological deposit model and recommendations for further mitigation,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:619:All staff and contractors also have a responsibility to observe mitigation measures agreed by PD Teesport

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:621: • Consult with stakeholders to agree appropriate mitigation measures

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:621: • Agreed mitigation measures implemented by PD Teesport

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:621: Mitigation • Removal/Formalisation of TEZ

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:622:agreement with the archaeological curator(s), PD Teesport may implement alternative forms of mitigation

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:635:Mitigation measures have been proposed to manage the potential risk of deposition at Seal Sands. The

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:638:spill and an impact of negligible significance is predicted. No further mitigation measures beyond those

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:638:guidelines, as mitigation for this potential impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:639:mitigation measures are recommended (and detailed above) in order to reduce this risk as far as possible.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT(2).pdf:639:groundwater as a result of the proposed scheme. With these mitigation measures in place, the NGCT is

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:2: 5.10 Mitigation and Monitoring ………………………………………………………………….. 19

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:10:NE in August 2020. NE replied stating that noise shrouding was a good mitigation

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:12:was also highlighted. The applicant proposed mitigation in the form of a Written

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:12:application and find that the suggested historic environment mitigations outlined in

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:13:Project will not impact on the mitigation strategies that are already in place.

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:14:the mitigation measures below, deterioration in the ecological status of the Tees

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:14:after several rounds of consultation, EA removed their objection subject to mitigation

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:15:support the applicant in pursuing off-site mitigations but understood that there is no

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:15:site mitigation cannot be achieved. Further, the MMO should also be satisfied that

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:15:there are no means to condition off-site mitigation (similar to a Grampian condition).

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:15:secure mitigation although it is apparent this will be off-site; with this agreement in

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:15:place the EA consider that satisfactory mitigation would be in place to meet this

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:15:licence decision. On that basis, we did not agree that the mitigations put forward

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:19:EA removed their objection to this topic due to the further mitigation put forward by

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:19:5.10 Mitigation and Monitoring

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:20:The key mitigation measures for the project are summarised below:

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:23:addition to mitigation measures to minimise disruption to fish passage. As outlined in

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:23:secure off-site mitigation and are working closely with the applicant to find a suitable

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:23:solution/project to provide mitigation for the loss of intertidal habitat. This would be in

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:26:risk mitigation measures take place:

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:27:the responses from consultees, and the inclusion of mitigation measures, the MMO

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:27:concluded that without mitigation, the impacts of underwater noise through impact

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:27:adverse effects. However, following mitigation (soft start piling techniques), the effect

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:27:minor/negligible without mitigation and negligible with mitigation.

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:27:support the proposed mitigation (soft start piling techniques), they have some

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:28:species and felt further mitigation was necessary. As outlined in Section 5.13, they

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:28:requested that the following mitigation measures be conditioned in order to mitigate

20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:29:The MMO is satisfied that adequate mitigation strategies have been agreed to

I&BPB8270MM001F0.1.pdf:3: • RHDHV/PDT does not consider that a silt mitigation

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:9:then identified and assessed and, where appropriate and practicable, mitigation measures are defined. The

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:9:residual impacts (potential impacts remaining assuming the proposed mitigation measures are effectively

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:31:structure, there is likely to be more piles (which may be percussive), but the same mitigation measures

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:47: • The generic approach taken to the derivation of mitigation measures and the assessment of

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:48: • The identification of mitigation measures (where required) to reduce the significance of, or avoid,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:48: • The evaluation of impacts, post-mitigation, to determine the significance of residual impacts.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:52:significance (as defined above); albeit that appropriate mitigation, where available, should be sought for all

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:Mitigation

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:Mitigation measures have been proposed, where available and practical, in those cases where adverse

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:impacts have been identified. It is important to note that the mitigation measures applied should be

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:‘Mitigation through design’ is an important factor in ensuring that the environmental impacts of a proposed

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:engineering and environmental impact studies, mitigation has been built into the design of the proposed

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:scheme. Where significant impacts potentially remain, further issue-specific mitigation measures are

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:industry standard or ‘embedded’ mitigation often applies in these cases (and is set out herein). It is also

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:other pressures on a receptor and, in this event, mitigation may be required.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:is relevant to the treatment of mitigation in HRA. The CJEU ruling determined that “…it is not appropriate,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:the harmful effects…” is interpreted as meaning any mitigation measures that are not clearly an intrinsic part

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:of the design of a plan or project. The effect of this ruling is that mitigation measures, which are not clearly

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:process has identified an adverse impact and mitigation is available (see above). In some cases, in order

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:to ensure that the mitigation measures are successful or where there is significant uncertainty with respect

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:Where further mitigation measures are identified, the significance of the residual environmental impact (i.e.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:53:the post-mitigation impact) is assessed.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:55:additional mitigation. Inter-relationships have been assessed within the relevant sections of the topic

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:93:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:93:The main mitigation measure to limit sediment plume is selection of the dredging method. As noted above,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:95:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:95:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:96:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:96:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of minor adverse significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:96:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:96:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of minor beneficial significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:96:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:96:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:97:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:97:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:97:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:97:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:98:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:98:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:101:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:101:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:103: mitigation measures described in the site investigation report relate only to the

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:105: works, considerable justification for this, together with details of mitigation and

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:105: than caused by other piling methods, such as percussive piling. mitigation, where required.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:127:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:129:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:130:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:130:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance. Although

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:130:mitigation measures are not required, studies undertaken to assess the impacts of the proposed scheme

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:132:high. Without mitigation, an impact of moderate adverse significance is predicted to arise.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:132:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:132:a pre-piling search prior to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:132:of a marine mammal check and the establishment of a mitigation zone would further reduce the potential

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:132:The JNCC’s 2010 guidance states that a mitigation zone is an area in which a marine mammal observer

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:132:mammals are detected within the mitigation zone or until 20 minutes after the last visual or acoustic detection

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:133:are satisfied the animals have left the mitigation zone before they advise the crew to commence piling

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:133:piling or reduce the power if a marine mammal is detected in the mitigation zone (it is deemed to have

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:133:With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, a residual impact of minor adverse significance

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:134:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:134:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:134:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:135:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:135:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:136:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:136:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:137:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:137:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:137:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:137:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:138:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:138:There are no mitigation measures that can be adopted to minimise potential operational phase noise

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:138:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:138:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:139: the survey and any necessary mitigation

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:144: • Identifying mitigation measures, as required.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:144: mitigation measures.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:159:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:159:Mitigation of the plume effects by reducing the size of the dredger, and thus reducing the rate of overflow,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:159:and tending to be more confined to the shallower waters. Mitigation of the suspended sediment generated

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:160:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:160:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:160:No mitigation measures are required. However, as set out in Section 9, the studies undertaken to assess

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:162:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:162:As mitigation for the potential impact of noise disturbance during the construction phase, it is proposed that

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:162:The acoustic barriers were found to reduce the pre-mitigation construction noise levels (predicted to arise

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:162:With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, it can be concluded that the potential for

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:163:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:163:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:165:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:165:No mitigation measures are possible and it is predicted that there would be a residual impact of negligible

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:165:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:165:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:166:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:166:Other than the normal controls on navigation already exercised by PDT, no other mitigation is possible. The

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:166:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:166:community) is an unavoidable consequence of the proposed scheme. There are no mitigation measures

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact, taking into account the effect of the habitat

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:168: mitigation is required, e.g. for fish receptors.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:168: between March and September, in any given year, a Silt Mitigation Plan must be in undertaken at any time of the year.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:169: as mitigation where appropriate.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:186:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:187:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:187:The following mitigation measure is proposed to reduce the potential for behavioural disturbance or injury

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:188:With the implementation of the above mitigation measure, water quality will only be impacted on one side

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:188:Mitigation of the plume effects by reducing the size of the TSHD, and thus reducing the rate of overflow, is

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:190:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:190:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:190:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance. However,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:191:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:191:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:192:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:193:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:193:of the proposed scheme. There are no mitigation measures that can be implemented. The residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:194:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:194:pollution, no mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:194:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:194:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:199:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:199:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:199:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:199:No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:199:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:199:No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:200:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:200:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:201:Mitigation was secured for the NGCT by condition. The transport related conditions specified by RCBC are:

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:202:the same mitigation strategy proposed within the original TA.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:202:It is, therefore, concluded that the 2006 transport impact assessments and mitigation remain valid.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:203:presented an updated summary of the likely impacts. This informed the programme of mitigation presented

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:204:be no impact and no mitigation is required.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:205:A draft outline methodology for the mitigation proposed above is included in Section 6 of the WSI. Prior to

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:205: Impact Mitigation Residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:210:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:210:No mitigation measures are required, however, PDT would adopt measures to minimise the risk to water

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:210:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:210:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:218:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:218:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:219:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:219:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of moderate beneficial significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:219:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:219:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:220:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:220:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:221:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:226:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:226:No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:226:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:226:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact to the Hartlepool power station

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:227:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:227:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:227:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:227:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:227:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:227:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:236: Impact Mitigation Residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:240:Mitigation and best practice measures recommended in relevant guidance and set out in existing container

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:241:impact on the mitigation strategies that are already in place.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:253:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:253:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:256:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:256:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:257:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:257:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:257:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:257:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:260:occurring, or where mitigation measures are still operating; and reasonably foreseeable future plans and

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:266:assessment of the significance of such impacts and recommendation of appropriate mitigation measures

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:269:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:269:project, mitigation comprises the use of specialist dredging equipment (i.e. an enclosed grab loading into a

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:271:and location of the dredger. Mitigation incorporated into each project (and enforced through the permissions

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:271:Mitigation and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:272:for NGCT. Consequently, it is concluded that there is no requirement for non-standard mitigation measures.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:273:each scheme when considered alone. Without mitigation, the cumulative impact could be of major adverse

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:273:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:273:establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area within which a marine mammal could be exposed to sound

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:274:mitigation measures identified for both individual projects would reduce the significance of the potential

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:275:Mitigation measures and residual impact

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:275:There is a range of mitigation measures that are typically adopted during construction works to manage the

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:276:consequence of the NGCT. No further mitigation measures are considered to be necessary.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:277:mitigation measures are recommended to reduce this risk as far as possible, namely:

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:278:geology (and consequently controlled waters, including the groundwater body). With these mitigation

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:279: projects. Where there are adverse impacts, an assessment of mitigation options is carried out to

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:279: determine adverse effect on the integrity of the site. If these mitigation options cannot avoid adverse

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:280:reduce the harmful effects of the plan or project on that site”. As such, no such mitigation measures have

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:296:disturbance impact would not represent a population level impact. Although mitigation measures are not

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:298:With the above mitigation strategy in place, in combination with the use of barriers to provide an acoustic

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:298:11 presents an important foraging ground for common and Sandwich tern, the following mitigation measures

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:299:Mitigation of the plume effects by reducing the size of the dredger, and thus reducing the rate of overflow,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:299:the shallower waters. Mitigation of the suspended sediment generated by reducing the size of the dredger,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:300:loss of habitat used by waterbirds (but not the same habitat). No mitigation measures were proposed for

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:303:identified as a risk in this EIA Report for the NGCT project. The mitigation measures proposed for the York

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:317:carried out and the survey and any necessary mitigation measures shall be

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:318:migratory fishery and detailing the mitigation measures necessary to offset any

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:318:and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. The agreed mitigation

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:323: • RHDHV/PDT does not consider that a silt mitigation

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:327: mitigation and compensation would need to be included.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:328: September, in any given year, a Silt Mitigation Plan must be in

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:329: from the noise source). No mitigation measures were proposed

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:329: that as part of the assessment, potential mitigation measures

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:329:resource help inform if any mitigation is required, e.g. for fish receptors.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:338: any mitigation measures that may be required in order to mitigate a potential

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:345: be influenced by the overflow loss rates. In any case, mitigation of these rates is

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:430: • The metric sits within a decision framework based on the mitigation hierarchy: it informs

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:430: decision-making where application of the mitigation hierarchy and good practice principles has

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:567:1.2.3 Mitigation was secured by condition. The transport related conditions specified by RCBC

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:570: and the Delivery adequately assessed and reported so as to ensure that the mitigation of any impact is compliant

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:580: to the conditioned mitigation measures.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:580: development with the same mitigation strategy proposed within the original TA.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:581: accommodate the 2017 proposed development with the same mitigation strategy proposed

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:582:6.2.3 It is, therefore, concluded that the 2006 transport impact assessments and mitigation remain

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:590:5 Impact Assessment and Mitigation Summary 9

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:593:mitigation works with regard to Marine Archaeology included the requirement for a sampling strategy to be

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:595:previously unknown archaeology. Consequently, no mitigation was deemed to be required in these areas.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:600:5 Impact Assessment and Mitigation Summary

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:600:will be no impact and no mitigation is required.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:600:no mitigation is recommended prior to demolition.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:600:archaeology. Consequently, no mitigation is recommended.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:600:such no mitigation is recommended.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:600:The draft outline methodology for proposed mitigation is included as a Scheme of Investigation below.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:603: Stage 5: Production of a geoarchaeological deposit model and recommendations for further mitigation,

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:619:All staff and contractors also have a responsibility to observe mitigation measures agreed by PD Teesport

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:621: • Consult with stakeholders to agree appropriate mitigation measures

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:621: • Agreed mitigation measures implemented by PD Teesport

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:621: Mitigation • Removal/Formalisation of TEZ

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:622:agreement with the archaeological curator(s), PD Teesport may implement alternative forms of mitigation

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:635:Mitigation measures have been proposed to manage the potential risk of deposition at Seal Sands. The

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:638:spill and an impact of negligible significance is predicted. No further mitigation measures beyond those

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:638:guidelines, as mitigation for this potential impact.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:639:mitigation measures are recommended (and detailed above) in order to reduce this risk as far as possible.

IBPB8270R001F01_EIA REPORT.pdf:639:groundwater as a result of the proposed scheme. With these mitigation measures in place, the NGCT is

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:10:Where potential adverse impacts have been identified, mitigation measures have been recommended to

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:12:A number of mitigation measures have been proposed to manage the potential reduction in water quality

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:13:and migratory fish due to the resuspension of sediments. The adoption of the mitigation measures outlined

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:14:impacts are predicted and no mitigation is required.

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:17:are minor adverse in the worst case. No significant impacts are therefore predicted and no mitigation

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:18:impact compared to the impacts of each scheme when considered alone. Without mitigation, the cumulative

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:18:to piling operations commencing, the establishment of a mitigation zone (i.e. an area within which a marine

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:18:mitigation measures identified for both individual projects would reduce the significance of the potential

PB8270-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0002.pdf:18:particular concern and therefore several mitigation measures are recommended to reduce this risk as far as

Licence Document (Marine).pdf:14: To ensure that the method contains appropriate mitigation and is within the scope of the assessed activities.

Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:3:5 Impact Assessment and Mitigation Summary 9

Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:6:mitigation works with regard to Marine Archaeology included the requirement for a sampling strategy to be

Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:8:previously unknown archaeology. Consequently, no mitigation was deemed to be required in these areas.

Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:13:5 Impact Assessment and Mitigation Summary

Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:13:will be no impact and no mitigation is required.

Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:13:no mitigation is recommended prior to demolition.

Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:13:archaeology. Consequently, no mitigation is recommended.

Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:13:such no mitigation is recommended.

Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:13:The draft outline methodology for proposed mitigation is included as a Scheme of Investigation below.

Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:16: Stage 5: Production of a geoarchaeological deposit model and recommendations for further mitigation,

Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:32:All staff and contractors also have a responsibility to observe mitigation measures agreed by PD Teesport

Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:34: • Consult with stakeholders to agree appropriate mitigation measures

Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:34: • Agreed mitigation measures implemented by PD Teesport

Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:34: Mitigation • Removal/Formalisation of TEZ

Schedule 7 - Archaeological WSI.pdf:35:agreement with the archaeological curator(s), PD Teesport may implement alternative forms of mitigation

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:2: 5.10 Mitigation and Monitoring ………………………………………………………………….. 19

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:10:NE in August 2020. NE replied stating that noise shrouding was a good mitigation

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:12:was also highlighted. The applicant proposed mitigation in the form of a Written

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:12:application and find that the suggested historic environment mitigations outlined in

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:13:Project will not impact on the mitigation strategies that are already in place.

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:14:the mitigation measures below, deterioration in the ecological status of the Tees

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:14:after several rounds of consultation, EA removed their objection subject to mitigation

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:15:support the applicant in pursuing off-site mitigations but understood that there is no

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:15:site mitigation cannot be achieved. Further, the MMO should also be satisfied that

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:15:there are no means to condition off-site mitigation (similar to a Grampian condition).

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:15:secure mitigation although it is apparent this will be off-site; with this agreement in

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:15:place the EA consider that satisfactory mitigation would be in place to meet this

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:15:licence decision. On that basis, we did not agree that the mitigations put forward

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:19:EA removed their objection to this topic due to the further mitigation put forward by

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:19:5.10 Mitigation and Monitoring

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:20:The key mitigation measures for the project are summarised below:

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:23:addition to mitigation measures to minimise disruption to fish passage. As outlined in

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:23:secure off-site mitigation and are working closely with the applicant to find a suitable

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:23:solution/project to provide mitigation for the loss of intertidal habitat. This would be in

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:26:risk mitigation measures take place:

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:27:the responses from consultees, and the inclusion of mitigation measures, the MMO

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:27:concluded that without mitigation, the impacts of underwater noise through impact

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:27:adverse effects. However, following mitigation (soft start piling techniques), the effect

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:27:minor/negligible without mitigation and negligible with mitigation.

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:27:support the proposed mitigation (soft start piling techniques), they have some

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:28:species and felt further mitigation was necessary. As outlined in Section 5.13, they

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:28:requested that the following mitigation measures be conditioned in order to mitigate

Schedule 8_ 20220302_EIA_Consent_Decision_Response MLA202000079.pdf:29:The MMO is satisfied that adequate mitigation strategies have been agreed to

Decision Letter (Marine).pdf:1:requiring mitigation or monitoring measures which can be found in section 5 of the

MLA_2021_00215-Decision Letter (Marine)-14.pdf:1:requiring mitigation or monitoring measures which can be found in section 5 of the

MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:12:Please refer to Section 4 of the attached report. With mitigation, no significant effects to

MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:12:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:12:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:12:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:12:Mitigation through the use of an environmental grab is required during capital dredging

MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:With mitigation, impacts are not considered to be significant.

MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:With mitigation in place no significant effects are anticipated. See Section 4 of the

MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:No mitigation is required for this activity (See Section 4 of the report)

MLA_2021_00215-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:10:description of potential for environmental impacts associated with the proposed scheme. Any mitigation

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:23: and consideration of mitigation for any impacts will need to

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:25:In addition to any mitigation measures identified (if necessary), industry good practice guidance will be

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:34:be short-term and limited to within Tees Dock. With mitigation in place it is considered that potential impacts

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:42:A CEMP will be developed and implemented for any required mitigation measures as well as setting out the

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:46:The projects noted in Table 8 all include mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to sensitive

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:54:contamination be found at the site either pre or during construction suitable mitigation

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:54:concludes, it is concluded that with the inclusion of suitable mitigation measures, to be

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:60:works and consideration of mitigation for any impacts will need to be undertaken.

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:62: mitigation options is carried out and mitigation measures (where available) are proposed to address

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:63: the effects. If, having considered mitigation, the potential for adverse effect on integrity remains,

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:63:to avoid or reduce the harmful effects of the plan or project on that site”. Therefore, no mitigation measures

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:72:The following mitigation measures are in place for the water body:

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:78:navigable depth at the berth. The following mitigation measures are in place for the Tees water body:

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:78:activity is in line with the mitigation measures for the Tees transitional water body and a will not cause a

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:79:Tees Dock. Therefore, the maintenance dredging activity is in line with the mitigation measures for the Tees

MLA_2021_00215-PB5051-RHD-106-ZZ-RP-Z-0021 Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report_Final-1.pdf:88:with other potential mitigation measures such as silt curtains.

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:10:description of potential for environmental impacts associated with the proposed scheme. Any mitigation

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:23: and consideration of mitigation for any impacts will need to

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:25:In addition to any mitigation measures identified (if necessary), industry good practice guidance will be

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:34:be short-term and limited to within Tees Dock. With mitigation in place it is considered that potential impacts

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:42:A CEMP will be developed and implemented for any required mitigation measures as well as setting out the

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:46:The projects noted in Table 8 all include mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to sensitive

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:54:contamination be found at the site either pre or during construction suitable mitigation

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:54:concludes, it is concluded that with the inclusion of suitable mitigation measures, to be

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:60:works and consideration of mitigation for any impacts will need to be undertaken.

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:62: mitigation options is carried out and mitigation measures (where available) are proposed to address

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:63: the effects. If, having considered mitigation, the potential for adverse effect on integrity remains,

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:63:to avoid or reduce the harmful effects of the plan or project on that site”. Therefore, no mitigation measures

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:72:The following mitigation measures are in place for the water body:

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:78:navigable depth at the berth. The following mitigation measures are in place for the Tees water body:

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:78:activity is in line with the mitigation measures for the Tees transitional water body and a will not cause a

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:79:Tees Dock. Therefore, the maintenance dredging activity is in line with the mitigation measures for the Tees

MLA_2021_00215-Tees Dock Ro-Ro 2 Environmental Report-13.pdf:88:with other potential mitigation measures such as silt curtains.

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:9:Mats for mitigation Hold… existing works

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:11:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:11:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:11:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:11:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:14:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:14:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:14:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:14:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:20:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:20:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:20:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:20:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:Able Seaton Port Holding basin and Channel - The use of Erosion Mats for mitigation

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:24:The use of Erosion Mats for mitigation purposes

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:25:Mats are proposed as a safety mitigation measure to Powerstation to prevent any

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:25:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:25:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:25:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:25:It should be noted that the erosion mats are a mitigation measure in their own form.

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:25:This mitigation is essential to protect the land stability on this sid eof the quay, to

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:25:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:27:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:27:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:27:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2015_00334-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:27:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

3 EIS Appendices (3).pdf:103:14.4.21 This legislation effectively requires that mitigation take place at the time of the remediation

Appendix 16.1b - DNV Addendum Report 2005.pdf:17:including proposed mitigation measures. Dredging in April, May and early June must be avoided

1911South-Tees-Master-Plan-Nov-19.2.pdf:56:Building on the overview of physical environmental likely adverse impacts addressed using the mitigation The Fleet within Coatham Marsh LWS, but surveys in 2007 coverage of open grasslands and bare/colonising

1911South-Tees-Master-Plan-Nov-19.2.pdf:56:such that the designations do not necessarily represent 2.12.8 REPTILES cannot be avoided, robust mitigation needs to be put in

1911South-Tees-Master-Plan-Nov-19.2.pdf:62:needed to fully capitalise on the development potential. mitigation;

1911South-Tees-Master-Plan-Nov-19.2.pdf:155:Sustainability and emissions mitigation is a key focus of the Once captured, the carbon dioxide gas is then compressed

R-2021-0674-NM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:4: - The details of compensatory habitat where onsite mitigation is

R-2021-0674-NM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:4: identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible,

R-2021-0674-NM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:5: mitigation measures identified as part of the assessment shall be

R-2021-0674-NM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:6: the proposed mitigation measures that no significant long term adverse impacts

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1141-MLA.2020.00506.2 SBQ MLV2 FIR 19 Response.pdf:2: 4. MMO require clarification whether any additional mitigation (outside of that detailed in condition

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1141-MLA.2020.00506.2 SBQ MLV2 FIR 19 Response.pdf:2: 5. MMO require clarification whether any mitigation associated with cutter suction dredging (such

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1141-MLA.2020.00506.2 SBQ MLV2 FIR 19 Response.pdf:3:3.4 Clarification on mitigation associated with dredging within

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1141-MLA.2020.00506.2 SBQ MLV2 FIR 19 Response.pdf:4:3.5 Clarification on mitigation associated with Cutter Suction Dredging

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1141-MLA.2020.00506.2 SBQ MLV2 FIR 19 Response.pdf:4:enclosed or restricted. As such no mitigation measures can be adopted.

MLA_2020_00506-20220512_MLA_2020_00506_1_variation_HRA_FINAL.pdf:5:Q3 - I can confirm that this LSE has not considered mitigation (either included within the application or through additional measures) when assessing the LSE.

MLA_2020_00506-20220512_MLA_2020_00506_1_variation_HRA_FINAL.pdf:5:Additional Comments: No mitigation proposed.

MLA_2020_00506-20220512_MLA_2020_00506_1_variation_HRA_FINAL.pdf:11:There will be no change to any mitigation or conditions imposed on the original licence. As such, the MMO considers the proposed changes to be within the

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:4: receptors were highlighted, additional mitigation measures were

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:12: at the surface (1m below surface) for smolt migration impact mitigation. chemical water quality parameters at both 1m below surface and 1m above the

MLA_2020_00506-20221017_MLA_2020_00506_variation 2_HRA_FINAL.pdf:5:Q3 - I can confirm that this LSE has not considered mitigation (either included within the application or through additional measures) when assessing the LSE.

MLA_2020_00506-20221017_MLA_2020_00506_variation 2_HRA_FINAL.pdf:5:Additional Comments: No mitigation proposed.

MLA_2020_00506-20221017_MLA_2020_00506_variation 2_HRA_FINAL.pdf:11:existing OSPAR/MHWS line and the new quay wall. There will be no change to any mitigation or conditions imposed on the original licence. As such, the

20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:3:Question 4 Are the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures sufficient?

20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:3:16. No mitigation for coastal process impacts is proposed. See my response to Question 11 of this

20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:5:34. Embedded mitigation is discussed in Section 3.12 but considers only spills, leaks, pollution and

20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:5:35. No secondary mitigation measures are proposed for coastal process impacts.

20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:5:37. Mitigation for the possible remobilising of groundwater contaminants due to construction and

20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:5: the method is not specified. They are assumed to be effective, as the mitigation is used to

20210119 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:5: mitigation proposed.

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:4: receptors were highlighted, additional mitigation measures were

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1127 MLA.2020.00506.R8 Response to Consultation Comments on Scheme of Monitoring.pdf:12: at the surface (1m below surface) for smolt migration impact mitigation. chemical water quality parameters at both 1m below surface and 1m above the

20210128 MLA202000507 Tee south bank phase 2 shellfish advice + JPQC.pdf:2:Question 4: Are the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures sufficient?

20210128 MLA202000507 Tee south bank phase 2 shellfish advice + JPQC.pdf:2:14. There are no proposed mitigation and monitoring measures in relation to shellfish species and

354204 MLA_2020_00506 - South Bank Wharf dredge Middlesbrough 5.07.2021 (1).pdf:2:Phase 2 of this project with the mitigation strategy of the Northern Gateway Container Terminal

354204 MLA_2020_00506 - South Bank Wharf dredge Middlesbrough 5.07.2021 (1).pdf:4: We concur with the findings and mitigation measures mentioned in

354204 MLA_2020_00506 - South Bank Wharf dredge Middlesbrough 5.07.2021 (1).pdf:4: river and the mitigation works for NGCT at Tees Mudflat.

354204 MLA_2020_00506 - South Bank Wharf dredge Middlesbrough 5.07.2021 (1).pdf:5:In-combination assessment The Northern Gateway Container Terminal (NGCT) mitigation

20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:2: mitigation to allow both maintenance and non-maintenance dredging to proceed during the

20220615 MLA2020005061 L2021003331 Tees South Bank (phase 1) Revised Scheme of Monitoring Review Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:3: developers in the Tees to agree on a suitable long-term monitoring programme and mitigation

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:21:The application contains mitigation that cannot be considered at LSE stage, and so this will be discussed at appropriate assessment. This is specific relation

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:22: Pressure Qualifying feature or species Adverse Effect Justification After mitigation, can you conclude no

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA phase 1 and 2.pdf:25:This conclusion is dependent on mitigation measures being secured by the following conditions being secured in a marine licence:

354204 MLA_2020_00506 - South Bank Wharf dredge Middlesbrough 5.07.2021.pdf:2:Phase 2 of this project with the mitigation strategy of the Northern Gateway Container Terminal

354204 MLA_2020_00506 - South Bank Wharf dredge Middlesbrough 5.07.2021.pdf:4: We concur with the findings and mitigation measures mentioned in

354204 MLA_2020_00506 - South Bank Wharf dredge Middlesbrough 5.07.2021.pdf:4: river and the mitigation works for NGCT at Tees Mudflat.

354204 MLA_2020_00506 - South Bank Wharf dredge Middlesbrough 5.07.2021.pdf:5:In-combination assessment The Northern Gateway Container Terminal (NGCT) mitigation

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:1:judgement on the significance of impacts to designated sites and the scope for mitigation.

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:2:site above in order to determine the significance of these for the SSSI and the scope for mitigation.

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:7: of impacts to designated sites and to determine mitigation measures.

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:9: the main over-wintering period (see ‘Mitigation measures’ comment below).

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:10:Mitigation measures We note that the HRA states that the following mitigation measure will be

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:10: wintering waterbirds, it is not clear whether this mitigation measure has

360368 NE response to MMO MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 HRA 30.07.2021.pdf:1:assessment conclusions, providing that all mitigation measures are appropriately secured in any

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:22: therefore be ruled out without mitigation.

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:23:The application contains mitigation that cannot be considered at LSE stage, and so this will be discussed at appropriate assessment. This is specific relation

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:24: Pressure Qualifying feature or species Adverse Effect Justification After mitigation, can you conclude no

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:25: • Shoveler mitigation measure will result in North Tees Mudflat, are sufficiently distant

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:25: Mitigation measures include sympathetic

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:26: Common tern, (Breeding) The applicant has proposed mitigation

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:29: therefore be ruled out without mitigation.

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA (2).pdf:30:This conclusion is dependent on mitigation measures being secured by the following conditions being secured in a marine licence:

20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:2:Question 4: Are the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures sufficient?

20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:2:16. A number of mitigation measures are proposed, and these are all sensible and should minimise

20210121 MLA202000506 Tees South Bank Quay Phase I Benthic ecology + JPQC.pdf:3: 9.1.5.2). However, I do not see any reference to whether there is any mitigation planned for this

EA MLA_2020_00506 v2 29 June 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:further on-site mitigation can be achieved to compensation for this loss of habitat. It

EA MLA_2020_00506 v2 29 June 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:would be preferable if the MMO were able to condition the requirement of mitigation off-

210422 EA response to MMO ref MLA202000506.pdf:2: the surface (1m below surface) for smolt migration impact mitigation. We

EA MLA_2020_00506 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:ii) Site specific benthic ecology surveys and assessments/adequate mitigation

EA MLA_2020_00506 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:marine licence and requirements for mitigation and/or compensation.

MLA-2020-00506.pdf:2: could be restrictions / mitigation or monitoring for example).

MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4: mitigation is required. In my opinion, these conclusions are not unreasonable. As noted previously, it is

MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4:Question 4: Are the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures sufficient?

MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4:24. No mitigation is proposed for marine mammals.

MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4:26. At this stage, it is difficult to say whether the proposed mitigation for fish is sufficient. I do have some

20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:2: the assessment and to determine whether additional mitigation measures are required. I have listed

20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: occurs during the peak migration season’. To this, the applicant has suggested that the mitigation

20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:6:Question 4. Are the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures sufficient?

20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:6:MITIGATION MEASURES PROPOSED DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE

20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:7: impact is considered to be high. Therefore, the following mitigation measure has been

20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:7:27. With the implementation of the above mitigation measure (point 26.iii), the applicant expects that

20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:7: there is not enough evidence to make a decision on whether the proposed mitigation measure will

20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:8: magnitude and limited to the dredge footprint. Therefore, no mitigation has been proposed.

20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:8: some issues that need to be addressed in order to consider the need for additional mitigation

20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:9: need to be addressed in order to consider the need for additional mitigation measures.

20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:9:MITIGATION MEASURES PROPOSED DURING THE OPERATIONAL PHASE

20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:10: considered to be accustomed to such impacts and therefore no mitigation is required. However,

20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:10: affect the population as a whole. Therefore, mitigation is not proposed beyond the best practice of

20210115 MLA202000506 South Bank Quay-phase 1 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:11: (e.g. NGCT). To this, the applicant has suggested that the mitigation measures proposed (or in

PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:2:regarding alternative mitigation to that required in Conditions 5.2.8 and linked Condition 5.2.9 around the

PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:2:This monitoring plan aims to present alternative mitigation for consideration by the MMO to allow both

PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:2:to provide alternative acceptable mitigation to that stipulated in Condition 5.2.8 and replace that required

PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:4:With specific reference to fish, it was considered that the proposed mitigation measures for each project

20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:2:7. This monitoring plan has been prepared to present alternative mitigation to allow both

20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:2: (i.e., it seeks to provide alternative acceptable mitigation to that stipulated in Condition 5.2.8)

20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:2: additional mitigation measures were recommended, and further information was requested.

20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:3: mitigation and or monitoring must be made by the Licensing Authority.

20220518 MLA202000506 L2021003331Tees South Bank (phase 1) Monitoring Plan Fisheries advice FINAL.pdf:3: developers in the Tees to agree on a suitable monitoring programme and mitigation measures.

MLA_2020_00506_1 South Bank Wharf Variation Response FINAL 392938.pdf:3:considered. If safer methods cannot be established then mitigation for any potential damages to the

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:1:judgement on the significance of impacts to designated sites and the scope for mitigation.

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:2:site above in order to determine the significance of these for the SSSI and the scope for mitigation.

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:7: of impacts to designated sites and to determine mitigation measures.

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:9: the main over-wintering period (see ‘Mitigation measures’ comment below).

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:10:Mitigation measures We note that the HRA states that the following mitigation measure will be

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1).pdf:10: wintering waterbirds, it is not clear whether this mitigation measure has

20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:3:Are the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures sufficient?

20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:4:19. As detailed in points 13 – 15 I cannot fully comment on whether any additional mitigation or

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:22:The application contains mitigation that cannot be considered at LSE stage, and so this will be discussed at appropriate assessment. This is specific relation

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:23: Pressure Qualifying feature or species Adverse Effect Justification After mitigation, can you conclude no

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:24: • Shoveler mitigation measure will result in North Tees Mudflat, are sufficiently distant

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:25: Black-headed gull Mitigation measures include sympathetic

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:25: Common tern, (Breeding) The applicant has proposed mitigation

MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Draft HRA.pdf:29:This conclusion is dependent on mitigation measures being secured by the following conditions being secured in a marine licence:

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:3:3.12 Embedded mitigation measures 20

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:12:mitigation measures are defined. The residual impacts (potential impacts remaining assuming the proposed

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:12:mitigation measures are effectively implemented) are then assessed.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:28:3.12 Embedded mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:29:built into the proposed scheme as embedded mitigation.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:42: • The generic approach taken to the derivation of mitigation measures and the assessment of residual

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:43: • The identification of mitigation measures (where required) to reduce the significance of, or avoid,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:43: • The evaluation of impacts, post-mitigation, to determine the significance of residual impacts.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:47:significance (as defined above); albeit that appropriate mitigation, where available, should be sought for all

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:Mitigation measures have been proposed, where available and practical, in those cases where adverse

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:impacts have been identified. It is important to note that the mitigation measures applied should be

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:‘Mitigation through design’ is an important factor in ensuring that the environmental impacts of a proposed

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:engineering and environmental impact studies, mitigation has been built into the design of the proposed

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:scheme. Where significant impacts potentially remain, further issue-specific mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:industry standard or ‘embedded’ mitigation often applies in these cases (and is set out herein). It is also

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:other pressures on a receptor and, in this event, mitigation may be required.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:is relevant to the treatment of mitigation in HRA. The CJEU ruling determined that “…it is not appropriate,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:the harmful effects…” is interpreted as meaning any mitigation measures that are not clearly an intrinsic part

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:of the design of a plan or project. The effect of this ruling is that mitigation measures, which are not clearly

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:process has identified an adverse impact and mitigation is available (see above). In some cases, in order

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:to ensure that the mitigation measures are successful or where there is significant uncertainty with respect

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:Where further mitigation measures are identified, the significance of the residual environmental impact (i.e.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:48:the post-mitigation impact) is assessed.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:50:additional mitigation. Inter-relationships have been assessed within the relevant sections of the topic

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:53: certain times of the year and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation such addressed in Section

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:142: waters and coastal waters. During the construction, operation and Section 5.6, Paragraph and mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:142: resources and physical characteristics of the water environment as mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:143: impacts will be observed (to water quality), and mitigation may be are assessment and mitigation measures outlined

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:143: Mitigation measures with regard to dredging may be required to manage

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:143: are assessment and mitigation measures outlined

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:143: times of the year and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:162:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:162:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:163:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:163:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:166:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:166:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:167:Overall therefore, the magnitude of effect would be significantly reduced by the proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:168:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:168:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:169:proposed scheme footprint and surrounding area, the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:169: of biodiversity or geological value and soils (in a impacts and subsequent mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:170: such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation are discussed within the land quality

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:172:operational activities. It will also aid in the identification of suitable mitigation measures to provide protection

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:172:identification of suitable preventative measures and mitigation techniques for the construction and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:186:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:187:adoption of the embedded mitigation measures outlined in Section 3, including the use of the CEMP. The

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:187:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:187:Following the implementation of these mitigation measures, the magnitude of effect will be very low.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:188:site and task specific health and safety plans. The plan will outline the use of risk mitigation strategies

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:188:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:188:The mitigation measures detailed in Section 16.5 (specifically those associated with the avoidance of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:188:construction phase dust) would also be applicable to this impact. No further mitigation measures have been

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:189:The sensitivity of the surface water is very high and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:189:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:189:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:190:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:190:Following implementation of the mitigation described above the magnitude of the impact is considered to be

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:191:and biofouling of hulls. Generic project-level mitigation has been put in place to minimise this risk, set out

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:192: be considered, and the mitigation hierarchy used to protect these features. Importance and species of ecological importance

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:192: mitigation and compensation.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:193: appropriate mitigation/compensation can be quantified. structures would have a habitat / species value, or

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:193: step is to fully consider options for mitigation on site prior to compensation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:193: site mitigation.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:193: Habitat Vision that aims to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:194: implement WFD mitigation measures and the applicant should explore

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:210:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:214:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:214:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:215:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:216:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:216:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:218: procedures requiring an EIA and mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:219: habitats will need to be considered, and the mitigation hierarchy used to Section 9 assesses potential impacts on marine

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:219: suitable mitigation and compensation.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:234: very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:235:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237: very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239: increased Low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:239:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice during construction works.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241: whale very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of best practice during maintenance

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice. The residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:244: • Restoring at least 15% of degraded ecosystems as a contribution to climate change mitigation and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:246: • The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The Mammal Society Guidance Series) (Dean et al, 2016);

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:246: • Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines (English Nature, 2001);

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:246: • Otters: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice (Natural

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:246: • Badgers: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:246: • Bats: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice (Natural

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:246: • Great crested newts: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:246: • Invertebrates: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:246: • Reptiles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:246: • Water voles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:247: Natural England advised following the mitigation hierarchy as STDC is in the process of developing a

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:249:a development, once all the appropriate mitigation has been implemented.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:252: through the implementation of mitigation measures or irreversible, when no recovery is possible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:253:mitigation and project commitments made as part of the design process. Where, following this assessment,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:253:likely significant impacts are identified, additional mitigation measures are then proposed. A final

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:253:assessment of the residual impacts remaining following implementation of these additional mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:254:Following initial assessment, if the impact does not require additional mitigation (or none is possible) the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:254:residual impact will remain the same. If, however, additional mitigation is proposed there will be an

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:254:assessment of the post-mitigation residual impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:261:EP1HS. Consequently, these are considered to be absent and no further surveys and/or mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:261:Therefore, roosting bats are considered to be absent and no further surveys and/or mitigation measures for

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:262:surveys and/or mitigation measures are required. Therefore, badgers are not considered further in this

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:262:and this species is considered to be absent. Therefore, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:263:colonise. Consequently, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are required, and amphibians

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:263:basking, shelter, foraging and/or refuge. Consequently, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:265:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:265:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:266:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:266:Following the implementation of the mitigation measures, the magnitude of impact will be reduced and the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:266:prior to works commencing, to ensure the protection afforded to otters, the agreed mitigation measures and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:266:Potential effects arising from changes in noise are considered in Section 17, including embedded mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:266:of no adverse significance following embedded mitigation of development of a Marine Pollution Contingency

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:267:implementation of the mitigation outlined in Section 18, there is not anticipated to be a significant impact to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:267:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:267:The following mitigation is proposed to minimise disturbance of otters from construction activities:

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:267:The following mitigation will be implemented to prevent injury or death to otter should any animal roam in

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:267: • All otter mitigation measures for the site will be agreed with Natural England prior to construction;

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:267: within this area. Consultation will be required with Natural England to discuss the mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:268:Following the implementation of the mitigation measures outlined above, the potential effects to otter are

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:268:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:268:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:268:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:268:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:268:As additional mitigation for hedgehog, any individuals found within the works area will be moved to a safe

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:269:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:269:Following the implementation of mitigation, the impact to commuting bats and otters is anticipated to be of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:273: consideration should be given to suitable mitigation. The river using the Tees are assessed in

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:296:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:296:by an experienced ornithologist. This mitigation will be included in the CEMP. The residual impact would

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:298:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:298:While the anticipated impact is minor, the following mitigation measure, proposed to reduce the potential for

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:298:With the implementation of the above mitigation measure, the modelled plume would only occupy half of the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:298:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:301:However, according to the Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013), species such as

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:301:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:301:As mitigation for the potential impact of noise disturbance during the construction phase, it is proposed that

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:301:to the Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013). With this in mind, and considering the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:301:noises at the distances associated with this project, the implementation of the above mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:302:The Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013) categorises visual disturbances into the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:303:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:303:The mitigation measures outlined in Section 12.5.2 would ensure that dredging vessels only operate along

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:304:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:305:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:305:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:306:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:306:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:309: and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation such as stop start 13.5.1.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:320:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:320:The following mitigation measure is proposed to reduce the potential for impacts on migratory fish from

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:320:With the implementation of the above mitigation measure, water quality will only be impacted on one side

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:320:Mitigation of the plume effects by reducing the size of the TSHD, and thus reducing the rate of overflow, is

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:321:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:325:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:327:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:329:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:329:for the proposed scheme, and there is no feasible mitigation measure that can prevent such losses.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:330:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required, although as a matter of course PDT will manage any conflicts through

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:330:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:331:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:331:No mitigation measures are required; however, in accordance with best practice, lighting would be directed

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:331:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:331:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:335:As detailed in the NRA, a number of embedded mitigation measures are already enforced by PDT which

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:335:(see Appendix 9). These embedded mitigation measures comprise:

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:336:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:336:As noted above, a number of embedded mitigation measures are already enforced by PDT which have been

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:336:Appendix 9). These embedded mitigation measures which are applicable to the operational phase

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:336:In addition to the above embedded mitigation measures, the following measures are proposed to be adopted

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:337:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:337:No additional mitigation measures are required beyond those detailed above (to be built into the proposed

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:337:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:338:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:348: Effective/acceptable mitigation options may still be possible, to offset and / or reduce residual impacts to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:348: Effective / acceptable mitigation options may still be possible, to offset and / or reduce residual impacts to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:348: Industry standard mitigation measures may still apply.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:358:HER. With appropriate mitigation, the residual impact will be reduced to minor adverse and not significant

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:358:riverside pumping station will be recorded in advance of demolition in accordance with mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:373:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:376:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:380: • any significant air emissions, their mitigation and any residual

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:380: mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:380: after mitigation methods have been applied; and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:380: • measures to be employed in preventing or mitigating the mitigation measures.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:383:3) Determine site specific mitigation; and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:383:4) Examine the residual effects to determine whether or not additional mitigation is required.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:383:of impacts prior to mitigation. Once appropriate mitigation measures were identified, the significance of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:389:construction and trackout is used to recommend appropriate mitigation measures. The dust magnitude for

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:391:Table 18.9 to determine the risk of impacts with no mitigation applied. The risks concluded for dust soiling

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:391:Table 18.10 Summary of risk table to define site-specific mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:392:18.4.1.5 Step 3: Site-specific mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:392:Step three of the IAQM guidance (IAQM, 2016) identifies appropriate site-specific mitigation. These

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:392:without the implementation of mitigation measures. Additional guidance has been provided by the IAQM in

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:392:relation to dust and air mitigation measures. It is recommended that the good practice measures outlined

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:392:Highly recommended mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:392:A list of mitigation measures that are highly recommended for a high risk site by the IAQM, as determined

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:392:by Step 2 of the construction dust and particulate matter assessment, is provided below. The mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:392:mitigation measures listed in the guidance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:393: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:394:With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, the residual impacts from the construction phase

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:399:considerations. In such cases appropriate mitigation will be required. Landscapes designated at a national

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:414:19.5.1 Mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:414:Woodland, tree and shrub planting is a typical mitigation measure used to screen development and improve

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:424:to consider all sources of flooding, any mitigation measures required to ensure a safe development in a 1 in

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:433:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:433:comparable with the existing. No further mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:433:users is high magnitude. Therefore, without the implementation of mitigation measures the impact is of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:433:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:433:implementation of the following mitigation measures:

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:434:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:434:once operational. No further mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact with

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:434:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:434:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:435:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:435:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:436:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:436:No mitigation measures are required in regard to the impact of swell waves or locally generated waves. The

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:442:exist in the surrounding area; the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or offset any significant

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:442:significance. Opportunities for the mitigation of any adverse effects and the enhancement of positive effects

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:455:Mitigation and residual impacts

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:455:Mitigation and residual impacts

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:456:Mitigation measures and residual impacts

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:456:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:458:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:459:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:460: • contribute to the mitigation of GHG emissions and support sustainable development;

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:460: • transparent reporting of information on mitigation, adaptation and support which undergoes

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:461:GHG emissions by 34%, relative to a 1990 baseline by 2020 and by 80% in 2050 (“climate mitigation”). The

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:463: d. ensuring opportunities to contribute to the mitigation of flooding elsewhere are taken;

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:463:2.56 The NPPF states that planning should proactively help the mitigation of, and adaption to, climate

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:472:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:472:developed. However, potential mitigation measures to reduce GHG emissions from construction phase

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:472:Furthermore, some of the mitigation measures to minimise air pollutant emissions during construction, listed

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:473:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:476:contact. The assessment concludes that with the adoption of embedded mitigation (i.e. implementation of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:477:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:477:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:479:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:482:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:484:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:484:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486: noise during very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487: collision risk from Low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:487:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice. The residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489: resource in whale very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:491:occurring, or where mitigation measures are still operating; and reasonably foreseeable future plans and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:500:assessment of the significance of such impacts and recommendation of appropriate mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:503:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:503:former project, mitigation comprises the use of specialist dredging equipment (i.e. an enclosed grab loading

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:506:at any location. Additionally, mitigation is outlined for all three schemes which would reduce plume extents

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:506:additional mitigation measures are identified to reduce any resulting sediment plume as far as possible and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:506:mitigation measures would be incorporated into the design of each and thus remove the potential for

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:507:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:507:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no cumulative residual impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:508:mitigation is adopted to reduce the risk of any such impact from occurring. However, there could be the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:510:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511:No mitigation measures are required to reduce the potential disturbance of marine mammals from

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511:lack of suitable habitat within its footprint. The mitigation outlined for the proposed scheme reduces the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511:subject to similar mitigation measures to minimise any potential effects, including reduced vessel speeds,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:511:No additional mitigation is proposed and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:512:As a more sizable development, the landside EIA proposes a number of mitigation measures including off

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:512:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:512:No mitigation measures are required and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:512:footprint. The mitigation outlined for the proposed scheme reduces the potential impacts to otter to an

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:512:an adverse impact to otter, it is assumed they will be subject to similar mitigation measures to minimise any

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:512:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:513:No mitigation measures are required and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:513:In the absence of suitable mitigation, this could potentially result in an increased risk to subtidal foraging

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:513:within the Tees. However, the mitigation measure described for the proposed scheme in Section 12.5.2

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:513:have a minor impact at worst (with the mitigation measures in place). With mitigation measures in place for

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:513:the SIZ development immediately landward. However, with the mitigation measures outlined in Section

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:514:mitigation relating to the effect of the loss of intertidal mud specifically in relation to these species is not

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:514:the risk of such responses being exhibited. However, the mitigation measure described for the proposed

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:514:project, and other mitigation measures have been proposed for the Anglo American Harbour facilities

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:514:With mitigation measures in place for all schemes, the combined impact will be reduced as far as possible,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:514:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:515:No further mitigation measures are possible (or necessary). The residual cumulative impact would be minor

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:515:are anticipated to be relatively habituated to such noises, plus the mitigation measures in place will help to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:515:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:515:No further mitigation measures are possible (or necessary). The residual cumulative impact would be minor

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:515:There is a range of mitigation measures that are typically adopted during construction works to manage the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:No mitigation measures are required beyond those to be embedded into the proposed scheme and those

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:mitigation measures outlined above would be adopted during the operational phase of the proposed scheme

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:No mitigation measures are required beyond those to be embedded into the proposed scheme and those

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:516:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:517:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:517:No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:518:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:518:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:519:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:519:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:519:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:519:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:520:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:520:No mitigation measures. There would be a substantial beneficial residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:520:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:520:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:520:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:520:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:520:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:520:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:521:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:524: The generic mitigation measures deemed applicable to this waterbody Measures are included in the assessment alongside

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:524: bank, Preserve or restore habitats. guidance mitigation measures table for the Tees.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:524: Mention of various reports to inform mitigation to address WFD issues of these reports is being fed into the developing

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:526: Mitigation measures (taken from

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:526: Mitigation measures provided by the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:528:and jetties WFD mitigation measures identified for only. be disposed of on land

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:528:C2 Capital dredging hydromorphology and WFD mitigation are no higher sensitivity water quality due to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:528:blanket hydromorphology. WFD mitigation no higher sensitivity on the seabed however

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:528:quay effects in relation to WFD mitigation therefore there would be require piling on land.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:529: mitigation measures also scoped in. intertidal and subtidal

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:529:water mitigation measures identified for the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:530: • For C2 - Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures, biology (fish and habitats) and water

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:530: • For C4 – RBMP mitigation measures.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:530: • For C5 – Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures, Groundwater – chemical quality

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:530: • For O1 - Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures assessment.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:530:Table 28.6 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:530: RBMP mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:539:28.5.5 River Basin Management Plan mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:539:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:539:Table 28.8 Summary of mitigation measures and assessment (taken from Clearing the Waters for All,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:539: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:539: Dredging would be managed in line with mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:540: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:540:Table 28.9 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:540: RBMP mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:540:28.6.2 RBMP mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:540:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:540:Table 28.10 Summary of mitigation measures and assessment (taken from Clearing the Waters for All,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:540: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:540: mitigation measure.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:541: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:541: Retime dredging or disposal Riverbank excavation would not impact on these mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:541:Table 28.11 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:542: Water body Quality elements mitigation Protected Areas

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:542:28.7.2 RBMP mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:542:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:542:Table 28.12 Summary of RBMP mitigation measures and assessment

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:542: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:542: effect on this mitigation measure is not predicted.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:542: these mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:545:Cefas Action Level 2 concentrations), additional mitigation measures would be implemented to reduce the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:545:proposed project both include mitigation measures to dredge in long strips to reduce the effects of sediment

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:549:would require site characterisation and remediation/ mitigation (such as piling risk assessments to be

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:549: • Surface waters: Hydromorphology (including the RBMP mitigation measures assessment)

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:549:Biodiversity Strategy. This will also support the implementation of the RBMP mitigation measures identified

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:549:suspended sediment thus reducing the risk of significant water quality effects. Mitigation measures to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:549:in potentially contaminated soils. Effective mitigation measures to ensure contamination is managed and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:550:projects would occur at the same time. Mitigation measures such as dredging in long strips as required for

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:550:A non-temporary deterioration in WFD quality elements was therefore not identified. Additionally, mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:550:is considered to be supportive of the implementation of the RBMP mitigation measures around ecological

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:551: projects. Where there are adverse impacts, an assessment of mitigation options is carried out to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:551: determine adverse effect on the integrity of the site. If these mitigation options cannot avoid adverse

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:552:reduce the harmful effects of the plan or project on that site”. As such, no such mitigation measures have

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:561: scheme subject to appropriate mitigation being

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:561: known as well as adoption of all mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:567: R/2016/0663/OOM for up to 550 residential units with associated granted October 2019 adoption of mitigation, including the provision of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:567: consented residential development, the mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:575:With the application of mitigation in the form of ensuring that the capital dredging transects run along the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:575:With mitigation in place, the predicted impacts on fish as a result of SSC increases are predicted to manifest

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:576:With mitigation in place, the predicted impacts on fish as a result of underwater noise is again predicted to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:577:e.g. pile driving). With the incorporation of the mitigation measures detailed in Section 12.5.4 (i.e.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:577:The Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit, developed by Cutts et al. (2013), provides noise level

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:578:with the implication of mitigation measures set out in Sections 12.5.4 and 12.6.3 (i.e. sympathetic placement

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:582:Without mitigation in place, the construction phase of the proposed scheme may result in redistribution of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:583:mitigation measures will be in place and noise levels within the SPA would be less than 50dB(A) (i.e. below

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:583:proposed scheme and lies outwith the 300m threshold stated within the Waterbird Disturbance & Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:584:It should be noted that the mitigation measures described for the proposed scheme in Section 12.5.2 (i.e.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:584:in the water column. With mitigation measures in place for all schemes, the combined impact will be reduced

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:588:Caltrans (2015). Technical Guidance for Assessment and Mitigation of the Hydroacoustic Effects of Pile

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:589:Cutts, N. Hemmingway, K. & Spencer, J. (2013). Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit Informing

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:589:Dean, M., Strachan, R., Gow, D. and Andrews, R. (2016). The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:589:Mammal Society Mitigation Guidance Series). Eds Fiona Mathews and Paul Chanin. The Mammal

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:590:English Nature (2001) Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:594:Natural England (2014) Otters: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:594:Natural England (2015) Badgers: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:594:Natural England (2015) Bats: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:595:Natural England (2015) Great crested newts: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:595:Natural England (2015). Invertebrates: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:595:Natural England, (2015). Reptiles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-10.pdf:595:Natural England, (2015). Water voles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:15:additional mitigation measures are required. Listed the information required below:

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-34.pdf:16:project) at any location. Additionally, mitigation is outlined for all three schemes which would reduce plume

MLA_2020_00506-22UK1862_SouthBankTees_NRA_Addendum_Issue_01-50.pdf:9:suitable mitigations in place.

MLA_2020_00506-22UK1862_SouthBankTees_NRA_Addendum_Issue_01-50.pdf:10:effective use of pilotage as a risk reduction mitigation.

MLA_2020_00506-Returns-56.pdf:5: alternative mitigation for consideration by the

MLA_2020_00506-Returns-56.pdf:5: provide alternative acceptable mitigation to that

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:15:additional mitigation measures are required. Listed the information required below:

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-25.pdf:16:project) at any location. Additionally, mitigation is outlined for all three schemes which would reduce plume

MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:4:clarify whether any mitigation associated with dredging activity in proximity to the contaminated material boundary is proposed to minimise

MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:5:would also be useful if the Applicant could please clarify whether any mitigation associated with cutter suction dredging (such as shielding or

MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:7: 4. MMO require clarification whether any additional mitigation (outside of that detailed in condition 5.2.11) associated with dredging activity

MLA_2020_00506-MLA_2020_00506_2_RFI 19_Cefas Comments_MMO requested updates.pdf:7: 5. MMO require clarification whether any mitigation associated with cutter suction dredging (such as shielding or enclosing of the cutter

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:17:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:17:release of sediment as the material is dredged. No further mitigation measures are required. The residual

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:24:and mitigation proposed in relation to INNS within the EIA Report remain valid and no update to the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are considered necessary. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:29:In terms of mitigation, the footprint of the dredge will be kept to what is absolutely necessary, in order to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:29:minimise the scale of the impact where possible. No further mitigation is considered necessary or feasible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:46:assessed within the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020). As such, the assessment and mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:47:of the previously reported impact assessment. The only additional mitigation measure required following

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-16.pdf:48:Cutts, N., Hemmingway, K. and Spencer, J. (2013). Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit Informing

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:3:3.12 Embedded mitigation measures 20

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:12:mitigation measures are defined. The residual impacts (potential impacts remaining assuming the proposed

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:12:mitigation measures are effectively implemented) are then assessed.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:28:3.12 Embedded mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:29:built into the proposed scheme as embedded mitigation.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42: • The generic approach taken to the derivation of mitigation measures and the assessment of residual

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43: • The identification of mitigation measures (where required) to reduce the significance of, or avoid,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43: • The evaluation of impacts, post-mitigation, to determine the significance of residual impacts.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:47:significance (as defined above); albeit that appropriate mitigation, where available, should be sought for all

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Mitigation measures have been proposed, where available and practical, in those cases where adverse

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:impacts have been identified. It is important to note that the mitigation measures applied should be

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:‘Mitigation through design’ is an important factor in ensuring that the environmental impacts of a proposed

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:engineering and environmental impact studies, mitigation has been built into the design of the proposed

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:scheme. Where significant impacts potentially remain, further issue-specific mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:industry standard or ‘embedded’ mitigation often applies in these cases (and is set out herein). It is also

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:other pressures on a receptor and, in this event, mitigation may be required.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:is relevant to the treatment of mitigation in HRA. The CJEU ruling determined that “…it is not appropriate,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:the harmful effects…” is interpreted as meaning any mitigation measures that are not clearly an intrinsic part

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:of the design of a plan or project. The effect of this ruling is that mitigation measures, which are not clearly

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:process has identified an adverse impact and mitigation is available (see above). In some cases, in order

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:to ensure that the mitigation measures are successful or where there is significant uncertainty with respect

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Where further mitigation measures are identified, the significance of the residual environmental impact (i.e.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:the post-mitigation impact) is assessed.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:50:additional mitigation. Inter-relationships have been assessed within the relevant sections of the topic

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:53: certain times of the year and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation such addressed in Section

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142: waters and coastal waters. During the construction, operation and Section 5.6, Paragraph and mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142: resources and physical characteristics of the water environment as mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: impacts will be observed (to water quality), and mitigation may be are assessment and mitigation measures outlined

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: Mitigation measures with regard to dredging may be required to manage

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: are assessment and mitigation measures outlined

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: times of the year and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:162:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:162:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:Overall therefore, the magnitude of effect would be significantly reduced by the proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:169:proposed scheme footprint and surrounding area, the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:169: of biodiversity or geological value and soils (in a impacts and subsequent mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:170: such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation are discussed within the land quality

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:172:operational activities. It will also aid in the identification of suitable mitigation measures to provide protection

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:172:identification of suitable preventative measures and mitigation techniques for the construction and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:186:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:187:adoption of the embedded mitigation measures outlined in Section 3, including the use of the CEMP. The

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:187:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:187:Following the implementation of these mitigation measures, the magnitude of effect will be very low.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:188:site and task specific health and safety plans. The plan will outline the use of risk mitigation strategies

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:188:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:188:The mitigation measures detailed in Section 16.5 (specifically those associated with the avoidance of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:188:construction phase dust) would also be applicable to this impact. No further mitigation measures have been

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:The sensitivity of the surface water is very high and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is very low

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:190:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:190:Following implementation of the mitigation described above the magnitude of the impact is considered to be

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:191:and biofouling of hulls. Generic project-level mitigation has been put in place to minimise this risk, set out

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:192: be considered, and the mitigation hierarchy used to protect these features. Importance and species of ecological importance

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:192: mitigation and compensation.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:193: appropriate mitigation/compensation can be quantified. structures would have a habitat / species value, or

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:193: step is to fully consider options for mitigation on site prior to compensation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:193: site mitigation.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:193: Habitat Vision that aims to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:194: implement WFD mitigation measures and the applicant should explore

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:215:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:216:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:216:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:218: procedures requiring an EIA and mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:219: habitats will need to be considered, and the mitigation hierarchy used to Section 9 assesses potential impacts on marine

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:219: suitable mitigation and compensation.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:235:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: increased Low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice during construction works.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: whale very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of best practice during maintenance

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice. The residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:244: • Restoring at least 15% of degraded ecosystems as a contribution to climate change mitigation and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The Mammal Society Guidance Series) (Dean et al, 2016);

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines (English Nature, 2001);

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • Otters: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice (Natural

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • Badgers: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • Bats: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice (Natural

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • Great crested newts: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • Invertebrates: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • Reptiles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • Water voles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:247: Natural England advised following the mitigation hierarchy as STDC is in the process of developing a

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:249:a development, once all the appropriate mitigation has been implemented.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:252: through the implementation of mitigation measures or irreversible, when no recovery is possible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253:mitigation and project commitments made as part of the design process. Where, following this assessment,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253:likely significant impacts are identified, additional mitigation measures are then proposed. A final

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253:assessment of the residual impacts remaining following implementation of these additional mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:254:Following initial assessment, if the impact does not require additional mitigation (or none is possible) the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:254:residual impact will remain the same. If, however, additional mitigation is proposed there will be an

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:254:assessment of the post-mitigation residual impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:261:EP1HS. Consequently, these are considered to be absent and no further surveys and/or mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:261:Therefore, roosting bats are considered to be absent and no further surveys and/or mitigation measures for

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:262:surveys and/or mitigation measures are required. Therefore, badgers are not considered further in this

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:262:and this species is considered to be absent. Therefore, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:263:colonise. Consequently, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are required, and amphibians

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:263:basking, shelter, foraging and/or refuge. Consequently, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:265:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:265:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:Following the implementation of the mitigation measures, the magnitude of impact will be reduced and the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:prior to works commencing, to ensure the protection afforded to otters, the agreed mitigation measures and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:Potential effects arising from changes in noise are considered in Section 17, including embedded mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:of no adverse significance following embedded mitigation of development of a Marine Pollution Contingency

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:267:implementation of the mitigation outlined in Section 18, there is not anticipated to be a significant impact to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:267:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:267:The following mitigation is proposed to minimise disturbance of otters from construction activities:

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:267:The following mitigation will be implemented to prevent injury or death to otter should any animal roam in

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:267: • All otter mitigation measures for the site will be agreed with Natural England prior to construction;

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:267: within this area. Consultation will be required with Natural England to discuss the mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:Following the implementation of the mitigation measures outlined above, the potential effects to otter are

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:As additional mitigation for hedgehog, any individuals found within the works area will be moved to a safe

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:269:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:269:Following the implementation of mitigation, the impact to commuting bats and otters is anticipated to be of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:273: consideration should be given to suitable mitigation. The river using the Tees are assessed in

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:296:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:296:by an experienced ornithologist. This mitigation will be included in the CEMP. The residual impact would

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:While the anticipated impact is minor, the following mitigation measure, proposed to reduce the potential for

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:With the implementation of the above mitigation measure, the modelled plume would only occupy half of the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:301:However, according to the Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013), species such as

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:301:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:301:As mitigation for the potential impact of noise disturbance during the construction phase, it is proposed that

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:301:to the Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013). With this in mind, and considering the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:301:noises at the distances associated with this project, the implementation of the above mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:302:The Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013) categorises visual disturbances into the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:303:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:303:The mitigation measures outlined in Section 12.5.2 would ensure that dredging vessels only operate along

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:304:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:309: and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation such as stop start 13.5.1.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:320:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:320:The following mitigation measure is proposed to reduce the potential for impacts on migratory fish from

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:320:With the implementation of the above mitigation measure, water quality will only be impacted on one side

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:320:Mitigation of the plume effects by reducing the size of the TSHD, and thus reducing the rate of overflow, is

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:321:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:325:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:327:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:329:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:329:for the proposed scheme, and there is no feasible mitigation measure that can prevent such losses.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required, although as a matter of course PDT will manage any conflicts through

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:331:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:331:No mitigation measures are required; however, in accordance with best practice, lighting would be directed

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:331:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:331:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:335:As detailed in the NRA, a number of embedded mitigation measures are already enforced by PDT which

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:335:(see Appendix 9). These embedded mitigation measures comprise:

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:As noted above, a number of embedded mitigation measures are already enforced by PDT which have been

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:Appendix 9). These embedded mitigation measures which are applicable to the operational phase

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:In addition to the above embedded mitigation measures, the following measures are proposed to be adopted

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:No additional mitigation measures are required beyond those detailed above (to be built into the proposed

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:338:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Effective/acceptable mitigation options may still be possible, to offset and / or reduce residual impacts to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Effective / acceptable mitigation options may still be possible, to offset and / or reduce residual impacts to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Industry standard mitigation measures may still apply.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:358:HER. With appropriate mitigation, the residual impact will be reduced to minor adverse and not significant

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:358:riverside pumping station will be recorded in advance of demolition in accordance with mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:376:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:380: • any significant air emissions, their mitigation and any residual

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:380: mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:380: after mitigation methods have been applied; and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:380: • measures to be employed in preventing or mitigating the mitigation measures.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:383:3) Determine site specific mitigation; and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:383:4) Examine the residual effects to determine whether or not additional mitigation is required.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:383:of impacts prior to mitigation. Once appropriate mitigation measures were identified, the significance of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:389:construction and trackout is used to recommend appropriate mitigation measures. The dust magnitude for

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391:Table 18.9 to determine the risk of impacts with no mitigation applied. The risks concluded for dust soiling

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391:Table 18.10 Summary of risk table to define site-specific mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:18.4.1.5 Step 3: Site-specific mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:Step three of the IAQM guidance (IAQM, 2016) identifies appropriate site-specific mitigation. These

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:without the implementation of mitigation measures. Additional guidance has been provided by the IAQM in

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:relation to dust and air mitigation measures. It is recommended that the good practice measures outlined

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:Highly recommended mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:A list of mitigation measures that are highly recommended for a high risk site by the IAQM, as determined

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:by Step 2 of the construction dust and particulate matter assessment, is provided below. The mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:mitigation measures listed in the guidance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:393: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:394:With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, the residual impacts from the construction phase

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:399:considerations. In such cases appropriate mitigation will be required. Landscapes designated at a national

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:414:19.5.1 Mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:414:Woodland, tree and shrub planting is a typical mitigation measure used to screen development and improve

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:424:to consider all sources of flooding, any mitigation measures required to ensure a safe development in a 1 in

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:433:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:433:comparable with the existing. No further mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:433:users is high magnitude. Therefore, without the implementation of mitigation measures the impact is of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:433:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:433:implementation of the following mitigation measures:

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:434:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:434:once operational. No further mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact with

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:434:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:434:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:435:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:435:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:436:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:436:No mitigation measures are required in regard to the impact of swell waves or locally generated waves. The

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:442:exist in the surrounding area; the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or offset any significant

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:442:significance. Opportunities for the mitigation of any adverse effects and the enhancement of positive effects

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:455:Mitigation and residual impacts

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:455:Mitigation and residual impacts

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:456:Mitigation measures and residual impacts

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:456:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:459:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:460: • contribute to the mitigation of GHG emissions and support sustainable development;

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:460: • transparent reporting of information on mitigation, adaptation and support which undergoes

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:461:GHG emissions by 34%, relative to a 1990 baseline by 2020 and by 80% in 2050 (“climate mitigation”). The

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:463: d. ensuring opportunities to contribute to the mitigation of flooding elsewhere are taken;

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:463:2.56 The NPPF states that planning should proactively help the mitigation of, and adaption to, climate

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:472:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:472:developed. However, potential mitigation measures to reduce GHG emissions from construction phase

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:472:Furthermore, some of the mitigation measures to minimise air pollutant emissions during construction, listed

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:473:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:contact. The assessment concludes that with the adoption of embedded mitigation (i.e. implementation of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: noise during very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: collision risk from Low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice. The residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: resource in whale very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:491:occurring, or where mitigation measures are still operating; and reasonably foreseeable future plans and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:500:assessment of the significance of such impacts and recommendation of appropriate mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:503:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:503:former project, mitigation comprises the use of specialist dredging equipment (i.e. an enclosed grab loading

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:at any location. Additionally, mitigation is outlined for all three schemes which would reduce plume extents

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:additional mitigation measures are identified to reduce any resulting sediment plume as far as possible and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:mitigation measures would be incorporated into the design of each and thus remove the potential for

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no cumulative residual impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:508:mitigation is adopted to reduce the risk of any such impact from occurring. However, there could be the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511:No mitigation measures are required to reduce the potential disturbance of marine mammals from

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511:lack of suitable habitat within its footprint. The mitigation outlined for the proposed scheme reduces the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511:subject to similar mitigation measures to minimise any potential effects, including reduced vessel speeds,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511:No additional mitigation is proposed and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:As a more sizable development, the landside EIA proposes a number of mitigation measures including off

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:No mitigation measures are required and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:footprint. The mitigation outlined for the proposed scheme reduces the potential impacts to otter to an

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:an adverse impact to otter, it is assumed they will be subject to similar mitigation measures to minimise any

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:No mitigation measures are required and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:In the absence of suitable mitigation, this could potentially result in an increased risk to subtidal foraging

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:within the Tees. However, the mitigation measure described for the proposed scheme in Section 12.5.2

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:have a minor impact at worst (with the mitigation measures in place). With mitigation measures in place for

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:the SIZ development immediately landward. However, with the mitigation measures outlined in Section

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:mitigation relating to the effect of the loss of intertidal mud specifically in relation to these species is not

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:the risk of such responses being exhibited. However, the mitigation measure described for the proposed

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:project, and other mitigation measures have been proposed for the Anglo American Harbour facilities

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:With mitigation measures in place for all schemes, the combined impact will be reduced as far as possible,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:515:No further mitigation measures are possible (or necessary). The residual cumulative impact would be minor

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:515:are anticipated to be relatively habituated to such noises, plus the mitigation measures in place will help to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:515:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:515:No further mitigation measures are possible (or necessary). The residual cumulative impact would be minor

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:515:There is a range of mitigation measures that are typically adopted during construction works to manage the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:No mitigation measures are required beyond those to be embedded into the proposed scheme and those

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:mitigation measures outlined above would be adopted during the operational phase of the proposed scheme

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:No mitigation measures are required beyond those to be embedded into the proposed scheme and those

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:517:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:517:No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:518:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:518:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:519:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:519:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:519:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:519:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:No mitigation measures. There would be a substantial beneficial residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:521:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:524: The generic mitigation measures deemed applicable to this waterbody Measures are included in the assessment alongside

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:524: bank, Preserve or restore habitats. guidance mitigation measures table for the Tees.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:524: Mention of various reports to inform mitigation to address WFD issues of these reports is being fed into the developing

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:526: Mitigation measures (taken from

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:526: Mitigation measures provided by the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:528:and jetties WFD mitigation measures identified for only. be disposed of on land

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:528:C2 Capital dredging hydromorphology and WFD mitigation are no higher sensitivity water quality due to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:528:blanket hydromorphology. WFD mitigation no higher sensitivity on the seabed however

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:528:quay effects in relation to WFD mitigation therefore there would be require piling on land.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:529: mitigation measures also scoped in. intertidal and subtidal

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:529:water mitigation measures identified for the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:530: • For C2 - Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures, biology (fish and habitats) and water

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:530: • For C4 – RBMP mitigation measures.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:530: • For C5 – Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures, Groundwater – chemical quality

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:530: • For O1 - Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures assessment.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:530:Table 28.6 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:530: RBMP mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:539:28.5.5 River Basin Management Plan mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:539:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:539:Table 28.8 Summary of mitigation measures and assessment (taken from Clearing the Waters for All,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:539: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:539: Dredging would be managed in line with mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:540: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:540:Table 28.9 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:540: RBMP mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:540:28.6.2 RBMP mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:540:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:540:Table 28.10 Summary of mitigation measures and assessment (taken from Clearing the Waters for All,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:540: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:540: mitigation measure.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:541: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:541: Retime dredging or disposal Riverbank excavation would not impact on these mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:541:Table 28.11 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542: Water body Quality elements mitigation Protected Areas

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542:28.7.2 RBMP mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542:Table 28.12 Summary of RBMP mitigation measures and assessment

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542: effect on this mitigation measure is not predicted.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542: these mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:Cefas Action Level 2 concentrations), additional mitigation measures would be implemented to reduce the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:proposed project both include mitigation measures to dredge in long strips to reduce the effects of sediment

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:549:would require site characterisation and remediation/ mitigation (such as piling risk assessments to be

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:549: • Surface waters: Hydromorphology (including the RBMP mitigation measures assessment)

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:549:Biodiversity Strategy. This will also support the implementation of the RBMP mitigation measures identified

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:549:suspended sediment thus reducing the risk of significant water quality effects. Mitigation measures to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:549:in potentially contaminated soils. Effective mitigation measures to ensure contamination is managed and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:550:projects would occur at the same time. Mitigation measures such as dredging in long strips as required for

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:550:A non-temporary deterioration in WFD quality elements was therefore not identified. Additionally, mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:550:is considered to be supportive of the implementation of the RBMP mitigation measures around ecological

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:551: projects. Where there are adverse impacts, an assessment of mitigation options is carried out to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:551: determine adverse effect on the integrity of the site. If these mitigation options cannot avoid adverse

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:552:reduce the harmful effects of the plan or project on that site”. As such, no such mitigation measures have

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:561: scheme subject to appropriate mitigation being

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:561: known as well as adoption of all mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:567: R/2016/0663/OOM for up to 550 residential units with associated granted October 2019 adoption of mitigation, including the provision of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:567: consented residential development, the mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:575:With the application of mitigation in the form of ensuring that the capital dredging transects run along the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:575:With mitigation in place, the predicted impacts on fish as a result of SSC increases are predicted to manifest

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:576:With mitigation in place, the predicted impacts on fish as a result of underwater noise is again predicted to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:577:e.g. pile driving). With the incorporation of the mitigation measures detailed in Section 12.5.4 (i.e.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:577:The Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit, developed by Cutts et al. (2013), provides noise level

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:578:with the implication of mitigation measures set out in Sections 12.5.4 and 12.6.3 (i.e. sympathetic placement

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:582:Without mitigation in place, the construction phase of the proposed scheme may result in redistribution of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:583:mitigation measures will be in place and noise levels within the SPA would be less than 50dB(A) (i.e. below

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:583:proposed scheme and lies outwith the 300m threshold stated within the Waterbird Disturbance & Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:584:It should be noted that the mitigation measures described for the proposed scheme in Section 12.5.2 (i.e.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:584:in the water column. With mitigation measures in place for all schemes, the combined impact will be reduced

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:588:Caltrans (2015). Technical Guidance for Assessment and Mitigation of the Hydroacoustic Effects of Pile

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:589:Cutts, N. Hemmingway, K. & Spencer, J. (2013). Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit Informing

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:589:Dean, M., Strachan, R., Gow, D. and Andrews, R. (2016). The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:589:Mammal Society Mitigation Guidance Series). Eds Fiona Mathews and Paul Chanin. The Mammal

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:590:English Nature (2001) Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:594:Natural England (2014) Otters: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:594:Natural England (2015) Badgers: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:594:Natural England (2015) Bats: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:595:Natural England (2015) Great crested newts: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:595:Natural England (2015). Invertebrates: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:595:Natural England, (2015). Reptiles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:595:Natural England, (2015). Water voles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:9:Without mitigation, the EIA Report concludes that the construction of the scheme would result in a

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:9:dredging campaign. The mitigation proposed within the EIA Report, which forms a condition on the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:9:implementing this mitigation, the EIA Report concludes an effect of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:9:Without mitigation, the original EIA Report concluded that direct loss of, and alteration to, habitat and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:9:unavoidable, mitigation measures have been embedded into the design of the quay, such as the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:10:well as aerial predators. The implementation of this mitigation is considered to reduce the overall effect of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:10: (with mitigation) Conclusion

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:14:receptors with regard to removing existing structures that obstruct the works. Mitigation measures have

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:14:habitat due to the demolition of existing structures and capital dredging activities. No mitigation is

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:no mitigation was considered necessary.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:15:Even without mitigation, the EIA Report concludes a negligible significance regarding the smothering of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1142-MLA.2020.00506.2 South Bank Quay MLV2 Appraisal of Environmental Effects.pdf:17: mitigation) Conclusion

MLA_2020_00506-Returns.pdf:5: alternative mitigation for consideration by the

MLA_2020_00506-Returns.pdf:5: provide alternative acceptable mitigation to that

MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:22:The application contains mitigation that cannot be considered at LSE stage, and so this will be discussed at appropriate assessment. This is specific relation

MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:23: Pressure Qualifying feature or species Adverse Effect Justification After mitigation, can you conclude no

MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:24: • Shoveler mitigation measure will result in North Tees Mudflat, are sufficiently distant

MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:25: Black-headed gull Mitigation measures include sympathetic

MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:25: Common tern, (Breeding) The applicant has proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-MLA202000506 and MLA202000507 Final HRA .pdf:29:This conclusion is dependent on mitigation measures being secured by the following conditions being secured in a marine licence:

MLA_2020_00506-Cefas RFI South Bank Phase 1 & 2-15.pdf:1:assessment and to determine whether additional mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00506-Decision Letter (Marine)-43.pdf:1:requiring mitigation or monitoring measures which can be found in section 5 of the

MLA_2020_00506-Decision Letter (Marine)-43.pdf:3:or refine any monitoring and mitigation. We would recommend that the following be

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:3:5.7 Avoidance or further mitigation 16

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:15:archaeological investigations required as mitigation in relation to the proposed activities covered by the

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:15:marine licences. The primary means of mitigation is the implementation of the PAD as set out in Section 6.

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:16:archaeological investigation and mitigation should these be required in the event of an unexpected discovery

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:17:and recording (e.g. diver/Remote Operated Vehicle (ROV) survey) and mitigation (e.g. Archaeological

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:18:activity for which mitigation is required and will also allow for an appropriate margin of error in the positioning

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:18:requirements for additional mitigation. The removal of a TEZ will occur only following consultation, and in

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:19:5.7 Avoidance or further mitigation

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:19:archaeological material then additional mitigation may be required. Such mitigation will be considered on a

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:19: carried out and appropriate mitigation agreed. TEZs may only be removed in consultation with Historic

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:19:In the event that additional mitigation is required, each package of archaeological work will be subject to a

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:20:a plan for further mitigation, such as the relocation of material and/or full excavation of a site. Any further

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:22:and as agreed by the relevant archaeological curators, mitigation requirements will be satisfied by carrying

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:26:All staff and contractors also have a responsibility to observe mitigation measures agreed by STDL with the

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:28:agreement with the archaeological curator, STDL may implement alternative forms of mitigation such as a

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:32: • Consult with stakeholders to agree appropriate mitigation measures

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:32: • Agreed mitigation measures implemented by STDL

PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1123 Written Scheme of Investigation.pdf:32: Mitigation

PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:2:regarding alternative mitigation to that required in Conditions 5.2.8 and linked Condition 5.2.9 around the

PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:2:This monitoring plan aims to present alternative mitigation for consideration by the MMO to allow both

PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:2:to provide alternative acceptable mitigation to that stipulated in Condition 5.2.8 and replace that required

PC1084-RHD-SB-XX-NT-Z-0001-South Bank SSC monitoring plan V3.pdf:4:With specific reference to fish, it was considered that the proposed mitigation measures for each project

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:8:compromise the mitigation measures in place for the water body.

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:No mitigation measures are required.

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:Mitigation measures are detailed in the EIA Report. No significant environmental

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:Mitigation measures are detailed in the EIA Report.

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:17:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:19:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:19:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:19:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:19:Mitigation measures are detailed in the supporting EIA Report.

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:19:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:Mitigation measures are outlined in the EIA Report.

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:24:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:24:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:24:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:24:Mitigation measures are outlined in the EIA Report.

MLA_2020_00506-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:25:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:11:Where potential adverse impacts have been identified, mitigation measures have been recommended to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:and minor adverse significance to human health. This is on the basis that the embedded mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:to the works outlined in the remediation strategy. With implementation of mitigation measures, the residual

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:14:control of spread of non-native plant material. Following the mitigation outlined above, a worst-case impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:15:piling works. Following the implementation of mitigation measures, including shrouding on the piling rigs,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:15:Tees will fall below significant sensitivity thresholds. With mitigation in place, disturbance impacts are

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:15:works, notably if creating barrier effects that may deter migratory patterns. However, with mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:15:mitigation measures such as creation of new complex habitat within the proposed quay walls via proposed

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:17:no mitigation is proposed prior to the removal of these elements.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:18:construction phase noise levels at the South Tees Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:18:Mitigation and control measures are recommended to minimise the effects of dust and plant emissions

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:19:the construction period. No mitigation measures during the construction phase are required.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:19:assessed as being permanent and negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:body to meet its objectives in the future or compromise the mitigation measures in place for the water body.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:54: • Mitigation.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:56: Cleveland Coast SPA, Ramsar site and SSSI, and should identify mitigation measures as required. This should include impacts on tern prey, intertidal

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:56: Wild Birds Directive activities, particularly during winter months and consideration should be given to suitable mitigation. The river channel is also important for foraging

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:57: developed a Tees Estuary Habitat Vision that aims to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:the significance of heritage assets is appropriately assessed and that mitigation recommendations are both

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:76:to the significance of heritage assets is appropriately assessed and that mitigation recommendations

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:252:cause harm to human health or the environment if mitigation measures are not implemented during the re-

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:286: • During construction works appropriate mitigation measures should be put in place to ensure no

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:125:with noise mitigation values. Supported by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:126:8 Caltrans (2015). Technical guidance for assessment and mitigation of the hydroacoustics effects of pile driving

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:133:PD Teesport has effectively implemented a suite of embedded mitigation measures ensuring that the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:133:risk profile remains at acceptable levels. Compliance with embedded mitigation and regulations

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:134:Possible additional mitigation measures were identified to further reduce risk which are outlined

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:135:5 Embedded Mitigation ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 32

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:135: Construction Phase – Baseline With Embedded Mitigation …………………………………….. 36

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:135: Operation Phase - Baseline With Embedded Mitigation………………………………………….. 38

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:137:Table 12: Embedded Mitigation Measures ………………………………………………………………………………. 32

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:137: Construction Phase Risk Assessment Hazard Log – Baseline with Embedded Mitigation C-

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:137: Operation Phase Risk Assessment Hazard Log – Baseline with Embedded Mitigation . D-1

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:137:Mitigation ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. E-1

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:137:Mitigation ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. F-1

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:170:5 EMBEDDED MITIGATION

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:170:Embedded mitigation measures describe those measures to which adherence is required by regulation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:170:/ are already enforced by the local SHA. Embedded mitigation measures are assumed to be in place

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:170:prior to assessment. Table 12 lists embedded mitigation measures considered within this NRA.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:170:Table 12: Embedded Mitigation Measures

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:173:re-assessed applying proposed possible additional mitigation measures (Section 8.4) to assess the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:174: CONSTRUCTION PHASE – BASELINE WITH EMBEDDED MITIGATION

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:176: OPERATION PHASE - BASELINE WITH EMBEDDED MITIGATION

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:180:Table 17 provides a description of each of the proposed mitigation measures. The individual hazards

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:180:control measures and procedures by PD Ports), the recommended additional mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:185:mitigation measures ensuring that the risk profile remains at acceptable levels.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:185:contained assuming compliance with embedded mitigation and regulations covering movements,

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:185:The possible additional mitigation measures identified are largely to protect third party property, for

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:192: 8 - 10 High Risk A level requiring immediate mitigation.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:205: • Existing mitigation measures enacted by the Tees Port should be

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:205: • Marico – Mitigation will be proposed during the assessment – lighting at

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:206: Baseline with Embedded Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:222: – Baseline with Embedded Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:238: Residual with Possible Additional Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:254: Residual with Possible Additional Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:293:dust impacts before the implementation of mitigation measures. The assigned risk categories may be

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:296:activity (demolition, earthworks, construction and trackout) before mitigation is applied should be determined

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:297:Step 3: Site-Specific Mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:297:Step three of the IAQM guidance identifies appropriate site-specific mitigation. These measures are related

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:297:With the implementation of the relevant mitigation measures, the residual impacts from the construction are

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:346:7.1 Design mitigation 27

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:348: • inform potential mitigation options related to resistance and resilience measures.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:362:all sources of flooding, any mitigation measures required to ensure a safe development in a 1 in 200 year

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:374:with modelled water levels. Residual risk may remain after flood management or mitigation measures have

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:374:with appropriate mitigation measures also discussed.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:374:7.1 Design mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:384:use as your activity hydromorphological parameters of the estuary or stop the mitigation measures identified for

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:397:use as your activity below) would not impact on the mitigation measures identified for this water body.

MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:1:judgement on the significance of impacts to designated sites and the scope for mitigation.

MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:2:site above in order to determine the significance of these for the SSSI and the scope for mitigation.

MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:7: of impacts to designated sites and to determine mitigation measures.

MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:9: the main over-wintering period (see ‘Mitigation measures’ comment below).

MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:10:Mitigation measures We note that the HRA states that the following mitigation measure will be

MLA_2020_00506-NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21 (1)-12.pdf:10: wintering waterbirds, it is not clear whether this mitigation measure has

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:17:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:17:release of sediment as the material is dredged. No further mitigation measures are required. The residual

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:24:and mitigation proposed in relation to INNS within the EIA Report remain valid and no update to the

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are considered necessary. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:29:In terms of mitigation, the footprint of the dredge will be kept to what is absolutely necessary, in order to

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:29:minimise the scale of the impact where possible. No further mitigation is considered necessary or feasible.

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:46:assessed within the EIA Report (Royal HaskoningDHV, 2020). As such, the assessment and mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:47:of the previously reported impact assessment. The only additional mitigation measure required following

MLA_2020_00506-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1115_South Bank Quay supplementary report-31.pdf:48:Cutts, N., Hemmingway, K. and Spencer, J. (2013). Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit Informing

MLA_2020_00506-MMO VARIATION OBJECTION_S_Rennie.pdf:4: Point 4- Objection- The Comment, nor mitigation

MLA_2020_00506-MMO VARIATION OBJECTION_S_Rennie.pdf:5:Point 10- Objection- There are not ANY MITIGATION

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:4: mitigation and compensation. It will also, therefore, be submitted periodically to RCBC in order

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:10: confirm the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat for resulting

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:10: • details of any mitigation and compensation proposed including long term maintenance

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:10: • implementation of the identified mitigation and compensation within a specified period in

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 173.58

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 363.55 area based

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: • The details of viable compensation habitat where on-site mitigation is demonstrated not to be

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible, compensation

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: level of habitat mitigation that can be provided within any landscape areas to be created within

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: the final development plots. The Strategy recognises that an objective of habitat mitigation /

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: compensation is to provide in the first instance and as a priority, mitigation within the

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:13: deliver habitat mitigation and biodiversity enhancements within the development plots. The

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:16:5.3 The INCA Feasibility Report assesses in detail the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:17:5.11 In line with the mitigation hierarchy, this Strategy prioritises the delivery of onsite

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:20: be met by on-site mitigation.

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:20: landowners such that works to implement the mitigation schemes commence by end of

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:28: • 5.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 7

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:28: • 6.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 8

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:29:of this stage of the Biodiversity Strategy is to demonstrate the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:29: • To investigate the opportunities for mitigation, i.e. the potential to retain and/or improve

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:32:Therefore mitigation or compensatory measures on this basis would be required for a total of 24

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:32:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:33:5.1 On- site mitigation and compensatory measures

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:33:On-site mitigation and compensatory measures that have been considered are on areas which are

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:34:6.1 On-site mitigation and compensation measures

R-2021-0830-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:39:However, much of the ex-situ mitigation to achieve the requisite number of BDUs is likely to be in

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Covering Letter - 29.09.21.pdf:2:• The details of compensatory habitat where onsite mitigation is demonstrated to not be feasible,

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Covering Letter - 29.09.21.pdf:2:The Strategy shall be approved by the Local Planning Authority. The identified mitigation and, where

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:4: mitigation and compensation. It will also, therefore, be submitted periodically to RCBC in order

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:10: confirm the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat for resulting

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:10: • details of any mitigation and compensation proposed including long term maintenance

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:10: • implementation of the identified mitigation and compensation within a specified period in

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 173.58

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 363.55 area based

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: • The details of viable compensation habitat where on-site mitigation is demonstrated not to be

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible, compensation

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: level of habitat mitigation that can be provided within any landscape areas to be created within

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: the final development plots. The Strategy recognises that an objective of habitat mitigation /

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: compensation is to provide in the first instance and as a priority, mitigation within the

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:13: deliver habitat mitigation and biodiversity enhancements within the development plots. The

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:16:5.3 The INCA Feasibility Report assesses in detail the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:17:5.11 In line with the mitigation hierarchy, this Strategy prioritises the delivery of onsite

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:20: be met by on-site mitigation.

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:20: landowners such that works to implement the mitigation schemes commence by end of

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:28: • 5.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 7

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:28: • 6.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 8

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:29:of this stage of the Biodiversity Strategy is to demonstrate the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:29: • To investigate the opportunities for mitigation, i.e. the potential to retain and/or improve

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:32:Therefore mitigation or compensatory measures on this basis would be required for a total of 24

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:32:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:33:5.1 On- site mitigation and compensatory measures

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:33:On-site mitigation and compensatory measures that have been considered are on areas which are

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:34:6.1 On-site mitigation and compensation measures

R-2021-0830-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:39:However, much of the ex-situ mitigation to achieve the requisite number of BDUs is likely to be in

R-2021-0830-CD-DECISION NOTICE 0684.pdf:4: - The details of compensatory habitat where onsite mitigation is

R-2021-0830-CD-DECISION NOTICE 0684.pdf:4: identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible,

R-2021-0830-CD-DECISION NOTICE 0684.pdf:5: mitigation measures identified as part of the assessment shall be

R-2021-0830-CD-DECISION NOTICE 0684.pdf:6: the proposed mitigation measures that no significant long term adverse impacts

R-2021-0830-CD-370819 393380 393440 R_2021_0830_CD R_2021_0831_CD R_2021_0832_CD - Discharge of conditoins relating to Environment and Biodiversity Strategy Teesworks Redcar_.pdf:1:identify off-site mitigation and biodiversity net gain opportunities, which is commendable.

R-2021-0830-CD-370819 393380 393440 R_2021_0830_CD R_2021_0831_CD R_2021_0832_CD - Discharge of conditoins relating to Environment and Biodiversity Strategy Teesworks Redcar_.pdf:2:habitats in their own right, where like for like mitigation is required.

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:5: mitigation and compensation. It will also, therefore, be submitted periodically to RCBC in order

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:11: confirm the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat for resulting

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:11: • details of any mitigation and compensation proposed including long term maintenance

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:11: • implementation of the identified mitigation and compensation within a specified period in

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 173.58

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 363.55 area based

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: • The details of viable compensation habitat where on-site mitigation is demonstrated not to

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible, compensation

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: level of habitat mitigation that can be provided within any landscape areas to be created within

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: the final development plots. The Strategy recognises that an objective of habitat mitigation /

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: compensation is to provide in the first instance and as a priority, mitigation within the

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:15: deliver habitat mitigation and biodiversity enhancements within the development plots. The

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:15: practical mitigation is taken to achieve good ecological potential. Whilst this Strategy takes

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:18:5.3 The INCA Feasibility Report assesses in detail the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:19:5.12 In line with the mitigation hierarchy, this Strategy prioritises the delivery of onsite

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:22: be met by on-site mitigation.

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:22: with those landowners such that works to implement the mitigation schemes commence by

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:34: • 5.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 7

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:34: • 6.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 8

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:35:of this stage of the Biodiversity Strategy is to demonstrate the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:35: • To investigate the opportunities for mitigation, i.e. the potential to retain and/or improve

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:38:Therefore mitigation or compensatory measures on this basis would be required for a total of 24

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:38:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:39:5.1 On- site mitigation and compensatory measures

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:39:On-site mitigation and compensatory measures that have been considered are on areas which are

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:40:6.1 On-site mitigation and compensation measures

R-2021-0830-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:45:However, much of the ex-situ mitigation to achieve the requisite number of BDUs is likely to be in

R-2022-0816-FFM-Teesworks Arboricortural Constraints Survey and Tree Protection Plan.pdf:20: • Damage mitigation measures appropriate to the scale of the incident will be deployed where

R-2022-0816-FFM-PN 0816.pdf:1: mitigation strategy for the construction phase of the development shall be

R-2022-0816-FFM-TSWX-JBAC-SWD-XX-RP-CE-0001-S1-P03-Steel_House_Park_&_Ride_FRA (2).pdf:6: considers potential flood risk mitigation where necessary and provides recommendations on

R-2022-0816-FFM-TSWX-JBAC-SWD-XX-RP-CE-0001-S1-P03-Steel_House_Park_&_Ride_FRA (2).pdf:19: Permeable paving provides pollution mitigation indices of 0.7 for Suspended Solids, 0.6 for

R-2022-0816-FFM-20220909 Steel House PandR TA Issue.pdf:5:Having presented the results of the assessment, it was identified that highway mitigation would be required

R-2022-0816-FFM-Steel House PandR Cover Letter(1).pdf:5:that, taking into account mitigation, the proposal would not result in an adverse effect on the SPA’s

R-2022-0816-FFM-Steel House PandR Cover Letter(1).pdf:5:reasonable alternatives are available, and mitigation, or where necessary compensation, is provided for

R-2022-0816-FFM-Steel House PandR Cover Letter(1).pdf:6:Coatham Marsh LWS and other designated sites. Subject to mitigation being secured planning

R-2022-0816-FFM-Steel House PandR Cover Letter(1).pdf:9:Assessment at the design stage that, taking into account mitigation, the proposal would not result in

R-2022-0816-FFM-220831_ HRA for Steel House Park and Ride_INCA_RevA (002).pdf:5:impacts are anticipated, potential mitigation measures to alleviate impacts should be proposed and

R-2022-0816-FFM-220831_ HRA for Steel House Park and Ride_INCA_RevA (002).pdf:10: Potential LSE Mitigation Outcome

R-2022-0816-FFM-220831_ HRA for Steel House Park and Ride_INCA_RevA (002).pdf:10: This mitigation measure will be detailed in a

R-2022-0816-FFM-220831_ HRA for Steel House Park and Ride_INCA_RevA (002).pdf:10: planning condition. The mitigation measure will be

R-2022-0816-FFM-220831_ HRA for Steel House Park and Ride_INCA_RevA (002).pdf:10: worded planning condition. The mitigation implemented

R-2022-0816-FFM-220831_ HRA for Steel House Park and Ride_INCA_RevA (002).pdf:10:7.2 So long as the prescribed mitigation measures are implemented there will be no AEOI from this

R-2022-0816-FFM-220831_ HRA for Steel House Park and Ride_INCA_RevA (002).pdf:10:where possible enhance the environment. This is in accordance with protective mitigation measures

R-2022-0816-FFM-220831_ HRA for Steel House Park and Ride_INCA_RevA (002).pdf:11:Ramsar Sites, either alone or in combination with other plans or projects, provided the mitigation

R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:3:embedded mitigation and other mitigation measures, to determine residual effects. It proposes

R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:3: • Assessing the significance of any residual effects after mitigation;

R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:15:projects, provided that mitigation measures are delivered’. The mitigation measures are for a

R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:17:Valued Ecological Receptor Section giving mitigation measure

R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:17:follow wildlife legislation and planning guidance are recommended, based on the planning mitigation

R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:17:hierarchy of avoidance, mitigation and compensation. These measures should be conditioned in the

R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:17:Mitigation

R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:17:9.3 Two mitigation measures are a requirement of the HRA (for the SPA and Ramsar sites) to ensure

R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:17: • Mitigation to prevent pollution entering the watercourse

R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:17: • Mitigation to control construction related dust

R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:17:9.6 Compensation refers to the process by which any residual effects (after avoidance and mitigation

R-2022-0816-FFM-INCA2022-42 EcIA Steel House Park and Ride.pdf:18:9.12 With the mitigation and compensation measures conditioned, there will be no residual effects.

R-2022-0515-CD-L05858-CLK-XX-XX-RP-GT-0005 P01.pdf:5: the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise agreed in writing.

R-2022-0515-CD-L05858-CLK-XX-XX-RP-GT-0005 P01.pdf:5: writing by the Local Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2022-0515-CD-L05858-CLK-XX-XX-RP-GT-0005 P01.pdf:6: mitigation will be complied with thereafter, unless otherwise agreed in writing.

R-2022-0515-CD-L05858-CLK-XX-XX-RP-GT-0005 P01.pdf:10: • Any notable variations and associated mitigation from the outline remediation

R-2022-0515-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2022-0515-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2022-0515-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2022-0515-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2022-0515-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2022-0515-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2022-0515-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2022-0515-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2022-0515-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2022-0515-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2021-0754-FFM-Officer Report 0754.pdf:3:Some of the mitigation relies on Travel Planning which will come in the future.

R-2021-0754-FFM-Officer Report 0754.pdf:9:reference also made within ED6. Given the wider habitat mitigation that will

R-2021-0754-FFM-Officer Report 0754.pdf:11: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2021-0754-FFM-Decision Notice 0754.pdf:2: mitigation measures required;

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:2: Embedded Mitigation 12

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:2:C6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 19

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:4: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:8: • Proposal of any mitigation measures to offset any likely significant impacts in relation to the

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:8: • Assessment of any residual impacts accounting for the implementation of mitigation.

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:9: after mitigation has been taken into account.

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:15: Embedded Mitigation

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:22:C6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:22: process and will identify any necessary mitigation to minimise the impact of construction traffic

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:22: on the transport networks. No mitigation measures over and above the requirement for a CTMP

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:23: junctions. In mitigation, it is expected that the requirement of the proposed development to

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:24: Receptor Potential effect Mitigation Residual

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:24: transport strategy to assess if additional mitigation

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:25: Receptor Potential effect Mitigation Residual

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:26: Receptor Potential effect Mitigation Measure Residual Effect

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:27: Receptor Potential effect Mitigation Measure Residual Effect

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:27: to assess if additional mitigation is

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:27: Trunk Road effect on driver a Servicing Management Plan, mitigation measures

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:27: effect on a Servicing Management Plan, mitigation measures

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:28: Receptor Potential effect Mitigation Measure Residual Effect

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:28: Road/A1053 effect on a Servicing Management Plan, mitigation measures

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:28: Road signalised effect on accidents introduced to reduce development mitigation measures

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Environmental Statement July 2020 Volume 2 Chapter C Transport.pdf:28: development, will consider if any additional mitigation at these locations is required once other

R-2021-0754-FFM-371465 Natural England Response Letter REF R.2021.0754.FF Land East of Dockside Road, South Bank.pdf:4:NPPF (paragraphs 8, 73, 104, 120,174, 175 and 180). We advise you to follow the mitigation hierarchy

R-2021-0754-FFM-371465 Natural England Response Letter REF R.2021.0754.FF Land East of Dockside Road, South Bank.pdf:5:information including contact details for the National Trail Officer. Appropriate mitigation measures

R-2021-0754-FFM-highways.pdf:1:Some of the mitigation relies on Travel Planning which will come in the future. They acknowledge that they expect

R-2021-0754-FFM-Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy.pdf:10: summary table of the existing flood risk and the mitigation required is provided below.

R-2021-0754-FFM-Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy.pdf:10: Flood Risk Current Mitigation Requirement Risk Level

R-2021-0754-FFM-Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy.pdf:10: Level Mitigation

R-2021-0754-FFM-Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy.pdf:10: Tidal and Fluvial LOW Development is located in Flood Zone 1. No mitigation required. LOW

R-2021-0754-FFM-Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy.pdf:10: Overland Flow LOW The site is unaffected by overland. No mitigation required. LOW

R-2021-0754-FFM-Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy.pdf:10: Groundwater LOW The proposed site is not at risk from groundwater. No mitigation LOW

R-2021-0754-FFM-Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage Strategy.pdf:10: Sewer Flooding LOW The proposed site is not at risk from sewer flooding. No mitigation LOW

R-2021-0754-FFM-South Industrial Zone Supplementary Environmental Statement September 2020 Volume 3 Technical Appendices Section 3 Transport.PDF:5:mitigation and if car mode share follows the trend recorded by the last Census

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:1: residual impact assessment has been carried out on the assumption that the above mitigation

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:1: secondary mitigation, this secondary mitigation will change the effect of the development over

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:1: and above that assessed in the embedded mitigation section.

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:1: light of the application of the appropriate mitigation following the mitigation hierarchy and the

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:1: change which may be expected from the beneficial mitigation measures undertaken means that

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:1:G7.4 The water management strategy shall seek to incorporate mitigation measures to limit risk of

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:1: mitigation will not change the effect of the development over and above that assessed in the

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:1: section above which includes consideration of the embedded mitigation.

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:2:G7.9 Surface water - flows: - there would be a minor magnitude of change from the mitigation

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:2: of the mitigation measures and so a substantial beneficial effect for the Tees and negligible

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:2: mitigation will not change the effect of the development over and above that assessed in the

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:2: section above which includes consideration of the embedded mitigation.

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 7 Residual effects.pdf:2: implementation of the mitigation measures and result in minor beneficial effect

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 2 Policy Context(2).pdf:1: Practice Guidance design and mitigation. For example, flood risk can be reduced and biodiversity and

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 2 Policy Context(2).pdf:1: Good design and mitigation measures can be secured through site specific policies

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 2 Policy Context(2).pdf:1: mitigation and compensatory measures where the relevant tests are met. Planning

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 2 Policy Context.pdf:1: Practice Guidance design and mitigation. For example, flood risk can be reduced and biodiversity and

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 2 Policy Context.pdf:1: Good design and mitigation measures can be secured through site specific policies

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 2 Policy Context.pdf:1: mitigation and compensatory measures where the relevant tests are met. Planning

Environmental Statement, Chapter H Ground Conditions and Remediation Section 6 Mitigation.pdf:1:H6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

Environmental Statement, Chapter H Ground Conditions and Remediation Section 6 Mitigation.pdf:1: mitigation (see below) and is therefore not embedded into the design of the scheme.

Environmental Statement, Chapter H Ground Conditions and Remediation Section 6 Mitigation.pdf:3: for further mitigation.

Environmental Statement, Chapter H Ground Conditions and Remediation Section 6 Mitigation.pdf:4:H6.10 The mitigation measures would aim at ensuring the surface water run-off from the site during

Environmental Statement, Chapter H Ground Conditions and Remediation Section 6 Mitigation.pdf:5:H6.21 Site buildings will be designed with adequate ground gas mitigation measures to prevent the

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 6 mitigation.pdf:1:G6.1 The mitigation for impacts to surface water and groundwater impacts will be provided through

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 6 mitigation.pdf:1: secondary mitigation (i.e. that in addition to the embedded mitigation) from adoption of the

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 6 mitigation.pdf:1: mitigation measures detailed in Chapter H (Ground Conditions and Remediation). The STDC

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 6 mitigation.pdf:1: for the design of water management and drainage assets and supply appropriate mitigation for

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 6 mitigation.pdf:2: and supply appropriate mitigation for the adverse impacts.The below table sets out the proposed

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 6 mitigation.pdf:2: mitigation and monitoring measures for the construction and operational phase of

Environmental Statement, Chapter G Water Management and Flooding Section 6 mitigation.pdf:2:Receptor Potential Impact Design Mitigation - Construction Design Mitigation - Operation

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:5:costly mitigation or compensation measures.

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:7: TEES water body Mitigation Measures 38

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:9:Table 6-1: Impacts and mitigation measures 34

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:9:Table 6-2: Assessment of proposed works against the water body’s mitigation

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:9:Table 6-4: Impacts and mitigation measures 41

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:9:Table 6-6: Impacts and mitigation measures 47

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:12: Specific mitigation measures have been identified for each Artificial and Heavily

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:12: Modified Water body and are listed in the RBMP. These mitigation measures are

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:12: reduce the need for costly mitigation or compensation measures.

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:12: Objectives, together with the specific actions (mitigation measures) necessary to

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:15: necessary mitigation measures. An impact assessment must be carried out for each

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:23: and space for water. These are impacting angiosperms, mitigation

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:23: navigation, ports and harbours. These are impacting the mitigation

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:40: conditions if not completed with sufficient mitigation such

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:42: without mitigation could have a negative

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: upon suitable mitigation measures, a good understanding of the proposed scheme

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: scoping assessment. Mitigation measures are recommended to mitigate the effects

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: of the proposed works. It should be noted that these mitigation measures differ to

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: the Mitigation Measures identified for any Heavily Modified water body.

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: Table 6-1: Impacts and mitigation measures

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: Mitigation measures: During construction works, fish

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:44: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:44: Mitigation measures: standard industry practices such

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:44: Mitigation measures: standard industry practices such

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:45: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:45: Mitigation measures: standard industry practices such

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:46: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:46: for mitigation recommendations.

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:46: Mitigation measures: High level recommendations are to

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:46: Mitigation measures: Any activity where pollution, spills,

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:47: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:47: Mitigation measures: Any activity where pollution, spills,

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:47: Mitigation measures: Any activity where pollution, spills,

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:47: TEES water body Mitigation Measures

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:47: There is one mitigation measure contributing to better ecological potential for the

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:47: The ability of the proposed works to deliver this mitigation measure, or the risk that

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:48:mitigation measure

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:48: Mitigation Measure Current Assessment of proposed works/ Recommended

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:48: provide mitigation without impacting on the use of the

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:48: Following consideration of the potential impacts and recommended mitigation

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:48: measures, as well as the appraised Mitigation Measure for the water body, Table 6-3

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:48: water body to achieve its WFD prevent Good Ecological Potential. Mitigation exists to

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:49: scoping assessment. Mitigation measures are recommended to mitigate the effects

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:50:Table 6-4: Impacts and mitigation measures

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:50: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:51: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:52: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:52: Mitigation: By increasing the bank roughness with riparian

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:53: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:53: Mitigation measures: During construction works, fish

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:53: Mitigation measures: standard industry practices such

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:54: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:54: Mitigation measures: standard industry practices such

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:55: Following consideration of the potential impacts and recommended mitigation

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:55: ∙ use the mitigation identified in this assessment and

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:56: scoping assessment. Mitigation measures are recommended to mitigate the effects

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:56: Table 6-6: Impacts and mitigation measures

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:56: WFD Quality Pathway (direct Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:56: Mitigation measures: standard industry practices

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:58: revised to ensure the mitigation measures and recommendations outlined in this

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:58: into the assessment. Any mitigation measures that need to be considered to make

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:58: Appropriate mitigation measures shall be implemented to ensure that habitats within

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:58: construction phase. Mitigation should include:

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:59: highly recommended that mitigation identified in this high level WFD report and to

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:59: sufficient mitigation such as ensuring enough space for water and other geomorphic

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:60: methods of mitigation and that the outfalls or any headwalls are to be designed and

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:61: The recommendations and mitigation measures highlighted in this report as well as

CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:61: to seek further mitigation in designs (such as ensuring enough space for water and

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:7: mitigation or avoidance measures can be applied.

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:9: Assessment the integrity of a European site, potential avoidance/mitigation

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:9: alternatives If suitable avoidance/mitigation or alternative options are identified,

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:9: remain If no suitable avoidance/mitigation or alternative options are identified,

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:21: with other plans or projects, provided that the mitigation measures specified in the

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:21: mitigation negating any effects on the European site there is determined to be no likely

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:22: comprehensive Construction Phase Environmental Management Plan. Due to mitigation

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:22: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA following the implementation of mitigation. Due to

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:22: mitigation negating any effects on the European site there is determined to be no likely

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:22: Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA following the implementation of mitigation. Due to

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:22: mitigation negating any effects on the European site there is determined to be no likely

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:22: A HRA was drafted and with mitigation there was no likely significant effects of pollution to

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:22: development site. Due to mitigation negating any effects on the European site there is

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:22: mitigation measures, and the conservation objectives for the European sites, the following

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:22: Further details on mitigation methods including methodologies and sources can be found in

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:23:Interest Hazard Scale and seriousness of potential Proposed mitigation and Residual In

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:23: be lasting impacts as a result of mitigation will be effective.

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:24:Interest Hazard Scale and seriousness of potential Proposed mitigation and Residual In

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:25:Interest Hazard Scale and seriousness of potential Proposed mitigation and Residual In

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:26:Interest Hazard Scale and seriousness of potential Proposed mitigation and Residual In

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:27: other plans or projects, providing the mitigation measures detailed in Table 7-2 are

TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-SB-00-RP-EN-0011-S4-P01-HRA.pdf:29:Cutts, N., Hemingway, K. & Spencer, J. (2013) Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit

MLA_2022_00248-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2022_00248-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2022_00248-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2022_00248-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:The following outlines the main environmental mitigation measures which will be

MLA_2022_00248-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:14:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2022_00248-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:14:mobilisation following the reprofiling works and mitigation measures. However, the

MLA_2022_00248-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:15:The site is not located within an Air Quality Management Area (‘AQMA’). Mitigation

MLA_2022_00248-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:21:projects, providing the mitigation measures detailed within the HRA are adhered to.

MLA_2022_00248-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:21:projects, providing the mitigation measures detailed within the HRA are adhered to. The

MLA_2022_00248-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:23:Management and Flooding Section 6 mitigation for further information.

R-2021-0422-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.PDF:16:mitigation and management strategy.

R-2021-0422-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.PDF:16: • Compensation is required to offset residual losses after the mitigation through the

R-2021-0422-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.PDF:21: Development of a UXO mitigation strategy.

R-2021-0422-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.PDF:25:assessment indicates a Medium risk from UXO for borehole and excavation activities. Further mitigation

R-2021-0422-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.PDF:25:activities such as detailed risk assessment or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the

R-2021-0422-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.PDF:34:of the HRA, any control and mitigation measures identified within it shall be adopted in relations to the

R-2021-0422-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.PDF:35:stream) in order to confirm the assessment of the waste impact and to implement embedded mitigation

R-2021-0422-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.PDF:35:  Any ecological mitigations required

R-2021-0422-CD-Compliance Decision Notice 0422.pdf:2: approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise agreed in

R-2021-0422-CD-Decision Notice (1).pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2021-0422-CD-Decision Notice (1).pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2021-0422-CD-Decision Notice (1).pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2021-0422-CD-Decision Notice (1).pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2021-0422-CD-Decision Notice (1).pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2021-0422-CD-Decision Notice (1).pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2021-0422-CD-Decision Notice (1).pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2021-0422-CD-Decision Notice (1).pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2021-0422-CD-Decision Notice (1).pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2021-0422-CD-Decision Notice (1).pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2021-0422-CD-61586_01 - RCBC - DoC Cover Letter - 19.05.21.PDF:1: details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise agreed in writing.

R-2021-0422-CD-Officer Report 0422.pdf:1:mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise agreed in writing.

R-2021-0610-PND-Officer Report 0610.pdf:2:mitigation measures that the proposed demolition works would not result in

R-2021-0610-PND-SBCO Site - Planning Stage MS - Rev 01 - 15.07.21.pdf:6:• Determine the mitigation measures required to maintain integrity of the remaining SBCO assets to prevent any incidents or accidents in advance of

R-2022-0049-CD-Decision Notice 2020 0318.pdf:2: works across the site and shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set

R-2022-0049-CD-Decision Notice 2020 0318.pdf:2: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2019-0629-CD-Discon (10) cover letter.pdf:1:201920) as supporting or potentially supporting reptiles, a reptile mitigation strategy should be prepared,

R-2019-0629-CD-Discon (10) cover letter.pdf:1:• Reptile Mitigation Strategy (Report ID: INCA 201931), October 2019, prepared by INCA

R-2019-0629-CD-ApplicationFormRedacted.pdf:3:Reptile Mitigation Strategy - October 2019, INCA

R-2019-0629-CD-NHM.pdf:1:I would support and agree with the proposed reptile mitigation strategy for the site, providing that timings are not

R-2019-0629-CD-201931 Reptile Mitigation Strategy Rev A.pdf:1:Reptile mitigation strategy

R-2019-0629-CD-201931 Reptile Mitigation Strategy Rev A.pdf:2:201920) as supporting or potentially supporting reptiles, a reptile mitigation strategy should be

R-2019-0629-CD-201931 Reptile Mitigation Strategy Rev A.pdf:2:mitigation, is therefore potential harm to a small number of a widespread reptile species.

R-2019-0629-CD-201931 Reptile Mitigation Strategy Rev A.pdf:5:population and to inform mitigation.

R-2019-0629-CD-201931 Reptile Mitigation Strategy Rev A.pdf:6:6. Mitigation options

R-2019-0629-CD-Compliance Decision Notice_R20190629CD.pdf:2: reptiles, a reptile mitigation strategy should be prepared, submitted to and

R-2022-0342-CD-COMPLIANCE DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2022-0342-CD-COMPLIANCE DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2022-0342-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2022-0342-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2022-0342-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2022-0342-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2022-0342-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2022-0342-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2022-0342-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2022-0342-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2022-0342-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2022-0342-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2022-0342-CD-COMPLIANCE OFFICER REPORT.pdf:1:mitigation measures identified as part of the assessment shall be implemented

R-2022-0342-CD-COMPLIANCE OFFICER REPORT.pdf:2:protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter, unless

R-2022-0342-CD-L05858-CLK-XX-XX-RP-GT-0002 Pile Risk Assessment .pdf:4: submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Any mitigation

R-2022-0342-CD-L05858-CLK-XX-XX-RP-GT-0002 Pile Risk Assessment .pdf:12:actions, or further mitigation measures, are considered necessary.

R-2022-0342-CD-61586 Conditions 21 and 25 Covering Letter 07-04-22(1).pdf:1:Local Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the assessment shall be

R-2022-0342-CD-61586 Conditions 21 and 25 Covering Letter 07-04-22(1).pdf:2:will not be altered by the process of piling. No remedial actions, or further mitigation measures, are

R-2022-0342-CD-61586 Conditions 21 and 25 Covering Letter 07-04-22(1).pdf:2:prior to the occupation of each building on site. Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:8: carried out in the absence of any mitigation measures that form part of that

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:8: means that mitigation measures must be excluded from assessing whether a

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:10: ERF will include embedded mitigation measures to reduce the risk of dust

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:10: and odour emissions. This mitigation includes only unloading waste within

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:11: Engineers Ltd, no additional mitigation measures have been embedded in

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:17: Waterbird Disturbances Mitigation Toolkit, which has been produced by the

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:17: Disturbances Mitigation Toolkit, which has been produced by the Institute of

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:22:5.24 Although the scheme includes embedded mitigation to contain dust and

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:22: SPA/Ramsar with or without the embedded mitigation.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:32: includes embedded mitigation to contain dust and odour during operation

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:32: with or without the embedded mitigation, due to distance between the ERF

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:43:8.2 The implementation of the CEMP is considered to be mitigation for the

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:44: be mitigation for the potential operational impacts on the Teesmouth and

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:53: safeguard surface water quality during construction. This is mitigation and

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:53: appropriate mitigation in place the proposals will not adversely affect the

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:65: Mitigation Toolkit Informing Estuarine Planning & Construction Projects

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Preliminary_Ecological_Appraisal.pdf:15: recommendations for mitigation where there is a perceived risk to habitats and/or species.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Preliminary_Ecological_Appraisal.pdf:17: Table 6.1 summarises the mitigation requirements for the proposed development, along with the

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_2of2.pdf:9:be significant. No mitigation was proposed.

R-2023-0246-RMM-428219 - R_2023_0246_RMM Reserved matters for R20190767OOM Construction of an energy recovery facility at Grangetown Prairie, Land East of John Boyle Road - Further Informat.pdf:1: impacts and the scope for mitigation. The following information is required:

R-2023-0246-RMM-428219 - R_2023_0246_RMM Reserved matters for R20190767OOM Construction of an energy recovery facility at Grangetown Prairie, Land East of John Boyle Road - Further Informat.pdf:3:Should the applicant wish to discuss the further information required and scope for mitigation with

R-2023-0246-RMM-428219 - R_2023_0246_RMM Reserved matters for R20190767OOM Construction of an energy recovery facility at Grangetown Prairie, Land East of John Boyle Road - Further Informat.pdf:5:NPPF (paragraphs 8, 73, 104, 120,174, 175 and 180). We advise you to follow the mitigation hierarchy

R-2023-0246-RMM-428219 - R_2023_0246_RMM Reserved matters for R20190767OOM Construction of an energy recovery facility at Grangetown Prairie, Land East of John Boyle Road - Further Informat.pdf:6:information including contact details for the National Trail Officer. Appropriate mitigation measures

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:10: on water quality subject to appropriate mitigation by means of details of the final

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:11:2.16 The outline scheme included ecological mitigation that involved the reservation of

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:11: all the ecological mitigation required for development within the STDC

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:11: may be used to support the wider biodiversity mitigation plan that is being

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:11: majority of the mitigation associated with the construction and operation of the

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:12: proportionate mitigation response.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:13: • Creation of ecological mitigation areas

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:15: England that ecological mitigation for the ERF and wider STDC development

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:16: of the reserved matters, or the creation of the ecological mitigation areas on site,

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:16: mitigation will be provided off-site by STDC in association with the wider site

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:19: 2019 ES (Chapter 7 Landscape and Visual Impact, Section 7.7 Mitigation). The

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:23: 7, Landscape and Visual Impact, section 7.7 Mitigation). The detailed landscape

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:25: biodiversity mitigation is to be provided by STDC off-site. Nevertheless, the

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:35: levels will result in a noise reduction or mitigation programme.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:39: approaches to construction and all the relevant mitigation measures identified by

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:40:4.7 It is assumed that all relevant mitigation measures which the December 2019 ES

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:40: accordingly. Where any changes to mitigation measures are considered

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:43: Mitigation

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:43: have agreed that all the ecological mitigation required for the ERF development

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:44: mitigation will be provided off-site in due course, some biodiversity features will be

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:44:5.16 While the location of the mitigation measures will vary from that set out in the

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:44: mitigation is robust, and will still ensure that no significant adverse effects will arise

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:44: construction or operational phases with the application of appropriate mitigation.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:44: As mitigation will be provided both on and off-site this conclusion is still

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:44: the recommended off-site mitigation put in place, the conclusions of chapter 6 of

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:47: Mitigation

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:47:6.14 Almost all the potential mitigation in the December 2019 ES refers to

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:48: ES after accounting for the residual effects with mitigation and after 15 years post

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:49: mitigation established by the OPP and has adopted an approach to deliver a high-

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:51: be slight adverse prior to mitigation, as opposed to negligible adverse as

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:51: adverse prior to mitigation, as opposed to moderate adverse as identified by

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:51: addressed by the mitigation measures outlined in the Arcadis Remediation

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:51: significant in EIA terms with the proposed mitigation in place. Mitigation measures

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:52: such, no mitigation measures additional to those identified in the Arcadis ROA and

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:52: Mitigation

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:52:7.12 The Arcadis (ROA) and Strategy includes a number of mitigation measures and

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:54: Mitigation

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:57:8.21 With the above mitigation measures in place, there will be no significant effects on

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:57: accordance with the NPPF. With the implementation of mitigation, no significant

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:57: appropriate mitigation measures, there are no identified significant adverse

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:60: Mitigation

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:60: considered to be of local significance. No further mitigation is required.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:60:9.15 The mitigation strategy to appropriately preserve by record the earliest remnant

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:60: December 2019 ES did not assess mitigation measures for the blast furnace

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:65: construction staff vehicle movements; however, with the mitigation measures that

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:66: Mitigation

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:67: economic effects of the proposed development, so mitigation was therefore not

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:67:10.27 Several mitigation measures were recommended to help prevent crime, including

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:67:10.28 Mitigation measures relating to traffic are discussed in section 12 and it is not

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:70:11.12 The Outline AQA included recommended mitigation measures appropriate for a

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:70: ‘low risk’ site. No changes to the recommended mitigation measures are

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:74:11.36 The ERF will include embedded mitigation measures to reduce the risk of dust

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:74: and odour emissions. This mitigation includes only unloading waste within the

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:74: Mitigation

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:74:11.39 The Outline AQA did not identify any mitigation measures for the operational

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:74:11.40 For the construction phase a number of mitigation measures were recommended

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:74: so these mitigation measures remain applicable. The exact mitigation measures

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:75: the implementation of appropriate mitigation measures. These conclusions remain

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:75: mitigation.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:77: Mitigation

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:77:11.59 No additional mitigation is expected to be required, over the inherent design

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:79: prior to the implementation of mitigation measures. The potential impact will be

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:79: the local level (significant in EIA terms), prior to the implementation of mitigation

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:80: prior to mitigation was as follows:

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:80: Mitigation

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:80: therefore mitigation was not required. However, for the construction phase a

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:80: significant in EIA terms. Therefore, mitigation in the form of the CEMP is proposed

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:81:12.21 As a result of the proposed mitigation measures the residual effects of the

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:81: the mitigation measures in the CEMP it is considered that the residual impact will

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:93: works and off-site mitigation is to be provided to compensate for the loss of these

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:98: proposed mitigation for flood risk.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:105: had been made to ensure that mitigation measures referred to in the ES would be

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:106: Habitat / Mitigation shall include appropriate biosecurity measures. These shall follow the

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:106: Ecological enhancement / mitigation areas to be created on c. 7ha of site to

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:106: Ecological mitigation is to be provided by STDC off-site.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:106: maintain connectivity of habitat across the open areas. mitigation is to be provided by STDC off-site.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:106: Habitat Loss allows for this). Ecological mitigation is to be provided by

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:106: The planned biodiversity area is expected to offset any valuable scrub habitat allows for this). Ecological mitigation is to be provided by

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:107: Ecological mitigation is to be provided by STDC off-site

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:107: phase mitigation measures to reduce the potential for identified impacts to

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:110: mitigation works have been completed by STDC).

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:110: Implementation of a programme of archaeological recording and reporting prior All archaeological mitigation works have been completed

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:113: No specific mitigation measures were considered

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:114: No additional mitigation over the embedded mitigation

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_EIA_SoC_Part_1of2.pdf:114: Landscape and Embedded Design mitigation – provided through choice of cladding,

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:8: with appropriate mitigation the ERF would not give rise to any unacceptable

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:14: OPP is subject to appropriate mitigation and details of the final drainage system

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:29: mitigation strategy is implemented effectively, there will be no unacceptable

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:29: mitigation agreed at outline stage and therefore criteria d. to g. are complied with

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:30: for the purpose of the assessment. The overall ES mitigation strategy was focused

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:30: mitigation established by the OPP and has adopted an approach to deliver a high-

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:30:5.49. Mitigation proposed at outline stage included the reservation of an area of land

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:31: management of this area was also accepted as suitable mitigation for any

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:31: some habitat loss, the identified mitigation and net gains were acceptable in

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:31: for redevelopment. As a result, the mitigation for the loss of on-site ecological

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:31: regeneration area. The mitigation works will be undertaken by STDC in

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:33: effects of the development and the proposed mitigation, where relevant. The OPP

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:39: those mitigation measures set out in Chapter 15 of Volume 1 of the submitted

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:39: Environmental Impact Assessment December 2019 and Chapter 7 (Mitigation)

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:39: approaches to biodiversity and archaeology mitigation are submitted to and

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Planning_Supporting_Statement.pdf:39: mitigation measures required;

R-2023-0246-RMM-EA_R20230246RMM_OFFICIAL_200423.pdf:1:Water Framework Directive (WFD) Mitigation Measures – Advice to Applicant

R-2023-0246-RMM-EA_R20230246RMM_OFFICIAL_200423.pdf:1:at risk any mitigation measures. It should be noted that the Catchment Data Explorer

R-2023-0246-RMM-EA_R20230246RMM_OFFICIAL_200423.pdf:1:website does not contain such information. However, details of the Mitigation Measures

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf:23: The noise levels presented do not allow for mitigation, which is not specifically deemed necessary

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Noise_and_Vibration_Impact_Assessment.pdf:24: The following external envelope and inherent mitigation measures were assumed in the model:

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:4:3.8 Mitigation 17

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:5: It has been determined that with implementation of the mitigation measures set out within this

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:14: the site, mitigation in compliance

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:17: The following mitigation measures include;

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:18: The impact assessment below is written in the context of the following mitigation measures/design

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:20: Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation Measures

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:21: Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation Measures

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:21: Indirect If this is not possible, an appropriate Environmental Permit must be obtained from On the basis of the above, together with the implementation of mitigation measures, it is concluded that the proposed

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:22: Implementation of the mitigation measures outlined within the JBA consulting report 1 will provide

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:22:3.8 Mitigation

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:22: mitigation measures in place for the Tees Estuary transitional water body, Tees Estuary (S Bank)

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:22: mitigation measures.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:23: It is concluded from the above assessment that, with implementation of the mitigation measures

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:29:suitable, options for on-site mitigation should always be explored.

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Water_Framework_Directive_Assessment_Review_and_Update.pdf:30:place. Opportunities on site should be sought, following the mitigation hierarchy

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Flood_Risk_Assessment.pdf:5: drainage strategy. Proposed mitigation comprises the inclusion of an attenuation pond and lined

R-2023-0246-RMM-TV_ERF_Flood_Risk_Assessment.pdf:16: The mitigation measures proposed are:

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:9: include environmental protection and mitigation measures and emergency preparedness

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:31:introduce mitigation measures to the point where no adverse effects occur. The

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:31: that with appropriate mitigation measures the plan or project would not give

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:32:mitigation will be assessed with the land within the Eston Road Highway Scheme

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:33: required, appropriate mitigation measures to deal with any noise and vibration

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:34: minor adverse, temporary effect on the environment and require no mitigation

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:48:concluded that with mitigation there were no likely significant effects from the

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:48:site will separately control pollution impacts, no additional mitigation will be

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:50:development remediation works, appropriate mitigation will have been put into

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:50:through contamination of the Holme Beck. The mitigation measures proposed for

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:50:Mitigation measures to control pollution of the Holme Beck are discussed in

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:53:objectives. This stage in the process also takes account of mitigation measures.

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:53:objectives, outlines any further mitigation measures, and then concludes whether

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:53:10.3.1 Likely Significant Effects – Without Mitigation

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:53:Without mitigation, this potential significant effect cannot be scoped out at AA.

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:53:10.3.2 Likely Significant Effects – With Mitigation

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:53:Coast SPA and Ramsar site, the following mitigation needs to be implemented:

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:55:at the same time, however the mitigation for both schemes separately or in-

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:64: Assessment of Effects and Mitigation 43

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:64: 6.2 Assessment of Effects without Mitigation 43

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:66:mitigation is deemed required. With the implementation of these mitigation

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:66:In terms of the BNG assessment, without mitigation, the proposed development is

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:67:It is not possible for direct mitigation to be identified for the loss of habitat value

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:70: required, appropriate mitigation measures to deal with any noise and vibration

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:70: minor adverse, temporary effect on the environment and require no mitigation

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:76:3. Assessing the significance of any residual effects after mitigation (see 4.5.2

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:79:4.7.5 Mitigation and Compensation Approach

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:79:It is not possible for direct mitigation to be identified for the loss of habitat value

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:104:works would have been removed and replaced as part of the mitigation and

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:104:mitigation measures proposed for the Eston Road Highway Scheme include a

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:108: Assessment of Effects and Mitigation

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:108:significance of any residual effects after mitigation.

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:108:6.2 Assessment of Effects without Mitigation

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:108:It is not possible for direct mitigation to be identified for the loss of habitat value

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:108:the HRA process and therefore discusses appropriate mitigation measures to

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:109:The HRA report concluded that with implementation of mitigation measures,

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:109:a Phasing Plan, no other specific mitigation is deemed required.

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:109:1) is construction related pollution. The required mitigation (CEMP and Phasing

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:110:Effect without mitigation: The loss of 1.44ha of OMH will result in a

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:110:Effect without mitigation: The surrounding area, contains limited to no other

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:111:Effect without mitigation: The habitats within the proposed development site

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:111:Effect without mitigation: The loss of small areas of fairly poor resting habitat

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:112:Effect without mitigation: The loss of small areas of fairly poor nesting habitat

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:112:Effect without mitigation: The loss of small areas of fairly poor nesting and

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:113:Effect without mitigation: The loss of sub-optimal breeding habitat for skylark

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:113:Effect without mitigation: The loss of this small area of sub-optimal grassland

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:114:Effect without mitigation: The loss of suitable foraging habitat within the OMH

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:114:Effect without mitigation: The loss of small area of suitable feeding plants in the

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:114:during the remediation works. Therefore, without mitigation, the proposed

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:115:Following the implementation of this mitigation, no significant residual impact is

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:116:In terms of the BNG assessment, without mitigation, the proposed development is

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:116:effects for each feature, the mitigation measures required and the means by which

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:116:mitigation measures can be secured.

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:117: Feature Impact Characterisation of Unmitigated Effect without mitigation Mitigation Significance of Residual

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:117: Open Mosaic Loss of habitat from site Direct loss of 1.44ha of OMH (a Significant adverse effect on the OMH No mitigation Significant adverse

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:117: Common toad Habitat loss from site Loss of ponds that support Significant adverse effect on the No mitigation Significant adverse

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:117: Breeding bird Habitat loss from site Loss of breeding and foraging Significant adverse effect on the No mitigation Significant adverse

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:118:Feature Impact Characterisation of Unmitigated Effect without mitigation Mitigation Significance of Residual

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:118:Dingy skipper Habitat loss from site Loss of small area of suitable Significant adverse effect on the dingy No mitigation Significant adverse

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:119:Without mitigation, the follow adverse significant residual effects remain:

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:119:In BNG terms, without mitigation, the proposed development is likely to result in

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:119:the remediation works being undertaken, without mitigation, the proposed

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:121:in the loss of, or permanent damage to, ecological features despite mitigation. In

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:121:to those provided as part of mitigation or compensation measures. In BNG terms,

R-2020-0800-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:132:cumulative, should be avoided. Where this is not possible mitigation, or lastly

R-2020-0800-CD-NATURAL ENGLAND.pdf:1:Screening Service for European Protected Species mitigation licence applications. These services help applicants

R-2020-0800-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:2: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2020-0800-CD-officer report.pdf:1:from construction works, including any details of any mitigation measures required;

R-2021-0296-NM-Decision 0270.pdf:2: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2022-0354-CD-Archaeological Recording WSI.pdf:6: with NEAR to take place and a strategy for mitigation be rapidly developed.

R-2022-0354-CD-Archaeological Recording WSI.pdf:9:9.5 Where assessment has identified the need for further analysis and no further mitigation work has

R-2022-0354-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2022-0354-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2022-0354-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2022-0354-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2022-0354-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2022-0354-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2022-0354-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2022-0354-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2022-0354-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2022-0354-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2022-0779-CD-COMPLIANCE OFFICER REPORT.pdf:1: works across the site and shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set

R-2022-0779-CD-Sep 22 - CEMP - Steel House Park and Ride Relocation of stockpile mounds.pdf:12:Working hours, plant types, construction methods and noise mitigation measures may be issues.

R-2022-0779-CD-Sep 22 - CEMP - Steel House Park and Ride Relocation of stockpile mounds.pdf:15:the construction phase of the project, mitigation measures will be implemented as part of a Traffic

R-2022-0779-CD-COMPLIANCE DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2:demonstrate how the mitigation measures set out in the Ecological Impact

R-2022-0779-CD-DOC (CEMP) Covering Letter September 2022.pdf:1:shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set out in the Ecological Impact Assessment, INCA,

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Covering Letter - 29.09.21.pdf:2:• The details of compensatory habitat where onsite mitigation is demonstrated to not be feasible,

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Covering Letter - 29.09.21.pdf:2:The Strategy shall be approved by the Local Planning Authority. The identified mitigation and, where

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:4: mitigation and compensation. It will also, therefore, be submitted periodically to RCBC in order

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:10: confirm the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat for resulting

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:10: • details of any mitigation and compensation proposed including long term maintenance

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:10: • implementation of the identified mitigation and compensation within a specified period in

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 173.58

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 363.55 area based

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: • The details of viable compensation habitat where on-site mitigation is demonstrated not to be

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible, compensation

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: level of habitat mitigation that can be provided within any landscape areas to be created within

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: the final development plots. The Strategy recognises that an objective of habitat mitigation /

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: compensation is to provide in the first instance and as a priority, mitigation within the

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:13: deliver habitat mitigation and biodiversity enhancements within the development plots. The

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:16:5.3 The INCA Feasibility Report assesses in detail the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:17:5.11 In line with the mitigation hierarchy, this Strategy prioritises the delivery of onsite

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:20: be met by on-site mitigation.

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:20: landowners such that works to implement the mitigation schemes commence by end of

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:28: • 5.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 7

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:28: • 6.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 8

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:29:of this stage of the Biodiversity Strategy is to demonstrate the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:29: • To investigate the opportunities for mitigation, i.e. the potential to retain and/or improve

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:32:Therefore mitigation or compensatory measures on this basis would be required for a total of 24

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:32:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:33:5.1 On- site mitigation and compensatory measures

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:33:On-site mitigation and compensatory measures that have been considered are on areas which are

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:34:6.1 On-site mitigation and compensation measures

R-2021-0832-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:39:However, much of the ex-situ mitigation to achieve the requisite number of BDUs is likely to be in

R-2021-0832-CD-DECISION NOTICE 0318.pdf:2: works across the site and shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set

R-2021-0832-CD-DECISION NOTICE 0318.pdf:2: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:4: mitigation and compensation. It will also, therefore, be submitted periodically to RCBC in order

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:10: confirm the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat for resulting

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:10: • details of any mitigation and compensation proposed including long term maintenance

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:10: • implementation of the identified mitigation and compensation within a specified period in

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 173.58

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 363.55 area based

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: • The details of viable compensation habitat where on-site mitigation is demonstrated not to be

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible, compensation

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: level of habitat mitigation that can be provided within any landscape areas to be created within

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: the final development plots. The Strategy recognises that an objective of habitat mitigation /

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: compensation is to provide in the first instance and as a priority, mitigation within the

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:13: deliver habitat mitigation and biodiversity enhancements within the development plots. The

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:16:5.3 The INCA Feasibility Report assesses in detail the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:17:5.11 In line with the mitigation hierarchy, this Strategy prioritises the delivery of onsite

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:20: be met by on-site mitigation.

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:20: landowners such that works to implement the mitigation schemes commence by end of

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:28: • 5.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 7

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:28: • 6.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 8

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:29:of this stage of the Biodiversity Strategy is to demonstrate the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:29: • To investigate the opportunities for mitigation, i.e. the potential to retain and/or improve

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:32:Therefore mitigation or compensatory measures on this basis would be required for a total of 24

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:32:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:33:5.1 On- site mitigation and compensatory measures

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:33:On-site mitigation and compensatory measures that have been considered are on areas which are

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:34:6.1 On-site mitigation and compensation measures

R-2021-0832-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:39:However, much of the ex-situ mitigation to achieve the requisite number of BDUs is likely to be in

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:5: mitigation and compensation. It will also, therefore, be submitted periodically to RCBC in order

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:11: confirm the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat for resulting

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:11: • details of any mitigation and compensation proposed including long term maintenance

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:11: • implementation of the identified mitigation and compensation within a specified period in

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 173.58

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 363.55 area based

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: • The details of viable compensation habitat where on-site mitigation is demonstrated not to

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible, compensation

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: level of habitat mitigation that can be provided within any landscape areas to be created within

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: the final development plots. The Strategy recognises that an objective of habitat mitigation /

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: compensation is to provide in the first instance and as a priority, mitigation within the

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:15: deliver habitat mitigation and biodiversity enhancements within the development plots. The

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:15: practical mitigation is taken to achieve good ecological potential. Whilst this Strategy takes

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:18:5.3 The INCA Feasibility Report assesses in detail the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:19:5.12 In line with the mitigation hierarchy, this Strategy prioritises the delivery of onsite

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:22: be met by on-site mitigation.

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:22: with those landowners such that works to implement the mitigation schemes commence by

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:34: • 5.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 7

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:34: • 6.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 8

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:35:of this stage of the Biodiversity Strategy is to demonstrate the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:35: • To investigate the opportunities for mitigation, i.e. the potential to retain and/or improve

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:38:Therefore mitigation or compensatory measures on this basis would be required for a total of 24

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:38:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:39:5.1 On- site mitigation and compensatory measures

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:39:On-site mitigation and compensatory measures that have been considered are on areas which are

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:40:6.1 On-site mitigation and compensation measures

R-2021-0832-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:45:However, much of the ex-situ mitigation to achieve the requisite number of BDUs is likely to be in

R-2021-0832-CD-370819 393380 393440 R_2021_0830_CD R_2021_0831_CD R_2021_0832_CD - Discharge of conditoins relating to Environment and Biodiversity Strategy Teesworks Redcar_.pdf:1:identify off-site mitigation and biodiversity net gain opportunities, which is commendable.

R-2021-0832-CD-370819 393380 393440 R_2021_0830_CD R_2021_0831_CD R_2021_0832_CD - Discharge of conditoins relating to Environment and Biodiversity Strategy Teesworks Redcar_.pdf:2:habitats in their own right, where like for like mitigation is required.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1: • The generic approach taken to the derivation of mitigation measures and the assessment of residual

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2: • The identification of mitigation measures (where required) to reduce the significance of, or avoid,

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2: • The evaluation of impacts, post-mitigation, to determine the significance of residual impacts.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:6:significance (as defined above); albeit that appropriate mitigation, where available, should be sought for all

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Mitigation measures have been proposed, where available and practical, in those cases where adverse

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:impacts have been identified. It is important to note that the mitigation measures applied should be

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:‘Mitigation through design’ is an important factor in ensuring that the environmental impacts of a proposed

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:engineering and environmental impact studies, mitigation has been built into the design of the proposed

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:scheme. Where significant impacts potentially remain, further issue-specific mitigation measures are

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:industry standard or ‘embedded’ mitigation often applies in these cases (and is set out herein). It is also

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:other pressures on a receptor and, in this event, mitigation may be required.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:is relevant to the treatment of mitigation in HRA. The CJEU ruling determined that “…it is not appropriate,

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:the harmful effects…” is interpreted as meaning any mitigation measures that are not clearly an intrinsic part

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:of the design of a plan or project. The effect of this ruling is that mitigation measures, which are not clearly

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:process has identified an adverse impact and mitigation is available (see above). In some cases, in order

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:to ensure that the mitigation measures are successful or where there is significant uncertainty with respect

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Where further mitigation measures are identified, the significance of the residual environmental impact (i.e.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:the post-mitigation impact) is assessed.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:9:additional mitigation. Inter-relationships have been assessed within the relevant sections of the topic

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:15:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:15:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:11:Where potential adverse impacts have been identified, mitigation measures have been recommended to

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:and minor adverse significance to human health. This is on the basis that the embedded mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:to the works outlined in the remediation strategy. With implementation of mitigation measures, the residual

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:14:control of spread of non-native plant material. Following the mitigation outlined above, a worst-case impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:15:piling works. Following the implementation of mitigation measures, including shrouding on the piling rigs,

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:15:Tees will fall below significant sensitivity thresholds. With mitigation in place, disturbance impacts are

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:15:works, notably if creating barrier effects that may deter migratory patterns. However, with mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:15:mitigation measures such as creation of new complex habitat within the proposed quay walls via proposed

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:17:no mitigation is proposed prior to the removal of these elements.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:18:construction phase noise levels at the South Tees Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:18:Mitigation and control measures are recommended to minimise the effects of dust and plant emissions

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:19:the construction period. No mitigation measures during the construction phase are required.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:19:assessed as being permanent and negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:body to meet its objectives in the future or compromise the mitigation measures in place for the water body.

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:7:with noise mitigation values. Supported by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:8:8 Caltrans (2015). Technical guidance for assessment and mitigation of the hydroacoustics effects of pile driving

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1: waters and coastal waters. During the construction, operation and Section 5.6, Paragraph and mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1: resources and physical characteristics of the water environment as mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: impacts will be observed (to water quality), and mitigation may be are assessment and mitigation measures outlined

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: Mitigation measures with regard to dredging may be required to manage

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: are assessment and mitigation measures outlined

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: times of the year and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:Overall therefore, the magnitude of effect would be significantly reduced by the proposed mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:3:considerations. In such cases appropriate mitigation will be required. Landscapes designated at a national

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:18:19.5.1 Mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:18:Woodland, tree and shrub planting is a typical mitigation measure used to screen development and improve

R-2020-0685-ESM-EA R_2020_0685_ESM 4 March 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:  The details of compensatory habitat where onsite mitigation is demonstrated to

R-2020-0685-ESM-EA R_2020_0685_ESM 4 March 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:The Strategy shall be approved by the Local Planning Authority. The identified mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:3: The generic mitigation measures deemed applicable to this waterbody Measures are included in the assessment alongside

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:3: bank, Preserve or restore habitats. guidance mitigation measures table for the Tees.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:3: Mention of various reports to inform mitigation to address WFD issues of these reports is being fed into the developing

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:5: Mitigation measures (taken from

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:5: Mitigation measures provided by the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:7:and jetties WFD mitigation measures identified for only. be disposed of on land

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:7:C2 Capital dredging hydromorphology and WFD mitigation are no higher sensitivity water quality due to

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:7:blanket hydromorphology. WFD mitigation no higher sensitivity on the seabed however

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:7:quay effects in relation to WFD mitigation therefore there would be require piling on land.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:8: mitigation measures also scoped in. intertidal and subtidal

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:8:water mitigation measures identified for the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:9: • For C2 - Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures, biology (fish and habitats) and water

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:9: • For C4 – RBMP mitigation measures.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:9: • For C5 – Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures, Groundwater – chemical quality

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:9: • For O1 - Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures assessment.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:9:Table 28.6 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:9: RBMP mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:18:28.5.5 River Basin Management Plan mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:18:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:18:Table 28.8 Summary of mitigation measures and assessment (taken from Clearing the Waters for All,

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:18: Mitigation measure Assessment

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:18: Dredging would be managed in line with mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:19: Mitigation measure Assessment

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:19:Table 28.9 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:19: RBMP mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:19:28.6.2 RBMP mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:19:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:19:Table 28.10 Summary of mitigation measures and assessment (taken from Clearing the Waters for All,

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:19: Mitigation measure Assessment

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:19: mitigation measure.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:20: Mitigation measure Assessment

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:20: Retime dredging or disposal Riverbank excavation would not impact on these mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:20:Table 28.11 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21: Water body Quality elements mitigation Protected Areas

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21:28.7.2 RBMP mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21:Table 28.12 Summary of RBMP mitigation measures and assessment

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21: Mitigation measure Assessment

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21: effect on this mitigation measure is not predicted.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21: these mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:Cefas Action Level 2 concentrations), additional mitigation measures would be implemented to reduce the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:proposed project both include mitigation measures to dredge in long strips to reduce the effects of sediment

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:28:would require site characterisation and remediation/ mitigation (such as piling risk assessments to be

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:28: • Surface waters: Hydromorphology (including the RBMP mitigation measures assessment)

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:28:Biodiversity Strategy. This will also support the implementation of the RBMP mitigation measures identified

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:28:suspended sediment thus reducing the risk of significant water quality effects. Mitigation measures to

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:28:in potentially contaminated soils. Effective mitigation measures to ensure contamination is managed and

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:29:projects would occur at the same time. Mitigation measures such as dredging in long strips as required for

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:29:A non-temporary deterioration in WFD quality elements was therefore not identified. Additionally, mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:29:is considered to be supportive of the implementation of the RBMP mitigation measures around ecological

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:4:As detailed in the NRA, a number of embedded mitigation measures are already enforced by PDT which

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:4:(see Appendix 9). These embedded mitigation measures comprise:

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:As noted above, a number of embedded mitigation measures are already enforced by PDT which have been

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:Appendix 9). These embedded mitigation measures which are applicable to the operational phase

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:In addition to the above embedded mitigation measures, the following measures are proposed to be adopted

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:No additional mitigation measures are required beyond those detailed above (to be built into the proposed

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: noise during very low No mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: collision risk from Low No mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice. The residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: resource in whale very low No mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:7:NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:7:We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:7:following mitigation measures are required:

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:7:• All environmental mitigation measures identified within the Environmental Statement

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:8:  The details of compensatory habitat where onsite mitigation is

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:8:mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible,

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:14:from construction activities without the implementation of mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:14:and para 18.4.1.5 highly recommends Site-specific mitigation measures to be

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:15:  Effectiveness of the mitigation strategy set out in the ES

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:15:responses of key consultees and the proposed mitigation strategy informed by

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:16:  Mitigation: The scope for incorporating mitigation measures to avoid,

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:16:  Residual Effects: Identification of any effects remaining after mitigation.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:21:pathways of contamination and provide suitable mitigation where necessary.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:21:the proposed mitigation measures outlined above to low. Given the sensitivity

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:22:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact are predicted to

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact is predicted to

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:24:however with the implementation of suitable embed mitigation including a

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:24:proposed that suitable mitigation measures can be put in place at the site

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:25:water is very high and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is very low

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:25:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:26:With regard to groundwater quality no mitigation measures are required and

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:26:Along with the embedded mitigation further mitigation with regard to ground

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:26:concludes that following the implementation of the above mitigation the impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:26:No further mitigation is proposed beyond the implementation of a CEMP and

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:26:No additional mitigation measures required with regard to controlled waters.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:26:No additional mitigation measures required with regard to human health. The

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:26:conditions. It is considered that through the provision of this mitigation of

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:32:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:32:With regard to suspended sediment concentrations no mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:32:No mitigation measures are required with regard to the creation of the habitat

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:32:No mitigation required and the residual impact with regard to flow regime

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:32:No mitigation required and no residual impact with regard to dredging regime

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:32:the assessment of the HRA suitable mitigation is considered necessary to

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:35:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:35:With regard to underwater noise no mitigation measures are required. The

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:35:With regard to vessel interactions no mitigation measures are required beyond

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:36:No mitigation measures are required with regard to seal haul-out sites. The

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:36:No mitigation measures are required with regard to water quality. The residual

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:36:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:39:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:39:No direct mitigation is proposed with regard to the loss of woodland. The

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:39:following the implementation of the mitigation measures, the residual impact is

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:39:A number of mitigation methods are proposed with regard to the impacts on

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:39:implementation of the mitigation measures, the residual impact is of negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:39:No additional mitigation is proposed with regard to loss of foraging and

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:39:With regard to impacts on hedgehog and brown hare, additional mitigation in

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:40:of this mitigation the impact to commuting bats and otters is anticipated to be

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:40:mitigation measures as set out above.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:40:compensation/mitigation that will be required. This has been agreed with both

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:40:mitigation measures being put in place the development has the potential to

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:40:Interest (SSSI) has been notified. The proposed method of mitigation as set

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:44:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:44:With the inclusion of the mitigation the residual impact would

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:44:following mitigation measures is proposed;

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:No mitigation measures are required with regard to deposition on intertidal

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:Mitigation is proposed with regard to piling methods in the form of noise

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:Mitigation with regard to visual disturbance will result from the direction and

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:dredger operates adjacent to the mudflats. Mitigation can also be provided

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:No mitigation is proposed with regard to noise disturbance. The residual

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:No mitigation is proposed with regard to vessel movements. The residual

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:mitigation measures regarding the proposed lighting will further reduce the

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:45:No mitigation measures are considered necessary with regard to intertidal

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:46:mitigation measures being put in place the development has the potential to

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:46:Interest (SSSI) has been notified. The proposed method of mitigation as set

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:46:suitable mitigation is considered necessary to avoid adverse impacts. The

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:46:suitable mitigation is considered to be;

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:48:most suitable form of mitigation relates to the location of dredging and the axis

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:50:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:50:Mitigation is proposed relating to impacts of dredging on water quality. This

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:50:No mitigation measures are required with regard to entrainment of fish and

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:50:With regard to underwater noise from dredging, the proposed mitigation is

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:50:No mitigation is proposed with regard to noise generated from land side pilling

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:51:Mitigation in the form of verti pools is proposed within the quay wall relating to

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:51:No mitigation is proposed relating to fishing vessels however this will be

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:51:No mitigation measures are required with regard to noise disturbance. The

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:51:With regard to light disturbance no direct mitigation is proposed, however a

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:51:No mitigation measures are required with regard to dredging regime affecting

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:52:mitigation measures that are already enforced by PD Teesport as Harbour

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:52:Master. The embedded mitigation measures set out in the ES include:

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:52:Given the content of the submitted NRA, the embedded mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:53:embedded mitigation measures that are currently enforced by PDT. These

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:53:embedded mitigation measures that are considered appropriate for the

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:54:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:54:development that no mitigation is required and that there would be residual

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:55:The ES concluded that no additional mitigation measures are required beyond

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:57:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:57:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is therefore

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:57:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is therefore

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:58:with the potential for suitable mitigation where required.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:59:mitigation the residual impact can be reduced to minor adverse.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:59:methods of mitigation are also proposed through the ES to limit such impacts.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:60:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:60:suitable mitigation is required in order to retain a record of the structures.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:61:submitted to the RCBC HER. With imposition of the appropriate mitigation,

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:61:No mitigation is proposed with regard to the removal of other buildings and

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:61:No mitigation is proposed with regard to the setting of the Transporter Bridge.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:61:No mitigation proposed

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:64:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:64:With regard to road traffic noise no mitigation is proposed and the residual

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:64:noise no mitigation is proposed and the residual impact would be of negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:64:No mitigation proposed.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:65:the applicant as a means of addressing a number of mitigation scenarios

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:67:specific mitigation is recommended and set out below.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:68:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:68:As set out in the ES at 18.4.1.5, it is considered that site specific mitigation is

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:68:implementation of the above mitigation measures, the residual impacts from

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:69:No mitigation is proposed.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:69:mitigation measures.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:69:from construction activities without the implementation of mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:69:and para 18.4.1.5 highly recommends Site-specific mitigation measures to be

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:74:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:74:No mitigation is proposed with regard to impacts during the construction

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:74:No mitigation is proposed with regard to impacts during the operational phase

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:77:without the implementation of mitigation measures the impact is of major

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:78:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:78:mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:78:need for mitigation. It is considered that this can take many forms including

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:79:that no further mitigation is required and that there would be no residual

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:79:No mitigation required relating to the rest of the estuary and no residual

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:79:No further mitigation is required beyond the final design solution and there

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:79:No mitigation measures are required in regard to the impact of swell waves or

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:84:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:84:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:84:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:85:effects from the development, no mitigation measures are proposed.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:87:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:87:suggest a number of mitigation measures that could be implemented to

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:88:implementation of suitable mitigation measures as set out above.

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:90:that through the implementation of suitable embedded mitigation in the form of

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:91:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:91:development that no mitigation is required and that there would be residual

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:91:development that no mitigation is required and that there would be residual

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:94:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:94:of material within the Tees Bay C that no mitigation is required and that there

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:94:of material within the Tees Bay C that no mitigation is required and that there

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:94:of material within the Tees Bay C that no mitigation is required and that there

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:94:of material within the Tees Bay C that no mitigation is required and that there

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:95:cumulative impacts. No additional mitigation is proposed beyond that

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:96:a likely significant effect can be ruled out subject to suitable mitigation. They

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:96:have suggested that the following mitigation measures should be secured by

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:96:In terms of mitigation these matters have been addressed through a suite of

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:97:proposed mitigation measures that no significant long term adverse impacts

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:100: - The details of compensatory habitat where onsite mitigation is

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:100: identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:101: Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the assessment

R-2020-0685-ESM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:102:with the inclusion of the proposed mitigation measures that no significant long

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:1:dust impacts before the implementation of mitigation measures. The assigned risk categories may be

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:4:activity (demolition, earthworks, construction and trackout) before mitigation is applied should be determined

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:5:Step 3: Site-Specific Mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:5:Step three of the IAQM guidance identifies appropriate site-specific mitigation. These measures are related

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:5:With the implementation of the relevant mitigation measures, the residual impacts from the construction are

R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:4:  Mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:5:project on the features of special interest and should identify such mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:6:identify mitigation measures as may be required in order to avoid, minimise or

R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:6:suitable mitigation. In addition, the river channel itself is important for foraging

R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:10:modified waterbody, and as such, requires that all practicable mitigation is taken to

R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:10:achieve good ecological potential. The generic mitigation measures deemed

R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:10:Estuary Habitat Vision that aims to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:11:There are other opportunities to implement WFD mitigation measures and the

R-2020-0685-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:12:impacts on the marine environment would be identified and appropriate mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:1:use as your activity hydromorphological parameters of the estuary or stop the mitigation measures identified for

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:14:use as your activity below) would not impact on the mitigation measures identified for this water body.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:1:proposed scheme footprint and surrounding area, the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:1: of biodiversity or geological value and soils (in a impacts and subsequent mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:2: such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation are discussed within the land quality

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:4:operational activities. It will also aid in the identification of suitable mitigation measures to provide protection

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:4:identification of suitable preventative measures and mitigation techniques for the construction and

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:18:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:18:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:19:adoption of the embedded mitigation measures outlined in Section 3, including the use of the CEMP. The

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:19:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:19:Following the implementation of these mitigation measures, the magnitude of effect will be very low.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:20:site and task specific health and safety plans. The plan will outline the use of risk mitigation strategies

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:20:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:20:The mitigation measures detailed in Section 16.5 (specifically those associated with the avoidance of

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:20:construction phase dust) would also be applicable to this impact. No further mitigation measures have been

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:The sensitivity of the surface water is very high and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is very low

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:22:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:22:Following implementation of the mitigation described above the magnitude of the impact is considered to be

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:4:to consider all sources of flooding, any mitigation measures required to ensure a safe development in a 1 in

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:13:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:13:comparable with the existing. No further mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:13:users is high magnitude. Therefore, without the implementation of mitigation measures the impact is of

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:13:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:13:implementation of the following mitigation measures:

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:14:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:14:once operational. No further mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact with

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:14:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:14:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:15:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:15:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:16:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:16:No mitigation measures are required in regard to the impact of swell waves or locally generated waves. The

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:1:and biofouling of hulls. Generic project-level mitigation has been put in place to minimise this risk, set out

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:2: be considered, and the mitigation hierarchy used to protect these features. Importance and species of ecological importance

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:2: mitigation and compensation.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:3: appropriate mitigation/compensation can be quantified. structures would have a habitat / species value, or

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:3: step is to fully consider options for mitigation on site prior to compensation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:3: site mitigation.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:3: Habitat Vision that aims to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:4: implement WFD mitigation measures and the applicant should explore

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:25:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PN 685.pdf:2:construction activities without the implementation of mitigation measures.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PN 685.pdf:2: The assessment provides highly recommended mitigation measures tailored to the

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:3:PD Teesport has effectively implemented a suite of embedded mitigation measures ensuring that the

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:3:risk profile remains at acceptable levels. Compliance with embedded mitigation and regulations

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:4:Possible additional mitigation measures were identified to further reduce risk which are outlined

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:5:5 Embedded Mitigation ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 32

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:5: Construction Phase – Baseline With Embedded Mitigation …………………………………….. 36

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:5: Operation Phase - Baseline With Embedded Mitigation………………………………………….. 38

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:7:Table 12: Embedded Mitigation Measures ………………………………………………………………………………. 32

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:7: Construction Phase Risk Assessment Hazard Log – Baseline with Embedded Mitigation C-

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:7: Operation Phase Risk Assessment Hazard Log – Baseline with Embedded Mitigation . D-1

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:7:Mitigation ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. E-1

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:7:Mitigation ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. F-1

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:40:5 EMBEDDED MITIGATION

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:40:Embedded mitigation measures describe those measures to which adherence is required by regulation

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:40:/ are already enforced by the local SHA. Embedded mitigation measures are assumed to be in place

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:40:prior to assessment. Table 12 lists embedded mitigation measures considered within this NRA.

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:40:Table 12: Embedded Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:43:re-assessed applying proposed possible additional mitigation measures (Section 8.4) to assess the

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:44: CONSTRUCTION PHASE – BASELINE WITH EMBEDDED MITIGATION

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:46: OPERATION PHASE - BASELINE WITH EMBEDDED MITIGATION

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:50:Table 17 provides a description of each of the proposed mitigation measures. The individual hazards

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:50:control measures and procedures by PD Ports), the recommended additional mitigation measures are

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:55:mitigation measures ensuring that the risk profile remains at acceptable levels.

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:55:contained assuming compliance with embedded mitigation and regulations covering movements,

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:55:The possible additional mitigation measures identified are largely to protect third party property, for

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:62: 8 - 10 High Risk A level requiring immediate mitigation.

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:75: • Existing mitigation measures enacted by the Tees Port should be

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:75: • Marico – Mitigation will be proposed during the assessment – lighting at

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:76: Baseline with Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:92: – Baseline with Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:108: Residual with Possible Additional Mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:124: Residual with Possible Additional Mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3: certain times of the year and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation such addressed in Section

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:4:7.1 Design mitigation 27

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:6: • inform potential mitigation options related to resistance and resilience measures.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:20:all sources of flooding, any mitigation measures required to ensure a safe development in a 1 in 200 year

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:32:with modelled water levels. Residual risk may remain after flood management or mitigation measures have

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:32:with appropriate mitigation measures also discussed.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:32:7.1 Design mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:4: consideration should be given to suitable mitigation. The river using the Tees are assessed in

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27:by an experienced ornithologist. This mitigation will be included in the CEMP. The residual impact would

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:While the anticipated impact is minor, the following mitigation measure, proposed to reduce the potential for

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:With the implementation of the above mitigation measure, the modelled plume would only occupy half of the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:32:However, according to the Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013), species such as

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:32:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:32:As mitigation for the potential impact of noise disturbance during the construction phase, it is proposed that

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:32:to the Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013). With this in mind, and considering the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:32:noises at the distances associated with this project, the implementation of the above mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:33:The Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013) categorises visual disturbances into the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:34:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:34:The mitigation measures outlined in Section 12.5.2 would ensure that dredging vessels only operate along

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:contact. The assessment concludes that with the adoption of embedded mitigation (i.e. implementation of

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-CON LAND 685.pdf:2:• During construction works appropriate mitigation measures should be put in place

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf:1:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf:1:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:1: • Restoring at least 15% of degraded ecosystems as a contribution to climate change mitigation and

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The Mammal Society Guidance Series) (Dean et al, 2016);

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines (English Nature, 2001);

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • Otters: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice (Natural

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • Badgers: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • Bats: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice (Natural

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • Great crested newts: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • Invertebrates: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • Reptiles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • Water voles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:4: Natural England advised following the mitigation hierarchy as STDC is in the process of developing a

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:6:a development, once all the appropriate mitigation has been implemented.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:9: through the implementation of mitigation measures or irreversible, when no recovery is possible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10:mitigation and project commitments made as part of the design process. Where, following this assessment,

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10:likely significant impacts are identified, additional mitigation measures are then proposed. A final

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10:assessment of the residual impacts remaining following implementation of these additional mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:11:Following initial assessment, if the impact does not require additional mitigation (or none is possible) the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:11:residual impact will remain the same. If, however, additional mitigation is proposed there will be an

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:11:assessment of the post-mitigation residual impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:18:EP1HS. Consequently, these are considered to be absent and no further surveys and/or mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:18:Therefore, roosting bats are considered to be absent and no further surveys and/or mitigation measures for

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:19:surveys and/or mitigation measures are required. Therefore, badgers are not considered further in this

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:19:and this species is considered to be absent. Therefore, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:20:colonise. Consequently, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are required, and amphibians

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:20:basking, shelter, foraging and/or refuge. Consequently, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:Following the implementation of the mitigation measures, the magnitude of impact will be reduced and the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:prior to works commencing, to ensure the protection afforded to otters, the agreed mitigation measures and

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:Potential effects arising from changes in noise are considered in Section 17, including embedded mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:of no adverse significance following embedded mitigation of development of a Marine Pollution Contingency

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24:implementation of the mitigation outlined in Section 18, there is not anticipated to be a significant impact to

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24:The following mitigation is proposed to minimise disturbance of otters from construction activities:

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24:The following mitigation will be implemented to prevent injury or death to otter should any animal roam in

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24: • All otter mitigation measures for the site will be agreed with Natural England prior to construction;

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24: within this area. Consultation will be required with Natural England to discuss the mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:Following the implementation of the mitigation measures outlined above, the potential effects to otter are

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:As additional mitigation for hedgehog, any individuals found within the works area will be moved to a safe

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:26:Following the implementation of mitigation, the impact to commuting bats and otters is anticipated to be of

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:16: necessary mitigation measures must be secured in advance of the development in order to

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: prevent development or require mitigation through the submission of planning applications.

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:25:5.25 Following the mitigation outlined above, a worst-case impact of minor adverse is predicted for

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: proposed piling works. Following the implementation of mitigation measures, including

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: With mitigation in place, disturbance impacts are predicted to be minor adverse, at worst.

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: deter migratory patterns. However, with mitigation measures in place to reduce the magnitude

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: fish, however the implementation of mitigation measures such as creation of new complex

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:27: value in themselves and no mitigation is proposed prior to the removal of these elements.

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: the embedded mitigation measures set out in a CEMP would be adhered to, and the measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: strategy. With implementation of mitigation measures, the residual impacts are of minor

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:29:5.56 Mitigation and control measures are recommended to minimise the effects of dust and plant

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: measured by Gross Value Added) during the construction period. No mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are required.

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:31: Mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:31:5.69 A range of mitigation measures have been identified throughout the ES, some of these, such as

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:31:5.70 With these mitigation measures in place, the ES concluded that there would be no significant

R-2020-0685-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:31: the ability of the water body to meet its objectives in the future or compromise the mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:3: • any significant air emissions, their mitigation and any residual

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:3: mitigation measures are

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:3: after mitigation methods have been applied; and

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:3: • measures to be employed in preventing or mitigating the mitigation measures.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:6:3) Determine site specific mitigation; and

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:6:4) Examine the residual effects to determine whether or not additional mitigation is required.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:6:of impacts prior to mitigation. Once appropriate mitigation measures were identified, the significance of

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:12:construction and trackout is used to recommend appropriate mitigation measures. The dust magnitude for

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14:Table 18.9 to determine the risk of impacts with no mitigation applied. The risks concluded for dust soiling

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14:Table 18.10 Summary of risk table to define site-specific mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:18.4.1.5 Step 3: Site-specific mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:Step three of the IAQM guidance (IAQM, 2016) identifies appropriate site-specific mitigation. These

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:without the implementation of mitigation measures. Additional guidance has been provided by the IAQM in

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:relation to dust and air mitigation measures. It is recommended that the good practice measures outlined

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:Highly recommended mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:A list of mitigation measures that are highly recommended for a high risk site by the IAQM, as determined

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:by Step 2 of the construction dust and particulate matter assessment, is provided below. The mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:mitigation measures listed in the guidance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:16: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:17:With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, the residual impacts from the construction phase

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:2: procedures requiring an EIA and mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:3: habitats will need to be considered, and the mitigation hierarchy used to Section 9 assesses potential impacts on marine

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:3: suitable mitigation and compensation.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: very low No mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:19:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: very low No mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: increased Low No mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice during construction works.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: whale very low No mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of best practice during maintenance

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice. The residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:3:3.12 Embedded mitigation measures 20

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:12:mitigation measures are defined. The residual impacts (potential impacts remaining assuming the proposed

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:12:mitigation measures are effectively implemented) are then assessed.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:6:exist in the surrounding area; the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or offset any significant

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:6:significance. Opportunities for the mitigation of any adverse effects and the enhancement of positive effects

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:19:Mitigation and residual impacts

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:19:Mitigation and residual impacts

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:20:Mitigation measures and residual impacts

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:20:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:23:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:23:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:4: - The details of compensatory habitat where onsite mitigation is

R-2020-0685-ESM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:4: identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible,

R-2020-0685-ESM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:5: mitigation measures identified as part of the assessment shall be

R-2020-0685-ESM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:6: the proposed mitigation measures that no significant long term adverse impacts

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:6:cause harm to human health or the environment if mitigation measures are not implemented during the re-

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:40: • During construction works appropriate mitigation measures should be put in place to ensure no

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:1:Caltrans (2015). Technical Guidance for Assessment and Mitigation of the Hydroacoustic Effects of Pile

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:2:Cutts, N. Hemmingway, K. & Spencer, J. (2013). Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit Informing

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:2:Dean, M., Strachan, R., Gow, D. and Andrews, R. (2016). The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:2:Mammal Society Mitigation Guidance Series). Eds Fiona Mathews and Paul Chanin. The Mammal

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:3:English Nature (2001) Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:7:Natural England (2014) Otters: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:7:Natural England (2015) Badgers: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:7:Natural England (2015) Bats: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:8:Natural England (2015) Great crested newts: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:8:Natural England (2015). Invertebrates: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:8:Natural England, (2015). Reptiles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:8:Natural England, (2015). Water voles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:14:3.12 Embedded mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:15:built into the proposed scheme as embedded mitigation.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:2:occurring, or where mitigation measures are still operating; and reasonably foreseeable future plans and

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:11:assessment of the significance of such impacts and recommendation of appropriate mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:14:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:14:former project, mitigation comprises the use of specialist dredging equipment (i.e. an enclosed grab loading

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:at any location. Additionally, mitigation is outlined for all three schemes which would reduce plume extents

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:additional mitigation measures are identified to reduce any resulting sediment plume as far as possible and

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:mitigation measures would be incorporated into the design of each and thus remove the potential for

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no cumulative residual impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:19:mitigation is adopted to reduce the risk of any such impact from occurring. However, there could be the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required to reduce the potential disturbance of marine mammals from

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22:lack of suitable habitat within its footprint. The mitigation outlined for the proposed scheme reduces the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22:subject to similar mitigation measures to minimise any potential effects, including reduced vessel speeds,

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22:No additional mitigation is proposed and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:As a more sizable development, the landside EIA proposes a number of mitigation measures including off

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:No mitigation measures are required and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:footprint. The mitigation outlined for the proposed scheme reduces the potential impacts to otter to an

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:an adverse impact to otter, it is assumed they will be subject to similar mitigation measures to minimise any

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:In the absence of suitable mitigation, this could potentially result in an increased risk to subtidal foraging

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:within the Tees. However, the mitigation measure described for the proposed scheme in Section 12.5.2

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:have a minor impact at worst (with the mitigation measures in place). With mitigation measures in place for

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:the SIZ development immediately landward. However, with the mitigation measures outlined in Section

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:mitigation relating to the effect of the loss of intertidal mud specifically in relation to these species is not

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:the risk of such responses being exhibited. However, the mitigation measure described for the proposed

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:project, and other mitigation measures have been proposed for the Anglo American Harbour facilities

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:With mitigation measures in place for all schemes, the combined impact will be reduced as far as possible,

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:26:No further mitigation measures are possible (or necessary). The residual cumulative impact would be minor

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:26:are anticipated to be relatively habituated to such noises, plus the mitigation measures in place will help to

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:26:No further mitigation measures are possible (or necessary). The residual cumulative impact would be minor

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:26:There is a range of mitigation measures that are typically adopted during construction works to manage the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required beyond those to be embedded into the proposed scheme and those

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:mitigation measures outlined above would be adopted during the operational phase of the proposed scheme

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required beyond those to be embedded into the proposed scheme and those

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:28:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:28:No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:29:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:29:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:30:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:30:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:30:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:30:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:No mitigation measures. There would be a substantial beneficial residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:32:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:32:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:1: projects. Where there are adverse impacts, an assessment of mitigation options is carried out to

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:1: determine adverse effect on the integrity of the site. If these mitigation options cannot avoid adverse

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:2:reduce the harmful effects of the plan or project on that site”. As such, no such mitigation measures have

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:11: scheme subject to appropriate mitigation being

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:11: known as well as adoption of all mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:17: R/2016/0663/OOM for up to 550 residential units with associated granted October 2019 adoption of mitigation, including the provision of

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:17: consented residential development, the mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:25:With the application of mitigation in the form of ensuring that the capital dredging transects run along the

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:25:With mitigation in place, the predicted impacts on fish as a result of SSC increases are predicted to manifest

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:26:With mitigation in place, the predicted impacts on fish as a result of underwater noise is again predicted to

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:27:e.g. pile driving). With the incorporation of the mitigation measures detailed in Section 12.5.4 (i.e.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:27:The Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit, developed by Cutts et al. (2013), provides noise level

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:28:with the implication of mitigation measures set out in Sections 12.5.4 and 12.6.3 (i.e. sympathetic placement

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:32:Without mitigation in place, the construction phase of the proposed scheme may result in redistribution of

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:33:mitigation measures will be in place and noise levels within the SPA would be less than 50dB(A) (i.e. below

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:33:proposed scheme and lies outwith the 300m threshold stated within the Waterbird Disturbance & Mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:34:It should be noted that the mitigation measures described for the proposed scheme in Section 12.5.2 (i.e.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:34:in the water column. With mitigation measures in place for all schemes, the combined impact will be reduced

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:4: • Mitigation.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:6: Cleveland Coast SPA, Ramsar site and SSSI, and should identify mitigation measures as required. This should include impacts on tern prey, intertidal

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:6: Wild Birds Directive activities, particularly during winter months and consideration should be given to suitable mitigation. The river channel is also important for foraging

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:7: developed a Tees Estuary Habitat Vision that aims to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:the significance of heritage assets is appropriately assessed and that mitigation recommendations are both

R-2020-0685-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:3:to the significance of heritage assets is appropriately assessed and that mitigation recommendations

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:1: • contribute to the mitigation of GHG emissions and support sustainable development;

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:1: • transparent reporting of information on mitigation, adaptation and support which undergoes

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:2:GHG emissions by 34%, relative to a 1990 baseline by 2020 and by 80% in 2050 (“climate mitigation”). The

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:4: d. ensuring opportunities to contribute to the mitigation of flooding elsewhere are taken;

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:4:2.56 The NPPF states that planning should proactively help the mitigation of, and adaption to, climate

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:13:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:13:developed. However, potential mitigation measures to reduce GHG emissions from construction phase

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:13:Furthermore, some of the mitigation measures to minimise air pollutant emissions during construction, listed

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:14:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:3:modified waterbody, and as such, requires that all practicable mitigation is taken to achieve

R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:3:good ecological potential. The generic mitigation measures deemed applicable to this

R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:3:to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:3:strategy for the proposal. There are other opportunities to implement WFD mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:4:and provide mitigation for the impacts to the Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA and

R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:10:especially during winter months, and consideration should be given to suitable mitigation.

R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:10:and should identify such mitigation measures as may be required in order to avoid, minimise

R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:10:include proposals for mitigation of any impacts and if appropriate, compensation measures.

R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:11:accompanying mitigation strategies included as part of the ES.

R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:11:on survey and mitigation.

R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:11:decisions’. Natural England therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:12: Full details of any mitigation or compensation that might be required.

R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:17:mitigation measures to address those impacts, and in particular indicate whether in the case

R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:17:of each impact whether mitigation requires preservation in situ of relevant assets or whether

R-2020-0685-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:17:some other mitigation of impacts is considered appropriate.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:3: and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation such as stop start 13.5.1.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:14:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:14:The following mitigation measure is proposed to reduce the potential for impacts on migratory fish from

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:14:With the implementation of the above mitigation measure, water quality will only be impacted on one side

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:14:Mitigation of the plume effects by reducing the size of the TSHD, and thus reducing the rate of overflow, is

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:15:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:15:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:19:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:21:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:23:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:23:for the proposed scheme, and there is no feasible mitigation measure that can prevent such losses.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required, although as a matter of course PDT will manage any conflicts through

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:25:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required; however, in accordance with best practice, lighting would be directed

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:25:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Effective/acceptable mitigation options may still be possible, to offset and / or reduce residual impacts to

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Effective / acceptable mitigation options may still be possible, to offset and / or reduce residual impacts to

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Industry standard mitigation measures may still apply.

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:20:HER. With appropriate mitigation, the residual impact will be reduced to minor adverse and not significant

R-2020-0685-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:20:riverside pumping station will be recorded in advance of demolition in accordance with mitigation measures

R-2020-0685-ESM-336540 R_2020_0685_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 2.pdf:1: NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2020-0685-ESM-336540 R_2020_0685_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 2.pdf:1: We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2020-0685-ESM-336540 R_2020_0685_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 2.pdf:1: mitigation measures are required:

R-2020-0685-ESM-336540 R_2020_0685_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 2.pdf:1: • All environmental mitigation measures identified within the Environmental Statement must

R-2020-0685-ESM-336540 R_2020_0685_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 2.pdf:2:all mitigation measures are appropriately secured in any planning permission given

R-2020-0685-ESM-336540 R_2020_0685_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 2.pdf:2:Further advice on mitigation

R-2020-0685-ESM-336540 R_2020_0685_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 2.pdf:3:to follow the mitigation hierarchy as set out in paragraph 175 of the NPPF and firstly consider what

R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:10:improvements or mitigation is proposed at junction despite the results of the assessment. Instead, it is claimed

R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:10:has been accepted, and that no physical mitigation or improvements are required on the SRN as part of this

R-2020-0685-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:mitigation measures are required. This is a position that we consider can be accepted by Highways England.

R-2019-0427-FFM-Decision Notice_R20190427FFM.pdf:3: identifies mitigation measures required to manage the movement of soils on

R-2019-0427-FFM-Decision Notice_R20190427FFM.pdf:4: appropriate mitigation including by way of on or off-site compensatory

R-2019-0427-FFM-Decision Notice_R20190427FFM.pdf:4: reptiles, a reptile mitigation strategy should be prepared, submitted to and

R-2019-0427-FFM-60686_01 - Planning Statement - 28.06.19.pdf:22: identifies flood risk mitigation measures. The assessment found that the presence of the mounds

R-2019-0427-FFM-60686_01 - Planning Statement - 28.06.19.pdf:22: water management, and the appropriate mitigation measures built into the design of the

R-2019-0427-FFM-60686_01 - Planning Statement - 28.06.19.pdf:26: over the coming years and appropriate mitigation and / or compensation secured at that time.

R-2019-0427-FFM-60686_01 - Planning Statement - 28.06.19.pdf:27: scheme that identifies mitigation measures required to manage the movement of soils on the

R-2019-0427-FFM-60686_01 - Planning Statement - 28.06.19.pdf:27: be avoided as a result of the final use of the soils, appropriate mitigation including by way of on

R-2019-0427-FFM-60686_01 - Planning Statement - 28.06.19.pdf:27: INCA 201920) as supporting or potentially supporting reptiles, a reptile mitigation strategy

R-2019-0427-FFM-60686_01 - Planning Statement - 28.06.19.pdf:29: appropriately assessed and mitigation identified where necessary.

R-2019-0427-FFM-Officer report _R20190427FFM.pdf:5:Mitigation measures to be adopted include:

R-2019-0427-FFM-Officer report _R20190427FFM.pdf:8:flooding and identifies flood risk mitigation measures. The assessment found

R-2019-0427-FFM-Officer report _R20190427FFM.pdf:12: management scheme that identifies mitigation measures required to

R-2019-0427-FFM-Officer report _R20190427FFM.pdf:13: of the final use of the soils, appropriate mitigation including by way of on

R-2019-0427-FFM-Officer report _R20190427FFM.pdf:13: reptiles, a reptile mitigation strategy should be prepared, submitted to

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P02.pdf:6: previous uses and any proposals for mitigation including land remediation or impacts on the

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P02.pdf:90:Key contaminant linkages identified as requiring some form of mitigation are summarised in Table 3.4.

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P02.pdf:93:where they may compliment any landfill gas mitigation measures but are not considered to be appreciate for

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P02.pdf:99:  Any notable variations and associated mitigation from the outline remediation strategy.

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P02.pdf:103:  Any notable variations and associated mitigation from the outline remediation strategy.

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P02.pdf:104:mitigation measures to be implemented to ensure no nuisance arises from waste storage such as odour or

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P02.pdf:104:arises. Mitigation measures to be adopted include:

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P02.pdf:104:be relatively low. If significant odours are noted, appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented by

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P02.pdf:104:practices to minimise odours and/or utilising odour suppression and mitigation equipment.

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P02.pdf:105:The remediation contractor shall implement appropriate mitigation measures to protect any surface water

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P02.pdf:105:There is a potential for mud to be carried out of the site on to local roads during the works. Mitigation

R-2019-0427-FFM-R_2019_0427_FFM - Natural England.pdf:4:to follow the mitigation hierarchy as set out in paragraph 175 of the NPPF and firstly consider what

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:3:3.2 Flood Risk Mitigation 14

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:6:  To summarise flood risks from all sources, and to identify if required, mitigation measures to

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:14:3.2 Flood Risk Mitigation

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:14:mounds from all sources. As a consequence, no specific flood risk mitigation measures are required to

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01.pdf:25:  The flood risk from all other sources is also considered to be low. Therefore, no mitigation

R-2019-0427-FFM-MGE03868.pdf:1:Mitigation measures to be adopted include:

R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:10:is not possible. The assessment also does not take account of any opportunities for mitigation that

R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:11:net loss of Open Mosaic Habitat, which in the absence of mitigation is likely to be of the order of

R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:11:those areas is quite small. The worst-case scenario from the proposal, without mitigation, is

R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:11:recommended that a condition of the permission is that a mitigation strategy to prevent harm to

R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:11:Without mitigation it is predicted that several hectares of good quality Open Mosaic Habitat would

R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:11:affected. It is not possible to predict the extent to which losses will occur, without mitigation, due to

R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:12:Without mitigation there is the potential for harm to a small number of a widespread reptile species.

R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:12:Harm to reptiles will be prevented by the implementation of a suitable mitigation strategy.

R-2019-0427-FFM-201920 Ecology report final.pdf:12:To ensure a necessary habitat protection, mitigation and/or compensation during the final use of the

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P01.pdf:6: previous uses and any proposals for mitigation including land remediation or impacts on the

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P01.pdf:88:Key contaminant linkages identified as requiring some form of mitigation are summarised in Table 3.4.

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P01.pdf:91:where they may compliment any landfill gas mitigation measures but are not considered to be appreciate for

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P01.pdf:102:mitigation measures to be implemented to ensure no nuisance arises from waste storage such as odour or

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P01.pdf:102:arises. Mitigation measures to be adopted include:

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P01.pdf:102:be relatively low. If significant odours are noted, appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented by

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P01.pdf:102:practices to minimise odours and/or utilising odour suppression and mitigation equipment.

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P01.pdf:102:The remediation contractor shall implement appropriate mitigation measures to protect any surface water

R-2019-0427-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0002_A_P01.pdf:103:There is a potential for mud to be carried out of the site on to local roads during the works. Mitigation

R-2021-0473-ESM-356921 - R_2021_0473_ESM Reserved Matters for 76200sqm floor space at Land East of Smiths Dock Rd and West of Tees Dock Rd Tees South Bank - No Objections.pdf:3:paragraphs 102d, 118a, 170d, 174b and 175d of the NPPF. We advise you to follow the mitigation

R-2021-0473-ESM-356921 - R_2021_0473_ESM Reserved Matters for 76200sqm floor space at Land East of Smiths Dock Rd and West of Tees Dock Rd Tees South Bank - No Objections.pdf:4:Appropriate mitigation measures should be incorporated for any adverse impacts.

R-2021-0676-FF-SembcorpObjectionLetter_FINAL.PDF:6: application form) and what monitoring and mitigation is proposed. In this respect, the

R-2021-0676-FF-SembcorpObjectionLetter_FINAL.PDF:14: What monitoring and mitigation equipment is proposed to any design

R-2021-0676-FF-ASQUITH R.pdf:7:to provide suitable mitigation before the development has been completed.” (our

R-2021-0624-NM-61586 Teesworks_LM - s96a Condition 8 covering letter.pdf:2: providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 363.55 area based

R-2021-0624-NM-61586 Teesworks_LM - s96a Condition 8 covering letter.pdf:2: • The details of viable compensation habitat where on-site mitigation is demonstrated not to be

R-2021-0624-NM-61586 Teesworks_LM - s96a Condition 8 covering letter.pdf:2:The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible, compensation shall be

R-2021-0624-NM-Officer Report.pdf:1:planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2021-0624-NM-Officer Report.pdf:1:• The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2021-0624-NM-Officer Report.pdf:2:The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2021-0624-NM-Officer Report.pdf:2:authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and

R-2021-0624-NM-Officer Report.pdf:2:• The details of viable compensation habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2021-0624-NM-Officer Report.pdf:2:The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2021-0624-NM-Officer Report.pdf:4: mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 363.55 area based

R-2021-0624-NM-Officer Report.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensation habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2021-0624-NM-Officer Report.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2021-0624-NM-Decision 0624.pdf:1:authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and

R-2021-0624-NM-Decision 0624.pdf:1:• The details of viable compensation habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2021-0624-NM-Decision 0624.pdf:1:The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible,

R-2021-0624-NM-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2021-0624-NM-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2021-0624-NM-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2021-0624-NM-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2021-0624-NM-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2021-0624-NM-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2021-0624-NM-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2021-0624-NM-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2021-0624-NM-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2021-0624-NM-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2023-0300-DCO-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:5:Management Plan CEMP, which will describe the specific mitigation measures to be

R-2023-0300-DCO-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:7:• The formulation of mitigation measures through both a Construction Worker Travel

R-2023-0300-DCO-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:7: operational impacts and, if required, mitigation strategy, will need to be agreed with

R-2023-0300-DCO-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:8: SRN assessment and mitigation measures being the subject of a set of planning

R-2023-0300-DCO-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11: consideration of operational impacts and, if required, mitigation strategy,

R-2021-1046-CD-NEAR 1046.pdf:2: mitigation ‘required to be undertaken.. etc’

R-2022-0475-NM-64764 LVIA Update 25-05-22.PDF:5: Mitigation Measures and Residual Effects

R-2022-0475-NM-64764 LVIA Update 25-05-22.PDF:5:1.26 No additional mitigation measures are necessary as a result of the amendments and the

R-2022-0475-NM-Officer report.pdf:3:No additional mitigation measures are necessary as a result of the

R-2022-0186-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2022-0186-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2022-0186-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2022-0186-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2022-0186-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2022-0186-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2022-0186-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2022-0186-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2022-0186-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2022-0186-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2021-0166-FFM-Environmental Risk Assessment.pdf:13:cross-boundary migration pathways would be required. It is considered that assessment or mitigation showing

R-2021-0166-FFM-Environmental Risk Assessment.pdf:30:Area and appropriate mitigation measures may be required, depending on the redevelopment scenario.

R-2021-0166-FFM-Environmental Risk Assessment.pdf:35:necessary mitigation measures. It may be that a clean cover system in areas of soft landscaping can be utilised

R-2021-0166-FFM-Environmental Risk Assessment.pdf:36: should be carried out to able appropriate mitigation measures to be designed that will prevent

R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:12: how the mitigation measures set out in the Ecological Impact

R-2021-0166-FFM-Officer Report 0166.pdf:12: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:3:mitigation measures to determine residual effects. It further proposes compensatory measures to

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:3:iii Assessing the significance of any residual effects after mitigation;

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:13:without suitable mitigation.

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:13:Mitigation

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:14:8.9 With the mitigation listed in sections 9.6-9.8 in place the residual effects that are of greater than

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ecological Assessment.pdf:14:10.1 Compensation refers to the process by which any residual effects after mitigation will be

R-2021-0166-FFM-347902 - R_2021_0166_FFM Engineering operations associated with ground remediation and preparation of the site at Phase 4 Grangetown Prairie - No Obj.pdf:3:paragraphs 102d, 118a, 170d, 174b and 175d of the NPPF. We advise you to follow the mitigation

R-2021-0166-FFM-347902 - R_2021_0166_FFM Engineering operations associated with ground remediation and preparation of the site at Phase 4 Grangetown Prairie - No Obj.pdf:4:details for the National Trail Officer. Appropriate mitigation measures should be incorporated for any

R-2021-0166-FFM-Phase 4 covering letter.pdf:5:taking into account mitigation, the proposal would not result in adverse effects on the site’s integrity, either

R-2021-0166-FFM-Decision Notice 0166.pdf:2: works across the site and shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set

R-2021-0166-FFM-Decision Notice 0166.pdf:2: mitigation measures required;

R-2021-0166-FFM-Geotechnical Risk Assessment .pdf:4: Mitigation Measures…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..14

R-2021-0166-FFM-Geotechnical Risk Assessment .pdf:17: 8. Design of mitigation measures to account for likely movement.

R-2021-0166-FFM-Geotechnical Risk Assessment .pdf:17:of the conceptual site model and recommendations for mitigation methods. Due to the quantity of the slag

R-2021-0166-FFM-Geotechnical Risk Assessment .pdf:19: Mitigation Measures

R-2021-0166-FFM-Geotechnical Risk Assessment .pdf:19:The main mitigation methods that are generally employed to mitigate the risks presented by expansive ferrous

R-2021-0166-FFM-Geotechnical Risk Assessment .pdf:22:during the design of the earthworks and appropriate mitigation measures and/or precautionary measures taken

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ground Remediation Options Report.pdf:10: • Mitigation of any identified ground gas risk (subject to additional monitoring);

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ground Remediation Options Report.pdf:12:• Development of a UXO mitigation strategy.

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ground Remediation Options Report.pdf:23:indicates a Medium risk from UXO for borehole and excavation activities. Further mitigation activities such as

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ground Remediation Options Report.pdf:23:detailed risk assessment or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the UXO risk on the site to As

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ground Remediation Options Report.pdf:27:mitigation identified within shall be adopted in relations to the remediation and restorations works and future

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ground Remediation Options Report.pdf:28:confirm the assessment of the waste impact and to implement embedded mitigation measures.

R-2021-0166-FFM-Ground Remediation Options Report.pdf:28: • Any ecological mitigations required

R-2022-0494-FFM-Shadow Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:5:impacts are anticipated, potential mitigation measures to alleviate impacts should be proposed and

R-2022-0494-FFM-Shadow Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:11:applied in accordance with protective mitigation measures already provided in the Local Plan (most

R-2022-0494-FFM-Shadow Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:11:effects on the integrity of any European Sites, taking into account the mitigation measures described

R-2022-0494-FFM-Shadow Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:11:provided the mitigation measures are delivered.

R-2022-0494-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:3:NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING

R-2022-0494-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:3:We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2022-0494-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:3:acceptable, the following mitigation measures should be secured:

R-2022-0494-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:4:  The mitigation measures set out in the submitted Shadow Appropriate

R-2022-0494-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:4: plan should also identify specific actions and mitigation for known

R-2022-0494-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:5:required to allow for development which will assist in mitigation of historic

R-2022-0494-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:13: mitigation measures set out in the Ecological Impact Assessment, INCA,,

R-2022-0494-FFM-395561 - R_2022_0494_FFM - Engineering operations - removal of mounds - Land north of Teesworks area Redcar.pdf:1: NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2022-0494-FFM-395561 - R_2022_0494_FFM - Engineering operations - removal of mounds - Land north of Teesworks area Redcar.pdf:1: We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2022-0494-FFM-395561 - R_2022_0494_FFM - Engineering operations - removal of mounds - Land north of Teesworks area Redcar.pdf:1: mitigation measures should be secured:

R-2022-0494-FFM-395561 - R_2022_0494_FFM - Engineering operations - removal of mounds - Land north of Teesworks area Redcar.pdf:1: • The mitigation measures set out in the submitted Shadow Appropriate Assessment

R-2022-0494-FFM-395561 - R_2022_0494_FFM - Engineering operations - removal of mounds - Land north of Teesworks area Redcar.pdf:1:Further advice on mitigation – Habitats Sites

R-2022-0494-FFM-395561 - R_2022_0494_FFM - Engineering operations - removal of mounds - Land north of Teesworks area Redcar.pdf:2:the assessment conclusions, providing that all mitigation measures are appropriately secured in any

R-2022-0494-FFM-395561 - R_2022_0494_FFM - Engineering operations - removal of mounds - Land north of Teesworks area Redcar.pdf:2:Based on the submitted plans and mitigation proposal, Natural England considers that the proposed

R-2022-0494-FFM-395561 - R_2022_0494_FFM - Engineering operations - removal of mounds - Land north of Teesworks area Redcar.pdf:2:and has no objection subject to securing the above mitigation measures.

R-2022-0494-FFM-395561 - R_2022_0494_FFM - Engineering operations - removal of mounds - Land north of Teesworks area Redcar.pdf:4:in the NPPF (paragraphs 8, 73, 104, 120,174, 175 and 180). We advise you to follow the mitigation

R-2022-0494-FFM-395561 - R_2022_0494_FFM - Engineering operations - removal of mounds - Land north of Teesworks area Redcar.pdf:5:Officer. Appropriate mitigation measures should be incorporated for any adverse impacts.

R-2022-0494-FFM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2: works across the site and shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set

R-2022-0494-FFM-EA_R20220494FFM_OFFICIAL_130722.pdf:1: also identify specific actions and mitigation for known INNS. In addition, a

R-2022-0494-FFM-19293141_1.pdf:4:3 Flood mitigation measures 35

R-2022-0494-FFM-19293141_1.pdf:7: mitigation and enhancement measures,

R-2022-0494-FFM-19293141_1.pdf:36:3 Flood mitigation measures

R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:3:considering embedded mitigation and other mitigation measures, to determine residual

R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:3: • Assessing the significance of any residual effects after mitigation;

R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:18: Constraint Section giving mitigation measure

R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:19:planning mitigation hierarchy of avoidance, mitigation and compensation. These measures

R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:19:Mitigation

R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:19: • Mitigation to prevent pollution entering the watercourse

R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:19: • Mitigation to control construction related dust

R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:19:in combination with other plans or projects, provided that mitigation measures are delivered’.

R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:19:9.5 Compensation refers to the process by which any residual effects after mitigation will be

R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:19:requiring the submission of details confirming the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:20:mitigation and/or compensatory measures are agreed, they shall be delivered within a

R-2022-0494-FFM-Ecological Impact Assessment.pdf:20:9.16 With the mitigation and compensation measures conditioned, there will be no residual

R-2022-0494-FFM-21089271_1.pdf:17:mitigation measures. It is likely that a clean cover system in areas of soft landscaping can be utilised to mitigate

R-2022-0494-FFM-21089271_1.pdf:18:Guidance on the assessment and mitigation of potential aggressive ground conditions is provided in BRE

R-2022-0494-FFM-Covering Letter.pdf:8:Assessment at the design stage that, taking into account mitigation, the proposal would not result in

R-2022-0494-FFM-Consultee Response - LLFA.pdf:1:assist in mitigation of historic flooding near to the fleet. It is considered that the works will not significantly increase

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:15: pulled, then a subsea DWCM will be used as mitigation.

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:32:14 https://www.tide-toolbox.eu/tidetools/waterbird_disturbance_mitigation_toolkit/ Accessed January 2022

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:33: these management and mitigation measures being in place, potential impacts related to

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:39: 5.10.2 The approach to demolition as well as any mitigation measures (e.g. to employ specific

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:39: mitigation will be secured through the Marine License, then these pipelines are

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:43: EMP or equivalent. Based on these management and mitigation measures being in place

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:43: management and mitigation measures are correctly implemented this potential effect is

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:44: characterise the existing underwater soundscape. Additionally, any mitigation measures

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:44: behavioural responses, if appropriate mitigation measures (e.g. no piling 3 hours after

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:45: with the Proposed Development. Furthermore, mitigation proposed for migratory fish

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:46: Development. Furthermore, mitigation proposed for migratory fish (e.g., defined breaks

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:47:26 https://www.tide-toolbox.eu/tidetools/waterbird_disturbance_mitigation_toolkit/ Accessed January 2022

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:51: effects is considered to be unlikely. Standard proven mitigation measures will be

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:52: the implementation of reasonable mitigation to avoid or minimise any potential adverse

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:64:potential mitigation requirements; and help establish the ecological baseline. Extended Phase 1 habitat

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:64:and mitigation where required.

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:65: Potential Mitigation Requirements 28

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:66: Appendix D Standard Avoidance and Mitigation Measures

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:67:additional survey or mitigation requirements; and help establish the ecological baseline.

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:68:identification of potential ecological constraints, and inform additional survey or mitigation requirements.

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:68:of an extended Phase 1 habitat survey (Section 3); and identifies any additional surveys, mitigation, or

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:68:  Does not set out detailed mitigation proposals (although potential mitigation solutions are

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:81:determine the baseline of mitigation requirements. The location of key interest features (e.g. potential bat

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:82:potential ecological constraints and additional survey or mitigation requirements. They may not provide a

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:91:additional surveys that may be necessary to determine appropriate mitigation measures,

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:91:that may reduce survey or mitigation requirements if implemented as part of the proposed

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:91:significance of any effects and/or the mitigation that may be required to support scheme delivery).

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:92:conservation importance, to require additional investigations or assessment. Specific mitigation measures

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:92:Additional ecological inputs (e.g., surveys, consultations, or mitigation design; see below) will be required to

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:92:the assessment and mitigation of the scheme’s effects on biodiversity features, which may be important

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:92:effects on nesting birds). Avoidance measures may reduce some survey or mitigation requirements if

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:92:The following avoidance measures may reduce the survey or mitigation requirements if incorporated into the

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:92:(presence / absence / population size class) of certain species and/or determine the mitigation requirements,

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:93:Potential Mitigation Requirements

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:93:The precise mitigation requirements will be determined once the additional surveys are complete, and the

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:94:  Birds: specific mitigation measures relating to birds are likely to be required, and these should

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:95:NE (2015) Guidance: Great crested newts: surveys and mitigation for development projects online. Available at:

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:95: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/great-crested-newts-surveys-and-mitigation-for-development-

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:104:Standard Avoidance and Mitigation Measures

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:104: the Designated Person(s) to brief them on the mitigation requirements;

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:109:discussed with the MMO to ensure no further appraisal or mitigation is required.

R-2022-0205-SC-Bran Sands EIA Screening Request_FINAL reduced signed.pdf:110:salmon and trout), particularly in relation to behavioural responses, if appropriate mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-Redcar Steelworks-AUK-XX-XX-RP-GE-0001-02-SSI1_SSI2A_GI_SCR.pdf:33: develop a suitable safe system of work however, typical mitigation measures such as personal protective

R-2021-1048-FFM-Redcar Steelworks-AUK-XX-XX-RP-GE-0001-02-SSI1_SSI2A_GI_SCR.pdf:33: required as mitigation.

R-2021-1048-FFM-Decision Notice 1048(1).pdf:2: works across the site and shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set

R-2021-1048-FFM-Decision Notice 1048(1).pdf:2: mitigation measures required;

R-2021-1048-FFM-Decision Notice 1048(1).pdf:2: mitigation measures.

R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:5:contingency action and / or mitigation measures arising from the monitoring.

R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:7:NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:7:We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:7:following mitigation options should be secured:

R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:12:recommendations for further works / mitigations as part of the redevelopment

R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:12:associated with permanent ground gas, and subsequent in-building mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:19:As part of a reptile mitigation strategy being developed to prevent harm to

R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:22: how the mitigation measures set out in the Ecological Impact

R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:22: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-Officer Report 1048.pdf:23: Remediation, Monitoring and Verification Reports include mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-63262 NZT - Response to EA - 06.05.22.pdf:8:understood or provide adequate mitigation for these risks.

R-2021-1048-FFM-63262 NZT - Response to EA - 06.05.22.pdf:9:understood or provide adequate mitigation for these risks.

R-2021-1048-FFM-63262 NZT - Response to EA - 06.05.22.pdf:41:for Remediation, Monitoring and Verification Reports include mitigation measures.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-CO-ZZ-0486-01-Net_Zero_Rem_Clarification_EA.pdf:10:adequate mitigation for these risks.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-CO-ZZ-0486-01-Net_Zero_Rem_Clarification_EA.pdf:10:adequate mitigation for these risks.

R-2021-1048-FFM-63262_01 NZT Site Remediation Cover Letter - 30.11.21.PDF:5:taking into account mitigation, the proposal would not result in adverse effects on the site’s integrity, either

R-2021-1048-FFM-63262_01 NZT Site Remediation Cover Letter - 30.11.21.PDF:6:and proportionate mitigation during the site remediation / preparation works.

R-2021-1048-FFM-63262_01 NZT Site Remediation Cover Letter - 30.11.21.PDF:7:• Onshore Unexploded Ordnance Threat and Risk Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy: Net Zero

R-2021-1048-FFM-Earthworks Specification.pdf:9:Mitigation Strategy: Net Zero Teesside ref. NS051-CV-REP-000-00001 dated Feb 2020). The proposed

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:9: • Onshore Unexploded Ordnance Threat and Risk Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy: Net Zero

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:33:linkages do exist and recommendations for further works / mitigations as part of the redevelopment.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:327: STAGE FIVE – RECOMMENDED RISK MITIGATION MEASURES ………………………………………………… 18

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:330: extensive military occupation previously and the quantity of potential UXO encounters, the following risk mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:330: Recommended Risk Mitigation Measures Overview – All Areas

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:330: Plan Briefing Mitigation)

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:330: Plan Briefing Mitigation)

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:330: A full and detailed guide to the recommended risk mitigation measures is presented at Section 5 of this report.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:331: proportional UXO risk mitigation strategy in circumstances where the SQRA evidences that further action is necessary

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:331: If intolerable UXO risks are identified, the methods of mitigation we have recommended are considered reasonable

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:331: risk mitigation, but that any mitigation must demonstrate that it is beneficial. Any additional mitigation that delivers

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:332: so that the prospective UXO risks and the associated risk mitigation methodology might be re-assessed. Certain

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:340: 3. The expenditure of additional risk mitigation resources and EOD clearance;

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:341: Implementation of Risk Mitigation in UXO Risk Zones

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:341: The UXO risk mitigation strategy has been refined to reflect the varying level of UXO risk across the Study Site and

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:341: consequently, the recommended risk mitigation measures will be specific to the level of assessed UXO risk in each

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:341: zone. The UXO risk mitigation strategy is outlined and presented at Stage 5.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:344: STAGE FIVE – RECOMMENDED RISK MITIGATION MEASURES

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:344: Non-Intrusive Methods of Mitigation – Magnetometer results may be affected by ferro-magnetic contamination due

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:344: Intrusive Methods of Mitigation – Intrusive magnetometry may be effective on this Study Site, prior to boreholing

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:344: Mitigation Measures to Reduce Risk to ‘ALARP’

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-03-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:344: Activity Risk Mitigation Measures

R-2021-1048-FFM-EA_R20211048FFM_OFFICIAL_270122.pdf:2:adequate mitigation for these risks.

R-2021-1048-FFM-EA_R20211048FFM_OFFICIAL_270122.pdf:2:adequate mitigation for these risks.

R-2021-1048-FFM-EA_R20211048FFM_OFFICIAL_010722.pdf:2: contingency action and / or mitigation measures arising from the

R-2021-1048-FFM-SSI 1 Desk Study_final(2).pdf:6:Table 7.1 - Potential hazards to construction with controls and mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-SSI 1 Desk Study_final(2).pdf:37:mitigation, mostly during the Supplementary Ground Investigation.

R-2021-1048-FFM-SSI 1 Desk Study_final(2).pdf:37:Table 7.1 - Potential hazards to construction with controls and mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-SSI 1 Desk Study_final(2).pdf:37: Consideration Detail Control and Mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-SSI 1 Desk Study_final(2).pdf:37: slag Potential requirement for mitigation in the G.I scope to assess extent of problem.

R-2021-1048-FFM-SSI 1 Desk Study_final(2).pdf:37: mitigation measures (long term).

R-2021-1048-FFM-377862 - R_2021_1048_FFM Ground remediation works at Former Redcar Steelworks Site - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf:1: NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2021-1048-FFM-377862 - R_2021_1048_FFM Ground remediation works at Former Redcar Steelworks Site - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf:1: We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2021-1048-FFM-377862 - R_2021_1048_FFM Ground remediation works at Former Redcar Steelworks Site - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf:1: mitigation options should be secured:

R-2021-1048-FFM-377862 - R_2021_1048_FFM Ground remediation works at Former Redcar Steelworks Site - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf:2:Further advice on mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-377862 - R_2021_1048_FFM Ground remediation works at Former Redcar Steelworks Site - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf:2:assessment conclusions, providing that all mitigation measures are appropriately secured in any

R-2021-1048-FFM-377862 - R_2021_1048_FFM Ground remediation works at Former Redcar Steelworks Site - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf:2:site. As such, the mitigation measures detailed in the shadow HRA are also relevant mitigation for

R-2021-1048-FFM-377862 - R_2021_1048_FFM Ground remediation works at Former Redcar Steelworks Site - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf:5:NPPF (paragraphs 8, 73, 104, 120,174, 175 and 180). We advise you to follow the mitigation hierarchy

R-2021-1048-FFM-377862 - R_2021_1048_FFM Ground remediation works at Former Redcar Steelworks Site - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf:6:information including contact details for the National Trail Officer. Appropriate mitigation measures

R-2021-1048-FFM-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S1-P02-NZT_FRA.pdf:4:3 Flood Mitigation Measures 31

R-2021-1048-FFM-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S1-P02-NZT_FRA.pdf:7: • Identify appropriate mitigation and enhancement measures

R-2021-1048-FFM-TW-SIZ-XX-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S1-P02-NZT_FRA.pdf:37:3 Flood Mitigation Measures

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:26: Future Made Ground Overall risks low, suitable mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:28:enable assessment if potential pollutant linkages do exist and recommendations for further works / mitigations

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:319: STAGE FIVE – RECOMMENDED RISK MITIGATION MEASURES ………………………………………………… 18

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:322: extensive military occupation previously and the quantity of potential UXO encounters, the following risk mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:322: Recommended Risk Mitigation Measures Overview – All Areas

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:322: Plan Briefing Mitigation)

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:322: Plan Briefing Mitigation)

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:322: A full and detailed guide to the recommended risk mitigation measures is presented at Section 5 of this report.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:323: proportional UXO risk mitigation strategy in circumstances where the SQRA evidences that further action is necessary

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:323: If intolerable UXO risks are identified, the methods of mitigation we have recommended are considered reasonable

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:323: risk mitigation, but that any mitigation must demonstrate that it is beneficial. Any additional mitigation that delivers

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:324: so that the prospective UXO risks and the associated risk mitigation methodology might be re-assessed. Certain

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:332: 3. The expenditure of additional risk mitigation resources and EOD clearance;

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:333: Implementation of Risk Mitigation in UXO Risk Zones

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:333: The UXO risk mitigation strategy has been refined to reflect the varying level of UXO risk across the Study Site and

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:333: consequently, the recommended risk mitigation measures will be specific to the level of assessed UXO risk in each

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:333: zone. The UXO risk mitigation strategy is outlined and presented at Stage 5.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:336: STAGE FIVE – RECOMMENDED RISK MITIGATION MEASURES

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:336: Non-Intrusive Methods of Mitigation – Magnetometer results may be affected by ferro-magnetic contamination due

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:336: Intrusive Methods of Mitigation – Intrusive magnetometry may be effective on this Study Site, prior to boreholing

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:336: Mitigation Measures to Reduce Risk to ‘ALARP’

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment(2).pdf:336: Activity Risk Mitigation Measures

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-02-Rem_Strat_NetZero.pdf:10: • Onshore Unexploded Ordnance Threat and Risk Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy:

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-02-Rem_Strat_NetZero.pdf:15:The aim of this report is to provide a remedial strategy for the site based on the mitigation of potential

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-02-Rem_Strat_NetZero.pdf:18:Risk Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy: Net Zero Teesside] completed for the Net Zero

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-02-Rem_Strat_NetZero.pdf:18:mitigation and management strategy.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-02-Rem_Strat_NetZero.pdf:23:• Development of a UXO mitigation strategy.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-02-Rem_Strat_NetZero.pdf:27:magnetic anomaly was detected in one location at 11m bgl. Further mitigation activities such as detailed

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-02-Rem_Strat_NetZero.pdf:27:risk assessment or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the UXO risk on the site to As

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-02-Rem_Strat_NetZero.pdf:34:findings of the HRA, any control and mitigation measures identified within it shall be adopted in relations

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-02-Rem_Strat_NetZero.pdf:35:stream) in order to confirm the assessment of the waste impact and to implement embedded mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-02-Rem_Strat_NetZero.pdf:35: • Any ecological mitigations required

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-02-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:7: It is expected that any risks associated with ground gas, and subsequent mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-02-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:7: best practice and employment of suitable mitigation measures which would be considered

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-02-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:12:based on the measured concentrations of CoC encountered, provided that mitigation measures were put in

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-02-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:13:• Onshore Unexploded Ordnance Threat and Risk Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy: Net Zero

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-02-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:29: gas, and subsequent mitigation measures required (e.g. building controls) would be the responsibility of the

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-02-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:30: suitable mitigation measures which would be considered standard practice in brownfield site redevelopment.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-02-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:63:It is expected that any risks associated with permanent ground gas, and subsequent in-building mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-02-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:63: suitable mitigation measures which would be considered standard practice in brownfield site redevelopment

R-2021-1048-FFM-4339 Preliminary Onshore GI for NZT (Draft Report).pdf:1321:mitigation of UXO risk.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:1:and Risk Assessment with Risk Mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:2:Onshore Unexploded Ordnance Threat and Risk Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy: Net Zero Teesside

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:3: Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy:

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:4: This UXO threat and risk assessment with risk mitigation strategy is considered a living document.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:4: 8008_NZT_Land_AECOM_UXO_Threat_and_Risk_Assessment_with_Risk_Mitigation_Strategy_Final

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:5: Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) threat and risk assessment, together with strategic risk mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:6: Mitigation Options

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:6: Risk Mitigation Design UXO Risk Mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:6: UXO Risk Mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:6: of UXO risk mitigation measures for the project, should be undertaken once construction/installation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:8: considered intolerable, risk mitigation measures have been recommended.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:8: A high-level risk mitigation strategy has been designed, based upon potential UXO detection of threat

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:8: guidance, an appropriate suite of mitigation measures – not only to zone the Study Site’s levels of risk

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:8: and risk mitigation measures, but also (with regard to the latter) to reasonably reduce their

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:8:Risk Mitigation Strategy

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:9:Risk Mitigation Measures

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:9: The risk mitigation strategy should be implemented through the employment of a suite of proactive

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:9: and reactive risk mitigation measures. Whilst the report delivers a provisional suite of options for

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:9: proactive and reactive risk mitigation, the land component of the site has been categorised into two

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:9: UXO risk mitigation, due especially to the expected differences in ground conditions and differences

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:9: in the likely engineering methodologies that might be employed. Therefore, risk mitigation measures

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:10: Table 3 – Risk Mitigation Measures: Main Site

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:10: Brief Survey Mitigation)

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:10: Brief Survey Mitigation)

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:11: Table 3 – Risk Mitigation Measures: Pipeline Corridor

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:11: y Response e Survey Brief r Survey Mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:11: y Response e Survey Brief r Survey Mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:11: risk mitigation to ‘blind’ intrusive works. However, more detail concerning the exact nature of

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:12: then further consideration of possible UXO risk mitigation alternatives would need to be considered

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:12: methodologies are known. Nevertheless, wherever the risk warrants it, proactive UXO risk mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:12: risk mitigation options might be considered.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:12: Following risk mitigation, UXO risks will not be reduced to “zero”. Residual UXO risks will likely remain,

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:13: is free from UXO rather, that necessary and appropriate UXO risk mitigation measures have been

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:13: Following the execution of UXO risk mitigation measures, ALARP safety sign-off certification should be

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:16:Part III – UXO Risk Mitigation Strategy…………………………………………………………………………….. 33

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:16:11 UXO Risk Mitigation…………………………………………………………………………………………….. 34

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:16: 11.2 Risk Mitigation Strategy ………………………………………………………………………………………………. 34

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:16: 11.3 Risk Mitigation Measures …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 35

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:16: 11.3.1 Proactive Risk Mitigation Measures ……………………………………………………………………………………………. 38

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:16: 11.3.2 Reactive Risk Mitigation Measures …………………………………………………………………………………………….. 39

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:20: not harmful or damaging falls upon those undertaking risk assessment and taking risk mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:23: mitigation measures associated with the Net Zero Teesside (NZT) carbon capture facility and transfer

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:23: mitigation measures, for the land sector of the NZT project (the land sector is defined as the area above

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:23: • “8008_NZT_Offshore_AECOM_UXO_Threat_and_Risk_Assessment_with_Risk_Mitigation_Str

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:27: Strategic Risk Mitigation UXO Risk Management

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:27: Risk Mitigation Design UXO Risk Mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:27: UXO Risk Mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:27: mitigation measures are outlined for the project as a whole to present a coherent risk mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:27: specification of UXO risk mitigation measures for the project, should be undertaken once

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:29: suitable and appropriate risk mitigation strategy to reduce such risks to ALARP. The threat and risk

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:29: assessment element of the report is presented in Part II, with a coherent but high level risk mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:29: strategy presented in Part III, which contains provisional and high level risk mitigation measures for

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:29: efficient risk mitigation strategy, benchmarked with reducing UXO risks to ALARP.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:29: • BP, Document Reference GP 04-81, Explosive Remnants of War Risk Mitigation Strategy for

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:31: In such circumstances, risks may require re-evaluation and risk mitigation recommendations may need

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:32: effect of the recommended risk mitigation measures, which are benchmarked with reducing risks

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:32: assessment and mitigation purposes, informs the risk and risk-mitigating action.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:43: Alpha are to be informed so that the prospective UXO risks and the associated risk mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:43: recommendations concerning UXO risk mitigation in order to reduce risks ALARP.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:50: • The expenditure of additional risk mitigation resources as well as UXO search and EOD

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:51: conducting a number of different activities at the Study Site, without any risk mitigation having been

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:52: mitigation measures subsequently – in order to further reduce their scope and to zone the site’s levels

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:52: of risk and risk mitigation measures, wherever it is reasonably practicable to do so - through the

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:53: risk mitigation measures have been recommended.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:53: A high-level risk mitigation strategy has been designed, based upon potential UXO detection of threat

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:53: guidance, an appropriate suite of mitigation measures – not only zone the Study Site’s levels of risk

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:53: and risk mitigation measures but also and with regard to the latter, to reasonably reduce their

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:54: Part III – UXO Risk Mitigation Strategy

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:55:11 UXO Risk Mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:55: and/or intrusive operations. Because some categories of risk are considered intolerable, risk mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:55: A summary of the recommended UXO risk mitigation measures for the land aspect of the NZT carbon

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:55: 12) in the score for the risk level after risk mitigation measures have been applied.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:55:11.2 Risk Mitigation Strategy

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:56: Nonetheless, this risk mitigation strategy should be implemented through the employment of a suite

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:56: of proactive and reactive risk mitigation measures.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:56: Nevertheless, wherever the risk warrants it, proactive UXO risk mitigation thorough (non-intrusive or

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:56: example due to significant ferrous metal contamination in the soil, other UXO risk mitigation options

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:56:11.3 Risk Mitigation Measures

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:56: The risk mitigation strategy should be implemented through the employment of a suite of proactive

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:56: and reactive risk mitigation measures. The overall site has been categorised into two distinct areas,

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:56: each of which would likely respond positively to different UXO risk mitigation measures due to the

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:56: Therefore, risk mitigation measures have been tailored to suit the land environment and works as

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:57:Table 10 – Risk Mitigation Measures: Main Site

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:57: Response Plan Briefing Brief Survey Mitigation)

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:57: Response Plan Briefing Brief Survey Mitigation)

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:58:Table 11 – Risk Mitigation Measures: Pipeline Corridor

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:58: Survey Brief Survey Mitigation)

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:58: Survey Brief Survey Mitigation)

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:58: risk mitigation to ‘blind’ intrusive works. However, more detail concerning the exact nature of

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:59: methodologies are known. Nevertheless, wherever the risk warrants it, proactive UXO risk mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:59: risk mitigation options might be considered.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:59:11.3.1 Proactive Risk Mitigation Measures

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:59: Proactive risk mitigation measures should be employed ahead of intrusive works at the onshore

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:59: trained EOD engineer to oversee proposed excavation works. Proactive risk mitigation via survey is

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:59: The risk mitigation measures vary depending on the precise nature of the works, as follows:

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:60: when benchmarked with intrusive UXO survey (mag-cone) and/or reactive UXO risk mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:60: UXO related in addition to reactive UXO risk mitigation measures being in place.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:60: mitigation measures may instead be more appropriate.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:60:11.3.2 Reactive Risk Mitigation Measures

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:60: Reactive risk mitigation measures are recommended, not only to reduce intolerable risks to ALARP but

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:60: also to help mitigate any residual risks that remain once the proactive risk mitigation measures have

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:60: be tailored to the land environment. Reactive risk mitigation measures are to include the following:

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:61: Following the implementation of proactive UXO risk mitigation measures, EOD Engineers should be

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:61: Following risk mitigation, UXO risks will not be reduced to “zero”. Residual UXO risks will likely remain

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:61: proactive and reactive risk mitigation measures.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:62: is free from UXO, rather that the necessary and appropriate UXO risk mitigation measures have been

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:62: necessary), those proactive risk mitigation measures that may have been undertaken, as well as

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:62: describing any reactive UXO risk mitigation measures that may need to be adhered to. Certificates will

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:62: also describe any caveats or limitations associated with the risk mitigation measures employed to

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:62: mitigation measures should also be reviewed by 6 Alpha, in order to ensure (and to formally endorse)

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:62: that the risk mitigation measures remain appropriate and relevant.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:62: Following the execution of UXO risk mitigation measures, ALARP safety sign-off certification should be

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:69:Preliminary UXO Threat Assessment Detailed UXO Threat & Risk Assessment Strategic Risk Management Options Risk Mitigation Design & Specification Implementation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:69: National Risk Mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:69: Construction Strategic Risk Mitigation Plan

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:69:Preliminary UXO Threat Assessment Detailed UXO Risk Assessment Strategic Risk Management Options Risk Mitigation Design & Specification Implementation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:69:Concise Report UXO Threat Assessment employing: Strategic Risk Mitigation (RM) options Detailed Risk Mitigation Design Safe Removal of UXO

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:69:Supported by: Comprehensive UXO Data Sources Criteria for selection of mix of options Accompanying Risk Mitigation Specifications Independent QA/QC on Contractor

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:69:Conclusions Independent/Robust/Transparent Assessment Strategic Risk Mitigation Plan Post Construction Maintenance/ Monitoring Plan

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:72: • Risk Mitigation Strategy; e.g. UXO avoidance which delivers the best value for

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:72: • Risk Mitigation Measures; divided typically into proactive and reactive categories.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:72:Tactical Level - Detailed Risk Mitigation Design

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:72:6 Alpha then deliver a “Detailed UXO Risk Mitigation Design”, considering the following factors, in

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:72: • Therefore, outline risk mitigation measures are typically sub-divided in to the

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:73:Operational Level - Delivery of UXO Risk Management and Mitigation Solutions

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:73:UXO risk mitigation execution might typically include, sequentially:

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:89:as well as the initial and residual UXO risk to that specific GI or pipeline installation operation after mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:93: with the law, and to determine if sufficient risk management and mitigation measures were

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:96: competent person will oversee the UXO geophysical survey and UXO risk mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:96: disproportionate level of risk mitigation. The client should be aware of the following common

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:98: 6 Alpha Associates’ risk matrix, which provides guidance on the required mitigation measures to be

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:99: grading and describes the recommended industry best practice, high-level mitigation measures

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:99: Whilst this risk matrix is aligned with 6 Alpha’s standards in providing a UXO risk mitigation strategy,

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:100: may proceed with no UXO risk mitigation measures required.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:100: 1 Tolerable Reactive mitigation measures are recommended to be

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:100: reviewed periodically to ensure risk mitigation controls

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:100: risk mitigation measures are to be implemented during the

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:100: ensure risk mitigation controls remain effective.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:100: 12-16 High Risk Operations may not proceed without proactive risk mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:100: risk mitigation measures must also be implemented to reduce

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:110: reactive UXO risk mitigation measures.

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:110: Should intrusive Magnetometry UXO risk mitigation measures prove ineffectual due to ferrous

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:110: ground or, on occasion, natural geological features, then other UXO risk mitigation measures should

R-2021-1048-FFM-UXO NS051-CV-REP-000-00001_Rev A01(18435).PDF:110: mitigation measures.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-03-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:7: It is expected that any risks associated with ground gas, and subsequent mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-03-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:7: best practice and employment of suitable mitigation measures which would be considered

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-03-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:12:based on the measured concentrations of CoC encountered, provided that mitigation measures were put in

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-03-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:13: Onshore Unexploded Ordnance Threat and Risk Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy: Net Zero

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-03-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:31: gas, and subsequent mitigation measures required (e.g. building controls) would be the responsibility of the

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-03-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:32: suitable mitigation measures which would be considered standard practice in brownfield site redevelopment.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-03-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:65:It is expected that any risks associated with permanent ground gas, and subsequent in-building mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-03-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:65: suitable mitigation measures which would be considered standard practice in brownfield site redevelopment

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-81 HRA NZT remediation.PDF:6:Taking into consideration the mitigation that will be provided by the CEMP, it is assessed that there

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-81 HRA NZT remediation.PDF:7:either alone or in combination , provided that the embedded and other mitigation measures specified

R-2021-1048-FFM-SSI2 Desk Study_Final(1).pdf:45: Consideration Detail Possible mitigation measures

R-2021-1048-FFM-SSI2 Desk Study_Final(1).pdf:46: Consideration Detail Possible mitigation measures

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-01-Net_Zero_DQRA.pdf:7: It is expected that any risks associated with ground gas, and subsequent mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-01-Net_Zero_DQRA.pdf:7: best practice and employment of suitable mitigation measures which would be considered

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-01-Net_Zero_DQRA.pdf:11:based on the measured concentrations of CoC encountered, provided that mitigation measures were put in

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-01-Net_Zero_DQRA.pdf:12: Onshore Unexploded Ordnance Threat and Risk Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy: Net Zero

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-01-Net_Zero_DQRA.pdf:26: gas, and subsequent mitigation measures required (e.g. building controls) would be the responsibility of the

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-01-Net_Zero_DQRA.pdf:26: suitable mitigation measures which would be considered standard practice in brownfield site redevelopment.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-01-Net_Zero_DQRA.pdf:57:It is expected that any risks associated with permanent ground gas, and subsequent in-building mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-01-Net_Zero_DQRA.pdf:58: suitable mitigation measures which would be considered standard practice in brownfield site redevelopment

R-2021-1048-FFM-Appendix1.pdf:5: 2.5 Site Specific Hazards and Mitigation Measures 3

R-2021-1048-FFM-Appendix1.pdf:9: 2.5 Site Specific Hazards and Mitigation Measures

R-2021-1048-FFM-Appendix1.pdf:12: Hazard Severity Route of Specific Mitigation required Risk Reduced

R-2021-1048-FFM-Appendix1.pdf:12: mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-Appendix1.pdf:19: Mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-Appendix1.pdf:22: Mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-MGE04767 Cont Land Response.pdf:2:further works / mitigations as part of the redevelopment

R-2021-1048-FFM-MGE04767 Cont Land Response.pdf:2:permanent ground gas, and subsequent in-building mitigation measures required

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:26: Future Made Ground Overall risks low, suitable mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:28:enable assessment if potential pollutant linkages do exist and recommendations for further works / mitigations

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:319: STAGE FIVE – RECOMMENDED RISK MITIGATION MEASURES ………………………………………………… 18

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:322: extensive military occupation previously and the quantity of potential UXO encounters, the following risk mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:322: Recommended Risk Mitigation Measures Overview – All Areas

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:322: Plan Briefing Mitigation)

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:322: Plan Briefing Mitigation)

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:322: A full and detailed guide to the recommended risk mitigation measures is presented at Section 5 of this report.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:323: proportional UXO risk mitigation strategy in circumstances where the SQRA evidences that further action is necessary

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:323: If intolerable UXO risks are identified, the methods of mitigation we have recommended are considered reasonable

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:323: risk mitigation, but that any mitigation must demonstrate that it is beneficial. Any additional mitigation that delivers

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:324: so that the prospective UXO risks and the associated risk mitigation methodology might be re-assessed. Certain

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:332: 3. The expenditure of additional risk mitigation resources and EOD clearance;

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:333: Implementation of Risk Mitigation in UXO Risk Zones

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:333: The UXO risk mitigation strategy has been refined to reflect the varying level of UXO risk across the Study Site and

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:333: consequently, the recommended risk mitigation measures will be specific to the level of assessed UXO risk in each

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:333: zone. The UXO risk mitigation strategy is outlined and presented at Stage 5.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:336: STAGE FIVE – RECOMMENDED RISK MITIGATION MEASURES

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:336: Non-Intrusive Methods of Mitigation – Magnetometer results may be affected by ferro-magnetic contamination due

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:336: Intrusive Methods of Mitigation – Intrusive magnetometry may be effective on this Study Site, prior to boreholing

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:336: Mitigation Measures to Reduce Risk to ‘ALARP’

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:336: Activity Risk Mitigation Measures

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-05-Rem_Strat_LWoW.pdf:10: • Onshore Unexploded Ordnance Threat and Risk Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy:

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-05-Rem_Strat_LWoW.pdf:15:The aim of this report is to provide a remedial strategy for the site based on the mitigation of potential

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-05-Rem_Strat_LWoW.pdf:18:Risk Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy: Net Zero Teesside] completed for the potential Net Zero

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-05-Rem_Strat_LWoW.pdf:18:mitigation and management strategy.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-05-Rem_Strat_LWoW.pdf:23:• Development of a UXO mitigation strategy.

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-05-Rem_Strat_LWoW.pdf:28:magnetic anomaly was detected in one location at 11m bgl. Further mitigation activities such as detailed

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-05-Rem_Strat_LWoW.pdf:28:risk assessment or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the UXO risk on the site to As

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-05-Rem_Strat_LWoW.pdf:36:findings of the HRA, any control and mitigation measures identified within it shall be adopted in relations

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-05-Rem_Strat_LWoW.pdf:37:stream) in order to confirm the assessment of the waste impact and to implement embedded mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-05-Rem_Strat_LWoW.pdf:37: • Any ecological mitigations required

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:3:embedded mitigation and other mitigation measures to determine residual effects. It further proposes

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:3:Assessing the significance of any residual effects after mitigation;

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:14:assessment takes into consideration the embedded mitigation measures. The Stage 2 Appropriate

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:14:plans or projects, provided that the embedded mitigation measures specified in the application are

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:14:8.4 As no additional mitigation is required beyond the embedded mitigation measures to mitigate the

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:15:particulates to acceptable levels. Taking into consideration the mitigation that will be provided by the

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:15:8.13 As part of a reptile mitigation strategy being developed to prevent harm to reptiles across

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:17:Mitigation

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:17:  Mitigation will be included to prevent and mitigate against any accidents, including but not

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:17:mitigation is possible.

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:17:9.5 With the mitigation in place the residual effects that are of greater than local significance are:

R-2021-1048-FFM-2021-83 EcIA NZT Remediation Rev A.PDF:18:10.1 Compensation refers to the process by which any residual effects after mitigation will be

R-2021-1048-FFM-GEO_STDCO_GEOENVIRONMENTALSUMMARYREPORT(002)sm.pdf:7:passive mitigation measures such as a reinforced concrete cast in situ floor slab with a 1200g Damp

R-2021-0878-ESM-0878(1).pdf:1:archaeological mitigation would not be appropriate with regard to below ground archaeology (including at

R-2021-0878-ESM-Natural England.pdf:4:NPPF (paragraphs 8, 73, 104, 120,174, 175 and 180). We advise you to follow the mitigation hierarchy

R-2021-0878-ESM-Natural England.pdf:5:information including contact details for the National Trail Officer. Appropriate mitigation measures

R-2021-0878-ESM-Officer Report 0878.pdf:3:archaeological mitigation would not be appropriate with regard to below

R-2021-0269-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2021-0269-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2021-0269-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2021-0269-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2021-0269-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2021-0269-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2021-0269-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2021-0269-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2021-0269-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2021-0269-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2021-0100-CD-Phase II ESA.pdf:33: Direct contact pathways with soils could be active throughout a potential redevelopment; typical mitigation

R-2021-0100-CD-Phase II ESA.pdf:33: required as mitigation.

R-2021-0100-CD-Phase II ESA.pdf:53:appropriate mitigation measures may be required.

R-2021-0100-CD-Phase II ESA.pdf:56:asbestos impact on the site and determine necessary mitigation measures. It is likely that a clean cover system

R-2021-0100-CD-Phase II ESA.pdf:57: assessment should be carried out to enable appropriate mitigation measures to be designed that will

R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf:5:Table 10-3 - Perceived risk level and mitigation action 47

R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf:12:their own appropriate risk assessments and mitigation to protect their staff, other human receptors and the

R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf:17: impacted, however appropriate mitigation should be utilised in

R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf:36: confined spaces (not impacted, however appropriate mitigation should be utilised in

R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf:46:preventative or mitigation measures and re-assesses the risk in light of those measures. The geotechnical

R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf:47:Table 10-3 - Perceived risk level and mitigation action

R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf:47: mitigation

R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf:48: Hazard Consequence Risk Rating Recommended Mitigation Measures Revised Risk

R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf:48: Incompetent Made Excessive differential settlement due to poorly 3 3 9 Recommended mitigation measure is complete 1 3 3

R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf:49: Hazard Consequence Risk Rating Recommended Mitigation Measures Revised Risk

R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf:49: increased cost. recommendations and if further mitigation is

R-2021-0100-CD-STDC_HWY-ATK-HGT-PR-RP-CE-000001_C01.pdf:50: Hazard Consequence Risk Rating Recommended Mitigation Measures Revised Risk

R-2021-0067-CD-Jan 20212366 CEMP Metals Recovery Processing Area.pdf:13:Working hours, plant types, construction methods and noise mitigation measures may be issues.

R-2021-0067-CD-Jan 20212366 CEMP Metals Recovery Processing Area.pdf:16:the construction phase of the project, mitigation measures will be implemented as part of a Traffic

R-2021-0067-CD-Jan 20212366 CEMP Metals Recovery Processing Area.pdf:21:The following mitigation will be incorporated in order to prevent significant effects to breeding

R-2021-0067-CD-Jan 20212366 CEMP Metals Recovery Processing Area.pdf:21: to propose suitable mitigation immediately, which may ultimately involve screening.

R-2021-0067-CD-Jan 20212366 CEMP Metals Recovery Processing Area.pdf:21:the mitigation measures in Section 4.5 – Water Quality, 4.10 – Material Storage and Pollution

R-2021-0067-CD-Jan 20212366 CEMP Metals Recovery Processing Area.pdf:22:the mitigation measures in Section 4.5 – Water Quality, 4.10 – Material Storage and Pollution

R-2021-0067-CD-Jan 20212366 CEMP Metals Recovery Processing Area.pdf:22:the mitigation measures in Section 4.5 – Water Quality, 4.10 – Material Storage and Pollution

R-2021-0067-CD-Compliance Decision Notice_R20210067CD.pdf:2: works across the site and shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set

R-2021-0067-CD-Compliance Decision Notice_R20210067CD.pdf:2: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2021-0067-CD-Compliance Decision Notice_R20210067CD.pdf:3: commence until, the SQE has identified and ensured that suitable mitigation has

R-2021-0067-CD-Compliance Officer report _R20210067CD.pdf:1:demonstrate how the mitigation measures set out in the submitted Habitats

R-2021-0067-CD-Compliance Officer report _R20210067CD.pdf:1: from construction works, including any details of any mitigation measures

R-2021-0067-CD-Compliance Officer report _R20210067CD.pdf:3:until, the SQE has identified and ensured that suitable mitigation has been

R-2022-0050-FFM-0050 nusiance.pdf:1: mitigation plan to reduce risks to potential workers.

R-2022-0050-FFM-0050 Off Rep.pdf:4: HSG264 and provide a mitigation plan to reduce risks to potential

R-2021-0753-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:12:mitigation and management strategy.

R-2021-0753-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:12: • Compensation is required to offset residual losses after the mitigation through the

R-2021-0753-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:17:• Development of a UXO mitigation strategy.

R-2021-0753-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:21:assessment indicates a Medium risk from UXO for borehole and excavation activities. Further mitigation

R-2021-0753-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:21:activities such as detailed risk assessment or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the

R-2021-0753-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:29:of the HRA, any control and mitigation measures identified within it shall be adopted in relations to the

R-2021-0753-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:30:stream) in order to confirm the assessment of the waste impact and to implement embedded mitigation

R-2021-0753-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:30: • Any ecological mitigations required

R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:3:3.2 Flood Risk Mitigation 14

R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:6:  To summarise flood risks from all sources, and to identify if required, mitigation measures to

R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:14:3.2 Flood Risk Mitigation

R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:14:mounds from all sources. As a consequence, no specific flood risk mitigation measures are required to

R-2021-0753-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:25:  The flood risk from all other sources is also considered to be low. Therefore, no mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:8: previous uses and any proposals for mitigation including land remediation or impacts on the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:92:Key contaminant linkages identified as requiring some form of mitigation are summarised in Table 3.4.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:95:where they may compliment any landfill gas mitigation measures but are not considered to be appreciate for

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:101:  Any notable variations and associated mitigation from the outline remediation strategy.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:105:  Any notable variations and associated mitigation from the outline remediation strategy.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:106:mitigation measures to be implemented to ensure no nuisance arises from waste storage such as odour or

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:106:arises. Mitigation measures to be adopted include:

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:106:be relatively low. If significant odours are noted, appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented by

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:106:practices to minimise odours and/or utilising odour suppression and mitigation equipment.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:107:The remediation contractor shall implement appropriate mitigation measures to protect any surface water

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:107:There is a potential for mud to be carried out of the site on to local roads during the works. Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:328:Table 7‐1 – Summary of risks and possible mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:421:Table 7‐1 – Summary of risks and possible mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix H - July 2020.pdf:421: Consideration Detail Possible mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank (1).pdf:1: NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank (1).pdf:1: We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank (1).pdf:1: mitigation measures are required / or the following mitigation options should be secured:

R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank (1).pdf:1:  All mitigation measures as described in the Habitats Regulation Assessment should be

R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank (1).pdf:2:all mitigation measures are appropriately secured in any planning permission given.

R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank (1).pdf:2: robust assessment of the detail of development, and to enable suitable mitigation to

R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank (1).pdf:4:to follow the mitigation hierarchy as set out in paragraph 175 of the NPPF and firstly consider what

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:2: Embedded Mitigation 27

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:2:H6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 31

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:3: development. Mitigation measures to reduce any negative environmental effects are identified

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:5: potential impacts as well as inform mitigation measures in line with industry good practice.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:6: or former activities such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation including land

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:27:H4.65 Key contaminant linkages (CL) identified as requiring some form of mitigation are summarised

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:27: Table H4.4 Key Contaminant Linkages Requiring Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:28: Contaminant Linkages Not Considered to Require Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:29: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:29:H5.1 The proposed embedded mitigation measures relevant to ground conditions include:

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:29: magnitude of impact prior to mitigation is medium. This could lead to impacts of moderate

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:29: adverse significance (considered ‘significant’ in EIA terms) if mitigation actions are not carried

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:31: impact prior to mitigation is medium. Thus, the impact on landfills (waste management

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:31:H5.20 The sensitivity of the human receptors is high and the magnitude of impact prior to mitigation is

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:31: considered to be low. Thus, the impact on human receptors prior to mitigation is considered to

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:32: impact prior to mitigation is medium. Thus, the impact on surface waters and/or groundwater is

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:32: and the magnitude of impact prior to mitigation is medium. Thus, the impact on development

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:32: Infrastructure and landscape during the operation stage prior to mitigation is considered

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:33:H6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:33: mitigation (see below) and is therefore not embedded into the design of the scheme.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:35: for further mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:36:H6.10 The mitigation measures would aim at ensuring the surface water run-off from the site during

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:37:H6.21 Site buildings will be designed with adequate ground gas mitigation measures to prevent the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: high and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. There are likely to be

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: impacts of negligible significance after the implementation of mitigation measures. This is not

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts after the implementation of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: mitigation measures are considered to be of negligible significance. This is not considered

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: following mitigation is Low and thus the impact on management facilities during the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, following the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: implementation of mitigation measures impacts are of negligible significance. This is not

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts following mitigation are of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:39: following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts are considered to be of negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:40:H8.2 Mitigation that is designed to protect the identified receptors susceptible to impacts

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:40: impacts identified is considered to be negligible following the implementation of the mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:41:Relevant Description of Mitigation / Description of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:41: also in accordance mitigation measures unsuitable material

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - July 2020.pdf:42:Relevant Description of Mitigation / Description of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:3: mitigation not previously identified.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:3:N1.2 Chapter O then summarises the mitigation and monitoring measures identified within this ES

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:3: to consider additional mitigation measures; albeit it is necessary to consider the likelihood of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:3: • Section N2.0: summary of residual effects (following mitigation) identified within the ES

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:4: effects) and any additional mitigation measures required to have regard to those effects;

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:5: mitigation measures described in Chapter P) as identified in Chapters C to M of this ES that

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:5: reduced to negligible (not significant) once mitigation measures have been incorporated into a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:9: give rise to a need for additional mitigation not identified previously.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:10:N3.5 Table N3.1 highlights residual effects on identified receptors after mitigation. This identifies that

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:10: there are no synergistic effects and therefore no additional mitigation measures are required to

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:10:N3.6 Mitigation measures are described further in the technical assessment ES chapters and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:10: will result in the loss of existing on-site habitats and species and no mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:10: details). Secondary mitigation measures are proposed that will mean the buildings are

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:11: cumulative impact requiring mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:19: mitigation measures for flow and quality of surface and groundwater. The cumulative

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:19: magnitude of impact with mitigation would be minor and not significant for the low sensitivity

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:19: mitigation, the works could have a moderate impact on the receptors of the high sensitivity

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:19: (non-significant) effect respectively. However, with mitigation there could be moderate

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:19: that shall include mitigation measures for flow and quality of surface and groundwater. The

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:19: cumulative magnitude of impact with mitigation would be minor and not significant for the low

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:19: assumed that there shall be effective mitigation measures implemented for the construction and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:20: mitigation measures implemented for the construction and operation phases at both sites for

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:20: assumed that there shall be effective mitigation measures implemented for the construction and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:20: from the Tees. Further, it assumed that there shall be effective mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:20: assumed that there shall be effective mitigation measures implemented for the construction and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:20: significant effect. Further, it assumed that there shall be effective mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:21: significant effect. Further, it assumed that there shall be effective mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:21: the Tees. Further, it assumed that there shall be effective mitigation measures implemented for

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:21: assumed that there shall be effective mitigation measures implemented for the construction and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:24: and whether there is a need for further mitigation (synergistic effects). It also considers the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:24:N5.3 A range of mitigation measures have been identified throughout the ES, some of these are

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - July 2020.pdf:24: mitigation measures.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix M - July 2020.pdf:6:Site and, if present, to allow a mitigation strategy to be developed. This is in accordance with the National

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix M - July 2020.pdf:15: for survival of this and 19th / early 20th century industrial structures, mitigation work in the form of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix M - July 2020.pdf:47:I’m pulling together my reports for both the South Bank and Prairie sites and wanted to establish what mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:1:Chapter O - Mitigation, M o n i to r i n g a n d C o mp en sa ti o n

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:2:O2.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 2

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:2: Mitigation, Monitoring and Compensation Measures 2

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:2:O3.0 Means of Securing Mitigation 11

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:2: Documents Required for Mitigation and Monitoring 11

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:3:O1.1 The Environmental Statement (‘ES’) has identified a series of mitigation and ongoing

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:3:O1.3 The Planning Practice Guidance (‘PPG’) confirms that “mitigation measures proposed in an

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:3: carefully how mitigation measures proposed in an Environmental Statement are to be

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:3:O1.5 This chapter presents the mitigation, monitoring and compensation measures proposed

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:3:Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring Pg 1

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:4:O2.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:4:O2.1 This section of the ES sets out the mitigation measures proposed throughout the technical

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:4: of a range of ‘in-built’ mitigation measures into the design of the proposed development. These

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:4: assumptions on which the assessment and resultant additional mitigation have been based.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:4: requirement of the Environment Agency (‘EA’) to provide mitigation in the event of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:4: require additional mitigation measures.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:4: Mitigation, Monitoring and Compensation Measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:4: considerations on an area wide level. The mitigation, monitoring and compensation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:4:Pg 2 Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:5: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:5:O2.6 Table O2.1 sets out the secondary mitigation measures that have been identified within the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:5: Table O2.1 Summary of Mitigation and Compensation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:5: Environmental Topic Summary of Identified Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:5: identifies proposed mitigation measures for the Teesmouth and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:5:Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring Pg 3

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:6: Environmental Topic Summary of Identified Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:6:Pg 4 Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:7: Environmental Topic Summary of Identified Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:7: mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:7:Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring Pg 5

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:8: Environmental Topic Summary of Identified Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:8: Socio-Economics No mitigation measures are proposed for the construction phase of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:8: Landscape and Visual Impact During construction, mitigation measures to reduce the LVIA impacts

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:8:Pg 6 Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:9: Environmental Topic Summary of Identified Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:9: assess whether additional mitigation measures are required on this

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:9: Biodiversity and Ecology No mitigation measures have been identified For the Teesmouth and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:9:Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring Pg 7

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:10: Environmental Topic Summary of Identified Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:10: no mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:10: Site buildings will be designed with adequate ground gas mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:10:Pg 8 Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:11: Environmental Topic Summary of Identified Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:11: Socio-Economics No mitigation measures are proposed as part of the operational

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:11: Climate Change Mitigation measures for the operational phase of the development

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:11: Landscape and Visual Impact During operation, the following mitigation measures will be

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:11:Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring Pg 9

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:12: Environmental Topic Summary of Identified Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:12: Below Ground Heritage No mitigation or monitoring is required during the operational phase

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:12:O2.7 In addition to the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures described in Table P2.1 above,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:12: possible to implement direct mitigation measures. They are also proposed to facilitate the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:12:O2.12 Chapter N of the ES considered the requirement for additional mitigation to address any

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:12: synergistic or cumulative effects. No mitigation measures have been identified in this regard.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:12:Pg 10 Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:13:O3.0 Means of Securing Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:13:O3.1 This section sets out the means by which the mitigation and monitoring proposed throughout

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:13: the ES (embedded and additional mitigation) can be secured. It also clarifies responsibility for

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:13: implementing the proposed mitigation and monitoring.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:13: may include mitigation measures…whilst… mitigation measures can only be secured through

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:13: Documents Required for Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:13:O3.5 Mitigation and monitoring identified throughout the ES will be secured, in part, through the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:13:Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring Pg 11

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:14:Pg 12 Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:15:O3.7 It is anticipated that other mitigation and monitoring identified throughout the ES, which does

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:15: not fall within the remit of a specific monitoring and mitigation document, will be secured via

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:15: of any further mitigation or monitoring required (such as a Health and Safety Plan).

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:15:Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring Pg 13

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:16: required mitigation measure identified within the EIA.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:16:Pg 14 Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:17:Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring Pg 15

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:18: cumulative effects. This chapter summarises the range of mitigation, compensation and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:18:Pg 16 Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:19:Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring Pg 17

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - July 2020.pdf:20:Pg 18 Chapter O: Mitigation, Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:2: Embedded Mitigation 26

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:2:F6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 34

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:4: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:4: mitigation measures across a range of projects, ranging from small scale schemes up to large

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:6: the appropriate mitigation measures are implemented. Experience has shown that once the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:6: appropriate mitigation measures are applied, in most cases the resulting dust impacts can be

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:8: • Formulation of mitigation measures, where appropriate, to ensure any adverse effects on air

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:9: development. Suitable mitigation measures are also proposed to reduce the risk of the proposed

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:10: application of any mitigation measures using Table 5, Appendix F1 and an overall risk for the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:10:F3.20 Once the risk of dust impacts has been determined and the appropriate dust mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:10: mitigation measures, the environmental effect will not be significant in most cases.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:27: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:27:F5.2 There are no air quality mitigation measures that can be considered embedded for the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:29:F5.18 Following the implementation of appropriate mitigation, the effects of dust soiling and effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:29: Table F5.2: Summary dust risk table prior to mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:34:F6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:34: specific mitigation measures for the site according to the IAQM guidance.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:34: mitigation measures, the environmental effect will not be significant in most cases. The

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:34:F6.3 Specific mitigation to minimise the risk of dust soiling, human health and ecological impacts of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:34: the proposed development is described below, using medium risk mitigation measures for the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:34:F6.4 Following the implementation of appropriate mitigation, the effects of dust soiling and effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:34:F6.5 In addition to this, Chapter D (Biodiversity and Ecology) also provides additional mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:35: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate;

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:36:F6.8 As with the construction and earthworks mitigation, the below measures are considered as

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:36: development, therefore no air quality mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:37:F7.1 Following the successful implementation of the mitigation measures outlined in Section F6.0, it

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38: IAQM guidance and it was concluded that with the appropriate best practice mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38: Receptors Potential Effect Mitigation Measure Residual Effect

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38: Residential receptors Negligible effect No mitigation measures None.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38: resulting from mitigation measures as

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38: appropriate mitigation included in the CEMP and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38: SSSI – Teesmouth and Negligible effect No mitigation measures None.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:38: resulting from mitigation measures as

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:39: Receptors Potential Effect Mitigation Measure Residual Effect

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:39: appropriate mitigation a DMP should be

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:39: This is considered to Additional mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - July 2020.pdf:39: SPA – Teesmouth and Negligible effect No mitigation measures None.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:2: Embedded Mitigation 34

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:2:G6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 37

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:3: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:5: Practice Guidance design and mitigation. For example, flood risk can be reduced and biodiversity and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:5: Good design and mitigation measures can be secured through site specific policies

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:5: mitigation and compensatory measures where the relevant tests are met. Planning

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:9: hazard results show that this site could be developed safely with straightforward mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:9: risk' which can be managed through mitigation measures such as selected land raising and flood

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:10: the mitigation of flooding elsewhere are taken.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:10: biodiversity. Where such removal is not possible or not in the public interest, mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:11: NPPF states that planning should proactively help the mitigation of, and adaption to, climate

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:23: supply appropriate mitigation for the adverse impacts. In light of NPPF, RCBC Local

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:24: l Environmental mitigation measures are recommended in accordance with the EA’s

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:36: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:36:G5.1 The points below present a summary of the mitigation measures embedded into the design

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:36: therefore considered as secondary mitigation. However, the STDC strategy shall be prepared in

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:36: appropriate mitigation for the adverse impacts. Further details are included in the next section

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:36: implementation of any secondary mitigation measures (i.e. those not included as embedded

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:36:G5.5 The following types of potential effect (prior to secondary embedded mitigation) of the proposed

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:36: mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:39:G6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:39:G6.1 The mitigation for impacts to surface water and groundwater impacts will be provided through

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:39: secondary mitigation (i.e. that in addition to the embedded mitigation) from adoption of the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:39: mitigation measures detailed in Chapter H (Ground Conditions and Remediation). The STDC

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:39: for the design of water management and drainage assets and supply appropriate mitigation for

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:40: and supply appropriate mitigation for the adverse impacts.The below table sets out the proposed

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:40: mitigation and monitoring measures for the construction and operational phase of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:40: Receptor Potential ImpactDesign Mitigation - Design Mitigation - Operation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:46: residual impact assessment has been carried out on the assumption that the above mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:46: secondary mitigation, this secondary mitigation will change the effect of the development over

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:46: and above that assessed in the embedded mitigation section.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:46: light of the application of the appropriate mitigation following the mitigation hierarchy and the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:46: change which may be expected from the beneficial mitigation measures undertaken means that

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:46:G7.4 The water management strategy shall seek to incorporate mitigation measures to limit risk of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:46: mitigation will not change the effect of the development over and above that assessed in the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:46: section above which includes consideration of the embedded mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:47:G7.9 Surface water - flows: - there would be a minor magnitude of change from the mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:47: of the mitigation measures and so a substantial beneficial effect for the Tees and negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:47: mitigation will not change the effect of the development over and above that assessed in the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:47: section above which includes consideration of the embedded mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:47: implementation of the mitigation measures and result in minor beneficial effect

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:48:G8.1 The table below summarises the: receptors, potential effect (including significance), mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:48: commitment to delivering mitigation that adheres to the best practice, regulations and guidance

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:48: strategy, blue green Infrastructure and other embedded mitigation. SuDS shall be used to

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:49: Table G8.1 receptors, potential effect (including significance), mitigation measure, residual effect

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:49:Water Environment Impact Receptor Impact including Mitigation Significance of Effects of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:49:Receptor Sensitivity embedded mitigation Residual Impacts

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:49: Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:50:Water Environment Impact Receptor Impact including Mitigation Significance of Effects of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:50:Receptor Sensitivity embedded mitigation Residual Impacts

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:50: Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:51:Water Environment Impact Receptor Impact including Mitigation Significance of Effects of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:51:Receptor Sensitivity embedded mitigation Residual Impacts

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:51: Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:52:Water Environment Impact Receptor Impact including Mitigation Significance of Effects of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:52:Receptor Sensitivity embedded mitigation Residual Impacts

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:52: Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:52:Mercia Mudstone Reduced infiltration Low Negligible adverse No further mitigation is proposed. No significant effect from

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:53:Water Environment Impact Receptor Impact including Mitigation Significance of Effects of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:53:Receptor Sensitivity embedded mitigation Residual Impacts

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:53: Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:53:Superficial aquifer Reduced infiltration Low Negligible adverse No further mitigation proposed. No significant effect from

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:53:River Tees estuary Increased runoff Very high Moderately adverse No additional mitigation measures are No significant effect from

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:53: Spillages and Substantial adverse Additional mitigation measures will be No significant effect from

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:53:Other surface water Increased runoff Very low Negligible adverse No additional mitigation measures are No significant effect from

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:54:Water Environment Impact Receptor Impact including Mitigation Significance of Effects of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:54:Receptor Sensitivity embedded mitigation Residual Impacts

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:54: Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:54:Mercia Mudstone Reduced infiltration Low Minor adverse No additional mitigation measures are required No significant effect from

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:54: Pollution from spills Minor adverse No additional mitigation measures are required No significant effect from

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:54:Superficial aquifer Reduced infiltration Low Minor adverse No additional mitigation measures are required No significant effect from

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:54: Pollution from spills Minor adverse No additional mitigation measures are required. No significant effect from

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:55:Water Environment Impact Receptor Impact including Mitigation Significance of Effects of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:55:Receptor Sensitivity embedded mitigation Residual Impacts

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - July 2020.pdf:55: Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:3: description of mitigation that has been embedded into the proposals;

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:21: (‘EA’). This will provide mitigation in the event of flooding.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:24: Site and mitigation hoarding / fencing, plant and machinery and safety and security lighting will

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:24: be erected and brought onto site. Mitigation and protective fencing will be required around the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:30: necessary mitigation measures must be secured in advance of the development in order to

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:36: prevent development or require mitigation through the submission of planning applications.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - July 2020.pdf:36: through mitigation and compensation measures delivered as part of planning applications.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:4: 6.3 Mitigation 35

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:39:that the measures would deliver, and re-model the junctions. In mitigation, it is

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:40:6.3 Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:45: management plan in the interim will be conditioned, as mitigation for the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix C - July 2020.pdf:128:MC Question – The assessment must be by all modes in order to identify the mitigation /

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:2: Embedded Mitigation 16

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:2:M6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 17

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:3: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:11: proposed mitigation and discussions regarding the scope of mitigation works are ongoing.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:18: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:18:M5.1 No embedded mitigation measures are included within the development parameters for the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:19:M6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:19: only mitigation possible is preservation by record.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:19:M6.4 No mitigation or monitoring is required during the operational phase of the development.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:20: impacts in EIA terms following mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - July 2020.pdf:21:M8.5 Mitigation measures comprising the excavation and recording of archaeological features and

R-2020-0357-OOM-EA R_2020_0357_OOM 29 October 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:1:overall biodiversity loss, and does not propose mitigation on site. The documents refer to

R-2020-0357-OOM-EA R_2020_0357_OOM 29 October 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:1:mitigation hierarchy (paragraph 175) should be fully explored through a subsequent

R-2020-0357-OOM-EA R_2020_0357_OOM 29 October 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:confirms the approach of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat

R-2020-0357-OOM-EA R_2020_0357_OOM 29 October 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:consider the mitigation hierarchy and to secure mitigation/compensation in the absence

R-2020-0357-OOM-EA R_2020_0357_OOM 29 October 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:  The details of compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is demonstrated not

R-2020-0357-OOM-EA R_2020_0357_OOM 29 October 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible,

R-2020-0357-OOM-EA R_2020_0357_OOM 29 October 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:consider the mitigation hierarchy and to secure mitigation/compensation in the absence

R-2020-0357-OOM-EA R_2020_0357_OOM 29 October 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:3:mitigation is taken to achieve good ecological potential.

R-2020-0357-OOM-EA R_2020_0357_OOM 29 October 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:3:the approved details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the

R-2020-0357-OOM-EA R_2020_0357_OOM 29 October 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:ensure mitigation for contaminated or poor quality surface water is appropriately

R-2020-0357-OOM-EA R_2020_0357_OOM 29 October 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:  Where necessary, propose mitigation for any adverse ecological impacts or

R-2020-0357-OOM-EA R_2020_0357_OOM 29 October 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:5:friendly” may be of some benefit to biodiversity mitigation and compensation which the

R-2020-0357-OOM-EA R_2020_0357_OOM 29 October 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:6:aims to deliver WFD mitigation objectives. The Tees River Trust are already leading an

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:3: 5 Section 16.0: summarises the proposed mitigation and monitoring to be secured as part of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:4: review the effectiveness of any identified mitigation and compensation and as a means to keep

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:9: will provide mitigation in the event of flooding.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:11: development or require mitigation through the submission of planning applications.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:11: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:11:4.4 The proposed development includes the following embedded mitigation measures in respect of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:12: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:12:4.9 A Travel Plan Framework has been outlined in the TA to ensure mitigation is implemented at

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:12: use. Other mitigation measures include the provision of an alternative access via the Steel House

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:12: also identified the need for appropriate mitigation and compensation measures. This chapter

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:13: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:13:5.6 Due to the nature of the development no embedded mitigation measures are proposed.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:13: impacts are expected following the implementation of best practice ecological mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:13: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:13:6.3 No embedded mitigation measures are proposed as part of this development. It is however

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:14: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:14: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:14:7.5 Embedded mitigation measures relevant to air quality include:

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:15: the implementation of best practice mitigation measures there is anticipated to be a negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:15: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:15: on site, the implementation of a stakeholder engagement plan and a Dust Mitigation Plan. The

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:15: Dust Mitigation Plan will be part of the CEMP.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:15: development, no mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:15: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:15:8.5 The proposed development includes the following embedded mitigation measures relevant to

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:16: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:17: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:17:9.5 Relevant embedded mitigation measures are similar to those identified for water management.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:17: dust generation and the potential for direct contact with contaminants. With mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:17: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:17:9.8 As set out above, mitigation measures are required to reduce the environmental impact

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:17: and buildings should be designed with adequate mitigation measures. A clean service run will be

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:18: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:18:10.4 No embedded mitigation measures are envisaged for the socio-economic elements of the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:18: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:18:10.7 No mitigation measures are required for the construction and operational phase of the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:19: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:19: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:19:11.6 No mitigation measures are required to reduce the impacts of the proposed development.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:20: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:20:13.3 There are no embedded mitigation measures that relate to landscape and visual effects aside

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:20: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:20:13.6 During construction, mitigation measures will be incorporated into the CEMP. These will

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:21:13.7 During operation, mitigation measures will include the consideration of building articulation,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:21:14.3 The proposed development will remove all elements of the archaeological record. Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:22:16.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 1 - Non-Tech Summary - July 2020.pdf:22:16.2 A range of other important mitigation measures can be secured via planning conditions. STDC is

R-2020-0357-OOM-TGN(E) 304 - Development near NG assets.pdf:5: d) where there is interaction, initial proposals for mitigation measures and design

R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:2: 6.3 Mitigation 35

R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:14: development on neighbouring junctions, and provides embedded mitigation, in

R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:37:that the measures would deliver, and re-model the junctions. In mitigation, it is

R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:38:6.3 Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:43: management plan in the interim will be conditioned, as mitigation for the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:55:suitable mitigation features may be considered as part of the development

R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:108: assessment if no mitigation is applied and the accessibility of the site remains as existing.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:123: network in each of the future year scenarios and to ensure that appropriate mitigation measures are

R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:124: The assessment must be by all modes in order to identify the mitigation/improvement measures required to

R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:125:ensure that appropriate mitigation measures are introduced at the appropriate time.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Transport Assessment.pdf:126:MC Question – The assessment must be by all modes in order to identify the mitigation /

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:2: Embedded Mitigation 16

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:2:E6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 22

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:3: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:3: mitigation strategies across a range of projects, from small-scale schemes to Nationally

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:5: significant effects are identified along with the envisaged mitigation to avoid or reduce these

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:5: vibration assessment and envisaged mitigation are informed by this legislation. Specific

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:18: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:18: natural barriers and provide embedded mitigation that was considered during the assessment.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:24:E6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:24: therefore no mitigation has been recommended.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:25: mitigation measures have been identified to control noise during the construction phase of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:25:E7.2 As no significant effects are identified, no additional mitigation has been proposed and there

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - July 2020.pdf:26: (See Table Potential Effect Mitigation Measure Residual effect

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:21: • Mitigation measures will be recommended for the construction and operational

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix F - July 2020.pdf:22:mitigation strategy, and discuss our methodology and assumptions to ensure the assessment is

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:4: 5 Section 16.0: summarises the proposed mitigation and monitoring to be secured as part of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:5: environmental data, to review the effectiveness of any identified mitigation and compensation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:11: will provide mitigation in the event of flooding.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:13: development or require mitigation through the submission of planning applications.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:13: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:13:4.4 The proposed development includes the following embedded mitigation measures in respect of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:14: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:14:4.9 A Travel Plan Framework has been outlined in the TA to ensure mitigation is implemented at

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:14: use. Other mitigation measures include the provision of an alternative access via the Steel House

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:14: also identified the need for appropriate mitigation and compensation measures. Additional

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:15: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:15:5.7 Due to the nature of the development no embedded mitigation measures are proposed.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:15: ecological mitigation measures within a CEMP for the construction process.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:16: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:16:6.3 No embedded mitigation measures are proposed as part of this development. It is however

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:16: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:17: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:17:7.5 Embedded mitigation measures relevant to air quality include:

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:17: the implementation of best practice mitigation measures there is anticipated to be a negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:17: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:17: on site, the implementation of a stakeholder engagement plan and a Dust Mitigation Plan. The

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:17: Dust Mitigation Plan will be part of the CEMP.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:17: development, no mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:18: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:18:8.5 The proposed development includes the following embedded mitigation measures relevant to

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:18: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:19: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:19:9.5 Relevant embedded mitigation measures are similar to those identified for water management.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:19: dust generation and the potential for direct contact with contaminants. With mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:20: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:20:9.8 As set out above, mitigation measures are required to reduce the environmental impact

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:20: and buildings should be designed with adequate mitigation measures. A clean service run will be

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:20: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:20:10.4 No embedded mitigation measures are envisaged for the socio-economic elements of the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:21: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:21:10.7 No mitigation measures are required for the construction and operational phase of the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:21: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:22: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:22:11.6 No mitigation measures are required to reduce the impacts of the proposed development.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:22: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:22:13.3 There are no embedded mitigation measures that relate to landscape and visual effects aside

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:23: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:23:13.6 During construction, mitigation measures will be incorporated into the CEMP. These will

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:23:13.7 During operation, mitigation measures will include the consideration of building articulation,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:23:14.3 The proposed development will remove all elements of the archaeological record. Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:24:16.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Indsutrial Zone SES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary.PDF:24:16.2 A range of other important mitigation measures can be secured via planning conditions. STDC is

R-2020-0357-OOM-0357 MGent AirQual comments.pdf:2: • All mitigation measures noted in para F6.5- F6.6 shall be adhered to

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:2:D5.0 Assessment of Effects and Mitigation 26

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:2: Assessment of Effects and Mitigation 26

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:2: Summary of Impacts, Mitigation and Residual Effects 36

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:3: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:3: mitigation strategies across a range of projects, from small-scale schemes to Nationally

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:7: iii. Assessing the significance of any residual effects after mitigation;

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:9: had as to how any direct mitigation necessary to protect the qualifying features of the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:10: Mitigation and Compensation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:10:D3.35 It is not practically possible for direct mitigation to be identified and delivered within the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:20: as individual features within this assessment due to any additional mitigation or compensation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:21: feature within this assessment due to any additional mitigation or compensation that may be

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:28:D5.0 Assessment of Effects and Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:28: effects after mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:28: Assessment of Effects and Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:28: this EcIA (Table D5.1). It also details any mitigation to be implemented within the construction

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:28: no mitigation proposed.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:28: process and, therefore, discusses appropriate mitigation measures to ensure the proposed

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:29: mitigation measures outlined below in relation to the Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SSSI, no

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:29: other specific mitigation is required.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:29:D5.13 The following mitigation will be incorporated in order to prevent significant effects as a result of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:29:D5.14 The following mitigation will be incorporated in order to prevent any significant effects as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:30:D5.16 The proposed development does not feature any mitigation to prevent significant effects as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:30:D5.19 The proposed development does not feature any mitigation to prevent significant effects as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:30:D5.22 The proposed development does not feature any mitigation to prevent significant effects as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:31:D5.25 The proposed development does not feature any mitigation to prevent significant effects as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:31:D5.28 The proposed development does not feature any mitigation to prevent significant effects as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:31:D5.31 The proposed development does not feature any mitigation to prevent significant effects as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:32:D5.34 The proposed development does not feature any mitigation to prevent significant effects as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:32:D5.38 The following mitigation is incorporated in order to prevent significant effects as a result of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:33:D5.41 The proposed development does not feature any mitigation to prevent significant effects as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:33:D5.45 The proposed development does not feature any mitigation to prevent significant effects as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:33:D5.49 The proposed development does not feature any mitigation to prevent significant effects as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:34:D5.53 The proposed development does not feature any mitigation to prevent significant effects as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:34:D5.54 The following mitigation will be incorporated in order to prevent potential a legal offence as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:34:D5.58 The proposed development does not feature any mitigation to prevent significant effects as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:35:D5.60 The following mitigation will be incorporated in order to prevent potential a legal offence as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:35:D5.64 The proposed development does not feature any mitigation to prevent significant effects as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:35:D5.68 No mitigation is proposed for the loss of foraging and commuting habitat utilised by the local

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:35:D5.69 The following mitigation is to be incorporated in order to prevent significant effects upon any

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:36:D5.72 The following mitigation is to be incorporated in order to prevent significant effects upon any

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:36:D5.74 The following mitigation will be incorporated in order to prevent significant effects as a result of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:37:D5.78 The following mitigation will be incorporated in order to prevent significant effects as a result of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:37:D5.82 The following mitigation is incorporated in order to prevent significant effects as a result of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:38:D5.86 The proposed development does not feature any mitigation to prevent significant effects as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:38:D5.89 The following mitigation is incorporated in order to prevent significant effects as a result of

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:38: Summary of Impacts, Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:38:D5.92 Table D5.1 provides a summary of the impacts, any mitigation proposed within the proposed

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:38: assessment following the enactment of mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:39:Table D5.1: Summary of impacts, mitigation proposed and significance of any residual effects.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:39: Feature Impact Characterisation of Unmitigated Impact Effect Mitigation Significance

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:39: Mitigation Effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:39: Open Mosaic Loss of OMH as a Loss of OMH across the proposed Major No mitigation proposed. No habitat Major

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:40: Feature Impact Characterisation of Unmitigated Impact Effect Mitigation Significance

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:40: Mitigation Effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:40: Lowland Loss of all lowland Loss of calcareous grassland within the Major No mitigation proposed. No habitat Major

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:40: Broadleaved Loss of all Loss of broadleaved woodland within the Major No mitigation proposed. No habitat Major

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:40: Open Waters Loss of all open water Loss of the Cleveland Channel, Lackenby Major No mitigation proposed. No new Major

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:40: Saltmarsh Loss of saltmarsh as a Loss of open water features and wetland Major No mitigation proposed. No mitigation for Major

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:40: Intertidal Mud Loss of intertidal mud Loss of open water features and wetland Major No mitigation proposed. No habitat Major

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:41: Feature Impact Characterisation of Unmitigated Impact Effect Mitigation Significance

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:41: Mitigation Effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:41: Reedbed Loss of reedbeds as a Loss of open water features and wetland Major No mitigation proposed. No habitat Major

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:41: Invertebrates Loss of foraging and Loss of habitat supportive of foraging and Moderate No mitigation proposed. No habitat Moderate

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:41: Dingy Skipper Loss of foraging and Loss of habitat supportive of foraging and Major No mitigation proposed. No habitat Major

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:41: Grayling Loss of foraging and Loss of habitat supportive of foraging and Major No mitigation proposed. No habitat Major

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:41: Breeding Birds Loss of breeding and Loss of woodland, scrub, grasslands, OMH, Moderate No mitigation proposed. No habitat Moderate

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:42: Feature Impact Characterisation of Unmitigated Impact Effect Mitigation Significance

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:42: Mitigation Effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:42: Shelduck Loss of breeding and Loss of wetland habitats resulting in the Moderate No mitigation proposed. No habitat Moderate

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:42: Wintering Loss of foraging Loss of woodland, scrub, grasslands, OMH, Moderate No mitigation proposed. No habitat Moderate

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:42: Bats Loss of foraging and Loss of woodland, scrub, grasslands, OMH, Negligible No mitigation proposed. No habitat Negligible

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:43: Feature Impact Characterisation of Unmitigated Impact Effect Mitigation Significance

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:43: Mitigation Effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:43: Brown Hare Loss of foraging and Loss of grassland and OMH habitat Moderate No mitigation proposed. No habitat Moderate

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:44: loss of, or permanent damage to, ecological features despite mitigation. In BNG terms,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:44:D6.2 Due to the nature of the proposals and the practical constraints to providing mitigation within

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:45: provided as part of mitigation or compensation measures. Enhancement could be described as

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:49: removed. Therefore, without mitigation, the proposed development is likely to result in

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - July 2020.pdf:50:D8.2 Following the implementation of the mitigation stated, significant residual effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-Archaeological Advice - Business Park and Warehousing Tees Dock RD R-2020-0357-OOM.pdf:2:mitigation possible is ‘preservation by record’ (chapter M6.1).

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:2: Embedded Mitigation 16

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:2:J6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 20

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:3: construction and operational phases of the proposed development. Mitigation measures to

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:10: v Identify opportunities/mitigation measures to reduce, re-use, recover and/ or

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:14:J3.16 Following the assessment, mitigation measures will be identified where practicable. All

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:14: mitigation measures identified will aim to ensure waste and materials are managed in

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:18: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:18:J5.2 In assessing the effects, it assumes that the following embedded mitigation measures apply to

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:22:J6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:23:J6.8 Using the mitigation measures above and the appointment of a licensed and high performing

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:27: Receptor Effects Mitigation Residual Effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - July 2020.pdf:28: Receptor Effects Mitigation Residual Effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:2: Embedded Mitigation 20

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:2:I6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 26

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:4: Mitigation measures to reduce any negative environmental effects are identified as appropriate,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:11: exist in the surrounding area; the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or offset any

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:11: development and their significance. Opportunities for the mitigation of any adverse effects and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:23: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:28: Table E5.1 Socio-Economic Effects (without mitigation)

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:29:I6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:29:I6.1 This section considers the need for mitigation measures in order to address any adverse effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:29: result, no mitigation measures are required during construction.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:29: operational employment and operational economic output. As a result, no mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:30:I7.1 As no mitigation measures are assessed as being necessary, the residual effects are the same as

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:30: Receptor Effects Mitigation Residual Effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:31:I8.3 Given the beneficial nature of the potential effects assessed, no mitigation measures are

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - July 2020.pdf:31: Receptor Effects Mitigation Residual Effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:2: Embedded Mitigation 12

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:2:C6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 19

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:4: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:8: • Proposal of any mitigation measures to offset any likely significant impacts in relation to the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:8: • Assessment of any residual impacts accounting for the implementation of mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:9: after mitigation has been taken into account.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:15: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:22:C6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:22: process and will identify any necessary mitigation to minimise the impact of construction traffic

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:22: on the transport networks. No mitigation measures over and above the requirement for a CTMP

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:23: junctions. In mitigation, it is expected that the requirement of the proposed development to

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:24: Receptor Potential effect Mitigation Residual

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:24: transport strategy to assess if additional mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:25: Receptor Potential effect Mitigation Residual

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:26: Receptor Potential effect Mitigation Measure Residual Effect

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:27: Receptor Potential effect Mitigation Measure Residual Effect

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:27: to assess if additional mitigation is

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:27: Trunk Road effect on driver a Servicing Management Plan, mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:27: effect on a Servicing Management Plan, mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:28: Receptor Potential effect Mitigation Measure Residual Effect

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:28: Road/A1053 effect on a Servicing Management Plan, mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:28: Road signalised effect on accidents introduced to reduce development mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - July 2020.pdf:28: development, will consider if any additional mitigation at these locations is required once other

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:19: propose mitigation, compensation or enhancements where required. A maintain. We may object to any planning applications involving culverting

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:25:3 Flood mitigation measures 31

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:28: mitigation and enhancement measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix G - July 2020.pdf:53:3 Flood mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone ES - Vol 3 - Appendix D - July 2020.pdf:8: whether individual or cumulative, should be avoided. Where this is not possible mitigation, or

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:13: (‘EA’). This will provide mitigation in the event of flooding.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:20: necessary mitigation measures must be secured in advance of the development in order to

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:29: prevent development or require mitigation through the submission of planning applications.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:30: through mitigation and compensation measures delivered as part of planning applications.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:30:5.9 A range of mitigation measures have been identified throughout the ES, some of these are

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:30: mitigation measures.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:31: no on-site mitigation is proposed.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:31: Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:31: mitigation to be identified (and delivered within the development scheme / site) for the loss of

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:32: loss of, or permanent damage to, ecological features despite mitigation. In BNG terms,

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:32:5.24 Due to the nature of the proposals and the practical constraints to providing mitigation within

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:33: provided as part of mitigation or compensation measures. Enhancement could be described as

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:35: mitigation of flooding elsewhere are taken.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:35: such removal is not possible or not in the public interest, mitigation measures must be

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:37: strategy, blue green Infrastructure and other embedded mitigation. SuDS should be used to

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:38: assessment concluded that, following the implementation of best practice mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:38: significant and hence no mitigation measures are required. There is, therefore, no conflict with

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:39: compliance with the requirements of Policy HE3, mitigation work in the form of a strip, map

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:40: in the region. The following mitigation measures are assumed during the construction phase of

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:40:5.69 With these mitigation measures in place there should be no significant adverse effects on

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:40:5.73 To assist in addressing these concerns the following mitigation measures are assumed during

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:41: when experienced from those receptors especially with the imposition of typical mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:43: strategy will consider if any additional mitigation at these junctions is required once other

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:43: junctions. In mitigation, it is expected that the requirement to provide a car parking

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:44:5.98 Taking into account mitigation in the form of compliance with the remediation strategy, Arcadis

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:53: proposals means that direct mitigation cannot be identified and delivered within the site, STDC

R-2020-0357-OOM-Planning Statement - July 2020.pdf:53: provided as part of mitigation or compensation measures will be provided in the form of

R-2020-0357-OOM-Decision Notice.pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Decision Notice.pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2020-0357-OOM-Decision Notice.pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Decision Notice.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2020-0357-OOM-Decision Notice.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2020-0357-OOM-Decision Notice.pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2020-0357-OOM-Decision Notice.pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2020-0357-OOM-Decision Notice.pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Decision Notice.pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Decision Notice.pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2020-0357-OOM-0357 Contam Land.pdf:2:following tasks which will identify the need for further mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:7: effects on the environment are identified, the assessment process establishes mitigation or

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:9: mitigation necessary to project

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:12: and mitigation strategy.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:12: mitigation measures. Minor

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:18: O Mitigation, Monitoring and Compensation Lichfields

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:20: Chapter O considers mitigation, compensation and monitoring measures arising from the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:21: 0 Mitigation, Monitoring and Compensation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:23: O – Mitigation, Compensation and Monitoring No technical appendices are associated with this

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:26: mitigation, monitoring and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:27: 5 The scope for incorporating mitigation measures to avoid, reduce, remedy or compensate

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:27: 6 Identification of any effects remaining after mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:27:A6.4 Mitigation measures that are identified with specific ES Chapters, and the mechanisms for

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:29: minimise significant adverse effects on the environment. Where ‘built in’ mitigation is taken

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - July 2020.pdf:30: (Mitigation, Monitoring and Compensation) establishes a series of outcomes from the EIA

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:4:No objection - subject to appropriate mitigation being secured

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:4:We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:4:the following mitigation measures are required / or the following mitigation options

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:4:  All mitigation measures as described in the Habitats Regulation Assessment

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:5:we concur with the assessment conclusions, providing that all mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:5:robust assessment of the detail of development, and to enable suitable mitigation to

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:6:NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:6:We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:6:the following mitigation measures are required / or the following mitigation options

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:6:  All mitigation measures as described in the Habitats Regulation Assessment

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:7:propose mitigation on site. The documents refer to the detail of this being

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:7:the mitigation hierarchy (paragraph 175) should be fully explored through a

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:7:planning authority that confirms the approach of providing habitat mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:7:application fully consider the mitigation hierarchy and to secure

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:7:mitigation/compensation in the absence of full details. This approach is

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:8:  The details of compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:8:The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:8:application fully consider the mitigation hierarchy and to secure

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:8:mitigation/compensation in the absence of full details and that this is

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:8:modified waterbody, and as such, requires that all practical mitigation is taken

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:9:mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment will be adhered

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:9:planning authority. The plan shall include detail to ensure mitigation for

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:10:  Where necessary, propose mitigation for any adverse ecological

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:11:be of some benefit to biodiversity mitigation and compensation which the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:12:Vision that aims to deliver WFD mitigation objectives. The Tees River Trust

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:31:following tasks which will identify the need for further mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:35:• All mitigation measures noted in para F6.5- F6.6 shall be adhered to

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:36:  Effectiveness of the mitigation strategy set out in the ES

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:37:responses of key consultees, overall conclusions and the proposed mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:38: and Chapter O considers mitigation, compensation and monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:38:  Chapter O – Mitigation, Monitoring and Compensation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:38:  Mitigation: The scope for incorporating mitigation measures to avoid,

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:39:  Residual Effects: Identification of any effects remaining after mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:43:Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:43:The following embedded mitigation measures are to be provided as part of the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:43:No mitigation measures over and above the requirement for a CTMP have

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:45:Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:45:It is considered the most appropriate from of mitigation is a CTMP which will

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:45:identify any necessary mitigation to minimise the impact of construction traffic

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:45:No further mitigation measures over and above the requirement for a CTMP

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:45:of the mitigation measures, there are highway improvement works proposed

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:46:if any additional mitigation at these locations is required once other measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:46:mitigation measures and residual effects.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:46:suitable mitigation measures as set out above.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:52:Potential Effects of Development and Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:52:also been given to any mitigation to be implemented within the construction

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:52:and Ramsar. The only proposed mitigation measures are those that also

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:52:mitigation measures are proposed to protect the SSSI and simultaneously the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:52:SPA and Ramsar. The ES sets these mitigation measures out as follows;

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:53:the site. These impacts and the potential for mitigation have been

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:53:despite mitigation. In BNG terms, compensation could be described as

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:54:that are additional to those provided as part of mitigation or compensation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:55:and includes the potential for mitigation to be provided.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:55:the implementation of the mitigation stated, significant residual effects upon

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:55:suitable mitigation measures as set out above.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:56:compensation/mitigation will be required.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:56:set out in the HRA as the most suitable form of mitigation to control any

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:56:STDC site. This will allow for the appropriate provision of mitigation and

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:56:necessary mitigation/compensation for the site into the wider approach for the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:57:Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:57:line boundary act as natural barriers and provide embedded mitigation that

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:59:Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:59:In order to deliver the suitable mitigation a Demolition and Construction

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:60:from changes in road traffic flows in the local area, therefore no mitigation has

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:60:and best practice mitigation measures have been identified to control noise

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:60:As no significant effects are identified, no additional mitigation has been

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:61:through the implementation of suitable mitigation measures as set out above.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:62:applicant as a means of addressing a number of mitigation scenarios. A

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:63:Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:63:The ES has considered whether there is the potential for embedded mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:64:There are no air quality mitigation measures that can be considered

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:65:of the proposed development, therefore no air quality mitigation measures are

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:65:Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:65:The ES has considered mitigation measures for both during construction and

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:66:emitting activities and therefore mitigation measures are put in place to

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:66:of the proposed development, therefore no air quality mitigation measures are

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:66:Following the successful implementation of the mitigation measures outlined

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:67:information currently available and the implementation of suitable mitigation is

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:67:receptors, potential effect (including significance), mitigation measure,

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:67:detailed and robust overview of the impacts and mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:67:appropriate best practice mitigation measures suitable for medium risk sites in

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:69:Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:69:Consideration has been given to the mitigation measures that will be designed

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:69:secondary mitigation. However, the STDC strategy shall be prepared in

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:70:management and drainage assets and supply appropriate mitigation for the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:70:therefore only including the embedded mitigation strategy as set out above.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:70:Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:70:The development is proposed to include the following mitigation measures;

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:71:The proposed mitigation and the rationale for its incorporation has been set

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:71:mitigation resulting in during both construction and operation. The table is

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:71:considered to provide a robust overview of the mitigation proposed during

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:71:implementation of the above mitigation measures. The ES states;

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:71:assumption that the above mitigation principles detailed in the strategy and

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:71:secondary mitigation, this secondary mitigation will change the effect of the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:71:development over and above that assessed in the embedded mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:71:completed but in light of the application of the appropriate mitigation following

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:71:the mitigation hierarchy and the aspirations to establish blue-green networks

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:71:development following the implementation of the mitigation measures set out

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:71:receptors, potential effect (including significance), mitigation measure,

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:71:impacts and mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:72:mitigation that adheres to the best practice, regulations and guidance noted in

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:72:other embedded mitigation. SuDS shall be used to protect and enhance the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:72:account of flood risk and appropriate mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:73:Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:73:The proposed embedded mitigation measures relevant to ground conditions

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:74:impact prior to mitigation is medium. This could lead to impacts of moderate

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:74:adverse significance (considered ‘significant’ in EIA terms) if mitigation actions

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:75:magnitude of impact prior to mitigation is considered to be low. Thus, the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:75:impact on human receptors prior to mitigation is considered to be of minor

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:75:medium and the magnitude of impact prior to mitigation is medium. Thus, the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:75:mitigation is medium. Thus, the impact on development Infrastructure and

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:75:landscape during the operation stage prior to mitigation is considered to be of

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:75:Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:health receptors) is high and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:implementation of mitigation measures. This is not considered significant in

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:after the implementation of mitigation measures are considered to be of

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:magnitude of impact following mitigation is Low and thus the impact on

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:mitigation is negligible. Therefore, following the implementation of mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:77:impacts following mitigation are of negligible significance. This is not

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:78:the magnitude of impact following mitigation is negligible. Therefore, the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:78:receptors, potential effect (including significance), mitigation measure,

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:78:of the impacts and mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:78:H8.2 Mitigation that is designed to protect the identified receptors susceptible

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:78:following the implementation of the mitigation measures.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:81:Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:82:the socio-economic effects of the development without any mitigation. The

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:84:Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:84:Consideration has been given to the need for mitigation measures in order to

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:84:effects in so far as they are benefits, no mitigation is proposed.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:84:As no mitigation measures are assessed as being necessary, the residual

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:84:effect (including significance), mitigation measure, residual effect (including

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:84:Given the beneficial nature of the potential effects assessed, no mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:85:from the development, no mitigation measures are proposed. The ES does

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:86:Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:86:The following embedded mitigation measures are proposed:

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:88:Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:88:Providing that the mitigation measures set out in the ES are adhered to and

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:88:The ES sets out the following considerations that may lead to the mitigation of

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:90:through the implementation of suitable mitigation measures as set out above.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:90:mitigation techniques to reduce the reliance on land fill for waste. Based on

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:91:Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:91:considered appropriate to consider embedded mitigation that relate to climate

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:92:Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:92:provide mitigation measures to reduce the GHG emissions associated with

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:92:summarises the possible mitigation measures for each of the product and

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:93:mitigation measures against each relevant operational lifecycle stage are set

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:93:Mitigation of emissions from user and staff travel will be developed in full as

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:93:construction related emissions even with the provision of suitable mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:94:implementation of suitable mitigation measures as set out above.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:96:Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:96:The application is made in outline and therefore the embedded mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:97:Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:97:A number of mitigation measures have been proposed to eliminate, minimise

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:98:  For View Point 5 there mitigation via tree planting and landscaping

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:100:mitigation strategy outline in the ES focuses rightly on the detail of materials,

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:101:Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:101:No embedded mitigation measures are included within the development

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:101:Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:101:in situ. It is therefore considered that the only mitigation possible is for the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:101:No mitigation or monitoring is required during the operational phase of the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:102:Mitigation measures comprising the excavation and recording of

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:104:synergistic effects and therefore no additional mitigation measures are

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:106:A range of mitigation measures have been identified throughout the ES, some

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:106:need for additional mitigation measures.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:107:Chapter O – Mitigation, Monitoring and Compensation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:107:This chapter presents the mitigation, monitoring and compensation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:107:potential for embedded mitigation. Any additional mitigation that has been

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:107:embedded mitigation measures relating to the development include, but are

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:107:With regard to more specific mitigation, monitoring and compensation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:107:prepared across the wider STDC area. The mitigation measures set out in

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:107:Table O2.1 of the ES sets out the secondary mitigation measures that have

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:107:In addition to the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures, a series of

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:108:enhances the benefits of the scheme as it is not a required mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:109:In terms of mitigation these matters have been addressed through a suite of

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:111: those mitigation measures to be employed to minimise or eliminate such

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:112: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:112: habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 363.55 area

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:112: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:113: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:113: approved details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:115: accordance with the approved details and mitigation measures therein,

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:116: mitigation measures included in paragraph F6.5 of Chapter F of the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:116: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2020-0357-OOM-Officer report.pdf:117: site. Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:2: Embedded Mitigation 43

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:2:L6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 58

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:3: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:7: 7 Identify any design and mitigation measures appropriate to the development proposals and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:14: the areas neighbouring the proposed development. It also describes any mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:19: likely to arise from the finalised design taking into account mitigation measures and change over

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:45: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:45: can be made or mitigation measures can be embedded into the proposal to reduce these effects.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:45: Appropriate mitigation measures have been explored to eliminate, minimise or manage

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:45: identified potential significant landscape and visual effects. The embedded mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:46: Change Change and Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:46:L5.13 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:47:L5.19 Mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects but are

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:47:L5.24 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:48:L5.29 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:48:L5.34 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:49:L5.39 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:49:L5.44 Specific embedded mitigation measures are not required for this LCZ due to the limited

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:50:L5.49 Specific embedded mitigation measures are not required for this LCZ due to the limited

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:50:L5.54 Specific embedded mitigation measures are not required for this LCZ due to the limited

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:60:L6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:60:L6.1 A number of mitigation measures have been proposed to eliminate, minimise or manage

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:60:L6.2 The following mitigation measures are assumed during the construction phase of the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:60:L6.3 The following mitigation measures are assumed during the operation phase of the development:

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:60: 3 For View Point 5 there mitigation via tree planting and landscaping along the boundary line

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:63: Receptor Potential Effect Mitigation Measure Residual Effect

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:64: Receptor Potential Effect Mitigation Measure Residual Effect

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - July 2020.pdf:65: Receptor Potential Effect Mitigation Measure Residual Effect

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:2: Embedded Mitigation 14

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:2:K6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 17

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:3: proposed development. Mitigation measures to reduce any negative environmental effects are

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:9: effects section represent a before mitigation scenario.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:14: consider embedded mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:16: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:16: consider embedded mitigation that relate to climate change and greenhouse gases.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:16: but the range of opportunities is set out in the mitigation section. As the detailed scheme design

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:19:K6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:19: mitigation measures to reduce the GHG emissions associated with the proposed development,

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:19: across the full life cycle. Table K6.1 summarises possible mitigation measures for each of the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:19: Table K6.1: Mitigation opportunities by life cycle - Construction

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:19: Lifecycle stage Possible mitigation measures Implementation and monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:20: Lifecycle stage Possible mitigation measures Implementation and monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:20: national carbon target of net zero. Possible mitigation measures against each relevant

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:20: Table K6.2: Mitigation opportunities by life cycle- Operation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:20: Stage Possible mitigation measures Implementation and monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:21: Stage Possible mitigation measures Implementation and monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:21:K6.5 Mitigation of emissions from user and staff travel will be developed in full as part of a Full

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - July 2020.pdf:22: substantial residual construction-related emissions, even after mitigation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 3 - Technical Appendices (Section 3).PDF:5:mitigation and if car mode share follows the trend recorded by the last Census

R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank.pdf:1: NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank.pdf:1: We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank.pdf:1: mitigation measures are required / or the following mitigation options should be secured:

R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank.pdf:1:  All mitigation measures as described in the Habitats Regulation Assessment should be

R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank.pdf:2:all mitigation measures are appropriately secured in any planning permission given.

R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank.pdf:2: robust assessment of the detail of development, and to enable suitable mitigation to

R-2020-0357-OOM-322735 R_2020_0357_OOM - Remediation of land at Southern Industrial Zone STDC South Bank.pdf:4:to follow the mitigation hierarchy as set out in paragraph 175 of the NPPF and firstly consider what

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:4: Additional Mitigation and Monitoring Measures 17

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:5: Updated Assessment of Effects and Mitigation 28

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:5: Additional Mitigation and Monitoring Measures 18

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:5: Additional Mitigation and Monitoring Measures 23

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:5:7.0 Updated Residual Effects, Cumulative Effects and Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:5: Mitigation, Monitoring and Compensation 28

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:8: 4 Section 7.0: provides an update to the mitigation, monitoring and compensation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:9: O (Mitigation, Monitoring and Compensation) of the ES (July 2020). The applicant and the EIA

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:10: 2 Mitigation, Monitoring and Compensation (updating Chapter O of the original ES).

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:11: 7 Additional Mitigation and Monitoring Measures;

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:16: mitigation being secured: information on the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:16: All mitigation measures described in the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:18: the control of proposed mitigation measures.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:22: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:22:3.16 The ES (July 2020) set out details of embedded mitigation, relevant to transport, at Paragraphs

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:22: C5.1 and C5.2. No changes are proposed to this and no additional embedded mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:24: traffic without any mitigation implemented. This overall moderate adverse effect reflects the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:24: Additional Mitigation and Monitoring Measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:24: 2020) which confirms that mitigation measures over and above the requirement for a CTMP

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:24: Middlesbrough area. In order to address these effects no additional or amended mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:24: C6.2 to C6.8. These outline that mitigation will include:

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:24: Receptor Potential effect Mitigation Residual

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:25: A66 / Borough Moderate strategy to assess if additional mitigation is required Minor

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:25: Receptor Potential effect Mitigation Measure Residual Effect

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:25: Interchange permanent adverse measures to significantly reduce car mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:26: Interchange permanent adverse measures to significantly reduce car mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:26: Road adverse effect on measures to significantly reduce car mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:26: Lane / A1085 permanent adverse measures to significantly reduce car mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:26: Lane / Cranmore permanent adverse measures to significantly reduce car mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:26: Fleet Lane permanent adverse measures to significantly reduce car mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:26: Lane / College permanent adverse measures to significantly reduce car mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:27: transport strategy, currently in development, will consider if any additional mitigation at these

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:28: mitigation strategies across a range of projects, from small-scale schemes to Nationally

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:29: response noted that they have no objection subject to appropriate mitigation being secured to

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:29: the following mitigation measures are required and an appropriate planning condition or

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:29: • All mitigation measures as described in the HRA [Error! Bookmark not

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:29: (at reserved matters stage) to demonstrate how the “mitigation hierarchy” (set out at para. 175

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:29: of the National Planning Policy Framework) is being applied, prioritising mitigation and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:31: Mitigation and Compensation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:31:4.34 As stated in the ES (July 2020), mitigation for impacts on the SPA and SSSI have been

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:35: Updated Assessment of Effects and Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:35: Assessment of Effects and Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:35:4.66 The proposed development does not feature any mitigation to prevent significant effects as a

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:35: Summary of Impacts, Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:36:Table 4.2: Summary of impacts, mitigation proposed and significance of any residual effects. The data in this table supersedes data from the Wintering Bird column of Table D4 of the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:36:Feature Impact Characterisation of Effect without Mitigation Mitigation Significance of Residual

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:36:Wintering Birds Loss of foraging Loss of woodland, scrub, Moderate negative effect No mitigation proposed. No habitat Moderate negative effect at

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:38: practical constraints to providing mitigation within the proposed development, significant

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:42: wintering waterbird assemblage, mitigation relating to the effect of the loss of intertidal mud

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:48: development. Therefore, without mitigation, the proposed development is likely to result

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:48:4.125 As no mitigation is proposed, offsite compensation is required to achieve a BNG. The approach

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:49:4.128 Without mitigation or compensation, significant residual effects upon ecological

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:49:4.129 Residual impacts anticipated as a result of the proposed development without mitigation or

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:49:4.131 Mitigation and compensatory measures will be implemented in order to mitigate the residual

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:49: mitigation and compensation will be identified within the emerging South Tees Regeneration

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:51: mitigation measures across a range of projects, ranging from small scale schemes up to large

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:52: medium mitigation measures have been recommended for the proposed development, which is

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:52: original ES (July 2020) notes that the recommended mitigation measures should be included

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:60: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:60:5.39 The embedded mitigation measures set out within Paragraphs F5.1 of the original ES (July

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:60: 2020) remain valid. No additional embedded mitigation measures are proposed within this SES

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:65: Additional Mitigation and Monitoring Measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:65:5.65 No changes are proposed to the construction phase mitigation measures as set out at

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:65: Paragraphs F6.1 to F6.9 of the July 2020 ES. The mitigation measures will also apply to the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:65: development, therefore no air quality mitigation measures are required, which is consistent with

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:66: of the July 2020 ES; following the implementation of mitigation measures no significant effects

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:66: Receptors Potential Effect Mitigation Measure Residual Effect

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:66: Residential receptors Negligible or slight No mitigation measures are None.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:67: Cleveland approves the proposed mitigation in regard to the following:

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:68:6.8 To determine the presence of intact prehistoric horizons and inform mitigation strategies, any

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:68: appropriate mitigation strategy for that development parcel.

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:69: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:69:6.1 No embedded mitigation measures are included within the development parameters for the

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:70: Additional Mitigation and Monitoring Measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:70: the only mitigation possible is preservation by record. This approach to mitigation was set out in

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:70:6.6 There is no proposed change to the mitigation measures set out within section M6.0 of the ES

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:70:6.7 No mitigation or monitoring is required during the operational phase of development. This is

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:71:6.15 Mitigation measures comprising the excavation and recording of archaeological features and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:72: Effects and Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:72:7.2 The technical chapters (Chapters C to M) of the ES (July 2020) set out mitigation and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:72: effects. Chapter O set out a summary of the proposed mitigation and compensation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:72: ‘embedded’ into the design of the scheme, those that were additional mitigation measures and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:74: scheme, the proposals include mitigation measures to eliminate any significant effects and

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:75: Mitigation, Monitoring and Compensation

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:75:7.20 This SES (July 2020) has identified no need for additional mitigation, monitoring or

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:75:7.21 Paragraphs 02.2 to O2.4 outline the mitigation measures embedded into the development

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:75: parameters. Table 02.1 sets out a summary of each mitigation measure required by each

R-2020-0357-OOM-South Industrial Zone SES - Vol 2 - Supplementary Environmental Statement.PDF:77: specialism and as a result no further mitigation, monitoring or compensation measures are

R-2020-0357-OOM-Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:10:introduce mitigation measures to the point where no adverse effects occur. The

R-2020-0357-OOM-Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:11: Providing it can be demonstrated that with appropriate mitigation measures

R-2020-0357-OOM-Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:13:Site and mitigation hoarding/fencing, plant and machinery and safety and security

R-2020-0357-OOM-Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:13:lighting will be erected at the site. Mitigation fencing and other best practice

R-2020-0357-OOM-Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:18:mitigation measures:

R-2020-0357-OOM-Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:26: climate change mitigation and adaptation.

R-2020-0357-OOM-Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:38:objectives. This stage in the process also takes account of mitigation measures,

R-2020-0357-OOM-Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:38:objectives, outlines any mitigation measures included within the proposed

R-2020-0357-OOM-Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:43:tower cranes and hoists moving on site. The Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:43: Cutts, N., Hemingway, K. & Spencer J. (2013) Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit:

R-2020-0357-OOM-Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:44:Once the mitigation measures within the CEMP are implemented, it is considered

R-2020-0357-OOM-Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:45:overarching design of the facility. The HRA determined that without mitigation

R-2020-0357-OOM-Habitats Regulation Assessment.pdf:45:mitigation will be required to specifically control in-combination effects these

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 6 HRA Screening Report(1).pdf:4:The conclusion is that in the absence of mitigation, the project will not have any likely

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 6 HRA Screening Report(1).pdf:8: objectives of the site(s). If significant adverse effects are identified, mitigation or avoidance

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 6 HRA Screening Report(1).pdf:12: alternatives and adverse impacts of a European site, potential avoidance/mitigation measures or alternative options

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 6 HRA Screening Report(1).pdf:12: If suitable avoidance/mitigation or alternative options are identified, that result in

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 6 HRA Screening Report(1).pdf:12: If no suitable avoidance/mitigation or alternative options are identified, as a rule

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:5:5.2 Mitigation Measures 34

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:5:5.2.1 Embedded Design Measures and Mitigation 34

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:6:6.7 Mitigation 55

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:6:6.7.1 Mitigation during construction 56

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:6:6.7.2 Mitigation of Operational Effects 56

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:7:7.7 Mitigation 102

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:7:7.8 Mitigation 103

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:8:8.7 Mitigation Measures 125

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:8:9.7 Mitigation Measures 149

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:8:10.7 Mitigation Measures 164

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:9:11.6 Mitigation Measures 179

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:9:11.6.8 Construction Impact Mitigation Measures 182

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:9:12.6 Mitigation and Operational Standards 194

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:9:13.7 Mitigation 218

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:11:Table 9-3 Impacts and mitigation measures 144

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:14: the Scheme on people and the environment, as well as identifying mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:14: • Stronger commitment to the delivery of post-consent mitigation and

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:15: • Greater emphasis on selecting environmental alternatives and mitigation at all

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:16: impacts, measures can be identified to allow for mitigation to minimize any

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:16: beneficial and adverse impacts of the Scheme, and identifies mitigation measures. The

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:16: • Mitigation: identification of ways to avoid, reduce or remedy environmental

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:16: • Residual impacts: the significance of effects following mitigation, including

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:21: reasonable mitigation;

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:36: • Creation of ecological mitigation areas;

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:39: / chemicals, and mitigation of silty surface water.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:40: mitigation is provided with assurance that there will be no such emissions

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:44: • Establish appropriate mitigation measures required to remove or reduce

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:47:5.2 Mitigation Measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:47: moderate or greater significance will be identified as priorities for mitigation.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:47: Figure 5-2: Defra’s Mitigation Hierarchy

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:47: Figure 5.2 illustrates Defra’s Mitigation Hierarchy. In this instance the example is based

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:47: It is important that mitigation is not confused with enhancement, where enhancement

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:47: For each of the environmental topic areas mitigation measures have been identified to

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:47: The mitigation measures are discussed in detail in each of the topic chapters and are

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:47: proposed mitigation measures are undertaken.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:47: potential impacts and provide the associated specific mitigation measures where

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:47:5.2.1 Embedded Design Measures and Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:47: EIA is a sequential process, and this concept is reflected in the mitigation process.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:48: Measures incorporated into the scheme design are described as ‘embedded mitigation’.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:48: Such Mitigation is particularly beneficial as there is greater certainty that it will be

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:48: Where it may not be possible to design-out an impact, then specific mitigation is

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:48: A summary table detailing the environmental effects without mitigation, with the

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:48: proposed mitigation and any residual impacts following the implementation of mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:48: and managed through the application of the mandatory mitigation. BNG aims to halt

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:48: Biodiversity net gain still relies on the application of the mitigation hierarchy to avoid,

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:49: ecological receptors have been identified, mitigation measures have been incorporated

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:52: mitigation, or where necessary compensation, is provided

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:53: • Assessing the significance of any residual effects after mitigation;

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:54: effects when decisions are made, especially in relation to mitigation requirements. For

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:58: planning and is subject to the mitigation hierarchy.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:64: The HRA Screening Assessment concluded that in the absence of mitigation, the project

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:66: embedded mitigation measures will be in place to prevent this occurrence.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:66: negligible, however some minimal mitigation measures shall be put in place for reptiles,

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:68:6.7 Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:68: Mitigation measures for impacts on species and habitats of concern during construction

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:68: Mitigation measures shall be implemented prior to the construction phase to ensure that

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:68: contaminants from the site. This will involve implementation of embedded mitigation to

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:69: Proposed mitigation is summarised on Figure 6-5.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:69:6.7.1 Mitigation during construction

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:69: Birds. Initial mitigation in the form of pre-construction checks for breeding birds shall

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:69: biodiversity area and should provide enough mitigation for the loss of ponds within the

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:69: biodiversity area and will provide enough mitigation for the loss of habitat within the

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:69:6.7.2 Mitigation of Operational Effects

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:69: Mitigation measures for impacts on species and habitats during operation are given in

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:69: It is assumed that embedded mitigation measures will be included within the detailed

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:70: Birds. It is assumed that embedded mitigation will be incorporated into the facility

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:70: aimed to provide mitigation for the development and improve the availability of valuable

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:70: The creation of ponds was considered as part of mitigation for loss of ponds within the

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:70: footprint of the facility, however this form of mitigation was considered ill-suited to the

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:70: attenuation of water. This is assessed as a more suitable mitigation option for the loss

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:70: All mitigation and enhancement options will use the existing available low-quality soil

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:70: mitigation following the mitigation hierarchy, no significant residual impacts are

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:71: Ecological Impact Importance of Impact without Mitigation Significance of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:71: Resource Feature Mitigation Effects of Residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:71: Introduction As above No LSE Mitigation shall include No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:72:Ecological Impact Importance of Impact without Mitigation Significance of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:72:Resource Feature Mitigation Effects of Residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:72: Introduction As above No LSE Mitigation shall include No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:73:Ecological Impact Importance of Impact without Mitigation Significance of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:73:Resource Feature Mitigation Effects of Residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:73: Introduction National: The Small-leaved Mitigation shall include No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:74:Ecological Impact Importance of Impact without Mitigation Significance of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:74:Resource Feature Mitigation Effects of Residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:75:Ecological Impact Importance of Impact without Mitigation Significance of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:75:Resource Feature Mitigation Effects of Residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:76:Ecological Impact Importance of Impact without Mitigation Significance of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:76:Resource Feature Mitigation Effects of Residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:76: Habitat loss Loss of foraging and No mitigation required No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:77:Ecological Impact Importance of Impact without Mitigation Significance of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:77:Resource Feature Mitigation Effects of Residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:78:Ecological Impact Importance of Impact without Mitigation Significance of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:78:Resource Feature Mitigation Effects of Residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:78:Cleveland Coast of synthetic / pSPA is designated for Accidental releases embedded mitigation from residual impacts.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:78: Introduction As above No LSE Mitigation shall include No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:79:Ecological Impact Importance of Impact without Mitigation Significance of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:79:Resource Feature Mitigation Effects of Residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:79: Air pollution As above No LSE Embedded mitigation No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:79:Cleveland Coast of synthetic Ramsar / pRamsar Accidental releases embedded mitigation from residual impacts.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:80:Ecological Impact Importance of Impact without Mitigation Significance of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:80:Resource Feature Mitigation Effects of Residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:80: Introduction As above No LSE Mitigation shall include No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:81:Ecological Impact Importance of Impact without Mitigation Significance of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:81:Resource Feature Mitigation Effects of Residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:81: Air pollution As above No LSE Embedded mitigation No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:82:Ecological Impact Importance of Impact without Mitigation Significance of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:82:Resource Feature Mitigation Effects of Residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:82: of synthetic valuable breeding newt and Common embedded mitigation from residual impacts.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:82:Scrub Introduction Local: Scrub areas Small-leaved Mitigation shall include No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:83:Ecological Impact Importance of Impact without Mitigation Significance of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:83:Resource Feature Mitigation Effects of Residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:83: of synthetic Beck is the only of compounds from embedded mitigation from residual impacts.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:84:Ecological Impact Importance of Impact without Mitigation Significance of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:84:Resource Feature Mitigation Effects of Residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:84: Air pollution Increased vehicle Embedded mitigation No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:85:Ecological Impact Importance of Impact without Mitigation Significance of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:85:Resource Feature Mitigation Effects of Residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:85: of synthetic Beck may provide fish through embedded mitigation from residual impacts.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:86: • Identification of mitigation to reduce residual adverse effects

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:86: 'Residual' effects are those that are likely to remain once any mitigation has been

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:86: • Residual effects with mitigation at Year 15, during the summer, which

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:90: routes in the vicinity of the development. Appropriate mitigation measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:93: considerations. In such cases appropriate mitigation will be required.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:114: account of the mitigation measures described.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:115:7.7 Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:115: mitigation that can be assumed to be applied to the project. For the purposes of this

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:115: chapter the mitigation that has been taken into account at this stage of the proposed

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:115: • Grassland mitigation areas as shown on Figure 6.5 (Volume 2), providing

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:116: Tees Regeneration Masterplan. There is limited opportunity for substantial mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:116:7.8 Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:118: mitigation) with respect to the protection of the water environment in Section 8.5. The

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:118: results (Section 8.6) of the assessment of the potential (pre-mitigation) effects are then

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:118: presented, along with details of environmental measures (additional mitigation,

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:119: Practice Guidance through good design and mitigation. For example, flood risk can be

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:119: Good design and mitigation measures can be secured through site

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:119: mitigation and compensatory measures where the relevant tests are

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:134: mitigation measures additional to those incorporated into the design.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:134: The following types of potential effect (prior to mitigation) of the proposed development

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:134: design mitigation in place the minor magnitude of change which may be expected

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:135: mitigation in place, the minor magnitude of change would mean that the level of effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:137: For these very high sensitivity human health receptors, without mitigation this would

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:138: mitigation this would result in a large level of effect, which would be deemed to be

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:138:8.7 Mitigation Measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:138: Receptor Potential Impact Design Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:139: Receptor Potential Impact Design Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:140: Receptor Potential Impact Design Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:141: Receptor Potential Impact Design Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:141: facilities. phase mitigation measures to reduce the

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:142: application of the appropriate mitigation following the mitigation hierarchy, no

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:143: Water Impact Receptor Impact without Mitigation Significance of Effects

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:143: Environment Sensitivity Mitigation of Residual Impacts

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:144:Water Impact Receptor Impact without Mitigation Significance of Effects

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:144:Environment Sensitivity Mitigation of Residual Impacts

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:145:Water Impact Receptor Impact without Mitigation Significance of Effects

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:145:Environment Sensitivity Mitigation of Residual Impacts

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:146:Water Impact Receptor Impact without Mitigation Significance of Effects

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:146:Environment Sensitivity Mitigation of Residual Impacts

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:146: construction/ operational phase mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:146:River Tees Increased Very high Slight adverse It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:146: Spillages and Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:146:Other surface Increased Very low Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:147:Water Impact Receptor Impact without Mitigation Significance of Effects

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:147:Environment Sensitivity Mitigation of Residual Impacts

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:147:Knitting Wife Spillages and Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:147:Mercia Reduced Low Slight adverse It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:147: Pollution from Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:147:Superficial Reduced Low Slight adverse It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:147: Pollution from Negligible It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:147:Human health Direct exposure Very high Large adverse It is expected that embedded mitigation measures No significant effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:148: spills of oils / fuels / chemicals, and mitigation of silty surface water.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:156: scoping assessment. Mitigation measures are recommended to mitigate the effects of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:156: the proposed works. It should be noted that these mitigation measures differ to the

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:156: Mitigation Measures identified for any Heavily Modified water body.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:157:Table 9-3: Impacts and mitigation measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:157: WFD Quality Pathway (direct/ Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:157: WFD Quality Pathway (direct/ Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:162:9.7 Mitigation Measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:164: mitigation following the mitigation hierarchy, no significant residual impacts are

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:164: With the implementation of appropriate mitigation there are no significant adverse

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:165:Water Impact Importance of Impact without Mitigation Significance of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:165:Resource Feature Mitigation Effects of Residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:166:Water Impact Importance of Impact without Mitigation Significance of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:166:Resource Feature Mitigation Effects of Residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:175: Embedded Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:175: embedded mitigation will allow the blast furnace bases to be preserved in situ. The

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:177:10.7 Mitigation Measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:177: site. This programme of mitigation will result in a reduced loss of evidential value and

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:177: minor-moderate beneficial effect as there is no additional mitigation to be implemented as

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:178: Cultural Impact Importance Impact Mitigation Significance of Effects of

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:178: Resource Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:178: Archaeological Removal of remains Medium Major Implementation of a The implementation of mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:178: Remains of Preservation in situ High Minor No further mitigation The conservation, preservation in

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:178: bases consolidation of the development / embedded mitigation)

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:192:11.6 Mitigation Measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:192: be positive and no mitigation is therefore required. It is recommended that when

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:193: supply is likely to not be significant and no mitigation is therefore required.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:193: significant and no mitigation is therefore required.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:193: measures for the site. The following mitigation measures discussed are also considered

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:194: socio-economic impacts, no mitigation is suggested. It is not possible to

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:194: significant and no mitigation is therefore required.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:195: significant and no mitigation is therefore required.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:195:11.6.8 Construction Impact Mitigation Measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:195: assuming implementation of the mitigation measures proposed.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:196: consideration Impact After Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:196: Mitigation measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:197: on ecological receptors have been identified, mitigation measures have been

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:197: use of specific plant) and noise mitigation.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:199: Paragraph 008 (Reference ID: 32-008-20140306): “Mitigation options where necessary

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:207: scale of these impacts depends on the dust suppression and other mitigation measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:207:12.6 Mitigation and Operational Standards

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:209: of the proposed development, the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce, or

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:209: and deliverable, subject to appropriate mitigation.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:211: “The Transport Assessment or Transport Statement may propose mitigation measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:219: description of the mitigation measures designed to avoid, reduce or, if possible,

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:226: Embedded Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:226: These are mitigation measures which will be designed into the proposals and are integral

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:227: implementation of mitigation measures. The potential impact will be medium-term (3

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231:13.7 Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231: Whilst mitigation measures are not required in accordance with the approach presented

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231: Given the above it is considered that mitigation measures are not required in accordance

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231: Given the above it is considered that mitigation measures are not required in accordance

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231: Whilst mitigation measures are not required in accordance with the approach presented

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:231: Whilst mitigation measures are not required in accordance with the approach presented

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: the local level. No mitigation measures are therefore required.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:232: development phases). Mitigation measures to prevent, reduce or offset the potential

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:233: With regards to all of the above, it is considered that once the identified mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:234: Description of Effect Potential impact Mitigation Residual Effect including

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:242: absence of mitigation, the project will have likely significant

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:244: In the absence of mitigation, the mineral processing proposed

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:249: The following commitments have been made to make sure that the mitigation stated in

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:250: • Mitigation shall include appropriate biosecurity measures. These shall follow the Check-

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:250: • Ecological enhancement / mitigation areas to be created on c. 7ha of site to replace the

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 - Energy Recovery Facility Environmental Statement.pdf:251: operational phase mitigation measures to reduce the potential for identified impacts to

R-2019-0767-OOM-EA R_2019_0767_OOM 29 Jan 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:3:impacts and proposed mitigation of the proposed development relevant to adjacent

R-2019-0767-OOM-EA R_2019_0767_OOM 29 Jan 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:3:We encourage and support the proposal to provide on-site mitigation to improve the

R-2019-0767-OOM-EA R_2019_0767_OOM 29 Jan 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:3:• Mitigation measure to include the safeguarding and enhancement of 5.73 Ha of

R-2019-0767-OOM-EA R_2019_0767_OOM 29 Jan 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:3:and incorporated into such mitigation.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 6 HRA Screening Report.pdf:4:The conclusion is that in the absence of mitigation, the project will not have any likely

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 6 HRA Screening Report.pdf:8: objectives of the site(s). If significant adverse effects are identified, mitigation or avoidance

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 6 HRA Screening Report.pdf:12: alternatives and adverse impacts of a European site, potential avoidance/mitigation measures or alternative options

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 6 HRA Screening Report.pdf:12: If suitable avoidance/mitigation or alternative options are identified, that result in

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 6 HRA Screening Report.pdf:12: If no suitable avoidance/mitigation or alternative options are identified, as a rule

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:4:7. Mitigation 64

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:4: Mitigation Included by Design 64

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:4: Recommended Mitigation 64

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:6:implement a package of mitigation measures to minimise dust emissions. With these measures in place, it is

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:6:mitigation are judged to be potentially significant due to existing conditions at the ecological sites. Consideration

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:9:the weather conditions. The scale of these impacts depends on the dust suppression and other mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:13:Paragraph: 008 Reference ID: 32-008-20191101:“Mitigation options will need to be locationally specific, will

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:13:planning authorities work with applicants to consider appropriate mitigation so as to ensure new development is

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:17:(see Appendix 2) to identify appropriate mitigation measures commensurate with the risk.

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:19:of the risk assessment is to identify site specific mitigation that, once implemented, should ensure that there will

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:19:be no significant effect. Therefore, the assessment has been used to determine an appropriate level of mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:19:The determination of which mitigation measures are recommended include elements of professional judgement

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:46:Proposed Development. Based on the impact assessment, appropriate mitigation has been identified.

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:46:two factors are then combined to determine the risk of dust impacts with no mitigation applied.

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:47:specific mitigation, trackout may occur from roads up to 500m from large development sites, as measured from

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:47:no mitigation applied. A summary of the unmitigated risk during each activity is provided in Table 27.

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:62:The operational air quality effects on human health without mitigation are judged to be not significant. This

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:63:The operational air quality effects on sensitive habitats without mitigation are judged to be potentially significant

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:64:7. Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:64: Mitigation Included by Design

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:64: Recommended Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:64:To mitigate the potential impacts during the construction phase, it is recommended that mitigation measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:64:consistent with the IAQM guidance are implemented. These mitigation measures have been selected for the

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:64:Table 53: Fugitive dust mitigation measures that are applicable to the Proposed Development

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:64:Issue Mitigation Measure

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:65:Issue Mitigation Measure

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:66:Issue Mitigation Measure

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:66: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:66:No further operational mitigation measures are proposed other than those included by design.

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:67:Assuming the relevant mitigation measures outlined in the mitigation section are implemented through, for

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:68:works has been used to identify appropriate mitigation measures. Provided these are implemented, for example

R-2019-0767-OOM-REP-1011778-AQ-CR-20200306-Grangetown Prairie Energy from Waste-AQA-R02.pdf:68:The operational air quality effects on sensitive habitats without mitigation are judged to be potentially significant

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 10 Desk Based Assessment.pdf:9:  To formulate a mitigation strategy for this impact or a strategy for further

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 10 Desk Based Assessment.pdf:9: investigation where insufficient information is available for mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-Environmental Statement ES Volume 2.pdf:9: Figure 6-5 Ecological Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 Ecology Report.pdf:1: Area C: Ecological mitigation area

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 Ecology Report.pdf:2:a material consideration in planning and is subject to the mitigation hierarchy.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 Ecology Report.pdf:2:the mitigation hierarchy.

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 Ecology Report.pdf:2:occurring. The measures outlined for habitat will provide an appropriate level of mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-2019s0951 Ecology Report.pdf:3: • Mitigation measure to include the safeguarding and enhancement of 5.73 Ha of

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:1: Cultural associations / Mitigation has the potential to put No effect

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:2: Potential mitigation N/A.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:2: mitigation: features or elements within this

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:2: Potential mitigation N/A.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:2: mitigation: features or elements within this

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:3: Potential mitigation N/A.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:3: with mitigation: features or elements within

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:3: Potential mitigation N/A.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:3: with mitigation: features or elements within

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:4: Potential mitigation N/A.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:4: with mitigation: any features or elements

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:4: Potential mitigation Management of traffic movements and controls on operational

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:4: with mitigation: perceptible change as the

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:5:Potential mitigation Careful consideration of façade treatment, layout and siting of

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:5:mitigation: quality and condition of the magnitude of Beneficial

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:6: Potential mitigation N/A.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:6: mitigation: Operation

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:6: Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:7:mitigation: Operation development visible above the existing tree line. Views to the top of Adverse.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:7:Potential mitigation Potential mitigation planting associated with the proposed residential development at the site within

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:7:mitigation: Operation term by proposed residential development in the foreground of the

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:8:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:8:mitigation: Operation green space matures and provides further screening.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:8:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:8:mitigation: Operation matures.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:9:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:9:mitigation: Operation Chimney stack, flue and boiler house clearly visible alongside moderate

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:10:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:10:mitigation: Operation Chimney stack, flue and boiler house clearly visible alongside pylons. moderate

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:10:Potential mitigation Consideration of siting of built elements as far from the north boundary of the site as possible to reduce

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:10:mitigation: Operation built buildings and maintained external environment improve the moderate

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:11:Potential mitigation Consideration of siting of built elements as far from the west boundary of the site as possible to reduce

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:11:mitigation: Operation replace views to derelict and degraded brownfield area. All element of moderate

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:12:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:12:mitigation: Operation the viewpoint matures and prevents views. Adverse.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:12:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:12:mitigation: Operation visible above existing works units through gaps in built form and at Adverse.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:13:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:13:mitigation: Operation above existing works units through gaps in built form such as across Adverse.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:14:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:14:mitigation: Operation with flue, Chimney stack and boiler house visible above intervening Adverse.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:15:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:15:mitigation: Operation elements of the facility, seen through the existing vegetation around Moderate

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:15:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:16:mitigation: Operation chimney stack and flue will be seen in amongst the vertical Adverse.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:16:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:16:mitigation: Operation chimney stack and flue will be seen in amongst the vertical Moderate

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:17:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:17:mitigation: vegetation. Chimney stack and flue will be visible at the at the site Moderate

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:18:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:18:mitigation: National Trail through gaps in and over vegetation. Chimney stack, Moderate

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:19:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:19:mitigation: Views to flue, chimney stack, boiler house and all ancillary buildings Adverse.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:20:mitigation: Tees, across open rural areas and with industrial development clearly

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:21:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:21:mitigation: open rural areas and with industrial development clearly visible in the Adverse.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:22:mitigation: Operation within the Teesmouth National Nature Reserve, with industrial ble.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:23:Potential mitigation Consideration of cladding and facade treatment of most visible parts of the facility to minimise visual

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix D Landscape and Visual Impact Tables.pdf:23:mitigation: across open rural areas and with industrial development clearly visible Adverse. Adverse.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:4:6.3 Water Body Mitigation Measures …………………………………………………………………………..23

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:5:Table 6-1: Impacts and mitigation measures 21

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:5:Table 6-2: Assessment of the proposed works against the water body's mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:8: Specific mitigation measures have been identified for each Artificial and Heavily

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:8: Modified water body and are listed in the RBMP. These mitigation measures are

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:9: Objectives, together with the specific actions (mitigation measures) necessary to

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:11: impacts of the proposed scheme in more detail and recommend necessary mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:27: upon suitable mitigation measures, a good understanding of the propose scheme and

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:27: scoping assessment. Mitigation measures are recommended to mitigate the effects of

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:27: the proposed works. It should be noted that these mitigation measures differ to the

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:27: Mitigation Measures identified for any Heavily Modified water body.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:27:Table 6-1: Impacts and mitigation measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:27: WFD Quality Element Pathway (direct/ indirect/ Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:28: WFD Quality Element Pathway (direct/ Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:29: WFD Quality Element Pathway (direct/ Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:29:6.3 Water Body Mitigation Measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:29: There are mitigation measures contributing to better ecological potential for the water

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:29: works to deliver these mitigation measures, or the risk that the works could prevent

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:30:mitigation measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:30: water body Reasons for not Mitigation Measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:30: ports and harbours use. There are several mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:30: measures not currently in place. Relevant mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:30: mitigation measures. The proposal provides Net

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:30: mitigation measures.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:30: no mitigation measures currently allocated.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:30: There are no mitigation measures currently allocated.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:30: therefore contributes to future mitigation measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:30: Following consideration of the potential impacts and recommended mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:30: measures, as well as the appraised Mitigation Measures for the water body, Table 6-3

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:30: water body as long as the suggested mitigation measures identified in Table

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:30: body to achieve its WFD status the mitigation measures in Table 6-1 will ensure this can be achieved.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:30: cause a permanent exclusion or as long as mitigation measures are followed.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:30: objectives Biodiversity Gain and therefore contributes to the mitigation measures that

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:31: Appropriate mitigation measures shall be implemented to ensure that habitats within

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:31: construction phase. Mitigation should include:

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 8 WFD Assessment.pdf:33: assessed. Implementation of the mitigation measures described above will ensure the

R-2019-0767-OOM-R-2019-0767-OOM-Archaeological Advice - Grangetown ERF R-2019-0767-OOM.pdf:1:the mitigation of the effects on the resource. These recommendations are considered

R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:35: species such as Dingy Skipper (Erynnis tages) and Grayling (Hipparchia Semele). Mitigation for the

R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:35: further surveys or licences for European Protected Species were required. However, mitigation for

R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:36: The HRA Screening concluded that, in the absence of appropriate mitigation measures, the

R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:36: The Environmental Objectives, together with the specific actions (mitigation measures) necessary

R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:37: waterbodies assessed. Implementation of the mitigation measures described within the WFD will

R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:37: Embedded mitigation will be included within the design, for example the vehicles would going in

R-2019-0767-OOM-20191201 ERF Planning DAS_Issued.pdf:37: As with noise, embedded mitigation will be included within the design to manage potential air

R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 6-5 Ecological Mitigation.pdf:1: ECOLOGICAL MITIGATION

R-2019-0767-OOM-Figure 6-5 Ecological Mitigation.pdf:1: FIGURE 6-5: ECOLOGICAL MITIGATION

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Response.pdf:2:during the construction of the site to prevent leaks and spills of oils / fuels / chemicals, and mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:2: • a description of the mitigation measures that will be implemented to remove, avoid or reduce

R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:2:that the mitigation will manage the effects of greatest importance and aim to reduce environment

R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:2:areas will have their own assessment guidelines for impact assessment. Impacts and mitigation are

R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:7:the impacts have been reduced through the design and mitigation that will be implemented.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:7: Mitigation: The surviving bases of the late 19th and 20th century blast furnaces will be retained on

R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:8:Mitigation: In order to ensure that flood risk is not

R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:8: Mitigation: Although the proposed development will

R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:8:Mitigation: The Energy from Waste facility will be

R-2019-0767-OOM-Non Technical Summary_Final.pdf:9:Mitigation: The work would be undertaken in accordance with EA guidance. Therefore, any effects

R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:4:The conclusion is that in the absence of mitigation, the project will have a likely significant

R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:8: conservation objectives of the site(s). If significant adverse effects are identified, mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:9: package of mitigation measures to minimise dust emissions. With these measures in place,

R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:12: alternatives and adverse impacts of a European site, potential avoidance/mitigation measures or alternative options

R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:12: If suitable avoidance/mitigation or alternative options are identified, that result in

R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:12: If no suitable avoidance/mitigation or alternative options are identified, as a rule

R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:33: works and mitigation measures and the conservation objectives for each European site, the

R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:34: environmental potential effect mitigation and on site integrity.

R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:34: Species: Redshank without mitigation are have been

R-2019-0767-OOM-BPM-JBAU-XX-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P01.01-HRA Report_Issued_2020303.pdf:35: environmental potential effect mitigation and on site integrity.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:20: “The Transport Assessment or Transport Statement may propose mitigation measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:45:during the construction of the site to prevent leaks and spills of oils / fuels / chemicals, and mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:50:development on the features of special interest within the site and should identify such mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:51:proposals for mitigation of any impacts and if appropriate, compensation measures. Contact the local

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:51:results, impact assessments and appropriate accompanying mitigation strategies included as part of

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:52:advice for protected species which includes links to guidance on survey and mitigation.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:52:therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation proposals for Habitats and Species

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:52: Full details of any mitigation or compensation that might be required.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:54:the development. Appropriate mitigation measures should be incorporated for any adverse impacts.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 13 Grangetown Prairie Transport Statement.pdf:56:Therefore, we object to the above proposition in its current form. If some mitigation is provided with

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:5:determine the significance of these impacts and the scope for mitigation.

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:9:potential impacts and proposed mitigation of the proposed development

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:10:We encourage and support the proposal to provide on-site mitigation to

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:10: • Mitigation measure to include the safeguarding and enhancement of

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:10:and incorporated into such mitigation.

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:15: stage that, taking into account mitigation, the proposal would not result

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:15:recommendations about the mitigation of the effects on the resource. These

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:20:  Effectiveness of the mitigation strategy set out in the ES

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:27:responses of key consultees, overall conclusions and the proposed mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:28: • Mitigation: identification of ways to avoid, reduce or remedy

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:28: • Residual impacts: the significance of effects following mitigation,

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:31:  Establish appropriate mitigation measures required to remove or

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:32:The next stage of the process is mitigation and the ES, along with consultee

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:32: priorities for mitigation…

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:32: For each of the environmental topic areas mitigation measures have been

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:32: The mitigation measures are discussed in detail in each of the topic

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:32: mitigation measures are undertaken.

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:32: mitigation measures where necessary. The CEMP will also detail

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:32: ‘embedded mitigation’. Such Mitigation is particularly beneficial as there is

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:32: mitigation is required. This may include for example habitat compensation

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:33: A summary table detailing the environmental effects without mitigation,

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:33: with the proposed mitigation and any residual impacts following the

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:33: implementation of mitigation measures, can be found at the end of each

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:33: through the application of the mandatory mitigation. BNG aims to halt the

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:33: Biodiversity net gain still relies on the application of the mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:33:Chapter 5 of the ES summaries the approach to assessment and mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:33:that provides the basis for the assessment of the proposal and the mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:34: • Assessing the significance of any residual effects after mitigation;

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:34: mitigation requirements. For the purpose of ecological assessment,

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:36:habitat is a material consideration in planning and is subject to the mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:39: mitigation, the project will have likely significant effects both alone and in-

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:41: embedded mitigation measures will be in place to prevent this

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:41: to be negligible, however some minimal mitigation measures shall be

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:43:Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:43:The ES sets out a mitigation strategy which may be summarised as follows;

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:44:mitigation for the loss of habitat within the works footprint.

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:44:appropriate mitigation following the mitigation hierarchy, no significant residual

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:45:project and proposes an appropriate response in terms of mitigation through a

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:45:dealt with by planning condition. Mitigation mainly takes the form of the

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:45:result from the development in terms of habitat loss, but appropriate mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:46:on ecology and proposes an appropriate mitigation strategy

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:46:terms and a mitigation strategy. The study draws a distinction between

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:48:In terms of the mitigation strategy the ES recognises the limitations of

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:48: scenario, taking into account the minimum expected mitigation that can be

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:48: mitigation that has been taken into account at this stage of the proposed

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:48: • Grassland mitigation areas as shown on Figure 6.5 (Volume 2),

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:49:In terms of the overall mitigation strategy this is focused on good design and

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:50:mitigation strategy outline in the ES focuses rightly on the detail of materials,

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:52:during construction are unlikely to vary. Without mitigation, the impact on the

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:52:In terms of human health and in the absence of mitigation, the risk from

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:53:human health could be of moderate magnitude of change, without mitigation,

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:53:Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:54:development and application of the appropriate mitigation strategy, no

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:54:hydrogeology concluding that, provided the appropriate mitigation strategy is

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:56:Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:57:account of flood risk and appropriate mitigation, assessing the use of SUDs,

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:60:Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:60:In terms of embedded mitigation an area of some 2ha will be excluded from

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:61:mitigation to be implemented as part of the application.

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:63:Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:63:no mitigation is required. The socio-economic impacts of the proposed

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:63:development on local employment is likely to be positive and no mitigation is

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:64:mitigation is required. The issue of crime will be dealt with by on-site security.

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:64: less severe adverse socio-economic impacts, no mitigation is

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:65:to not be significant and no mitigation is therefore required.

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:65:be significant and no mitigation is therefore required.

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:65:Construction Impact Mitigation Measures

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:65:environment but with mitigation measures in place residual effects would not

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:66:mitigation are judged to be potentially significant due to existing conditions at

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:68:Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:68:construction works has been used to identify appropriate mitigation measures.

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:69:The operational air quality effects on sensitive habitats without mitigation are

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:70:appropriate mitigation. The ES sets out legislation, planning policy and

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:72:level, prior to the implementation of mitigation measures. The potential impact

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:72:adverse significance at the local level, no mitigation measures are therefore

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:73:This section of the ES sets out the mitigation strategy based on the proposed

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:73:mitigation measure identified in each of the preceding topic chapters and

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:76:to large scale development with the minimum of landscape impacts. Mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:76:Finally, the ES sets out the mitigation strategy based on the proposed

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:76:mitigation measure identified in each of the preceding topic chapters and

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:78: out those mitigation measures to be employed to minimise or eliminate

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:78: details of all those mitigation measures set out in Chapter 15 of Volume

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:78: and Chapter 7 (Mitigation) of the Air Quality Assessment Rev 02 6 March

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:78: mitigation measures required;

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:86:potential impacts and proposed mitigation of the proposed development

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:86:We encourage and support the proposal to provide on-site mitigation to

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:86:Mitigation measure to include the safeguarding and enhancement of 5.73 Ha

R-2019-0767-OOM-officer report.pdf:86:and incorporated into such mitigation.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 12 Grangetown Prairie Baseline Noise Survey Report.pdf:3:Mitigation selections should take cognisance of the limitations proposed for the cumulative effect of the

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 12 Grangetown Prairie Baseline Noise Survey Report.pdf:13: mitigation, the noise levels are still above the relevant threshold in Table E.1 of BS 5228-1 (Table

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 12 Grangetown Prairie Baseline Noise Survey Report.pdf:23:5.25 Mitigation measures for the site should be selected to achieve the above design target values as

R-2019-0767-OOM-Chapter 12 Grangetown Prairie Baseline Noise Survey Report.pdf:25:6.12 Mitigation selections for the 2 No phases should be selected to achieve the maximum design target

R-2019-0767-OOM-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: additional information shall set out those mitigation measures to be

R-2019-0767-OOM-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: those mitigation measures set out in Chapter 15 of Volume 1 of the submitted

R-2019-0767-OOM-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: Environmental Impact Assessment December 2019 and Chapter 7 (Mitigation)

R-2019-0767-OOM-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: approaches to biodiversity and archaeology mitigation are submitted to and

R-2019-0767-OOM-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: mitigation measures required;

R-2019-0767-OOM-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:6: agreed with the Local Planning Authority for on or off-site mitigation and net

R-2019-0767-OOM-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:9: potential impacts and proposed mitigation of the proposed development

R-2019-0767-OOM-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:10: We encourage and support the proposal to provide on-site mitigation to

R-2019-0767-OOM-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:10: Mitigation measure to include the safeguarding and enhancement of 5.73 Ha

R-2019-0767-OOM-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:10: and incorporated into such mitigation.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:3: proposed mitigation and a summary of any residual impacts. This

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:4:operational phases of the proposed development and the proposed mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:4:phases and outline mitigation measures will be identified as appropriate. It is

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:5: for further mitigation measures where appropriate (e.g.

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:5:of the EFW proposal with water features will be assessed and mitigation

R-2019-0767-OOM-Appendix B Scoping Letter Request.pdf:5:potential requirements of any mitigation measures to be incorporated within

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:4: mitigation and compensation. It will also, therefore, be submitted periodically to RCBC in order

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:10: confirm the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat for resulting

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:10: • details of any mitigation and compensation proposed including long term maintenance

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:10: • implementation of the identified mitigation and compensation within a specified period in

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 173.58

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 363.55 area based

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: • The details of viable compensation habitat where on-site mitigation is demonstrated not to be

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible, compensation

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: level of habitat mitigation that can be provided within any landscape areas to be created within

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: the final development plots. The Strategy recognises that an objective of habitat mitigation /

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:12: compensation is to provide in the first instance and as a priority, mitigation within the

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:13: deliver habitat mitigation and biodiversity enhancements within the development plots. The

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:16:5.3 The INCA Feasibility Report assesses in detail the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:17:5.11 In line with the mitigation hierarchy, this Strategy prioritises the delivery of onsite

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:20: be met by on-site mitigation.

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:20: landowners such that works to implement the mitigation schemes commence by end of

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:28: • 5.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 7

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:28: • 6.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 8

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:29:of this stage of the Biodiversity Strategy is to demonstrate the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:29: • To investigate the opportunities for mitigation, i.e. the potential to retain and/or improve

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:32:Therefore mitigation or compensatory measures on this basis would be required for a total of 24

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:32:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:33:5.1 On- site mitigation and compensatory measures

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:33:On-site mitigation and compensatory measures that have been considered are on areas which are

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:34:6.1 On-site mitigation and compensation measures

R-2021-0831-CD-63262_01 - Biodiversity Strategy IB - Sept 2021.PDF:39:However, much of the ex-situ mitigation to achieve the requisite number of BDUs is likely to be in

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Covering Letter - 29.09.21.pdf:2:• The details of compensatory habitat where onsite mitigation is demonstrated to not be feasible,

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Covering Letter - 29.09.21.pdf:2:The Strategy shall be approved by the Local Planning Authority. The identified mitigation and, where

R-2021-0831-CD-370819 393380 393440 R_2021_0830_CD R_2021_0831_CD R_2021_0832_CD - Discharge of conditoins relating to Environment and Biodiversity Strategy Teesworks Redcar_.pdf:1:identify off-site mitigation and biodiversity net gain opportunities, which is commendable.

R-2021-0831-CD-370819 393380 393440 R_2021_0830_CD R_2021_0831_CD R_2021_0832_CD - Discharge of conditoins relating to Environment and Biodiversity Strategy Teesworks Redcar_.pdf:2:habitats in their own right, where like for like mitigation is required.

R-2021-0831-CD-393340-R_2021_0831_CD-NE_Response.pdf:3:NPPF (paragraphs 8, 73, 104, 120,174, 175 and 180). We advise you to follow the mitigation hierarchy

R-2021-0831-CD-393340-R_2021_0831_CD-NE_Response.pdf:4:information including contact details for the National Trail Officer. Appropriate mitigation measures

R-2021-0831-CD-DECISION NOTICE 0357.pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2021-0831-CD-DECISION NOTICE 0357.pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2021-0831-CD-DECISION NOTICE 0357.pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2021-0831-CD-DECISION NOTICE 0357.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2021-0831-CD-DECISION NOTICE 0357.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2021-0831-CD-DECISION NOTICE 0357.pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2021-0831-CD-DECISION NOTICE 0357.pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2021-0831-CD-DECISION NOTICE 0357.pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2021-0831-CD-DECISION NOTICE 0357.pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2021-0831-CD-DECISION NOTICE 0357.pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:5: mitigation and compensation. It will also, therefore, be submitted periodically to RCBC in order

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:11: confirm the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat for resulting

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:11: • details of any mitigation and compensation proposed including long term maintenance

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:11: • implementation of the identified mitigation and compensation within a specified period in

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 173.58

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 363.55 area based

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: • The details of viable compensation habitat where on-site mitigation is demonstrated not to

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible, compensation

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: level of habitat mitigation that can be provided within any landscape areas to be created within

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: the final development plots. The Strategy recognises that an objective of habitat mitigation /

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:14: compensation is to provide in the first instance and as a priority, mitigation within the

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:15: deliver habitat mitigation and biodiversity enhancements within the development plots. The

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:15: practical mitigation is taken to achieve good ecological potential. Whilst this Strategy takes

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:18:5.3 The INCA Feasibility Report assesses in detail the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:19:5.12 In line with the mitigation hierarchy, this Strategy prioritises the delivery of onsite

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:22: be met by on-site mitigation.

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:22: with those landowners such that works to implement the mitigation schemes commence by

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:34: • 5.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 7

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:34: • 6.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 8

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:35:of this stage of the Biodiversity Strategy is to demonstrate the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:35: • To investigate the opportunities for mitigation, i.e. the potential to retain and/or improve

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:38:Therefore mitigation or compensatory measures on this basis would be required for a total of 24

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:38:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:39:5.1 On- site mitigation and compensatory measures

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:39:On-site mitigation and compensatory measures that have been considered are on areas which are

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:40:6.1 On-site mitigation and compensation measures

R-2021-0831-CD-63262 - Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy May 2022.PDF:45:However, much of the ex-situ mitigation to achieve the requisite number of BDUs is likely to be in

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:4: mitigation and compensation. It will also, therefore, be submitted periodically to RCBC in order

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:10: confirm the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat for resulting

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:10: • details of any mitigation and compensation proposed including long term maintenance

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:10: • implementation of the identified mitigation and compensation within a specified period in

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: feasibility of providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 173.58

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: providing habitat mitigation and compensatory habitat equivalent to be 363.55 area based

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: • The details of viable compensation habitat where on-site mitigation is demonstrated not to be

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible, compensation

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: level of habitat mitigation that can be provided within any landscape areas to be created within

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: the final development plots. The Strategy recognises that an objective of habitat mitigation /

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:12: compensation is to provide in the first instance and as a priority, mitigation within the

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:13: deliver habitat mitigation and biodiversity enhancements within the development plots. The

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:16:5.3 The INCA Feasibility Report assesses in detail the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:17:5.11 In line with the mitigation hierarchy, this Strategy prioritises the delivery of onsite

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:20: be met by on-site mitigation.

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:20: landowners such that works to implement the mitigation schemes commence by end of

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:28: • 5.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 7

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:28: • 6.1 On-site mitigation and compensatory measures 8

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:29:of this stage of the Biodiversity Strategy is to demonstrate the feasibility of providing mitigation and

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:29: • To investigate the opportunities for mitigation, i.e. the potential to retain and/or improve

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:32:Therefore mitigation or compensatory measures on this basis would be required for a total of 24

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:32:fully at the time the EIA was submitted. Based on the Tees Rivers Trust assessment, mitigation or

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:33:5.1 On- site mitigation and compensatory measures

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:33:On-site mitigation and compensatory measures that have been considered are on areas which are

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:34:6.1 On-site mitigation and compensation measures

R-2021-0831-CD-Teesworks Environment and Biodiversity Strategy - Sept 2021.pdf:39:However, much of the ex-situ mitigation to achieve the requisite number of BDUs is likely to be in

R-2022-0454-CD-SeAH Monopile Facility_Construction Environmental Management Plan Rev A.pdf:17:carried out and any additional mitigation works.

R-2022-0454-CD-SeAH Monopile Facility_Construction Environmental Management Plan Rev A(1).pdf:17:carried out and any additional mitigation works.

R-2021-0057-VC-Decision Notice_R20210057VC.pdf:4: identifies mitigation measures required to manage the movement of soils on

R-2021-0057-VC-Decision Notice_R20210057VC.pdf:4: appropriate mitigation including by way of on or off-site compensatory

R-2021-0057-VC-Decision Notice_R20210057VC.pdf:4: the Reptile Mitigation Strategy (October 2019, INCA) received by the Local

R-2021-0057-VC-email.pdf:9:restrictions and guidance documentation. This will often result in additional CATS mitigation such as

R-2021-0057-VC-Officer report _R20210057VC.pdf:10: management scheme that identifies mitigation measures required to

R-2021-0057-VC-Officer report _R20210057VC.pdf:10: of the final use of the soils, appropriate mitigation including by way of on

R-2021-0057-VC-Officer report _R20210057VC.pdf:10: with the Reptile Mitigation Strategy (October 2019, INCA) received by

R-2021-0057-VC-FAO-JBAU-XX-XX-TN-Z-0001-S3-P01-South_Tees_Stockpile_5_FRA.PDF:4:3.2 Flood Risk Mitigation 2

R-2021-0057-VC-FAO-JBAU-XX-XX-TN-Z-0001-S3-P01-South_Tees_Stockpile_5_FRA.PDF:7:3.2 Flood Risk Mitigation

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils_Part1.pdf:15:• Direct contact pathways with soils could be active throughout a potential redevelopment; typical mitigation

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils_Part1.pdf:15: redevelopment works, additional PPE may be required as mitigation.

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils_Part1.pdf:16:ground gas are also considered potentially active. It is understood that mitigation of risks to property will be

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils_Part1.pdf:25:appropriate mitigation measures may be required, these will be dependent on the redevelopment scenario and

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils_Part1.pdf:27:presence of asbestos on the site and determine necessary mitigation measures. It is likely that a clean cover

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils.pdf:15:• Direct contact pathways with soils could be active throughout a potential redevelopment; typical mitigation

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils.pdf:15: redevelopment works, additional PPE may be required as mitigation.

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils.pdf:16:ground gas are also considered potentially active. It is understood that mitigation of risks to property will be

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils.pdf:25:appropriate mitigation measures may be required, these will be dependent on the redevelopment scenario and

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-02-MPA_Shallow_Soils.pdf:27:presence of asbestos on the site and determine necessary mitigation measures. It is likely that a clean cover

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0181-MPA_ROA and Strategy.pdf:14:notably the Shelduck. Ecological oversight and mitigation shall be required to ensure that no significant

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0181-MPA_ROA and Strategy.pdf:14:should be reviewed to develop an appropriate mitigation and management strategy.

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0181-MPA_ROA and Strategy.pdf:17:• Development of a UXO mitigation strategy.

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0181-MPA_ROA and Strategy.pdf:27:assessment indicates a Medium risk from UXO for borehole and excavation activities. Further mitigation

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0181-MPA_ROA and Strategy.pdf:27:activities such as detailed risk assessment or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0181-MPA_ROA and Strategy.pdf:32:The control measures and mitigation identified shall be reviewed by a SQE and shall be adopted in

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0181-MPA_ROA and Strategy.pdf:33:stream) in order to confirm the assessment of the waste impact and to implement embedded mitigation

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0181-MPA_ROA and Strategy.pdf:33: • Any ecological mitigations required,

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0223-01-MPA_Deep_Soils.pdf:21:• Direct contact pathways with soils could be active throughout a potential redevelopment; typical mitigation

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0223-01-MPA_Deep_Soils.pdf:21: redevelopment works, additional PPE may be required as mitigation.

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0223-01-MPA_Deep_Soils.pdf:22:ground gas are also considered potentially active. It is understood that mitigation of risks to property will be

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0223-01-MPA_Deep_Soils.pdf:36:appropriate mitigation measures may be required, these will be dependent on the redevelopment scenario and

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0223-01-MPA_Deep_Soils.pdf:38: should be carried out to enable appropriate mitigation measures to be designed that will prevent

R-2020-0743-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0223-01-MPA_Deep_Soils.pdf:39: 4. Appropriate UXO mitigation measures should be implemented during any excavation / piling works at

R-2023-0224-CD-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:5:conjunction with the CEMP, which gives specific details environmental management and mitigations.

R-2023-0224-CD-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:10:protected species and other ecology issues are detailed in the Environmental Management and Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:10: Risk Consequence Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:11:Risk Consequence Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:11:Overhead Electrocution Goalposts and other mitigations as relevant and as specified in

R-2023-0224-CD-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:12:Risk Consequence Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:13:Risk Consequence Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:14: Risk Consequence Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:25:required. Examples may include; use of ladders, waste management, dust mitigation measures

R-2023-0224-CD-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:39:mitigations put in place. Where vehicles are used for tipping materials into an excavation, safety measures,

R-2023-0224-CD-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:40:• Implementing dust mitigation measures.

R-2023-0224-CD-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:58: assessment, and written permission is granted by HZI, subject to mitigation of hazard, i.e. no work

R-2023-0224-CD-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:60:both on and off site. See the CEMP for more details of mitigations relating to environmental noise.

R-2023-0224-CD-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:61:See Environmental Management and Mitigation Plan for more details of mitigations relating to dust.

R-2023-0224-CD-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:63:amended to take account of the additional hazards and detailed mitigation measures developed and

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL. 007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.1 Issue 2.pdf:10: The section below details key mitigations relating to waste and incorporates the measures

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:2:4.4 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 11

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:2:5.4 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 13

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:3:6.2 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 16

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:3:7.3 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 18

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:3:8.2 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 20

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:3:9.2 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 22

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:3:10.2 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 23

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:3:11.2 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 24

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:3:12.2 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 26

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:4:environmental management and mitigation measures that would be implemented during construction. These

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:9: Inspection of habitats and identification of mitigation measures (i.e. if vegetation clearance work has to

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:9:when required. Examples may include; waste management and dust mitigation measures. Contractors shall

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:11:4.4 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:11:The potential impacts and associated mitigation measures are summarised Table 2. Mitigations relating to

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:12:Table 2: Potential Impacts to Ecological Receptors and Associated Mitigations

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:12: Activity Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:12: Harm to nesting Initial mitigation in the form of pre-construction checks for breeding birds shall

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:13:risks associated with any identified contamination and propose appropriate construction phase mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:13:5.4 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:14:The potential impacts and associated mitigation measures to comply with pollution prevention legislation and

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:14:Table 3: Potential Pollution Impacts and Associated Mitigations

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:14: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:14: TBTs about potential water pollution impacts and associated mitigations

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:14: mitigations detailed in the Environmental Statement and Flood Risk

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:14: protected species attenuation pond, siltbusters, silt fences or other mitigations shall be

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:15: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:16:6.2 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:16:The potential impacts and associated mitigation measures with respect soils are summarised in Table 4.

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:16:Table 4: Potential Impacts relating to Soils and Associated Mitigations

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:16: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:17: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:18:construction was therefore assessed to be minimal. However, standard mitigations shall be applied on site.

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:18:7.3 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:18:The potential noise impacts and associated mitigation measures are summarised in Table 5 and include noise

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:18:Table 5: Potential Impacts and Mitigations relating to Noise and Vibration

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:18: Activity Potential Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:19: Activity Potential Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:20:8.2 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:20:The potential dust impacts and associated mitigation measures are summarised in Table 6.

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:20:Table 6: Potential Impacts and Mitigations relating to Dust

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:20: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:20: All staff shall be made aware of potential impacts and mitigations

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:21: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:22:shall proceed and the requirements for archaeological investigation or mitigation.

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:22:9.2 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:22:The potential impacts to archaeology and associated mitigation measures are summarised in Table 7. This

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:22:Table 7: Potential Impacts and Mitigations relating to Unexpected Finds

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:22: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:23:10.2 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:23:Potential impacts and mitigations relating to lighting on site are summarised below.

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:23:Table 8: Potential Impacts and Mitigations relating to Lighting

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:23: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:24:11.2 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:24:The main mitigations relating to site waste management are detailed in Table 9.

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:24:Table 9: Potential Impacts and Mitigations relating to Waste

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:24: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:25: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:26:socio-economic impacts were identified in the Environmental Statement and proposed mitigations are

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:26:12.2 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:26:The main mitigations relating to socio economic impacts are detailed in Table 10.

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:26:Table 10: Potential Impacts and Mitigations relating to Local Community

R-2023-0224-CD-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:26: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:5: set out those mitigation measures to be employed to minimise or eliminate such impacts.’

R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:6: • Chapter Six: describes the Appropriate Assessment, which includes mitigation measures where

R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:10: clarification as to when avoidance or reduction (i.e., mitigation) measures can be considered within

R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:10: appropriate assessment, at which point such mitigation measures can be considered. This judgment

R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:21: ‘appropriate assessment’ and mitigation measures may need to be introduced.

R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:21: possible to rely on mitigation measures that allow a conclusion of ‘no likely significant effect’ to be

R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:25: features. Measures are proposed to mitigation pollution related

R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:25: Peak Resources Refinery disturbance to species at the SPA / Ramsar. Standard mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:73: mitigation measures and is therefore compliant with the judgment People Over Wind - Sweetman vs

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.4 Issue 2 COMPRESSED.pdf:7: details of on-site dust mitigation measures are set out in Dust Management Plan

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.4 Issue 2 COMPRESSED.pdf:10: reviewed and where practical mitigation measures incorporated into future best practice

R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:5: Planning Authority for on or off-site mitigation and net gain provision that will be implemented to offset

R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:5: off-site mitigation and net gain provision. It is understood from FCC Environment that the planning

R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:5: authority is responsible for all off-site mitigation as part of a wider package of measures that are

R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:5: Consequently this report only considers mitigation and net gain provision within the Site.

R-2023-0224-CD-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:8: subject to the mitigation hierarchy.

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:59: set out those mitigation measures to be employed to minimise or eliminate such impacts.’

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:60: • Chapter Six: describes the Appropriate Assessment, which includes mitigation measures where

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:64: clarification as to when avoidance or reduction (i.e., mitigation) measures can be considered within

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:64: appropriate assessment, at which point such mitigation measures can be considered. This judgment

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:75: ‘appropriate assessment’ and mitigation measures may need to be introduced.

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:75: possible to rely on mitigation measures that allow a conclusion of ‘no likely significant effect’ to be

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:79: features. Measures are proposed to mitigation pollution related

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:79: Peak Resources Refinery disturbance to species at the SPA / Ramsar. Standard mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:169: mitigation measures and is therefore compliant with the judgment People Over Wind - Sweetman vs

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:177: 3.13 NL asked if there are any other mitigation measures (at source) that could be employed. AP2

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:177: “unlikely” and what mitigation would be provided so that they become unlikely.

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (3 of 3).pdf:184:out mitigation work as well as for impacts directly connected with a development. Further

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.3 Issue 2.pdf:3: and debris from construction works along with mitigation measures employed.

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.3 Issue 2.pdf:6: generic mitigation measures set out below.

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.3 Issue 2.pdf:7: Mitigation measures for stockpiles for instance of aggregate, soils etc., shall be as follows:

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.5 Issue 2.pdf:4: vibration from construction works along with mitigation measures employed.

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.5 Issue 2.pdf:8: Mitigation Measures

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.5 Issue 2.pdf:12: The Development Site Environmental Advisor shall ensure that all appropriate mitigation

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.5 Issue 2.pdf:12:  determine if any of the general mitigation control measures listed in Chapter 3 are

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.5 Issue 2.pdf:13: If a breach in the use of the prescribed mitigation measures is identified, this will be

R-2023-0224-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: additional information shall set out those mitigation measures to be

R-2023-0224-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: those mitigation measures set out in Chapter 15 of Volume 1 of the submitted

R-2023-0224-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: Environmental Impact Assessment December 2019 and Chapter 7 (Mitigation)

R-2023-0224-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: approaches to biodiversity and archaeology mitigation are submitted to and

R-2023-0224-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: mitigation measures required;

R-2023-0224-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:6: agreed with the Local Planning Authority for on or off-site mitigation and net

R-2023-0224-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:9: potential impacts and proposed mitigation of the proposed development

R-2023-0224-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:10: We encourage and support the proposal to provide on-site mitigation to

R-2023-0224-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:10: Mitigation measure to include the safeguarding and enhancement of 5.73 Ha

R-2023-0224-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:10: and incorporated into such mitigation.

R-2023-0224-CD-CON LAND 0224.pdf:1:contamination and propose appropriate construction phase mitigation measures to

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.2 Issue 2 COMPRESSED.pdf:7: details of on-site dust mitigation measures are set out in Dust Management Plan

R-2023-0224-CD-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.2 Issue 2 COMPRESSED.pdf:10: reviewed and where practical mitigation measures incorporated into future best practice

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:5: Mitigation measures ………………………………………………………………………………… 51

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:21: visual resources and the primary mitigation measures.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:21: Primary mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:21:5.7 It is usual to state in this section the key primary mitigation measures that have

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:21:5.9 There is the potential for secondary mitigation measures to reduce the remaining

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:21: Types of secondary mitigation that are likely to be incorporated in detailed design

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:38: for wildlife, recreation, flood risk mitigation, cooling/shading, carbon storage or

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:46: impacts on landscapes and to set out necessary mitigation measures, such as

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:47: considerations. In such cases appropriate mitigation will be required. Protection will

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:52: • Mitigation – Makes proposals for measures designed to avoid / prevent, reduce

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:55: Mitigation measures

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:55:A2.30 The GLVIA describes three forms of mitigation measures. These are:

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:56:A2.31 The first two forms are referred to as primary mitigation, while the last is referred to

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:56: as secondary mitigation. At this stage of the design all matters are reserved

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:56:A2.32 Secondary mitigation measures are those that have not been designed into the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Landscape_and_Visual_Appraisal_Part_1of2.pdf:56: proposals that form part of this application. Potential secondary mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Heritage_Statement_Part_1of2.pdf:25: Preservation by Archaeological mitigation strategy where archaeological remains are fully

R-2023-0247-OOM-428285 - R_2023_0247_OOM Outline application for bottom ash facility Grangetown Prairie Land East of John Boyle Road - No Objection subject to mitigation.pdf:1: NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2023-0247-OOM-428285 - R_2023_0247_OOM Outline application for bottom ash facility Grangetown Prairie Land East of John Boyle Road - No Objection subject to mitigation.pdf:1: We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2023-0247-OOM-428285 - R_2023_0247_OOM Outline application for bottom ash facility Grangetown Prairie Land East of John Boyle Road - No Objection subject to mitigation.pdf:1: mitigation measures are required / or the following mitigation options should be secured:

R-2023-0247-OOM-428285 - R_2023_0247_OOM Outline application for bottom ash facility Grangetown Prairie Land East of John Boyle Road - No Objection subject to mitigation.pdf:1: • The mitigation measures as set out in the shadow Habitats Regulations Assessment

R-2023-0247-OOM-428285 - R_2023_0247_OOM Outline application for bottom ash facility Grangetown Prairie Land East of John Boyle Road - No Objection subject to mitigation.pdf:1:Further advice on mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-428285 - R_2023_0247_OOM Outline application for bottom ash facility Grangetown Prairie Land East of John Boyle Road - No Objection subject to mitigation.pdf:2:assessment conclusions, providing that all mitigation measures are appropriately secured in any

R-2023-0247-OOM-428285 - R_2023_0247_OOM Outline application for bottom ash facility Grangetown Prairie Land East of John Boyle Road - No Objection subject to mitigation.pdf:4:NPPF (paragraphs 8, 73, 104, 120,174, 175 and 180). We advise you to follow the mitigation hierarchy

R-2023-0247-OOM-428285 - R_2023_0247_OOM Outline application for bottom ash facility Grangetown Prairie Land East of John Boyle Road - No Objection subject to mitigation.pdf:5:information including contact details for the National Trail Officer. Appropriate mitigation measures

R-2023-0247-OOM-NEAR.pdf:1:No archaeological mitigation measures are necessary and we therefore recommend that no

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:7: mitigation required for development within the STDC Regeneration Master Plan

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:7: this will support the wider biodiversity mitigation plan that has been prepared by

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:16: low risk. Mitigation measures have been recommended appropriate for the risk

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:16: number of dust mitigation measures to suppress dust generation (e.g. the ash will

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:18: level of mitigation for dust emissions during construction and operational phase

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:18: effects from construction noise. The noise mitigation measures to be used for the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:23: that all the ecological mitigation required for development within the STDC

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:24: the ecological mitigation required for development within the STDC Regeneration

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:33: • Off-site habitat / protected species mitigation is to be provided by STDC

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:34: comprehensive design and mitigation measures associated with any

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:34: operational mitigation measures set out in the Dorman Point ES will be brought

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:50: on water quality subject to appropriate mitigation by means of details of the final

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:51:2.16 The outline scheme included ecological mitigation that involved the reservation of

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:51: all the ecological mitigation required for development within the STDC

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:51: may be used to support the wider biodiversity mitigation plan that is being

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:51: majority of the mitigation associated with the construction and operation of the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:52: proportionate mitigation response.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:53: • Creation of ecological mitigation areas

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:55: England that ecological mitigation for the ERF and wider STDC development

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:56: of the reserved matters, or the creation of the ecological mitigation areas on site,

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:56: mitigation will be provided off-site by STDC in association with the wider site

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:59: 2019 ES (Chapter 7 Landscape and Visual Impact, Section 7.7 Mitigation). The

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:63: 7, Landscape and Visual Impact, section 7.7 Mitigation). The detailed landscape

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:65: biodiversity mitigation is to be provided by STDC off-site. Nevertheless, the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:75: levels will result in a noise reduction or mitigation programme.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:79: approaches to construction and all the relevant mitigation measures identified by

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:80:4.7 It is assumed that all relevant mitigation measures which the December 2019 ES

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:80: accordingly. Where any changes to mitigation measures are considered

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:83: Mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:83: have agreed that all the ecological mitigation required for the ERF development

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:84: mitigation will be provided off-site in due course, some biodiversity features will be

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:84:5.16 While the location of the mitigation measures will vary from that set out in the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:84: mitigation is robust, and will still ensure that no significant adverse effects will arise

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:84: construction or operational phases with the application of appropriate mitigation.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:84: As mitigation will be provided both on and off-site this conclusion is still

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:84: the recommended off-site mitigation put in place, the conclusions of chapter 6 of

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:87: Mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:87:6.14 Almost all the potential mitigation in the December 2019 ES refers to

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:88: ES after accounting for the residual effects with mitigation and after 15 years post

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:89: mitigation established by the OPP and has adopted an approach to deliver a high-

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:91: be slight adverse prior to mitigation, as opposed to negligible adverse as

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:91: adverse prior to mitigation, as opposed to moderate adverse as identified by

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:91: addressed by the mitigation measures outlined in the Arcadis Remediation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:91: significant in EIA terms with the proposed mitigation in place. Mitigation measures

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:92: such, no mitigation measures additional to those identified in the Arcadis ROA and

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:92: Mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:92:7.12 The Arcadis (ROA) and Strategy includes a number of mitigation measures and

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:94: Mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:97:8.21 With the above mitigation measures in place, there will be no significant effects on

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:97: accordance with the NPPF. With the implementation of mitigation, no significant

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:97: appropriate mitigation measures, there are no identified significant adverse

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:100: Mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:100: considered to be of local significance. No further mitigation is required.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:100:9.15 The mitigation strategy to appropriately preserve by record the earliest remnant

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:100: December 2019 ES did not assess mitigation measures for the blast furnace

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:105: construction staff vehicle movements; however, with the mitigation measures that

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:106: Mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:107: economic effects of the proposed development, so mitigation was therefore not

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:107:10.27 Several mitigation measures were recommended to help prevent crime, including

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:107:10.28 Mitigation measures relating to traffic are discussed in section 12 and it is not

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:110:11.12 The Outline AQA included recommended mitigation measures appropriate for a

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:110: ‘low risk’ site. No changes to the recommended mitigation measures are

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:114:11.36 The ERF will include embedded mitigation measures to reduce the risk of dust

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:114: and odour emissions. This mitigation includes only unloading waste within the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:114: Mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:114:11.39 The Outline AQA did not identify any mitigation measures for the operational

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:114:11.40 For the construction phase a number of mitigation measures were recommended

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:114: so these mitigation measures remain applicable. The exact mitigation measures

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:115: the implementation of appropriate mitigation measures. These conclusions remain

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:115: mitigation.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:117: Mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:117:11.59 No additional mitigation is expected to be required, over the inherent design

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:119: prior to the implementation of mitigation measures. The potential impact will be

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:119: the local level (significant in EIA terms), prior to the implementation of mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:120: prior to mitigation was as follows:

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:120: Mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:120: therefore mitigation was not required. However, for the construction phase a

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:120: significant in EIA terms. Therefore, mitigation in the form of the CEMP is proposed

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:121:12.21 As a result of the proposed mitigation measures the residual effects of the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:121: the mitigation measures in the CEMP it is considered that the residual impact will

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:133: works and off-site mitigation is to be provided to compensate for the loss of these

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:138: proposed mitigation for flood risk.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:145: had been made to ensure that mitigation measures referred to in the ES would be

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:146: Habitat / Mitigation shall include appropriate biosecurity measures. These shall follow the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:146: Ecological enhancement / mitigation areas to be created on c. 7ha of site to

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:146: Ecological mitigation is to be provided by STDC off-site.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:146: maintain connectivity of habitat across the open areas. mitigation is to be provided by STDC off-site.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:146: Habitat Loss allows for this). Ecological mitigation is to be provided by

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:146: The planned biodiversity area is expected to offset any valuable scrub habitat allows for this). Ecological mitigation is to be provided by

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:147: Ecological mitigation is to be provided by STDC off-site

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:147: phase mitigation measures to reduce the potential for identified impacts to

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:150: mitigation works have been completed by STDC).

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:150: Implementation of a programme of archaeological recording and reporting prior All archaeological mitigation works have been completed

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:153: No specific mitigation measures were considered

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:154: No additional mitigation over the embedded mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_EIA_Screening_Report_Part_1of2.pdf:154: Landscape and Embedded Design mitigation – provided through choice of cladding,

R-2023-0247-OOM-EP CL.pdf:2: natural hazards or former activities such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:12: wider STDC regeneration works and off-site mitigation.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:41: importance at up to site level and identifies appropriate mitigation and

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:41: implementation of the mitigation and enhancements, negative impacts on

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:41:5.129. The HRA report concludes that with the incorporation of mitigation measures, the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:42: mitigation measures in the form of a CEMP for the construction phase of the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:42: as ‘low risk’. Mitigation measures have been recommended appropriate for the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:42: includes a number of dust mitigation measures to suppress dust generation. With

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Planning_and_Design_Statement.pdf:43:5.139. This assessment has demonstrated that with the appropriate level of mitigation for

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:8: carried out in the absence of any mitigation measures that form part of that

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:8: means that mitigation measures must be excluded from assessing whether a

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:13: the BA facility will include embedded mitigation measures to reduce the risk

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:17: Waterbird Disturbances Mitigation Toolkit, which has been produced by the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:18: Disturbances Mitigation Toolkit, which has been produced by the Institute of

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:20:5.19 Although the scheme includes embedded mitigation to contain dust

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:21: Coast SPA/Ramsar with or without the embedded mitigation.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:25: considered to be mitigation for the potential operational impacts on the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:28: that with the appropriate mitigation in place the proposals will not adversely

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:32: Mitigation Toolkit Informing Estuarine Planning & Construction Projects

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:4:5. ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS, MITIGATION

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:4:5.2 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures 17

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:5: activities, taking into account the mitigation and enhancement measures incorporated into the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:5: • describe the proposed mitigation measures; and

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:11: by baseline conditions) have been assessed taking into consideration mitigation measures

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:11: additional mitigation to reduce or off-set potential significant effects, and all residual effects have

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:11: this, consideration was given to the avoidance, mitigation, restoration, compensation and

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:11: enhancement measures (the ‘mitigation hierarchy’) integral to the proposed development.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:20:5. ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS, MITIGATION

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:20: the site and outlines mitigation measures for inclusion into redevelopment proposals to avoid

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:20: mitigation is to be delivered for the previous baseline.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:20: mitigation, the proposed development would likely result in the following effects at the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:20: from development of the site are considered unlikely. Mitigation for the remaining designated

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:20: In the absence of mitigation, the removal of the above habitats would likely result in the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:21: of Site level importance. In the absence of mitigation, scattered scrub clearance during the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:21: mitigation, the development of the site would likely result in the following effects at the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:21:5.2 Mitigation and Enhancement Measures

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:23: No mitigation is available for the construction stage. However, the provision of landscape planting

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:24: Table 5.1 contains a summary of the potential effects pre-mitigation, and likely residual effect

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:24: post-mitigation. As seen in table 5.1 below, with mitigation and enhancements measures, the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:24: Importance Effects Mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:25: Importance Effects Mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:26: Following the implementation of the mitigation and enhancements listed in Table 6.1, negative

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:26: Table 6.1 summarises the mitigation requirements for the proposed development, along with the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:26: Table 6.1: Summary of Mitigation and Enhancement

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Ecological_Impact_Assessment.pdf:26: Ecological Feature Mitigation and Enhancement

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:4: construction phase activities has been assessed as ‘low risk’. Mitigation measures have been

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:4: the same principles. The design of the Proposed Development includes a number of dust mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:5: This assessment has demonstrated that with the appropriate level of mitigation for dust emissions

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:6:C Construction Dust Mitigation Measures …………………………………………………………………………………………….33

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:7: recommended construction phase dust mitigation measures.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:9: • acceptable mitigation measures to reduce or remove adverse effects; and

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:9: “Mitigation options will need to be locationally specific, will depend on the proposed development

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:9: authorities work with applicants to consider appropriate mitigation so as to ensure the new

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:9: conditions and obligations can be used to secure mitigation where the relevant tests are met.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:9: Examples of mitigation include:

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:12: The third stage is to define appropriate, site-specific, mitigation measures.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:12: mitigation. Experience has shown that this is normally possible through the implementation of

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:12: suitable mitigation. Hence the residual effect would normally be ‘not significant’.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:12: The dust mitigation measures proposed as part of the design of the Proposed Development have

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:18: 5.2.3 Stage three – Identification of mitigation measures

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:18: IAQM guidance recommends that general mitigation measures be applied according to the highest

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:18: risk rating for the site. Appendix C presents the mitigation measures recommended for the risk

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:18: soiling and human health impacts. Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified. It is

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:20: 6.2.2 Embedded mitigation measures

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:20: emissions. With the implementation of the embedded mitigation measures detailed above, the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:23: the TVERF alone is predicted to be ‘low risk’ and the residual effect, with appropriate mitigation

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:24: mitigation measures have been recommended and with the implementation of these measures the

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:24: A number of embedded mitigation measures to suppress dust are included as part of the design of

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:24: the Proposed Development. With the implementation of these mitigation measures, residual effect

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:28: • The adequacy of the mitigation measures applied to reduce or eliminate dust; and

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:28: mitigation measures beyond those required by legislation.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:33: determine the risk of impacts with no mitigation applied. For the cases where the risk category is

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:33: ‘negligible’, no mitigation measures beyond those required by accepted best practice would be

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:33: Table 14: Risk of Dust Impacts – Level of Mitigation Required

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:34: C Construction Dust Mitigation Measures

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:34: following mitigation measures are highly recommended for ‘low risk’ sites in the IAQM guidance.

R-2023-0247-OOM-TV_BAF_Air_Quality_Assessment.pdf:34: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate.

R-2021-0316-VC-Officer report _R20210316VC.pdf:9: management scheme that identifies mitigation measures required to

R-2021-0316-VC-Officer report _R20210316VC.pdf:9: of the final use of the soils, appropriate mitigation including by way of on

R-2021-0316-VC-Officer report _R20210316VC.pdf:10: with the Reptile Mitigation Strategy (October 2019, INCA) received by

R-2021-0316-VC-Decision Notice_R20210316VC.pdf:4: identifies mitigation measures required to manage the movement of soils on

R-2021-0316-VC-Decision Notice_R20210316VC.pdf:4: appropriate mitigation including by way of on or off-site compensatory

R-2021-0316-VC-Decision Notice_R20210316VC.pdf:4: the Reptile Mitigation Strategy (October 2019, INCA) received by the Local

R-2021-0316-VC-Metals Recovery Area Stockpile 2 FRA and DS Addendum.pdf:4:3.2 Flood Risk Mitigation 3

R-2021-0316-VC-Metals Recovery Area Stockpile 2 FRA and DS Addendum.pdf:8:3.2 Flood Risk Mitigation

R-2021-0316-VC-CAT-PPI-PRC-019.pdf:6:restrictions and guidance documentation. This will often result in additional CATS mitigation such as

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:3: Embedded Mitigation 20

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:3:D6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 27

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:5: impacts and effects; the baseline conditions in the surrounding area; mitigation measures to

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:7: significant effects are identified along with the envisaged mitigation to avoid or reduce these

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:8: vibration assessment and envisaged mitigation are informed by this legislation. Specific

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:9: series of embedded mitigation measures that are in built into the design of development. Those

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:10: significant effect and to determine any additional mitigation needed.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:17: natural barriers and provide embedded mitigation that was considered during the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:24: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:24:D5.3 There are no embedded mitigation measures that relate to the operational phase of

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:24: further mitigation, over and above the proposed CEMP and CTMP, is required in order to

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:31:D6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:31: significant, however the following mitigation of on-site activities will help to ensure the noise

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:31: the operation of the proposed development have been identified and therefore no mitigation is

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:32:D7.1 No temporary Significant effects have been identified. The proposed mitigation set out within

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:32: mitigation has not yet been finalised, the residual effects are assumed to remain as set out in

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:32: mitigation measures set out above will help minimise the noise effects further and they will

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:33: noted that the additional mitigation measures are identified to seek to keep noise to a minimum,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:33: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:33: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:34: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:34: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:15:potential mitigation), are proposed:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:3: Embedded Mitigation 21

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:3:E6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 29

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:5: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:5: providing mitigation measures across a range of projects, ranging from small scale to major

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:8: and mitigation rather than by the determination of statutory nuisance and/or prosecution or

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:9: the appropriate mitigation measures are implemented. Experience has shown that once the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:9: appropriate mitigation measures are applied, in most cases the resulting dust impacts can be

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:10: iv. Formulation of mitigation measures, where appropriate, to ensure any adverse effects

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:11:E3.8 Mitigation measures applicable to high risk sites outlined in the IAQM guidance ix will

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:11: assumption that the required mitigation measures are appropriately implemented, the residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:11: therefore been scoped out, on the understanding that the appropriate level of mitigation will be

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:11: CEMP) and is considered as embedded mitigation. This approach has been agreed with the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:21: based on a series of embedded mitigation measures that are built into the design of the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:25: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:25:E5.1 As described in Section E3.8, the best practice construction dust mitigation measures for high

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:25: are considered as embedded mitigation and allowed construction dust to be scoped out of the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:26: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate;

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:27:E5.3 As with the construction and earthworks mitigation, the below measures are highly

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:27:E5.4 There are no embedded mitigation measures that relate to the operational phase of the proposed

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:27: However, high risk mitigation measures from the IAQM guidance ix have been included in the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:27: Framework CEMP as embedded mitigation measures, which will address the potential overlap

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:33:E6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:33: identify the need for any specific mitigation measures. Notwithstanding this, a Framework

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:33: development, therefore no air quality mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:34: Significant as a result of the operational phase of the proposed development. As no mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:35:E8.4 Best practice mitigation measures in line with the IAQM guidance on the assessment of

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:35: construction practices have been included as embedded mitigation. With the appropriate best

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:35: practice mitigation measures suitable for high risk sites in place, there is likely to be a Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:35: Not Significant. Therefore, no mitigation measures are proposed for the operational phase.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:35: account of embedded Mitigation and Effects

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:35: mitigation) Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-MGE04279 Contaminated Land 0820.pdf:2: natural hazards or former activities such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:3: Embedded Mitigation 35

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:3:J6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 51

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:4: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:8: 7 Identify any design and mitigation measures appropriate to the proposed development and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:15: mitigation measures that help to avoid or reduce the potential for adverse visual effects.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:20: likely to arise from the finalised design taking into account mitigation measures and change over

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:38: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:38: can be made or mitigation measures can be embedded in the proposal to reduce these effects.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:38: Appropriate mitigation measures have been explored to eliminate, minimise or manage

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:38: identified potential significant landscape and visual effects. The embedded mitigation measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:38: Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP). Full details of the mitigation measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:39: Change Change and Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:40:J5.14 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:41:J5.20 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:41:J5.25 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:42:J5.30 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:42:J5.35 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:44:J5.40 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:54:J6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:54:J6.1 A number of mitigation measures have been proposed to minimise or manage identified

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:54:J6.2 The following mitigation measures are proposed during the construction phase of the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:54:J6.3 The following mitigation measures are proposed during the operation phase of the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:57: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:57: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:58: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:58: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:59: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:59: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:60: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:60: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:61: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - LVIA - Dec 2020.pdf:61: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Embedded Mitigation 26

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:4:G6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 29

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Mitigation measures to reduce any adverse environmental effects are identified as appropriate

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:8: significance of potential impacts as well as inform mitigation measures in line with industry

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:9: former activities such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation including land

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:29:G4.74 Key contaminant linkages (CL) identified as requiring some form of mitigation are summarised

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:29: Table G4.5 Potential Contaminant Linkages requiring mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:31: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:31:G5.1 The proposed embedded mitigation measures relevant to ground conditions include:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:31:G5.2 These embedded mitigation measures have been considered during this assessment when

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:31: below or in Section G6.0: Mitigation and Monitoring.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:31: Mitigation is detailed, in Section G6.0, with regards to UXO and risk from contamination. With

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:32: to mitigation but considering the embedded mitigation is medium due to the presence of

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:32: receptors (considered ‘Significant’ in EIA terms) if mitigation actions are not carried out.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:32: magnitude of likely impact from construction when embedded mitigation is considered, the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:32: mitigation is medium. This is due to the potential for soil/materials disposal required following

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:34:G6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:34:G6.1 Embedded mitigation is detailed in G5.1 above which includes further investigation, a piling risk

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:34: assessment and best practice detailed within the Framework CEMP. Additional mitigation is

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:34: be undertaken and where remediation is considered necessary additional mitigation will be

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:34: undertaken (detailed as embedded mitigation), areas that pose a risk to human health as a result

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:34: which will identify the need for further mitigation.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:35: • A risk of UXO is considered to be present for this site. Further mitigation activities such as

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:35: detailed risk assessment or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the UXO risk

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:36: in CEMP - embedded mitigation); data will be stored electronically in a specifically designed

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: is very high to high to medium respectively and the magnitude of impact following mitigation,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: mitigation measures outlined in Section G6.0, there are likely to be impacts on construction

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: following additional mitigation, e.g. soil remediation, is negligible. Therefore, the impacts after

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: the implementation of mitigation measures are considered to be of Negligible significance. This

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: following mitigation identified in Section G6.0 is Low and thus the impact on waste

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:38:G8.4 Mitigation that is designed to protect the identified receptors susceptible to impacts

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:38: Significant following the implementation of the mitigation measures.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:38: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:38: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:38: Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:39: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:39: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1424:cross-boundary migration pathways would be required. It is considered that assessment or mitigation showing

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1441:Area and appropriate mitigation measures may be required, depending on the redevelopment scenario.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1446:necessary mitigation measures. It may be that a clean cover system in areas of soft landscaping can be utilised

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1447: should be carried out to able appropriate mitigation measures to be designed that will prevent

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1517:• Direct contact pathways would be active throughout a potential redevelopment; typical mitigation measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1517: mitigation.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1529:• Direct contact pathways would be active throughout a potential redevelopment; typical mitigation measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1529: may be required as mitigation.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1587: Mitigation Measures…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..14

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1600: 8. Design of mitigation measures to account for likely movement.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1600:of the conceptual site model and recommendations for mitigation methods. Due to the quantity of the slag

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1602: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1602:The main mitigation methods that are generally employed to mitigate the risks presented by expansive ferrous

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1605:during the design of the earthworks and appropriate mitigation measures and/or precautionary measures taken

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1628:  Mitigation of any identified ground gas risk (subject to additional monitoring);

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1629: Development of a UXO mitigation strategy.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1665: previous uses and any proposals for mitigation including land remediation or impacts on the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1749:Key contaminant linkages identified as requiring some form of mitigation are summarised in Table 3.4.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1752:where they may compliment any landfill gas mitigation measures but are not considered to be appreciate for

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1758:  Any notable variations and associated mitigation from the outline remediation strategy.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1762:  Any notable variations and associated mitigation from the outline remediation strategy.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1763:mitigation measures to be implemented to ensure no nuisance arises from waste storage such as odour or

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1763:arises. Mitigation measures to be adopted include:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1763:be relatively low. If significant odours are noted, appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented by

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1763:practices to minimise odours and/or utilising odour suppression and mitigation equipment.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1764:The remediation contractor shall implement appropriate mitigation measures to protect any surface water

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.pdf:1764:There is a potential for mud to be carried out of the site on to local roads during the works. Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:18: principle of relocating the Fleet subject to certain mitigation and final details of the diversion to

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:21: considered at the detailed stage of the planning process based on best practice mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:22: B the ESs. This outlines all dust mitigation measures required for high risk receptors. With

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:22: contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and Not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:23: mitigation.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:29: 5 The scope for incorporating mitigation measures to avoid, reduce, remedy or compensate

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:29: 6 Identification of any effects remaining after mitigation.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.pdf:32:based on consultation with the technical team and the inclusion of known mitigation measures. Section 4.0 of the

R-2020-0820-ESM-341100 R_2020_0820_ESM - Natural England.pdf:1:all mitigation measures are appropriately secured in any planning permission given.

R-2020-0820-ESM-341100 R_2020_0820_ESM - Natural England.pdf:3:to follow the mitigation hierarchy as set out in paragraph 175 of the NPPF and firstly consider what

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:26: propose mitigation, compensation or enhancements where required. A maintain. We may object to any planning applications involving culverting

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:32:3 Flood Mitigation Measures 32

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:35: mitigation and enhancement measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020.pdf:61:3 Flood Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Embedded Mitigation 19

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:4:H6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 26

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:6: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:12: exist in the surrounding area; the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or offset any

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:12: development and their significance. Opportunities for the mitigation of any adverse effects and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:30: Table H5.2 Socio-Economic Effects (without mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:31:H6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:31:H6.1 This section considers the need for mitigation measures in order to address any adverse effects

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:31: a result, no mitigation measures are required during construction.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:31: employment and economic output. As a result, no mitigation measures are required during

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:32:H7.1 As no mitigation measures are assessed as being necessary, the residual effects are the same as

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:32: beneficial and no additional mitigation measures are proposed. The residual effects are

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:32: and no additional mitigation measures are proposed. The residual effects are therefore

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:32: Receptor Potential Effects Mitigation Residual Effects

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:33:H8.3 Given the beneficial nature of the potential effects assessed, no mitigation measures are

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:33: (taking account of Mitigation and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Socio Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:33: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:21: necessary mitigation measures must be secured in advance of the development in order to

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:32: prevent development or require mitigation through the submission of planning applications.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:33: through mitigation and compensation measures delivered as part of planning applications.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:35: Mitigation, Compensation and Enhancement

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:35: result of the loss of habitats. No on site mitigation is proposed however mitigation measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:35: • Mitigation will be included to prevent and mitigate against any accidents, including but not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:35:5.25 It is not practically possible for direct mitigation to be identified (and delivered within the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:35: loss of, or permanent damage to, ecological features despite mitigation. In Biodiversity Net Gain

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:35: provided as part of mitigation or compensation measures. Enhancement could be described as

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:37: each. This assessment took into consideration the embedded mitigation measures, in particular

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:37: mitigation measures specified in the application are satisfactorily delivered.”

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:38: mitigation of flooding elsewhere are taken.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:38: such removal is not possible or not in the public interest, mitigation measures must be

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:40:5.51 The ES concludes that there will be no significant adverse effects remaining after mitigation and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:40: remediation strategy, blue green Infrastructure and other embedded mitigation. SuDS should be

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:41: causing a significant effect and to determine any additional mitigation needed. The assumptions

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:42: of this mitigation measures applicable to high risk sites will be employed at the site. Best

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:42: practice mitigation measures in the form of a Framework Construction Environmental

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:42: Management Plan (Framework CEMP) have been included as embedded mitigation. With the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:42: appropriate mitigation measures suitable for high risk sites in place, there is likely to be a

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:42: significant and hence no mitigation measures are required. There is, therefore, no conflict with

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:43:5.79 The following mitigation measures are assumed during the construction phase of the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:44:5.80 With these mitigation measures in place it should be possible to minimise adverse effects on

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:44: the Eston Nab Hill footpath. To assist in addressing this the following mitigation measures are

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:45: when experienced from those receptors especially with the imposition of typical mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:46: will be undertaken based on a series of embedded mitigation measures that are in built into the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:47: road network, the following additional mitigation measures have been proposed:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:47:5.102 These mitigation measures will be secured by way of an appropriately worded planning

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:47: condition or obligation. With these mitigation measures in place it is concluded that there will

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:47: mitigation considered to be essential, there would be no transport related reasons why this

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:49:5.112 Without mitigation, the use of heavy equipment and activities such as excavation, backfilling,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:49: be undertaken and where remediation is considered necessary additional mitigation will be

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:49: ground gases on the site. Detailed risk assessment or site mitigations are also considered

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:49:5.116 Taking into account mitigation in the form of compliance with the remediation strategy and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:49: other mitigation measures, Arcadis concludes that impacts on human health, surface waters,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:55: mitigation not previously identified.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:55: consider additional mitigation measures; albeit it is necessary to consider the likelihood of those

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:55: additional mitigation measures to address effects arising from the inter relationship between

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:55: impacts on sensitive receptors, over and above the mitigation and monitoring measures already

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:56: effects are anticipated during both the construction and operational phases. No mitigation is

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:56: supply options, which will help to mitigation the cumulative greenhouse gas emissions.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:60: options, which will help to mitigation the cumulative greenhouse gas emissions. Framework and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:60: undertaken for relevant highway junctions to determine when mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:60: The design and implementation of any mitigation scheme for the junctions must take into

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:61:7.8 No mitigation is proposed or possible in relation to the significant adverse cumulative noise and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackeny - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:61: subject to agreeing and providing any highway mitigation considered to be essential, there

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 16

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:3:K6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 20

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:4: construction and operational phases of the proposed development. Mitigation measures to

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:9: will be considered as an additional mitigation measure for materials use within this assessment.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:11: 5 Identify opportunities/mitigation measures to reduce, re-use, recover and/ or recycle

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:15:K3.16 Following the assessment, mitigation measures will be identified where practicable. All

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:15: mitigation measures identified will aim to ensure waste and materials are managed in

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:19: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:19:K5.2 In assessing the effects, it assumes that the following embedded mitigation measures apply to

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:23:K6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:23:K6.2 In addition to the embedded mitigation identified in Chapter B and Section K5.0 of this chapter,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:24:K6.5 Using the mitigation measures above and the appointment of a licensed and high performing

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:25: collection, waste transport, treatment and disposal and include the following mitigation:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:25: scoped out of further assessment and therefore no additional mitigation measures have been

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:26: development, via the implementation of the mitigation measures outlined in Section K6.0

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:26: Negligible Adverse impact (Not Significant). Whilst mitigation will reduce any effects, the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: (taking account Mitigation and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:29: (taking account Mitigation and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Waste and Materials - Dec 2020(1).PDF:29: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:6: 7.6 Additional Mitigation 48

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:17: development on neighbouring junctions, and provides embedded mitigation, in

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:36:An indicative mitigation has been tested at this stage, which includes widening of

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:36:(with indicative mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:36:the ‘2033 Base + Development’ scenario when the indicative mitigation measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:37:indicative mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:37:The modelling outputs for the indicative mitigation scheme show a betterment of

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:37:undertaken to establish the type and scale of the mitigation required. As with all

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:37:mitigation should be considered alongside other measures that will be introduced

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:38:A mitigation scheme is likely to be required for the junction to operate efficiently

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:39:Potential mitigation for the junction could include a partial signalisation scheme

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:39:arms of the junction. This mitigation has been reviewed and found to have the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:41:Additional mitigation may be required for the junction to operate efficiently for

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:44:The results indicate a mitigation scheme may be required for the junction to

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:44:undertaken. As noted for the other junctions, this mitigation exercise needs to

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:47:A mitigation scheme may be required for the junction to operate efficiently for the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:47:‘2033 Cumulative Assessment’ scenario. Possible mitigation for the junction

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:49:Mitigation measures to address the traffic impacts associated with the proposed

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:49:assess capacity. The need or otherwise for additional mitigation measures will be

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:50:mitigation measures, such as widening the roundabout to accommodate three lane

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:50:‘2033 Cumulative Assessment’ scenario. A mitigation scheme is expected to be

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:50:mitigation for the junction could include a partial signalisation scheme and layout

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:50:could be made with the existing Infrastructure. Mitigation measures may still be

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:50:mitigation for the junction could be to extend the short/pocket/flared lanes on

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:54:7.6 Additional Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:54:Section 7.4 provided indicative suggestions for potential mitigation measures for

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:60: undertaken to determine when mitigation measures are required;

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:60: However, the design and implementation of any mitigation scheme for the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:61:highway mitigation considered to be essential, there would be no transport related

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:72:suitable mitigation features may be considered as part of the development

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:81:prepared and will form part of the embedded mitigation of the development. The

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:81:identify any necessary mitigation to minimise the impact of construction traffic on

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:137:Filename: A66_Tees Dock Road_Lackenby Access Roundabout_mitigation.j9

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:137: Access_with mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:268:suitable mitigation features may be considered as part of the development

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:277:prepared and will form part of the embedded mitigation of the development. The

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:277:identify any necessary mitigation to minimise the impact of construction traffic on

R-2020-0820-ESM-MGE04280 Nuisance 0820.pdf:2:Therefore, no mitigation measures are proposed for the operational phase.

R-2020-0820-ESM-EA R_2020_0820_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:the approved details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the

R-2020-0820-ESM-EA R_2020_0820_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:ensure mitigation for contaminated or poor quality surface water is appropriate. The

R-2020-0820-ESM-EA R_2020_0820_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:application, on any design changes, additional mitigation, compensation or enhancement

R-2020-0820-ESM-EA R_2020_0820_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:3: waterbody, and as such, requires that all practicable mitigation is taken to achieve

R-2020-0820-ESM-EA R_2020_0820_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:3: good ecological potential. The generic mitigation measures deemed applicable to

R-2020-0820-ESM-EA R_2020_0820_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:Environment & Biodiversity Strategy to demonstrate the mitigation and compensation for

R-2020-0820-ESM-EA R_2020_0820_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:the mitigation hierarchy to firstly secure on-site mitigation, then compensation through

R-2020-0820-ESM-EA R_2020_0820_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:the Environment & Biodiversity Strategy. On site mitigation must be the first port of call

R-2020-0820-ESM-EA R_2020_0820_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:daylighting of these as part of any onsite mitigation and biodiversity net gain.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: 5 Section 14.0: summarises the proposed mitigation and monitoring to be secured as part

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4: 4 Allowed review of the effectiveness of any identified mitigation and compensation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:10: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:10: part of the embedded mitigation of the development (see paragraph 3.11 above). The CEMP

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:11:4.9 With the implementation of embedded mitigation measures and the below secondary mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:11: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:11:4.10 At this point in time no additional mitigation measures have been identified for the construction

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:11: secondary mitigation measures are proposed. These measures include: occupier travel plans for

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:12: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:12:5.5 There are no embedded mitigation measures for the operation of the proposed development.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:12: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13:6.6 Construction dust mitigation measures have been included in the Framework CEMP. These

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13:6.7 There are no embedded mitigation measures proposed as a result of air quality for the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13: implementation of best practice mitigation measures for construction dust that are embedded in

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13:6.10 Beyond the embedded mitigation measures, no further mitigation is required for the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13: considered to be Not Significant, no mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:14: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:14: part of the embedded mitigation for the proposed development during the construction phase

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:14:7.7 Other embedded mitigation measures relevant to water management and flooding are:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: Through the implementation of the embedded mitigation measures described above, the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15:7.12 The implementation of the mitigation measures described above would result in the following

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:16: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:16:8.9 Embedded mitigation measures include items such as the implementation of the Framework

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:16: dust generation and the potential for direct contact with contaminants. With mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:16: (described below) and embedded mitigation, this is expected to result in a Minor Adverse

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: implementation of a ground remediation strategy (see details below) and embedded mitigation.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17:8.14 Mitigation measures are required to reduce the environmental impact associated with the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: remediation is considered necessary additional mitigation will be agreed with the relevant

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: and buildings should be designed with adequate mitigation measures. A detailed UXO risk

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17:8.17 Mitigation to reduce the effects on waste facilities is discussed in the waste chapter in more

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:18: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:18: Socio-Economics no mitigation measures are proposed in this regard.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19: consider potential primary embedded mitigation measures that relate to climate change and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19: provide a reduction in carbon emissions and act as primary mitigation measures. These include

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19: have not been identified at this stage, but the range of opportunities is set out in the mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19: scenario, this assessment has not considered the potential embedded mitigation they would

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: conservative of assumptions and represent a reasonable worst case ‘before mitigation’ scenario.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: national or local GHG emissions targets after mitigation. The development is therefore assessed

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: mitigation measures to reduce the GHG emissions associated with the proposed development,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21:11.6 The embedded mitigation measures relevant to LVIA are the fixing of development parameters

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21:11.9 A number of mitigation measures have been proposed to minimise or manage identified

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21:11.10 The following mitigation measures are proposed during the construction phase of the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:22:11.11 Mitigation for the operational phase of development will comprise:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23:12.11 Embedded mitigation relevant to the waste assessment includes:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23:12.14 No mitigation measures are required to reduce the impacts of the proposed development.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: those effects, may give rise to a need for additional mitigation not identified previously. No

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: Significant synergistic effects were identified and therefore no further mitigation required in this

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24: regarding other potential transport mitigation measures.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25:14.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25:14.2 These documents, and a range of other important mitigation measures, will be secured by way of

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Embedded Mitigation 14

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:4:I6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 19

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:6: development. Mitigation measures to reduce any adverse environmental effects are identified as

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:12: effects section represent a before mitigation scenario.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:17: embedded mitigation measures. However, mitigation of some emissions arising from

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:18: development and any carbon mitigation strategies employed to reduce GHG emissions.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:19: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:19: consider potential primary embedded mitigation measures that relate to climate change and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:19: provide a reduction in carbon emissions and act as primary mitigation measures. These include

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:19: have not been identified at this stage, but the range of opportunities is set out in the mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:19: assessment does not consider the potential embedded mitigation they would provide in relation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:24:I6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:24: mitigation measures to reduce the GHG emissions associated with the proposed development,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:24: across the full life cycle. Table I6.1 summarises possible mitigation measures for each of the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Table I6.1: Mitigation opportunities by life cycle - Construction

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Lifecycle stage Possible mitigation measures Implementation and monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:25: Lifecycle stage Possible mitigation measures Implementation and monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:25: national carbon target of net zero. Possible mitigation measures against each relevant

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:25: Table I6.2: Mitigation opportunities by life cycle- Operation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:25: Stage Possible mitigation measures Implementation and monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:26:I6.5 Mitigation of emissions from user and staff travel will be developed in full as part of a Full

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:27: substantial residual construction-related emissions, even after mitigation.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:28: Receptor Impact Potential Additional Mitigation and Monitoring Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-2022 03 08 (Lakenby 0820) Conds.pdf:4:required scheme(s) of mitigation shall be set out in an agreement entered into with

R-2020-0820-ESM-2022 03 08 (Lakenby 0820) Conds.pdf:4:programme for the delivery of the mitigation works. Thereafter the mitigation works

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:8: discuss and agree the scope of each EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:10: on the environment are identified, the assessment process establishes mitigation measures to

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:11: of this ES. This outlines all dust mitigation measures required for high risk receptors. With

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:13: considered to be tertiary mitigation and ‘embedded’ (see Chapter B of this ES for further detail).

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:13: With this tertiary mitigation in place, the risk of significant effects to human health and other

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:14: to discuss and agree the scope of each EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: M Mitigation and Monitoring Lichfields

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:25: scenario. It also includes details on the construction methodology and ‘embedded mitigation’.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:25: and cumulative effects and Chapter M considers mitigation, compensation and monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:25: M Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:29: necessary mitigation, monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: 5 The scope for incorporating mitigation measures to avoid, reduce, remedy or compensate

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: 6 Identification of any effects remaining after mitigation.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30:A7.4 Mitigation measures that are identified with specific ES Chapters, and the mechanisms for

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:32: minimise significant adverse effects on the environment. Where ‘built in’ mitigation is taken

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:14: similar timeframe, it is likely that the sites would require high risk dust mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:14: measures. As such, it is proposed that we embed the high risk dust mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Air Quality - Dec 2020.pdf:15: • Mitigation measures will be recommended for the construction and operational

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:4:B8.0 Summary of Primary and Tertiary Mitigation 32

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:6: • Section B8.0: summarises the ‘embedded’ primary and tertiary mitigation;

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:16: scope of each EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:28:B7.16 Site hoarding, fencing, plants, machinery, lighting and mitigation measures will be erected and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:28: brought onto the site. Mitigation and protective fencing will be required around areas of land

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:30:B7.33 A FCEMP is being designed into the scheme as tertiary mitigation and will therefore form part

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:30: of the embedded mitigation for the proposed developments. It is proposed that the measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:30: phase and this will be secured by an appropriately worded planning condition. The mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:30:B7.34 The FCEMP key principles/mitigation measures are as follows.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:31: 1 Mitigation will be included to prevent and mitigate against any accidents, including but not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:32:B7.39 Mitigation measures applicable to high risk sites outlined in the IAQM Guidance on the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:33: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate;

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:34:B7.41 As with the construction and earthworks mitigation, the below measures are highly

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:35: mitigation measures to protect site workers would include on-site inductions, provision of

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:37: Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:37:B8.1 This section describes the primary and tertiary mitigation which has been assumed to be in

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:37: • Primary or ‘embedded’ mitigation includes measures and modifications that have been

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:37: • Tertiary mitigation includes ‘best practice’ measures or actions that will occur outside of the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:37:B8.3 Primary and tertiary mitigation measures assumed to be in place during the construction phase

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38:B8.5 The Parameters Plan provides for the following embedded mitigation:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38: conditioned and form part of the embedded mitigation of the scheme:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38:B8.7 These mitigation measures will be secured through a range of planning conditions and will

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38: ensure that the development delivers the required primary and tertiary mitigation. This

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38: mitigation is taken into account in the potential effects sections of technical Chapters C to K (e.g.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38: the potential effects defined assume that all of the mitigation measures above form part of the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38:B8.8 Any additional mitigation required over and above that already listed in this chapter is provided

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38: for within the mitigation section of Chapters C to K. Full details of the mitigation, monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:40: Without the proposed development none of the proposed mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:1:MITIGATION AND MONITORING

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:2:Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:3:M2.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 3

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:M1.1 The Environmental Statement (‘ES’) has identified a series of mitigation and ongoing

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:M1.3 The Planning Practice Guidance (“PPG”) confirms that “mitigation measures proposed in an

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: carefully how mitigation measures proposed in an Environmental Statement are to be

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:M1.5 The ES has identified primary/embedded, secondary/additional and tertiary mitigation and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: definitions of the three types of mitigation as follows, which have been used as a basis for

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: categorising mitigation within this ES:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: “Primary mitigation is an intrinsic part of the project design – it should be described in the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Secondary mitigation requires further activity in order to achieve the anticipated outcome –

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Tertiary mitigation will be required regardless of any EIA assessment, as it is imposed, for

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:M1.6 The primary and tertiary mitigation and monitoring for the proposed development are set out in

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Chapter B. The secondary mitigation measures are set out in Section 6.0 of each technical

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: for further secondary mitigation to address these effects. Chapter L concludes that there are no

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: significant synergistic effects and therefore no associated additional mitigation. Chapter L does

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 1

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: that there will be a need for further secondary mitigation and this is discussed in Section M2.0

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5:M1.8 This chapter summarises all mitigation measures proposed throughout the ES for ease of

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5:Pg 2 Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6:M2.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: of a range of ‘built-in’ mitigation measures into the design of the proposed development. These

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: assumptions on which the assessment and resultant additional mitigation have been based.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6:M2.2 Tables M2.1 and M2.2 set out the primary and tertiary and secondary mitigation and monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Chapter B. The tables also set out the means by which the mitigation can be secured, including

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: whether there will be a requirement to submit mitigation and or monitoring documents or

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: mitigation and monitoring.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6:M2.3 In considering how best to secure the mitigation and monitoring measures, consideration has

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Table M2.1 Summary of Primary/Tertiary Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6:Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 3

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:7:Pg 4 Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:8: Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:8:Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 5

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Table M2.2 summary of Secondary Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Environmental Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibilit

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Transport No mitigation measures are required during N/A N/A

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Noise and No mitigation required, other than a Risk Noise and vibration Applicant/

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Air Quality No mitigation measures are required during N/A N/A

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: need for any specific mitigation measures.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9:Pg 6 Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:10: Environmental Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibilit

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:10: Further mitigation activities such as Detailed Risk UXO Risk Applicant

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:10:Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 7

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:11: Environmental Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibilit

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:11: Assessment or site mitigations to reduce the Assessment and Principal

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:11:Pg 8 Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:12: Environmental Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibilit

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:12: Socio-Economic No mitigation measures are required during N/A N/A

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:12:Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 9

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Environmental Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibilit

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Landscape and The following mitigation measures are proposed Planning Condition Applicant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Transport The following mitigation measures are proposed: OTP secured via Applicant.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:13:Pg 10 Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Environmental Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibilit

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:14: The following mitigation of on-site activities will Planning Condition Applicant

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:14:Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 11

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:15: Environmental Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibilit

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:15: on air quality and therefore no mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:15:Pg 12 Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:16: Environmental Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibilit

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:16: Remediation such there are no mitigation measures required.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:16: Socio-Economic No mitigation measures are required during N/A N/A

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:16:Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 13

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:17: Environmental Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibilit

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:17: include the following mitigation:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:17:Pg 14 Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:18: Environmental Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibilit

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:18:M2.5 Chapter L of the ES considered the requirement for additional mitigation to address any

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:18: developed and that there are ongoing discussions regarding other potential transport mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:18:Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 15

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:19: cumulative effects. This chapter summarises the range of mitigation and monitoring measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:19:Pg 16 Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:20:Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 17

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:21:Pg 18 Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:22:Chapter M: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 19

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby HRA Rev A(1).PDF:8:embedded mitigation it is considered that significant pollution at a scale likely to affect the SPA is

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby HRA Rev A(1).PDF:8:substantial distance separating the development site from the SPA, the mitigation embedded within

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby HRA Rev A(1).PDF:8:embedded mitigation measures specified in the application are satisfactorily delivered.

R-2020-0820-ESM-R-2020-0820-ESM-Archaeological Advice, Lackenby Site R-2020-0820-ESM.pdf:2:4.2 No condition addressing archaeological mitigation is considered necessary in this

R-2020-0820-ESM-Decision Notice 0820.pdf:3: the approved details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of

R-2020-0820-ESM-Decision Notice 0820.pdf:5: Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the assessment shall

R-2020-0820-ESM-Decision Notice 0820.pdf:9: required scheme(s) of mitigation shall be set out in an agreement entered into

R-2020-0820-ESM-Decision Notice 0820.pdf:9: responsibilities and programme for the delivery of the mitigation works.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Decision Notice 0820.pdf:9: Thereafter the mitigation works shall be delivered in accordance with the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Decision Notice 0820.pdf:11: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:15: • Mitigation measures will be recommended for the construction and operational phases, should they

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.pdf:15:change targets and mitigation strategy, and discuss our methodology and assumptions to ensure the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 35

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:3:F6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 42

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:5: development. Mitigation measures to reduce any negative environmental effects are identified

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:7: Practice Guidance (Ref design and mitigation. For example, flood risk can be reduced and biodiversity and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:7: Good design and mitigation measures can be secured through site specific policies

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:7: mitigation and compensatory measures where the relevant tests are met. Planning

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:12: ‘residual risk’ which can be managed through mitigation measures such as sustainable drainage

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:12: the mitigation of flooding elsewhere are taken”; “prioritising the use of sustainable

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:13: biodiversity. Where such removal is not possible or not in the public interest, mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:13: should proactively help the mitigation of, and adaption to, climate change including the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:24: Assessment) that shall be undertaken prior to construction (as detailed in the Mitigation Section

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:25: process. This point is picked up in Section F6.0: Mitigation and Monitoring;

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:39: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:39:F5.1 A full list of the mitigation measures embedded into the proposed development is provided in

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:39: embedded mitigation for the proposed development during the construction phase. The

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:39: 3 Mitigation will be included to prevent and mitigate against any accidents, including but not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:39:F5.3 Of the other embedded mitigation measures that shall be in place during the construction phase

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:40: risk are detailed in Section G6 Mitigation and Monitoring.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:40: along with the identification of mitigation, where necessary, which is required in order to

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:40: Accident Hazard Risk before Mitigation Relevance of Embedded mitigation Impact

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:40: chapter mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:41: Accident Hazard Risk before Mitigation Relevance of Embedded mitigation Impact

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:41: chapter mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:42: Accident Hazard Risk before Mitigation Relevance of Embedded mitigation Impact

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:42: chapter mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:43: as detailed in Section F6 – Mitigation and Monitoring.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:43: development, prior to the implementation of any additional mitigation measures i.e. those not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:43: following the CIRIA and Pollution Prevention Guidelines detailed in embedded mitigation. A

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:44: to be of minor magnitude without embedded mitigation. With the implementation of the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:46:F6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:46:F6.5 Secondary mitigation (in addition to the documents in F6.1) shall include the following with

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:47: F6.6 The table below sets out the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures for the construction

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:47:Receptor Potential Impact Additional Mitigation - Additional Mitigation - Operation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:48:Receptor Potential Impact Additional Mitigation - Additional Mitigation - Operation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:48: Additional mitigation in relation The drainage strategy will not include

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:49:Receptor Potential Impact Additional Mitigation - Additional Mitigation - Operation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:49:Secondary bedrock and Groundwater recharge No additional mitigation No additional mitigation identified.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:50:Receptor Potential Impact Additional Mitigation - Additional Mitigation - Operation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:50: Beneficial changes to No additional mitigation The drainage strategy will reduce the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:50:Surface waters and Potential for No additional mitigation No additional mitigation identified.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:51:F7.1 Embedded mitigation is detailed in Section F5.0. Potential Effects and additional mitigation is

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:51: detailed in Section F6.0. Mitigation and Monitoring. This section contains an assessment of the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:51: residual effects which remain after this mitigation is applied during the construction and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:51: in the Section F6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring. The magnitude of change on surface water flows

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:51:F7.3 The Tees estuary has a very high sensitivity, mitigation would not result in any changes,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:51:F7.4 The mitigation measures are detailed in the mitigation section (in particular the avoidance of

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:51: The additional mitigation outlined above will change the effect from adverse to beneficial

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:51: Significant. The additional mitigation outlined above will not change the effect of the proposed

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:51: embedded mitigation measures.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:52:F7.13 The Tees estuary has a very high sensitivity. Mitigation would not result in any changes,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:52:F7.16 The additional mitigation outline above does not change the effect arising from the proposed

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:52: embedded mitigation measures. Receptor sensitivity category for the superficial and bedrock

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:53: implementation of the mitigation measures and result in Minor Beneficial effect which is Not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:54:F8.1 The table below summarises the receptors, potential effects, additional mitigation measures and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:54: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:54: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:55: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:55: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:56: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:56: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:56: Mercia Reduced Negligible Adverse and No further mitigation is Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:57: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:57: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:57: Superficial Reduced Negligible Adverse and No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:58: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:58: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:59: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:59: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:60: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:60: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:60: Mercia Reduced Negligible Adverse and No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:60: Superficial Reduced Negligible Adverse and No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:60:F8.2 There will be no significant Adverse effects remaining after mitigation and there will be

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Water Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:60: implementation of a remediation strategy, and other embedded/additional mitigation. SuDS

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:3: Embedded Mitigation 13

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:3:C6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 19

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:5: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:9: 4 Proposal of any mitigation measures to offset any likely significant impacts in relation to

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:9: 5 Assessment of any residual impacts accounting for the implementation of mitigation.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:9: be undertaken based on a series of embedded mitigation measures that are in built into the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:11:C3.16 Residual effects have been identified in C7.0 if they remain after mitigation has been taken into

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:17: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:17: prepared and will form part of the embedded mitigation of the development. The CEMP

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:17: • Any other mitigation required to minimise the impact of construction traffic on the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:17:C5.4 These mitigation measures will be secured through a range of planning conditions, designed and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:17: the required primary and tertiary mitigation. This mitigation is taken into account in the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:18:C5.11 These mitigation measures will be secured by planning condition and they are taken into

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:18:C5.14 The phasing of any mitigation measures will be subject to further discussion with the relevant

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:18: term effects to driver delay are likely to be Not Significant. Any mitigation will be reflected in the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:23:C6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:23: construction stage do not identify the need for additional mitigation measures over and above

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:23: the strategic road network, the following additional mitigation measures are proposed:

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:23:C6.3 These mitigation measures will be secured by way of an appropriately worded planning

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:24: Receptor Potential effect Mitigation Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:24: roundabout on a Driver and Teesworks site. Mitigation measures to address

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:25: Receptor Potential effect Mitigation Residual

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:26: traffic on the transport networks. No additional mitigation measures over and above the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:26:C8.5 Similarly, a bus service is proposed as embedded mitigation to encourage sustainable transport

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:26: to the development site. Further additional mitigation is expected through the implementation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:26: Receptor Impact Potential Effects Additional Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:26: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:27: Receptor Impact Potential Effects Additional Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:27: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:27: queues at the Mitigation measures to performance to

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:28: Receptor Impact Potential Effects Additional Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.pdf:28: mitigation)

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:3:embedded mitigation and other mitigation measures to determine residual effects. It further proposes

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:3:iii Assessing the significance of any residual effects after mitigation;

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:12:assessment takes into consideration the embedded mitigation measures. The Stage 2 Appropriate

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:13:plans or projects, provided that the embedded mitigation measures specified in the application are

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:13:8.4 As no additional mitigation is required beyond the embedded mitigation measures to mitigate the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:13:mitigation in the application, it is concluded that there would be no effects on Teesmouth and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:15:Mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:15:(CEMP) will form part of the embedded mitigation for the proposed development during the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:15:  Mitigation will be included to prevent and mitigate against any accidents, including but not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:15:mitigation is possible.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:15:9.5 Mitigation measures identified in the CEMP to prevent substances from entering watercourses will

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:15:9.5 With the embedded mitigation in place the residual effects that are of greater than negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby EcIA Rev A.pdf:16:10.1 Compensation refers to the process by which any residual effects after mitigation will be

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:4: mitigation not previously identified.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:4:L1.2 Chapter M then summarises the mitigation and monitoring measures identified within this ES

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:4: consider additional mitigation measures; albeit it is necessary to consider the likelihood of those

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:4: • Section L2.0 – Summary of residual effects (following mitigation) identified within the ES

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: effects) and any additional mitigation measures required to have regard to those effects;

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:6: mitigation measures described in Chapter M) as identified in Chapters C to K of this ES that

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:10: give rise to a need for additional mitigation not identified previously.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:11:L3.5 Table L3.1 highlights residual effects on identified receptors after mitigation. Where a series of

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:11: a new significant effect giving rise to a need for mitigation has been undertaken. This has been

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:11: been given to mitigation measures already either embedded into the development or capable of

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:11:L3.7 In the context of the analysis above, there is no requirement for additional mitigation measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:11: over and above the mitigation and monitoring measures already proposed in Chapters C to K

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:12: effects requiring mitigation.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:13: • together provide an opportunity for RCBC to have greater control over the mitigation of this

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:29: and additional mitigation measures, which when implemented will result in no

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:39: sensitive receptors, the additional site specific mitigation for Long Acres, Foundry and Steel

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:39: building is known. Further information on these additional site-specific mitigation measures are

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:39: set out in the Mitigation and Monitoring sections of the Noise and Vibration Chapters of the

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:40:L5.30 With the implementation of the additional site specific mitigation measures set out in the Noise

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:40:L5.34 With regards to construction dust, high risk mitigation measures from the best practice IAQM

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:40: and are included as embedded mitigation. It is considered that as high-risk measures are likely

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:40: successful implementation of appropriate mitigation measures, the effects will be Not

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41: proposed development site: that mitigation of impacts will be achieved through the CEMP and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41: secondary mitigation measures. In addition, the assessment is also based on the assumptions

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41:L5.42 In addition to the Framework CEMP and other embedded mitigation measures, secondary

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41: mitigation measures for both schemes include a Construction Stage Surface Water Management

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41: With the implementation of the similar, effective pollution control and mitigation measures at

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41:L5.44 In terms of surface water, the mitigation measures are anticipated to have a Negligible

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:42:L5.48 With the implementation of similar, mitigation measures at the Lackenby site, the cumulative

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:43: commonality, and the potential for combined mitigation strategies, it is proposed that the GHG

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: further consideration and mitigation. Once further information is available on the end users of

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47:L5.79 No mitigation is proposed or possible in relation to the Significant Beneficial effects and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: utilise low and zero carbon energy supply options, which will help to mitigation the cumulative

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:48: mitigation measures.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:49:L5.93 At this stage of the development, additional mitigation measures to reduce the cumulative

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:50: implementing mitigation measures during day, evening and night-time;

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:58: the determination of the planning application to discuss potential mitigation measures.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:62: the proposed additional site specific mitigation for Long Acres, Foundry and Steel House sites

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:62: Further details on these site-specific measures are included in the Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:62:L5.136 With the implementation of the additional site specific mitigation measures set out in the Noise

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:62:L5.140 With regards to construction dust, high risk mitigation measures from the best practice IAQM

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:62: proposed Tier 1 developments and are included as embedded mitigation. It is considered that as

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:62:L5.141 If each of the Tier 2 developments successfully implements an appropriate level of mitigation for

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:62: construction dust guidance uses the category ‘high’ as the most stringent level of mitigation

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:62: measures that can be proposed, and as the Tier 1 sites all include high risk mitigation measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:62: and each of the Tier 2 sites should include appropriate mitigation measures, no further

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:62: mitigation measures are suggested here. This is considered the most appropriate approach to

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:66: mitigation of impacts will be achieved through the council making the mitigation measures

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:66: identified receptors have the potential to be impacted. Nonetheless, with mitigation in place,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:67: identified receptors have the potential to be impacted. Nonetheless, with mitigation in place,

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:68: commonality and will not share combined mitigation strategies. For this reason, the full list

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:68: spatially and in terms of both ownership and likely mitigation measures. As such a high-level

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:70:L5.184 No mitigation is proposed or possible in relation to the Significant Beneficial effects and

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:70: utilise low and zero carbon energy supply options, which will help to mitigation the cumulative

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:70: mitigation measures.

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:71: whether there is a need for further mitigation (synergistic effects). It also considers the potential

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:71:L6.5 No mitigation is proposed or possible in relation to the Significant Beneficial cumulative effects

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:71: supply options, which will help to mitigation the cumulative greenhouse gas emissions. There

R-2020-0820-ESM-Lackenby ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:71: are ongoing discussions regarding other potential transport mitigation measures.

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:2:6 Assessment of Effects and Mitigation 31

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:2: 6.2 Assessment of Effects and Mitigation 31

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:4:Environmental Management Plan (CEMP), no other specific mitigation is deemed

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:4:required. With the implementation of these mitigation measures to control the

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:4:impact of construction related pollution on the SPA and Ramsar, these mitigation

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:6:• Set out the mitigation measures required to ensure compliance with nature

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:6:• Identify how mitigation measures could be secured;

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:8: required, appropriate mitigation measures to deal with any noise and vibration

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:8: minor adverse, temporary effect on the environment and require no mitigation

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:13:3. Assessing the significance of any residual effects after mitigation (see 4.5.2

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:32:6 Assessment of Effects and Mitigation

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:32:significance of any residual effects after mitigation.

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:32:6.2 Assessment of Effects and Mitigation

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:32:(Table 4). It also details any mitigation to be implemented within the construction

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:32:the HRA process and therefore discusses appropriate mitigation measures to

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:33:CEMP, no other specific mitigation is deemed required.

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:33:1) is construction and operation related pollution. The required mitigation

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:34:effects for each feature, the mitigation measures required and the means by which

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:34:mitigation measures can be secured.

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:34:invertebrates and brown hare. Following the implementation of this mitigation, no

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:35:to providing the 7ha of on-site mitigation, would be for the ERF development to

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:36: Feature Impact Characterisation of Unmitigated Effect without mitigation Mitigation Significance of Residual

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:37:in the loss of, or permanent damage to, ecological features despite mitigation. In

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_29_STDC Eston Road EcIA_Issue.PDF:37:to those provided as part of mitigation or compensation measures. In BNG terms,

R-2020-0270-FFM-319577 Response Letter.pdf:3:assess the impacts likely to arise and consider any mitigation measures that may be necessary.

R-2020-0270-FFM-319577 Response Letter.pdf:5:the mitigation hierarchy as set out in paragraph 175 of the NPPF and firstly consider what existing

R-2020-0270-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:7: previous uses and any proposals for mitigation including land remediation or impacts on the

R-2020-0270-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:97:Key contaminant linkages identified as requiring some form of mitigation are summarised in Table 3.4.

R-2020-0270-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:101:where they may compliment any landfill gas mitigation measures but are not considered to be appreciate for

R-2020-0270-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:mitigation measures to be implemented to ensure no nuisance arises from waste storage such as odour or

R-2020-0270-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:arises. Mitigation measures to be adopted include:

R-2020-0270-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:be relatively low. If significant odours are noted, appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented by

R-2020-0270-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:practices to minimise odours and/or utilising odour suppression and mitigation equipment.

R-2020-0270-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:The remediation contractor shall implement appropriate mitigation measures to protect any surface water

R-2020-0270-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:113:There is a potential for mud to be carried out of the site on to local roads during the works. Mitigation

R-2020-0270-FFM-HERITAGE 0270.pdf:1:I would have no objection to the proposals and would support and encourage mitigation measures where ecological

R-2020-0270-FFM-Officer Report 0270.pdf:7:No objection to the proposals and would support and encourage mitigation

R-2020-0270-FFM-Officer Report 0270.pdf:11:2 of the HRA process and therefore discusses appropriate mitigation

R-2020-0270-FFM-Officer Report 0270.pdf:12:proposed development subject to mitigation in the form of a CEMP. The

R-2020-0270-FFM-Officer Report 0270.pdf:12:required mitigation (CEMP) put in place through the HRA process is

R-2020-0270-FFM-Officer Report 0270.pdf:18:have an adverse impact that would require mitigation measures to be put in

R-2020-0270-FFM-Officer Report 0270.pdf:18:the implementation of this mitigation, no significant residual impact is

R-2020-0270-FFM-Officer Report 0270.pdf:18:on-site mitigation, would be for the ERF development to contribute to a

R-2020-0270-FFM-Officer Report 0270.pdf:21: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2020-0270-FFM-Decision 0270.pdf:2: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_28_STDC Eston Road HRA_Issue.PDF:8:introduce mitigation measures to the point where no adverse effects occur. The

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_28_STDC Eston Road HRA_Issue.PDF:8: that with appropriate mitigation measures the plan or project would not give

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_28_STDC Eston Road HRA_Issue.PDF:10: monitoring. If required, appropriate mitigation measures to deal with any

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_28_STDC Eston Road HRA_Issue.PDF:10: minor adverse, temporary effect on the environment and require no mitigation

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_28_STDC Eston Road HRA_Issue.PDF:25:mitigation there were no likely significant effects from the proposed ERF

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_28_STDC Eston Road HRA_Issue.PDF:25:mitigation will be required to specifically control in-combination effects from the

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_28_STDC Eston Road HRA_Issue.PDF:27:objectives. This stage in the process also takes account of mitigation measures.

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_28_STDC Eston Road HRA_Issue.PDF:27:objectives, outlines any further mitigation measures, and then concludes whether

R-2020-0270-FFM-2020_05_28_STDC Eston Road HRA_Issue.PDF:28:mitigation and enhancement of the proposed development site, which includes

R-2021-0432-FFM-10035118-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0250-02-EP_Deployment - Supporting Information.pdf:23: The use of visual trigger levels will identify when additional mitigation

R-2021-0432-FFM-19736928_1.PDF:13:exceed the parameters used to design any mitigation measures.

R-2021-0432-FFM-Redcar Steelworks-AUK-XX-XX-RP-GE-0001-02-SSI3_GI_SCR.PDF:32:• Direct contact pathways would be active throughout a potential redevelopment; typical mitigation measures

R-2021-0432-FFM-Redcar Steelworks-AUK-XX-XX-RP-GE-0001-02-SSI3_GI_SCR.PDF:32: mitigation.

R-2021-0432-FFM-Redcar Steelworks-AUK-XX-XX-RP-GE-0001-02-SSI3_GI_SCR.PDF:44:• Direct contact pathways would be active throughout a potential redevelopment; typical mitigation measures

R-2021-0432-FFM-Redcar Steelworks-AUK-XX-XX-RP-GE-0001-02-SSI3_GI_SCR.PDF:44: may be required as mitigation.

R-2020-0724-PND-STDC-Early Phase Demolition Outline MS_For Issue.PDF:11:client has ongoing ecological surveys across site and will be carried out on the above structures, with mitigation

R-2023-0339-CD-JER10061_Redcar Energy Centre_V01_230314_Report Final V3.pdf:3:4 MITIGATION MEASURES ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 8

R-2023-0339-CD-JER10061_Redcar Energy Centre_V01_230314_Report Final V3.pdf:4:been complied with. This excludes any agreed remediation / mitigation measures provided by the

R-2023-0339-CD-JER10061_Redcar Energy Centre_V01_230314_Report Final V3.pdf:5:writing by the Local Planning Authority. This excludes any agreed remediation/mitigation measures provided

R-2023-0339-CD-JER10061_Redcar Energy Centre_V01_230314_Report Final V3.pdf:6:Section 4: Mitigation Measures. This section details the mitigation measures that will be implemented where

R-2023-0339-CD-JER10061_Redcar Energy Centre_V01_230314_Report Final V3.pdf:11:4 MITIGATION MEASURES

R-2023-0339-CD-JER10061_Redcar Energy Centre_V01_230314_Report Final V3.pdf:13:phase oils (free product) will be sufficient mitigation.

R-2023-0339-CD-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:20: • Provision of recommendations (where necessary) for remediation/mitigation measures to

R-2023-0339-CD-230328 JER10061 Redcar Energy Centre LPA Letter Final Rev 2.pdf:3:based contaminant concentrations to the extent required to define appropriate mitigation measures for the

R-2023-0339-CD-230328 JER10061 Redcar Energy Centre LPA Letter Final Rev 2.pdf:3:assess the need for and scope of gas mitigation. It is proposed that a series of nine boreholes are advanced

R-2023-0339-CD-230328 JER10061 Redcar Energy Centre LPA Letter Final Rev 2.pdf:16: chemical analysis results, and recommendations (where necessary) for remediation/mitigation

R-2023-0339-CD-230328 JER10061 Redcar Energy Centre LPA Letter Final Rev 2.pdf:17:• Users during development (construction workers): High risk – Mitigation measures required during

R-2023-0339-CD-230328 JER10061 Redcar Energy Centre LPA Letter Final Rev 2.pdf:17:• Users of surrounding land: Moderate – Mitigation measures required such as damping down to

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:1: • highlights any necessary monitoring and/or mitigation measures which could prevent,

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:5: should include proposals for mitigation of any

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:8: accordingly and any unacceptable risks to receptors would be subject to mitigation or remediation.

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:12:9.4 Mitigation Measures Adopted as Part of the Project

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:13: mitigation / remediation requirements to manage the risk associated with ground

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:13: • on completion of the mitigation/remediation works, a validation report would be prepared with

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:13: appropriate) are at acceptable levels and that design measures for remdiation/mitigation have

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:14: additional mitigation measures are considered necessary.

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:14: risk to human health or controlled waters receptors would be subject to remediation or mitigation

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:14: considered to be very highly sensitive. With the implementation the mitigation measures set out in

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:14: Mercia Mudstone Group.. Construction phase mitigation measures would be in accordance with

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:15: implementation of the mitigation measures, in particular the dust control measures, the magnitude

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:15: construction phase mitigation measures, in particular site investigation and remediation (where

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:15: short-term, and of local spatial extent. With the implementation of the mitigation measures, in

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:16:9.5.22 At the end of the construction process, the implementation of the remediation/mitigation measures

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:16: acceptable levels and that remediation/mitigation measures have been appropriately installed. The

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:16: mitigation required and the addition of hardstanding/building cover would be up to medium

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:16: mitigation incorporated into the proposed development.

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:16: remediated or controlled through mitigation and much of the Application Site would be covered by

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:16: mitigation required and the addition of hardstanding/building cover would be up to low beneficial

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:16: depending on the degree of existing contamination and the nature of the remediation / mitigation

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:17:9.5.32 The implementation of mitigation measures and a remediation scheme where required, and the

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:17:9.5.33 The impacts to groundwater as a result of the implementation of any remediation / mitigation

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:17: depending on the degree of existing contamination and the nature of the remediation / mitigation

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:17:9.5.36 These potential impacts would be included as part of the site investigation and mitigation would be

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:17: basis the appropriate mitigation is adopted the magnitude of effects will be no change. Therefore,

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:17: may be implemented in addition to remediation / mitigation measures where considered of value.

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:18: Further Mitigation

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:18:9.6.8 No further mitigation is likely to be required once the project is operational.

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:18:9.6.10 The site’s Environmental Permit would include any necessary accident/disaster mitigation/planning

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:19: its associated Infrastructure, and mitigation/remediation would be implemented (where

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:19: investigation and remediation/mitigation would be undertaken on the Application Site. On this

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:20: risk would be managed through remediating or mitigation as defined within a remediation strategy.

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:20: remediation, a validation report would be prepared to confirm that the remediation/mitigation

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:21: implementation of any remediation / mitigation required and the addition of hardstanding/building

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:21: the nature of the remediation / mitigation incorporated into the development. The effect on off-site

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:23:Receptor Sensitivity of Description of impact Mitigation Magnitude of Significance of Significant / Not

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:23: mitigation, etc.

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:23:Adjacent site users exposure to ground mitigation.

R-2023-0339-CD-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:24:Receptor Sensitivity of Description of impact Mitigation Magnitude of Significance of Significant / Not

R-2022-0145-CD-Riverside Ph1 WB WSIv3.pdf:6: with NEAR to take place and a strategy for mitigation be rapidly developed.

R-2022-0145-CD-Riverside Ph1 WB WSIv3.pdf:9:8.5 Where assessment has identified the need for further analysis and no further mitigation work has

R-2022-0355-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:16:mitigation and management strategy.

R-2022-0355-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:16: • Compensation is required to offset residual losses after the mitigation through the

R-2022-0355-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:21: Development of a UXO mitigation strategy.

R-2022-0355-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:25:assessment indicates a Medium risk from UXO for borehole and excavation activities. Further mitigation

R-2022-0355-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:25:activities such as detailed risk assessment or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the

R-2022-0355-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:34:of the HRA, any control and mitigation measures identified within it shall be adopted in relations to the

R-2022-0355-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:35:stream) in order to confirm the assessment of the waste impact and to implement embedded mitigation

R-2022-0355-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:35:  Any ecological mitigations required

R-2022-0355-FFM-20857612_1.pdf:2:set out those mitigation measures to be employed to minimise or eliminate such impacts. REASON:

R-2022-0355-FFM-Officer report.pdf:5:archaeological mitigation will be provided if (where relevant) the works and

R-2022-0355-FFM-ARCHAEOLOGIST.pdf:1:For R/2022/0343/ESM and R/2022/0355/FFM therefore sufficient archaeological mitigation

R-2022-0355-FFM-ARCHAEOLOGIST.pdf:7: with NEAR to take place and a strategy for mitigation be rapidly developed.

R-2022-0355-FFM-ARCHAEOLOGIST.pdf:10:9.5 Where assessment has identified the need for further analysis and no further mitigation work has

R-2022-0355-FFM-390614 - Erection of Industrial Facility. Land at South Bank, Off Tees Dock Road, South Bank - No Objection.pdf:4:NPPF (paragraphs 8, 73, 104, 120,174, 175 and 180). We advise you to follow the mitigation hierarchy

R-2022-0355-FFM-390614 - Erection of Industrial Facility. Land at South Bank, Off Tees Dock Road, South Bank - No Objection.pdf:5:information including contact details for the National Trail Officer. Appropriate mitigation measures

R-2021-0846-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:12:mitigation and management strategy.

R-2021-0846-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:12: • Compensation is required to offset residual losses after the mitigation through the

R-2021-0846-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:17:• Development of a UXO mitigation strategy.

R-2021-0846-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:21:assessment indicates a Medium risk from UXO for borehole and excavation activities. Further mitigation

R-2021-0846-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:21:activities such as detailed risk assessment or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the

R-2021-0846-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:29:of the HRA, any control and mitigation measures identified within it shall be adopted in relations to the

R-2021-0846-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:30:stream) in order to confirm the assessment of the waste impact and to implement embedded mitigation

R-2021-0846-FFM-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:30: • Any ecological mitigations required

R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:3:3.2 Flood Risk Mitigation 14

R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:6:  To summarise flood risks from all sources, and to identify if required, mitigation measures to

R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:14:3.2 Flood Risk Mitigation

R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:14:mounds from all sources. As a consequence, no specific flood risk mitigation measures are required to

R-2021-0846-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OW-0001_A_P01 Drainage Strategy.pdf:25:  The flood risk from all other sources is also considered to be low. Therefore, no mitigation

R-2020-0730-CD-Memo Prairies Conditions.PDF:2:mitigation works proposed. The remedial strategy also details works which will be carried out to

R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part1.PDF:33:• Direct contact pathways with soils could be active throughout a potential redevelopment; typical mitigation

R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part1.PDF:33: required as mitigation.

R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part1.PDF:53:appropriate mitigation measures may be required.

R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part1.PDF:56:asbestos impact on the site and determine necessary mitigation measures. It is likely that a clean cover system

R-2020-0730-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part1.PDF:57: assessment should be carried out to enable appropriate mitigation measures to be designed that will

R-2021-0439-CD-officer report.pdf:1:mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise agreed in writing.

R-2021-0439-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:2: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2021-0439-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2021-0439-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2021-0439-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2021-0439-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2021-0439-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2021-0439-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2021-0439-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2021-0439-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2021-0439-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2021-0439-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2021-0439-CD-South Bank Quay Strategy Rev. 1.pdf:14:mitigation and management strategy.

R-2021-0439-CD-South Bank Quay Strategy Rev. 1.pdf:14:  Compensation is required to offset residual losses after the mitigation through the preparation

R-2021-0439-CD-South Bank Quay Strategy Rev. 1.pdf:19: Identify the requirement for a UXO mitigation strategy.

R-2021-0439-CD-South Bank Quay Strategy Rev. 1.pdf:26:assessment indicates a Medium risk from UXO for borehole and excavation activities. Further mitigation

R-2021-0439-CD-South Bank Quay Strategy Rev. 1.pdf:26:activities such as detailed risk assessment or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the

R-2021-0439-CD-South Bank Quay Strategy Rev. 1.pdf:34:findings of the HRA, any control and mitigation measures identified within it shall be adopted in

R-2021-0439-CD-South Bank Quay Strategy Rev. 1.pdf:35:stream) in order to confirm the assessment of the waste impact and to implement embedded mitigation

R-2021-0439-CD-South Bank Quay Strategy Rev. 1.pdf:35:  Any ecological mitigations required

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.5 Issue 2.pdf:4: vibration from construction works along with mitigation measures employed.

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.5 Issue 2.pdf:8: Mitigation Measures

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.5 Issue 2.pdf:12: The Development Site Environmental Advisor shall ensure that all appropriate mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.5 Issue 2.pdf:12:  determine if any of the general mitigation control measures listed in Chapter 3 are

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.5 Issue 2.pdf:13: If a breach in the use of the prescribed mitigation measures is identified, this will be

R-2023-0253-RMM-NATURAL ENGLAND EMAIL.pdf:1: R20190767OOM - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf

R-2023-0253-RMM-NATURAL ENGLAND EMAIL.pdf:1:Tees, I would prefer to see these potential impacts considered in the Stage 2 appropriate assessment and mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-NATURAL ENGLAND EMAIL.pdf:1:secured through the CEMP. This is because mitigation can only be considered at Stage 2.

R-2023-0253-RMM-NATURAL ENGLAND EMAIL.pdf:2:- the Pre-submission Screening Service (PSS) for European Protected Species mitigation licence applications.

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL. 007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.1 Issue 2.pdf:10: The section below details key mitigations relating to waste and incorporates the measures

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.4 Issue 2 COMPRESSED.pdf:7: details of on-site dust mitigation measures are set out in Dust Management Plan

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.4 Issue 2 COMPRESSED.pdf:10: reviewed and where practical mitigation measures incorporated into future best practice

R-2023-0253-RMM-Grangetown ERF - PS - RM - Mar 23.pdf:25: scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation measures to be employed to

R-2023-0253-RMM-Grangetown ERF - PS - RM - Mar 23.pdf:26: shall include of all those mitigation measures set out in Chapter 15 of Volume 1 of the

R-2023-0253-RMM-Grangetown ERF - PS - RM - Mar 23.pdf:26: submitted Environmental Impact Assessment December 2019 and Chapter 7 (Mitigation) of the

R-2023-0253-RMM-Grangetown ERF - PS - RM - Mar 23.pdf:26: and archaeology mitigation are submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority, in

R-2023-0253-RMM-Grangetown ERF - PS - RM - Mar 23.pdf:26: including any details of any mitigation 5 of CEMP – Noise and Vibration Dust

R-2023-0253-RMM-Grangetown ERF - PS - RM - Mar 23.pdf:30: the Local Planning Authority for on or off-site mitigation and net gain provision that will be

R-2023-0253-RMM-Grangetown ERF - PS - RM - Mar 23.pdf:30: shall include off-site mitigation and net gain provision. It is understood that the planning authority is

R-2023-0253-RMM-Grangetown ERF - PS - RM - Mar 23.pdf:30: responsible for all off-site mitigation as part of a wider package of measures that are being brought

R-2023-0253-RMM-Grangetown ERF - PS - RM - Mar 23.pdf:30: appended Biodiversity Improvement Plan only considers mitigation and net gain provision within the

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:244: set out those mitigation measures to be employed to minimise or eliminate such impacts.’

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:245: • Chapter Six: describes the Appropriate Assessment, which includes mitigation measures where

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:249: clarification as to when avoidance or reduction (i.e., mitigation) measures can be considered within

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:249: appropriate assessment, at which point such mitigation measures can be considered. This judgment

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:260: ‘appropriate assessment’ and mitigation measures may need to be introduced.

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:260: possible to rely on mitigation measures that allow a conclusion of ‘no likely significant effect’ to be

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:264: features. Measures are proposed to mitigation pollution related

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:264: Peak Resources Refinery disturbance to species at the SPA / Ramsar. Standard mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:354: mitigation measures and is therefore compliant with the judgment People Over Wind - Sweetman vs

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:362: 3.13 NL asked if there are any other mitigation measures (at source) that could be employed. AP2

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:362: “unlikely” and what mitigation would be provided so that they become unlikely.

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01_ADM - Issue 1a (1 of 3).pdf:369:out mitigation work as well as for impacts directly connected with a development. Further

R-2023-0253-RMM-NEAR.pdf:1:we would recommend that no further archaeological mitigation or archaeological conditions are

R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:5: Planning Authority for on or off-site mitigation and net gain provision that will be implemented to offset

R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:5: off-site mitigation and net gain provision. It is understood from FCC Environment that the planning

R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:5: authority is responsible for all off-site mitigation as part of a wider package of measures that are

R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:5: Consequently this report only considers mitigation and net gain provision within the Site.

R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie Biodiversity Improvement Plan.pdf:8: subject to the mitigation hierarchy.

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.3 Issue 2.pdf:3: and debris from construction works along with mitigation measures employed.

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.3 Issue 2.pdf:6: generic mitigation measures set out below.

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.3 Issue 2.pdf:7: Mitigation measures for stockpiles for instance of aggregate, soils etc., shall be as follows:

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.2 Issue 2 COMPRESSED.pdf:7: details of on-site dust mitigation measures are set out in Dust Management Plan

R-2023-0253-RMM-ECL.007.04.01CEMP-ANNEX.2 Issue 2 COMPRESSED.pdf:10: reviewed and where practical mitigation measures incorporated into future best practice

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:5:conjunction with the CEMP, which gives specific details environmental management and mitigations.

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:10:protected species and other ecology issues are detailed in the Environmental Management and Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:10: Risk Consequence Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:11:Risk Consequence Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:11:Overhead Electrocution Goalposts and other mitigations as relevant and as specified in

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:12:Risk Consequence Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:13:Risk Consequence Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:14: Risk Consequence Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:25:required. Examples may include; use of ladders, waste management, dust mitigation measures

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:39:mitigations put in place. Where vehicles are used for tipping materials into an excavation, safety measures,

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:40:• Implementing dust mitigation measures.

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:58: assessment, and written permission is granted by HZI, subject to mitigation of hazard, i.e. no work

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:60:both on and off site. See the CEMP for more details of mitigations relating to environmental noise.

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:61:See Environmental Management and Mitigation Plan for more details of mitigations relating to dust.

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134151_1_CPP.pdf:63:amended to take account of the additional hazards and detailed mitigation measures developed and

R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:5: set out those mitigation measures to be employed to minimise or eliminate such impacts.’

R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:6: • Chapter Six: describes the Appropriate Assessment, which includes mitigation measures where

R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:10: clarification as to when avoidance or reduction (i.e., mitigation) measures can be considered within

R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:10: appropriate assessment, at which point such mitigation measures can be considered. This judgment

R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:21: ‘appropriate assessment’ and mitigation measures may need to be introduced.

R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:21: possible to rely on mitigation measures that allow a conclusion of ‘no likely significant effect’ to be

R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:25: features. Measures are proposed to mitigation pollution related

R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:25: Peak Resources Refinery disturbance to species at the SPA / Ramsar. Standard mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-P20-1004 Grangetown Prairie shadow HRA.pdf:73: mitigation measures and is therefore compliant with the judgment People Over Wind - Sweetman vs

R-2023-0253-RMM-428233 - R_2023_0253_RMM Reserved matters application following R20190767OOM - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf:1: NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2023-0253-RMM-428233 - R_2023_0253_RMM Reserved matters application following R20190767OOM - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf:1: We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2023-0253-RMM-428233 - R_2023_0253_RMM Reserved matters application following R20190767OOM - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf:1: mitigation options should be secured:

R-2023-0253-RMM-428233 - R_2023_0253_RMM Reserved matters application following R20190767OOM - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf:2:Further advice on mitigation – Construction Phase Impacts / Construction Environmental

R-2023-0253-RMM-428233 - R_2023_0253_RMM Reserved matters application following R20190767OOM - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf:4:NPPF (paragraphs 8, 73, 104, 120,174, 175 and 180). We advise you to follow the mitigation hierarchy

R-2023-0253-RMM-428233 - R_2023_0253_RMM Reserved matters application following R20190767OOM - No Objection Subject to Mitigation.pdf:5:information including contact details for the National Trail Officer. Appropriate mitigation measures

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:2:4.4 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 11

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:2:5.4 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 13

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:3:6.2 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 16

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:3:7.3 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 18

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:3:8.2 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 20

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:3:9.2 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 22

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:3:10.2 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 23

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:3:11.2 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 24

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:3:12.2 Impacts and Mitigations ………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 26

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:4:environmental management and mitigation measures that would be implemented during construction. These

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:9: Inspection of habitats and identification of mitigation measures (i.e. if vegetation clearance work has to

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:9:when required. Examples may include; waste management and dust mitigation measures. Contractors shall

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:11:4.4 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:11:The potential impacts and associated mitigation measures are summarised Table 2. Mitigations relating to

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:12:Table 2: Potential Impacts to Ecological Receptors and Associated Mitigations

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:12: Activity Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:12: Harm to nesting Initial mitigation in the form of pre-construction checks for breeding birds shall

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:13:risks associated with any identified contamination and propose appropriate construction phase mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:13:5.4 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:14:The potential impacts and associated mitigation measures to comply with pollution prevention legislation and

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:14:Table 3: Potential Pollution Impacts and Associated Mitigations

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:14: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:14: TBTs about potential water pollution impacts and associated mitigations

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:14: mitigations detailed in the Environmental Statement and Flood Risk

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:14: protected species attenuation pond, siltbusters, silt fences or other mitigations shall be

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:15: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:16:6.2 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:16:The potential impacts and associated mitigation measures with respect soils are summarised in Table 4.

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:16:Table 4: Potential Impacts relating to Soils and Associated Mitigations

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:16: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:17: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:18:construction was therefore assessed to be minimal. However, standard mitigations shall be applied on site.

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:18:7.3 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:18:The potential noise impacts and associated mitigation measures are summarised in Table 5 and include noise

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:18:Table 5: Potential Impacts and Mitigations relating to Noise and Vibration

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:18: Activity Potential Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:19: Activity Potential Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:20:8.2 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:20:The potential dust impacts and associated mitigation measures are summarised in Table 6.

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:20:Table 6: Potential Impacts and Mitigations relating to Dust

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:20: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:20: All staff shall be made aware of potential impacts and mitigations

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:21: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:22:shall proceed and the requirements for archaeological investigation or mitigation.

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:22:9.2 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:22:The potential impacts to archaeology and associated mitigation measures are summarised in Table 7. This

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:22:Table 7: Potential Impacts and Mitigations relating to Unexpected Finds

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:22: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:23:10.2 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:23:Potential impacts and mitigations relating to lighting on site are summarised below.

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:23:Table 8: Potential Impacts and Mitigations relating to Lighting

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:23: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:24:11.2 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:24:The main mitigations relating to site waste management are detailed in Table 9.

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:24:Table 9: Potential Impacts and Mitigations relating to Waste

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:24: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:25: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:26:socio-economic impacts were identified in the Environmental Statement and proposed mitigations are

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:26:12.2 Impacts and Mitigations

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:26:The main mitigations relating to socio economic impacts are detailed in Table 10.

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:26:Table 10: Potential Impacts and Mitigations relating to Local Community

R-2023-0253-RMM-50134216_1_CEMP.pdf:26: Activity Potential Impact Mitigation

R-2021-0943-CD-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:2:submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Any mitigation

R-2021-0943-CD-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:2:being discharge include mitigation as required in the Habitat Regulations

R-2021-0943-CD-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:2:Management Plan include mitigation measures for potential noise and vibration

R-2021-0943-CD-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:4: - The details of compensatory habitat where onsite mitigation is

R-2021-0943-CD-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:4: identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible,

R-2021-0943-CD-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:5: mitigation measures identified as part of the assessment shall be

R-2021-0943-CD-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:6: the proposed mitigation measures that no significant long term adverse impacts

R-2021-0943-CD-Natural England.pdf:1:previous stage of this planning application and that the conditions being discharge include mitigation

R-2021-0943-CD-Natural England.pdf:1:mitigation measures for potential noise and vibration impacts as detailed in the Environmental

R-2021-0943-CD-Natural England.pdf:4:NPPF (paragraphs 8, 73, 104, 120,174, 175 and 180). We advise you to follow the mitigation hierarchy

R-2021-0943-CD-Natural England.pdf:5:information including contact details for the National Trail Officer. Appropriate mitigation measures

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:3:4.6 Mitigation Measures

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:4:6.5 Dust and Air Pollution Mitigation Measures

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:14: • Ensure environmental mitigation drawings are reviewed prior to

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:15: • Provide environmental mitigation required during their works

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:19:frequencies. The meetings will include an update on risk mitigation, progress against targets and a

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:19: other documents that record the environmental risks, best practice examples, mitigation

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:24: • Selected mitigation methods to minimise impacts

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:28:This section prescribes the mitigation measures which are necessary to be implemented in order to

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:28:With the adoption of mitigation measures, a worst case impact of minor adverse was predicted.

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:29:proposed piling works. Following the implementation of mitigation measures, noise levels at the North

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:29:significant sensitivity thresholds. With mitigation in place, disturbance impacts are predicted to be

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:29:However, with mitigation measures in place to reduce the magnitude of such effects, any residual

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:30:MITIGATION

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:30: mitigation and compensation will be fully followed

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:32:MITIGATION

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:32: discuss the mitigation measures required, which will subsequently form the basis of the otter

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:33:• Once obtained, the licence conditions for mitigation and compensation will be fully followed

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:34:MITIGATION

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:34:In order to minimise noise and visual disturbance to birds the following mitigation measures will be

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:36:MITIGATION

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:36:from dredging the following mitigation measures will be implemented:

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:38:MITIGATION

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:38: under water noise from dredging the following mitigation measures will be implemented:

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:39:MITIGATION

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:39:In order to minimise disturbance and loss to brown Hare and hedgehog the following mitigation

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:41:MITIGATION

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:41:• To minimise / offset any direct loss of marine habitat the following mitigation measures will be

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:42:4.6 Mitigation Measures

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:45: minor adverse significance to human health. This is on the basis that the mitigation measures

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:46:4.6 Mitigation Measures

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:46: • Works will be completed in line with planning and site investigation mitigation measures

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:47: to commencement of piling. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:48: o The plan will outline the use of risk mitigation strategies including appropriate

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:64: 6.5 Dust and Air Pollution Mitigation Measures

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:66:6.5 Dust and Air pollution mitigation measures

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:73: adverse significance (pre-mitigation) and minor adverse (post-mitigation).

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:74:Mitigation measures will be undertaken if the results of noise monitoring indicate that excessive

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:173:Clerk of Works and checks undertaken as part of a regular audit process to ensure mitigation measures are

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:175:ensure mitigation measures are being appropriately applied.

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:176:ensure mitigation measures are being appropriately applied.

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:183:1 Embedded mitigation

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:186: commencement of piling. Any mitigation

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:187: • The plan will outline the use of risk mitigation

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:187:5.1 Minimise disturbance to • No mitigation measures required beyond the Contractor

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:189: to discuss the mitigation measures required, which

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:192: identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:195:12.1 Minimising on-site • No mitigation measures are required beyond best -

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:197: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:200:14.1 Minimising effects on No mitigation measures required based on assessment -

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:200: site implementation of the following mitigation

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001_CEMP_A (Fit for Construction)_C03.pdf:201:16.1 Minimise adverse socio- No mitigation measures required based on assessment -

R-2021-0943-CD-COMPLIANCE DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2: mitigation measures identified as part of the assessment shall be

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:3:4.6 Mitigation Measures

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:4:6.5 Dust and Air Pollution Mitigation Measures

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:14: • Ensure environmental mitigation drawings are reviewed prior to

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:15: • Provide environmental mitigation required during their works

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:19:frequencies. The meetings will include an update on risk mitigation, progress against targets and a

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:19: other documents that record the environmental risks, best practice examples, mitigation

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:24: • Selected mitigation methods to minimise impacts

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:28:This section prescribes the mitigation measures which are necessary to be implemented in order to

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:28:With the adoption of mitigation measures, a worst case impact of minor adverse was predicted.

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:29:proposed piling works. Following the implementation of mitigation measures, noise levels at the North

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:29:significant sensitivity thresholds. With mitigation in place, disturbance impacts are predicted to be

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:29:However, with mitigation measures in place to reduce the magnitude of such effects, any residual

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:30:MITIGATION

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:30: mitigation and compensation will be fully followed

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:32:MITIGATION

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:32: discuss the mitigation measures required, which will subsequently form the basis of the otter

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:33:• Once obtained, the licence conditions for mitigation and compensation will be fully followed

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:34:MITIGATION

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:34:In order to minimise noise and visual disturbance to birds the following mitigation measures will be

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:36:MITIGATION

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:36:from dredging the following mitigation measures will be implemented:

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:38:MITIGATION

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:38: under water noise from dredging the following mitigation measures will be implemented:

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:39:MITIGATION

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:39:In order to minimise disturbance and loss to brown Hare and hedgehog the following mitigation

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:41:MITIGATION

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:41:• To minimise / offset any direct loss of marine habitat the following mitigation measures will be

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:42:4.6 Mitigation Measures

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:45: minor adverse significance to human health. This is on the basis that the mitigation measures

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:46:4.6 Mitigation Measures

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:46: • Works will be completed in line with planning and site investigation mitigation measures

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:47: to commencement of piling. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:48: o The plan will outline the use of risk mitigation strategies including appropriate

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:64: 6.5 Dust and Air Pollution Mitigation Measures

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:66:6.5 Dust and Air pollution mitigation measures

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:73: adverse significance (pre-mitigation) and minor adverse (post-mitigation).

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:74:Mitigation measures will be undertaken if the results of noise monitoring indicate that excessive

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:155:1 Embedded mitigation

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:158: commencement of piling. Any mitigation

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:159: • The plan will outline the use of risk mitigation

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:159:5.1 Minimise disturbance to • No mitigation measures required beyond the Contractor

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:161: to discuss the mitigation measures required, which

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:164: identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:167:12.1 Minimising on-site • No mitigation measures are required beyond best -

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:169: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:172:14.1 Minimising effects on No mitigation measures required based on assessment -

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:172: site implementation of the following mitigation

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-PL-WM-000001.pdf:173:16.1 Minimise adverse socio- No mitigation measures required based on assessment -

R-2021-0943-CD-SBQ1-GCL-ENV-SBKXX-MS-WM-000001.pdf:3: negligible significance and no additional mitigation is proposed.

R-2021-0397-PND-63262_Cover letter PDF_May 2021.PDF:3: application includes the following mitigation:

R-2021-0397-PND-63262_Cover letter PDF_May 2021.PDF:4: 3. Tertiary noise and vibration mitigation measures, which will ensure no significant noise and

R-2021-0397-PND-63262_Cover letter PDF_May 2021.PDF:4: In addition to the mitigation set out in the Demolition Method Statement and set out above, the

R-2021-0397-PND-63262_Cover letter PDF_May 2021.PDF:4: following mitigation is also proposed.

R-2021-0397-PND-63262_Cover letter PDF_May 2021.PDF:4: ecological mitigation that is contained in this letter.

R-2021-0397-PND-Outline Method Statement - South Bank Coke Oven Battery Plant - Rev0 (002).PDF:16: Safety Briefings, Inductions etc will be held outdoors as a Covid-19 mitigation.

R-2021-0397-PND-Outline Method Statement - South Bank Coke Oven Battery Plant - Rev0 (002).PDF:17: Mitigation Government guidance), emails, MEMOs and toolbox talks etc.

R-2021-0397-PND-officer report.pdf:2:accompanied the Prior Approval application includes the following mitigation:

R-2021-0397-PND-officer report.pdf:3:3. Tertiary noise and vibration mitigation measures, which will ensure no

R-2021-0397-PND-officer report.pdf:3:In addition to the mitigation set out in the Demolition Method Statement and

R-2021-0397-PND-officer report.pdf:3:set out above, the following mitigation is also proposed.

R-2021-0397-PND-officer report.pdf:3:mitigation measures that fall outside of this that the proposed demolition

R-2020-0598-FF-email.pdf:7:restrictions and guidance documentation. This will often result in additional CATS mitigation such as

R-2022-0411-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2022-0411-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2022-0411-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2022-0411-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2022-0411-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2022-0411-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2022-0411-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2022-0411-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2022-0411-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2022-0411-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2022-0411-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:2: Local Planning Authority. All mitigation measures included in paragraph F6.5 of

R-2022-0411-CD-61586 Condition 18 (SeAH) covering letter.pdf:1:carried out and submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation measures

R-2022-0411-CD-Officer report.pdf:1:approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation measures included in

R-2022-0411-CD-32435-HM-AC-RP-01_00 ISSUE.pdf:16: Typical mitigation measures included as part of “best practicable means”, relevant to the proposed

R-2021-1077-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2021-1077-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2021-1077-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2021-1077-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2021-1077-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2021-1077-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2021-1077-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2021-1077-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2021-1077-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2021-1077-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2021-1077-CD-21156 FHA v1.PDF:5: o Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse ecological

R-2021-1077-CD-21156 FHA v1.PDF:6: o Where necessary, propose mitigation for any adverse ecological impacts or

R-2021-1077-CD-21156 FHA v1.PDF:6: 1.10 To identify potential mitigation, compensation or enhancement measures if required.

R-2021-1077-CD-21156 FHA v1.PDF:7: mitigation licences within 2km of the survey area.

R-2021-1077-CD-21156 FHA v1.PDF:15: impacts, without appropriate avoidance measures, mitigation and/or compensation

R-2021-1077-CD-Discharge Condition 7 Cover Letter.pdf:1:• Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse ecological impacts or compensation

R-2021-1077-CD-Consultee Response - Natural England.pdf:2:Pre-submission Screening Service for European Protected Species mitigation licence applications. These

R-2020-0318-FFM-Decision Notice.pdf:2: works across the site and shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set

R-2020-0318-FFM-Decision Notice.pdf:2: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2020-0318-FFM-322582 R_2020_0318_FFM - Ground remediation works at Grangetown Prairie, STDC land, Redcar.pdf:1: NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2020-0318-FFM-322582 R_2020_0318_FFM - Ground remediation works at Grangetown Prairie, STDC land, Redcar.pdf:1: We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2020-0318-FFM-322582 R_2020_0318_FFM - Ground remediation works at Grangetown Prairie, STDC land, Redcar.pdf:1: mitigation measures are required / or the following mitigation options should be secured:

R-2020-0318-FFM-322582 R_2020_0318_FFM - Ground remediation works at Grangetown Prairie, STDC land, Redcar.pdf:2:all mitigation measures are appropriately secured in any planning permission given.

R-2020-0318-FFM-322582 R_2020_0318_FFM - Ground remediation works at Grangetown Prairie, STDC land, Redcar.pdf:3:to follow the mitigation hierarchy as set out in paragraph 175 of the NPPF and firstly consider what

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:2: Assessment of Effects and Mitigation 43

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:2: 6.2 Assessment of Effects without Mitigation 43

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:4:mitigation is deemed required. With the implementation of these mitigation

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:4:In terms of the BNG assessment, without mitigation, the proposed development is

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:5:It is not possible for direct mitigation to be identified for the loss of habitat value

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:8: required, appropriate mitigation measures to deal with any noise and vibration

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:8: minor adverse, temporary effect on the environment and require no mitigation

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:14:3. Assessing the significance of any residual effects after mitigation (see 4.5.2

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:17:4.7.5 Mitigation and Compensation Approach

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:17:It is not possible for direct mitigation to be identified for the loss of habitat value

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:42:works would have been removed and replaced as part of the mitigation and

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:42:mitigation measures proposed for the Eston Road Highway Scheme include a

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:46: Assessment of Effects and Mitigation

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:46:significance of any residual effects after mitigation.

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:46:6.2 Assessment of Effects without Mitigation

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:46:It is not possible for direct mitigation to be identified for the loss of habitat value

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:46:the HRA process and therefore discusses appropriate mitigation measures to

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:47:The HRA report concluded that with implementation of mitigation measures,

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:47:a Phasing Plan, no other specific mitigation is deemed required.

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:47:1) is construction related pollution. The required mitigation (CEMP and Phasing

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:48:Effect without mitigation: The loss of 1.44ha of OMH will result in a

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:48:Effect without mitigation: The surrounding area, contains limited to no other

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:49:Effect without mitigation: The habitats within the proposed development site

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:49:Effect without mitigation: The loss of small areas of fairly poor resting habitat

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:50:Effect without mitigation: The loss of small areas of fairly poor nesting habitat

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:50:Effect without mitigation: The loss of small areas of fairly poor nesting and

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:51:Effect without mitigation: The loss of sub-optimal breeding habitat for skylark

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:51:Effect without mitigation: The loss of this small area of sub-optimal grassland

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:52:Effect without mitigation: The loss of suitable foraging habitat within the OMH

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:52:Effect without mitigation: The loss of small area of suitable feeding plants in the

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:52:during the remediation works. Therefore, without mitigation, the proposed

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:53:Following the implementation of this mitigation, no significant residual impact is

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:54:In terms of the BNG assessment, without mitigation, the proposed development is

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:54:effects for each feature, the mitigation measures required and the means by which

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:54:mitigation measures can be secured.

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:55: Feature Impact Characterisation of Unmitigated Effect without mitigation Mitigation Significance of Residual

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:55: Open Mosaic Loss of habitat from site Direct loss of 1.44ha of OMH (a Significant adverse effect on the OMH No mitigation Significant adverse

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:55: Common toad Habitat loss from site Loss of ponds that support Significant adverse effect on the No mitigation Significant adverse

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:55: Breeding bird Habitat loss from site Loss of breeding and foraging Significant adverse effect on the No mitigation Significant adverse

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:56:Feature Impact Characterisation of Unmitigated Effect without mitigation Mitigation Significance of Residual

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:56:Dingy skipper Habitat loss from site Loss of small area of suitable Significant adverse effect on the dingy No mitigation Significant adverse

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:57:Without mitigation, the follow adverse significant residual effects remain:

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:57:In BNG terms, without mitigation, the proposed development is likely to result in

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:57:the remediation works being undertaken, without mitigation, the proposed

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:59:in the loss of, or permanent damage to, ecological features despite mitigation. In

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:59:to those provided as part of mitigation or compensation measures. In BNG terms,

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation EcIA_Issue.PDF:70:cumulative, should be avoided. Where this is not possible mitigation, or lastly

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation HRA_Issue.PDF:8:introduce mitigation measures to the point where no adverse effects occur. The

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation HRA_Issue.PDF:8: that with appropriate mitigation measures the plan or project would not give

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation HRA_Issue.PDF:9:mitigation will be assessed with the land within the Eston Road Highway Scheme

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation HRA_Issue.PDF:10: required, appropriate mitigation measures to deal with any noise and vibration

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation HRA_Issue.PDF:11: minor adverse, temporary effect on the environment and require no mitigation

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation HRA_Issue.PDF:25:concluded that with mitigation there were no likely significant effects from the

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation HRA_Issue.PDF:25:site will separately control pollution impacts, no additional mitigation will be

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation HRA_Issue.PDF:27:development remediation works, appropriate mitigation will have been put into

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation HRA_Issue.PDF:27:through contamination of the Holme Beck. The mitigation measures proposed for

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation HRA_Issue.PDF:27:Mitigation measures to control pollution of the Holme Beck are discussed in

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation HRA_Issue.PDF:30:objectives. This stage in the process also takes account of mitigation measures.

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation HRA_Issue.PDF:30:objectives, outlines any further mitigation measures, and then concludes whether

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation HRA_Issue.PDF:30:10.3.1 Likely Significant Effects – Without Mitigation

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation HRA_Issue.PDF:30:Without mitigation, this potential significant effect cannot be scoped out at AA.

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation HRA_Issue.PDF:30:10.3.2 Likely Significant Effects – With Mitigation

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation HRA_Issue.PDF:30:Coast SPA and Ramsar site, the following mitigation needs to be implemented:

R-2020-0318-FFM-Prairie Site Remediation HRA_Issue.PDF:32:at the same time, however the mitigation for both schemes separately or in-

R-2020-0318-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:7: previous uses and any proposals for mitigation including land remediation or impacts on the

R-2020-0318-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:97:Key contaminant linkages identified as requiring some form of mitigation are summarised in Table 3.4.

R-2020-0318-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:101:where they may compliment any landfill gas mitigation measures but are not considered to be appreciate for

R-2020-0318-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:mitigation measures to be implemented to ensure no nuisance arises from waste storage such as odour or

R-2020-0318-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:arises. Mitigation measures to be adopted include:

R-2020-0318-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:be relatively low. If significant odours are noted, appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented by

R-2020-0318-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:practices to minimise odours and/or utilising odour suppression and mitigation equipment.

R-2020-0318-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:The remediation contractor shall implement appropriate mitigation measures to protect any surface water

R-2020-0318-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:113:There is a potential for mud to be carried out of the site on to local roads during the works. Mitigation

R-2020-0318-FFM-318 contam land.pdf:2:• Any ecological mitigations required

R-2020-0318-FFM-EP CL.pdf:2: Any ecological mitigations required

R-2020-0318-FFM-EP CL.pdf:3: • Any ecological mitigations required

R-2020-0318-FFM-Phase II ESA.PDF:33: Direct contact pathways with soils could be active throughout a potential redevelopment; typical mitigation

R-2020-0318-FFM-Phase II ESA.PDF:33: required as mitigation.

R-2020-0318-FFM-Phase II ESA.PDF:53:appropriate mitigation measures may be required.

R-2020-0318-FFM-Phase II ESA.PDF:56:asbestos impact on the site and determine necessary mitigation measures. It is likely that a clean cover system

R-2020-0318-FFM-Phase II ESA.PDF:57: assessment should be carried out to enable appropriate mitigation measures to be designed that will

R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:4:No objection - subject to appropriate mitigation being secured

R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:4:We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:4:following mitigation measures are required / or the following mitigation options should

R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:4:conclusions, providing that all mitigation measures are appropriately secured

R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:9:  Any ecological mitigations required

R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:9:• Any ecological mitigations required

R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:10:• Any ecological mitigations required

R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:15:2 of the HRA process and therefore discusses appropriate mitigation

R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:15:proposed development subject to mitigation in the form of a CEMP and

R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:15:construction related pollution. The required mitigation in the form of the

R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:21:Without mitigation, the follow adverse significant residual effects remain:

R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:21:In terms of the BNG assessment, without mitigation, the proposed

R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:23: how the mitigation measures set out in the Habitats Regulations

R-2020-0318-FFM-officer report.pdf:23: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2020-0318-FFM-ROA and Remediation Strategy.PDF:15:mitigation and management strategy. It is understood archaeological development constraints may be

R-2020-0318-FFM-ROA and Remediation Strategy.PDF:15:document. These documents should be reviewed when available to develop appropriate mitigation and

R-2020-0318-FFM-ROA and Remediation Strategy.PDF:20: Development of a UXO mitigation strategy.

R-2020-0318-FFM-ROA and Remediation Strategy.PDF:34:assessment indicates a Medium risk from UXO for borehole and excavation activities. Further mitigation

R-2020-0318-FFM-ROA and Remediation Strategy.PDF:34:activities such as detailed risk assessment or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the

R-2020-0318-FFM-ROA and Remediation Strategy.PDF:41:Following the completion of the ecological surveys and HRA, control measures and mitigation identified

R-2020-0318-FFM-ROA and Remediation Strategy.PDF:42:stream) in order to confirm the assessment of the waste impact and to implement embedded mitigation

R-2020-0318-FFM-ROA and Remediation Strategy.PDF:42:  Any ecological mitigations required

R-2020-0318-FFM-EA R_2020_0318_FFM 20 August 2020 OFFICIAL_.pdf:3:suitable, options for on-site mitigation should always be explored.

R-2020-0318-FFM-EA R_2020_0318_FFM 20 August 2020 OFFICIAL_.pdf:4:place. Opportunities on site should be sought, following the mitigation hierarchy

R-2020-0318-FFM-R-2020-0318-FFM-Archaeological Advice - Prairie Site Grangetown R-2020-0318-FFM.pdf:4:the mitigation of the effects on the resource. These recommendations are considered

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:5:costly mitigation or compensation measures.

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:7: TEES water body Mitigation Measures 38

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:9:Table 6-1: Impacts and mitigation measures 34

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:9:Table 6-2: Assessment of proposed works against the water body’s mitigation

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:9:Table 6-4: Impacts and mitigation measures 41

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:9:Table 6-6: Impacts and mitigation measures 47

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:12: Specific mitigation measures have been identified for each Artificial and Heavily

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:12: Modified Water body and are listed in the RBMP. These mitigation measures are

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:12: reduce the need for costly mitigation or compensation measures.

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:12: Objectives, together with the specific actions (mitigation measures) necessary to

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:15: necessary mitigation measures. An impact assessment must be carried out for each

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:23: and space for water. These are impacting angiosperms, mitigation

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:23: navigation, ports and harbours. These are impacting the mitigation

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:40: conditions if not completed with sufficient mitigation such

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:42: without mitigation could have a negative

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: upon suitable mitigation measures, a good understanding of the proposed scheme

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: scoping assessment. Mitigation measures are recommended to mitigate the effects

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: of the proposed works. It should be noted that these mitigation measures differ to

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: the Mitigation Measures identified for any Heavily Modified water body.

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: Table 6-1: Impacts and mitigation measures

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:43: Mitigation measures: During construction works, fish

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:44: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:44: Mitigation measures: standard industry practices such

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:44: Mitigation measures: standard industry practices such

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:45: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:45: Mitigation measures: standard industry practices such

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:46: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:46: for mitigation recommendations.

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:46: Mitigation measures: High level recommendations are to

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:46: Mitigation measures: Any activity where pollution, spills,

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:47: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:47: Mitigation measures: Any activity where pollution, spills,

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:47: Mitigation measures: Any activity where pollution, spills,

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:47: TEES water body Mitigation Measures

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:47: There is one mitigation measure contributing to better ecological potential for the

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:47: The ability of the proposed works to deliver this mitigation measure, or the risk that

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:48:mitigation measure

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:48: Mitigation Measure Current Assessment of proposed works/ Recommended

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:48: provide mitigation without impacting on the use of the

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:48: Following consideration of the potential impacts and recommended mitigation

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:48: measures, as well as the appraised Mitigation Measure for the water body, Table 6-3

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:48: water body to achieve its WFD prevent Good Ecological Potential. Mitigation exists to

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:49: scoping assessment. Mitigation measures are recommended to mitigate the effects

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:50:Table 6-4: Impacts and mitigation measures

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:50: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:51: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:52: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:52: Mitigation: By increasing the bank roughness with riparian

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:53: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:53: Mitigation measures: During construction works, fish

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:53: Mitigation measures: standard industry practices such

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:54: WFD Quality Pathway Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:54: Mitigation measures: standard industry practices such

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:55: Following consideration of the potential impacts and recommended mitigation

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:55: ∙ use the mitigation identified in this assessment and

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:56: scoping assessment. Mitigation measures are recommended to mitigate the effects

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:56: Table 6-6: Impacts and mitigation measures

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:56: WFD Quality Pathway (direct Potential Impact/ Mitigation measures

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:56: Mitigation measures: standard industry practices

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:58: revised to ensure the mitigation measures and recommendations outlined in this

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:58: into the assessment. Any mitigation measures that need to be considered to make

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:58: Appropriate mitigation measures shall be implemented to ensure that habitats within

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:58: construction phase. Mitigation should include:

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:59: highly recommended that mitigation identified in this high level WFD report and to

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:59: sufficient mitigation such as ensuring enough space for water and other geomorphic

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:60: methods of mitigation and that the outfalls or any headwalls are to be designed and

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:61: The recommendations and mitigation measures highlighted in this report as well as

R-2021-0924-CD-CHK-JBAU-00-00-RP-EN-0001-S3-P02-South_Bank_WFD_Report.pdf:61: to seek further mitigation in designs (such as ensuring enough space for water and

R-2021-0924-CD-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2021-0924-CD-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2021-0924-CD-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2021-0924-CD-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2021-0924-CD-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2021-0924-CD-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2021-0924-CD-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2021-0924-CD-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2021-0924-CD-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2021-0924-CD-Decision Notice 0357.pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2021-0729-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2021-0729-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2021-0729-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2021-0729-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2021-0729-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2021-0729-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2021-0729-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2021-0729-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2021-0729-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2021-0729-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2021-0729-CD-COMPLIANCE OFFICER REPORT.pdf:1:scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation measures to be

R-2021-0729-CD-South Bank Condition 6 Covering Letter 19.08.21.pdf:1:the approved detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation measures to be

R-2021-0729-CD-COMPLIANCE DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2021-0729-CD-INCA2021-59 HRA - South Bank reserved matters.pdf:2:set out those mitigation measures to be employed to minimise or eliminate such impacts. REASON:

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf:2: are addressed within other chapters within the ES. As such, the ‘Mitigation’, ‘Screening Process’, and

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf:4: the end of this chapter in the Mitigation and Limitations sections.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf:5:13.24. Mitigation opportunities will be considered following the results of the above scenarios.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf:8:Mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf:8:13.35. Mitigation has been considered at all stages of the facility’s design development and technology

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf:8: selection. The mitigation measures for energy, transport, and materials detailed in this section are in line

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf:9: Table 13.2: IEMA GHG Mitigation Hierarchy

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf:9:13.36. The mitigation opportunities below were unable to be considered in this GHG assessment due to

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf:9:13.37. Key mitigation measures adopted by the Proposed Development to minimise GHG emissions from

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf:10:13.43. Mitigation of transport impacts was considered in Minviro’s Life Cycle Assessment. Comparison was

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 13 Climate Change and GHG.pdf:11:13.44. Another potential mitigation is the use of biodiesel or electric vehicles for the various transport stages

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 10 - LVIA.pdf:2: Locally important and notable mitigation may be appropriate

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:5: significant and, therefore, mitigation measures have been incorporated to eliminate or reduce the

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:5: impacts to an acceptable level. The residual effects (post mitigation) are discussed in the final

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:13: associated with the Proposed Development. The ‘pre-mitigation scenario’ includes the measures that

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:13: Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS). Any additional mitigation measures that are not shown within the

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:13: design code and layout will not be included in the pre-mitigation scenario and will be recommended as

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:13:CONSTRUCTION PHASE EFFECTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:13: Proposed Development is considered to be Minor. Prior to mitigation, the effect significance is

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:13:Mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:14:9.61. With these mitigation measures in place, it is considered that the residual effect would be Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:15: Minor. Prior to mitigation, the effect significance is considered to be to be Minor Adverse on

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:15: groundwater (medium sensitivity receptor) and mitigation measures are required.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:15:Mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:15:9.68. With these mitigation measures in place, it is considered that the residual effect would be Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:15: Prior to mitigation, the effect significance of contamination arising from general construction activities

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:15:Mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:16:9.75. These mitigation measures have been incorporated into a Construction Environmental Management

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:16:9.77. With these mitigation measures in place, it is considered that the residual effect would be Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:17: construction phase is considered to be Minor on flooding (medium sensitivity). Prior to mitigation, the

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:17:Mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:17:9.86. With these mitigation measures in place, it is considered that the residual effects would be Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:18: into groundwater and surface water is considered Minor. Prior to mitigation, the effect significance of

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:18:Mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:18:OPERATIONAL PHASE EFFECTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:19: operational phase is considered to be Minor on flooding (medium sensitivity). Prior to mitigation, the

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:19:Mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:19:9.103. With these mitigation measures in place, it is considered that the residual effects would be Negligible.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:22: Development is considered to be Negligible. Prior to mitigation, the effect significance is considered to

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:22: be Negligible for water supply and Infrastructure and no mitigation measures are required.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:22: authorities in England are obligated to provide a point of connection and undertake any mitigation or

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:22: considered to be negligible on Infrastructure. Prior to mitigation, the effect significance is considered to

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:22: be Negligible, and no mitigation measures are therefore required.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:23:9.128. The proposed mitigation measures include the future effects of climate change and, therefore, once

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:24:9.129. Overall, with the proposed mitigation measures in place, there will be no change in the significance

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:25: classification, mitigation measures and residual effects.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:26: Effect Receptor Mitigation Measure

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 9 Flood Risk and Drainage.pdf:26: mitigation) mitigation)

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:6:14.14. The potential effects have been classified, prior to mitigation, as minor, moderate or major (either

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:6: (substantial), mitigation measures have been incorporated to eliminate or reduce the effects to an

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:7: (construction workers and end users) requiring extensive mitigation works. For example,

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:7: Adverse (construction workers and/or end users) requiring monitoring and local mitigation work. For

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:7: (construction workers and end users) requiring extensive mitigation works. For example,

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:8: necessary to always propose mitigation methods. Impacts of moderate or higher significance will be

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:8: deemed to be potentially significant and will require, where possible, mitigation methods to be adopted.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:9: uses and any proposals for mitigation including land remediation or impacts on the natural

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:24: required to quantify the risk to construction workers and review the required mitigation and

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:24: the absence of mitigation, the effect is likely to be temporary, local, adverse and of minor significance.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:26:14.93. Consequently, in the absence of mitigation, the potential for long-term exposure to contaminated soils

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:26: by future occupants is considered unlikely. In the absence of mitigation, the effects of ground

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:27: to establish the required mitigation measures. However, it is likely that Made Ground containing slag is

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:27: absence of mitigation, effects are long-term, Site-wide, adverse and of minor significance.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:27: absence of mitigation, effects are long-term, local, adverse and of minor significance.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:28:ENHANCEMENT, MITIGATION AND RESIDUAL EFFECTS

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:31:14.121. Ground investigation will be undertaken to establish any required mitigation measures for the

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:31:14.122. Ground investigation will be undertaken to establish any required mitigation measures for the

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:31: mitigation measures, the residual effects of the Proposed Development on buried structures and

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:31:14.123. Ground investigation will be undertaken to establish any required mitigation measures for the

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:31: Proposed Development in relation to vegetation. With appropriate design and mitigation measures, the

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:32: any areas where remediation is required and allow the establishment of required mitigation measures

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:33: Mitigation/ Enhancement

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 14 Contaminated Lands.pdf:33: Completed development Permanent Insignificant No specific mitigation Negligible

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 12 - Noise.pdf:23:upon information available to date. This will help to identify where noise mitigation is likely to be required,

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 12 - Noise.pdf:30: nor does it advise of the requirements for environmental noise mitigation that may be needed in order to

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf:2: into the design development of the proposals from the initial stages in order to embed mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf:11: maximum development area and maximum visibility, and with no mitigation planting

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf:17:MITIGATION WITHIN THE SUBMITTED DESIGN

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf:17: mitigation measures including the articulation and orientation of buildings so that the visual scale and

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf:17:10.95. The following mitigation measures should be considered and controlled through the implementation of

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf:18:ADDITIONAL MITIGATION, COMPENSATION AND ENHANCEMENT MEASURES

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf:18:10.104. Additional mitigation could be brought about by the early establishment of new planting to maximise

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 10 Landscape.pdf:18:10.105. The following summarises the additional mitigation as set out on the Landscape Strategy Plan:

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 8 - Ecology.pdf:3:species on the site therefore development of this site will require mitigation or compensation for

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 8 - Ecology.pdf:10:geodiversity, whether individual or cumulative, should be avoided. Where this is not possible mitigation, or

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 8 - Ecology.pdf:11: mitigation, the proposal would not result in adverse effects on the site’s integrity, either alone or in

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 8 - Ecology.pdf:11:strategic mitigation measures identified in the Recreation Management Plan. This is to ensure that adverse

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 8 - Ecology.pdf:11:effects on the site's integrity can be avoided. Any alternative suitable mitigation would need to be proven

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:2: ecological receptor locations following the implementation of appropriate mitigation measures has been

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:2: However, with the proposed mitigation measures incorporated into a Construction Environmental

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:3:15.16. The conclusion of this chapter was avoidance and further mitigation of the losses from development

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:3: contamination arising from general construction activities or through routine Site drainage. Mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:4: mitigation measures including the articulation and orientation of buildings so that the visual scale and

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:4:15.26. The following mitigation measures should be considered and controlled through the implementation of

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:6:15.36. Mitigation to control the impact of noise during the construction period includes using silenced plant

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:8: Receptor Mitigation Measure

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:8: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:8: Point Source Emissions Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:8: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:8: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:8: Species: Dingy Skipper Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:8: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: Controlled Waters from No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: Water Demand Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: Foul Drainage Demand Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: Landscape Character Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: Visual Receptors Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:9: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:10: Character of the Site Minor No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:10: Visual Receptors Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:10: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:10: through the construction Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:10: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:10: Operational Solid Wastes No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:10: Noise from fixed plant - Appropriate mitigation to be determined during detailed design

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:11: Negligible No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 15 Summary and Conclusions.pdf:11: No additional mitigation required

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:46:3.80. The lighting design would incorporate the following mitigation measures:

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:64:4.41. Chapter 14 has a primary focus on mitigation and prevention of climate change and its effects. In

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:75:5.42. Developments with the potential for significant adverse effects that require mitigation have the potential

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:75: mitigation to be proposed and agreed with the airport.

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:84: network. The Air quality assessment concludes that the pollution control and mitigation measures

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:85: design, flood mitigation strategy and pollution prevention measures demonstrate the Proposed

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:85: assessment concludes, that taking into consideration the mitigation measures inherent to the design

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:85: and those outlined in the Chapter and the mitigation incorporated in good practice techniques, the

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:89: demonstrate how they have taken a proactive approach to mitigation and adaption of climate change,

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:89: mitigation measures and sustainable designs. The development should also help to reduce carbon

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:89: ensuring opportunities to contribute to the mitigation of flooding elsewhere are taken;

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Planning Statement.pdf:90: guidance, with suitable mitigation identified.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 F. Geotechnical Risk Register.pdf:2:mitigation measures to help eliminate or reduce them.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 14 - Contaminated Lands.pdf:6:unacceptable contaminant linkages with future users) following the implementation of mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 14 - Contaminated Lands.pdf:10:activities such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation including land remediation (as well as

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 14 - Contaminated Lands.pdf:36:and provides proposed mitigation measures, including further investigation and assessment, to

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 14 - Contaminated Lands.pdf:42:as Detailed Quantitative Risk Assessment (DQRA), and remedial/mitigation measures may be

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 14 - Contaminated Lands.pdf:43:unacceptable contaminant linkages with future users) following the implementation of mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 7 - Air Quality.pdf:11: Appendix 7.5 – Construction Mitigation Measures

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 7 - Air Quality.pdf:11: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate;

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 11 Waste.pdf:3:11.9. The potential effects have been classified, prior to mitigation, as minor, moderate or major (either

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 11 Waste.pdf:3: mitigation measures have been incorporated to eliminate or reduce the impacts to an acceptable level.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 11 Waste.pdf:13:ENHANCEMENT, MITIGATION AND RESIDUAL EFFECTS

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 11 Waste.pdf:13:Enhancement / Mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 11 Waste.pdf:13: are described above. No additional mitigation measures are considered to be required.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 11 Waste.pdf:13: phases are described above. No additional mitigation measures are considered to be required.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 11 Waste.pdf:14: Nature of Effect Mitigation/ Residual

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:8: introducing a new noise-sensitive receptor and the extent of required noise mitigation.”

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:14: the calculated impact is Negligible, it is still prudent to employ mitigation measures to further minimise

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:16: calculated impact is low, it is still prudent to employ mitigation measures to further minimise the

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:16:MITIGATION AND RESIDUAL EFFECTS

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:16:Construction Mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:17:12.59. Mitigation options will be specified during the detailed design stage, as appropriate. Effects from fixed

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:18: incorporate appropriate mitigation measures into the design. Specific requirements will be identified as

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:18: stage. However, with appropriate consideration of mitigation measures the effect of the Proposed

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:18: and assessed in accordance with BS 5228. Generic mitigation measures have been recommended, which

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:19: Nature of Effect Mitigation/

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 12 Noise.pdf:19: mitigation, to be

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 9 - Water.pdf:7:mitigation measures included.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 9 - Water.pdf:23: Fluvial Low Low Low No specific mitigation required.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 9 - Water.pdf:23: Tidal Low Low Low No specific mitigation required.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 9 - Water.pdf:23: Pluvial Low Low Low No specific mitigation required.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 9 - Water.pdf:23: Artificial Low Low Low No specific mitigation required.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 9 - Water.pdf:23: Sewer Low Low Low No specific mitigation required.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 9 - Water.pdf:23: Breach Low None None No specific mitigation required.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Green Lithium Appendix 9 - Water.pdf:28:mitigation measures included.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 E. PRA Methodology.pdf:4: receptor unless immediate remedial works/mitigation measures are undertaken.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 2 Appendix 14.1 E. PRA Methodology.pdf:4: High Risk Harm is likely to arise to a receptor, and is likely to be severe, unless appropriate remedial actions/mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:2: defines integrated and embedded ecological mitigation and enhancement measures before considering

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:2: • Assessment of the significance of any residual effects after mitigation has been applied;

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:7: • Assessing the significance of any residual effects after mitigation;

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:7: the creation of roads which cause hydrological changes, which, in the absence of mitigation, could lead

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:8: change, and this has been incorporated into the approach to integrated and embedded mitigation as set

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:9:Avoidance, Mitigation, Compensation and Enhancement

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:9:8.34. When seeking mitigation or compensation solutions, efforts should be consistent with the geographical

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:9: scale at which an effect is significant. For example, mitigation and compensation for effects on a species

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:9:8.35. Where potentially significant effects have been identified, the ‘mitigation hierarchy’ has been applied,

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:9: as recommended in the CIEEM Guidelines. The mitigation hierarchy sets out a sequential approach

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:9: beginning with the avoidance of impacts where possible, the application of mitigation measures to

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:9: mitigation measures have been applied residual effects are then identified along with any necessary

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:9:8.36. It is important for the EcIA to clearly differentiate between avoidance mitigation, compensation and

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:9: • Mitigation is used to refer to measures to reduce or remedy a specific negative impact in situ;

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:9: • Compensation describes measures taken to offset residual effects, i.e., where mitigation in situ

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:9: provided as part of mitigation or compensation measures, although they can be

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:15: for those species is not considered a significant issue, nevertheless mitigation will be provided to avoid

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:16:8.60. As this is an outline planning application, details of landscaping and other mitigation measures are not

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:17:Mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:17:8.67. Mitigation may be possible as part of a future detailed application, both by retaining some habitats on

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:17:8.68. As it is unclear at this stage to what extent mitigation may be possible, the residual impact is considered

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:19:8.78. If after avoidance and on-site mitigation has been applied there remains a net deficit of HUs, then

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:19: a) Off-site Mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:20:8.84. Mitigation may be possible as part of a future detailed application, both by retaining some habitats on

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:20:8.85. Following implementation of the above mitigation, there should be no harm to breeding birds. As it is

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:20:Mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:21:Mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:21:8.91. Mitigation may be possible as part of a future detailed application, both by retaining some habitats on

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:21:8.92. As it is unclear at this stage to what extent mitigation may be possible, the residual impact is considered

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:21:Mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:21:8.98. Given the mitigation measures described above, there should be no impacts from Invasive Non-native

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:22: Authority. The Biodiversity Strategy outlines options for avoidance, mitigation and compensation, which

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:23:8.103. Following the mitigation described above, the impacts of the Proposed Development are predicted to

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:23:8.104. Avoidance or further mitigation for some, or all, of these ecological receptors may be possible through

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 8 Ecology.pdf:23:8.105. Should avoidance and/or further mitigation not be sufficient to prevent the loss of the valued ecological

R-2023-0291-ESM-INCA 2023-11 HRA.pdf:6: suitable mitigation measures

R-2023-0291-ESM-INCA 2023-11 HRA.pdf:6:significance of any such impacts. It takes into account mitigation measures in assessing both

R-2023-0291-ESM-INCA 2023-11 HRA.pdf:8:mitigation measures are required.”

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:4: Table 7.19: Summary of Risk of Dust Impacts Prior to Mitigation 96

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:6: Table 13.2: IEMA GHG Mitigation Hierarchy 236

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:18: • Mitigation measures provided are used to avoid, reduce or off-set any adverse effects.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:18: • Assessment of significance of any residual effects after mitigation.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:21: environmental effects of the development, a description of mitigation measures and discussion on

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:22: mitigation for potential impacts:

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:37: • Determining mitigation and management measures, which would be required in order to prevent,

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:37: • Identifying any residual significant effects once mitigation has been taken into account.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:39:3.10. The effects that were considered to be significant prior to mitigation have been identified within the ES.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:39:3.13. A summary impact table that describes the potential impacts, mitigation measures and any residual

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:42: and outlines proposals for their mitigation.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:42: assessed, together with their associated mitigation measures, are provided in each of the technical

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:44: discharge to an appropriate point. Further details on drainage and mitigation are provided in Chapter 7

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:47: works will be fully described, with all required mitigation measures detailed within the approved CEMP.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:47:ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:48: environmental effects, with an indication of the mitigation measures to be employed;

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:54: presented within the Planning Statement, which identifies relevant mitigation.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:55: with the mitigation measures, set out in this ES.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:55: regarding specific mitigation during construction works for the Proposed Development is presented

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:60: Management Plan (CEMP) to RCBC for approval. Once in receipt of approval, any required mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:76: would require mitigation and cause financial burdens on the area, this policy is created

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 1 to 6.pdf:76: and Low Carbon have the potential or impacting airport radar, unless demonstrated that mitigation is

R-2023-0291-ESM-PN 0291.pdf:2:dust soiling and human health effects. However, with the proposed mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:5: impacts potentially caused by the development, determining mitigation and management measures,

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:5: and identifying any residual significant effects once mitigation has been taken into account.

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:11: a low risk to dust soiling and human health effects. However, with the proposed mitigation measures

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:12:5.5. A detailed design and mitigation proposal will be provided to the planning authority as part of the

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:14:7.4. Based on the above assessment, the following additional mitigation has been proposed as part of the

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:17: and be controlled through a detailed noise mitigation plan (NMP).

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:17:MITIGATION

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:17: items. Mitigation options will be specified, as appropriate, during the progression of the detailed design.

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:17: accordance with BS 5228. Generic mitigation measures have been recommended, which when

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:18:MITIGATION

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:18:10.6. Mitigation measures to reduce the Construction phase GHG emissions will be confirmed as procurement

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:20:MITIGATION

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR ES Vol 3 Exec Summary.pdf:21: proposed mitigation is put in place that is specified throughout this Environmental Statement.

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Ventilation and Extraction Statement.pdf:1:including predicted noise levels, noise mitigation measures and odour abatement techniques where required.

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement Annex 3.C - Online Public Consultation Page.pdf:7: element of localised visual screening and to support environmental mitigation activities.

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement Annex 3.C - Online Public Consultation Page.pdf:7: providing further environmental mitigation measures.

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement Annex 3.C - Online Public Consultation Page.pdf:9: levels, mitigation measures would be required, or the development would not be approved.

R-2023-0291-ESM-SOL_23_P016_GLR Statement of Community Engagement Annex 3.C - Online Public Consultation Page.pdf:9: development would have on the specified receptors, with results presented and mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-Green Lithium_BREEAM NC 2018 Pre-Assessment Report_1 (with Appendices).pdf:33: have been managed according to the mitigation hierachy, in line with the SQE's recommendations Full Credits assumed. Inca (ecologist) are completing report

R-2023-0291-ESM-Green Lithium_BREEAM NC 2018 Pre-Assessment Report_1 (with Appendices).pdf:44:the suitability of a proposed development is assessed and mitigation measures, if any, are designed.

R-2023-0291-ESM-Green Lithium_BREEAM NC 2018 Pre-Assessment Report_1 (with Appendices).pdf:48: recommendations for suitable acoustic performance levels and mitigation measures.

R-2023-0291-ESM-Green Lithium_BREEAM NC 2018 Pre-Assessment Report_1 (with Appendices).pdf:48: mitigation measures. Examples of relevant experience are ecological impact assessments,

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:3: and to determine any necessary mitigation measures, an assessment based on the latest guidance from

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:9:7.23. The risk of dust impacts prior to mitigation for each emission source is determined based on the dust

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:19:7.62. Ozone is not included in the Regulations as, due to its trans-boundary nature, mitigation measures must

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:27: A summary of the risks is presented in Table 7.19. These are defined on the basis of no mitigation beyond

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:27: that required by legislation. Where the risk is assessed as ‘negligible’ no additional mitigation is

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:27: Table 7.19: Summary of Risk of Dust Impacts Prior to Mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:37: following the implementation of the relevant site specific mitigation measures.

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:42:ENHANCEMENT, MITIGATION AND RESIDUAL EFFECTS

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:42:Mitigation

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:42: mitigation techniques to reduce emissions of dust and limit dispersion. Where dust emission controls

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:42: matter emissions from construction activities at the Site. Appropriate mitigation measures for the

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:42: Therefore, mitigation measures are not considered necessary. It is recommended, however, that good

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:43: effects. However, with the proposed mitigation measures incorporated into a Construction

R-2023-0291-ESM-ES Vol 1 Chapter 7 Air Quality.pdf:44: Nature of Effect Mitigation/

R-2021-0905-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2021-0905-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2021-0905-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2021-0905-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2021-0905-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2021-0905-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2021-0905-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2021-0905-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2021-0905-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2021-0905-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2020-0799-CD-Nov 2020 - 2383 - CEMP - Prairie Phase 2 Works Prairie Rev 2 (1).pdf:12:Working hours, plant types, construction methods and noise mitigation measures may be issues.

R-2020-0799-CD-Nov 2020 - 2383 - CEMP - Prairie Phase 2 Works Prairie Rev 2 (1).pdf:15:the construction phase of the project, mitigation measures will be implemented as part of a Traffic

R-2020-0799-CD-Nov 2020 - 2383 - CEMP - Prairie Phase 2 Works Prairie Rev 2 (1).pdf:19:The following mitigation will be incorporated in order to prevent significant effects to breeding

R-2020-0799-CD-Nov 2020 - 2383 - CEMP - Prairie Phase 2 Works Prairie Rev 2 (1).pdf:20:the mitigation measures in Section 4.5 – Water Quality, 4.10 – Material Storage and Pollution

R-2020-0799-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:2: works across the site and shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set

R-2020-0799-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:2: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2020-0799-CD-Decision Notice R 2020 0318.pdf:2: works across the site and shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set

R-2020-0799-CD-Decision Notice R 2020 0318.pdf:2: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:9: include environmental protection and mitigation measures and emergency preparedness

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:31:introduce mitigation measures to the point where no adverse effects occur. The

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:31: that with appropriate mitigation measures the plan or project would not give

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:32:mitigation will be assessed with the land within the Eston Road Highway Scheme

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:33: required, appropriate mitigation measures to deal with any noise and vibration

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:34: minor adverse, temporary effect on the environment and require no mitigation

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:48:concluded that with mitigation there were no likely significant effects from the

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:48:site will separately control pollution impacts, no additional mitigation will be

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:50:development remediation works, appropriate mitigation will have been put into

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:50:through contamination of the Holme Beck. The mitigation measures proposed for

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:50:Mitigation measures to control pollution of the Holme Beck are discussed in

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:53:objectives. This stage in the process also takes account of mitigation measures.

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:53:objectives, outlines any further mitigation measures, and then concludes whether

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:53:10.3.1 Likely Significant Effects – Without Mitigation

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:53:Without mitigation, this potential significant effect cannot be scoped out at AA.

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:53:10.3.2 Likely Significant Effects – With Mitigation

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:53:Coast SPA and Ramsar site, the following mitigation needs to be implemented:

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:55:at the same time, however the mitigation for both schemes separately or in-

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:64: Assessment of Effects and Mitigation 43

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:64: 6.2 Assessment of Effects without Mitigation 43

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:66:mitigation is deemed required. With the implementation of these mitigation

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:66:In terms of the BNG assessment, without mitigation, the proposed development is

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:67:It is not possible for direct mitigation to be identified for the loss of habitat value

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:70: required, appropriate mitigation measures to deal with any noise and vibration

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:70: minor adverse, temporary effect on the environment and require no mitigation

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:76:3. Assessing the significance of any residual effects after mitigation (see 4.5.2

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:79:4.7.5 Mitigation and Compensation Approach

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:79:It is not possible for direct mitigation to be identified for the loss of habitat value

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:104:works would have been removed and replaced as part of the mitigation and

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:104:mitigation measures proposed for the Eston Road Highway Scheme include a

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:108: Assessment of Effects and Mitigation

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:108:significance of any residual effects after mitigation.

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:108:6.2 Assessment of Effects without Mitigation

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:108:It is not possible for direct mitigation to be identified for the loss of habitat value

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:108:the HRA process and therefore discusses appropriate mitigation measures to

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:109:The HRA report concluded that with implementation of mitigation measures,

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:109:a Phasing Plan, no other specific mitigation is deemed required.

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:109:1) is construction related pollution. The required mitigation (CEMP and Phasing

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:110:Effect without mitigation: The loss of 1.44ha of OMH will result in a

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:110:Effect without mitigation: The surrounding area, contains limited to no other

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:111:Effect without mitigation: The habitats within the proposed development site

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:111:Effect without mitigation: The loss of small areas of fairly poor resting habitat

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:112:Effect without mitigation: The loss of small areas of fairly poor nesting habitat

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:112:Effect without mitigation: The loss of small areas of fairly poor nesting and

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:113:Effect without mitigation: The loss of sub-optimal breeding habitat for skylark

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:113:Effect without mitigation: The loss of this small area of sub-optimal grassland

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:114:Effect without mitigation: The loss of suitable foraging habitat within the OMH

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:114:Effect without mitigation: The loss of small area of suitable feeding plants in the

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:114:during the remediation works. Therefore, without mitigation, the proposed

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:115:Following the implementation of this mitigation, no significant residual impact is

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:116:In terms of the BNG assessment, without mitigation, the proposed development is

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:116:effects for each feature, the mitigation measures required and the means by which

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:116:mitigation measures can be secured.

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:117: Feature Impact Characterisation of Unmitigated Effect without mitigation Mitigation Significance of Residual

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:117: Open Mosaic Loss of habitat from site Direct loss of 1.44ha of OMH (a Significant adverse effect on the OMH No mitigation Significant adverse

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:117: Common toad Habitat loss from site Loss of ponds that support Significant adverse effect on the No mitigation Significant adverse

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:117: Breeding bird Habitat loss from site Loss of breeding and foraging Significant adverse effect on the No mitigation Significant adverse

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:118:Feature Impact Characterisation of Unmitigated Effect without mitigation Mitigation Significance of Residual

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:118:Dingy skipper Habitat loss from site Loss of small area of suitable Significant adverse effect on the dingy No mitigation Significant adverse

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:119:Without mitigation, the follow adverse significant residual effects remain:

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:119:In BNG terms, without mitigation, the proposed development is likely to result in

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:119:the remediation works being undertaken, without mitigation, the proposed

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:121:in the loss of, or permanent damage to, ecological features despite mitigation. In

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:121:to those provided as part of mitigation or compensation measures. In BNG terms,

R-2020-0799-CD-Grangetown Prairie CEMP - Rev D.pdf:132:cumulative, should be avoided. Where this is not possible mitigation, or lastly

R-2020-0799-CD-officer report.pdf:1:demonstrate how the mitigation measures set out in the Habitats Regulations

R-2020-0799-CD-officer report.pdf:1:from construction works, including any details of any mitigation measures required;

R-2022-0746-CD-SeAH Monopile Facility_Construction Environmental Management Plan Rev B.pdf:17:carried out and any additional mitigation works.

R-2022-0746-CD-406263 response.pdf:3:NPPF (paragraphs 8, 73, 104, 120,174, 175 and 180). We advise you to follow the mitigation hierarchy as

R-2022-0746-CD-406263 response.pdf:4:information including contact details for the National Trail Officer. Appropriate mitigation measures should

R-2022-0746-CD-Decision Notice (4).pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2022-0746-CD-Decision Notice (4).pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2022-0746-CD-Decision Notice (4).pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2022-0746-CD-Decision Notice (4).pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2022-0746-CD-Decision Notice (4).pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2022-0746-CD-Decision Notice (4).pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2022-0746-CD-Decision Notice (4).pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2022-0746-CD-Decision Notice (4).pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2022-0746-CD-Decision Notice (4).pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2022-0746-CD-Decision Notice (4).pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2022-0096-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0408-02-Rem_Strat_South_Bank_West_Rev01 (Part 1).pdf:17:mitigation and management strategy.

R-2022-0096-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0408-02-Rem_Strat_South_Bank_West_Rev01 (Part 1).pdf:18: • Compensation is required to offset residual losses after the mitigation through the

R-2022-0096-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0408-02-Rem_Strat_South_Bank_West_Rev01 (Part 1).pdf:22: Development of a UXO mitigation strategy.

R-2022-0096-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0408-02-Rem_Strat_South_Bank_West_Rev01 (Part 1).pdf:26:assessment indicates a Medium risk from UXO for borehole and excavation activities. Further mitigation

R-2022-0096-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0408-02-Rem_Strat_South_Bank_West_Rev01 (Part 1).pdf:26:activities such as detailed risk assessment or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the

R-2022-0096-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0408-02-Rem_Strat_South_Bank_West_Rev01 (Part 1).pdf:33:of the HRA, any control and mitigation measures identified within it shall be adopted in relations to the

R-2022-0096-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0408-02-Rem_Strat_South_Bank_West_Rev01 (Part 1).pdf:34:stream) in order to confirm the assessment of the waste impact and to implement embedded mitigation

R-2022-0096-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0408-02-Rem_Strat_South_Bank_West_Rev01 (Part 1).pdf:34: Any ecological mitigations required

R-2022-0096-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2022-0096-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2022-0096-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2022-0096-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2022-0096-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2022-0096-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2022-0096-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2022-0096-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2022-0096-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2022-0096-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2022-0096-CD-61586-01 Cover Letter.pdf:1:mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise agreed in writing.

R-2022-0096-CD-COMPLIANCE OFFICER REPORT.pdf:1:mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise agreed in writing.

R-2022-0096-CD-COMPLIANCE DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2022-0237-CD-Decision Notice R 2021 0166 FFM.pdf:2: works across the site and shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set

R-2022-0237-CD-Decision Notice R 2021 0166 FFM.pdf:2: mitigation measures required;

R-2022-0237-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0452-01-P4_GI_AD Part 1.pdf:15: • Direct contact pathways would be active throughout a potential redevelopment; typical mitigation

R-2022-0237-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0452-01-P4_GI_AD Part 1.pdf:15: required as mitigation.

R-2022-0237-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0452-01-P4_GI_AD Part 1.pdf:27:Given the reported ACEC class appropriate mitigation measures in line with BRE SD1 should be incorporated

R-2022-0237-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0452-01-P4_GI_AD Part 1.pdf:32:ACEC class (AC-2 for Superficial Deposits, AC-3 for bedrock), appropriate mitigation measures in line with BRE

R-2022-0237-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0452-01-P4_GI_AD Part 1.pdf:32: carried out to enable appropriate mitigation measures to be designed that will prevent contaminant migration

R-2021-0713-CD-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:12:mitigation and management strategy.

R-2021-0713-CD-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:12: • Compensation is required to offset residual losses after the mitigation through the

R-2021-0713-CD-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:17:• Development of a UXO mitigation strategy.

R-2021-0713-CD-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:21:assessment indicates a Medium risk from UXO for borehole and excavation activities. Further mitigation

R-2021-0713-CD-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:21:activities such as detailed risk assessment or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the

R-2021-0713-CD-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:29:of the HRA, any control and mitigation measures identified within it shall be adopted in relations to the

R-2021-0713-CD-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:30:stream) in order to confirm the assessment of the waste impact and to implement embedded mitigation

R-2021-0713-CD-Arcadis - South Bank Strategy.pdf:30: • Any ecological mitigations required

R-2021-0713-CD-COMPLIANCE OFFICER REPORT.pdf:1:mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise agreed in writing.

R-2021-0713-CD-Cover letter.pdf:1: details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise agreed in writing.

R-2021-0713-CD-COMPLIANCE DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2021-0608-PND-Officer Report 0608.pdf:1:NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2021-0608-PND-Officer Report 0608.pdf:1:We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2021-0608-PND-Officer Report 0608.pdf:1:following mitigation options should be secured:

R-2021-0608-PND-Officer Report 0608.pdf:3:accordance with the proposed details including the embedded mitigation there

R-2021-0608-PND-Officer Report 0608.pdf:3:mitigation measures that the proposed demolition works would not result in

R-2021-0608-PND-hra.pdf:6:anticipated, mitigation measures to alleviate impacts should be proposed and assessed.

R-2021-0608-PND-hra.pdf:6:projects) will have an AEoI on a European Site, including the assessment of mitigation

R-2021-0608-PND-hra.pdf:10:Adverse Effect on Integrity (AEoI). Proposed mitigation measures are assessed. Seven

R-2021-0608-PND-hra.pdf:11:Disturbance of Embedded mitigation for potential dust contamination No AEoI

R-2021-0608-PND-hra.pdf:11:Contamination of Embedded mitigation for potential dust contamination No AEoI

R-2021-0608-PND-hra.pdf:11: mitigation for potential dust contamination in the

R-2021-0608-PND-hra.pdf:12: mitigation for potential groundwater contamination in

R-2021-0608-PND-hra.pdf:13:within the SPD, can only be applied in accordance with protective mitigation measures

R-2021-0608-PND-hra.pdf:14:taking into account the mitigation measures described within Local Plan Policy N4, the RMP,

R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:7:Potentially damaging operation Mitigation including embedded mitigation in the Outline

R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:8: 11. Mitigation measures

R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:8:There are two delivery mechanisms for mitigation measures. Embedded mitigation

R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:8:document will deliver further mitigation measures.

R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:8:Table 6. Embedded mitigation.

R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:8:Potentially Embedded mitigation

R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:9: 12. Likelihood of harm following mitigation

R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:9:Following assessment of the potentially damaging operations and the embedded mitigation,

R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:9:Valued Ecological Embedded Additional mitigation Residual level of harm

R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:9:Receptor mitigation

R-2021-0608-PND-210801_Ecolgy screening (EIA criteria) for Teesworks demolitions_INCA_RevA.pdf:11: mitigation mitigation level of harm

R-2021-0608-PND-363937 - R_2021_0608_PND Prior Notification for demolition of structures at Former Redcar Steel Works Site (Teesworks), Redcar.pdf:1: NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2021-0608-PND-363937 - R_2021_0608_PND Prior Notification for demolition of structures at Former Redcar Steel Works Site (Teesworks), Redcar.pdf:1: We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2021-0608-PND-363937 - R_2021_0608_PND Prior Notification for demolition of structures at Former Redcar Steel Works Site (Teesworks), Redcar.pdf:1: mitigation options should be secured:

R-2021-0608-PND-363937 - R_2021_0608_PND Prior Notification for demolition of structures at Former Redcar Steel Works Site (Teesworks), Redcar.pdf:2:Further advice on mitigation

R-2021-0608-PND-363937 - R_2021_0608_PND Prior Notification for demolition of structures at Former Redcar Steel Works Site (Teesworks), Redcar.pdf:2:all mitigation measures are appropriately secured in any planning permission given.

R-2021-0608-PND-363937 - R_2021_0608_PND Prior Notification for demolition of structures at Former Redcar Steel Works Site (Teesworks), Redcar.pdf:2:mitigation measures set out in the submitted HRA (Appropriate Assessment).

R-2021-0608-PND-363937 - R_2021_0608_PND Prior Notification for demolition of structures at Former Redcar Steel Works Site (Teesworks), Redcar.pdf:3:the mitigation hierarchy as set out in paragraph 175 of the NPPF and firstly consider what existing

R-2021-0608-PND-19931629_1.pdf:17: Safety Briefings, Inductions etc will be held outdoors as a Covid-19 mitigation.

R-2021-0608-PND-19931629_1.pdf:17: Mitigation Government guidance), emails, MEMOs and toolbox talks etc.

20210128 MLA202000507 Tee south bank phase 2 shellfish advice + JPQC.pdf:2:Question 4: Are the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures sufficient?

20210128 MLA202000507 Tee south bank phase 2 shellfish advice + JPQC.pdf:2:14. There are no proposed mitigation and monitoring measures in relation to shellfish species and

EA MLA_2020_00507 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:ii) Site specific benthic ecology surveys and assessments/adequate mitigation

EA MLA_2020_00507 22 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:marine licence and requirements for mitigation and/or compensation.

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:1:judgement on the significance of impacts to designated sites and the scope for mitigation.

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:2:site above in order to determine the significance of these for the SSSI and the scope for mitigation.

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:7: of impacts to designated sites and to determine mitigation measures.

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:9: the main over-wintering period (see ‘Mitigation measures’ comment below).

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:10:Mitigation measures We note that the HRA states that the following mitigation measure will be

338486 - 338489, NE formal response to SBW MLA, 29.01.21.pdf:10: wintering waterbirds, it is not clear whether this mitigation measure has

20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:2:Question 4: Are the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures sufficient?

20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:2:16. A number of mitigation measures are proposed, and these are all sensible and should minimise

20210121 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phase II Benthic ecology JPQC.pdf:3: 9.1.5.2). However, I do not see any reference to whether there is any mitigation planned for this

20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:3:Question 4 Are the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures sufficient?

20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:3:16. No mitigation for coastal process impacts is proposed. See my response to Question 11 of this

20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:5:34. Embedded mitigation is discussed in Section 3.12 but considers only spills, leaks, pollution and

20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:5:35. No secondary mitigation measures are proposed for coastal process impacts.

20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:5:37. Mitigation for the possible remobilising of groundwater contaminants due to construction and

20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:5: the method is not specified. They are assumed to be effective, as the mitigation is used to

20210119 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay CP advice + JPQC.pdf:5: mitigation proposed.

20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:2: the assessment and to determine whether additional mitigation measures are required. I have listed

20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:5: occurs during the peak migration season’. To this, the applicant has suggested that the mitigation

20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:6:Question 4. Are the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures sufficient?

20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:6:MITIGATION MEASURES PROPOSED DURING CONSTRUCTION PHASE

20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:7: impact is considered to be high. Therefore, the following mitigation measure has been

20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:7:27. With the implementation of the above mitigation measure (point 26.iii), the applicant expects that

20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:7: there is not enough evidence to make a decision on whether the proposed mitigation measure will

20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:8: magnitude and limited to the dredge footprint. Therefore, no mitigation has been proposed.

20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:8: some issues that need to be addressed in order to consider the need for additional mitigation

20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:9: need to be addressed in order to consider the need for additional mitigation measures.

20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:9:MITIGATION MEASURES PROPOSED DURING THE OPERATIONAL PHASE

20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:10: considered to be accustomed to such impacts and therefore no mitigation is required. However,

20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:10: affect the population as a whole. Therefore, mitigation is not proposed beyond the best practice of

20210115 MLA202000507 South Bank Quay-phase 2 - Fisheries advice MG GE + JPQC.pdf:11: (e.g. NGCT). To this, the applicant has suggested that the mitigation measures proposed (or in

MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4: mitigation is required. In my opinion, these conclusions are not unreasonable. As noted previously, it is

MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4:Question 4: Are the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures sufficient?

MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4:24. No mitigation is proposed for marine mammals.

MLA202000506 & MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Quay Phases 1&2 UWN advice + JPQC.pdf:4:26. At this stage, it is difficult to say whether the proposed mitigation for fish is sufficient. I do have some

MLA-2020-00507.pdf:2: could be restrictions / mitigation or monitoring for example).

20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:3:Are the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures sufficient?

20210201 MLA202000506 MLA202000507 Tees South Bank Phases 1 and 2 - EIA Licence Advice Minute - SEAL Advice v2+SJB.pdf:4:19. As detailed in points 13 – 15 I cannot fully comment on whether any additional mitigation or

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:11:Where potential adverse impacts have been identified, mitigation measures have been recommended to

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:and minor adverse significance to human health. This is on the basis that the embedded mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:13:to the works outlined in the remediation strategy. With implementation of mitigation measures, the residual

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:14:control of spread of non-native plant material. Following the mitigation outlined above, a worst-case impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:15:piling works. Following the implementation of mitigation measures, including shrouding on the piling rigs,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:15:Tees will fall below significant sensitivity thresholds. With mitigation in place, disturbance impacts are

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:15:works, notably if creating barrier effects that may deter migratory patterns. However, with mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:15:mitigation measures such as creation of new complex habitat within the proposed quay walls via proposed

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:17:no mitigation is proposed prior to the removal of these elements.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:18:construction phase noise levels at the South Tees Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:18:Mitigation and control measures are recommended to minimise the effects of dust and plant emissions

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:19:the construction period. No mitigation measures during the construction phase are required.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:19:assessed as being permanent and negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS-5.pdf:20:body to meet its objectives in the future or compromise the mitigation measures in place for the water body.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:3:3.12 Embedded mitigation measures 20

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:12:mitigation measures are defined. The residual impacts (potential impacts remaining assuming the proposed

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:12:mitigation measures are effectively implemented) are then assessed.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:28:3.12 Embedded mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:29:built into the proposed scheme as embedded mitigation.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:42: • The generic approach taken to the derivation of mitigation measures and the assessment of residual

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:43: • The identification of mitigation measures (where required) to reduce the significance of, or avoid,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:43: • The evaluation of impacts, post-mitigation, to determine the significance of residual impacts.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:47:significance (as defined above); albeit that appropriate mitigation, where available, should be sought for all

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:Mitigation measures have been proposed, where available and practical, in those cases where adverse

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:impacts have been identified. It is important to note that the mitigation measures applied should be

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:‘Mitigation through design’ is an important factor in ensuring that the environmental impacts of a proposed

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:engineering and environmental impact studies, mitigation has been built into the design of the proposed

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:scheme. Where significant impacts potentially remain, further issue-specific mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:industry standard or ‘embedded’ mitigation often applies in these cases (and is set out herein). It is also

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:other pressures on a receptor and, in this event, mitigation may be required.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:is relevant to the treatment of mitigation in HRA. The CJEU ruling determined that “…it is not appropriate,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:the harmful effects…” is interpreted as meaning any mitigation measures that are not clearly an intrinsic part

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:of the design of a plan or project. The effect of this ruling is that mitigation measures, which are not clearly

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:process has identified an adverse impact and mitigation is available (see above). In some cases, in order

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:to ensure that the mitigation measures are successful or where there is significant uncertainty with respect

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:Where further mitigation measures are identified, the significance of the residual environmental impact (i.e.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:48:the post-mitigation impact) is assessed.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:50:additional mitigation. Inter-relationships have been assessed within the relevant sections of the topic

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:53: certain times of the year and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation such addressed in Section

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:142: waters and coastal waters. During the construction, operation and Section 5.6, Paragraph and mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:142: resources and physical characteristics of the water environment as mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:143: impacts will be observed (to water quality), and mitigation may be are assessment and mitigation measures outlined

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:143: Mitigation measures with regard to dredging may be required to manage

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:143: are assessment and mitigation measures outlined

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:143: times of the year and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:162:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:162:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:163:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:163:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:166:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:166:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:167:Overall therefore, the magnitude of effect would be significantly reduced by the proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:168:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:168:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:169:proposed scheme footprint and surrounding area, the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:169: of biodiversity or geological value and soils (in a impacts and subsequent mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:170: such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation are discussed within the land quality

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:172:operational activities. It will also aid in the identification of suitable mitigation measures to provide protection

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:172:identification of suitable preventative measures and mitigation techniques for the construction and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:186:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:187:adoption of the embedded mitigation measures outlined in Section 3, including the use of the CEMP. The

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:187:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:187:Following the implementation of these mitigation measures, the magnitude of effect will be very low.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:188:site and task specific health and safety plans. The plan will outline the use of risk mitigation strategies

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:188:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:188:The mitigation measures detailed in Section 16.5 (specifically those associated with the avoidance of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:188:construction phase dust) would also be applicable to this impact. No further mitigation measures have been

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:189:The sensitivity of the surface water is very high and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:189:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:189:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:190:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:190:Following implementation of the mitigation described above the magnitude of the impact is considered to be

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:191:and biofouling of hulls. Generic project-level mitigation has been put in place to minimise this risk, set out

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:192: be considered, and the mitigation hierarchy used to protect these features. Importance and species of ecological importance

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:192: mitigation and compensation.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:193: appropriate mitigation/compensation can be quantified. structures would have a habitat / species value, or

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:193: step is to fully consider options for mitigation on site prior to compensation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:193: site mitigation.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:193: Habitat Vision that aims to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:194: implement WFD mitigation measures and the applicant should explore

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:210:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:214:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:214:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:215:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:216:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:216:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:218: procedures requiring an EIA and mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:219: habitats will need to be considered, and the mitigation hierarchy used to Section 9 assesses potential impacts on marine

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:219: suitable mitigation and compensation.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:234: very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:235:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237: very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239: increased Low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:239:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice during construction works.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241: whale very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of best practice during maintenance

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice. The residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:244: • Restoring at least 15% of degraded ecosystems as a contribution to climate change mitigation and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:246: • The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The Mammal Society Guidance Series) (Dean et al, 2016);

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:246: • Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines (English Nature, 2001);

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:246: • Otters: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice (Natural

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:246: • Badgers: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:246: • Bats: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice (Natural

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:246: • Great crested newts: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:246: • Invertebrates: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:246: • Reptiles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:246: • Water voles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:247: Natural England advised following the mitigation hierarchy as STDC is in the process of developing a

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:249:a development, once all the appropriate mitigation has been implemented.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:252: through the implementation of mitigation measures or irreversible, when no recovery is possible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:253:mitigation and project commitments made as part of the design process. Where, following this assessment,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:253:likely significant impacts are identified, additional mitigation measures are then proposed. A final

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:253:assessment of the residual impacts remaining following implementation of these additional mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:254:Following initial assessment, if the impact does not require additional mitigation (or none is possible) the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:254:residual impact will remain the same. If, however, additional mitigation is proposed there will be an

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:254:assessment of the post-mitigation residual impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:261:EP1HS. Consequently, these are considered to be absent and no further surveys and/or mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:261:Therefore, roosting bats are considered to be absent and no further surveys and/or mitigation measures for

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:262:surveys and/or mitigation measures are required. Therefore, badgers are not considered further in this

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:262:and this species is considered to be absent. Therefore, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:263:colonise. Consequently, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are required, and amphibians

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:263:basking, shelter, foraging and/or refuge. Consequently, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:265:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:265:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:266:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:266:Following the implementation of the mitigation measures, the magnitude of impact will be reduced and the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:266:prior to works commencing, to ensure the protection afforded to otters, the agreed mitigation measures and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:266:Potential effects arising from changes in noise are considered in Section 17, including embedded mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:266:of no adverse significance following embedded mitigation of development of a Marine Pollution Contingency

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:267:implementation of the mitigation outlined in Section 18, there is not anticipated to be a significant impact to

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:267:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:267:The following mitigation is proposed to minimise disturbance of otters from construction activities:

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:267:The following mitigation will be implemented to prevent injury or death to otter should any animal roam in

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:267: • All otter mitigation measures for the site will be agreed with Natural England prior to construction;

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:267: within this area. Consultation will be required with Natural England to discuss the mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:268:Following the implementation of the mitigation measures outlined above, the potential effects to otter are

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:268:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:268:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:268:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:268:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:268:As additional mitigation for hedgehog, any individuals found within the works area will be moved to a safe

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:269:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:269:Following the implementation of mitigation, the impact to commuting bats and otters is anticipated to be of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:273: consideration should be given to suitable mitigation. The river using the Tees are assessed in

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:296:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:296:by an experienced ornithologist. This mitigation will be included in the CEMP. The residual impact would

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:298:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:298:While the anticipated impact is minor, the following mitigation measure, proposed to reduce the potential for

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:298:With the implementation of the above mitigation measure, the modelled plume would only occupy half of the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:298:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:301:However, according to the Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013), species such as

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:301:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:301:As mitigation for the potential impact of noise disturbance during the construction phase, it is proposed that

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:301:to the Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013). With this in mind, and considering the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:301:noises at the distances associated with this project, the implementation of the above mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:302:The Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013) categorises visual disturbances into the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:303:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:303:The mitigation measures outlined in Section 12.5.2 would ensure that dredging vessels only operate along

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:304:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:305:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:305:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:306:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:306:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:309: and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation such as stop start 13.5.1.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:320:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:320:The following mitigation measure is proposed to reduce the potential for impacts on migratory fish from

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:320:With the implementation of the above mitigation measure, water quality will only be impacted on one side

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:320:Mitigation of the plume effects by reducing the size of the TSHD, and thus reducing the rate of overflow, is

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:321:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:325:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:327:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:329:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:329:for the proposed scheme, and there is no feasible mitigation measure that can prevent such losses.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:330:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required, although as a matter of course PDT will manage any conflicts through

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:330:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:331:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:331:No mitigation measures are required; however, in accordance with best practice, lighting would be directed

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:331:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:331:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:335:As detailed in the NRA, a number of embedded mitigation measures are already enforced by PDT which

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:335:(see Appendix 9). These embedded mitigation measures comprise:

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:336:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:336:As noted above, a number of embedded mitigation measures are already enforced by PDT which have been

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:336:Appendix 9). These embedded mitigation measures which are applicable to the operational phase

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:336:In addition to the above embedded mitigation measures, the following measures are proposed to be adopted

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:337:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:337:No additional mitigation measures are required beyond those detailed above (to be built into the proposed

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:337:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:338:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:348: Effective/acceptable mitigation options may still be possible, to offset and / or reduce residual impacts to

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:348: Effective / acceptable mitigation options may still be possible, to offset and / or reduce residual impacts to

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:348: Industry standard mitigation measures may still apply.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:358:HER. With appropriate mitigation, the residual impact will be reduced to minor adverse and not significant

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:358:riverside pumping station will be recorded in advance of demolition in accordance with mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:373:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:376:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:380: • any significant air emissions, their mitigation and any residual

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:380: mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:380: after mitigation methods have been applied; and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:380: • measures to be employed in preventing or mitigating the mitigation measures.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:383:3) Determine site specific mitigation; and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:383:4) Examine the residual effects to determine whether or not additional mitigation is required.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:383:of impacts prior to mitigation. Once appropriate mitigation measures were identified, the significance of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:389:construction and trackout is used to recommend appropriate mitigation measures. The dust magnitude for

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:391:Table 18.9 to determine the risk of impacts with no mitigation applied. The risks concluded for dust soiling

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:391:Table 18.10 Summary of risk table to define site-specific mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:392:18.4.1.5 Step 3: Site-specific mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:392:Step three of the IAQM guidance (IAQM, 2016) identifies appropriate site-specific mitigation. These

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:392:without the implementation of mitigation measures. Additional guidance has been provided by the IAQM in

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:392:relation to dust and air mitigation measures. It is recommended that the good practice measures outlined

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:392:Highly recommended mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:392:A list of mitigation measures that are highly recommended for a high risk site by the IAQM, as determined

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:392:by Step 2 of the construction dust and particulate matter assessment, is provided below. The mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:392:mitigation measures listed in the guidance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:393: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:394:With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, the residual impacts from the construction phase

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:399:considerations. In such cases appropriate mitigation will be required. Landscapes designated at a national

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:414:19.5.1 Mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:414:Woodland, tree and shrub planting is a typical mitigation measure used to screen development and improve

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:424:to consider all sources of flooding, any mitigation measures required to ensure a safe development in a 1 in

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:433:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:433:comparable with the existing. No further mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:433:users is high magnitude. Therefore, without the implementation of mitigation measures the impact is of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:433:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:433:implementation of the following mitigation measures:

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:434:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:434:once operational. No further mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact with

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:434:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:434:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:435:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:435:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:436:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:436:No mitigation measures are required in regard to the impact of swell waves or locally generated waves. The

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:442:exist in the surrounding area; the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or offset any significant

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:442:significance. Opportunities for the mitigation of any adverse effects and the enhancement of positive effects

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:455:Mitigation and residual impacts

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:455:Mitigation and residual impacts

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:456:Mitigation measures and residual impacts

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:456:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:458:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:459:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:460: • contribute to the mitigation of GHG emissions and support sustainable development;

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:460: • transparent reporting of information on mitigation, adaptation and support which undergoes

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:461:GHG emissions by 34%, relative to a 1990 baseline by 2020 and by 80% in 2050 (“climate mitigation”). The

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:463: d. ensuring opportunities to contribute to the mitigation of flooding elsewhere are taken;

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:463:2.56 The NPPF states that planning should proactively help the mitigation of, and adaption to, climate

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:472:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:472:developed. However, potential mitigation measures to reduce GHG emissions from construction phase

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:472:Furthermore, some of the mitigation measures to minimise air pollutant emissions during construction, listed

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:473:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:476:contact. The assessment concludes that with the adoption of embedded mitigation (i.e. implementation of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:477:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:477:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:479:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:482:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:484:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:484:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486: noise during very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487: collision risk from Low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:487:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice. The residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489: resource in whale very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:491:occurring, or where mitigation measures are still operating; and reasonably foreseeable future plans and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:500:assessment of the significance of such impacts and recommendation of appropriate mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:503:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:503:former project, mitigation comprises the use of specialist dredging equipment (i.e. an enclosed grab loading

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:506:at any location. Additionally, mitigation is outlined for all three schemes which would reduce plume extents

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:506:additional mitigation measures are identified to reduce any resulting sediment plume as far as possible and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:506:mitigation measures would be incorporated into the design of each and thus remove the potential for

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:507:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:507:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no cumulative residual impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:508:mitigation is adopted to reduce the risk of any such impact from occurring. However, there could be the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:510:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511:No mitigation measures are required to reduce the potential disturbance of marine mammals from

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511:lack of suitable habitat within its footprint. The mitigation outlined for the proposed scheme reduces the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511:subject to similar mitigation measures to minimise any potential effects, including reduced vessel speeds,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:511:No additional mitigation is proposed and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:512:As a more sizable development, the landside EIA proposes a number of mitigation measures including off

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:512:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:512:No mitigation measures are required and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:512:footprint. The mitigation outlined for the proposed scheme reduces the potential impacts to otter to an

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:512:an adverse impact to otter, it is assumed they will be subject to similar mitigation measures to minimise any

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:512:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:513:No mitigation measures are required and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:513:In the absence of suitable mitigation, this could potentially result in an increased risk to subtidal foraging

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:513:within the Tees. However, the mitigation measure described for the proposed scheme in Section 12.5.2

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:513:have a minor impact at worst (with the mitigation measures in place). With mitigation measures in place for

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:513:the SIZ development immediately landward. However, with the mitigation measures outlined in Section

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:514:mitigation relating to the effect of the loss of intertidal mud specifically in relation to these species is not

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:514:the risk of such responses being exhibited. However, the mitigation measure described for the proposed

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:514:project, and other mitigation measures have been proposed for the Anglo American Harbour facilities

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:514:With mitigation measures in place for all schemes, the combined impact will be reduced as far as possible,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:514:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:515:No further mitigation measures are possible (or necessary). The residual cumulative impact would be minor

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:515:are anticipated to be relatively habituated to such noises, plus the mitigation measures in place will help to

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:515:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:515:No further mitigation measures are possible (or necessary). The residual cumulative impact would be minor

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:515:There is a range of mitigation measures that are typically adopted during construction works to manage the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:No mitigation measures are required beyond those to be embedded into the proposed scheme and those

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:mitigation measures outlined above would be adopted during the operational phase of the proposed scheme

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:No mitigation measures are required beyond those to be embedded into the proposed scheme and those

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:516:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:517:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:517:No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:518:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:518:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:519:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:519:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:519:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:519:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:520:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:520:No mitigation measures. There would be a substantial beneficial residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:520:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:520:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:520:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:520:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:520:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:520:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:521:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:524: The generic mitigation measures deemed applicable to this waterbody Measures are included in the assessment alongside

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:524: bank, Preserve or restore habitats. guidance mitigation measures table for the Tees.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:524: Mention of various reports to inform mitigation to address WFD issues of these reports is being fed into the developing

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:526: Mitigation measures (taken from

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:526: Mitigation measures provided by the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:528:and jetties WFD mitigation measures identified for only. be disposed of on land

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:528:C2 Capital dredging hydromorphology and WFD mitigation are no higher sensitivity water quality due to

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:528:blanket hydromorphology. WFD mitigation no higher sensitivity on the seabed however

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:528:quay effects in relation to WFD mitigation therefore there would be require piling on land.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:529: mitigation measures also scoped in. intertidal and subtidal

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:529:water mitigation measures identified for the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:530: • For C2 - Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures, biology (fish and habitats) and water

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:530: • For C4 – RBMP mitigation measures.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:530: • For C5 – Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures, Groundwater – chemical quality

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:530: • For O1 - Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures assessment.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:530:Table 28.6 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:530: RBMP mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:539:28.5.5 River Basin Management Plan mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:539:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:539:Table 28.8 Summary of mitigation measures and assessment (taken from Clearing the Waters for All,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:539: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:539: Dredging would be managed in line with mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:540: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:540:Table 28.9 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:540: RBMP mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:540:28.6.2 RBMP mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:540:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:540:Table 28.10 Summary of mitigation measures and assessment (taken from Clearing the Waters for All,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:540: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:540: mitigation measure.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:541: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:541: Retime dredging or disposal Riverbank excavation would not impact on these mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:541:Table 28.11 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:542: Water body Quality elements mitigation Protected Areas

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:542:28.7.2 RBMP mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:542:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:542:Table 28.12 Summary of RBMP mitigation measures and assessment

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:542: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:542: effect on this mitigation measure is not predicted.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:542: these mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:545:Cefas Action Level 2 concentrations), additional mitigation measures would be implemented to reduce the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:545:proposed project both include mitigation measures to dredge in long strips to reduce the effects of sediment

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:549:would require site characterisation and remediation/ mitigation (such as piling risk assessments to be

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:549: • Surface waters: Hydromorphology (including the RBMP mitigation measures assessment)

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:549:Biodiversity Strategy. This will also support the implementation of the RBMP mitigation measures identified

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:549:suspended sediment thus reducing the risk of significant water quality effects. Mitigation measures to

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:549:in potentially contaminated soils. Effective mitigation measures to ensure contamination is managed and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:550:projects would occur at the same time. Mitigation measures such as dredging in long strips as required for

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:550:A non-temporary deterioration in WFD quality elements was therefore not identified. Additionally, mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:550:is considered to be supportive of the implementation of the RBMP mitigation measures around ecological

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:551: projects. Where there are adverse impacts, an assessment of mitigation options is carried out to

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:551: determine adverse effect on the integrity of the site. If these mitigation options cannot avoid adverse

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:552:reduce the harmful effects of the plan or project on that site”. As such, no such mitigation measures have

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:561: scheme subject to appropriate mitigation being

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:561: known as well as adoption of all mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:567: R/2016/0663/OOM for up to 550 residential units with associated granted October 2019 adoption of mitigation, including the provision of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:567: consented residential development, the mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:575:With the application of mitigation in the form of ensuring that the capital dredging transects run along the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:575:With mitigation in place, the predicted impacts on fish as a result of SSC increases are predicted to manifest

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:576:With mitigation in place, the predicted impacts on fish as a result of underwater noise is again predicted to

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:577:e.g. pile driving). With the incorporation of the mitigation measures detailed in Section 12.5.4 (i.e.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:577:The Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit, developed by Cutts et al. (2013), provides noise level

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:578:with the implication of mitigation measures set out in Sections 12.5.4 and 12.6.3 (i.e. sympathetic placement

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:582:Without mitigation in place, the construction phase of the proposed scheme may result in redistribution of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:583:mitigation measures will be in place and noise levels within the SPA would be less than 50dB(A) (i.e. below

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:583:proposed scheme and lies outwith the 300m threshold stated within the Waterbird Disturbance & Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:584:It should be noted that the mitigation measures described for the proposed scheme in Section 12.5.2 (i.e.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:584:in the water column. With mitigation measures in place for all schemes, the combined impact will be reduced

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:588:Caltrans (2015). Technical Guidance for Assessment and Mitigation of the Hydroacoustic Effects of Pile

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:589:Cutts, N. Hemmingway, K. & Spencer, J. (2013). Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit Informing

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:589:Dean, M., Strachan, R., Gow, D. and Andrews, R. (2016). The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:589:Mammal Society Mitigation Guidance Series). Eds Fiona Mathews and Paul Chanin. The Mammal

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:590:English Nature (2001) Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:594:Natural England (2014) Otters: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:594:Natural England (2015) Badgers: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:594:Natural England (2015) Bats: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:595:Natural England (2015) Great crested newts: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:595:Natural England (2015). Invertebrates: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:595:Natural England, (2015). Reptiles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-9.pdf:595:Natural England, (2015). Water voles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:54: • Mitigation.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:56: Cleveland Coast SPA, Ramsar site and SSSI, and should identify mitigation measures as required. This should include impacts on tern prey, intertidal

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:56: Wild Birds Directive activities, particularly during winter months and consideration should be given to suitable mitigation. The river channel is also important for foraging

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:57: developed a Tees Estuary Habitat Vision that aims to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:63:the significance of heritage assets is appropriately assessed and that mitigation recommendations are both

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:76:to the significance of heritage assets is appropriately assessed and that mitigation recommendations

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:252:cause harm to human health or the environment if mitigation measures are not implemented during the re-

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part1-3.pdf:286: • During construction works appropriate mitigation measures should be put in place to ensure no

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:15:additional mitigation measures are required. Listed the information required below:

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-CO-EV-1116 Response to Cefas comments-10.pdf:16:project) at any location. Additionally, mitigation is outlined for all three schemes which would reduce plume

MLA_2020_00507-Decision Letter (Marine)-16.pdf:1:requiring mitigation or monitoring measures which can be found in section 5 of the

MLA_2020_00507-Decision Letter (Marine)-16.pdf:3:or refine any monitoring and mitigation. We would recommend that the following be

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:3:3.12 Embedded mitigation measures 20

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:12:mitigation measures are defined. The residual impacts (potential impacts remaining assuming the proposed

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:12:mitigation measures are effectively implemented) are then assessed.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:28:3.12 Embedded mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:29:built into the proposed scheme as embedded mitigation.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:42: • The generic approach taken to the derivation of mitigation measures and the assessment of residual

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43: • The identification of mitigation measures (where required) to reduce the significance of, or avoid,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:43: • The evaluation of impacts, post-mitigation, to determine the significance of residual impacts.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:47:significance (as defined above); albeit that appropriate mitigation, where available, should be sought for all

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Mitigation measures have been proposed, where available and practical, in those cases where adverse

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:impacts have been identified. It is important to note that the mitigation measures applied should be

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:‘Mitigation through design’ is an important factor in ensuring that the environmental impacts of a proposed

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:engineering and environmental impact studies, mitigation has been built into the design of the proposed

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:scheme. Where significant impacts potentially remain, further issue-specific mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:industry standard or ‘embedded’ mitigation often applies in these cases (and is set out herein). It is also

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:other pressures on a receptor and, in this event, mitigation may be required.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:is relevant to the treatment of mitigation in HRA. The CJEU ruling determined that “…it is not appropriate,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:the harmful effects…” is interpreted as meaning any mitigation measures that are not clearly an intrinsic part

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:of the design of a plan or project. The effect of this ruling is that mitigation measures, which are not clearly

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:process has identified an adverse impact and mitigation is available (see above). In some cases, in order

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:to ensure that the mitigation measures are successful or where there is significant uncertainty with respect

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:Where further mitigation measures are identified, the significance of the residual environmental impact (i.e.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:48:the post-mitigation impact) is assessed.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:50:additional mitigation. Inter-relationships have been assessed within the relevant sections of the topic

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:53: certain times of the year and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation such addressed in Section

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142: waters and coastal waters. During the construction, operation and Section 5.6, Paragraph and mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:142: resources and physical characteristics of the water environment as mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: impacts will be observed (to water quality), and mitigation may be are assessment and mitigation measures outlined

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: Mitigation measures with regard to dredging may be required to manage

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: are assessment and mitigation measures outlined

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:143: times of the year and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:162:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:162:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:163:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:166:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:Overall therefore, the magnitude of effect would be significantly reduced by the proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:169:proposed scheme footprint and surrounding area, the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:169: of biodiversity or geological value and soils (in a impacts and subsequent mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:170: such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation are discussed within the land quality

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:172:operational activities. It will also aid in the identification of suitable mitigation measures to provide protection

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:172:identification of suitable preventative measures and mitigation techniques for the construction and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:186:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:187:adoption of the embedded mitigation measures outlined in Section 3, including the use of the CEMP. The

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:187:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:187:Following the implementation of these mitigation measures, the magnitude of effect will be very low.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:188:site and task specific health and safety plans. The plan will outline the use of risk mitigation strategies

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:188:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:188:The mitigation measures detailed in Section 16.5 (specifically those associated with the avoidance of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:188:construction phase dust) would also be applicable to this impact. No further mitigation measures have been

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:The sensitivity of the surface water is very high and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is very low

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:190:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:190:Following implementation of the mitigation described above the magnitude of the impact is considered to be

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:191:and biofouling of hulls. Generic project-level mitigation has been put in place to minimise this risk, set out

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:192: be considered, and the mitigation hierarchy used to protect these features. Importance and species of ecological importance

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:192: mitigation and compensation.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:193: appropriate mitigation/compensation can be quantified. structures would have a habitat / species value, or

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:193: step is to fully consider options for mitigation on site prior to compensation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:193: site mitigation.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:193: Habitat Vision that aims to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:194: implement WFD mitigation measures and the applicant should explore

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:210:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:215:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:216:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:216:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:218: procedures requiring an EIA and mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:219: habitats will need to be considered, and the mitigation hierarchy used to Section 9 assesses potential impacts on marine

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:219: suitable mitigation and compensation.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:234: very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:235:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237: very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239: increased Low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:239:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice during construction works.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241: whale very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of best practice during maintenance

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice. The residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:244: • Restoring at least 15% of degraded ecosystems as a contribution to climate change mitigation and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The Mammal Society Guidance Series) (Dean et al, 2016);

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines (English Nature, 2001);

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • Otters: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice (Natural

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • Badgers: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • Bats: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice (Natural

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • Great crested newts: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • Invertebrates: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • Reptiles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:246: • Water voles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:247: Natural England advised following the mitigation hierarchy as STDC is in the process of developing a

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:249:a development, once all the appropriate mitigation has been implemented.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:252: through the implementation of mitigation measures or irreversible, when no recovery is possible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253:mitigation and project commitments made as part of the design process. Where, following this assessment,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253:likely significant impacts are identified, additional mitigation measures are then proposed. A final

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:253:assessment of the residual impacts remaining following implementation of these additional mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:254:Following initial assessment, if the impact does not require additional mitigation (or none is possible) the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:254:residual impact will remain the same. If, however, additional mitigation is proposed there will be an

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:254:assessment of the post-mitigation residual impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:261:EP1HS. Consequently, these are considered to be absent and no further surveys and/or mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:261:Therefore, roosting bats are considered to be absent and no further surveys and/or mitigation measures for

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:262:surveys and/or mitigation measures are required. Therefore, badgers are not considered further in this

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:262:and this species is considered to be absent. Therefore, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:263:colonise. Consequently, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are required, and amphibians

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:263:basking, shelter, foraging and/or refuge. Consequently, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:265:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:265:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:Following the implementation of the mitigation measures, the magnitude of impact will be reduced and the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:prior to works commencing, to ensure the protection afforded to otters, the agreed mitigation measures and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:Potential effects arising from changes in noise are considered in Section 17, including embedded mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:266:of no adverse significance following embedded mitigation of development of a Marine Pollution Contingency

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:267:implementation of the mitigation outlined in Section 18, there is not anticipated to be a significant impact to

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:267:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:267:The following mitigation is proposed to minimise disturbance of otters from construction activities:

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:267:The following mitigation will be implemented to prevent injury or death to otter should any animal roam in

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:267: • All otter mitigation measures for the site will be agreed with Natural England prior to construction;

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:267: within this area. Consultation will be required with Natural England to discuss the mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:Following the implementation of the mitigation measures outlined above, the potential effects to otter are

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is of minor adverse significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:268:As additional mitigation for hedgehog, any individuals found within the works area will be moved to a safe

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:269:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:269:Following the implementation of mitigation, the impact to commuting bats and otters is anticipated to be of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:273: consideration should be given to suitable mitigation. The river using the Tees are assessed in

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:296:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:296:by an experienced ornithologist. This mitigation will be included in the CEMP. The residual impact would

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:While the anticipated impact is minor, the following mitigation measure, proposed to reduce the potential for

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:With the implementation of the above mitigation measure, the modelled plume would only occupy half of the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:301:However, according to the Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013), species such as

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:301:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:301:As mitigation for the potential impact of noise disturbance during the construction phase, it is proposed that

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:301:to the Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013). With this in mind, and considering the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:301:noises at the distances associated with this project, the implementation of the above mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:302:The Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013) categorises visual disturbances into the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:303:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:303:The mitigation measures outlined in Section 12.5.2 would ensure that dredging vessels only operate along

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:304:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:309: and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation such as stop start 13.5.1.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:320:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:320:The following mitigation measure is proposed to reduce the potential for impacts on migratory fish from

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:320:With the implementation of the above mitigation measure, water quality will only be impacted on one side

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:320:Mitigation of the plume effects by reducing the size of the TSHD, and thus reducing the rate of overflow, is

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:321:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:325:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:327:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:329:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:329:for the proposed scheme, and there is no feasible mitigation measure that can prevent such losses.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required, although as a matter of course PDT will manage any conflicts through

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:331:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:331:No mitigation measures are required; however, in accordance with best practice, lighting would be directed

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:331:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:331:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:335:As detailed in the NRA, a number of embedded mitigation measures are already enforced by PDT which

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:335:(see Appendix 9). These embedded mitigation measures comprise:

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:As noted above, a number of embedded mitigation measures are already enforced by PDT which have been

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:Appendix 9). These embedded mitigation measures which are applicable to the operational phase

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:336:In addition to the above embedded mitigation measures, the following measures are proposed to be adopted

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:No additional mitigation measures are required beyond those detailed above (to be built into the proposed

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:338:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Effective/acceptable mitigation options may still be possible, to offset and / or reduce residual impacts to

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Effective / acceptable mitigation options may still be possible, to offset and / or reduce residual impacts to

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:348: Industry standard mitigation measures may still apply.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:358:HER. With appropriate mitigation, the residual impact will be reduced to minor adverse and not significant

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:358:riverside pumping station will be recorded in advance of demolition in accordance with mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:376:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:380: • any significant air emissions, their mitigation and any residual

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:380: mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:380: after mitigation methods have been applied; and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:380: • measures to be employed in preventing or mitigating the mitigation measures.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:383:3) Determine site specific mitigation; and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:383:4) Examine the residual effects to determine whether or not additional mitigation is required.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:383:of impacts prior to mitigation. Once appropriate mitigation measures were identified, the significance of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:389:construction and trackout is used to recommend appropriate mitigation measures. The dust magnitude for

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391:Table 18.9 to determine the risk of impacts with no mitigation applied. The risks concluded for dust soiling

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:391:Table 18.10 Summary of risk table to define site-specific mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:18.4.1.5 Step 3: Site-specific mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:Step three of the IAQM guidance (IAQM, 2016) identifies appropriate site-specific mitigation. These

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:without the implementation of mitigation measures. Additional guidance has been provided by the IAQM in

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:relation to dust and air mitigation measures. It is recommended that the good practice measures outlined

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:Highly recommended mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:A list of mitigation measures that are highly recommended for a high risk site by the IAQM, as determined

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:by Step 2 of the construction dust and particulate matter assessment, is provided below. The mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:392:mitigation measures listed in the guidance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:393: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:394:With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, the residual impacts from the construction phase

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:399:considerations. In such cases appropriate mitigation will be required. Landscapes designated at a national

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:414:19.5.1 Mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:414:Woodland, tree and shrub planting is a typical mitigation measure used to screen development and improve

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:424:to consider all sources of flooding, any mitigation measures required to ensure a safe development in a 1 in

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:433:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:433:comparable with the existing. No further mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:433:users is high magnitude. Therefore, without the implementation of mitigation measures the impact is of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:433:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:433:implementation of the following mitigation measures:

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:434:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:434:once operational. No further mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact with

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:434:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:434:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:435:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:435:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:436:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:436:No mitigation measures are required in regard to the impact of swell waves or locally generated waves. The

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:442:exist in the surrounding area; the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or offset any significant

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:442:significance. Opportunities for the mitigation of any adverse effects and the enhancement of positive effects

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:455:Mitigation and residual impacts

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:455:Mitigation and residual impacts

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:456:Mitigation measures and residual impacts

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:456:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:459:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:460: • contribute to the mitigation of GHG emissions and support sustainable development;

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:460: • transparent reporting of information on mitigation, adaptation and support which undergoes

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:461:GHG emissions by 34%, relative to a 1990 baseline by 2020 and by 80% in 2050 (“climate mitigation”). The

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:463: d. ensuring opportunities to contribute to the mitigation of flooding elsewhere are taken;

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:463:2.56 The NPPF states that planning should proactively help the mitigation of, and adaption to, climate

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:472:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:472:developed. However, potential mitigation measures to reduce GHG emissions from construction phase

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:472:Furthermore, some of the mitigation measures to minimise air pollutant emissions during construction, listed

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:473:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:476:contact. The assessment concludes that with the adoption of embedded mitigation (i.e. implementation of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486: noise during very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487: collision risk from Low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:487:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice. The residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489: resource in whale very low No mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:491:occurring, or where mitigation measures are still operating; and reasonably foreseeable future plans and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:500:assessment of the significance of such impacts and recommendation of appropriate mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:503:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:503:former project, mitigation comprises the use of specialist dredging equipment (i.e. an enclosed grab loading

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:at any location. Additionally, mitigation is outlined for all three schemes which would reduce plume extents

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:additional mitigation measures are identified to reduce any resulting sediment plume as far as possible and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:506:mitigation measures would be incorporated into the design of each and thus remove the potential for

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:507:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no cumulative residual impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:508:mitigation is adopted to reduce the risk of any such impact from occurring. However, there could be the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:510:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511:No mitigation measures are required to reduce the potential disturbance of marine mammals from

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511:lack of suitable habitat within its footprint. The mitigation outlined for the proposed scheme reduces the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511:subject to similar mitigation measures to minimise any potential effects, including reduced vessel speeds,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:511:No additional mitigation is proposed and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:As a more sizable development, the landside EIA proposes a number of mitigation measures including off

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:No mitigation measures are required and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:footprint. The mitigation outlined for the proposed scheme reduces the potential impacts to otter to an

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:an adverse impact to otter, it is assumed they will be subject to similar mitigation measures to minimise any

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:512:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:No mitigation measures are required and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:In the absence of suitable mitigation, this could potentially result in an increased risk to subtidal foraging

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:within the Tees. However, the mitigation measure described for the proposed scheme in Section 12.5.2

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:have a minor impact at worst (with the mitigation measures in place). With mitigation measures in place for

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:513:the SIZ development immediately landward. However, with the mitigation measures outlined in Section

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:mitigation relating to the effect of the loss of intertidal mud specifically in relation to these species is not

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:the risk of such responses being exhibited. However, the mitigation measure described for the proposed

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:project, and other mitigation measures have been proposed for the Anglo American Harbour facilities

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:With mitigation measures in place for all schemes, the combined impact will be reduced as far as possible,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:514:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:515:No further mitigation measures are possible (or necessary). The residual cumulative impact would be minor

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:515:are anticipated to be relatively habituated to such noises, plus the mitigation measures in place will help to

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:515:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:515:No further mitigation measures are possible (or necessary). The residual cumulative impact would be minor

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:515:There is a range of mitigation measures that are typically adopted during construction works to manage the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:No mitigation measures are required beyond those to be embedded into the proposed scheme and those

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:mitigation measures outlined above would be adopted during the operational phase of the proposed scheme

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:No mitigation measures are required beyond those to be embedded into the proposed scheme and those

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:516:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:517:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:517:No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:518:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:518:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:519:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:519:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:519:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:519:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:Mitigation measures and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:No mitigation measures. There would be a substantial beneficial residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:520:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:521:Mitigation and residual impact

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:524: The generic mitigation measures deemed applicable to this waterbody Measures are included in the assessment alongside

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:524: bank, Preserve or restore habitats. guidance mitigation measures table for the Tees.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:524: Mention of various reports to inform mitigation to address WFD issues of these reports is being fed into the developing

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:526: Mitigation measures (taken from

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:526: Mitigation measures provided by the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:528:and jetties WFD mitigation measures identified for only. be disposed of on land

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:528:C2 Capital dredging hydromorphology and WFD mitigation are no higher sensitivity water quality due to

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:528:blanket hydromorphology. WFD mitigation no higher sensitivity on the seabed however

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:528:quay effects in relation to WFD mitigation therefore there would be require piling on land.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:529: mitigation measures also scoped in. intertidal and subtidal

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:529:water mitigation measures identified for the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:530: • For C2 - Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures, biology (fish and habitats) and water

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:530: • For C4 – RBMP mitigation measures.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:530: • For C5 – Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures, Groundwater – chemical quality

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:530: • For O1 - Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures assessment.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:530:Table 28.6 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:530: RBMP mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:539:28.5.5 River Basin Management Plan mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:539:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:539:Table 28.8 Summary of mitigation measures and assessment (taken from Clearing the Waters for All,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:539: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:539: Dredging would be managed in line with mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:540: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:540:Table 28.9 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:540: RBMP mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:540:28.6.2 RBMP mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:540:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:540:Table 28.10 Summary of mitigation measures and assessment (taken from Clearing the Waters for All,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:540: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:540: mitigation measure.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:541: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:541: Retime dredging or disposal Riverbank excavation would not impact on these mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:541:Table 28.11 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542: Water body Quality elements mitigation Protected Areas

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542:28.7.2 RBMP mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542:Table 28.12 Summary of RBMP mitigation measures and assessment

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542: Mitigation measure Assessment

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542: effect on this mitigation measure is not predicted.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:542: these mitigation measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:Cefas Action Level 2 concentrations), additional mitigation measures would be implemented to reduce the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:545:proposed project both include mitigation measures to dredge in long strips to reduce the effects of sediment

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:549:would require site characterisation and remediation/ mitigation (such as piling risk assessments to be

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:549: • Surface waters: Hydromorphology (including the RBMP mitigation measures assessment)

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:549:Biodiversity Strategy. This will also support the implementation of the RBMP mitigation measures identified

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:549:suspended sediment thus reducing the risk of significant water quality effects. Mitigation measures to

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:549:in potentially contaminated soils. Effective mitigation measures to ensure contamination is managed and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:550:projects would occur at the same time. Mitigation measures such as dredging in long strips as required for

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:550:A non-temporary deterioration in WFD quality elements was therefore not identified. Additionally, mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:550:is considered to be supportive of the implementation of the RBMP mitigation measures around ecological

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:551: projects. Where there are adverse impacts, an assessment of mitigation options is carried out to

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:551: determine adverse effect on the integrity of the site. If these mitigation options cannot avoid adverse

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:552:reduce the harmful effects of the plan or project on that site”. As such, no such mitigation measures have

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:561: scheme subject to appropriate mitigation being

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:561: known as well as adoption of all mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:567: R/2016/0663/OOM for up to 550 residential units with associated granted October 2019 adoption of mitigation, including the provision of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:567: consented residential development, the mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:575:With the application of mitigation in the form of ensuring that the capital dredging transects run along the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:575:With mitigation in place, the predicted impacts on fish as a result of SSC increases are predicted to manifest

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:576:With mitigation in place, the predicted impacts on fish as a result of underwater noise is again predicted to

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:577:e.g. pile driving). With the incorporation of the mitigation measures detailed in Section 12.5.4 (i.e.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:577:The Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit, developed by Cutts et al. (2013), provides noise level

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:578:with the implication of mitigation measures set out in Sections 12.5.4 and 12.6.3 (i.e. sympathetic placement

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:582:Without mitigation in place, the construction phase of the proposed scheme may result in redistribution of

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:583:mitigation measures will be in place and noise levels within the SPA would be less than 50dB(A) (i.e. below

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:583:proposed scheme and lies outwith the 300m threshold stated within the Waterbird Disturbance & Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:584:It should be noted that the mitigation measures described for the proposed scheme in Section 12.5.2 (i.e.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:584:in the water column. With mitigation measures in place for all schemes, the combined impact will be reduced

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:588:Caltrans (2015). Technical Guidance for Assessment and Mitigation of the Hydroacoustic Effects of Pile

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:589:Cutts, N. Hemmingway, K. & Spencer, J. (2013). Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit Informing

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:589:Dean, M., Strachan, R., Gow, D. and Andrews, R. (2016). The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:589:Mammal Society Mitigation Guidance Series). Eds Fiona Mathews and Paul Chanin. The Mammal

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:590:English Nature (2001) Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:594:Natural England (2014) Otters: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:594:Natural England (2015) Badgers: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:594:Natural England (2015) Bats: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:595:Natural England (2015) Great crested newts: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:595:Natural England (2015). Invertebrates: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:595:Natural England, (2015). Reptiles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_main body-8.pdf:595:Natural England, (2015). Water voles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:125:with noise mitigation values. Supported by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:126:8 Caltrans (2015). Technical guidance for assessment and mitigation of the hydroacoustics effects of pile driving

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:133:PD Teesport has effectively implemented a suite of embedded mitigation measures ensuring that the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:133:risk profile remains at acceptable levels. Compliance with embedded mitigation and regulations

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:134:Possible additional mitigation measures were identified to further reduce risk which are outlined

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:135:5 Embedded Mitigation ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 32

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:135: Construction Phase – Baseline With Embedded Mitigation …………………………………….. 36

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:135: Operation Phase - Baseline With Embedded Mitigation………………………………………….. 38

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:137:Table 12: Embedded Mitigation Measures ………………………………………………………………………………. 32

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:137: Construction Phase Risk Assessment Hazard Log – Baseline with Embedded Mitigation C-

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:137: Operation Phase Risk Assessment Hazard Log – Baseline with Embedded Mitigation . D-1

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:137:Mitigation ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. E-1

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:137:Mitigation ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. F-1

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:170:5 EMBEDDED MITIGATION

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:170:Embedded mitigation measures describe those measures to which adherence is required by regulation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:170:/ are already enforced by the local SHA. Embedded mitigation measures are assumed to be in place

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:170:prior to assessment. Table 12 lists embedded mitigation measures considered within this NRA.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:170:Table 12: Embedded Mitigation Measures

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:173:re-assessed applying proposed possible additional mitigation measures (Section 8.4) to assess the

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:174: CONSTRUCTION PHASE – BASELINE WITH EMBEDDED MITIGATION

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:176: OPERATION PHASE - BASELINE WITH EMBEDDED MITIGATION

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:180:Table 17 provides a description of each of the proposed mitigation measures. The individual hazards

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:180:control measures and procedures by PD Ports), the recommended additional mitigation measures are

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:185:mitigation measures ensuring that the risk profile remains at acceptable levels.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:185:contained assuming compliance with embedded mitigation and regulations covering movements,

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:185:The possible additional mitigation measures identified are largely to protect third party property, for

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:192: 8 - 10 High Risk A level requiring immediate mitigation.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:205: • Existing mitigation measures enacted by the Tees Port should be

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:205: • Marico – Mitigation will be proposed during the assessment – lighting at

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:206: Baseline with Embedded Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:222: – Baseline with Embedded Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:238: Residual with Possible Additional Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:254: Residual with Possible Additional Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:293:dust impacts before the implementation of mitigation measures. The assigned risk categories may be

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:296:activity (demolition, earthworks, construction and trackout) before mitigation is applied should be determined

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:297:Step 3: Site-Specific Mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:297:Step three of the IAQM guidance identifies appropriate site-specific mitigation. These measures are related

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:297:With the implementation of the relevant mitigation measures, the residual impacts from the construction are

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:346:7.1 Design mitigation 27

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:348: • inform potential mitigation options related to resistance and resilience measures.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:362:all sources of flooding, any mitigation measures required to ensure a safe development in a 1 in 200 year

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:374:with modelled water levels. Residual risk may remain after flood management or mitigation measures have

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:374:with appropriate mitigation measures also discussed.

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:374:7.1 Design mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:384:use as your activity hydromorphological parameters of the estuary or stop the mitigation measures identified for

MLA_2020_00507-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA Report_Appendices_Part2-4.pdf:397:use as your activity below) would not impact on the mitigation measures identified for this water body.

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:8:compromise the mitigation measures in place for the water body.

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:No mitigation measures are required.

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:13:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:16:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:16:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:16:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:16:Mitigation measures are outlined in the EIA Report.

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:16:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:Mitigation measures are detailed in the supporting EIA Report.

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:18:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:21:Proposed mitigation

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:21:You should detail the mitigation you propose in response to the potential impacts. This should include a detailed

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:21:explanation of the mitigation measure and evidence to demonstrate that the mitigation is likely to be successful. If

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:21:Mitigation measures are outlined in the EIA Report.

MLA_2020_00507-APPLICATION-FORM.pdf:22:You should detail the residual risks from the activity following the mitigation. This should include an assessment of

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:3:3.12 Embedded mitigation measures 20

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:12:mitigation measures are defined. The residual impacts (potential impacts remaining assuming the proposed

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:12:mitigation measures are effectively implemented) are then assessed.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:28:3.12 Embedded mitigation measures

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:29:built into the proposed scheme as embedded mitigation.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:42: • The generic approach taken to the derivation of mitigation measures and the assessment of residual

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:43: • The identification of mitigation measures (where required) to reduce the significance of, or avoid,

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:43: • The evaluation of impacts, post-mitigation, to determine the significance of residual impacts.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:47:significance (as defined above); albeit that appropriate mitigation, where available, should be sought for all

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:Mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:Mitigation measures have been proposed, where available and practical, in those cases where adverse

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:impacts have been identified. It is important to note that the mitigation measures applied should be

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:‘Mitigation through design’ is an important factor in ensuring that the environmental impacts of a proposed

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:engineering and environmental impact studies, mitigation has been built into the design of the proposed

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:scheme. Where significant impacts potentially remain, further issue-specific mitigation measures are

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:industry standard or ‘embedded’ mitigation often applies in these cases (and is set out herein). It is also

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:other pressures on a receptor and, in this event, mitigation may be required.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:is relevant to the treatment of mitigation in HRA. The CJEU ruling determined that “…it is not appropriate,

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:the harmful effects…” is interpreted as meaning any mitigation measures that are not clearly an intrinsic part

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:of the design of a plan or project. The effect of this ruling is that mitigation measures, which are not clearly

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:process has identified an adverse impact and mitigation is available (see above). In some cases, in order

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:to ensure that the mitigation measures are successful or where there is significant uncertainty with respect

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:Where further mitigation measures are identified, the significance of the residual environmental impact (i.e.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:48:the post-mitigation impact) is assessed.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:50:additional mitigation. Inter-relationships have been assessed within the relevant sections of the topic

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:53: certain times of the year and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation such addressed in Section

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:142: waters and coastal waters. During the construction, operation and Section 5.6, Paragraph and mitigation measures

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:142: resources and physical characteristics of the water environment as mitigation measures

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:143: impacts will be observed (to water quality), and mitigation may be are assessment and mitigation measures outlined

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:143: Mitigation measures with regard to dredging may be required to manage

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:143: are assessment and mitigation measures outlined

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:143: times of the year and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:162:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:162:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:163:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:163:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:166:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:166:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:167:Overall therefore, the magnitude of effect would be significantly reduced by the proposed mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:167:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:167:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:168:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:168:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:168:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:169:proposed scheme footprint and surrounding area, the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:169: of biodiversity or geological value and soils (in a impacts and subsequent mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:170: such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation are discussed within the land quality

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:172:operational activities. It will also aid in the identification of suitable mitigation measures to provide protection

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:172:identification of suitable preventative measures and mitigation techniques for the construction and

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:186:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:186:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:187:adoption of the embedded mitigation measures outlined in Section 3, including the use of the CEMP. The

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:187:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:187:Following the implementation of these mitigation measures, the magnitude of effect will be very low.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:188:site and task specific health and safety plans. The plan will outline the use of risk mitigation strategies

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:188:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:188:The mitigation measures detailed in Section 16.5 (specifically those associated with the avoidance of

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:188:construction phase dust) would also be applicable to this impact. No further mitigation measures have been

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:189:The sensitivity of the surface water is very high and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is very low

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:189:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:189:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:189:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:190:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:190:Following implementation of the mitigation described above the magnitude of the impact is considered to be

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:191:and biofouling of hulls. Generic project-level mitigation has been put in place to minimise this risk, set out

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:192: be considered, and the mitigation hierarchy used to protect these features. Importance and species of ecological importance

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:192: mitigation and compensation.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:193: appropriate mitigation/compensation can be quantified. structures would have a habitat / species value, or

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:193: step is to fully consider options for mitigation on site prior to compensation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:193: site mitigation.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:193: Habitat Vision that aims to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:194: implement WFD mitigation measures and the applicant should explore

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:210:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:212:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:214:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:214:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:214:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:215:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:215:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:216:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:216:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:218: procedures requiring an EIA and mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:219: habitats will need to be considered, and the mitigation hierarchy used to Section 9 assesses potential impacts on marine

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:219: suitable mitigation and compensation.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:234: very low No mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:235:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:235:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237: very low No mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:237:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239: increased Low No mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:239:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice during construction works.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:240:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241: whale very low No mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:241:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of best practice during maintenance

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:242:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:243:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice. The residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:244: • Restoring at least 15% of degraded ecosystems as a contribution to climate change mitigation and

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:246: • The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The Mammal Society Guidance Series) (Dean et al, 2016);

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:246: • Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines (English Nature, 2001);

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:246: • Otters: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice (Natural

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:246: • Badgers: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:246: • Bats: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice (Natural

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:246: • Great crested newts: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:246: • Invertebrates: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:246: • Reptiles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:246: • Water voles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:247: Natural England advised following the mitigation hierarchy as STDC is in the process of developing a

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:249:a development, once all the appropriate mitigation has been implemented.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:252: through the implementation of mitigation measures or irreversible, when no recovery is possible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:253:mitigation and project commitments made as part of the design process. Where, following this assessment,

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:253:likely significant impacts are identified, additional mitigation measures are then proposed. A final

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:253:assessment of the residual impacts remaining following implementation of these additional mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:254:Following initial assessment, if the impact does not require additional mitigation (or none is possible) the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:254:residual impact will remain the same. If, however, additional mitigation is proposed there will be an

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:254:assessment of the post-mitigation residual impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:261:EP1HS. Consequently, these are considered to be absent and no further surveys and/or mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:261:Therefore, roosting bats are considered to be absent and no further surveys and/or mitigation measures for

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:262:surveys and/or mitigation measures are required. Therefore, badgers are not considered further in this

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:262:and this species is considered to be absent. Therefore, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:263:colonise. Consequently, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are required, and amphibians

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:263:basking, shelter, foraging and/or refuge. Consequently, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:265:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:265:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:266:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:266:Following the implementation of the mitigation measures, the magnitude of impact will be reduced and the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:266:prior to works commencing, to ensure the protection afforded to otters, the agreed mitigation measures and

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:266:Potential effects arising from changes in noise are considered in Section 17, including embedded mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:266:of no adverse significance following embedded mitigation of development of a Marine Pollution Contingency

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:267:implementation of the mitigation outlined in Section 18, there is not anticipated to be a significant impact to

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:267:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:267:The following mitigation is proposed to minimise disturbance of otters from construction activities:

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:267:The following mitigation will be implemented to prevent injury or death to otter should any animal roam in

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:267: • All otter mitigation measures for the site will be agreed with Natural England prior to construction;

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:267: within this area. Consultation will be required with Natural England to discuss the mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:268:Following the implementation of the mitigation measures outlined above, the potential effects to otter are

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:268:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:268:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:268:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:268:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:268:As additional mitigation for hedgehog, any individuals found within the works area will be moved to a safe

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:269:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:269:Following the implementation of mitigation, the impact to commuting bats and otters is anticipated to be of

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:273: consideration should be given to suitable mitigation. The river using the Tees are assessed in

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:296:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:296:by an experienced ornithologist. This mitigation will be included in the CEMP. The residual impact would

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:298:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:298:While the anticipated impact is minor, the following mitigation measure, proposed to reduce the potential for

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:298:With the implementation of the above mitigation measure, the modelled plume would only occupy half of the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:298:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:298:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:301:However, according to the Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013), species such as

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:301:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:301:As mitigation for the potential impact of noise disturbance during the construction phase, it is proposed that

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:301:to the Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013). With this in mind, and considering the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:301:noises at the distances associated with this project, the implementation of the above mitigation measures

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:302:The Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013) categorises visual disturbances into the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:303:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:303:The mitigation measures outlined in Section 12.5.2 would ensure that dredging vessels only operate along

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:304:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:304:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:305:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:305:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:305:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:306:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:306:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:306:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:306:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:309: and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation such as stop start 13.5.1.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:320:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:320:The following mitigation measure is proposed to reduce the potential for impacts on migratory fish from

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:320:With the implementation of the above mitigation measure, water quality will only be impacted on one side

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:320:Mitigation of the plume effects by reducing the size of the TSHD, and thus reducing the rate of overflow, is

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:321:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:321:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:325:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:327:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:327:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:329:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:329:for the proposed scheme, and there is no feasible mitigation measure that can prevent such losses.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:330:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required, although as a matter of course PDT will manage any conflicts through

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:330:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:330:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:331:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:331:No mitigation measures are required; however, in accordance with best practice, lighting would be directed

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:331:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:331:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:335:As detailed in the NRA, a number of embedded mitigation measures are already enforced by PDT which

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:335:(see Appendix 9). These embedded mitigation measures comprise:

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:336:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:336:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:336:As noted above, a number of embedded mitigation measures are already enforced by PDT which have been

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:336:Appendix 9). These embedded mitigation measures which are applicable to the operational phase

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:336:In addition to the above embedded mitigation measures, the following measures are proposed to be adopted

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:337:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:337:No additional mitigation measures are required beyond those detailed above (to be built into the proposed

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:337:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:337:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:338:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:338:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:348: Effective/acceptable mitigation options may still be possible, to offset and / or reduce residual impacts to

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:348: Effective / acceptable mitigation options may still be possible, to offset and / or reduce residual impacts to

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:348: Industry standard mitigation measures may still apply.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:358:HER. With appropriate mitigation, the residual impact will be reduced to minor adverse and not significant

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:358:riverside pumping station will be recorded in advance of demolition in accordance with mitigation measures

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:373:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:373:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:376:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:376:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:380: • any significant air emissions, their mitigation and any residual

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:380: mitigation measures are

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:380: after mitigation methods have been applied; and

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:380: • measures to be employed in preventing or mitigating the mitigation measures.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:383:3) Determine site specific mitigation; and

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:383:4) Examine the residual effects to determine whether or not additional mitigation is required.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:383:of impacts prior to mitigation. Once appropriate mitigation measures were identified, the significance of

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:389:construction and trackout is used to recommend appropriate mitigation measures. The dust magnitude for

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:391:Table 18.9 to determine the risk of impacts with no mitigation applied. The risks concluded for dust soiling

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:391:Table 18.10 Summary of risk table to define site-specific mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:392:18.4.1.5 Step 3: Site-specific mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:392:Step three of the IAQM guidance (IAQM, 2016) identifies appropriate site-specific mitigation. These

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:392:without the implementation of mitigation measures. Additional guidance has been provided by the IAQM in

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:392:relation to dust and air mitigation measures. It is recommended that the good practice measures outlined

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:392:Highly recommended mitigation measures

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:392:A list of mitigation measures that are highly recommended for a high risk site by the IAQM, as determined

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:392:by Step 2 of the construction dust and particulate matter assessment, is provided below. The mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:392:mitigation measures listed in the guidance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:393: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:394:With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, the residual impacts from the construction phase

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:399:considerations. In such cases appropriate mitigation will be required. Landscapes designated at a national

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:414:19.5.1 Mitigation measures

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:414:Woodland, tree and shrub planting is a typical mitigation measure used to screen development and improve

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:424:to consider all sources of flooding, any mitigation measures required to ensure a safe development in a 1 in

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:433:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:433:comparable with the existing. No further mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:433:users is high magnitude. Therefore, without the implementation of mitigation measures the impact is of

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:433:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:433:implementation of the following mitigation measures:

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:434:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:434:once operational. No further mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact with

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:434:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:434:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:435:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:435:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:436:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:436:No mitigation measures are required in regard to the impact of swell waves or locally generated waves. The

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:442:exist in the surrounding area; the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or offset any significant

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:442:significance. Opportunities for the mitigation of any adverse effects and the enhancement of positive effects

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:455:Mitigation and residual impacts

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:455:Mitigation and residual impacts

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:455:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:456:Mitigation measures and residual impacts

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:456:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:458:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:458:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:459:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:459:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:460: • contribute to the mitigation of GHG emissions and support sustainable development;

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:460: • transparent reporting of information on mitigation, adaptation and support which undergoes

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:461:GHG emissions by 34%, relative to a 1990 baseline by 2020 and by 80% in 2050 (“climate mitigation”). The

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:463: d. ensuring opportunities to contribute to the mitigation of flooding elsewhere are taken;

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:463:2.56 The NPPF states that planning should proactively help the mitigation of, and adaption to, climate

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:472:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:472:developed. However, potential mitigation measures to reduce GHG emissions from construction phase

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:472:Furthermore, some of the mitigation measures to minimise air pollutant emissions during construction, listed

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:473:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:476:contact. The assessment concludes that with the adoption of embedded mitigation (i.e. implementation of

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:477:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:477:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:477:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:479:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:479:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:482:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:482:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:484:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:484:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:484:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486: noise during very low No mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:486:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487: collision risk from Low No mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:487:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice. The residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:488:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489: resource in whale very low No mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:489:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:491:occurring, or where mitigation measures are still operating; and reasonably foreseeable future plans and

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:500:assessment of the significance of such impacts and recommendation of appropriate mitigation measures

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:503:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:503:former project, mitigation comprises the use of specialist dredging equipment (i.e. an enclosed grab loading

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:506:at any location. Additionally, mitigation is outlined for all three schemes which would reduce plume extents

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:506:additional mitigation measures are identified to reduce any resulting sediment plume as far as possible and

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:506:mitigation measures would be incorporated into the design of each and thus remove the potential for

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:507:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:507:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no cumulative residual impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:508:mitigation is adopted to reduce the risk of any such impact from occurring. However, there could be the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:510:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511:No mitigation measures are required to reduce the potential disturbance of marine mammals from

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511:lack of suitable habitat within its footprint. The mitigation outlined for the proposed scheme reduces the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511:subject to similar mitigation measures to minimise any potential effects, including reduced vessel speeds,

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:511:No additional mitigation is proposed and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:512:As a more sizable development, the landside EIA proposes a number of mitigation measures including off

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:512:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:512:No mitigation measures are required and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:512:footprint. The mitigation outlined for the proposed scheme reduces the potential impacts to otter to an

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:512:an adverse impact to otter, it is assumed they will be subject to similar mitigation measures to minimise any

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:512:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:513:No mitigation measures are required and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:513:In the absence of suitable mitigation, this could potentially result in an increased risk to subtidal foraging

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:513:within the Tees. However, the mitigation measure described for the proposed scheme in Section 12.5.2

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:513:have a minor impact at worst (with the mitigation measures in place). With mitigation measures in place for

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:513:the SIZ development immediately landward. However, with the mitigation measures outlined in Section

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:514:mitigation relating to the effect of the loss of intertidal mud specifically in relation to these species is not

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:514:the risk of such responses being exhibited. However, the mitigation measure described for the proposed

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:514:project, and other mitigation measures have been proposed for the Anglo American Harbour facilities

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:514:With mitigation measures in place for all schemes, the combined impact will be reduced as far as possible,

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:514:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:515:No further mitigation measures are possible (or necessary). The residual cumulative impact would be minor

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:515:are anticipated to be relatively habituated to such noises, plus the mitigation measures in place will help to

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:515:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:515:No further mitigation measures are possible (or necessary). The residual cumulative impact would be minor

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:515:There is a range of mitigation measures that are typically adopted during construction works to manage the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:No mitigation measures are required beyond those to be embedded into the proposed scheme and those

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:mitigation measures outlined above would be adopted during the operational phase of the proposed scheme

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:No mitigation measures are required beyond those to be embedded into the proposed scheme and those

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:516:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:517:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:517:No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:518:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:518:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:519:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:519:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:519:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:519:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:520:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:520:No mitigation measures. There would be a substantial beneficial residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:520:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:520:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:520:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:520:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:520:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:520:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:521:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:521:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:524: The generic mitigation measures deemed applicable to this waterbody Measures are included in the assessment alongside

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:524: bank, Preserve or restore habitats. guidance mitigation measures table for the Tees.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:524: Mention of various reports to inform mitigation to address WFD issues of these reports is being fed into the developing

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:526: Mitigation measures (taken from

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:526: Mitigation measures provided by the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:528:and jetties WFD mitigation measures identified for only. be disposed of on land

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:528:C2 Capital dredging hydromorphology and WFD mitigation are no higher sensitivity water quality due to

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:528:blanket hydromorphology. WFD mitigation no higher sensitivity on the seabed however

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:528:quay effects in relation to WFD mitigation therefore there would be require piling on land.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:529: mitigation measures also scoped in. intertidal and subtidal

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:529:water mitigation measures identified for the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:530: • For C2 - Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures, biology (fish and habitats) and water

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:530: • For C4 – RBMP mitigation measures.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:530: • For C5 – Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures, Groundwater – chemical quality

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:530: • For O1 - Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures assessment.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:530:Table 28.6 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:530: RBMP mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:539:28.5.5 River Basin Management Plan mitigation measures

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:539:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:539:Table 28.8 Summary of mitigation measures and assessment (taken from Clearing the Waters for All,

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:539: Mitigation measure Assessment

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:539: Dredging would be managed in line with mitigation measures

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:540: Mitigation measure Assessment

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:540:Table 28.9 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:540: RBMP mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:540:28.6.2 RBMP mitigation measures

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:540:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:540:Table 28.10 Summary of mitigation measures and assessment (taken from Clearing the Waters for All,

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:540: Mitigation measure Assessment

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:540: mitigation measure.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:541: Mitigation measure Assessment

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:541: Retime dredging or disposal Riverbank excavation would not impact on these mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:541:Table 28.11 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:542: Water body Quality elements mitigation Protected Areas

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:542:28.7.2 RBMP mitigation measures

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:542:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:542:Table 28.12 Summary of RBMP mitigation measures and assessment

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:542: Mitigation measure Assessment

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:542: effect on this mitigation measure is not predicted.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:542: these mitigation measures

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:545:Cefas Action Level 2 concentrations), additional mitigation measures would be implemented to reduce the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:545:proposed project both include mitigation measures to dredge in long strips to reduce the effects of sediment

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:549:would require site characterisation and remediation/ mitigation (such as piling risk assessments to be

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:549: • Surface waters: Hydromorphology (including the RBMP mitigation measures assessment)

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:549:Biodiversity Strategy. This will also support the implementation of the RBMP mitigation measures identified

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:549:suspended sediment thus reducing the risk of significant water quality effects. Mitigation measures to

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:549:in potentially contaminated soils. Effective mitigation measures to ensure contamination is managed and

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:550:projects would occur at the same time. Mitigation measures such as dredging in long strips as required for

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:550:A non-temporary deterioration in WFD quality elements was therefore not identified. Additionally, mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:550:is considered to be supportive of the implementation of the RBMP mitigation measures around ecological

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:551: projects. Where there are adverse impacts, an assessment of mitigation options is carried out to

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:551: determine adverse effect on the integrity of the site. If these mitigation options cannot avoid adverse

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:552:reduce the harmful effects of the plan or project on that site”. As such, no such mitigation measures have

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:561: scheme subject to appropriate mitigation being

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:561: known as well as adoption of all mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:567: R/2016/0663/OOM for up to 550 residential units with associated granted October 2019 adoption of mitigation, including the provision of

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:567: consented residential development, the mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:575:With the application of mitigation in the form of ensuring that the capital dredging transects run along the

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:575:With mitigation in place, the predicted impacts on fish as a result of SSC increases are predicted to manifest

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:576:With mitigation in place, the predicted impacts on fish as a result of underwater noise is again predicted to

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:577:e.g. pile driving). With the incorporation of the mitigation measures detailed in Section 12.5.4 (i.e.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:577:The Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit, developed by Cutts et al. (2013), provides noise level

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:578:with the implication of mitigation measures set out in Sections 12.5.4 and 12.6.3 (i.e. sympathetic placement

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:582:Without mitigation in place, the construction phase of the proposed scheme may result in redistribution of

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:583:mitigation measures will be in place and noise levels within the SPA would be less than 50dB(A) (i.e. below

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:583:proposed scheme and lies outwith the 300m threshold stated within the Waterbird Disturbance & Mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:584:It should be noted that the mitigation measures described for the proposed scheme in Section 12.5.2 (i.e.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:584:in the water column. With mitigation measures in place for all schemes, the combined impact will be reduced

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:588:Caltrans (2015). Technical Guidance for Assessment and Mitigation of the Hydroacoustic Effects of Pile

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:589:Cutts, N. Hemmingway, K. & Spencer, J. (2013). Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit Informing

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:589:Dean, M., Strachan, R., Gow, D. and Andrews, R. (2016). The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:589:Mammal Society Mitigation Guidance Series). Eds Fiona Mathews and Paul Chanin. The Mammal

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:590:English Nature (2001) Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:594:Natural England (2014) Otters: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:594:Natural England (2015) Badgers: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:594:Natural England (2015) Bats: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:595:Natural England (2015) Great crested newts: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:595:Natural England (2015). Invertebrates: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:595:Natural England, (2015). Reptiles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084_R-2020-0371-SCP-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_EIA_Report_main_body-from-gov-uk.pdf:595:Natural England, (2015). Water voles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:3: that all practicable mitigation is taken to achieve good ecological potential. The

R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:3: generic mitigation measures deemed applicable to this waterbody include,

R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:3:supporting Mitigation Measures Assessment element of the WFD classification. The

R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:3:Good Ecological Potential (GEP) through putting in place mitigation measures. The

R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:3:the estuary, however, the applicant should expect that additional mitigation will be

R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:adverse impacts will be observed, and suggested mitigation may be required, such as

R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:habitats will need to be considered, and the mitigation hierarchy used to protect these

R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:of these habitats will require a habitat regulations assessment and suitable mitigation and

R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:5:mitigation/compensation can be quanitfied.

R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:5:to certain times of the year and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation such as

R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:5:Mitigation on site

R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:6:initial step is to fully consider options for mitigation on site prior to compensation off-site.

R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:6:will provide an opportunity for some on-site mitigation.

R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:6:aims to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives. The Tees Rivers Trust are already

R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:6:strategy for the proposal. There are other opportunities to implement WFD mitigation

R-2020-0371-SCP-EA R_2020_0371_SCP 14 August 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:7:mitigation measures that will be implemented to ensure a safe development in a 1 in 200

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:4: • Mitigation.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:6: Cleveland Coast SPA, Ramsar site and SSSI, and should identify mitigation measures as required. This should include impacts on tern prey, intertidal

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:6: Wild Birds Directive activities, particularly during winter months and consideration should be given to suitable mitigation. The river channel is also important for foraging

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:7: developed a Tees Estuary Habitat Vision that aims to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

R-2020-0371-SCP-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106.pdf:13:the significance of heritage assets is appropriately assessed and that mitigation recommendations are both

R-2020-0371-SCP-NEAR.pdf:1:significance of heritage assets is appropriately assessed and that mitigation recommendations are both appropriate

R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:3: mitigation.

R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:3: and should identify such mitigation measures as may be required in order to avoid, minimise

R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:3:proposals for mitigation of any impacts and if appropriate, compensation measures. Contact the

R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:4:results, impact assessments and appropriate accompanying mitigation strategies included as part of

R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:4:standing advice for protected species which includes links to guidance on survey and mitigation.

R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:4:therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation proposals for Habitats and Species

R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:4:  Full details of any mitigation or compensation that might be required.

R-2020-0371-SCP-323395 R_2020_0371_SCP - Natural England.pdf:6:using the biodiversity metric. We advise local planning authorities to follow the mitigation hierarchy,

R-2020-0684-ESM-EA R_2020_0684_ESM 4 March 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:  The details of compensatory habitat where onsite mitigation is demonstrated to

R-2020-0684-ESM-EA R_2020_0684_ESM 4 March 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:The Strategy shall be approved by the Local Planning Authority. The identified mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:3: and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation such as stop start 13.5.1.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:14:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:14:The following mitigation measure is proposed to reduce the potential for impacts on migratory fish from

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:14:With the implementation of the above mitigation measure, water quality will only be impacted on one side

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:14:Mitigation of the plume effects by reducing the size of the TSHD, and thus reducing the rate of overflow, is

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:15:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:15:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would remain of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:19:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:21:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact remains negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:23:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:23:for the proposed scheme, and there is no feasible mitigation measure that can prevent such losses.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required, although as a matter of course PDT will manage any conflicts through

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact will remain negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:25:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required; however, in accordance with best practice, lighting would be directed

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:25:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_13. Fish and fisheries.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:1: • The generic approach taken to the derivation of mitigation measures and the assessment of residual

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2: • The identification of mitigation measures (where required) to reduce the significance of, or avoid,

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:2: • The evaluation of impacts, post-mitigation, to determine the significance of residual impacts.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:6:significance (as defined above); albeit that appropriate mitigation, where available, should be sought for all

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Mitigation measures have been proposed, where available and practical, in those cases where adverse

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:impacts have been identified. It is important to note that the mitigation measures applied should be

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:‘Mitigation through design’ is an important factor in ensuring that the environmental impacts of a proposed

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:engineering and environmental impact studies, mitigation has been built into the design of the proposed

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:scheme. Where significant impacts potentially remain, further issue-specific mitigation measures are

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Whilst mitigation for minor or negligible impacts may not be specifically defined as a matter of course,

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:industry standard or ‘embedded’ mitigation often applies in these cases (and is set out herein). It is also

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:other pressures on a receptor and, in this event, mitigation may be required.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:is relevant to the treatment of mitigation in HRA. The CJEU ruling determined that “…it is not appropriate,

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:the harmful effects…” is interpreted as meaning any mitigation measures that are not clearly an intrinsic part

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:of the design of a plan or project. The effect of this ruling is that mitigation measures, which are not clearly

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Appropriate mitigation measures have been identified and recommended in this EIA Report where the EIA

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:process has identified an adverse impact and mitigation is available (see above). In some cases, in order

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:to ensure that the mitigation measures are successful or where there is significant uncertainty with respect

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:Where further mitigation measures are identified, the significance of the residual environmental impact (i.e.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:7:the post-mitigation impact) is assessed.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_5. Approach to the EIA.pdf:9:additional mitigation. Inter-relationships have been assessed within the relevant sections of the topic

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:4: • Mitigation.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:6: Cleveland Coast SPA, Ramsar site and SSSI, and should identify mitigation measures as required. This should include impacts on tern prey, intertidal

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:6: Wild Birds Directive activities, particularly during winter months and consideration should be given to suitable mitigation. The river channel is also important for foraging

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:7: developed a Tees Estuary Habitat Vision that aims to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-NT-EV-1106_Appendix 2_Scoping note.pdf:13:the significance of heritage assets is appropriately assessed and that mitigation recommendations are both

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:1:and biofouling of hulls. Generic project-level mitigation has been put in place to minimise this risk, set out

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:2: be considered, and the mitigation hierarchy used to protect these features. Importance and species of ecological importance

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:2: mitigation and compensation.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:3: appropriate mitigation/compensation can be quantified. structures would have a habitat / species value, or

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:3: step is to fully consider options for mitigation on site prior to compensation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:3: site mitigation.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:3: Habitat Vision that aims to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:4: implement WFD mitigation measures and the applicant should explore

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:20:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:25:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_9. Marine ecology.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:11:Where potential adverse impacts have been identified, mitigation measures have been recommended to

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:and minor adverse significance to human health. This is on the basis that the embedded mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:13:to the works outlined in the remediation strategy. With implementation of mitigation measures, the residual

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:14:control of spread of non-native plant material. Following the mitigation outlined above, a worst-case impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:15:piling works. Following the implementation of mitigation measures, including shrouding on the piling rigs,

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:15:Tees will fall below significant sensitivity thresholds. With mitigation in place, disturbance impacts are

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:15:works, notably if creating barrier effects that may deter migratory patterns. However, with mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:15:mitigation measures such as creation of new complex habitat within the proposed quay walls via proposed

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:17:no mitigation is proposed prior to the removal of these elements.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:18:construction phase noise levels at the South Tees Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:18:Mitigation and control measures are recommended to minimise the effects of dust and plant emissions

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:19:the construction period. No mitigation measures during the construction phase are required.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:19:assessed as being permanent and negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1108_NTS.pdf:20:body to meet its objectives in the future or compromise the mitigation measures in place for the water body.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:2:occurring, or where mitigation measures are still operating; and reasonably foreseeable future plans and

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:11:assessment of the significance of such impacts and recommendation of appropriate mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:14:Mitigation measures to limit the suspension of sediment and subsequent deposition of sediment during

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:14:former project, mitigation comprises the use of specialist dredging equipment (i.e. an enclosed grab loading

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:at any location. Additionally, mitigation is outlined for all three schemes which would reduce plume extents

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:additional mitigation measures are identified to reduce any resulting sediment plume as far as possible and

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:17:mitigation measures would be incorporated into the design of each and thus remove the potential for

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:18:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no cumulative residual impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:19:mitigation is adopted to reduce the risk of any such impact from occurring. However, there could be the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:21:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required to reduce the potential disturbance of marine mammals from

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22:lack of suitable habitat within its footprint. The mitigation outlined for the proposed scheme reduces the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22:subject to similar mitigation measures to minimise any potential effects, including reduced vessel speeds,

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:22:No additional mitigation is proposed and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:As a more sizable development, the landside EIA proposes a number of mitigation measures including off

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:No mitigation measures are required and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:footprint. The mitigation outlined for the proposed scheme reduces the potential impacts to otter to an

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:an adverse impact to otter, it is assumed they will be subject to similar mitigation measures to minimise any

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:23:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required and the residual cumulative impact would be of minor adverse.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:In the absence of suitable mitigation, this could potentially result in an increased risk to subtidal foraging

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:within the Tees. However, the mitigation measure described for the proposed scheme in Section 12.5.2

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:have a minor impact at worst (with the mitigation measures in place). With mitigation measures in place for

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:24:the SIZ development immediately landward. However, with the mitigation measures outlined in Section

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:mitigation relating to the effect of the loss of intertidal mud specifically in relation to these species is not

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:the risk of such responses being exhibited. However, the mitigation measure described for the proposed

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:project, and other mitigation measures have been proposed for the Anglo American Harbour facilities

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:With mitigation measures in place for all schemes, the combined impact will be reduced as far as possible,

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:25:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:26:No further mitigation measures are possible (or necessary). The residual cumulative impact would be minor

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:26:are anticipated to be relatively habituated to such noises, plus the mitigation measures in place will help to

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:26:No further mitigation measures are possible (or necessary). The residual cumulative impact would be minor

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:26:There is a range of mitigation measures that are typically adopted during construction works to manage the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required beyond those to be embedded into the proposed scheme and those

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:mitigation measures outlined above would be adopted during the operational phase of the proposed scheme

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required beyond those to be embedded into the proposed scheme and those

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:27:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:28:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:28:No mitigation measures are required and there would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:29:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:29:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:30:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:30:No mitigation measures. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:30:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:30:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:No mitigation measures. There would be a substantial beneficial residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:31:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual cumulative impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:32:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_27. Cumulative impact assessment.pdf:32:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual cumulative impact of negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:4: - The details of compensatory habitat where onsite mitigation is

R-2020-0684-ESM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:4: identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible,

R-2020-0684-ESM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:5: mitigation measures identified as part of the assessment shall be

R-2020-0684-ESM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:6: the proposed mitigation measures that no significant long term adverse impacts

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:3:3.12 Embedded mitigation measures 20

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:12:mitigation measures are defined. The residual impacts (potential impacts remaining assuming the proposed

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_1. Introduction.pdf:12:mitigation measures are effectively implemented) are then assessed.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:6:exist in the surrounding area; the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or offset any significant

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:6:significance. Opportunities for the mitigation of any adverse effects and the enhancement of positive effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:19:Mitigation and residual impacts

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:19:Mitigation and residual impacts

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:20:Mitigation measures and residual impacts

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:20:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:23:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_21_Socio-economics.pdf:23:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:4:to consider all sources of flooding, any mitigation measures required to ensure a safe development in a 1 in

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:13:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:13:comparable with the existing. No further mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:13:users is high magnitude. Therefore, without the implementation of mitigation measures the impact is of

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:13:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:13:implementation of the following mitigation measures:

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:14:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:14:once operational. No further mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact with

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:14:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:14:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:15:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:15:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:16:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_20. Flood risk and coastal defence.pdf:16:No mitigation measures are required in regard to the impact of swell waves or locally generated waves. The

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:7:with noise mitigation values. Supported by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 8_Underwater noise assessment.pdf:8:8 Caltrans (2015). Technical guidance for assessment and mitigation of the hydroacoustics effects of pile driving

R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:4:  Mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:5:project on the features of special interest and should identify such mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:6:identify mitigation measures as may be required in order to avoid, minimise or

R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:6:suitable mitigation. In addition, the river channel itself is important for foraging

R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:10:modified waterbody, and as such, requires that all practicable mitigation is taken to

R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:10:achieve good ecological potential. The generic mitigation measures deemed

R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:10:Estuary Habitat Vision that aims to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:11:There are other opportunities to implement WFD mitigation measures and the

R-2020-0684-ESM-EIA_Scoping_Response_EIA201900017_FINAL.pdf:12:impacts on the marine environment would be identified and appropriate mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:10:improvements or mitigation is proposed at junction despite the results of the assessment. Instead, it is claimed

R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:10:has been accepted, and that no physical mitigation or improvements are required on the SRN as part of this

R-2020-0684-ESM-HIGHWAYS ENGLAND.pdf:11:mitigation measures are required. This is a position that we consider can be accepted by Highways England.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:1:proposed scheme footprint and surrounding area, the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:1: of biodiversity or geological value and soils (in a impacts and subsequent mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:2: such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation are discussed within the land quality

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:4:operational activities. It will also aid in the identification of suitable mitigation measures to provide protection

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:4:identification of suitable preventative measures and mitigation techniques for the construction and

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:18:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:18:No mitigation measures are required and residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:19:adoption of the embedded mitigation measures outlined in Section 3, including the use of the CEMP. The

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:19:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:19:Following the implementation of these mitigation measures, the magnitude of effect will be very low.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:20:site and task specific health and safety plans. The plan will outline the use of risk mitigation strategies

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:20:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:20:The mitigation measures detailed in Section 16.5 (specifically those associated with the avoidance of

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:20:construction phase dust) would also be applicable to this impact. No further mitigation measures have been

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:The sensitivity of the surface water is very high and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is very low

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of minor beneficial significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:21:No additional mitigation measures required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:22:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_8. Land quality and geology.pdf:22:Following implementation of the mitigation described above the magnitude of the impact is considered to be

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:1: • Restoring at least 15% of degraded ecosystems as a contribution to climate change mitigation and

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The Mammal Society Guidance Series) (Dean et al, 2016);

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines (English Nature, 2001);

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • Otters: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice (Natural

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • Badgers: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • Bats: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice (Natural

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • Great crested newts: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • Invertebrates: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • Reptiles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:3: • Water voles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing Advice

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:4: Natural England advised following the mitigation hierarchy as STDC is in the process of developing a

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:6:a development, once all the appropriate mitigation has been implemented.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:9: through the implementation of mitigation measures or irreversible, when no recovery is possible

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10:mitigation and project commitments made as part of the design process. Where, following this assessment,

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10:likely significant impacts are identified, additional mitigation measures are then proposed. A final

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:10:assessment of the residual impacts remaining following implementation of these additional mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:11:Following initial assessment, if the impact does not require additional mitigation (or none is possible) the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:11:residual impact will remain the same. If, however, additional mitigation is proposed there will be an

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:11:assessment of the post-mitigation residual impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:18:EP1HS. Consequently, these are considered to be absent and no further surveys and/or mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:18:Therefore, roosting bats are considered to be absent and no further surveys and/or mitigation measures for

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:19:surveys and/or mitigation measures are required. Therefore, badgers are not considered further in this

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:19:and this species is considered to be absent. Therefore, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:20:colonise. Consequently, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are required, and amphibians

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:20:basking, shelter, foraging and/or refuge. Consequently, no further surveys and/or mitigation measures are

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:Following the implementation of the mitigation measures, the magnitude of impact will be reduced and the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:prior to works commencing, to ensure the protection afforded to otters, the agreed mitigation measures and

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:Potential effects arising from changes in noise are considered in Section 17, including embedded mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:23:of no adverse significance following embedded mitigation of development of a Marine Pollution Contingency

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24:implementation of the mitigation outlined in Section 18, there is not anticipated to be a significant impact to

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24:The following mitigation is proposed to minimise disturbance of otters from construction activities:

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24:The following mitigation will be implemented to prevent injury or death to otter should any animal roam in

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24: • All otter mitigation measures for the site will be agreed with Natural England prior to construction;

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:24: within this area. Consultation will be required with Natural England to discuss the mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:Following the implementation of the mitigation measures outlined above, the potential effects to otter are

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:25:As additional mitigation for hedgehog, any individuals found within the works area will be moved to a safe

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_11. Terrestrial ecology.pdf:26:Following the implementation of mitigation, the impact to commuting bats and otters is anticipated to be of

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:12:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:15:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_17. Noise and vibration.pdf:15:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:3:PD Teesport has effectively implemented a suite of embedded mitigation measures ensuring that the

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:3:risk profile remains at acceptable levels. Compliance with embedded mitigation and regulations

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:4:Possible additional mitigation measures were identified to further reduce risk which are outlined

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:5:5 Embedded Mitigation ………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 32

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:5: Construction Phase – Baseline With Embedded Mitigation …………………………………….. 36

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:5: Operation Phase - Baseline With Embedded Mitigation………………………………………….. 38

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:7:Table 12: Embedded Mitigation Measures ………………………………………………………………………………. 32

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:7: Construction Phase Risk Assessment Hazard Log – Baseline with Embedded Mitigation C-

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:7: Operation Phase Risk Assessment Hazard Log – Baseline with Embedded Mitigation . D-1

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:7:Mitigation ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. E-1

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:7:Mitigation ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. F-1

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:40:5 EMBEDDED MITIGATION

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:40:Embedded mitigation measures describe those measures to which adherence is required by regulation

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:40:/ are already enforced by the local SHA. Embedded mitigation measures are assumed to be in place

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:40:prior to assessment. Table 12 lists embedded mitigation measures considered within this NRA.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:40:Table 12: Embedded Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:43:re-assessed applying proposed possible additional mitigation measures (Section 8.4) to assess the

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:44: CONSTRUCTION PHASE – BASELINE WITH EMBEDDED MITIGATION

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:46: OPERATION PHASE - BASELINE WITH EMBEDDED MITIGATION

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:50:Table 17 provides a description of each of the proposed mitigation measures. The individual hazards

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:50:control measures and procedures by PD Ports), the recommended additional mitigation measures are

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:55:mitigation measures ensuring that the risk profile remains at acceptable levels.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:55:contained assuming compliance with embedded mitigation and regulations covering movements,

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:55:The possible additional mitigation measures identified are largely to protect third party property, for

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:62: 8 - 10 High Risk A level requiring immediate mitigation.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:75: • Existing mitigation measures enacted by the Tees Port should be

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:75: • Marico – Mitigation will be proposed during the assessment – lighting at

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:76: Baseline with Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:92: – Baseline with Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:108: Residual with Possible Additional Mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 9_Navigation Risk Assessment.pdf:124: Residual with Possible Additional Mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:1: • contribute to the mitigation of GHG emissions and support sustainable development;

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:1: • transparent reporting of information on mitigation, adaptation and support which undergoes

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:2:GHG emissions by 34%, relative to a 1990 baseline by 2020 and by 80% in 2050 (“climate mitigation”). The

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:4: d. ensuring opportunities to contribute to the mitigation of flooding elsewhere are taken;

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:4:2.56 The NPPF states that planning should proactively help the mitigation of, and adaption to, climate

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:13:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:13:developed. However, potential mitigation measures to reduce GHG emissions from construction phase

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:13:Furthermore, some of the mitigation measures to minimise air pollutant emissions during construction, listed

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_22. Climate change.pdf:14:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:7:NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:7:We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:7:following mitigation measures are required:

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:7:• All environmental mitigation measures identified within the Environmental Statement

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:8: The details of compensatory habitat where onsite mitigation is

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:8:mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible,

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:14:from construction activities without the implementation of mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:14:and para 18.4.1.5 highly recommends Site-specific mitigation measures to be

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:15: Effectiveness of the mitigation strategy set out in the ES

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:15:responses of key consultees and the proposed mitigation strategy informed by

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:16: Mitigation: The scope for incorporating mitigation measures to avoid,

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:16: Residual Effects: Identification of any effects remaining after mitigation.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:21:pathways of contamination and provide suitable mitigation where necessary.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:21:the proposed mitigation measures outlined above to low. Given the sensitivity

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:22:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact are predicted to

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required, and the residual impact is predicted to

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:24:however with the implementation of suitable embed mitigation including a

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:24:proposed that suitable mitigation measures can be put in place at the site

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:25:water is very high and the magnitude of impact following mitigation is very low

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:25:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:25:With regard to groundwater quality no mitigation measures are required and

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:26:Along with the embedded mitigation further mitigation with regard to ground

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:26:concludes that following the implementation of the above mitigation the impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:26:No further mitigation is proposed beyond the implementation of a CEMP and

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:26:No additional mitigation measures required with regard to controlled waters.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:26:No additional mitigation measures required with regard to human health. The

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:26:conditions. It is considered that through the provision of this mitigation of

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:31:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:32:With regard to suspended sediment concentrations no mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:32:No mitigation measures are required with regard to the creation of the habitat

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:32:No mitigation required and the residual impact with regard to flow regime

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:32:No mitigation required and no residual impact with regard to dredging regime

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:32:the assessment of the HRA suitable mitigation is considered necessary to

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:With regard to underwater noise no mitigation measures are required. The

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:With regard to vessel interactions no mitigation measures are required beyond

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:No mitigation measures are required with regard to seal haul-out sites. The

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:No mitigation measures are required with regard to water quality. The residual

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:35:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:39:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:39:No direct mitigation is proposed with regard to the loss of woodland. The

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:39:following the implementation of the mitigation measures, the residual impact is

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:39:A number of mitigation methods are proposed with regard to the impacts on

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:39:implementation of the mitigation measures, the residual impact is of negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:39:No additional mitigation is proposed with regard to loss of foraging and

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:39:With regard to impacts on hedgehog and brown hare, additional mitigation in

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:40:of this mitigation the impact to commuting bats and otters is anticipated to be

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:40:mitigation measures as set out above.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:40:compensation/mitigation that will be required. This has been agreed with both

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:40:mitigation measures being put in place the development has the potential to

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:40:Interest (SSSI) has been notified. The proposed method of mitigation as set

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:44:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:44:With the inclusion of the mitigation the residual impact would

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:44:following mitigation measures is proposed;

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:No mitigation measures are required with regard to deposition on intertidal

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:Mitigation is proposed with regard to piling methods in the form of noise

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:Mitigation with regard to visual disturbance will result from the direction and

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:dredger operates adjacent to the mudflats. Mitigation can also be provided

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:No mitigation is proposed with regard to noise disturbance. The residual

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:No mitigation is proposed with regard to vessel movements. The residual

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:mitigation measures regarding the proposed lighting will further reduce the

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:No mitigation measures are considered necessary with regard to intertidal

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:45:mitigation measures being put in place the development has the potential to

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:46:Interest (SSSI) has been notified. The proposed method of mitigation as set

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:46:suitable mitigation is considered necessary to avoid adverse impacts. The

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:46:suitable mitigation is considered to be;

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:48:most suitable form of mitigation relates to the location of dredging and the axis

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:50:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:50:Mitigation is proposed relating to impacts of dredging on water quality. This

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:50:No mitigation measures are required with regard to entrainment of fish and

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:50:With regard to underwater noise from dredging, the proposed mitigation is

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:50:No mitigation is proposed with regard to noise generated from land side pilling

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:50:Mitigation in the form of verti pools is proposed within the quay wall relating to

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:50:No mitigation is proposed relating to fishing vessels however this will be

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:51:No mitigation measures are required with regard to noise disturbance. The

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:51:With regard to light disturbance no direct mitigation is proposed, however a

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:51:No mitigation measures are required with regard to dredging regime affecting

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:52:mitigation measures that are already enforced by PD Teesport as Harbour

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:52:Master. The embedded mitigation measures set out in the ES include:

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:52:Given the content of the submitted NRA, the embedded mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:53:embedded mitigation measures that are currently enforced by PDT. These

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:53:embedded mitigation measures that are considered appropriate for the

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:54:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:54:development that no mitigation is required and that there would be residual

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:54:The ES concluded that no additional mitigation measures are required beyond

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:57:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:57:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is therefore

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:57:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is therefore

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:58:with the potential for suitable mitigation where required.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:59:mitigation the residual impact can be reduced to minor adverse.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:59:methods of mitigation are also proposed through the ES to limit such impacts.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:60:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:60:suitable mitigation is required in order to retain a record of the structures.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:61:submitted to the RCBC HER. With imposition of the appropriate mitigation,

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:61:No mitigation is proposed with regard to the removal of other buildings and

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:61:No mitigation is proposed with regard to the setting of the Transporter Bridge.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:61:No mitigation proposed

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:64:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:64:With regard to road traffic noise no mitigation is proposed and the residual

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:64:noise no mitigation is proposed and the residual impact would be of negligible

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:64:No mitigation proposed.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:65:the applicant as a means of addressing a number of mitigation scenarios

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:67:specific mitigation is recommended and set out below.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:68:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:68:As set out in the ES at 18.4.1.5, it is considered that site specific mitigation is

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:68:implementation of the above mitigation measures, the residual impacts from

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:69:No mitigation is proposed.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:69:mitigation measures.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:69:from construction activities without the implementation of mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:69:and para 18.4.1.5 highly recommends Site-specific mitigation measures to be

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:74:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:74:No mitigation is proposed with regard to impacts during the construction

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:74:No mitigation is proposed with regard to impacts during the operational phase

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:77:without the implementation of mitigation measures the impact is of major

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:78:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:78:mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:78:need for mitigation. It is considered that this can take many forms including

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:79:that no further mitigation is required and that there would be no residual

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:79:No mitigation required relating to the rest of the estuary and no residual

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:79:No further mitigation is required beyond the final design solution and there

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:79:No mitigation measures are required in regard to the impact of swell waves or

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:84:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:84:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of minor

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:84:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:85:effects from the development, no mitigation measures are proposed.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:87:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:87:suggest a number of mitigation measures that could be implemented to

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:88:implementation of suitable mitigation measures as set out above.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:90:that through the implementation of suitable embedded mitigation in the form of

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:91:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:91:development that no mitigation is required and that there would be residual

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:91:development that no mitigation is required and that there would be residual

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:94:Mitigation and Residual Effects

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:94:of material within the Tees Bay C that no mitigation is required and that there

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:94:of material within the Tees Bay C that no mitigation is required and that there

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:94:of material within the Tees Bay C that no mitigation is required and that there

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:94:of material within the Tees Bay C that no mitigation is required and that there

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:95:cumulative impacts. No additional mitigation is proposed beyond that

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:96:a likely significant effect can be ruled out subject to suitable mitigation. They

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:96:have suggested that the following mitigation measures should be secured by

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:96:In terms of mitigation these matters have been addressed through a suite of

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:97:proposed mitigation measures that no significant long term adverse impacts

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:100: - The details of compensatory habitat where onsite mitigation is

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:100: identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:101: Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the assessment

R-2020-0684-ESM-Officer Report 0684.pdf:102:with the inclusion of the proposed mitigation measures that no significant long

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:4:As detailed in the NRA, a number of embedded mitigation measures are already enforced by PDT which

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:4:(see Appendix 9). These embedded mitigation measures comprise:

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:As noted above, a number of embedded mitigation measures are already enforced by PDT which have been

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:Appendix 9). These embedded mitigation measures which are applicable to the operational phase

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:5:In addition to the above embedded mitigation measures, the following measures are proposed to be adopted

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:No additional mitigation measures are required beyond those detailed above (to be built into the proposed

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_14. Commercial and recreational navigation.pdf:6:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf:1:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_15. Traffic and transport.pdf:1:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:1:dust impacts before the implementation of mitigation measures. The assigned risk categories may be

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:4:activity (demolition, earthworks, construction and trackout) before mitigation is applied should be determined

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:5:Step 3: Site-Specific Mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:5:Step three of the IAQM guidance identifies appropriate site-specific mitigation. These measures are related

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 11_Air quality assessment method.pdf:5:With the implementation of the relevant mitigation measures, the residual impacts from the construction are

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1: waters and coastal waters. During the construction, operation and Section 5.6, Paragraph and mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:1: resources and physical characteristics of the water environment as mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: impacts will be observed (to water quality), and mitigation may be are assessment and mitigation measures outlined

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: Mitigation measures with regard to dredging may be required to manage

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: are assessment and mitigation measures outlined

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:2: times of the year and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:22:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:Overall therefore, the magnitude of effect would be significantly reduced by the proposed mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of minor adverse significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_7. Marine sediment and water quality.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact is predicted to be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:1: projects. Where there are adverse impacts, an assessment of mitigation options is carried out to

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:1: determine adverse effect on the integrity of the site. If these mitigation options cannot avoid adverse

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:2:reduce the harmful effects of the plan or project on that site”. As such, no such mitigation measures have

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:11: scheme subject to appropriate mitigation being

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:11: known as well as adoption of all mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:17: R/2016/0663/OOM for up to 550 residential units with associated granted October 2019 adoption of mitigation, including the provision of

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:17: consented residential development, the mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:25:With the application of mitigation in the form of ensuring that the capital dredging transects run along the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:25:With mitigation in place, the predicted impacts on fish as a result of SSC increases are predicted to manifest

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:26:With mitigation in place, the predicted impacts on fish as a result of underwater noise is again predicted to

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:27:e.g. pile driving). With the incorporation of the mitigation measures detailed in Section 12.5.4 (i.e.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:27:The Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit, developed by Cutts et al. (2013), provides noise level

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:28:with the implication of mitigation measures set out in Sections 12.5.4 and 12.6.3 (i.e. sympathetic placement

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:32:Without mitigation in place, the construction phase of the proposed scheme may result in redistribution of

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:33:mitigation measures will be in place and noise levels within the SPA would be less than 50dB(A) (i.e. below

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:33:proposed scheme and lies outwith the 300m threshold stated within the Waterbird Disturbance & Mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:34:It should be noted that the mitigation measures described for the proposed scheme in Section 12.5.2 (i.e.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_29. Habitats Regulations Assessment.pdf:34:in the water column. With mitigation measures in place for all schemes, the combined impact will be reduced

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:4:7.1 Design mitigation 27

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:6: • inform potential mitigation options related to resistance and resilience measures.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:20:all sources of flooding, any mitigation measures required to ensure a safe development in a 1 in 200 year

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:32:with modelled water levels. Residual risk may remain after flood management or mitigation measures have

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:32:with appropriate mitigation measures also discussed.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1109_Appendix 15_Flood Risk Assessment.pdf:32:7.1 Design mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:1:use as your activity hydromorphological parameters of the estuary or stop the mitigation measures identified for

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 16_WFD scoping tables.pdf:14:use as your activity below) would not impact on the mitigation measures identified for this water body.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:1:Caltrans (2015). Technical Guidance for Assessment and Mitigation of the Hydroacoustic Effects of Pile

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:2:Cutts, N. Hemmingway, K. & Spencer, J. (2013). Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit Informing

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:2:Dean, M., Strachan, R., Gow, D. and Andrews, R. (2016). The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:2:Mammal Society Mitigation Guidance Series). Eds Fiona Mathews and Paul Chanin. The Mammal

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:3:English Nature (2001) Great Crested Newt Mitigation Guidelines

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:7:Natural England (2014) Otters: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:7:Natural England (2015) Badgers: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:7:Natural England (2015) Bats: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England Standing

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:8:Natural England (2015) Great crested newts: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:8:Natural England (2015). Invertebrates: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:8:Natural England, (2015). Reptiles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_30. References.pdf:8:Natural England, (2015). Water voles: surveys and mitigation for development projects. Natural England

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:3: The generic mitigation measures deemed applicable to this waterbody Measures are included in the assessment alongside

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:3: bank, Preserve or restore habitats. guidance mitigation measures table for the Tees.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:3: Mention of various reports to inform mitigation to address WFD issues of these reports is being fed into the developing

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:5: Mitigation measures (taken from

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:5: Mitigation measures provided by the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:7:and jetties WFD mitigation measures identified for only. be disposed of on land

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:7:C2 Capital dredging hydromorphology and WFD mitigation are no higher sensitivity water quality due to

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:7:blanket hydromorphology. WFD mitigation no higher sensitivity on the seabed however

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:7:quay effects in relation to WFD mitigation therefore there would be require piling on land.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:8: mitigation measures also scoped in. intertidal and subtidal

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:8:water mitigation measures identified for the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:9: • For C2 - Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures, biology (fish and habitats) and water

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:9: • For C4 – RBMP mitigation measures.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:9: • For C5 – Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures, Groundwater – chemical quality

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:9: • For O1 - Hydromorphology and RBMP mitigation measures assessment.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:9:Table 28.6 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:9: RBMP mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:18:28.5.5 River Basin Management Plan mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:18:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:18:Table 28.8 Summary of mitigation measures and assessment (taken from Clearing the Waters for All,

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:18: Mitigation measure Assessment

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:18: Dredging would be managed in line with mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:19: Mitigation measure Assessment

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:19:Table 28.9 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:19: RBMP mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:19:28.6.2 RBMP mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:19:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:19:Table 28.10 Summary of mitigation measures and assessment (taken from Clearing the Waters for All,

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:19: Mitigation measure Assessment

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:19: mitigation measure.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:20: Mitigation measure Assessment

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:20: Retime dredging or disposal Riverbank excavation would not impact on these mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:20:Table 28.11 Summary of water bodies, quality elements, RBMP mitigation measures and protected areas

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21: Water body Quality elements mitigation Protected Areas

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21:28.7.2 RBMP mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21:The RBMP mitigation measures identified for the water body in which the activity would occur and the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21:Table 28.12 Summary of RBMP mitigation measures and assessment

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21: Mitigation measure Assessment

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21: effect on this mitigation measure is not predicted.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:21: these mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:Cefas Action Level 2 concentrations), additional mitigation measures would be implemented to reduce the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:24:proposed project both include mitigation measures to dredge in long strips to reduce the effects of sediment

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:28:would require site characterisation and remediation/ mitigation (such as piling risk assessments to be

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:28: • Surface waters: Hydromorphology (including the RBMP mitigation measures assessment)

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:28:Biodiversity Strategy. This will also support the implementation of the RBMP mitigation measures identified

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:28:suspended sediment thus reducing the risk of significant water quality effects. Mitigation measures to

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:28:in potentially contaminated soils. Effective mitigation measures to ensure contamination is managed and

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:29:projects would occur at the same time. Mitigation measures such as dredging in long strips as required for

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:29:A non-temporary deterioration in WFD quality elements was therefore not identified. Additionally, mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_28. Water Framework Directive compliance assessment.pdf:29:is considered to be supportive of the implementation of the RBMP mitigation measures around ecological

R-2020-0684-ESM-Appendix 3_Scoping consultation.pdf:3:to the significance of heritage assets is appropriately assessed and that mitigation recommendations

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:5:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:7:No mitigation measures are required. There would be no residual impact.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9: noise during very low No mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:9:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10: collision risk from Low No mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:10:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice. The residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:11:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12: resource in whale very low No mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_26. Offshore disposal of dredged material.pdf:12:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:4: consideration should be given to suitable mitigation. The river using the Tees are assessed in

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:27:by an experienced ornithologist. This mitigation will be included in the CEMP. The residual impact would

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:While the anticipated impact is minor, the following mitigation measure, proposed to reduce the potential for

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:With the implementation of the above mitigation measure, the modelled plume would only occupy half of the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:29:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact is of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:32:However, according to the Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013), species such as

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:32:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:32:As mitigation for the potential impact of noise disturbance during the construction phase, it is proposed that

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:32:to the Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013). With this in mind, and considering the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:32:noises at the distances associated with this project, the implementation of the above mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:33:The Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit (Cutts et al., 2013) categorises visual disturbances into the

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:34:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:34:The mitigation measures outlined in Section 12.5.2 would ensure that dredging vessels only operate along

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:35:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:36:Mitigation measures for this impact are not considered necessary and the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:While impacts are anticipated to be negligible, the implication of best practice mitigation measures set out

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:Mitigation and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_12. Marine and coastal ornithology.pdf:37:No mitigation measures are considered necessary, therefore the residual impact is negligible.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:6:cause harm to human health or the environment if mitigation measures are not implemented during the re-

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084-RHD-SB-EN-RP-EV-1107_Appendix 7_Land quality desk study.pdf:40: • During construction works appropriate mitigation measures should be put in place to ensure no

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:16: necessary mitigation measures must be secured in advance of the development in order to

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:24: prevent development or require mitigation through the submission of planning applications.

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:25:5.25 Following the mitigation outlined above, a worst-case impact of minor adverse is predicted for

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: proposed piling works. Following the implementation of mitigation measures, including

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: With mitigation in place, disturbance impacts are predicted to be minor adverse, at worst.

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: deter migratory patterns. However, with mitigation measures in place to reduce the magnitude

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:26: fish, however the implementation of mitigation measures such as creation of new complex

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:27: value in themselves and no mitigation is proposed prior to the removal of these elements.

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: the embedded mitigation measures set out in a CEMP would be adhered to, and the measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: strategy. With implementation of mitigation measures, the residual impacts are of minor

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:28: Business Parks would be negligible. No mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:29:5.56 Mitigation and control measures are recommended to minimise the effects of dust and plant

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: measured by Gross Value Added) during the construction period. No mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:30: negligible. No mitigation measures during the operational phase are required.

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:31: Mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:31:5.69 A range of mitigation measures have been identified throughout the ES, some of these, such as

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:31:5.70 With these mitigation measures in place, the ES concluded that there would be no significant

R-2020-0684-ESM-61586 Quay Planning Statement 09-11-20.pdf:31: the ability of the water body to meet its objectives in the future or compromise the mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:14:3.12 Embedded mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_3. Description of the proposed scheme.pdf:15:built into the proposed scheme as embedded mitigation.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Effective/acceptable mitigation options may still be possible, to offset and / or reduce residual impacts to

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Effective / acceptable mitigation options may still be possible, to offset and / or reduce residual impacts to

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:10: Industry standard mitigation measures may still apply.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:20:HER. With appropriate mitigation, the residual impact will be reduced to minor adverse and not significant

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_16. Archaeology and cultural heritage.pdf:20:riverside pumping station will be recorded in advance of demolition in accordance with mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:1:contact. The assessment concludes that with the adoption of embedded mitigation (i.e. implementation of

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required and the residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_25. Health risk assessment.pdf:2:No mitigation measures are required. There would be a residual impact of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:2: procedures requiring an EIA and mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:3: habitats will need to be considered, and the mitigation hierarchy used to Section 9 assesses potential impacts on marine

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:3: suitable mitigation and compensation.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:18: very low No mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:19:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:19:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21: very low No mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:21:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23: increased Low No mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:23:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice during construction works.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:24:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: Receptor Sensitivity Magnitude Significance Mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25: whale very low No mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:25:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of best practice during maintenance

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:26:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required. The residual impact would be of negligible significance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:Mitigation measures and residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_10. Marine mammals.pdf:27:No mitigation measures are required beyond the implementation of good practice. The residual impact

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:3:considerations. In such cases appropriate mitigation will be required. Landscapes designated at a national

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:18:19.5.1 Mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_19. Landscape and visual.pdf:18:Woodland, tree and shrub planting is a typical mitigation measure used to screen development and improve

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_6. Hydrodynamic and sedimentary regime.pdf:3: certain times of the year and/or providing suitable monitoring and mitigation such addressed in Section

R-2020-0684-ESM-PN 0684.pdf:2:construction activities without the implementation of mitigation measures and para

R-2020-0684-ESM-PN 0684.pdf:2:18.4.1.5 highly recommends Site-specific mitigation measures to be incorporated

R-2020-0684-ESM-336521 R_2020_0684_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 1.pdf:1: NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2020-0684-ESM-336521 R_2020_0684_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 1.pdf:1: We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2020-0684-ESM-336521 R_2020_0684_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 1.pdf:1: mitigation measures are required:

R-2020-0684-ESM-336521 R_2020_0684_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 1.pdf:1: • All environmental mitigation measures identified within the Environmental Statement must

R-2020-0684-ESM-336521 R_2020_0684_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 1.pdf:2:all mitigation measures are appropriately secured in any planning permission given

R-2020-0684-ESM-336521 R_2020_0684_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 1.pdf:2:Further advice on mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-336521 R_2020_0684_ESM - Demolition of existing quay, capital dredge and development of new quay at South Bank Wharf, Grangetown, Redcar - Phase 1.pdf:3:to follow the mitigation hierarchy as set out in paragraph 175 of the NPPF and firstly consider what

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:3: • any significant air emissions, their mitigation and any residual

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:3: mitigation measures are

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:3: after mitigation methods have been applied; and

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:3: • measures to be employed in preventing or mitigating the mitigation measures.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:6:3) Determine site specific mitigation; and

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:6:4) Examine the residual effects to determine whether or not additional mitigation is required.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:6:of impacts prior to mitigation. Once appropriate mitigation measures were identified, the significance of

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:12:construction and trackout is used to recommend appropriate mitigation measures. The dust magnitude for

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14:Table 18.9 to determine the risk of impacts with no mitigation applied. The risks concluded for dust soiling

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:14:Table 18.10 Summary of risk table to define site-specific mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:18.4.1.5 Step 3: Site-specific mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:Step three of the IAQM guidance (IAQM, 2016) identifies appropriate site-specific mitigation. These

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:without the implementation of mitigation measures. Additional guidance has been provided by the IAQM in

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:relation to dust and air mitigation measures. It is recommended that the good practice measures outlined

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:Highly recommended mitigation measures

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:A list of mitigation measures that are highly recommended for a high risk site by the IAQM, as determined

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:by Step 2 of the construction dust and particulate matter assessment, is provided below. The mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:15:mitigation measures listed in the guidance.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:16: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate.

R-2020-0684-ESM-PC1084_RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-1100_18. Air quality.pdf:17:With the implementation of the above mitigation measures, the residual impacts from the construction phase

R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:3:modified waterbody, and as such, requires that all practicable mitigation is taken to achieve

R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:3:good ecological potential. The generic mitigation measures deemed applicable to this

R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:3:to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:3:strategy for the proposal. There are other opportunities to implement WFD mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:4:and provide mitigation for the impacts to the Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA and

R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:10:especially during winter months, and consideration should be given to suitable mitigation.

R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:10:and should identify such mitigation measures as may be required in order to avoid, minimise

R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:10:include proposals for mitigation of any impacts and if appropriate, compensation measures.

R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:11:accompanying mitigation strategies included as part of the ES.

R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:11:on survey and mitigation.

R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:11:decisions’. Natural England therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation

R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:12: Full details of any mitigation or compensation that might be required.

R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:17:mitigation measures to address those impacts, and in particular indicate whether in the case

R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:17:of each impact whether mitigation requires preservation in situ of relevant assets or whether

R-2020-0684-ESM-RCBC scoping opinion.pdf:17:some other mitigation of impacts is considered appropriate.

R-2021-0405-FFM-355679 - R_2021_0405_FFM Engineering operations associated with ground remediation and preparation at Land at South Bank South Industrial Zone Redcar - No Objs Sub Mit.pdf:1: NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2021-0405-FFM-355679 - R_2021_0405_FFM Engineering operations associated with ground remediation and preparation at Land at South Bank South Industrial Zone Redcar - No Objs Sub Mit.pdf:1: We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2021-0405-FFM-355679 - R_2021_0405_FFM Engineering operations associated with ground remediation and preparation at Land at South Bank South Industrial Zone Redcar - No Objs Sub Mit.pdf:1: mitigation measures are required / or the following mitigation options should be secured:

R-2021-0405-FFM-355679 - R_2021_0405_FFM Engineering operations associated with ground remediation and preparation at Land at South Bank South Industrial Zone Redcar - No Objs Sub Mit.pdf:2:mitigation being secured by a suitably worded planning condition:

R-2021-0405-FFM-355679 - R_2021_0405_FFM Engineering operations associated with ground remediation and preparation at Land at South Bank South Industrial Zone Redcar - No Objs Sub Mit.pdf:4:paragraphs 102d, 118a, 170d, 174b and 175d of the NPPF. We advise you to follow the mitigation

R-2021-0405-FFM-NATURAL HERITAGE 0405.pdf:1:It is important that mitigation measures are followed as per 10.0 EIA. It is also important that a net gain in terms of

R-2021-0405-FFM-EA R_2021_0405_FFM 17 June 2021 OFFICIAL .pdf:1:ensure mitigation for contaminated or poor quality surface water is appropriately

R-2021-0405-FFM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2: works across the site and shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set

R-2021-0405-FFM-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:3:mitigation and other mitigation measures to determine residual effects. It further proposes

R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:3:iii Assessing the significance of any residual effects after mitigation;

R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:20:assessment takes into consideration the embedded mitigation measures. The Stage 2 Appropriate

R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:20:plans or projects’. No additional mitigation measures are required.

R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:20:the embedded mitigation in the application, it is concluded that there would be no effects on

R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:22:9.4 It is assessed that general nesting birds could be harmed – see mitigation below.

R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:23:Invasive Alien Species (Enforcement and Permitting) Order 2019) – see mitigation below.

R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:23:Mitigation measures (including Informatives)

R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:23:on-site mitigation is possible.

R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, EcIA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:23:10.4 Compensation refers to the process by which any residual losses after mitigation will be

R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:4:NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:4:We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:4:following mitigation measures are required / or the following mitigation options should

R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:4:planning authority. The plan shall include detail to ensure mitigation for

R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:9:It is important that mitigation measures are followed as per 10.0 EIA. It is also

R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:15: how the mitigation measures set out in the Ecological Impact

R-2021-0405-FFM-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:16: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, HRA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:6:impacts are anticipated, potential mitigation measures to alleviate impacts should be proposed and

R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, HRA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:10:applied in accordance with protective mitigation measures already provided in the Local Plan (most

R-2021-0405-FFM-210512, HRA for South Bank Site Remediation_INCA_RevA Final.PDF:10:effects on the integrity of any European Sites, taking into account the mitigation measures described

R-2021-0405-FFM-63262_01 - South Bank Remediation Cover Letter - 13.05.21.PDF:5:of development on biodiversity and geodiversity…should be avoided. Where this is not possible mitigation,

R-2021-0405-FFM-63262_01 - South Bank Remediation Cover Letter - 13.05.21.PDF:6:taking into account mitigation, the proposal would not result in adverse effects on the site’s integrity, either

R-2021-0405-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0293-01-South Bank Quay Strategy rev1.PDF:14:mitigation and management strategy.

R-2021-0405-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0293-01-South Bank Quay Strategy rev1.PDF:14:  Compensation is required to offset residual losses after the mitigation through the preparation

R-2021-0405-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0293-01-South Bank Quay Strategy rev1.PDF:19: Identify the requirement for a UXO mitigation strategy.

R-2021-0405-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0293-01-South Bank Quay Strategy rev1.PDF:26:assessment indicates a Medium risk from UXO for borehole and excavation activities. Further mitigation

R-2021-0405-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0293-01-South Bank Quay Strategy rev1.PDF:26:activities such as detailed risk assessment or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the

R-2021-0405-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0293-01-South Bank Quay Strategy rev1.PDF:34:findings of the HRA, any control and mitigation measures identified within it shall be adopted in

R-2021-0405-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0293-01-South Bank Quay Strategy rev1.PDF:35:stream) in order to confirm the assessment of the waste impact and to implement embedded mitigation

R-2021-0405-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0293-01-South Bank Quay Strategy rev1.PDF:35:  Any ecological mitigations required

R-2021-0268-CD-Decision.pdf:2: mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise agreed in writing.

R-2021-0268-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2021-0268-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2021-0268-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2021-0268-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2021-0268-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2021-0268-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2021-0268-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2021-0268-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2021-0268-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2021-0268-CD-Decision Notice.pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2021-0268-CD-Teesworks Southbank Condtion16 Covering letter 2.pdf:1: mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise agreed in writing.

R-2021-0268-CD-OFFICER REPORT.pdf:1:mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise agreed in writing.

R-2022-0526-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2022-0526-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:3: • Where necessary and feasible, propose mitigation for any adverse

R-2022-0526-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2022-0526-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2022-0526-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2022-0526-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:4: details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the assessment

R-2022-0526-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:6: with the approved details and mitigation measures therein, unless otherwise

R-2022-0526-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:7: submitted to and approved by the Local Planning Authority. All mitigation

R-2022-0526-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:7: Planning Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the

R-2022-0526-CD-R 2020 0357 OOM Decision Notice.pdf:8: Any protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:4:6. Mitigation ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 30

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:5: required mitigation measures to minimise impacts.

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:5: and trackout phases. Through good site practice, the implementation of suitable mitigation

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:5: Based upon the above findings it is concluded that site-specific mitigation to protect surrounding

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:7: are identified and the mitigation measures that should be implemented to minimise the impact

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:12: determine the significance of impacts and the likely mitigation measures required to minimise the

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:12: identify mitigation measures associated to the risk classification determined.

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:13: phase of the Proposed Development and determination of subsequent mitigation measures

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:17: case area sensitivity and in the absence of mitigation, for each of the construction related activities

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:17: The IAQM guidelines identify a range of mitigation measures intended to reduce the emission and

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:18: mitigation measures, with the significance of the residual effect based on professional judgement.

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:31: To determine the risk of impacts prior to the implementation of mitigation the dust emission

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:31: and ecological impacts without the implementation of mitigation.

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:31: NRMM have been discounted. However, mitigation measures for NRMM have been identified to

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:32: On this basis, mitigation to protect future users of the Proposed Development from elevated

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:32: traffic on hourly mean NO2 concentrations are negligible, therefore mitigation is not required.

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:32: with the highest predicted concentration being 31.0 μg/m3 at P3. On this basis, mitigation to

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:32: On this basis, mitigation to protect future users of the Proposed Development from elevated

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:33: On this basis, mitigation to protect future users of the Proposed Development from elevated

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:34:6. Mitigation

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:34: Mitigation

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:34: The IAQM guidelines provide an indication of the mitigation measures that would be appropriate

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:34: identified for each of the activities. Consequently, the following mitigation measures should be

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:34: Mitigation measures that are generic to each of the activities, and therefore should be

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:34: Table 6.1, whilst activity specific mitigation measures are identified in Table 6.2.

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:34: Table 6.1 Mitigation to be implemented during the Construction Phase

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:34: Development Mitigation Measure

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:35: Development Mitigation Measure

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:36: Development Mitigation Measure

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:36: matter suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:36: Table 6.2 Activity Specific Mitigation Measures to be implemented during the Construction

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:36: Development Mitigation Measure

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:37: Development Mitigation Measure

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:37: of mitigation measures described above and good side practise is not significant.

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:37: significant and site-specific mitigation in relation to construction traffic is not required. However

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:38: and trackout phases. Through good site practice, the implementation of suitable mitigation

R-2022-0526-CD-AQIA_FINAL.pdf:38: Based upon the above findings it is concluded that site-specific mitigation to protect surrounding

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:8: mining, and any proposals for mitigation including land remediation (as well as potential impacts on the

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:10: • Onshore Unexploded Ordnance Threat and Risk Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy: Net Zero

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:337: STAGE FIVE – RECOMMENDED RISK MITIGATION MEASURES ………………………………………………… 18

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:340: extensive military occupation previously and the quantity of potential UXO encounters, the following risk mitigation

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:340: Recommended Risk Mitigation Measures Overview – All Areas

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:340: Plan Briefing Mitigation)

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:340: Plan Briefing Mitigation)

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:340: A full and detailed guide to the recommended risk mitigation measures is presented at Section 5 of this report.

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:341: proportional UXO risk mitigation strategy in circumstances where the SQRA evidences that further action is necessary

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:341: If intolerable UXO risks are identified, the methods of mitigation we have recommended are considered reasonable

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:341: risk mitigation, but that any mitigation must demonstrate that it is beneficial. Any additional mitigation that delivers

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:342: so that the prospective UXO risks and the associated risk mitigation methodology might be re-assessed. Certain

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:350: 3. The expenditure of additional risk mitigation resources and EOD clearance;

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:351: Implementation of Risk Mitigation in UXO Risk Zones

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:351: The UXO risk mitigation strategy has been refined to reflect the varying level of UXO risk across the Study Site and

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:351: consequently, the recommended risk mitigation measures will be specific to the level of assessed UXO risk in each

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:351: zone. The UXO risk mitigation strategy is outlined and presented at Stage 5.

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:354: STAGE FIVE – RECOMMENDED RISK MITIGATION MEASURES

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:354: Non-Intrusive Methods of Mitigation – Magnetometer results may be affected by ferro-magnetic contamination due

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:354: Intrusive Methods of Mitigation – Intrusive magnetometry may be effective on this Study Site, prior to boreholing

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:354: Mitigation Measures to Reduce Risk to ‘ALARP’

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-04-Land West of Warrenby Redcar.pdf:354: Activity Risk Mitigation Measures

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:26: Future Made Ground Overall risks low, suitable mitigation

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:28:enable assessment if potential pollutant linkages do exist and recommendations for further works / mitigations

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:319: STAGE FIVE – RECOMMENDED RISK MITIGATION MEASURES ………………………………………………… 18

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:322: extensive military occupation previously and the quantity of potential UXO encounters, the following risk mitigation

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:322: Recommended Risk Mitigation Measures Overview – All Areas

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:322: Plan Briefing Mitigation)

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:322: Plan Briefing Mitigation)

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:322: A full and detailed guide to the recommended risk mitigation measures is presented at Section 5 of this report.

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:323: proportional UXO risk mitigation strategy in circumstances where the SQRA evidences that further action is necessary

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:323: If intolerable UXO risks are identified, the methods of mitigation we have recommended are considered reasonable

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:323: risk mitigation, but that any mitigation must demonstrate that it is beneficial. Any additional mitigation that delivers

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:324: so that the prospective UXO risks and the associated risk mitigation methodology might be re-assessed. Certain

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:332: 3. The expenditure of additional risk mitigation resources and EOD clearance;

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:333: Implementation of Risk Mitigation in UXO Risk Zones

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:333: The UXO risk mitigation strategy has been refined to reflect the varying level of UXO risk across the Study Site and

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:333: consequently, the recommended risk mitigation measures will be specific to the level of assessed UXO risk in each

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:333: zone. The UXO risk mitigation strategy is outlined and presented at Stage 5.

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:336: STAGE FIVE – RECOMMENDED RISK MITIGATION MEASURES

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:336: Non-Intrusive Methods of Mitigation – Magnetometer results may be affected by ferro-magnetic contamination due

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:336: Intrusive Methods of Mitigation – Intrusive magnetometry may be effective on this Study Site, prior to boreholing

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:336: Mitigation Measures to Reduce Risk to ‘ALARP’

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0520-01-Land West of Warrenby Redcar Preliminary Risk Assessment.pdf:336: Activity Risk Mitigation Measures

R-2022-0755-CD-Aug 22 - CEMP - Land West of Warrenby - Site Preparation Remediation Works.pdf:13:Working hours, plant types, construction methods and noise mitigation measures may be issues.

R-2022-0755-CD-Aug 22 - CEMP - Land West of Warrenby - Site Preparation Remediation Works.pdf:16:the construction phase of the project, mitigation measures will be implemented as part of a Traffic

R-2022-0755-CD-Aug 22 - CEMP - Land West of Warrenby - Site Preparation Remediation Works.pdf:21:The following mitigation will be incorporated in order to prevent significant effects to breeding

R-2022-0755-CD-Aug 22 - CEMP - Land West of Warrenby - Site Preparation Remediation Works.pdf:21: to propose suitable mitigation immediately, which may ultimately involve screening.

R-2022-0755-CD-Aug 22 - CEMP - Land West of Warrenby - Site Preparation Remediation Works.pdf:21:the mitigation measures in Section 4.5 – Water Quality, 4.10 – Material Storage and Pollution

R-2022-0755-CD-Aug 22 - CEMP - Land West of Warrenby - Site Preparation Remediation Works.pdf:21:the mitigation measures in Section 4.5 – Water Quality, 4.10 – Material Storage and Pollution

R-2022-0755-CD-Aug 22 - CEMP - Land West of Warrenby - Site Preparation Remediation Works.pdf:22:the mitigation measures in Section 4.5 – Water Quality, 4.10 – Material Storage and Pollution

R-2022-0755-CD-63262 Covering Letter NZT DoC 13.09.22.pdf:1:shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set out in the Ecological Impact Assessment, INCA,

R-2022-0755-CD-63262 Covering Letter NZT DoC 13.09.22.pdf:1: construction works, including any details of any mitigation measures required;

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-04-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:7: It is expected that any risks associated with ground gas, and subsequent mitigation

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-04-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:7: best practice and employment of suitable mitigation measures which would be considered

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-04-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:13: mining, and any proposals for mitigation including land remediation (as well as potential impacts on the

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-04-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:14:based on the measured concentrations of CoC encountered, provided that mitigation measures were put in

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-04-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:15:• Onshore Unexploded Ordnance Threat and Risk Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy: Net Zero

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-04-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:33: gas, and subsequent mitigation measures required (e.g. building controls) would be the responsibility of the

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-04-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:34: suitable mitigation measures which would be considered standard practice in brownfield site redevelopment.

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-04-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:67:It is expected that any risks associated with permanent ground gas, and subsequent in-building mitigation

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0428-04-LWoW_DQRA.pdf:67: suitable mitigation measures which would be considered standard practice in brownfield site redevelopment

R-2022-0755-CD-COMPLIANCE OFFICER REPORT.pdf:1:demonstrate how the mitigation measures set out in the Ecological Impact

R-2022-0755-CD-COMPLIANCE OFFICER REPORT.pdf:1:from construction works, including any details of any mitigation measures required;

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-06-Rem_Strat_LWoW(1).pdf:8: activities such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation including land remediation (as well as

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-06-Rem_Strat_LWoW(1).pdf:11: • Onshore Unexploded Ordnance Threat and Risk Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy:

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-06-Rem_Strat_LWoW(1).pdf:16:The aim of this report is to provide a remedial strategy for the site based on the mitigation of potential

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-06-Rem_Strat_LWoW(1).pdf:19:Risk Assessment with Risk Mitigation Strategy: Net Zero Teesside] completed for the potential Net Zero

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-06-Rem_Strat_LWoW(1).pdf:19:mitigation and management strategy.

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-06-Rem_Strat_LWoW(1).pdf:24:• Development of a UXO mitigation strategy.

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-06-Rem_Strat_LWoW(1).pdf:29:magnetic anomaly was detected in one location at 11m bgl. Further mitigation activities such as detailed

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-06-Rem_Strat_LWoW(1).pdf:29:risk assessment or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the UXO risk on the site to As

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-06-Rem_Strat_LWoW(1).pdf:37:findings of the HRA, any control and mitigation measures identified within it shall be adopted in relations

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-06-Rem_Strat_LWoW(1).pdf:38:stream) in order to confirm the assessment of the waste impact and to implement embedded mitigation

R-2022-0755-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0417-06-Rem_Strat_LWoW(1).pdf:38: • Any ecological mitigations required

R-2022-0435-CD-Compliance Officer Report 0435.pdf:2:scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation measures to be

R-2022-0435-CD-Compliance Decision Notice 0435(1).pdf:2: detailed scheme, the additional information shall set out those mitigation

R-2022-0435-CD-395126 - R_2022_0435_CD Partial discharge of Condition 6. Land at South Tees Development Corporation, South Bank - No Objections.pdf:2:all mitigation measures are appropriately secured in any planning permission given.

R-2022-0435-CD-395126 - R_2022_0435_CD Partial discharge of Condition 6. Land at South Tees Development Corporation, South Bank - No Objections.pdf:4:NPPF (paragraphs 8, 73, 104, 120,174, 175 and 180). We advise you to follow the mitigation hierarchy

R-2022-0435-CD-395126 - R_2022_0435_CD Partial discharge of Condition 6. Land at South Tees Development Corporation, South Bank - No Objections.pdf:5:information including contact details for the National Trail Officer. Appropriate mitigation measures

R-2022-0435-CD-391845-R20220435CD.pdf:3:NPPF (paragraphs 8, 73, 104, 120,174, 175 and 180). We advise you to follow the mitigation hierarchy

R-2022-0435-CD-391845-R20220435CD.pdf:4:information including contact details for the National Trail Officer. Appropriate mitigation measures

R-2022-0435-CD-INCA2022-12 HRA - SeAH South Bank Rev 1.pdf:2:set out those mitigation measures to be employed to minimise or eliminate such impacts. REASON:

R-2022-0435-CD-64764_01 Covering Letter 03.05.2022(1).pdf:1:set out those mitigation measures to be employed to minimise or eliminate such impacts.

R-2021-1058-NM-Decision 0270.pdf:2: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2019-0331-SCP-Archaeological Advice R-2019-0331-SCP South Bank Wharf _.pdf:2:policy objectives and priorities, the assessment should then also consider potential mitigation

R-2019-0331-SCP-Archaeological Advice R-2019-0331-SCP South Bank Wharf _.pdf:2:whether mitigation requires preservation in situ of relevant assets or whether some other mitigation

R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:3: mitigation.

R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:3: sites and should identify such mitigation measures as may be required in order to avoid,

R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:3:proposals for mitigation of any impacts and if appropriate, compensation measures. Contact the

R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:4:results, impact assessments and appropriate accompanying mitigation strategies included as part of

R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:4:standing advice for protected species which includes links to guidance on survey and mitigation.

R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:4:therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation proposals for Habitats and Species

R-2019-0331-SCP-284160 R_2019_0331_SCP - EIA Scoping, South Bank Wharf Redevelopment, South Bank, Middlesbrough.pdf:4:  Full details of any mitigation or compensation that might be required.

R-2019-0331-SCP-Letter to RCBC 19.05.20 Scoping Request FINAL.pdf:15: impacts on the environment would be identified and appropriate mitigation measures will be

R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:3:modified waterbody, and as such, requires that all practicable mitigation is taken to achieve

R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:3:good ecological potential. The generic mitigation measures deemed applicable to this

R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:3:to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:3:strategy for the proposal. There are other opportunities to implement WFD mitigation

R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:4:and provide mitigation for the impacts to the Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA and

R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:10:especially during winter months, and consideration should be given to suitable mitigation.

R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:10:and should identify such mitigation measures as may be required in order to avoid, minimise

R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:10:include proposals for mitigation of any impacts and if appropriate, compensation measures.

R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:11:accompanying mitigation strategies included as part of the ES.

R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:11:on survey and mitigation.

R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:11:decisions’. Natural England therefore advises that survey, impact assessment and mitigation

R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:12: Full details of any mitigation or compensation that might be required.

R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:17:mitigation measures to address those impacts, and in particular indicate whether in the case

R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:17:of each impact whether mitigation requires preservation in situ of relevant assets or whether

R-2019-0331-SCP-Officer Letter_R20190331SCP.pdf:17:some other mitigation of impacts is considered appropriate.

R-2019-0331-SCP-114582 (3).pdf:2: that all practicable mitigation is taken to achieve good ecological potential. The

R-2019-0331-SCP-114582 (3).pdf:2: generic mitigation measures deemed applicable to this waterbody include,

R-2019-0331-SCP-114582 (3).pdf:2:that aims to deliver WFD mitigation measure objectives.

R-2019-0331-SCP-114582 (3).pdf:3:There are other opportunities to implement WFD mitigation measures and the applicant

R-2019-0331-SCP-114582 (3).pdf:3:and provide mitigation for the impacts to the Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SPA and

R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0066-01-Prairie ROA and Strategy.PDF:15:mitigation and management strategy. It is understood archaeological development constraints may be

R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0066-01-Prairie ROA and Strategy.PDF:15:document. These documents should be reviewed when available to develop appropriate mitigation and

R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0066-01-Prairie ROA and Strategy.PDF:20: Development of a UXO mitigation strategy.

R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0066-01-Prairie ROA and Strategy.PDF:34:assessment indicates a Medium risk from UXO for borehole and excavation activities. Further mitigation

R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0066-01-Prairie ROA and Strategy.PDF:34:activities such as detailed risk assessment or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the

R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0066-01-Prairie ROA and Strategy.PDF:41:Following the completion of the ecological surveys and HRA, control measures and mitigation identified

R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0066-01-Prairie ROA and Strategy.PDF:42:stream) in order to confirm the assessment of the waste impact and to implement embedded mitigation

R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0066-01-Prairie ROA and Strategy.PDF:42:  Any ecological mitigations required

R-2021-0879-FF-Officer report.pdf:8:(R/2020/0318/FFM). Mitigation measures a CEMP were implemented during

R-2021-0879-FF-Officer report.pdf:8:has stated that the adopted mitigation measures will continue to be followed.

R-2021-0879-FF-63262 01 Dorman Long Training Centre Cover Letter 14.10.21.pdf:4:taking into account mitigation, the proposal would not result in adverse effects on the site’s integrity, either

R-2021-0879-FF-63262 01 Dorman Long Training Centre Cover Letter 14.10.21.pdf:4:part of the remediation phase of planning consent ref: R/2020/0318/FFM. Mitigation measures were

R-2021-0879-FF-63262 01 Dorman Long Training Centre Cover Letter 14.10.21.pdf:4:(CEMP) subject to condition 4 of the remediation works The adopted mitigation measures will continue to be

R-2021-0879-FF-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0-P01 (Part 1).pdf:7: previous uses and any proposals for mitigation including land remediation or impacts on the

R-2021-0879-FF-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0-P01 (Part 1).pdf:97:Key contaminant linkages identified as requiring some form of mitigation are summarised in Table 3.4.

R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part1.PDF:33:• Direct contact pathways with soils could be active throughout a potential redevelopment; typical mitigation

R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part1.PDF:33: required as mitigation.

R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part1.PDF:53:appropriate mitigation measures may be required.

R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part1.PDF:56:asbestos impact on the site and determine necessary mitigation measures. It is likely that a clean cover system

R-2021-0879-FF-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0062-02-Prairie_ESA_Part1.PDF:57: assessment should be carried out to enable appropriate mitigation measures to be designed that will

R-2021-0879-FF-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0-P01 (Part 2).pdf:1:where they may compliment any landfill gas mitigation measures but are not considered to be appreciate for

R-2021-0879-FF-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0-P01 (Part 2).pdf:12:mitigation measures to be implemented to ensure no nuisance arises from waste storage such as odour or

R-2021-0879-FF-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0-P01 (Part 2).pdf:12:arises. Mitigation measures to be adopted include:

R-2021-0879-FF-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0-P01 (Part 2).pdf:12:be relatively low. If significant odours are noted, appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented by

R-2021-0879-FF-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0-P01 (Part 2).pdf:12:practices to minimise odours and/or utilising odour suppression and mitigation equipment.

R-2021-0879-FF-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0-P01 (Part 2).pdf:12:The remediation contractor shall implement appropriate mitigation measures to protect any surface water

R-2021-0879-FF-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0-P01 (Part 2).pdf:13:There is a potential for mud to be carried out of the site on to local roads during the works. Mitigation

R-2021-0589-PND-Outline Method Statement - BOS Plant - Rev0.PDF:17: Safety Briefings, Inductions etc will be held outdoors as a Covid-19 mitigation.

R-2021-0589-PND-Outline Method Statement - BOS Plant - Rev0.PDF:17: Mitigation Government guidance), emails, MEMOs and toolbox talks etc.

R-2021-0589-PND-Officer Report 0589.pdf:3:mitigation measures that the proposed demolition works would not result in

R-2022-0343-ESM-EA_R20220343ESM_OFFICIAL_310522.pdf:1: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2022-0343-ESM-ARCHAEOLOGIST.pdf:1:For R/2022/0343/ESM and R/2022/0355/FFM therefore sufficient archaeological mitigation

R-2022-0343-ESM-ARCHAEOLOGIST.pdf:7: with NEAR to take place and a strategy for mitigation be rapidly developed.

R-2022-0343-ESM-ARCHAEOLOGIST.pdf:10:9.5 Where assessment has identified the need for further analysis and no further mitigation work has

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:5: developed large-scale complex species and habitat mitigation strategies for licencing, and typically

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:6: requirements for Abnormal Indivisible Loads and accommodation / mitigation measures,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 1.2 Statement of Expertise - formatted.pdf:7: calculation, evaluation and mitigation of environmental noise and vibration. Phil has been involved

R-2020-0411-FFM-Decision 0411.pdf:2: complied with. This excludes any agreed remediation/mitigation measures

R-2020-0411-FFM-Decision 0411.pdf:3: Planning Authority. This excludes any agreed remediation/mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Decision 0411.pdf:4: mitigation strategy for the construction phase of the development shall be

R-2020-0411-FFM-Decision 0411.pdf:6: assessment and mitigation scheme, including long-term design objectives of

R-2020-0411-FFM-Decision 0411.pdf:6: (d) management and mitigation of artificial light emissions.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 6.1 LVIA Planning Policy Context.pdf:6: mitigation measures must be secured in advance of the development in

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 6.1 LVIA Planning Policy Context.pdf:6: landscape considerations. In such cases appropriate mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 6.1 LVIA Planning Policy Context.pdf:9: mitigation measures may be required.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:1: • highlights any necessary monitoring and/or mitigation measures which could prevent,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:5: should include proposals for mitigation of any

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:8: accordingly and any unacceptable risks to receptors would be subject to mitigation or remediation.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:12:9.4 Mitigation Measures Adopted as Part of the Project

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:13: mitigation / remediation requirements to manage the risk associated with ground

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:13: • on completion of the mitigation/remediation works, a validation report would be prepared with

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:13: appropriate) are at acceptable levels and that design measures for remdiation/mitigation have

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:14: additional mitigation measures are considered necessary.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:14: risk to human health or controlled waters receptors would be subject to remediation or mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:14: considered to be very highly sensitive. With the implementation the mitigation measures set out in

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:14: Mercia Mudstone Group.. Construction phase mitigation measures would be in accordance with

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:15: implementation of the mitigation measures, in particular the dust control measures, the magnitude

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:15: construction phase mitigation measures, in particular site investigation and remediation (where

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:15: short-term, and of local spatial extent. With the implementation of the mitigation measures, in

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:16:9.5.22 At the end of the construction process, the implementation of the remediation/mitigation measures

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:16: acceptable levels and that remediation/mitigation measures have been appropriately installed. The

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:16: mitigation required and the addition of hardstanding/building cover would be up to medium

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:16: mitigation incorporated into the proposed development.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:16: remediated or controlled through mitigation and much of the Application Site would be covered by

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:16: mitigation required and the addition of hardstanding/building cover would be up to low beneficial

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:16: depending on the degree of existing contamination and the nature of the remediation / mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:17:9.5.32 The implementation of mitigation measures and a remediation scheme where required, and the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:17:9.5.33 The impacts to groundwater as a result of the implementation of any remediation / mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:17: depending on the degree of existing contamination and the nature of the remediation / mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:17:9.5.36 These potential impacts would be included as part of the site investigation and mitigation would be

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:17: basis the appropriate mitigation is adopted the magnitude of effects will be no change. Therefore,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:17: may be implemented in addition to remediation / mitigation measures where considered of value.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:18: Further Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:18:9.6.8 No further mitigation is likely to be required once the project is operational.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:18:9.6.10 The site’s Environmental Permit would include any necessary accident/disaster mitigation/planning

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:19: its associated Infrastructure, and mitigation/remediation would be implemented (where

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:19: investigation and remediation/mitigation would be undertaken on the Application Site. On this

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:20: risk would be managed through remediating or mitigation as defined within a remediation strategy.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:20: remediation, a validation report would be prepared to confirm that the remediation/mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:21: implementation of any remediation / mitigation required and the addition of hardstanding/building

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:21: the nature of the remediation / mitigation incorporated into the development. The effect on off-site

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:23:Receptor Sensitivity of Description of impact Mitigation Magnitude of Significance of Significant / Not

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:23: mitigation, etc.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:23:Adjacent site users exposure to ground mitigation.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 9 Geology Hydrogeology and Contamination.pdf:24:Receptor Sensitivity of Description of impact Mitigation Magnitude of Significance of Significant / Not

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.2 Outline Drainage Strategy.pdf:6: SuDS hazard mitigation indices in accordance with Chapter 26, of the CIRIA C753 SuDS Manual

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_Response to Anglo American_AS_S.pdf:3: Chapter 9 sets out mitigation measures adopted as part of the project and confirms a Code of Construction

R-2020-0411-FFM-EA R_2020_0411_FFM v2 10 November 2020 OFFICIAL .pdf:2:the risk of scour from the proposal and suggest, where necessary, mitigation. It should

R-2020-0411-FFM-EA R_2020_0411_FFM v2 10 November 2020 OFFICIAL .pdf:2:mitigation scheme, including long-term design objectives of the proposed outfall,

R-2020-0411-FFM-EA R_2020_0411_FFM v2 10 November 2020 OFFICIAL .pdf:2:mitigation measures for heavily modified waterbodies.

R-2020-0411-FFM-EP CL.pdf:2:• Provision of recommendations (where necessary) for remediation/mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:8: assessment concludes, after taking account of the mitigation proposed, that the proposal may either

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:12: A validation report would also be prepared to confirm that the remediation/mitigation measures had

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:12: mitigation measures, in particular site investigation and remediation (where required) to manage the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:13: morphological mitigation measures for those waterbodies, where applicable.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:13: During the operation phase of the proposed development, mitigation measures will be

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:15:4.3.20 Given the terrestrial nature of the species and the mitigation measures in place to prevent importing

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:16: status objectives. Where appropriate it is also the stage where design mitigation, aimed at reducing

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:16: Construction phase impacts and proposed mitigation measures

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:16: under environment, health and safety legislation are fulfilled. In relation to mitigation against

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:16: mitigation / remediation requirements to manage the risk associated with ground

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:16: • on completion of the mitigation/remediation works, a validation report will be prepared with

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:16: design measures for remdiation/mitigation have been appropriately installed;

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:17:4.4.7 The construction phase will include temporary drainage mitigation techniques including, but not

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:17: Operation phase impacts and proposed mitigation measures

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:18: SuDS hazard mitigation indices in accordance with Chapter 26, of the CIRIA C753 SuDS Manual

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:19: Demolition phase impacts and proposed mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:22: SuDS hazard mitigation indices in accordance with Chapter 26, of the CIRIA C753 SuDS Manual

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:23: impact assessments and mitigation strategies proposed (documented in Chapter 2: Project

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:29: During the operation phase of the proposed development, mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:30: During the operation phase of the proposed development, mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:30: prepared to confirm that the remediation/mitigation measures had been

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:31: construction phase mitigation measures, in particular site investigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 8.3 WFD.pdf:34: During the operation phase of the proposed development, mitigation measures will be in place to include

R-2020-0411-FFM-325067 R_2020_0411_FFM - Proposed Redcar Energy Centre, Land at Redcar Bulk Terminal, Redcar.pdf:1: NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2020-0411-FFM-325067 R_2020_0411_FFM - Proposed Redcar Energy Centre, Land at Redcar Bulk Terminal, Redcar.pdf:1: We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2020-0411-FFM-325067 R_2020_0411_FFM - Proposed Redcar Energy Centre, Land at Redcar Bulk Terminal, Redcar.pdf:1: mitigation measures are required / or the following mitigation options should be secured:

R-2020-0411-FFM-325067 R_2020_0411_FFM - Proposed Redcar Energy Centre, Land at Redcar Bulk Terminal, Redcar.pdf:2:all mitigation measures are appropriately secured in any planning permission given.

R-2020-0411-FFM-325067 R_2020_0411_FFM - Proposed Redcar Energy Centre, Land at Redcar Bulk Terminal, Redcar.pdf:2:Further advice on mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-325067 R_2020_0411_FFM - Proposed Redcar Energy Centre, Land at Redcar Bulk Terminal, Redcar.pdf:3:to follow the mitigation hierarchy as set out in paragraph 175 of the NPPF and firstly consider what

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf:4: design, engineering or archaeological mitigation.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 13.1 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment - Formatted.pdf:8: or otherwise for additional mitigation measures.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:1: monitoring and/or mitigation measures that could prevent, minimise, reduce or offset the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:5: quality of life. Noise exposures in this range are below the LOAEL and need no mitigation. On this

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:8: embedded mitigation measures will be with the construction and operation of

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:8: the effects on air quality, noise and mitigation measures as necessary.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:13:12.3 Mitigation Measures Adopted as Part of the Project

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:15: Further Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:15: statement would set out specific mitigation measures for reducing disturbance to birds. With the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:18: Further Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:18:12.5.28 On the basis that no significant adverse noise effects are predicted, further mitigation is not

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 12 Noise and Vibration.pdf:21:Receptor Sensitivity of Description of impact Mitigation Magnitude of Significance of Significant / Not

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:1: mitigation measures, and the framework in which it will be consented. The procedural obligations

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:5: Infrastructure, and planning measures to address climate change mitigation and adaptation.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:8: hazards or former activities such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation including land

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:12: “minimise harm to the landscape, including by reasonable mitigation” (paragraph 5.9.17).

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:12:5.2.73 Different types of mitigation are explored in paragraphs 5.9.21 to 5.9.23. These include reducing

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:12: adverse landscape and/or visual effects. Paragraph 2.5.51 notes that “mitigation is primarily

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:15: mitigation;

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:18: Cleveland Coast SPA are avoided. Any necessary mitigation measures must be secured in

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:19: landscape considerations. In such cases appropriate mitigation will be required. Protection will be

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:20: or cumulative, should be avoided. Where this is not possible mitigation, or lastly compensation,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:20: account mitigation, the proposal would not result in adverse effects on the site’s integrity, either

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:20: expected to contribute towards strategic mitigation measures identified in the Recreation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:20: Any alternative suitable mitigation would need to be proven effective and agreed with the Council,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:21: e. mitigation, or where necessary compensation, is provided for the impact.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:21: h. mitigation, or where necessary compensation, is provided for the impact.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:26: proposed mitigation measures must meet the requirements of the Habitat Regulations. All minerals

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:27: Any proposed mitigation measures must meet the requirements of the Habitat Regulations. All

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:28: likely adverse impacts are identified, avoidance or appropriate mitigation measures may be

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 5 Planning Policy.pdf:36: Cleveland Coast SPA Recreation Management Plan, including in the mitigation of likely cumulative

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:10: mitigation measures adopted. Therefore the emphasis in this document is on classifying the risk of

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:10: dust impacts from a site, which will then allow mitigation measures commensurate with that risk to

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:16: trackout. These have been used to define the appropriate site-specific mitigation measures based

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:16: the mitigation measures are successfully implemented, the resultant effects of the dust exposure

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:20:11.4 Mitigation Measures Adopted as Part of the Project

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:20: Construction Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:20:11.4.2 The IAQM dust guidance lists mitigation measures for low, medium and high dust risks.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:21: • Ensure an adequate water supply on the site for effective dust/particulate matter suppression/mitigation,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:21: Operational Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:22: IAQM methodology (IAQM, 2014), predicts the risk of dust impacts and the level of mitigation that

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:23: implementation of mitigation.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:23: without Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:23:11.5.10 Taking the site as a whole, the overall risk is assessed as medium. The mitigation measures

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:23:11.5.11 With the implementation of those committed mitigation measures, which are adopted as part of the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:23: significant effects on receptors through the use of effective mitigation. Experience shows that this

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:24: activities are considered with mitigation in place. The agreed mitigation measures would be

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:24: Further Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:24: Table 11.20: Desirable Dust Mitigation Measures as set out by the IAQM

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:29: Further Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:29:11.6.22 The effects are not considered to be significant and further mitigation is not required.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:30: mitigation measures at both developments should ensure the risk of cumulative dust effects is

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:31: guidance (IAQM, 2014), indicate that before the implementation of mitigation and controls, the risk

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:31: of dust impacts will be medium. Implementation of the ‘highly recommended’ mitigation measures

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:31:11.9.4 The main dust mitigation measure is containment. Taking into account the fact that the processes

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 11 Air Quality.pdf:33:Receptor Sensitivity of Description of impact Mitigation Magnitude of Significance of Significant / Not

R-2020-0411-FFM-411 air quality.pdf:2: • Prior to the commencement of construction details of a detailed dust mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 2 Project Description.pdf:23: likely to focus on the mitigation of fire and the consequences of spills.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 2 Project Description.pdf:23: Resources Table 2.7) otherwise, no mitigation measures during construction.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 2 Project Description.pdf:23: Ornithology protection of the existing bund. Mitigation measures from the Hydrology and Flood

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 2 Project Description.pdf:24: • The construction phase would include temporary drainage mitigation techniques

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 2 Project Description.pdf:25: would identify and prescribe appropriate mitigation / remediation requirements to

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 2 Project Description.pdf:25: • on completion of the mitigation/remediation works, a validation report would be

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 2 Project Description.pdf:25: measures for remdiation/mitigation have been appropriately installed;

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 2 Project Description.pdf:27: Traffic and Transport No mitigation measures during operation other than the design of the access route

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 2 Project Description.pdf:27: Noise and Vibration No mitigation measures during the operation.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:13: development of mitigation measures.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:15: • Identification of any mitigation measures proposed to avoid, reduce and, if possible, remedy

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:18:5.2.4 Standard mitigation measures are to be adopted, following industry best practice during the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:18: metre-high wall has been included as an embedded mitigation feature.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:18:5.2.6 The assessment concludes that with the implementation of mitigation measures the impact of the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:19:5.3.10 With the above proposed mitigation measures, the effect of the construction work on on-site and

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:20: Any unacceptable risks to such receptors would be managed through remediation or mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:20: of existing contamination and the nature of the remediation / mitigation incorporated into the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:21: Implementation of the highly recommended mitigation measures described in the IAQM

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:21:5.6.3 The agreed mitigation measures would be included in a Code of Construction Practice (CoCP),

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:22:5.7.5 Mitigation measures applied as part of the project design include the erection of a 5 m high wall

R-2020-0411-FFM-Non Technical Summary.pdf:25:5.8.23 The main dust mitigation measure is containment. Taking into account the fact that the processes

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:1: • identifies the proposed mitigation measures during construction; and

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:2: standards expected for controlled waters, and mitigation through flood defence

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:8: • Reversible/irreversible effect: effects can be reversed by mitigation measures or by natural

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:17:8.4 Mitigation Measures Adopted as Part of the Project

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:17:8.4.1 As part of the design process, a number of mitigation measures have been proposed to reduce the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:18: • The construction phase would include temporary drainage mitigation techniques including, but

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:20:8.5.12 Designed-in mitigation measures would be implemented to reduce any potential increase in

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:21: the pollutant, on the mitigation measures adopted and their timing and effectiveness, and on the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:21: Further Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:21:8.5.22 As no significant adverse effects are predicted further mitigation is unlikely to be required.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:22: Further Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:22:8.6.13 As no significant adverse effects are predicted, further mitigation is unlikely to be required.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:23: unlikely to be significant subject to implementation of appropriate mitigation measures.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:24: watercourses through accidental release of sediment, appropriate mitigation measures have been

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:26: Receptor Sensitivity of Description of impact Mitigation measure Magnitude of Significance of Significant / Not

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:26: Mitigation measures Low Adverse Minor Adverse Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:26: Mitigation measures Low Adverse Minor Adverse Not significant

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:26:Flood Risk Medium mitigation measures

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:27: Receptor Sensitivity of Description of impact Mitigation measure Magnitude of Significance of Significant / Not

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 8 Hydrology and Flood Risk.pdf:27: mitigation measures

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 13 - Other Environmental Effects.pdf:3:13.5.6 The main dust mitigation measure is containment. Taking into account the fact that the processes

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:5: • Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (1997) Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:6: • measures adopted as part of the project, including mitigation and design measures that form

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:6: • identification of any further mitigation or monitoring measures envisaged to avoid, reduce and,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:7: Mitigation Measures Adopted as Part of the Project

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:7: • Measures included as part of the project design (sometimes referred to as primary mitigation);

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:10: Further Mitigation and Future Monitoring

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:10:4.5.32 Where required, further mitigation measures have been identified within topic chapters. These are

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 4 - EIA Methodology.pdf:12: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (1997) Mitigation Measures in

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.1 - Air Quality Planning Policy Context.pdf:4:1.2.7 The NPPG provides advice on how air quality impacts can be mitigated and notes “Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.1 - Air Quality Planning Policy Context.pdf:4: authorities work with applicants to consider appropriate mitigation so as to ensure the new

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.1 - Air Quality Planning Policy Context.pdf:4: conditions and obligations can be used to secure mitigation where the relevant tests are met.”

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:34: likely to focus on the mitigation of fire and the consequences of spills.

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:36: mitigation;

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:37: avoidance or mitigation measures may be required.

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:43:4.4.33 The proposed REC has been designed, and mitigation measures have been incorporated into the

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:43: former activities such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation including land remediation

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:48: “minimise harm to the landscape, including by reasonable mitigation” (paragraph 5.9.17).

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:48:4.4.69 Different types of mitigation are explored in paragraphs 5.9.21 to 5.9.23. These include reducing

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:49: adverse landscape and/or visual effects. Paragraph 2.5.51 notes that “mitigation is primarily

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:71: including where relevant the mitigation measures which ensure conformity with policy (or other

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:72: possible that these effects should be mitigated, and lastly if avoidance and mitigation cannot

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:72: account mitigation, the proposal would not result in adverse effects on the site’s integrity, either

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:72: will be expected to contribute towards strategic mitigation measures identified in the Recreation

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:72: Any alternative suitable mitigation would need to be proven effective and agreed with the Council,

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:72: e. mitigation, or where necessary compensation, is provided for the impact.”

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:75: appropriate mitigation will be required.

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:78: summer year 15, when proposed planting would have achieved its design and mitigation functions.

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:85:6.6.8 It concludes that during the construction phase with mitigation measures the residual dust effects

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:88: d. ensuring opportunities to contribute to the mitigation of flooding elsewhere are taken;

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:91: prepared to confirm that the remediation/mitigation measures had implemented.

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:92: with the implementation of pre-construction phase mitigation measures, in particular site

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:92: term, and of local spatial extent. And with the implementation of the mitigation measures, in

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:92: implementation of any remediation / mitigation required and the addition of hardstanding/building

R-2020-0411-FFM-11366_REC Planning Statement_S_AS.pdf:92: the nature of the remediation / mitigation incorporated into the development. The effect on off-site

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf:6:b For trackout, the distances have been measured from the side of the roads used by construction traffic. Without site-specific mitigation, trackout may

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf:6:d For trackout, the distances have been measured from the side of the roads used by construction traffic. Without site-specific mitigation, trackout may

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf:8: level of mitigation that should be applied. For those cases where the risk category is ‘negligible’,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 11.3 - Detailed Construction Phase Dust Assessment Methodology.pdf:8: no mitigation measures are required beyond those mandated by legislation.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:15: mitigation, operational and other relevant constraints; and cumulative impacts of proposals.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:19: highway or transport mitigation and so these developments and their highway and transport

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:19:5.1.11 For this reason, those developments (traffic flows and their highway and transport mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 10.1 Transport Assessment.pdf:19: their cumulative highway and transport mitigation requirements (if required).

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:4: Mitigation Measures ………………………………………………………………………………………………………12

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:15: • Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (1997) Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:16: • Identification of any further mitigation measures envisaged to avoid, reduce and, if possible,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:18: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:18:3.29 The development of mitigation measures is part of an iterative EIA process. Therefore, measures

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:18: • measures included as part of the project design (sometimes referred to as primary mitigation);

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:18:3.31 Where required, further mitigation measures will be identified within topic chapters. These are

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:25:5.5 Where mitigation measures have been identified and developed through the EIA process and have

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:27:5.13 Where appropriate, mitigation measures will be identified to avoid or reduce landscape and visual

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:29: mitigation measures that form part of the proposed development and to which the applicant is

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:29:5.30 Where necessary, any further mitigation measures will be identified to ensure that the proposed

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:29: any identified effects, detailing mitigation/avoidance measures to ensure a conclusion of no

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:30: design will utilise appropriate mitigation measures such as the use of SuDS (sustainable drainage

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:31: identifying appropriate mitigation measures), the ES chapter will consider potential impacts of the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:32:5.53 A review would be undertaken of potential development constraints, mitigation measures and/or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:36:5.86 Generic mitigation measures designed to control dust nuisance effects and emissions during

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:39: Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions (DETR) (1997) Mitigation Measures in

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:52:The Scoping Report also includes a number of references to ‘primary’ mitigation measures (i.e., those

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:52:The Report (at page 12) states that as well as primary mitigation measures, best practice measures

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:52:applicant to engage with STDC on the potential for the Strategy to assist in the project’s mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:52:and mitigation stages of these assessments.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 4.1 Redcar Energy Centre Scoping Report and Scoping Opinion.pdf:53:The Scoping Report advises that embedded mitigation measures will be included within the scheme

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:9:7.2.42 The assessment similarly includes consideration of any proposed mitigation to avoid or minimise

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:9:7.2.45 The assessment of effects includes the consideration of any proposed mitigation measures to

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:9: take into account the likely success of the proposed mitigation measures to reduce the extent,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:12:7.2.55 The final assessment of whether a significant effect is likely was completed by taking the mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:12: measures into account, including the mitigation incorporated into the design of the proposed

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:12: development. This requires an assessment on the likelihood of successful mitigation being

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:12: achieved and the mitigation proposed needs to be qualified in terms of the probability of success.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:12: The assessment of mitigation success can be based on both professional judgement and

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:12: experience of other mitigation schemes. In general, a precautionary approach has been adopted

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:21:7.4 Mitigation Measures Adopted as Part of the Project

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:21:7.4.1 In order to address the impacts listed above, as far as practicable, a number of mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:21: Mitigation Measures Adopted for Construction

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:22:7.4.5 Further mitigation measures are included in Chapter 12: Noise and Vibration.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:22: Mitigation Measures Adopted for Operation Phase

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:24: mitigation the level of effect would be moderate adverse, which is significant.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:25: mitigation measures have been adopted to limit any potential for pollution events. There would be

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:25:7.5.21 The construction phase would include temporary drainage mitigation techniques including, but not

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:26: phase mitigation measures, in particular site investigation and remediation (where required) to

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:26: Further Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:26: out how the piling would be undertaken and the mitigation measures (e.g. soft-start techniques)

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:26:7.5.26 The effect following implementation of this mitigation is deemed to reduce the level of effect to

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:26: noise generating activities, the ECoW will advise on the need for additional mitigation measures to

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:29: Further Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:29: development, and therefore there are no requirement for future mitigation.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:29: would be equal to those identified during the construction phase, as are the mitigation measures.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:30: for additional mitigation. Table 7.8 below presents the other developments which have been

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:32:7.10.3 The embedded mitigation of the retention of the existing earth bund along the boundary of the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:33:Receptor Sensitivity Description of Mitigation measure Magnitude Significance Significant /

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:34:Receptor Sensitivity Description of Mitigation measure Magnitude Significance Significant /

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 7 Ecology and Ornithology.pdf:35: K. and Spencer, J. (2013) Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit. Information Estuarine Planning

R-2020-0411-FFM-411 nuisance.pdf:2:Para 12.3-12.5 discusses mitigation measures to be adopted for construction,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:1: development proposals and any required transport mitigation measures to prevent, reduce or

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:12: transport mitigation and so these developments and their highway and transport schemes are

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:12:10.3.33 For this reason, those developments (traffic flows and their highway and transport mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:12: their cumulative highway and transport mitigation requirements (if required).

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:14:10.4 Mitigation Measures Adopted as Part of the Project

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:15: Further Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:15:10.2 No further mitigation is required as a result of the effects determined above.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:15: there is no need for any specific mitigation in this regard.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:18: Further Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:18:10.6.16 No further mitigation is required as a result of the effects determined above.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:18: highway and there is no need for any specific mitigation in this regard.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:21: Mitigation Magnitude of Significance of Significant / Not

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22: Mitigation Magnitude of Significance of Significant / Not

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22:A1085 Trunk Road South No mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22: No mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22:A1053 between A66 and No mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:22:A66 between A1053 and Severance, driver delay, No mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:23: Mitigation Magnitude of Significance of Significant / Not

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:23:between junction with No mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:23: No mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:23:A174 between the A1053 No mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:23: No mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 10 Transport.pdf:23: No mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 9.1 Preliminary Phase 1 Risk Assessment.pdf:20: • Provision of recommendations (where necessary) for remediation/mitigation measures to

R-2020-0411-FFM-EA R_2020_0411_FFM 24 September 2020 OFFICIAL.pdf:3: loss of priority habitat and demonstrate mitigation, where necessary, from the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 7.2 Ecology PEA.pdf:3:5 MITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT ……………………………………………………………………………………….14

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 7.2 Ecology PEA.pdf:5: about the nature conservation value of the Application Site and recommendations for mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 7.2 Ecology PEA.pdf:18:5 MITIGATION AND ENHANCEMENT

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 7.2 Ecology PEA.pdf:18:5.1.1 Mitigation and enhancement relevant to birds is considered in Appendix 7.1 and Chapter 7:

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 7.2 Ecology PEA.pdf:18: metre buffer to identify any changes which may affect the recommended mitigation or the need for

R-2020-0411-FFM-Appendix 7.2 Ecology PEA.pdf:18:5.3.2 In addition to the mitigation measures outlined above, opportunities for enhancements include:

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:26:6.4 Mitigation Measures Adopted as Part of the Project

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:26:6.4.1 Early mitigation ideas for the proposed development relate to the layout and massing of proposed

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:27: The design intention would be to offer some mitigation in relation to the site’s sense of place, and

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:28: mitigation planting would be implemented. The assessment of construction effects upon the

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:30: Further Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:30:6.5.17 No further mitigation is proposed.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:33: have achieved its design and mitigation functions. However, given the local environment,

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:37: Further Mitigation

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:37: additional mitigation requirement has been identified.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:43: design in order to provide mitigation where possible within the project.

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:48: Receptor Sensitivity of Description of impact Mitigation Magnitude of Significance of Significant / Notes

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:49: Receptor Sensitivity of Description of impact Mitigation Magnitude of Significance of Significant / Notes

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:50: Receptor Sensitivity of Description of impact Mitigation Magnitude of Significance of Significant / Notes

R-2020-0411-FFM-Chapter 6 Landscape and Visual Impact.pdf:51: Receptor Sensitivity of Description of impact Mitigation Magnitude of Significance of Significant / Notes

R-2020-0247-CD-Decision Notice_R20190427FFM.pdf:3: identifies mitigation measures required to manage the movement of soils on

R-2020-0247-CD-Decision Notice_R20190427FFM.pdf:4: appropriate mitigation including by way of on or off-site compensatory

R-2020-0247-CD-Decision Notice_R20190427FFM.pdf:4: reptiles, a reptile mitigation strategy should be prepared, submitted to and

R-2020-0247-CD-Warrenby 3B Enabling Works - CEMP (Rev C).pdf:4: Appendix B – Reptile Mitigation Strategy (Report ID: INCA 201931)

R-2020-0247-CD-Warrenby 3B Enabling Works - CEMP (Rev C).pdf:8: include environmental protection and mitigation measures and emergency preparedness

R-2020-0247-CD-Warrenby 3B Enabling Works - CEMP (Rev C).pdf:13:5.17.3 The requirements of the Reptile Mitigation Strategy (Report ID: INCA 201931) will be adhered

R-2020-0247-CD-Warrenby 3B Enabling Works - CEMP (Rev C).pdf:19:Reptile Mitigation Strategy

R-2020-0247-CD-Warrenby 3B Enabling Works - CEMP (Rev C).pdf:20:Reptile mitigation strategy

R-2020-0247-CD-Warrenby 3B Enabling Works - CEMP (Rev C).pdf:21:201920) as supporting or potentially supporting reptiles, a reptile mitigation strategy should be

R-2020-0247-CD-Warrenby 3B Enabling Works - CEMP (Rev C).pdf:21:mitigation, is therefore potential harm to a small number of a widespread reptile species.

R-2020-0247-CD-Warrenby 3B Enabling Works - CEMP (Rev C).pdf:24:population and to inform mitigation.

R-2020-0247-CD-Warrenby 3B Enabling Works - CEMP (Rev C).pdf:25:6. Mitigation options

R-2022-0176-CD-2015-10 Section 36 Consent (Memo).pdf:2:out on the Site and inclusion of suitable mitigation measures should evidence of any

R-2022-0176-CD-2015-10 Section 36 Consent (Conditions) (12).pdf:14:Protection and Mitigation For Birds

R-2022-0176-CD-2015-10 Section 36 Consent (Conditions) (12).pdf:15: a scheme of mitigation measures for approval in writing by the

R-2022-0176-CD-2015-10 Section 36 Consent (Conditions) (12).pdf:15:(41) Notwithstanding any mitigation measures approved pursuant to

R-2022-0176-CD-2015-10 Section 36 Consent (Conditions) (12).pdf:20:Protection and Mitigation for Protected Species

R-2022-0176-CD-2015-10 Section 36 Consent (Conditions) (12).pdf:20: scheme of mitigation measures for approval in writing by the

R-2022-0587-CD-R 2020 0684 ESM DECISION NOTICE.pdf:4: - The details of compensatory habitat where onsite mitigation is

R-2022-0587-CD-R 2020 0684 ESM DECISION NOTICE.pdf:4: identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and feasible,

R-2022-0587-CD-R 2020 0684 ESM DECISION NOTICE.pdf:5: mitigation measures identified as part of the assessment shall be

R-2022-0587-CD-R 2020 0684 ESM DECISION NOTICE.pdf:6: the proposed mitigation measures that no significant long term adverse impacts

R-2021-0728-PND-COMMENTS Kirsty email.pdf:2:notice. The National Grid have not been consulted. A mitigation licence has not been granted for the safe

R-2021-0728-PND-COMMENTS Kirsty email.pdf:4:notice. The National Grid have not been consulted. A mitigation licence has not been

R-2021-0728-PND-COMMENTS Gregory R.pdf:2:5. A mitigation licence has not been granted for the safe removal of any bats; a bat survey has

R-2021-0728-PND-Officer Report(1).pdf:3:mitigation measures that the proposed demolition works would not result in

R-2021-0465-FFM-356907 - R_2021_0465_FFM - Erection of 3396sqm of B2_B8 floorspace. Tees Dock Road. Grangetown.pdf:1: mitigation.

R-2021-0465-FFM-356907 - R_2021_0465_FFM - Erection of 3396sqm of B2_B8 floorspace. Tees Dock Road. Grangetown.pdf:2:Should the applicant wish to discuss the further information required and scope for mitigation with

R-2021-0465-FFM-356907 - R_2021_0465_FFM - Erection of 3396sqm of B2_B8 floorspace. Tees Dock Road. Grangetown.pdf:4:the mitigation hierarchy as set out in paragraph 175 of the NPPF and firstly consid er what existing

R-2021-0465-FFM-Officer Report 0465.pdf:3:of these impacts and the scope for mitigation.

R-2021-0465-FFM-Officer Report 0465.pdf:9:projects, provided that the mitigation measures specified in the remediation

R-2021-0465-FFM-Officer Report 0465.pdf:11: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2021-0465-FFM-INCA 2021-30 HRA South Bank Quay enabling works.pdf:6:impacts are anticipated, potential mitigation measures to alleviate impacts should be proposed and

R-2021-0465-FFM-INCA 2021-30 HRA South Bank Quay enabling works.pdf:10:applied in accordance with protective mitigation measures already provided in the Local Plan (most

R-2021-0465-FFM-INCA 2021-30 HRA South Bank Quay enabling works.pdf:10:effects on the integrity of any European Sites, taking into account the mitigation measures described

R-2021-0465-FFM-Decision Notice 0465.pdf:2: vibration from construction works, including any details of any mitigation

R-2021-0465-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:16:mitigation and management strategy.

R-2021-0465-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:16: • Compensation is required to offset residual losses after the mitigation through the

R-2021-0465-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:21: Development of a UXO mitigation strategy.

R-2021-0465-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:25:assessment indicates a Medium risk from UXO for borehole and excavation activities. Further mitigation

R-2021-0465-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:25:activities such as detailed risk assessment or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the

R-2021-0465-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:34:of the HRA, any control and mitigation measures identified within it shall be adopted in relations to the

R-2021-0465-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:35:stream) in order to confirm the assessment of the waste impact and to implement embedded mitigation

R-2021-0465-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0271-02-South Bank Priority Strategy.pdf:35:  Any ecological mitigations required

R-2021-0465-FFM-INCA2021-56 HRA land at South Bank.pdf:7:mitigation measures specified in the remediation strategy submitted with the application are

R-2021-0152-CD-Blast furnace RecordingWSIv4.PDF:6: for mitigation be rapidly developed.

R-2021-0152-CD-Blast furnace RecordingWSIv4.PDF:9:9.5 Where assessment has identified the need for further analysis and no further mitigation work has

R-2021-0152-CD-Blast furnace RecordingWSIv4.PDF:10:11.1 Formal publication is expected to take place following a mitigation phase of fieldwork; should such

R-2021-0152-CD-60722_Covering letter DOC Arch_Feb 2021.PDF:2:CEMP shall be adhered to throughout the construction phase and shall include of all those mitigation

R-2021-0152-CD-60722_Covering letter DOC Arch_Feb 2021.PDF:2:2019 and Chapter 7 (Mitigation) of the Air Quality Assessment Rev 02 6 March 2020, unless alternative

R-2021-0152-CD-60722_Covering letter DOC Arch_Feb 2021.PDF:2:approaches to biodiversity and archaeology mitigation are submitted to and approved by the Local

R-2021-0152-CD-Officer report _R20210152CD.pdf:3:mitigation to be implemented as part of the application.

R-2021-0152-CD-Officer report _R20210152CD.pdf:4:19th century blast furnaces exist, unless alternative archaeological mitigation

R-2021-0152-CD-Blast furnace RecordingWSI revMar21.pdf:10:9.5 Where assessment has identified the need for further analysis and no further mitigation work has

R-2021-0152-CD-Blast furnace RecordingWSI revMar21.pdf:11:11.1 Formal publication is expected to take place following a mitigation phase of fieldwork; should such

R-2021-0152-CD-Compliance Decision.pdf:2: those mitigation measures set out in Chapter 15 of Volume 1 of the submitted

R-2021-0152-CD-Compliance Decision.pdf:2: Environmental Impact Assessment December 2019 and Chapter 7 (Mitigation)

R-2021-0152-CD-Compliance Decision.pdf:2: approaches to biodiversity and archaeology mitigation are submitted to and

R-2021-0152-CD-Compliance Decision.pdf:2: mitigation measures required;

R-2023-0179-SCP-424840_HyGreen_Redcar_EIA_Scoping_NEresponse_28.3.23.pdf:4:This should also take into account any agreed strategic mitigation solution that may be being

R-2023-0179-SCP-424840_HyGreen_Redcar_EIA_Scoping_NEresponse_28.3.23.pdf:4:mitigation measures to avoid, minimise or reduce any adverse significant effects. The consideration

R-2023-0179-SCP-424840_HyGreen_Redcar_EIA_Scoping_NEresponse_28.3.23.pdf:5:mitigation of any impacts and if appropriate, compensation measures and opportunities for

R-2023-0179-SCP-424840_HyGreen_Redcar_EIA_Scoping_NEresponse_28.3.23.pdf:5:assessments and appropriate accompanying mitigation strategies included as part of the ES.

R-2023-0179-SCP-424840_HyGreen_Redcar_EIA_Scoping_NEresponse_28.3.23.pdf:5:survey and mitigation measures . A separate protected species licence from Natural England or

R-2023-0179-SCP-424840_HyGreen_Redcar_EIA_Scoping_NEresponse_28.3.23.pdf:5:District level licensing (DLL) is a type of strategic mitigation licence for great crested newts (GCN)

R-2023-0179-SCP-424840_HyGreen_Redcar_EIA_Scoping_NEresponse_28.3.23.pdf:6: • Full details of any mitigation or compensation measures

R-2023-0179-SCP-424840_HyGreen_Redcar_EIA_Scoping_NEresponse_28.3.23.pdf:7:services they provide, including for food production, water storage and flood mitigation, as a carbon

R-2023-0179-SCP-424840_HyGreen_Redcar_EIA_Scoping_NEresponse_28.3.23.pdf:9:and sequester greenhouse gases, in relation to climate change mitigation and the natural

R-2023-0179-SCP-230306 - HyGreen - EIA Scoping Opinion Request Letter - Final.pdf:2:and size, that it is located within the vicinity of sensitive areas and its potential, without mitigation, to

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:3: EPSM European Protected Species Mitigation (Licence)

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:28: Management Plan (CEMP), which will describe the specific mitigation measures to

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:35: will be expected to contribute towards mitigation measures identified in

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:35: the Recreation Management Plan, unless other appropriate mitigation is

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:35: provided. Mitigation may also be required for other schemes where

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:36: this is not possible mitigation, or compensation must be provided.

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:37: strategic mitigation measures identified in the Recreation Management

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:37: available; and mitigation, or where necessary compensation, is provided

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:50: appropriate to the current stage of design, alongside potential mitigation measures

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:55: may be required to determine the change and what mitigation may be required;

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:56: recommendations for mitigation measures.

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:56: mitigation or enhancement.

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:57: impacts, and determine what the scope for mitigation might be. It is proposed to

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:57:6.1.36 Depending on the outcomes of the preliminary assessment and the mitigation

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:65:6.1.70 As appropriate, the EIA will inform the design as to where mitigation measures may

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:65: mitigation measures may include the recommendation for further intrusive

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:65: mitigation measures to be employed by contractors, on a precautionary basis, to

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:73: Appropriate mitigation measures will be developed, and European Protected

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:73: Species Mitigation (EPSM) licensing requirements, if necessary, where trees

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:74: Proposed Development. These data will inform the EcIA and mitigation

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:77: but that have sufficient value at the site level to merit retention or mitigation);

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:77: mitigation at the relevant location to otherwise maintain a favourable nature

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:77: implementation of mitigation and compensation, any residual effects on ecological

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:81:6.1.129 Where the assessment indicates the need for mitigation as a result of significant

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:84: mitigation. Such measures may include:

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:85: and additional mitigation measures may be proposed where significant effects are

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:85: predicted. Additional mitigation measures may include:

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:87: • the formulation of mitigation measures, such as a Construction Worker Travel

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:88: impacts will be provided should the proposed mitigation not fully address the impact

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:90:6.1.176 Construction phase dust impacts, and the level of recommended mitigation will be

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:90: is to identify the recommended level of best practice mitigation required for the

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:91: emissions standards and through best-practice mitigation measures, as listed within

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:95: mitigation. Following the implementation of further specific mitigation, any residual

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:99:6.1.220 Mitigation measures (some of which may have already been considered through the

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:105: • identify mitigation measures to eliminate risk where possible; and if not possible,

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:108:6.1.268 Due to the uncertainty about the nature of mitigation and the method by which

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:108: mitigation would be secured, material use and waste generation during the

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:111: • Climate change mitigation and adaptation;

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:114:6.1.290 Mitigation measures will be identified to reduce the impact of the Proposed

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:114: of mitigation to be implemented.

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:118: a result of changes to the design, including any mitigation measures that are

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:119: beneficial and adverse effects. The mitigation measures envisaged in order to

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:120:7.1.13 The significance of effects before and after mitigation will be evaluated with

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:122: Mitigation and Enhancement Measures

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:122:7.1.23 The Mitigation and Enhancement Measures section will describe the measures that

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:122: available mitigation measures are known as ‘residual effects’. These will be discussed

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:122: investigation. Consultation is an ongoing process, which enables mitigation

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:124: environmental effects are identified, mitigation measures will be described where

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:127: Mitigation Handbook online. Available at: https://gat04-live-

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:128: _water_vole_mitigation_handbook81824175_1.pdf.

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:129: • English Nature (2001). Great crested newt mitigation guidelines online.

R-2023-0179-SCP-HyGreen Production Facility Scoping Report_FINAL.pdf:129: https://mokrady.wbs.cz/literatura_ke_stazeni/great_crested_newt_mitigation_

R-2023-0179-SCP-0179 Highways.pdf:1:- Detail of the proposed construction arrangements with impact on highway network and proposed mitigation as

R-2023-0179-SCP-0179 Highways.pdf:1:- Detail of the proposed operational arrangements with impact on highway network and proposed mitigation as

R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:2: proposed mitigation as required*.

R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:2: proposed mitigation as required*

R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:11:This should also take into account any agreed strategic mitigation solution that may be being

R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:11:mitigation measures to avoid, minimise or reduce any adverse significant effects. The

R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:11:proposals for mitigation of any impacts and if appropriate, compensation measures and

R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:12:assessments and appropriate accompanying mitigation strategies included as part of the ES.

R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:12:survey and mitigation measures . A separate protected species licence from Natural England or

R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:12:District level licensing (DLL) is a type of strategic mitigation licence for great crested newts (GCN)

R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:13:• Full details of any mitigation or compensation measures

R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:15:services they provide, including for food production, water storage and flood mitigation, as a

R-2023-0179-SCP-SCOPING OPINION DECISION.pdf:18:store and sequester greenhouse gases, in relation to climate change mitigation and the natural

R-2023-0179-SCP-Consultee Response - CATS Pipeline(1).pdf:7:restrictions and guidance documentation. This will often result in additional CATS mitigation such as

R-2020-0819-ESM-MBC.pdf:1:necessary mitigation being identified and introduced. In this respect it is felt that the scope of the Transport

R-2020-0819-ESM-MBC.pdf:1:Middlesbrough’s network and as such could lead to the need for physical mitigation in the Borough and/or

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:3: Embedded Mitigation 33

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:3:H6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 37

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:4: H3.15 of this chapter. Mitigation measures to reduce any adverse environmental effects are

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:7: significance of potential impacts as well as to inform mitigation measures in line with industry

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:8: activities such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation including land remediation (as well

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:27: works risk assessment should be carried out to enable appropriate mitigation measures to

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:36: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:36:H5.1 The proposed embedded mitigation measures relevant to ground conditions include:

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:37:H5.4 These embedded mitigation measures have been taken into account during this assessment

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:37: repeated below or in Section H6.0: Mitigation and Monitoring.

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:37: Mitigation is detailed, in Section G6.0, with regards to UXO and risk from contamination. With

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:38: properties. The magnitude of impact prior to mitigation but considering the embedded

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:38: mitigation is medium to low (primarily due to areas not currently investigated). This could lead

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:38: if additional mitigation actions are not carried

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:39: mitigation is medium. This is due to the potential for soil/materials disposal required following

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:40:H6.1 Embedded mitigation is detailed in H5.1 to H5.4 above which includes implementation of the

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:40: practice detailed within the Framework CEMP. Additional mitigation is detailed below.

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:40:H6.3 An Outline Remediation Strategy is included in the embedded mitigation above. T his covers the

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:41: for further mitigation.

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:41: activities. Further mitigation activities such as detailed risk assessment or site mitigations

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:43: magnitude of impact following mitigation identifie d in Section H6.0 is negligible. There are

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:43: significance for off site human health receptors after the implementation of mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:43: following mitigation identified in Section H6.0 is negligible. Therefore , the impacts after the

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:43: implementation of mitigation measures are considered to be of Negligible significance. This is

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:43: following mitigation identified in Section H6.0 is Low and thus the impact on management

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:44:H8.4 Mitigation that is designed to protect the identified receptors susceptible to imp acts

R-2020-0819-ESM-VOL 2 CHAPTER H.pdf:44: Significant following the implementation of the mitigation measu res.

R-2020-0819-ESM-341083 R_2020_0819_ESM - Outline permission for development of general industrial, storage and distribution facilities at Dorman Point for Teesworks, Redcar.pdf:2:all mitigation measures are appropriately secured in any planning permission given.

R-2020-0819-ESM-341083 R_2020_0819_ESM - Outline permission for development of general industrial, storage and distribution facilities at Dorman Point for Teesworks, Redcar.pdf:3:to follow the mitigation hierarchy as set out in paragraph 175 of the NPPF and firstly consider what

R-2020-0819-ESM-2022 03 08 Other Four Teesworks Appns(Not Foundry)- response letter.pdf:2: • That the designs proposed as mitigation have been through a number of review

R-2020-0819-ESM-2022 03 08 Other Four Teesworks Appns(Not Foundry)- response letter.pdf:2: of the currently proposed mitigation.

R-2020-0819-ESM-2022 03 08 Other Four Teesworks Appns(Not Foundry)- response letter.pdf:2: will allow National Highways to identify the requirement for any further mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:18: principle of relocating the Fleet subject to certain mitigation and final details of the diversion to

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: considered at the detailed stage of the planning process based on best practice mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:22: B the ESs. This outlines all dust mitigation measures required for high risk receptors. With

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:22: contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: mitigation.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:29: 5 The scope for incorporating mitigation measures to avoid, reduce, remedy or compensate

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:29: 6 Identification of any effects remaining after mitigation.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:32:based on consultation with the technical team and the inclusion of known mitigation measures. Section 4.0 of the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:15: • Mitigation measures will be recommended for the construction and operational phases, should they

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:15:change targets and mitigation strategy, and discuss our methodology and assumptions to ensure the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:1:MITIGATION AND MONITORING

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:2:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:3:O2.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 3

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:O1.1 The Environmental Statement (‘ES’) has identified a series of mitigation and ongoing

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:O1.3 The Planning Practice Guidance (‘PPG’) confirms that “mitigation measures proposed in an

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: carefully how mitigation measures proposed in an Environmental Statement are to be

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:O1.5 The ES has identified primary/embedded, secondary/additional and tertiary mitigation and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: definitions of the three types of mitigation as follows, which have been used as a basis for

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: categorising mitigation within this ES:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: “Primary mitigation is an intrinsic part of the project design – it should be described in the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Secondary mitigation requires further activity in order to achieve the anticipated outcome –

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Tertiary mitigation will be required regardless of any EIA assessment, as it is imposed, for

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:O1.6 The primary and tertiary mitigation and monitoring for the proposed development are set out in

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Chapter B. The secondary mitigation measures are set out in Section 6.0 of each technical

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: for further secondary mitigation to address these effects. Chapter N concludes that there are no

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: synergistic effects and therefore no associated secondary mitigation. Chapter N does conclude

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 1

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: will be a need for further secondary mitigation, and this is discussed in Section O2.0 below.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5:O1.8 This chapter summarises all mitigation measures proposed throughout the ES for ease of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5:Pg 2 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6:O2.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: of a range of ‘built-in’ mitigation measures into the design of the proposed development. These

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: assumptions on which the assessment and resultant additional mitigation have been based.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6:O2.2 Table O2.1 and Table O2.2 set out the primary and tertiary and secondary mitigation and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: out within Chapter B. The tables also set out the means by which the mitigation can be secured,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: including whether there will be a requirement to submit a mitigation and or monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: the proposed mitigation and monitoring.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6:O2.3 In considering how best to secure the mitigation and monitoring measures, consideration has

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Table O2.1 Summary of Primary/Tertiary Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Summary of Identified Primary/Tertiary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 3

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Summary of Identified Primary/Tertiary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:7:Pg 4 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:8: Summary of Identified Primary/Tertiary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:8:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 5

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Table O2.2 summary of Secondary Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Responsibility

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Transport No mitigation measures are required during N/A N/A

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Biodiversity and Ecology No mitigation is proposed to address the loss N/A N/A

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Noise and Vibration No mitigation required, other than a Risk Noise and Applicant/

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Air Quality No mitigation measures are required during N/A N/A

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: the need for any specific mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9:Pg 6 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:10: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Responsibility

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:10:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 7

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:11: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Responsibility

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:11: Further mitigation activities such as Detailed UXO Risk Applicant and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:11: Risk Assessment or site mitigations to reduce Assessment Principal

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:11:Pg 8 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:12: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Responsibility

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:12:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 9

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Responsibility

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Socio-Economic No mitigation measures are required during N/A N/A

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:13:Pg 10 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Responsibility

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Landscape and Visual The following mitigation measures are Planning Applicant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:14:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 11

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:15: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Responsibility

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:15:Pg 12 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:16: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Responsibility

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:16: Transport The following mitigation measures are OTP secured Applicant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:16: further mitigation is proposed.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:16:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 13

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:17: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Responsibility

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:17: The following mitigation of on-site activities Planning Applicant

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:17: mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:17:Pg 14 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:18: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Responsibility

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:18:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 15

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:19: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Responsibility

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:19: remediation as such there are no mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:19: Socio-Economic No mitigation measures are required during N/A N/A

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:19:Pg 16 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:20: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Responsibility

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:20: Below Ground Heritage No mitigation or monitoring is required N/A N/A

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:20: following mitigation:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:20:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 17

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:21: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Responsibility

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:21:O2.8 Chapter N of the ES considered the requirement for additional mitigation to address any

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:21: developed and that there are ongoing discussions regarding other potential transport mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:21:Pg 18 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:22: cumulative effects. This chapter summarises the range of mitigation and monitoring measures

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:22:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 19

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:23:Pg 20 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:24:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 21

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:25:Pg 22 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:26: propose mitigation, compensation or enhancements where required. A maintain. We may object to any planning applications involving culverting

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:32:3 Flood Mitigation Measures 31

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:35: mitigation and enhancement measures,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:60:3 Flood Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0819-ESM-2022 03 08 (Dorman Point 0819) Conds.pdf:4:required scheme(s) of mitigation shall be set out in an agreement entered into with

R-2020-0819-ESM-2022 03 08 (Dorman Point 0819) Conds.pdf:4:programme for the delivery of the mitigation works. Thereafter the mitigation works

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:6: 7.6 Additional Mitigation 47

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:17: development on neighbouring junctions, and provides embedded mitigation, in

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:36:Mitigation measures are likely to be required to address the future capacity issues

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:36:on the A66/Tees Dock Road/A1053 roundabout. Any potential mitigation for the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:37:Based on the junction modelling outputs, mitigation measures will be required to

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:37:As part of this TA, indicative mitigation has been tested, which includes widening

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:37:Assessment’ scenario (with indicative mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:38:The modelling outputs for the indicative mitigation scheme show a betterment of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:38:establish the type and scale of the mitigation required. As with all junctions that

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:38:are identified as operating above capacity, the development of mitigation should

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:39:A mitigation scheme is likely to be required for the junction to operate efficiently

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:40:Potential mitigation for the junction could include a partial signalisation scheme

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:40:arms of the junction. This mitigation has been reviewed and found to have the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:41:Based on the junction modelling outputs, mitigation measures may be required to

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:41:instance to see if junction operation can be optimised. Any potential mitigation for

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:42:The results indicate a mitigation scheme may be required for the junction to

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:42:undertaken. As noted above, this mitigation exercise needs to consider other

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:44:A mitigation scheme will be required for the junction to operate efficiently for the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:47:A mitigation scheme may be required for the junction to operate efficiently for the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:47:‘2033 Cumulative Assessment’ scenario. Possible mitigation for the junction

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:48:Mitigation measures to address the traffic impacts associated with the proposed

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:49:assess capacity. The need or otherwise for additional mitigation measures will be

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:49:the junction. Indicative mitigation measures, such as widening the roundabout to

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:50:‘2033 Cumulative Assessment’ scenario. A mitigation scheme is expected to be

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:50:mitigation for the junction could include a partial signalisation scheme and layout

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:50:existing Infrastructure. Mitigation measures may still be required but should take

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:50:mitigation for the junction could be to extend the short/pocket/flared lanes on

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:53:7.6 Additional Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:54:suggestions for potential mitigation measures for the assessed junctions, noting

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:59: undertaken to determine when mitigation measures are required;

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:59: However, the design and implementation of any mitigation scheme for the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:60:highway mitigation considered to be essential, there would be no transport related

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:71:suitable mitigation features may be considered as part of the development

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:80:prepared and will form part of the embedded mitigation of the development. The

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:80:identify any necessary mitigation to minimise the impact of construction traffic on

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:134:Filename: A66_Tees Dock Road_Lackenby Access Roundabout_mitigation.j9

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:134: Access_with mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:257:suitable mitigation features may be considered as part of the development

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:266:prepared and will form part of the embedded mitigation of the development. The

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:266:identify any necessary mitigation to minimise the impact of construction traffic on

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:36: prevent development or require mitigation through the submission of planning applications.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:36: through mitigation and compensation measures delivered as part of planning applications.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:38: these species and no on-site mitigation is proposed.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:38: Mitigation, Compensation and Enhancement

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:38: mitigation to be identified (and delivered within the development site) for the loss of on-site

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:38:5.21 Due to the nature of the proposals and the practical constraints to providing mitigation within

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:38: effects resulting in the loss of, or permanent damage to, ecological features despite mitigation.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:39: provided as part of mitigation or compensation measures. Enhancement could be described as

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:40: each. This assessment took into consideration the embedded mitigation measures, in particular

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:40: mitigation measures specified in the application are satisfactorily delivered.”

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:41: mitigation of flooding elsewhere are taken.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:42: such removal is not possible or not in the public interest, mitigation measures must be

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:43: strategy, blue green Infrastructure and other embedded mitigation. SuDS should be used to

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:44: causing a significant effect and to determine any additional mitigation needed. The assumptions

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:45: classification of medium to high risk. As a consequence of this, mitigation measures applicable

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:45: to high risk sites will be employed at the site. Best practice mitigation measures in the form of a

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:45: included as embedded mitigation. With the appropriate mitigation measures suitable for high

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:45: significant and hence no mitigation measures are required. There is, therefore, no conflict with

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:46: in situ. As there is no potential for preservation in situ, the only mitigation possible is

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:46: preservation by record. Mitigation measures proposed initially focus on cleaning and recording

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:46: of preservation, and significance. A further programme of mitigation relating to the blast

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:47: region. The following mitigation measures are assumed during the construction phase of the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:47:5.74 With these mitigation measures in place it should be possible to minimise adverse effects on

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:47: the Eston Nab Hill footpath. To assist in addressing this the following mitigation measures are

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:48: when experienced from those receptors especially with the imposition of typical mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:49: will be undertaken based on a series of embedded mitigation measures that are in built into the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:50: additional mitigation measures have been proposed:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:50:5.96 These mitigation measures will be secured by way of an appropriately worded planning

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:50: condition or obligation. With these mitigation measures in place it is concluded that there will

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:51: mitigation considered to be essential, there would be no transport related reasons why this

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:53: ground gases on the site. Detailed risk assessment or site mitigations are also considered

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:53:5.110 Taking into account mitigation in the form of compliance with the remediation strategy and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:53: other mitigation measures, Arcadis concludes that impacts on human health, surface waters,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:58: mitigation not previously identified.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:59: additional mitigation measures; albeit it is necessary to consider the likelihood of those other

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:59: receptors. In this context there is no requirement for additional mitigation measures to address

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:59: above the mitigation and monitoring measures already proposed all of which are capable of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:59: construction and operational phases. No mitigation is proposed or possible in relation to the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:59: options, which will help to mitigation the cumulative greenhouse gas emissions. Framework and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:64: options, which will help to mitigation the cumulative greenhouse gas emissions. Framework and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:64: undertaken for relevant highway junctions to determine when mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:64: The design and implementation of any mitigation scheme for the junctions must take into

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:65: proposals means that direct mitigation cannot be identified and delivered within the site, STDC

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:65: provided as part of mitigation or compensation measures will be provided in the form of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:65:7.9 No mitigation is proposed or possible in relation to the significant adverse cumulative

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point - Planning Statement - Dec 2020.pdf:65: mitigation considered to be essential, there would be no transport related reasons why this

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:14: similar timeframe, it is likely that the sites would require high risk dust mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:14: measures. As such, it is proposed that we embed the high risk dust mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:15: • Mitigation measures will be recommended for the construction and operational

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 14

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:3:J6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 19

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:4: development. Mitigation measures to reduce any adverse environmental effects are identified as

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:10: effects section represent a before mitigation scenario.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:15: embedded mitigation measures. However, mitigation of some emissions arising from

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:16: development and any carbon mitigation strategies employed to reduce GHG emissions.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:17: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:17: consider potential primary embedded mitigation measures that relate to climate change an d

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:17: provide a reduction in carbon emissions and act as primary mitigation measures. These include

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:17: have not been identified at this stage, but the range of opportunities is set out in the mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:17: assessment does not consider the potential embedded mitigation they would provide in relation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:22:J6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:22: mitigation measures to reduce the GHG emissions associated with the proposed development,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:22: across the full life cycle. Table J6.1 summarises possible mitigation measures for each of the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:22: Table J6.1 Mitigation opportunities by life cycle - Construction

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:22: Lifecycle stage Possible mitigation measures Implementation and monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Lifecycle stage Possible mitigation measures Implementation and monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:23: national carbon target of net zero. Possible mitigation measures against each relevant

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Table J6.2 Mitigation opportunities by life cycle- Operation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Stage Possible mitigation measures Implementation and monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:24:J6.5 Mitigation of emissions from user and staff travel will be developed in full as part of a Full

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:25: substantial residual construction-related emissions, even after mitigation.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:26: Receptor Impact Potential Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 16

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:3:K6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 17

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:5: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of th e development. Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:20: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:20:K5.1 There are no embedded mitigation measures relevant to below ground heritage.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:20: mitigation would therefore need to be undertaken in advance of or during the site

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:21:K6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:21: below ground assets in situ. As there is no potential for preservation in situ, the only mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:21:K6.2 The mitigation measures proposed initially focus on cleaning and recording of the area of the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:21: and significance. A further programme of mitigation relating to the blast furnaces may be

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:21:K6.5 No mitigation or monitoring is required during the operational phase of the development.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:23:K8.4 Mitigation measures comprising the excavation and recording of archaeological features and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Mitigation and

R-2020-0819-ESM-EP NUI.pdf:1:carried out to determine whether further mitigation, over and above the proposed

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 22

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:3:F6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 30

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:5: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:5: providing mitigation measures across a range of projects, ranging from small scale to major

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:8: and mitigation rather than by the determination of statutory nuisance and/or prosecution or

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:9: the appropriate mitigation measures are implemented. Experience has shown that once the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:9: appropriate mitigation measures are applied, in most cases the resulting dust impacts can be

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:10: iv. Formulation of mitigation measures, where appropriate, to ensure any adverse effects

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:11:F3.8 Mitigation measures applicable to high risk sites outlined in the IAQM guidance ix will

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:11: assumption that the required mitigation measures are appropriately implemented, the residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:11: therefore been scoped out, on the understanding that the appropriate level of mitigation will be

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:11: CEMP) and is considered as embedded mitigation. This approach has been agreed with the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:21: based on a series of embedded mitigation measures that are built into the design of the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:26: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:26:F5.1 As described in Section F3.8, the best practice construction dust mitigation measures for high

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:26: are considered as embedded mitigation and allowed construction dust to be scoped out of the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:27: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate;

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:28:F5.3 As with the construction and earthworks mitigation, the below measures are highly

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:28:F5.4 There are no embedded mitigation measures that relate to the operational phase of the proposed

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:28: However, high risk mitigation measures from the IAQM guidance ix have been included in the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:28: Framework CEMP as embedded mitigation measures, which will address the potential overlap

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:35:F6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:35: identify the need for any specific mitigation measures. Notwithstanding this, a Framework

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:35: development, therefore no air quality mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:36: Significant as a result of the operational phase of the proposed development. As no mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37:F8.4 Best practice mitigation measures in line with the IAQM guidance on the assessment of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37: construction practices have been included as embedded mitigation. With the appropriate best

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37: practice mitigation measures suitable for high risk sites in place, there is likely to be a Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37: Not Significant. Therefore, no mitigation measures are proposed for the operational phase.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37: account of embedded Mitigation and Effects

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37: mitigation) Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:3:B8.0 Summary of Primary and Tertiary Mitigation 33

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:5: • Section B8.0: summarises the ‘embedded’ primary and tertiary mitigation;

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:15: EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:29:B7.14 Site hoarding, fencing, plants, machinery, lighting and mitigation measures will be erected and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:29: brought onto the site. Mitigation and protective fencing will be required around areas of land

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:31:B7.30 A FCEMP is being designed into the scheme as tertiary mitigation and will therefore form part

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:31: of the embedded mitigation for the proposed developments. It is proposed that the measures

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:31: phase and this will be secured by an appropriately worded planning condition. The mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:31:B7.31 The FCEMP key principles/mitigation measures are as follows.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:32: 1 Mitigation will be included to prevent and mitigate against any accidents, including but not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:33:B7.32 Mitigation measures applicable to high risk sites outlined in the IAQM Guidance on the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:34: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate;

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:35:B7.34 As with the construction and earthworks mitigation, the below measures are highly

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:36: mitigation measures to protect site workers would include on-site inductions, provision of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:37: Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:37:B8.1 This section describes the primary and tertiary mitigation which has been assumed to be in

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:37: • Primary or ‘embedded’ mitigation includes measures and modifications that have been

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:37: • Tertiary mitigation includes ‘best practice’ measures or actions that will occur outside of the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:37:B8.3 Primary and tertiary mitigation measures assumed to be in place during the construction phase

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38:B8.4 The Parameters Plan provides for the following embedded mitigation:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38: conditioned and form part of the embedded mitigation of the scheme:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38:B8.6 These mitigation measures will be secured through a range of planning conditions and will

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38: ensure that the development delivers the required primary and tertiary mitigation. This

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38: mitigation is taken into account in the potential effects sections of technical Chapters C to M

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38: (e.g. the potential effects defined assume that all of the mitigation measures above form part of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38:B8.7 Any additional mitigation required over and above that already listed in this chapter is provided

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:38: for within the mitigation section of Chapters C to M. Full details of the mitigation, monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:40: Without the proposed development none of the proposed mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B -Site Description and Scheme Proposals - Dec 2020.PDF:43: effects in terms of habitat mitigation and compensation on and off-site

R-2020-0819-ESM-EA R_2020_0819_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:the approved details and any mitigation measures recommended as part of the

R-2020-0819-ESM-EA R_2020_0819_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:ensure mitigation for contaminated or poor quality surface water is appropriate. The

R-2020-0819-ESM-EA R_2020_0819_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:2:application, on any design changes, additional mitigation, compensation or enhancement

R-2020-0819-ESM-EA R_2020_0819_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:Environment & Biodiversity Strategy to demonstrate the mitigation and compensation for

R-2020-0819-ESM-EA R_2020_0819_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:the mitigation hierarchy to firstly secure on-site mitigation, then compensation through

R-2020-0819-ESM-EA R_2020_0819_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:the Environment & Biodiversity Strategy. On site mitigation must be the first port of call

R-2020-0819-ESM-EA R_2020_0819_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:daylighting of these as part of any onsite mitigation and biodiversity net gain.

R-2020-0819-ESM-EA R_2020_0819_ESM 16 February 2021 OFFICIAL.pdf:4:adequately assessed and the correct mitigation and compensation value identified.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:19: principle of relocating the Fleet subject to certain mitigation and final details of the diversion to

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:22: considered at the detailed stage of the planning process based on best practice mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:23: B the ESs. This outlines all dust mitigation measures required for high risk receptors. With

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:23: contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:24: mitigation.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:30: 5 The scope for incorporating mitigation measures to avoid, reduce, remedy or compensate

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:30: 6 Identification of any effects remaining after mitigation.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:33:based on consultation with the technical team and the inclusion of known mitigation measures. Section 4.0 of the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41:potential mitigation), are proposed:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 34

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:3:L6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 49

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:4: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:8: 7 Identify any design and mitigation measures appropriate to the development proposals and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:15: mitigation measures that help to avoid or reduce the potential for adverse visual effects.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:20: likely to arise from the finalised design taking into account mitigation measures and change over

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:37: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:37: can be made or mitigation measures can be embedded in the proposal to reduce these effects.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:37: Appropriate mitigation measures have been explored to eliminate, minimise or manage

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:37: identified potential significant landscape and visual effects. The embedded mitigation measures

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:37: Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP). Full details of the mitigation measures

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:38: Change Change and Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:39:L5.14 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:40:L5.20 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:40:L5.25 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:41:L5.30 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:41:L5.35 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:42:L5.40 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:52:L6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:52:L6.1 A number of mitigation measures have been proposed to minimise or manage identified

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:52:L6.2 The following mitigation measures are proposed during the construction phase of the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:52:L6.3 The following mitigation measures are proposed during the operation phase of the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:55: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:55: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:56: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:56: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:57: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:57: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:58: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:58: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:59: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:59: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 35

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:3:G6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 42

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:4: development. Mitigation measures to reduce any negative environmental effects are identified

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Practice Guidance (Ref good design and mitigation. For example, flood risk can be reduced and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Good design and mitigation measures can be secured through site specific

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:6: and / or obligations to secure mitigation and compensatory measures where

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:11: ‘residual risk’ which can be managed through mitigation measures such as sustainable drainage

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:11: mitigation of flooding elsewhere are taken”; “prioritising the use of sustainable drainage

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:12: Where such removal is not possible or not in the public interest, mitigation measures must

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:12: should proactively help the mitigation of, and adaption to, climate change including the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Assessment) that shall be undertaken prior to construction (as detailed in the Mitigation Section

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:25: process. This point is picked up in Section G6.0: Mitigation and Monitoring;

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:38: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:38:G5.1 A full list of the mitigation measures embedded into the proposed development is provided in

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:38: embedded mitigation for the proposed development during the construction phase. The

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:38: 3 Mitigation will be included to prevent and mitigate against any accidents, including but not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:38:G5.3 Of the other embedded mitigation measures that shall be in place during the construction phase

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:39: risk are detailed in Section G6 Mitigation and Monitoring.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:39: along with the identification of mitigation, where necessary, which is required in order to

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:39: Accident Hazard Risk before Mitigation Relevance Embedded Impact

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:39: of accident mitigation level after

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:39: to chapter mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:40: Accident Hazard Risk before Mitigation Relevance Embedded Impact

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:40: of accident mitigation level after

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:40: to chapter mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:41: Accident Hazard Risk before Mitigation Relevance Embedded Impact

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:41: of accident mitigation level after

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:41: to chapter mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:42: as detailed in Section G6 – Mitigation and Monitoring. This assessment is for the outline

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:42: development, prior to the implementation of any additional mitigation measures i.e. those not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:43: to be of minor magnitude without embedded mitigation. With the implementation of the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:45:G6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:45:G6.4 Secondary mitigation (in addition to the documents in G6.1) shall include the following with

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:46: G6.5 The table below sets out the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures for the construction

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:46:Receptor Potential Impact Additional Mitigation - Additional Mitigation - Operation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:47:Receptor Potential Impact Additional Mitigation - Additional Mitigation - Operation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:48:Receptor Potential Impact Additional Mitigation - Additional Mitigation - Operation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:48:Secondary bedrock and Groundwater recharge No additional mitigation No additional mitigation identified.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:49:Receptor Potential Impact Additional Mitigation - Additional Mitigation - Operation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:49:Surface waters and Potential for No additional mitigation No additional mitigation identified.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:50:G7.1 Embedded mitigation is detailed in Section G5.0 Potential Effects and additional mitigation is

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:50: detailed in Section G6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring. This section contains an assessment of the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:50: residual effects which remain after this mitigation is applied during the construction and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:50:G7.3 The mitigation measures are detailed in the mitigation section (in particular the avoidance of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:50: The additional mitigation outlined above will change the effect from adverse to beneficial.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:50: Significant. The additional mitigation outlined above will not change the effect of the proposed

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:50: embedded mitigation measures.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:51:G7.15 The additional mitigation outlined above does not change the effect arising from the proposed

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:51: embedded mitigation measures. Receptor sensitivity category for the superficial and bedrock

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:51: implementation of the mitigation measures and result in Minor Beneficial effect which is Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:52:G8.1 The table below summarises the receptors, potential effects, additional mitigation measures and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:52: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:52: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:53: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:53: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:54: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:54: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:54: Mercia Reduced Negligible Adverse and Not No further mitigation is Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:55: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:55: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:55: Superficial Reduced Negligible Adverse and Not No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:56: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:56: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:57: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:57: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:58: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:58: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:58: Mercia Reduced Negligible Adverse and Not No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:58: Superficial Reduced Negligible Adverse and Not No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:58:G8.2 There will be no significant Adverse effects remaining after mitigation and there will be

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water Management and Flooding - Dec 2020.PDF:58: implementation of a remediation strategy, and other embedded mitigation. SuDS shall also be

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:9:to development and any opportunities for mitigation and ecological enhancements.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:16:Mitigation and Enhancement Opportunities

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:16:Mitigation for loss of biodiversity should be provided and enhancements for biodiversity sought where

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:16:mitigation and enhancements on site, for example through a Landscape & Ecological Management

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:16:Plan for the site. If on-site mitigation and enhancements are not possible then off-site measures

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 20

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:3:E6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 28

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:5: impacts and effects; the baseline conditions in the surrounding area; mitigation measures to

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:7: significant effects are identified along with the envisaged mitigation to avoid or reduce these

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:8: vibration assessment and envisaged mitigation are informed by this legislation. Specific

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:9: series of embedded mitigation measures that are in built into the design of development. Those

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:10: significant effect and to determine any additional mitigation needed.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:17: natural barriers and provide embedded mitigation that was considered during the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:24:E5.3 There are no embedded mitigation measures that relate to the operational phase of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:24: whether further mitigation, over and above the proposed CEMP and CTMP, is required in order

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:32:E6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:32: significant, however the following mitigation of on-site activities will help to ensure the noise

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:32: significant and therefore no mitigation is proposed.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:33:E7.1 No temporary Significant effects have been identified. The proposed mitigation set out within

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:33: mitigation has not yet been finalised, the residual effects are assumed to remain as set out in

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:33: mitigation measures set out above will help minimise the noise effects further and they will

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:34: noted that the additional mitigation measures are identified to seek to keep noise to a minimum,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:34: (taking account of Mitigation and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:34: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:35: (taking account of Mitigation and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:35: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: 5 Section 16.0: summarises the proposed mitigation and monitoring to be secured as part of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4: 4 Allowed review of the effectiveness of any identified mitigation and compensation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:11: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:11: part of the embedded mitigation of the development (see paragraph 3.11 above). The CEMP

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:12:4.9 With the implementation of embedded mitigation measures and the below secondary mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:12: increase in development traffic travelling through the junctions. With the secondary mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:12: effects, after mitigation, on pedestrian and cyclist amenity. This is Not Significant.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:12: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:12:4.10 At this point in time no secondary mitigation measures have been identified for the construction

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:12: above, secondary mitigation measures are proposed. These measures include: an Occupier

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13:5.5 Embedded mitigation will take the form of adherence to measures outlined in the Framework

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13: 1 Mitigation will be included to prevent and mitigate against any accidents, including but not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13:5.6 The only other embedded mitigation measure relevant to the ecological assessment is:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13: Mitigation and Compensation Measures

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13: mitigation is possible other than that described under Embedded Mitigation.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:14: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:14:6.5 There are no embedded mitigation measures for the operation of the proposed development.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:14: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15:7.5 Construction dust mitigation measures have been included in the Framework CEMP. These

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15:7.6 There are no embedded mitigation measures proposed as a result of air quality for the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: successful implementation of best practice mitigation measures for construction dust that are

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:16: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:16:7.9 Beyond the embedded mitigation measures, no further mitigation is required for the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:16: considered to be Not Significant, no mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:16: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:16: embedded mitigation for the proposed development during the construction phase (see

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:16:8.7 Other embedded mitigation measures relevant to water management and flooding include:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: implementation of the embedded mitigation measures described above, the effects on the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17:8.11 The implementation of the mitigation measures described above would result in the following

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19:9.9 Embedded mitigation measures include items such as the implementation of the Framework

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19: for direct contact with and inhalation of contaminants. With mitigation (described below) and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19: embedded mitigation, this is expected to result in a Minor Adverse impact on construction

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19: with the implementation of the mitigation (see details below) and embedded mitigation. Where

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19:H1.1 Mitigation measures are required to reduce the environmental impact associated with the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19: remediation is considered necessary additional mitigation will be agreed with the relevant

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19: and buildings should be designed with adequate mitigation measures. A detailed UXO risk

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19:H1.3 An Outline Remediation Strategy is included in the embedded mitigation. This covers the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:19: before a Remediation Strategy can be prepared. As mitigation, once the further investigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: Socio-Economics no mitigation measures are proposed in this regard.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21: consider potential primary embedded mitigation measures that relate to climate change and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21: provide a reduction in carbon emissions and act as primary mitigation measures. These include

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21: have not been identified at this stage, but the range of opportunities is set out in the mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:22: scenario, this assessment has not considered the potential embedded mitigation they would

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:22: conservative of assumptions and represent a reasonable worst case ‘before mitigation’ scenario.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:22: national or local GHG emissions targets after mitigation. The development is therefore assessed

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:22: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: mitigation measures to reduce the GHG emissions associated with the proposed development,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23:12.6 The embedded mitigation measures relevant to LVIA are the fixing of development parameters

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24:12.9 A number of mitigation measures have been proposed to minimise or manage identified

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24:12.10 The following mitigation measures are proposed during the construction phase of the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24:12.11 Mitigation for the operational phase of development will comprise:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24:13.3 There are no embedded mitigation measures relevant to below ground heritage.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25:13.5 With mitigation (described below), this is expected to result in a Minor Adverse impact on the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25:13.7 As there is no potential for preservation in situ, the only mitigation possible is preservation by

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25: record. As the full extent of surviving archaeology is as yet unknown the mitigation measures

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:26: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:26:14.11 Embedded mitigation relevant to the waste assessment includes:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:26: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:26:14.14 No mitigation measures are required to reduce the impacts of the proposed development.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:27: those effects, may give rise to a need for additional mitigation not identified previously. No

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:27: Significant synergistic effects were identified and therefore no further mitigation required in this

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:27: regarding other potential transport mitigation measures.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:28:16.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:28:16.2 These documents, and a range of other important mitigation measures, will be secured by way of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 16

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:3:M6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 20

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:4: construction and operational phases of the proposed development. Mitigation measures to

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:11: 5 Identify opportunities/mitigation measures to reduce, re-use, recover and/ or recycle

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:15:M3.16 Following the assessment, mitigation measures will be identified where practicable. All

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:15: mitigation measures identified will aim to ensure waste and materials are managed in

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:19: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:19:M5.2 In assessing the effects, it assumes that the following embedded mitigation measures apply to

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:23:M6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:23:M6.2 In addition to the embedded mitigation identified in Chapter B and Section M5.0 of this

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:24:M6.5 Using the mitigation measures above and the appointment of a licensed and high performing

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:25: collection, waste transport, treatment and disposal and include the following mitigation:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:25: scoped out of further assessment and therefore no additional mitigation measures have been

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:26: development, via the implementation of the mitigation measures outlined in Section M6.0

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:26: be Negligible Adverse impact (Not Significant). Whilst mitigation will reduce any effects, the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: mitigation, it is possible the volumes of waste requiring disposal may be reduced by at least 80%

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: (taking account Mitigation and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:29: (taking account Mitigation and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020(1).PDF:29: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-SBC RESPONSE.pdf:3: mitigation which is required is appropriately secured through planning conditions or section 106

R-2020-0819-ESM-EP CL.pdf:2: natural hazards or former activities such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-CONSERVATION.pdf:1:of those mitigation proposals.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Decision Notice 0819.pdf:3: planning authority that confirms the feasibility of providing habitat mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Decision Notice 0819.pdf:3: • The details of viable compensatory habitat where on-site mitigation is

R-2020-0819-ESM-Decision Notice 0819.pdf:3: The identified mitigation and, where demonstrated to be necessary and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Decision Notice 0819.pdf:4: implemented in accordance with the approved details and any mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Decision Notice 0819.pdf:6: Authority. Any mitigation measures identified as part of the assessment shall

R-2020-0819-ESM-Decision Notice 0819.pdf:7: protection measures or gas mitigation will be complied with thereafter,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Decision Notice 0819.pdf:10: required scheme(s) of mitigation shall be set out in an agreement entered into

R-2020-0819-ESM-Decision Notice 0819.pdf:10: responsibilities and programme for the delivery of the mitigation works.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Decision Notice 0819.pdf:10: Thereafter the mitigation works shall be delivered in accordance with the

R-2020-0819-ESM-R-2020-0819-ESM-Archaeological Advice, Dorman Point Site R-2020-0819-ESM.pdf:2:4.5 Impacts and potential mitigation are summarised at Table K8.1 of the DBA/assessment.

R-2020-0819-ESM-R-2020-0819-ESM-Archaeological Advice, Dorman Point Site R-2020-0819-ESM.pdf:2:We agree with the suggested mitigation for the open hearth furnace remains and other

R-2020-0819-ESM-R-2020-0819-ESM-Archaeological Advice, Dorman Point Site R-2020-0819-ESM.pdf:2:hearth furnaces, not the remainder of the Site as a whole). This mitigation consists of

R-2020-0819-ESM-R-2020-0819-ESM-Archaeological Advice, Dorman Point Site R-2020-0819-ESM.pdf:2:4.6 Mitigation of impact (by other archaeological investigation: evaluation, and where

R-2020-0819-ESM-R-2020-0819-ESM-Archaeological Advice, Dorman Point Site R-2020-0819-ESM.pdf:3:6.2 The mitigation proposals stated above constitute a reasonable approach, but the Council

R-2020-0819-ESM-R-2020-0819-ESM-Archaeological Advice, Dorman Point Site R-2020-0819-ESM.pdf:3:secured by conditions in the earlier (ERF permission) as well as the mitigation of the impact

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:4: mitigation not previously identified.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:4:N1.2 Chapter O then summarises the mitigation and monitoring measures identified within this ES

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:4: consider additional mitigation measures; albeit it is necessary to consider the likelihood of those

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:4: • Section N2.0 - Summary of residual effects (following mitigation) identified within the ES

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: effects) and any additional mitigation measures required to have regard to those effects;

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:6: mitigation measures described in Chapter O) as identified in Chapters C to M of this ES that

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:10: give rise to a need for additional mitigation not identified previously.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:11:N3.5 Table N3.1 highlights residual effects on identified receptors after mitigation. Where a series of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:11: a new significant effect giving rise to a need for mitigation has been undertaken. This has been

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:11: been given to mitigation measures already either embedded into the development or capable of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:11:N3.7 In the context of the analysis above, there is no requirement for additional mitigation measures

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:11: over and above the mitigation and monitoring measures already proposed in Chapters C to M

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:12: effects requiring mitigation.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:13: • together provide an opportunity for RCBC to have greater control over the mitigation of this

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:29: and additional mitigation measures, which when implemented will result in no

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:30: assessment takes account of embedded and other mitigation associated with each of the Tier 1

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:30: and no further mitigation is possible. Therefore, the residual cumulative effects will be as set

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41: sensitive receptors, the additional site-specific mitigation for Long Acres, Foundry and Steel

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41: building is known. Further information on these additional site-specific mitigation measures are

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41: set out in the Mitigation and Monitoring sections of the Noise and Vibration Chapters of the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41:N5.37 With the implementation of the additional site-specific mitigation measures set out in the Noise

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41:N5.41 With regards to construction dust, high risk mitigation measures from the best practice IAQM

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:41: and are included as embedded mitigation. It is considered that as high-risk measures are likely

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:42: successful implementation of appropriate mitigation measures, the effects will be Not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:42: proposed development site - that mitigation of impacts will be achieved through the CEMP and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:42: secondary mitigation measures. In addition, the assessment is also based on the assumptions

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:42:N5.49 In addition to the Framework CEMP and other embedded mitigation measures, secondary

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:42: mitigation measures for both schemes include a Construction Stage Surface Water Management

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:43: limited. With the implementation of the similar, effective pollution control and mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:43:N5.51 In terms of surface water, the mitigation measures are anticipated to have a Negligible

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:43:N5.55 With the implementation of similar, mitigation measures at the Lackenby site, the cumulative

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: commonality, and the potential for combined mitigation strategies, it is proposed that the GHG

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:47: further consideration and mitigation. Once further information is available on the end users of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:49:N5.86 No mitigation is proposed or possible in relation to the Significant Beneficial effects and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:49: mitigation the cumulative greenhouse gas emissions. There are ongoing discussions regarding

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:49: other potential transport mitigation measures.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:51:N5.100 At this stage of the development, additional mitigation measures to reduce the cumulative

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:53: implementing mitigation measures during day, evening and night-time;

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:60: the determination of the planning application to discuss potential mitigation measures.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:64: the proposed additional site-specific mitigation for Long Acres, Foundry and Steel House sites

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:64: Further details on these site-specific measures are included in the Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:64:N5.150 With the implementation of the additional site-specific mitigation measures set out in the Noise

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:64:N5.154 With regards to construction dust, high risk mitigation measures from the best practice IAQM

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:64: proposed Tier 1 developments and are included as embedded mitigation. It is considered that as

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:64:N5.155 If each of the Tier 2 developments successfully implements an appropriate level of mitigation for

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:64: construction dust guidance uses the category ‘high’ as the most stringent level of mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:64: measures that can be proposed, and as the Tier 1 sites all include high risk mitigation measures

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:64: and each of the Tier 2 sites should include appropriate mitigation measures, no further

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:64: mitigation measures are suggested here. This is considered the most appropriate approach to

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:68: proposed development: that mitigation of impacts will be achieved through the council making

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:68: the mitigation measures planning conditions of the application. In addition, the assessment is

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:68: identified receptors have the potential to be impacted. Nonetheless, with mitigation in place,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:69: identified receptors have the potential to be impacted. Nonetheless, with mitigation in place,

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:70: commonality and will not share combined mitigation strategies. For this reason, the full list of

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:70: spatially and in terms of both ownership and likely mitigation measures. As such a high-level

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:72:N5.198 No mitigation is proposed or possible in relation to the Significant Beneficial effects and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:72: mitigation the cumulative greenhouse gas emissions. There are ongoing discussions regarding

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:72: other potential transport mitigation measures.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:73: whether there is a need for further mitigation (synergistic effects). It also considers the potential

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:73:N6.5 No mitigation is proposed or possible in relation to the Significant Beneficial cumulative effects

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:73: supply options, which will help to mitigation the cumulative greenhouse gas emissions. There

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative and Residual Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:73: are ongoing discussions regarding other potential transport mitigation measures.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point HRA Rev B(1).PDF:8:embedded mitigation it is considered that significant pollution at a scale likely to affect the SPA is

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point HRA Rev B(1).PDF:8:substantial distance separating the development site from the SPA, the mitigation embedded within

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point HRA Rev B(1).PDF:8:embedded mitigation measures specified in the application are satisfactorily delivered.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 22

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:3:D6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 26

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:5: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:9: iii Assessing the significance of any residual effects after mitigation;

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:11: birds, invertebrates and habitats. Discussions were also had as to how any direct mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:26: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:26: (CEMP) will form part of the embedded mitigation for the proposed development during the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:26: 1 Mitigation will be included to prevent and mitigate against any accidents, including but not

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:26:D5.3 Section B8.0 Summary of Primary and Tertiary Mitigation of Chapter B of this ES, provides a

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:26: list of further embedded mitigation measures, one of which is relevant to this ecological

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:26:D5.4 The assessment of potential effects assumes that this embedded mitigation is in place and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:27: on the site’s integrity. This assessment takes into consideration the embedded mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:27: mitigation measures specified in the application are satisfactorily delivered.”.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:27:D5.13 As no additional mitigation is required beyond the embedded mitigation measures set out at

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:29: above, mitigation has been incorporated into the Framework CEMP to prevent this, and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:30:D6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:30:D6.1 No mitigation is proposed to address the loss of on site habitats at this stage and therefore the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:30: mitigation is proposed.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:31:D7.1 As no additional mitigation is proposed during construction, residual effects are as set out in

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:31:D7.2 As no additional mitigation is proposed during operation, residual effects are as set out in

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:34:D9.1 Compensation refers to the process by which any residual effects after mitigation will be

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:34: specific VERs which require like-for-like mitigation. The Defra Biodiversity Metric 2.0 requires

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:34:D9.7 There is no equivalent guidance on the need for like-for-like mitigation for species and there is

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:34: being of County significance or above it would seem appropriate that like-for-like mitigation is

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:36:D10.3 Following the implementation of the embedded mitigation measures, significant residual effects

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:36: Receptor Impact Embedded Potential Effects Mitigation Residual Effects

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:36: Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:37: Receptor Impact Embedded Potential Effects Mitigation Residual Effects

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:37: Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:37:D10.5 Taking into consideration the proposed mitigation measures, effects on VERs that would be

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 19

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:3:I6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 26

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:5: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:11: exist in the surrounding area; the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or offset any

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:11: development and their significance. Opportunities for the mitigation of any adverse effects and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:29: Table I5.2 Socio-Economic Effects (without mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:30:I6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:30:I6.1 This section considers the need for mitigation measures in order to address any adverse effects

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:30: a result, no mitigation measures are required during construction.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:30: employment and economic output. As a result, no mitigation measures are required during

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:31:I7.1 As no mitigation measures are assessed as being necessary, the residual effects are the same as

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:31: beneficial and no additional mitigation measures are proposed. The residual effects are

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:31: and no additional mitigation measures are proposed. The residual effects are therefore

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:31: Receptor Potential Effects Mitigation Residual Effects

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:32:I8.3 Given the beneficial nature of the potential effects assessed, no mitigation measures are

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:32: (taking account of Mitigation and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economic - Dec 2020.PDF:32: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 14

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:3:C6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 22

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:5: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:9: 4 Proposal of any mitigation measures to offset any likely significant impacts in relation to

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:9: 5 Assessment of any residual impacts accounting for the implementation of mitigation.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:9: quantitative assessment will be undertaken based on a series of embedded mitigation measures

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:11:C3.16 Residual effects have been identified in C7.0 if they remain after mitigation has been taken into

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:18: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:18: prepared and forms part of the embedded mitigation for the development. The CEMP identifies

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:18: • Any other mitigation required to minimise the impact of construction traffic on the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:18:C5.4 These mitigation measures will be secured through a range of planning conditions, designed and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:18: the required primary and tertiary mitigation. This mitigation is taken into account in the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:19:C5.11 These mitigation measures will be secured by planning condition and they are taken into

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:19:C5.14 The phasing of any mitigation measures will be subject to further discussion with the relevant

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:19: effects to driver delay are likely to be Not Significant. Any mitigation will be reflected in the

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:26:C6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:26:C6.1 As set out in the embedded mitigation section of this Chapter, a Framework CEMP and CTMP

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:26: additional mitigation measures over and above the requirements outlined in the CEMP.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:26: the road network, the following additional mitigation measures are proposed:

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:26:C6.3 These mitigation measures will be secured by way of an appropriately worded planning

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:27: Receptor Potential effect Mitigation Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:28: Receptor Potential effect Mitigation Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:28: Roundabout on Driver and Teesworks site. Mitigation measures to address

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:29: construction traffic on the transport networks. No additional mitigation measures over and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:29:C8.5 Similarly, a bus service is proposed as embedded mitigation to encourage sustainable transport

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:29: to the development site. Further additional mitigation is expected through the implementation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:29: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:29: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:30: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:30: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:31: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:31: mitigation)

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:31: nby Road permanent related to turning to be introduced to mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:6: discuss and agree the scope of each EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:8: adverse effects on the environment are identified, the assessment process establishes mitigation

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:9: of this ES. This outlines all dust mitigation measures required for high risk receptors. With

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:10: new contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:11: considered to be tertiary mitigation and ‘embedded’ (see Chapter B of this ES for further detail).

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:11: With this tertiary mitigation in place, the risk of significant effects to human health and other

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:11: to discuss and agree the scope of each EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: O Mitigation and Monitoring Lichfields

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: scenario. It also includes details on the construction methodology and ‘embedded mitigation’.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: and cumulative effects and Chapter O considers mitigation, compensation and monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:24: 0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:27: necessary mitigation, monitoring

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:28: 5 The scope for incorporating mitigation measures to avoid, reduce, remedy or compensate

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:28: 6 Identification of any effects remaining after mitigation.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:28:A7.4 Mitigation measures that are identified with specific ES Chapters, and the mechanisms for

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Introduction and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: minimise significant adverse effects on the environment. Where ‘built in’ mitigation is taken

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:15: development and allow a programme of mitigation to be established.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:48: features which may be impacted and require mitigation. A mitigation strategy will be developed in

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:48: for mitigation be rapidly developed.

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:52:9.5 Where assessment has identified the need for further analysis and no further mitigation work has

R-2020-0819-ESM-Dorman Point ES - Vol 3 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020.PDF:53:11.1 Formal publication is expected to take place following a mitigation phase of fieldwork; should such

R-2023-0277-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-623-01-Data Gap Areas GQRA.pdf:9: mining, and any proposals for mitigation including land remediation (as well as potential impacts on the

R-2023-0277-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-623-01-Data Gap Areas GQRA.pdf:21:subsequent mitigation measures required (e.g. building controls) would be the responsibility of the developer.

R-2023-0277-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-623-01-Data Gap Areas GQRA.pdf:21:mitigation measures which would be considered standard practice in brownfield site redevelopment.

R-2023-0277-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-623-01-Data Gap Areas GQRA.pdf:45: works across the site and shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set

R-2023-0277-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-623-01-Data Gap Areas GQRA.pdf:45: mitigation measures required;

R-2023-0277-CD-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-623-01-Data Gap Areas GQRA.pdf:45: mitigation measures.

R-2023-0277-CD-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2: works across the site and shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set

R-2023-0277-CD-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2: mitigation measures required;

R-2023-0277-CD-DECISION NOTICE.pdf:2: mitigation measures.

R-2023-0277-CD-63262_01 - NZT DoC 4 - 04.04.23.PDF:1:mitigation measures.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 16

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:3:M6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 20

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:4: construction and operational phases of the proposed development. Mitigation measures to

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:9: will be considered as an additional mitigation measure for materials use within this assessment.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:11: 5. Identify opportunities/mitigation measures to reduce, re-use, recover and/ or recycle

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:15:M3.16 Following the assessment, mitigation measures will be identified where practicable. All

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:15: mitigation measures identified will aim to ensure waste and materials are managed in

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:19: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:19:M5.2 In assessing the effects, it is assumed that the following embedded mitigation measures apply to

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:23:M6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:23:M6.3 In addition to the embedded mitigation identified in Chapter B and Section M5.0 of this

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:24:M6.6 Using the mitigation measures above and the appointment of a licensed and high performing

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:25: collection, waste transport, treatment and disposal and include the following mitigation:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:25: scoped out of further assessment and therefore no additional mitigation measures have been

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:26: development, via the implementation of the mitigation measures outlined in Section M6.0

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:26: Negligible Adverse impact (Not Significant). Whilst mitigation will reduce any effects, the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:28: mitigation, it is possible the volumes of waste requiring disposal may be reduced by at least 80%

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:28: (taking account Mitigation and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:28: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:29: (taking account Mitigation and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter M - Waste and Materials Management - Dec 2020.PDF:29: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-SBC RESPONSE.pdf:3: mitigation which is required is appropriately secured through planning conditions or section 106

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:4: mitigation not previously identified.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:4:N1.2 Chapter O then summarises the mitigation and monitoring measures identified within this ES

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:4: consider additional mitigation measures; albeit it is necessary to consider the likelihood of those

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:4: • Section N2.0 - Summary of residual effects (following mitigation) identified within the ES

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:5: effects) and any additional mitigation measures required to have regard to those effects;

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:6: mitigation measures described in Chapter O) as identified in Chapters C to M of this ES that

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:11: give rise to a need for additional mitigation not identified previously.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:12:N3.5 Table N3.1 highlights residual effects on identified receptors after mitigation. Where a series of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:12: a new significant effect giving rise to a need for mitigation has been undertaken. This has been

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:12: been given to mitigation measures already either embedded into the development or capable of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:13:N3.7 In the context of the analysis above, there is no requirement for additional mitigation measures

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:13: over and above the mitigation and monitoring measures already proposed in Chapters C to M

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:14: effects requiring mitigation.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:15: • together provide an opportunity for RCBC to have greater control over the mitigation of this

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:31: and additional mitigation measures, which when implemented will result in no

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:32: assessment takes account of embedded and other mitigation associated with each of the Tier 1

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:32: and no further mitigation is possible. Therefore, the residual cumulative effects will be as in

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:42: sensitive receptors, the additional site specific mitigation for Long Acres, Foundry and Steel

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:42: building is known. Further information on these additional site-specific mitigation measures are

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:42: set out in the Mitigation and Monitoring sections of the Noise and Vibration Chapters of the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:43:N5.35 With the implementation of the additional site specific mitigation measures set out in the Noise

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:43:N5.39 With regards to construction dust, high risk mitigation measures from the best practice IAQM

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:43: and are included as embedded mitigation. It is considered that as high-risk measures are likely

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:43: successful implementation of appropriate mitigation measures, the effects will be Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: mitigation of impacts will be achieved through the CEMP and secondary mitigation measures.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44:N5.47 In addition to the Framework CEMP and other embedded mitigation measures, secondary

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: mitigation measures for both schemes include a Construction Stage Surface Water Management

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44: mitigation measures at both sites, the cumulative effects will therefore be Negligible Adverse

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:44:N5.49 In terms of surface water, the mitigation measures are anticipated to have a Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:45: Floor Level as embedded mitigation, include the production of a Flood Risk Assessment (‘FRA’)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:45:N5.53 With the implementation of similar, mitigation measures at the Foundry and Steel House sites,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:46: commonality, and the potential for combined mitigation strategies, it is proposed that the GHG

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:49: further consideration and mitigation. Once further information is available on the end users of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:51:N5.84 No mitigation is proposed or possible in relation to the Significant Beneficial effects and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:51: other potential transport mitigation measures.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:53:N5.98 At this stage of the development, additional mitigation measures to reduce the cumulative

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:55: implementing mitigation measures during day, evening and night-time;

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:63: the determination of the planning application to discuss potential mitigation measures.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:66: the proposed additional site specific mitigation for Long Acres, Foundry and Steel House sites

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:66: Further details on these site-specific measures are included in the Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:66:N5.149 With the implementation of the additional site specific mitigation measures set out in the Noise

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:66:N5.153 With regards to construction dust, high risk mitigation measures from the best practice IAQM

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:66: proposed Tier 1 developments and are included as embedded mitigation. It is considered that as

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:67:N5.154 If each of the Tier 2 developments successfully implements an appropriate level of mitigation for

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:67: construction dust guidance uses the category ‘high’ as the most stringent level of mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:67: measures that can be proposed, and as the Tier 1 sites all include high risk mitigation measures

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:67: and each of the Tier 2 sites should include appropriate mitigation measures, no further

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:67: mitigation measures are suggested here. This is considered the most appropriate approach to

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:70: proposed development: that mitigation of impacts will be achieved through the council making

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:70: the mitigation measures planning conditions of the application. In addition, the assessment is

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:70: identified receptors have the potential to be impacted. Nonetheless, with mitigation in place,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:71: surface water, the mitigation measures are anticipated to have a Negligible Beneficial and Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:71: identified receptors have the potential to be impacted. Nonetheless, with mitigation in place,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:73: commonality and will not share combined mitigation strategies. For this reason, the full list

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:73: spatially and in terms of both ownership and likely mitigation measures. As such a high-level

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:75:N5.198 No mitigation is proposed or possible in relation to the Significant Beneficial effects and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:75: mitigation the cumulative greenhouse gas emissions. There are ongoing discussions regarding

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:75: other potential transport mitigation measures.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:76: whether there is a need for further mitigation (synergistic effects). It also considers the potential

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:76:N6.5 No mitigation is proposed or possible in relation to the Significant Beneficial cumulative effects

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:76: supply options, which will help to mitigation the cumulative greenhouse gas emissions. There

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter N - Cumulative Effects - Dec 2020.PDF:76: are ongoing discussions regarding other potential transport mitigation measures.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 38

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:3:G6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 46

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:5: development. Mitigation measures to reduce any negative environmental effects are identified

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Practice Guidance (Ref design and mitigation. For example, flood risk can be reduced and biodiversity and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Good design and mitigation measures can be secured through site specific policies

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:7: mitigation and compensatory measures where the relevant tests are met. Planning

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:12: the mitigation of flooding elsewhere are taken”; “prioritising the use of sustainable

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:13: biodiversity. Where such removal is not possible or not in the public interest, mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:13: should proactively help the mitigation of, and adaption to, climate change including the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:25: Assessment) that shall be undertaken prior to construction (as detailed in the Mitigation Section

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:26: planning process. This point is picked up in Section G6.0: Mitigation and Monitoring;

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:42: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:42:G5.1 A full list of the mitigation measures embedded into the proposed development is provided in

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:42: embedded mitigation for the proposed development during the construction phase. The

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:42: 3 Mitigation will be included to prevent and mitigate against any accidents, including

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:42:G5.3 Of the other embedded mitigation measures that shall be in place during the construction phase

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:43: risk are detailed in Section G6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:43: along with the identification of mitigation, where necessary, which is required in order to

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:43: Mitigation accident to mitigation mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:44: Mitigation accident to mitigation mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:45: Mitigation accident to mitigation mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:45: Impact Assessment as well as WFD Assessment – as detailed in Section G6.0 Mitigation and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:45: development, prior to the implementation of any additional mitigation measures i.e. those not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:46: pollution prevention guidance detailed in the points of embedded mitigation in Paragraph G5.2,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:46: Significant without further mitigation. The receptor sensitivity of The Fleet is Low and so the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:46: Marshes is Very High but with the embedded mitigation detailed in Paragraph 5.3 Bullet Point 2

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:46: detailed in embedded mitigation. A potential pollution pathway exists from the site through the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:47: Significant without further mitigation.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:47:G5.16 The receptor sensitivity for Coatham Marshes is Very High but with the embedded mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:47: to be of minor magnitude without embedded mitigation. With the implementation of the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:48: opportunity for better attenuation (discussed in the Mitigation section). The receptor sensitivity

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:48: the effect would be Moderate Adverse and thus Significant without further mitigation. The

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:48: Adverse and Significant without further mitigation. The receptor sensitivity of The Fleet is low

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:48: mitigation. The receptor sensitivity for Coatham Marshes is Very high and so the effect could be

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:48: Moderate Adverse and Significant without further mitigation. The receptor sensitivity of The

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:50:G6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:50:G6.8 Secondary mitigation (in addition to the documents in G6.1) shall include the following with

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:52: G6.9 The table below sets out the proposed mitigation and monitoring measures for the construction

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:52:Receptor Potential Impact Additional Mitigation - Additional Mitigation - Operation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:53:Receptor Potential Impact Additional Mitigation - Additional Mitigation - Operation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:53: Additional mitigation in relation The drainage strategy will not include

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:54:Receptor Potential Impact Additional Mitigation - Additional Mitigation - Operation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:54:Coatham Marsh (surface Potential changes to No additional mitigation 1. Any works carried out to The Fleet

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:54: Marsh during re- mitigation, detailed in characteristics of Coatham Marsh

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:55:Receptor Potential Impact Additional Mitigation - Additional Mitigation - Operation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:55:Secondary bedrock and Groundwater A Construction phase No additional mitigation identified.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:56:Receptor Potential Impact Additional Mitigation - Additional Mitigation - Operation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:56:Surface waters and Potential for No additional mitigation No additional mitigation identified.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57:G7.1 Embedded (including tertiary) mitigation is detailed in Section G5.0. and additional (secondary)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57: mitigation is detailed in Section G6.0. This section contains an assessment of the residual effects

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57: which remain after this mitigation is applied during the construction and operational phases of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57: be beneficial; albeit negligible after additional mitigation. The receptor sensitivity of Ash Gill

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57:G7.3 No further mitigation is proposed for Coatham Marshes so the effect would remain Neutral and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57:G7.6 The mitigation measures are detailed in the mitigation section (in particular the avoidance of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57:G7.8 No further mitigation is proposed for Coatham Marshes so the effect would remain Neutral and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57: The additional mitigation outlined above will change the effect from adverse to beneficial.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:57: Negligible Adverse, and Not Significant. As no additional mitigation is proposed, the residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:58:G7.12 Following the additional mitigation in the form of the construction phase GWMP, the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:58: and Coatham Marshes, following the implementation of additional mitigation in the form of the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:58:G7.19 The receptor sensitivity for Coatham Marshes is Very high but with secondary mitigation the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:59:G7.23 The receptor sensitivity for Coatham Marshes is Very high, but with secondary mitigation the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:59:G7.26 No additional mitigation is proposed in relation to the low sensitivity receptors of superficial

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:59: implementation of the mitigation measures and result in Minor Beneficial effect which is Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:60:G8.1 The table below summarises the receptors, potential effects, additional mitigation measures and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:60: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:60: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:61: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:61: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:62: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:62: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:62: Coatham Flows - Neutral and Not No additional mitigation Neutral and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:62: runoff embedded mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:62: Water Quality - Neutral and Not No additional mitigation Neutral and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:62: contaminants embedded mitigation Permanent

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:62: Mudstone Reduced Negligible Adverse and No further mitigation is Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:63: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:63: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:63: Superficial Reduced Negligible Adverse and No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:64: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:64: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:65: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:65: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:66: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:66: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:67: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:67: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:67: Mudstone Reduced Negligible Adverse and No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:67: Superficial Reduced Negligible Adverse and No further mitigation Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:68: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:68: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:68:G8.2 There will be no significant Adverse effects remaining after mitigation and there will be

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:68: implementation of a remediation strategy and other embedded mitigation. SuDS shall also be

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter G - Water - Dec 2020.PDF:68: SSSI/SPA/Ramsar. Groundwater monitoring outcomes identified in the additional mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 14

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:3:C6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 21

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:5: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:9: • Proposal of any mitigation measures to offset any likely significant impacts in relation to the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:9: • Assessment of any residual impacts accounting for the implementation of mitigation.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:9: be undertaken based on a series of embedded mitigation measures that are in built into the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:11:C3.16 Residual effects have been identified in C7.0 if they remain after mitigation has been taken into

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:18: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:18: prepared and forms part of the embedded mitigation for the development. The CEMP identifies

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:18: • Any other mitigation required to minimise the impact of construction traffic on the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:18:C5.4 These mitigation measures will be secured through a range of planning conditions, designed and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:18: the required primary and tertiary mitigation. This mitigation is taken into account in the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:19:C5.11 These mitigation measures will be secured through a range of planning conditions and will

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:19: ensure that the development delivers the required primary and tertiary mitigation. This be taken

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:19:C5.14 The phasing of any mitigation measures will be subject to further discussion with the relevant

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:19: effects are likely to be Not Significant. Any mitigation will be reflected in the CTMP as described

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:25:C6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:25: construction stage do not identify the need for additional mitigation measures over and above

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:25: the road network, the following additional mitigation measures are proposed:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:25:C6.3 These mitigation measures will be secured by way of an appropriately worded planning

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:26: Receptor Potential Mitigation Residual Effect

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:26: on Driver and the Teesworks site. Mitigation measures to improvements

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:27: Receptor Potential Mitigation Residual Effect

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:28: the impact of construction traffic on the transport networks. No additional mitigation measures

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:28:C8.5 Similarly, a bus service is proposed as embedded mitigation to encourage sustainable transport

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:28: to the development site. Further additional mitigation is expected through the implementation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:28: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:28: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:29: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:29: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:30: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:30: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 28

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:3:H6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 31

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Mitigation measures to reduce any adverse environmental effects are identified as appropriate

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:6: potential impacts as well as inform mitigation measures in line with industry good practice.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:8: or former activities such as mining, and any proposals for mitigation including land

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:29:H4.67 Key contaminant linkages (CL) identified as requiring some form of mitigation are summarised

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:29: Table H4.5 Potential Contaminant Linkages requiring mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:31: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:31:H5.1 The proposed embedded mitigation measures relevant to ground conditions include:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:31:H5.2 These embedded mitigation measures have been taken into account during this assessment

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:31: repeated below or in Section H6.0: Mitigation and Monitoring.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:31: Mitigation is detailed, in Section H6.0, with regards to UXO and risk from contamination. With

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:32: to mitigation but considering the embedded mitigation is medium due to the presence of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:32: receptors (considered ‘Significant’ in EIA terms) if mitigation actions are not carried out.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:32: magnitude of likely impact from construction when embedded mitigation is considered, the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:33: mitigation is medium. This is due to the potential for soil/materials disposal required following

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:34:H6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:34:H6.1 Embedded mitigation is detailed in H5.1 above which includes further investigation, a piling risk

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:34: assessment and best practice detailed within the Framework CEMP. Additional mitigation is

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:35: for further mitigation.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:35: natural Superficial Deposits. Further mitigation activities such as detailed risk assessment

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:35: or site mitigations are considered essential to reduce the UXO risk on the site to As Low As

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: very high too high to medium respectively and the magnitude of impact following mitigation,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: mitigation measures outlined in Section H6.0, there are likely to be impacts on construction

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: impact following additional mitigation e.g. soil remediation is negligible. Therefore, the impacts

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: after the implementation of mitigation measures are considered to be of Negligible significance.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:37: following mitigation identified in Section H6.0 is Low and thus the impact on waste

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:38:H8.4 Mitigation that is designed to protect the identified receptors susceptible to impacts

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:38: Significant following the implementation of the mitigation measures.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:38: account of embedded Mitigation and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:38: mitigation) Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:38: Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:39: account of embedded Mitigation and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter H - Ground Conditions - Dec 2020.PDF:39: mitigation) Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-MBC.pdf:1:necessary mitigation being identified and introduced. In this respect it is felt that the scope of the Transport

R-2020-0822-ESM-MBC.pdf:1:Middlesbrough’s network and as such could lead to the need for physical mitigation in the Borough and/or

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 20

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:3:E6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 28

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:5: impacts and effects; the baseline conditions in the surrounding area; mitigation measures to

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:7: significant effects are identified along with the envisaged mitigation to avoid or reduce these

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:8: vibration assessment and envisaged mitigation are informed by this legislation. Specific

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:9: series of embedded mitigation measures that are in built into the design of development. Those

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:10: significant effect and to determine any additional mitigation needed.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:17: natural barriers and provide embedded mitigation that was considered during the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:24:E5.3 There are no embedded mitigation measures that relate to the operational phase of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:24: further mitigation, over and above the proposed CEMP and CTMP, is required in order to

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:32:E6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:32: significant except at Marsh Farmhouse. The following mitigation of on-site activities will reduce

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:32: therefore no additional mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:33:E7.1 Incorporating the additional mitigation measures set out in Section E6.0 above, the potential

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:33: Not Significant effects and the additional mitigation measures will ensure that noise associated

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:33: Implementing the recommended mitigation measures set out in Section E6.0 will avoid

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:34: residual significant effect if embedded mitigation and additional mitigation measures set out

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:34: Farmhouse. With the implementation of additional mitigation measures this effect is reduced to

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:34: noted that the additional mitigation measures are required to reduce the impact to Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:34: (Figure E2) account of embedded Mitigation and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:34: mitigation) Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:35: (Figure E2) account of embedded Mitigation and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:35: mitigation) Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:1:MITIGATION AND MONITORING

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:2:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:3:O2.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 3

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:O1.1 The Environmental Statement (‘ES’) has identified a series of mitigation and ongoing

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:O1.3 The Planning Practice Guidance (“PPG”) confirms that “mitigation measures proposed in an

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: carefully how mitigation measures proposed in an Environmental Statement are to be

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:O1.5 The ES has identified primary/embedded, secondary/additional and tertiary mitigation and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: definitions of the three types of mitigation as follows, which have been used as a basis for

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: categorising mitigation within this ES:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: “Primary mitigation is an intrinsic part of the project design – it should be described in the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Secondary mitigation requires further activity in order to achieve the anticipated outcome –

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Tertiary mitigation will be required regardless of any EIA assessment, as it is imposed, for

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:O1.6 The primary and tertiary mitigation and monitoring for the proposed development are set out in

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: Chapter B. The secondary mitigation measures are set out in Section 6.0 of each technical

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4: for further secondary mitigation to address these effects. Chapter N does conclude that there

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:4:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 1

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5: will be a need for further secondary mitigation and this is discussed in Section O2.0 below.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5:O1.8 This chapter summarises all mitigation measures proposed throughout the ES for ease of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:5:Pg 2 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6:O2.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: of a range of ‘built-in’ mitigation measures into the design of the proposed development. These

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: assumptions on which the assessment and resultant additional mitigation have been based.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6:O2.2 Tables O2.1 and O2.2 set out the primary and tertiary and secondary mitigation and monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Chapter B. The tables also set out the means by which the mitigation can be secured, including

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: whether there will be a requirement to submit a mitigation and or monitoring documents or

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: mitigation and monitoring.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6:O2.3 In considering how best to secure the mitigation and monitoring measures, consideration has

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Table O2.1 Summary of Primary/Tertiary Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6: Summary of Identified Primary/Tertiary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:6:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 3

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:7: Summary of Identified Primary/Tertiary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:7:Pg 4 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:8: Summary of Identified Primary/Tertiary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:8:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 5

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Table O2.2 summary of Secondary Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Transport No mitigation measures are required N/A N/A

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Biodiversity and A reptile mitigation strategy will be Reptile Mitigation Applicant/

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Ecology prepared. The reptile mitigation strategy Strategy secured via Principal

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: mitigation strategy will be implemented in

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: further mitigation is proposed.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Noise and Vibration No mitigation required, other than a Risk Noise and vibration Applicant/

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: Air Quality No mitigation measures are required N/A N/A

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9: identify the need for any specific mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:9:Pg 6 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:10: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:10: Further mitigation activities such as UXO Risk Applicant and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:10: Detailed Risk Assessment or site mitigation Assessment secured Principal

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:10:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 7

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:11: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:11:Pg 8 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:12: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:12: Socio-Economic No mitigation measures are required N/A N/A

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:12:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 9

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:13: Landscape and Visual The following mitigation measures are Planning Condition Applicant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:13:Pg 10 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:14: Transport The following mitigation measures are OTP secured via Applicant.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:14:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 11

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:15: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:15: further mitigation is proposed.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:15: The following mitigation of on-site activities Planning Condition Applicant

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:15:Pg 12 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:16: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:16: no mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:16:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 13

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:17: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:17:Pg 14 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:18: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:18:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 15

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:19: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:19: remediation as such there are no mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:19: Socio-Economic No mitigation measures are required N/A N/A

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:19:Pg 16 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:20: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:20: Below Ground No mitigation or monitoring is required N/A N/A

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:20: following mitigation:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:20:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 17

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:21: Environmental Topic Summary of Secondary Mitigation Means of Securing Responsibility

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:21:O2.5 Chapter N of the ES considered the requirement for additional mitigation to address any

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:21: developed and that there are ongoing discussions regarding other potential transport mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:21:Pg 18 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:22: cumulative effects. This chapter summarises the range of mitigation and monitoring measures

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:22:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 19

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:23:Pg 20 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:24:Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring Pg 21

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter O - Mitigation and Monitoring - Dec 2020.PDF:25:Pg 22 Chapter O: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:3: 5 Section 15.0: summarises the proposed mitigation and monitoring to be secured as part of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:4: • Allowed review of the effectiveness of any identified mitigation and compensation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:11: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:11: part of the embedded mitigation of the development (see paragraph 3.12 above). The CEMP

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:11:4.9 Within the implementation of embedded mitigation measures and the below secondary

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:11: mitigation measures, during operation, the assessment has identified no Significant effects. All

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:12: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:12:4.10 At this point in time no additional mitigation measures have been identified for the construction

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:12: above, secondary mitigation measures are proposed. These include: occupier travel plans for

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:12: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:12:5.3 Embedded mitigation will take the form of adherence to measures outlined in a Framework

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13: 1 Mitigation will be included to prevent and mitigate against any accidents, including but not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13:5.4 The only other embedded mitigation measures relevant to the ecology assessment is:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13: Mitigation and Compensation Measures

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13:5.11 A reptile mitigation strategy will be submitted for approval and implemented in accordance with

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13: than for reptiles, no mitigation is possible other than that described under Embedded

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:13: Mitigation.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:14: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:14:6.5 There are no embedded mitigation measures proposed for the operation of the proposed

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:15:7.5 Construction dust mitigation measures have been included in the Framework CEMP. These

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:16:7.6 There are no embedded mitigation measures proposed as a result of air quality for the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:16: successful implementation of best practice mitigation measures for construction dust that are

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:16: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:16:7.9 Beyond the embedded mitigation measures, no further mitigation is required for the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:16: considered to be Not Significant, no mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: part of the embedded mitigation for the proposed development during the construction phase

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17:7.17 Other embedded mitigation measures relevant to water management and flooding are:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: Through the implementation of the embedded mitigation measures described above, the effects

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:17: Adverse without further mitigation and the effect on Coatham Marsh is considered to be

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:18: effect is considered to be Moderate Adverse and Significant without further mitigation.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:18: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:18:7.22 Secondary mitigation will include further items to manage water at the site: preparation of the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:18:7.23 The implementation of the mitigation measures described above would result in the following

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20:8.10 Embedded mitigation measures include the implementation of the Framework CEMP and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: for direct contact and inhalation of contaminants. With mitigation (described below) and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: embedded mitigation, this is expected to result in a residual Minor Adverse impact on

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: mitigation. Where hazardous waste needs to be removed from site it is expected to go to the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20:8.15 Mitigation measures, in addition to the embedded mitigation outlined above, are required to

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: mitigation will be agreed with the relevant authorities.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:20: should be undertaken, and the site and buildings should be designed with adequate mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:21: Socio-Economics no mitigation measures are proposed in this regard.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:22: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:22: consider potential primary embedded mitigation measures that relate to climate change and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:22: provide a reduction in carbon emissions and act as primary mitigation measures. These include

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:22: have not been identified at this stage, but the range of opportunities is set out in the mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: scenario, this assessment has not considered the potential embedded mitigation they would

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: conservative of assumptions and represent a reasonable worst case ‘before mitigation’ scenario.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: national or local GHG emissions targets after mitigation. The development is therefore assessed

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:23: mitigation measures to reduce the GHG emissions associated with the proposed development,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24:11.5 The embedded mitigation measures relevant to LVIA are the fixing of development parameters

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:24:11.8 A number of mitigation measures have been proposed to minimise or manage identified

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25:11.9 The following mitigation measures are proposed during the construction phase of the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25:11.10 Mitigation for the operational phase of development will comprise:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:25:12.3 There is no embedded mitigation relating to below-ground heritage.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:26:12.5 With mitigation (described below), this is expected to result in a Minor Adverse effect on the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:26: Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:26:12.7 As there is no potential for preservation in situ, the only mitigation possible is preservation by

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:26: record. As the full extent of surviving archaeology is as yet unknown the mitigation measures

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:27: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:27:13.11 Embedded mitigation relevant to the waste assessment includes:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:27: Mitigation Measures

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:27:13.14 No mitigation measures are required to reduce the impacts of the proposed development.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:28: those effects, may give rise to a need for additional mitigation not identified previously. No

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:28: Significant synergistic effects were identified and therefore no further mitigation required in this

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:28: regarding other potential transport mitigation measures.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:29:15.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:29: onsite watercourse(s), a Reptile Mitigation Strategy, Site Waste Management Plan, a Piling

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 1 - Non Technical Summary - Dec 2020.pdf:29:15.2 These documents, and a range of other important mitigation measures, will be secured by way of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 17

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:3:K6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 19

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:5: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:21: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:21:K5.1 There are no embedded mitigation measures relating to below ground heritage.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:21: mitigation would therefore need to be undertaken in advance of or during the site

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:23:K6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:23:K6.1 As there is no potential for preservation in situ, the only mitigation possible is preservation by

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:23:K6.6 No mitigation or monitoring is required during the operational phase of the development.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:25:K8.4 Mitigation measures comprising evaluation excavation and monitoring of test pits to confirm

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:25: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:25: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:26: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter K - Below Ground Heritage - Dec 2020(1).PDF:26: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:14: similar timeframe, it is likely that the sites would require high risk dust mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:14: measures. As such, it is proposed that we embed the high risk dust mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:15: • Mitigation measures will be recommended for the construction and operational

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:18: principle of relocating the Fleet subject to certain mitigation and final details of the diversion to

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: considered at the detailed stage of the planning process based on best practice mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:22: B the ESs. This outlines all dust mitigation measures required for high risk receptors. With

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:22: contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and Not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: mitigation.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:29: 5 The scope for incorporating mitigation measures to avoid, reduce, remedy or compensate

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:29: 6 Identification of any effects remaining after mitigation.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:32:based on consultation with the technical team and the inclusion of known mitigation measures. Section 4.0 of the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 33

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:3:L6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 46

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:4: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:8: 7 Identify any design and mitigation measures appropriate to the development proposals and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:15: the areas neighbouring the proposed development. It also describes any mitigation measures

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:20: likely to arise from the finalised design taking into account mitigation measures and change over

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:36: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:36: can be made or mitigation measures can be embedded in the proposal to reduce these effects.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:36: Appropriate mitigation measures have been explored to eliminate, minimise or manage

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:36: identified potential significant landscape and visual effects. The embedded mitigation measures

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:36: Construction Environmental Management Plan (CEMP). Full details of the mitigation measures

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:37: Change and Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:38:L5.16 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:39:L5.22 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:39:L5.27 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:40:L5.32 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:40:L5.37 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:41:L5.42 Embedded mitigation measures are likely to have a positive influence on the operational effects

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:49:L6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:49:L6.1 A number of mitigation measures have been proposed to minimise or manage identified

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:49:L6.2 The following mitigation measures are proposed during the construction phase of the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:49:L6.3 The following mitigation measures are proposed during the operational phase of the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:52: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:52: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:53: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:53: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:54: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:54: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:55: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:55: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:56: Receptor Impact Potential Effects (taking Additional Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter L - LVIA - Dec 2020.PDF:56: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 20

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:3:I6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 27

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:5: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:11: exist in the surrounding area; the mitigation measures required to prevent, reduce or offset any

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:11: development and their significance. Opportunities for the mitigation of any adverse effects and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:30: Table I5.2 Socio-Economic Effects (without mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:31:I6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:31:I6.1 This section considers the need for mitigation measures in order to address any adverse effects

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:31: a result, no mitigation measures are required during construction.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:31: employment and economic output. As a result, no mitigation measures are required during

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:32:I7.1 As no mitigation measures are assessed as being necessary, the residual effects are the same as

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:32: beneficial and no additional mitigation measures are proposed. The residual effects are

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:32: and no additional mitigation measures are proposed. The residual effects are therefore

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:32: Receptor Potential Effects Mitigation Residual Effects

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:33:I8.3 Given the beneficial nature of the potential effects assessed, no mitigation measures are

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:33: (taking account of Mitigation and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter I - Socio-Economics - Dec 2020.PDF:33: mitigation)

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:17: Mitigation …………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 4

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:18: • Mitigation should be provided

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:19:the demolition of the buildings and appropriate mitigation.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:19:recommended mitigation measure. Appendices 1 to 4 provide the individual results for each

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:20:Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:20:Mitigation is required for barn owls as outlined in the documents below:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:21:Mitigation measures

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:23: • Mitigation should be provided

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:26: • Mitigation should be provided

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:29: • Mitigation should be provided for loss of a barn owl roost site

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020.PDF:31: • Mitigation should be provided for loss of a barn owl roost site

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:3:B8.0 Summary of Primary and Tertiary Mitigation 33

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:4: 7 Section B8.0: summarises the ‘embedded’ primary and tertiary mitigation;

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:15: scope of each EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:20: permitted the AA must demonstrate that, taking into account mitigation, it would not result in

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:28: necessary mitigation.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:28:B7.16 Site hoarding, fencing, plants, machinery, lighting and mitigation measures will be erected and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:28: brought onto the site. Mitigation and protective fencing will be required around areas of land

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:28: Specific mitigation measures will also be required to protect The Fleet and the easements and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:30:B7.32 A Framework CEMP is being designed into the scheme as tertiary mitigation and will therefore

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:30: form part of the embedded mitigation for the proposed developments. It is proposed that the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:30: mitigation measures/key principles within the CEMP are taken into account in each technical

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:30:B7.33 The Framework CEMP key principles/mitigation measures are as follows.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:31: 1 Mitigation will be included to prevent and mitigate against any accidents, including but not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:32:B7.34 Mitigation measures applicable to high risk sites outlined in the IAQM Guidance on the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:33: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate;

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:34:B7.36 As with the construction and earthworks mitigation, the below measures are highly

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:34: mitigation measures to protect site workers would include on-site inductions, provision of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:36: Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:36:B8.1 This section describes the primary and tertiary mitigation which has been assumed to be in

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:36: • Primary or ‘embedded’ mitigation includes measures and modifications that have been

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:36: • Tertiary mitigation includes ‘best practice’ measures or actions that will occur outside of the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:36:B8.3 Primary and tertiary mitigation measures assumed to be in place during the construction phase

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:37:B8.4 The Parameters Plan provides for the following embedded mitigation:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:37: conditioned and form part of the embedded mitigation of the scheme:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:37:B8.6 These mitigation measures will be secured through a range of planning conditions and will

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:37: ensure that the development delivers the required primary and tertiary mitigation. This

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:37: mitigation is taken into account in the potential effect’s sections of technical Chapters C to M

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:37: (e.g. the potential effects defined assume that all of the mitigation measures above form part of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:37:B8.7 Any additional mitigation required over and above that already listed in this chapter is provided

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:37: for within the mitigation section of Chapters C to M. Full details of the mitigation, monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter B - Site and Scheme Description - Dec 2020.PDF:39: Without the proposed development none of the proposed mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:6: discuss and agree the scope of each EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:8: adverse effects on the environment are identified, the assessment process establishes mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:9: of this ES. This outlines all dust mitigation measures required for high risk receptors. With

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:10: new contamination with this tertiary mitigation in place, would be Negligible and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:11: considered to be tertiary mitigation and ‘embedded’ (see Chapter B of this ES for further detail).

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:11: With this tertiary mitigation in place, the risk of significant effects to human health and other

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:12: to discuss and agree the scope of each EIA and approach to cumulative effects and mitigation.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:21: O Mitigation and Monitoring Lichfields

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: scenario. It also includes details on the construction methodology and ‘embedded mitigation’.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:23: and cumulative effects and Chapter O considers mitigation, compensation and monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:24: 0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:27: necessary mitigation, monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:28: 5 The scope for incorporating mitigation measures to avoid, reduce, remedy or compensate

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:28: 6 Identification of any effects remaining after mitigation.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:28:A7.4 Mitigation measures that are identified with specific ES Chapters, and the mechanisms for

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter A - Intro and Background - Dec 2020.PDF:30: minimise significant adverse effects on the environment. Where ‘built in’ mitigation is taken

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:6: 7.6 Additional Mitigation 39

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:17: development on neighbouring junctions, and provides embedded mitigation, in

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:34:A mitigation scheme is likely to be required for the junction to operate efficiently

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:34:committed South Bank site. Possible mitigation for the junction could include

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:34:establish the type and scale of the mitigation required. As with all junctions that

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:34:are identified as operating above capacity, the development of mitigation should

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:36:A mitigation scheme may be required for the junction to operate efficiently for the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:36:‘2033 Cumulative Assessment’ scenario. Possible mitigation for the junction

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:38:Mitigation measures to address the traffic impacts associated with the proposed

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:38:assess capacity. The need or otherwise for additional mitigation measures will be

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:40:Additional mitigation may be required for the junction to operate efficiently for

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:41:above capacity. Possible mitigation for the junction could include providing a

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:41:Assessment’ scenario. Possible mitigation for the junction could be to extend the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:41:Mitigation measures for the assessed junctions should take account of other

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:45:7.6 Additional Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:45:mitigation measures for the assessed junctions, noting that a detailed optioneering,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:51: undertaken to determine when mitigation measures are required;

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:51: However, the design and implementation of any mitigation scheme for the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:52:highway mitigation considered to be essential, there would be no transport related

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:63:suitable mitigation features may be considered as part of the development

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:72:prepared and will form part of the embedded mitigation of the development. The

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:72:identify any necessary mitigation to minimise the impact of construction traffic on

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:213:suitable mitigation features may be considered as part of the development

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:222:prepared and will form part of the embedded mitigation of the development. The

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter C - Transport - Dec 2020.PDF:222:identify any necessary mitigation to minimise the impact of construction traffic on

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:15: • Mitigation measures will be recommended for the construction and operational phases, should they

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 3 - Chapter E - Noise & Vibration - Dec 2020.PDF:15:change targets and mitigation strategy, and discuss our methodology and assumptions to ensure the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 22

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:3:D6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 27

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:5: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:9: iii Assessing the significance of any residual effects after mitigation;

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:11: birds, invertebrates and habitats. Discussions were also had as to how any direct mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:21: mitigation associated with the proposed development. Therefore, they are scoped out of further

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:26: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:26: (CEMP) will form part of the embedded mitigation for the proposed development during the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:26: 1 Mitigation will be included to prevent and mitigate against any accidents, including but not

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:26:D5.3 Section B8.0 Summary of Primary and Tertiary Mitigation, provides a list of further embedded

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:26: mitigation measures, one of which is relevant to this ecological assessment:

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:26:D5.5 The assessment of potential effects assumes that this embedded mitigation is in place and

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:27: on the site’s integrity, taking into consideration all proposed mitigation measures. The Stage 2

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:27: mitigation measures specified in the application are satisfactorily delivered.”.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:27:D5.13 The relevant embedded mitigation measures include submission and approval of a method

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:28: be avoided through the mitigation embedded in the CEMP.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:30: out in paragraph D5.2 above, mitigation has been incorporated into the Framework CEMP to

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:31:D6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:31: embedded mitigation measures are set out in the CEMP, the only other VER for which

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:31: mitigation is required during construction is reptiles. A small population of Common Lizards is

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:31:D6.2 A reptile mitigation strategy will be drawn up and submitted for approval. The reptile mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:31:D6.3 The recommendations of the reptile mitigation strategy will be implemented in accordance with

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:31: mitigation is proposed.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:32: mitigation outlined in section D6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring, the residual effect on reptiles

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:32: mitigation strategy, the aims of which will be to prevent harm to reptiles and to maintain a

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:32: mitigation strategy, will assess the efficacy of the ex-situ population and if necessary, inform

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:32:D7.3 As no additional mitigation is considered necessary during operation residual effects are as set

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:35:D9.1 Compensation refers to the process by which any residual effects after mitigation will be

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:35: specific VERs which require like-for-like mitigation. The Defra Biodiversity Metric 2.0 requires

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:35:D9.7 There is no equivalent guidance on the need for like-for-like mitigation for species and there is

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:36:D9.8 Reptiles area also a VER of County importance however a mitigation strategy will be devised

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:36:D9.14 A specific monitoring programme will be required as part of the reptile mitigation strategy, to

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:38:D10.4 Following the implementation of the embedded and other mitigation measures, significant

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:38: Receptor Impact Embedded Potential Effects Mitigation Residual Effects

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:38: Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:39: Receptor Impact Embedded Potential Effects Mitigation Residual Effects

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:39: Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:39: construction Adverse and mitigation Not Significant

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:39: due to Adverse and mitigation Not Significant

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:40: Receptor Impact Embedded Potential Effects Mitigation Residual Effects

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:40: Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter D - Biodiversity and Ecology - Dec 2020(1).PDF:40:D10.6 Taking into consideration the proposed mitigation measures the residual effect on VERs that

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 23

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:3:F6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 3

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:5: are identified, both during construction and operational phases of the development. Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:5: providing mitigation measures across a range of projects, ranging from small scale to major

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:8: and mitigation rather than by the determination of statutory nuisance and/or prosecution or

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:9: the appropriate mitigation measures are implemented. Experience has shown that once the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:9: appropriate mitigation measures are applied, in most cases the resulting dust impacts can be

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:10: iv Formulation of mitigation measures, where appropriate, to ensure any adverse

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:11:F3.8 Mitigation measures applicable to high risk sites outlined in the IAQM guidance 9 will

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:11: assumption that the required mitigation measures are appropriately implemented, the residual

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:11: therefore been scoped out, on the understanding that the appropriate level of mitigation will be

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:11: ‘CEMP’) and is considered as embedded mitigation. This approach has been agreed with the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:21: undertaken based on a series of embedded mitigation measures that are built into

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:27: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:27:F5.1 As described in Section F3.8, the best practice construction dust mitigation measures for high

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:27: are considered as embedded mitigation, and allowed construction dust to be scoped out of the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:28: suppression/mitigation, using non-potable water where possible and appropriate;

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:29:F5.3 As with the construction and earthworks mitigation, the below measures are highly

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:29:F5.4 There are no embedded mitigation measures that relate to the operational phase of the proposed

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:29: However, high risk mitigation measures from the IAQM guidance 9 have been included in the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:29: Framework CEMP as embedded mitigation measures, which will address the potential overlap

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:35:F6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:35: identify the need for any specific mitigation measures. Notwithstanding this, a Framework

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:35: development, therefore no air quality mitigation measures are required.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:36: Significant as a result of the operational phase of the proposed development. As no mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37:F8.4 Best practice mitigation measures in line with the IAQM guidance on the assessment of

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37: construction practices have been included as embedded mitigation. With the appropriate best

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37: practice mitigation measures suitable for high risk sites in place, there is likely to be a Negligible

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37: Not Significant. Therefore, no mitigation measures are proposed for the operational phase.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37: account of embedded Mitigation and Effects

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter F - Air Quality - Dec 2020.PDF:37: mitigation) Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:3: Embedded Mitigation 15

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:3:J6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring 20

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:4: development. Mitigation measures to reduce any adverse environmental effects are identified as

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:10: effects section represent a before mitigation scenario.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:15: embedded mitigation measures. However, mitigation of some emissions arising from

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:17: development and any carbon mitigation strategies employed to reduce GHG emissions.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:18: Embedded Mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:18: potential primary embedded mitigation that relates to climate change and greenhouse gases.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:18: provide a reduction in carbon emissions and act as primary mitigation measures. These include

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:18: have not been identified at this stage, but the range of opportunities is set out in the mitigation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:18: assessment does not consider the potential embedded mitigation they would provide in relation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:23:J6.0 Mitigation and Monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:23: mitigation measures to reduce the GHG emissions associated with the proposed development,

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:23: across the full life cycle. Table J6.1 summarises possible mitigation measures for each of the

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Table J6.1: Mitigation opportunities by life cycle - Construction

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:23: Lifecycle stage Possible mitigation measures Implementation and monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Lifecycle stage Possible mitigation measures Implementation and monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:24: national carbon target of net zero. Possible mitigation measures against each relevant

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Table J6.2: Mitigation opportunities by life cycle- Operation

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:24: Stage Possible mitigation measures Implementation and monitoring

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:25:J6.5 Mitigation of emissions from user and staff travel will be developed in full as part of a Full

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:26: substantial residual construction-related emissions, even after mitigation.

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:27: Receptor Impact Potential Effects Additional Mitigation and Monitoring Residual Effects

R-2020-0822-ESM-Long Acres ES - Vol 2 - Chapter J - Climate Change - Dec 2020.PDF:28: Receptor Impact Potential Effects Additional Mitigation and Monitoring Residual Effects

R-2020-0822-ESM-2022 03 08 Other Four Teesworks Appns(Not Foundry)- response letter.pdf:2: • That the designs proposed as mitigation have been through a number of review

R-2020-0822-ESM-2022 03 08 Other Four Teesworks Appns(Not Foundry)- response letter.pdf:2: of the currently proposed mitigation.

R-2020-0822-ESM-2022 03 08 Other Four Teesworks Appns(Not Foundry)- response letter.pdf:2: will allow National Highways to identify the requirement for any further mitigation

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:4:No objection - subject to appropriate mitigation being secured

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:4:We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:4:the following mitigation measures are required / or the following mitigation options

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:4:• The mitigation measures as set out in the submitted Habitats Regulations

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:6: • Prior to the commencement of construction details of a dust mitigation

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:6:I would have no objections provided that the proposed mitigation and/or

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:11:2 of the HRA process and therefore discusses appropriate mitigation

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:12:proposed development subject to mitigation in the form of a CEMP and

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:12:construction related pollution. The required mitigation in the form of the

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:13:In addition, to ensure legal compliance the following mitigation has been

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:14:disturbance it is considered, that in the absence of mitigation, there is the

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:14:disturbed however, the SQE will be required to propose suitable mitigation

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:14:Following the implementation of mitigation, there will be no significant

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:15:bird species, in the absence of mitigation, there is the potential for a

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:15:Following the implementation of mitigation, there will be no significant

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:17:Following the implementation of mitigation, no significant residual effects upon

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:19: how the mitigation measures set out in the submitted Habitats

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:19: mitigation measures required;

R-2020-0465-FFM-Officer report _R20200465FFM.pdf:20: with the mitigation measures as set out in the submitted Habitats

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:4:Following the implementation of mitigation to avoid or screen visual disturbance

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:7:introduce mitigation measures to the point where no adverse effects occur. The

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:8: Providing it can be demonstrated that with appropriate mitigation measures

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:10: required, appropriate mitigation measures to deal with any noise and vibration

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:10: minor adverse, temporary effect on the environment and require no mitigation

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:22: climate change mitigation and adaptation.

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:33:objectives. This stage in the process also takes account of mitigation measures,

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:33:objectives, outlines any mitigation measures included within the proposed

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:37:The Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit identifies occasional movement of

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:37:Mitigation Toolkit’ shelduck specifically are considered to be…

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:37:visual disturbance, it is considered, that in the absence of mitigation, there is the

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:37: Cutts, N., Hemingway, K. & Spencer J. (2013) Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit:

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:38: disturbed the SQE will be required to propose suitable mitigation

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:38:Following the implementation of mitigation, there will be no significant adverse

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:38:Once the mitigation measures are implemented, it is considered that the effects of

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:39:overarching design of the facility. The HRA determined that without mitigation

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:39:mitigation will be required to specifically control in-combination effects of these

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:39:included mitigation to cover any potential impacts from construction within the

R-2020-0465-FFM-Metals Recovery Site HRA_Issue.PDF:39:implemented appropriate mitigation to control pollution to the River Tees and

R-2020-0465-FFM-Heritage 0465.pdf:1:I would have no objections provided that the proposed mitigation and/or compensation actions are undertaken as

R-2020-0465-FFM-Decision Notice_R20200465FFM.pdf:2: works across the site and shall demonstrate how the mitigation measures set

R-2020-0465-FFM-Decision Notice_R20200465FFM.pdf:2: mitigation measures required;

R-2020-0465-FFM-Decision Notice_R20200465FFM.pdf:3: the mitigation measures as set out in the submitted Habitats Regulations

R-2020-0465-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:7: previous uses and any proposals for mitigation including land remediation or impacts on the

R-2020-0465-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:97:Key contaminant linkages identified as requiring some form of mitigation are summarised in Table 3.4.

R-2020-0465-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:101:where they may compliment any landfill gas mitigation measures but are not considered to be appreciate for

R-2020-0465-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:mitigation measures to be implemented to ensure no nuisance arises from waste storage such as odour or

R-2020-0465-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:arises. Mitigation measures to be adopted include:

R-2020-0465-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:be relatively low. If significant odours are noted, appropriate mitigation measures will be implemented by

R-2020-0465-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:practices to minimise odours and/or utilising odour suppression and mitigation equipment.

R-2020-0465-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:112:The remediation contractor shall implement appropriate mitigation measures to protect any surface water

R-2020-0465-FFM-41825-WOOD-XX-XX-RP-OC-0001_S0_P01.PDF:113:There is a potential for mud to be carried out of the site on to local roads during the works. Mitigation

R-2020-0465-FFM-R 20 0465 nat eng.pdf:1: NO OBJECTION - SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATE MITIGATION BEING SECURED

R-2020-0465-FFM-R 20 0465 nat eng.pdf:1: We consider that without appropriate mitigation the application would:

R-2020-0465-FFM-R 20 0465 nat eng.pdf:1: mitigation measures are required / or the following mitigation options should be secured:

R-2020-0465-FFM-R 20 0465 nat eng.pdf:1: • The mitigation measures as set out in the submitted Habitats Regulations Assessment

R-2020-0465-FFM-R 20 0465 nat eng.pdf:1:Further advice on mitigation

R-2020-0465-FFM-R 20 0465 nat eng.pdf:1: should include details of all mitigation measures described in the HRA and how they will be

R-2020-0465-FFM-R 20 0465 nat eng.pdf:2:all mitigation measures are appropriately secured in any planning permission given.

R-2020-0465-FFM-R 20 0465 nat eng.pdf:3:to follow the mitigation hierarchy as set out in paragraph 175 of the NPPF and firstly consider what

R-2020-0465-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-01-MPA_Shallow_Soils.PDF:15: Direct contact pathways with soils could be active throughout a potential redevelopment; typical mitigation

R-2020-0465-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-01-MPA_Shallow_Soils.PDF:15: redevelopment works, additional PPE may be required as mitigation.

R-2020-0465-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-01-MPA_Shallow_Soils.PDF:16:ground gas are also considered potentially active. It is understood that mitigation of risks to property will be

R-2020-0465-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-01-MPA_Shallow_Soils.PDF:25:appropriate mitigation measures may be required, these will be dependent on the redevelopment scenario and

R-2020-0465-FFM-10035117-AUK-XX-XX-RP-ZZ-0125-01-MPA_Shallow_Soils.PDF:27:presence of asbestos on the site and determine necessary mitigation measures. It is likely that a clean cover

R-2020-0465-FFM-R 20 0465 Nuisance.pdf:1:  Prior to the commencement of construction details of a dust mitigation

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:2:6 Assessment of Impacts, Effects and Mitigation 31

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:2: 6.2 Assessment of Impacts, Effects and Mitigation 31

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:2: 6.4 Summary of Impacts, Mitigation and Residual Effects 38

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:4:Following the implementation of mitigation (avoidance of breeding bird season or

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:5:In terms of the BNG assessment, without mitigation, the proposed development is

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:8: required, appropriate mitigation measures to deal with any noise and vibration

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:8: minor adverse, temporary effect on the environment and require no mitigation

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:14:3. Assessing the significance of any residual effects after mitigation (see 4.4.2

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:17:had as to how any direct mitigation necessary to protect the qualifying features of

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:18:4.7.2 Mitigation and Compensation Approach

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:18:It is not possible for direct mitigation to be identified for the loss of habitat value

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:27:individual feature within this assessment due to any additional mitigation or

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:34: Mitigation

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:34:significance of any residual effects after mitigation.

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:34:6.2 Assessment of Impacts, Effects and Mitigation

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:34:It is not possible for direct mitigation to be identified for the loss of habitat value

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:34:the HRA process and, therefore, discusses appropriate mitigation measures to

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:35:development. Other than mitigation measures outlined below in relation to the

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:35:Teesmouth and Cleveland Coast SSSI, no other specific mitigation is required.

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:35:The following mitigation will be incorporated in order to prevent significant

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:36:In addition, to ensure legal compliance the following mitigation has been

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:36:detailed within the ‘Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Toolkit34’ shelduck are

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:36:considered, that in the absence of mitigation, there is the potential for a

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:36: N Cutts K Hemingway & J Spencer. Waterbird Disturbance Mitigation Tool Kit: Informing

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:37: disturbed however, the SQE will be required to propose suitable mitigation

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:37:Following the implementation of mitigation, there will be no significant

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:37:species, in the absence of mitigation, there is the potential for a significant

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:38:Following the implementation of mitigation, there will be no significant

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:41:6.4 Summary of Impacts, Mitigation and Residual

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:41:Table 3 provides a summary of the impacts, any mitigation proposed within the

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:41:scoped into this assessment following the enactment of mitigation.

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:42:Table 3: Summary of impacts, mitigation proposed and significance of any residual effects.

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:42: Feature Impact Characterisation of Effect without Mitigation Significance of

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:42: Unmitigated Impact on Mitigation Residual Effects

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:42: Breeding Birds Loss of breeding and foraging Loss of small areas of scrub No significant No mitigation proposed. No habitat No significant

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:43: Feature Impact Characterisation of Effect without Mitigation Significance of

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:43: Unmitigated Impact on Mitigation Residual Effects

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:43: Potential visual disturbance screening cannot be undertaken, a SQE will mitigation.

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:43: breeding shelduck may implement mitigation (such as

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:43: such as dust the loss of foraging mitigation.

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:44: Feature Impact Characterisation of Effect without Mitigation Significance of

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:44: Unmitigated Impact on Mitigation Residual Effects

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:45:mitigation. In BNG terms, compensation could be described as achieving ‘No Net

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:45:residual effects in EcIA terms remain following the implementation of mitigation.

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:45:to those provided as part of mitigation or compensation measures. Enhancement

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:49:proposed development site will be removed. Therefore, without mitigation, the

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:50:Following the implementation of mitigation, no significant residual effects

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:50:The following mitigation will be incorporated in order to prevent significant

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:50: disturbed the SQE will be required to propose suitable mitigation immediately,

R-2020-0465-FFM-MRS EcIA Report_Issue.PDF:61:cumulative, should be avoided. Where this is not possible mitigation, or lastly

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Condition_Discharge_Cover_Letter_230323.pdf:2:mitigation measures to be employed to minimise or eliminate such impacts.

R-2023-0227-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: additional information shall set out those mitigation measures to be

R-2023-0227-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: those mitigation measures set out in Chapter 15 of Volume 1 of the submitted

R-2023-0227-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: Environmental Impact Assessment December 2019 and Chapter 7 (Mitigation)

R-2023-0227-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: approaches to biodiversity and archaeology mitigation are submitted to and

R-2023-0227-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:2: mitigation measures required;

R-2023-0227-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:6: agreed with the Local Planning Authority for on or off-site mitigation and net

R-2023-0227-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:9: potential impacts and proposed mitigation of the proposed development

R-2023-0227-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:10: We encourage and support the proposal to provide on-site mitigation to

R-2023-0227-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:10: Mitigation measure to include the safeguarding and enhancement of 5.73 Ha

R-2023-0227-CD-Decision Notice_R20190767OOM(4).pdf:10: and incorporated into such mitigation.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:7: carried out in the absence of any mitigation measures that form part of that

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:7: means that mitigation measures must be excluded from assessing whether a

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:9: ERF will include embedded mitigation measures to reduce the risk of dust

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:9: and odour emissions. This mitigation includes only unloading waste within

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:10: Engineers Ltd, no additional mitigation measures have been embedded in

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:16: Waterbird Disturbances Mitigation Toolkit, which has been produced by the

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:16: Disturbances Mitigation Toolkit, which has been produced by the Institute of

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:21:5.24 Although the scheme includes embedded mitigation to contain dust and

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:21: SPA/Ramsar with or without the embedded mitigation.

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:31: includes embedded mitigation to contain dust and odour during operation

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:31: with or without the embedded mitigation, due to distance between the ERF

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:42:8.2 The implementation of the CEMP is considered to be mitigation for the

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:43: be mitigation for the potential operational impacts on the Teesmouth and

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:52: safeguard surface water quality during construction. This is mitigation and

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:52: appropriate mitigation in place the proposals will not adversely affect the

R-2023-0227-CD-TV_ERF_Shadow_HRA.pdf:64: Mitigation Toolkit Informing Estuarine Planning & Construction Projects

171019South-Tees-Master-Plan-19-Nov-17.pdf:56:all of which are within the STDC area. The SPA is also within the site boundary. Grayling and Small Heath robust mitigation needs to be put in place as

171019South-Tees-Master-Plan-19-Nov-17.pdf:81:for beneficial recognition when assessing and in mitigation

171019South-Tees-Master-Plan-19-Nov-17.pdf:151:Sustainability and emissions mitigation is a key focus • Coal bed methane: Carbon dioxide is injected

teesworks_-_keywords_-_mitigation.txt · Last modified: 2024/04/02 18:10 by 127.0.0.1